Laugier-Hunziker Syndrome

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 01/10/2019 - 13:46
Display Headline
Laugier-Hunziker Syndrome

To the Editor:

A 55-year-old man presented with hyperpigmented brown macules on the lips, hands, and fingertips of 6 years’ duration. The spots were persistent, asymptomatic, and had not changed in size. The patient denied a history of alopecia or dystrophic nails. He also denied a family history of similar skin findings. He had no personal history of cancer and a colonoscopy performed 5 years prior revealed no notable abnormalities. His medications included amlodipine and hydrocodone-acetaminophen. His mother died of “abdominal bleeding” at 74 years of age and his father died of a brain tumor at 64 years of age. Physical examination demonstrated numerous well-defined, dark brown macules of variable size distributed on the lower and upper mucosal lips (Figure 1A), buccal mucosa, hard palate, and gingiva, as well as the dorsal aspect of the fingers (Figure 1B) and volar aspect of the fingertips (Figure 1C).

Figure 1. Numerous well-defined, dark brown macules of variable size distributed on the lower lip (A), dorsal aspect of both hands (B), and volar aspect of the fingertips (C).

A shave biopsy of a dark brown macule from the lower lip (Figure 2) was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed pigmentation of the basal layer of the epidermis with pigment-laden cells in the dermis immediately deep to the surface epithelium. Immunoperoxidase stains showed a normal number and distribution of melanocytes.

Figure 2. A shave biopsy of a dark brown macule from the lower lip displayed pigment-laden macrophages in the papillary dermis (H&E, original magnification ×40).

A diagnosis of Laugier-Hunziker syndrome (LHS) was made given the age of onset; distribution of pigmentation; and lack of pathologic colonoscopic findings, personal history of cancer, or gastrointestinal tract symptoms.

 

 

Benign hyperpigmentation of the lips and fingers has been reported.1 The average age of onset of LHS is 52 years, and it typically is diagnosed in white adults.1,2 In LHS, pigmentation is most commonly distributed on the lips, especially the lower lips and oral mucosa.2 Pigmentation of the nails in the form of longitudinal melanonychia is present in approximately half of cases.2,3 There also may be pigmentation of the neck; thorax; abdomen; and acral surfaces, especially the fingertips.1-3 Rarely, pigmented macules can occur on the genitalia or sclera.1,2 Unlike Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, the diagnosis of LHS does not result from a germline mutation and carries no risk of gastrointestinal polyposis or internal malignancy.3,4 The histopathology of a pigmented macule of LHS shows a normal number and morphology of melanocytes. Epidermal basement membrane pigmentation is common, with pigment-laden macrophages evident in the papillary dermis.3

RELATED ARTICLE: Asymptomatic Lower Lip Hyperpigmentation From Laugier-Hunziker Syndrome

The differential diagnosis of multiple lentigines is broad and includes Peutz-Jeghers syndrome; LEOPARD (lentigines, electrocardiographic conduction abnormalities, ocular hypertelorism, pulmonary stenosis, abnormalities of genitalia, retardation of growth, deafness) syndrome; Carney complexes, including LAMB (lentigines, atrial myxoma, mucocutaneous myxoma, blue nevi) and NAME (nevi, atrial myxoma, myxoid neurofibroma, ephelide) syndromes5; primary adrenocortical insufficiency (Addison disease); and idiopathic melanoplakia.2 Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, an autosomal-dominant syndrome with mucocutaneous lentigines, has a similar clinical appearance to LHS; therefore, it is necessary to exclude this diagnosis due to its association with intestinal hamartomatous polyps and internal malignancies (Table).3,6,7

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is characterized by mucocutaneous hyperpigmentation and intestinal hamartomatous polyposis and is associated with internal malignancies of the colon, breast, pancreas, stomach, small intestines, ovaries, lung, and Sertoli cells in men.6,7 Associated gastrointestinal tract malignancies in descending order of frequency are colon (39%), pancreatic (36%), gastric (29%), and small intestine (13%).1 It is caused by a germ line mutation of the serine/threonine kinase 11 gene, STK11. Although the appearance and distribution of the mucocutaneous lentigines is similar to individuals with LHS, by contrast the lentiginosis in individuals with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is present from birth or develops during infancy.6 Aggressive cancer screening guidelines aid in early detection and begin at 8 years of age with a baseline colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy; future screening is dictated by the presence or absence of polyps. If no polyps are detected at 8 years of age, a colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy are repeated at 18 years of age and then every 3 years until 50 years of age.8

In an adult patient, the diagnosis of LHS can be made clinically and a correct diagnosis prevents frequent and unpleasant gastrointestinal tract cancer screening examinations. Lampe et al2 described a man with LHS who was incorrectly diagnosed with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and experienced a colonic perforation as a complication of a screening colonoscopy. Their case report underscores the importance of making the correct diagnosis of LHS to avoid undertaking unnecessary aggressive cancer screening regimens.2

Although LHS is a benign condition that does not require treatment, Q-switched alexandrite or erbium:YAG laser therapy has been shown to improve the pigmentary findings associated with LHS.9,10 It has been suggested that LHS should be renamed Laugier-Hunziker pigmentation2 or mucocutaneous lentiginosis of Laugier and Hunziker1 to differentiate LHS as simply a disorder of pigmentation rather than a potentially morbid genetic defect, as in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.

References
  1. Moore RT, Chae KA, Rhodes AR. Laugier and Hunziker pigmentation: a lentiginous proliferation of melanocytes. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50(5 suppl):S70-S74.
  2. Lampe AK, Hampton PJ, Woodford-Richens K, et al. Laugier-Hunziker Syndrome: an important differential diagnosis for Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome. J Med Genet. 2003;40:E77.
  3. Baran R. Longitudinal melanotic streaks as a clue for Laugier-Hunziker syndrome. Arch Dermatol. 1979;115:1148-1149.
  4. Grimes P, Nordlund JJ, Pandya AG, et al. Increasing our understanding of pigmentary disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54(5 suppl 2):S255-S261.
  5. Bertherat J. Carney complex (CNC). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1:21.
  6. Giardiello FM, Brensinger JD, Tersemette AC, et al. Very high risk of cancer in Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1447-1453.
  7. Brosens LA, van Hattem WA, Jansen M, et al. Gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes. Curr Mol Med. 2007;7:29-46.
  8. Beggs AD, Latchford AR, Vasen HF, et al. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a systematic review and recommendations for management. Gut. 2010;59:975-986.
  9. Zuo YG, Ma DL, Jin HZ, et al. Treatment of Laugier-Hunziker syndrome with the Q-switched alexandrite laser in 22 Chinese patients. Arch Dermatol Res. 2010;302:125-130.
  10. Ergun S, Saruhanog˘lu A, Migliari DA, et al. Refractory pigmentation associated with Laugier-Hunziker syndrome following Er:YAG laser treatment [published online December 3, 2013]. Case Rep Dent. 2013;2013:561040.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Paul is from Kaiser Permanente, Union City, California. Dr. Harvey is from the Department of Dermatology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, and Hampton University Skin of Color Research Institute, Virginia. Dr. Sbicca is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dr. O’Neal is from the Department of Dermatology, United States Naval Hospital, Yokosuka, Japan.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representative of or endorsed by the US Army, the US Navy, the Department of Defense, or any other federal government agency.

Correspondence: Joan Paul, MD, MPH, DTMH, 3555 Whipple Rd, Building A, Union City, CA 94587 (joannypaul@gmail.com).

Issue
Cutis - 100(3)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E17-E19
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Paul is from Kaiser Permanente, Union City, California. Dr. Harvey is from the Department of Dermatology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, and Hampton University Skin of Color Research Institute, Virginia. Dr. Sbicca is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dr. O’Neal is from the Department of Dermatology, United States Naval Hospital, Yokosuka, Japan.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representative of or endorsed by the US Army, the US Navy, the Department of Defense, or any other federal government agency.

Correspondence: Joan Paul, MD, MPH, DTMH, 3555 Whipple Rd, Building A, Union City, CA 94587 (joannypaul@gmail.com).

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Paul is from Kaiser Permanente, Union City, California. Dr. Harvey is from the Department of Dermatology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, and Hampton University Skin of Color Research Institute, Virginia. Dr. Sbicca is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dr. O’Neal is from the Department of Dermatology, United States Naval Hospital, Yokosuka, Japan.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representative of or endorsed by the US Army, the US Navy, the Department of Defense, or any other federal government agency.

Correspondence: Joan Paul, MD, MPH, DTMH, 3555 Whipple Rd, Building A, Union City, CA 94587 (joannypaul@gmail.com).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

To the Editor:

A 55-year-old man presented with hyperpigmented brown macules on the lips, hands, and fingertips of 6 years’ duration. The spots were persistent, asymptomatic, and had not changed in size. The patient denied a history of alopecia or dystrophic nails. He also denied a family history of similar skin findings. He had no personal history of cancer and a colonoscopy performed 5 years prior revealed no notable abnormalities. His medications included amlodipine and hydrocodone-acetaminophen. His mother died of “abdominal bleeding” at 74 years of age and his father died of a brain tumor at 64 years of age. Physical examination demonstrated numerous well-defined, dark brown macules of variable size distributed on the lower and upper mucosal lips (Figure 1A), buccal mucosa, hard palate, and gingiva, as well as the dorsal aspect of the fingers (Figure 1B) and volar aspect of the fingertips (Figure 1C).

Figure 1. Numerous well-defined, dark brown macules of variable size distributed on the lower lip (A), dorsal aspect of both hands (B), and volar aspect of the fingertips (C).

A shave biopsy of a dark brown macule from the lower lip (Figure 2) was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed pigmentation of the basal layer of the epidermis with pigment-laden cells in the dermis immediately deep to the surface epithelium. Immunoperoxidase stains showed a normal number and distribution of melanocytes.

Figure 2. A shave biopsy of a dark brown macule from the lower lip displayed pigment-laden macrophages in the papillary dermis (H&E, original magnification ×40).

A diagnosis of Laugier-Hunziker syndrome (LHS) was made given the age of onset; distribution of pigmentation; and lack of pathologic colonoscopic findings, personal history of cancer, or gastrointestinal tract symptoms.

