Calcific uremic arteriolopathy

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 07:22
Display Headline
Calcific uremic arteriolopathy

A 51-year-old man with end-stage renal disease, on peritoneal dialysis for the past 4 years, presented to the emergency department with severe pain in both legs. The pain had started 2 months previously and had progressively worsened. After multiple admissions in the past for hyperkalemia and volume overload due to noncompliance, he had been advised to switch to hemodialysis.

See related article and editorial

Figure 1. Necrotic ulcers with eschar formation surrounded by indurated plaques, accompanied by scattered flaccid bullae.
Figure 1. Necrotic ulcers with eschar formation surrounded by indurated plaques, accompanied by scattered flaccid bullae.
On examination, the skin from his toes up to his scrotum was covered with extensive tender necrotic ulcers with eschar formation surrounded by violaceous plaques and scattered flaccid bullae (Figure 1). His peripheral pulses were intact.

Laboratory analysis revealed the following values:

  • Serum creatinine 12.62 mg/dL (reference range 0.73–1.22)
  • Blood urea nitrogen 159 mg/dL (9–24)
  • Serum calcium corrected for serum albumin 8.1 mg/dL (8.4–10.0)
  • Serum phosphorus 10.6 mg/dL (2.7–4.8).

His history of end-stage renal disease, failure of peritoneal dialysis, high calcium-phosphorus product (8.1 mg/dL × 10.6 mg/dL = 85.9 mg2/dL 2, reference range ≤ 55), and characteristic physical findings led to the diagnosis of calcific uremic arteriolopathy.

CALCIFIC UREMIC ARTERIOLOPATHY

Calcific uremic arteriolopathy or “calciphylaxis,” seen most often in patients with end-stage renal disease, is caused by calcium deposition in the media of the dermo-hypodermic arterioles, leading to infarction of adjacent tissue.1–3 A high calcium-phosphorus product (> 55) has been implicated in its development; however, the calcium-phosphorus product can be normal despite hyperphosphatemia, which itself may promote ectopic calcification.

Early ischemic manifestations include livedo reticularis and painful retiform purpura on the thighs and other areas of high adiposity. Lesions evolve into violaceous plaquelike subcutaneous nodules that can infarct, become necrotic, ulcerate, and become infected. Punch biopsy demonstrating arteriolar calcification, subintimal fibrosis, and thrombosis confirms the diagnosis.

Differential diagnosis

Warfarin necrosis can cause large, irregular, bloody bullae that ulcerate and turn into eschar that may resemble lesions of calcific uremic arteriolopathy. Our patient, however, had no exposure to warfarin.

Pemphigus foliaceus, an immunoglobulin G4-mediated autoimmune disorder targeted against desmoglein-1, leads to the formation of fragile blisters that easily rupture when rubbed (Nikolsky sign). Lesions evolve into scaling, crusty erosions on an erythematous base. With tender blisters and lack of mucous membrane involvement, pemphigus foliaceus shares similarities with calcific uremic arteriolopathy, but the presence of necrotic eschar surrounded by violaceous plaques in our patient made it an unlikely diagnosis.

Cryofibrinogenemia. In the right clinical scenario, ie, in a patient with vasculitis, malignancy, infection, cryoglobulinemia, or collagen diseases, cryofibrinogen-mediated cold-induced occlusive lesions may mimic calcific uremic arteriolopathy, with painful or pruritic erythema, purpura, livedo reticularis, necrosis, and ulceration.4 Our patient had no color changes with exposure to cold, nor any history of Raynaud phenomenon or joint pain, making the diagnosis of cryofibrinogenemia less likely.

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Gadolinium contrast medium in magnetic resonance imaging can cause nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, characterized by erythematous papules that coalesce into brawny plaques with surrounding woody induration, which may resemble lesions of calcific uremic arteriolopathy.5 However, our patient had not been exposed to gadolinium.

Management

Management is multidisciplinary and includes the following1:

  • Hemodialysis, modified to optimize calcium balance2
  • Intravenous sodium thiosulfate: the exact mechanism of action remains unclear, but it is thought to play a role in chelating calcium from tissue deposits, thus decreasing pain and promoting regression of skin lesions3
  • Wound care, including chemical debridement agents, negative-pressure wound therapy, and surgical debridement for infected wounds6
  • Pain management with opioid analgesics.

The patient was treated with all these measures. However, he died of sudden cardiac arrest during the same admission.

References
  1. Weenig RH, Sewell LD, Davis MD, McCarthy JT, Pittelkow MR. Calciphylaxis: natural history, risk factor analysis, and outcome. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56(4):569–579. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2006.08.065
  2. Nigwekar SU, Kroshinsky D, Nazarian RM, et al. Calciphylaxis: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 66(1):133–146. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.01.034
  3. Janigan DT, Hirsch DJ, Klassen GA, MacDonald AS. Calcified subcutaneous arterioles with infarcts of the subcutis and skin (“calciphylaxis”) in chronic renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35(4):588–597. pmid:10739777
  4. Michaud M, Pourrat J. Cryofibrinogenemia. J Clin Rheumatol 2013; 19(3):142–148. doi:10.1097/RHU.0b013e318289e06e
  5. Galan A, Cowper SE, Bucala R. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy). Curr Opin Rheumatol 2006; 18(6):614–617. doi:10.1097/01.bor.0000245725.94887.8d
  6. Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, eds. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2003:558–562.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Mrinali Shetty, MD
Chief Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ

Yuvraj Chowdhury, MD
Chief Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ

Balaji Yegneswaran, MD, FACP
Associate Program Director, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital,
New Brunswick, NJ

Address: Mrinali Shetty, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, 254 Easton Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901; mshetty@saintpetersuh.com

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(8)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
584-585
Legacy Keywords
calcific uremic arteriolopathy, calciphylaxis, end-stage renal disease, ESRD, leg ulcers, calcium, phosphorus, necrosis, warfarin, pemphigus, cryofibrinogenemia, Mrinali Shetty, Yuvraj Chowdhury, Balaji Yegneswaran
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Mrinali Shetty, MD
Chief Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ

Yuvraj Chowdhury, MD
Chief Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ

Balaji Yegneswaran, MD, FACP
Associate Program Director, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital,
New Brunswick, NJ

Address: Mrinali Shetty, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, 254 Easton Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901; mshetty@saintpetersuh.com

Author and Disclosure Information

Mrinali Shetty, MD
Chief Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ

Yuvraj Chowdhury, MD
Chief Resident, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ

Balaji Yegneswaran, MD, FACP
Associate Program Director, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital,
New Brunswick, NJ

Address: Mrinali Shetty, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital, 254 Easton Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901; mshetty@saintpetersuh.com

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

A 51-year-old man with end-stage renal disease, on peritoneal dialysis for the past 4 years, presented to the emergency department with severe pain in both legs. The pain had started 2 months previously and had progressively worsened. After multiple admissions in the past for hyperkalemia and volume overload due to noncompliance, he had been advised to switch to hemodialysis.

See related article and editorial

Figure 1. Necrotic ulcers with eschar formation surrounded by indurated plaques, accompanied by scattered flaccid bullae.
Figure 1. Necrotic ulcers with eschar formation surrounded by indurated plaques, accompanied by scattered flaccid bullae.
On examination, the skin from his toes up to his scrotum was covered with extensive tender necrotic ulcers with eschar formation surrounded by violaceous plaques and scattered flaccid bullae (Figure 1). His peripheral pulses were intact.

Laboratory analysis revealed the following values:

  • Serum creatinine 12.62 mg/dL (reference range 0.73–1.22)
  • Blood urea nitrogen 159 mg/dL (9–24)
  • Serum calcium corrected for serum albumin 8.1 mg/dL (8.4–10.0)
  • Serum phosphorus 10.6 mg/dL (2.7–4.8).

His history of end-stage renal disease, failure of peritoneal dialysis, high calcium-phosphorus product (8.1 mg/dL × 10.6 mg/dL = 85.9 mg2/dL 2, reference range ≤ 55), and characteristic physical findings led to the diagnosis of calcific uremic arteriolopathy.

CALCIFIC UREMIC ARTERIOLOPATHY

Calcific uremic arteriolopathy or “calciphylaxis,” seen most often in patients with end-stage renal disease, is caused by calcium deposition in the media of the dermo-hypodermic arterioles, leading to infarction of adjacent tissue.1–3 A high calcium-phosphorus product (> 55) has been implicated in its development; however, the calcium-phosphorus product can be normal despite hyperphosphatemia, which itself may promote ectopic calcification.

Early ischemic manifestations include livedo reticularis and painful retiform purpura on the thighs and other areas of high adiposity. Lesions evolve into violaceous plaquelike subcutaneous nodules that can infarct, become necrotic, ulcerate, and become infected. Punch biopsy demonstrating arteriolar calcification, subintimal fibrosis, and thrombosis confirms the diagnosis.

Differential diagnosis

Warfarin necrosis can cause large, irregular, bloody bullae that ulcerate and turn into eschar that may resemble lesions of calcific uremic arteriolopathy. Our patient, however, had no exposure to warfarin.

Pemphigus foliaceus, an immunoglobulin G4-mediated autoimmune disorder targeted against desmoglein-1, leads to the formation of fragile blisters that easily rupture when rubbed (Nikolsky sign). Lesions evolve into scaling, crusty erosions on an erythematous base. With tender blisters and lack of mucous membrane involvement, pemphigus foliaceus shares similarities with calcific uremic arteriolopathy, but the presence of necrotic eschar surrounded by violaceous plaques in our patient made it an unlikely diagnosis.

Cryofibrinogenemia. In the right clinical scenario, ie, in a patient with vasculitis, malignancy, infection, cryoglobulinemia, or collagen diseases, cryofibrinogen-mediated cold-induced occlusive lesions may mimic calcific uremic arteriolopathy, with painful or pruritic erythema, purpura, livedo reticularis, necrosis, and ulceration.4 Our patient had no color changes with exposure to cold, nor any history of Raynaud phenomenon or joint pain, making the diagnosis of cryofibrinogenemia less likely.

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Gadolinium contrast medium in magnetic resonance imaging can cause nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, characterized by erythematous papules that coalesce into brawny plaques with surrounding woody induration, which may resemble lesions of calcific uremic arteriolopathy.5 However, our patient had not been exposed to gadolinium.

Management

Management is multidisciplinary and includes the following1:

  • Hemodialysis, modified to optimize calcium balance2
  • Intravenous sodium thiosulfate: the exact mechanism of action remains unclear, but it is thought to play a role in chelating calcium from tissue deposits, thus decreasing pain and promoting regression of skin lesions3
  • Wound care, including chemical debridement agents, negative-pressure wound therapy, and surgical debridement for infected wounds6
  • Pain management with opioid analgesics.

The patient was treated with all these measures. However, he died of sudden cardiac arrest during the same admission.

A 51-year-old man with end-stage renal disease, on peritoneal dialysis for the past 4 years, presented to the emergency department with severe pain in both legs. The pain had started 2 months previously and had progressively worsened. After multiple admissions in the past for hyperkalemia and volume overload due to noncompliance, he had been advised to switch to hemodialysis.

See related article and editorial

Figure 1. Necrotic ulcers with eschar formation surrounded by indurated plaques, accompanied by scattered flaccid bullae.
Figure 1. Necrotic ulcers with eschar formation surrounded by indurated plaques, accompanied by scattered flaccid bullae.
On examination, the skin from his toes up to his scrotum was covered with extensive tender necrotic ulcers with eschar formation surrounded by violaceous plaques and scattered flaccid bullae (Figure 1). His peripheral pulses were intact.

Laboratory analysis revealed the following values:

  • Serum creatinine 12.62 mg/dL (reference range 0.73–1.22)
  • Blood urea nitrogen 159 mg/dL (9–24)
  • Serum calcium corrected for serum albumin 8.1 mg/dL (8.4–10.0)
  • Serum phosphorus 10.6 mg/dL (2.7–4.8).

His history of end-stage renal disease, failure of peritoneal dialysis, high calcium-phosphorus product (8.1 mg/dL × 10.6 mg/dL = 85.9 mg2/dL 2, reference range ≤ 55), and characteristic physical findings led to the diagnosis of calcific uremic arteriolopathy.

CALCIFIC UREMIC ARTERIOLOPATHY

Calcific uremic arteriolopathy or “calciphylaxis,” seen most often in patients with end-stage renal disease, is caused by calcium deposition in the media of the dermo-hypodermic arterioles, leading to infarction of adjacent tissue.1–3 A high calcium-phosphorus product (> 55) has been implicated in its development; however, the calcium-phosphorus product can be normal despite hyperphosphatemia, which itself may promote ectopic calcification.

Early ischemic manifestations include livedo reticularis and painful retiform purpura on the thighs and other areas of high adiposity. Lesions evolve into violaceous plaquelike subcutaneous nodules that can infarct, become necrotic, ulcerate, and become infected. Punch biopsy demonstrating arteriolar calcification, subintimal fibrosis, and thrombosis confirms the diagnosis.

Differential diagnosis

Warfarin necrosis can cause large, irregular, bloody bullae that ulcerate and turn into eschar that may resemble lesions of calcific uremic arteriolopathy. Our patient, however, had no exposure to warfarin.

Pemphigus foliaceus, an immunoglobulin G4-mediated autoimmune disorder targeted against desmoglein-1, leads to the formation of fragile blisters that easily rupture when rubbed (Nikolsky sign). Lesions evolve into scaling, crusty erosions on an erythematous base. With tender blisters and lack of mucous membrane involvement, pemphigus foliaceus shares similarities with calcific uremic arteriolopathy, but the presence of necrotic eschar surrounded by violaceous plaques in our patient made it an unlikely diagnosis.

Cryofibrinogenemia. In the right clinical scenario, ie, in a patient with vasculitis, malignancy, infection, cryoglobulinemia, or collagen diseases, cryofibrinogen-mediated cold-induced occlusive lesions may mimic calcific uremic arteriolopathy, with painful or pruritic erythema, purpura, livedo reticularis, necrosis, and ulceration.4 Our patient had no color changes with exposure to cold, nor any history of Raynaud phenomenon or joint pain, making the diagnosis of cryofibrinogenemia less likely.

Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Gadolinium contrast medium in magnetic resonance imaging can cause nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, characterized by erythematous papules that coalesce into brawny plaques with surrounding woody induration, which may resemble lesions of calcific uremic arteriolopathy.5 However, our patient had not been exposed to gadolinium.

Management

Management is multidisciplinary and includes the following1:

  • Hemodialysis, modified to optimize calcium balance2
  • Intravenous sodium thiosulfate: the exact mechanism of action remains unclear, but it is thought to play a role in chelating calcium from tissue deposits, thus decreasing pain and promoting regression of skin lesions3
  • Wound care, including chemical debridement agents, negative-pressure wound therapy, and surgical debridement for infected wounds6
  • Pain management with opioid analgesics.

The patient was treated with all these measures. However, he died of sudden cardiac arrest during the same admission.

References
  1. Weenig RH, Sewell LD, Davis MD, McCarthy JT, Pittelkow MR. Calciphylaxis: natural history, risk factor analysis, and outcome. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56(4):569–579. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2006.08.065
  2. Nigwekar SU, Kroshinsky D, Nazarian RM, et al. Calciphylaxis: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 66(1):133–146. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.01.034
  3. Janigan DT, Hirsch DJ, Klassen GA, MacDonald AS. Calcified subcutaneous arterioles with infarcts of the subcutis and skin (“calciphylaxis”) in chronic renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35(4):588–597. pmid:10739777
  4. Michaud M, Pourrat J. Cryofibrinogenemia. J Clin Rheumatol 2013; 19(3):142–148. doi:10.1097/RHU.0b013e318289e06e
  5. Galan A, Cowper SE, Bucala R. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy). Curr Opin Rheumatol 2006; 18(6):614–617. doi:10.1097/01.bor.0000245725.94887.8d
  6. Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, eds. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2003:558–562.
References
  1. Weenig RH, Sewell LD, Davis MD, McCarthy JT, Pittelkow MR. Calciphylaxis: natural history, risk factor analysis, and outcome. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56(4):569–579. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2006.08.065
  2. Nigwekar SU, Kroshinsky D, Nazarian RM, et al. Calciphylaxis: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 66(1):133–146. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.01.034
  3. Janigan DT, Hirsch DJ, Klassen GA, MacDonald AS. Calcified subcutaneous arterioles with infarcts of the subcutis and skin (“calciphylaxis”) in chronic renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35(4):588–597. pmid:10739777
  4. Michaud M, Pourrat J. Cryofibrinogenemia. J Clin Rheumatol 2013; 19(3):142–148. doi:10.1097/RHU.0b013e318289e06e
  5. Galan A, Cowper SE, Bucala R. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy). Curr Opin Rheumatol 2006; 18(6):614–617. doi:10.1097/01.bor.0000245725.94887.8d
  6. Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, eds. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology in General Medicine. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2003:558–562.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(8)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(8)
Page Number
584-585
Page Number
584-585
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Calcific uremic arteriolopathy
Display Headline
Calcific uremic arteriolopathy
Legacy Keywords
calcific uremic arteriolopathy, calciphylaxis, end-stage renal disease, ESRD, leg ulcers, calcium, phosphorus, necrosis, warfarin, pemphigus, cryofibrinogenemia, Mrinali Shetty, Yuvraj Chowdhury, Balaji Yegneswaran
Legacy Keywords
calcific uremic arteriolopathy, calciphylaxis, end-stage renal disease, ESRD, leg ulcers, calcium, phosphorus, necrosis, warfarin, pemphigus, cryofibrinogenemia, Mrinali Shetty, Yuvraj Chowdhury, Balaji Yegneswaran
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 08:00
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 08:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 08:00
Article PDF Media

Skip ultrasound in acute UTI in small children

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:50

 

– Ultrasound of the kidneys and urinary tract in the acute phase of a first urinary tract infection in young children has an unacceptably high false-positive rate, Magdalena Okarska-Napierala, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News
Dr. Magdalena Okarska-Napierala

“Sonography performed 2 weeks after treatment initiation seems to be more reliable,” said Dr. Okarska-Napierala, a pediatrician at the Medical University of Warsaw Children’s Hospital.

Broad agreement exists that imaging is warranted in all children with a first urinary tract infection (UTI), because this infection can be the first signal of a structural abnormality of the kidneys or urinary tract. Abdominal ultrasound is the first-choice imaging modality in this setting because it is noninvasive, widely available, and inexpensive. But there remains controversy – and guidelines differ – regarding when to perform the ultrasound in children with UTI who respond well to therapy. This was the impetus for Dr. Okarska-Napierala and her coinvestigators to launch a prospective, single-center study examining the issue.

“The theory beneath it is the possibility that diffuse inflammation affects the ultrasound picture of the kidneys and urinary tract and may give us false-positive results, so we shouldn’t base our decisions on those results,” she explained.

This theory has been provisionally confirmed by the preliminary results of the study, which is continuing to enroll patients.

To date, the study includes 48 children, mean age 10.4 months, hospitalized for their first UTI. Participation was restricted to patients with no known congenital abnormalities of the kidneys or urinary tract and who were not on antibiotics at enrollment. Of the 48 children, 44 had an Escherichia coli infection. The predominant treatment was a second-generation cephalosporin for a median of 10 days.

On day 1 of treatment all patients underwent an ultrasound exam evaluating kidney size, anterior-posterior renal pelvis diameter, and the urinary tract based upon a grading system for urinary tract dilation developed by multidisciplinary consensus (J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Dec;10[6]:982-98). The ultrasound exam was repeated 2 weeks later, and again 2 weeks after that.

The most striking findings were a significantly increased kidney size and more prevalent urinary tract dilation on the day 1 ultrasound exam than on repeat ultrasound 2 weeks later. The average length of the left and right kidneys was 67.0 and 64.5 mm, respectively, on day 1, dropping off to 64.3 and 62.0 mm at 2 weeks, with a smaller and statistically nonsignificant further drop-off to 61.9 and 60.0 mm on the week 4 ultrasound.

“We saw a strong correlation between initial kidney size and CRP [C-reactive protein] value: The higher the CRP you have initially, the bigger the kidneys. It’s an interesting finding, but not so very practical. The only practical conclusion is that if we perform ultrasound at this stage and the child has big kidneys, it doesn’t mean anything. We have to check it again later,” she said.

Also, the number of renal units with urinary tract dilation went from 29 on day 1 ultrasound to 20 at 2 weeks and 19 at 4 weeks. Of the 48 children, 28 had urinary tract dilation on day 1, compared with 18 at 2 weeks and 16 at 4 weeks.

“If we look at this practically, if we base our decision on the day 1 ultrasound we would qualify half of all children for voiding cystourethrography, which is harmful, but if we wait 2 weeks to do the ultrasound we would reduce this number by six children. So I think we can call this a clinically significant difference,” she continued.

Of the 48 children, 11 have undergone voiding cystourethrography, revealing 2 mild cases of vesicoureteral reflux, which is the most common congenital abnormality of the urinary tract.

“I would like to emphasize that there is no real benefit in performing an ultrasound exam in children in this acute phase of infection. And there is harm in that we have to repeat the exam later, the parents are worried, the doctor is worried,” Dr. Okarska-Napierala concluded.

She reported having no relevant financial conflicts, and the study was conducted free of commercial support.

bjancin@mdedge.com

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Ultrasound of the kidneys and urinary tract in the acute phase of a first urinary tract infection in young children has an unacceptably high false-positive rate, Magdalena Okarska-Napierala, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News
Dr. Magdalena Okarska-Napierala

“Sonography performed 2 weeks after treatment initiation seems to be more reliable,” said Dr. Okarska-Napierala, a pediatrician at the Medical University of Warsaw Children’s Hospital.

Broad agreement exists that imaging is warranted in all children with a first urinary tract infection (UTI), because this infection can be the first signal of a structural abnormality of the kidneys or urinary tract. Abdominal ultrasound is the first-choice imaging modality in this setting because it is noninvasive, widely available, and inexpensive. But there remains controversy – and guidelines differ – regarding when to perform the ultrasound in children with UTI who respond well to therapy. This was the impetus for Dr. Okarska-Napierala and her coinvestigators to launch a prospective, single-center study examining the issue.

“The theory beneath it is the possibility that diffuse inflammation affects the ultrasound picture of the kidneys and urinary tract and may give us false-positive results, so we shouldn’t base our decisions on those results,” she explained.

This theory has been provisionally confirmed by the preliminary results of the study, which is continuing to enroll patients.

To date, the study includes 48 children, mean age 10.4 months, hospitalized for their first UTI. Participation was restricted to patients with no known congenital abnormalities of the kidneys or urinary tract and who were not on antibiotics at enrollment. Of the 48 children, 44 had an Escherichia coli infection. The predominant treatment was a second-generation cephalosporin for a median of 10 days.

On day 1 of treatment all patients underwent an ultrasound exam evaluating kidney size, anterior-posterior renal pelvis diameter, and the urinary tract based upon a grading system for urinary tract dilation developed by multidisciplinary consensus (J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Dec;10[6]:982-98). The ultrasound exam was repeated 2 weeks later, and again 2 weeks after that.

The most striking findings were a significantly increased kidney size and more prevalent urinary tract dilation on the day 1 ultrasound exam than on repeat ultrasound 2 weeks later. The average length of the left and right kidneys was 67.0 and 64.5 mm, respectively, on day 1, dropping off to 64.3 and 62.0 mm at 2 weeks, with a smaller and statistically nonsignificant further drop-off to 61.9 and 60.0 mm on the week 4 ultrasound.

“We saw a strong correlation between initial kidney size and CRP [C-reactive protein] value: The higher the CRP you have initially, the bigger the kidneys. It’s an interesting finding, but not so very practical. The only practical conclusion is that if we perform ultrasound at this stage and the child has big kidneys, it doesn’t mean anything. We have to check it again later,” she said.

