Sexual dysfunction in women: Can we talk about it?

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Sexual dysfunction in women: Can we talk about it?

Many women experience some form of sexual dysfunction, be it lack of desire, lack of arousal, failure to achieve orgasm, or pain during sexual activity.

Sexual health may be difficult to discuss, for both the patient and the provider. Here, we describe how primary care physicians can approach this topic, assess potential problems, and begin treatment.

A COMMON PROBLEM

The age-adjusted prevalence of sexual dysfunction in US women was reported at 44% in the Prevalence of Female Sexual Problems Associated With Distress and Determinants of Treatment Seeking (PRESIDE) study,1 but the prevalence of distress associated with sexual dysfunction was 12%. The most common type of sexual dysfunction reported by women was low sexual desire, a finding consistent with that of another large population-based study.2

While the prevalence of any type of sexual dysfunction was highest in women over age 65,1 the prevalence of distress was lowest in this age group and highest in midlife between the ages of 45 and 65. The diagnostic criteria require both a problem and distress over the problem.

Sexual dysfunction negatively affects quality of life and emotional health, regardless of age.3

LIFESTYLE AND SEXUAL FUNCTION

Various lifestyle factors have been linked to either more or less sexual activity. For example, a Mediterranean diet was associated with increased sexual activity, as were social activity, social support, psychological well-being, self-reported good quality of life, moderate alcohol intake, absence of tobacco use, a normal body mass index, and exercise.4–6 A higher sense of purpose in life has been associated with greater sexual enjoyment.7

Conversely, sexual inactivity has been associated with alcohol misuse, an elevated body mass index, and somatization.4–6

SEXUAL RESPONSE: LINEAR OR CIRCULAR?

Masters and Johnson8 initially proposed a linear model of human sexual response, which Kaplan later modified to include desire and applied to both men and women.9,10 This model presumed that sexual response begins with spontaneous sexual desire, followed by arousal, and then (sometimes) orgasm and resolution.

Adapted with permission from Basson R. Human sex-response cycles. J Sex Marital Ther 2001; 27:33–43.
Figure 1. The intimacy-based female sexual response model suggests that while a woman may experience spontaneous sexual desire, a desire for emotional closeness or intimacy may also predispose her to engage in sexual activity. Biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors may adversely affect female sexual response.

In 2000, Basson11 proposed a circular, intimacy-based model of sexual response in women that acknowledged the complexities involved in a woman’s motivation to be sexual (Figure 1). While a woman may enter the cycle with spontaneous sexual desire, she may also enter it as sexually neutral, with arousal in response to a sexual stimulus. Emotional intimacy is an important part of the cycle, and emotional closeness and bonding with the partner may provide motivation for a woman to enter into the cycle again in the future.

In a Danish survey,12 more people of both sexes said the 2 linear models described their experiences better than the circular model, but more women than men endorsed the circular model, and more men than women endorsed a linear model.

In evaluating women who complain of low sexual desire, clinicians should be aware that women, particularly those who are postmenopausal, may not enter the cycle with spontaneous sexual desire, but instead may experience arousal in response to a sexual stimulus followed by desire—ie, responsive rather than spontaneous sexual desire. Sexual arousal may precede desire, especially for women in long-term relationships, and emotional intimacy is a key driver for sexual engagement in women.11

 

 

CATEGORIES OF SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION IN WOMEN

The World Health Organization defines sexual health as “a state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being in relation to sexuality” and “not merely the absence of disease, dysfunction, or infirmity.”13

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5),14 published in 2013, defines three categories of sexual dysfunction in women:

  • Female sexual interest and arousal disorder
  • Female sexual orgasmic disorder
  • Genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder.

To meet the diagnosis of any of these, symptoms must:

  • Persist for at least 6 months
  • Occur in 75% to 100% of sexual encounters
  • Be accompanied by personal distress
  • Not be related to another psychological or medical condition, medication or substance use, or relationship distress.

Sexual problems may be lifelong or acquired after a period of normal functioning, and may be situational (present only in certain situations) or generalized (present in all situations).

Female sexual interest and arousal disorder used to be 2 separate categories in earlier editions of the DSM. Proponents of merging the 2 categories in DSM-5 cited several reasons, including difficulty in clearly distinguishing desire from other motivations for sexual activity, the relatively low reporting of fantasy in women, the complexity of distinguishing spontaneous from responsive desire, and the common co-occurrence of decreased desire and arousal difficulties.15

Other experts, however, have recommended keeping the old, separate categories of hypoactive sexual desire disorder and arousal disorder.16 The recommendation to preserve the diagnostic category of hypoactive sexual desire disorder is based on robust observational and registry data, as well as the results of randomized controlled trials that used the old criteria for hypoactive sexual desire disorder to assess responses to pharmacologic treatment of this condition.17–19 In addition, this classification as a separate and distinct diagnosis is consistent with the nomenclature used in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision and was endorsed by the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine in 2015.16

HOW TO ASK ABOUT SEXUAL HEALTH

Assessment of sexual health concerns should be a part of a routine health examination, particularly after childbirth and other major medical, surgical, psychological, and life events. Women are unlikely to bring up sexual health concerns with their healthcare providers, but instead hope that their providers will bring up the topic.20

Barriers to the discussion include lack of provider education and training, patient and provider discomfort, perceived lack of time during an office visit, and lack of approved treatments.21,22 Additionally, older women are less likely than men to discuss sexual health with their providers.23 Other potential barriers to communication include negative societal attitudes about sexuality in women and in older individuals.24,25 To overcome these barriers:

Legitimize sexual health as an important health concern and normalize its discussion as part of a routine clinical health assessment. Prefacing a query about sexual health with a normalizing and universalizing statement can help: eg, “Many women going through menopause have concerns about their sexual health. Do you have any sexual problems or concerns?” Table 1 contains examples of questions to use for initial screening for sexual dysfunction.22,26

Flynn et al27 proposed a validated single-question checklist to screen for sexual dysfunction that is an efficient way to identify specific sexual concerns, guide selection of interventions, and facilitate patient-provider communication (Table 2).

Don’t judge and don’t make assumptions about sexuality and sexual practices.

Assure confidentiality.

Use simple, direct language that is appropriate for the patient’s age, ethnicity, culture, and level of health literacy.3

Take a thorough history (sexual and reproductive, medical-surgical, and psychosocial).

 

 

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

Perform a focused physical examination to evaluate for potential causes of pain (eg, infectious causes, vulvar dermatoses, pelvic floor muscle dysfunction). The examination is also an opportunity to teach the patient about anatomy and normal sexual function.

No standard laboratory tests or imaging studies are required for the assessment of sexual dysfunction.28

IT’S NOT JUST PHYSICAL

Evaluation and treatment of female sexual dysfunction is guided by the biopsychosocial model, with potential influences from the biological, psychological, sociocultural, and interpersonal realms (Table 3).29,30

Biological factors include pelvic surgery, cancer and its treatment, neurologic diseases, and vascular diseases. Medications, including antidepressants, narcotics, anticholinergics, antihistamines, antihypertensives, oral contraceptives, and antiestrogens may also adversely affect sexual response.26

Psychological factors include a history of sexual abuse or trauma, body image concerns, distraction, stress, anxiety, depression, and personality disorders.22

Sociocultural factors include lack of sex education, unrealistic expectations, cultural norms, and religious influences.

Relationship factors include conflict with one’s partner, lack of emotional intimacy, absence of a partner, and partner sexual dysfunction. While there appears to be a close link between sexual satisfaction and a woman’s relationship with her partner in correlational studies and in clinical experience, there has been little research about relationship factors and their contribution to desire and arousal concerns.31 Sexual dysfunction in one’s partner (eg, erectile dysfunction) has been shown to negatively affect the female partner’s sexual desire.32

GENERAL APPROACH TO TREATMENT

In treating sexual health problems in women, we address contributing factors identified during the initial assessment.

A multidisciplinary approach

As sexual dysfunction in women is often multifactorial, management of the problem is well suited to a multidisciplinary approach. The team of providers may include:

  • A medical provider (primary care provider, gynecologist, or sexual health specialist) to coordinate care and manage biological factors contributing to sexual dysfunction
  • A physical therapist with expertise in treating pelvic floor disorders
  • A psychologist to address psychological, relational, and sociocultural contributors to sexual dysfunction
  • A sex therapist (womenshealthapta.org, aasect.org) to facilitate treatment of tight, tender pelvic floor muscles through education and guidance about kinesthetic awareness, muscle relaxation, and dilator therapy.33

Even in the initial visit, the primary care provider can educate, reassure regarding normal sexual function, and treat conditions such as genitourinary syndrome of menopause and antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction. The PLISSIT model (Permission, Limited Information, Specific Suggestions, and Intensive Therapy) is a useful tool for initiating counseling about sexual health (Table 4).34

AGING VS MENOPAUSE

Aging can affect sexual function in both men and women. About 40% of women experience changes in sexual function around the menopausal transition, with common complaints being loss of sexual responsiveness and desire, sexual pain, decreased sexual activity, and partner sexual dysfunction.35 However, studies seem to show that while menopause results in hormonal changes that affect sexual function, other factors may have a greater impact.

The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation36 found vaginal and pelvic pain and decreased sexual desire were associated with the menopausal transition, but other sexual health outcomes (frequency of sexual activities, arousal, importance of sex, emotional satisfaction, or physical pleasure) were not. Physical and psychological health, marital status, and a change in relationship were all associated with differences in sexual health.

The Massachusetts Women’s Health Study II37 found a greater association between physical and mental health, relationship status, and smoking and women’s sexual functioning than menopausal status.

The Penn Ovarian Aging Study38 found that sexual function declined across the menopausal transition. Risk factors for sexual dysfunction included postmenopausal status, anxiety, and absence of a sexual partner.

The Melbourne Women’s Midlife Health Project39 also found that sexual function declined across the menopausal transition. Sexual dysfunction with distress was associated with relationship factors and depression.37

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause and its treatment

As the ovaries shut down during menopause, estradiol levels decrease. Nearly 50% of women experience symptoms related to genitourinary syndrome of menopause (formerly called atrophic vaginitis or vulvovaginal atrophy).40,41 These symptoms include vaginal dryness and discomfort or pain with sexual activity, but menopausal hormone loss can also result in reduced genital blood flow, decreased sensory perception, and decreased sexual responsiveness.22

Estrogen is the most effective treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, with low-dose vaginal preparations preferred over systemic ones for isolated vulvar and vaginal symptoms.40 While estrogen is effective for vaginal dryness and sexual pain associated with estrogen loss, replacing estrogen systemically has not been associated with improvements in sexual desire.42

 

 

DEPRESSION AND ANTIDEPRESSANT-INDUCED SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION

Depression increases the risk of sexual dysfunction, and vice versa.

A meta-analysis that included 12 studies involving almost 15,000 patients confirmed that depression increased the risk of sexual dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction increased the risk of depression.43 This interaction may be related to the overlap in affected neuro­transmitters and neuroendocrine systems.44

In the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression trial, Ishak et al45 found that patients treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) who experienced remission of depression had a lower prevalence of impaired sexual satisfaction and much greater improvements in sexual satisfaction than did those who remained depressed. The severity of depressive symptoms predicted impairment in sexual satisfaction, which in turn predicted poorer quality of life. The authors suggested that physicians encourage patients to remain on SSRI treatment, given that improvement in depressive symptoms is likely to improve sexual satisfaction.

Antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction

As many as 70% of patients taking an SSRI or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) experience antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, though this is difficult to estimate across studies of different medications due to differences in methods and because many patients only report it when directly asked about it.46

Treatment of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction includes not only optimal management of depression but reassessment of the antidepressant treatment. If using only nondrug treatments for the mood disorder is not feasible, switching to (or ideally, starting with) an antidepressant with fewer sexual side effects such as mirtazapine, vilazodone, or bupropion is an option.46

A drug holiday (suspending antidepressant treatment for 1 or 2 days) has been suggested as a means of treating antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, but this may result in poorer control of depressive symptoms and discontinuation symptoms, and it encourages medication noncompliance.46,47

Treatment with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (eg, sildenafil) has been studied in women with antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, with modest results.48

A Cochrane review reported that treatment with bupropion shows promise at higher doses (300 mg daily).49

Exercise for 20 minutes 3 times weekly is associated with improvement in antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction when the exercise is performed immediately before sexual activity.50

LOW SEXUAL DESIRE

Hypoactive sexual desire disorder is defined as persistent or recurrent deficiency or absence of sexual fantasies and desire for sexual activity associated with marked distress and not due exclusively to a medication, substance abuse, or a medical condition.

Low or decreased sexual desire is the most commonly reported sexual health concern in women of all ages, with an unadjusted prevalence of 39.7%. When the criterion of personal distress is included, the prevalence is 8.9% in women ages 18 to 44, 12.3% in women ages 45 to 64, and 7.4% in women ages 65 and older.1

Multiple biological, psychological, and social factors may contribute to the problem. Identifying the ones that are present can help in planning treatment. A multifaceted approach may be appropriate.

Mindfulness and cognitive behavioral therapy for low sexual desire

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy is designed to improve awareness, focusing on and accepting the present moment, and directing attention away from and lessening self-criticism and evaluation of one’s sexual responsiveness.

Mindfulness-based therapy has been associated with improvements in sexual desire and associated distress.51 Similarly, the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for treating hypoactive sexual desire disorder is supported by 3 controlled trials, although concerns exist about the adequacy of these trials, and further study is needed.52

Androgen therapy in women

In randomized controlled trials in women with low sexual desire who were either naturally or surgically menopausal, sexual function improved with testosterone therapy that resulted in mostly supraphysiologic total testosterone levels (which may not reflect free testosterone levels) with or without concurrent estrogen treatment.53–57

Testosterone is not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in women, primarily because of the lack of long-term safety and efficacy data (ie, beyond 24 months). However, studies have shown no evidence of increased risk of endometrial cancer or cardiovascular disease with testosterone dosed to achieve physiologic premenopausal levels.58 Data on breast cancer risk are less clear, but observational studies over the last decade do not support an association with testosterone use in women.58 There is no clearly defined androgen deficiency syndrome in women, and androgen levels do not reliably correlate with symptoms.59

The Endocrine Society59 guidelines endorse the use of testosterone in postmenopausal women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. They say to aim for the midnormal premenopausal range and suggest discontinuing the drug if there is no response in 6 months. They recommend checking testosterone levels at baseline, after 3 to 6 weeks of therapy, and every 6 months to monitor for excessive use, to avoid supraphysiologic dosing and to evaluate for signs of androgen excess (eg, acne, hair growth). The use of products formulated for men or those formulated by pharmacies is discouraged; however, no FDA-approved products are currently available for use in women in the United States.

Flibanserin

A postsynaptic serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist and 5-HT2A receptor agonist, flibanserin was approved by the FDA in 2015 for treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women. Its mechanism of action is likely through an effect on neurotransmitters that suppresses serotonin (which has sexually inhibitory effects) and promotes dopamine and norepinephrine (which have excitatory effects).60

The efficacy of flibanserin has been demonstrated in 3 randomized controlled trials, with significant increases in the number of sexually satisfying events and in sexual desire scores and a decrease in distress associated with low sexual desire.17­–19 While the increase in sexually satisfying events was modest (about 1 extra event per month), some have suggested that the frequency of sexual activity may not be the best measure of sexual function in women.61 Further, responders to this drug showed a return to near-normal premenopausal frequencies of sexual activity in a separate analysis.61

The drug is generally well tolerated, with common adverse effects being somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue.18,19 Flibanserin has been associated with orthostatic hypotension with alcohol use and carries a boxed warning highlighting this potential interaction.62 Use of this drug is contraindicated in women who drink alcohol or take medications that are moderate or strong inhibitors of CYP-3A4 (eg, some antiretroviral drugs, antihypertensive drugs, antibiotics, and fluconazole, which can increase systemic exposure to flibanserin and potential side effects), and in those with liver impairment.

 

 

SEXUAL AROUSAL DISORDERS

Female sexual arousal disorder is the persistent or recurrent inability to attain or maintain an adequate lubrication-swelling response of sexual excitement. Sexual arousal results from a complex interaction between genital response, central nervous system activity, and information processing of the sexual stimulus. Difficulty with sexual arousal can result from neurovascular or neuroendocrine dysfunction or impaired central nervous system processing.

Women may experience a mismatch between subjective and objective genital arousal. A subjective report of decreased genital arousal may not be confirmed with measurement of vaginal pulse amplitude by photoplethysmography.63 Even in postmenopausal women, in the absence of significant neurovascular or neuroendocrine dysfunction, it is likely that either contextual or relational variables resulting in inadequate sexual stimulation or cognitive inhibition are more important factors contributing to difficulty with sexual arousal.63

Although there are no standard recommendations for evaluation of arousal disorders and advanced testing is often unnecessary, nerve function can be assessed with genital sensory testing utilizing thermal and vibratory threshholds64; vaginal blood flow can be assessed with vaginal photoplethysmography63; and imaging of the spine and pelvis can help to rule out neurovascular pathology.

Treatment of arousal disorders

As with other forms of female sexual dysfunction, treatment of arousal disorders includes addressing contributing factors.

Although there are few data from randomized controlled trials, psychological treatments such as sensate focus exercises and masturbation training have been suggested, centered on women becoming more self-focused and assertive.31 Sensate focus exercises are a series of graded, nondemand, sensual touching exercises aimed at reducing anxiety and avoidance of sexual activity, and improving sexual communication and intimacy by the gradual reintroduction of sexual activity.65 More recently, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy has been associated with improvements in sexual arousal as well as other parameters of sexual function.51

Currently, no pharmacologic treatments are recommended for arousal disorders because of a lack of evidence of efficacy and because of adverse effects.31

ORGASMIC DISORDER

Female orgasmic disorder is the marked delay, marked infrequency, or absence of orgasm, or markedly reduced intensity of orgasm.

Important considerations in evaluating orgasm disorders include psychosocial factors (eg, lack of sex education, negative feelings about sex, religiosity), psychological factors (eg, anxiety, depression, body image concerns), relational factors (eg, communication issues, lack of emotional intimacy, partner sexual dysfunction), adverse childhood or adult experiences (eg, physical, sexual, or emotional or verbal abuse), medical history (pelvic surgery, neurologic, or vascular disease) and medications (eg, SSRIs, SNRIs, and antipsychotic medications).66

Treatment of orgasmic disorder

Involving the partner in treatment is important, particularly if the difficulty with orgasm is acquired and only occurs with sex with a partner. Using the PLISSIT model to provide targeted, office-based interventions can be helpful.

Behavioral therapies such as directed masturbation, sensate focus exercises, or a combination of these have been shown to be effective, as has coital alignment during intercourse (positioning of male partner with his pelvis above the pubic bone of his partner to maximize clitoral stimulation with penile penetration).66

Hormonal therapy may be useful in postmenopausal women. However, there are no data on it for women whose primary complaint is female orgasmic disorder, and further study is needed.66

SEXUAL PAIN DISORDERS

The DSM-5 describes genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder as fear or anxiety, marked tightening or tensing of abdominal and pelvic muscles, or actual pain with vaginal penetration that is recurrent or persistent for a minimum of 6 months.14 Pain may occur with initial penetration, with deeper thrusting, or both.

Although the DSM-5 definition focuses on pain with penetration, it is important to recognize and ask about noncoital sexual pain. Women may also present with persistent vulvar pain or pain at the vulvar vestibule with provocation, (eg, sexual activity, tampon insertion, sitting), also known as provoked vestibulodynia.

Assessment of vaginal and vulvar pain includes a directed history and physical examination aimed at identifying potential etiologies or contributing factors, including infectious, inflammatory, neoplastic, neurologic, traumatic, iatrogenic, or factors related to hormonal deficiency.67

Treatment of sexual pain

Removal of offending agents is a first step. This includes a thorough review of vulvar and vaginal hygiene practices and emphasis on avoiding the use of any product containing potential irritants (eg, soaps or detergents containing perfumes or dyes) and using lubricants and moisturizers without gimmicks (no warming or tingling agents or flavors). Oral contraceptives have been associated with vestibulodynia, and women in whom the sexual pain started when they started an oral contraceptive may benefit from switching to an alternate form of contraception.68

Dysfunction of pelvic floor muscles may result in sexual pain and may be a primary problem or a secondary complication related to other issues such as symptomatic genitourinary syndrome of menopause. The symptoms of nonrelaxing pelvic floor dysfunction (also known as hypertonic pelvic floor dysfunction or pelvic floor tension myalgia) include pain in the pelvis with sexual activity that may linger for hours or even days, and may also include bowel and bladder dysfunction and low back pain or hip pain radiating to the thighs or groin.33 Physical therapy under the care of a physical therapist with expertise in the management of pelvic floor disorders is the cornerstone of treatment for this condition.33

Treatment of the genital and urinary symptoms related to loss of estrogen after menopause (genitourinary syndrome of menopause) includes the use of vaginal lubricants with sexual activity and vaginal moisturizers on a regular basis (2 to 5 times per week).40 Low-dose vaginal estrogen creams, rings, or tablets and the oral selective estrogen receptor antagonist ospemifene are recommended for moderate to severe symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause.40 Intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone was recently approved by the FDA for treatment of dyspareunia associated with menopause.69 Topical lidocaine applied to the introitus before sexual activity has been found to be effective for reducing sexual pain in women with breast cancer, and when used in combination with vaginal lubricants and moisturizers is a practical option for women, particularly those unable to use estrogen-based therapies.70

References
  1. Shifren JL, Monz BU, Russo PA, Segreti A, Johannes CB. Sexual problems and distress in United States women: prevalence and correlates. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:970–978.
  2. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA 1999; 281:537–544.
  3. Sadovsky R, Nusbaum M. Sexual health inquiry and support is a primary care priority. J Sex Med 2006; 3:3–11.
  4. Alvisi S, Baldassarre M, Lambertini M, et al. Sexuality and psychopathological aspects in premenopausal women with metabolic syndrome. J Sex Med 2014; 11:2020–2028.
  5. Bach LE, Mortimer JA, VandeWeerd C, Corvin J. The association of physical and mental health with sexual activity in older adults in a retirement community. J Sex Med 2013; 10:2671–2678.
  6. Esposito K, Ciotola M, Giugliano F, et al. Mediterranean diet improves sexual function in women with the metabolic syndrome. Int J Impot Res 2007; 19:486–491.
  7. Prairie BA, Scheier MF, Matthews KA, Chang CC, Hess R. A higher sense of purpose in life is associated with sexual enjoyment in midlife women. Menopause 2011; 18:839–844.
  8. Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual response. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company; 1966.
  9. Kaplan HS. The new sex therapy. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel; 1974.
  10. Robinson PA. The modernization of sex: Havelock Ellis, Alfred Kinsey, William Masters, and Virginia Johnson. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1976.
  11. Basson R. The female sexual response: a different model. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26:51–65.
  12. Giraldi A, Kristensen E, Sand M. Endorsement of models describing sexual response of men and women with a sexual partner: an online survey in a population sample of Danish adults ages 20–65 years. J Sex Med 2015; 12:116–128.
  13. World Health Organization. Defining sexual health. Report of a technical consultation on sexual health, 28–31 January 2002, Geneva. Geneva; 2006.
  14. American Psychiatric Association (APA). DSM-5: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2013.
  15. Brotto LA. The DSM diagnostic criteria for hypoactive sexual desire disorder in women. Arch Sex Behav 2010; 39:221–239.
  16. McCabe MP, Sharlip ID, Atalla E, et al. Definitions of sexual dysfunctions in women and men: a consensus statement from the Fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine 2015. J Sex Med 2016; 13:135–143.
  17. Derogatis LR, Komer L, Katz M, et al; VIOLET Trial Investigators. Treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women: efficacy of flibanserin in the VIOLET study. J Sex Med 2012; 9:1074–1085.
  18. Katz M, DeRogatis LR, Ackerman R, et al; BEGONIA trial investigators. Efficacy of flibanserin in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder: results from the BEGONIA trial. J Sex Med 2013; 10:1807–1815.
  19. Thorp J, Simon J, Dattani D, et al; DAISY trial investigators. Treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women: efficacy of flibanserin in the DAISY study. J Sex Med 2012; 9:793–804.
  20. Berman L, Berman J, Felder S, et al. Seeking help for sexual function complaints: what gynecologists need to know about the female patient's experience. Fertil Steril 2003; 79:572–576.
  21. Kingsberg SA. Taking a sexual history. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2006; 33:535–547.
  22. Kingsberg SA, Rezaee RL. Hypoactive sexual desire in women. Menopause 2013; 20:1284–1300.
  23. Lindau ST, Schumm LP, Laumann EO, Levinson W, O’Muircheartaigh CA, Waite LJ. A study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:762–774.
  24. Gott M, Hinchliff S, Galena E. General practitioner attitudes to discussing sexual health issues with older people. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58:2093–2103.
  25. Lindau ST, Leitsch SA, Lundberg KL, Jerome J. Older women's attitudes, behavior, and communication about sex and HIV: a community-based study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2006; 15:747–753.
  26. Faubion SS, Rullo JE. Sexual dysfunction in women: a practical approach. Am Fam Physician 2015; 92:281–288.
  27. Flynn KE, Lindau ST, Lin L, et al. Development and validation of a single-item screener for self-reporting sexual problems in US adults. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30:1468–1475.
  28. Latif EZ, Diamond MP. Arriving at the diagnosis of female sexual dysfunction. Fertil Steril 2013; 100:898–904.
  29. Althof SE, Leiblum SR, Chevret-Measson M, et al. Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction. J Sex Med 2005; 2:793–800.
  30. Rosen RC, Barsky JL. Normal sexual response in women. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2006; 33:515–526.
  31. Brotto LA, Bitzer J, Laan E, Leiblum S, Luria M. Women's sexual desire and arousal disorders. J Sex Med 2010; 7:586–614.
  32. Rubio-Aurioles E, Kim ED, Rosen RC, et al. Impact on erectile function and sexual quality of life of couples: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of tadalafil taken once daily. J Sex Med 2009; 6:1314–1323.
  33. Faubion SS, Shuster LT, Bharucha AE. Recognition and management of nonrelaxing pelvic floor dysfunction. Mayo Clin Proc 2012; 87:187–193.
  34. Annon JS. The PLISSIT model: a proposed conceptual scheme for the behavioral treatment of sexual problems. J Sex Educ Ther 1976; 2:1–15.
  35. Sarrel PM. Sexuality and menopause. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75(suppl 4):26S–30S; discussion 31S–35S.
  36. Avis NE, Brockwell S, Randolph JF, Jr, et al. Longitudinal changes in sexual functioning as women transition through menopause: results from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. Menopause 2009; 16:442–452.
  37. Avis NE, Stellato R, Crawford S, Johannes C, Longcope C. Is there an association between menopause status and sexual functioning? Menopause 2000; 7:297–309.
  38. Gracia CR, Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Lin H, Mogul M. Hormones and sexuality during transition to menopause. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:831–840.
  39. Dennerstein L, Guthrie JR, Hayes RD, DeRogatis LR, Lehert P. Sexual function, dysfunction, and sexual distress in a prospective, population-based sample of mid-aged, Australian-born women. J Sex Med 2008; 5:2291–2299.
  40. Management of symptomatic vulvovaginal atrophy: 2013 position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2013; 20:888–902.
  41. Mac Bride MB, Rhodes DJ, Shuster LT. Vulvovaginal atrophy. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85:87–94.
  42. Nastri CO, Lara LA, Ferriani RA, Rosa ESAC, Figueiredo JB, Martins WP. Hormone therapy for sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 6:CD009672.
  43. Atlantis E, Sullivan T. Bidirectional association between depression and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med 2012; 9:1497–1507.
  44. Clayton AH, Maserejian NN, Connor MK, Huang L, Heiman JR, Rosen RC. Depression in premenopausal women with HSDD: baseline findings from the HSDD Registry for Women. Psychosom Med 2012; 74:305–311.
  45. Ishak WW, Christensen S, Sayer G, et al. Sexual satisfaction and quality of life in major depressive disorder before and after treatment with citalopram in the STAR*D study. J Clin Psychiatry 2013; 74:256–261.
  46. Clayton AH, Croft HA, Handiwala L. Antidepressants and sexual dysfunction: mechanisms and clinical implications. Postgrad Med 2014; 126:91–99.
  47. Rothschild AJ. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-induced sexual dysfunction: efficacy of a drug holiday. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:1514–1516.
  48. Nurnberg HG, Hensley PL, Heiman JR, Croft HA, Debattista C, Paine S. Sildenafil treatment of women with antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008; 300:395–404.
  49. Taylor MJ, Rudkin L, Bullemor-Day P, Lubin J, Chukwujekwu C, Hawton K. Strategies for managing sexual dysfunction induced by antidepressant medication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 5:CD003382.
  50. Lorenz TA, Meston CM. Exercise improves sexual function in women taking antidepressants: results from a randomized crossover trial. Depress Anxiety 2014; 31:188–195.
  51. Brotto LA, Basson R. Group mindfulness-based therapy significantly improves sexual desire in women. Behav Res Ther 2014; 5743–5754.
  52. Pyke RE, Clayton AH. Psychological treatment trials for hypoactive sexual desire disorder: a sexual medicine critique and perspective. J Sex Med 2015; 12:2451–2458.
  53. Cappelletti M, Wallen K. Increasing women's sexual desire: the comparative effectiveness of estrogens and androgens. Horm Behav 2016; 78:178–193.
  54. Davis SR, Moreau M, Kroll R, et al. Testosterone for low libido in postmenopausal women not taking estrogen. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:2005–2017.
  55. Davis SR, van der Mooren MJ, van Lunsen RH, et al. Efficacy and safety of a testosterone patch for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in surgically menopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Menopause 2006; 13:387–396.
  56. Panay N, Al-Azzawi F, Bouchard C, et al. Testosterone treatment of HSDD in naturally menopausal women: the ADORE study. Climacteric 2010; 13:121–131.
  57. Somboonporn W, Davis S, Seif MW, Bell R. Testosterone for peri- and postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 4:CD004509.
  58. Davis SR. Cardiovascular and cancer safety of testosterone in women. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2011; 18:198–203.
  59. Wierman ME, Arlt W, Basson R, et al. Androgen therapy in women: a reappraisal: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 99:3489–3510.
  60. Stahl SM, Sommer B, Allers KA. Multifunctional pharmacology of flibanserin: possible mechanism of therapeutic action in hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Med 2011; 8:15–27.
  61. Simon JA, Goldstein I, Kim N, Freedman M, Parish S. Flibanserin approval: facts or feelings? Sex Med 2016; 4:e69–e70.
  62. Joffe HV, Chang C, Sewell C, et al. FDA approval of flibanserin—treating hypoactive sexual desire disorder. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:101–104.
  63. van Lunsen RH, Laan E. Genital vascular responsiveness and sexual feelings in midlife women: psychophysiologic, brain, and genital imaging studies. Menopause 2004; 11:741–748.
  64. Beco J, Seidel L, Albert A. Normative values of skin temperature and thermal sensory thresholds in the pudendal nerve territory. Neurourol Urodyn 2015; 34:571–577.
  65. Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual inadequacy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company; 1970.
  66. Laan E, Rellini AH, Barnes T; International Society for Sexual Medicine. Standard operating procedures for female orgasmic disorder: consensus of the International Society for Sexual Medicine. J Sex Med 2013; 10:74–82.
  67. Bornstein J, Goldstein A, Coady D. Consensus terminology and classification of persistent vulvar pain. Vulvar pain/Vulvodynia Nomenclature Consensus Conference. Annapolis, MD; 2015.
  68. Burrows LJ, Goldstein AT. The treatment of vestibulodynia with topical estradiol and testosterone. Sex Med 2013; 1:30–33.
  69. Labrie F. Efficacy of intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on moderate to severe dyspareunia and vaginal dryness, symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy, and of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Manopause 2016; 23:243–256.
  70. Goetsch MF, Lim JY, Caughey AB. A practical solution for dyspareunia in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:3394–3400.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Stephanie S. Faubion, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Women’s Health Clinic, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Board of Directors, International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health

Sharon J. Parish, MD
Professor of Medicine in Clinical Psychiatry, Professor of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Immediate Past President, International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health

Address: Stephanie S. Faubion, MD, Women’s Health Clinic, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905; faubion.stephanie@mayo.edu

Dr. Parish has disclosed membership on advisory committees or review panels and teaching and speaking for Palatin Technologies and Pfizer.

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
367-376
Legacy Keywords
sexual dysfunction, desire, arousal, orgasm, intimacy, drive, female sexual interest and arousal disorder, female sexual orgasmic disorder, genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder, sex, Stephanie Faubion, Sharon Parish
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Stephanie S. Faubion, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Women’s Health Clinic, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Board of Directors, International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health

Sharon J. Parish, MD
Professor of Medicine in Clinical Psychiatry, Professor of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Immediate Past President, International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health

Address: Stephanie S. Faubion, MD, Women’s Health Clinic, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905; faubion.stephanie@mayo.edu

Dr. Parish has disclosed membership on advisory committees or review panels and teaching and speaking for Palatin Technologies and Pfizer.

Author and Disclosure Information

Stephanie S. Faubion, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Women’s Health Clinic, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Board of Directors, International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health

Sharon J. Parish, MD
Professor of Medicine in Clinical Psychiatry, Professor of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Immediate Past President, International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health

Address: Stephanie S. Faubion, MD, Women’s Health Clinic, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905; faubion.stephanie@mayo.edu

Dr. Parish has disclosed membership on advisory committees or review panels and teaching and speaking for Palatin Technologies and Pfizer.

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Many women experience some form of sexual dysfunction, be it lack of desire, lack of arousal, failure to achieve orgasm, or pain during sexual activity.

Sexual health may be difficult to discuss, for both the patient and the provider. Here, we describe how primary care physicians can approach this topic, assess potential problems, and begin treatment.

A COMMON PROBLEM

The age-adjusted prevalence of sexual dysfunction in US women was reported at 44% in the Prevalence of Female Sexual Problems Associated With Distress and Determinants of Treatment Seeking (PRESIDE) study,1 but the prevalence of distress associated with sexual dysfunction was 12%. The most common type of sexual dysfunction reported by women was low sexual desire, a finding consistent with that of another large population-based study.2

While the prevalence of any type of sexual dysfunction was highest in women over age 65,1 the prevalence of distress was lowest in this age group and highest in midlife between the ages of 45 and 65. The diagnostic criteria require both a problem and distress over the problem.

Sexual dysfunction negatively affects quality of life and emotional health, regardless of age.3

LIFESTYLE AND SEXUAL FUNCTION

Various lifestyle factors have been linked to either more or less sexual activity. For example, a Mediterranean diet was associated with increased sexual activity, as were social activity, social support, psychological well-being, self-reported good quality of life, moderate alcohol intake, absence of tobacco use, a normal body mass index, and exercise.4–6 A higher sense of purpose in life has been associated with greater sexual enjoyment.7

Conversely, sexual inactivity has been associated with alcohol misuse, an elevated body mass index, and somatization.4–6

SEXUAL RESPONSE: LINEAR OR CIRCULAR?

Masters and Johnson8 initially proposed a linear model of human sexual response, which Kaplan later modified to include desire and applied to both men and women.9,10 This model presumed that sexual response begins with spontaneous sexual desire, followed by arousal, and then (sometimes) orgasm and resolution.

Adapted with permission from Basson R. Human sex-response cycles. J Sex Marital Ther 2001; 27:33–43.
Figure 1. The intimacy-based female sexual response model suggests that while a woman may experience spontaneous sexual desire, a desire for emotional closeness or intimacy may also predispose her to engage in sexual activity. Biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors may adversely affect female sexual response.

In 2000, Basson11 proposed a circular, intimacy-based model of sexual response in women that acknowledged the complexities involved in a woman’s motivation to be sexual (Figure 1). While a woman may enter the cycle with spontaneous sexual desire, she may also enter it as sexually neutral, with arousal in response to a sexual stimulus. Emotional intimacy is an important part of the cycle, and emotional closeness and bonding with the partner may provide motivation for a woman to enter into the cycle again in the future.

In a Danish survey,12 more people of both sexes said the 2 linear models described their experiences better than the circular model, but more women than men endorsed the circular model, and more men than women endorsed a linear model.

In evaluating women who complain of low sexual desire, clinicians should be aware that women, particularly those who are postmenopausal, may not enter the cycle with spontaneous sexual desire, but instead may experience arousal in response to a sexual stimulus followed by desire—ie, responsive rather than spontaneous sexual desire. Sexual arousal may precede desire, especially for women in long-term relationships, and emotional intimacy is a key driver for sexual engagement in women.11

 

 

CATEGORIES OF SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION IN WOMEN

The World Health Organization defines sexual health as “a state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being in relation to sexuality” and “not merely the absence of disease, dysfunction, or infirmity.”13

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5),14 published in 2013, defines three categories of sexual dysfunction in women:

  • Female sexual interest and arousal disorder
  • Female sexual orgasmic disorder
  • Genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder.

To meet the diagnosis of any of these, symptoms must:

  • Persist for at least 6 months
  • Occur in 75% to 100% of sexual encounters
  • Be accompanied by personal distress
  • Not be related to another psychological or medical condition, medication or substance use, or relationship distress.

Sexual problems may be lifelong or acquired after a period of normal functioning, and may be situational (present only in certain situations) or generalized (present in all situations).

Female sexual interest and arousal disorder used to be 2 separate categories in earlier editions of the DSM. Proponents of merging the 2 categories in DSM-5 cited several reasons, including difficulty in clearly distinguishing desire from other motivations for sexual activity, the relatively low reporting of fantasy in women, the complexity of distinguishing spontaneous from responsive desire, and the common co-occurrence of decreased desire and arousal difficulties.15

Other experts, however, have recommended keeping the old, separate categories of hypoactive sexual desire disorder and arousal disorder.16 The recommendation to preserve the diagnostic category of hypoactive sexual desire disorder is based on robust observational and registry data, as well as the results of randomized controlled trials that used the old criteria for hypoactive sexual desire disorder to assess responses to pharmacologic treatment of this condition.17–19 In addition, this classification as a separate and distinct diagnosis is consistent with the nomenclature used in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision and was endorsed by the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine in 2015.16

HOW TO ASK ABOUT SEXUAL HEALTH

Assessment of sexual health concerns should be a part of a routine health examination, particularly after childbirth and other major medical, surgical, psychological, and life events. Women are unlikely to bring up sexual health concerns with their healthcare providers, but instead hope that their providers will bring up the topic.20

Barriers to the discussion include lack of provider education and training, patient and provider discomfort, perceived lack of time during an office visit, and lack of approved treatments.21,22 Additionally, older women are less likely than men to discuss sexual health with their providers.23 Other potential barriers to communication include negative societal attitudes about sexuality in women and in older individuals.24,25 To overcome these barriers:

Legitimize sexual health as an important health concern and normalize its discussion as part of a routine clinical health assessment. Prefacing a query about sexual health with a normalizing and universalizing statement can help: eg, “Many women going through menopause have concerns about their sexual health. Do you have any sexual problems or concerns?” Table 1 contains examples of questions to use for initial screening for sexual dysfunction.22,26

Flynn et al27 proposed a validated single-question checklist to screen for sexual dysfunction that is an efficient way to identify specific sexual concerns, guide selection of interventions, and facilitate patient-provider communication (Table 2).

Don’t judge and don’t make assumptions about sexuality and sexual practices.

Assure confidentiality.

Use simple, direct language that is appropriate for the patient’s age, ethnicity, culture, and level of health literacy.3

Take a thorough history (sexual and reproductive, medical-surgical, and psychosocial).

 

 

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

Perform a focused physical examination to evaluate for potential causes of pain (eg, infectious causes, vulvar dermatoses, pelvic floor muscle dysfunction). The examination is also an opportunity to teach the patient about anatomy and normal sexual function.

No standard laboratory tests or imaging studies are required for the assessment of sexual dysfunction.28

IT’S NOT JUST PHYSICAL

Evaluation and treatment of female sexual dysfunction is guided by the biopsychosocial model, with potential influences from the biological, psychological, sociocultural, and interpersonal realms (Table 3).29,30

Biological factors include pelvic surgery, cancer and its treatment, neurologic diseases, and vascular diseases. Medications, including antidepressants, narcotics, anticholinergics, antihistamines, antihypertensives, oral contraceptives, and antiestrogens may also adversely affect sexual response.26

Psychological factors include a history of sexual abuse or trauma, body image concerns, distraction, stress, anxiety, depression, and personality disorders.22

Sociocultural factors include lack of sex education, unrealistic expectations, cultural norms, and religious influences.

Relationship factors include conflict with one’s partner, lack of emotional intimacy, absence of a partner, and partner sexual dysfunction. While there appears to be a close link between sexual satisfaction and a woman’s relationship with her partner in correlational studies and in clinical experience, there has been little research about relationship factors and their contribution to desire and arousal concerns.31 Sexual dysfunction in one’s partner (eg, erectile dysfunction) has been shown to negatively affect the female partner’s sexual desire.32

GENERAL APPROACH TO TREATMENT

In treating sexual health problems in women, we address contributing factors identified during the initial assessment.

A multidisciplinary approach

As sexual dysfunction in women is often multifactorial, management of the problem is well suited to a multidisciplinary approach. The team of providers may include:

  • A medical provider (primary care provider, gynecologist, or sexual health specialist) to coordinate care and manage biological factors contributing to sexual dysfunction
  • A physical therapist with expertise in treating pelvic floor disorders
  • A psychologist to address psychological, relational, and sociocultural contributors to sexual dysfunction
  • A sex therapist (womenshealthapta.org, aasect.org) to facilitate treatment of tight, tender pelvic floor muscles through education and guidance about kinesthetic awareness, muscle relaxation, and dilator therapy.33

Even in the initial visit, the primary care provider can educate, reassure regarding normal sexual function, and treat conditions such as genitourinary syndrome of menopause and antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction. The PLISSIT model (Permission, Limited Information, Specific Suggestions, and Intensive Therapy) is a useful tool for initiating counseling about sexual health (Table 4).34

AGING VS MENOPAUSE

Aging can affect sexual function in both men and women. About 40% of women experience changes in sexual function around the menopausal transition, with common complaints being loss of sexual responsiveness and desire, sexual pain, decreased sexual activity, and partner sexual dysfunction.35 However, studies seem to show that while menopause results in hormonal changes that affect sexual function, other factors may have a greater impact.

The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation36 found vaginal and pelvic pain and decreased sexual desire were associated with the menopausal transition, but other sexual health outcomes (frequency of sexual activities, arousal, importance of sex, emotional satisfaction, or physical pleasure) were not. Physical and psychological health, marital status, and a change in relationship were all associated with differences in sexual health.

The Massachusetts Women’s Health Study II37 found a greater association between physical and mental health, relationship status, and smoking and women’s sexual functioning than menopausal status.

The Penn Ovarian Aging Study38 found that sexual function declined across the menopausal transition. Risk factors for sexual dysfunction included postmenopausal status, anxiety, and absence of a sexual partner.

The Melbourne Women’s Midlife Health Project39 also found that sexual function declined across the menopausal transition. Sexual dysfunction with distress was associated with relationship factors and depression.37

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause and its treatment

As the ovaries shut down during menopause, estradiol levels decrease. Nearly 50% of women experience symptoms related to genitourinary syndrome of menopause (formerly called atrophic vaginitis or vulvovaginal atrophy).40,41 These symptoms include vaginal dryness and discomfort or pain with sexual activity, but menopausal hormone loss can also result in reduced genital blood flow, decreased sensory perception, and decreased sexual responsiveness.22

Estrogen is the most effective treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, with low-dose vaginal preparations preferred over systemic ones for isolated vulvar and vaginal symptoms.40 While estrogen is effective for vaginal dryness and sexual pain associated with estrogen loss, replacing estrogen systemically has not been associated with improvements in sexual desire.42

 

 

DEPRESSION AND ANTIDEPRESSANT-INDUCED SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION

Depression increases the risk of sexual dysfunction, and vice versa.

A meta-analysis that included 12 studies involving almost 15,000 patients confirmed that depression increased the risk of sexual dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction increased the risk of depression.43 This interaction may be related to the overlap in affected neuro­transmitters and neuroendocrine systems.44

In the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression trial, Ishak et al45 found that patients treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) who experienced remission of depression had a lower prevalence of impaired sexual satisfaction and much greater improvements in sexual satisfaction than did those who remained depressed. The severity of depressive symptoms predicted impairment in sexual satisfaction, which in turn predicted poorer quality of life. The authors suggested that physicians encourage patients to remain on SSRI treatment, given that improvement in depressive symptoms is likely to improve sexual satisfaction.

Antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction

As many as 70% of patients taking an SSRI or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) experience antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, though this is difficult to estimate across studies of different medications due to differences in methods and because many patients only report it when directly asked about it.46

Treatment of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction includes not only optimal management of depression but reassessment of the antidepressant treatment. If using only nondrug treatments for the mood disorder is not feasible, switching to (or ideally, starting with) an antidepressant with fewer sexual side effects such as mirtazapine, vilazodone, or bupropion is an option.46

A drug holiday (suspending antidepressant treatment for 1 or 2 days) has been suggested as a means of treating antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, but this may result in poorer control of depressive symptoms and discontinuation symptoms, and it encourages medication noncompliance.46,47

Treatment with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (eg, sildenafil) has been studied in women with antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, with modest results.48

A Cochrane review reported that treatment with bupropion shows promise at higher doses (300 mg daily).49

Exercise for 20 minutes 3 times weekly is associated with improvement in antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction when the exercise is performed immediately before sexual activity.50

LOW SEXUAL DESIRE

Hypoactive sexual desire disorder is defined as persistent or recurrent deficiency or absence of sexual fantasies and desire for sexual activity associated with marked distress and not due exclusively to a medication, substance abuse, or a medical condition.

Low or decreased sexual desire is the most commonly reported sexual health concern in women of all ages, with an unadjusted prevalence of 39.7%. When the criterion of personal distress is included, the prevalence is 8.9% in women ages 18 to 44, 12.3% in women ages 45 to 64, and 7.4% in women ages 65 and older.1

Multiple biological, psychological, and social factors may contribute to the problem. Identifying the ones that are present can help in planning treatment. A multifaceted approach may be appropriate.

Mindfulness and cognitive behavioral therapy for low sexual desire

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy is designed to improve awareness, focusing on and accepting the present moment, and directing attention away from and lessening self-criticism and evaluation of one’s sexual responsiveness.

Mindfulness-based therapy has been associated with improvements in sexual desire and associated distress.51 Similarly, the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for treating hypoactive sexual desire disorder is supported by 3 controlled trials, although concerns exist about the adequacy of these trials, and further study is needed.52

Androgen therapy in women

In randomized controlled trials in women with low sexual desire who were either naturally or surgically menopausal, sexual function improved with testosterone therapy that resulted in mostly supraphysiologic total testosterone levels (which may not reflect free testosterone levels) with or without concurrent estrogen treatment.53–57

Testosterone is not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in women, primarily because of the lack of long-term safety and efficacy data (ie, beyond 24 months). However, studies have shown no evidence of increased risk of endometrial cancer or cardiovascular disease with testosterone dosed to achieve physiologic premenopausal levels.58 Data on breast cancer risk are less clear, but observational studies over the last decade do not support an association with testosterone use in women.58 There is no clearly defined androgen deficiency syndrome in women, and androgen levels do not reliably correlate with symptoms.59

The Endocrine Society59 guidelines endorse the use of testosterone in postmenopausal women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. They say to aim for the midnormal premenopausal range and suggest discontinuing the drug if there is no response in 6 months. They recommend checking testosterone levels at baseline, after 3 to 6 weeks of therapy, and every 6 months to monitor for excessive use, to avoid supraphysiologic dosing and to evaluate for signs of androgen excess (eg, acne, hair growth). The use of products formulated for men or those formulated by pharmacies is discouraged; however, no FDA-approved products are currently available for use in women in the United States.

Flibanserin

A postsynaptic serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist and 5-HT2A receptor agonist, flibanserin was approved by the FDA in 2015 for treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women. Its mechanism of action is likely through an effect on neurotransmitters that suppresses serotonin (which has sexually inhibitory effects) and promotes dopamine and norepinephrine (which have excitatory effects).60

The efficacy of flibanserin has been demonstrated in 3 randomized controlled trials, with significant increases in the number of sexually satisfying events and in sexual desire scores and a decrease in distress associated with low sexual desire.17­–19 While the increase in sexually satisfying events was modest (about 1 extra event per month), some have suggested that the frequency of sexual activity may not be the best measure of sexual function in women.61 Further, responders to this drug showed a return to near-normal premenopausal frequencies of sexual activity in a separate analysis.61

The drug is generally well tolerated, with common adverse effects being somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue.18,19 Flibanserin has been associated with orthostatic hypotension with alcohol use and carries a boxed warning highlighting this potential interaction.62 Use of this drug is contraindicated in women who drink alcohol or take medications that are moderate or strong inhibitors of CYP-3A4 (eg, some antiretroviral drugs, antihypertensive drugs, antibiotics, and fluconazole, which can increase systemic exposure to flibanserin and potential side effects), and in those with liver impairment.

 

 

SEXUAL AROUSAL DISORDERS

Female sexual arousal disorder is the persistent or recurrent inability to attain or maintain an adequate lubrication-swelling response of sexual excitement. Sexual arousal results from a complex interaction between genital response, central nervous system activity, and information processing of the sexual stimulus. Difficulty with sexual arousal can result from neurovascular or neuroendocrine dysfunction or impaired central nervous system processing.

Women may experience a mismatch between subjective and objective genital arousal. A subjective report of decreased genital arousal may not be confirmed with measurement of vaginal pulse amplitude by photoplethysmography.63 Even in postmenopausal women, in the absence of significant neurovascular or neuroendocrine dysfunction, it is likely that either contextual or relational variables resulting in inadequate sexual stimulation or cognitive inhibition are more important factors contributing to difficulty with sexual arousal.63

Although there are no standard recommendations for evaluation of arousal disorders and advanced testing is often unnecessary, nerve function can be assessed with genital sensory testing utilizing thermal and vibratory threshholds64; vaginal blood flow can be assessed with vaginal photoplethysmography63; and imaging of the spine and pelvis can help to rule out neurovascular pathology.

Treatment of arousal disorders

As with other forms of female sexual dysfunction, treatment of arousal disorders includes addressing contributing factors.

Although there are few data from randomized controlled trials, psychological treatments such as sensate focus exercises and masturbation training have been suggested, centered on women becoming more self-focused and assertive.31 Sensate focus exercises are a series of graded, nondemand, sensual touching exercises aimed at reducing anxiety and avoidance of sexual activity, and improving sexual communication and intimacy by the gradual reintroduction of sexual activity.65 More recently, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy has been associated with improvements in sexual arousal as well as other parameters of sexual function.51

Currently, no pharmacologic treatments are recommended for arousal disorders because of a lack of evidence of efficacy and because of adverse effects.31

ORGASMIC DISORDER

Female orgasmic disorder is the marked delay, marked infrequency, or absence of orgasm, or markedly reduced intensity of orgasm.

Important considerations in evaluating orgasm disorders include psychosocial factors (eg, lack of sex education, negative feelings about sex, religiosity), psychological factors (eg, anxiety, depression, body image concerns), relational factors (eg, communication issues, lack of emotional intimacy, partner sexual dysfunction), adverse childhood or adult experiences (eg, physical, sexual, or emotional or verbal abuse), medical history (pelvic surgery, neurologic, or vascular disease) and medications (eg, SSRIs, SNRIs, and antipsychotic medications).66

Treatment of orgasmic disorder

Involving the partner in treatment is important, particularly if the difficulty with orgasm is acquired and only occurs with sex with a partner. Using the PLISSIT model to provide targeted, office-based interventions can be helpful.

Behavioral therapies such as directed masturbation, sensate focus exercises, or a combination of these have been shown to be effective, as has coital alignment during intercourse (positioning of male partner with his pelvis above the pubic bone of his partner to maximize clitoral stimulation with penile penetration).66

Hormonal therapy may be useful in postmenopausal women. However, there are no data on it for women whose primary complaint is female orgasmic disorder, and further study is needed.66

SEXUAL PAIN DISORDERS

The DSM-5 describes genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder as fear or anxiety, marked tightening or tensing of abdominal and pelvic muscles, or actual pain with vaginal penetration that is recurrent or persistent for a minimum of 6 months.14 Pain may occur with initial penetration, with deeper thrusting, or both.

Although the DSM-5 definition focuses on pain with penetration, it is important to recognize and ask about noncoital sexual pain. Women may also present with persistent vulvar pain or pain at the vulvar vestibule with provocation, (eg, sexual activity, tampon insertion, sitting), also known as provoked vestibulodynia.

Assessment of vaginal and vulvar pain includes a directed history and physical examination aimed at identifying potential etiologies or contributing factors, including infectious, inflammatory, neoplastic, neurologic, traumatic, iatrogenic, or factors related to hormonal deficiency.67

Treatment of sexual pain

Removal of offending agents is a first step. This includes a thorough review of vulvar and vaginal hygiene practices and emphasis on avoiding the use of any product containing potential irritants (eg, soaps or detergents containing perfumes or dyes) and using lubricants and moisturizers without gimmicks (no warming or tingling agents or flavors). Oral contraceptives have been associated with vestibulodynia, and women in whom the sexual pain started when they started an oral contraceptive may benefit from switching to an alternate form of contraception.68

Dysfunction of pelvic floor muscles may result in sexual pain and may be a primary problem or a secondary complication related to other issues such as symptomatic genitourinary syndrome of menopause. The symptoms of nonrelaxing pelvic floor dysfunction (also known as hypertonic pelvic floor dysfunction or pelvic floor tension myalgia) include pain in the pelvis with sexual activity that may linger for hours or even days, and may also include bowel and bladder dysfunction and low back pain or hip pain radiating to the thighs or groin.33 Physical therapy under the care of a physical therapist with expertise in the management of pelvic floor disorders is the cornerstone of treatment for this condition.33

Treatment of the genital and urinary symptoms related to loss of estrogen after menopause (genitourinary syndrome of menopause) includes the use of vaginal lubricants with sexual activity and vaginal moisturizers on a regular basis (2 to 5 times per week).40 Low-dose vaginal estrogen creams, rings, or tablets and the oral selective estrogen receptor antagonist ospemifene are recommended for moderate to severe symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause.40 Intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone was recently approved by the FDA for treatment of dyspareunia associated with menopause.69 Topical lidocaine applied to the introitus before sexual activity has been found to be effective for reducing sexual pain in women with breast cancer, and when used in combination with vaginal lubricants and moisturizers is a practical option for women, particularly those unable to use estrogen-based therapies.70

Many women experience some form of sexual dysfunction, be it lack of desire, lack of arousal, failure to achieve orgasm, or pain during sexual activity.

Sexual health may be difficult to discuss, for both the patient and the provider. Here, we describe how primary care physicians can approach this topic, assess potential problems, and begin treatment.

A COMMON PROBLEM

The age-adjusted prevalence of sexual dysfunction in US women was reported at 44% in the Prevalence of Female Sexual Problems Associated With Distress and Determinants of Treatment Seeking (PRESIDE) study,1 but the prevalence of distress associated with sexual dysfunction was 12%. The most common type of sexual dysfunction reported by women was low sexual desire, a finding consistent with that of another large population-based study.2

While the prevalence of any type of sexual dysfunction was highest in women over age 65,1 the prevalence of distress was lowest in this age group and highest in midlife between the ages of 45 and 65. The diagnostic criteria require both a problem and distress over the problem.

Sexual dysfunction negatively affects quality of life and emotional health, regardless of age.3

LIFESTYLE AND SEXUAL FUNCTION

Various lifestyle factors have been linked to either more or less sexual activity. For example, a Mediterranean diet was associated with increased sexual activity, as were social activity, social support, psychological well-being, self-reported good quality of life, moderate alcohol intake, absence of tobacco use, a normal body mass index, and exercise.4–6 A higher sense of purpose in life has been associated with greater sexual enjoyment.7

Conversely, sexual inactivity has been associated with alcohol misuse, an elevated body mass index, and somatization.4–6

SEXUAL RESPONSE: LINEAR OR CIRCULAR?

Masters and Johnson8 initially proposed a linear model of human sexual response, which Kaplan later modified to include desire and applied to both men and women.9,10 This model presumed that sexual response begins with spontaneous sexual desire, followed by arousal, and then (sometimes) orgasm and resolution.

Adapted with permission from Basson R. Human sex-response cycles. J Sex Marital Ther 2001; 27:33–43.
Figure 1. The intimacy-based female sexual response model suggests that while a woman may experience spontaneous sexual desire, a desire for emotional closeness or intimacy may also predispose her to engage in sexual activity. Biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors may adversely affect female sexual response.

In 2000, Basson11 proposed a circular, intimacy-based model of sexual response in women that acknowledged the complexities involved in a woman’s motivation to be sexual (Figure 1). While a woman may enter the cycle with spontaneous sexual desire, she may also enter it as sexually neutral, with arousal in response to a sexual stimulus. Emotional intimacy is an important part of the cycle, and emotional closeness and bonding with the partner may provide motivation for a woman to enter into the cycle again in the future.

In a Danish survey,12 more people of both sexes said the 2 linear models described their experiences better than the circular model, but more women than men endorsed the circular model, and more men than women endorsed a linear model.

In evaluating women who complain of low sexual desire, clinicians should be aware that women, particularly those who are postmenopausal, may not enter the cycle with spontaneous sexual desire, but instead may experience arousal in response to a sexual stimulus followed by desire—ie, responsive rather than spontaneous sexual desire. Sexual arousal may precede desire, especially for women in long-term relationships, and emotional intimacy is a key driver for sexual engagement in women.11

 

 

CATEGORIES OF SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION IN WOMEN

The World Health Organization defines sexual health as “a state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being in relation to sexuality” and “not merely the absence of disease, dysfunction, or infirmity.”13

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5),14 published in 2013, defines three categories of sexual dysfunction in women:

  • Female sexual interest and arousal disorder
  • Female sexual orgasmic disorder
  • Genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder.

To meet the diagnosis of any of these, symptoms must:

  • Persist for at least 6 months
  • Occur in 75% to 100% of sexual encounters
  • Be accompanied by personal distress
  • Not be related to another psychological or medical condition, medication or substance use, or relationship distress.

Sexual problems may be lifelong or acquired after a period of normal functioning, and may be situational (present only in certain situations) or generalized (present in all situations).

Female sexual interest and arousal disorder used to be 2 separate categories in earlier editions of the DSM. Proponents of merging the 2 categories in DSM-5 cited several reasons, including difficulty in clearly distinguishing desire from other motivations for sexual activity, the relatively low reporting of fantasy in women, the complexity of distinguishing spontaneous from responsive desire, and the common co-occurrence of decreased desire and arousal difficulties.15

Other experts, however, have recommended keeping the old, separate categories of hypoactive sexual desire disorder and arousal disorder.16 The recommendation to preserve the diagnostic category of hypoactive sexual desire disorder is based on robust observational and registry data, as well as the results of randomized controlled trials that used the old criteria for hypoactive sexual desire disorder to assess responses to pharmacologic treatment of this condition.17–19 In addition, this classification as a separate and distinct diagnosis is consistent with the nomenclature used in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision and was endorsed by the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine in 2015.16

HOW TO ASK ABOUT SEXUAL HEALTH

Assessment of sexual health concerns should be a part of a routine health examination, particularly after childbirth and other major medical, surgical, psychological, and life events. Women are unlikely to bring up sexual health concerns with their healthcare providers, but instead hope that their providers will bring up the topic.20

Barriers to the discussion include lack of provider education and training, patient and provider discomfort, perceived lack of time during an office visit, and lack of approved treatments.21,22 Additionally, older women are less likely than men to discuss sexual health with their providers.23 Other potential barriers to communication include negative societal attitudes about sexuality in women and in older individuals.24,25 To overcome these barriers:

Legitimize sexual health as an important health concern and normalize its discussion as part of a routine clinical health assessment. Prefacing a query about sexual health with a normalizing and universalizing statement can help: eg, “Many women going through menopause have concerns about their sexual health. Do you have any sexual problems or concerns?” Table 1 contains examples of questions to use for initial screening for sexual dysfunction.22,26

Flynn et al27 proposed a validated single-question checklist to screen for sexual dysfunction that is an efficient way to identify specific sexual concerns, guide selection of interventions, and facilitate patient-provider communication (Table 2).

Don’t judge and don’t make assumptions about sexuality and sexual practices.

Assure confidentiality.

Use simple, direct language that is appropriate for the patient’s age, ethnicity, culture, and level of health literacy.3

Take a thorough history (sexual and reproductive, medical-surgical, and psychosocial).

 

 

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

Perform a focused physical examination to evaluate for potential causes of pain (eg, infectious causes, vulvar dermatoses, pelvic floor muscle dysfunction). The examination is also an opportunity to teach the patient about anatomy and normal sexual function.

No standard laboratory tests or imaging studies are required for the assessment of sexual dysfunction.28

IT’S NOT JUST PHYSICAL

Evaluation and treatment of female sexual dysfunction is guided by the biopsychosocial model, with potential influences from the biological, psychological, sociocultural, and interpersonal realms (Table 3).29,30

Biological factors include pelvic surgery, cancer and its treatment, neurologic diseases, and vascular diseases. Medications, including antidepressants, narcotics, anticholinergics, antihistamines, antihypertensives, oral contraceptives, and antiestrogens may also adversely affect sexual response.26

Psychological factors include a history of sexual abuse or trauma, body image concerns, distraction, stress, anxiety, depression, and personality disorders.22

Sociocultural factors include lack of sex education, unrealistic expectations, cultural norms, and religious influences.

Relationship factors include conflict with one’s partner, lack of emotional intimacy, absence of a partner, and partner sexual dysfunction. While there appears to be a close link between sexual satisfaction and a woman’s relationship with her partner in correlational studies and in clinical experience, there has been little research about relationship factors and their contribution to desire and arousal concerns.31 Sexual dysfunction in one’s partner (eg, erectile dysfunction) has been shown to negatively affect the female partner’s sexual desire.32

GENERAL APPROACH TO TREATMENT

In treating sexual health problems in women, we address contributing factors identified during the initial assessment.

A multidisciplinary approach

As sexual dysfunction in women is often multifactorial, management of the problem is well suited to a multidisciplinary approach. The team of providers may include:

  • A medical provider (primary care provider, gynecologist, or sexual health specialist) to coordinate care and manage biological factors contributing to sexual dysfunction
  • A physical therapist with expertise in treating pelvic floor disorders
  • A psychologist to address psychological, relational, and sociocultural contributors to sexual dysfunction
  • A sex therapist (womenshealthapta.org, aasect.org) to facilitate treatment of tight, tender pelvic floor muscles through education and guidance about kinesthetic awareness, muscle relaxation, and dilator therapy.33

Even in the initial visit, the primary care provider can educate, reassure regarding normal sexual function, and treat conditions such as genitourinary syndrome of menopause and antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction. The PLISSIT model (Permission, Limited Information, Specific Suggestions, and Intensive Therapy) is a useful tool for initiating counseling about sexual health (Table 4).34

AGING VS MENOPAUSE

Aging can affect sexual function in both men and women. About 40% of women experience changes in sexual function around the menopausal transition, with common complaints being loss of sexual responsiveness and desire, sexual pain, decreased sexual activity, and partner sexual dysfunction.35 However, studies seem to show that while menopause results in hormonal changes that affect sexual function, other factors may have a greater impact.

The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation36 found vaginal and pelvic pain and decreased sexual desire were associated with the menopausal transition, but other sexual health outcomes (frequency of sexual activities, arousal, importance of sex, emotional satisfaction, or physical pleasure) were not. Physical and psychological health, marital status, and a change in relationship were all associated with differences in sexual health.

The Massachusetts Women’s Health Study II37 found a greater association between physical and mental health, relationship status, and smoking and women’s sexual functioning than menopausal status.

The Penn Ovarian Aging Study38 found that sexual function declined across the menopausal transition. Risk factors for sexual dysfunction included postmenopausal status, anxiety, and absence of a sexual partner.

The Melbourne Women’s Midlife Health Project39 also found that sexual function declined across the menopausal transition. Sexual dysfunction with distress was associated with relationship factors and depression.37

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause and its treatment

As the ovaries shut down during menopause, estradiol levels decrease. Nearly 50% of women experience symptoms related to genitourinary syndrome of menopause (formerly called atrophic vaginitis or vulvovaginal atrophy).40,41 These symptoms include vaginal dryness and discomfort or pain with sexual activity, but menopausal hormone loss can also result in reduced genital blood flow, decreased sensory perception, and decreased sexual responsiveness.22

Estrogen is the most effective treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, with low-dose vaginal preparations preferred over systemic ones for isolated vulvar and vaginal symptoms.40 While estrogen is effective for vaginal dryness and sexual pain associated with estrogen loss, replacing estrogen systemically has not been associated with improvements in sexual desire.42

 

 

DEPRESSION AND ANTIDEPRESSANT-INDUCED SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION

Depression increases the risk of sexual dysfunction, and vice versa.

A meta-analysis that included 12 studies involving almost 15,000 patients confirmed that depression increased the risk of sexual dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction increased the risk of depression.43 This interaction may be related to the overlap in affected neuro­transmitters and neuroendocrine systems.44

In the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression trial, Ishak et al45 found that patients treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) who experienced remission of depression had a lower prevalence of impaired sexual satisfaction and much greater improvements in sexual satisfaction than did those who remained depressed. The severity of depressive symptoms predicted impairment in sexual satisfaction, which in turn predicted poorer quality of life. The authors suggested that physicians encourage patients to remain on SSRI treatment, given that improvement in depressive symptoms is likely to improve sexual satisfaction.

Antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction

As many as 70% of patients taking an SSRI or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) experience antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, though this is difficult to estimate across studies of different medications due to differences in methods and because many patients only report it when directly asked about it.46

Treatment of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction includes not only optimal management of depression but reassessment of the antidepressant treatment. If using only nondrug treatments for the mood disorder is not feasible, switching to (or ideally, starting with) an antidepressant with fewer sexual side effects such as mirtazapine, vilazodone, or bupropion is an option.46

A drug holiday (suspending antidepressant treatment for 1 or 2 days) has been suggested as a means of treating antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, but this may result in poorer control of depressive symptoms and discontinuation symptoms, and it encourages medication noncompliance.46,47

Treatment with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (eg, sildenafil) has been studied in women with antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction, with modest results.48

A Cochrane review reported that treatment with bupropion shows promise at higher doses (300 mg daily).49

Exercise for 20 minutes 3 times weekly is associated with improvement in antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction when the exercise is performed immediately before sexual activity.50

LOW SEXUAL DESIRE

Hypoactive sexual desire disorder is defined as persistent or recurrent deficiency or absence of sexual fantasies and desire for sexual activity associated with marked distress and not due exclusively to a medication, substance abuse, or a medical condition.

Low or decreased sexual desire is the most commonly reported sexual health concern in women of all ages, with an unadjusted prevalence of 39.7%. When the criterion of personal distress is included, the prevalence is 8.9% in women ages 18 to 44, 12.3% in women ages 45 to 64, and 7.4% in women ages 65 and older.1

Multiple biological, psychological, and social factors may contribute to the problem. Identifying the ones that are present can help in planning treatment. A multifaceted approach may be appropriate.

Mindfulness and cognitive behavioral therapy for low sexual desire

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy is designed to improve awareness, focusing on and accepting the present moment, and directing attention away from and lessening self-criticism and evaluation of one’s sexual responsiveness.

Mindfulness-based therapy has been associated with improvements in sexual desire and associated distress.51 Similarly, the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for treating hypoactive sexual desire disorder is supported by 3 controlled trials, although concerns exist about the adequacy of these trials, and further study is needed.52

Androgen therapy in women

In randomized controlled trials in women with low sexual desire who were either naturally or surgically menopausal, sexual function improved with testosterone therapy that resulted in mostly supraphysiologic total testosterone levels (which may not reflect free testosterone levels) with or without concurrent estrogen treatment.53–57

Testosterone is not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in women, primarily because of the lack of long-term safety and efficacy data (ie, beyond 24 months). However, studies have shown no evidence of increased risk of endometrial cancer or cardiovascular disease with testosterone dosed to achieve physiologic premenopausal levels.58 Data on breast cancer risk are less clear, but observational studies over the last decade do not support an association with testosterone use in women.58 There is no clearly defined androgen deficiency syndrome in women, and androgen levels do not reliably correlate with symptoms.59

The Endocrine Society59 guidelines endorse the use of testosterone in postmenopausal women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. They say to aim for the midnormal premenopausal range and suggest discontinuing the drug if there is no response in 6 months. They recommend checking testosterone levels at baseline, after 3 to 6 weeks of therapy, and every 6 months to monitor for excessive use, to avoid supraphysiologic dosing and to evaluate for signs of androgen excess (eg, acne, hair growth). The use of products formulated for men or those formulated by pharmacies is discouraged; however, no FDA-approved products are currently available for use in women in the United States.

Flibanserin

A postsynaptic serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist and 5-HT2A receptor agonist, flibanserin was approved by the FDA in 2015 for treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women. Its mechanism of action is likely through an effect on neurotransmitters that suppresses serotonin (which has sexually inhibitory effects) and promotes dopamine and norepinephrine (which have excitatory effects).60

The efficacy of flibanserin has been demonstrated in 3 randomized controlled trials, with significant increases in the number of sexually satisfying events and in sexual desire scores and a decrease in distress associated with low sexual desire.17­–19 While the increase in sexually satisfying events was modest (about 1 extra event per month), some have suggested that the frequency of sexual activity may not be the best measure of sexual function in women.61 Further, responders to this drug showed a return to near-normal premenopausal frequencies of sexual activity in a separate analysis.61

The drug is generally well tolerated, with common adverse effects being somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue.18,19 Flibanserin has been associated with orthostatic hypotension with alcohol use and carries a boxed warning highlighting this potential interaction.62 Use of this drug is contraindicated in women who drink alcohol or take medications that are moderate or strong inhibitors of CYP-3A4 (eg, some antiretroviral drugs, antihypertensive drugs, antibiotics, and fluconazole, which can increase systemic exposure to flibanserin and potential side effects), and in those with liver impairment.

 

 

SEXUAL AROUSAL DISORDERS

Female sexual arousal disorder is the persistent or recurrent inability to attain or maintain an adequate lubrication-swelling response of sexual excitement. Sexual arousal results from a complex interaction between genital response, central nervous system activity, and information processing of the sexual stimulus. Difficulty with sexual arousal can result from neurovascular or neuroendocrine dysfunction or impaired central nervous system processing.

Women may experience a mismatch between subjective and objective genital arousal. A subjective report of decreased genital arousal may not be confirmed with measurement of vaginal pulse amplitude by photoplethysmography.63 Even in postmenopausal women, in the absence of significant neurovascular or neuroendocrine dysfunction, it is likely that either contextual or relational variables resulting in inadequate sexual stimulation or cognitive inhibition are more important factors contributing to difficulty with sexual arousal.63

Although there are no standard recommendations for evaluation of arousal disorders and advanced testing is often unnecessary, nerve function can be assessed with genital sensory testing utilizing thermal and vibratory threshholds64; vaginal blood flow can be assessed with vaginal photoplethysmography63; and imaging of the spine and pelvis can help to rule out neurovascular pathology.

Treatment of arousal disorders

As with other forms of female sexual dysfunction, treatment of arousal disorders includes addressing contributing factors.

Although there are few data from randomized controlled trials, psychological treatments such as sensate focus exercises and masturbation training have been suggested, centered on women becoming more self-focused and assertive.31 Sensate focus exercises are a series of graded, nondemand, sensual touching exercises aimed at reducing anxiety and avoidance of sexual activity, and improving sexual communication and intimacy by the gradual reintroduction of sexual activity.65 More recently, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy has been associated with improvements in sexual arousal as well as other parameters of sexual function.51

Currently, no pharmacologic treatments are recommended for arousal disorders because of a lack of evidence of efficacy and because of adverse effects.31

ORGASMIC DISORDER

Female orgasmic disorder is the marked delay, marked infrequency, or absence of orgasm, or markedly reduced intensity of orgasm.

Important considerations in evaluating orgasm disorders include psychosocial factors (eg, lack of sex education, negative feelings about sex, religiosity), psychological factors (eg, anxiety, depression, body image concerns), relational factors (eg, communication issues, lack of emotional intimacy, partner sexual dysfunction), adverse childhood or adult experiences (eg, physical, sexual, or emotional or verbal abuse), medical history (pelvic surgery, neurologic, or vascular disease) and medications (eg, SSRIs, SNRIs, and antipsychotic medications).66

Treatment of orgasmic disorder

Involving the partner in treatment is important, particularly if the difficulty with orgasm is acquired and only occurs with sex with a partner. Using the PLISSIT model to provide targeted, office-based interventions can be helpful.

Behavioral therapies such as directed masturbation, sensate focus exercises, or a combination of these have been shown to be effective, as has coital alignment during intercourse (positioning of male partner with his pelvis above the pubic bone of his partner to maximize clitoral stimulation with penile penetration).66

Hormonal therapy may be useful in postmenopausal women. However, there are no data on it for women whose primary complaint is female orgasmic disorder, and further study is needed.66

SEXUAL PAIN DISORDERS

The DSM-5 describes genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder as fear or anxiety, marked tightening or tensing of abdominal and pelvic muscles, or actual pain with vaginal penetration that is recurrent or persistent for a minimum of 6 months.14 Pain may occur with initial penetration, with deeper thrusting, or both.

Although the DSM-5 definition focuses on pain with penetration, it is important to recognize and ask about noncoital sexual pain. Women may also present with persistent vulvar pain or pain at the vulvar vestibule with provocation, (eg, sexual activity, tampon insertion, sitting), also known as provoked vestibulodynia.

Assessment of vaginal and vulvar pain includes a directed history and physical examination aimed at identifying potential etiologies or contributing factors, including infectious, inflammatory, neoplastic, neurologic, traumatic, iatrogenic, or factors related to hormonal deficiency.67

Treatment of sexual pain

Removal of offending agents is a first step. This includes a thorough review of vulvar and vaginal hygiene practices and emphasis on avoiding the use of any product containing potential irritants (eg, soaps or detergents containing perfumes or dyes) and using lubricants and moisturizers without gimmicks (no warming or tingling agents or flavors). Oral contraceptives have been associated with vestibulodynia, and women in whom the sexual pain started when they started an oral contraceptive may benefit from switching to an alternate form of contraception.68

Dysfunction of pelvic floor muscles may result in sexual pain and may be a primary problem or a secondary complication related to other issues such as symptomatic genitourinary syndrome of menopause. The symptoms of nonrelaxing pelvic floor dysfunction (also known as hypertonic pelvic floor dysfunction or pelvic floor tension myalgia) include pain in the pelvis with sexual activity that may linger for hours or even days, and may also include bowel and bladder dysfunction and low back pain or hip pain radiating to the thighs or groin.33 Physical therapy under the care of a physical therapist with expertise in the management of pelvic floor disorders is the cornerstone of treatment for this condition.33

Treatment of the genital and urinary symptoms related to loss of estrogen after menopause (genitourinary syndrome of menopause) includes the use of vaginal lubricants with sexual activity and vaginal moisturizers on a regular basis (2 to 5 times per week).40 Low-dose vaginal estrogen creams, rings, or tablets and the oral selective estrogen receptor antagonist ospemifene are recommended for moderate to severe symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause.40 Intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone was recently approved by the FDA for treatment of dyspareunia associated with menopause.69 Topical lidocaine applied to the introitus before sexual activity has been found to be effective for reducing sexual pain in women with breast cancer, and when used in combination with vaginal lubricants and moisturizers is a practical option for women, particularly those unable to use estrogen-based therapies.70

References
  1. Shifren JL, Monz BU, Russo PA, Segreti A, Johannes CB. Sexual problems and distress in United States women: prevalence and correlates. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:970–978.
  2. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA 1999; 281:537–544.
  3. Sadovsky R, Nusbaum M. Sexual health inquiry and support is a primary care priority. J Sex Med 2006; 3:3–11.
  4. Alvisi S, Baldassarre M, Lambertini M, et al. Sexuality and psychopathological aspects in premenopausal women with metabolic syndrome. J Sex Med 2014; 11:2020–2028.
  5. Bach LE, Mortimer JA, VandeWeerd C, Corvin J. The association of physical and mental health with sexual activity in older adults in a retirement community. J Sex Med 2013; 10:2671–2678.
  6. Esposito K, Ciotola M, Giugliano F, et al. Mediterranean diet improves sexual function in women with the metabolic syndrome. Int J Impot Res 2007; 19:486–491.
  7. Prairie BA, Scheier MF, Matthews KA, Chang CC, Hess R. A higher sense of purpose in life is associated with sexual enjoyment in midlife women. Menopause 2011; 18:839–844.
  8. Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual response. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company; 1966.
  9. Kaplan HS. The new sex therapy. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel; 1974.
  10. Robinson PA. The modernization of sex: Havelock Ellis, Alfred Kinsey, William Masters, and Virginia Johnson. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1976.
  11. Basson R. The female sexual response: a different model. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26:51–65.
  12. Giraldi A, Kristensen E, Sand M. Endorsement of models describing sexual response of men and women with a sexual partner: an online survey in a population sample of Danish adults ages 20–65 years. J Sex Med 2015; 12:116–128.
  13. World Health Organization. Defining sexual health. Report of a technical consultation on sexual health, 28–31 January 2002, Geneva. Geneva; 2006.
  14. American Psychiatric Association (APA). DSM-5: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2013.
  15. Brotto LA. The DSM diagnostic criteria for hypoactive sexual desire disorder in women. Arch Sex Behav 2010; 39:221–239.
  16. McCabe MP, Sharlip ID, Atalla E, et al. Definitions of sexual dysfunctions in women and men: a consensus statement from the Fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine 2015. J Sex Med 2016; 13:135–143.
  17. Derogatis LR, Komer L, Katz M, et al; VIOLET Trial Investigators. Treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women: efficacy of flibanserin in the VIOLET study. J Sex Med 2012; 9:1074–1085.
  18. Katz M, DeRogatis LR, Ackerman R, et al; BEGONIA trial investigators. Efficacy of flibanserin in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder: results from the BEGONIA trial. J Sex Med 2013; 10:1807–1815.
  19. Thorp J, Simon J, Dattani D, et al; DAISY trial investigators. Treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women: efficacy of flibanserin in the DAISY study. J Sex Med 2012; 9:793–804.
  20. Berman L, Berman J, Felder S, et al. Seeking help for sexual function complaints: what gynecologists need to know about the female patient's experience. Fertil Steril 2003; 79:572–576.
  21. Kingsberg SA. Taking a sexual history. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2006; 33:535–547.
  22. Kingsberg SA, Rezaee RL. Hypoactive sexual desire in women. Menopause 2013; 20:1284–1300.
  23. Lindau ST, Schumm LP, Laumann EO, Levinson W, O’Muircheartaigh CA, Waite LJ. A study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:762–774.
  24. Gott M, Hinchliff S, Galena E. General practitioner attitudes to discussing sexual health issues with older people. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58:2093–2103.
  25. Lindau ST, Leitsch SA, Lundberg KL, Jerome J. Older women's attitudes, behavior, and communication about sex and HIV: a community-based study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2006; 15:747–753.
  26. Faubion SS, Rullo JE. Sexual dysfunction in women: a practical approach. Am Fam Physician 2015; 92:281–288.
  27. Flynn KE, Lindau ST, Lin L, et al. Development and validation of a single-item screener for self-reporting sexual problems in US adults. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30:1468–1475.
  28. Latif EZ, Diamond MP. Arriving at the diagnosis of female sexual dysfunction. Fertil Steril 2013; 100:898–904.
  29. Althof SE, Leiblum SR, Chevret-Measson M, et al. Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction. J Sex Med 2005; 2:793–800.
  30. Rosen RC, Barsky JL. Normal sexual response in women. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2006; 33:515–526.
  31. Brotto LA, Bitzer J, Laan E, Leiblum S, Luria M. Women's sexual desire and arousal disorders. J Sex Med 2010; 7:586–614.
  32. Rubio-Aurioles E, Kim ED, Rosen RC, et al. Impact on erectile function and sexual quality of life of couples: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of tadalafil taken once daily. J Sex Med 2009; 6:1314–1323.
  33. Faubion SS, Shuster LT, Bharucha AE. Recognition and management of nonrelaxing pelvic floor dysfunction. Mayo Clin Proc 2012; 87:187–193.
  34. Annon JS. The PLISSIT model: a proposed conceptual scheme for the behavioral treatment of sexual problems. J Sex Educ Ther 1976; 2:1–15.
  35. Sarrel PM. Sexuality and menopause. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75(suppl 4):26S–30S; discussion 31S–35S.
  36. Avis NE, Brockwell S, Randolph JF, Jr, et al. Longitudinal changes in sexual functioning as women transition through menopause: results from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. Menopause 2009; 16:442–452.
  37. Avis NE, Stellato R, Crawford S, Johannes C, Longcope C. Is there an association between menopause status and sexual functioning? Menopause 2000; 7:297–309.
  38. Gracia CR, Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Lin H, Mogul M. Hormones and sexuality during transition to menopause. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:831–840.
  39. Dennerstein L, Guthrie JR, Hayes RD, DeRogatis LR, Lehert P. Sexual function, dysfunction, and sexual distress in a prospective, population-based sample of mid-aged, Australian-born women. J Sex Med 2008; 5:2291–2299.
  40. Management of symptomatic vulvovaginal atrophy: 2013 position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2013; 20:888–902.
  41. Mac Bride MB, Rhodes DJ, Shuster LT. Vulvovaginal atrophy. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85:87–94.
  42. Nastri CO, Lara LA, Ferriani RA, Rosa ESAC, Figueiredo JB, Martins WP. Hormone therapy for sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 6:CD009672.
  43. Atlantis E, Sullivan T. Bidirectional association between depression and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med 2012; 9:1497–1507.
  44. Clayton AH, Maserejian NN, Connor MK, Huang L, Heiman JR, Rosen RC. Depression in premenopausal women with HSDD: baseline findings from the HSDD Registry for Women. Psychosom Med 2012; 74:305–311.
  45. Ishak WW, Christensen S, Sayer G, et al. Sexual satisfaction and quality of life in major depressive disorder before and after treatment with citalopram in the STAR*D study. J Clin Psychiatry 2013; 74:256–261.
  46. Clayton AH, Croft HA, Handiwala L. Antidepressants and sexual dysfunction: mechanisms and clinical implications. Postgrad Med 2014; 126:91–99.
  47. Rothschild AJ. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-induced sexual dysfunction: efficacy of a drug holiday. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:1514–1516.
  48. Nurnberg HG, Hensley PL, Heiman JR, Croft HA, Debattista C, Paine S. Sildenafil treatment of women with antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008; 300:395–404.
  49. Taylor MJ, Rudkin L, Bullemor-Day P, Lubin J, Chukwujekwu C, Hawton K. Strategies for managing sexual dysfunction induced by antidepressant medication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 5:CD003382.
  50. Lorenz TA, Meston CM. Exercise improves sexual function in women taking antidepressants: results from a randomized crossover trial. Depress Anxiety 2014; 31:188–195.
  51. Brotto LA, Basson R. Group mindfulness-based therapy significantly improves sexual desire in women. Behav Res Ther 2014; 5743–5754.
  52. Pyke RE, Clayton AH. Psychological treatment trials for hypoactive sexual desire disorder: a sexual medicine critique and perspective. J Sex Med 2015; 12:2451–2458.
  53. Cappelletti M, Wallen K. Increasing women's sexual desire: the comparative effectiveness of estrogens and androgens. Horm Behav 2016; 78:178–193.
  54. Davis SR, Moreau M, Kroll R, et al. Testosterone for low libido in postmenopausal women not taking estrogen. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:2005–2017.
  55. Davis SR, van der Mooren MJ, van Lunsen RH, et al. Efficacy and safety of a testosterone patch for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in surgically menopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Menopause 2006; 13:387–396.
  56. Panay N, Al-Azzawi F, Bouchard C, et al. Testosterone treatment of HSDD in naturally menopausal women: the ADORE study. Climacteric 2010; 13:121–131.
  57. Somboonporn W, Davis S, Seif MW, Bell R. Testosterone for peri- and postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 4:CD004509.
  58. Davis SR. Cardiovascular and cancer safety of testosterone in women. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2011; 18:198–203.
  59. Wierman ME, Arlt W, Basson R, et al. Androgen therapy in women: a reappraisal: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 99:3489–3510.
  60. Stahl SM, Sommer B, Allers KA. Multifunctional pharmacology of flibanserin: possible mechanism of therapeutic action in hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Med 2011; 8:15–27.
  61. Simon JA, Goldstein I, Kim N, Freedman M, Parish S. Flibanserin approval: facts or feelings? Sex Med 2016; 4:e69–e70.
  62. Joffe HV, Chang C, Sewell C, et al. FDA approval of flibanserin—treating hypoactive sexual desire disorder. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:101–104.
  63. van Lunsen RH, Laan E. Genital vascular responsiveness and sexual feelings in midlife women: psychophysiologic, brain, and genital imaging studies. Menopause 2004; 11:741–748.
  64. Beco J, Seidel L, Albert A. Normative values of skin temperature and thermal sensory thresholds in the pudendal nerve territory. Neurourol Urodyn 2015; 34:571–577.
  65. Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual inadequacy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company; 1970.
  66. Laan E, Rellini AH, Barnes T; International Society for Sexual Medicine. Standard operating procedures for female orgasmic disorder: consensus of the International Society for Sexual Medicine. J Sex Med 2013; 10:74–82.
  67. Bornstein J, Goldstein A, Coady D. Consensus terminology and classification of persistent vulvar pain. Vulvar pain/Vulvodynia Nomenclature Consensus Conference. Annapolis, MD; 2015.
  68. Burrows LJ, Goldstein AT. The treatment of vestibulodynia with topical estradiol and testosterone. Sex Med 2013; 1:30–33.
  69. Labrie F. Efficacy of intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on moderate to severe dyspareunia and vaginal dryness, symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy, and of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Manopause 2016; 23:243–256.
  70. Goetsch MF, Lim JY, Caughey AB. A practical solution for dyspareunia in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:3394–3400.
References
  1. Shifren JL, Monz BU, Russo PA, Segreti A, Johannes CB. Sexual problems and distress in United States women: prevalence and correlates. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:970–978.
  2. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA 1999; 281:537–544.
  3. Sadovsky R, Nusbaum M. Sexual health inquiry and support is a primary care priority. J Sex Med 2006; 3:3–11.
  4. Alvisi S, Baldassarre M, Lambertini M, et al. Sexuality and psychopathological aspects in premenopausal women with metabolic syndrome. J Sex Med 2014; 11:2020–2028.
  5. Bach LE, Mortimer JA, VandeWeerd C, Corvin J. The association of physical and mental health with sexual activity in older adults in a retirement community. J Sex Med 2013; 10:2671–2678.
  6. Esposito K, Ciotola M, Giugliano F, et al. Mediterranean diet improves sexual function in women with the metabolic syndrome. Int J Impot Res 2007; 19:486–491.
  7. Prairie BA, Scheier MF, Matthews KA, Chang CC, Hess R. A higher sense of purpose in life is associated with sexual enjoyment in midlife women. Menopause 2011; 18:839–844.
  8. Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual response. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company; 1966.
  9. Kaplan HS. The new sex therapy. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel; 1974.
  10. Robinson PA. The modernization of sex: Havelock Ellis, Alfred Kinsey, William Masters, and Virginia Johnson. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1976.
  11. Basson R. The female sexual response: a different model. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26:51–65.
  12. Giraldi A, Kristensen E, Sand M. Endorsement of models describing sexual response of men and women with a sexual partner: an online survey in a population sample of Danish adults ages 20–65 years. J Sex Med 2015; 12:116–128.
  13. World Health Organization. Defining sexual health. Report of a technical consultation on sexual health, 28–31 January 2002, Geneva. Geneva; 2006.
  14. American Psychiatric Association (APA). DSM-5: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2013.
  15. Brotto LA. The DSM diagnostic criteria for hypoactive sexual desire disorder in women. Arch Sex Behav 2010; 39:221–239.
  16. McCabe MP, Sharlip ID, Atalla E, et al. Definitions of sexual dysfunctions in women and men: a consensus statement from the Fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine 2015. J Sex Med 2016; 13:135–143.
  17. Derogatis LR, Komer L, Katz M, et al; VIOLET Trial Investigators. Treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women: efficacy of flibanserin in the VIOLET study. J Sex Med 2012; 9:1074–1085.
  18. Katz M, DeRogatis LR, Ackerman R, et al; BEGONIA trial investigators. Efficacy of flibanserin in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder: results from the BEGONIA trial. J Sex Med 2013; 10:1807–1815.
  19. Thorp J, Simon J, Dattani D, et al; DAISY trial investigators. Treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women: efficacy of flibanserin in the DAISY study. J Sex Med 2012; 9:793–804.
  20. Berman L, Berman J, Felder S, et al. Seeking help for sexual function complaints: what gynecologists need to know about the female patient's experience. Fertil Steril 2003; 79:572–576.
  21. Kingsberg SA. Taking a sexual history. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2006; 33:535–547.
  22. Kingsberg SA, Rezaee RL. Hypoactive sexual desire in women. Menopause 2013; 20:1284–1300.
  23. Lindau ST, Schumm LP, Laumann EO, Levinson W, O’Muircheartaigh CA, Waite LJ. A study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:762–774.
  24. Gott M, Hinchliff S, Galena E. General practitioner attitudes to discussing sexual health issues with older people. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58:2093–2103.
  25. Lindau ST, Leitsch SA, Lundberg KL, Jerome J. Older women's attitudes, behavior, and communication about sex and HIV: a community-based study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2006; 15:747–753.
  26. Faubion SS, Rullo JE. Sexual dysfunction in women: a practical approach. Am Fam Physician 2015; 92:281–288.
  27. Flynn KE, Lindau ST, Lin L, et al. Development and validation of a single-item screener for self-reporting sexual problems in US adults. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30:1468–1475.
  28. Latif EZ, Diamond MP. Arriving at the diagnosis of female sexual dysfunction. Fertil Steril 2013; 100:898–904.
  29. Althof SE, Leiblum SR, Chevret-Measson M, et al. Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction. J Sex Med 2005; 2:793–800.
  30. Rosen RC, Barsky JL. Normal sexual response in women. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2006; 33:515–526.
  31. Brotto LA, Bitzer J, Laan E, Leiblum S, Luria M. Women's sexual desire and arousal disorders. J Sex Med 2010; 7:586–614.
  32. Rubio-Aurioles E, Kim ED, Rosen RC, et al. Impact on erectile function and sexual quality of life of couples: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of tadalafil taken once daily. J Sex Med 2009; 6:1314–1323.
  33. Faubion SS, Shuster LT, Bharucha AE. Recognition and management of nonrelaxing pelvic floor dysfunction. Mayo Clin Proc 2012; 87:187–193.
  34. Annon JS. The PLISSIT model: a proposed conceptual scheme for the behavioral treatment of sexual problems. J Sex Educ Ther 1976; 2:1–15.
  35. Sarrel PM. Sexuality and menopause. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75(suppl 4):26S–30S; discussion 31S–35S.
  36. Avis NE, Brockwell S, Randolph JF, Jr, et al. Longitudinal changes in sexual functioning as women transition through menopause: results from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. Menopause 2009; 16:442–452.
  37. Avis NE, Stellato R, Crawford S, Johannes C, Longcope C. Is there an association between menopause status and sexual functioning? Menopause 2000; 7:297–309.
  38. Gracia CR, Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Lin H, Mogul M. Hormones and sexuality during transition to menopause. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:831–840.
  39. Dennerstein L, Guthrie JR, Hayes RD, DeRogatis LR, Lehert P. Sexual function, dysfunction, and sexual distress in a prospective, population-based sample of mid-aged, Australian-born women. J Sex Med 2008; 5:2291–2299.
  40. Management of symptomatic vulvovaginal atrophy: 2013 position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2013; 20:888–902.
  41. Mac Bride MB, Rhodes DJ, Shuster LT. Vulvovaginal atrophy. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85:87–94.
  42. Nastri CO, Lara LA, Ferriani RA, Rosa ESAC, Figueiredo JB, Martins WP. Hormone therapy for sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 6:CD009672.
  43. Atlantis E, Sullivan T. Bidirectional association between depression and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med 2012; 9:1497–1507.
  44. Clayton AH, Maserejian NN, Connor MK, Huang L, Heiman JR, Rosen RC. Depression in premenopausal women with HSDD: baseline findings from the HSDD Registry for Women. Psychosom Med 2012; 74:305–311.
  45. Ishak WW, Christensen S, Sayer G, et al. Sexual satisfaction and quality of life in major depressive disorder before and after treatment with citalopram in the STAR*D study. J Clin Psychiatry 2013; 74:256–261.
  46. Clayton AH, Croft HA, Handiwala L. Antidepressants and sexual dysfunction: mechanisms and clinical implications. Postgrad Med 2014; 126:91–99.
  47. Rothschild AJ. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-induced sexual dysfunction: efficacy of a drug holiday. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:1514–1516.
  48. Nurnberg HG, Hensley PL, Heiman JR, Croft HA, Debattista C, Paine S. Sildenafil treatment of women with antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008; 300:395–404.
  49. Taylor MJ, Rudkin L, Bullemor-Day P, Lubin J, Chukwujekwu C, Hawton K. Strategies for managing sexual dysfunction induced by antidepressant medication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 5:CD003382.
  50. Lorenz TA, Meston CM. Exercise improves sexual function in women taking antidepressants: results from a randomized crossover trial. Depress Anxiety 2014; 31:188–195.
  51. Brotto LA, Basson R. Group mindfulness-based therapy significantly improves sexual desire in women. Behav Res Ther 2014; 5743–5754.
  52. Pyke RE, Clayton AH. Psychological treatment trials for hypoactive sexual desire disorder: a sexual medicine critique and perspective. J Sex Med 2015; 12:2451–2458.
  53. Cappelletti M, Wallen K. Increasing women's sexual desire: the comparative effectiveness of estrogens and androgens. Horm Behav 2016; 78:178–193.
  54. Davis SR, Moreau M, Kroll R, et al. Testosterone for low libido in postmenopausal women not taking estrogen. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:2005–2017.
  55. Davis SR, van der Mooren MJ, van Lunsen RH, et al. Efficacy and safety of a testosterone patch for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in surgically menopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Menopause 2006; 13:387–396.
  56. Panay N, Al-Azzawi F, Bouchard C, et al. Testosterone treatment of HSDD in naturally menopausal women: the ADORE study. Climacteric 2010; 13:121–131.
  57. Somboonporn W, Davis S, Seif MW, Bell R. Testosterone for peri- and postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 4:CD004509.
  58. Davis SR. Cardiovascular and cancer safety of testosterone in women. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2011; 18:198–203.
  59. Wierman ME, Arlt W, Basson R, et al. Androgen therapy in women: a reappraisal: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 99:3489–3510.
  60. Stahl SM, Sommer B, Allers KA. Multifunctional pharmacology of flibanserin: possible mechanism of therapeutic action in hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Med 2011; 8:15–27.
  61. Simon JA, Goldstein I, Kim N, Freedman M, Parish S. Flibanserin approval: facts or feelings? Sex Med 2016; 4:e69–e70.
  62. Joffe HV, Chang C, Sewell C, et al. FDA approval of flibanserin—treating hypoactive sexual desire disorder. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:101–104.
  63. van Lunsen RH, Laan E. Genital vascular responsiveness and sexual feelings in midlife women: psychophysiologic, brain, and genital imaging studies. Menopause 2004; 11:741–748.
  64. Beco J, Seidel L, Albert A. Normative values of skin temperature and thermal sensory thresholds in the pudendal nerve territory. Neurourol Urodyn 2015; 34:571–577.
  65. Masters WH, Johnson VE. Human sexual inadequacy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company; 1970.
  66. Laan E, Rellini AH, Barnes T; International Society for Sexual Medicine. Standard operating procedures for female orgasmic disorder: consensus of the International Society for Sexual Medicine. J Sex Med 2013; 10:74–82.
  67. Bornstein J, Goldstein A, Coady D. Consensus terminology and classification of persistent vulvar pain. Vulvar pain/Vulvodynia Nomenclature Consensus Conference. Annapolis, MD; 2015.
  68. Burrows LJ, Goldstein AT. The treatment of vestibulodynia with topical estradiol and testosterone. Sex Med 2013; 1:30–33.
  69. Labrie F. Efficacy of intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on moderate to severe dyspareunia and vaginal dryness, symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy, and of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Manopause 2016; 23:243–256.
  70. Goetsch MF, Lim JY, Caughey AB. A practical solution for dyspareunia in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:3394–3400.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Page Number
367-376
Page Number
367-376
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Sexual dysfunction in women: Can we talk about it?
Display Headline
Sexual dysfunction in women: Can we talk about it?
Legacy Keywords
sexual dysfunction, desire, arousal, orgasm, intimacy, drive, female sexual interest and arousal disorder, female sexual orgasmic disorder, genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder, sex, Stephanie Faubion, Sharon Parish
Legacy Keywords
sexual dysfunction, desire, arousal, orgasm, intimacy, drive, female sexual interest and arousal disorder, female sexual orgasmic disorder, genitopelvic pain/penetration disorder, sex, Stephanie Faubion, Sharon Parish
Sections
Inside the Article

KEY POINTS

  • Sexual dysfunction in women is complex and often multifactorial and has a significant impact on quality of life.
  • Primary care providers can assess the problem, provide education on sexual health and normal sexual functioning, and manage biological factors affecting sexual function, including genitourinary syndrome of menopause in postmenopausal women and antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction.
  • Treatment may require a multidisciplinary team, including a psychologist or sex therapist to manage the psychological, sociocultural, and relational factors affecting a woman’s sexual health, and a physical therapist to manage pelvic floor disorders.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

A burning sensation in the mouth

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
A burning sensation in the mouth

A 38-year-old man presented with a burning sensation in the mouth for the previous 2 months. He was currently a smoker. He had no history of any dental procedure or new drug intake.

Figure 1. White reticular striated lesion on the left buccal mucosa.

On examination, his oral hygiene was poor, and a whitish, striated lesion 3-by-3 cm was noted on the left buccal mucosa (Figure 1). Based on the appearance and pattern of the lesion, a clinical diagnosis of reticular-type oral lichen planus was made. The patient was advised to stop smoking. A thorough scaling of the teeth was done, and he was started on topical triamcinolone acetonide ointment for 2 weeks. At a 4-month follow-up visit, the symptoms had resolved.

ORAL LICHEN PLANUS

Oral lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the mucous membrane of the oral cavity. It is a T-cell mediated autoimmune disease in which the cytotoxic CD8+ T cells trigger apoptosis of the basal cells of the oral epithelium.1 No risk factors have been identified, but the condition has been associated with smoking, chewing tobacco, dental materials such as amalgam, celiac disease, ulcerative colitis, stress, diabetes, and use of systemic drugs such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and beta-blockers.1,2 Women are affected more than men in a ratio of 1.4:1, frequently in the fourth decade.

The clinical forms are reticular, papular, plaque-like, erosive, atrophic, and bullous types.

Clinical presentation

The lesions are usually asymptomatic. Symptoms such as a burning sensation are associated mainly with the erosive and atrophic types,1–3 although in rare cases it occurs with the reticular form, as in our patient. Erosive and atrophic types carry a 1% to 2% risk of malignant transformation and require close follow-up.3

Oral mucosal lesions present alone or, in up to 15% to 20% of cases, with concomitant skin lesions.1,2 The most common oral sites are the buccal mucosa, tongue, and gingiva. Skin lesions present as violaceous flat-topped papules on the ankles, wrists, and genitalia.

DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT

The differential diagnosis of oral lichen planus includes cheek-frictional keratosis, lichenoid reaction, leukoplakia, pemphigus, oral candidiasis, and chronic ulcerative stomatitis.1,2

The diagnosis is clinical, but biopsy is indicated in the erosive or atrophic type and when a malignant lesion is suspected, especially in patients with a history of smoking and tobacco chewing. Oral lichen planus may be associated with oral candidiasis, especially in patients with poor oral hygiene and smoking, and this needs to be addressed before a diagnosis of oral lichen planus can be made.

The mainstay of management is oral or topical corticosteroids.4 Calcineurin inhibitors, retinoids, dapsone, hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate mofetil, and enoxaparin have also been shown to be effective and are used when corticosteroids alone are ineffective or contraindicated.4

References
  1. Alrashdan MS, Cirillo N, McCullough M. Oral lichen planus: a literature review and update. Arch Dermatol Res 2016; 308:539–551.
  2. Nogueira PA, Carneiro S, Ramos-e-Silva M. Oral lichen planus: an update on its pathogenesis. Int J Dermatol 2015; 54:1005–1010.
  3. Fitzpatrick SG, Hirsch SA, Gordon SC. The malignant transformation of oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145:45–56.
  4. Lodi G, Carrozzo M, Furness S, Thongprasom K. Interventions for treating oral lichen planus: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2012; 166:938–947.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Satvinder Singh Bakshi, MS, DNB
Assistant Professor, Department of ENT and Head & Neck Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College And Research Institute, Pillaiyarkuppam, Pondicherry, India

Address: Satvinder Singh Bakshi, MS, DNB, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, House B2, Shree Pushpa Complex, 15th Bharathi Street, Ananda Nagar, Piliaiyarkuppam, Pondicherrry 605009 India; saty.bakshi@gmail.com

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
344-345
Legacy Keywords
oral pain, mouth, oral lichen planus, oral hygiene, smoking, Satvinder Singh Bakshi
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Satvinder Singh Bakshi, MS, DNB
Assistant Professor, Department of ENT and Head & Neck Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College And Research Institute, Pillaiyarkuppam, Pondicherry, India

Address: Satvinder Singh Bakshi, MS, DNB, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, House B2, Shree Pushpa Complex, 15th Bharathi Street, Ananda Nagar, Piliaiyarkuppam, Pondicherrry 605009 India; saty.bakshi@gmail.com

Author and Disclosure Information

Satvinder Singh Bakshi, MS, DNB
Assistant Professor, Department of ENT and Head & Neck Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College And Research Institute, Pillaiyarkuppam, Pondicherry, India

Address: Satvinder Singh Bakshi, MS, DNB, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, House B2, Shree Pushpa Complex, 15th Bharathi Street, Ananda Nagar, Piliaiyarkuppam, Pondicherrry 605009 India; saty.bakshi@gmail.com

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

A 38-year-old man presented with a burning sensation in the mouth for the previous 2 months. He was currently a smoker. He had no history of any dental procedure or new drug intake.

Figure 1. White reticular striated lesion on the left buccal mucosa.

On examination, his oral hygiene was poor, and a whitish, striated lesion 3-by-3 cm was noted on the left buccal mucosa (Figure 1). Based on the appearance and pattern of the lesion, a clinical diagnosis of reticular-type oral lichen planus was made. The patient was advised to stop smoking. A thorough scaling of the teeth was done, and he was started on topical triamcinolone acetonide ointment for 2 weeks. At a 4-month follow-up visit, the symptoms had resolved.

ORAL LICHEN PLANUS

Oral lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the mucous membrane of the oral cavity. It is a T-cell mediated autoimmune disease in which the cytotoxic CD8+ T cells trigger apoptosis of the basal cells of the oral epithelium.1 No risk factors have been identified, but the condition has been associated with smoking, chewing tobacco, dental materials such as amalgam, celiac disease, ulcerative colitis, stress, diabetes, and use of systemic drugs such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and beta-blockers.1,2 Women are affected more than men in a ratio of 1.4:1, frequently in the fourth decade.

The clinical forms are reticular, papular, plaque-like, erosive, atrophic, and bullous types.

Clinical presentation

The lesions are usually asymptomatic. Symptoms such as a burning sensation are associated mainly with the erosive and atrophic types,1–3 although in rare cases it occurs with the reticular form, as in our patient. Erosive and atrophic types carry a 1% to 2% risk of malignant transformation and require close follow-up.3

Oral mucosal lesions present alone or, in up to 15% to 20% of cases, with concomitant skin lesions.1,2 The most common oral sites are the buccal mucosa, tongue, and gingiva. Skin lesions present as violaceous flat-topped papules on the ankles, wrists, and genitalia.

DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT

The differential diagnosis of oral lichen planus includes cheek-frictional keratosis, lichenoid reaction, leukoplakia, pemphigus, oral candidiasis, and chronic ulcerative stomatitis.1,2

The diagnosis is clinical, but biopsy is indicated in the erosive or atrophic type and when a malignant lesion is suspected, especially in patients with a history of smoking and tobacco chewing. Oral lichen planus may be associated with oral candidiasis, especially in patients with poor oral hygiene and smoking, and this needs to be addressed before a diagnosis of oral lichen planus can be made.

The mainstay of management is oral or topical corticosteroids.4 Calcineurin inhibitors, retinoids, dapsone, hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate mofetil, and enoxaparin have also been shown to be effective and are used when corticosteroids alone are ineffective or contraindicated.4

A 38-year-old man presented with a burning sensation in the mouth for the previous 2 months. He was currently a smoker. He had no history of any dental procedure or new drug intake.

Figure 1. White reticular striated lesion on the left buccal mucosa.

On examination, his oral hygiene was poor, and a whitish, striated lesion 3-by-3 cm was noted on the left buccal mucosa (Figure 1). Based on the appearance and pattern of the lesion, a clinical diagnosis of reticular-type oral lichen planus was made. The patient was advised to stop smoking. A thorough scaling of the teeth was done, and he was started on topical triamcinolone acetonide ointment for 2 weeks. At a 4-month follow-up visit, the symptoms had resolved.

ORAL LICHEN PLANUS

Oral lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the mucous membrane of the oral cavity. It is a T-cell mediated autoimmune disease in which the cytotoxic CD8+ T cells trigger apoptosis of the basal cells of the oral epithelium.1 No risk factors have been identified, but the condition has been associated with smoking, chewing tobacco, dental materials such as amalgam, celiac disease, ulcerative colitis, stress, diabetes, and use of systemic drugs such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and beta-blockers.1,2 Women are affected more than men in a ratio of 1.4:1, frequently in the fourth decade.

The clinical forms are reticular, papular, plaque-like, erosive, atrophic, and bullous types.

Clinical presentation

The lesions are usually asymptomatic. Symptoms such as a burning sensation are associated mainly with the erosive and atrophic types,1–3 although in rare cases it occurs with the reticular form, as in our patient. Erosive and atrophic types carry a 1% to 2% risk of malignant transformation and require close follow-up.3

Oral mucosal lesions present alone or, in up to 15% to 20% of cases, with concomitant skin lesions.1,2 The most common oral sites are the buccal mucosa, tongue, and gingiva. Skin lesions present as violaceous flat-topped papules on the ankles, wrists, and genitalia.

DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT

The differential diagnosis of oral lichen planus includes cheek-frictional keratosis, lichenoid reaction, leukoplakia, pemphigus, oral candidiasis, and chronic ulcerative stomatitis.1,2

The diagnosis is clinical, but biopsy is indicated in the erosive or atrophic type and when a malignant lesion is suspected, especially in patients with a history of smoking and tobacco chewing. Oral lichen planus may be associated with oral candidiasis, especially in patients with poor oral hygiene and smoking, and this needs to be addressed before a diagnosis of oral lichen planus can be made.

The mainstay of management is oral or topical corticosteroids.4 Calcineurin inhibitors, retinoids, dapsone, hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate mofetil, and enoxaparin have also been shown to be effective and are used when corticosteroids alone are ineffective or contraindicated.4

References
  1. Alrashdan MS, Cirillo N, McCullough M. Oral lichen planus: a literature review and update. Arch Dermatol Res 2016; 308:539–551.
  2. Nogueira PA, Carneiro S, Ramos-e-Silva M. Oral lichen planus: an update on its pathogenesis. Int J Dermatol 2015; 54:1005–1010.
  3. Fitzpatrick SG, Hirsch SA, Gordon SC. The malignant transformation of oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145:45–56.
  4. Lodi G, Carrozzo M, Furness S, Thongprasom K. Interventions for treating oral lichen planus: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2012; 166:938–947.
References
  1. Alrashdan MS, Cirillo N, McCullough M. Oral lichen planus: a literature review and update. Arch Dermatol Res 2016; 308:539–551.
  2. Nogueira PA, Carneiro S, Ramos-e-Silva M. Oral lichen planus: an update on its pathogenesis. Int J Dermatol 2015; 54:1005–1010.
  3. Fitzpatrick SG, Hirsch SA, Gordon SC. The malignant transformation of oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145:45–56.
  4. Lodi G, Carrozzo M, Furness S, Thongprasom K. Interventions for treating oral lichen planus: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2012; 166:938–947.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Page Number
344-345
Page Number
344-345
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
A burning sensation in the mouth
Display Headline
A burning sensation in the mouth
Legacy Keywords
oral pain, mouth, oral lichen planus, oral hygiene, smoking, Satvinder Singh Bakshi
Legacy Keywords
oral pain, mouth, oral lichen planus, oral hygiene, smoking, Satvinder Singh Bakshi
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Which bowel preparation should be used for colonoscopy in patients who have had bariatric surgery?

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Which bowel preparation should be used for colonoscopy in patients who have had bariatric surgery?

We routinely use low-volume (2-L) polyethylene glycol electrolyte preparations such as Moviprep and Miralax in split-dose regimens, in which patients drink half of the preparation the day before the procedure and the other half the day of the procedure. In our experience, these are well tolerated by patients with a history of bariatric surgery and provide adequate colon cleansing before colonoscopy.

RATIONALE

Adequate bowel preparation by the ingestion of a cleansing agent is extremely important before colonoscopy: the quality of colon preparation affects the diagnostic accuracy and safety of the procedure, as inadequate bowel preparation has been associated with failure to detect polyps and with a higher rate of adverse events during the procedure.1–3

The most commonly used bowel preparations can be divided into high-volume (which require drinking at least 4 L of a cathartic solution) and low-volume (which require drinking about 2 L).4 Polyethylene glycol electrolyte solutions are among the most commonly used and are available in both high-volume (eg, Golytely, Nulytely) and low-volume (eg, Moviprep, Miralax) forms.

Other low-volume preparations include sodium picosulfate (Prepopik), magnesium citrate, and sodium phosphate tablets. However, these should be avoided in patients with renal insufficiency.4

Prices for bowel preparations vary. For example, the average reported wholesale price of Golytely is $24.56, Moviprep $81.17, and Miralax $10.08.4 However, the final cost depends on the patient’s insurance coverage. Generic formulations are available for some preparations.

After bariatric surgery, patients have a smaller stomach

After bariatric surgery, patients have significantly reduced stomach volume, due either to resection of a part of the stomach (such as in partial gastrectomy) or to diversion of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to bypass most of the stomach (such as in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass). This causes early satiety with smaller amounts of food and leads to weight loss. However, this restriction in stomach volume also makes it more difficult for the patient to tolerate the intake of large volumes of fluids for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy.

Bariatric surgery patients may require colonoscopy for indications such as colorectal cancer screening, chronic diarrhea, or GI bleeding, all of which are commonly encountered during routine clinical practice.

Guidelines are available

Currently, there are no published data available to support the use of one preparation over another in patients with a history of bariatric surgery. However, for patients who have had bariatric surgery, guidelines from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer—endorsed by the three major American gastroenterology societies, ie, the American Gastroenterological Association, the American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy—recommend either a low-volume solution or, if a high-volume solution is used, extending the duration over which the preparation is consumed.5 In addition, it is recommended that patients consume sugar-free drinks and liquids to avoid dumping syndrome from high sugar content.6

The use of split-dose regimens is also strongly recommended for elective colonoscopy by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.5

Our clinical experience has been in line with the above recommendations.

References
  1. Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T, Early DS, Wang JS. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75:1197–1203.
  2. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81:31–53.
  3. Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH, et al; American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgerons (SAGES). Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:894–909.
  4. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Saltzman JR, Cash BD, Pasha SF, et al. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81:781–794.
  5. Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, et al; US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2014; 147:903–924.
  6. Heber D, Greenway FL, Kaplan LM, Livingston E, Salvador J, Still C; Endocrine Society. Endocrine and nutritional management of the post-bariatric surgery patient: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:4823–4843.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Zubin Arora, MD
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Gursimran Kochhar, MD
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Bo Shen, MD
Section Head and The Ed and Joey Story Endowed Chair, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Professor, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH

Address: Bo Shen, MD, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, A31, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; shenb@ccf.org

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
350-351
Legacy Keywords
bowel preparation, bowel cleansing, colonoscopy, polyethylene glycol, bariatric surgery, Zubin Arora, Gursimran Kochhar, Bo Shen
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Zubin Arora, MD
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Gursimran Kochhar, MD
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Bo Shen, MD
Section Head and The Ed and Joey Story Endowed Chair, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Professor, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH

Address: Bo Shen, MD, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, A31, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; shenb@ccf.org

Author and Disclosure Information

Zubin Arora, MD
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Gursimran Kochhar, MD
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic

Bo Shen, MD
Section Head and The Ed and Joey Story Endowed Chair, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Professor, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH

Address: Bo Shen, MD, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, A31, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; shenb@ccf.org

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

We routinely use low-volume (2-L) polyethylene glycol electrolyte preparations such as Moviprep and Miralax in split-dose regimens, in which patients drink half of the preparation the day before the procedure and the other half the day of the procedure. In our experience, these are well tolerated by patients with a history of bariatric surgery and provide adequate colon cleansing before colonoscopy.

RATIONALE

Adequate bowel preparation by the ingestion of a cleansing agent is extremely important before colonoscopy: the quality of colon preparation affects the diagnostic accuracy and safety of the procedure, as inadequate bowel preparation has been associated with failure to detect polyps and with a higher rate of adverse events during the procedure.1–3

The most commonly used bowel preparations can be divided into high-volume (which require drinking at least 4 L of a cathartic solution) and low-volume (which require drinking about 2 L).4 Polyethylene glycol electrolyte solutions are among the most commonly used and are available in both high-volume (eg, Golytely, Nulytely) and low-volume (eg, Moviprep, Miralax) forms.

Other low-volume preparations include sodium picosulfate (Prepopik), magnesium citrate, and sodium phosphate tablets. However, these should be avoided in patients with renal insufficiency.4

Prices for bowel preparations vary. For example, the average reported wholesale price of Golytely is $24.56, Moviprep $81.17, and Miralax $10.08.4 However, the final cost depends on the patient’s insurance coverage. Generic formulations are available for some preparations.

After bariatric surgery, patients have a smaller stomach

After bariatric surgery, patients have significantly reduced stomach volume, due either to resection of a part of the stomach (such as in partial gastrectomy) or to diversion of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to bypass most of the stomach (such as in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass). This causes early satiety with smaller amounts of food and leads to weight loss. However, this restriction in stomach volume also makes it more difficult for the patient to tolerate the intake of large volumes of fluids for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy.

Bariatric surgery patients may require colonoscopy for indications such as colorectal cancer screening, chronic diarrhea, or GI bleeding, all of which are commonly encountered during routine clinical practice.

Guidelines are available

Currently, there are no published data available to support the use of one preparation over another in patients with a history of bariatric surgery. However, for patients who have had bariatric surgery, guidelines from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer—endorsed by the three major American gastroenterology societies, ie, the American Gastroenterological Association, the American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy—recommend either a low-volume solution or, if a high-volume solution is used, extending the duration over which the preparation is consumed.5 In addition, it is recommended that patients consume sugar-free drinks and liquids to avoid dumping syndrome from high sugar content.6

The use of split-dose regimens is also strongly recommended for elective colonoscopy by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.5

Our clinical experience has been in line with the above recommendations.

We routinely use low-volume (2-L) polyethylene glycol electrolyte preparations such as Moviprep and Miralax in split-dose regimens, in which patients drink half of the preparation the day before the procedure and the other half the day of the procedure. In our experience, these are well tolerated by patients with a history of bariatric surgery and provide adequate colon cleansing before colonoscopy.

RATIONALE

Adequate bowel preparation by the ingestion of a cleansing agent is extremely important before colonoscopy: the quality of colon preparation affects the diagnostic accuracy and safety of the procedure, as inadequate bowel preparation has been associated with failure to detect polyps and with a higher rate of adverse events during the procedure.1–3

The most commonly used bowel preparations can be divided into high-volume (which require drinking at least 4 L of a cathartic solution) and low-volume (which require drinking about 2 L).4 Polyethylene glycol electrolyte solutions are among the most commonly used and are available in both high-volume (eg, Golytely, Nulytely) and low-volume (eg, Moviprep, Miralax) forms.

Other low-volume preparations include sodium picosulfate (Prepopik), magnesium citrate, and sodium phosphate tablets. However, these should be avoided in patients with renal insufficiency.4

Prices for bowel preparations vary. For example, the average reported wholesale price of Golytely is $24.56, Moviprep $81.17, and Miralax $10.08.4 However, the final cost depends on the patient’s insurance coverage. Generic formulations are available for some preparations.

After bariatric surgery, patients have a smaller stomach

After bariatric surgery, patients have significantly reduced stomach volume, due either to resection of a part of the stomach (such as in partial gastrectomy) or to diversion of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to bypass most of the stomach (such as in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass). This causes early satiety with smaller amounts of food and leads to weight loss. However, this restriction in stomach volume also makes it more difficult for the patient to tolerate the intake of large volumes of fluids for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy.

Bariatric surgery patients may require colonoscopy for indications such as colorectal cancer screening, chronic diarrhea, or GI bleeding, all of which are commonly encountered during routine clinical practice.

Guidelines are available

Currently, there are no published data available to support the use of one preparation over another in patients with a history of bariatric surgery. However, for patients who have had bariatric surgery, guidelines from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer—endorsed by the three major American gastroenterology societies, ie, the American Gastroenterological Association, the American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy—recommend either a low-volume solution or, if a high-volume solution is used, extending the duration over which the preparation is consumed.5 In addition, it is recommended that patients consume sugar-free drinks and liquids to avoid dumping syndrome from high sugar content.6

The use of split-dose regimens is also strongly recommended for elective colonoscopy by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.5

Our clinical experience has been in line with the above recommendations.

References
  1. Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T, Early DS, Wang JS. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75:1197–1203.
  2. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81:31–53.
  3. Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH, et al; American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgerons (SAGES). Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:894–909.
  4. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Saltzman JR, Cash BD, Pasha SF, et al. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81:781–794.
  5. Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, et al; US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2014; 147:903–924.
  6. Heber D, Greenway FL, Kaplan LM, Livingston E, Salvador J, Still C; Endocrine Society. Endocrine and nutritional management of the post-bariatric surgery patient: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:4823–4843.
References
  1. Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T, Early DS, Wang JS. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75:1197–1203.
  2. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81:31–53.
  3. Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH, et al; American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgerons (SAGES). Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:894–909.
  4. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Saltzman JR, Cash BD, Pasha SF, et al. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81:781–794.
  5. Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, et al; US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2014; 147:903–924.
  6. Heber D, Greenway FL, Kaplan LM, Livingston E, Salvador J, Still C; Endocrine Society. Endocrine and nutritional management of the post-bariatric surgery patient: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:4823–4843.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Page Number
350-351
Page Number
350-351
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Which bowel preparation should be used for colonoscopy in patients who have had bariatric surgery?
Display Headline
Which bowel preparation should be used for colonoscopy in patients who have had bariatric surgery?
Legacy Keywords
bowel preparation, bowel cleansing, colonoscopy, polyethylene glycol, bariatric surgery, Zubin Arora, Gursimran Kochhar, Bo Shen
Legacy Keywords
bowel preparation, bowel cleansing, colonoscopy, polyethylene glycol, bariatric surgery, Zubin Arora, Gursimran Kochhar, Bo Shen
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

A second-degree burn after MRI

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
A second-degree burn after MRI

A 48-year-old Nicaraguan man underwent mag netic resonance imaging (MRI) 3 days after admission to a South Florida hospital for treatment of cellulitis of the right thigh with vancomycin. MRI had been ordered to evaluate for a possible drainable source of infection, as the clinical picture and duration of illness was worsening and longer than expected for typical uncomplicated cellulitis despite intravenous antibiotic therapy. The MRI showed multiple enlarged inguinal lymph nodes and cellulitis of the superficial soft tissues of the thigh without discrete drainable collections.

Figure 1. (A) Articulating 1-cm lesions developed after magnetic resonance imaging. The black and red tracings on the right inner thigh indicate the original area of cellulitis. (B) A bullous lesion with clear serous fluid on the right medial thigh.

After the procedure, the patient was noted to have a bullous lesion on each thigh, each lesion roughly 1 cm in diameter and filled with clear serous fluid (Figure 1). He reported that his legs had been pressed together before entering the MRI machine and that he had felt a burning sensation in both thighs during the test. Examination confirmed that the lesions indeed aligned with each other when he pressed his thighs together.

Study of a biopsy of one of the lesions revealed subepidermal cell blisters with focal epidermal necrosis and coagulative changes in the superficial dermis, consistent with a thermal injury (Figure 2).

HOW BURNS CAN OCCUR DURING MRI

Figure 2. Focal epidermal necrosis (arrows) and coagulative changes in the superficial dermis were consistent with thermal injury (hematoxylin and eosin; panel A magnification x 2.5; panel B magnification x 10).

Thermal burns are a potential cause of injury during MRI. Most have been observed in patients connected to external metal-containing monitoring devices, such as electrocardiogram leads and pulse oximeters.1,2 Thermal burns  in patients unconnected to external devices have occurred when the patient’s body was touching radiofrequency coils3 or, as with our patient, when skin touches skin.2,4,5 Skin-to-skin contact during MRI can cause the scanner to emit high-power electromagnetic radiofrequency pulses that are conducted through the body, creating heat. Tissue loops are created at points of skin-to-skin contact, thus forming a closed conducting circuit. The current flowing through this circuit can produce second-degree burns.4

We believe that during placement in the scanner, our patient inadvertently moved his thighs together, forming a closed loop conduction circuit and resulting in a thermal burn.

This case illustrates the importance of correct positioning during MRI. The MRI technicians had taken standard precautions, placing a sheet over the patient and ensuring no direct contact with the radiofrequency transmitter receiver (MR unit). However, precautions against skin-to-skin contact were not taken, and the patient’s legs were not separated.

LESSONS LEARNED

Appropriate positioning prevents closed skin-to-skin loops, but this may be more challenging in a larger patient.6 While the patient is in the scanner, a “squeeze ball” alert system allows the patient to signal the technologist should unexpected distress or heating occur.6,7 A patient’s inability to utilize the squeeze ball contributes to the risk of a severe injury. Further, in this instance, there may have been a language barrier. Also, proximity of the anatomic skin-to-skin loop to the imaged body part (and therefore the center of the MRI coil) may have conferred risk related to field strength in this patient.

The MRI technologist, under supervision of a radiologist, is primarily responsible for positioning the patient to decrease the risk of this complication and for following institutional MRI safety protocols and professional guidelines.6–8 MRI technologist certification training highlights all aspects of safety, including skin-to-skin conducting loop prevention.7,8

References
  1. Dempsey MF, Condon B. Thermal injuries associated with MRI. Clin Radiol 2001; 56:457–465.
  2. Haik J, Daniel S, Tessone A, Orenstein A, Winkler E. MRI induced fourth-degree burn in an extremity, leading to amputation. Burns 2009; 35:294–296.
  3. Friedstat J, Moore ME, Goverman J, Fagan SP. An unusual burn during routine magnetic resonance imaging. J Burn Care Res 2013; 34: e110–e111.
  4. Eising EG, Hughes J, Nolte F, Jentzen W, Bockisch A. Burn injury by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging 2010; 34:293–297.
  5. Landman A, Goldfarb S. Magnetic resonance-induced thermal burn. Ann Emerg Med 2008; 52:308–309.
  6. Expert Panel on MR Safety; Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, et al. ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 37:501–530.
  7. Magnetic resonance safety. Radiol Technol 2010; 81:615–616.
  8. Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 2004; 232:635–652.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Nicole S. Mandel, MD
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital, New York, NY

Jeremy L. Ramdial, MD
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL

Erin N. Marcus, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL

Address: Jeremy L. Ramdial, MD, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Jackson Memorial Hospital, 1611 NW, 12th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136; jramdial@med.miami.edu

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
348-349
Legacy Keywords
magnetic resonance imaging, MRI, burn, Nicole Mandel, Jeremy Ramdial, Erin Marcus
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Nicole S. Mandel, MD
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital, New York, NY

Jeremy L. Ramdial, MD
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL

Erin N. Marcus, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL

Address: Jeremy L. Ramdial, MD, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Jackson Memorial Hospital, 1611 NW, 12th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136; jramdial@med.miami.edu

Author and Disclosure Information

Nicole S. Mandel, MD
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital, New York, NY

Jeremy L. Ramdial, MD
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL

Erin N. Marcus, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL

Address: Jeremy L. Ramdial, MD, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Jackson Memorial Hospital, 1611 NW, 12th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136; jramdial@med.miami.edu

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

A 48-year-old Nicaraguan man underwent mag netic resonance imaging (MRI) 3 days after admission to a South Florida hospital for treatment of cellulitis of the right thigh with vancomycin. MRI had been ordered to evaluate for a possible drainable source of infection, as the clinical picture and duration of illness was worsening and longer than expected for typical uncomplicated cellulitis despite intravenous antibiotic therapy. The MRI showed multiple enlarged inguinal lymph nodes and cellulitis of the superficial soft tissues of the thigh without discrete drainable collections.

Figure 1. (A) Articulating 1-cm lesions developed after magnetic resonance imaging. The black and red tracings on the right inner thigh indicate the original area of cellulitis. (B) A bullous lesion with clear serous fluid on the right medial thigh.

After the procedure, the patient was noted to have a bullous lesion on each thigh, each lesion roughly 1 cm in diameter and filled with clear serous fluid (Figure 1). He reported that his legs had been pressed together before entering the MRI machine and that he had felt a burning sensation in both thighs during the test. Examination confirmed that the lesions indeed aligned with each other when he pressed his thighs together.

Study of a biopsy of one of the lesions revealed subepidermal cell blisters with focal epidermal necrosis and coagulative changes in the superficial dermis, consistent with a thermal injury (Figure 2).

HOW BURNS CAN OCCUR DURING MRI

Figure 2. Focal epidermal necrosis (arrows) and coagulative changes in the superficial dermis were consistent with thermal injury (hematoxylin and eosin; panel A magnification x 2.5; panel B magnification x 10).

Thermal burns are a potential cause of injury during MRI. Most have been observed in patients connected to external metal-containing monitoring devices, such as electrocardiogram leads and pulse oximeters.1,2 Thermal burns  in patients unconnected to external devices have occurred when the patient’s body was touching radiofrequency coils3 or, as with our patient, when skin touches skin.2,4,5 Skin-to-skin contact during MRI can cause the scanner to emit high-power electromagnetic radiofrequency pulses that are conducted through the body, creating heat. Tissue loops are created at points of skin-to-skin contact, thus forming a closed conducting circuit. The current flowing through this circuit can produce second-degree burns.4

We believe that during placement in the scanner, our patient inadvertently moved his thighs together, forming a closed loop conduction circuit and resulting in a thermal burn.

This case illustrates the importance of correct positioning during MRI. The MRI technicians had taken standard precautions, placing a sheet over the patient and ensuring no direct contact with the radiofrequency transmitter receiver (MR unit). However, precautions against skin-to-skin contact were not taken, and the patient’s legs were not separated.

LESSONS LEARNED

Appropriate positioning prevents closed skin-to-skin loops, but this may be more challenging in a larger patient.6 While the patient is in the scanner, a “squeeze ball” alert system allows the patient to signal the technologist should unexpected distress or heating occur.6,7 A patient’s inability to utilize the squeeze ball contributes to the risk of a severe injury. Further, in this instance, there may have been a language barrier. Also, proximity of the anatomic skin-to-skin loop to the imaged body part (and therefore the center of the MRI coil) may have conferred risk related to field strength in this patient.

The MRI technologist, under supervision of a radiologist, is primarily responsible for positioning the patient to decrease the risk of this complication and for following institutional MRI safety protocols and professional guidelines.6–8 MRI technologist certification training highlights all aspects of safety, including skin-to-skin conducting loop prevention.7,8

A 48-year-old Nicaraguan man underwent mag netic resonance imaging (MRI) 3 days after admission to a South Florida hospital for treatment of cellulitis of the right thigh with vancomycin. MRI had been ordered to evaluate for a possible drainable source of infection, as the clinical picture and duration of illness was worsening and longer than expected for typical uncomplicated cellulitis despite intravenous antibiotic therapy. The MRI showed multiple enlarged inguinal lymph nodes and cellulitis of the superficial soft tissues of the thigh without discrete drainable collections.

Figure 1. (A) Articulating 1-cm lesions developed after magnetic resonance imaging. The black and red tracings on the right inner thigh indicate the original area of cellulitis. (B) A bullous lesion with clear serous fluid on the right medial thigh.

After the procedure, the patient was noted to have a bullous lesion on each thigh, each lesion roughly 1 cm in diameter and filled with clear serous fluid (Figure 1). He reported that his legs had been pressed together before entering the MRI machine and that he had felt a burning sensation in both thighs during the test. Examination confirmed that the lesions indeed aligned with each other when he pressed his thighs together.

Study of a biopsy of one of the lesions revealed subepidermal cell blisters with focal epidermal necrosis and coagulative changes in the superficial dermis, consistent with a thermal injury (Figure 2).

HOW BURNS CAN OCCUR DURING MRI

Figure 2. Focal epidermal necrosis (arrows) and coagulative changes in the superficial dermis were consistent with thermal injury (hematoxylin and eosin; panel A magnification x 2.5; panel B magnification x 10).

Thermal burns are a potential cause of injury during MRI. Most have been observed in patients connected to external metal-containing monitoring devices, such as electrocardiogram leads and pulse oximeters.1,2 Thermal burns  in patients unconnected to external devices have occurred when the patient’s body was touching radiofrequency coils3 or, as with our patient, when skin touches skin.2,4,5 Skin-to-skin contact during MRI can cause the scanner to emit high-power electromagnetic radiofrequency pulses that are conducted through the body, creating heat. Tissue loops are created at points of skin-to-skin contact, thus forming a closed conducting circuit. The current flowing through this circuit can produce second-degree burns.4

We believe that during placement in the scanner, our patient inadvertently moved his thighs together, forming a closed loop conduction circuit and resulting in a thermal burn.

This case illustrates the importance of correct positioning during MRI. The MRI technicians had taken standard precautions, placing a sheet over the patient and ensuring no direct contact with the radiofrequency transmitter receiver (MR unit). However, precautions against skin-to-skin contact were not taken, and the patient’s legs were not separated.

LESSONS LEARNED

Appropriate positioning prevents closed skin-to-skin loops, but this may be more challenging in a larger patient.6 While the patient is in the scanner, a “squeeze ball” alert system allows the patient to signal the technologist should unexpected distress or heating occur.6,7 A patient’s inability to utilize the squeeze ball contributes to the risk of a severe injury. Further, in this instance, there may have been a language barrier. Also, proximity of the anatomic skin-to-skin loop to the imaged body part (and therefore the center of the MRI coil) may have conferred risk related to field strength in this patient.

The MRI technologist, under supervision of a radiologist, is primarily responsible for positioning the patient to decrease the risk of this complication and for following institutional MRI safety protocols and professional guidelines.6–8 MRI technologist certification training highlights all aspects of safety, including skin-to-skin conducting loop prevention.7,8

References
  1. Dempsey MF, Condon B. Thermal injuries associated with MRI. Clin Radiol 2001; 56:457–465.
  2. Haik J, Daniel S, Tessone A, Orenstein A, Winkler E. MRI induced fourth-degree burn in an extremity, leading to amputation. Burns 2009; 35:294–296.
  3. Friedstat J, Moore ME, Goverman J, Fagan SP. An unusual burn during routine magnetic resonance imaging. J Burn Care Res 2013; 34: e110–e111.
  4. Eising EG, Hughes J, Nolte F, Jentzen W, Bockisch A. Burn injury by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging 2010; 34:293–297.
  5. Landman A, Goldfarb S. Magnetic resonance-induced thermal burn. Ann Emerg Med 2008; 52:308–309.
  6. Expert Panel on MR Safety; Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, et al. ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 37:501–530.
  7. Magnetic resonance safety. Radiol Technol 2010; 81:615–616.
  8. Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 2004; 232:635–652.
References
  1. Dempsey MF, Condon B. Thermal injuries associated with MRI. Clin Radiol 2001; 56:457–465.
  2. Haik J, Daniel S, Tessone A, Orenstein A, Winkler E. MRI induced fourth-degree burn in an extremity, leading to amputation. Burns 2009; 35:294–296.
  3. Friedstat J, Moore ME, Goverman J, Fagan SP. An unusual burn during routine magnetic resonance imaging. J Burn Care Res 2013; 34: e110–e111.
  4. Eising EG, Hughes J, Nolte F, Jentzen W, Bockisch A. Burn injury by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging 2010; 34:293–297.
  5. Landman A, Goldfarb S. Magnetic resonance-induced thermal burn. Ann Emerg Med 2008; 52:308–309.
  6. Expert Panel on MR Safety; Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, et al. ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 37:501–530.
  7. Magnetic resonance safety. Radiol Technol 2010; 81:615–616.
  8. Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 2004; 232:635–652.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Page Number
348-349
Page Number
348-349
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
A second-degree burn after MRI
Display Headline
A second-degree burn after MRI
Legacy Keywords
magnetic resonance imaging, MRI, burn, Nicole Mandel, Jeremy Ramdial, Erin Marcus
Legacy Keywords
magnetic resonance imaging, MRI, burn, Nicole Mandel, Jeremy Ramdial, Erin Marcus
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Serotonin syndrome

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Serotonin syndrome

To the Editor: I enjoyed the article “Serotonin syndrome: Preventing, recognizing, and treating it.”1 I am a relatively new internal medicine physician, out of residency only 1 year, and sadly I felt that the psychiatric training I received was minimal at best. Therefore, I was very excited to read more about serotonin syndrome since such a large percentage of my patients are on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.

Could you speak to the time frame it takes for serotonin syndrome to develop? For instance, if someone is taking an SSRI and develops a terrible yeast infection, would 3 doses of fluconazole be enough to tip the scales? Or as-needed sumatriptan, with some ondansetron for migraine? The problem I have is that patients often require short doses of many medications that can interact, and I routinely sigh, briefly explain the possibility of serotonin syndrome, and then click through the flashing red warning signs on the electronic medical record and send patients out with their meds—though in honesty I do not know the likelihood of developing even mild symptoms of serotonin syndrome with short courses of interacting medications.

References
  1. Wang RZ, Vashistha V, Kaur S, Houchens NW. Serotonin syndrome: preventing, recognizing, and treating it. Cleve Clin J Med 2016; 83:810–817.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Cielo Z. Rose, DO
Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Tallahassee, FL

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
342-343
Legacy Keywords
serotonin syndrome, drug interactions, antidepressants, triptans, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs, depression, yeast infection, fluconazole, Cielo Rose
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Cielo Z. Rose, DO
Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Tallahassee, FL

Author and Disclosure Information

Cielo Z. Rose, DO
Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, Tallahassee, FL

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

To the Editor: I enjoyed the article “Serotonin syndrome: Preventing, recognizing, and treating it.”1 I am a relatively new internal medicine physician, out of residency only 1 year, and sadly I felt that the psychiatric training I received was minimal at best. Therefore, I was very excited to read more about serotonin syndrome since such a large percentage of my patients are on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.

Could you speak to the time frame it takes for serotonin syndrome to develop? For instance, if someone is taking an SSRI and develops a terrible yeast infection, would 3 doses of fluconazole be enough to tip the scales? Or as-needed sumatriptan, with some ondansetron for migraine? The problem I have is that patients often require short doses of many medications that can interact, and I routinely sigh, briefly explain the possibility of serotonin syndrome, and then click through the flashing red warning signs on the electronic medical record and send patients out with their meds—though in honesty I do not know the likelihood of developing even mild symptoms of serotonin syndrome with short courses of interacting medications.

To the Editor: I enjoyed the article “Serotonin syndrome: Preventing, recognizing, and treating it.”1 I am a relatively new internal medicine physician, out of residency only 1 year, and sadly I felt that the psychiatric training I received was minimal at best. Therefore, I was very excited to read more about serotonin syndrome since such a large percentage of my patients are on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.

Could you speak to the time frame it takes for serotonin syndrome to develop? For instance, if someone is taking an SSRI and develops a terrible yeast infection, would 3 doses of fluconazole be enough to tip the scales? Or as-needed sumatriptan, with some ondansetron for migraine? The problem I have is that patients often require short doses of many medications that can interact, and I routinely sigh, briefly explain the possibility of serotonin syndrome, and then click through the flashing red warning signs on the electronic medical record and send patients out with their meds—though in honesty I do not know the likelihood of developing even mild symptoms of serotonin syndrome with short courses of interacting medications.

References
  1. Wang RZ, Vashistha V, Kaur S, Houchens NW. Serotonin syndrome: preventing, recognizing, and treating it. Cleve Clin J Med 2016; 83:810–817.
References
  1. Wang RZ, Vashistha V, Kaur S, Houchens NW. Serotonin syndrome: preventing, recognizing, and treating it. Cleve Clin J Med 2016; 83:810–817.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Page Number
342-343
Page Number
342-343
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Serotonin syndrome
Display Headline
Serotonin syndrome
Legacy Keywords
serotonin syndrome, drug interactions, antidepressants, triptans, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs, depression, yeast infection, fluconazole, Cielo Rose
Legacy Keywords
serotonin syndrome, drug interactions, antidepressants, triptans, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs, depression, yeast infection, fluconazole, Cielo Rose
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

In reply: Serotonin syndrome

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
In reply: Serotonin syndrome

In Reply: The questions posed by Dr. Rose reflect critical issues primary care physicians encounter when prescribing medications for patients who are taking serotonergic agents. “Switching strategies” have been described for starting or discontinuing serotonergic antidepressants.1 Options range from conservative exchanges requiring 5 half-lives between discontinuation of 1 antidepressant and initiation of another vs a direct cross-taper exchange. Decisions regarding specific patients should take into account previous adverse effects from serotonergic medications and half-lives of discontinued antidepressants. To our knowledge, switching strategies have not been validated and are based on expert opinion. Scenarios are complicated further if patients have already been prescribed 2 or more antidepressants and 1 medication is exchanged or dose-adjusted while another is added. With this degree of complexity, we recommend referral to a psychiatrist.

Dr. Rose’s questions on prescribing nonpsychiatric serotonergic drugs concurrently with antidepressants broaches a topic with even less evidence. Some data exist about nonpsychiatric serotonergic drugs given in combination with triptans. Soldin et al2 reviewed the US Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System and discovered 38 cases of serotonin syndrome in patients using triptans. Eleven of these patients were using triptans without concomitant antidepressants. Though definitive evidence is lacking for safe prescribing practice with triptans, the authors noted that most cases of triptan-induced serotonin toxicity occur within hours of triptan ingestion.2

The evidence on the risk of serotonin syndrome with other medications is limited to case reports. In regard to linezolid, a review suggested that when linezolid was administered to a patient on long-term citalopram, a prolonged serotonin syndrome was precipitated, which is not an issue with other antidepressants.3 The World Health Organization has issued warnings for serotonin toxicity with ondansetron and other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists based on case reports.4,5 No data are available for the appropriate prescribing of 5-HT3 antagonists with antidepressants. A review of cases suggests a link between fluconazole and severe serotonin toxicity in patients taking citalopram; however, no prescribing guidelines have been established for fluconazole either.6

Dr. Rose asks important clinical questions, but evidence-based answers are not available.  We can only recommend that patients be advised to report symptoms immediately after starting any medication associated with serotonin syndrome. For patients on multiple antidepressants, psychiatric assistance is advised. An observational cohort study of patients using antidepressants while exposed to other suspect drugs may better delineate effects of several pharmaceuticals on the serotonergic axis. Only then may safe prescribing practices be validated with evidence.

References
  1. Keks N, Hope J, Keogh S. Switching and stopping antidepressants. Aust Prescr 2016; 39:76–83.
  2. Soldin OP, Tonning JM; Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research Unit Network. Serotonin syndrome associated with triptan monotherapy (letter). N Engl J Med 2008; 15:2185–2186.
  3. Morales-Molina JA, Mateu-de Antonio J, Marín-Casino M, Grau S. Linezolid-associated serotonin syndrome: what we can learn from cases reported so far. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56:1176–1178.
  4. World Health Organization. Ondansetron and serotonin syndrome. WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter 2012; 3:16–21.
  5. Rojas-Fernandez CH. Can 5-HT3 antagonists really contribute to serotonin toxicity? A call for clarity and pharmacological law and order. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2014; 1:3–5.
  6. Levin TT, Cortes-Ladino A, Weiss M, Palomba ML. Life-threatening serotonin toxicity due to a citalopram-fluconazole drug interaction: case reports and discussion. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2008; 30:372–377.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Vishal Vashistha, MD
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Robert Z. Wang, MD
Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY

Sukhdeep Kaur, MD
Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India

Gregory Rutecki, MD
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
342-343
Legacy Keywords
serotonin syndrome, drug interactions, antidepressants, triptans, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs, depression, yeast infection, fluconazole, Vishal Vashistha, Robert Wang, Sukhdeep Kaur, Gregory Rutecki
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Vishal Vashistha, MD
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Robert Z. Wang, MD
Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY

Sukhdeep Kaur, MD
Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India

Gregory Rutecki, MD
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Author and Disclosure Information

Vishal Vashistha, MD
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Robert Z. Wang, MD
Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY

Sukhdeep Kaur, MD
Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India

Gregory Rutecki, MD
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

In Reply: The questions posed by Dr. Rose reflect critical issues primary care physicians encounter when prescribing medications for patients who are taking serotonergic agents. “Switching strategies” have been described for starting or discontinuing serotonergic antidepressants.1 Options range from conservative exchanges requiring 5 half-lives between discontinuation of 1 antidepressant and initiation of another vs a direct cross-taper exchange. Decisions regarding specific patients should take into account previous adverse effects from serotonergic medications and half-lives of discontinued antidepressants. To our knowledge, switching strategies have not been validated and are based on expert opinion. Scenarios are complicated further if patients have already been prescribed 2 or more antidepressants and 1 medication is exchanged or dose-adjusted while another is added. With this degree of complexity, we recommend referral to a psychiatrist.

Dr. Rose’s questions on prescribing nonpsychiatric serotonergic drugs concurrently with antidepressants broaches a topic with even less evidence. Some data exist about nonpsychiatric serotonergic drugs given in combination with triptans. Soldin et al2 reviewed the US Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System and discovered 38 cases of serotonin syndrome in patients using triptans. Eleven of these patients were using triptans without concomitant antidepressants. Though definitive evidence is lacking for safe prescribing practice with triptans, the authors noted that most cases of triptan-induced serotonin toxicity occur within hours of triptan ingestion.2

The evidence on the risk of serotonin syndrome with other medications is limited to case reports. In regard to linezolid, a review suggested that when linezolid was administered to a patient on long-term citalopram, a prolonged serotonin syndrome was precipitated, which is not an issue with other antidepressants.3 The World Health Organization has issued warnings for serotonin toxicity with ondansetron and other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists based on case reports.4,5 No data are available for the appropriate prescribing of 5-HT3 antagonists with antidepressants. A review of cases suggests a link between fluconazole and severe serotonin toxicity in patients taking citalopram; however, no prescribing guidelines have been established for fluconazole either.6

Dr. Rose asks important clinical questions, but evidence-based answers are not available.  We can only recommend that patients be advised to report symptoms immediately after starting any medication associated with serotonin syndrome. For patients on multiple antidepressants, psychiatric assistance is advised. An observational cohort study of patients using antidepressants while exposed to other suspect drugs may better delineate effects of several pharmaceuticals on the serotonergic axis. Only then may safe prescribing practices be validated with evidence.

In Reply: The questions posed by Dr. Rose reflect critical issues primary care physicians encounter when prescribing medications for patients who are taking serotonergic agents. “Switching strategies” have been described for starting or discontinuing serotonergic antidepressants.1 Options range from conservative exchanges requiring 5 half-lives between discontinuation of 1 antidepressant and initiation of another vs a direct cross-taper exchange. Decisions regarding specific patients should take into account previous adverse effects from serotonergic medications and half-lives of discontinued antidepressants. To our knowledge, switching strategies have not been validated and are based on expert opinion. Scenarios are complicated further if patients have already been prescribed 2 or more antidepressants and 1 medication is exchanged or dose-adjusted while another is added. With this degree of complexity, we recommend referral to a psychiatrist.

Dr. Rose’s questions on prescribing nonpsychiatric serotonergic drugs concurrently with antidepressants broaches a topic with even less evidence. Some data exist about nonpsychiatric serotonergic drugs given in combination with triptans. Soldin et al2 reviewed the US Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System and discovered 38 cases of serotonin syndrome in patients using triptans. Eleven of these patients were using triptans without concomitant antidepressants. Though definitive evidence is lacking for safe prescribing practice with triptans, the authors noted that most cases of triptan-induced serotonin toxicity occur within hours of triptan ingestion.2

The evidence on the risk of serotonin syndrome with other medications is limited to case reports. In regard to linezolid, a review suggested that when linezolid was administered to a patient on long-term citalopram, a prolonged serotonin syndrome was precipitated, which is not an issue with other antidepressants.3 The World Health Organization has issued warnings for serotonin toxicity with ondansetron and other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists based on case reports.4,5 No data are available for the appropriate prescribing of 5-HT3 antagonists with antidepressants. A review of cases suggests a link between fluconazole and severe serotonin toxicity in patients taking citalopram; however, no prescribing guidelines have been established for fluconazole either.6

Dr. Rose asks important clinical questions, but evidence-based answers are not available.  We can only recommend that patients be advised to report symptoms immediately after starting any medication associated with serotonin syndrome. For patients on multiple antidepressants, psychiatric assistance is advised. An observational cohort study of patients using antidepressants while exposed to other suspect drugs may better delineate effects of several pharmaceuticals on the serotonergic axis. Only then may safe prescribing practices be validated with evidence.

References
  1. Keks N, Hope J, Keogh S. Switching and stopping antidepressants. Aust Prescr 2016; 39:76–83.
  2. Soldin OP, Tonning JM; Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research Unit Network. Serotonin syndrome associated with triptan monotherapy (letter). N Engl J Med 2008; 15:2185–2186.
  3. Morales-Molina JA, Mateu-de Antonio J, Marín-Casino M, Grau S. Linezolid-associated serotonin syndrome: what we can learn from cases reported so far. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56:1176–1178.
  4. World Health Organization. Ondansetron and serotonin syndrome. WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter 2012; 3:16–21.
  5. Rojas-Fernandez CH. Can 5-HT3 antagonists really contribute to serotonin toxicity? A call for clarity and pharmacological law and order. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2014; 1:3–5.
  6. Levin TT, Cortes-Ladino A, Weiss M, Palomba ML. Life-threatening serotonin toxicity due to a citalopram-fluconazole drug interaction: case reports and discussion. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2008; 30:372–377.
References
  1. Keks N, Hope J, Keogh S. Switching and stopping antidepressants. Aust Prescr 2016; 39:76–83.
  2. Soldin OP, Tonning JM; Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research Unit Network. Serotonin syndrome associated with triptan monotherapy (letter). N Engl J Med 2008; 15:2185–2186.
  3. Morales-Molina JA, Mateu-de Antonio J, Marín-Casino M, Grau S. Linezolid-associated serotonin syndrome: what we can learn from cases reported so far. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56:1176–1178.
  4. World Health Organization. Ondansetron and serotonin syndrome. WHO Pharmaceuticals Newsletter 2012; 3:16–21.
  5. Rojas-Fernandez CH. Can 5-HT3 antagonists really contribute to serotonin toxicity? A call for clarity and pharmacological law and order. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2014; 1:3–5.
  6. Levin TT, Cortes-Ladino A, Weiss M, Palomba ML. Life-threatening serotonin toxicity due to a citalopram-fluconazole drug interaction: case reports and discussion. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2008; 30:372–377.
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 84(5)
Page Number
342-343
Page Number
342-343
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
In reply: Serotonin syndrome
Display Headline
In reply: Serotonin syndrome
Legacy Keywords
serotonin syndrome, drug interactions, antidepressants, triptans, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs, depression, yeast infection, fluconazole, Vishal Vashistha, Robert Wang, Sukhdeep Kaur, Gregory Rutecki
Legacy Keywords
serotonin syndrome, drug interactions, antidepressants, triptans, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, SSRIs, depression, yeast infection, fluconazole, Vishal Vashistha, Robert Wang, Sukhdeep Kaur, Gregory Rutecki
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

May 2017 Digital Edition

Article Type
Changed
Total knee and hip arthroplasty, personal health inventory, FRAX predicitions and more.
Publications
Sections
Total knee and hip arthroplasty, personal health inventory, FRAX predicitions and more.
Total knee and hip arthroplasty, personal health inventory, FRAX predicitions and more.
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Caution patients about common food–drug interactions

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Caution patients about common food–drug interactions
 

Many individuals read about the health benefits of certain foods, such as coffee, grapefruit, and red wine, but psychiatrists might neglect to inform their patients that these common foods could interact with drugs, thereby preventing certain psychotropics from achieving maximum benefit or causing toxicity. Educate your patients about food–drug interactions and to refrain from alcohol and specific foods when taking psychotropics. Although far from comprehensive, we present a discussion of the most frequently encountered and preventable food/nutrient–drug interactions.

Grapefruit juice may alter bioavailability of many psychotropics by inhibiting cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 1A2 isoforms, interfering with prehepatic metabolism, and enteric absorption. Common medications affected by this interaction include alprazolam, buspirone, sertraline, carbamazepine, and methadone.1 Patients should be advised about eating grapefruit or drinking grapefruit juice as it could require dose adjustment to avoid drug toxicity.

Table salt. Lithium is a salt, and less table salt intake could cause lithium levels to rise and vice versa. Lithium and other salts compete for absorption and secretion in the renal tubules, which are responsible for this interaction. Therefore, it is advisable to keep a stable salt intake throughout treatment. Patients should be cautioned about eating salty foods during the summer because excessive sweating could lead to lithium intoxication.

Caffeine is a widely used stimulant; however, it can decrease blood lithium levels and block clozapine clearance via inhibition of the CYP1A2 enzyme. Excessive caffeine intake can lead to clozapine toxicity.2

Beef liver, aged sausage and cheese, and wine contain tyramine. Tyramine is broken down by monoamine oxidase (MAO) enzymes in the body, which are inhibited by MAO inhibitors (MAOI) such as phenelzine and selegiline. A patient taking a MAOI cannot catabolize tyramine and other amines. These exogenous amines could cause a life-threatening hyperadrenergic crisis. Physicians should educate their patients about the MAOI diet and monitor adherence to the food avoidance list.

St. Johns wort is a herb commonly used for treating mild depression. It is a strong inducer of the CYP3A4 enzyme and reduces plasma concentrations and could decrease clinical effectiveness of aripiprazole, quetia­pine, alprazolam, and oxycodone.3 It could interact with serotonin reuptake inhibitors causing serotonin syndrome.

Full vs empty stomach. Food is known to affect bioavailability and enteral absorption of different psychotropics. Some medications are best taken on a full stomach and some on an empty one. For example, the antipsychotic ziprasidone should be taken with meals of at least 500 calories for optimal and consistent bioavailability. Benzodiazepines are rapidly absorbed when taken on an empty stomach.

Discuss dietary habits with patients to encourage a healthy lifestyle and provide valuable direction about potential food/nutrient–drug interactions.

References

1. Pawełczyk T, Kłoszewska I. Grapefruit juice interactions with psychotropic drugs: advantages and potential risk [in Polish]. Przegl Lek. 2008;62(2):92-95.
2. Hägg S, Spigset O, Mjörndal T, et al. Effect of caffeine on clozapine pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;49(1):59-63.
3. Markowitz JS, Donovan JL, DeVane CL, et al. Effect of St John’s wort on drug metabolism by induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme. JAMA. 2003;290(11):1500-1504.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Majeed is Attending Psychiatrist, Natchaug Hospital, Mansfield Center, Connecticut. Dr. Ali is a Psychiatry Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (Elmhurst), Queens, New York.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Issue
May 2017
Publications
Topics
Page Number
e1
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Majeed is Attending Psychiatrist, Natchaug Hospital, Mansfield Center, Connecticut. Dr. Ali is a Psychiatry Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (Elmhurst), Queens, New York.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Majeed is Attending Psychiatrist, Natchaug Hospital, Mansfield Center, Connecticut. Dr. Ali is a Psychiatry Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (Elmhurst), Queens, New York.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Article PDF
Article PDF
 

Many individuals read about the health benefits of certain foods, such as coffee, grapefruit, and red wine, but psychiatrists might neglect to inform their patients that these common foods could interact with drugs, thereby preventing certain psychotropics from achieving maximum benefit or causing toxicity. Educate your patients about food–drug interactions and to refrain from alcohol and specific foods when taking psychotropics. Although far from comprehensive, we present a discussion of the most frequently encountered and preventable food/nutrient–drug interactions.

Grapefruit juice may alter bioavailability of many psychotropics by inhibiting cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 1A2 isoforms, interfering with prehepatic metabolism, and enteric absorption. Common medications affected by this interaction include alprazolam, buspirone, sertraline, carbamazepine, and methadone.1 Patients should be advised about eating grapefruit or drinking grapefruit juice as it could require dose adjustment to avoid drug toxicity.

Table salt. Lithium is a salt, and less table salt intake could cause lithium levels to rise and vice versa. Lithium and other salts compete for absorption and secretion in the renal tubules, which are responsible for this interaction. Therefore, it is advisable to keep a stable salt intake throughout treatment. Patients should be cautioned about eating salty foods during the summer because excessive sweating could lead to lithium intoxication.

Caffeine is a widely used stimulant; however, it can decrease blood lithium levels and block clozapine clearance via inhibition of the CYP1A2 enzyme. Excessive caffeine intake can lead to clozapine toxicity.2

Beef liver, aged sausage and cheese, and wine contain tyramine. Tyramine is broken down by monoamine oxidase (MAO) enzymes in the body, which are inhibited by MAO inhibitors (MAOI) such as phenelzine and selegiline. A patient taking a MAOI cannot catabolize tyramine and other amines. These exogenous amines could cause a life-threatening hyperadrenergic crisis. Physicians should educate their patients about the MAOI diet and monitor adherence to the food avoidance list.

St. Johns wort is a herb commonly used for treating mild depression. It is a strong inducer of the CYP3A4 enzyme and reduces plasma concentrations and could decrease clinical effectiveness of aripiprazole, quetia­pine, alprazolam, and oxycodone.3 It could interact with serotonin reuptake inhibitors causing serotonin syndrome.

Full vs empty stomach. Food is known to affect bioavailability and enteral absorption of different psychotropics. Some medications are best taken on a full stomach and some on an empty one. For example, the antipsychotic ziprasidone should be taken with meals of at least 500 calories for optimal and consistent bioavailability. Benzodiazepines are rapidly absorbed when taken on an empty stomach.

Discuss dietary habits with patients to encourage a healthy lifestyle and provide valuable direction about potential food/nutrient–drug interactions.

 

Many individuals read about the health benefits of certain foods, such as coffee, grapefruit, and red wine, but psychiatrists might neglect to inform their patients that these common foods could interact with drugs, thereby preventing certain psychotropics from achieving maximum benefit or causing toxicity. Educate your patients about food–drug interactions and to refrain from alcohol and specific foods when taking psychotropics. Although far from comprehensive, we present a discussion of the most frequently encountered and preventable food/nutrient–drug interactions.

Grapefruit juice may alter bioavailability of many psychotropics by inhibiting cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 1A2 isoforms, interfering with prehepatic metabolism, and enteric absorption. Common medications affected by this interaction include alprazolam, buspirone, sertraline, carbamazepine, and methadone.1 Patients should be advised about eating grapefruit or drinking grapefruit juice as it could require dose adjustment to avoid drug toxicity.

Table salt. Lithium is a salt, and less table salt intake could cause lithium levels to rise and vice versa. Lithium and other salts compete for absorption and secretion in the renal tubules, which are responsible for this interaction. Therefore, it is advisable to keep a stable salt intake throughout treatment. Patients should be cautioned about eating salty foods during the summer because excessive sweating could lead to lithium intoxication.

Caffeine is a widely used stimulant; however, it can decrease blood lithium levels and block clozapine clearance via inhibition of the CYP1A2 enzyme. Excessive caffeine intake can lead to clozapine toxicity.2

Beef liver, aged sausage and cheese, and wine contain tyramine. Tyramine is broken down by monoamine oxidase (MAO) enzymes in the body, which are inhibited by MAO inhibitors (MAOI) such as phenelzine and selegiline. A patient taking a MAOI cannot catabolize tyramine and other amines. These exogenous amines could cause a life-threatening hyperadrenergic crisis. Physicians should educate their patients about the MAOI diet and monitor adherence to the food avoidance list.

St. Johns wort is a herb commonly used for treating mild depression. It is a strong inducer of the CYP3A4 enzyme and reduces plasma concentrations and could decrease clinical effectiveness of aripiprazole, quetia­pine, alprazolam, and oxycodone.3 It could interact with serotonin reuptake inhibitors causing serotonin syndrome.

Full vs empty stomach. Food is known to affect bioavailability and enteral absorption of different psychotropics. Some medications are best taken on a full stomach and some on an empty one. For example, the antipsychotic ziprasidone should be taken with meals of at least 500 calories for optimal and consistent bioavailability. Benzodiazepines are rapidly absorbed when taken on an empty stomach.

Discuss dietary habits with patients to encourage a healthy lifestyle and provide valuable direction about potential food/nutrient–drug interactions.

References

1. Pawełczyk T, Kłoszewska I. Grapefruit juice interactions with psychotropic drugs: advantages and potential risk [in Polish]. Przegl Lek. 2008;62(2):92-95.
2. Hägg S, Spigset O, Mjörndal T, et al. Effect of caffeine on clozapine pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;49(1):59-63.
3. Markowitz JS, Donovan JL, DeVane CL, et al. Effect of St John’s wort on drug metabolism by induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme. JAMA. 2003;290(11):1500-1504.

References

1. Pawełczyk T, Kłoszewska I. Grapefruit juice interactions with psychotropic drugs: advantages and potential risk [in Polish]. Przegl Lek. 2008;62(2):92-95.
2. Hägg S, Spigset O, Mjörndal T, et al. Effect of caffeine on clozapine pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;49(1):59-63.
3. Markowitz JS, Donovan JL, DeVane CL, et al. Effect of St John’s wort on drug metabolism by induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme. JAMA. 2003;290(11):1500-1504.

Issue
May 2017
Issue
May 2017
Page Number
e1
Page Number
e1
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Caution patients about common food–drug interactions
Display Headline
Caution patients about common food–drug interactions
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media

Subjected to sexually inappropriate behavior? Set LIMITS

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Subjected to sexually inappropriate behavior? Set LIMITS
 

Everyone needs love, companionship, and intimacy. Unfortunately, mental illness often results in interpersonal dysfunction, thereby frustrating these desires. Patients might exhibit sexually inappropriate behavior (SIB), consisting of comments, requests, or actions. The causes of SIB include confusion, predation, loneliness, psychosis, social impairment, character pathology, and/or mania.

Such attention poses an issue for mental health providers; trainees could be particularly vulnerable. The impact can be disheartening and cause practitioners to withdraw from patients or question their work, which could be detrimental to both providers and patients. While maintaining their personal safety, it is important that clinicians approach patients with compassion. To help clinicians manage SIB, we propose setting LIMITS.

Look after personal safety. Clinicians are trained to care for all patients, but situations can arise where it is no longer safe to work with an individual. A clinician who feels threatened is less likely to help the patient, especially if real danger is posed. Such situations could necessitate transferring the patient’s care to another provider. Clinicians also can choose to interact with a patient exhibiting SIB while colleagues are present.

Identify the etiology. SIB arises from a variety of underlying states, and the clinician’s response can vary depending on the cause. Questions to consider before reacting include:

  • What is the origin of the behavior?
  • What form is the behavior taking?
  • In what context is it occurring?
  • How frequent is it occurring?
  • What factors are contributing?
  • What are the risks to all parties?1

Maintain a professional role. Although SIB can undermine the provider–patient relationship, the behavior could be unintended. To remain professional, practitioners should pause before reacting and consider how to respond. A particular concern is countertransference, meaning that the provider might react to a patient’s behavior based on personal bias. This could result in amorous, hateful, or angry responses from the provider, which could put the treatment relationship at risk, harm the patient, or result in medical–legal repercussions.

Implement appropriate boundaries. In many cases, it is important to address the SIB. Practitioners should attempt to identify the inappropriate behavior and communicate boundaries with the patient. Clinicians can use statements such as, “I feel uncomfortable with this behavior and would appreciate it if it could be left out of our interactions from now on.” Additional discussion about the motivation behind the SIB may be warranted.

Talk with a Supervisor. These scenarios often produce many emotions. Residents could be experiencing them for the first time, but even seasoned clinicians can find them challenging. When in doubt, seek guidance from colleagues, supervisors, or mentors to help you clarify the situation.
 

Acknowledgments
The authors thank Kristina Zdanys, MD, David Schmidt, DO, Joanna Chaurette, MD, PhD, and Shilpa Lad, MD, for their input.

References

1. Series H, Dégano P. Hypersexuality in dementia. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2005; 11(6):424-431.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Aziz is Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Neurology, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey. Dr. Marshall is Clinical Psychologist, Mount Sinai Services at Elmhurst Hospital Center, Elmhurst, New York.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Issue
May 2017
Publications
Topics
Page Number
53
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Aziz is Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Neurology, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey. Dr. Marshall is Clinical Psychologist, Mount Sinai Services at Elmhurst Hospital Center, Elmhurst, New York.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Aziz is Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Neurology, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey. Dr. Marshall is Clinical Psychologist, Mount Sinai Services at Elmhurst Hospital Center, Elmhurst, New York.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Article PDF
Article PDF
 

Everyone needs love, companionship, and intimacy. Unfortunately, mental illness often results in interpersonal dysfunction, thereby frustrating these desires. Patients might exhibit sexually inappropriate behavior (SIB), consisting of comments, requests, or actions. The causes of SIB include confusion, predation, loneliness, psychosis, social impairment, character pathology, and/or mania.

Such attention poses an issue for mental health providers; trainees could be particularly vulnerable. The impact can be disheartening and cause practitioners to withdraw from patients or question their work, which could be detrimental to both providers and patients. While maintaining their personal safety, it is important that clinicians approach patients with compassion. To help clinicians manage SIB, we propose setting LIMITS.

Look after personal safety. Clinicians are trained to care for all patients, but situations can arise where it is no longer safe to work with an individual. A clinician who feels threatened is less likely to help the patient, especially if real danger is posed. Such situations could necessitate transferring the patient’s care to another provider. Clinicians also can choose to interact with a patient exhibiting SIB while colleagues are present.

Identify the etiology. SIB arises from a variety of underlying states, and the clinician’s response can vary depending on the cause. Questions to consider before reacting include:

  • What is the origin of the behavior?
  • What form is the behavior taking?
  • In what context is it occurring?
  • How frequent is it occurring?
  • What factors are contributing?
  • What are the risks to all parties?1

Maintain a professional role. Although SIB can undermine the provider–patient relationship, the behavior could be unintended. To remain professional, practitioners should pause before reacting and consider how to respond. A particular concern is countertransference, meaning that the provider might react to a patient’s behavior based on personal bias. This could result in amorous, hateful, or angry responses from the provider, which could put the treatment relationship at risk, harm the patient, or result in medical–legal repercussions.

Implement appropriate boundaries. In many cases, it is important to address the SIB. Practitioners should attempt to identify the inappropriate behavior and communicate boundaries with the patient. Clinicians can use statements such as, “I feel uncomfortable with this behavior and would appreciate it if it could be left out of our interactions from now on.” Additional discussion about the motivation behind the SIB may be warranted.

Talk with a Supervisor. These scenarios often produce many emotions. Residents could be experiencing them for the first time, but even seasoned clinicians can find them challenging. When in doubt, seek guidance from colleagues, supervisors, or mentors to help you clarify the situation.
 

Acknowledgments
The authors thank Kristina Zdanys, MD, David Schmidt, DO, Joanna Chaurette, MD, PhD, and Shilpa Lad, MD, for their input.

 

Everyone needs love, companionship, and intimacy. Unfortunately, mental illness often results in interpersonal dysfunction, thereby frustrating these desires. Patients might exhibit sexually inappropriate behavior (SIB), consisting of comments, requests, or actions. The causes of SIB include confusion, predation, loneliness, psychosis, social impairment, character pathology, and/or mania.

Such attention poses an issue for mental health providers; trainees could be particularly vulnerable. The impact can be disheartening and cause practitioners to withdraw from patients or question their work, which could be detrimental to both providers and patients. While maintaining their personal safety, it is important that clinicians approach patients with compassion. To help clinicians manage SIB, we propose setting LIMITS.

Look after personal safety. Clinicians are trained to care for all patients, but situations can arise where it is no longer safe to work with an individual. A clinician who feels threatened is less likely to help the patient, especially if real danger is posed. Such situations could necessitate transferring the patient’s care to another provider. Clinicians also can choose to interact with a patient exhibiting SIB while colleagues are present.

Identify the etiology. SIB arises from a variety of underlying states, and the clinician’s response can vary depending on the cause. Questions to consider before reacting include:

  • What is the origin of the behavior?
  • What form is the behavior taking?
  • In what context is it occurring?
  • How frequent is it occurring?
  • What factors are contributing?
  • What are the risks to all parties?1

Maintain a professional role. Although SIB can undermine the provider–patient relationship, the behavior could be unintended. To remain professional, practitioners should pause before reacting and consider how to respond. A particular concern is countertransference, meaning that the provider might react to a patient’s behavior based on personal bias. This could result in amorous, hateful, or angry responses from the provider, which could put the treatment relationship at risk, harm the patient, or result in medical–legal repercussions.

Implement appropriate boundaries. In many cases, it is important to address the SIB. Practitioners should attempt to identify the inappropriate behavior and communicate boundaries with the patient. Clinicians can use statements such as, “I feel uncomfortable with this behavior and would appreciate it if it could be left out of our interactions from now on.” Additional discussion about the motivation behind the SIB may be warranted.

Talk with a Supervisor. These scenarios often produce many emotions. Residents could be experiencing them for the first time, but even seasoned clinicians can find them challenging. When in doubt, seek guidance from colleagues, supervisors, or mentors to help you clarify the situation.
 

Acknowledgments
The authors thank Kristina Zdanys, MD, David Schmidt, DO, Joanna Chaurette, MD, PhD, and Shilpa Lad, MD, for their input.

References

1. Series H, Dégano P. Hypersexuality in dementia. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2005; 11(6):424-431.

References

1. Series H, Dégano P. Hypersexuality in dementia. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2005; 11(6):424-431.

Issue
May 2017
Issue
May 2017
Page Number
53
Page Number
53
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Subjected to sexually inappropriate behavior? Set LIMITS
Display Headline
Subjected to sexually inappropriate behavior? Set LIMITS
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Article PDF Media