 

 

Benign hyperpigmentation of the lips and fingers has been reported.1 The average age of onset of LHS is 52 years, and it typically is diagnosed in white adults.1,2 In LHS, pigmentation is most commonly distributed on the lips, especially the lower lips and oral mucosa.2 Pigmentation of the nails in the form of longitudinal melanonychia is present in approximately half of cases.2,3 There also may be pigmentation of the neck; thorax; abdomen; and acral surfaces, especially the fingertips.1-3 Rarely, pigmented macules can occur on the genitalia or sclera.1,2 Unlike Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, the diagnosis of LHS does not result from a germline mutation and carries no risk of gastrointestinal polyposis or internal malignancy.3,4 The histopathology of a pigmented macule of LHS shows a normal number and morphology of melanocytes. Epidermal basement membrane pigmentation is common, with pigment-laden macrophages evident in the papillary dermis.3

RELATED ARTICLE: Asymptomatic Lower Lip Hyperpigmentation From Laugier-Hunziker Syndrome

The differential diagnosis of multiple lentigines is broad and includes Peutz-Jeghers syndrome; LEOPARD (lentigines, electrocardiographic conduction abnormalities, ocular hypertelorism, pulmonary stenosis, abnormalities of genitalia, retardation of growth, deafness) syndrome; Carney complexes, including LAMB (lentigines, atrial myxoma, mucocutaneous myxoma, blue nevi) and NAME (nevi, atrial myxoma, myxoid neurofibroma, ephelide) syndromes5; primary adrenocortical insufficiency (Addison disease); and idiopathic melanoplakia.2 Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, an autosomal-dominant syndrome with mucocutaneous lentigines, has a similar clinical appearance to LHS; therefore, it is necessary to exclude this diagnosis due to its association with intestinal hamartomatous polyps and internal malignancies (Table).3,6,7

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is characterized by mucocutaneous hyperpigmentation and intestinal hamartomatous polyposis and is associated with internal malignancies of the colon, breast, pancreas, stomach, small intestines, ovaries, lung, and Sertoli cells in men.6,7 Associated gastrointestinal tract malignancies in descending order of frequency are colon (39%), pancreatic (36%), gastric (29%), and small intestine (13%).1 It is caused by a germ line mutation of the serine/threonine kinase 11 gene, STK11. Although the appearance and distribution of the mucocutaneous lentigines is similar to individuals with LHS, by contrast the lentiginosis in individuals with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is present from birth or develops during infancy.6 Aggressive cancer screening guidelines aid in early detection and begin at 8 years of age with a baseline colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy; future screening is dictated by the presence or absence of polyps. If no polyps are detected at 8 years of age, a colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy are repeated at 18 years of age and then every 3 years until 50 years of age.8

In an adult patient, the diagnosis of LHS can be made clinically and a correct diagnosis prevents frequent and unpleasant gastrointestinal tract cancer screening examinations. Lampe et al2 described a man with LHS who was incorrectly diagnosed with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and experienced a colonic perforation as a complication of a screening colonoscopy. Their case report underscores the importance of making the correct diagnosis of LHS to avoid undertaking unnecessary aggressive cancer screening regimens.2

Although LHS is a benign condition that does not require treatment, Q-switched alexandrite or erbium:YAG laser therapy has been shown to improve the pigmentary findings associated with LHS.9,10 It has been suggested that LHS should be renamed Laugier-Hunziker pigmentation2 or mucocutaneous lentiginosis of Laugier and Hunziker1 to differentiate LHS as simply a disorder of pigmentation rather than a potentially morbid genetic defect, as in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.

To the Editor:

A 55-year-old man presented with hyperpigmented brown macules on the lips, hands, and fingertips of 6 years’ duration. The spots were persistent, asymptomatic, and had not changed in size. The patient denied a history of alopecia or dystrophic nails. He also denied a family history of similar skin findings. He had no personal history of cancer and a colonoscopy performed 5 years prior revealed no notable abnormalities. His medications included amlodipine and hydrocodone-acetaminophen. His mother died of “abdominal bleeding” at 74 years of age and his father died of a brain tumor at 64 years of age. Physical examination demonstrated numerous well-defined, dark brown macules of variable size distributed on the lower and upper mucosal lips (Figure 1A), buccal mucosa, hard palate, and gingiva, as well as the dorsal aspect of the fingers (Figure 1B) and volar aspect of the fingertips (Figure 1C).

Figure 1. Numerous well-defined, dark brown macules of variable size distributed on the lower lip (A), dorsal aspect of both hands (B), and volar aspect of the fingertips (C).

A shave biopsy of a dark brown macule from the lower lip (Figure 2) was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed pigmentation of the basal layer of the epidermis with pigment-laden cells in the dermis immediately deep to the surface epithelium. Immunoperoxidase stains showed a normal number and distribution of melanocytes.

Figure 2. A shave biopsy of a dark brown macule from the lower lip displayed pigment-laden macrophages in the papillary dermis (H&E, original magnification ×40).

A diagnosis of Laugier-Hunziker syndrome (LHS) was made given the age of onset; distribution of pigmentation; and lack of pathologic colonoscopic findings, personal history of cancer, or gastrointestinal tract symptoms.

 

 

Benign hyperpigmentation of the lips and fingers has been reported.1 The average age of onset of LHS is 52 years, and it typically is diagnosed in white adults.1,2 In LHS, pigmentation is most commonly distributed on the lips, especially the lower lips and oral mucosa.2 Pigmentation of the nails in the form of longitudinal melanonychia is present in approximately half of cases.2,3 There also may be pigmentation of the neck; thorax; abdomen; and acral surfaces, especially the fingertips.1-3 Rarely, pigmented macules can occur on the genitalia or sclera.1,2 Unlike Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, the diagnosis of LHS does not result from a germline mutation and carries no risk of gastrointestinal polyposis or internal malignancy.3,4 The histopathology of a pigmented macule of LHS shows a normal number and morphology of melanocytes. Epidermal basement membrane pigmentation is common, with pigment-laden macrophages evident in the papillary dermis.3

RELATED ARTICLE: Asymptomatic Lower Lip Hyperpigmentation From Laugier-Hunziker Syndrome

The differential diagnosis of multiple lentigines is broad and includes Peutz-Jeghers syndrome; LEOPARD (lentigines, electrocardiographic conduction abnormalities, ocular hypertelorism, pulmonary stenosis, abnormalities of genitalia, retardation of growth, deafness) syndrome; Carney complexes, including LAMB (lentigines, atrial myxoma, mucocutaneous myxoma, blue nevi) and NAME (nevi, atrial myxoma, myxoid neurofibroma, ephelide) syndromes5; primary adrenocortical insufficiency (Addison disease); and idiopathic melanoplakia.2 Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, an autosomal-dominant syndrome with mucocutaneous lentigines, has a similar clinical appearance to LHS; therefore, it is necessary to exclude this diagnosis due to its association with intestinal hamartomatous polyps and internal malignancies (Table).3,6,7

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is characterized by mucocutaneous hyperpigmentation and intestinal hamartomatous polyposis and is associated with internal malignancies of the colon, breast, pancreas, stomach, small intestines, ovaries, lung, and Sertoli cells in men.6,7 Associated gastrointestinal tract malignancies in descending order of frequency are colon (39%), pancreatic (36%), gastric (29%), and small intestine (13%).1 It is caused by a germ line mutation of the serine/threonine kinase 11 gene, STK11. Although the appearance and distribution of the mucocutaneous lentigines is similar to individuals with LHS, by contrast the lentiginosis in individuals with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome is present from birth or develops during infancy.6 Aggressive cancer screening guidelines aid in early detection and begin at 8 years of age with a baseline colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy; future screening is dictated by the presence or absence of polyps. If no polyps are detected at 8 years of age, a colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy are repeated at 18 years of age and then every 3 years until 50 years of age.8

In an adult patient, the diagnosis of LHS can be made clinically and a correct diagnosis prevents frequent and unpleasant gastrointestinal tract cancer screening examinations. Lampe et al2 described a man with LHS who was incorrectly diagnosed with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and experienced a colonic perforation as a complication of a screening colonoscopy. Their case report underscores the importance of making the correct diagnosis of LHS to avoid undertaking unnecessary aggressive cancer screening regimens.2

Although LHS is a benign condition that does not require treatment, Q-switched alexandrite or erbium:YAG laser therapy has been shown to improve the pigmentary findings associated with LHS.9,10 It has been suggested that LHS should be renamed Laugier-Hunziker pigmentation2 or mucocutaneous lentiginosis of Laugier and Hunziker1 to differentiate LHS as simply a disorder of pigmentation rather than a potentially morbid genetic defect, as in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.

References
  1. Moore RT, Chae KA, Rhodes AR. Laugier and Hunziker pigmentation: a lentiginous proliferation of melanocytes. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50(5 suppl):S70-S74.
  2. Lampe AK, Hampton PJ, Woodford-Richens K, et al. Laugier-Hunziker Syndrome: an important differential diagnosis for Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome. J Med Genet. 2003;40:E77.
  3. Baran R. Longitudinal melanotic streaks as a clue for Laugier-Hunziker syndrome. Arch Dermatol. 1979;115:1148-1149.
  4. Grimes P, Nordlund JJ, Pandya AG, et al. Increasing our understanding of pigmentary disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54(5 suppl 2):S255-S261.
  5. Bertherat J. Carney complex (CNC). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1:21.
  6. Giardiello FM, Brensinger JD, Tersemette AC, et al. Very high risk of cancer in Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1447-1453.
  7. Brosens LA, van Hattem WA, Jansen M, et al. Gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes. Curr Mol Med. 2007;7:29-46.
  8. Beggs AD, Latchford AR, Vasen HF, et al. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a systematic review and recommendations for management. Gut. 2010;59:975-986.
  9. Zuo YG, Ma DL, Jin HZ, et al. Treatment of Laugier-Hunziker syndrome with the Q-switched alexandrite laser in 22 Chinese patients. Arch Dermatol Res. 2010;302:125-130.
  10. Ergun S, Saruhanog˘lu A, Migliari DA, et al. Refractory pigmentation associated with Laugier-Hunziker syndrome following Er:YAG laser treatment [published online December 3, 2013]. Case Rep Dent. 2013;2013:561040.
References
  1. Moore RT, Chae KA, Rhodes AR. Laugier and Hunziker pigmentation: a lentiginous proliferation of melanocytes. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50(5 suppl):S70-S74.
  2. Lampe AK, Hampton PJ, Woodford-Richens K, et al. Laugier-Hunziker Syndrome: an important differential diagnosis for Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome. J Med Genet. 2003;40:E77.
  3. Baran R. Longitudinal melanotic streaks as a clue for Laugier-Hunziker syndrome. Arch Dermatol. 1979;115:1148-1149.
  4. Grimes P, Nordlund JJ, Pandya AG, et al. Increasing our understanding of pigmentary disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54(5 suppl 2):S255-S261.
  5. Bertherat J. Carney complex (CNC). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1:21.
  6. Giardiello FM, Brensinger JD, Tersemette AC, et al. Very high risk of cancer in Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1447-1453.
  7. Brosens LA, van Hattem WA, Jansen M, et al. Gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes. Curr Mol Med. 2007;7:29-46.
  8. Beggs AD, Latchford AR, Vasen HF, et al. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: a systematic review and recommendations for management. Gut. 2010;59:975-986.
  9. Zuo YG, Ma DL, Jin HZ, et al. Treatment of Laugier-Hunziker syndrome with the Q-switched alexandrite laser in 22 Chinese patients. Arch Dermatol Res. 2010;302:125-130.
  10. Ergun S, Saruhanog˘lu A, Migliari DA, et al. Refractory pigmentation associated with Laugier-Hunziker syndrome following Er:YAG laser treatment [published online December 3, 2013]. Case Rep Dent. 2013;2013:561040.
Issue
Cutis - 100(3)
Issue
Cutis - 100(3)
Page Number
E17-E19
Page Number
E17-E19
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Laugier-Hunziker Syndrome
Display Headline
Laugier-Hunziker Syndrome
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Laugier-Hunziker syndrome (LHS) comprises benign mucosal pigmentation in the absence of gastrointestinal pathology.
  • Differentiating LHS from Peutz-Jeghers syndrome can prevent unnecessary aggressive cancer screening protocols.
  • The average age of onset of LHS is 52 years and typically occurs in white adults.
  • Pigmentation in LHS is most commonly distributed on the lower lips and oral mucosa.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article PDF Media

Robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection outperforms open or laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancers

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 05/26/2021 - 13:51

– The automaton uprising continues: Robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection (APR) can be safely performed in patients with rectal cancers within 5 cm of the anal verge, with surgical results equivalent to those seen with open or laparoscopic APR, investigators say.

Robot-assisted procedures were associated with a significantly lower rate of postoperative complications and with faster functional recovery than either laparoscopic or open surgery in a randomized trial, reported Jianmin Xu, MD, PhD., from Fudan University in Shanghai, China, and colleagues in a scientific poster presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress.
 

 

“Retrospective studies have showed that robotic surgery was better than laparoscopic surgery in ensuring radical resection, reducing complications, and promoting recovery. However, there is no clinical trial reported for robotic surgery for rectal cancer. Thus, we conduct this randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery for low rectal cancer,” they wrote.

Dr. Xu and colleagues enrolled 506 patients from 18 to 75 years of age with clinical stage T1 to T3 cancers within 5 cm of the anal verge and no distant metastases and randomly assigned them to resection with either a robot-assisted, laparoscopic, or open APR technique. Three of the 506 patients randomized did not undergo resection, leaving 503 for the per-protocol analysis presented here.

For the primary endpoint of complications rates within 30 days following surgery, the investigators found that patients assigned to robotic-assisted surgery (173 patients) had a total complication rate of 10.4%, compared with 18.8% for 176 patients assigned to laparoscopy (P = .027), and 26% for 154 assigned to open APR (P less than .001). The latter group included four patients assigned to laparoscopy whose procedures were converted to open surgery.

Among patients without complications, robot-assisted procedures were also associated with faster recovery, as measured by days to first flatus, at a median of 1 vs. 2 for laparoscopy and 3 for open procedures (P less than .001 for robots vs. each other surgery type). The robotic surgery was also significantly associated with fewer days to first automatic urination (median 2 vs. 4 for each of the other procedures; P less than .001), and with fewer days to discharge (median 5 vs. 7 for the other procedures; P less than .001).

Dr. Jianmin Xu
There were no significant differences among the groups in resection margins achieved or numbers of lymph nodes harvested.

"These are excellent postoperative complication rates reported, especially for the robotic treatment group, commented Thomas Gruenberger, MD, an oncologic surgeon at Rudolf Hospital in Vienna, in a poster discussion session.

“We all are now favoring laparoscopic surgery for these kinds of patients. The robot is a nice thing to have; however, we cannot use it in every hospital because it’s still quite expensive,” he said.

“We require – and this is a secondary endpoint of the study – long-term follow-up for local and distant outcomes,” he added,

The investigators did not report a funding source. All authors declared having no conflicts of interest. Dr. Gruenberger disclosed research funding, speakers bureau participation, and/or advisory roles with several companies.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– The automaton uprising continues: Robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection (APR) can be safely performed in patients with rectal cancers within 5 cm of the anal verge, with surgical results equivalent to those seen with open or laparoscopic APR, investigators say.

Robot-assisted procedures were associated with a significantly lower rate of postoperative complications and with faster functional recovery than either laparoscopic or open surgery in a randomized trial, reported Jianmin Xu, MD, PhD., from Fudan University in Shanghai, China, and colleagues in a scientific poster presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress.
 

 

“Retrospective studies have showed that robotic surgery was better than laparoscopic surgery in ensuring radical resection, reducing complications, and promoting recovery. However, there is no clinical trial reported for robotic surgery for rectal cancer. Thus, we conduct this randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery for low rectal cancer,” they wrote.

Dr. Xu and colleagues enrolled 506 patients from 18 to 75 years of age with clinical stage T1 to T3 cancers within 5 cm of the anal verge and no distant metastases and randomly assigned them to resection with either a robot-assisted, laparoscopic, or open APR technique. Three of the 506 patients randomized did not undergo resection, leaving 503 for the per-protocol analysis presented here.

For the primary endpoint of complications rates within 30 days following surgery, the investigators found that patients assigned to robotic-assisted surgery (173 patients) had a total complication rate of 10.4%, compared with 18.8% for 176 patients assigned to laparoscopy (P = .027), and 26% for 154 assigned to open APR (P less than .001). The latter group included four patients assigned to laparoscopy whose procedures were converted to open surgery.

Among patients without complications, robot-assisted procedures were also associated with faster recovery, as measured by days to first flatus, at a median of 1 vs. 2 for laparoscopy and 3 for open procedures (P less than .001 for robots vs. each other surgery type). The robotic surgery was also significantly associated with fewer days to first automatic urination (median 2 vs. 4 for each of the other procedures; P less than .001), and with fewer days to discharge (median 5 vs. 7 for the other procedures; P less than .001).

Dr. Jianmin Xu
There were no significant differences among the groups in resection margins achieved or numbers of lymph nodes harvested.

"These are excellent postoperative complication rates reported, especially for the robotic treatment group, commented Thomas Gruenberger, MD, an oncologic surgeon at Rudolf Hospital in Vienna, in a poster discussion session.

“We all are now favoring laparoscopic surgery for these kinds of patients. The robot is a nice thing to have; however, we cannot use it in every hospital because it’s still quite expensive,” he said.

“We require – and this is a secondary endpoint of the study – long-term follow-up for local and distant outcomes,” he added,

The investigators did not report a funding source. All authors declared having no conflicts of interest. Dr. Gruenberger disclosed research funding, speakers bureau participation, and/or advisory roles with several companies.

– The automaton uprising continues: Robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection (APR) can be safely performed in patients with rectal cancers within 5 cm of the anal verge, with surgical results equivalent to those seen with open or laparoscopic APR, investigators say.

Robot-assisted procedures were associated with a significantly lower rate of postoperative complications and with faster functional recovery than either laparoscopic or open surgery in a randomized trial, reported Jianmin Xu, MD, PhD., from Fudan University in Shanghai, China, and colleagues in a scientific poster presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress.
 

 

“Retrospective studies have showed that robotic surgery was better than laparoscopic surgery in ensuring radical resection, reducing complications, and promoting recovery. However, there is no clinical trial reported for robotic surgery for rectal cancer. Thus, we conduct this randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery for low rectal cancer,” they wrote.

Dr. Xu and colleagues enrolled 506 patients from 18 to 75 years of age with clinical stage T1 to T3 cancers within 5 cm of the anal verge and no distant metastases and randomly assigned them to resection with either a robot-assisted, laparoscopic, or open APR technique. Three of the 506 patients randomized did not undergo resection, leaving 503 for the per-protocol analysis presented here.

For the primary endpoint of complications rates within 30 days following surgery, the investigators found that patients assigned to robotic-assisted surgery (173 patients) had a total complication rate of 10.4%, compared with 18.8% for 176 patients assigned to laparoscopy (P = .027), and 26% for 154 assigned to open APR (P less than .001). The latter group included four patients assigned to laparoscopy whose procedures were converted to open surgery.

Among patients without complications, robot-assisted procedures were also associated with faster recovery, as measured by days to first flatus, at a median of 1 vs. 2 for laparoscopy and 3 for open procedures (P less than .001 for robots vs. each other surgery type). The robotic surgery was also significantly associated with fewer days to first automatic urination (median 2 vs. 4 for each of the other procedures; P less than .001), and with fewer days to discharge (median 5 vs. 7 for the other procedures; P less than .001).

Dr. Jianmin Xu
There were no significant differences among the groups in resection margins achieved or numbers of lymph nodes harvested.

"These are excellent postoperative complication rates reported, especially for the robotic treatment group, commented Thomas Gruenberger, MD, an oncologic surgeon at Rudolf Hospital in Vienna, in a poster discussion session.

“We all are now favoring laparoscopic surgery for these kinds of patients. The robot is a nice thing to have; however, we cannot use it in every hospital because it’s still quite expensive,” he said.

“We require – and this is a secondary endpoint of the study – long-term follow-up for local and distant outcomes,” he added,

The investigators did not report a funding source. All authors declared having no conflicts of interest. Dr. Gruenberger disclosed research funding, speakers bureau participation, and/or advisory roles with several companies.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT ESMO 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Launch of adalimumab biosimilar Amjevita postponed

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 02/07/2023 - 16:56

 

Amgen, maker of the adalimumab biosimilar Amjevita (adalimumab-atto) has reached an agreement with AbbVie, manufacturer of the originator adalimumab Humira, that halts marketing of Amjevita in the United States until 2023 and in Europe until 2018, according to a company statement.

The deal between the two manufacturers settles a patent infringement lawsuit that AbbVie brought against Amgen after it received Food and Drug Administration approval in September 2016 for seven of Humira’s nine indications: rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, plaque psoriasis, and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Amjevita is not approved for two of Humira’s indications, hidradenitis suppurativa and uveitis.

Amgen said in its statement that AbbVie will grant patent licenses for the use and sale of Amjevita worldwide, on a country-by-country basis, with current expectations that marketing will begin in Europe on Oct. 16, 2018, and in the United States on Jan. 31, 2023. Amjevita is named Amgevita in Europe.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Related Articles

 

Amgen, maker of the adalimumab biosimilar Amjevita (adalimumab-atto) has reached an agreement with AbbVie, manufacturer of the originator adalimumab Humira, that halts marketing of Amjevita in the United States until 2023 and in Europe until 2018, according to a company statement.

The deal between the two manufacturers settles a patent infringement lawsuit that AbbVie brought against Amgen after it received Food and Drug Administration approval in September 2016 for seven of Humira’s nine indications: rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, plaque psoriasis, and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Amjevita is not approved for two of Humira’s indications, hidradenitis suppurativa and uveitis.

Amgen said in its statement that AbbVie will grant patent licenses for the use and sale of Amjevita worldwide, on a country-by-country basis, with current expectations that marketing will begin in Europe on Oct. 16, 2018, and in the United States on Jan. 31, 2023. Amjevita is named Amgevita in Europe.

 

Amgen, maker of the adalimumab biosimilar Amjevita (adalimumab-atto) has reached an agreement with AbbVie, manufacturer of the originator adalimumab Humira, that halts marketing of Amjevita in the United States until 2023 and in Europe until 2018, according to a company statement.

The deal between the two manufacturers settles a patent infringement lawsuit that AbbVie brought against Amgen after it received Food and Drug Administration approval in September 2016 for seven of Humira’s nine indications: rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, plaque psoriasis, and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Amjevita is not approved for two of Humira’s indications, hidradenitis suppurativa and uveitis.

Amgen said in its statement that AbbVie will grant patent licenses for the use and sale of Amjevita worldwide, on a country-by-country basis, with current expectations that marketing will begin in Europe on Oct. 16, 2018, and in the United States on Jan. 31, 2023. Amjevita is named Amgevita in Europe.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Under our noses

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:03

 

If you graduated from medical school after 1990, you may be surprised to learn that there was a time when the typical general pediatrician could go through an entire day of seeing patients and not write a single prescription for a stimulant medication. In fact, he or she could go for several months without writing for any controlled substance.

ADHD is a modern phenomenon. There always have been children with “ants in their pants” who couldn’t sit still. And there always were “daydreamers” who didn’t pay attention in school. But in the 1970s, the number of children who might now be labeled as having ADHD was nowhere near the 11% often quoted for the prevalence in the current pediatric population.

Eva-Foreman/Thinkstock
One explanation simply may be that the discrepancy reflects a relabeling phenomenon compounded by a heightened awareness. However, most people – including some of us who have lived and practiced pediatrics over the last 40 years – suspect that there must be some factor or factors driving the emergence of this behavior pattern among an increasing number of children.

Could there be some genetic selection process that is favoring the birth and survival of hyperactive and distractible children? In the last decade or two, biologists have discovered evolutionary changes in some animals occurring at pace far faster than had been previously imagined. However, a Darwinian explanation seems unlikely in the case of the emergence of ADHD.

Could it be a diet laced with high fructose sugars or artificial dyes and food coloring? While there continues to be a significant number of parents whose anecdotal observations point to a relationship between diet and behavior, to date controlled studies have not supported a dietary cause for the ADHD phenomenon.

Within a few years of beginning my dual careers as parent and pediatrician, I began to notice that children who were sleep deprived often were distractible and inattentive. Some also were hyperactive, an observation that initially seemed counterintuitive. Over the ensuing four decades, I have become more convinced that a substantial driver of the emergence of the ADHD phenomenon is the fact that the North American lifestyle places sleep so far down on its priority list that a significant percentage of both the pediatric and adult populations are sleep deprived.

I freely admit that my initial anecdotal observations have evolved to the point of an obsession. Of course, I tend to read the papers, such as those linking obstructive sleep apnea and ADHD, which support my contention that sleep deprivation is a major contributor. I look at the data that show that children are getting less sleep than they did a century ago and suspect that this decline must somehow be reflected in their behavior (“Never enough sleep: A brief history of sleep recommendations for children” by Matricciani et al. Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129[3]:548-56). And, of course, I wonder whether the success and popularity of stimulant medication to treat ADHD is just chance or whether it simply could be waking up a bunch of children who aren’t getting enough sleep.

At times, it has been a lonely several decades, trying to convince parents and other pediatricians that sleep may be the answer. I can’t point to my own research because I have been too busy doing general pediatrics. I can only point to the observations of others that fit into my construct.

You can imagine the warm glow that swept over me when I came across an article in the Washington Post titled “Could some ADHD be a type of sleep disorder? That would fundamentally change how we treat it” (A.E. Cha, Sep. 20, 2017). The studies referred to in the article are not terribly earth shaking. But it was nice to read some quotes in a national newspaper from scientists who share my suspicions about sleep deprivation as a major contributor to the ADHD phenomenon. I instantly felt less lonely.

Unfortunately, it is still a long way from this token recognition in the Washington Post to convincing parents and pediatricians to do the heavy lifting that will be required to undo decades of our society’s sleep-unfriendly norms. It’s so much easier to pull out a prescription pad and write for a stimulant.

Dr. William G. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years.
Dr. William G. Wilkoff

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.”

Email him at pdnews@frontlinemedcom.com.
 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

If you graduated from medical school after 1990, you may be surprised to learn that there was a time when the typical general pediatrician could go through an entire day of seeing patients and not write a single prescription for a stimulant medication. In fact, he or she could go for several months without writing for any controlled substance.

ADHD is a modern phenomenon. There always have been children with “ants in their pants” who couldn’t sit still. And there always were “daydreamers” who didn’t pay attention in school. But in the 1970s, the number of children who might now be labeled as having ADHD was nowhere near the 11% often quoted for the prevalence in the current pediatric population.

Eva-Foreman/Thinkstock
One explanation simply may be that the discrepancy reflects a relabeling phenomenon compounded by a heightened awareness. However, most people – including some of us who have lived and practiced pediatrics over the last 40 years – suspect that there must be some factor or factors driving the emergence of this behavior pattern among an increasing number of children.

Could there be some genetic selection process that is favoring the birth and survival of hyperactive and distractible children? In the last decade or two, biologists have discovered evolutionary changes in some animals occurring at pace far faster than had been previously imagined. However, a Darwinian explanation seems unlikely in the case of the emergence of ADHD.

Could it be a diet laced with high fructose sugars or artificial dyes and food coloring? While there continues to be a significant number of parents whose anecdotal observations point to a relationship between diet and behavior, to date controlled studies have not supported a dietary cause for the ADHD phenomenon.

Within a few years of beginning my dual careers as parent and pediatrician, I began to notice that children who were sleep deprived often were distractible and inattentive. Some also were hyperactive, an observation that initially seemed counterintuitive. Over the ensuing four decades, I have become more convinced that a substantial driver of the emergence of the ADHD phenomenon is the fact that the North American lifestyle places sleep so far down on its priority list that a significant percentage of both the pediatric and adult populations are sleep deprived.

I freely admit that my initial anecdotal observations have evolved to the point of an obsession. Of course, I tend to read the papers, such as those linking obstructive sleep apnea and ADHD, which support my contention that sleep deprivation is a major contributor. I look at the data that show that children are getting less sleep than they did a century ago and suspect that this decline must somehow be reflected in their behavior (“Never enough sleep: A brief history of sleep recommendations for children” by Matricciani et al. Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129[3]:548-56). And, of course, I wonder whether the success and popularity of stimulant medication to treat ADHD is just chance or whether it simply could be waking up a bunch of children who aren’t getting enough sleep.

At times, it has been a lonely several decades, trying to convince parents and other pediatricians that sleep may be the answer. I can’t point to my own research because I have been too busy doing general pediatrics. I can only point to the observations of others that fit into my construct.

You can imagine the warm glow that swept over me when I came across an article in the Washington Post titled “Could some ADHD be a type of sleep disorder? That would fundamentally change how we treat it” (A.E. Cha, Sep. 20, 2017). The studies referred to in the article are not terribly earth shaking. But it was nice to read some quotes in a national newspaper from scientists who share my suspicions about sleep deprivation as a major contributor to the ADHD phenomenon. I instantly felt less lonely.

Unfortunately, it is still a long way from this token recognition in the Washington Post to convincing parents and pediatricians to do the heavy lifting that will be required to undo decades of our society’s sleep-unfriendly norms. It’s so much easier to pull out a prescription pad and write for a stimulant.

Dr. William G. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years.
Dr. William G. Wilkoff

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.”

Email him at pdnews@frontlinemedcom.com.
 

 

If you graduated from medical school after 1990, you may be surprised to learn that there was a time when the typical general pediatrician could go through an entire day of seeing patients and not write a single prescription for a stimulant medication. In fact, he or she could go for several months without writing for any controlled substance.

ADHD is a modern phenomenon. There always have been children with “ants in their pants” who couldn’t sit still. And there always were “daydreamers” who didn’t pay attention in school. But in the 1970s, the number of children who might now be labeled as having ADHD was nowhere near the 11% often quoted for the prevalence in the current pediatric population.

Eva-Foreman/Thinkstock
One explanation simply may be that the discrepancy reflects a relabeling phenomenon compounded by a heightened awareness. However, most people – including some of us who have lived and practiced pediatrics over the last 40 years – suspect that there must be some factor or factors driving the emergence of this behavior pattern among an increasing number of children.

Could there be some genetic selection process that is favoring the birth and survival of hyperactive and distractible children? In the last decade or two, biologists have discovered evolutionary changes in some animals occurring at pace far faster than had been previously imagined. However, a Darwinian explanation seems unlikely in the case of the emergence of ADHD.

Could it be a diet laced with high fructose sugars or artificial dyes and food coloring? While there continues to be a significant number of parents whose anecdotal observations point to a relationship between diet and behavior, to date controlled studies have not supported a dietary cause for the ADHD phenomenon.

Within a few years of beginning my dual careers as parent and pediatrician, I began to notice that children who were sleep deprived often were distractible and inattentive. Some also were hyperactive, an observation that initially seemed counterintuitive. Over the ensuing four decades, I have become more convinced that a substantial driver of the emergence of the ADHD phenomenon is the fact that the North American lifestyle places sleep so far down on its priority list that a significant percentage of both the pediatric and adult populations are sleep deprived.

I freely admit that my initial anecdotal observations have evolved to the point of an obsession. Of course, I tend to read the papers, such as those linking obstructive sleep apnea and ADHD, which support my contention that sleep deprivation is a major contributor. I look at the data that show that children are getting less sleep than they did a century ago and suspect that this decline must somehow be reflected in their behavior (“Never enough sleep: A brief history of sleep recommendations for children” by Matricciani et al. Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129[3]:548-56). And, of course, I wonder whether the success and popularity of stimulant medication to treat ADHD is just chance or whether it simply could be waking up a bunch of children who aren’t getting enough sleep.

At times, it has been a lonely several decades, trying to convince parents and other pediatricians that sleep may be the answer. I can’t point to my own research because I have been too busy doing general pediatrics. I can only point to the observations of others that fit into my construct.

You can imagine the warm glow that swept over me when I came across an article in the Washington Post titled “Could some ADHD be a type of sleep disorder? That would fundamentally change how we treat it” (A.E. Cha, Sep. 20, 2017). The studies referred to in the article are not terribly earth shaking. But it was nice to read some quotes in a national newspaper from scientists who share my suspicions about sleep deprivation as a major contributor to the ADHD phenomenon. I instantly felt less lonely.

Unfortunately, it is still a long way from this token recognition in the Washington Post to convincing parents and pediatricians to do the heavy lifting that will be required to undo decades of our society’s sleep-unfriendly norms. It’s so much easier to pull out a prescription pad and write for a stimulant.

Dr. William G. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years.
Dr. William G. Wilkoff

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.”

Email him at pdnews@frontlinemedcom.com.
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Transoral robotic surgery assessed for oral lesions

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 09:59


A single-arm study is being conducted at the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, to assess transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oral and laryngopharyngeal benign and malignant lesions using the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System.

The study started in 2007, and the estimated completion date is December 2020. Investigators hope to enroll 360 adults.

The goal is to determine the feasibility of TORS in patients with benign and malignant lesions; the impact of TORS on operative time, blood loss, and complications; and the quality of life of TORS patients out to 8 years. The investigators are also measuring the efficiency and accuracy of surgeons who perform the procedure to quantify the learning curve.

Patients are scheduled for regular postop visits to assess quality of life and other matters. Those unable to return to Ohio State University are contacted by phone or provided with the questionnaire by mail.

Publications
Topics
Sections


A single-arm study is being conducted at the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, to assess transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oral and laryngopharyngeal benign and malignant lesions using the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System.

The study started in 2007, and the estimated completion date is December 2020. Investigators hope to enroll 360 adults.

The goal is to determine the feasibility of TORS in patients with benign and malignant lesions; the impact of TORS on operative time, blood loss, and complications; and the quality of life of TORS patients out to 8 years. The investigators are also measuring the efficiency and accuracy of surgeons who perform the procedure to quantify the learning curve.

Patients are scheduled for regular postop visits to assess quality of life and other matters. Those unable to return to Ohio State University are contacted by phone or provided with the questionnaire by mail.


A single-arm study is being conducted at the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, to assess transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oral and laryngopharyngeal benign and malignant lesions using the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System.

The study started in 2007, and the estimated completion date is December 2020. Investigators hope to enroll 360 adults.

The goal is to determine the feasibility of TORS in patients with benign and malignant lesions; the impact of TORS on operative time, blood loss, and complications; and the quality of life of TORS patients out to 8 years. The investigators are also measuring the efficiency and accuracy of surgeons who perform the procedure to quantify the learning curve.

Patients are scheduled for regular postop visits to assess quality of life and other matters. Those unable to return to Ohio State University are contacted by phone or provided with the questionnaire by mail.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

‘Without clinical prodrome’

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:03

 

For the most part pediatricians are insulated from death. Our little patients are surprisingly resilient. Once past that anxiety-provoking transition from placental dependence to air breathing, children will thrive in an environment that includes immunizations, potable water, and adequate nutrition. But pediatric deaths do occur infrequently in North America, and they are particularly unsettling to us because we are so unaccustomed to processing the emotions that swirl around the end of life. When a child’s death is unexpected and unexplained, we are likely to find ourselves tortured by feelings of guilt and inadequacy. Did I miss something at the last health maintenance visit? Should I have taken more seriously that call last week about what sounded like a simple viral prodrome? Should I have asked that mother to make an appointment?

germi_p/Thinkstock
The August 2017 Pediatrics opens with a thought-provoking Pediatrics Perspectives titled, “A new approach to the investigation of sudden unexpected death” (doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0024). Richard D. Goldstein, MD, and his coauthors describe an exhaustive multidisciplined and multistep approach searching for the rare neuroanatomic, cardiac, and metabolic conditions that might have explained the unexpected death of a child who was under 3 years of age. Using a variety of sophisticated techniques, including DNA analysis and central nervous system imaging, the investigators examined not only the child who died but also his parents and surviving siblings.

Their approach, which has been labeled the Robert’s Program, is particularly appealing because it is careful to address the families’ concerns about their surviving and future children. I found the inclusion of the dead child’s pediatrician and the office of the chief medical examiner in the summation of the investigation especially appealing.

However, I have trouble envisioning how this novel approach, funded by several philanthropic organizations, could be rolled out on a larger scale. Here in Maine and in many other smaller cash-strapped communities, the medical examiner’s office is overburdened with opioid overdoses and traumatic deaths. The police and sheriffs’ departments may lack sufficient training and experience to do careful scene investigations.

In reviewing the summary of the 17 deaths included in the article, I was struck by the inclusion of 3 cases in which the final cause of death was meningitis or encephalitis “without clinical prodrome.”

Dr. William G. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years.
Dr. William G. Wilkoff
What exactly does “without clinical prodrome” mean? Does it mean that the parents or a day-care provider missed the subtle signs that the child was ill? Were one or two poor feedings written off as just one of those things? Did the child feel a bit warmer to the touch but not hot enough to warrant hunting for the thermometer? Was the pediatrician involved at any point during the period of time when the disease process must have been evolving? Did he or she miss a subtle change in tone or discount the parents’ observations? These things happen.

While a thorough investigation did eventually unearth the cause of death in these three cases, it is in that devilish prodrome that the seeds of guilt can continue to germinate. Parents and physicians will continue to wonder whether someone else with more sensitive antennae might have picked up those early signs of impending disaster. The answer is that there probably wasn’t anyone with better antennae, but there may have been someone with better luck.
 

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.”

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

For the most part pediatricians are insulated from death. Our little patients are surprisingly resilient. Once past that anxiety-provoking transition from placental dependence to air breathing, children will thrive in an environment that includes immunizations, potable water, and adequate nutrition. But pediatric deaths do occur infrequently in North America, and they are particularly unsettling to us because we are so unaccustomed to processing the emotions that swirl around the end of life. When a child’s death is unexpected and unexplained, we are likely to find ourselves tortured by feelings of guilt and inadequacy. Did I miss something at the last health maintenance visit? Should I have taken more seriously that call last week about what sounded like a simple viral prodrome? Should I have asked that mother to make an appointment?

germi_p/Thinkstock
The August 2017 Pediatrics opens with a thought-provoking Pediatrics Perspectives titled, “A new approach to the investigation of sudden unexpected death” (doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0024). Richard D. Goldstein, MD, and his coauthors describe an exhaustive multidisciplined and multistep approach searching for the rare neuroanatomic, cardiac, and metabolic conditions that might have explained the unexpected death of a child who was under 3 years of age. Using a variety of sophisticated techniques, including DNA analysis and central nervous system imaging, the investigators examined not only the child who died but also his parents and surviving siblings.

Their approach, which has been labeled the Robert’s Program, is particularly appealing because it is careful to address the families’ concerns about their surviving and future children. I found the inclusion of the dead child’s pediatrician and the office of the chief medical examiner in the summation of the investigation especially appealing.

However, I have trouble envisioning how this novel approach, funded by several philanthropic organizations, could be rolled out on a larger scale. Here in Maine and in many other smaller cash-strapped communities, the medical examiner’s office is overburdened with opioid overdoses and traumatic deaths. The police and sheriffs’ departments may lack sufficient training and experience to do careful scene investigations.

In reviewing the summary of the 17 deaths included in the article, I was struck by the inclusion of 3 cases in which the final cause of death was meningitis or encephalitis “without clinical prodrome.”

Dr. William G. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years.
Dr. William G. Wilkoff
What exactly does “without clinical prodrome” mean? Does it mean that the parents or a day-care provider missed the subtle signs that the child was ill? Were one or two poor feedings written off as just one of those things? Did the child feel a bit warmer to the touch but not hot enough to warrant hunting for the thermometer? Was the pediatrician involved at any point during the period of time when the disease process must have been evolving? Did he or she miss a subtle change in tone or discount the parents’ observations? These things happen.

While a thorough investigation did eventually unearth the cause of death in these three cases, it is in that devilish prodrome that the seeds of guilt can continue to germinate. Parents and physicians will continue to wonder whether someone else with more sensitive antennae might have picked up those early signs of impending disaster. The answer is that there probably wasn’t anyone with better antennae, but there may have been someone with better luck.
 

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.”

 

For the most part pediatricians are insulated from death. Our little patients are surprisingly resilient. Once past that anxiety-provoking transition from placental dependence to air breathing, children will thrive in an environment that includes immunizations, potable water, and adequate nutrition. But pediatric deaths do occur infrequently in North America, and they are particularly unsettling to us because we are so unaccustomed to processing the emotions that swirl around the end of life. When a child’s death is unexpected and unexplained, we are likely to find ourselves tortured by feelings of guilt and inadequacy. Did I miss something at the last health maintenance visit? Should I have taken more seriously that call last week about what sounded like a simple viral prodrome? Should I have asked that mother to make an appointment?

germi_p/Thinkstock
The August 2017 Pediatrics opens with a thought-provoking Pediatrics Perspectives titled, “A new approach to the investigation of sudden unexpected death” (doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0024). Richard D. Goldstein, MD, and his coauthors describe an exhaustive multidisciplined and multistep approach searching for the rare neuroanatomic, cardiac, and metabolic conditions that might have explained the unexpected death of a child who was under 3 years of age. Using a variety of sophisticated techniques, including DNA analysis and central nervous system imaging, the investigators examined not only the child who died but also his parents and surviving siblings.

Their approach, which has been labeled the Robert’s Program, is particularly appealing because it is careful to address the families’ concerns about their surviving and future children. I found the inclusion of the dead child’s pediatrician and the office of the chief medical examiner in the summation of the investigation especially appealing.

However, I have trouble envisioning how this novel approach, funded by several philanthropic organizations, could be rolled out on a larger scale. Here in Maine and in many other smaller cash-strapped communities, the medical examiner’s office is overburdened with opioid overdoses and traumatic deaths. The police and sheriffs’ departments may lack sufficient training and experience to do careful scene investigations.

In reviewing the summary of the 17 deaths included in the article, I was struck by the inclusion of 3 cases in which the final cause of death was meningitis or encephalitis “without clinical prodrome.”

Dr. William G. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years.
Dr. William G. Wilkoff
What exactly does “without clinical prodrome” mean? Does it mean that the parents or a day-care provider missed the subtle signs that the child was ill? Were one or two poor feedings written off as just one of those things? Did the child feel a bit warmer to the touch but not hot enough to warrant hunting for the thermometer? Was the pediatrician involved at any point during the period of time when the disease process must have been evolving? Did he or she miss a subtle change in tone or discount the parents’ observations? These things happen.

While a thorough investigation did eventually unearth the cause of death in these three cases, it is in that devilish prodrome that the seeds of guilt can continue to germinate. Parents and physicians will continue to wonder whether someone else with more sensitive antennae might have picked up those early signs of impending disaster. The answer is that there probably wasn’t anyone with better antennae, but there may have been someone with better luck.
 

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.”

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Robotic surgery technologies have unique learning curves for trainees

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 09:59

 

Training surgeons to use robotic technology involves learning curves, and a study has found that robotic technologies have unique learning curve profiles that have implications for the time and number of procedures needed to achieve competence.

Giorgio Mazzon, MD, of the Institute of Urology at University College Hospital, London, and his colleagues reviewed the literature on training surgeons in the use of a variety of technologies for urological procedures. They analyzed learning curves for virtual reality robotic simulators, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP), robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) (Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Sep 23;18:89).

Master Video/Shutterstock
For virtual reality training programs, recommendations for achieving safety and competence is between 4 and 12 hours of training in a simulator. One study showed that surgeons were required to complete 11 basic robotic surgical tasks and 6 advanced tasks. The basic and advanced tasks were completed 89.9% and 75% of the time and within 7 hours and in just over 6 hours, respectively (J Endourol. 2015;29[11]:1289-93).Studies of RALP show that prior experience in open radical prostatectomy improved the learning curve for surgeon RALP performance. One study posited that it only took 50-120 cases for the learning curve to plateau in these surgeons (J Endourol. 2011 Oct 25[10]:1633-7).

RARC learning curves are more rapid than RALP, but this may be due to the fact that most surgeons practice RALP before learning RARC. It is estimated that it takes 21 procedures for operating time to plateau and 30 patients for proper lymph node yield and positive surgical margins of less than 5% to occur (Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58[2]:197-202).Safety and competence in RAPN is usually defined by operating times, warm ischemic time, positive surgical margin, and complication rates. It has been reported that RAPN can be safely performed with completion of 25-30 cases (Eur Urol. 2010 Jul;58[1]:127-32).The results of the review “should inform trainers and trainees on what outcomes are expected at a given stage of training,” according to the investigators.

They reported no relevant financial disclosures.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Training surgeons to use robotic technology involves learning curves, and a study has found that robotic technologies have unique learning curve profiles that have implications for the time and number of procedures needed to achieve competence.

Giorgio Mazzon, MD, of the Institute of Urology at University College Hospital, London, and his colleagues reviewed the literature on training surgeons in the use of a variety of technologies for urological procedures. They analyzed learning curves for virtual reality robotic simulators, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP), robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) (Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Sep 23;18:89).

Master Video/Shutterstock
For virtual reality training programs, recommendations for achieving safety and competence is between 4 and 12 hours of training in a simulator. One study showed that surgeons were required to complete 11 basic robotic surgical tasks and 6 advanced tasks. The basic and advanced tasks were completed 89.9% and 75% of the time and within 7 hours and in just over 6 hours, respectively (J Endourol. 2015;29[11]:1289-93).Studies of RALP show that prior experience in open radical prostatectomy improved the learning curve for surgeon RALP performance. One study posited that it only took 50-120 cases for the learning curve to plateau in these surgeons (J Endourol. 2011 Oct 25[10]:1633-7).

RARC learning curves are more rapid than RALP, but this may be due to the fact that most surgeons practice RALP before learning RARC. It is estimated that it takes 21 procedures for operating time to plateau and 30 patients for proper lymph node yield and positive surgical margins of less than 5% to occur (Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58[2]:197-202).Safety and competence in RAPN is usually defined by operating times, warm ischemic time, positive surgical margin, and complication rates. It has been reported that RAPN can be safely performed with completion of 25-30 cases (Eur Urol. 2010 Jul;58[1]:127-32).The results of the review “should inform trainers and trainees on what outcomes are expected at a given stage of training,” according to the investigators.

They reported no relevant financial disclosures.

 

Training surgeons to use robotic technology involves learning curves, and a study has found that robotic technologies have unique learning curve profiles that have implications for the time and number of procedures needed to achieve competence.

Giorgio Mazzon, MD, of the Institute of Urology at University College Hospital, London, and his colleagues reviewed the literature on training surgeons in the use of a variety of technologies for urological procedures. They analyzed learning curves for virtual reality robotic simulators, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP), robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) (Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Sep 23;18:89).

Master Video/Shutterstock
For virtual reality training programs, recommendations for achieving safety and competence is between 4 and 12 hours of training in a simulator. One study showed that surgeons were required to complete 11 basic robotic surgical tasks and 6 advanced tasks. The basic and advanced tasks were completed 89.9% and 75% of the time and within 7 hours and in just over 6 hours, respectively (J Endourol. 2015;29[11]:1289-93).Studies of RALP show that prior experience in open radical prostatectomy improved the learning curve for surgeon RALP performance. One study posited that it only took 50-120 cases for the learning curve to plateau in these surgeons (J Endourol. 2011 Oct 25[10]:1633-7).

RARC learning curves are more rapid than RALP, but this may be due to the fact that most surgeons practice RALP before learning RARC. It is estimated that it takes 21 procedures for operating time to plateau and 30 patients for proper lymph node yield and positive surgical margins of less than 5% to occur (Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58[2]:197-202).Safety and competence in RAPN is usually defined by operating times, warm ischemic time, positive surgical margin, and complication rates. It has been reported that RAPN can be safely performed with completion of 25-30 cases (Eur Urol. 2010 Jul;58[1]:127-32).The results of the review “should inform trainers and trainees on what outcomes are expected at a given stage of training,” according to the investigators.

They reported no relevant financial disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Robotic technologies have unique learning curves that have implications for the time and number of procedures needed to achieve competence and safety.

Major finding: For virtual reality training programs, recommendations for achieving safety and competence is between 4 and 12 hours of training in a simulator.

Data source: Review of studies of learning curves in robotic urological surgery.

Disclosures: The researchers reported no financial disclosures.

Disqus Comments
Default

Biophysical properties of HCV evolve over course of infection

Lipid components of HCV particle may be targetable
Article Type
Changed
Sat, 12/08/2018 - 14:29

 

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) particles are of lowest density and most infectious early in the course of infection, based on findings from a study of chimeric mice.

Body

A hallmark of HCV infection is the association of virus particles with lipoproteins. The HCV virion (lipo-viro particle, LVP) is composed of nucleocapsid and envelope glycoproteins associated with very-low- and low-density lipoproteins, cholesterol, and apolipoproteins. The lipid components determine the size, density, hepatotropism, and infectivity of LVPs and play a role in cell entry, morphogenesis, release, and viral escape mechanisms. LVPs undergo dynamic changes during infection, and dietary triglycerides induce alterations in their biophysical properties and infectivity.

Dr. Agata Budkowska
HCV species and tissue specificity is limited to the human hepatocyte. Since hepatoma cells in vitro produce virus particles with incomplete lipoprotein composition, mouse models with transplanted human primary hepatocytes have been developed to investigate infection in vivo.
Dr. Andreo and colleagues used humanized Fah–/– mice to analyze the evolution of HCV particles during infection. As previously reported, two viral populations of different densities were detected in mice sera, with higher infectivity observed for the low-density population. The proportions and infectivity of these populations varied during infection, reflecting changes in biochemical features of the virus. Sucrose diet influenced the properties of virus particles; these properties’ changes correlated with a redistribution of triglycerides and cholesterol among lipoproteins.

Changes in biochemical features of the virus during infection represent a fascinating aspect of the structural heterogeneity, which influences HCV infectivity and evolution of the disease. Further studies in experimental models that reproduce the lipoprotein-dependent morphogenesis and release of virus particles, maturation, and intravascular remodeling of HCV-associated lipoproteins would help to develop novel lipid-targeting inhibitors to improve existing therapies.

Agata Budkowska, PhD, is scientific advisor for the department of international affairs at the Institut Pasteur, Paris. She has no conflicts of interest.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Body

A hallmark of HCV infection is the association of virus particles with lipoproteins. The HCV virion (lipo-viro particle, LVP) is composed of nucleocapsid and envelope glycoproteins associated with very-low- and low-density lipoproteins, cholesterol, and apolipoproteins. The lipid components determine the size, density, hepatotropism, and infectivity of LVPs and play a role in cell entry, morphogenesis, release, and viral escape mechanisms. LVPs undergo dynamic changes during infection, and dietary triglycerides induce alterations in their biophysical properties and infectivity.

Dr. Agata Budkowska
HCV species and tissue specificity is limited to the human hepatocyte. Since hepatoma cells in vitro produce virus particles with incomplete lipoprotein composition, mouse models with transplanted human primary hepatocytes have been developed to investigate infection in vivo.
Dr. Andreo and colleagues used humanized Fah–/– mice to analyze the evolution of HCV particles during infection. As previously reported, two viral populations of different densities were detected in mice sera, with higher infectivity observed for the low-density population. The proportions and infectivity of these populations varied during infection, reflecting changes in biochemical features of the virus. Sucrose diet influenced the properties of virus particles; these properties’ changes correlated with a redistribution of triglycerides and cholesterol among lipoproteins.

Changes in biochemical features of the virus during infection represent a fascinating aspect of the structural heterogeneity, which influences HCV infectivity and evolution of the disease. Further studies in experimental models that reproduce the lipoprotein-dependent morphogenesis and release of virus particles, maturation, and intravascular remodeling of HCV-associated lipoproteins would help to develop novel lipid-targeting inhibitors to improve existing therapies.

Agata Budkowska, PhD, is scientific advisor for the department of international affairs at the Institut Pasteur, Paris. She has no conflicts of interest.

Body

A hallmark of HCV infection is the association of virus particles with lipoproteins. The HCV virion (lipo-viro particle, LVP) is composed of nucleocapsid and envelope glycoproteins associated with very-low- and low-density lipoproteins, cholesterol, and apolipoproteins. The lipid components determine the size, density, hepatotropism, and infectivity of LVPs and play a role in cell entry, morphogenesis, release, and viral escape mechanisms. LVPs undergo dynamic changes during infection, and dietary triglycerides induce alterations in their biophysical properties and infectivity.

Dr. Agata Budkowska
HCV species and tissue specificity is limited to the human hepatocyte. Since hepatoma cells in vitro produce virus particles with incomplete lipoprotein composition, mouse models with transplanted human primary hepatocytes have been developed to investigate infection in vivo.
Dr. Andreo and colleagues used humanized Fah–/– mice to analyze the evolution of HCV particles during infection. As previously reported, two viral populations of different densities were detected in mice sera, with higher infectivity observed for the low-density population. The proportions and infectivity of these populations varied during infection, reflecting changes in biochemical features of the virus. Sucrose diet influenced the properties of virus particles; these properties’ changes correlated with a redistribution of triglycerides and cholesterol among lipoproteins.

Changes in biochemical features of the virus during infection represent a fascinating aspect of the structural heterogeneity, which influences HCV infectivity and evolution of the disease. Further studies in experimental models that reproduce the lipoprotein-dependent morphogenesis and release of virus particles, maturation, and intravascular remodeling of HCV-associated lipoproteins would help to develop novel lipid-targeting inhibitors to improve existing therapies.

Agata Budkowska, PhD, is scientific advisor for the department of international affairs at the Institut Pasteur, Paris. She has no conflicts of interest.

Title
Lipid components of HCV particle may be targetable
Lipid components of HCV particle may be targetable

 

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) particles are of lowest density and most infectious early in the course of infection, based on findings from a study of chimeric mice.

 

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) particles are of lowest density and most infectious early in the course of infection, based on findings from a study of chimeric mice.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: The biophysical properties of the hepatitis C virus evolve during the course of infection and shift with dietary changes.

Major finding: Density fractionation of infectious mouse serum showed higher infectivity in the low-density fractions soon after infection, but heterogeneity subsequently increased while infectivity decreased. A 5-week diet of 10% sucrose produced a minor shift toward infectivity that correlated with redistribution of triglycerides and cholesterol.

Data source: A study of 13 human liver chimeric mice.

Disclosures: Funders included the National Institutes of Health and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. The investigators disclosed no conflicts.

Disqus Comments
Default

Personality changes may not occur before Alzheimer’s onset

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:03

 

Personality changes do not presage dementia, at least when examined through the lens of self-report, a large retrospective study has determined.

Dementia patients do show personality characteristics that are different from those of their cognitively normal peers, wrote Antonio Terracciano, PhD (JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 20. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2816). Notably, they tend to be more neurotic and less conscientious, he noted. But among more than 2,000 older adults with up to 36 years of data, no temporal associations were found between these traits and the onset of cognitive difficulty, even within a few years of the onset of dementia symptoms.

“From a clinical perspective, these findings suggest that tracking change in self-rated personality as an early indicator of dementia is unlikely to be fruitful, while a single assessment provides reliable information on the personality traits that increase resilience [e.g., conscientiousness] or vulnerability [e.g., neuroticism] to clinical dementia,” wrote Dr. Terracciano of Florida State University, Tallahassee, and his coauthors.

However, the authors noted, it’s possible that self-reported personality may not be as good a marker of dementia-related personality change as informant report.

“Self-rated personality provides participants’ perspectives of themselves. … Individuals with AD could be anosognosic to change in their psychological trains and functioning. Self-reported personality might remain stable and reflect premorbid functioning more than current traits,” the researchers wrote.

The study tracked 2,046 community-living older adults who were part of the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, which began in 1958. Healthy individuals of different ages are continuously enrolled in the study and assessed with regular follow-up visits. These visits include cognitive and neuropsychiatric assessments, from which data for this study were extracted. The mean follow-up time was about 12 years, but some subjects had up to 36 years. From 1980 to 2016, the group completed more than 8,000 assessments and accumulated 24,569 person/years of follow-up.

Dr. Terracciano examined the cohort’s Revised NEO Personality Inventory results, a 240-item questionnaire that assesses 30 facets of personality in the dimensions of neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. Cognitive decline was assessed by results on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale and the older Dementia Questionnaire.

At the end of the follow-up period, 104 subjects (5%) had developed mild cognitive impairment, and 255 (12.5%) all-cause dementia; of those, 194 (9.5%) were later diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. In an unadjusted analysis, the authors found that the group that eventually developed AD scored higher on neuroticism, and lower on extraversion, openness, and conscientiousness than did the nonaffected subjects.

Over time, the authors found some changes in the reference group, including small declines in neuroticism and extraversion, and small increases in agreeableness and conscientiousness. However, when they looked at the trajectory of change, they found no significant differences in the rate of any change, compared with the AD group – although that group continued to display changes in its baseline difference of neuroticism and conscientiousness.

“Although the trajectories were similar, there were significant ... differences on the intercept,” they wrote. “The AD cohort scored higher on neuroticism and lower on conscientiousness and extraversion than the nonimpaired group.”

The team ran several temporal analyses on the data, and none found any significant temporal association with accelerated personality change in the AD group, the MCI group, or the all-cause dementia groups compared with the reference group, with one exception: Subjects with MCI showed a steeper decline in openness than did nonaffected subjects.

Those results were consistent even when they examined the two assessments performed just before the onset of cognitive symptoms (a mean of 6 and 3 years). “Consistent with the results and the broader literature, the AD group scored higher on neuroticism and lower on conscientiousness. Contrary to expectations, the AD group did not increase in neuroticism and decline in conscientiousness.”

The findings may shed some light on the chicken-or-egg question of personality change and dementia, they suggested.

“This research has relevance to the question of reverse causality for the association between personality and risk of incident AD. That is, if personality changed in response to increasing neuropathology in the brain in the preclinical phase, the association between personality and AD could have been due to the disease process rather than personality as an independent risk factor. We did not, however, find any evidence that neuroticism and conscientiousness changed significantly as the onset of disease approached. Thus, rather than an effect of AD neuropathology, these traits appear to confer risk for the development of the disease.”

The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging is supported by the National Institutes of Health. Neither Dr. Terracciano nor his colleagues had financial disclosures.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Personality changes do not presage dementia, at least when examined through the lens of self-report, a large retrospective study has determined.

Dementia patients do show personality characteristics that are different from those of their cognitively normal peers, wrote Antonio Terracciano, PhD (JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 20. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2816). Notably, they tend to be more neurotic and less conscientious, he noted. But among more than 2,000 older adults with up to 36 years of data, no temporal associations were found between these traits and the onset of cognitive difficulty, even within a few years of the onset of dementia symptoms.

“From a clinical perspective, these findings suggest that tracking change in self-rated personality as an early indicator of dementia is unlikely to be fruitful, while a single assessment provides reliable information on the personality traits that increase resilience [e.g., conscientiousness] or vulnerability [e.g., neuroticism] to clinical dementia,” wrote Dr. Terracciano of Florida State University, Tallahassee, and his coauthors.

However, the authors noted, it’s possible that self-reported personality may not be as good a marker of dementia-related personality change as informant report.

“Self-rated personality provides participants’ perspectives of themselves. … Individuals with AD could be anosognosic to change in their psychological trains and functioning. Self-reported personality might remain stable and reflect premorbid functioning more than current traits,” the researchers wrote.

The study tracked 2,046 community-living older adults who were part of the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, which began in 1958. Healthy individuals of different ages are continuously enrolled in the study and assessed with regular follow-up visits. These visits include cognitive and neuropsychiatric assessments, from which data for this study were extracted. The mean follow-up time was about 12 years, but some subjects had up to 36 years. From 1980 to 2016, the group completed more than 8,000 assessments and accumulated 24,569 person/years of follow-up.

Dr. Terracciano examined the cohort’s Revised NEO Personality Inventory results, a 240-item questionnaire that assesses 30 facets of personality in the dimensions of neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. Cognitive decline was assessed by results on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale and the older Dementia Questionnaire.

At the end of the follow-up period, 104 subjects (5%) had developed mild cognitive impairment, and 255 (12.5%) all-cause dementia; of those, 194 (9.5%) were later diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. In an unadjusted analysis, the authors found that the group that eventually developed AD scored higher on neuroticism, and lower on extraversion, openness, and conscientiousness than did the nonaffected subjects.

Over time, the authors found some changes in the reference group, including small declines in neuroticism and extraversion, and small increases in agreeableness and conscientiousness. However, when they looked at the trajectory of change, they found no significant differences in the rate of any change, compared with the AD group – although that group continued to display changes in its baseline difference of neuroticism and conscientiousness.

“Although the trajectories were similar, there were significant ... differences on the intercept,” they wrote. “The AD cohort scored higher on neuroticism and lower on conscientiousness and extraversion than the nonimpaired group.”

The team ran several temporal analyses on the data, and none found any significant temporal association with accelerated personality change in the AD group, the MCI group, or the all-cause dementia groups compared with the reference group, with one exception: Subjects with MCI showed a steeper decline in openness than did nonaffected subjects.

Those results were consistent even when they examined the two assessments performed just before the onset of cognitive symptoms (a mean of 6 and 3 years). “Consistent with the results and the broader literature, the AD group scored higher on neuroticism and lower on conscientiousness. Contrary to expectations, the AD group did not increase in neuroticism and decline in conscientiousness.”

The findings may shed some light on the chicken-or-egg question of personality change and dementia, they suggested.

“This research has relevance to the question of reverse causality for the association between personality and risk of incident AD. That is, if personality changed in response to increasing neuropathology in the brain in the preclinical phase, the association between personality and AD could have been due to the disease process rather than personality as an independent risk factor. We did not, however, find any evidence that neuroticism and conscientiousness changed significantly as the onset of disease approached. Thus, rather than an effect of AD neuropathology, these traits appear to confer risk for the development of the disease.”

The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging is supported by the National Institutes of Health. Neither Dr. Terracciano nor his colleagues had financial disclosures.

 

Personality changes do not presage dementia, at least when examined through the lens of self-report, a large retrospective study has determined.

Dementia patients do show personality characteristics that are different from those of their cognitively normal peers, wrote Antonio Terracciano, PhD (JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 20. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2816). Notably, they tend to be more neurotic and less conscientious, he noted. But among more than 2,000 older adults with up to 36 years of data, no temporal associations were found between these traits and the onset of cognitive difficulty, even within a few years of the onset of dementia symptoms.

“From a clinical perspective, these findings suggest that tracking change in self-rated personality as an early indicator of dementia is unlikely to be fruitful, while a single assessment provides reliable information on the personality traits that increase resilience [e.g., conscientiousness] or vulnerability [e.g., neuroticism] to clinical dementia,” wrote Dr. Terracciano of Florida State University, Tallahassee, and his coauthors.

However, the authors noted, it’s possible that self-reported personality may not be as good a marker of dementia-related personality change as informant report.

“Self-rated personality provides participants’ perspectives of themselves. … Individuals with AD could be anosognosic to change in their psychological trains and functioning. Self-reported personality might remain stable and reflect premorbid functioning more than current traits,” the researchers wrote.

The study tracked 2,046 community-living older adults who were part of the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, which began in 1958. Healthy individuals of different ages are continuously enrolled in the study and assessed with regular follow-up visits. These visits include cognitive and neuropsychiatric assessments, from which data for this study were extracted. The mean follow-up time was about 12 years, but some subjects had up to 36 years. From 1980 to 2016, the group completed more than 8,000 assessments and accumulated 24,569 person/years of follow-up.

Dr. Terracciano examined the cohort’s Revised NEO Personality Inventory results, a 240-item questionnaire that assesses 30 facets of personality in the dimensions of neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. Cognitive decline was assessed by results on the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale and the older Dementia Questionnaire.

At the end of the follow-up period, 104 subjects (5%) had developed mild cognitive impairment, and 255 (12.5%) all-cause dementia; of those, 194 (9.5%) were later diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. In an unadjusted analysis, the authors found that the group that eventually developed AD scored higher on neuroticism, and lower on extraversion, openness, and conscientiousness than did the nonaffected subjects.

Over time, the authors found some changes in the reference group, including small declines in neuroticism and extraversion, and small increases in agreeableness and conscientiousness. However, when they looked at the trajectory of change, they found no significant differences in the rate of any change, compared with the AD group – although that group continued to display changes in its baseline difference of neuroticism and conscientiousness.

“Although the trajectories were similar, there were significant ... differences on the intercept,” they wrote. “The AD cohort scored higher on neuroticism and lower on conscientiousness and extraversion than the nonimpaired group.”

The team ran several temporal analyses on the data, and none found any significant temporal association with accelerated personality change in the AD group, the MCI group, or the all-cause dementia groups compared with the reference group, with one exception: Subjects with MCI showed a steeper decline in openness than did nonaffected subjects.

Those results were consistent even when they examined the two assessments performed just before the onset of cognitive symptoms (a mean of 6 and 3 years). “Consistent with the results and the broader literature, the AD group scored higher on neuroticism and lower on conscientiousness. Contrary to expectations, the AD group did not increase in neuroticism and decline in conscientiousness.”

The findings may shed some light on the chicken-or-egg question of personality change and dementia, they suggested.

“This research has relevance to the question of reverse causality for the association between personality and risk of incident AD. That is, if personality changed in response to increasing neuropathology in the brain in the preclinical phase, the association between personality and AD could have been due to the disease process rather than personality as an independent risk factor. We did not, however, find any evidence that neuroticism and conscientiousness changed significantly as the onset of disease approached. Thus, rather than an effect of AD neuropathology, these traits appear to confer risk for the development of the disease.”

The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging is supported by the National Institutes of Health. Neither Dr. Terracciano nor his colleagues had financial disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM JAMA PSYCHIATRY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Self-reported changes in personality do not presage the development of Alzheimer’s disease.

Major finding: Although patients with AD scored higher on neuroticism and lower on conscientiousness, those traits did not change any faster than personality traits in the nonaffected subjects.

Data source: The study comprised 2,046 subjects with up to 36 years’ follow-up.

Disclosures: The Baltimore Longitudinal Study on Aging is funded by the National Institutes of Health. Neither Dr. Terracciano nor his coauthors had financial disclosures.

Disqus Comments
Default

Insist on flu vaccination for all, say experts

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:03

“If you are 6 months or older in the U.S., there’s a flu vaccine for you,” William Schaffner, MD, of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, said in a press briefing sponsored by the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases.

Some good news about the flu – vaccination rates increased slightly last year, compared with the previous year among all individuals aged 6 months and older without contraindications, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Heidi Splete/Frontline Medical News
HHS Secretary Tom Price receives a flu vaccine during the press briefing.
However, these numbers fall short of the Healthy People 2020 flu vaccination goal of 70% for most population subgroups, so there is room for improvement, said Dr. Schaffner, medical director of the NFID in Bethesda, Md.

Experts continue to recommend annual influenza vaccination for all persons aged 6 months and older, but they emphasize the need to identify those at risk of not getting vaccinated and develop strategies to increase vaccination coverage.

“Vaccines are among the greatest public health achievements of modern times, but they are only as useful as we as a society take advantage of them,” Secretary of Health & Human Services Thomas E. Price, MD, said at the briefing.

Overall flu vaccination in the United States was 47% for the 2016-2017 season, compared with 46% during the 2015-2016 season, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Dr. Price emphasized that vaccination is only part of a successful flu prevention strategy. Stay home when you are sick to help avoid spreading germs to others and take antiviral drugs if a doctor prescribes them to help reduce and avoid complications from flu, he said.

Children aged 6-23 months were the only population subgroup to meet the 70% Healthy People 2020 goal last year, with a rate of 73%, said Patricia A. Stinchfield, RN, CPNP, senior director of infection prevention and control at Children’s Hospital Minnesota, Minneapolis.

“Our goal is to increase coverage for children of all ages,” she said. But it’s not just about the kids themselves, she emphasized.

“If your child gets the flu, they expose babies, grandparents, pregnant women. We need to vaccinate children to protect the public at large,” she said. In addition, health care professionals must be clear about recommending vaccination. The research shows that a specific recommendation often makes the difference for vaccinating families.

Pregnant women are among those who can and should safely be vaccinated, Ms. Stinchfield emphasized. Flu vaccination among pregnant women was 54% in 2016-2017, similar to the past three flu seasons, and approximately two-thirds (67%) of pregnant women in 2016-2017 reported that a health care provider recommended and offered flu vaccination, according to CDC data.

Older adults also are important targets for flu vaccination, noted Kathleen M. Neuzil, MD, director of the Center for Vaccine Development at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. Last year, approximately 65% of U.S. adults aged 65 years and older were vaccinated, which was the largest subgroup of adults aged 18 years and older, she said. Older adults may be caring for frail spouses or infant grandchildren, so protecting others should be a motivating factor in continuing to encourage vaccination in this age group, she noted.

The flu vaccine supply is plentiful going into the start of the 2016-2017 flu season, with an estimated 166 million doses available in several formulations, said Daniel B. Jernigan, MD, director of the CDC’s Influenza Division.

Options for vaccination include the standard vaccine, a cell-based vaccine, and a recombinant vaccine. In addition, an adjuvanted vaccine and a high-dose vaccine are available specifically for adults aged 65 years and older; these vaccines are designed to provoke a stronger immune response, Dr. Jernigan said.

However, the briefing participants agreed that the best strategy is to get vaccinated as soon as possible, rather than postponing vaccination in order to secure a particular vaccine type.

Clinicians should not underestimate the power of leading by example when it comes to flu vaccination, Dr. Schaffner noted. Support from the highest levels of administration is important to help overcome barriers to vaccination coverage for health care workers by making vaccination easy and accessible, he said.

The overall influenza vaccination coverage estimate among health care providers was 79% for the 2016-2017 season, similar to the 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 seasons, but representing a 15% increase since 2010-2011. Vaccination coverage was highest among health care personnel whose workplaces required it.

Complete data on 2016-2017 vaccination coverage in health care workers and in pregnant women were published in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report on Sept. 29.

The CDC’s complete flu vaccination recommendations are available online.

The briefing participants had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
 

 

 

Publications
Topics
Sections
Related Articles

“If you are 6 months or older in the U.S., there’s a flu vaccine for you,” William Schaffner, MD, of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, said in a press briefing sponsored by the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases.

Some good news about the flu – vaccination rates increased slightly last year, compared with the previous year among all individuals aged 6 months and older without contraindications, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Heidi Splete/Frontline Medical News
HHS Secretary Tom Price receives a flu vaccine during the press briefing.
However, these numbers fall short of the Healthy People 2020 flu vaccination goal of 70% for most population subgroups, so there is room for improvement, said Dr. Schaffner, medical director of the NFID in Bethesda, Md.

Experts continue to recommend annual influenza vaccination for all persons aged 6 months and older, but they emphasize the need to identify those at risk of not getting vaccinated and develop strategies to increase vaccination coverage.

“Vaccines are among the greatest public health achievements of modern times, but they are only as useful as we as a society take advantage of them,” Secretary of Health & Human Services Thomas E. Price, MD, said at the briefing.

Overall flu vaccination in the United States was 47% for the 2016-2017 season, compared with 46% during the 2015-2016 season, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Dr. Price emphasized that vaccination is only part of a successful flu prevention strategy. Stay home when you are sick to help avoid spreading germs to others and take antiviral drugs if a doctor prescribes them to help reduce and avoid complications from flu, he said.

Children aged 6-23 months were the only population subgroup to meet the 70% Healthy People 2020 goal last year, with a rate of 73%, said Patricia A. Stinchfield, RN, CPNP, senior director of infection prevention and control at Children’s Hospital Minnesota, Minneapolis.

“Our goal is to increase coverage for children of all ages,” she said. But it’s not just about the kids themselves, she emphasized.

“If your child gets the flu, they expose babies, grandparents, pregnant women. We need to vaccinate children to protect the public at large,” she said. In addition, health care professionals must be clear about recommending vaccination. The research shows that a specific recommendation often makes the difference for vaccinating families.

Pregnant women are among those who can and should safely be vaccinated, Ms. Stinchfield emphasized. Flu vaccination among pregnant women was 54% in 2016-2017, similar to the past three flu seasons, and approximately two-thirds (67%) of pregnant women in 2016-2017 reported that a health care provider recommended and offered flu vaccination, according to CDC data.

Older adults also are important targets for flu vaccination, noted Kathleen M. Neuzil, MD, director of the Center for Vaccine Development at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. Last year, approximately 65% of U.S. adults aged 65 years and older were vaccinated, which was the largest subgroup of adults aged 18 years and older, she said. Older adults may be caring for frail spouses or infant grandchildren, so protecting others should be a motivating factor in continuing to encourage vaccination in this age group, she noted.

The flu vaccine supply is plentiful going into the start of the 2016-2017 flu season, with an estimated 166 million doses available in several formulations, said Daniel B. Jernigan, MD, director of the CDC’s Influenza Division.

Options for vaccination include the standard vaccine, a cell-based vaccine, and a recombinant vaccine. In addition, an adjuvanted vaccine and a high-dose vaccine are available specifically for adults aged 65 years and older; these vaccines are designed to provoke a stronger immune response, Dr. Jernigan said.

However, the briefing participants agreed that the best strategy is to get vaccinated as soon as possible, rather than postponing vaccination in order to secure a particular vaccine type.

Clinicians should not underestimate the power of leading by example when it comes to flu vaccination, Dr. Schaffner noted. Support from the highest levels of administration is important to help overcome barriers to vaccination coverage for health care workers by making vaccination easy and accessible, he said.

The overall influenza vaccination coverage estimate among health care providers was 79% for the 2016-2017 season, similar to the 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 seasons, but representing a 15% increase since 2010-2011. Vaccination coverage was highest among health care personnel whose workplaces required it.

Complete data on 2016-2017 vaccination coverage in health care workers and in pregnant women were published in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report on Sept. 29.

The CDC’s complete flu vaccination recommendations are available online.

The briefing participants had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
 

 

 

“If you are 6 months or older in the U.S., there’s a flu vaccine for you,” William Schaffner, MD, of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, said in a press briefing sponsored by the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases.

Some good news about the flu – vaccination rates increased slightly last year, compared with the previous year among all individuals aged 6 months and older without contraindications, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Heidi Splete/Frontline Medical News
HHS Secretary Tom Price receives a flu vaccine during the press briefing.
However, these numbers fall short of the Healthy People 2020 flu vaccination goal of 70% for most population subgroups, so there is room for improvement, said Dr. Schaffner, medical director of the NFID in Bethesda, Md.

Experts continue to recommend annual influenza vaccination for all persons aged 6 months and older, but they emphasize the need to identify those at risk of not getting vaccinated and develop strategies to increase vaccination coverage.

“Vaccines are among the greatest public health achievements of modern times, but they are only as useful as we as a society take advantage of them,” Secretary of Health & Human Services Thomas E. Price, MD, said at the briefing.

Overall flu vaccination in the United States was 47% for the 2016-2017 season, compared with 46% during the 2015-2016 season, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Dr. Price emphasized that vaccination is only part of a successful flu prevention strategy. Stay home when you are sick to help avoid spreading germs to others and take antiviral drugs if a doctor prescribes them to help reduce and avoid complications from flu, he said.

Children aged 6-23 months were the only population subgroup to meet the 70% Healthy People 2020 goal last year, with a rate of 73%, said Patricia A. Stinchfield, RN, CPNP, senior director of infection prevention and control at Children’s Hospital Minnesota, Minneapolis.

“Our goal is to increase coverage for children of all ages,” she said. But it’s not just about the kids themselves, she emphasized.

“If your child gets the flu, they expose babies, grandparents, pregnant women. We need to vaccinate children to protect the public at large,” she said. In addition, health care professionals must be clear about recommending vaccination. The research shows that a specific recommendation often makes the difference for vaccinating families.

Pregnant women are among those who can and should safely be vaccinated, Ms. Stinchfield emphasized. Flu vaccination among pregnant women was 54% in 2016-2017, similar to the past three flu seasons, and approximately two-thirds (67%) of pregnant women in 2016-2017 reported that a health care provider recommended and offered flu vaccination, according to CDC data.

Older adults also are important targets for flu vaccination, noted Kathleen M. Neuzil, MD, director of the Center for Vaccine Development at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. Last year, approximately 65% of U.S. adults aged 65 years and older were vaccinated, which was the largest subgroup of adults aged 18 years and older, she said. Older adults may be caring for frail spouses or infant grandchildren, so protecting others should be a motivating factor in continuing to encourage vaccination in this age group, she noted.

The flu vaccine supply is plentiful going into the start of the 2016-2017 flu season, with an estimated 166 million doses available in several formulations, said Daniel B. Jernigan, MD, director of the CDC’s Influenza Division.

Options for vaccination include the standard vaccine, a cell-based vaccine, and a recombinant vaccine. In addition, an adjuvanted vaccine and a high-dose vaccine are available specifically for adults aged 65 years and older; these vaccines are designed to provoke a stronger immune response, Dr. Jernigan said.

However, the briefing participants agreed that the best strategy is to get vaccinated as soon as possible, rather than postponing vaccination in order to secure a particular vaccine type.

Clinicians should not underestimate the power of leading by example when it comes to flu vaccination, Dr. Schaffner noted. Support from the highest levels of administration is important to help overcome barriers to vaccination coverage for health care workers by making vaccination easy and accessible, he said.

The overall influenza vaccination coverage estimate among health care providers was 79% for the 2016-2017 season, similar to the 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 seasons, but representing a 15% increase since 2010-2011. Vaccination coverage was highest among health care personnel whose workplaces required it.

Complete data on 2016-2017 vaccination coverage in health care workers and in pregnant women were published in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report on Sept. 29.

The CDC’s complete flu vaccination recommendations are available online.

The briefing participants had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.
 

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default