Also, the number of renal units with urinary tract dilation went from 29 on day 1 ultrasound to 20 at 2 weeks and 19 at 4 weeks. Of the 48 children, 28 had urinary tract dilation on day 1, compared with 18 at 2 weeks and 16 at 4 weeks.

“If we look at this practically, if we base our decision on the day 1 ultrasound we would qualify half of all children for voiding cystourethrography, which is harmful, but if we wait 2 weeks to do the ultrasound we would reduce this number by six children. So I think we can call this a clinically significant difference,” she continued.

Of the 48 children, 11 have undergone voiding cystourethrography, revealing 2 mild cases of vesicoureteral reflux, which is the most common congenital abnormality of the urinary tract.

“I would like to emphasize that there is no real benefit in performing an ultrasound exam in children in this acute phase of infection. And there is harm in that we have to repeat the exam later, the parents are worried, the doctor is worried,” Dr. Okarska-Napierala concluded.

She reported having no relevant financial conflicts, and the study was conducted free of commercial support.

bjancin@mdedge.com

 

– Ultrasound of the kidneys and urinary tract in the acute phase of a first urinary tract infection in young children has an unacceptably high false-positive rate, Magdalena Okarska-Napierala, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News
Dr. Magdalena Okarska-Napierala

“Sonography performed 2 weeks after treatment initiation seems to be more reliable,” said Dr. Okarska-Napierala, a pediatrician at the Medical University of Warsaw Children’s Hospital.

Broad agreement exists that imaging is warranted in all children with a first urinary tract infection (UTI), because this infection can be the first signal of a structural abnormality of the kidneys or urinary tract. Abdominal ultrasound is the first-choice imaging modality in this setting because it is noninvasive, widely available, and inexpensive. But there remains controversy – and guidelines differ – regarding when to perform the ultrasound in children with UTI who respond well to therapy. This was the impetus for Dr. Okarska-Napierala and her coinvestigators to launch a prospective, single-center study examining the issue.

“The theory beneath it is the possibility that diffuse inflammation affects the ultrasound picture of the kidneys and urinary tract and may give us false-positive results, so we shouldn’t base our decisions on those results,” she explained.

This theory has been provisionally confirmed by the preliminary results of the study, which is continuing to enroll patients.

To date, the study includes 48 children, mean age 10.4 months, hospitalized for their first UTI. Participation was restricted to patients with no known congenital abnormalities of the kidneys or urinary tract and who were not on antibiotics at enrollment. Of the 48 children, 44 had an Escherichia coli infection. The predominant treatment was a second-generation cephalosporin for a median of 10 days.

On day 1 of treatment all patients underwent an ultrasound exam evaluating kidney size, anterior-posterior renal pelvis diameter, and the urinary tract based upon a grading system for urinary tract dilation developed by multidisciplinary consensus (J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Dec;10[6]:982-98). The ultrasound exam was repeated 2 weeks later, and again 2 weeks after that.

The most striking findings were a significantly increased kidney size and more prevalent urinary tract dilation on the day 1 ultrasound exam than on repeat ultrasound 2 weeks later. The average length of the left and right kidneys was 67.0 and 64.5 mm, respectively, on day 1, dropping off to 64.3 and 62.0 mm at 2 weeks, with a smaller and statistically nonsignificant further drop-off to 61.9 and 60.0 mm on the week 4 ultrasound.

“We saw a strong correlation between initial kidney size and CRP [C-reactive protein] value: The higher the CRP you have initially, the bigger the kidneys. It’s an interesting finding, but not so very practical. The only practical conclusion is that if we perform ultrasound at this stage and the child has big kidneys, it doesn’t mean anything. We have to check it again later,” she said.

Also, the number of renal units with urinary tract dilation went from 29 on day 1 ultrasound to 20 at 2 weeks and 19 at 4 weeks. Of the 48 children, 28 had urinary tract dilation on day 1, compared with 18 at 2 weeks and 16 at 4 weeks.

“If we look at this practically, if we base our decision on the day 1 ultrasound we would qualify half of all children for voiding cystourethrography, which is harmful, but if we wait 2 weeks to do the ultrasound we would reduce this number by six children. So I think we can call this a clinically significant difference,” she continued.

Of the 48 children, 11 have undergone voiding cystourethrography, revealing 2 mild cases of vesicoureteral reflux, which is the most common congenital abnormality of the urinary tract.

“I would like to emphasize that there is no real benefit in performing an ultrasound exam in children in this acute phase of infection. And there is harm in that we have to repeat the exam later, the parents are worried, the doctor is worried,” Dr. Okarska-Napierala concluded.

She reported having no relevant financial conflicts, and the study was conducted free of commercial support.

bjancin@mdedge.com

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM ESPID 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Wait at least 2 weeks after starting treatment to perform ultrasound in small children with a first urinary tract infection.

Major finding: Average left kidney length dropped from 67.0 mm on treatment day 1 to 64.3 mm 2 weeks later.

Study details: This interim report from an ongoing, prospective, single-center study included 48 children up to age 3 years who were hospitalized for their first urinary tract infection.

Disclosures: The presenter reported no relevant financial conflicts.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Recommendations aim to reduce pediatric nephrology testing

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 03/28/2019 - 14:35

 

Evidence-based recommendations for appropriate nephrology testing in children are the latest installment of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation’s “Choosing Wisely” campaign.

“Five things physicians and patients should question” were produced for the foundation by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Society of Pediatric Nephrology and cover “specific nephrology tests and procedures that are commonly ordered but not always necessary when treating children for kidney-related conditions,” the AAP said.

The list includes recommendations on when not to order screening urine analyses and urine cultures, initiate hypertension workups, and place central lines. “Sometimes parents or physicians want to ensure all available testing is done, but unnecessary testing can create more fear, cost, and risk for children. Good communication and discussion of options can help reduce the likelihood of unnecessary testing,” said Doug Silverstein, MD, chairperson of the AAP section on nephrology.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Evidence-based recommendations for appropriate nephrology testing in children are the latest installment of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation’s “Choosing Wisely” campaign.

“Five things physicians and patients should question” were produced for the foundation by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Society of Pediatric Nephrology and cover “specific nephrology tests and procedures that are commonly ordered but not always necessary when treating children for kidney-related conditions,” the AAP said.

The list includes recommendations on when not to order screening urine analyses and urine cultures, initiate hypertension workups, and place central lines. “Sometimes parents or physicians want to ensure all available testing is done, but unnecessary testing can create more fear, cost, and risk for children. Good communication and discussion of options can help reduce the likelihood of unnecessary testing,” said Doug Silverstein, MD, chairperson of the AAP section on nephrology.

 

Evidence-based recommendations for appropriate nephrology testing in children are the latest installment of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation’s “Choosing Wisely” campaign.

“Five things physicians and patients should question” were produced for the foundation by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Society of Pediatric Nephrology and cover “specific nephrology tests and procedures that are commonly ordered but not always necessary when treating children for kidney-related conditions,” the AAP said.

The list includes recommendations on when not to order screening urine analyses and urine cultures, initiate hypertension workups, and place central lines. “Sometimes parents or physicians want to ensure all available testing is done, but unnecessary testing can create more fear, cost, and risk for children. Good communication and discussion of options can help reduce the likelihood of unnecessary testing,” said Doug Silverstein, MD, chairperson of the AAP section on nephrology.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

CREDENCE canagliflozin trial halted because of efficacy

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/03/2022 - 15:18

 

The CREDENCE trial, which was investigating whether the antidiabetes drug canagliflozin (Invokana) plus standard of care could safely help prevent or slow chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes, has been ended early because it has already achieved prespecified efficacy criteria, Janssen announced in a press release. These criteria included risk reduction in the composite endpoint of time to dialysis or kidney transplant, doubling of serum creatinine, and renal or cardiovascular death.

In CANVAS, the cardiovascular outcomes trial for canagliflozin, treatment was linked to reductions in progression of albuminuria and the composite outcome of a sustained 40% reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, the need for renal replacement therapy, or death from renal causes, compared with placebo, but those didn’t reach statistical significance.

CREDENCE (Evaluation of the Effects of Canagliflozin on Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Participants With Diabetic Nephropathy) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial that enrolled roughly 4,400 patients with type 2 diabetes and established kidney disease who had been receiving ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization.



The decision to halt CREDENCE came about after a review of data by the study’s independent data monitoring committee during a planned interim analysis. The resulting recommendation was based on the efficacy findings, the exact data for which have not yet been released.

Canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, in conjunction with diet and exercise, can help improve glycemic control. In the context of kidney disease and type 2 diabetes, canagliflozin has been associated with increased risk of dehydration, vaginal or penile yeast infections, and amputations of all or part of the foot or leg. It has also been associated with ketoacidosis, kidney problems, hyperkalemia, hypoglycemia, and urinary tract infections.

More information can be found in the press release. Full prescribing information can be found on the Food and Drug Administration website.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The CREDENCE trial, which was investigating whether the antidiabetes drug canagliflozin (Invokana) plus standard of care could safely help prevent or slow chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes, has been ended early because it has already achieved prespecified efficacy criteria, Janssen announced in a press release. These criteria included risk reduction in the composite endpoint of time to dialysis or kidney transplant, doubling of serum creatinine, and renal or cardiovascular death.

In CANVAS, the cardiovascular outcomes trial for canagliflozin, treatment was linked to reductions in progression of albuminuria and the composite outcome of a sustained 40% reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, the need for renal replacement therapy, or death from renal causes, compared with placebo, but those didn’t reach statistical significance.

CREDENCE (Evaluation of the Effects of Canagliflozin on Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Participants With Diabetic Nephropathy) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial that enrolled roughly 4,400 patients with type 2 diabetes and established kidney disease who had been receiving ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization.



The decision to halt CREDENCE came about after a review of data by the study’s independent data monitoring committee during a planned interim analysis. The resulting recommendation was based on the efficacy findings, the exact data for which have not yet been released.

Canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, in conjunction with diet and exercise, can help improve glycemic control. In the context of kidney disease and type 2 diabetes, canagliflozin has been associated with increased risk of dehydration, vaginal or penile yeast infections, and amputations of all or part of the foot or leg. It has also been associated with ketoacidosis, kidney problems, hyperkalemia, hypoglycemia, and urinary tract infections.

More information can be found in the press release. Full prescribing information can be found on the Food and Drug Administration website.

 

The CREDENCE trial, which was investigating whether the antidiabetes drug canagliflozin (Invokana) plus standard of care could safely help prevent or slow chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes, has been ended early because it has already achieved prespecified efficacy criteria, Janssen announced in a press release. These criteria included risk reduction in the composite endpoint of time to dialysis or kidney transplant, doubling of serum creatinine, and renal or cardiovascular death.

In CANVAS, the cardiovascular outcomes trial for canagliflozin, treatment was linked to reductions in progression of albuminuria and the composite outcome of a sustained 40% reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, the need for renal replacement therapy, or death from renal causes, compared with placebo, but those didn’t reach statistical significance.

CREDENCE (Evaluation of the Effects of Canagliflozin on Renal and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Participants With Diabetic Nephropathy) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial that enrolled roughly 4,400 patients with type 2 diabetes and established kidney disease who had been receiving ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization.



The decision to halt CREDENCE came about after a review of data by the study’s independent data monitoring committee during a planned interim analysis. The resulting recommendation was based on the efficacy findings, the exact data for which have not yet been released.

Canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, in conjunction with diet and exercise, can help improve glycemic control. In the context of kidney disease and type 2 diabetes, canagliflozin has been associated with increased risk of dehydration, vaginal or penile yeast infections, and amputations of all or part of the foot or leg. It has also been associated with ketoacidosis, kidney problems, hyperkalemia, hypoglycemia, and urinary tract infections.

More information can be found in the press release. Full prescribing information can be found on the Food and Drug Administration website.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Abatacept loses ALLURE in lupus nephritis

Article Type
Changed
Sat, 12/08/2018 - 15:11

 

– Abatacept used on top of the standard of care did not improve the primary endpoint of a complete renal response versus placebo in the ALLURE phase 3 study.

Criteria for a complete renal response (CRR) at 1 year was met by 35.1% of abatacept-treated and 33.5% of placebo-treated patients (P = .73). CRR criteria included having a urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR) of less than 0.5, a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or an eGFR of 85% or more of baseline values, no cellular casts, and a daily corticosteroid dose of 10 mg or less.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Richard A. Furie
Despite the negative result, there were some “provocative findings,” said study investigator Richard A. Furie, MD, who presented these data at the European Congress of Rheumatology. A Kaplan-Meier plot of the time to first sustained CRR showed that “an earlier and also a more robust response was seen in the abatacept group” than in the placebo group. At 1 year, 48% of patients taking abatacept had a sustained CRR vs. 38% of those assigned to placebo (hazard ratio 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-2.01). They defined a sustained CRR as a complete response on at least two consecutive visits.

“We also saw a more rapid decline in proteinuria in those people treated with abatacept, and that seemed to be sustained over the course of the study,” said Dr. Furie, professor of medicine at Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y., chief of the division of rheumatology at Northwell Health in Great Neck, N.Y., and a professor at the Center for Autoimmune, Musculoskeletal, and Hematopoietic Diseases in the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in Manhasset, N.Y. After about 12 weeks, the adjusted mean change in UPCR from baseline was –2.5 for abatacept and –2.0 for placebo; the values at 1 year were a respective –2.95 vs. –2.68 and at 2 years were –3.13 vs. –2.72.

Renal function was not negatively impacted by treatment with abatacept, with about a 5%-8% increase in eGFR seen in both groups.

Furthermore, improvements in lupus-related biomarkers were more pronounced in patients treated with abatacept than placebo, Dr. Furie said. This included a greater decrease in anti–double-stranded DNA autoantibody titers and an increase in complement C3 and C4 levels.

Eric Morand, MD, who was not involved in the ALLURE study, commented during discussion that the main result of the study was “very sad.”

Dr. Morand of Monash University in Melbourne observed that the duration of renal disease at study entry was about 14 months and that around 38% had been previously treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). So, could this have influenced the findings?

Dr. Furie was unable to answer the question but confirmed that MMF was one of two background medications given in the trial, at an oral dose of 1.5 g/day, alongside of oral prednisone up to 60-mg daily.

ALLURE was a 2-year randomized, double-blind study with an open-ended, blinded, long-term extension in 405 patients with active class III or IV lupus nephritis. The aim of the trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of abatacept versus placebo in the treatment of active proliferative lupus nephritis.

Abatacept was given intravenously, first at a dose of 30 mg/kg on days 1, 15, 29, and 57, and then at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks.

In terms of safety, 14 deaths occurred during the course of the study and its long-term extension. Seven abatacept patients died in year 1, two of whom died more than 56 days after discontinuing the study drug. Five patients in the placebo group died in year 1, one in year 2, and one in the long-term extension. Rates of any or serious adverse events were similar among the groups, decreasing over time.

“The safety signals were really no different to what we already know about abatacept,” Dr. Furie said. As for the future, more analyses from the trial can be expected, he added.

The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Furie disclosed receiving grant or research support from, and acting as a consultant to, the company. All but 3 of the study’s 12 authors had financial ties to many pharmaceutical companies, some of which included Bristol-Myers Squibb. Two authors are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Monash was not involved in the ALLURE study but has received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, among other pharmaceutical companies.

 

 

SOURCE: Furie RA et al. EULAR 2018. Abstract OP0253.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles

 

– Abatacept used on top of the standard of care did not improve the primary endpoint of a complete renal response versus placebo in the ALLURE phase 3 study.

Criteria for a complete renal response (CRR) at 1 year was met by 35.1% of abatacept-treated and 33.5% of placebo-treated patients (P = .73). CRR criteria included having a urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR) of less than 0.5, a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or an eGFR of 85% or more of baseline values, no cellular casts, and a daily corticosteroid dose of 10 mg or less.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Richard A. Furie
Despite the negative result, there were some “provocative findings,” said study investigator Richard A. Furie, MD, who presented these data at the European Congress of Rheumatology. A Kaplan-Meier plot of the time to first sustained CRR showed that “an earlier and also a more robust response was seen in the abatacept group” than in the placebo group. At 1 year, 48% of patients taking abatacept had a sustained CRR vs. 38% of those assigned to placebo (hazard ratio 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-2.01). They defined a sustained CRR as a complete response on at least two consecutive visits.

“We also saw a more rapid decline in proteinuria in those people treated with abatacept, and that seemed to be sustained over the course of the study,” said Dr. Furie, professor of medicine at Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y., chief of the division of rheumatology at Northwell Health in Great Neck, N.Y., and a professor at the Center for Autoimmune, Musculoskeletal, and Hematopoietic Diseases in the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in Manhasset, N.Y. After about 12 weeks, the adjusted mean change in UPCR from baseline was –2.5 for abatacept and –2.0 for placebo; the values at 1 year were a respective –2.95 vs. –2.68 and at 2 years were –3.13 vs. –2.72.

Renal function was not negatively impacted by treatment with abatacept, with about a 5%-8% increase in eGFR seen in both groups.

Furthermore, improvements in lupus-related biomarkers were more pronounced in patients treated with abatacept than placebo, Dr. Furie said. This included a greater decrease in anti–double-stranded DNA autoantibody titers and an increase in complement C3 and C4 levels.

Eric Morand, MD, who was not involved in the ALLURE study, commented during discussion that the main result of the study was “very sad.”

Dr. Morand of Monash University in Melbourne observed that the duration of renal disease at study entry was about 14 months and that around 38% had been previously treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). So, could this have influenced the findings?

Dr. Furie was unable to answer the question but confirmed that MMF was one of two background medications given in the trial, at an oral dose of 1.5 g/day, alongside of oral prednisone up to 60-mg daily.

ALLURE was a 2-year randomized, double-blind study with an open-ended, blinded, long-term extension in 405 patients with active class III or IV lupus nephritis. The aim of the trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of abatacept versus placebo in the treatment of active proliferative lupus nephritis.

Abatacept was given intravenously, first at a dose of 30 mg/kg on days 1, 15, 29, and 57, and then at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks.

In terms of safety, 14 deaths occurred during the course of the study and its long-term extension. Seven abatacept patients died in year 1, two of whom died more than 56 days after discontinuing the study drug. Five patients in the placebo group died in year 1, one in year 2, and one in the long-term extension. Rates of any or serious adverse events were similar among the groups, decreasing over time.

“The safety signals were really no different to what we already know about abatacept,” Dr. Furie said. As for the future, more analyses from the trial can be expected, he added.

The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Furie disclosed receiving grant or research support from, and acting as a consultant to, the company. All but 3 of the study’s 12 authors had financial ties to many pharmaceutical companies, some of which included Bristol-Myers Squibb. Two authors are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Monash was not involved in the ALLURE study but has received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, among other pharmaceutical companies.

 

 

SOURCE: Furie RA et al. EULAR 2018. Abstract OP0253.

 

– Abatacept used on top of the standard of care did not improve the primary endpoint of a complete renal response versus placebo in the ALLURE phase 3 study.

Criteria for a complete renal response (CRR) at 1 year was met by 35.1% of abatacept-treated and 33.5% of placebo-treated patients (P = .73). CRR criteria included having a urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR) of less than 0.5, a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or an eGFR of 85% or more of baseline values, no cellular casts, and a daily corticosteroid dose of 10 mg or less.

Sara Freeman/MDedge News
Dr. Richard A. Furie
Despite the negative result, there were some “provocative findings,” said study investigator Richard A. Furie, MD, who presented these data at the European Congress of Rheumatology. A Kaplan-Meier plot of the time to first sustained CRR showed that “an earlier and also a more robust response was seen in the abatacept group” than in the placebo group. At 1 year, 48% of patients taking abatacept had a sustained CRR vs. 38% of those assigned to placebo (hazard ratio 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-2.01). They defined a sustained CRR as a complete response on at least two consecutive visits.

“We also saw a more rapid decline in proteinuria in those people treated with abatacept, and that seemed to be sustained over the course of the study,” said Dr. Furie, professor of medicine at Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y., chief of the division of rheumatology at Northwell Health in Great Neck, N.Y., and a professor at the Center for Autoimmune, Musculoskeletal, and Hematopoietic Diseases in the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in Manhasset, N.Y. After about 12 weeks, the adjusted mean change in UPCR from baseline was –2.5 for abatacept and –2.0 for placebo; the values at 1 year were a respective –2.95 vs. –2.68 and at 2 years were –3.13 vs. –2.72.

Renal function was not negatively impacted by treatment with abatacept, with about a 5%-8% increase in eGFR seen in both groups.

Furthermore, improvements in lupus-related biomarkers were more pronounced in patients treated with abatacept than placebo, Dr. Furie said. This included a greater decrease in anti–double-stranded DNA autoantibody titers and an increase in complement C3 and C4 levels.

Eric Morand, MD, who was not involved in the ALLURE study, commented during discussion that the main result of the study was “very sad.”

Dr. Morand of Monash University in Melbourne observed that the duration of renal disease at study entry was about 14 months and that around 38% had been previously treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). So, could this have influenced the findings?

Dr. Furie was unable to answer the question but confirmed that MMF was one of two background medications given in the trial, at an oral dose of 1.5 g/day, alongside of oral prednisone up to 60-mg daily.

ALLURE was a 2-year randomized, double-blind study with an open-ended, blinded, long-term extension in 405 patients with active class III or IV lupus nephritis. The aim of the trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of abatacept versus placebo in the treatment of active proliferative lupus nephritis.

Abatacept was given intravenously, first at a dose of 30 mg/kg on days 1, 15, 29, and 57, and then at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks.

In terms of safety, 14 deaths occurred during the course of the study and its long-term extension. Seven abatacept patients died in year 1, two of whom died more than 56 days after discontinuing the study drug. Five patients in the placebo group died in year 1, one in year 2, and one in the long-term extension. Rates of any or serious adverse events were similar among the groups, decreasing over time.

“The safety signals were really no different to what we already know about abatacept,” Dr. Furie said. As for the future, more analyses from the trial can be expected, he added.

The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Furie disclosed receiving grant or research support from, and acting as a consultant to, the company. All but 3 of the study’s 12 authors had financial ties to many pharmaceutical companies, some of which included Bristol-Myers Squibb. Two authors are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Monash was not involved in the ALLURE study but has received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, among other pharmaceutical companies.

 

 

SOURCE: Furie RA et al. EULAR 2018. Abstract OP0253.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM THE EULAR 2018 CONGRESS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Abatacept treatment did not improve the complete renal response rate versus placebo.

Major finding: A complete renal response rate at 1 year was seen in 35.1% of abatacept-treated and 33.5% of placebo-treated patients (P = .73).

Study details: The phase 3 ALLURE study, a 2-year, randomized, double-blind study with an open-ended, blinded, long-term extension in 405 patients with active class III or IV lupus nephritis.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Furie disclosed receiving grant or research support from, and acting as a consultant to, the company. All but 3 of the study’s 12 authors had financial ties to many pharmaceutical companies, some of which included Bristol-Myers Squibb. Two authors are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb. Dr. Monash was not involved in the ALLURE study but has received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, among other pharmaceutical companies.

Source: Furie RA et al. EULAR 2018. Abstract OP0253.
 

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Early BCC seen in teen kidney transplant patient

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:48

 

A 17-year-old girl seen in a Portuguese dermatology clinic was found to have a nodular basal cell carcinoma on the parietal region of her scalp. The nodule appeared 6 years after she had received a kidney transplant, according to João Borges-Costa, MD, PhD, who submitted the case report.

Since the transplant, the girl had been maintained on immunosuppressive medication of tacrolimus 1 mg twice daily, mycophenolate sodium 360 mg twice daily, and prednisolone 10 mg every other day. The 1-cm nodule was pigmented; dermatoscopy did not yield clarity about whether the lesion was melanocytic. An excisional biopsy with 0.5-cm margins was performed, and histology confirmed that the lesion was a nodular pigmented basal cell carcinoma that had been excised completely.

The case, said Dr. Borges-Costa, shows that skin cancers can develop earlier than the typical 12-18 years after pediatric transplantation. Most reported cases have been squamous cell cancers and melanomas, and often are associated with lack of appropriate sun protection behavior.

The patient, a Caucasian, was a sailor who used sunscreen but did not typically wear a hat while sailing, reported Dr. Borges-Costa, a dermatologist at the University of Lisbon. Her family history was significant for a grandparent with melanoma.

Dr. Borges noted that the parents and patient were given advice regarding the importance of the lifelong use of sun-protective clothing and headgear. “Education of pediatric organ recipients and their parents about sun protection is important because, as occurred with our patient, protective clothing and hats are frequently forgotten.”

Because of the ongoing potential for skin malignancies, early referral “after transplantation to specialized dermatology outpatient clinics, similar to what is now advocated for transplanted adults, could help in surveillance and improve adherence to sun-protective measures,” he added.

SOURCE: Borges-Costa J et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018. doi: 10.1111/pde.13537..

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

A 17-year-old girl seen in a Portuguese dermatology clinic was found to have a nodular basal cell carcinoma on the parietal region of her scalp. The nodule appeared 6 years after she had received a kidney transplant, according to João Borges-Costa, MD, PhD, who submitted the case report.

Since the transplant, the girl had been maintained on immunosuppressive medication of tacrolimus 1 mg twice daily, mycophenolate sodium 360 mg twice daily, and prednisolone 10 mg every other day. The 1-cm nodule was pigmented; dermatoscopy did not yield clarity about whether the lesion was melanocytic. An excisional biopsy with 0.5-cm margins was performed, and histology confirmed that the lesion was a nodular pigmented basal cell carcinoma that had been excised completely.

The case, said Dr. Borges-Costa, shows that skin cancers can develop earlier than the typical 12-18 years after pediatric transplantation. Most reported cases have been squamous cell cancers and melanomas, and often are associated with lack of appropriate sun protection behavior.

The patient, a Caucasian, was a sailor who used sunscreen but did not typically wear a hat while sailing, reported Dr. Borges-Costa, a dermatologist at the University of Lisbon. Her family history was significant for a grandparent with melanoma.

Dr. Borges noted that the parents and patient were given advice regarding the importance of the lifelong use of sun-protective clothing and headgear. “Education of pediatric organ recipients and their parents about sun protection is important because, as occurred with our patient, protective clothing and hats are frequently forgotten.”

Because of the ongoing potential for skin malignancies, early referral “after transplantation to specialized dermatology outpatient clinics, similar to what is now advocated for transplanted adults, could help in surveillance and improve adherence to sun-protective measures,” he added.

SOURCE: Borges-Costa J et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018. doi: 10.1111/pde.13537..

 

A 17-year-old girl seen in a Portuguese dermatology clinic was found to have a nodular basal cell carcinoma on the parietal region of her scalp. The nodule appeared 6 years after she had received a kidney transplant, according to João Borges-Costa, MD, PhD, who submitted the case report.

Since the transplant, the girl had been maintained on immunosuppressive medication of tacrolimus 1 mg twice daily, mycophenolate sodium 360 mg twice daily, and prednisolone 10 mg every other day. The 1-cm nodule was pigmented; dermatoscopy did not yield clarity about whether the lesion was melanocytic. An excisional biopsy with 0.5-cm margins was performed, and histology confirmed that the lesion was a nodular pigmented basal cell carcinoma that had been excised completely.

The case, said Dr. Borges-Costa, shows that skin cancers can develop earlier than the typical 12-18 years after pediatric transplantation. Most reported cases have been squamous cell cancers and melanomas, and often are associated with lack of appropriate sun protection behavior.

The patient, a Caucasian, was a sailor who used sunscreen but did not typically wear a hat while sailing, reported Dr. Borges-Costa, a dermatologist at the University of Lisbon. Her family history was significant for a grandparent with melanoma.

Dr. Borges noted that the parents and patient were given advice regarding the importance of the lifelong use of sun-protective clothing and headgear. “Education of pediatric organ recipients and their parents about sun protection is important because, as occurred with our patient, protective clothing and hats are frequently forgotten.”

Because of the ongoing potential for skin malignancies, early referral “after transplantation to specialized dermatology outpatient clinics, similar to what is now advocated for transplanted adults, could help in surveillance and improve adherence to sun-protective measures,” he added.

SOURCE: Borges-Costa J et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018. doi: 10.1111/pde.13537..

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Uric acid tied to pediatric diabetic kidney disease

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/03/2022 - 15:18

Serum uric acid lowering might help prevent kidney disease in children with type 2 diabetes mellitus, according to a 7-year investigation of 539 children.

Every 1-mg/dL climb in baseline serum uric acid increased the risk of subsequent elevated urine albumin excretion 1.23 fold, after adjustment for potential confounders (P = .02).

The finding adds to growing evidence that serum uric acid (SUA) isn’t just a marker of diabetic kidney disease, but a contributor to it. “There is definitely” cross-talk between gout and diabetes, said lead investigator Petter Bjornstad, MD, assistant professor of pediatric endocrinology at the University of Colorado, Aurora.

Elevated SUA is common in both conditions and a risk factor for kidney disease. Newer studies have linked higher levels to nephron number decline and other pathologies, perhaps through renal inflammation. Allopurinol, the traditional uric acid lowering agent in gout, is already under investigation to prevent kidney decline in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. There’s also evidence that the potent uric acid lowering agent, febuxostat (Uloric), attenuates hypofiltration in early diabetic kidney disease.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News
Dr. Petter Bjornstad
Dr. Bjornstad said a trial of SUA lowering is probably justified now in children with diabetes. It might also reduce the incidence of hypertension, since his team found that every 1-mg/dL jump in baseline SUA increased the risk hypertension 1.2-fold (P = .007). SUA lowering, however, couldn’t be too aggressive in children because some level of uric acid is needed for cognitive development, he said at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association.

The 539 children, all part of the Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) trial, were assessed annually over a mean of 5.7 years. At baseline, they were 13.9 years old and had T2DM for 7.9 months, on average. The mean body mass index was 34.6 kg/m2, mean hemoglobin A1c was 6%.

Almost 20% of the children were hypertensive at baseline (130/80 mm Hg or higher); 26% were hyperuricemic (6.8 mg/dL or higher); and 6.1% had elevated urine albumin excretion (urine albumin creatinine ratio of at least 30 mg/g), a marker of renal pathology. At the end of follow-up, 18% had elevated albumin excretion and 37.4% were hypertensive.

“Hyperuricemia was common in youth with type 2 diabetes,” just as it’s been shown in adults with the disease. “Higher baseline SUA independently increase[s] risk for onset of hypertension and elevated urine albumin excretion,” Dr. Bjornstad said.

However, the association between SUA and elevated albumin excretion was statistically significant only in boys – 36% of the study population – and non-Hispanic whites, 20% of the subjects, after adjustment for BMI, hemoglobin A1c, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and use of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers.

The National Institutes of Health funded the work. Dr. Bjornstad is a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim.
 

SOURCE: Bjornstad P et al. ADA 2018, abstract 339-OR.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

Serum uric acid lowering might help prevent kidney disease in children with type 2 diabetes mellitus, according to a 7-year investigation of 539 children.

Every 1-mg/dL climb in baseline serum uric acid increased the risk of subsequent elevated urine albumin excretion 1.23 fold, after adjustment for potential confounders (P = .02).

The finding adds to growing evidence that serum uric acid (SUA) isn’t just a marker of diabetic kidney disease, but a contributor to it. “There is definitely” cross-talk between gout and diabetes, said lead investigator Petter Bjornstad, MD, assistant professor of pediatric endocrinology at the University of Colorado, Aurora.

Elevated SUA is common in both conditions and a risk factor for kidney disease. Newer studies have linked higher levels to nephron number decline and other pathologies, perhaps through renal inflammation. Allopurinol, the traditional uric acid lowering agent in gout, is already under investigation to prevent kidney decline in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. There’s also evidence that the potent uric acid lowering agent, febuxostat (Uloric), attenuates hypofiltration in early diabetic kidney disease.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News
Dr. Petter Bjornstad
Dr. Bjornstad said a trial of SUA lowering is probably justified now in children with diabetes. It might also reduce the incidence of hypertension, since his team found that every 1-mg/dL jump in baseline SUA increased the risk hypertension 1.2-fold (P = .007). SUA lowering, however, couldn’t be too aggressive in children because some level of uric acid is needed for cognitive development, he said at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association.

The 539 children, all part of the Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) trial, were assessed annually over a mean of 5.7 years. At baseline, they were 13.9 years old and had T2DM for 7.9 months, on average. The mean body mass index was 34.6 kg/m2, mean hemoglobin A1c was 6%.

Almost 20% of the children were hypertensive at baseline (130/80 mm Hg or higher); 26% were hyperuricemic (6.8 mg/dL or higher); and 6.1% had elevated urine albumin excretion (urine albumin creatinine ratio of at least 30 mg/g), a marker of renal pathology. At the end of follow-up, 18% had elevated albumin excretion and 37.4% were hypertensive.

“Hyperuricemia was common in youth with type 2 diabetes,” just as it’s been shown in adults with the disease. “Higher baseline SUA independently increase[s] risk for onset of hypertension and elevated urine albumin excretion,” Dr. Bjornstad said.

However, the association between SUA and elevated albumin excretion was statistically significant only in boys – 36% of the study population – and non-Hispanic whites, 20% of the subjects, after adjustment for BMI, hemoglobin A1c, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and use of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers.

The National Institutes of Health funded the work. Dr. Bjornstad is a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim.
 

SOURCE: Bjornstad P et al. ADA 2018, abstract 339-OR.

Serum uric acid lowering might help prevent kidney disease in children with type 2 diabetes mellitus, according to a 7-year investigation of 539 children.

Every 1-mg/dL climb in baseline serum uric acid increased the risk of subsequent elevated urine albumin excretion 1.23 fold, after adjustment for potential confounders (P = .02).

The finding adds to growing evidence that serum uric acid (SUA) isn’t just a marker of diabetic kidney disease, but a contributor to it. “There is definitely” cross-talk between gout and diabetes, said lead investigator Petter Bjornstad, MD, assistant professor of pediatric endocrinology at the University of Colorado, Aurora.

Elevated SUA is common in both conditions and a risk factor for kidney disease. Newer studies have linked higher levels to nephron number decline and other pathologies, perhaps through renal inflammation. Allopurinol, the traditional uric acid lowering agent in gout, is already under investigation to prevent kidney decline in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. There’s also evidence that the potent uric acid lowering agent, febuxostat (Uloric), attenuates hypofiltration in early diabetic kidney disease.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News
Dr. Petter Bjornstad
Dr. Bjornstad said a trial of SUA lowering is probably justified now in children with diabetes. It might also reduce the incidence of hypertension, since his team found that every 1-mg/dL jump in baseline SUA increased the risk hypertension 1.2-fold (P = .007). SUA lowering, however, couldn’t be too aggressive in children because some level of uric acid is needed for cognitive development, he said at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association.

The 539 children, all part of the Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) trial, were assessed annually over a mean of 5.7 years. At baseline, they were 13.9 years old and had T2DM for 7.9 months, on average. The mean body mass index was 34.6 kg/m2, mean hemoglobin A1c was 6%.

Almost 20% of the children were hypertensive at baseline (130/80 mm Hg or higher); 26% were hyperuricemic (6.8 mg/dL or higher); and 6.1% had elevated urine albumin excretion (urine albumin creatinine ratio of at least 30 mg/g), a marker of renal pathology. At the end of follow-up, 18% had elevated albumin excretion and 37.4% were hypertensive.

“Hyperuricemia was common in youth with type 2 diabetes,” just as it’s been shown in adults with the disease. “Higher baseline SUA independently increase[s] risk for onset of hypertension and elevated urine albumin excretion,” Dr. Bjornstad said.

However, the association between SUA and elevated albumin excretion was statistically significant only in boys – 36% of the study population – and non-Hispanic whites, 20% of the subjects, after adjustment for BMI, hemoglobin A1c, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and use of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers.

The National Institutes of Health funded the work. Dr. Bjornstad is a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim.
 

SOURCE: Bjornstad P et al. ADA 2018, abstract 339-OR.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM ADA 2018

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Serum uric acid lowering might help prevent kidney disease in children with T2DM.

Major finding: Every1-mg/dL climb in baseline serum uric acid increased the risk of subsequent elevated urine albumin excretion 1.23 fold, after adjustment for potential confounders (P = .02)

Study details: Seven-year investigation of 539 children with new-onset T2DM.

Disclosures: The National Institutes of Health funded the work. The study lead is a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim.

Source: Bjornstad P et al. ADA 2018 Abstract 339-OR.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Study spotlights risk factors for albuminuria in youth with T2DM

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/03/2022 - 15:18

 

– When Brandy Wicklow, MD, began her pediatric endocrinology fellowship at McGill University in 2006, about 12 per 100,000 children in Manitoba, Canada, were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus each year. By 2016 that rate had more than doubled, to 26 per 100,000 children.

“If you look just at indigenous youth in our province, it’s probably one of the highest rates ever reported, with 95 per 100,000 Manitoba First Nation children diagnosed with type 2 diabetes,” said Dr. Wicklow, a pediatric endocrinologist at the University of Manitoba and the Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba.

Many indigenous populations also face an increased risk for primary renal disease. One study reviewed the charts 90 of Canadian First Nation children and adolescents with T2DM (Diabetes Care. 2009;32[5]:786-90). Of 10 who had renal biopsies performed, nine had immune complex disease/glomerulosclerosis, two had mild diabetes-related lesions, and seven had focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS); yet none had classic nephropathy. An analysis of Chinese youth that included 216 renal biopsies yielded similar findings (Intl Urol Nephrol. 2012;45[1]:173-9).

It’s also known that early-onset T2DM is associated with substantially increased incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and mortality in middle age. For example, one study of Pima Indians found that those who were diagnosed with T2DM earlier than 20 years of age had a one in five chance of developing ESRD, while those who were diagnosed at age 20 years or older had a one in two chance of ESRD (JAMA. 2006;296[4]:421-6). In a separate analysis, researchers estimated the remaining lifetime risks for ESRD among Aboriginal people in Australia with and without diabetes (Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103[3]:e24-6). The value for young adults with diabetes was high, about one in two at the age of 30 years, while it decreased with age to one in seven at 60 years.

“One of the first biomarkers we see in terms of renal disease in kids with T2DM is albuminuria,” Dr. Wicklow said at the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting. “The question is, why do kids with type 2 get more renal disease than kids with type 1 diabetes?” The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth (SEARCH) study from 2006 found that hypertension, increased body mass index, increased weight circumference, and increased lipids were factors, while the SEARCH study from 2015 found that ethnicity, increased weight to height ratio, and mean arterial pressure were factors.

“Insulin resistance is significantly associated with albuminuria,” Dr. Wicklow continued. “It’s also been shown to be associated with hyperfiltration. Some of the markers of insulin resistance are important but they make up about 19% of the variance between type 1 and type 2, which means there are other variables that we’re not measuring.”

Enter ICARE (Improving Renal Complications in Adolescents with Type 2 Diabetes through Research), an ongoing prospective cohort study that Dr. Wicklow and her associates launched in 2014 at eight centers in Canada. It aims to examine the biopsychosocial risk factors for albuminuria in youth with T2DM and the mechanisms for renal injury. “Our theoretical framework was that biological exposures that we are aware of, such as glycemic control, hypertension, and lipids, would all be important in the development of albuminuria and renal disease in kids,” said Dr. Wicklow, who is the study’s coprimary investigator along with Allison Dart, MD. “But what we thought was novel was that psychological exposures either as socioeconomic status or as mental health factors would also directly impinge on renal health with respect to chronic inflammation in the body, inflammation in the kidneys, and long-term kidney damage.”

Courtesy Dr. Brandy Wicklow
During winter, Dr. Wicklow and her colleagues take a hovercraft to visit ICARE study participants in Garden Hill First Nation, in the northeast section of the Canadian Province of Manitoba on the shore of Lake Island.


The first phase of ICARE involved a detailed phenotypic assessment of youth, including anthropometrics, biochemistry, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, overnight urine collections for albumin excretion, renal ultrasound, and iohexol-derived glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Phase 2 included an evaluation of psychological factors, including hair-derived cortisol; validated questionnaires for perceived stress, distress, and resiliency; and a detailed evaluation of systemic and urine inflammatory biomarkers. Annual follow-up is carried out to assess temporal associations between clinical risk factors and renal outcomes, including progression of albuminuria.

At the meeting, Dr. Wicklow reported on 187 youth enrolled to date. Of these, 96% were of indigenous ethnicity, 57 had albuminuria and 130 did not, and the mean ages of the groups were 16 years and 15 years, respectively. At baseline, a higher proportion of those in the albuminuria group were female (74% vs. 64% of those in the no albuminuria group, respectively), had a higher mean hemoglobin A1c (11% vs. 9%), and had hypertension (94% vs. 72%). She noted that upon presentation to the clinic, only 23% of participants had HbA1c levels less than 7%, only 26% had ranges between 7% and 9%, and about 40% did not have any hypertension. Of those who did, 27% had nighttime-only hypertension, and only 2% had daytime-only hypertension.

“The other risk factor these kids have for developing ESRD is that the majority were exposed to diabetes in pregnancy,” Dr. Wicklow said. “Murine models of maternal diabetes exposure have demonstrated that offspring have small kidneys, less ureteric bud branching, and a lower number of nephrons. Most of the human clinical cohort studies look at associations between development of diabetes and parental hypertension, maternal smoking, and maternal education. There is likely an impact at birth that sets these kids up for development of type 2 diabetes.”

In addition, results from clinical cohort studies have found that depression, mental stress, and distress are high in youth with T2DM. “Preliminary data suggest that if you have positive mental health, or coping strategies, or someone has worked through this with you and you are resilient, you might benefit in terms of overall glycemic control,” she said. For example, ICARE investigators have found that the higher the score on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6), the greater the risk of renal inflammation as measured by monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1; P = .02). “Mental health seems to be something that can directly impact your health from a biological standpoint, and we might be able to find biomarkers of that risk,” Dr. Wicklow said. “Where does the stress come from? Most of my patients are indigenous, so it’s not surprising that the history in Canada of colonization of residential schools has left a lasting impression on these families and communities in terms of loss of language, loss of culture, and loss of land. There’s a community-based stress and a family-based stress that these children feel.”

Social factors also play a big role. She presented baseline findings from 196 youth with T2DM and 456 with T1DM, including measures such as the Socioeconomic Factor Index-Version 2 (SEFI-2), a way to assess socioeconomic characteristics based on Canadian Census data that reflects nonmedical social determinants of health. “It looks at factors like number of rooms in the house, single-parent households, maternal education attainment, and family income,” Dr. Wicklow explained. “The higher the SEFI-2 score, the lower your socioeconomic status is for the area you live in. Kids with T2DM generally live in areas of lower SES and lower socioeconomic index. They often live far away from health care providers. Many do not attend school and many are not with their biologic families, so we’ve had a lot of issues addressing child and family services, in particular in the phase of a chronic illness where our expectation is one thing and the family’s and community’s expectations of what’s realistic in terms of treatment and goals is another. We also have a lot of adolescent pregnancies.”

Courtesy Dr. Brandy Wicklow
An aerial view of Garden Hill First Nation in winter.


To date, about 80% of youth with T1D have seen a health care provider within the first year after transition from the pediatric diabetes clinic, compared with just over 50% of kids with T2D. “We transition youth with T1DM to internists, while our youth with T2DM go to itinerant physicians often back in their communities and/or rural family physicians,” she said. Between baseline and year 2, the rate of hospital admissions remained similar among T1DM at 11.6 and 11.8 admissions per 100 patient-years, respectively, but the number of hospital admissions for T2DM patients jumped from 20.1 to 25.5 admissions per 100 patient-years. “Kids with type 2 are showing up in the hospital a lot more than those with type 1 diabetes, but not for diabetes-related diagnoses,” Dr. Wicklow said. “We’re starting to look through the data now, and most of our kids are showing up with mental health complaints and issues. That’s why they’re getting hospitalized.”

Among ICARE study participants who have completed 3 years of follow-up, about 52% had albuminuria at their baseline visit and 48% sustained albuminuria throughout the study. About 26% progressed from normal levels of albuminuria to microalbuminuria, from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria, or from normal levels of albuminuria to macroalbuminuria. In addition, 16% persisted in the category that they were in, and 10% regressed. “The good news is, some of our kids get better over time,” Dr. Wicklow said. “The bad news is that the majority do not.”
Courtesy Dr. Brandy Wicklow
During summer, Dr. Wicklow reaches ICARE study participants in Garden Hill First Nation via helicopter.


Going forward, Dr. Wicklow and her associates work with an ICARE advisory group composed of children and families “who sit with us and talk about what mental health needs might be important, and how we should organize our study in a follow-up of the kids, to try and answer some of the questions that are important,” she said. “Working with the concept of the study’s theoretical framework, they acknowledged that the biological exposures are important, but they were also concerned about food security, finding strength/resilience within the community, and finding coping factors in terms of keeping themselves healthy with their diabetes. For some communities, they are concerned with basic needs. We’re working with them to help them progress, and to figure out how to best study children with type 2 diabetes.”



ICARE has received support from Diabetes Canada, Research Manitoba, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba (specifically the Diabetes Research Envisioned and Accomplished in Manitoba (DREAM) theme), and the University of Manitoba. Dr. Wicklow reported having no financial disclosures.

dbrunk@mdedge.com

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– When Brandy Wicklow, MD, began her pediatric endocrinology fellowship at McGill University in 2006, about 12 per 100,000 children in Manitoba, Canada, were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus each year. By 2016 that rate had more than doubled, to 26 per 100,000 children.

“If you look just at indigenous youth in our province, it’s probably one of the highest rates ever reported, with 95 per 100,000 Manitoba First Nation children diagnosed with type 2 diabetes,” said Dr. Wicklow, a pediatric endocrinologist at the University of Manitoba and the Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba.

Many indigenous populations also face an increased risk for primary renal disease. One study reviewed the charts 90 of Canadian First Nation children and adolescents with T2DM (Diabetes Care. 2009;32[5]:786-90). Of 10 who had renal biopsies performed, nine had immune complex disease/glomerulosclerosis, two had mild diabetes-related lesions, and seven had focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS); yet none had classic nephropathy. An analysis of Chinese youth that included 216 renal biopsies yielded similar findings (Intl Urol Nephrol. 2012;45[1]:173-9).

It’s also known that early-onset T2DM is associated with substantially increased incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and mortality in middle age. For example, one study of Pima Indians found that those who were diagnosed with T2DM earlier than 20 years of age had a one in five chance of developing ESRD, while those who were diagnosed at age 20 years or older had a one in two chance of ESRD (JAMA. 2006;296[4]:421-6). In a separate analysis, researchers estimated the remaining lifetime risks for ESRD among Aboriginal people in Australia with and without diabetes (Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103[3]:e24-6). The value for young adults with diabetes was high, about one in two at the age of 30 years, while it decreased with age to one in seven at 60 years.

“One of the first biomarkers we see in terms of renal disease in kids with T2DM is albuminuria,” Dr. Wicklow said at the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting. “The question is, why do kids with type 2 get more renal disease than kids with type 1 diabetes?” The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth (SEARCH) study from 2006 found that hypertension, increased body mass index, increased weight circumference, and increased lipids were factors, while the SEARCH study from 2015 found that ethnicity, increased weight to height ratio, and mean arterial pressure were factors.

“Insulin resistance is significantly associated with albuminuria,” Dr. Wicklow continued. “It’s also been shown to be associated with hyperfiltration. Some of the markers of insulin resistance are important but they make up about 19% of the variance between type 1 and type 2, which means there are other variables that we’re not measuring.”

Enter ICARE (Improving Renal Complications in Adolescents with Type 2 Diabetes through Research), an ongoing prospective cohort study that Dr. Wicklow and her associates launched in 2014 at eight centers in Canada. It aims to examine the biopsychosocial risk factors for albuminuria in youth with T2DM and the mechanisms for renal injury. “Our theoretical framework was that biological exposures that we are aware of, such as glycemic control, hypertension, and lipids, would all be important in the development of albuminuria and renal disease in kids,” said Dr. Wicklow, who is the study’s coprimary investigator along with Allison Dart, MD. “But what we thought was novel was that psychological exposures either as socioeconomic status or as mental health factors would also directly impinge on renal health with respect to chronic inflammation in the body, inflammation in the kidneys, and long-term kidney damage.”

Courtesy Dr. Brandy Wicklow
During winter, Dr. Wicklow and her colleagues take a hovercraft to visit ICARE study participants in Garden Hill First Nation, in the northeast section of the Canadian Province of Manitoba on the shore of Lake Island.


The first phase of ICARE involved a detailed phenotypic assessment of youth, including anthropometrics, biochemistry, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, overnight urine collections for albumin excretion, renal ultrasound, and iohexol-derived glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Phase 2 included an evaluation of psychological factors, including hair-derived cortisol; validated questionnaires for perceived stress, distress, and resiliency; and a detailed evaluation of systemic and urine inflammatory biomarkers. Annual follow-up is carried out to assess temporal associations between clinical risk factors and renal outcomes, including progression of albuminuria.

At the meeting, Dr. Wicklow reported on 187 youth enrolled to date. Of these, 96% were of indigenous ethnicity, 57 had albuminuria and 130 did not, and the mean ages of the groups were 16 years and 15 years, respectively. At baseline, a higher proportion of those in the albuminuria group were female (74% vs. 64% of those in the no albuminuria group, respectively), had a higher mean hemoglobin A1c (11% vs. 9%), and had hypertension (94% vs. 72%). She noted that upon presentation to the clinic, only 23% of participants had HbA1c levels less than 7%, only 26% had ranges between 7% and 9%, and about 40% did not have any hypertension. Of those who did, 27% had nighttime-only hypertension, and only 2% had daytime-only hypertension.

“The other risk factor these kids have for developing ESRD is that the majority were exposed to diabetes in pregnancy,” Dr. Wicklow said. “Murine models of maternal diabetes exposure have demonstrated that offspring have small kidneys, less ureteric bud branching, and a lower number of nephrons. Most of the human clinical cohort studies look at associations between development of diabetes and parental hypertension, maternal smoking, and maternal education. There is likely an impact at birth that sets these kids up for development of type 2 diabetes.”

In addition, results from clinical cohort studies have found that depression, mental stress, and distress are high in youth with T2DM. “Preliminary data suggest that if you have positive mental health, or coping strategies, or someone has worked through this with you and you are resilient, you might benefit in terms of overall glycemic control,” she said. For example, ICARE investigators have found that the higher the score on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6), the greater the risk of renal inflammation as measured by monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1; P = .02). “Mental health seems to be something that can directly impact your health from a biological standpoint, and we might be able to find biomarkers of that risk,” Dr. Wicklow said. “Where does the stress come from? Most of my patients are indigenous, so it’s not surprising that the history in Canada of colonization of residential schools has left a lasting impression on these families and communities in terms of loss of language, loss of culture, and loss of land. There’s a community-based stress and a family-based stress that these children feel.”

Social factors also play a big role. She presented baseline findings from 196 youth with T2DM and 456 with T1DM, including measures such as the Socioeconomic Factor Index-Version 2 (SEFI-2), a way to assess socioeconomic characteristics based on Canadian Census data that reflects nonmedical social determinants of health. “It looks at factors like number of rooms in the house, single-parent households, maternal education attainment, and family income,” Dr. Wicklow explained. “The higher the SEFI-2 score, the lower your socioeconomic status is for the area you live in. Kids with T2DM generally live in areas of lower SES and lower socioeconomic index. They often live far away from health care providers. Many do not attend school and many are not with their biologic families, so we’ve had a lot of issues addressing child and family services, in particular in the phase of a chronic illness where our expectation is one thing and the family’s and community’s expectations of what’s realistic in terms of treatment and goals is another. We also have a lot of adolescent pregnancies.”

Courtesy Dr. Brandy Wicklow
An aerial view of Garden Hill First Nation in winter.


To date, about 80% of youth with T1D have seen a health care provider within the first year after transition from the pediatric diabetes clinic, compared with just over 50% of kids with T2D. “We transition youth with T1DM to internists, while our youth with T2DM go to itinerant physicians often back in their communities and/or rural family physicians,” she said. Between baseline and year 2, the rate of hospital admissions remained similar among T1DM at 11.6 and 11.8 admissions per 100 patient-years, respectively, but the number of hospital admissions for T2DM patients jumped from 20.1 to 25.5 admissions per 100 patient-years. “Kids with type 2 are showing up in the hospital a lot more than those with type 1 diabetes, but not for diabetes-related diagnoses,” Dr. Wicklow said. “We’re starting to look through the data now, and most of our kids are showing up with mental health complaints and issues. That’s why they’re getting hospitalized.”

Among ICARE study participants who have completed 3 years of follow-up, about 52% had albuminuria at their baseline visit and 48% sustained albuminuria throughout the study. About 26% progressed from normal levels of albuminuria to microalbuminuria, from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria, or from normal levels of albuminuria to macroalbuminuria. In addition, 16% persisted in the category that they were in, and 10% regressed. “The good news is, some of our kids get better over time,” Dr. Wicklow said. “The bad news is that the majority do not.”
Courtesy Dr. Brandy Wicklow
During summer, Dr. Wicklow reaches ICARE study participants in Garden Hill First Nation via helicopter.


Going forward, Dr. Wicklow and her associates work with an ICARE advisory group composed of children and families “who sit with us and talk about what mental health needs might be important, and how we should organize our study in a follow-up of the kids, to try and answer some of the questions that are important,” she said. “Working with the concept of the study’s theoretical framework, they acknowledged that the biological exposures are important, but they were also concerned about food security, finding strength/resilience within the community, and finding coping factors in terms of keeping themselves healthy with their diabetes. For some communities, they are concerned with basic needs. We’re working with them to help them progress, and to figure out how to best study children with type 2 diabetes.”



ICARE has received support from Diabetes Canada, Research Manitoba, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba (specifically the Diabetes Research Envisioned and Accomplished in Manitoba (DREAM) theme), and the University of Manitoba. Dr. Wicklow reported having no financial disclosures.

dbrunk@mdedge.com

 

– When Brandy Wicklow, MD, began her pediatric endocrinology fellowship at McGill University in 2006, about 12 per 100,000 children in Manitoba, Canada, were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus each year. By 2016 that rate had more than doubled, to 26 per 100,000 children.

“If you look just at indigenous youth in our province, it’s probably one of the highest rates ever reported, with 95 per 100,000 Manitoba First Nation children diagnosed with type 2 diabetes,” said Dr. Wicklow, a pediatric endocrinologist at the University of Manitoba and the Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba.

Many indigenous populations also face an increased risk for primary renal disease. One study reviewed the charts 90 of Canadian First Nation children and adolescents with T2DM (Diabetes Care. 2009;32[5]:786-90). Of 10 who had renal biopsies performed, nine had immune complex disease/glomerulosclerosis, two had mild diabetes-related lesions, and seven had focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS); yet none had classic nephropathy. An analysis of Chinese youth that included 216 renal biopsies yielded similar findings (Intl Urol Nephrol. 2012;45[1]:173-9).

It’s also known that early-onset T2DM is associated with substantially increased incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and mortality in middle age. For example, one study of Pima Indians found that those who were diagnosed with T2DM earlier than 20 years of age had a one in five chance of developing ESRD, while those who were diagnosed at age 20 years or older had a one in two chance of ESRD (JAMA. 2006;296[4]:421-6). In a separate analysis, researchers estimated the remaining lifetime risks for ESRD among Aboriginal people in Australia with and without diabetes (Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103[3]:e24-6). The value for young adults with diabetes was high, about one in two at the age of 30 years, while it decreased with age to one in seven at 60 years.

“One of the first biomarkers we see in terms of renal disease in kids with T2DM is albuminuria,” Dr. Wicklow said at the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting. “The question is, why do kids with type 2 get more renal disease than kids with type 1 diabetes?” The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth (SEARCH) study from 2006 found that hypertension, increased body mass index, increased weight circumference, and increased lipids were factors, while the SEARCH study from 2015 found that ethnicity, increased weight to height ratio, and mean arterial pressure were factors.

“Insulin resistance is significantly associated with albuminuria,” Dr. Wicklow continued. “It’s also been shown to be associated with hyperfiltration. Some of the markers of insulin resistance are important but they make up about 19% of the variance between type 1 and type 2, which means there are other variables that we’re not measuring.”

Enter ICARE (Improving Renal Complications in Adolescents with Type 2 Diabetes through Research), an ongoing prospective cohort study that Dr. Wicklow and her associates launched in 2014 at eight centers in Canada. It aims to examine the biopsychosocial risk factors for albuminuria in youth with T2DM and the mechanisms for renal injury. “Our theoretical framework was that biological exposures that we are aware of, such as glycemic control, hypertension, and lipids, would all be important in the development of albuminuria and renal disease in kids,” said Dr. Wicklow, who is the study’s coprimary investigator along with Allison Dart, MD. “But what we thought was novel was that psychological exposures either as socioeconomic status or as mental health factors would also directly impinge on renal health with respect to chronic inflammation in the body, inflammation in the kidneys, and long-term kidney damage.”

Courtesy Dr. Brandy Wicklow
During winter, Dr. Wicklow and her colleagues take a hovercraft to visit ICARE study participants in Garden Hill First Nation, in the northeast section of the Canadian Province of Manitoba on the shore of Lake Island.


The first phase of ICARE involved a detailed phenotypic assessment of youth, including anthropometrics, biochemistry, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, overnight urine collections for albumin excretion, renal ultrasound, and iohexol-derived glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Phase 2 included an evaluation of psychological factors, including hair-derived cortisol; validated questionnaires for perceived stress, distress, and resiliency; and a detailed evaluation of systemic and urine inflammatory biomarkers. Annual follow-up is carried out to assess temporal associations between clinical risk factors and renal outcomes, including progression of albuminuria.

At the meeting, Dr. Wicklow reported on 187 youth enrolled to date. Of these, 96% were of indigenous ethnicity, 57 had albuminuria and 130 did not, and the mean ages of the groups were 16 years and 15 years, respectively. At baseline, a higher proportion of those in the albuminuria group were female (74% vs. 64% of those in the no albuminuria group, respectively), had a higher mean hemoglobin A1c (11% vs. 9%), and had hypertension (94% vs. 72%). She noted that upon presentation to the clinic, only 23% of participants had HbA1c levels less than 7%, only 26% had ranges between 7% and 9%, and about 40% did not have any hypertension. Of those who did, 27% had nighttime-only hypertension, and only 2% had daytime-only hypertension.

“The other risk factor these kids have for developing ESRD is that the majority were exposed to diabetes in pregnancy,” Dr. Wicklow said. “Murine models of maternal diabetes exposure have demonstrated that offspring have small kidneys, less ureteric bud branching, and a lower number of nephrons. Most of the human clinical cohort studies look at associations between development of diabetes and parental hypertension, maternal smoking, and maternal education. There is likely an impact at birth that sets these kids up for development of type 2 diabetes.”

In addition, results from clinical cohort studies have found that depression, mental stress, and distress are high in youth with T2DM. “Preliminary data suggest that if you have positive mental health, or coping strategies, or someone has worked through this with you and you are resilient, you might benefit in terms of overall glycemic control,” she said. For example, ICARE investigators have found that the higher the score on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6), the greater the risk of renal inflammation as measured by monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1; P = .02). “Mental health seems to be something that can directly impact your health from a biological standpoint, and we might be able to find biomarkers of that risk,” Dr. Wicklow said. “Where does the stress come from? Most of my patients are indigenous, so it’s not surprising that the history in Canada of colonization of residential schools has left a lasting impression on these families and communities in terms of loss of language, loss of culture, and loss of land. There’s a community-based stress and a family-based stress that these children feel.”

Social factors also play a big role. She presented baseline findings from 196 youth with T2DM and 456 with T1DM, including measures such as the Socioeconomic Factor Index-Version 2 (SEFI-2), a way to assess socioeconomic characteristics based on Canadian Census data that reflects nonmedical social determinants of health. “It looks at factors like number of rooms in the house, single-parent households, maternal education attainment, and family income,” Dr. Wicklow explained. “The higher the SEFI-2 score, the lower your socioeconomic status is for the area you live in. Kids with T2DM generally live in areas of lower SES and lower socioeconomic index. They often live far away from health care providers. Many do not attend school and many are not with their biologic families, so we’ve had a lot of issues addressing child and family services, in particular in the phase of a chronic illness where our expectation is one thing and the family’s and community’s expectations of what’s realistic in terms of treatment and goals is another. We also have a lot of adolescent pregnancies.”

Courtesy Dr. Brandy Wicklow
An aerial view of Garden Hill First Nation in winter.


To date, about 80% of youth with T1D have seen a health care provider within the first year after transition from the pediatric diabetes clinic, compared with just over 50% of kids with T2D. “We transition youth with T1DM to internists, while our youth with T2DM go to itinerant physicians often back in their communities and/or rural family physicians,” she said. Between baseline and year 2, the rate of hospital admissions remained similar among T1DM at 11.6 and 11.8 admissions per 100 patient-years, respectively, but the number of hospital admissions for T2DM patients jumped from 20.1 to 25.5 admissions per 100 patient-years. “Kids with type 2 are showing up in the hospital a lot more than those with type 1 diabetes, but not for diabetes-related diagnoses,” Dr. Wicklow said. “We’re starting to look through the data now, and most of our kids are showing up with mental health complaints and issues. That’s why they’re getting hospitalized.”

Among ICARE study participants who have completed 3 years of follow-up, about 52% had albuminuria at their baseline visit and 48% sustained albuminuria throughout the study. About 26% progressed from normal levels of albuminuria to microalbuminuria, from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria, or from normal levels of albuminuria to macroalbuminuria. In addition, 16% persisted in the category that they were in, and 10% regressed. “The good news is, some of our kids get better over time,” Dr. Wicklow said. “The bad news is that the majority do not.”
Courtesy Dr. Brandy Wicklow
During summer, Dr. Wicklow reaches ICARE study participants in Garden Hill First Nation via helicopter.


Going forward, Dr. Wicklow and her associates work with an ICARE advisory group composed of children and families “who sit with us and talk about what mental health needs might be important, and how we should organize our study in a follow-up of the kids, to try and answer some of the questions that are important,” she said. “Working with the concept of the study’s theoretical framework, they acknowledged that the biological exposures are important, but they were also concerned about food security, finding strength/resilience within the community, and finding coping factors in terms of keeping themselves healthy with their diabetes. For some communities, they are concerned with basic needs. We’re working with them to help them progress, and to figure out how to best study children with type 2 diabetes.”



ICARE has received support from Diabetes Canada, Research Manitoba, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba (specifically the Diabetes Research Envisioned and Accomplished in Manitoba (DREAM) theme), and the University of Manitoba. Dr. Wicklow reported having no financial disclosures.

dbrunk@mdedge.com

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

AT PAS 18

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Mental health may indirectly increase inflammation, which contributes to kidney health.

Major finding: The higher the score on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6), the greater the risk of renal inflammation as measured by MCP-1 (P = .02).

Study details: Preliminary results from ICARE (Improving Renal Complications in Adolescents with Type 2 Diabetes through Research), an ongoing prospective cohort study.

Disclosures: ICARE has received support from Diabetes Canada, Research Manitoba, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba (specifically the Diabetes Research Envisioned and Accomplished in Manitoba [DREAM] theme), and the University of Manitoba. Dr. Wicklow reported having no financial disclosures.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

How the IHS Reduced Kidney Disease in the Highest-risk Population

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 06/14/2019 - 12:55
Display Headline
How the IHS Reduced Kidney Disease in the Highest-risk Population

Alaska is a vast state—larger than Texas, Montana, and California combined. It is also home to the highest percentage of American Indian (AI) and Alaska Native (AN) persons in the United States. These two populations—collectively referred to as Native Americans—have been served by the Indian Health Services (IHS) since it was established through the Snyder Act of 1921, in response to the dismal health conditions of the indigenous tribes in this country.1 Across the US (not only in Alaska), the IHS has partnered with AI/AN peoples to decrease health disparities in a culturally acceptable manner that honors and protects their traditions and values.

The IHS—which in 2016 comprised 2,500 nurses, 750 physicians, 700 pharmacists, 200 PAs and NPs, and 280 dentists, as well as nutritionists, diabetes educators, administrators, and other professionals—has made huge advances in decreasing health disparities in their populations. Among them: decreased rates of tuberculosis and of maternal and infant deaths.

However, life expectancy among Native Americans remains four years shorter than that of the rest of the US population. This disparity can be traced to three recalcitrant factors: unintentional injuries, liver disease, and diabetes.

The IHS practitioners decided to tackle diabetes with a multipronged approach. And what they achieved is astonishing.

WHAT THEY DID

Worldwide, diabetes is the most common cause of kidney failure; identifying patients with diabetes and early-stage chronic kidney disease allows for aggressive treatment that can slow progression to kidney failure and dialysis.

Diabetes-related kidney failure among Native Americans dropped by 54% from 1996 to 2013

The IHS providers knew when they decided to tackle the problem of diabetes in the AI/AN population that the incidence was 16%—and the rate of diabetes leading to kidney failure in this population was the highest for any ethnic group in the US.2,3 And yet …

From 1996 to 2013, the rate of diabetes-related kidney failure among Native Americans dropped by 54%.3 Yes—the group of patients with the highest percentage of diabetes diagnoses has had the greatest improvement in prevention of kidney failure.4

Continue to: Some of the clinical achievements that contributed to...

 

 

Some of the clinical achievements that contributed to this significant change include

  • Increased use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) (from 42% to 74% over a five-year period)
  • Reduced average blood pressure among hypertensive patients (to 133/76 mm Hg)
  • Improved blood glucose control (by 10%)
  • Increased testing for kidney disease among older patients (50% higher than the rest of the Medicare diabetes population).3

HOW THEY DID IT

This is not rocket science. The IHS staff integrated both population- and team-based approaches to achieve a more impressive decrease than ever could have been expected. In retrospect, perhaps this success should not come as such a surprise—many religious beliefs held by Native Americans focus around society, communal harmony, kinship, and cooperation.

The population health approach focused on promoting the wellness of the entire community and connecting people to local resources, including healthy food, transportation, housing, and mental health care. In the team approach, IHS medical experts implemented strategies to improve patient education, community outreach, care coordination, health outcome tracking, and access to a wide variety of health care providers.3,5

In a place like Alaska—where the northernmost city, Barrow, is more than 700 miles (two hours by plane) from Anchorage, and the southeastern Annette Island is more than 1,000 miles (six hours by plane) from the capital—this can be an especially challenging prospect. To reduce travel burden for rural patients, the IHS sponsors a diabetes team that travels from village to village. Nephrology services are not included in these field visits, however, so the kidney team relies heavily on telehealth. This requires extensive clinic staff coordination, as well as equipment and knowledgeable information systems support teams.

Other challenges require educational and logistical solutions. As noted, the use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs increased through the IHS’s efforts—and contributed to the delayed progression of diabetic kidney disease—but those additional prescriptions necessitate patient education. Understanding of these medications can be limited; many rural patients trust that when the bottle is empty, their practitioner has treated and cured their disease—mistakenly believing that no refills are needed. And even when the need to continue the prescription is understood, rural clinics may have difficulty tracking appointments and prescriptions written by providers at specialty clinics in Anchorage, making ongoing refills an issue.

Continue to: The necessary dietary changes can also be...

 

 

The necessary dietary changes can also be difficult for AI/AN populations. For example, in rural Alaska, tap water may not be safe to drink, and soda costs less than bottled water. Fresh produce is expensive and has often begun to spoil by the time it reaches local stores. The Native villagers often prefer their usual diets of gathered berries, fish, and red meat from subsistence hunting, making implementation of dietary changes difficult.

However, as the success of the IHS initiative shows, challenges can be met and overcome by practitioners who see a need, formulate a solution individualized to the circumstance, and think outside the box. One of the keys is developing a trusting relationship with patients. Another is to recognize informational needs and utilize available resources to educate patients. For example, visual representations of kidney function tend to be helpful in explaining the nature and course of disease; the National Kidney Disease Education Program uses an illustration similar to a gas gauge to demonstrate glomerular filtration rate (which would otherwise seem abstract and hard to understand for some patients; see below).6 When you understand your patient population and their needs, it makes addressing the challenging aspects of health care and prevention easier.

Explaining Kidney Function

CONCLUSION

The results that the IHS achieved should serve as an example for all Americans with diabetes and their health care providers. We must be open to delivery of care via different approaches and practitioners in order to successfully help patients of different backgrounds and circumstances. This is the individualization of care that we hear so much about.

In 2016, the costs of caring for the kidney failure population were greater than the entire budget of the NIH. By aggressively identifying and treating patients at risk for kidney failure, we can slow disease progression—saving society money, but more importantly allowing our patients many more years of life free from the constraints of dialysis. —MET, RB

Mandy E. Thompson, PA-C
Kidney Center of Denver Health

Robin Bassett, DNP
Nephrology and Hypertension Associates, Anchorage
Adjunct Professor, NP program, University of Alaska, Anchorage

References

1. Indian Health Service. Legislation. www.ihs.gov/aboutihs/legislation. Accessed June 13, 2018.
2. National Health Interview Survey and Indian Health Service, 2010-2012.
3. CDC. Native Americans with diabetes. www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/aian-diabetes/. Accessed June 13, 2018.
4. United States Renal Data System. Figure 1.5: Trends in adjusted* ESRD incidence rate (per million/year), by race, in the U.S. population, 1996-2014. In: 2016 USRDS annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2016.
5. Indian Health Service. Special diabetes program for In­dians. www.ihs.gov/newsroom/factsheets/diabetes. Accessed June 13, 2018.
6. National Kidney Disease Education Program. How well are your kidneys working? Explaining your kidney test results. www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/professionals/clinical-tools-patient-education-outreach/explain-kidney-test-results. Accessed June 13, 2018.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Clinician Reviews in partnership with


The National Kidney Foundation Council of Advanced Practitioners' (NKF-CAP) mission is to serve as an advisory resource for the NKF, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists, and the community in advancing the care, treatment, and education of patients with kidney disease and their families. CAP is an advocate for professional development, research, and health policies that impact the delivery of patient care and professional practice. For more information on NKF-CAP, visit www.kidney.org/CAP. Renal Consult is edited by Jane S. Davis, CRNP, DNP, a member of the Clinician Reviews editorial board, who is a nurse practitioner in the Division of Nephrology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and is the communications chairperson for the National Kidney Foundation’s Council of Advanced Practitioners (NKF- CAP); and Kim Zuber, PA-C, MSPS, DFAAPA, a semi- retired PA who works with the American Academy of Nephrology PAs and is a past chair of the NKF-CAP. This month's column was authored by Mandy E. Thompson, PA-C, who practices at the Kidney Center of Denver Health, and Robin Bassett, DNP, who practices with Nephrology and Hypertension Associates in Anchorage and is an Adjunct Professor in the NP program at the University of Alaska-Anchorage. Dr. Bassett was assigned to the IHS Alaska Native Medical Center in Anchorage for 13 years during her employment with the United States Public Health Service.

Issue
Clinician Reviews - 28(7)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
e11-e13
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Clinician Reviews in partnership with


The National Kidney Foundation Council of Advanced Practitioners' (NKF-CAP) mission is to serve as an advisory resource for the NKF, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists, and the community in advancing the care, treatment, and education of patients with kidney disease and their families. CAP is an advocate for professional development, research, and health policies that impact the delivery of patient care and professional practice. For more information on NKF-CAP, visit www.kidney.org/CAP. Renal Consult is edited by Jane S. Davis, CRNP, DNP, a member of the Clinician Reviews editorial board, who is a nurse practitioner in the Division of Nephrology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and is the communications chairperson for the National Kidney Foundation’s Council of Advanced Practitioners (NKF- CAP); and Kim Zuber, PA-C, MSPS, DFAAPA, a semi- retired PA who works with the American Academy of Nephrology PAs and is a past chair of the NKF-CAP. This month's column was authored by Mandy E. Thompson, PA-C, who practices at the Kidney Center of Denver Health, and Robin Bassett, DNP, who practices with Nephrology and Hypertension Associates in Anchorage and is an Adjunct Professor in the NP program at the University of Alaska-Anchorage. Dr. Bassett was assigned to the IHS Alaska Native Medical Center in Anchorage for 13 years during her employment with the United States Public Health Service.

Author and Disclosure Information

Clinician Reviews in partnership with


The National Kidney Foundation Council of Advanced Practitioners' (NKF-CAP) mission is to serve as an advisory resource for the NKF, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists, and the community in advancing the care, treatment, and education of patients with kidney disease and their families. CAP is an advocate for professional development, research, and health policies that impact the delivery of patient care and professional practice. For more information on NKF-CAP, visit www.kidney.org/CAP. Renal Consult is edited by Jane S. Davis, CRNP, DNP, a member of the Clinician Reviews editorial board, who is a nurse practitioner in the Division of Nephrology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and is the communications chairperson for the National Kidney Foundation’s Council of Advanced Practitioners (NKF- CAP); and Kim Zuber, PA-C, MSPS, DFAAPA, a semi- retired PA who works with the American Academy of Nephrology PAs and is a past chair of the NKF-CAP. This month's column was authored by Mandy E. Thompson, PA-C, who practices at the Kidney Center of Denver Health, and Robin Bassett, DNP, who practices with Nephrology and Hypertension Associates in Anchorage and is an Adjunct Professor in the NP program at the University of Alaska-Anchorage. Dr. Bassett was assigned to the IHS Alaska Native Medical Center in Anchorage for 13 years during her employment with the United States Public Health Service.

Article PDF
Article PDF

Alaska is a vast state—larger than Texas, Montana, and California combined. It is also home to the highest percentage of American Indian (AI) and Alaska Native (AN) persons in the United States. These two populations—collectively referred to as Native Americans—have been served by the Indian Health Services (IHS) since it was established through the Snyder Act of 1921, in response to the dismal health conditions of the indigenous tribes in this country.1 Across the US (not only in Alaska), the IHS has partnered with AI/AN peoples to decrease health disparities in a culturally acceptable manner that honors and protects their traditions and values.

The IHS—which in 2016 comprised 2,500 nurses, 750 physicians, 700 pharmacists, 200 PAs and NPs, and 280 dentists, as well as nutritionists, diabetes educators, administrators, and other professionals—has made huge advances in decreasing health disparities in their populations. Among them: decreased rates of tuberculosis and of maternal and infant deaths.

However, life expectancy among Native Americans remains four years shorter than that of the rest of the US population. This disparity can be traced to three recalcitrant factors: unintentional injuries, liver disease, and diabetes.

The IHS practitioners decided to tackle diabetes with a multipronged approach. And what they achieved is astonishing.

WHAT THEY DID

Worldwide, diabetes is the most common cause of kidney failure; identifying patients with diabetes and early-stage chronic kidney disease allows for aggressive treatment that can slow progression to kidney failure and dialysis.

Diabetes-related kidney failure among Native Americans dropped by 54% from 1996 to 2013

The IHS providers knew when they decided to tackle the problem of diabetes in the AI/AN population that the incidence was 16%—and the rate of diabetes leading to kidney failure in this population was the highest for any ethnic group in the US.2,3 And yet …

From 1996 to 2013, the rate of diabetes-related kidney failure among Native Americans dropped by 54%.3 Yes—the group of patients with the highest percentage of diabetes diagnoses has had the greatest improvement in prevention of kidney failure.4

Continue to: Some of the clinical achievements that contributed to...

 

 

Some of the clinical achievements that contributed to this significant change include

  • Increased use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) (from 42% to 74% over a five-year period)
  • Reduced average blood pressure among hypertensive patients (to 133/76 mm Hg)
  • Improved blood glucose control (by 10%)
  • Increased testing for kidney disease among older patients (50% higher than the rest of the Medicare diabetes population).3

HOW THEY DID IT

This is not rocket science. The IHS staff integrated both population- and team-based approaches to achieve a more impressive decrease than ever could have been expected. In retrospect, perhaps this success should not come as such a surprise—many religious beliefs held by Native Americans focus around society, communal harmony, kinship, and cooperation.

The population health approach focused on promoting the wellness of the entire community and connecting people to local resources, including healthy food, transportation, housing, and mental health care. In the team approach, IHS medical experts implemented strategies to improve patient education, community outreach, care coordination, health outcome tracking, and access to a wide variety of health care providers.3,5

In a place like Alaska—where the northernmost city, Barrow, is more than 700 miles (two hours by plane) from Anchorage, and the southeastern Annette Island is more than 1,000 miles (six hours by plane) from the capital—this can be an especially challenging prospect. To reduce travel burden for rural patients, the IHS sponsors a diabetes team that travels from village to village. Nephrology services are not included in these field visits, however, so the kidney team relies heavily on telehealth. This requires extensive clinic staff coordination, as well as equipment and knowledgeable information systems support teams.

Other challenges require educational and logistical solutions. As noted, the use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs increased through the IHS’s efforts—and contributed to the delayed progression of diabetic kidney disease—but those additional prescriptions necessitate patient education. Understanding of these medications can be limited; many rural patients trust that when the bottle is empty, their practitioner has treated and cured their disease—mistakenly believing that no refills are needed. And even when the need to continue the prescription is understood, rural clinics may have difficulty tracking appointments and prescriptions written by providers at specialty clinics in Anchorage, making ongoing refills an issue.

Continue to: The necessary dietary changes can also be...

 

 

The necessary dietary changes can also be difficult for AI/AN populations. For example, in rural Alaska, tap water may not be safe to drink, and soda costs less than bottled water. Fresh produce is expensive and has often begun to spoil by the time it reaches local stores. The Native villagers often prefer their usual diets of gathered berries, fish, and red meat from subsistence hunting, making implementation of dietary changes difficult.

However, as the success of the IHS initiative shows, challenges can be met and overcome by practitioners who see a need, formulate a solution individualized to the circumstance, and think outside the box. One of the keys is developing a trusting relationship with patients. Another is to recognize informational needs and utilize available resources to educate patients. For example, visual representations of kidney function tend to be helpful in explaining the nature and course of disease; the National Kidney Disease Education Program uses an illustration similar to a gas gauge to demonstrate glomerular filtration rate (which would otherwise seem abstract and hard to understand for some patients; see below).6 When you understand your patient population and their needs, it makes addressing the challenging aspects of health care and prevention easier.

Explaining Kidney Function

CONCLUSION

The results that the IHS achieved should serve as an example for all Americans with diabetes and their health care providers. We must be open to delivery of care via different approaches and practitioners in order to successfully help patients of different backgrounds and circumstances. This is the individualization of care that we hear so much about.

In 2016, the costs of caring for the kidney failure population were greater than the entire budget of the NIH. By aggressively identifying and treating patients at risk for kidney failure, we can slow disease progression—saving society money, but more importantly allowing our patients many more years of life free from the constraints of dialysis. —MET, RB

Mandy E. Thompson, PA-C
Kidney Center of Denver Health

Robin Bassett, DNP
Nephrology and Hypertension Associates, Anchorage
Adjunct Professor, NP program, University of Alaska, Anchorage

Alaska is a vast state—larger than Texas, Montana, and California combined. It is also home to the highest percentage of American Indian (AI) and Alaska Native (AN) persons in the United States. These two populations—collectively referred to as Native Americans—have been served by the Indian Health Services (IHS) since it was established through the Snyder Act of 1921, in response to the dismal health conditions of the indigenous tribes in this country.1 Across the US (not only in Alaska), the IHS has partnered with AI/AN peoples to decrease health disparities in a culturally acceptable manner that honors and protects their traditions and values.

The IHS—which in 2016 comprised 2,500 nurses, 750 physicians, 700 pharmacists, 200 PAs and NPs, and 280 dentists, as well as nutritionists, diabetes educators, administrators, and other professionals—has made huge advances in decreasing health disparities in their populations. Among them: decreased rates of tuberculosis and of maternal and infant deaths.

However, life expectancy among Native Americans remains four years shorter than that of the rest of the US population. This disparity can be traced to three recalcitrant factors: unintentional injuries, liver disease, and diabetes.

The IHS practitioners decided to tackle diabetes with a multipronged approach. And what they achieved is astonishing.

WHAT THEY DID

Worldwide, diabetes is the most common cause of kidney failure; identifying patients with diabetes and early-stage chronic kidney disease allows for aggressive treatment that can slow progression to kidney failure and dialysis.

Diabetes-related kidney failure among Native Americans dropped by 54% from 1996 to 2013

The IHS providers knew when they decided to tackle the problem of diabetes in the AI/AN population that the incidence was 16%—and the rate of diabetes leading to kidney failure in this population was the highest for any ethnic group in the US.2,3 And yet …

From 1996 to 2013, the rate of diabetes-related kidney failure among Native Americans dropped by 54%.3 Yes—the group of patients with the highest percentage of diabetes diagnoses has had the greatest improvement in prevention of kidney failure.4

Continue to: Some of the clinical achievements that contributed to...

 

 

Some of the clinical achievements that contributed to this significant change include

  • Increased use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) (from 42% to 74% over a five-year period)
  • Reduced average blood pressure among hypertensive patients (to 133/76 mm Hg)
  • Improved blood glucose control (by 10%)
  • Increased testing for kidney disease among older patients (50% higher than the rest of the Medicare diabetes population).3

HOW THEY DID IT

This is not rocket science. The IHS staff integrated both population- and team-based approaches to achieve a more impressive decrease than ever could have been expected. In retrospect, perhaps this success should not come as such a surprise—many religious beliefs held by Native Americans focus around society, communal harmony, kinship, and cooperation.

The population health approach focused on promoting the wellness of the entire community and connecting people to local resources, including healthy food, transportation, housing, and mental health care. In the team approach, IHS medical experts implemented strategies to improve patient education, community outreach, care coordination, health outcome tracking, and access to a wide variety of health care providers.3,5

In a place like Alaska—where the northernmost city, Barrow, is more than 700 miles (two hours by plane) from Anchorage, and the southeastern Annette Island is more than 1,000 miles (six hours by plane) from the capital—this can be an especially challenging prospect. To reduce travel burden for rural patients, the IHS sponsors a diabetes team that travels from village to village. Nephrology services are not included in these field visits, however, so the kidney team relies heavily on telehealth. This requires extensive clinic staff coordination, as well as equipment and knowledgeable information systems support teams.

Other challenges require educational and logistical solutions. As noted, the use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs increased through the IHS’s efforts—and contributed to the delayed progression of diabetic kidney disease—but those additional prescriptions necessitate patient education. Understanding of these medications can be limited; many rural patients trust that when the bottle is empty, their practitioner has treated and cured their disease—mistakenly believing that no refills are needed. And even when the need to continue the prescription is understood, rural clinics may have difficulty tracking appointments and prescriptions written by providers at specialty clinics in Anchorage, making ongoing refills an issue.

Continue to: The necessary dietary changes can also be...

 

 

The necessary dietary changes can also be difficult for AI/AN populations. For example, in rural Alaska, tap water may not be safe to drink, and soda costs less than bottled water. Fresh produce is expensive and has often begun to spoil by the time it reaches local stores. The Native villagers often prefer their usual diets of gathered berries, fish, and red meat from subsistence hunting, making implementation of dietary changes difficult.

However, as the success of the IHS initiative shows, challenges can be met and overcome by practitioners who see a need, formulate a solution individualized to the circumstance, and think outside the box. One of the keys is developing a trusting relationship with patients. Another is to recognize informational needs and utilize available resources to educate patients. For example, visual representations of kidney function tend to be helpful in explaining the nature and course of disease; the National Kidney Disease Education Program uses an illustration similar to a gas gauge to demonstrate glomerular filtration rate (which would otherwise seem abstract and hard to understand for some patients; see below).6 When you understand your patient population and their needs, it makes addressing the challenging aspects of health care and prevention easier.

Explaining Kidney Function

CONCLUSION

The results that the IHS achieved should serve as an example for all Americans with diabetes and their health care providers. We must be open to delivery of care via different approaches and practitioners in order to successfully help patients of different backgrounds and circumstances. This is the individualization of care that we hear so much about.

In 2016, the costs of caring for the kidney failure population were greater than the entire budget of the NIH. By aggressively identifying and treating patients at risk for kidney failure, we can slow disease progression—saving society money, but more importantly allowing our patients many more years of life free from the constraints of dialysis. —MET, RB

Mandy E. Thompson, PA-C
Kidney Center of Denver Health

Robin Bassett, DNP
Nephrology and Hypertension Associates, Anchorage
Adjunct Professor, NP program, University of Alaska, Anchorage

References

1. Indian Health Service. Legislation. www.ihs.gov/aboutihs/legislation. Accessed June 13, 2018.
2. National Health Interview Survey and Indian Health Service, 2010-2012.
3. CDC. Native Americans with diabetes. www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/aian-diabetes/. Accessed June 13, 2018.
4. United States Renal Data System. Figure 1.5: Trends in adjusted* ESRD incidence rate (per million/year), by race, in the U.S. population, 1996-2014. In: 2016 USRDS annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2016.
5. Indian Health Service. Special diabetes program for In­dians. www.ihs.gov/newsroom/factsheets/diabetes. Accessed June 13, 2018.
6. National Kidney Disease Education Program. How well are your kidneys working? Explaining your kidney test results. www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/professionals/clinical-tools-patient-education-outreach/explain-kidney-test-results. Accessed June 13, 2018.

References

1. Indian Health Service. Legislation. www.ihs.gov/aboutihs/legislation. Accessed June 13, 2018.
2. National Health Interview Survey and Indian Health Service, 2010-2012.
3. CDC. Native Americans with diabetes. www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/aian-diabetes/. Accessed June 13, 2018.
4. United States Renal Data System. Figure 1.5: Trends in adjusted* ESRD incidence rate (per million/year), by race, in the U.S. population, 1996-2014. In: 2016 USRDS annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2016.
5. Indian Health Service. Special diabetes program for In­dians. www.ihs.gov/newsroom/factsheets/diabetes. Accessed June 13, 2018.
6. National Kidney Disease Education Program. How well are your kidneys working? Explaining your kidney test results. www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/professionals/clinical-tools-patient-education-outreach/explain-kidney-test-results. Accessed June 13, 2018.

Issue
Clinician Reviews - 28(7)
Issue
Clinician Reviews - 28(7)
Page Number
e11-e13
Page Number
e11-e13
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
How the IHS Reduced Kidney Disease in the Highest-risk Population
Display Headline
How the IHS Reduced Kidney Disease in the Highest-risk Population
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media

Renal disease and the surgical patient: Minimizing the impact

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 07/02/2018 - 09:25
Display Headline
Renal disease and the surgical patient: Minimizing the impact

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is estimated to affect 14% of Americans, but it is likely underdiagnosed because it is often asymptomatic.1,2 Its prevalence is even higher in patients who undergo surgery—up to 30% in cardiac surgery.3 Its impact on surgical outcomes is substantial.4 Importantly, patients with CKD are at higher risk of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), which is also associated with adverse outcomes. Thus, it is important to recognize, assess, and manage abnormal renal function in surgical patients.

WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES?

Criteria for chronic kidney disease
CKD is defined in various ways, making it difficult to derive exact numbers about its impact on surgical outcomes. The definition (Table 1) and categories (Table 2) devised by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) program are now the most widely accepted.5,6

Cardiac surgery outcomes

Defining the severity of chronic kidney disease
In cardiac surgery patients, CKD is strongly correlated with higher postoperative inpatient and 30-day mortality rates, both all-cause and cardiovascular.7–10 It is a strong predictor of death in the first 30 days after surgery, with a 35% to 43% higher risk of death for every 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 of preoperative decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR).10

Moreover, in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the worse the renal dysfunction, the higher the long-term mortality rate. Patients with moderate (stage 3) CKD had a 3.5 times higher odds of in-hospital mortality compared with patients with normal renal function, rising to 8.8 with severe (stage 4) and to 9.6 with dialysis-dependent (stage 5) CKD.11

The mechanisms linking CKD with negative cardiac outcomes are unclear, but many possibilities exist. CKD is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease and shares underlying risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes. Cardiac surgery patients with CKD are also more likely to have diabetes, left ventricular dysfunction, and peripheral vascular disease.

Noncardiac surgery outcomes

CKD is also associated with adverse outcomes in noncardiac surgery patients, especially at higher levels of renal dysfunction.12–14 For example, in patients who underwent major noncardiac surgery, compared with patients in stage 1 (estimated GFR > 90 mL/min/1.73 m2), the odds ratios for all-cause mortality were as follows:

  • 0.8 for patients with stage 2 CKD
  • 2.2 in stage 3a
  • 2.8 in stage 3b
  • 11.3 in stage 4
  • 5.8 in stage 5.14

The association between estimated GFR and all-cause mortality was not statistically significant (P = .071), but statistically significant associations were observed between estimated GFR and major adverse cardiovascular events (P < .001) and hospital length of stay (P < .001).

The association of CKD with major adverse outcomes and death in both cardiac and noncardiac surgical patients demonstrates the importance of understanding this risk, identifying patients with CKD preoperatively, and taking steps to lower the risk.

WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY?

AKI is a common and serious complication of surgery, especially cardiac surgery. It has been associated with higher rates of morbidity, mortality, and cardiovascular events, longer hospital length of stay, and higher cost.

Several groups have proposed criteria for defining AKI and its severity; the KDIGO criteria are the most widely accepted.15 These define AKI as an increase in serum creatinine concentration of 0.3 mg/dL or more within 48 hours or at least 1.5 times the baseline value within 7 days, or urine volume less than 0.5 mL/kg/hour for more than 6 hours. There are 3 stages of severity:

  • Stage 1—an increase in serum creatinine of 1.5 to 1.9 times baseline, an absolute increase of at least 0.3 mg/dL, or urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/hour for 6 to 12 hours
  • Stage 2—an increase in serum creatinine of 2.0 to 2.9 times baseline or urine output less than 0.5 mmL/kg/hour for 12 or more hours
  • Stage 3—an increase in serum creatinine of 3 times baseline, an absolute increase of at least 4 mg/dL, initiation of renal replacement therapy, urine output less than 0.3 mL/kg/hour for 24 or more hours, or anuria for 12 or more hours.15

Multiple factors associated with surgery may contribute to AKI, including hemodynamic instability, volume shifts, blood loss, use of heart-lung bypass, new medications, activation of the inflammatory cascade, oxidative stress, and anemia.

AKI in cardiac surgery

The incidence of AKI is high in cardiac surgery. In a meta-analysis of 46 studies (N = 242,000), its incidence in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery was about 18%, with 2.1% of patients needing renal replacement therapy.16 However, the incidence varied considerably from study to study, ranging from 1% to 53%, and was influenced by the definition of AKI, the type of cardiac surgery, and the patient population.16

Cardiac surgery-associated AKI adversely affects outcomes. Several studies have shown that cardiac surgery patients who develop AKI have higher rates of death and stroke.16–21 More severe AKI confers higher mortality rates, with the highest mortality rate in patients who need renal replacement therapy, approximately 37%.17 Patients with cardiac surgery-associated AKI also have a longer hospital length of stay and significantly higher costs of care.17,18

Long-term outcomes are also negatively affected by AKI. In cardiac surgery patients with AKI who had completely recovered renal function by the time they left the hospital, the 2-year incidence rate of CKD was 6.8%, significantly higher than the 0.2% rate in patients who did not develop AKI.19 The 2-year survival rates also were significantly worse for patients who developed postoperative AKI (82.3% vs 93.7%). Similarly, in patients undergoing CABG who had normal renal function before surgery, those who developed AKI postoperatively had significantly shorter long-term survival rates.20 The effect does not require a large change in renal function. An increase in creatinine as small as 0.3 mg/dL has been associated with a higher rate of death and a long-term risk of end-stage renal disease that is 3 times higher.21

 

 

WHAT ARE THE RISK FACTORS FOR ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY?

Risk factors for acute kidney injury in surgical patients
The etiology of AKI is complex and multifactorial. Risk factors can be divided into patient- and surgery-associated risk factors (Table 3).

Cardiac surgery

CKD is a risk factor not only after cardiac surgery but also after percutaneous procedures. In a meta-analysis of 4,992 patients with CKD who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement, both moderate and severe CKD increased the odds of AKI, early stroke, the need for dialysis, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 1 year.22,23 Increased rates of AKI also have been found in patients with CKD undergoing CABG surgery.24 These results point to a synergistic effect between AKI and CKD, with outcomes much worse in combination than alone.

In cardiac surgery, the most important patient risk factors associated with a higher incidence of postoperative AKI are age older than 75, CKD, preoperative heart failure, and prior myocardial infarction.19,25 Diabetes is an additional independent risk factor, with type 1 conferring higher risk than type 2.26 Preoperative use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may or may not be a risk factor for cardiac surgery-associated AKI, with some studies finding increased risk and others finding reduced rates.27,28

Anemia, which may be related to either patient or surgical risk factors (eg, intraoperative blood loss), also increases the risk of AKI in cardiac surgery.29,30 A retrospective study of CABG surgery patients found that intraoperative hemoglobin levels below 8 g/dL were associated with a 25% to 30% incidence of AKI, compared with 15% to 20% with hemoglobin levels above 9 g/dL.29 Additionally, having severe hypotension (mean arterial pressure < 50 mm Hg) significantly increased the AKI rates in the low-hemoglobin group.29 Similar results were reported in a later study.30

Among surgical factors, several randomized controlled trials have shown that off-pump CABG is associated with a significantly lower risk of postoperative AKI than on-pump CABG; however, this difference did not translate into any long-term difference in mortality rates.31,32 Longer cardiopulmonary bypass time is strongly associated with a higher incidence of AKI and postoperative death.33

Noncardiac surgery

AKI is less common after noncardiac surgery; however, outcomes are severe in patients in whom it occurs. In a study of 15,102 noncardiac surgery patients, only 0.8% developed AKI and 0.1% required renal replacement therapy.34

Risk factors after noncardiac surgery are similar to those after cardiac surgery (Table 3).34–36 Factors with the greatest impact are older age, peripheral vascular occlusive disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease necessitating chronic bronchodilator therapy, high-risk surgery, hepatic disease, emergent or urgent surgery, and high body mass index.

Surgical risk factors include total vasopressor dose administered, use of a vasopressor infusion, and diuretic administration.34 In addition, intraoperative hypotension is associated with a higher risk of AKI, major adverse cardiac events, and 30-day mortality.37

Noncardiac surgery patients with postoperative AKI have significantly higher rates of 30-day readmissions, 1-year progression to end-stage renal disease, and mortality than patients who do not develop AKI.35 Additionally, patients with AKI have significantly higher rates of cardiovascular complications (33.3% vs 11.3%) and death (6.1% vs 0.9%), as well as a significantly longer length of hospital stay.34,36

CAN WE DECREASE THE IMPACT OF RENAL DISEASE IN SURGERY?

Before surgery, practitioners need to identify patients at risk of AKI, implement possible risk-reduction measures, and, afterward, treat it early in its course if it occurs.

The preoperative visit is the ideal time to assess a patient’s risk of postoperative renal dysfunction. Laboratory tests can identify risks based on surgery type, age, hypertension, the presence of CKD, and medications that affect renal function. However, the basic chemistry panel is abnormal in only 8.2% of patients and affects management in just 2.6%, requiring the clinician to target testing to patients at high risk.38

Patients with a significant degree of renal dysfunction, particularly those previously undiagnosed, may benefit from additional preoperative testing and medication management. Perioperative management of medications that could adversely affect renal function should be carefully considered during the preoperative visit. In addition, the postoperative inpatient team needs to be informed about potentially nephrotoxic medications and medications that are renally cleared. Attention needs to be given to the renal impact of common perioperative medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, intravenous contrast, low-molecular-weight heparins, diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers. With the emphasis on opioid-sparing analgesics, it is particularly important to assess the risk of AKI if nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are part of the pain control plan.

Nephrology referral may help, especially for patients with a GFR less than 45 mL/min. This information enables more informed decision-making regarding the risks of adverse outcomes related to kidney disease.

WHAT TOOLS DO WE HAVE TO DIAGNOSE RENAL INJURY?

Several risk-prediction models have been developed to assess the postoperative risk of AKI in both cardiac and major noncardiac surgery patients. Although these models can identify risk factors, their clinical accuracy and utility have been questioned.

Biomarkers

Early diagnosis is the first step in managing AKI, allowing time to implement measures to minimize its impact.

Serum creatinine testing is widely used to measure renal function and diagnose AKI; however, it does not detect small reductions in renal function, and there is a time lag between renal insult and a rise in creatinine. The result is a delay to diagnosis of AKI.

Biomarkers other than creatinine have been studied for early detection of intraoperative and postoperative renal insult. These novel renal injury markers include the following:

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). Two studies looked at plasma NGAL as an early marker of AKI in patients with CKD who were undergoing cardiac surgery.39,40 One study found that by using NGAL instead of creatinine, postoperative AKI could be diagnosed an average of 20 hours earlier.39 In addition, NGAL helped detect renal recovery earlier than creatinine.40 The diagnostic cut-off values of NGAL were different for patients with CKD than for those without CKD.39,40

Other novel markers include:

  • Kidney injury marker 1
  • N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase
  • Cysteine C.

Although these biomarkers show some ability to detect renal injury, they provide only modest discrimination and are not widely available for clinical use.41 Current evidence does not support routine use of these markers in clinical settings.

 

 

CAN WE PROTECT RENAL FUNCTION?

Interventions to prevent or ameliorate the impact of CKD and AKI on surgical outcomes have been studied most extensively in cardiac surgery patients.

Aspirin. A retrospective study of 3,585 cardiac surgery patients with CKD found that preoperative aspirin use significantly lowered the incidence of postoperative AKI and 30-day mortality compared with patients not using aspirin.42 Aspirin use reduced 30-day mortality in CKD stages 1, 2, and 3 by 23.3%, 58%, and 70%, respectively. On the other hand, in the Perioperative Ischemic Evaluation (POISE) trial, in noncardiac surgery patients, neither aspirin nor clonidine started 2 to 4 hours preoperatively and continued up to 30 days after surgery altered the risk of AKI significantly more than placebo.43

Statins have been ineffective in reducing the incidence of AKI in cardiac surgery patients. In fact, a meta-analysis of 8 interventional trials found an increased incidence of AKI in patients in whom statins were started perioperatively.44 Erythropoietin was also found to be ineffective in the prevention of perioperative AKI in cardiac surgery patients in a separate study.45

The evidence regarding other therapies has also varied.

N-acetylcysteine in high doses reduced the incidence of AKI in patients with CKD stage 3 and 4 undergoing CABG.46 Another meta-analysis of 10 studies in cardiac surgery patients published recently did not show any benefit of N-acetylcysteine in reducing AKI.47

Human atrial natriuretic peptide, given preoperatively to patients with CKD, reduced the acute and long-term creatinine rise as well as the number of cardiac events after CABG; however, it did not reduce mortality rates.48

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, given preoperatively to patients with heart failure was associated with a decrease in the incidence of AKI in 1 study.49

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha 2 adrenoreceptor agonist. A recent meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials found it beneficial in reducing the risk of perioperative AKI in cardiac surgery patients.50 An earlier meta-analysis had similar results.51

Levosimendan is an inotropic vasodilator that improves cardiac output and renal perfusion in patients with systolic heart failure, and it has been hypothesized to decrease the risk of AKI after cardiac surgery. Previous data demonstrated that this drug reduced AKI and mortality; however, analysis was limited by small sample size and varying definitions of AKI.52 A recent meta-analysis showed that levosimendan was associated with a lower incidence of AKI but was also associated with an increased incidence of atrial fibrillation and no reduction in 30-day mortality.53

Remote ischemic preconditioning is a procedure that subjects the kidneys to brief episodes of ischemia before surgery, protecting them when they are later subjected to prolonged ischemia or reperfusion injury. It has shown initial promising results in preventing AKI. In a randomized controlled trial in 240 patients at high risk of AKI, those who received remote ischemic preconditioning had an AKI incidence of 37.5% compared with 52.5% for controls (P = .02); however, the mortality rate was the same.54 Similarly, remote ischemic preconditioning significantly lowered the incidence of AKI in nondiabetic patients undergoing CABG surgery compared with controls.55

Fluid management. Renal perfusion is intimately related to the development of AKI, and there is evidence that both hypovolemia and excessive fluid resuscitation can increase the risk of AKI in noncardiac surgery patients.56 Because of this, fluid management has also received attention in perioperative AKI. Goal-directed fluid management has been evaluated in noncardiac surgery patients, and it did not show any benefit in preventing AKI.57 However, in a more recent retrospective study, postoperative positive fluid balance was associated with increased incidence of AKI compared with zero fluid balance. Negative fluid balance did not appear to have a detrimental effect.58

RECOMMENDATIONS

No prophylactic therapy has yet been shown to definitively decrease the risk of postoperative AKI in all patients. Nevertheless, it is important to identify patients at risk during the preoperative visit, especially those with CKD. Many patients undergoing surgery have CKD, placing them at high risk of developing AKI in the perioperative period. The risk is particularly high with cardiac surgery.

Serum creatinine and urine output should be closely monitored perioperatively in at-risk patients. If AKI is diagnosed, practitioners need to identify and ameliorate the cause as early as possible.

Recommendations for perioperative prevention and management of acute kidney injury

Recommendations from KDIGO for perioperative prevention and management of AKI are listed in Table 4.15 These include avoiding additional nephrotoxic medications and adjusting the doses of renally cleared medications. Also, some patients may benefit from preoperative counseling and specialist referral.

References
  1. Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA 2007; 298(17):2038–2047. doi:10.1001/jama.298.17.2038
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Kidney Disease Statistics for the United States. www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-statistics/kidney-disease. Accessed June 11, 2018.
  3. Rosner MH, Okusa MD. Acute kidney injury associated with cardiac surgery. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1(1):19–32. doi:10.2215/CJN.00240605
  4. Meersch M, Schmidt C, Zarbock A. Patient with chronic renal failure undergoing surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2016; 29(3):413–420. doi:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000329
  5. Stevens PE, Levin A; Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Chronic Kidney Disease Guideline Development Work Group Members. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158(11):825–830. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00007
  6. Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 2005; 67(6):2089–2100. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00365.x
  7. Saitoh M, Takahashi T, Sakurada K, et al. Factors determining achievement of early postoperative cardiac rehabilitation goal in patients with or without preoperative kidney dysfunction undergoing isolated cardiac surgery. J Cardiol 2013; 61(4):299–303. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.12.014
  8. Minakata K, Bando K, Tanaka S, et al. Preoperative chronic kidney disease as a strong predictor of postoperative infection and mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. Circ J 2014; 78(9):2225–2231. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0328
  9. Domoto S, Tagusari O, Nakamura Y, et al. Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate as a significant predictor of long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting in Japanese patients. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 62(2):95–102. doi:10.1007/s11748-013-0306-5
  10. Hedley AJ, Roberts MA, Hayward PA, et al. Impact of chronic kidney disease on patient outcome following cardiac surgery. Heart Lung Circ 2010; 19(8):453–459. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2010.03.005
  11. Boulton BJ, Kilgo P, Guyton RA, et al. Impact of preoperative renal dysfunction in patients undergoing off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92(2):595–601. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.023
  12. Prowle JR, Kam EP, Ahmad T, Smith NC, Protopapa K, Pearse RM. Preoperative renal dysfunction and mortality after non-cardiac surgery. Br J Surg 2016; 103(10):1316–1325. doi:10.1002/bjs.10186
  13. Gaber AO, Moore LW, Aloia TA, et al. Cross-sectional and case-control analyses of the association of kidney function staging with adverse postoperative outcomes in general and vascular surgery. Ann Surg 2013; 258(1):169–177. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318288e18e
  14. Mases A, Sabaté S, Guilera N, et al. Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in non-cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113(4):644–651. doi:10.1093/bja/aeu134
  15. Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clinical Practice 2012; 120(4):c179–c184. doi:10.1159/000339789
  16. Pickering JW, James MT, Palmer SC. Acute kidney injury and prognosis after cardiopulmonary bypass: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 65(2):283–293. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.09.008
  17. Dasta JF, Kane-Gill SL, Durtschi AJ, Pathak DS, Kellum JA. Costs and outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23(6):1970-1974. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm908
  18. Karkouti K, Wijeysundera DN, Yau TM, et al. Acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery focus on modifiable risk factors. Circulation 2009; 119(4):495–502. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.786913
  19. Xu JR, Zhu JM, Jiang J, et al. Risk factors for long-term mortality and progressive chronic kidney disease associated with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94(45):e2025. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000002025
  20. Chalmers J, Mediratta N, McShane J, Shaw M, Pullan M, Poullis M. The long-term effects of developing renal failure post-coronary artery bypass surgery, in patients with normal preoperative renal function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43(3):555–559. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezs329
  21. Ryden L, Sartipy U, Evans M, Holzmann MJ. Acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting and long-term risk of end-stage renal disease. Circulation 2014; 130(23):2005–2011. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010622
  22. Gargiulo G, Capodanno D, Sannino A, et al. Impact of moderate preoperative chronic kidney disease on mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 2015; 189:77–78. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.077
  23. Gargiulo G, Capodanno D, Sannino A, et al. Moderate and severe preoperative chronic kidney disease worsen clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation meta-analysis of 4,992 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8(2):e002220. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002220
  24. Han SS, Shin N, Baek SH, et al. Effects of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease on long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J 2015; 169(3):419–425. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2014.12.019
  25. Aronson S, Fontes ML, Miao Y, Mangano DT; Investigators of the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group; Ischemia Research and Education Foundation. Risk index for perioperative renal dysfunction/failure: critical dependence on pulse pressure hypertension. Circulation 2007; 115(6):733–742. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.623538
  26. Hertzberg D, Sartipy U, Holzmann MJ. Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J 2015; 170(5):895–902. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2015.08.013
  27. Benedetto U, Sciarretta S, Roscitano A, et al. Preoperative angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86(4):1160–1165. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.018
  28. Arora P, Rajagopalam S, Ranjan R, et al. Preoperative use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers is associated with increased risk for acute kidney injury after cardiovascular surgery. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3(5):1266–1273. doi:10.2215/CJN.05271107
  29. Haase M, Bellomo R, Story D, et al. Effect of mean arterial pressure, haemoglobin and blood transfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass on post-operative acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27(1):153–160. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfr275
  30. Ono M, Arnaoutakis GJ, Fine DM, et al. Blood pressure excursions below the cerebral autoregulation threshold during cardiac surgery are associated with acute kidney injury. Crit Care Med 2013; 41(2):464-471. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826ab3a1
  31. Seabra VF, Alobaidi S, Balk EM, Poon AH, Jaber BL. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5(10):1734–1744. doi:10.2215/CJN.02800310
  32. Garg AX, Devereaux PJ, Yusuf S, et al; CORONARY Investigators. Kidney function after off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311(21):2191–2198. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.4952
  33. Kumar AB, Suneja M, Bayman EO, Weide GD, Tarasi M. Association between postoperative acute kidney injury and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass: a meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012; 26(1):64–69. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2011.07.007
  34. Kheterpal S, Tremper KK, Englesbe MJ, et al. Predictors of postoperative acute renal failure after noncardiac surgery in patients with previously normal renal function. Anesthesiology 2007; 107(6):892–902. doi:10.1097/01.anes.0000290588.29668.38
  35. Grams ME, Sang Y, Coresh J, et al. Acute kidney injury after major surgery: a retrospective analysis of Veterans Health Administration data. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 67(6):872–880. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.022
  36. Biteker M, Dayan A, Tekkesin AI, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of perioperative acute kidney injury in noncardiac and nonvascular surgery. Am J Surg 2014: 207(1):53–59. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.04.006
  37. Gu W-J, Hou B-L, Kwong JS, et al. Association between intraoperative hypotension and 30-day mortality, major adverse cardiac events, and acute kidney injury after non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Cardiol 2018; 258:68–73. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.137
  38. Smetana GW, Macpherson DS. The case against routine preoperative laboratory testing. Med Clin North Am 2003; 87(1):7–40. pmid:12575882
  39. Perrotti A, Miltgen G, Chevet-Noel A, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as early predictor of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery in adults with chronic kidney failure. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99(3):864–869. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.10.011
  40. Doi K, Urata M, Katagiri D, et al. Plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in acute kidney injury superimposed on chronic kidney disease after cardiac surgery: a multicenter prospective study. Crit Care 2013; 17(6):R270. doi:10.1186/cc13104
  41. Ho J, Tangri N, Komenda P, et al. Urinary, plasma, and serum biomarkers’ utility for predicting acute kidney injury associated with cardiac surgery in adults: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 66(6):993–1005. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.06.018
  42. Yao L, Young N, Liu H, et al. Evidence for preoperative aspirin improving major outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing cardiac surgery: a cohort study. Ann Surg 2015; 261(1):207–212. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000641
  43. Garg AX, Kurz A, Sessler DI, et al; POISE-2 Investigators. Aspirin and clonidine in non-cardiac surgery: acute kidney injury substudy protocol of the perioperative ischaemic evaluation (POISE) 2 randomised controlled trial. BMJ open 2014; 4(2):e004886. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004886
  44. He SJ, Liu Q, Li HQ, Tian F, Chen SY, Weng JX. Role of statins in preventing cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2018; 14:475–482. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S160298
  45. Tie HT, Luo MZ, Lin D, Zhang M, Wan JY, Wu QC. Erythropoietin administration for prevention of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 48(1):32–39. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezu378
  46. Santana-Santos E, Gowdak LH, Gaiotto FA, et al. High dose of N-acetylcystein prevents acute kidney injury in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97(5):1617–1623. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.01.056
  47. Mei M, Zhao HW, Pan QG, Pu YM, Tang MZ, Shen BB. Efficacy of N-acetylcysteine in preventing acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis study. J Invest Surg 2018; 31(1):14–23. doi:10.1080/08941939.2016.1269853
  48. Sezai A, Hata M, Niino T, et al. Results of low-dose human atrial natriuretic peptide infusion in nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: the NU-HIT (Nihon University working group study of low-dose HANP infusion therapy during cardiac surgery) trial for CKD. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58(9):897–903. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.056
  49. Xu N, Long Q, He T, et al. Association between preoperative renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use and postoperative acute kidney injury risk in patients with hypertension. Clin Nephrol 2018; 89(6):403–414. doi:10.5414/CN109319
  50. Liu Y, Sheng B, Wang S, Lu F, Zhen J, Chen W. Dexmedetomidine prevents acute kidney injury after adult cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol 2018; 18(1):7.  doi:10.1186/s12871-018-0472-1
  51. Shi R, Tie H-T. Dexmedetomidine as a promising prevention strategy for cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis. Critical Care 2017; 21(1):198. doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1776-0
  52. Zhou C, Gong J, Chen D, Wang W, Liu M, Liu B. Levosimendan for prevention of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 67(3):408–416. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.09.015
  53. Elbadawi A, Elgendy IY, Saad M, et al. Meta-analysis of trials on prophylactic use of levosimendan in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105(5):1403–1410. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.11.027
  54. Zarbock A, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, et al; RenalRIPC Investigators. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on kidney injury among high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 313(21):2133–2141. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.4189
  55. Venugopal V, Laing CM, Ludman A, Yellon DM, Hausenloy D. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on acute kidney injury in nondiabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a secondary analysis of 2 small randomized trials. Am J Kidney Dis 2010; 56(6):1043–1049. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.07.014
  56. Futier E, Constantin JM, Petit A, et al. Conservative vs restrictive individualized goal-directed fluid replacement strategy in major abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2010; 145(12):1193–1200. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.275
  57. Patel A, Prowle JR, Ackland GL. Postoperative goal-directed therapy and development of acute kidney injury following major elective noncardiac surgery: post-hoc analysis of POM-O randomized controlled trial. Clin Kidney J 2017; 10(3):348–356. doi:10.1093/ckj/sfw118
  58. Shen Y, Zhang W, Cheng X, Ying M. Association between postoperative fluid balance and acute kidney injury in patients after cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study. J Crit Care 2018; 44:273–277. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.11.041
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Kanav Sharma, MBBS, MPH
Assistant Professor, Perioperative and Consultative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Barbara Slawski, MD, MS, SFHM
Chief, Section of Perioperative and Consultative Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Address: Kanav Sharma, MBBS, MPH, Assistant Professor, Perioperative and Consultative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226; ksharma@mcw.edu

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(7)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
559-567
Legacy Keywords
chronic kidney disease, CKD, acute kidney injury, AKI, preoperative evaluation, surgery, risk factors, glomerular filtration rate, GFR, creatinine, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, NGAL, KDIGO, perioperative management, Kanav Sharma, Barbara Slawski
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Kanav Sharma, MBBS, MPH
Assistant Professor, Perioperative and Consultative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Barbara Slawski, MD, MS, SFHM
Chief, Section of Perioperative and Consultative Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Address: Kanav Sharma, MBBS, MPH, Assistant Professor, Perioperative and Consultative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226; ksharma@mcw.edu

Author and Disclosure Information

Kanav Sharma, MBBS, MPH
Assistant Professor, Perioperative and Consultative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Barbara Slawski, MD, MS, SFHM
Chief, Section of Perioperative and Consultative Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Address: Kanav Sharma, MBBS, MPH, Assistant Professor, Perioperative and Consultative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226; ksharma@mcw.edu

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is estimated to affect 14% of Americans, but it is likely underdiagnosed because it is often asymptomatic.1,2 Its prevalence is even higher in patients who undergo surgery—up to 30% in cardiac surgery.3 Its impact on surgical outcomes is substantial.4 Importantly, patients with CKD are at higher risk of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), which is also associated with adverse outcomes. Thus, it is important to recognize, assess, and manage abnormal renal function in surgical patients.

WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES?

Criteria for chronic kidney disease
CKD is defined in various ways, making it difficult to derive exact numbers about its impact on surgical outcomes. The definition (Table 1) and categories (Table 2) devised by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) program are now the most widely accepted.5,6

Cardiac surgery outcomes

Defining the severity of chronic kidney disease
In cardiac surgery patients, CKD is strongly correlated with higher postoperative inpatient and 30-day mortality rates, both all-cause and cardiovascular.7–10 It is a strong predictor of death in the first 30 days after surgery, with a 35% to 43% higher risk of death for every 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 of preoperative decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR).10

Moreover, in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the worse the renal dysfunction, the higher the long-term mortality rate. Patients with moderate (stage 3) CKD had a 3.5 times higher odds of in-hospital mortality compared with patients with normal renal function, rising to 8.8 with severe (stage 4) and to 9.6 with dialysis-dependent (stage 5) CKD.11

The mechanisms linking CKD with negative cardiac outcomes are unclear, but many possibilities exist. CKD is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease and shares underlying risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes. Cardiac surgery patients with CKD are also more likely to have diabetes, left ventricular dysfunction, and peripheral vascular disease.

Noncardiac surgery outcomes

CKD is also associated with adverse outcomes in noncardiac surgery patients, especially at higher levels of renal dysfunction.12–14 For example, in patients who underwent major noncardiac surgery, compared with patients in stage 1 (estimated GFR > 90 mL/min/1.73 m2), the odds ratios for all-cause mortality were as follows:

  • 0.8 for patients with stage 2 CKD
  • 2.2 in stage 3a
  • 2.8 in stage 3b
  • 11.3 in stage 4
  • 5.8 in stage 5.14

The association between estimated GFR and all-cause mortality was not statistically significant (P = .071), but statistically significant associations were observed between estimated GFR and major adverse cardiovascular events (P < .001) and hospital length of stay (P < .001).

The association of CKD with major adverse outcomes and death in both cardiac and noncardiac surgical patients demonstrates the importance of understanding this risk, identifying patients with CKD preoperatively, and taking steps to lower the risk.

WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY?

AKI is a common and serious complication of surgery, especially cardiac surgery. It has been associated with higher rates of morbidity, mortality, and cardiovascular events, longer hospital length of stay, and higher cost.

Several groups have proposed criteria for defining AKI and its severity; the KDIGO criteria are the most widely accepted.15 These define AKI as an increase in serum creatinine concentration of 0.3 mg/dL or more within 48 hours or at least 1.5 times the baseline value within 7 days, or urine volume less than 0.5 mL/kg/hour for more than 6 hours. There are 3 stages of severity:

  • Stage 1—an increase in serum creatinine of 1.5 to 1.9 times baseline, an absolute increase of at least 0.3 mg/dL, or urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/hour for 6 to 12 hours
  • Stage 2—an increase in serum creatinine of 2.0 to 2.9 times baseline or urine output less than 0.5 mmL/kg/hour for 12 or more hours
  • Stage 3—an increase in serum creatinine of 3 times baseline, an absolute increase of at least 4 mg/dL, initiation of renal replacement therapy, urine output less than 0.3 mL/kg/hour for 24 or more hours, or anuria for 12 or more hours.15

Multiple factors associated with surgery may contribute to AKI, including hemodynamic instability, volume shifts, blood loss, use of heart-lung bypass, new medications, activation of the inflammatory cascade, oxidative stress, and anemia.

AKI in cardiac surgery

The incidence of AKI is high in cardiac surgery. In a meta-analysis of 46 studies (N = 242,000), its incidence in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery was about 18%, with 2.1% of patients needing renal replacement therapy.16 However, the incidence varied considerably from study to study, ranging from 1% to 53%, and was influenced by the definition of AKI, the type of cardiac surgery, and the patient population.16

Cardiac surgery-associated AKI adversely affects outcomes. Several studies have shown that cardiac surgery patients who develop AKI have higher rates of death and stroke.16–21 More severe AKI confers higher mortality rates, with the highest mortality rate in patients who need renal replacement therapy, approximately 37%.17 Patients with cardiac surgery-associated AKI also have a longer hospital length of stay and significantly higher costs of care.17,18

Long-term outcomes are also negatively affected by AKI. In cardiac surgery patients with AKI who had completely recovered renal function by the time they left the hospital, the 2-year incidence rate of CKD was 6.8%, significantly higher than the 0.2% rate in patients who did not develop AKI.19 The 2-year survival rates also were significantly worse for patients who developed postoperative AKI (82.3% vs 93.7%). Similarly, in patients undergoing CABG who had normal renal function before surgery, those who developed AKI postoperatively had significantly shorter long-term survival rates.20 The effect does not require a large change in renal function. An increase in creatinine as small as 0.3 mg/dL has been associated with a higher rate of death and a long-term risk of end-stage renal disease that is 3 times higher.21

 

 

WHAT ARE THE RISK FACTORS FOR ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY?

Risk factors for acute kidney injury in surgical patients
The etiology of AKI is complex and multifactorial. Risk factors can be divided into patient- and surgery-associated risk factors (Table 3).

Cardiac surgery

CKD is a risk factor not only after cardiac surgery but also after percutaneous procedures. In a meta-analysis of 4,992 patients with CKD who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement, both moderate and severe CKD increased the odds of AKI, early stroke, the need for dialysis, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 1 year.22,23 Increased rates of AKI also have been found in patients with CKD undergoing CABG surgery.24 These results point to a synergistic effect between AKI and CKD, with outcomes much worse in combination than alone.

In cardiac surgery, the most important patient risk factors associated with a higher incidence of postoperative AKI are age older than 75, CKD, preoperative heart failure, and prior myocardial infarction.19,25 Diabetes is an additional independent risk factor, with type 1 conferring higher risk than type 2.26 Preoperative use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may or may not be a risk factor for cardiac surgery-associated AKI, with some studies finding increased risk and others finding reduced rates.27,28

Anemia, which may be related to either patient or surgical risk factors (eg, intraoperative blood loss), also increases the risk of AKI in cardiac surgery.29,30 A retrospective study of CABG surgery patients found that intraoperative hemoglobin levels below 8 g/dL were associated with a 25% to 30% incidence of AKI, compared with 15% to 20% with hemoglobin levels above 9 g/dL.29 Additionally, having severe hypotension (mean arterial pressure < 50 mm Hg) significantly increased the AKI rates in the low-hemoglobin group.29 Similar results were reported in a later study.30

Among surgical factors, several randomized controlled trials have shown that off-pump CABG is associated with a significantly lower risk of postoperative AKI than on-pump CABG; however, this difference did not translate into any long-term difference in mortality rates.31,32 Longer cardiopulmonary bypass time is strongly associated with a higher incidence of AKI and postoperative death.33

Noncardiac surgery

AKI is less common after noncardiac surgery; however, outcomes are severe in patients in whom it occurs. In a study of 15,102 noncardiac surgery patients, only 0.8% developed AKI and 0.1% required renal replacement therapy.34

Risk factors after noncardiac surgery are similar to those after cardiac surgery (Table 3).34–36 Factors with the greatest impact are older age, peripheral vascular occlusive disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease necessitating chronic bronchodilator therapy, high-risk surgery, hepatic disease, emergent or urgent surgery, and high body mass index.

Surgical risk factors include total vasopressor dose administered, use of a vasopressor infusion, and diuretic administration.34 In addition, intraoperative hypotension is associated with a higher risk of AKI, major adverse cardiac events, and 30-day mortality.37

Noncardiac surgery patients with postoperative AKI have significantly higher rates of 30-day readmissions, 1-year progression to end-stage renal disease, and mortality than patients who do not develop AKI.35 Additionally, patients with AKI have significantly higher rates of cardiovascular complications (33.3% vs 11.3%) and death (6.1% vs 0.9%), as well as a significantly longer length of hospital stay.34,36

CAN WE DECREASE THE IMPACT OF RENAL DISEASE IN SURGERY?

Before surgery, practitioners need to identify patients at risk of AKI, implement possible risk-reduction measures, and, afterward, treat it early in its course if it occurs.

The preoperative visit is the ideal time to assess a patient’s risk of postoperative renal dysfunction. Laboratory tests can identify risks based on surgery type, age, hypertension, the presence of CKD, and medications that affect renal function. However, the basic chemistry panel is abnormal in only 8.2% of patients and affects management in just 2.6%, requiring the clinician to target testing to patients at high risk.38

Patients with a significant degree of renal dysfunction, particularly those previously undiagnosed, may benefit from additional preoperative testing and medication management. Perioperative management of medications that could adversely affect renal function should be carefully considered during the preoperative visit. In addition, the postoperative inpatient team needs to be informed about potentially nephrotoxic medications and medications that are renally cleared. Attention needs to be given to the renal impact of common perioperative medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, intravenous contrast, low-molecular-weight heparins, diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers. With the emphasis on opioid-sparing analgesics, it is particularly important to assess the risk of AKI if nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are part of the pain control plan.

Nephrology referral may help, especially for patients with a GFR less than 45 mL/min. This information enables more informed decision-making regarding the risks of adverse outcomes related to kidney disease.

WHAT TOOLS DO WE HAVE TO DIAGNOSE RENAL INJURY?

Several risk-prediction models have been developed to assess the postoperative risk of AKI in both cardiac and major noncardiac surgery patients. Although these models can identify risk factors, their clinical accuracy and utility have been questioned.

Biomarkers

Early diagnosis is the first step in managing AKI, allowing time to implement measures to minimize its impact.

Serum creatinine testing is widely used to measure renal function and diagnose AKI; however, it does not detect small reductions in renal function, and there is a time lag between renal insult and a rise in creatinine. The result is a delay to diagnosis of AKI.

Biomarkers other than creatinine have been studied for early detection of intraoperative and postoperative renal insult. These novel renal injury markers include the following:

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). Two studies looked at plasma NGAL as an early marker of AKI in patients with CKD who were undergoing cardiac surgery.39,40 One study found that by using NGAL instead of creatinine, postoperative AKI could be diagnosed an average of 20 hours earlier.39 In addition, NGAL helped detect renal recovery earlier than creatinine.40 The diagnostic cut-off values of NGAL were different for patients with CKD than for those without CKD.39,40

Other novel markers include:

  • Kidney injury marker 1
  • N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase
  • Cysteine C.

Although these biomarkers show some ability to detect renal injury, they provide only modest discrimination and are not widely available for clinical use.41 Current evidence does not support routine use of these markers in clinical settings.

 

 

CAN WE PROTECT RENAL FUNCTION?

Interventions to prevent or ameliorate the impact of CKD and AKI on surgical outcomes have been studied most extensively in cardiac surgery patients.

Aspirin. A retrospective study of 3,585 cardiac surgery patients with CKD found that preoperative aspirin use significantly lowered the incidence of postoperative AKI and 30-day mortality compared with patients not using aspirin.42 Aspirin use reduced 30-day mortality in CKD stages 1, 2, and 3 by 23.3%, 58%, and 70%, respectively. On the other hand, in the Perioperative Ischemic Evaluation (POISE) trial, in noncardiac surgery patients, neither aspirin nor clonidine started 2 to 4 hours preoperatively and continued up to 30 days after surgery altered the risk of AKI significantly more than placebo.43

Statins have been ineffective in reducing the incidence of AKI in cardiac surgery patients. In fact, a meta-analysis of 8 interventional trials found an increased incidence of AKI in patients in whom statins were started perioperatively.44 Erythropoietin was also found to be ineffective in the prevention of perioperative AKI in cardiac surgery patients in a separate study.45

The evidence regarding other therapies has also varied.

N-acetylcysteine in high doses reduced the incidence of AKI in patients with CKD stage 3 and 4 undergoing CABG.46 Another meta-analysis of 10 studies in cardiac surgery patients published recently did not show any benefit of N-acetylcysteine in reducing AKI.47

Human atrial natriuretic peptide, given preoperatively to patients with CKD, reduced the acute and long-term creatinine rise as well as the number of cardiac events after CABG; however, it did not reduce mortality rates.48

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, given preoperatively to patients with heart failure was associated with a decrease in the incidence of AKI in 1 study.49

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha 2 adrenoreceptor agonist. A recent meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials found it beneficial in reducing the risk of perioperative AKI in cardiac surgery patients.50 An earlier meta-analysis had similar results.51

Levosimendan is an inotropic vasodilator that improves cardiac output and renal perfusion in patients with systolic heart failure, and it has been hypothesized to decrease the risk of AKI after cardiac surgery. Previous data demonstrated that this drug reduced AKI and mortality; however, analysis was limited by small sample size and varying definitions of AKI.52 A recent meta-analysis showed that levosimendan was associated with a lower incidence of AKI but was also associated with an increased incidence of atrial fibrillation and no reduction in 30-day mortality.53

Remote ischemic preconditioning is a procedure that subjects the kidneys to brief episodes of ischemia before surgery, protecting them when they are later subjected to prolonged ischemia or reperfusion injury. It has shown initial promising results in preventing AKI. In a randomized controlled trial in 240 patients at high risk of AKI, those who received remote ischemic preconditioning had an AKI incidence of 37.5% compared with 52.5% for controls (P = .02); however, the mortality rate was the same.54 Similarly, remote ischemic preconditioning significantly lowered the incidence of AKI in nondiabetic patients undergoing CABG surgery compared with controls.55

Fluid management. Renal perfusion is intimately related to the development of AKI, and there is evidence that both hypovolemia and excessive fluid resuscitation can increase the risk of AKI in noncardiac surgery patients.56 Because of this, fluid management has also received attention in perioperative AKI. Goal-directed fluid management has been evaluated in noncardiac surgery patients, and it did not show any benefit in preventing AKI.57 However, in a more recent retrospective study, postoperative positive fluid balance was associated with increased incidence of AKI compared with zero fluid balance. Negative fluid balance did not appear to have a detrimental effect.58

RECOMMENDATIONS

No prophylactic therapy has yet been shown to definitively decrease the risk of postoperative AKI in all patients. Nevertheless, it is important to identify patients at risk during the preoperative visit, especially those with CKD. Many patients undergoing surgery have CKD, placing them at high risk of developing AKI in the perioperative period. The risk is particularly high with cardiac surgery.

Serum creatinine and urine output should be closely monitored perioperatively in at-risk patients. If AKI is diagnosed, practitioners need to identify and ameliorate the cause as early as possible.

Recommendations for perioperative prevention and management of acute kidney injury

Recommendations from KDIGO for perioperative prevention and management of AKI are listed in Table 4.15 These include avoiding additional nephrotoxic medications and adjusting the doses of renally cleared medications. Also, some patients may benefit from preoperative counseling and specialist referral.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is estimated to affect 14% of Americans, but it is likely underdiagnosed because it is often asymptomatic.1,2 Its prevalence is even higher in patients who undergo surgery—up to 30% in cardiac surgery.3 Its impact on surgical outcomes is substantial.4 Importantly, patients with CKD are at higher risk of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), which is also associated with adverse outcomes. Thus, it is important to recognize, assess, and manage abnormal renal function in surgical patients.

WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES?

Criteria for chronic kidney disease
CKD is defined in various ways, making it difficult to derive exact numbers about its impact on surgical outcomes. The definition (Table 1) and categories (Table 2) devised by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) program are now the most widely accepted.5,6

Cardiac surgery outcomes

Defining the severity of chronic kidney disease
In cardiac surgery patients, CKD is strongly correlated with higher postoperative inpatient and 30-day mortality rates, both all-cause and cardiovascular.7–10 It is a strong predictor of death in the first 30 days after surgery, with a 35% to 43% higher risk of death for every 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 of preoperative decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR).10

Moreover, in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the worse the renal dysfunction, the higher the long-term mortality rate. Patients with moderate (stage 3) CKD had a 3.5 times higher odds of in-hospital mortality compared with patients with normal renal function, rising to 8.8 with severe (stage 4) and to 9.6 with dialysis-dependent (stage 5) CKD.11

The mechanisms linking CKD with negative cardiac outcomes are unclear, but many possibilities exist. CKD is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease and shares underlying risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes. Cardiac surgery patients with CKD are also more likely to have diabetes, left ventricular dysfunction, and peripheral vascular disease.

Noncardiac surgery outcomes

CKD is also associated with adverse outcomes in noncardiac surgery patients, especially at higher levels of renal dysfunction.12–14 For example, in patients who underwent major noncardiac surgery, compared with patients in stage 1 (estimated GFR > 90 mL/min/1.73 m2), the odds ratios for all-cause mortality were as follows:

  • 0.8 for patients with stage 2 CKD
  • 2.2 in stage 3a
  • 2.8 in stage 3b
  • 11.3 in stage 4
  • 5.8 in stage 5.14

The association between estimated GFR and all-cause mortality was not statistically significant (P = .071), but statistically significant associations were observed between estimated GFR and major adverse cardiovascular events (P < .001) and hospital length of stay (P < .001).

The association of CKD with major adverse outcomes and death in both cardiac and noncardiac surgical patients demonstrates the importance of understanding this risk, identifying patients with CKD preoperatively, and taking steps to lower the risk.

WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY?

AKI is a common and serious complication of surgery, especially cardiac surgery. It has been associated with higher rates of morbidity, mortality, and cardiovascular events, longer hospital length of stay, and higher cost.

Several groups have proposed criteria for defining AKI and its severity; the KDIGO criteria are the most widely accepted.15 These define AKI as an increase in serum creatinine concentration of 0.3 mg/dL or more within 48 hours or at least 1.5 times the baseline value within 7 days, or urine volume less than 0.5 mL/kg/hour for more than 6 hours. There are 3 stages of severity:

  • Stage 1—an increase in serum creatinine of 1.5 to 1.9 times baseline, an absolute increase of at least 0.3 mg/dL, or urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/hour for 6 to 12 hours
  • Stage 2—an increase in serum creatinine of 2.0 to 2.9 times baseline or urine output less than 0.5 mmL/kg/hour for 12 or more hours
  • Stage 3—an increase in serum creatinine of 3 times baseline, an absolute increase of at least 4 mg/dL, initiation of renal replacement therapy, urine output less than 0.3 mL/kg/hour for 24 or more hours, or anuria for 12 or more hours.15

Multiple factors associated with surgery may contribute to AKI, including hemodynamic instability, volume shifts, blood loss, use of heart-lung bypass, new medications, activation of the inflammatory cascade, oxidative stress, and anemia.

AKI in cardiac surgery

The incidence of AKI is high in cardiac surgery. In a meta-analysis of 46 studies (N = 242,000), its incidence in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery was about 18%, with 2.1% of patients needing renal replacement therapy.16 However, the incidence varied considerably from study to study, ranging from 1% to 53%, and was influenced by the definition of AKI, the type of cardiac surgery, and the patient population.16

Cardiac surgery-associated AKI adversely affects outcomes. Several studies have shown that cardiac surgery patients who develop AKI have higher rates of death and stroke.16–21 More severe AKI confers higher mortality rates, with the highest mortality rate in patients who need renal replacement therapy, approximately 37%.17 Patients with cardiac surgery-associated AKI also have a longer hospital length of stay and significantly higher costs of care.17,18

Long-term outcomes are also negatively affected by AKI. In cardiac surgery patients with AKI who had completely recovered renal function by the time they left the hospital, the 2-year incidence rate of CKD was 6.8%, significantly higher than the 0.2% rate in patients who did not develop AKI.19 The 2-year survival rates also were significantly worse for patients who developed postoperative AKI (82.3% vs 93.7%). Similarly, in patients undergoing CABG who had normal renal function before surgery, those who developed AKI postoperatively had significantly shorter long-term survival rates.20 The effect does not require a large change in renal function. An increase in creatinine as small as 0.3 mg/dL has been associated with a higher rate of death and a long-term risk of end-stage renal disease that is 3 times higher.21

 

 

WHAT ARE THE RISK FACTORS FOR ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY?

Risk factors for acute kidney injury in surgical patients
The etiology of AKI is complex and multifactorial. Risk factors can be divided into patient- and surgery-associated risk factors (Table 3).

Cardiac surgery

CKD is a risk factor not only after cardiac surgery but also after percutaneous procedures. In a meta-analysis of 4,992 patients with CKD who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement, both moderate and severe CKD increased the odds of AKI, early stroke, the need for dialysis, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 1 year.22,23 Increased rates of AKI also have been found in patients with CKD undergoing CABG surgery.24 These results point to a synergistic effect between AKI and CKD, with outcomes much worse in combination than alone.

In cardiac surgery, the most important patient risk factors associated with a higher incidence of postoperative AKI are age older than 75, CKD, preoperative heart failure, and prior myocardial infarction.19,25 Diabetes is an additional independent risk factor, with type 1 conferring higher risk than type 2.26 Preoperative use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may or may not be a risk factor for cardiac surgery-associated AKI, with some studies finding increased risk and others finding reduced rates.27,28

Anemia, which may be related to either patient or surgical risk factors (eg, intraoperative blood loss), also increases the risk of AKI in cardiac surgery.29,30 A retrospective study of CABG surgery patients found that intraoperative hemoglobin levels below 8 g/dL were associated with a 25% to 30% incidence of AKI, compared with 15% to 20% with hemoglobin levels above 9 g/dL.29 Additionally, having severe hypotension (mean arterial pressure < 50 mm Hg) significantly increased the AKI rates in the low-hemoglobin group.29 Similar results were reported in a later study.30

Among surgical factors, several randomized controlled trials have shown that off-pump CABG is associated with a significantly lower risk of postoperative AKI than on-pump CABG; however, this difference did not translate into any long-term difference in mortality rates.31,32 Longer cardiopulmonary bypass time is strongly associated with a higher incidence of AKI and postoperative death.33

Noncardiac surgery

AKI is less common after noncardiac surgery; however, outcomes are severe in patients in whom it occurs. In a study of 15,102 noncardiac surgery patients, only 0.8% developed AKI and 0.1% required renal replacement therapy.34

Risk factors after noncardiac surgery are similar to those after cardiac surgery (Table 3).34–36 Factors with the greatest impact are older age, peripheral vascular occlusive disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease necessitating chronic bronchodilator therapy, high-risk surgery, hepatic disease, emergent or urgent surgery, and high body mass index.

Surgical risk factors include total vasopressor dose administered, use of a vasopressor infusion, and diuretic administration.34 In addition, intraoperative hypotension is associated with a higher risk of AKI, major adverse cardiac events, and 30-day mortality.37

Noncardiac surgery patients with postoperative AKI have significantly higher rates of 30-day readmissions, 1-year progression to end-stage renal disease, and mortality than patients who do not develop AKI.35 Additionally, patients with AKI have significantly higher rates of cardiovascular complications (33.3% vs 11.3%) and death (6.1% vs 0.9%), as well as a significantly longer length of hospital stay.34,36

CAN WE DECREASE THE IMPACT OF RENAL DISEASE IN SURGERY?

Before surgery, practitioners need to identify patients at risk of AKI, implement possible risk-reduction measures, and, afterward, treat it early in its course if it occurs.

The preoperative visit is the ideal time to assess a patient’s risk of postoperative renal dysfunction. Laboratory tests can identify risks based on surgery type, age, hypertension, the presence of CKD, and medications that affect renal function. However, the basic chemistry panel is abnormal in only 8.2% of patients and affects management in just 2.6%, requiring the clinician to target testing to patients at high risk.38

Patients with a significant degree of renal dysfunction, particularly those previously undiagnosed, may benefit from additional preoperative testing and medication management. Perioperative management of medications that could adversely affect renal function should be carefully considered during the preoperative visit. In addition, the postoperative inpatient team needs to be informed about potentially nephrotoxic medications and medications that are renally cleared. Attention needs to be given to the renal impact of common perioperative medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, intravenous contrast, low-molecular-weight heparins, diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers. With the emphasis on opioid-sparing analgesics, it is particularly important to assess the risk of AKI if nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are part of the pain control plan.

Nephrology referral may help, especially for patients with a GFR less than 45 mL/min. This information enables more informed decision-making regarding the risks of adverse outcomes related to kidney disease.

WHAT TOOLS DO WE HAVE TO DIAGNOSE RENAL INJURY?

Several risk-prediction models have been developed to assess the postoperative risk of AKI in both cardiac and major noncardiac surgery patients. Although these models can identify risk factors, their clinical accuracy and utility have been questioned.

Biomarkers

Early diagnosis is the first step in managing AKI, allowing time to implement measures to minimize its impact.

Serum creatinine testing is widely used to measure renal function and diagnose AKI; however, it does not detect small reductions in renal function, and there is a time lag between renal insult and a rise in creatinine. The result is a delay to diagnosis of AKI.

Biomarkers other than creatinine have been studied for early detection of intraoperative and postoperative renal insult. These novel renal injury markers include the following:

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). Two studies looked at plasma NGAL as an early marker of AKI in patients with CKD who were undergoing cardiac surgery.39,40 One study found that by using NGAL instead of creatinine, postoperative AKI could be diagnosed an average of 20 hours earlier.39 In addition, NGAL helped detect renal recovery earlier than creatinine.40 The diagnostic cut-off values of NGAL were different for patients with CKD than for those without CKD.39,40

Other novel markers include:

  • Kidney injury marker 1
  • N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase
  • Cysteine C.

Although these biomarkers show some ability to detect renal injury, they provide only modest discrimination and are not widely available for clinical use.41 Current evidence does not support routine use of these markers in clinical settings.

 

 

CAN WE PROTECT RENAL FUNCTION?

Interventions to prevent or ameliorate the impact of CKD and AKI on surgical outcomes have been studied most extensively in cardiac surgery patients.

Aspirin. A retrospective study of 3,585 cardiac surgery patients with CKD found that preoperative aspirin use significantly lowered the incidence of postoperative AKI and 30-day mortality compared with patients not using aspirin.42 Aspirin use reduced 30-day mortality in CKD stages 1, 2, and 3 by 23.3%, 58%, and 70%, respectively. On the other hand, in the Perioperative Ischemic Evaluation (POISE) trial, in noncardiac surgery patients, neither aspirin nor clonidine started 2 to 4 hours preoperatively and continued up to 30 days after surgery altered the risk of AKI significantly more than placebo.43

Statins have been ineffective in reducing the incidence of AKI in cardiac surgery patients. In fact, a meta-analysis of 8 interventional trials found an increased incidence of AKI in patients in whom statins were started perioperatively.44 Erythropoietin was also found to be ineffective in the prevention of perioperative AKI in cardiac surgery patients in a separate study.45

The evidence regarding other therapies has also varied.

N-acetylcysteine in high doses reduced the incidence of AKI in patients with CKD stage 3 and 4 undergoing CABG.46 Another meta-analysis of 10 studies in cardiac surgery patients published recently did not show any benefit of N-acetylcysteine in reducing AKI.47

Human atrial natriuretic peptide, given preoperatively to patients with CKD, reduced the acute and long-term creatinine rise as well as the number of cardiac events after CABG; however, it did not reduce mortality rates.48

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, given preoperatively to patients with heart failure was associated with a decrease in the incidence of AKI in 1 study.49

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha 2 adrenoreceptor agonist. A recent meta-analysis of 10 clinical trials found it beneficial in reducing the risk of perioperative AKI in cardiac surgery patients.50 An earlier meta-analysis had similar results.51

Levosimendan is an inotropic vasodilator that improves cardiac output and renal perfusion in patients with systolic heart failure, and it has been hypothesized to decrease the risk of AKI after cardiac surgery. Previous data demonstrated that this drug reduced AKI and mortality; however, analysis was limited by small sample size and varying definitions of AKI.52 A recent meta-analysis showed that levosimendan was associated with a lower incidence of AKI but was also associated with an increased incidence of atrial fibrillation and no reduction in 30-day mortality.53

Remote ischemic preconditioning is a procedure that subjects the kidneys to brief episodes of ischemia before surgery, protecting them when they are later subjected to prolonged ischemia or reperfusion injury. It has shown initial promising results in preventing AKI. In a randomized controlled trial in 240 patients at high risk of AKI, those who received remote ischemic preconditioning had an AKI incidence of 37.5% compared with 52.5% for controls (P = .02); however, the mortality rate was the same.54 Similarly, remote ischemic preconditioning significantly lowered the incidence of AKI in nondiabetic patients undergoing CABG surgery compared with controls.55

Fluid management. Renal perfusion is intimately related to the development of AKI, and there is evidence that both hypovolemia and excessive fluid resuscitation can increase the risk of AKI in noncardiac surgery patients.56 Because of this, fluid management has also received attention in perioperative AKI. Goal-directed fluid management has been evaluated in noncardiac surgery patients, and it did not show any benefit in preventing AKI.57 However, in a more recent retrospective study, postoperative positive fluid balance was associated with increased incidence of AKI compared with zero fluid balance. Negative fluid balance did not appear to have a detrimental effect.58

RECOMMENDATIONS

No prophylactic therapy has yet been shown to definitively decrease the risk of postoperative AKI in all patients. Nevertheless, it is important to identify patients at risk during the preoperative visit, especially those with CKD. Many patients undergoing surgery have CKD, placing them at high risk of developing AKI in the perioperative period. The risk is particularly high with cardiac surgery.

Serum creatinine and urine output should be closely monitored perioperatively in at-risk patients. If AKI is diagnosed, practitioners need to identify and ameliorate the cause as early as possible.

Recommendations for perioperative prevention and management of acute kidney injury

Recommendations from KDIGO for perioperative prevention and management of AKI are listed in Table 4.15 These include avoiding additional nephrotoxic medications and adjusting the doses of renally cleared medications. Also, some patients may benefit from preoperative counseling and specialist referral.

References
  1. Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA 2007; 298(17):2038–2047. doi:10.1001/jama.298.17.2038
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Kidney Disease Statistics for the United States. www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-statistics/kidney-disease. Accessed June 11, 2018.
  3. Rosner MH, Okusa MD. Acute kidney injury associated with cardiac surgery. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1(1):19–32. doi:10.2215/CJN.00240605
  4. Meersch M, Schmidt C, Zarbock A. Patient with chronic renal failure undergoing surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2016; 29(3):413–420. doi:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000329
  5. Stevens PE, Levin A; Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Chronic Kidney Disease Guideline Development Work Group Members. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158(11):825–830. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00007
  6. Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 2005; 67(6):2089–2100. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00365.x
  7. Saitoh M, Takahashi T, Sakurada K, et al. Factors determining achievement of early postoperative cardiac rehabilitation goal in patients with or without preoperative kidney dysfunction undergoing isolated cardiac surgery. J Cardiol 2013; 61(4):299–303. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.12.014
  8. Minakata K, Bando K, Tanaka S, et al. Preoperative chronic kidney disease as a strong predictor of postoperative infection and mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. Circ J 2014; 78(9):2225–2231. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0328
  9. Domoto S, Tagusari O, Nakamura Y, et al. Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate as a significant predictor of long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting in Japanese patients. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 62(2):95–102. doi:10.1007/s11748-013-0306-5
  10. Hedley AJ, Roberts MA, Hayward PA, et al. Impact of chronic kidney disease on patient outcome following cardiac surgery. Heart Lung Circ 2010; 19(8):453–459. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2010.03.005
  11. Boulton BJ, Kilgo P, Guyton RA, et al. Impact of preoperative renal dysfunction in patients undergoing off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92(2):595–601. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.023
  12. Prowle JR, Kam EP, Ahmad T, Smith NC, Protopapa K, Pearse RM. Preoperative renal dysfunction and mortality after non-cardiac surgery. Br J Surg 2016; 103(10):1316–1325. doi:10.1002/bjs.10186
  13. Gaber AO, Moore LW, Aloia TA, et al. Cross-sectional and case-control analyses of the association of kidney function staging with adverse postoperative outcomes in general and vascular surgery. Ann Surg 2013; 258(1):169–177. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318288e18e
  14. Mases A, Sabaté S, Guilera N, et al. Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in non-cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113(4):644–651. doi:10.1093/bja/aeu134
  15. Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clinical Practice 2012; 120(4):c179–c184. doi:10.1159/000339789
  16. Pickering JW, James MT, Palmer SC. Acute kidney injury and prognosis after cardiopulmonary bypass: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 65(2):283–293. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.09.008
  17. Dasta JF, Kane-Gill SL, Durtschi AJ, Pathak DS, Kellum JA. Costs and outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23(6):1970-1974. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm908
  18. Karkouti K, Wijeysundera DN, Yau TM, et al. Acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery focus on modifiable risk factors. Circulation 2009; 119(4):495–502. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.786913
  19. Xu JR, Zhu JM, Jiang J, et al. Risk factors for long-term mortality and progressive chronic kidney disease associated with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94(45):e2025. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000002025
  20. Chalmers J, Mediratta N, McShane J, Shaw M, Pullan M, Poullis M. The long-term effects of developing renal failure post-coronary artery bypass surgery, in patients with normal preoperative renal function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43(3):555–559. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezs329
  21. Ryden L, Sartipy U, Evans M, Holzmann MJ. Acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting and long-term risk of end-stage renal disease. Circulation 2014; 130(23):2005–2011. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010622
  22. Gargiulo G, Capodanno D, Sannino A, et al. Impact of moderate preoperative chronic kidney disease on mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 2015; 189:77–78. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.077
  23. Gargiulo G, Capodanno D, Sannino A, et al. Moderate and severe preoperative chronic kidney disease worsen clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation meta-analysis of 4,992 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8(2):e002220. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002220
  24. Han SS, Shin N, Baek SH, et al. Effects of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease on long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J 2015; 169(3):419–425. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2014.12.019
  25. Aronson S, Fontes ML, Miao Y, Mangano DT; Investigators of the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group; Ischemia Research and Education Foundation. Risk index for perioperative renal dysfunction/failure: critical dependence on pulse pressure hypertension. Circulation 2007; 115(6):733–742. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.623538
  26. Hertzberg D, Sartipy U, Holzmann MJ. Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J 2015; 170(5):895–902. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2015.08.013
  27. Benedetto U, Sciarretta S, Roscitano A, et al. Preoperative angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86(4):1160–1165. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.018
  28. Arora P, Rajagopalam S, Ranjan R, et al. Preoperative use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers is associated with increased risk for acute kidney injury after cardiovascular surgery. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3(5):1266–1273. doi:10.2215/CJN.05271107
  29. Haase M, Bellomo R, Story D, et al. Effect of mean arterial pressure, haemoglobin and blood transfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass on post-operative acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27(1):153–160. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfr275
  30. Ono M, Arnaoutakis GJ, Fine DM, et al. Blood pressure excursions below the cerebral autoregulation threshold during cardiac surgery are associated with acute kidney injury. Crit Care Med 2013; 41(2):464-471. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826ab3a1
  31. Seabra VF, Alobaidi S, Balk EM, Poon AH, Jaber BL. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5(10):1734–1744. doi:10.2215/CJN.02800310
  32. Garg AX, Devereaux PJ, Yusuf S, et al; CORONARY Investigators. Kidney function after off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311(21):2191–2198. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.4952
  33. Kumar AB, Suneja M, Bayman EO, Weide GD, Tarasi M. Association between postoperative acute kidney injury and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass: a meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012; 26(1):64–69. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2011.07.007
  34. Kheterpal S, Tremper KK, Englesbe MJ, et al. Predictors of postoperative acute renal failure after noncardiac surgery in patients with previously normal renal function. Anesthesiology 2007; 107(6):892–902. doi:10.1097/01.anes.0000290588.29668.38
  35. Grams ME, Sang Y, Coresh J, et al. Acute kidney injury after major surgery: a retrospective analysis of Veterans Health Administration data. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 67(6):872–880. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.022
  36. Biteker M, Dayan A, Tekkesin AI, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of perioperative acute kidney injury in noncardiac and nonvascular surgery. Am J Surg 2014: 207(1):53–59. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.04.006
  37. Gu W-J, Hou B-L, Kwong JS, et al. Association between intraoperative hypotension and 30-day mortality, major adverse cardiac events, and acute kidney injury after non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Cardiol 2018; 258:68–73. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.137
  38. Smetana GW, Macpherson DS. The case against routine preoperative laboratory testing. Med Clin North Am 2003; 87(1):7–40. pmid:12575882
  39. Perrotti A, Miltgen G, Chevet-Noel A, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as early predictor of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery in adults with chronic kidney failure. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99(3):864–869. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.10.011
  40. Doi K, Urata M, Katagiri D, et al. Plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in acute kidney injury superimposed on chronic kidney disease after cardiac surgery: a multicenter prospective study. Crit Care 2013; 17(6):R270. doi:10.1186/cc13104
  41. Ho J, Tangri N, Komenda P, et al. Urinary, plasma, and serum biomarkers’ utility for predicting acute kidney injury associated with cardiac surgery in adults: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 66(6):993–1005. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.06.018
  42. Yao L, Young N, Liu H, et al. Evidence for preoperative aspirin improving major outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing cardiac surgery: a cohort study. Ann Surg 2015; 261(1):207–212. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000641
  43. Garg AX, Kurz A, Sessler DI, et al; POISE-2 Investigators. Aspirin and clonidine in non-cardiac surgery: acute kidney injury substudy protocol of the perioperative ischaemic evaluation (POISE) 2 randomised controlled trial. BMJ open 2014; 4(2):e004886. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004886
  44. He SJ, Liu Q, Li HQ, Tian F, Chen SY, Weng JX. Role of statins in preventing cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2018; 14:475–482. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S160298
  45. Tie HT, Luo MZ, Lin D, Zhang M, Wan JY, Wu QC. Erythropoietin administration for prevention of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 48(1):32–39. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezu378
  46. Santana-Santos E, Gowdak LH, Gaiotto FA, et al. High dose of N-acetylcystein prevents acute kidney injury in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97(5):1617–1623. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.01.056
  47. Mei M, Zhao HW, Pan QG, Pu YM, Tang MZ, Shen BB. Efficacy of N-acetylcysteine in preventing acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis study. J Invest Surg 2018; 31(1):14–23. doi:10.1080/08941939.2016.1269853
  48. Sezai A, Hata M, Niino T, et al. Results of low-dose human atrial natriuretic peptide infusion in nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: the NU-HIT (Nihon University working group study of low-dose HANP infusion therapy during cardiac surgery) trial for CKD. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58(9):897–903. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.056
  49. Xu N, Long Q, He T, et al. Association between preoperative renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use and postoperative acute kidney injury risk in patients with hypertension. Clin Nephrol 2018; 89(6):403–414. doi:10.5414/CN109319
  50. Liu Y, Sheng B, Wang S, Lu F, Zhen J, Chen W. Dexmedetomidine prevents acute kidney injury after adult cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol 2018; 18(1):7.  doi:10.1186/s12871-018-0472-1
  51. Shi R, Tie H-T. Dexmedetomidine as a promising prevention strategy for cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis. Critical Care 2017; 21(1):198. doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1776-0
  52. Zhou C, Gong J, Chen D, Wang W, Liu M, Liu B. Levosimendan for prevention of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 67(3):408–416. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.09.015
  53. Elbadawi A, Elgendy IY, Saad M, et al. Meta-analysis of trials on prophylactic use of levosimendan in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105(5):1403–1410. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.11.027
  54. Zarbock A, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, et al; RenalRIPC Investigators. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on kidney injury among high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 313(21):2133–2141. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.4189
  55. Venugopal V, Laing CM, Ludman A, Yellon DM, Hausenloy D. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on acute kidney injury in nondiabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a secondary analysis of 2 small randomized trials. Am J Kidney Dis 2010; 56(6):1043–1049. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.07.014
  56. Futier E, Constantin JM, Petit A, et al. Conservative vs restrictive individualized goal-directed fluid replacement strategy in major abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2010; 145(12):1193–1200. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.275
  57. Patel A, Prowle JR, Ackland GL. Postoperative goal-directed therapy and development of acute kidney injury following major elective noncardiac surgery: post-hoc analysis of POM-O randomized controlled trial. Clin Kidney J 2017; 10(3):348–356. doi:10.1093/ckj/sfw118
  58. Shen Y, Zhang W, Cheng X, Ying M. Association between postoperative fluid balance and acute kidney injury in patients after cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study. J Crit Care 2018; 44:273–277. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.11.041
References
  1. Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA 2007; 298(17):2038–2047. doi:10.1001/jama.298.17.2038
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Kidney Disease Statistics for the United States. www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-statistics/kidney-disease. Accessed June 11, 2018.
  3. Rosner MH, Okusa MD. Acute kidney injury associated with cardiac surgery. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1(1):19–32. doi:10.2215/CJN.00240605
  4. Meersch M, Schmidt C, Zarbock A. Patient with chronic renal failure undergoing surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2016; 29(3):413–420. doi:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000329
  5. Stevens PE, Levin A; Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Chronic Kidney Disease Guideline Development Work Group Members. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158(11):825–830. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00007
  6. Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 2005; 67(6):2089–2100. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00365.x
  7. Saitoh M, Takahashi T, Sakurada K, et al. Factors determining achievement of early postoperative cardiac rehabilitation goal in patients with or without preoperative kidney dysfunction undergoing isolated cardiac surgery. J Cardiol 2013; 61(4):299–303. doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2012.12.014
  8. Minakata K, Bando K, Tanaka S, et al. Preoperative chronic kidney disease as a strong predictor of postoperative infection and mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. Circ J 2014; 78(9):2225–2231. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0328
  9. Domoto S, Tagusari O, Nakamura Y, et al. Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate as a significant predictor of long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting in Japanese patients. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 62(2):95–102. doi:10.1007/s11748-013-0306-5
  10. Hedley AJ, Roberts MA, Hayward PA, et al. Impact of chronic kidney disease on patient outcome following cardiac surgery. Heart Lung Circ 2010; 19(8):453–459. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2010.03.005
  11. Boulton BJ, Kilgo P, Guyton RA, et al. Impact of preoperative renal dysfunction in patients undergoing off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92(2):595–601. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.04.023
  12. Prowle JR, Kam EP, Ahmad T, Smith NC, Protopapa K, Pearse RM. Preoperative renal dysfunction and mortality after non-cardiac surgery. Br J Surg 2016; 103(10):1316–1325. doi:10.1002/bjs.10186
  13. Gaber AO, Moore LW, Aloia TA, et al. Cross-sectional and case-control analyses of the association of kidney function staging with adverse postoperative outcomes in general and vascular surgery. Ann Surg 2013; 258(1):169–177. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318288e18e
  14. Mases A, Sabaté S, Guilera N, et al. Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in non-cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113(4):644–651. doi:10.1093/bja/aeu134
  15. Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clinical Practice 2012; 120(4):c179–c184. doi:10.1159/000339789
  16. Pickering JW, James MT, Palmer SC. Acute kidney injury and prognosis after cardiopulmonary bypass: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 65(2):283–293. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.09.008
  17. Dasta JF, Kane-Gill SL, Durtschi AJ, Pathak DS, Kellum JA. Costs and outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23(6):1970-1974. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm908
  18. Karkouti K, Wijeysundera DN, Yau TM, et al. Acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery focus on modifiable risk factors. Circulation 2009; 119(4):495–502. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.786913
  19. Xu JR, Zhu JM, Jiang J, et al. Risk factors for long-term mortality and progressive chronic kidney disease associated with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94(45):e2025. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000002025
  20. Chalmers J, Mediratta N, McShane J, Shaw M, Pullan M, Poullis M. The long-term effects of developing renal failure post-coronary artery bypass surgery, in patients with normal preoperative renal function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 43(3):555–559. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezs329
  21. Ryden L, Sartipy U, Evans M, Holzmann MJ. Acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting and long-term risk of end-stage renal disease. Circulation 2014; 130(23):2005–2011. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010622
  22. Gargiulo G, Capodanno D, Sannino A, et al. Impact of moderate preoperative chronic kidney disease on mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol 2015; 189:77–78. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.077
  23. Gargiulo G, Capodanno D, Sannino A, et al. Moderate and severe preoperative chronic kidney disease worsen clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation meta-analysis of 4,992 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8(2):e002220. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002220
  24. Han SS, Shin N, Baek SH, et al. Effects of acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease on long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J 2015; 169(3):419–425. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2014.12.019
  25. Aronson S, Fontes ML, Miao Y, Mangano DT; Investigators of the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group; Ischemia Research and Education Foundation. Risk index for perioperative renal dysfunction/failure: critical dependence on pulse pressure hypertension. Circulation 2007; 115(6):733–742. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.623538
  26. Hertzberg D, Sartipy U, Holzmann MJ. Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J 2015; 170(5):895–902. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2015.08.013
  27. Benedetto U, Sciarretta S, Roscitano A, et al. Preoperative angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and acute kidney injury after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86(4):1160–1165. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.018
  28. Arora P, Rajagopalam S, Ranjan R, et al. Preoperative use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers is associated with increased risk for acute kidney injury after cardiovascular surgery. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3(5):1266–1273. doi:10.2215/CJN.05271107
  29. Haase M, Bellomo R, Story D, et al. Effect of mean arterial pressure, haemoglobin and blood transfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass on post-operative acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27(1):153–160. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfr275
  30. Ono M, Arnaoutakis GJ, Fine DM, et al. Blood pressure excursions below the cerebral autoregulation threshold during cardiac surgery are associated with acute kidney injury. Crit Care Med 2013; 41(2):464-471. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826ab3a1
  31. Seabra VF, Alobaidi S, Balk EM, Poon AH, Jaber BL. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5(10):1734–1744. doi:10.2215/CJN.02800310
  32. Garg AX, Devereaux PJ, Yusuf S, et al; CORONARY Investigators. Kidney function after off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 311(21):2191–2198. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.4952
  33. Kumar AB, Suneja M, Bayman EO, Weide GD, Tarasi M. Association between postoperative acute kidney injury and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass: a meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012; 26(1):64–69. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2011.07.007
  34. Kheterpal S, Tremper KK, Englesbe MJ, et al. Predictors of postoperative acute renal failure after noncardiac surgery in patients with previously normal renal function. Anesthesiology 2007; 107(6):892–902. doi:10.1097/01.anes.0000290588.29668.38
  35. Grams ME, Sang Y, Coresh J, et al. Acute kidney injury after major surgery: a retrospective analysis of Veterans Health Administration data. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 67(6):872–880. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.022
  36. Biteker M, Dayan A, Tekkesin AI, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of perioperative acute kidney injury in noncardiac and nonvascular surgery. Am J Surg 2014: 207(1):53–59. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.04.006
  37. Gu W-J, Hou B-L, Kwong JS, et al. Association between intraoperative hypotension and 30-day mortality, major adverse cardiac events, and acute kidney injury after non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Cardiol 2018; 258:68–73. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.01.137
  38. Smetana GW, Macpherson DS. The case against routine preoperative laboratory testing. Med Clin North Am 2003; 87(1):7–40. pmid:12575882
  39. Perrotti A, Miltgen G, Chevet-Noel A, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as early predictor of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery in adults with chronic kidney failure. Ann Thorac Surg 2015; 99(3):864–869. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.10.011
  40. Doi K, Urata M, Katagiri D, et al. Plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in acute kidney injury superimposed on chronic kidney disease after cardiac surgery: a multicenter prospective study. Crit Care 2013; 17(6):R270. doi:10.1186/cc13104
  41. Ho J, Tangri N, Komenda P, et al. Urinary, plasma, and serum biomarkers’ utility for predicting acute kidney injury associated with cardiac surgery in adults: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 66(6):993–1005. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.06.018
  42. Yao L, Young N, Liu H, et al. Evidence for preoperative aspirin improving major outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing cardiac surgery: a cohort study. Ann Surg 2015; 261(1):207–212. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000641
  43. Garg AX, Kurz A, Sessler DI, et al; POISE-2 Investigators. Aspirin and clonidine in non-cardiac surgery: acute kidney injury substudy protocol of the perioperative ischaemic evaluation (POISE) 2 randomised controlled trial. BMJ open 2014; 4(2):e004886. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004886
  44. He SJ, Liu Q, Li HQ, Tian F, Chen SY, Weng JX. Role of statins in preventing cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2018; 14:475–482. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S160298
  45. Tie HT, Luo MZ, Lin D, Zhang M, Wan JY, Wu QC. Erythropoietin administration for prevention of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2015; 48(1):32–39. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezu378
  46. Santana-Santos E, Gowdak LH, Gaiotto FA, et al. High dose of N-acetylcystein prevents acute kidney injury in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97(5):1617–1623. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.01.056
  47. Mei M, Zhao HW, Pan QG, Pu YM, Tang MZ, Shen BB. Efficacy of N-acetylcysteine in preventing acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis study. J Invest Surg 2018; 31(1):14–23. doi:10.1080/08941939.2016.1269853
  48. Sezai A, Hata M, Niino T, et al. Results of low-dose human atrial natriuretic peptide infusion in nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: the NU-HIT (Nihon University working group study of low-dose HANP infusion therapy during cardiac surgery) trial for CKD. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58(9):897–903. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.056
  49. Xu N, Long Q, He T, et al. Association between preoperative renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use and postoperative acute kidney injury risk in patients with hypertension. Clin Nephrol 2018; 89(6):403–414. doi:10.5414/CN109319
  50. Liu Y, Sheng B, Wang S, Lu F, Zhen J, Chen W. Dexmedetomidine prevents acute kidney injury after adult cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol 2018; 18(1):7.  doi:10.1186/s12871-018-0472-1
  51. Shi R, Tie H-T. Dexmedetomidine as a promising prevention strategy for cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis. Critical Care 2017; 21(1):198. doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1776-0
  52. Zhou C, Gong J, Chen D, Wang W, Liu M, Liu B. Levosimendan for prevention of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 67(3):408–416. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.09.015
  53. Elbadawi A, Elgendy IY, Saad M, et al. Meta-analysis of trials on prophylactic use of levosimendan in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2018; 105(5):1403–1410. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.11.027
  54. Zarbock A, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, et al; RenalRIPC Investigators. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on kidney injury among high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015; 313(21):2133–2141. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.4189
  55. Venugopal V, Laing CM, Ludman A, Yellon DM, Hausenloy D. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on acute kidney injury in nondiabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a secondary analysis of 2 small randomized trials. Am J Kidney Dis 2010; 56(6):1043–1049. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.07.014
  56. Futier E, Constantin JM, Petit A, et al. Conservative vs restrictive individualized goal-directed fluid replacement strategy in major abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2010; 145(12):1193–1200. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.275
  57. Patel A, Prowle JR, Ackland GL. Postoperative goal-directed therapy and development of acute kidney injury following major elective noncardiac surgery: post-hoc analysis of POM-O randomized controlled trial. Clin Kidney J 2017; 10(3):348–356. doi:10.1093/ckj/sfw118
  58. Shen Y, Zhang W, Cheng X, Ying M. Association between postoperative fluid balance and acute kidney injury in patients after cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study. J Crit Care 2018; 44:273–277. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.11.041
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(7)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(7)
Page Number
559-567
Page Number
559-567
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Renal disease and the surgical patient: Minimizing the impact
Display Headline
Renal disease and the surgical patient: Minimizing the impact
Legacy Keywords
chronic kidney disease, CKD, acute kidney injury, AKI, preoperative evaluation, surgery, risk factors, glomerular filtration rate, GFR, creatinine, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, NGAL, KDIGO, perioperative management, Kanav Sharma, Barbara Slawski
Legacy Keywords
chronic kidney disease, CKD, acute kidney injury, AKI, preoperative evaluation, surgery, risk factors, glomerular filtration rate, GFR, creatinine, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, NGAL, KDIGO, perioperative management, Kanav Sharma, Barbara Slawski
Sections
Inside the Article

KEY POINTS

  • Many patients undergoing surgery have CKD—up to 30% in some cardiac surgery populations.
  • CKD is a risk factor for perioperative complications including acute kidney injury and death.
  • Although challenging, early detection of renal injury is crucial to improving outcomes in this patient population. New biomarkers are being investigated.
  • Preoperative assessment and perioperative management of renal dysfunction may reduce the risk of adverse postoperative outcomes.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Tue, 06/26/2018 - 14:30
Un-Gate On Date
Tue, 06/26/2018 - 14:30
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Tue, 06/26/2018 - 14:30
Article PDF Media