Warn patients about the risk of misusing OTC pain meds

Article Type
Changed

 

Roughly 8 in 10 Americans routinely reach for over-the-counter (OTC) pain pills to relieve headaches, backaches, sore muscles, fevers, or colds, according to a national poll by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA). Most are unaware that these medications, if used incorrectly, can be just as dangerous as prescription drugs.

In my GI practice, I often see cases of accidental OTC pain medicine overdose that have caused stomach bleeding, ulcers, liver damage, and even liver failure. And, I am not alone – the poll found that gastroenterologists see, on average, nearly two patients per week with complications from OTC pain pills.

As the nation’s attention is focused on the opioid crisis, and with good reason, we cannot forget about the risks associated with OTC pain medicines. While it may seem harmless to take more OTC medications than indicated, the body is not capable of absorbing higher doses of pain medicine ingredients at a faster rate.

According to the AGA’s survey, many people are confident they can manage symptoms on their own, without consulting a doctor. Yet, the same poll found that 39% of Americans knowingly took more than the recommended dosage. In most cases, they falsely believed that taking more OTC pain medicine than what was indicated on the label would help them “feel better faster.”

Dr. Charles Mel Wilcox

A short time ago, I treated a woman in her 20s who recently had dental surgery. She was taking Lortab, which is a combination of acetaminophen and hydrocodone, an opioid. But when she still felt pain, she took additional OTC acetaminophen to try to find faster relief. When I saw her, her liver tests were abnormal, her acetaminophen level was elevated, and she was feeling very nauseated. In trying to get faster pain relief, she unintentionally overdosed on OTC pain medicine.

To help patients avoid this kind of medication mishap, it’s vital that health care providers initiate conversations at every visit about the dangers of OTC pain medicine overdose. The following tips have helped me advise my patients and educate them on the associated risks:

• Encourage your patients to read and follow all medicine labels, even on OTC drugs – every time they reach for something in the medicine cabinet.

• Talk to your patients about the two main types of oral OTC pain medicines and make sure they know to take only one product at a time containing the same type of active ingredient.

• Ask about all medicines your patients take, including OTC medicines, as they may not know to tell you.

• Patients may not realize that their current health situation, age, and/or medical history can impact their risk for OTC pain medicine overdose. Let them know that products that worked in the past may no longer be the right choice for them now.

If more health care providers emphasized the dangers of incorrect usage of OTC pain medicines, we could easily help patients avoid the dangerous side effects of taking too much.
 

Dr. Wilcox is professor of medicine in the division of gastroenterology and hepatology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and a chair of AGA’s Gut Check: Know Your Medicine campaign.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Roughly 8 in 10 Americans routinely reach for over-the-counter (OTC) pain pills to relieve headaches, backaches, sore muscles, fevers, or colds, according to a national poll by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA). Most are unaware that these medications, if used incorrectly, can be just as dangerous as prescription drugs.

In my GI practice, I often see cases of accidental OTC pain medicine overdose that have caused stomach bleeding, ulcers, liver damage, and even liver failure. And, I am not alone – the poll found that gastroenterologists see, on average, nearly two patients per week with complications from OTC pain pills.

As the nation’s attention is focused on the opioid crisis, and with good reason, we cannot forget about the risks associated with OTC pain medicines. While it may seem harmless to take more OTC medications than indicated, the body is not capable of absorbing higher doses of pain medicine ingredients at a faster rate.

According to the AGA’s survey, many people are confident they can manage symptoms on their own, without consulting a doctor. Yet, the same poll found that 39% of Americans knowingly took more than the recommended dosage. In most cases, they falsely believed that taking more OTC pain medicine than what was indicated on the label would help them “feel better faster.”

Dr. Charles Mel Wilcox

A short time ago, I treated a woman in her 20s who recently had dental surgery. She was taking Lortab, which is a combination of acetaminophen and hydrocodone, an opioid. But when she still felt pain, she took additional OTC acetaminophen to try to find faster relief. When I saw her, her liver tests were abnormal, her acetaminophen level was elevated, and she was feeling very nauseated. In trying to get faster pain relief, she unintentionally overdosed on OTC pain medicine.

To help patients avoid this kind of medication mishap, it’s vital that health care providers initiate conversations at every visit about the dangers of OTC pain medicine overdose. The following tips have helped me advise my patients and educate them on the associated risks:

• Encourage your patients to read and follow all medicine labels, even on OTC drugs – every time they reach for something in the medicine cabinet.

• Talk to your patients about the two main types of oral OTC pain medicines and make sure they know to take only one product at a time containing the same type of active ingredient.

• Ask about all medicines your patients take, including OTC medicines, as they may not know to tell you.

• Patients may not realize that their current health situation, age, and/or medical history can impact their risk for OTC pain medicine overdose. Let them know that products that worked in the past may no longer be the right choice for them now.

If more health care providers emphasized the dangers of incorrect usage of OTC pain medicines, we could easily help patients avoid the dangerous side effects of taking too much.
 

Dr. Wilcox is professor of medicine in the division of gastroenterology and hepatology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and a chair of AGA’s Gut Check: Know Your Medicine campaign.

 

Roughly 8 in 10 Americans routinely reach for over-the-counter (OTC) pain pills to relieve headaches, backaches, sore muscles, fevers, or colds, according to a national poll by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA). Most are unaware that these medications, if used incorrectly, can be just as dangerous as prescription drugs.

In my GI practice, I often see cases of accidental OTC pain medicine overdose that have caused stomach bleeding, ulcers, liver damage, and even liver failure. And, I am not alone – the poll found that gastroenterologists see, on average, nearly two patients per week with complications from OTC pain pills.

As the nation’s attention is focused on the opioid crisis, and with good reason, we cannot forget about the risks associated with OTC pain medicines. While it may seem harmless to take more OTC medications than indicated, the body is not capable of absorbing higher doses of pain medicine ingredients at a faster rate.

According to the AGA’s survey, many people are confident they can manage symptoms on their own, without consulting a doctor. Yet, the same poll found that 39% of Americans knowingly took more than the recommended dosage. In most cases, they falsely believed that taking more OTC pain medicine than what was indicated on the label would help them “feel better faster.”

Dr. Charles Mel Wilcox

A short time ago, I treated a woman in her 20s who recently had dental surgery. She was taking Lortab, which is a combination of acetaminophen and hydrocodone, an opioid. But when she still felt pain, she took additional OTC acetaminophen to try to find faster relief. When I saw her, her liver tests were abnormal, her acetaminophen level was elevated, and she was feeling very nauseated. In trying to get faster pain relief, she unintentionally overdosed on OTC pain medicine.

To help patients avoid this kind of medication mishap, it’s vital that health care providers initiate conversations at every visit about the dangers of OTC pain medicine overdose. The following tips have helped me advise my patients and educate them on the associated risks:

• Encourage your patients to read and follow all medicine labels, even on OTC drugs – every time they reach for something in the medicine cabinet.

• Talk to your patients about the two main types of oral OTC pain medicines and make sure they know to take only one product at a time containing the same type of active ingredient.

• Ask about all medicines your patients take, including OTC medicines, as they may not know to tell you.

• Patients may not realize that their current health situation, age, and/or medical history can impact their risk for OTC pain medicine overdose. Let them know that products that worked in the past may no longer be the right choice for them now.

If more health care providers emphasized the dangers of incorrect usage of OTC pain medicines, we could easily help patients avoid the dangerous side effects of taking too much.
 

Dr. Wilcox is professor of medicine in the division of gastroenterology and hepatology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and a chair of AGA’s Gut Check: Know Your Medicine campaign.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Support GI Research through the AGA Research Foundation

Article Type
Changed

 

The way we diagnose and treat patients is thanks to years of research. Decades of research and discoveries by dedicated investigators have revolutionized the care of many digestive disease patients. As the charitable arm of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), the AGA Research Foundation contributes to this tradition of discovery.

Federal research funding is at risk. Promising early-stage investigators find it increasingly difficult to secure funding and many leave the field because they are unable to sustain a research career. The foundation provides a key source of funding at a critical juncture in a young investigator’s career.

“As a clinical researcher, funding for investigation is critical in scientific breakthroughs to promote more efficient and robust patient care. My project will provide novel insights into the role of distensibility in the treatment of patients with esophageal eosinophilia, potentially resulting in more efficient treatment selection and disease management.”

By joining others in donating to the AGA Research Foundation, you can help fill the funding gap and protect the next generation of investigators.


Your tax-deductible donation will make a critical difference in retaining talented GI scientists, like Dr. Kristle Lynch, whose research will impact the future care of patients.

Donate on the foundation’s website at www.gastro.org/donateonline or by mail to 4930 Del Ray Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The way we diagnose and treat patients is thanks to years of research. Decades of research and discoveries by dedicated investigators have revolutionized the care of many digestive disease patients. As the charitable arm of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), the AGA Research Foundation contributes to this tradition of discovery.

Federal research funding is at risk. Promising early-stage investigators find it increasingly difficult to secure funding and many leave the field because they are unable to sustain a research career. The foundation provides a key source of funding at a critical juncture in a young investigator’s career.

“As a clinical researcher, funding for investigation is critical in scientific breakthroughs to promote more efficient and robust patient care. My project will provide novel insights into the role of distensibility in the treatment of patients with esophageal eosinophilia, potentially resulting in more efficient treatment selection and disease management.”

By joining others in donating to the AGA Research Foundation, you can help fill the funding gap and protect the next generation of investigators.


Your tax-deductible donation will make a critical difference in retaining talented GI scientists, like Dr. Kristle Lynch, whose research will impact the future care of patients.

Donate on the foundation’s website at www.gastro.org/donateonline or by mail to 4930 Del Ray Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
 

 

The way we diagnose and treat patients is thanks to years of research. Decades of research and discoveries by dedicated investigators have revolutionized the care of many digestive disease patients. As the charitable arm of the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), the AGA Research Foundation contributes to this tradition of discovery.

Federal research funding is at risk. Promising early-stage investigators find it increasingly difficult to secure funding and many leave the field because they are unable to sustain a research career. The foundation provides a key source of funding at a critical juncture in a young investigator’s career.

“As a clinical researcher, funding for investigation is critical in scientific breakthroughs to promote more efficient and robust patient care. My project will provide novel insights into the role of distensibility in the treatment of patients with esophageal eosinophilia, potentially resulting in more efficient treatment selection and disease management.”

By joining others in donating to the AGA Research Foundation, you can help fill the funding gap and protect the next generation of investigators.


Your tax-deductible donation will make a critical difference in retaining talented GI scientists, like Dr. Kristle Lynch, whose research will impact the future care of patients.

Donate on the foundation’s website at www.gastro.org/donateonline or by mail to 4930 Del Ray Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Pseudo-Pedicle Heterotopic Ossification From Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Pseudo-Pedicle Heterotopic Ossification From Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages

ABSTRACT

We conducted a study to determine the common characteristics of patients who developed radiculopathy symptoms and corresponding heterotopic ossification (HO) from transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF) using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2). HO can arise from a disk space with rhBMP-2 use in TLIF. Formation of bone around nerve roots or the thecal sac can cause a radiculopathy with a consistent pattern of symptoms.

We identified 38 patients (26 males, 12 females) with a mean (SD) age of 50.8 (7.5) years who developed radiculopathy symptoms and corresponding HO from TLIF with rhBMP-2 in the disk space between 2002 and 2015. To document this complication and improve its recognition, we recorded common patterns of symptom development and radiologic findings: specifically, time from implantation of rhBMP-2 to symptom development, consistency with side of TLIF placement, and radiologic findings.

Radicular pain generally developed a mean (SD) of 3.8 (1.0) months after TLIF with rhBMP-2. Development of radiculopathy symptoms corresponded to consistent “pseudo-pedicle”-like HO. In all 38 patients, HO arising from the annulotomy site showed a distinct pseudo-pedicle pattern encompassing nerve roots and the thecal sac. In addition, development of radiculopathy symptoms and corresponding HO appear to be independent of amount of rhBMP-2. HO resulting from TLIF with rhBMP-2 in the disk space is a pain generator and a recognizable complication that can be diagnosed by assessment of symptoms and computed tomography characteristics.

Continue to: Bone morphogenetic proteins...

 

 

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), first isolated by Urist in 19641, are a family of growth factors that stimulate the cascade of bone formation. Recombinant human BMP (rhBMP), specifically rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7 (also known as osteogenic protein 1 [OP-1]), was developed in the 1990s after the advent of gene splicing. Then, in 2002, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved use of rhBMP to stimulate fusion in the human spine. Specifically, rhBMP-2 (Medtronic) was approved for use in combination with a specific brand of interbody cage in 1-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.2 Over the past decade, off-label use of rhBMP-2 to achieve osseous union has increased dramatically, particularly in spinal surgery: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and posterolateral lumbar fusion.3-9 However, this widespread off-label use for posterior spinal fusion began despite FDA data indicating that specific complications were underreported in the peer-reviewed literature.10,11 Although rhBMP-2 is very effective in increasing osteoblast formation and improving osteogenesis and subsequent bone healing in spinal surgery,12,13 its use in TLIF resulted in significant adverse side effects, including radiculopathy with and without neuroforaminal heterotopic ossification (HO); 14-24 complications in the FDA studies; 14,22,25-27 and osteolysis causing intervertebral cage subsidence, inflammatory radiculitis, genitourinary complications, infections, possible systemic effects, and significant HO complications.10,28-30 Of these, HO complications involved rhBMP leakage through the annulotomy to the disk space that led to HO. Specifically, rhBMP leaked directly out of the disk space and formed a pillar of bone that encased the nerve roots and dura, which led to occlusion of the foramen and symptoms of radiculopathy.10,28-30

Despite this frequent finding of HO in the intervertebral space outside the target fusion area, use of rhBMP-2 with intervertebral cages increased so rapidly that rhBMP-2 was used more often than autologous bone.5,11,17,31 In this study, we reviewed the common characteristics of patients who developed HO and subsequent radiculopathy from TLIF with rhBMP.

METHODS

After this study received Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed cases of radiculopathy symptoms that developed after TLIF with rhBMP between January 2002 and January 2015. During this period, 38 patients (26 males, 12 females) with a mean (SD) age of 50.8 (7.5) years and radiculopathy symptoms arising from TLIF with rhBMP-2 were identified to determine commonalities and defining characteristics that will help facilitate diagnosis.

Inclusion criteria were computed tomography (CT)–documented HO arising from the TLIF annulotomy site in continuity with bone in the disk space or ectopic bone forming a distinctive shell with contouring around the thecal sac or nerve roots, as well as recurrence or initial occurrence of radiculopathy with signs and symptoms corresponding to the CT site of aberrant bone growth in terms of laterality and particular nerve root(s) involved. Exclusion criteria were malplacement of interbody cage or pedicle screws, disk herniation, systemic neuropathic disease, and new or unresolved radiculopathy immediately after index surgery.

To improve recognition of this complication, we also documented the amount of BMP used, common patterns of radiculopathy symptom development, and radiologic findings. Type and timing of radiculopathy symptom onset and consistency with side of TLIF placement were documented as well. Radiculopathy symptoms included shooting pain in the legs, incontinence, sexual dysfunction, and severe paralysis. Radiologic findings were specific to bone formation from the disk space (detected with CT).

Continue to: RESULTS

 

 

RESULTS

All 38 selected patients had radiculopathy symptoms from HO out of the intervertebral space. The Table lists the patients’ overall characteristics. The left side had the most radiculopathy symptoms (31/38 patients), followed by the right side (5/38) and both sides (2/38). Radiculopathy symptoms began a mean (SD) of 3.8 (1.0) months (range, 2-6 months) after index surgery. The 38 patients had 4 characteristics in common:

Table. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2: Onset Time for Radiculopathy Symptoms, Surgery Level, Side of Pseudo-Pedicle Bone Formation, and Subsequent Complications

PtSympton Onset, moSurgery Level(s)Side(s)Complication(s)
13L3-L5 (2)BothRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, urine
23L4-L5 (2)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
34L5-S1 (1)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
45L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
54L4-S1 (2)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, subsidence
65L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
74L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
84L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
93L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
102L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
112L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, subsidence, neurologic
126L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
133L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, neurologic
142L2-L3 (1)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
154L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
163L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
173L2-L3, L4-L5 (2)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
183L4-L5, L2-L3 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, nonunion
194L4-L5 (1)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
205L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
215L5-S1 (1)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
223L3-L4, L5-S1 (2)BothRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
234L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
246L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
254L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
263L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, urine, bowel
274L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
284L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
296L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
303L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
313L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
324L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
333L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
344L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
354L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
363L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
374L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
384L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle

1. Bone growing out of the annulotomy site for TLIF cage placement was present and in continuity with the disk space in 33 (87%) of the 38 cases. In the other 5 cases (13%), HO was present around the neural tissue, but not necessarily in continuity with the disk space. This bone appeared ectopic and not osteophytic and facet-related, as it formed a shell around either the nerve root or the thecal sac, contouring to the structure.

Magnetic resonance imaging shows that recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 used in the disk space during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion can leak out of the space and cause heterotopic bone formation around nerve roots and the thecal sac

2. The common, novel finding on CT was a “pseudo-pedicle” (Figures 1A, 1B), which appeared as ectopic growth from the disk space—a solid piece of bone in the same direction as the anatomical pedicle. Confusing similarity to the anatomical pedicle is present on axial cuts and during surgery. The pseudo-pedicle varied in thickness and extent out of the disk space, but was always presented as a bar of bone arising from the annulotomy site. After arising from the disk space, the HO could disperse in any direction, further calcifying neural structures or the facet joints above or below. There was no apparent distinguishable repeating pattern, given the variable nature of arthritic facet changes, scoliotic deformities, size of annulotomies, amount of rhBMP used, and placement in cage and disk space or only in cage.

As heterotopic ossification is often interpreted as postoperative fibrous or granulation tissue on magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography is needed to fully appreciate heterotopic bone.

3. In 36 (95%) of the 38 cases, the initial interpretation of HO on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was of tissue other than bone, such as fibrous tissue, granulation tissue, recurrent disk herniation, or postoperative changes. However, this tissue was later determined to be bone from HO complications, which we confirmed with CT in all 38 cases. It is important to note that HO on MRI (Figures 2A, 2B) was initially interpreted by a radiologist as fibrous tissue, but same-level CT of the same case (Figures 3A, 3B) showed clear HO.

Computed tomography shows pseudo-pedicle-like heterotopic ossification of varying extent. Bone arising from the annulotomy site for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion was universally present in all pateints.

4. The radiculopathy symptoms caused by HO were independent of the amount of rhBMP-2 used in TLIF. Of the 38 patients, 19 had 1 rhBMP-2 sponge placed in the cage, 12 had a small kit sponge (1.05 mg), 5 had 1 sponge placed in the cage and 1 sponge placed directly in the disk space before cage placement (no notation of precise size or amount of rhBMP-2), and 2 had 1 sponge placed in the cage (no notation of rhBMP-2 amount). The data showed that HO can occur with even a small amount of rhBMP-2.

Continue to: Bone formation with rhBMP-2...

 

 

Bone formation with rhBMP-2 is robust and beneficial, but HO-related complications are significant, and identifiable on assessment of radiculopathy symptoms and CT characteristics.

DISCUSSION

We identified 38 patients with a recognizable and consistent pattern of complications of off-label use of rhBMP-2 in TLIF performed at our institution between 2002 and 2015. This pattern included consistent radiculopathy symptoms with corresponding HO at the annulotomy site in continuity with bone in the disk space or ectopic bone forming a distinctive shell around the thecal sac or nerve roots, as well as showing a distinct pseudo-pedicle pattern encompassing nerve roots and the thecal sac. Our finding differs from other findings of similar complication characteristics, but with much larger variations without consistency within the patient population.19,20,22,24 Specifically, previous studies found an association between off-label rhBMP-2 use in the posterior spine and radiculopathy with and without neuroforaminal HO. However, our study found consistent radiculopathy symptoms with pseudo-pedicle-like HO complications in all its 38 patients a mean (SD) of 3.8 (1.0) months after surgery.

In this study, consistent radiculopathy symptoms with pseudo-pedicle-like HO complications were independent of the amount of rhBMP-2 used, as some complications occurred with use of small pack rhBMP-2 with TLIF. It is well understood that high doses of rhBMP-2 may be required to improve fusion rates, but to our knowledge an optimal dosing strategy for TLIF has not been reported, particularly with respect to potential complications.8,20,31-33 For anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery, the FDA-approved use of rhBMP-2 appears to have a significantly decreased risk of neuroforaminal HO complications. This may be attributable to the protective presence of the intact posterior annulus and longitudinal ligament for this procedure.20,33 For TLIF, it has been suggested that rhBMP-2 should be placed only along the anterior annulus with a posterior strut and morselized bone allograft barricade,33 and that fibrin glue should be used to limit BMP diffusion through the annulotomy site31 to prevent this complication.

Our study results suggest that radiculopathy symptoms with pseudo-pedicle-like HO complications appear to be caused by leakage of rhBMP-2 from the disk space through the annulotomy site. This was often initially interpreted incorrectly on MRI in the first year after surgery as being fibrous or granulation tissue, or even postoperative changes that the heterotopic tissue was bone was obvious only on CT. Even then the tissue may be incorrectly identified, as the encasing nerve roots in bone are similar to the scar tissue having no compressive effect. HO may compress, but it also has an inflammatory component that the scars lack. Additionally, the HO from the disk space, caused by leakage of the BMP placed in or around the fusion cage, can create a pseudo-pedicle of varying size and extent. This was present in all 38 of our cases.

This retrospective case series had its limitations. Its clinical and radiographic findings were not blinded. Confounding variables cannot be isolated for causal relationships, if any, to the complication in a case series such as this.

Bone formation with rhBMP-2 is robust and beneficial, but HO-related complications are significant, and identifiable on assessment of radiculopathy symptoms and CT characteristics.

References

1. Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science. 1965;150(3698):893-899.

2. Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Schuler TC, Kleeman TJ, Zdeblick TA. Six-year outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis with use of interbody fusion cages and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(5):1181-1189.

3. Boden SD, Kang J, Sandhu H, Heller JG. Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 to achieve posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in humans: a prospective, randomized clinical pilot trial: 2002 Volvo award in clinical studies. Spine. 2002;27(23):2662-2673.

4. Boden SD, Zdeblick TA, Sandhu HS, Heim SE. The use of rhBMP-2 in interbody fusion cages. Definitive evidence of osteoinduction in humans: a preliminary report. Spine. 2000;25(3):376-381.

5. Haid RW Jr, Branch CL Jr, Alexander JT, Burkus JK. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages. Spine J. 2004;4(5):527-538.

6. Meisel HJ, Schnöring M, Hohaus C, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(12):1735-1744.

7. Mummaneni PV, Pan J, Haid RW, Rodts GE. Contribution of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 to the rapid creation of interbody fusion when used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary report. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1(1):19-23.

8. Shimer AL, Oner FC, Vaccaro AR. Spinal reconstruction and bone morphogenetic proteins: open questions. Injury. 2009;40(suppl 3):S32-S38.

9. Slosar PJ, Josey R, Reynolds J. Accelerating lumbar fusions by combining rhBMP-2 with allograft bone: a prospective analysis of interbody fusion rates and clinical outcomes. Spine J. 2007;7(3):301-307.

10. Knox JB, Dai JM 3rd, Orchowski J. Osteolysis in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenetic protein-2. Spine. 2011;36(8):672-676.

11. Owens K, Glassman SD, Howard JM, Djurasovic M, Witten JL, Carreon LY. Perioperative complications with rhBMP-2 in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(4):612-617.

12. Mindea SA, Shih P, Song JK. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2-induced radiculitis in elective minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: a series review. Spine. 2009;34(14):1480-1484.

13. Yoon ST, Park JS, Kim KS, et al. ISSLS prize winner: LMP-1 upregulates intervertebral disc cell production of proteoglycans and BMPs in vitro and in vivo. Spine. 2004;29(23):2603-2611.

14. Cahill KS, Chi JH, Day A, Claus EB. Prevalence, complications, and hospital charges associated with use of bone-morphogenetic proteins in spinal fusion procedures. JAMA. 2009;302(1):58-66.

15. Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Weiner BK. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J. 2011;11(6):471-491.

16. Chen NF, Smith ZA, Stiner E, Armin S, Sheikh H, Khoo LT. Symptomatic ectopic bone formation after off-label use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;12(1):40-46.

17. Joseph V, Rampersaud YR. Heterotopic bone formation with the use of rhBMP2 in posterior minimal access interbody fusion: a CT analysis. Spine. 2007;32(25):2885-2890.

18. McClellan JW, Mulconrey DS, Forbes RJ, Fullmer N. Vertebral bone resorption after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2). J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19(7):483-486.

19. Mroz TE, Wang JC, Hashimoto R, Norvell DC. Complications related to osteobiologics use in spine surgery: a systematic review. Spine. 2010;35(9 suppl):S86-S104.

20. Muchow RD, Hsu WK, Anderson PA. Histopathologic inflammatory response induced by recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 causing radiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2010;10(9):e1-e6.

21. Ong KL, Villarraga ML, Lau E, Carreon LY, Kurtz SM, Glassman SD. Off-label use of bone morphogenetic proteins in the United States using administrative data. Spine. 2010;35(19):1794-1800.

22. Rihn JA, Patel R, Makda J, et al. Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2009;9(8):623-629.

23. Vaidya R, Sethi A, Bartol S, Jacobson M, Coe C, Craig JG. Complications in the use of rhBMP-2 in PEEK cages for interbody spinal fusions. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21(8):557-562.

24. Wong DA, Kumar A, Jatana S, Ghiselli G, Wong K. Neurologic impairment from ectopic bone in the lumbar canal: a potential complication of off-label PLIF/TLIF use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2). Spine J. 2008;8(6):1011-1018.

25. Delawi D, Dhert WJ, Rillardon L, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of osteogenic protein-1 in instrumented posterolateral fusions: report on safety and feasibility. Spine. 2010;35(12):1185-1191.

26. Vaccaro AR, Patel T, Fischgrund J, et al. A pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of OP-1 putty (rhBMP-7) as a replacement for iliac crest autograft in posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2004;29(17):1885-1892.

27. Vaidya R, Weir R, Sethi A, Meisterling S, Hakeos W, Wybo CD. Interbody fusion with allograft and rhBMP-2 leads to consistent fusion but early subsidence. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(3):342-345.

28. Glassman SD, Howard J, Dimar J, Sweet A, Wilson G, Carreon L. Complications with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 in posterolateral spine fusion: a consecutive series of 1037 cases. Spine. 2011;36(22):1849-1854.

29. Helgeson MD, Lehman RA Jr, Patzkowski JC, Dmitriev AE, Rosner MK, Mack AW. Adjacent vertebral body osteolysis with bone morphogenetic protein use in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2011;11(6):507-510.

30. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. Adjuncts in posterior lumbar spine fusion: comparison of complications and efficacy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(8):1105-1110.

31. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Nelson EL, Bulsara KR, Favors M, Thramann J. Safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and intervertebral recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3(6):436-443.

32. Patel VV, Zhao L, Wong P, et al. Controlling bone morphogenetic protein diffusion and bone morphogenetic protein-stimulated bone growth using fibrin glue. Spine. 2006;31(11):1201-1206.

33. Zhang H, Sucato DJ, Welch RD. Recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2-enhanced anterior spine fusion without bone encroachment into the spinal canal: a histomorphometric study in a thoracoscopically instrumented porcine model. Spine. 2005;30(5):512-518.

Author and Disclosure Information

Authors’ Disclosure Statement: The authors report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article. 

Dr. Rosen and Dr. Kiester are Clinical Professors, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California. Dr. Lee is Senior Research Career Scientist, Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development, Professor and Vice Chairman for Research and Academic Affairs, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, and Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering, University of California Irvine, Orange, California.

Address correspondence to: Charles D. Rosen, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Irvine (UCI) Medical Center, 101 City Drive S, Pavilion III, Orange, CA 92868 (tel, 714-456-1699; email, crosen@uci.edu).

Charles D. Rosen, MD P. Douglas Kiester, MD Thay Q. Lee, PhD . Pseudo-Pedicle Heterotopic Ossification From Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages. Am J Orthop. January 29, 2018

Publications
Topics
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Authors’ Disclosure Statement: The authors report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article. 

Dr. Rosen and Dr. Kiester are Clinical Professors, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California. Dr. Lee is Senior Research Career Scientist, Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development, Professor and Vice Chairman for Research and Academic Affairs, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, and Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering, University of California Irvine, Orange, California.

Address correspondence to: Charles D. Rosen, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Irvine (UCI) Medical Center, 101 City Drive S, Pavilion III, Orange, CA 92868 (tel, 714-456-1699; email, crosen@uci.edu).

Charles D. Rosen, MD P. Douglas Kiester, MD Thay Q. Lee, PhD . Pseudo-Pedicle Heterotopic Ossification From Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages. Am J Orthop. January 29, 2018

Author and Disclosure Information

Authors’ Disclosure Statement: The authors report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article. 

Dr. Rosen and Dr. Kiester are Clinical Professors, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California. Dr. Lee is Senior Research Career Scientist, Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development, Professor and Vice Chairman for Research and Academic Affairs, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, and Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering, University of California Irvine, Orange, California.

Address correspondence to: Charles D. Rosen, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Irvine (UCI) Medical Center, 101 City Drive S, Pavilion III, Orange, CA 92868 (tel, 714-456-1699; email, crosen@uci.edu).

Charles D. Rosen, MD P. Douglas Kiester, MD Thay Q. Lee, PhD . Pseudo-Pedicle Heterotopic Ossification From Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages. Am J Orthop. January 29, 2018

ABSTRACT

We conducted a study to determine the common characteristics of patients who developed radiculopathy symptoms and corresponding heterotopic ossification (HO) from transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF) using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2). HO can arise from a disk space with rhBMP-2 use in TLIF. Formation of bone around nerve roots or the thecal sac can cause a radiculopathy with a consistent pattern of symptoms.

We identified 38 patients (26 males, 12 females) with a mean (SD) age of 50.8 (7.5) years who developed radiculopathy symptoms and corresponding HO from TLIF with rhBMP-2 in the disk space between 2002 and 2015. To document this complication and improve its recognition, we recorded common patterns of symptom development and radiologic findings: specifically, time from implantation of rhBMP-2 to symptom development, consistency with side of TLIF placement, and radiologic findings.

Radicular pain generally developed a mean (SD) of 3.8 (1.0) months after TLIF with rhBMP-2. Development of radiculopathy symptoms corresponded to consistent “pseudo-pedicle”-like HO. In all 38 patients, HO arising from the annulotomy site showed a distinct pseudo-pedicle pattern encompassing nerve roots and the thecal sac. In addition, development of radiculopathy symptoms and corresponding HO appear to be independent of amount of rhBMP-2. HO resulting from TLIF with rhBMP-2 in the disk space is a pain generator and a recognizable complication that can be diagnosed by assessment of symptoms and computed tomography characteristics.

Continue to: Bone morphogenetic proteins...

 

 

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), first isolated by Urist in 19641, are a family of growth factors that stimulate the cascade of bone formation. Recombinant human BMP (rhBMP), specifically rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7 (also known as osteogenic protein 1 [OP-1]), was developed in the 1990s after the advent of gene splicing. Then, in 2002, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved use of rhBMP to stimulate fusion in the human spine. Specifically, rhBMP-2 (Medtronic) was approved for use in combination with a specific brand of interbody cage in 1-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.2 Over the past decade, off-label use of rhBMP-2 to achieve osseous union has increased dramatically, particularly in spinal surgery: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and posterolateral lumbar fusion.3-9 However, this widespread off-label use for posterior spinal fusion began despite FDA data indicating that specific complications were underreported in the peer-reviewed literature.10,11 Although rhBMP-2 is very effective in increasing osteoblast formation and improving osteogenesis and subsequent bone healing in spinal surgery,12,13 its use in TLIF resulted in significant adverse side effects, including radiculopathy with and without neuroforaminal heterotopic ossification (HO); 14-24 complications in the FDA studies; 14,22,25-27 and osteolysis causing intervertebral cage subsidence, inflammatory radiculitis, genitourinary complications, infections, possible systemic effects, and significant HO complications.10,28-30 Of these, HO complications involved rhBMP leakage through the annulotomy to the disk space that led to HO. Specifically, rhBMP leaked directly out of the disk space and formed a pillar of bone that encased the nerve roots and dura, which led to occlusion of the foramen and symptoms of radiculopathy.10,28-30

Despite this frequent finding of HO in the intervertebral space outside the target fusion area, use of rhBMP-2 with intervertebral cages increased so rapidly that rhBMP-2 was used more often than autologous bone.5,11,17,31 In this study, we reviewed the common characteristics of patients who developed HO and subsequent radiculopathy from TLIF with rhBMP.

METHODS

After this study received Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed cases of radiculopathy symptoms that developed after TLIF with rhBMP between January 2002 and January 2015. During this period, 38 patients (26 males, 12 females) with a mean (SD) age of 50.8 (7.5) years and radiculopathy symptoms arising from TLIF with rhBMP-2 were identified to determine commonalities and defining characteristics that will help facilitate diagnosis.

Inclusion criteria were computed tomography (CT)–documented HO arising from the TLIF annulotomy site in continuity with bone in the disk space or ectopic bone forming a distinctive shell with contouring around the thecal sac or nerve roots, as well as recurrence or initial occurrence of radiculopathy with signs and symptoms corresponding to the CT site of aberrant bone growth in terms of laterality and particular nerve root(s) involved. Exclusion criteria were malplacement of interbody cage or pedicle screws, disk herniation, systemic neuropathic disease, and new or unresolved radiculopathy immediately after index surgery.

To improve recognition of this complication, we also documented the amount of BMP used, common patterns of radiculopathy symptom development, and radiologic findings. Type and timing of radiculopathy symptom onset and consistency with side of TLIF placement were documented as well. Radiculopathy symptoms included shooting pain in the legs, incontinence, sexual dysfunction, and severe paralysis. Radiologic findings were specific to bone formation from the disk space (detected with CT).

Continue to: RESULTS

 

 

RESULTS

All 38 selected patients had radiculopathy symptoms from HO out of the intervertebral space. The Table lists the patients’ overall characteristics. The left side had the most radiculopathy symptoms (31/38 patients), followed by the right side (5/38) and both sides (2/38). Radiculopathy symptoms began a mean (SD) of 3.8 (1.0) months (range, 2-6 months) after index surgery. The 38 patients had 4 characteristics in common:

Table. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2: Onset Time for Radiculopathy Symptoms, Surgery Level, Side of Pseudo-Pedicle Bone Formation, and Subsequent Complications

PtSympton Onset, moSurgery Level(s)Side(s)Complication(s)
13L3-L5 (2)BothRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, urine
23L4-L5 (2)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
34L5-S1 (1)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
45L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
54L4-S1 (2)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, subsidence
65L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
74L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
84L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
93L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
102L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
112L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, subsidence, neurologic
126L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
133L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, neurologic
142L2-L3 (1)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
154L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
163L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
173L2-L3, L4-L5 (2)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
183L4-L5, L2-L3 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, nonunion
194L4-L5 (1)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
205L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
215L5-S1 (1)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
223L3-L4, L5-S1 (2)BothRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
234L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
246L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
254L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
263L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, urine, bowel
274L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
284L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
296L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
303L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
313L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
324L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
333L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
344L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
354L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
363L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
374L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
384L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle

1. Bone growing out of the annulotomy site for TLIF cage placement was present and in continuity with the disk space in 33 (87%) of the 38 cases. In the other 5 cases (13%), HO was present around the neural tissue, but not necessarily in continuity with the disk space. This bone appeared ectopic and not osteophytic and facet-related, as it formed a shell around either the nerve root or the thecal sac, contouring to the structure.

Magnetic resonance imaging shows that recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 used in the disk space during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion can leak out of the space and cause heterotopic bone formation around nerve roots and the thecal sac

2. The common, novel finding on CT was a “pseudo-pedicle” (Figures 1A, 1B), which appeared as ectopic growth from the disk space—a solid piece of bone in the same direction as the anatomical pedicle. Confusing similarity to the anatomical pedicle is present on axial cuts and during surgery. The pseudo-pedicle varied in thickness and extent out of the disk space, but was always presented as a bar of bone arising from the annulotomy site. After arising from the disk space, the HO could disperse in any direction, further calcifying neural structures or the facet joints above or below. There was no apparent distinguishable repeating pattern, given the variable nature of arthritic facet changes, scoliotic deformities, size of annulotomies, amount of rhBMP used, and placement in cage and disk space or only in cage.

As heterotopic ossification is often interpreted as postoperative fibrous or granulation tissue on magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography is needed to fully appreciate heterotopic bone.

3. In 36 (95%) of the 38 cases, the initial interpretation of HO on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was of tissue other than bone, such as fibrous tissue, granulation tissue, recurrent disk herniation, or postoperative changes. However, this tissue was later determined to be bone from HO complications, which we confirmed with CT in all 38 cases. It is important to note that HO on MRI (Figures 2A, 2B) was initially interpreted by a radiologist as fibrous tissue, but same-level CT of the same case (Figures 3A, 3B) showed clear HO.

Computed tomography shows pseudo-pedicle-like heterotopic ossification of varying extent. Bone arising from the annulotomy site for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion was universally present in all pateints.

4. The radiculopathy symptoms caused by HO were independent of the amount of rhBMP-2 used in TLIF. Of the 38 patients, 19 had 1 rhBMP-2 sponge placed in the cage, 12 had a small kit sponge (1.05 mg), 5 had 1 sponge placed in the cage and 1 sponge placed directly in the disk space before cage placement (no notation of precise size or amount of rhBMP-2), and 2 had 1 sponge placed in the cage (no notation of rhBMP-2 amount). The data showed that HO can occur with even a small amount of rhBMP-2.

Continue to: Bone formation with rhBMP-2...

 

 

Bone formation with rhBMP-2 is robust and beneficial, but HO-related complications are significant, and identifiable on assessment of radiculopathy symptoms and CT characteristics.

DISCUSSION

We identified 38 patients with a recognizable and consistent pattern of complications of off-label use of rhBMP-2 in TLIF performed at our institution between 2002 and 2015. This pattern included consistent radiculopathy symptoms with corresponding HO at the annulotomy site in continuity with bone in the disk space or ectopic bone forming a distinctive shell around the thecal sac or nerve roots, as well as showing a distinct pseudo-pedicle pattern encompassing nerve roots and the thecal sac. Our finding differs from other findings of similar complication characteristics, but with much larger variations without consistency within the patient population.19,20,22,24 Specifically, previous studies found an association between off-label rhBMP-2 use in the posterior spine and radiculopathy with and without neuroforaminal HO. However, our study found consistent radiculopathy symptoms with pseudo-pedicle-like HO complications in all its 38 patients a mean (SD) of 3.8 (1.0) months after surgery.

In this study, consistent radiculopathy symptoms with pseudo-pedicle-like HO complications were independent of the amount of rhBMP-2 used, as some complications occurred with use of small pack rhBMP-2 with TLIF. It is well understood that high doses of rhBMP-2 may be required to improve fusion rates, but to our knowledge an optimal dosing strategy for TLIF has not been reported, particularly with respect to potential complications.8,20,31-33 For anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery, the FDA-approved use of rhBMP-2 appears to have a significantly decreased risk of neuroforaminal HO complications. This may be attributable to the protective presence of the intact posterior annulus and longitudinal ligament for this procedure.20,33 For TLIF, it has been suggested that rhBMP-2 should be placed only along the anterior annulus with a posterior strut and morselized bone allograft barricade,33 and that fibrin glue should be used to limit BMP diffusion through the annulotomy site31 to prevent this complication.

Our study results suggest that radiculopathy symptoms with pseudo-pedicle-like HO complications appear to be caused by leakage of rhBMP-2 from the disk space through the annulotomy site. This was often initially interpreted incorrectly on MRI in the first year after surgery as being fibrous or granulation tissue, or even postoperative changes that the heterotopic tissue was bone was obvious only on CT. Even then the tissue may be incorrectly identified, as the encasing nerve roots in bone are similar to the scar tissue having no compressive effect. HO may compress, but it also has an inflammatory component that the scars lack. Additionally, the HO from the disk space, caused by leakage of the BMP placed in or around the fusion cage, can create a pseudo-pedicle of varying size and extent. This was present in all 38 of our cases.

This retrospective case series had its limitations. Its clinical and radiographic findings were not blinded. Confounding variables cannot be isolated for causal relationships, if any, to the complication in a case series such as this.

Bone formation with rhBMP-2 is robust and beneficial, but HO-related complications are significant, and identifiable on assessment of radiculopathy symptoms and CT characteristics.

ABSTRACT

We conducted a study to determine the common characteristics of patients who developed radiculopathy symptoms and corresponding heterotopic ossification (HO) from transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF) using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2). HO can arise from a disk space with rhBMP-2 use in TLIF. Formation of bone around nerve roots or the thecal sac can cause a radiculopathy with a consistent pattern of symptoms.

We identified 38 patients (26 males, 12 females) with a mean (SD) age of 50.8 (7.5) years who developed radiculopathy symptoms and corresponding HO from TLIF with rhBMP-2 in the disk space between 2002 and 2015. To document this complication and improve its recognition, we recorded common patterns of symptom development and radiologic findings: specifically, time from implantation of rhBMP-2 to symptom development, consistency with side of TLIF placement, and radiologic findings.

Radicular pain generally developed a mean (SD) of 3.8 (1.0) months after TLIF with rhBMP-2. Development of radiculopathy symptoms corresponded to consistent “pseudo-pedicle”-like HO. In all 38 patients, HO arising from the annulotomy site showed a distinct pseudo-pedicle pattern encompassing nerve roots and the thecal sac. In addition, development of radiculopathy symptoms and corresponding HO appear to be independent of amount of rhBMP-2. HO resulting from TLIF with rhBMP-2 in the disk space is a pain generator and a recognizable complication that can be diagnosed by assessment of symptoms and computed tomography characteristics.

Continue to: Bone morphogenetic proteins...

 

 

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), first isolated by Urist in 19641, are a family of growth factors that stimulate the cascade of bone formation. Recombinant human BMP (rhBMP), specifically rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7 (also known as osteogenic protein 1 [OP-1]), was developed in the 1990s after the advent of gene splicing. Then, in 2002, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved use of rhBMP to stimulate fusion in the human spine. Specifically, rhBMP-2 (Medtronic) was approved for use in combination with a specific brand of interbody cage in 1-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.2 Over the past decade, off-label use of rhBMP-2 to achieve osseous union has increased dramatically, particularly in spinal surgery: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and posterolateral lumbar fusion.3-9 However, this widespread off-label use for posterior spinal fusion began despite FDA data indicating that specific complications were underreported in the peer-reviewed literature.10,11 Although rhBMP-2 is very effective in increasing osteoblast formation and improving osteogenesis and subsequent bone healing in spinal surgery,12,13 its use in TLIF resulted in significant adverse side effects, including radiculopathy with and without neuroforaminal heterotopic ossification (HO); 14-24 complications in the FDA studies; 14,22,25-27 and osteolysis causing intervertebral cage subsidence, inflammatory radiculitis, genitourinary complications, infections, possible systemic effects, and significant HO complications.10,28-30 Of these, HO complications involved rhBMP leakage through the annulotomy to the disk space that led to HO. Specifically, rhBMP leaked directly out of the disk space and formed a pillar of bone that encased the nerve roots and dura, which led to occlusion of the foramen and symptoms of radiculopathy.10,28-30

Despite this frequent finding of HO in the intervertebral space outside the target fusion area, use of rhBMP-2 with intervertebral cages increased so rapidly that rhBMP-2 was used more often than autologous bone.5,11,17,31 In this study, we reviewed the common characteristics of patients who developed HO and subsequent radiculopathy from TLIF with rhBMP.

METHODS

After this study received Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed cases of radiculopathy symptoms that developed after TLIF with rhBMP between January 2002 and January 2015. During this period, 38 patients (26 males, 12 females) with a mean (SD) age of 50.8 (7.5) years and radiculopathy symptoms arising from TLIF with rhBMP-2 were identified to determine commonalities and defining characteristics that will help facilitate diagnosis.

Inclusion criteria were computed tomography (CT)–documented HO arising from the TLIF annulotomy site in continuity with bone in the disk space or ectopic bone forming a distinctive shell with contouring around the thecal sac or nerve roots, as well as recurrence or initial occurrence of radiculopathy with signs and symptoms corresponding to the CT site of aberrant bone growth in terms of laterality and particular nerve root(s) involved. Exclusion criteria were malplacement of interbody cage or pedicle screws, disk herniation, systemic neuropathic disease, and new or unresolved radiculopathy immediately after index surgery.

To improve recognition of this complication, we also documented the amount of BMP used, common patterns of radiculopathy symptom development, and radiologic findings. Type and timing of radiculopathy symptom onset and consistency with side of TLIF placement were documented as well. Radiculopathy symptoms included shooting pain in the legs, incontinence, sexual dysfunction, and severe paralysis. Radiologic findings were specific to bone formation from the disk space (detected with CT).

Continue to: RESULTS

 

 

RESULTS

All 38 selected patients had radiculopathy symptoms from HO out of the intervertebral space. The Table lists the patients’ overall characteristics. The left side had the most radiculopathy symptoms (31/38 patients), followed by the right side (5/38) and both sides (2/38). Radiculopathy symptoms began a mean (SD) of 3.8 (1.0) months (range, 2-6 months) after index surgery. The 38 patients had 4 characteristics in common:

Table. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2: Onset Time for Radiculopathy Symptoms, Surgery Level, Side of Pseudo-Pedicle Bone Formation, and Subsequent Complications

PtSympton Onset, moSurgery Level(s)Side(s)Complication(s)
13L3-L5 (2)BothRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, urine
23L4-L5 (2)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
34L5-S1 (1)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
45L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
54L4-S1 (2)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, subsidence
65L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
74L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
84L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
93L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
102L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
112L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, subsidence, neurologic
126L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
133L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, neurologic
142L2-L3 (1)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
154L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
163L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
173L2-L3, L4-L5 (2)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
183L4-L5, L2-L3 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, nonunion
194L4-L5 (1)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
205L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
215L5-S1 (1)RRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
223L3-L4, L5-S1 (2)BothRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
234L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
246L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
254L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
263L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle, urine, bowel
274L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
284L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
296L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
303L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
313L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
324L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
333L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
344L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
354L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
363L5-S1 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
374L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle
384L4-L5 (1)LRadiculopathy, pseudo-pedicle

1. Bone growing out of the annulotomy site for TLIF cage placement was present and in continuity with the disk space in 33 (87%) of the 38 cases. In the other 5 cases (13%), HO was present around the neural tissue, but not necessarily in continuity with the disk space. This bone appeared ectopic and not osteophytic and facet-related, as it formed a shell around either the nerve root or the thecal sac, contouring to the structure.

Magnetic resonance imaging shows that recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 used in the disk space during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion can leak out of the space and cause heterotopic bone formation around nerve roots and the thecal sac

2. The common, novel finding on CT was a “pseudo-pedicle” (Figures 1A, 1B), which appeared as ectopic growth from the disk space—a solid piece of bone in the same direction as the anatomical pedicle. Confusing similarity to the anatomical pedicle is present on axial cuts and during surgery. The pseudo-pedicle varied in thickness and extent out of the disk space, but was always presented as a bar of bone arising from the annulotomy site. After arising from the disk space, the HO could disperse in any direction, further calcifying neural structures or the facet joints above or below. There was no apparent distinguishable repeating pattern, given the variable nature of arthritic facet changes, scoliotic deformities, size of annulotomies, amount of rhBMP used, and placement in cage and disk space or only in cage.

As heterotopic ossification is often interpreted as postoperative fibrous or granulation tissue on magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography is needed to fully appreciate heterotopic bone.

3. In 36 (95%) of the 38 cases, the initial interpretation of HO on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was of tissue other than bone, such as fibrous tissue, granulation tissue, recurrent disk herniation, or postoperative changes. However, this tissue was later determined to be bone from HO complications, which we confirmed with CT in all 38 cases. It is important to note that HO on MRI (Figures 2A, 2B) was initially interpreted by a radiologist as fibrous tissue, but same-level CT of the same case (Figures 3A, 3B) showed clear HO.

Computed tomography shows pseudo-pedicle-like heterotopic ossification of varying extent. Bone arising from the annulotomy site for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion was universally present in all pateints.

4. The radiculopathy symptoms caused by HO were independent of the amount of rhBMP-2 used in TLIF. Of the 38 patients, 19 had 1 rhBMP-2 sponge placed in the cage, 12 had a small kit sponge (1.05 mg), 5 had 1 sponge placed in the cage and 1 sponge placed directly in the disk space before cage placement (no notation of precise size or amount of rhBMP-2), and 2 had 1 sponge placed in the cage (no notation of rhBMP-2 amount). The data showed that HO can occur with even a small amount of rhBMP-2.

Continue to: Bone formation with rhBMP-2...

 

 

Bone formation with rhBMP-2 is robust and beneficial, but HO-related complications are significant, and identifiable on assessment of radiculopathy symptoms and CT characteristics.

DISCUSSION

We identified 38 patients with a recognizable and consistent pattern of complications of off-label use of rhBMP-2 in TLIF performed at our institution between 2002 and 2015. This pattern included consistent radiculopathy symptoms with corresponding HO at the annulotomy site in continuity with bone in the disk space or ectopic bone forming a distinctive shell around the thecal sac or nerve roots, as well as showing a distinct pseudo-pedicle pattern encompassing nerve roots and the thecal sac. Our finding differs from other findings of similar complication characteristics, but with much larger variations without consistency within the patient population.19,20,22,24 Specifically, previous studies found an association between off-label rhBMP-2 use in the posterior spine and radiculopathy with and without neuroforaminal HO. However, our study found consistent radiculopathy symptoms with pseudo-pedicle-like HO complications in all its 38 patients a mean (SD) of 3.8 (1.0) months after surgery.

In this study, consistent radiculopathy symptoms with pseudo-pedicle-like HO complications were independent of the amount of rhBMP-2 used, as some complications occurred with use of small pack rhBMP-2 with TLIF. It is well understood that high doses of rhBMP-2 may be required to improve fusion rates, but to our knowledge an optimal dosing strategy for TLIF has not been reported, particularly with respect to potential complications.8,20,31-33 For anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery, the FDA-approved use of rhBMP-2 appears to have a significantly decreased risk of neuroforaminal HO complications. This may be attributable to the protective presence of the intact posterior annulus and longitudinal ligament for this procedure.20,33 For TLIF, it has been suggested that rhBMP-2 should be placed only along the anterior annulus with a posterior strut and morselized bone allograft barricade,33 and that fibrin glue should be used to limit BMP diffusion through the annulotomy site31 to prevent this complication.

Our study results suggest that radiculopathy symptoms with pseudo-pedicle-like HO complications appear to be caused by leakage of rhBMP-2 from the disk space through the annulotomy site. This was often initially interpreted incorrectly on MRI in the first year after surgery as being fibrous or granulation tissue, or even postoperative changes that the heterotopic tissue was bone was obvious only on CT. Even then the tissue may be incorrectly identified, as the encasing nerve roots in bone are similar to the scar tissue having no compressive effect. HO may compress, but it also has an inflammatory component that the scars lack. Additionally, the HO from the disk space, caused by leakage of the BMP placed in or around the fusion cage, can create a pseudo-pedicle of varying size and extent. This was present in all 38 of our cases.

This retrospective case series had its limitations. Its clinical and radiographic findings were not blinded. Confounding variables cannot be isolated for causal relationships, if any, to the complication in a case series such as this.

Bone formation with rhBMP-2 is robust and beneficial, but HO-related complications are significant, and identifiable on assessment of radiculopathy symptoms and CT characteristics.

References

1. Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science. 1965;150(3698):893-899.

2. Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Schuler TC, Kleeman TJ, Zdeblick TA. Six-year outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis with use of interbody fusion cages and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(5):1181-1189.

3. Boden SD, Kang J, Sandhu H, Heller JG. Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 to achieve posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in humans: a prospective, randomized clinical pilot trial: 2002 Volvo award in clinical studies. Spine. 2002;27(23):2662-2673.

4. Boden SD, Zdeblick TA, Sandhu HS, Heim SE. The use of rhBMP-2 in interbody fusion cages. Definitive evidence of osteoinduction in humans: a preliminary report. Spine. 2000;25(3):376-381.

5. Haid RW Jr, Branch CL Jr, Alexander JT, Burkus JK. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages. Spine J. 2004;4(5):527-538.

6. Meisel HJ, Schnöring M, Hohaus C, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(12):1735-1744.

7. Mummaneni PV, Pan J, Haid RW, Rodts GE. Contribution of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 to the rapid creation of interbody fusion when used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary report. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1(1):19-23.

8. Shimer AL, Oner FC, Vaccaro AR. Spinal reconstruction and bone morphogenetic proteins: open questions. Injury. 2009;40(suppl 3):S32-S38.

9. Slosar PJ, Josey R, Reynolds J. Accelerating lumbar fusions by combining rhBMP-2 with allograft bone: a prospective analysis of interbody fusion rates and clinical outcomes. Spine J. 2007;7(3):301-307.

10. Knox JB, Dai JM 3rd, Orchowski J. Osteolysis in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenetic protein-2. Spine. 2011;36(8):672-676.

11. Owens K, Glassman SD, Howard JM, Djurasovic M, Witten JL, Carreon LY. Perioperative complications with rhBMP-2 in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(4):612-617.

12. Mindea SA, Shih P, Song JK. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2-induced radiculitis in elective minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: a series review. Spine. 2009;34(14):1480-1484.

13. Yoon ST, Park JS, Kim KS, et al. ISSLS prize winner: LMP-1 upregulates intervertebral disc cell production of proteoglycans and BMPs in vitro and in vivo. Spine. 2004;29(23):2603-2611.

14. Cahill KS, Chi JH, Day A, Claus EB. Prevalence, complications, and hospital charges associated with use of bone-morphogenetic proteins in spinal fusion procedures. JAMA. 2009;302(1):58-66.

15. Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Weiner BK. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J. 2011;11(6):471-491.

16. Chen NF, Smith ZA, Stiner E, Armin S, Sheikh H, Khoo LT. Symptomatic ectopic bone formation after off-label use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;12(1):40-46.

17. Joseph V, Rampersaud YR. Heterotopic bone formation with the use of rhBMP2 in posterior minimal access interbody fusion: a CT analysis. Spine. 2007;32(25):2885-2890.

18. McClellan JW, Mulconrey DS, Forbes RJ, Fullmer N. Vertebral bone resorption after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2). J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19(7):483-486.

19. Mroz TE, Wang JC, Hashimoto R, Norvell DC. Complications related to osteobiologics use in spine surgery: a systematic review. Spine. 2010;35(9 suppl):S86-S104.

20. Muchow RD, Hsu WK, Anderson PA. Histopathologic inflammatory response induced by recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 causing radiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2010;10(9):e1-e6.

21. Ong KL, Villarraga ML, Lau E, Carreon LY, Kurtz SM, Glassman SD. Off-label use of bone morphogenetic proteins in the United States using administrative data. Spine. 2010;35(19):1794-1800.

22. Rihn JA, Patel R, Makda J, et al. Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2009;9(8):623-629.

23. Vaidya R, Sethi A, Bartol S, Jacobson M, Coe C, Craig JG. Complications in the use of rhBMP-2 in PEEK cages for interbody spinal fusions. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21(8):557-562.

24. Wong DA, Kumar A, Jatana S, Ghiselli G, Wong K. Neurologic impairment from ectopic bone in the lumbar canal: a potential complication of off-label PLIF/TLIF use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2). Spine J. 2008;8(6):1011-1018.

25. Delawi D, Dhert WJ, Rillardon L, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of osteogenic protein-1 in instrumented posterolateral fusions: report on safety and feasibility. Spine. 2010;35(12):1185-1191.

26. Vaccaro AR, Patel T, Fischgrund J, et al. A pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of OP-1 putty (rhBMP-7) as a replacement for iliac crest autograft in posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2004;29(17):1885-1892.

27. Vaidya R, Weir R, Sethi A, Meisterling S, Hakeos W, Wybo CD. Interbody fusion with allograft and rhBMP-2 leads to consistent fusion but early subsidence. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(3):342-345.

28. Glassman SD, Howard J, Dimar J, Sweet A, Wilson G, Carreon L. Complications with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 in posterolateral spine fusion: a consecutive series of 1037 cases. Spine. 2011;36(22):1849-1854.

29. Helgeson MD, Lehman RA Jr, Patzkowski JC, Dmitriev AE, Rosner MK, Mack AW. Adjacent vertebral body osteolysis with bone morphogenetic protein use in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2011;11(6):507-510.

30. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. Adjuncts in posterior lumbar spine fusion: comparison of complications and efficacy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(8):1105-1110.

31. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Nelson EL, Bulsara KR, Favors M, Thramann J. Safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and intervertebral recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3(6):436-443.

32. Patel VV, Zhao L, Wong P, et al. Controlling bone morphogenetic protein diffusion and bone morphogenetic protein-stimulated bone growth using fibrin glue. Spine. 2006;31(11):1201-1206.

33. Zhang H, Sucato DJ, Welch RD. Recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2-enhanced anterior spine fusion without bone encroachment into the spinal canal: a histomorphometric study in a thoracoscopically instrumented porcine model. Spine. 2005;30(5):512-518.

References

1. Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science. 1965;150(3698):893-899.

2. Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Schuler TC, Kleeman TJ, Zdeblick TA. Six-year outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis with use of interbody fusion cages and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(5):1181-1189.

3. Boden SD, Kang J, Sandhu H, Heller JG. Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 to achieve posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in humans: a prospective, randomized clinical pilot trial: 2002 Volvo award in clinical studies. Spine. 2002;27(23):2662-2673.

4. Boden SD, Zdeblick TA, Sandhu HS, Heim SE. The use of rhBMP-2 in interbody fusion cages. Definitive evidence of osteoinduction in humans: a preliminary report. Spine. 2000;25(3):376-381.

5. Haid RW Jr, Branch CL Jr, Alexander JT, Burkus JK. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages. Spine J. 2004;4(5):527-538.

6. Meisel HJ, Schnöring M, Hohaus C, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(12):1735-1744.

7. Mummaneni PV, Pan J, Haid RW, Rodts GE. Contribution of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 to the rapid creation of interbody fusion when used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary report. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1(1):19-23.

8. Shimer AL, Oner FC, Vaccaro AR. Spinal reconstruction and bone morphogenetic proteins: open questions. Injury. 2009;40(suppl 3):S32-S38.

9. Slosar PJ, Josey R, Reynolds J. Accelerating lumbar fusions by combining rhBMP-2 with allograft bone: a prospective analysis of interbody fusion rates and clinical outcomes. Spine J. 2007;7(3):301-307.

10. Knox JB, Dai JM 3rd, Orchowski J. Osteolysis in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenetic protein-2. Spine. 2011;36(8):672-676.

11. Owens K, Glassman SD, Howard JM, Djurasovic M, Witten JL, Carreon LY. Perioperative complications with rhBMP-2 in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(4):612-617.

12. Mindea SA, Shih P, Song JK. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2-induced radiculitis in elective minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: a series review. Spine. 2009;34(14):1480-1484.

13. Yoon ST, Park JS, Kim KS, et al. ISSLS prize winner: LMP-1 upregulates intervertebral disc cell production of proteoglycans and BMPs in vitro and in vivo. Spine. 2004;29(23):2603-2611.

14. Cahill KS, Chi JH, Day A, Claus EB. Prevalence, complications, and hospital charges associated with use of bone-morphogenetic proteins in spinal fusion procedures. JAMA. 2009;302(1):58-66.

15. Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Weiner BK. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J. 2011;11(6):471-491.

16. Chen NF, Smith ZA, Stiner E, Armin S, Sheikh H, Khoo LT. Symptomatic ectopic bone formation after off-label use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;12(1):40-46.

17. Joseph V, Rampersaud YR. Heterotopic bone formation with the use of rhBMP2 in posterior minimal access interbody fusion: a CT analysis. Spine. 2007;32(25):2885-2890.

18. McClellan JW, Mulconrey DS, Forbes RJ, Fullmer N. Vertebral bone resorption after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2). J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19(7):483-486.

19. Mroz TE, Wang JC, Hashimoto R, Norvell DC. Complications related to osteobiologics use in spine surgery: a systematic review. Spine. 2010;35(9 suppl):S86-S104.

20. Muchow RD, Hsu WK, Anderson PA. Histopathologic inflammatory response induced by recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 causing radiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2010;10(9):e1-e6.

21. Ong KL, Villarraga ML, Lau E, Carreon LY, Kurtz SM, Glassman SD. Off-label use of bone morphogenetic proteins in the United States using administrative data. Spine. 2010;35(19):1794-1800.

22. Rihn JA, Patel R, Makda J, et al. Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2009;9(8):623-629.

23. Vaidya R, Sethi A, Bartol S, Jacobson M, Coe C, Craig JG. Complications in the use of rhBMP-2 in PEEK cages for interbody spinal fusions. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21(8):557-562.

24. Wong DA, Kumar A, Jatana S, Ghiselli G, Wong K. Neurologic impairment from ectopic bone in the lumbar canal: a potential complication of off-label PLIF/TLIF use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2). Spine J. 2008;8(6):1011-1018.

25. Delawi D, Dhert WJ, Rillardon L, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of osteogenic protein-1 in instrumented posterolateral fusions: report on safety and feasibility. Spine. 2010;35(12):1185-1191.

26. Vaccaro AR, Patel T, Fischgrund J, et al. A pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of OP-1 putty (rhBMP-7) as a replacement for iliac crest autograft in posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2004;29(17):1885-1892.

27. Vaidya R, Weir R, Sethi A, Meisterling S, Hakeos W, Wybo CD. Interbody fusion with allograft and rhBMP-2 leads to consistent fusion but early subsidence. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(3):342-345.

28. Glassman SD, Howard J, Dimar J, Sweet A, Wilson G, Carreon L. Complications with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 in posterolateral spine fusion: a consecutive series of 1037 cases. Spine. 2011;36(22):1849-1854.

29. Helgeson MD, Lehman RA Jr, Patzkowski JC, Dmitriev AE, Rosner MK, Mack AW. Adjacent vertebral body osteolysis with bone morphogenetic protein use in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2011;11(6):507-510.

30. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL. Adjuncts in posterior lumbar spine fusion: comparison of complications and efficacy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(8):1105-1110.

31. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Nelson EL, Bulsara KR, Favors M, Thramann J. Safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and intervertebral recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3(6):436-443.

32. Patel VV, Zhao L, Wong P, et al. Controlling bone morphogenetic protein diffusion and bone morphogenetic protein-stimulated bone growth using fibrin glue. Spine. 2006;31(11):1201-1206.

33. Zhang H, Sucato DJ, Welch RD. Recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2-enhanced anterior spine fusion without bone encroachment into the spinal canal: a histomorphometric study in a thoracoscopically instrumented porcine model. Spine. 2005;30(5):512-518.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Pseudo-Pedicle Heterotopic Ossification From Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages
Display Headline
Pseudo-Pedicle Heterotopic Ossification From Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (rhBMP-2) in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages
Sections
Inside the Article

TAKE-HOME POINTS

  • Use of rhBMP-2 in TLIF cages can result in HO out of the cage into the spinal canal.
  • HO from rhBMP-2 in TLIF cages can result in a radiculopathy from compression or inflammatory reaction.
  • HO out of the cage into the spinal canal resulting from use of rhBMP-2 in TLIF cages can be adequately diagnosed only with CT.
  • HO can appear as a pedicle or pseudo-pedicle.
  • Consider potential HO when using rhBMP-2 in TLIF cages.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Tough patient cases from 2017

Article Type
Changed

 

AGA’s member-only online networking platform, the AGA Community, was the hub for clinical case scenarios in 2017. About 100 deidentified patient cases were submitted to the forum, generating over 475 private and public responses from your peers.

Here is a summary of the three cases that sparked the most discussion among AGA members. You can view all discussions in the forum at community.gastro.org/discussions.
 

#3 “Esophageal hyperkeratosis” (February 2017)

Patient scenario: Patient was having dysphagia. EGD showed circumferential thickening of esophageal lining in the lower half of the esophagus causing partial obstruction; lumen diameter was 7 mm (scope was able to pass with mild resistance). Human papillomavirus (HPV) stain was negative. Multiple biopsies were negative for malignancy, so the practice did not recommend esophagectomy and believed the symptoms were consistent with hyperkeratosis of esophagus. Endoscopic cryotherapy was being considered.

Question: Has anyone come across a case like this?
 

#2 Thickened stomach (May 2017)

Patient scenario: A 74-year-old male presented early satiety, anemia, and dyspepsia. EGD showed diffuse moderate erythema of the stomach sparing the antrum, and two small superficial duodenal ulcers. Biopsies showed mild chronic inflammation, duodenitis, and negative for H. pylori. The patient was started on a proton pump inhibitor (PPI).

One month later, patient reported early satiety, a 40-pound weight loss over last few months, nausea and vomiting, with minimal improvement while using the PPI. A CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis showed diffuse thickening of the stomach, but was otherwise unremarkable.

One month after that, a repeated EGD showed moderate erythema with enlarged gastric folds, cobblestone of mucosa, again all sparing the antrum. The colonoscopy results were unremarkable. Gastric biopsies showed mild chronic inflammation. Endoscopic ultrasound showed a thickened gastric wall to 14 mm (normal 5 mm) and fine needle aspiration showed normal gastric foveolar epithelium. The patient received a PEG-J tube to maintain nutrition, and then had a laparoscopic assisted full thickness gastric biopsy, which showed benign hypertrophic gastric smooth muscle tissue.

Serum protein electrophoresis and urine protein electrophoresis test results were normal, with total IgG and IgA normal, total IgM low at 31 (normal 60-265), albumin low, other proteins normal, and immunofixation negative. Prealbumin was low at 5 (normal 15-45). Albumin initially normal and over a couple of days low at 2.6 (normal 3.4-5.0). Total protein initially normal and over a couple of days was low at 6.3 (normal 6.8-8.8). Gastrin level was insignificant on the PPI, in the 400s. Zollinger Ellison gastrin not impressive, and the patient is HIV negative.

Question: With a negative biopsy and other test results, Menetrier’s, malignancy, sarcoidosis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, and amyloidosis can be ruled out. What could the diagnosis be?
 

#1 IBD and prior hep B (July 2017)

Patient scenario: A 53-year-old male diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) at outside hospital after presenting with abdominal pain, perforation of sigmoid colon. He underwent total colectomy with ileostomy, which showed he has remnant rectum, and the path of colon showed UC with sigmoid stricture. There is no malignancy or dysplasia, and the terminal ileum included in the resection was normal. He had complicated post-op course with enterocutaneous fistula.

He underwent takedown of ileostomy, small bowel resection and ileostomy revision. Path showed segmental small bowel showing viable mucosa with acute serositis and serial adhesions. Ileal mucosa was normal. Rectum has inflammation, and he has symptoms of mucus, urgency, and blood. He had rectal burning and did not tolerate CANASA® suppository. He did not seem to improve with hydrocortisone suppository either.

In trying to decipher next treatment step, hepatitis panel was done, which showed positive hepatitis B core antibody (IgM). Hepatitis B viral load was undetectable. Hepatitis B surface antibody test (HBsAb) quantitative was 6 (not quite the range for immunity of greater than 10). Hepatitis B “e” antigen (HBeAg) negative and hepatitis B “e” antibody (HBeAb) positive. This patient’s hep B core total was positive and hep B surface antigen was negative.

Question: How would you treat this patient? Would you use Imuran?

Share your difficult patient case for the GI community to help you solve at community.gastro.org/quickpost.
 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

AGA’s member-only online networking platform, the AGA Community, was the hub for clinical case scenarios in 2017. About 100 deidentified patient cases were submitted to the forum, generating over 475 private and public responses from your peers.

Here is a summary of the three cases that sparked the most discussion among AGA members. You can view all discussions in the forum at community.gastro.org/discussions.
 

#3 “Esophageal hyperkeratosis” (February 2017)

Patient scenario: Patient was having dysphagia. EGD showed circumferential thickening of esophageal lining in the lower half of the esophagus causing partial obstruction; lumen diameter was 7 mm (scope was able to pass with mild resistance). Human papillomavirus (HPV) stain was negative. Multiple biopsies were negative for malignancy, so the practice did not recommend esophagectomy and believed the symptoms were consistent with hyperkeratosis of esophagus. Endoscopic cryotherapy was being considered.

Question: Has anyone come across a case like this?
 

#2 Thickened stomach (May 2017)

Patient scenario: A 74-year-old male presented early satiety, anemia, and dyspepsia. EGD showed diffuse moderate erythema of the stomach sparing the antrum, and two small superficial duodenal ulcers. Biopsies showed mild chronic inflammation, duodenitis, and negative for H. pylori. The patient was started on a proton pump inhibitor (PPI).

One month later, patient reported early satiety, a 40-pound weight loss over last few months, nausea and vomiting, with minimal improvement while using the PPI. A CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis showed diffuse thickening of the stomach, but was otherwise unremarkable.

One month after that, a repeated EGD showed moderate erythema with enlarged gastric folds, cobblestone of mucosa, again all sparing the antrum. The colonoscopy results were unremarkable. Gastric biopsies showed mild chronic inflammation. Endoscopic ultrasound showed a thickened gastric wall to 14 mm (normal 5 mm) and fine needle aspiration showed normal gastric foveolar epithelium. The patient received a PEG-J tube to maintain nutrition, and then had a laparoscopic assisted full thickness gastric biopsy, which showed benign hypertrophic gastric smooth muscle tissue.

Serum protein electrophoresis and urine protein electrophoresis test results were normal, with total IgG and IgA normal, total IgM low at 31 (normal 60-265), albumin low, other proteins normal, and immunofixation negative. Prealbumin was low at 5 (normal 15-45). Albumin initially normal and over a couple of days low at 2.6 (normal 3.4-5.0). Total protein initially normal and over a couple of days was low at 6.3 (normal 6.8-8.8). Gastrin level was insignificant on the PPI, in the 400s. Zollinger Ellison gastrin not impressive, and the patient is HIV negative.

Question: With a negative biopsy and other test results, Menetrier’s, malignancy, sarcoidosis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, and amyloidosis can be ruled out. What could the diagnosis be?
 

#1 IBD and prior hep B (July 2017)

Patient scenario: A 53-year-old male diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) at outside hospital after presenting with abdominal pain, perforation of sigmoid colon. He underwent total colectomy with ileostomy, which showed he has remnant rectum, and the path of colon showed UC with sigmoid stricture. There is no malignancy or dysplasia, and the terminal ileum included in the resection was normal. He had complicated post-op course with enterocutaneous fistula.

He underwent takedown of ileostomy, small bowel resection and ileostomy revision. Path showed segmental small bowel showing viable mucosa with acute serositis and serial adhesions. Ileal mucosa was normal. Rectum has inflammation, and he has symptoms of mucus, urgency, and blood. He had rectal burning and did not tolerate CANASA® suppository. He did not seem to improve with hydrocortisone suppository either.

In trying to decipher next treatment step, hepatitis panel was done, which showed positive hepatitis B core antibody (IgM). Hepatitis B viral load was undetectable. Hepatitis B surface antibody test (HBsAb) quantitative was 6 (not quite the range for immunity of greater than 10). Hepatitis B “e” antigen (HBeAg) negative and hepatitis B “e” antibody (HBeAb) positive. This patient’s hep B core total was positive and hep B surface antigen was negative.

Question: How would you treat this patient? Would you use Imuran?

Share your difficult patient case for the GI community to help you solve at community.gastro.org/quickpost.
 

 

AGA’s member-only online networking platform, the AGA Community, was the hub for clinical case scenarios in 2017. About 100 deidentified patient cases were submitted to the forum, generating over 475 private and public responses from your peers.

Here is a summary of the three cases that sparked the most discussion among AGA members. You can view all discussions in the forum at community.gastro.org/discussions.
 

#3 “Esophageal hyperkeratosis” (February 2017)

Patient scenario: Patient was having dysphagia. EGD showed circumferential thickening of esophageal lining in the lower half of the esophagus causing partial obstruction; lumen diameter was 7 mm (scope was able to pass with mild resistance). Human papillomavirus (HPV) stain was negative. Multiple biopsies were negative for malignancy, so the practice did not recommend esophagectomy and believed the symptoms were consistent with hyperkeratosis of esophagus. Endoscopic cryotherapy was being considered.

Question: Has anyone come across a case like this?
 

#2 Thickened stomach (May 2017)

Patient scenario: A 74-year-old male presented early satiety, anemia, and dyspepsia. EGD showed diffuse moderate erythema of the stomach sparing the antrum, and two small superficial duodenal ulcers. Biopsies showed mild chronic inflammation, duodenitis, and negative for H. pylori. The patient was started on a proton pump inhibitor (PPI).

One month later, patient reported early satiety, a 40-pound weight loss over last few months, nausea and vomiting, with minimal improvement while using the PPI. A CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis showed diffuse thickening of the stomach, but was otherwise unremarkable.

One month after that, a repeated EGD showed moderate erythema with enlarged gastric folds, cobblestone of mucosa, again all sparing the antrum. The colonoscopy results were unremarkable. Gastric biopsies showed mild chronic inflammation. Endoscopic ultrasound showed a thickened gastric wall to 14 mm (normal 5 mm) and fine needle aspiration showed normal gastric foveolar epithelium. The patient received a PEG-J tube to maintain nutrition, and then had a laparoscopic assisted full thickness gastric biopsy, which showed benign hypertrophic gastric smooth muscle tissue.

Serum protein electrophoresis and urine protein electrophoresis test results were normal, with total IgG and IgA normal, total IgM low at 31 (normal 60-265), albumin low, other proteins normal, and immunofixation negative. Prealbumin was low at 5 (normal 15-45). Albumin initially normal and over a couple of days low at 2.6 (normal 3.4-5.0). Total protein initially normal and over a couple of days was low at 6.3 (normal 6.8-8.8). Gastrin level was insignificant on the PPI, in the 400s. Zollinger Ellison gastrin not impressive, and the patient is HIV negative.

Question: With a negative biopsy and other test results, Menetrier’s, malignancy, sarcoidosis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, and amyloidosis can be ruled out. What could the diagnosis be?
 

#1 IBD and prior hep B (July 2017)

Patient scenario: A 53-year-old male diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) at outside hospital after presenting with abdominal pain, perforation of sigmoid colon. He underwent total colectomy with ileostomy, which showed he has remnant rectum, and the path of colon showed UC with sigmoid stricture. There is no malignancy or dysplasia, and the terminal ileum included in the resection was normal. He had complicated post-op course with enterocutaneous fistula.

He underwent takedown of ileostomy, small bowel resection and ileostomy revision. Path showed segmental small bowel showing viable mucosa with acute serositis and serial adhesions. Ileal mucosa was normal. Rectum has inflammation, and he has symptoms of mucus, urgency, and blood. He had rectal burning and did not tolerate CANASA® suppository. He did not seem to improve with hydrocortisone suppository either.

In trying to decipher next treatment step, hepatitis panel was done, which showed positive hepatitis B core antibody (IgM). Hepatitis B viral load was undetectable. Hepatitis B surface antibody test (HBsAb) quantitative was 6 (not quite the range for immunity of greater than 10). Hepatitis B “e” antigen (HBeAg) negative and hepatitis B “e” antibody (HBeAb) positive. This patient’s hep B core total was positive and hep B surface antigen was negative.

Question: How would you treat this patient? Would you use Imuran?

Share your difficult patient case for the GI community to help you solve at community.gastro.org/quickpost.
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Insurance barriers should not hinder step therapy treatment for IBD

Article Type
Changed

As part of Crohn’s and Colitis Awareness Week 2017 (Dec. 1-7), AGA participated in a congressional briefing sponsored by Takeda and the California Life Sciences Association highlighting advances in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies, as well as the barriers that patients face in receiving proper treatment for managing their disease.

Physician perspective

Michael Weinstein, MD, representing AGA and the Digestive Health Physicians Association, discussed how treatment options have changed considerably since he began practicing in the 1980s when the only treatment options were immunosuppressive drugs or high-dose steroids that led to dangerous side effects. He highlighted the burden that physicians face with prior authorization practices, especially step therapy in which a patient is required to fail several therapies before being granted coverage to the preferred, physician-prescribed therapy. These insurance protocols can have dire effects on patient care and can be very disruptive to patients who may be so ill that they cannot work or go to school. Dr. Weinstein stated that the burden step therapy places on his practice requires him to have a full-time employee just to navigate the various insurance policies. Many small practices do not have the resources to handle these burdens. Read more from Dr. Weinstein in his op-ed from The Hill.

Patient perspective

Members of Congress and congressional staff heard compelling testimony from Kate Detwiler, an IBD patient who spoke of her family history of IBD, her experience with the disease, and how disruptive it has been to find the best provider and treatments to manage her disease. She and Dr. Weinstein both stressed the financial burdens that the disease puts on families and how limiting it can be to patients who are starting out in their careers or school.

Legislator perspective

Rep. Brad Weinstrup, R-OH, and Rep. Raul Ruiz, D-CA, addressed the briefing as the lead sponsors of HR 2077, the Restoring Patient’s Voice Act, which would provide patients and providers with a clear, equitable, and transparent appeals process when subject to step therapy protocols. Both Rep. Wenstrup and Rep. Ruiz are physicians and have seen the real-life consequences of these policies and their impact on patient care. Both representatives stressed that this is a bipartisan, commonsense solution to ensuring that patients have access to the care that they need when they need it.

AGA continues to advocate for support and passage of HR 2077 and thanks those members who have contacted their members of Congress to request their support. If you haven’t already, please call on your legislator to support this legislation. We will continue to work to garner additional support for the bill in this Congress.
 

Publications
Topics
Sections

As part of Crohn’s and Colitis Awareness Week 2017 (Dec. 1-7), AGA participated in a congressional briefing sponsored by Takeda and the California Life Sciences Association highlighting advances in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies, as well as the barriers that patients face in receiving proper treatment for managing their disease.

Physician perspective

Michael Weinstein, MD, representing AGA and the Digestive Health Physicians Association, discussed how treatment options have changed considerably since he began practicing in the 1980s when the only treatment options were immunosuppressive drugs or high-dose steroids that led to dangerous side effects. He highlighted the burden that physicians face with prior authorization practices, especially step therapy in which a patient is required to fail several therapies before being granted coverage to the preferred, physician-prescribed therapy. These insurance protocols can have dire effects on patient care and can be very disruptive to patients who may be so ill that they cannot work or go to school. Dr. Weinstein stated that the burden step therapy places on his practice requires him to have a full-time employee just to navigate the various insurance policies. Many small practices do not have the resources to handle these burdens. Read more from Dr. Weinstein in his op-ed from The Hill.

Patient perspective

Members of Congress and congressional staff heard compelling testimony from Kate Detwiler, an IBD patient who spoke of her family history of IBD, her experience with the disease, and how disruptive it has been to find the best provider and treatments to manage her disease. She and Dr. Weinstein both stressed the financial burdens that the disease puts on families and how limiting it can be to patients who are starting out in their careers or school.

Legislator perspective

Rep. Brad Weinstrup, R-OH, and Rep. Raul Ruiz, D-CA, addressed the briefing as the lead sponsors of HR 2077, the Restoring Patient’s Voice Act, which would provide patients and providers with a clear, equitable, and transparent appeals process when subject to step therapy protocols. Both Rep. Wenstrup and Rep. Ruiz are physicians and have seen the real-life consequences of these policies and their impact on patient care. Both representatives stressed that this is a bipartisan, commonsense solution to ensuring that patients have access to the care that they need when they need it.

AGA continues to advocate for support and passage of HR 2077 and thanks those members who have contacted their members of Congress to request their support. If you haven’t already, please call on your legislator to support this legislation. We will continue to work to garner additional support for the bill in this Congress.
 

As part of Crohn’s and Colitis Awareness Week 2017 (Dec. 1-7), AGA participated in a congressional briefing sponsored by Takeda and the California Life Sciences Association highlighting advances in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies, as well as the barriers that patients face in receiving proper treatment for managing their disease.

Physician perspective

Michael Weinstein, MD, representing AGA and the Digestive Health Physicians Association, discussed how treatment options have changed considerably since he began practicing in the 1980s when the only treatment options were immunosuppressive drugs or high-dose steroids that led to dangerous side effects. He highlighted the burden that physicians face with prior authorization practices, especially step therapy in which a patient is required to fail several therapies before being granted coverage to the preferred, physician-prescribed therapy. These insurance protocols can have dire effects on patient care and can be very disruptive to patients who may be so ill that they cannot work or go to school. Dr. Weinstein stated that the burden step therapy places on his practice requires him to have a full-time employee just to navigate the various insurance policies. Many small practices do not have the resources to handle these burdens. Read more from Dr. Weinstein in his op-ed from The Hill.

Patient perspective

Members of Congress and congressional staff heard compelling testimony from Kate Detwiler, an IBD patient who spoke of her family history of IBD, her experience with the disease, and how disruptive it has been to find the best provider and treatments to manage her disease. She and Dr. Weinstein both stressed the financial burdens that the disease puts on families and how limiting it can be to patients who are starting out in their careers or school.

Legislator perspective

Rep. Brad Weinstrup, R-OH, and Rep. Raul Ruiz, D-CA, addressed the briefing as the lead sponsors of HR 2077, the Restoring Patient’s Voice Act, which would provide patients and providers with a clear, equitable, and transparent appeals process when subject to step therapy protocols. Both Rep. Wenstrup and Rep. Ruiz are physicians and have seen the real-life consequences of these policies and their impact on patient care. Both representatives stressed that this is a bipartisan, commonsense solution to ensuring that patients have access to the care that they need when they need it.

AGA continues to advocate for support and passage of HR 2077 and thanks those members who have contacted their members of Congress to request their support. If you haven’t already, please call on your legislator to support this legislation. We will continue to work to garner additional support for the bill in this Congress.
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Registration open for DDW® 2018 and 2018 AGA Postgraduate Course

Article Type
Changed

Digestive Disease Week® (DDW), taking place in Washington, D.C., June 2-5, is the gold standard digestive disease meeting. Attend to learn monumental developments in science and medicine, meet leaders in the field, network with colleagues, and attain practical takeaways that you can implement in your career. Visit www.ddw.org to register, for general meeting information, details about the host city, and much more.

On the DDW website, you can also register for the AGA Postgraduate Course taking place during DDW, June 2-3. The 2018 AGA Postgraduate Course will provide a comprehensive look at the latest medical, surgical, and technological advances over the past 12 months that aim to keep you up to date in a field that is rapidly changing. Each presenter will turn abstract ideas into concrete action items that you can immediately implement in your practice. At the end of the course, the take-home points will be compiled and distributed with the eSyllabus.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Digestive Disease Week® (DDW), taking place in Washington, D.C., June 2-5, is the gold standard digestive disease meeting. Attend to learn monumental developments in science and medicine, meet leaders in the field, network with colleagues, and attain practical takeaways that you can implement in your career. Visit www.ddw.org to register, for general meeting information, details about the host city, and much more.

On the DDW website, you can also register for the AGA Postgraduate Course taking place during DDW, June 2-3. The 2018 AGA Postgraduate Course will provide a comprehensive look at the latest medical, surgical, and technological advances over the past 12 months that aim to keep you up to date in a field that is rapidly changing. Each presenter will turn abstract ideas into concrete action items that you can immediately implement in your practice. At the end of the course, the take-home points will be compiled and distributed with the eSyllabus.

Digestive Disease Week® (DDW), taking place in Washington, D.C., June 2-5, is the gold standard digestive disease meeting. Attend to learn monumental developments in science and medicine, meet leaders in the field, network with colleagues, and attain practical takeaways that you can implement in your career. Visit www.ddw.org to register, for general meeting information, details about the host city, and much more.

On the DDW website, you can also register for the AGA Postgraduate Course taking place during DDW, June 2-3. The 2018 AGA Postgraduate Course will provide a comprehensive look at the latest medical, surgical, and technological advances over the past 12 months that aim to keep you up to date in a field that is rapidly changing. Each presenter will turn abstract ideas into concrete action items that you can immediately implement in your practice. At the end of the course, the take-home points will be compiled and distributed with the eSyllabus.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Career Choices: Consultation-liaison psychiatry

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Career Choices: Consultation-liaison psychiatry
 

Editor’s note: Career Choices features a psychiatry resident/fellow interviewing a psychiatrist about why he (she) has chosen a specific career path. The goal is to inform trainees about the various psychiatric career options, and to give them a feel for the pros and cons of the various paths.

In this Career Choices, Cornel Stanciu, MD, talked with Peter Ganpat, MD, a consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatrist at Florida Hospital, where he provides guidance to various medical specialties on managing acute and chronic mental illness and substance use disorders. In addition, he also is the medical director for the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation service and staffs the inpatient unit.

 

Dr. Stanciu: What made you choose to become a C-L psychiatrist?

Dr. Ganpat: In my opinion, C-L is the most challenging area of psychiatry because not only are you thinking along the realms of a psychiatrist, but you’re also considering the viewpoint of the other subspecialties at the same time. For me, it brings together my medical background with my passion for psychiatry, and the patients I see daily allow for this incorporation.

Dr. Stanciu: How did your career path prepare you to become a C-L psychiatrist?

Dr. Ganpat: My career path was unique in that I completed a family medicine residency, and then immediately pursued training in psychiatry. Some may consider this as “overkill” for C-L, but as I’ve come to learn, this background grants me a level of understanding and confidence to step in when dealing with a complex case and lend a hand to the consulting physician beyond psychiatry. I do not feel a fellowship is required to practice C-L psychiatry. However, a psychosomatic fellowship will definitely provide the experience needed for this career path, and also will enable one to get a second American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology board certification.

Dr. Stanciu: What types of clinical conditions are you asked to provide input on managing, and how do you find working alongside other specialties?

Dr. Ganpat: I have been managing the full breadth of psychiatry, and in some cases I also provide medical management. Practicing in a metropolitan area with a high influx of tourists also brings in unique cultural cases. The level of respect that the other specialties give is impressive, because they have now seen what a C-L psychiatrist can do. Their performance scores also have improved as a result of my involvement. They greatly appreciate my efforts to shed light on cases or assist with the ever-challenging patient whose psychiatric complexity impedes care.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe a physician who is well-suited for such a setting?

Dr. Ganpat: The perfect candidate for this role should be capable of abstract as well as objective thinking. Having a good understanding of the other medical specialties and being able to solve problems is essential, because often it isn’t a clear-cut picture. It is imperative for the C-L psychiatrist to have sound teaching abilities and to be able to educate and communicate his (her) reasoning to the consulting team. It also is important to be well-versed in the psychiatric manifestations of various medical disorders and the psychiatric iatrogenesis of widely used prescription medications.

 

 

 

Dr. Stanciu: What challenges and surprises did you encounter when you first began to practice in this setting?

Dr. Ganpat: I think the largest challenge that I have encountered is the lack of resources. Substance abuse is a major problem here, especially opioids, and there are limited community resources for these patients, so they wind up in the hospital.

Dr. Stanciu: What are the disadvantages of C-L compared with other branches of psychiatry?

Dr. Ganpat: There isn’t much continuity of care with C-L psychiatry over the long run, but you do get to see patients improve during the duration of their hospitalization, which is very rewarding.

Dr. Stanciu: What is the typical reimbursement model for a C-L psychiatrist, and have you run into difficulties with insurance providers in this setting?

Dr. Ganpat: The reimbursement model varies from one system to the next. The common model is to bill just as any other hospital service would, based on the time or level of complexity. Obviously, the more consults you have, the more billing is generated. Most insurance carriers recognize this and so I haven’t had much of an issue with reimbursement, although some unexpected problems may arise.

Dr. Stanciu: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating a C-L career?

Dr. Ganpat: If you enjoy working in the hospital and interfacing with other specialties, then consider C-L psychiatry. It is challenging but intellectually stimulating. Make sure you request a C-L rotation during your training, because the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires it during a psychiatric residency.

Dr. Stanciu: What is the future outlook of C-L?

Dr. Ganpat: There is a shortage of C-L psychiatrists because >50% of practicing psychiatrists are in private practice in an outpatient setting. Because access to psychiatric care outside of a hospital setting is an issue, and much care is being driven to hospitals, there will be an increasing need for C-L psychiatrists.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Stanciu is an addiction psychiatry fellow, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. Dr. Ganpat is a consultation-liaison psychiatrist, Florida Hospital, Orlando, Florida, where he also is involved in the training of general psychiatry residents.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Issue
February 2018
Publications
Page Number
e1-e2
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Stanciu is an addiction psychiatry fellow, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. Dr. Ganpat is a consultation-liaison psychiatrist, Florida Hospital, Orlando, Florida, where he also is involved in the training of general psychiatry residents.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Stanciu is an addiction psychiatry fellow, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. Dr. Ganpat is a consultation-liaison psychiatrist, Florida Hospital, Orlando, Florida, where he also is involved in the training of general psychiatry residents.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Article PDF
Article PDF
 

Editor’s note: Career Choices features a psychiatry resident/fellow interviewing a psychiatrist about why he (she) has chosen a specific career path. The goal is to inform trainees about the various psychiatric career options, and to give them a feel for the pros and cons of the various paths.

In this Career Choices, Cornel Stanciu, MD, talked with Peter Ganpat, MD, a consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatrist at Florida Hospital, where he provides guidance to various medical specialties on managing acute and chronic mental illness and substance use disorders. In addition, he also is the medical director for the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation service and staffs the inpatient unit.

 

Dr. Stanciu: What made you choose to become a C-L psychiatrist?

Dr. Ganpat: In my opinion, C-L is the most challenging area of psychiatry because not only are you thinking along the realms of a psychiatrist, but you’re also considering the viewpoint of the other subspecialties at the same time. For me, it brings together my medical background with my passion for psychiatry, and the patients I see daily allow for this incorporation.

Dr. Stanciu: How did your career path prepare you to become a C-L psychiatrist?

Dr. Ganpat: My career path was unique in that I completed a family medicine residency, and then immediately pursued training in psychiatry. Some may consider this as “overkill” for C-L, but as I’ve come to learn, this background grants me a level of understanding and confidence to step in when dealing with a complex case and lend a hand to the consulting physician beyond psychiatry. I do not feel a fellowship is required to practice C-L psychiatry. However, a psychosomatic fellowship will definitely provide the experience needed for this career path, and also will enable one to get a second American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology board certification.

Dr. Stanciu: What types of clinical conditions are you asked to provide input on managing, and how do you find working alongside other specialties?

Dr. Ganpat: I have been managing the full breadth of psychiatry, and in some cases I also provide medical management. Practicing in a metropolitan area with a high influx of tourists also brings in unique cultural cases. The level of respect that the other specialties give is impressive, because they have now seen what a C-L psychiatrist can do. Their performance scores also have improved as a result of my involvement. They greatly appreciate my efforts to shed light on cases or assist with the ever-challenging patient whose psychiatric complexity impedes care.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe a physician who is well-suited for such a setting?

Dr. Ganpat: The perfect candidate for this role should be capable of abstract as well as objective thinking. Having a good understanding of the other medical specialties and being able to solve problems is essential, because often it isn’t a clear-cut picture. It is imperative for the C-L psychiatrist to have sound teaching abilities and to be able to educate and communicate his (her) reasoning to the consulting team. It also is important to be well-versed in the psychiatric manifestations of various medical disorders and the psychiatric iatrogenesis of widely used prescription medications.

 

 

 

Dr. Stanciu: What challenges and surprises did you encounter when you first began to practice in this setting?

Dr. Ganpat: I think the largest challenge that I have encountered is the lack of resources. Substance abuse is a major problem here, especially opioids, and there are limited community resources for these patients, so they wind up in the hospital.

Dr. Stanciu: What are the disadvantages of C-L compared with other branches of psychiatry?

Dr. Ganpat: There isn’t much continuity of care with C-L psychiatry over the long run, but you do get to see patients improve during the duration of their hospitalization, which is very rewarding.

Dr. Stanciu: What is the typical reimbursement model for a C-L psychiatrist, and have you run into difficulties with insurance providers in this setting?

Dr. Ganpat: The reimbursement model varies from one system to the next. The common model is to bill just as any other hospital service would, based on the time or level of complexity. Obviously, the more consults you have, the more billing is generated. Most insurance carriers recognize this and so I haven’t had much of an issue with reimbursement, although some unexpected problems may arise.

Dr. Stanciu: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating a C-L career?

Dr. Ganpat: If you enjoy working in the hospital and interfacing with other specialties, then consider C-L psychiatry. It is challenging but intellectually stimulating. Make sure you request a C-L rotation during your training, because the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires it during a psychiatric residency.

Dr. Stanciu: What is the future outlook of C-L?

Dr. Ganpat: There is a shortage of C-L psychiatrists because >50% of practicing psychiatrists are in private practice in an outpatient setting. Because access to psychiatric care outside of a hospital setting is an issue, and much care is being driven to hospitals, there will be an increasing need for C-L psychiatrists.

 

Editor’s note: Career Choices features a psychiatry resident/fellow interviewing a psychiatrist about why he (she) has chosen a specific career path. The goal is to inform trainees about the various psychiatric career options, and to give them a feel for the pros and cons of the various paths.

In this Career Choices, Cornel Stanciu, MD, talked with Peter Ganpat, MD, a consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatrist at Florida Hospital, where he provides guidance to various medical specialties on managing acute and chronic mental illness and substance use disorders. In addition, he also is the medical director for the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation service and staffs the inpatient unit.

 

Dr. Stanciu: What made you choose to become a C-L psychiatrist?

Dr. Ganpat: In my opinion, C-L is the most challenging area of psychiatry because not only are you thinking along the realms of a psychiatrist, but you’re also considering the viewpoint of the other subspecialties at the same time. For me, it brings together my medical background with my passion for psychiatry, and the patients I see daily allow for this incorporation.

Dr. Stanciu: How did your career path prepare you to become a C-L psychiatrist?

Dr. Ganpat: My career path was unique in that I completed a family medicine residency, and then immediately pursued training in psychiatry. Some may consider this as “overkill” for C-L, but as I’ve come to learn, this background grants me a level of understanding and confidence to step in when dealing with a complex case and lend a hand to the consulting physician beyond psychiatry. I do not feel a fellowship is required to practice C-L psychiatry. However, a psychosomatic fellowship will definitely provide the experience needed for this career path, and also will enable one to get a second American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology board certification.

Dr. Stanciu: What types of clinical conditions are you asked to provide input on managing, and how do you find working alongside other specialties?

Dr. Ganpat: I have been managing the full breadth of psychiatry, and in some cases I also provide medical management. Practicing in a metropolitan area with a high influx of tourists also brings in unique cultural cases. The level of respect that the other specialties give is impressive, because they have now seen what a C-L psychiatrist can do. Their performance scores also have improved as a result of my involvement. They greatly appreciate my efforts to shed light on cases or assist with the ever-challenging patient whose psychiatric complexity impedes care.

Dr. Stanciu: How would you describe a physician who is well-suited for such a setting?

Dr. Ganpat: The perfect candidate for this role should be capable of abstract as well as objective thinking. Having a good understanding of the other medical specialties and being able to solve problems is essential, because often it isn’t a clear-cut picture. It is imperative for the C-L psychiatrist to have sound teaching abilities and to be able to educate and communicate his (her) reasoning to the consulting team. It also is important to be well-versed in the psychiatric manifestations of various medical disorders and the psychiatric iatrogenesis of widely used prescription medications.

 

 

 

Dr. Stanciu: What challenges and surprises did you encounter when you first began to practice in this setting?

Dr. Ganpat: I think the largest challenge that I have encountered is the lack of resources. Substance abuse is a major problem here, especially opioids, and there are limited community resources for these patients, so they wind up in the hospital.

Dr. Stanciu: What are the disadvantages of C-L compared with other branches of psychiatry?

Dr. Ganpat: There isn’t much continuity of care with C-L psychiatry over the long run, but you do get to see patients improve during the duration of their hospitalization, which is very rewarding.

Dr. Stanciu: What is the typical reimbursement model for a C-L psychiatrist, and have you run into difficulties with insurance providers in this setting?

Dr. Ganpat: The reimbursement model varies from one system to the next. The common model is to bill just as any other hospital service would, based on the time or level of complexity. Obviously, the more consults you have, the more billing is generated. Most insurance carriers recognize this and so I haven’t had much of an issue with reimbursement, although some unexpected problems may arise.

Dr. Stanciu: What advice do you have for early career psychiatrists and trainees who are contemplating a C-L career?

Dr. Ganpat: If you enjoy working in the hospital and interfacing with other specialties, then consider C-L psychiatry. It is challenging but intellectually stimulating. Make sure you request a C-L rotation during your training, because the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires it during a psychiatric residency.

Dr. Stanciu: What is the future outlook of C-L?

Dr. Ganpat: There is a shortage of C-L psychiatrists because >50% of practicing psychiatrists are in private practice in an outpatient setting. Because access to psychiatric care outside of a hospital setting is an issue, and much care is being driven to hospitals, there will be an increasing need for C-L psychiatrists.

Issue
February 2018
Issue
February 2018
Page Number
e1-e2
Page Number
e1-e2
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Career Choices: Consultation-liaison psychiatry
Display Headline
Career Choices: Consultation-liaison psychiatry
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article PDF Media

Short takes

Article Type
Changed

 

Pacing in syncope for select patients only

The 2017 ACC/AHA/HRD guideline for syncope evaluation and management concludes that the evidence does not yet support the use of pacing for reflex-mediated except among those with both recurrent vasovagal syncope and asystole documented by implantable loop recorder.

Citation: Varosy P et al. Pacing as a treatment for reflex-mediated (vasovagal, situational, or carotid sinus hypersensitivity) syncope: A systematic review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;20(5):664-79.
 

Postoperative opioids often underutilized

Between 67% and 92% of patients report postoperative opioid oversupply, defined as filled but unused opioid prescriptions or unfilled opioid prescriptions. Half of the filled prescriptions were unused, with the majority reporting that the narcotics were not stored in locked containers.

Citation: Bicket MC et al. Prescription opioid analgesics commonly unused after surgery: A systematic review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Aug 2. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0831
 

5-hour protocol for contrast allergy safe and effective

Observational study showing a 5-hour IV steroid protocol was noninferior to a traditional 13-hour oral premedication regimen in patients at high risk for IV contrast reactions.

Citation: Mervak BM et al. Intravenous corticosteroid premedication administered 5 hours before CT, compared with a traditional 13-hour oral regimen. Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):425-33.
 

Poor food intake and chills predict true bacteremia in hospitalized patients

Observational study showing that poor food consumption had a sensitivity of 93.7% and shaking chills a specificity of 95.1% in diagnosing true bacteremia based on blood culture results.

Citation: Komatsu T et al. A simple algorithm for predicting bacteremia using food consumption and shaking chills: a prospective observational study. J Hosp Med. 2017 Jul;12(7),510-5.
 

Lower readmission rates do not lead to increased postdischarge mortality at 30 days

Post–Affordable Care Act reductions in 30-day hospital risk-adjusted readmission rates for heart failure, acute MI, and pneumonia among Medicare beneficiaries did not increase but were weakly associated with decreased 30-day post–hospital discharge risk-adjusted mortality.

Citation: Dharmarajan K et al. Association of changing hospital readmission rates with mortality rates after hospital discharge. JAMA. 2017Jul 18;318(3):270-8.

Publications
Sections

 

Pacing in syncope for select patients only

The 2017 ACC/AHA/HRD guideline for syncope evaluation and management concludes that the evidence does not yet support the use of pacing for reflex-mediated except among those with both recurrent vasovagal syncope and asystole documented by implantable loop recorder.

Citation: Varosy P et al. Pacing as a treatment for reflex-mediated (vasovagal, situational, or carotid sinus hypersensitivity) syncope: A systematic review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;20(5):664-79.
 

Postoperative opioids often underutilized

Between 67% and 92% of patients report postoperative opioid oversupply, defined as filled but unused opioid prescriptions or unfilled opioid prescriptions. Half of the filled prescriptions were unused, with the majority reporting that the narcotics were not stored in locked containers.

Citation: Bicket MC et al. Prescription opioid analgesics commonly unused after surgery: A systematic review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Aug 2. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0831
 

5-hour protocol for contrast allergy safe and effective

Observational study showing a 5-hour IV steroid protocol was noninferior to a traditional 13-hour oral premedication regimen in patients at high risk for IV contrast reactions.

Citation: Mervak BM et al. Intravenous corticosteroid premedication administered 5 hours before CT, compared with a traditional 13-hour oral regimen. Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):425-33.
 

Poor food intake and chills predict true bacteremia in hospitalized patients

Observational study showing that poor food consumption had a sensitivity of 93.7% and shaking chills a specificity of 95.1% in diagnosing true bacteremia based on blood culture results.

Citation: Komatsu T et al. A simple algorithm for predicting bacteremia using food consumption and shaking chills: a prospective observational study. J Hosp Med. 2017 Jul;12(7),510-5.
 

Lower readmission rates do not lead to increased postdischarge mortality at 30 days

Post–Affordable Care Act reductions in 30-day hospital risk-adjusted readmission rates for heart failure, acute MI, and pneumonia among Medicare beneficiaries did not increase but were weakly associated with decreased 30-day post–hospital discharge risk-adjusted mortality.

Citation: Dharmarajan K et al. Association of changing hospital readmission rates with mortality rates after hospital discharge. JAMA. 2017Jul 18;318(3):270-8.

 

Pacing in syncope for select patients only

The 2017 ACC/AHA/HRD guideline for syncope evaluation and management concludes that the evidence does not yet support the use of pacing for reflex-mediated except among those with both recurrent vasovagal syncope and asystole documented by implantable loop recorder.

Citation: Varosy P et al. Pacing as a treatment for reflex-mediated (vasovagal, situational, or carotid sinus hypersensitivity) syncope: A systematic review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;20(5):664-79.
 

Postoperative opioids often underutilized

Between 67% and 92% of patients report postoperative opioid oversupply, defined as filled but unused opioid prescriptions or unfilled opioid prescriptions. Half of the filled prescriptions were unused, with the majority reporting that the narcotics were not stored in locked containers.

Citation: Bicket MC et al. Prescription opioid analgesics commonly unused after surgery: A systematic review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Aug 2. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0831
 

5-hour protocol for contrast allergy safe and effective

Observational study showing a 5-hour IV steroid protocol was noninferior to a traditional 13-hour oral premedication regimen in patients at high risk for IV contrast reactions.

Citation: Mervak BM et al. Intravenous corticosteroid premedication administered 5 hours before CT, compared with a traditional 13-hour oral regimen. Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):425-33.
 

Poor food intake and chills predict true bacteremia in hospitalized patients

Observational study showing that poor food consumption had a sensitivity of 93.7% and shaking chills a specificity of 95.1% in diagnosing true bacteremia based on blood culture results.

Citation: Komatsu T et al. A simple algorithm for predicting bacteremia using food consumption and shaking chills: a prospective observational study. J Hosp Med. 2017 Jul;12(7),510-5.
 

Lower readmission rates do not lead to increased postdischarge mortality at 30 days

Post–Affordable Care Act reductions in 30-day hospital risk-adjusted readmission rates for heart failure, acute MI, and pneumonia among Medicare beneficiaries did not increase but were weakly associated with decreased 30-day post–hospital discharge risk-adjusted mortality.

Citation: Dharmarajan K et al. Association of changing hospital readmission rates with mortality rates after hospital discharge. JAMA. 2017Jul 18;318(3):270-8.

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

MDedge Daily News: For Zika birth defects, it matters where you live

Article Type
Changed
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

Zika-linked birth defects are climbing, elderly trauma patients are at risk after leaving the hospital, junk food can damage the teenage brain, and the Food and Drug Administration has approved a starting dose of roflumilast for COPD patients.

Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.

Publications
Sections
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

Zika-linked birth defects are climbing, elderly trauma patients are at risk after leaving the hospital, junk food can damage the teenage brain, and the Food and Drug Administration has approved a starting dose of roflumilast for COPD patients.

Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

Zika-linked birth defects are climbing, elderly trauma patients are at risk after leaving the hospital, junk food can damage the teenage brain, and the Food and Drug Administration has approved a starting dose of roflumilast for COPD patients.

Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

IMPDH inhibitors could treat ALL

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
IMPDH inhibitors could treat ALL

Micrograph showing ALL

A mutation that leads to relapse in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) also causes a weakness that could be exploited to kill leukemia cells, according to research published in Nature.

Investigators found evidence to suggest that mutations in the NT5C2 gene make leukemic cells resistant to a common chemotherapy drug but vulnerable to a class of drugs called IMPDH inhibitors.

“Increased sensitivity to IMPDH inhibition shows proof of principle that the pathway for resistance provides a new therapeutic target,” said Adolfo Ferrando, MD, PhD, of Columbia University’s Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center in New York, New York.

Dr Ferrando’s lab had previously found that cancer cells from relapsed ALL patients frequently have mutations in NT5C2, which drives resistance to 6-mercaptopurine.

However, the investigators didn’t know how these mutations emerge as cancer recurs after remission.

In analyzing samples from ALL patients, the team found they could detect the NT5C2 mutation R367Q in cancer cells before patients were clinically diagnosed as relapsed. However, the mutation was not detectable in most cases at the time of diagnosis.

These findings suggest that cells with the R367Q mutation only multiply in response to treatment, and the mutation may help predict relapse.

“This seems to be a late mutation involved in disease progression,” Dr Ferrando said. “Our data support that it may not be present at diagnosis in many cases, and that, in cases where it may be present, it represents a very minor population.”

The investigators also found the R367Q mutation impaired leukemia cell growth and leukemia-initiating cell activity. This was “associated with excess export of purines to the extracellular space and depletion of the intracellular purine-nucleotide pool.”

These findings led the investigators to test mizoribine, an IMPDH inhibitor, in Nt5c2+/R367Q mutant and Nt5c2+/co-R367Q wild-type ALL lymphoblasts. The team found the mutant cells were significantly more sensitive to mizoribine.

In Nt5c2+/R367Q leukemia-bearing mice, treatment with mizoribine produced a “marked” anti-leukemic response and significantly prolonged survival.

In immunodeficient mice transplanted with an NT5C2(R367Q) xenograft, mizoribine decreased tumor burden and tumor infiltration.

“IMPDH inhibitors could eventually emerge as relevant antileukemic drugs, but this would require additional preclinical work before clinical testing,” Dr Ferrando said.

Publications
Topics

Micrograph showing ALL

A mutation that leads to relapse in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) also causes a weakness that could be exploited to kill leukemia cells, according to research published in Nature.

Investigators found evidence to suggest that mutations in the NT5C2 gene make leukemic cells resistant to a common chemotherapy drug but vulnerable to a class of drugs called IMPDH inhibitors.

“Increased sensitivity to IMPDH inhibition shows proof of principle that the pathway for resistance provides a new therapeutic target,” said Adolfo Ferrando, MD, PhD, of Columbia University’s Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center in New York, New York.

Dr Ferrando’s lab had previously found that cancer cells from relapsed ALL patients frequently have mutations in NT5C2, which drives resistance to 6-mercaptopurine.

However, the investigators didn’t know how these mutations emerge as cancer recurs after remission.

In analyzing samples from ALL patients, the team found they could detect the NT5C2 mutation R367Q in cancer cells before patients were clinically diagnosed as relapsed. However, the mutation was not detectable in most cases at the time of diagnosis.

These findings suggest that cells with the R367Q mutation only multiply in response to treatment, and the mutation may help predict relapse.

“This seems to be a late mutation involved in disease progression,” Dr Ferrando said. “Our data support that it may not be present at diagnosis in many cases, and that, in cases where it may be present, it represents a very minor population.”

The investigators also found the R367Q mutation impaired leukemia cell growth and leukemia-initiating cell activity. This was “associated with excess export of purines to the extracellular space and depletion of the intracellular purine-nucleotide pool.”

These findings led the investigators to test mizoribine, an IMPDH inhibitor, in Nt5c2+/R367Q mutant and Nt5c2+/co-R367Q wild-type ALL lymphoblasts. The team found the mutant cells were significantly more sensitive to mizoribine.

In Nt5c2+/R367Q leukemia-bearing mice, treatment with mizoribine produced a “marked” anti-leukemic response and significantly prolonged survival.

In immunodeficient mice transplanted with an NT5C2(R367Q) xenograft, mizoribine decreased tumor burden and tumor infiltration.

“IMPDH inhibitors could eventually emerge as relevant antileukemic drugs, but this would require additional preclinical work before clinical testing,” Dr Ferrando said.

Micrograph showing ALL

A mutation that leads to relapse in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) also causes a weakness that could be exploited to kill leukemia cells, according to research published in Nature.

Investigators found evidence to suggest that mutations in the NT5C2 gene make leukemic cells resistant to a common chemotherapy drug but vulnerable to a class of drugs called IMPDH inhibitors.

“Increased sensitivity to IMPDH inhibition shows proof of principle that the pathway for resistance provides a new therapeutic target,” said Adolfo Ferrando, MD, PhD, of Columbia University’s Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center in New York, New York.

Dr Ferrando’s lab had previously found that cancer cells from relapsed ALL patients frequently have mutations in NT5C2, which drives resistance to 6-mercaptopurine.

However, the investigators didn’t know how these mutations emerge as cancer recurs after remission.

In analyzing samples from ALL patients, the team found they could detect the NT5C2 mutation R367Q in cancer cells before patients were clinically diagnosed as relapsed. However, the mutation was not detectable in most cases at the time of diagnosis.

These findings suggest that cells with the R367Q mutation only multiply in response to treatment, and the mutation may help predict relapse.

“This seems to be a late mutation involved in disease progression,” Dr Ferrando said. “Our data support that it may not be present at diagnosis in many cases, and that, in cases where it may be present, it represents a very minor population.”

The investigators also found the R367Q mutation impaired leukemia cell growth and leukemia-initiating cell activity. This was “associated with excess export of purines to the extracellular space and depletion of the intracellular purine-nucleotide pool.”

These findings led the investigators to test mizoribine, an IMPDH inhibitor, in Nt5c2+/R367Q mutant and Nt5c2+/co-R367Q wild-type ALL lymphoblasts. The team found the mutant cells were significantly more sensitive to mizoribine.

In Nt5c2+/R367Q leukemia-bearing mice, treatment with mizoribine produced a “marked” anti-leukemic response and significantly prolonged survival.

In immunodeficient mice transplanted with an NT5C2(R367Q) xenograft, mizoribine decreased tumor burden and tumor infiltration.

“IMPDH inhibitors could eventually emerge as relevant antileukemic drugs, but this would require additional preclinical work before clinical testing,” Dr Ferrando said.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
IMPDH inhibitors could treat ALL
Display Headline
IMPDH inhibitors could treat ALL
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica