DMTs Are Associated With Reduced Stroke Risk in Patients With MS

Article Type
Changed
After controlling for covariates, the likelihood of ischemic stroke remained higher in untreated patients.

LOS ANGELES—Among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), treatment with disease-modifying therapy is associated with a significantly decreased likelihood of ischemic stroke, compared with no disease-modifying therapy, according to a study presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

Stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. One-third to one-half of stroke survivors have post-stoke disability. Autoimmune diseases are associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. To examine the role of disease-modifying therapy in the prevention of ischemic stroke in MS, Asad Ikram, MD, a clinical research fellow in the Department of Neurology at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine in Albuquerque, and colleagues conducted a nationwide, case–control, population-based study.

Investigators extracted data from the Cerner’s Health Facts database and used ICD-9/10 codes to identify all patients diagnosed with MS between 2000 and 2016. The researchers identified patients with MS who had an ischemic stroke and categorized them as having received disease-modifying therapy or not. They excluded patients younger than 18 and patients for whom they did not have information about sex.

The investigators used multiple logistic regression to evaluate the likelihood of ischemic stroke in patients treated with disease-modifying therapy. In the final model, they also adjusted for patients’ baseline characteristics and medications.

In all, Dr. Ikram and colleagues identified 57,769 patients with a diagnosis of MS, 1,349 of whom had a CT-confirmed ischemic stroke (2.34%).

The study group (ie, patients with ischemic stroke who were receiving disease-modifying therapy) included 126 patients (89 females), and the control group (ie, patients with ischemic stroke who had not received disease-modifying therapy) included 1,002 patients.

Patients not treated with disease-modifying therapy were approximately twice as likely to have an ischemic stroke, compared with patients treated with disease-modifying therapy (odds ratio = 1.91).

After controlling for covariates (eg, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, age, and sex), the likelihood of ischemic stroke remained higher in the untreated group.

“This study suggests that the early treatment of MS with disease-modifying therapies may reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in the MS population,” said Dr. Ikram and colleagues.

—Jake Remaly

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
30
Sections
Related Articles
After controlling for covariates, the likelihood of ischemic stroke remained higher in untreated patients.
After controlling for covariates, the likelihood of ischemic stroke remained higher in untreated patients.

LOS ANGELES—Among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), treatment with disease-modifying therapy is associated with a significantly decreased likelihood of ischemic stroke, compared with no disease-modifying therapy, according to a study presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

Stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. One-third to one-half of stroke survivors have post-stoke disability. Autoimmune diseases are associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. To examine the role of disease-modifying therapy in the prevention of ischemic stroke in MS, Asad Ikram, MD, a clinical research fellow in the Department of Neurology at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine in Albuquerque, and colleagues conducted a nationwide, case–control, population-based study.

Investigators extracted data from the Cerner’s Health Facts database and used ICD-9/10 codes to identify all patients diagnosed with MS between 2000 and 2016. The researchers identified patients with MS who had an ischemic stroke and categorized them as having received disease-modifying therapy or not. They excluded patients younger than 18 and patients for whom they did not have information about sex.

The investigators used multiple logistic regression to evaluate the likelihood of ischemic stroke in patients treated with disease-modifying therapy. In the final model, they also adjusted for patients’ baseline characteristics and medications.

In all, Dr. Ikram and colleagues identified 57,769 patients with a diagnosis of MS, 1,349 of whom had a CT-confirmed ischemic stroke (2.34%).

The study group (ie, patients with ischemic stroke who were receiving disease-modifying therapy) included 126 patients (89 females), and the control group (ie, patients with ischemic stroke who had not received disease-modifying therapy) included 1,002 patients.

Patients not treated with disease-modifying therapy were approximately twice as likely to have an ischemic stroke, compared with patients treated with disease-modifying therapy (odds ratio = 1.91).

After controlling for covariates (eg, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, age, and sex), the likelihood of ischemic stroke remained higher in the untreated group.

“This study suggests that the early treatment of MS with disease-modifying therapies may reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in the MS population,” said Dr. Ikram and colleagues.

—Jake Remaly

LOS ANGELES—Among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), treatment with disease-modifying therapy is associated with a significantly decreased likelihood of ischemic stroke, compared with no disease-modifying therapy, according to a study presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

Stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. One-third to one-half of stroke survivors have post-stoke disability. Autoimmune diseases are associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. To examine the role of disease-modifying therapy in the prevention of ischemic stroke in MS, Asad Ikram, MD, a clinical research fellow in the Department of Neurology at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine in Albuquerque, and colleagues conducted a nationwide, case–control, population-based study.

Investigators extracted data from the Cerner’s Health Facts database and used ICD-9/10 codes to identify all patients diagnosed with MS between 2000 and 2016. The researchers identified patients with MS who had an ischemic stroke and categorized them as having received disease-modifying therapy or not. They excluded patients younger than 18 and patients for whom they did not have information about sex.

The investigators used multiple logistic regression to evaluate the likelihood of ischemic stroke in patients treated with disease-modifying therapy. In the final model, they also adjusted for patients’ baseline characteristics and medications.

In all, Dr. Ikram and colleagues identified 57,769 patients with a diagnosis of MS, 1,349 of whom had a CT-confirmed ischemic stroke (2.34%).

The study group (ie, patients with ischemic stroke who were receiving disease-modifying therapy) included 126 patients (89 females), and the control group (ie, patients with ischemic stroke who had not received disease-modifying therapy) included 1,002 patients.

Patients not treated with disease-modifying therapy were approximately twice as likely to have an ischemic stroke, compared with patients treated with disease-modifying therapy (odds ratio = 1.91).

After controlling for covariates (eg, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, age, and sex), the likelihood of ischemic stroke remained higher in the untreated group.

“This study suggests that the early treatment of MS with disease-modifying therapies may reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in the MS population,” said Dr. Ikram and colleagues.

—Jake Remaly

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(6)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(6)
Page Number
30
Page Number
30
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Safety of MRI in patients with implantable cardiac devices

Article Type
Changed

Clinical question: Is MRI safe for patients who have implanted ICD or pacemakers that have not been deemed to be “MRI conditional” by the Food and Drug Administration?

Background: The majority of patients with implantable cardiac devices have a clinical indication for MRI within 10 years. Devices that meet certain criteria specified by the Food and Drug Administration are not felt to pose any safety hazards and are deemed “MRI conditional.” Those that do not meet these criteria are referred to as “legacy” devices and are considered to be a contraindication to MRI by the FDA and device manufacturers. The majority of ICDs and pacemakers currently in use are legacy devices and access to MRI for patients who have these devices has been very limited. This study is the first large prospective study to evaluate the safety of an MRI protocol in patients with legacy ICDs and pacemakers.

Study design: Prospective nonrandomized study.

Setting: Single academic medical center.



Synopsis: During 2003-2015, 1,509 patients with ICDs (629 patients) and pacemakers (880 patients) were enrolled and underwent 2,103 MRI examinations supervised by either an electrophysiologist or a registered nurse with cardiac device programming experience.

Study outcomes included safety and device function immediately after MRI and change in device parameters both immediately after MRI and at long-term follow-up. The most important clinical adverse event that occurred was a reset of device to backup settings referred to as “power on reset” that occurred in nine examinations. Of these nine events, one was associated with mild physical discomfort, one led to device replacement, and one was associated with transient inhibition of pacing. Small changes in P- or R-wave amplitude and atrial or ventricular capture were noted at long-term follow-up. However, none of these were large enough to result in lead revision or device reprogramming. Notable limitations of this study include that it is a single-center study limiting its ability to be generalized and that nearly 20% of patients were lost to long term follow up.

Bottom line: When performed at an institution with an established safety protocol, MRI examinations in patients with legacy devices are not associated with clinically significant adverse safety events or changes in device function that require reprogramming. Multicenter studies are necessary to determine if these results can be generalizable.

Citation: Nazarian S et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac devices. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2555-64.

Dr. Scaletta is a hospitalist at Denver Health Medical Center and an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Clinical question: Is MRI safe for patients who have implanted ICD or pacemakers that have not been deemed to be “MRI conditional” by the Food and Drug Administration?

Background: The majority of patients with implantable cardiac devices have a clinical indication for MRI within 10 years. Devices that meet certain criteria specified by the Food and Drug Administration are not felt to pose any safety hazards and are deemed “MRI conditional.” Those that do not meet these criteria are referred to as “legacy” devices and are considered to be a contraindication to MRI by the FDA and device manufacturers. The majority of ICDs and pacemakers currently in use are legacy devices and access to MRI for patients who have these devices has been very limited. This study is the first large prospective study to evaluate the safety of an MRI protocol in patients with legacy ICDs and pacemakers.

Study design: Prospective nonrandomized study.

Setting: Single academic medical center.



Synopsis: During 2003-2015, 1,509 patients with ICDs (629 patients) and pacemakers (880 patients) were enrolled and underwent 2,103 MRI examinations supervised by either an electrophysiologist or a registered nurse with cardiac device programming experience.

Study outcomes included safety and device function immediately after MRI and change in device parameters both immediately after MRI and at long-term follow-up. The most important clinical adverse event that occurred was a reset of device to backup settings referred to as “power on reset” that occurred in nine examinations. Of these nine events, one was associated with mild physical discomfort, one led to device replacement, and one was associated with transient inhibition of pacing. Small changes in P- or R-wave amplitude and atrial or ventricular capture were noted at long-term follow-up. However, none of these were large enough to result in lead revision or device reprogramming. Notable limitations of this study include that it is a single-center study limiting its ability to be generalized and that nearly 20% of patients were lost to long term follow up.

Bottom line: When performed at an institution with an established safety protocol, MRI examinations in patients with legacy devices are not associated with clinically significant adverse safety events or changes in device function that require reprogramming. Multicenter studies are necessary to determine if these results can be generalizable.

Citation: Nazarian S et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac devices. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2555-64.

Dr. Scaletta is a hospitalist at Denver Health Medical Center and an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora.

Clinical question: Is MRI safe for patients who have implanted ICD or pacemakers that have not been deemed to be “MRI conditional” by the Food and Drug Administration?

Background: The majority of patients with implantable cardiac devices have a clinical indication for MRI within 10 years. Devices that meet certain criteria specified by the Food and Drug Administration are not felt to pose any safety hazards and are deemed “MRI conditional.” Those that do not meet these criteria are referred to as “legacy” devices and are considered to be a contraindication to MRI by the FDA and device manufacturers. The majority of ICDs and pacemakers currently in use are legacy devices and access to MRI for patients who have these devices has been very limited. This study is the first large prospective study to evaluate the safety of an MRI protocol in patients with legacy ICDs and pacemakers.

Study design: Prospective nonrandomized study.

Setting: Single academic medical center.



Synopsis: During 2003-2015, 1,509 patients with ICDs (629 patients) and pacemakers (880 patients) were enrolled and underwent 2,103 MRI examinations supervised by either an electrophysiologist or a registered nurse with cardiac device programming experience.

Study outcomes included safety and device function immediately after MRI and change in device parameters both immediately after MRI and at long-term follow-up. The most important clinical adverse event that occurred was a reset of device to backup settings referred to as “power on reset” that occurred in nine examinations. Of these nine events, one was associated with mild physical discomfort, one led to device replacement, and one was associated with transient inhibition of pacing. Small changes in P- or R-wave amplitude and atrial or ventricular capture were noted at long-term follow-up. However, none of these were large enough to result in lead revision or device reprogramming. Notable limitations of this study include that it is a single-center study limiting its ability to be generalized and that nearly 20% of patients were lost to long term follow up.

Bottom line: When performed at an institution with an established safety protocol, MRI examinations in patients with legacy devices are not associated with clinically significant adverse safety events or changes in device function that require reprogramming. Multicenter studies are necessary to determine if these results can be generalizable.

Citation: Nazarian S et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac devices. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2555-64.

Dr. Scaletta is a hospitalist at Denver Health Medical Center and an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Coding considerations in investigating chronic pelvic pain

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Coding considerations in investigating chronic pelvic pain

Nonsurgical interventions for chronic pelvic pain may include evaluation and management visits for managing medications, trigger point injections, or pelvic floor physical therapy. However, while these management options can be coded, some of them may have limitations imposed by payers on the frequency of care and by whom the care may be rendered.

For encounters that involve the management of pain medications, it is important that documentation for each of these visits clearly spells out the progress the patient is making in setting goals for pain management. Frequent office visits may send a flag to the payer for overutilization; complete documentation will go a long way to support the medical necessity of each visit at the level billed.

Who renders treatment?

Sometimes, chronic pelvic pain management involves pelvic floor physical therapy, such as teaching pelvic floor exercises or using biofeedback to control certain aspects of the pain. The majority of payers have strict guidelines dictating who can render these services by way of licensure and training if performed by someone other than the physician, and at what frequency. Typically, the person performing the therapy must be, at minimum, a licensed physical therapist.

Frequency

Frequency is often limited to 1 to 2 times a week in increments of 4 weeks before additional authorization is granted. Again, careful and detailed documentation of the patient’s progress will be crucial to continued therapy.

The TABLE shows typical Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes that might be authorized by the payer for this type of management.

Timed codes

Keep in mind that the “timed” codes listed above are based on the provider’s time spent one-on-one in direct contact with the patient. The time must have been used to provide skilled services and includes pre-, intra-, and posttreatment. CPT also has clarified that if “less than 15 minutes of service is provided, then the reduced services modifier -52 should be appended to the code to identify the reduction of service.” It will therefore be important that the provider accurately document the time involved in the therapy session for these codes.

Trigger point injections

Another treatment option is the use of trigger point injections to control pelvic pain. CPT provides 2 codes to report these:

  • 20552, Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), 1 or 2 muscle(s)
  • 20553, Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), 3 or more muscles.

Notice that the choice of code depends on the number of muscles the anesthetic is injected into, not the number of injections given at that muscle site.

The relative values units assigned to these codes are based on the injection procedure alone. Normally, the anesthetic used (lidocaine or bupivacaine) can be billed in addition; however, there are no specific Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) “J” codes for either. Code J2001, Injection, lidocaine HCl, can only be reported for an intravenous infusion, not intramuscular, and the only current code for bupivacaine is an “S” code that is only recognized by some Blue Cross/Blue Shield payers (S0020, Injection, bupivacaine HCl, 30 ml).

Some physicians also inject sodium bicarbonate, but this, too, has no specific “J” code. Because of this, the only correct J code to report these drugs will be J3490, Unclassified drugs. Be sure to include the National Drug Code (NDC) number (usually found on the package insert) for each drug, and an invoice showing your cost with the claim.

ICD-10-CM codes needed for support

Billing for services will not be complete without a supporting diagnostic code. For pelvic pain in particular, 1 or more of the following ICD-10-CM codes may provide the medical justification for the provided nonsurgical services so long as there are no identified psychological factors:

  • G89.0, Central pain syndrome
  • G89.29, Other chronic pain
  • N94.10, Unspecified dyspareunia
  • N94.11, Superficial (introital) dyspareunia
  • N94.12, Deep dyspareunia
  • N94.19, Other specified dyspareunia
  • N94.2, Vaginismus
  • N94.4, Primary dysmenorrhea
  • N94.5, Secondary dysmenorrhea
  • N94.6, Dysmenorrhea, unspecified
  • N94.810, Vulvar vestibulitis
  • N94.818, Other vulvodynia
  • N94.819, Vulvodynia, unspecified
  • R10.2, Pelvic and perineal pain.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@mdedge.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Witt is an independent coding and documentation consultant and former program manager, department of coding and nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

The author reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Issue
OBG Management - 30(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
14, 16
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Witt is an independent coding and documentation consultant and former program manager, department of coding and nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

The author reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Witt is an independent coding and documentation consultant and former program manager, department of coding and nomenclature, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

The author reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Article PDF
Article PDF

Nonsurgical interventions for chronic pelvic pain may include evaluation and management visits for managing medications, trigger point injections, or pelvic floor physical therapy. However, while these management options can be coded, some of them may have limitations imposed by payers on the frequency of care and by whom the care may be rendered.

For encounters that involve the management of pain medications, it is important that documentation for each of these visits clearly spells out the progress the patient is making in setting goals for pain management. Frequent office visits may send a flag to the payer for overutilization; complete documentation will go a long way to support the medical necessity of each visit at the level billed.

Who renders treatment?

Sometimes, chronic pelvic pain management involves pelvic floor physical therapy, such as teaching pelvic floor exercises or using biofeedback to control certain aspects of the pain. The majority of payers have strict guidelines dictating who can render these services by way of licensure and training if performed by someone other than the physician, and at what frequency. Typically, the person performing the therapy must be, at minimum, a licensed physical therapist.

Frequency

Frequency is often limited to 1 to 2 times a week in increments of 4 weeks before additional authorization is granted. Again, careful and detailed documentation of the patient’s progress will be crucial to continued therapy.

The TABLE shows typical Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes that might be authorized by the payer for this type of management.

Timed codes

Keep in mind that the “timed” codes listed above are based on the provider’s time spent one-on-one in direct contact with the patient. The time must have been used to provide skilled services and includes pre-, intra-, and posttreatment. CPT also has clarified that if “less than 15 minutes of service is provided, then the reduced services modifier -52 should be appended to the code to identify the reduction of service.” It will therefore be important that the provider accurately document the time involved in the therapy session for these codes.

Trigger point injections

Another treatment option is the use of trigger point injections to control pelvic pain. CPT provides 2 codes to report these:

  • 20552, Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), 1 or 2 muscle(s)
  • 20553, Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), 3 or more muscles.

Notice that the choice of code depends on the number of muscles the anesthetic is injected into, not the number of injections given at that muscle site.

The relative values units assigned to these codes are based on the injection procedure alone. Normally, the anesthetic used (lidocaine or bupivacaine) can be billed in addition; however, there are no specific Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) “J” codes for either. Code J2001, Injection, lidocaine HCl, can only be reported for an intravenous infusion, not intramuscular, and the only current code for bupivacaine is an “S” code that is only recognized by some Blue Cross/Blue Shield payers (S0020, Injection, bupivacaine HCl, 30 ml).

Some physicians also inject sodium bicarbonate, but this, too, has no specific “J” code. Because of this, the only correct J code to report these drugs will be J3490, Unclassified drugs. Be sure to include the National Drug Code (NDC) number (usually found on the package insert) for each drug, and an invoice showing your cost with the claim.

ICD-10-CM codes needed for support

Billing for services will not be complete without a supporting diagnostic code. For pelvic pain in particular, 1 or more of the following ICD-10-CM codes may provide the medical justification for the provided nonsurgical services so long as there are no identified psychological factors:

  • G89.0, Central pain syndrome
  • G89.29, Other chronic pain
  • N94.10, Unspecified dyspareunia
  • N94.11, Superficial (introital) dyspareunia
  • N94.12, Deep dyspareunia
  • N94.19, Other specified dyspareunia
  • N94.2, Vaginismus
  • N94.4, Primary dysmenorrhea
  • N94.5, Secondary dysmenorrhea
  • N94.6, Dysmenorrhea, unspecified
  • N94.810, Vulvar vestibulitis
  • N94.818, Other vulvodynia
  • N94.819, Vulvodynia, unspecified
  • R10.2, Pelvic and perineal pain.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@mdedge.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Nonsurgical interventions for chronic pelvic pain may include evaluation and management visits for managing medications, trigger point injections, or pelvic floor physical therapy. However, while these management options can be coded, some of them may have limitations imposed by payers on the frequency of care and by whom the care may be rendered.

For encounters that involve the management of pain medications, it is important that documentation for each of these visits clearly spells out the progress the patient is making in setting goals for pain management. Frequent office visits may send a flag to the payer for overutilization; complete documentation will go a long way to support the medical necessity of each visit at the level billed.

Who renders treatment?

Sometimes, chronic pelvic pain management involves pelvic floor physical therapy, such as teaching pelvic floor exercises or using biofeedback to control certain aspects of the pain. The majority of payers have strict guidelines dictating who can render these services by way of licensure and training if performed by someone other than the physician, and at what frequency. Typically, the person performing the therapy must be, at minimum, a licensed physical therapist.

Frequency

Frequency is often limited to 1 to 2 times a week in increments of 4 weeks before additional authorization is granted. Again, careful and detailed documentation of the patient’s progress will be crucial to continued therapy.

The TABLE shows typical Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes that might be authorized by the payer for this type of management.

Timed codes

Keep in mind that the “timed” codes listed above are based on the provider’s time spent one-on-one in direct contact with the patient. The time must have been used to provide skilled services and includes pre-, intra-, and posttreatment. CPT also has clarified that if “less than 15 minutes of service is provided, then the reduced services modifier -52 should be appended to the code to identify the reduction of service.” It will therefore be important that the provider accurately document the time involved in the therapy session for these codes.

Trigger point injections

Another treatment option is the use of trigger point injections to control pelvic pain. CPT provides 2 codes to report these:

  • 20552, Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), 1 or 2 muscle(s)
  • 20553, Injection(s); single or multiple trigger point(s), 3 or more muscles.

Notice that the choice of code depends on the number of muscles the anesthetic is injected into, not the number of injections given at that muscle site.

The relative values units assigned to these codes are based on the injection procedure alone. Normally, the anesthetic used (lidocaine or bupivacaine) can be billed in addition; however, there are no specific Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) “J” codes for either. Code J2001, Injection, lidocaine HCl, can only be reported for an intravenous infusion, not intramuscular, and the only current code for bupivacaine is an “S” code that is only recognized by some Blue Cross/Blue Shield payers (S0020, Injection, bupivacaine HCl, 30 ml).

Some physicians also inject sodium bicarbonate, but this, too, has no specific “J” code. Because of this, the only correct J code to report these drugs will be J3490, Unclassified drugs. Be sure to include the National Drug Code (NDC) number (usually found on the package insert) for each drug, and an invoice showing your cost with the claim.

ICD-10-CM codes needed for support

Billing for services will not be complete without a supporting diagnostic code. For pelvic pain in particular, 1 or more of the following ICD-10-CM codes may provide the medical justification for the provided nonsurgical services so long as there are no identified psychological factors:

  • G89.0, Central pain syndrome
  • G89.29, Other chronic pain
  • N94.10, Unspecified dyspareunia
  • N94.11, Superficial (introital) dyspareunia
  • N94.12, Deep dyspareunia
  • N94.19, Other specified dyspareunia
  • N94.2, Vaginismus
  • N94.4, Primary dysmenorrhea
  • N94.5, Secondary dysmenorrhea
  • N94.6, Dysmenorrhea, unspecified
  • N94.810, Vulvar vestibulitis
  • N94.818, Other vulvodynia
  • N94.819, Vulvodynia, unspecified
  • R10.2, Pelvic and perineal pain.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@mdedge.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Issue
OBG Management - 30(6)
Issue
OBG Management - 30(6)
Page Number
14, 16
Page Number
14, 16
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Coding considerations in investigating chronic pelvic pain
Display Headline
Coding considerations in investigating chronic pelvic pain
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Ixekizumab improves psoriatic arthritis patient-reported outcomes

Article Type
Changed

 

– In biologic-experienced patients with psoriatic arthritis, the interleukin-17 inhibitor ixekizumab not only met the primary efficacy endpoint of a pivotal phase 3 trial, but also improved multiple patient-reported outcomes in doing so.

Newly-released results from the Study of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (SPIRIT-P2) showed that patients who received active treatment exhibited significantly better changes in physical function, quality of life, itch score, and work productivity compared with those given placebo.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Helena Marzo-Ortega
Changes in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores from baseline to week 24 were a respective –0.4 and –0.6 for 80 mg of ixekizumab given either every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks and –0.2 for placebo (P less than or equal to .001). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in HAQ-DI is 0.351, said SPIRIT-P2 investigator Helena Marzo-Ortega, MD, who presented the findings at the British Society for Rheumatology annual conference.

Patients treated with ixekizumab 80 mg every 2 or 4 weeks more often achieved the MCID by week 24, reaching 40% for 80 mg every 2 weeks and 43% for every 4 weeks, compared with 17% for placebo.

A total of 363 patients who met CASPAR (Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis) criteria were randomized into the SPIRIT-P2 trial. Patients could be included only if they had at least three tender and three swollen joints, active skin lesions, or a documented history of skin psoriasis, and had received prior treatment with a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi).

“The population of patients studied is representative of the patients we see in our clinics,” said Dr. Marzo-Ortega, a consultant rheumatologist at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, England. The mean age was 52 years, a similar percentage of men and women were seen, and the majority (53%-58%) were inadequate responders to one TNFi. One-third had not responded to two TNFis, and 8%-10% had an intolerance.

The primary endpoint results, which have been previously presented and published (Lancet. 2017;389[10086]:2317-27), showed that a significantly (P less than .0001) higher percentage of patients treated with either of the two regimens of ixekizumab achieved a 20% response level on American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at 24 weeks. Indeed, 48% of 123 patients given 80 mg of ixekizumab every 2 weeks and 53% of 122 given 80 mg every 4 weeks achieved an ACR20 versus 20% of 118 placebo-treated patients. Also, on two key secondary endpoints at 24 weeks, an ACR50 response was achieved by a respective 33%, 35%, and 5% of patients, and an ACR70 by 12%, 22%, and 0%, she said.
 

 


Dr. Marzo-Ortega noted that the study had only been powered to show a difference between the active treatment and placebo, and not between the two doses, and that, looking at the speed of response, a difference from placebo was already being seen by week 2 “and certainly by week 4,” indicating an early effect. Data from the trial at 52 weeks are being analyzed and should be available soon, she said.

Another efficacy measure used was the percentage of patients achieving minimum disease activity at week 24. “These are stringent criteria to achieve: Five of seven criteria need to be met,” Dr. Marzo-Ortega said. “This was achieved by almost 30% of patients on the 4-weekly dose,” and by 24% on the 2-weekly dose, but by just 3% of those given placebo.



“One of the remarkable things is that nearly a third [of patients] achieved PASI [Psoriasis Area Severity Index] 100 by week 24, which is complete resolution of skin psoriasis,” she said. This is one of the first times this type of skin response has been seen in a psoriasis trial, she noted.

However, there was little difference between the active treatment and placebo arms in terms of the percentage of patients seeing a response on enthesitis, and only the dose taken every 4 weeks had a significant benefit over placebo in terms of improving dactylitis.

 

 


It is not clear why these modest results were seen in the joints, perhaps there were too few patients. While this is surprising, Dr. Marzo-Ortega noted that she “wouldn’t put too much weight on” the lack of an enthesis response; these are “fantastic drugs for the skin,” she said. “There is no doubt about it.”

Other findings from the trial included a significant improvement in itch with both ixekizumab regimens versus placebo, as shown by a greater reduction in numerical rating scale scores from baseline to week 24 (–3.4 and –3.5 vs. –1.2; P less than .001).

Significant improvements with ixekizumab versus placebo in patients’ mental and physical health were also seen when data from the Short Form–36 and EQ-5D instruments were analyzed.

There was also evidence that treatment with ixekizumab significantly improved patients’ presenteeism, work productivity, and activity impairment at work when compared against placebo. There was no difference in absenteeism, as measured by changes in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire–Specific Health Problem scores from baseline to week 24.

 

 


SPIRIT-P2 is one of two pivotal trials conducted with ixekizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis; the other is SPIRIT-P1, which was conducted in biologic-naive patients (Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76[1]:79-87). Investigators recently reported 1-year data from it (J Rheumatol. 2018;45[3]:367-77.).

Eli Lilly, which markets ixekizumab as Taltz, sponsored the study. Dr. Marzo-Ortega disclosed receiving honoraria from AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and UCB, and honoraria and research funding from Janssen and Pfizer. Several other authors reported disclosures with many manufacturers of biologics for psoriatic arthritis, including Eli Lilly.

SOURCE: Marzo-Ortega H et al. Rheumatology. 2018;57[Suppl. 3]:key075.185.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– In biologic-experienced patients with psoriatic arthritis, the interleukin-17 inhibitor ixekizumab not only met the primary efficacy endpoint of a pivotal phase 3 trial, but also improved multiple patient-reported outcomes in doing so.

Newly-released results from the Study of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (SPIRIT-P2) showed that patients who received active treatment exhibited significantly better changes in physical function, quality of life, itch score, and work productivity compared with those given placebo.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Helena Marzo-Ortega
Changes in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores from baseline to week 24 were a respective –0.4 and –0.6 for 80 mg of ixekizumab given either every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks and –0.2 for placebo (P less than or equal to .001). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in HAQ-DI is 0.351, said SPIRIT-P2 investigator Helena Marzo-Ortega, MD, who presented the findings at the British Society for Rheumatology annual conference.

Patients treated with ixekizumab 80 mg every 2 or 4 weeks more often achieved the MCID by week 24, reaching 40% for 80 mg every 2 weeks and 43% for every 4 weeks, compared with 17% for placebo.

A total of 363 patients who met CASPAR (Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis) criteria were randomized into the SPIRIT-P2 trial. Patients could be included only if they had at least three tender and three swollen joints, active skin lesions, or a documented history of skin psoriasis, and had received prior treatment with a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi).

“The population of patients studied is representative of the patients we see in our clinics,” said Dr. Marzo-Ortega, a consultant rheumatologist at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, England. The mean age was 52 years, a similar percentage of men and women were seen, and the majority (53%-58%) were inadequate responders to one TNFi. One-third had not responded to two TNFis, and 8%-10% had an intolerance.

The primary endpoint results, which have been previously presented and published (Lancet. 2017;389[10086]:2317-27), showed that a significantly (P less than .0001) higher percentage of patients treated with either of the two regimens of ixekizumab achieved a 20% response level on American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at 24 weeks. Indeed, 48% of 123 patients given 80 mg of ixekizumab every 2 weeks and 53% of 122 given 80 mg every 4 weeks achieved an ACR20 versus 20% of 118 placebo-treated patients. Also, on two key secondary endpoints at 24 weeks, an ACR50 response was achieved by a respective 33%, 35%, and 5% of patients, and an ACR70 by 12%, 22%, and 0%, she said.
 

 


Dr. Marzo-Ortega noted that the study had only been powered to show a difference between the active treatment and placebo, and not between the two doses, and that, looking at the speed of response, a difference from placebo was already being seen by week 2 “and certainly by week 4,” indicating an early effect. Data from the trial at 52 weeks are being analyzed and should be available soon, she said.

Another efficacy measure used was the percentage of patients achieving minimum disease activity at week 24. “These are stringent criteria to achieve: Five of seven criteria need to be met,” Dr. Marzo-Ortega said. “This was achieved by almost 30% of patients on the 4-weekly dose,” and by 24% on the 2-weekly dose, but by just 3% of those given placebo.



“One of the remarkable things is that nearly a third [of patients] achieved PASI [Psoriasis Area Severity Index] 100 by week 24, which is complete resolution of skin psoriasis,” she said. This is one of the first times this type of skin response has been seen in a psoriasis trial, she noted.

However, there was little difference between the active treatment and placebo arms in terms of the percentage of patients seeing a response on enthesitis, and only the dose taken every 4 weeks had a significant benefit over placebo in terms of improving dactylitis.

 

 


It is not clear why these modest results were seen in the joints, perhaps there were too few patients. While this is surprising, Dr. Marzo-Ortega noted that she “wouldn’t put too much weight on” the lack of an enthesis response; these are “fantastic drugs for the skin,” she said. “There is no doubt about it.”

Other findings from the trial included a significant improvement in itch with both ixekizumab regimens versus placebo, as shown by a greater reduction in numerical rating scale scores from baseline to week 24 (–3.4 and –3.5 vs. –1.2; P less than .001).

Significant improvements with ixekizumab versus placebo in patients’ mental and physical health were also seen when data from the Short Form–36 and EQ-5D instruments were analyzed.

There was also evidence that treatment with ixekizumab significantly improved patients’ presenteeism, work productivity, and activity impairment at work when compared against placebo. There was no difference in absenteeism, as measured by changes in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire–Specific Health Problem scores from baseline to week 24.

 

 


SPIRIT-P2 is one of two pivotal trials conducted with ixekizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis; the other is SPIRIT-P1, which was conducted in biologic-naive patients (Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76[1]:79-87). Investigators recently reported 1-year data from it (J Rheumatol. 2018;45[3]:367-77.).

Eli Lilly, which markets ixekizumab as Taltz, sponsored the study. Dr. Marzo-Ortega disclosed receiving honoraria from AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and UCB, and honoraria and research funding from Janssen and Pfizer. Several other authors reported disclosures with many manufacturers of biologics for psoriatic arthritis, including Eli Lilly.

SOURCE: Marzo-Ortega H et al. Rheumatology. 2018;57[Suppl. 3]:key075.185.

 

– In biologic-experienced patients with psoriatic arthritis, the interleukin-17 inhibitor ixekizumab not only met the primary efficacy endpoint of a pivotal phase 3 trial, but also improved multiple patient-reported outcomes in doing so.

Newly-released results from the Study of Ixekizumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis (SPIRIT-P2) showed that patients who received active treatment exhibited significantly better changes in physical function, quality of life, itch score, and work productivity compared with those given placebo.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Helena Marzo-Ortega
Changes in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores from baseline to week 24 were a respective –0.4 and –0.6 for 80 mg of ixekizumab given either every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks and –0.2 for placebo (P less than or equal to .001). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in HAQ-DI is 0.351, said SPIRIT-P2 investigator Helena Marzo-Ortega, MD, who presented the findings at the British Society for Rheumatology annual conference.

Patients treated with ixekizumab 80 mg every 2 or 4 weeks more often achieved the MCID by week 24, reaching 40% for 80 mg every 2 weeks and 43% for every 4 weeks, compared with 17% for placebo.

A total of 363 patients who met CASPAR (Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis) criteria were randomized into the SPIRIT-P2 trial. Patients could be included only if they had at least three tender and three swollen joints, active skin lesions, or a documented history of skin psoriasis, and had received prior treatment with a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi).

“The population of patients studied is representative of the patients we see in our clinics,” said Dr. Marzo-Ortega, a consultant rheumatologist at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, England. The mean age was 52 years, a similar percentage of men and women were seen, and the majority (53%-58%) were inadequate responders to one TNFi. One-third had not responded to two TNFis, and 8%-10% had an intolerance.

The primary endpoint results, which have been previously presented and published (Lancet. 2017;389[10086]:2317-27), showed that a significantly (P less than .0001) higher percentage of patients treated with either of the two regimens of ixekizumab achieved a 20% response level on American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at 24 weeks. Indeed, 48% of 123 patients given 80 mg of ixekizumab every 2 weeks and 53% of 122 given 80 mg every 4 weeks achieved an ACR20 versus 20% of 118 placebo-treated patients. Also, on two key secondary endpoints at 24 weeks, an ACR50 response was achieved by a respective 33%, 35%, and 5% of patients, and an ACR70 by 12%, 22%, and 0%, she said.
 

 


Dr. Marzo-Ortega noted that the study had only been powered to show a difference between the active treatment and placebo, and not between the two doses, and that, looking at the speed of response, a difference from placebo was already being seen by week 2 “and certainly by week 4,” indicating an early effect. Data from the trial at 52 weeks are being analyzed and should be available soon, she said.

Another efficacy measure used was the percentage of patients achieving minimum disease activity at week 24. “These are stringent criteria to achieve: Five of seven criteria need to be met,” Dr. Marzo-Ortega said. “This was achieved by almost 30% of patients on the 4-weekly dose,” and by 24% on the 2-weekly dose, but by just 3% of those given placebo.



“One of the remarkable things is that nearly a third [of patients] achieved PASI [Psoriasis Area Severity Index] 100 by week 24, which is complete resolution of skin psoriasis,” she said. This is one of the first times this type of skin response has been seen in a psoriasis trial, she noted.

However, there was little difference between the active treatment and placebo arms in terms of the percentage of patients seeing a response on enthesitis, and only the dose taken every 4 weeks had a significant benefit over placebo in terms of improving dactylitis.

 

 


It is not clear why these modest results were seen in the joints, perhaps there were too few patients. While this is surprising, Dr. Marzo-Ortega noted that she “wouldn’t put too much weight on” the lack of an enthesis response; these are “fantastic drugs for the skin,” she said. “There is no doubt about it.”

Other findings from the trial included a significant improvement in itch with both ixekizumab regimens versus placebo, as shown by a greater reduction in numerical rating scale scores from baseline to week 24 (–3.4 and –3.5 vs. –1.2; P less than .001).

Significant improvements with ixekizumab versus placebo in patients’ mental and physical health were also seen when data from the Short Form–36 and EQ-5D instruments were analyzed.

There was also evidence that treatment with ixekizumab significantly improved patients’ presenteeism, work productivity, and activity impairment at work when compared against placebo. There was no difference in absenteeism, as measured by changes in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire–Specific Health Problem scores from baseline to week 24.

 

 


SPIRIT-P2 is one of two pivotal trials conducted with ixekizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis; the other is SPIRIT-P1, which was conducted in biologic-naive patients (Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76[1]:79-87). Investigators recently reported 1-year data from it (J Rheumatol. 2018;45[3]:367-77.).

Eli Lilly, which markets ixekizumab as Taltz, sponsored the study. Dr. Marzo-Ortega disclosed receiving honoraria from AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and UCB, and honoraria and research funding from Janssen and Pfizer. Several other authors reported disclosures with many manufacturers of biologics for psoriatic arthritis, including Eli Lilly.

SOURCE: Marzo-Ortega H et al. Rheumatology. 2018;57[Suppl. 3]:key075.185.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM RHEUMATOLOGY 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Ixekizumab has multiple beneficial effects in patients with psoriatic arthritis previously treated with biologics.

Major finding: Mean HAQ-DI score changes (baseline to week 24) were –0.4 and –0.6 with ixekizumab (80 mg every 2 or 4 weeks) and –0.2 for placebo (P less than or equal to .001).

Study details: SPIRIT-P2: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of ixekizumab in 363 biologic-experienced patients.

Disclosures: Eli Lilly, which markets ixekizumab as Taltz, sponsored the study. Dr. Marzo-Ortega disclosed receiving honoraria from AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and UCB, and honoraria and research funding from Janssen and Pfizer. Several other authors reported disclosures with many manufacturers of biologics for psoriatic arthritis, including Eli Lilly.

Source: Marzo-Ortega H et al. Rheumatology. 2018;57[Suppl. 3]:key075.185.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Peer mentorship, groups help combat burnout in female physicians

Article Type
Changed

– Female physicians are at higher risk for burnout compared with their male counterparts, and the reasons and potential solutions for the problem were addressed at a symposium during the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association.

The work environment for women has improved over time, but lingering implicit and unconscious biases are part of the reason for the high burnout rate among women who are physicians, as are some inherent biological differences, according to Cynthia M. Stonnington, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, Phoenix.

In this video interview, Dr. Stonnington, symposium chair, discussed potential solutions, including facilitated peer mentorship and group support. She also reviewed recent data on how group support can be of benefit, and noted that “there is power in numbers.



It is imperative that women ... band together and find a way to support each other,” she said.

Dr. Stonnington reported having no disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– Female physicians are at higher risk for burnout compared with their male counterparts, and the reasons and potential solutions for the problem were addressed at a symposium during the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association.

The work environment for women has improved over time, but lingering implicit and unconscious biases are part of the reason for the high burnout rate among women who are physicians, as are some inherent biological differences, according to Cynthia M. Stonnington, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, Phoenix.

In this video interview, Dr. Stonnington, symposium chair, discussed potential solutions, including facilitated peer mentorship and group support. She also reviewed recent data on how group support can be of benefit, and noted that “there is power in numbers.



It is imperative that women ... band together and find a way to support each other,” she said.

Dr. Stonnington reported having no disclosures.

– Female physicians are at higher risk for burnout compared with their male counterparts, and the reasons and potential solutions for the problem were addressed at a symposium during the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association.

The work environment for women has improved over time, but lingering implicit and unconscious biases are part of the reason for the high burnout rate among women who are physicians, as are some inherent biological differences, according to Cynthia M. Stonnington, MD, of the Mayo Clinic, Phoenix.

In this video interview, Dr. Stonnington, symposium chair, discussed potential solutions, including facilitated peer mentorship and group support. She also reviewed recent data on how group support can be of benefit, and noted that “there is power in numbers.



It is imperative that women ... band together and find a way to support each other,” she said.

Dr. Stonnington reported having no disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM APA

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

New agents may bring hope for SLE patients

Article Type
Changed

– Several drugs approved for other conditions may also have good effect in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, Michelle Petri, MD, said in an interview at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

The molecules target several different disease pathways, said Dr. Petri, director of the Hopkins Lupus Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

Ustekinumab (Stelara) has accumulated the most data so far. A phase 2 study presented last fall at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology found that it conferred significant benefits relative to placebo, including a 60% responder rate (29% better than placebo), a significantly lower flare rate, and improvements in musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous disease features. The rate of serious adverse events was acceptable (8.3% vs. 9.5% for placebo).

Baricitinib is also being investigated in SLE, Dr. Petri said. A phase 2 study conducted by Eli Lilly closed late last year and will be reported on June 13 at the European League Against Rheumatism’s opening plenary session (Wallace et al. EULAR 2018 abstract OP0019).

The three-armed, placebo-controlled study comprised 314 patients who were randomized to placebo or one of two baricitinib doses, given orally for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was remission of arthritis and/or rash as measured by the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). Secondary endpoints included responder rate, change from baseline in the SLEDAI-2K, change in the Global Assessment of Disease Activity score, and pharmacokinetic measures.

Dr. Petri disclosed relationships with Amgen, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Janssen, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline.

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– Several drugs approved for other conditions may also have good effect in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, Michelle Petri, MD, said in an interview at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

The molecules target several different disease pathways, said Dr. Petri, director of the Hopkins Lupus Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

Ustekinumab (Stelara) has accumulated the most data so far. A phase 2 study presented last fall at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology found that it conferred significant benefits relative to placebo, including a 60% responder rate (29% better than placebo), a significantly lower flare rate, and improvements in musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous disease features. The rate of serious adverse events was acceptable (8.3% vs. 9.5% for placebo).

Baricitinib is also being investigated in SLE, Dr. Petri said. A phase 2 study conducted by Eli Lilly closed late last year and will be reported on June 13 at the European League Against Rheumatism’s opening plenary session (Wallace et al. EULAR 2018 abstract OP0019).

The three-armed, placebo-controlled study comprised 314 patients who were randomized to placebo or one of two baricitinib doses, given orally for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was remission of arthritis and/or rash as measured by the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). Secondary endpoints included responder rate, change from baseline in the SLEDAI-2K, change in the Global Assessment of Disease Activity score, and pharmacokinetic measures.

Dr. Petri disclosed relationships with Amgen, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Janssen, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline.

 

– Several drugs approved for other conditions may also have good effect in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, Michelle Petri, MD, said in an interview at the annual Congress of Clinical Rheumatology.

The molecules target several different disease pathways, said Dr. Petri, director of the Hopkins Lupus Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

Ustekinumab (Stelara) has accumulated the most data so far. A phase 2 study presented last fall at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology found that it conferred significant benefits relative to placebo, including a 60% responder rate (29% better than placebo), a significantly lower flare rate, and improvements in musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous disease features. The rate of serious adverse events was acceptable (8.3% vs. 9.5% for placebo).

Baricitinib is also being investigated in SLE, Dr. Petri said. A phase 2 study conducted by Eli Lilly closed late last year and will be reported on June 13 at the European League Against Rheumatism’s opening plenary session (Wallace et al. EULAR 2018 abstract OP0019).

The three-armed, placebo-controlled study comprised 314 patients who were randomized to placebo or one of two baricitinib doses, given orally for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was remission of arthritis and/or rash as measured by the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K). Secondary endpoints included responder rate, change from baseline in the SLEDAI-2K, change in the Global Assessment of Disease Activity score, and pharmacokinetic measures.

Dr. Petri disclosed relationships with Amgen, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Janssen, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline.

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM CCR 18

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

CMSC looks to increase advocacy efforts to address looming concerns

Article Type
Changed

 

As patients with multiple sclerosis and their caregivers face various challenges in the American health care system, the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC) is re-energizing its focus on advocacy. The 2018 annual meeting in Nashville, Tenn., will feature programming designed to teach MS professionals and researchers how to speak up and let their voices be heard.

“CMSC has re-engaged in advocacy, in a more focused and energized way, because of mounting concerns that there is inadequate advocacy pressure on some of the critical issues negatively impacting the quality and comprehensive nature of MS care required of people living with MS,” said Lisa Taylor Skutnik, a physical therapist and chief operating officer of the CMSC. “Both people living with MS and the clinicians dedicated to treating them are increasingly frustrated and powerless in attempts to facilitate the right care and resources for people living with MS. Our members are facing significant barriers and obstacles to ensure timely and seamless comprehensive care.”

Lisa Taylor Skutnik
Specifically, she said, the MS community is concerned about topics such as “the shortage of health care professionals engaged in MS care; the future of the MS workforce; limited/compromised access to MS neurology clinicians, mental health professionals, and rehabilitation professionals trained in MS care; and drug pricing/utilization management challenges.”

The development of quality measures in MS is also a “huge concern,” she said, referring to the federal government’s efforts to develop new ways to measure whether health professionals are providing high-quality care. Physicians have expressed widespread concern about the measures, which are being linked to reimbursement from Medicare and Medicaid.

Among the highlights of the CMSC meeting will be an educational session that “will focus on the available resources within the MS community for MS professionals and researchers to access advocacy efforts and get involved,” Ms. Skutnik said.

Another educational session “will focus on helping MS clinicians and researchers to understand all of the various stakeholders and their respective perspectives related to access to comprehensive care services for those living with MS,” such as pharmacy benefit managers and insurers, she said.
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

As patients with multiple sclerosis and their caregivers face various challenges in the American health care system, the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC) is re-energizing its focus on advocacy. The 2018 annual meeting in Nashville, Tenn., will feature programming designed to teach MS professionals and researchers how to speak up and let their voices be heard.

“CMSC has re-engaged in advocacy, in a more focused and energized way, because of mounting concerns that there is inadequate advocacy pressure on some of the critical issues negatively impacting the quality and comprehensive nature of MS care required of people living with MS,” said Lisa Taylor Skutnik, a physical therapist and chief operating officer of the CMSC. “Both people living with MS and the clinicians dedicated to treating them are increasingly frustrated and powerless in attempts to facilitate the right care and resources for people living with MS. Our members are facing significant barriers and obstacles to ensure timely and seamless comprehensive care.”

Lisa Taylor Skutnik
Specifically, she said, the MS community is concerned about topics such as “the shortage of health care professionals engaged in MS care; the future of the MS workforce; limited/compromised access to MS neurology clinicians, mental health professionals, and rehabilitation professionals trained in MS care; and drug pricing/utilization management challenges.”

The development of quality measures in MS is also a “huge concern,” she said, referring to the federal government’s efforts to develop new ways to measure whether health professionals are providing high-quality care. Physicians have expressed widespread concern about the measures, which are being linked to reimbursement from Medicare and Medicaid.

Among the highlights of the CMSC meeting will be an educational session that “will focus on the available resources within the MS community for MS professionals and researchers to access advocacy efforts and get involved,” Ms. Skutnik said.

Another educational session “will focus on helping MS clinicians and researchers to understand all of the various stakeholders and their respective perspectives related to access to comprehensive care services for those living with MS,” such as pharmacy benefit managers and insurers, she said.

 

As patients with multiple sclerosis and their caregivers face various challenges in the American health care system, the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC) is re-energizing its focus on advocacy. The 2018 annual meeting in Nashville, Tenn., will feature programming designed to teach MS professionals and researchers how to speak up and let their voices be heard.

“CMSC has re-engaged in advocacy, in a more focused and energized way, because of mounting concerns that there is inadequate advocacy pressure on some of the critical issues negatively impacting the quality and comprehensive nature of MS care required of people living with MS,” said Lisa Taylor Skutnik, a physical therapist and chief operating officer of the CMSC. “Both people living with MS and the clinicians dedicated to treating them are increasingly frustrated and powerless in attempts to facilitate the right care and resources for people living with MS. Our members are facing significant barriers and obstacles to ensure timely and seamless comprehensive care.”

Lisa Taylor Skutnik
Specifically, she said, the MS community is concerned about topics such as “the shortage of health care professionals engaged in MS care; the future of the MS workforce; limited/compromised access to MS neurology clinicians, mental health professionals, and rehabilitation professionals trained in MS care; and drug pricing/utilization management challenges.”

The development of quality measures in MS is also a “huge concern,” she said, referring to the federal government’s efforts to develop new ways to measure whether health professionals are providing high-quality care. Physicians have expressed widespread concern about the measures, which are being linked to reimbursement from Medicare and Medicaid.

Among the highlights of the CMSC meeting will be an educational session that “will focus on the available resources within the MS community for MS professionals and researchers to access advocacy efforts and get involved,” Ms. Skutnik said.

Another educational session “will focus on helping MS clinicians and researchers to understand all of the various stakeholders and their respective perspectives related to access to comprehensive care services for those living with MS,” such as pharmacy benefit managers and insurers, she said.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

MDedge Daily News: Genes, not adiposity, may be driving appetite differences in obesity

Article Type
Changed

 

Research shows that genes may be driving appetite differences in obesity, not adiposity. Also today, conservative early approach likely best, the true burden of nonmelanoma skin cancer and atopic eczema is linked to cardiovascular disease.

Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.


 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Research shows that genes may be driving appetite differences in obesity, not adiposity. Also today, conservative early approach likely best, the true burden of nonmelanoma skin cancer and atopic eczema is linked to cardiovascular disease.

Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.


 

 

Research shows that genes may be driving appetite differences in obesity, not adiposity. Also today, conservative early approach likely best, the true burden of nonmelanoma skin cancer and atopic eczema is linked to cardiovascular disease.

Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.


 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

VA Nurses Address Critical Needs

Article Type
Changed

For more than 35 years, the Nurses Organization of Veterans Affairs (NOVA) has been the voice of more than 3,000 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) nurses caring for veterans. Speaking on behalf of its members, NOVA leaders provide an annual list of its legislative priority goals, which identifies concerns that require either legislation, funding, or implementation at the regulatory level within the VA.

At the top of this list of priorities is the ability to retain, recruit, and hire critical staff. The VA has had difficulty hiring essential staff at many levels within its health care facilities. A VA internal audit found that the need for additional doctors, nurses, and other specialty care was the highest barrier or challenge to providing access to care for veterans. Both congressional VA oversight committees have discussed this issue and included hiring provisions in their respective Choice/Community Care bills that await final action in both chambers.

In its recruitment/staffing goals, NOVA identified the 5 following areas:

  • Hire additional human resources (HR) staff and review and streamline policies and procedures to improve the hiring process;
  • Review thoroughly downgrades and reclassification of critical positions across the VA;
  • Increase training of HR personnel on use of locality pay process in hiring;
  • Revise the cap on nurse pay structures and registered nurse pay schedules and reclassification of critical positions so that VA can ensure competitive salaries; and
  • Address USAJOBS website problems, including the complexity and excessive time required to complete application and inadequate applications response/feedback.

Addressing Choice/Community Integrated Health Care—Choice 2.0—is another NOVA goal. When the VA cannot provide timely care to veterans, NOVA supports the use of outside providers. A consolidated community care program implemented with clear eligibility rules and training for VA employees will end confusion for veterans using the program. The leadership of NOVA believes that the VA must remain the first point of access and coordinator of all health care for enrolled veterans. The Choice program was intended to fill gaps and be a temporary solution to access issues. Current legislation would consolidate all non-VA care and make the Choice program permanent with funding subject to appropriations.

Although NOVA supports the addition of community providers as a crucial part of an integrated network designed to provide care where there are shortages, the change has called attention to myriad problems created by outside providers, such as delays in care, the wrong care, or the veteran not being seen at all. Any final Choice/Community Care legislation must include mandatory training for both VA personnel and community providers to improve coordination and timeliness of care and services. The legislation also must hold community providers to the same high standards and quality metrics already in place at the VA.

Last, NOVA addresses information technology (IT) across VHA, which includes supporting an electronic health record for seamless transition of care between DoD and VA, proper funding for all IT stations to improve patient safety, software usability, and standardization of patient health care records across the system. As the VA continues to modernize, NOVA asks that nursing leadership be at the forefront of all strategic decision making.

As an advocate for its members and the patients they serve, NOVA will continue to share its views with Congress, the administration, and VA leadership on how they can work together toward common goals—educating the next generation of nurses, providing innovative health care solutions, or learning how veterans envision their health care. For more information about NOVA, a list of its 2018 Legislative Priority Goals, or to become a member, visit vanurse.org.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Morris is Director of Advocacy and Government Relations at the Nurses Organization of Veterans Affairs.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
Federal Practitioner , Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 35(5)a
Publications
Topics
Page Number
14
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Morris is Director of Advocacy and Government Relations at the Nurses Organization of Veterans Affairs.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
Federal Practitioner , Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies.

Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Morris is Director of Advocacy and Government Relations at the Nurses Organization of Veterans Affairs.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
Federal Practitioner , Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, or any of its agencies.

Article PDF
Article PDF

For more than 35 years, the Nurses Organization of Veterans Affairs (NOVA) has been the voice of more than 3,000 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) nurses caring for veterans. Speaking on behalf of its members, NOVA leaders provide an annual list of its legislative priority goals, which identifies concerns that require either legislation, funding, or implementation at the regulatory level within the VA.

At the top of this list of priorities is the ability to retain, recruit, and hire critical staff. The VA has had difficulty hiring essential staff at many levels within its health care facilities. A VA internal audit found that the need for additional doctors, nurses, and other specialty care was the highest barrier or challenge to providing access to care for veterans. Both congressional VA oversight committees have discussed this issue and included hiring provisions in their respective Choice/Community Care bills that await final action in both chambers.

In its recruitment/staffing goals, NOVA identified the 5 following areas:

  • Hire additional human resources (HR) staff and review and streamline policies and procedures to improve the hiring process;
  • Review thoroughly downgrades and reclassification of critical positions across the VA;
  • Increase training of HR personnel on use of locality pay process in hiring;
  • Revise the cap on nurse pay structures and registered nurse pay schedules and reclassification of critical positions so that VA can ensure competitive salaries; and
  • Address USAJOBS website problems, including the complexity and excessive time required to complete application and inadequate applications response/feedback.

Addressing Choice/Community Integrated Health Care—Choice 2.0—is another NOVA goal. When the VA cannot provide timely care to veterans, NOVA supports the use of outside providers. A consolidated community care program implemented with clear eligibility rules and training for VA employees will end confusion for veterans using the program. The leadership of NOVA believes that the VA must remain the first point of access and coordinator of all health care for enrolled veterans. The Choice program was intended to fill gaps and be a temporary solution to access issues. Current legislation would consolidate all non-VA care and make the Choice program permanent with funding subject to appropriations.

Although NOVA supports the addition of community providers as a crucial part of an integrated network designed to provide care where there are shortages, the change has called attention to myriad problems created by outside providers, such as delays in care, the wrong care, or the veteran not being seen at all. Any final Choice/Community Care legislation must include mandatory training for both VA personnel and community providers to improve coordination and timeliness of care and services. The legislation also must hold community providers to the same high standards and quality metrics already in place at the VA.

Last, NOVA addresses information technology (IT) across VHA, which includes supporting an electronic health record for seamless transition of care between DoD and VA, proper funding for all IT stations to improve patient safety, software usability, and standardization of patient health care records across the system. As the VA continues to modernize, NOVA asks that nursing leadership be at the forefront of all strategic decision making.

As an advocate for its members and the patients they serve, NOVA will continue to share its views with Congress, the administration, and VA leadership on how they can work together toward common goals—educating the next generation of nurses, providing innovative health care solutions, or learning how veterans envision their health care. For more information about NOVA, a list of its 2018 Legislative Priority Goals, or to become a member, visit vanurse.org.

For more than 35 years, the Nurses Organization of Veterans Affairs (NOVA) has been the voice of more than 3,000 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) nurses caring for veterans. Speaking on behalf of its members, NOVA leaders provide an annual list of its legislative priority goals, which identifies concerns that require either legislation, funding, or implementation at the regulatory level within the VA.

At the top of this list of priorities is the ability to retain, recruit, and hire critical staff. The VA has had difficulty hiring essential staff at many levels within its health care facilities. A VA internal audit found that the need for additional doctors, nurses, and other specialty care was the highest barrier or challenge to providing access to care for veterans. Both congressional VA oversight committees have discussed this issue and included hiring provisions in their respective Choice/Community Care bills that await final action in both chambers.

In its recruitment/staffing goals, NOVA identified the 5 following areas:

  • Hire additional human resources (HR) staff and review and streamline policies and procedures to improve the hiring process;
  • Review thoroughly downgrades and reclassification of critical positions across the VA;
  • Increase training of HR personnel on use of locality pay process in hiring;
  • Revise the cap on nurse pay structures and registered nurse pay schedules and reclassification of critical positions so that VA can ensure competitive salaries; and
  • Address USAJOBS website problems, including the complexity and excessive time required to complete application and inadequate applications response/feedback.

Addressing Choice/Community Integrated Health Care—Choice 2.0—is another NOVA goal. When the VA cannot provide timely care to veterans, NOVA supports the use of outside providers. A consolidated community care program implemented with clear eligibility rules and training for VA employees will end confusion for veterans using the program. The leadership of NOVA believes that the VA must remain the first point of access and coordinator of all health care for enrolled veterans. The Choice program was intended to fill gaps and be a temporary solution to access issues. Current legislation would consolidate all non-VA care and make the Choice program permanent with funding subject to appropriations.

Although NOVA supports the addition of community providers as a crucial part of an integrated network designed to provide care where there are shortages, the change has called attention to myriad problems created by outside providers, such as delays in care, the wrong care, or the veteran not being seen at all. Any final Choice/Community Care legislation must include mandatory training for both VA personnel and community providers to improve coordination and timeliness of care and services. The legislation also must hold community providers to the same high standards and quality metrics already in place at the VA.

Last, NOVA addresses information technology (IT) across VHA, which includes supporting an electronic health record for seamless transition of care between DoD and VA, proper funding for all IT stations to improve patient safety, software usability, and standardization of patient health care records across the system. As the VA continues to modernize, NOVA asks that nursing leadership be at the forefront of all strategic decision making.

As an advocate for its members and the patients they serve, NOVA will continue to share its views with Congress, the administration, and VA leadership on how they can work together toward common goals—educating the next generation of nurses, providing innovative health care solutions, or learning how veterans envision their health care. For more information about NOVA, a list of its 2018 Legislative Priority Goals, or to become a member, visit vanurse.org.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 35(5)a
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 35(5)a
Page Number
14
Page Number
14
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Eyebrow Default
NOVA Updates
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media

New and Noteworthy Information—May 2018

Article Type
Changed

Starting School Later Improves Sleep Time

Delaying school start time can provide sustained benefits for sleep duration, daytime alertness, and mental well-being, according to a study published online ahead of print April 10 in Sleep. The study included 375 girls in grades 7 to 10 from a secondary school for girls. The school delayed its start time from 7:30 to 8:15 in the morning. Self-reports of sleep timing, sleepiness, and well-being were obtained at baseline before the delay and at approximately one and nine months after the delay. After one month, bedtimes on school nights were delayed by nine minutes, while rise times were delayed by 31.6 minutes, resulting in an increase in time in bed of 23.2 minutes. After nine months, the increase in time in bed was sustained, and total sleep time increased by 10 minutes.

Lo JC, Lee SM, Lee XK, et al. Sustained benefits of delaying school start time on adolescent sleep and well-being. Sleep. 2018 Apr 10 [Epub ahead of print].

Stroke Affects Social, Cognitive, and Psychologic Outcomes

Patients with ischemic stroke report symptoms in multiple domains that increase to variable degrees at higher levels of disability, according to a study published online ahead of print March 28 in Neurology. The observational cohort included 1,195 patients who completed Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders or the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scales as part of routine care. Participants were questioned about their physical function, satisfaction with social roles, fatigue, anxiety, depression, pain interference, and sleep disturbance. Researchers also measured participants’ level of disability. Among people with stroke, scores were considerably worse than those in the general population in every area except sleep and depression. About 58% of people with stroke had scores related to satisfaction with social roles that were meaningfully worse than those of the general population.

Katzan IL, Thompson NR, Uchino K, Lapin B. The most affected health domains after ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2018 Mar 28 [Epub ahead of print].

ALS Genetic Variant Also a Risk Factor for Frontotemporal Dementia

One of the newly identified genetic variants associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) also is a risk factor for frontotemporal dementia (FTD), according to a study published online ahead of print April 9 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers pooled data from previous genome-wide association studies that included genetic data from 124,876 participants. The studies included healthy controls and participants with ALS, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, FTD, corticobasal degeneration, and progressive supranuclear palsy. Investigators found that a variation in a region of DNA containing the gene for tau protein was associated with elevated risk for ALS. In addition, study authors found significant genetic overlap between ALS and FTD at known ALS loci rs13302855, rs3849942, and rs4239633. They also found a genetic variation at rs538622 that is associated with ALS and FTD and affects BNIP1 production in the brain.

Karch CM, Wen N, Fan CC, et al. Selective genetic overlap between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and diseases of the frontotemporal dementia spectrum. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 9 [Epub ahead of print].

Intervention Promotes Stroke Preparedness

Hip-Hop Stroke (HHS) is an effective, intergenerational model for increasing stroke preparedness among economically disadvantaged minorities, according to a study published in the April issue of Stroke. HHS is a three-hour, culturally tailored, theory-based, multimedia stroke literacy intervention that empowers schoolchildren to share stroke information with parents. Researchers recruited 3,070 fourth- through sixth-graders and 1,144 parents from 22 schools into a cluster-randomized trial. Schools were randomized to the HHS intervention or attentional control (ie, nutrition classes). Main outcome measures were stroke knowledge and preparedness of children and parents using validated surrogates. Among children, it was estimated that 1% of controls and 2% of the intervention group demonstrated optimal stroke preparedness at baseline, increasing to 57% immediately after the program in the intervention group.

Williams O, Leighton-Herrmann Quinn E, Teresi J, et al. Improving community stroke preparedness in the HHS (Hip-Hop Stroke) randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 2018;49(4):972-979.

Risk of Unnatural Death Is Increased in Epilepsy

People with epilepsy are at increased risk of mortality from suicide and accidents, according to a study published online ahead of print April 9 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers examined the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and the Secure Anonymized Information Linkage (SAIL) databank, which are linked to hospitalization and mortality records. They matched people with epilepsy on age, sex, and general practice with as many as 20 controls. In all, 44,678 people in the CPRD and 14,051 individuals in the SAIL databank were identified in the prevalent epilepsy cohorts. Furthermore, 891,429 participants from the CPRD and 279,365 people from the SAIL databank were identified as controls. People with epilepsy were significantly more likely to die of an unnatural cause, unintentional injury, poisoning, or suicide, compared with controls.

 

 

Gorton HC, Webb RT, Carr MJ, et al. Risk of unnatural mortality in people with epilepsy. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 9 [Epub ahead of print].

Method to Assess Consciousness May Improve Care

The Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupil (GCS-P) score provides a way to rapidly assess levels of consciousness in people with head injuries and could improve patient care, according to a study published online ahead of print April 10 in the Journal of Neurosurgery. Investigators obtained patient-level information about early GCS scores, pupil responses, late outcomes on the Glasgow Outcome Scale, and mortality by reviewing data from the Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury study and the International Mission for Prognosis and Clinical Trials database. GCS score and pupil response were independently related to patient outcome. Adding information about pupil response to the GCS score improved the information. The performance of the GCS-P was similar to that of methods for evaluating traumatic brain damage.

Brennan PM, Murray GD, Teasdale GM. Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 1: The GCS-Pupils score: an extended index of clinical severity. J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 10 [Epub ahead of print].

Biomarkers of Dementia Risk Identified

Researchers have identified novel biomarkers of risk for future dementia, according to a study published online ahead of print February 28 in Alzheimer’s & Dementia. Investigators analyzed metabolites in blood samples drawn from 22,623 people enrolled in eight prospective cohorts. Over 246,698 person-years, they detected 995 cases of incident dementia and 745 cases of incident Alzheimer’s disease. Isoleucine, leucine, valine, creatinine, and two VLDL-specific lipoprotein lipid subclasses were associated with lower dementia risk. One HDL and one VLDL lipoprotein lipid subclass were associated with increased dementia risk. Branched-chain amino acids also were associated with decreased Alzheimer’s disease risk, and the concentration of cholesterol esters relative to total lipids in large HDL was associated with increased Alzheimer’s disease risk.

Tynkkynen J, Chouraki V, van der Lee SJ, et al. Association of branched-chain amino acids and other circulating metabolites with risk of incident dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective study in eight cohorts. Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Feb 28 [Epub ahead of print].

Smartphone App Helps Doctors Track Parkinson’s Disease Symptoms

A smartphone app generates a score that reflects symptom severity in patients with Parkinson’s disease, according to a study published online ahead of print March 26 in JAMA Neurology. This observational study assessed people with Parkinson’s disease who remotely completed voice, finger tapping, gait, balance, and reaction time tasks on the app. Researchers generated a mobile Parkinson’s disease score (mPDS) of 0 to 100 that objectively weighed features derived from each smartphone activity. The mPDS was based on 6,148 smartphone activity assessments from 129 individuals. Gait features contributed most to the total mPDS (33.4%). The mPDS detected symptom fluctuations with a mean intraday change of 13.9 points. The mPDS improved by a mean of 16.3 points in response to dopaminergic therapy.

Zhan A, Mohan S, Tarolli C, et al. Using smartphones and machine learning to quantify Parkinson disease severity: the mobile Parkinson disease score. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Mar 26 [Epub ahead of print].

Age at Natural Menopause Linked to Memory

Entering menopause at a later age may benefit memory in women years later, according to a study published online ahead of print April 11 in Neurology. Researchers used data from 1,315 participants in the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development with known age at period cessation and as many as four assessments of verbal memory and processing speed at ages 43, 53, between 60 and 64, and 69. Investigators fitted multilevel models with linear and quadratic age terms, stratified by natural or surgical menopause, and adjusted for hormone replacement therapy, BMI, smoking, occupational class, education, and childhood cognitive ability. Verbal memory increased with later age at natural menopause and with later age at surgical menopause. The association between age at natural menopause and verbal memory remained significant after data adjustment.

Kuh D, Cooper R, Moore A, et al. Age at menopause and lifetime cognition: findings from a British birth cohort study. Neurology. 2018 Apr 11 [Epub ahead of print].

Single-Pulse TMS Decreases Migraine Frequency

Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) may be an effective, well-tolerated treatment option for migraine prevention, according to a study published online ahead of print March 4 in Cephalalgia. Researchers examined data from the eNeura SpringTMS Post-Market Observational US Study of Migraine, a multicenter, prospective, open-label, observational study. A total of 263 patients with migraine completed a one-month baseline headache diary, followed by three months of preventive (four pulses bid) and acute treatment (three pulses repeated as many as three times per attack). In all, 220 participants were eligible based on their number of headache days. The device was assigned to 217 subjects, and 132 were included in the intention-to-treat full-analysis set. Treatment reduced mean monthly headache days by 2.75. The most common adverse events were tingling, lightheadedness, and tinnitus.

 

 

Starling AJ, Tepper SJ, Marmura MJ, et al. A multicenter, prospective, single arm, open label, observational study of sTMS for migraine prevention (ESPOUSE Study). Cephalalgia. 2018 Mar 4 [Epub ahead of print].

Short Sleep Increases Risk of Obesity in the Young

Short sleep duration is a risk factor for obesity in infants, children, and adolescents, according to a study published online ahead of print February 1 in Sleep. Researchers reviewed the results of 42 population studies that included 75,499 infants, children, and adolescents ages 0 to 18. Sleep duration was assessed through methods such as questionnaires and wearable technology. The investigators classified participants as short sleepers or regular sleepers. Short sleepers were defined as having less sleep than the reference category for their age. Participants were followed up for a median of three years, and changes in BMI and incidence of overweight status and obesity were recorded. At all ages, short sleepers gained more weight and were 58% more likely to become overweight or obese.

Miller MA, Kruisbrink M, Wallace J, et al. Sleep duration and incidence of obesity in infants, children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sleep. 2018 Feb 1 [Epub ahead of print].

—Kimberly Williams

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
3-4
Sections

Starting School Later Improves Sleep Time

Delaying school start time can provide sustained benefits for sleep duration, daytime alertness, and mental well-being, according to a study published online ahead of print April 10 in Sleep. The study included 375 girls in grades 7 to 10 from a secondary school for girls. The school delayed its start time from 7:30 to 8:15 in the morning. Self-reports of sleep timing, sleepiness, and well-being were obtained at baseline before the delay and at approximately one and nine months after the delay. After one month, bedtimes on school nights were delayed by nine minutes, while rise times were delayed by 31.6 minutes, resulting in an increase in time in bed of 23.2 minutes. After nine months, the increase in time in bed was sustained, and total sleep time increased by 10 minutes.

Lo JC, Lee SM, Lee XK, et al. Sustained benefits of delaying school start time on adolescent sleep and well-being. Sleep. 2018 Apr 10 [Epub ahead of print].

Stroke Affects Social, Cognitive, and Psychologic Outcomes

Patients with ischemic stroke report symptoms in multiple domains that increase to variable degrees at higher levels of disability, according to a study published online ahead of print March 28 in Neurology. The observational cohort included 1,195 patients who completed Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders or the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scales as part of routine care. Participants were questioned about their physical function, satisfaction with social roles, fatigue, anxiety, depression, pain interference, and sleep disturbance. Researchers also measured participants’ level of disability. Among people with stroke, scores were considerably worse than those in the general population in every area except sleep and depression. About 58% of people with stroke had scores related to satisfaction with social roles that were meaningfully worse than those of the general population.

Katzan IL, Thompson NR, Uchino K, Lapin B. The most affected health domains after ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2018 Mar 28 [Epub ahead of print].

ALS Genetic Variant Also a Risk Factor for Frontotemporal Dementia

One of the newly identified genetic variants associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) also is a risk factor for frontotemporal dementia (FTD), according to a study published online ahead of print April 9 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers pooled data from previous genome-wide association studies that included genetic data from 124,876 participants. The studies included healthy controls and participants with ALS, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, FTD, corticobasal degeneration, and progressive supranuclear palsy. Investigators found that a variation in a region of DNA containing the gene for tau protein was associated with elevated risk for ALS. In addition, study authors found significant genetic overlap between ALS and FTD at known ALS loci rs13302855, rs3849942, and rs4239633. They also found a genetic variation at rs538622 that is associated with ALS and FTD and affects BNIP1 production in the brain.

Karch CM, Wen N, Fan CC, et al. Selective genetic overlap between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and diseases of the frontotemporal dementia spectrum. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 9 [Epub ahead of print].

Intervention Promotes Stroke Preparedness

Hip-Hop Stroke (HHS) is an effective, intergenerational model for increasing stroke preparedness among economically disadvantaged minorities, according to a study published in the April issue of Stroke. HHS is a three-hour, culturally tailored, theory-based, multimedia stroke literacy intervention that empowers schoolchildren to share stroke information with parents. Researchers recruited 3,070 fourth- through sixth-graders and 1,144 parents from 22 schools into a cluster-randomized trial. Schools were randomized to the HHS intervention or attentional control (ie, nutrition classes). Main outcome measures were stroke knowledge and preparedness of children and parents using validated surrogates. Among children, it was estimated that 1% of controls and 2% of the intervention group demonstrated optimal stroke preparedness at baseline, increasing to 57% immediately after the program in the intervention group.

Williams O, Leighton-Herrmann Quinn E, Teresi J, et al. Improving community stroke preparedness in the HHS (Hip-Hop Stroke) randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 2018;49(4):972-979.

Risk of Unnatural Death Is Increased in Epilepsy

People with epilepsy are at increased risk of mortality from suicide and accidents, according to a study published online ahead of print April 9 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers examined the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and the Secure Anonymized Information Linkage (SAIL) databank, which are linked to hospitalization and mortality records. They matched people with epilepsy on age, sex, and general practice with as many as 20 controls. In all, 44,678 people in the CPRD and 14,051 individuals in the SAIL databank were identified in the prevalent epilepsy cohorts. Furthermore, 891,429 participants from the CPRD and 279,365 people from the SAIL databank were identified as controls. People with epilepsy were significantly more likely to die of an unnatural cause, unintentional injury, poisoning, or suicide, compared with controls.

 

 

Gorton HC, Webb RT, Carr MJ, et al. Risk of unnatural mortality in people with epilepsy. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 9 [Epub ahead of print].

Method to Assess Consciousness May Improve Care

The Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupil (GCS-P) score provides a way to rapidly assess levels of consciousness in people with head injuries and could improve patient care, according to a study published online ahead of print April 10 in the Journal of Neurosurgery. Investigators obtained patient-level information about early GCS scores, pupil responses, late outcomes on the Glasgow Outcome Scale, and mortality by reviewing data from the Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury study and the International Mission for Prognosis and Clinical Trials database. GCS score and pupil response were independently related to patient outcome. Adding information about pupil response to the GCS score improved the information. The performance of the GCS-P was similar to that of methods for evaluating traumatic brain damage.

Brennan PM, Murray GD, Teasdale GM. Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 1: The GCS-Pupils score: an extended index of clinical severity. J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 10 [Epub ahead of print].

Biomarkers of Dementia Risk Identified

Researchers have identified novel biomarkers of risk for future dementia, according to a study published online ahead of print February 28 in Alzheimer’s & Dementia. Investigators analyzed metabolites in blood samples drawn from 22,623 people enrolled in eight prospective cohorts. Over 246,698 person-years, they detected 995 cases of incident dementia and 745 cases of incident Alzheimer’s disease. Isoleucine, leucine, valine, creatinine, and two VLDL-specific lipoprotein lipid subclasses were associated with lower dementia risk. One HDL and one VLDL lipoprotein lipid subclass were associated with increased dementia risk. Branched-chain amino acids also were associated with decreased Alzheimer’s disease risk, and the concentration of cholesterol esters relative to total lipids in large HDL was associated with increased Alzheimer’s disease risk.

Tynkkynen J, Chouraki V, van der Lee SJ, et al. Association of branched-chain amino acids and other circulating metabolites with risk of incident dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective study in eight cohorts. Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Feb 28 [Epub ahead of print].

Smartphone App Helps Doctors Track Parkinson’s Disease Symptoms

A smartphone app generates a score that reflects symptom severity in patients with Parkinson’s disease, according to a study published online ahead of print March 26 in JAMA Neurology. This observational study assessed people with Parkinson’s disease who remotely completed voice, finger tapping, gait, balance, and reaction time tasks on the app. Researchers generated a mobile Parkinson’s disease score (mPDS) of 0 to 100 that objectively weighed features derived from each smartphone activity. The mPDS was based on 6,148 smartphone activity assessments from 129 individuals. Gait features contributed most to the total mPDS (33.4%). The mPDS detected symptom fluctuations with a mean intraday change of 13.9 points. The mPDS improved by a mean of 16.3 points in response to dopaminergic therapy.

Zhan A, Mohan S, Tarolli C, et al. Using smartphones and machine learning to quantify Parkinson disease severity: the mobile Parkinson disease score. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Mar 26 [Epub ahead of print].

Age at Natural Menopause Linked to Memory

Entering menopause at a later age may benefit memory in women years later, according to a study published online ahead of print April 11 in Neurology. Researchers used data from 1,315 participants in the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development with known age at period cessation and as many as four assessments of verbal memory and processing speed at ages 43, 53, between 60 and 64, and 69. Investigators fitted multilevel models with linear and quadratic age terms, stratified by natural or surgical menopause, and adjusted for hormone replacement therapy, BMI, smoking, occupational class, education, and childhood cognitive ability. Verbal memory increased with later age at natural menopause and with later age at surgical menopause. The association between age at natural menopause and verbal memory remained significant after data adjustment.

Kuh D, Cooper R, Moore A, et al. Age at menopause and lifetime cognition: findings from a British birth cohort study. Neurology. 2018 Apr 11 [Epub ahead of print].

Single-Pulse TMS Decreases Migraine Frequency

Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) may be an effective, well-tolerated treatment option for migraine prevention, according to a study published online ahead of print March 4 in Cephalalgia. Researchers examined data from the eNeura SpringTMS Post-Market Observational US Study of Migraine, a multicenter, prospective, open-label, observational study. A total of 263 patients with migraine completed a one-month baseline headache diary, followed by three months of preventive (four pulses bid) and acute treatment (three pulses repeated as many as three times per attack). In all, 220 participants were eligible based on their number of headache days. The device was assigned to 217 subjects, and 132 were included in the intention-to-treat full-analysis set. Treatment reduced mean monthly headache days by 2.75. The most common adverse events were tingling, lightheadedness, and tinnitus.

 

 

Starling AJ, Tepper SJ, Marmura MJ, et al. A multicenter, prospective, single arm, open label, observational study of sTMS for migraine prevention (ESPOUSE Study). Cephalalgia. 2018 Mar 4 [Epub ahead of print].

Short Sleep Increases Risk of Obesity in the Young

Short sleep duration is a risk factor for obesity in infants, children, and adolescents, according to a study published online ahead of print February 1 in Sleep. Researchers reviewed the results of 42 population studies that included 75,499 infants, children, and adolescents ages 0 to 18. Sleep duration was assessed through methods such as questionnaires and wearable technology. The investigators classified participants as short sleepers or regular sleepers. Short sleepers were defined as having less sleep than the reference category for their age. Participants were followed up for a median of three years, and changes in BMI and incidence of overweight status and obesity were recorded. At all ages, short sleepers gained more weight and were 58% more likely to become overweight or obese.

Miller MA, Kruisbrink M, Wallace J, et al. Sleep duration and incidence of obesity in infants, children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sleep. 2018 Feb 1 [Epub ahead of print].

—Kimberly Williams

Starting School Later Improves Sleep Time

Delaying school start time can provide sustained benefits for sleep duration, daytime alertness, and mental well-being, according to a study published online ahead of print April 10 in Sleep. The study included 375 girls in grades 7 to 10 from a secondary school for girls. The school delayed its start time from 7:30 to 8:15 in the morning. Self-reports of sleep timing, sleepiness, and well-being were obtained at baseline before the delay and at approximately one and nine months after the delay. After one month, bedtimes on school nights were delayed by nine minutes, while rise times were delayed by 31.6 minutes, resulting in an increase in time in bed of 23.2 minutes. After nine months, the increase in time in bed was sustained, and total sleep time increased by 10 minutes.

Lo JC, Lee SM, Lee XK, et al. Sustained benefits of delaying school start time on adolescent sleep and well-being. Sleep. 2018 Apr 10 [Epub ahead of print].

Stroke Affects Social, Cognitive, and Psychologic Outcomes

Patients with ischemic stroke report symptoms in multiple domains that increase to variable degrees at higher levels of disability, according to a study published online ahead of print March 28 in Neurology. The observational cohort included 1,195 patients who completed Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders or the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scales as part of routine care. Participants were questioned about their physical function, satisfaction with social roles, fatigue, anxiety, depression, pain interference, and sleep disturbance. Researchers also measured participants’ level of disability. Among people with stroke, scores were considerably worse than those in the general population in every area except sleep and depression. About 58% of people with stroke had scores related to satisfaction with social roles that were meaningfully worse than those of the general population.

Katzan IL, Thompson NR, Uchino K, Lapin B. The most affected health domains after ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2018 Mar 28 [Epub ahead of print].

ALS Genetic Variant Also a Risk Factor for Frontotemporal Dementia

One of the newly identified genetic variants associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) also is a risk factor for frontotemporal dementia (FTD), according to a study published online ahead of print April 9 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers pooled data from previous genome-wide association studies that included genetic data from 124,876 participants. The studies included healthy controls and participants with ALS, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, FTD, corticobasal degeneration, and progressive supranuclear palsy. Investigators found that a variation in a region of DNA containing the gene for tau protein was associated with elevated risk for ALS. In addition, study authors found significant genetic overlap between ALS and FTD at known ALS loci rs13302855, rs3849942, and rs4239633. They also found a genetic variation at rs538622 that is associated with ALS and FTD and affects BNIP1 production in the brain.

Karch CM, Wen N, Fan CC, et al. Selective genetic overlap between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and diseases of the frontotemporal dementia spectrum. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 9 [Epub ahead of print].

Intervention Promotes Stroke Preparedness

Hip-Hop Stroke (HHS) is an effective, intergenerational model for increasing stroke preparedness among economically disadvantaged minorities, according to a study published in the April issue of Stroke. HHS is a three-hour, culturally tailored, theory-based, multimedia stroke literacy intervention that empowers schoolchildren to share stroke information with parents. Researchers recruited 3,070 fourth- through sixth-graders and 1,144 parents from 22 schools into a cluster-randomized trial. Schools were randomized to the HHS intervention or attentional control (ie, nutrition classes). Main outcome measures were stroke knowledge and preparedness of children and parents using validated surrogates. Among children, it was estimated that 1% of controls and 2% of the intervention group demonstrated optimal stroke preparedness at baseline, increasing to 57% immediately after the program in the intervention group.

Williams O, Leighton-Herrmann Quinn E, Teresi J, et al. Improving community stroke preparedness in the HHS (Hip-Hop Stroke) randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 2018;49(4):972-979.

Risk of Unnatural Death Is Increased in Epilepsy

People with epilepsy are at increased risk of mortality from suicide and accidents, according to a study published online ahead of print April 9 in JAMA Neurology. Researchers examined the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and the Secure Anonymized Information Linkage (SAIL) databank, which are linked to hospitalization and mortality records. They matched people with epilepsy on age, sex, and general practice with as many as 20 controls. In all, 44,678 people in the CPRD and 14,051 individuals in the SAIL databank were identified in the prevalent epilepsy cohorts. Furthermore, 891,429 participants from the CPRD and 279,365 people from the SAIL databank were identified as controls. People with epilepsy were significantly more likely to die of an unnatural cause, unintentional injury, poisoning, or suicide, compared with controls.

 

 

Gorton HC, Webb RT, Carr MJ, et al. Risk of unnatural mortality in people with epilepsy. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 9 [Epub ahead of print].

Method to Assess Consciousness May Improve Care

The Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupil (GCS-P) score provides a way to rapidly assess levels of consciousness in people with head injuries and could improve patient care, according to a study published online ahead of print April 10 in the Journal of Neurosurgery. Investigators obtained patient-level information about early GCS scores, pupil responses, late outcomes on the Glasgow Outcome Scale, and mortality by reviewing data from the Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury study and the International Mission for Prognosis and Clinical Trials database. GCS score and pupil response were independently related to patient outcome. Adding information about pupil response to the GCS score improved the information. The performance of the GCS-P was similar to that of methods for evaluating traumatic brain damage.

Brennan PM, Murray GD, Teasdale GM. Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 1: The GCS-Pupils score: an extended index of clinical severity. J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 10 [Epub ahead of print].

Biomarkers of Dementia Risk Identified

Researchers have identified novel biomarkers of risk for future dementia, according to a study published online ahead of print February 28 in Alzheimer’s & Dementia. Investigators analyzed metabolites in blood samples drawn from 22,623 people enrolled in eight prospective cohorts. Over 246,698 person-years, they detected 995 cases of incident dementia and 745 cases of incident Alzheimer’s disease. Isoleucine, leucine, valine, creatinine, and two VLDL-specific lipoprotein lipid subclasses were associated with lower dementia risk. One HDL and one VLDL lipoprotein lipid subclass were associated with increased dementia risk. Branched-chain amino acids also were associated with decreased Alzheimer’s disease risk, and the concentration of cholesterol esters relative to total lipids in large HDL was associated with increased Alzheimer’s disease risk.

Tynkkynen J, Chouraki V, van der Lee SJ, et al. Association of branched-chain amino acids and other circulating metabolites with risk of incident dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective study in eight cohorts. Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Feb 28 [Epub ahead of print].

Smartphone App Helps Doctors Track Parkinson’s Disease Symptoms

A smartphone app generates a score that reflects symptom severity in patients with Parkinson’s disease, according to a study published online ahead of print March 26 in JAMA Neurology. This observational study assessed people with Parkinson’s disease who remotely completed voice, finger tapping, gait, balance, and reaction time tasks on the app. Researchers generated a mobile Parkinson’s disease score (mPDS) of 0 to 100 that objectively weighed features derived from each smartphone activity. The mPDS was based on 6,148 smartphone activity assessments from 129 individuals. Gait features contributed most to the total mPDS (33.4%). The mPDS detected symptom fluctuations with a mean intraday change of 13.9 points. The mPDS improved by a mean of 16.3 points in response to dopaminergic therapy.

Zhan A, Mohan S, Tarolli C, et al. Using smartphones and machine learning to quantify Parkinson disease severity: the mobile Parkinson disease score. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Mar 26 [Epub ahead of print].

Age at Natural Menopause Linked to Memory

Entering menopause at a later age may benefit memory in women years later, according to a study published online ahead of print April 11 in Neurology. Researchers used data from 1,315 participants in the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development with known age at period cessation and as many as four assessments of verbal memory and processing speed at ages 43, 53, between 60 and 64, and 69. Investigators fitted multilevel models with linear and quadratic age terms, stratified by natural or surgical menopause, and adjusted for hormone replacement therapy, BMI, smoking, occupational class, education, and childhood cognitive ability. Verbal memory increased with later age at natural menopause and with later age at surgical menopause. The association between age at natural menopause and verbal memory remained significant after data adjustment.

Kuh D, Cooper R, Moore A, et al. Age at menopause and lifetime cognition: findings from a British birth cohort study. Neurology. 2018 Apr 11 [Epub ahead of print].

Single-Pulse TMS Decreases Migraine Frequency

Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) may be an effective, well-tolerated treatment option for migraine prevention, according to a study published online ahead of print March 4 in Cephalalgia. Researchers examined data from the eNeura SpringTMS Post-Market Observational US Study of Migraine, a multicenter, prospective, open-label, observational study. A total of 263 patients with migraine completed a one-month baseline headache diary, followed by three months of preventive (four pulses bid) and acute treatment (three pulses repeated as many as three times per attack). In all, 220 participants were eligible based on their number of headache days. The device was assigned to 217 subjects, and 132 were included in the intention-to-treat full-analysis set. Treatment reduced mean monthly headache days by 2.75. The most common adverse events were tingling, lightheadedness, and tinnitus.

 

 

Starling AJ, Tepper SJ, Marmura MJ, et al. A multicenter, prospective, single arm, open label, observational study of sTMS for migraine prevention (ESPOUSE Study). Cephalalgia. 2018 Mar 4 [Epub ahead of print].

Short Sleep Increases Risk of Obesity in the Young

Short sleep duration is a risk factor for obesity in infants, children, and adolescents, according to a study published online ahead of print February 1 in Sleep. Researchers reviewed the results of 42 population studies that included 75,499 infants, children, and adolescents ages 0 to 18. Sleep duration was assessed through methods such as questionnaires and wearable technology. The investigators classified participants as short sleepers or regular sleepers. Short sleepers were defined as having less sleep than the reference category for their age. Participants were followed up for a median of three years, and changes in BMI and incidence of overweight status and obesity were recorded. At all ages, short sleepers gained more weight and were 58% more likely to become overweight or obese.

Miller MA, Kruisbrink M, Wallace J, et al. Sleep duration and incidence of obesity in infants, children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sleep. 2018 Feb 1 [Epub ahead of print].

—Kimberly Williams

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(5)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 26(5)
Page Number
3-4
Page Number
3-4
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica