Melanoma

Abemaciclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, showed durable clinical activity when given as continuous single-agent therapy to patients with advanced cancer, including breast cancer and non–small-cell lung cancer, according to investigators.

Neutropenia was rarely observed in patients treated with abemaciclib, the toxicity observed in some patients who receive the only Food and Drug Administration–approved CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib.

“Abemaciclib is a small-molecule inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6 that is structurally distinct from other dual inhibitors (such as palbociclib and ribociclib) and notably exhibits greater selectivity for CDK4 compared with CDK6,” wrote Dr. Amita Patnaik of South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics and her associates (Cancer Discov. 2016 May 23. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0095).

Furthermore, preclinical models indicate that the drug can cross the blood-brain barrier, suggesting potential efficacy against primary and metastatic tumors involving the central nervous system, they said.

A total of 225 patients with various types of advanced cancers were enrolled in this multicohort phase I study (dose escalation, n = 33; single-agent abemaciclib therapy for breast cancer, n = 47; non–small-cell lung cancer, n = 68; glioblastoma, n = 17; melanoma, n = 26; colorectal cancer, n = 15; abemaciclib plus fulvestrant combination therapy for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, n = 19). Abemaciclib was given orally to all patients.

Neither dose-limiting toxicity nor maximum tolerated dose was reached in patients treated at levels of 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, or 225 mg once daily. The maximum tolerated dose was 200 mg for patients treated with abemaciclib twice daily.

In the single-agent breast cancer cohort, the disease control rate was 81% for hormone receptor–positive (HR-positive) tumors, 33% for HR-negative tumors, 100% for HR-positive HER2-positive tumors, 72% for HR-positive HER2-negative tumors, and 70% overall. The response rate was 31% for HR-positive tumors, 0% for HR-negative tumors, 36% for HR-positive HER2-positive tumors, 28% for HR-positive HER2-negative tumors, and 23% overall.

The overall response rate was 21% for breast cancer patients receiving abemaciclib plus fulvestrant.

Among the 68 patients with non–small-cell lung cancer, 2 had a partial response and 31 had stable disease. Of the 26 patients with melanoma, 1 had a partial response and 6 had stable disease. Of the 17 patients with glioblastoma, 3 had stable disease.

Overall, there were no study-related deaths. Diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue were the most common adverse events; all were reversible.

Neutropenia was observed in 39 patients (23% of 173 patients in the single-agent tumor-specific cohort) – 2 were grade 4 events. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 6 patients (32% of 19 patients with HR-positive breast cancer receiving combination therapy with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant).

“Previous reports have identified neutropenia as an adverse event associated with dual inhibition of CDK4 and CDK6. However, abemaciclib given as a single agent on a continuous schedule in the tumor-specific cohorts was associated with an acceptable incidence of investigator-reported grade 3 (9%, 16 of 173 patients) or grade 4 (1%, 2 of 173 patients) neutropenia,” wrote the investigators.

“In summary, the results of this clinical trial demonstrate the safety and antitumor activity of abemaciclib as a single agent and support its further development both as monotherapy and in rational combinations. Furthermore, these findings validate CDK4 and CDK6 as anticancer drug targets and translate preclinical predictions regarding therapeutic targeting of cell-cycle derangements in cancer into clinical efficacy,”they wrote.

Eli Lilly funded the study. Eight investigators reported serving in advisory roles, having ownership or stock interest in, or receiving financial compensation from multiple companies including Eli Lilly.

jcraig@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @JessCraig_OP

Abemaciclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, showed durable clinical activity when given as continuous single-agent therapy to patients with advanced cancer, including breast cancer and non–small-cell lung cancer, according to investigators.

Neutropenia was rarely observed in patients treated with abemaciclib, the toxicity observed in some patients who receive the only Food and Drug Administration–approved CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib.

“Abemaciclib is a small-molecule inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6 that is structurally distinct from other dual inhibitors (such as palbociclib and ribociclib) and notably exhibits greater selectivity for CDK4 compared with CDK6,” wrote Dr. Amita Patnaik of South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics and her associates (Cancer Discov. 2016 May 23. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0095).

Furthermore, preclinical models indicate that the drug can cross the blood-brain barrier, suggesting potential efficacy against primary and metastatic tumors involving the central nervous system, they said.

A total of 225 patients with various types of advanced cancers were enrolled in this multicohort phase I study (dose escalation, n = 33; single-agent abemaciclib therapy for breast cancer, n = 47; non–small-cell lung cancer, n = 68; glioblastoma, n = 17; melanoma, n = 26; colorectal cancer, n = 15; abemaciclib plus fulvestrant combination therapy for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, n = 19). Abemaciclib was given orally to all patients.

Neither dose-limiting toxicity nor maximum tolerated dose was reached in patients treated at levels of 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, or 225 mg once daily. The maximum tolerated dose was 200 mg for patients treated with abemaciclib twice daily.

In the single-agent breast cancer cohort, the disease control rate was 81% for hormone receptor–positive (HR-positive) tumors, 33% for HR-negative tumors, 100% for HR-positive HER2-positive tumors, 72% for HR-positive HER2-negative tumors, and 70% overall. The response rate was 31% for HR-positive tumors, 0% for HR-negative tumors, 36% for HR-positive HER2-positive tumors, 28% for HR-positive HER2-negative tumors, and 23% overall.

The overall response rate was 21% for breast cancer patients receiving abemaciclib plus fulvestrant.

Among the 68 patients with non–small-cell lung cancer, 2 had a partial response and 31 had stable disease. Of the 26 patients with melanoma, 1 had a partial response and 6 had stable disease. Of the 17 patients with glioblastoma, 3 had stable disease.

Overall, there were no study-related deaths. Diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue were the most common adverse events; all were reversible.

Neutropenia was observed in 39 patients (23% of 173 patients in the single-agent tumor-specific cohort) – 2 were grade 4 events. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 6 patients (32% of 19 patients with HR-positive breast cancer receiving combination therapy with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant).

“Previous reports have identified neutropenia as an adverse event associated with dual inhibition of CDK4 and CDK6. However, abemaciclib given as a single agent on a continuous schedule in the tumor-specific cohorts was associated with an acceptable incidence of investigator-reported grade 3 (9%, 16 of 173 patients) or grade 4 (1%, 2 of 173 patients) neutropenia,” wrote the investigators.

“In summary, the results of this clinical trial demonstrate the safety and antitumor activity of abemaciclib as a single agent and support its further development both as monotherapy and in rational combinations. Furthermore, these findings validate CDK4 and CDK6 as anticancer drug targets and translate preclinical predictions regarding therapeutic targeting of cell-cycle derangements in cancer into clinical efficacy,”they wrote.

Eli Lilly funded the study. Eight investigators reported serving in advisory roles, having ownership or stock interest in, or receiving financial compensation from multiple companies including Eli Lilly.

jcraig@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @JessCraig_OP

Abemaciclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, showed durable clinical activity when given as continuous single-agent therapy to patients with advanced cancer, including breast cancer and non–small-cell lung cancer, according to investigators.

Neutropenia was rarely observed in patients treated with abemaciclib, the toxicity observed in some patients who receive the only Food and Drug Administration–approved CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib.

“Abemaciclib is a small-molecule inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6 that is structurally distinct from other dual inhibitors (such as palbociclib and ribociclib) and notably exhibits greater selectivity for CDK4 compared with CDK6,” wrote Dr. Amita Patnaik of South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics and her associates (Cancer Discov. 2016 May 23. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0095).

Furthermore, preclinical models indicate that the drug can cross the blood-brain barrier, suggesting potential efficacy against primary and metastatic tumors involving the central nervous system, they said.

A total of 225 patients with various types of advanced cancers were enrolled in this multicohort phase I study (dose escalation, n = 33; single-agent abemaciclib therapy for breast cancer, n = 47; non–small-cell lung cancer, n = 68; glioblastoma, n = 17; melanoma, n = 26; colorectal cancer, n = 15; abemaciclib plus fulvestrant combination therapy for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, n = 19). Abemaciclib was given orally to all patients.

Neither dose-limiting toxicity nor maximum tolerated dose was reached in patients treated at levels of 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, or 225 mg once daily. The maximum tolerated dose was 200 mg for patients treated with abemaciclib twice daily.

In the single-agent breast cancer cohort, the disease control rate was 81% for hormone receptor–positive (HR-positive) tumors, 33% for HR-negative tumors, 100% for HR-positive HER2-positive tumors, 72% for HR-positive HER2-negative tumors, and 70% overall. The response rate was 31% for HR-positive tumors, 0% for HR-negative tumors, 36% for HR-positive HER2-positive tumors, 28% for HR-positive HER2-negative tumors, and 23% overall.

The overall response rate was 21% for breast cancer patients receiving abemaciclib plus fulvestrant.

Among the 68 patients with non–small-cell lung cancer, 2 had a partial response and 31 had stable disease. Of the 26 patients with melanoma, 1 had a partial response and 6 had stable disease. Of the 17 patients with glioblastoma, 3 had stable disease.

Overall, there were no study-related deaths. Diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue were the most common adverse events; all were reversible.

Neutropenia was observed in 39 patients (23% of 173 patients in the single-agent tumor-specific cohort) – 2 were grade 4 events. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 6 patients (32% of 19 patients with HR-positive breast cancer receiving combination therapy with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant).

“Previous reports have identified neutropenia as an adverse event associated with dual inhibition of CDK4 and CDK6. However, abemaciclib given as a single agent on a continuous schedule in the tumor-specific cohorts was associated with an acceptable incidence of investigator-reported grade 3 (9%, 16 of 173 patients) or grade 4 (1%, 2 of 173 patients) neutropenia,” wrote the investigators.

“In summary, the results of this clinical trial demonstrate the safety and antitumor activity of abemaciclib as a single agent and support its further development both as monotherapy and in rational combinations. Furthermore, these findings validate CDK4 and CDK6 as anticancer drug targets and translate preclinical predictions regarding therapeutic targeting of cell-cycle derangements in cancer into clinical efficacy,”they wrote.

Eli Lilly funded the study. Eight investigators reported serving in advisory roles, having ownership or stock interest in, or receiving financial compensation from multiple companies including Eli Lilly.

jcraig@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @JessCraig_OP

ORLANDO – Sentinel node biopsies may be a useful staging tool for patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

These patients – especially those with compromised immune systems – appear to be at sufficiently high risk of metastasis to justify the procedure, Dr. Jonathan Lopez said at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

“We found that sentinel lymph node biopsy in our clinic had a 91% negative predictive value for local recurrence, nodal recurrence, and disease-specific death. It provides valuable prognostic information for patients at increased risk of nodal metastasis,” said Dr. Lopez, a dermatology resident at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

He and his associates conducted a chart review of 24 patients treated at the Mayo Clinic from 2000 to 2014 for a cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head or neck. Of these, 11 patients were immunosuppressed. Five had undergone a kidney transplant and three a lung transplant. One patient had Hodgkin’s lymphoma, one had cutaneous lymphocytic leukemia, and one, metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Before sentinel node biopsy, eight patients had a wide local excision; 12 were treated with Mohs micrographic surgery only; and four had a Mohs procedure followed by resection for better margins.

The biopsies identified two patients with nodal disease, but failed to identify a third who had it, Dr. Lopez said.

Patient No. 1 had a primary SCC on the nasal tip that was stage 2, according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, and 2b according to the Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) system. He had undergone a prior double lung transplant and his lymph node dissection showed no nodal metastasis. He declined radiotherapy and died within 2 months of the biopsy, of unclear causes that were not related to his skin cancer.

Patient No. 2 had a primary lesion on the right cheek, and a history of kidney transplant. His cancer was stage 2 by the AJCC system and 2b by the BWH system. His lymph node dissection of the right parotid and neck was negative. At last follow-up of 3.5 years, he was cancer free. However, Dr. Lopez noted, the patient died at 4 years’ follow-up of unknown causes.

The final patient had a primary lesion on the right conchal bowl. It was a stage 2 cancer by the AJCC system and 2a by the BWH system. His sentinel node biopsy was negative. However, the otolaryngologist who performed the biopsy also took seven superficial parotid nodes and one of those was positive. This patient had no recurrence at the last visit, 1.5 years after the biopsy.

The sentinel node biopsies were negative in the 21 other patients. Of these, 14 had no evidence of recurrence at a mean of 3 years’ follow-up after the sentinel lymph node biopsy. Two developed local recurrence and two others, both of whom had a history of multiple squamous cell carcinomas, developed nodal spread and died of metastatic disease. Three have died of causes unrelated to their cancer.

Dr. Lopez had no financial disclosures.

msullivan@frontlinemedcom.com

ORLANDO – Sentinel node biopsies may be a useful staging tool for patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

These patients – especially those with compromised immune systems – appear to be at sufficiently high risk of metastasis to justify the procedure, Dr. Jonathan Lopez said at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

“We found that sentinel lymph node biopsy in our clinic had a 91% negative predictive value for local recurrence, nodal recurrence, and disease-specific death. It provides valuable prognostic information for patients at increased risk of nodal metastasis,” said Dr. Lopez, a dermatology resident at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

He and his associates conducted a chart review of 24 patients treated at the Mayo Clinic from 2000 to 2014 for a cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head or neck. Of these, 11 patients were immunosuppressed. Five had undergone a kidney transplant and three a lung transplant. One patient had Hodgkin’s lymphoma, one had cutaneous lymphocytic leukemia, and one, metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Before sentinel node biopsy, eight patients had a wide local excision; 12 were treated with Mohs micrographic surgery only; and four had a Mohs procedure followed by resection for better margins.

The biopsies identified two patients with nodal disease, but failed to identify a third who had it, Dr. Lopez said.

Patient No. 1 had a primary SCC on the nasal tip that was stage 2, according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, and 2b according to the Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) system. He had undergone a prior double lung transplant and his lymph node dissection showed no nodal metastasis. He declined radiotherapy and died within 2 months of the biopsy, of unclear causes that were not related to his skin cancer.

Patient No. 2 had a primary lesion on the right cheek, and a history of kidney transplant. His cancer was stage 2 by the AJCC system and 2b by the BWH system. His lymph node dissection of the right parotid and neck was negative. At last follow-up of 3.5 years, he was cancer free. However, Dr. Lopez noted, the patient died at 4 years’ follow-up of unknown causes.

The final patient had a primary lesion on the right conchal bowl. It was a stage 2 cancer by the AJCC system and 2a by the BWH system. His sentinel node biopsy was negative. However, the otolaryngologist who performed the biopsy also took seven superficial parotid nodes and one of those was positive. This patient had no recurrence at the last visit, 1.5 years after the biopsy.

The sentinel node biopsies were negative in the 21 other patients. Of these, 14 had no evidence of recurrence at a mean of 3 years’ follow-up after the sentinel lymph node biopsy. Two developed local recurrence and two others, both of whom had a history of multiple squamous cell carcinomas, developed nodal spread and died of metastatic disease. Three have died of causes unrelated to their cancer.

Dr. Lopez had no financial disclosures.

msullivan@frontlinemedcom.com

ORLANDO – Sentinel node biopsies may be a useful staging tool for patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

These patients – especially those with compromised immune systems – appear to be at sufficiently high risk of metastasis to justify the procedure, Dr. Jonathan Lopez said at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery.

“We found that sentinel lymph node biopsy in our clinic had a 91% negative predictive value for local recurrence, nodal recurrence, and disease-specific death. It provides valuable prognostic information for patients at increased risk of nodal metastasis,” said Dr. Lopez, a dermatology resident at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

He and his associates conducted a chart review of 24 patients treated at the Mayo Clinic from 2000 to 2014 for a cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head or neck. Of these, 11 patients were immunosuppressed. Five had undergone a kidney transplant and three a lung transplant. One patient had Hodgkin’s lymphoma, one had cutaneous lymphocytic leukemia, and one, metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Before sentinel node biopsy, eight patients had a wide local excision; 12 were treated with Mohs micrographic surgery only; and four had a Mohs procedure followed by resection for better margins.

The biopsies identified two patients with nodal disease, but failed to identify a third who had it, Dr. Lopez said.

Patient No. 1 had a primary SCC on the nasal tip that was stage 2, according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, and 2b according to the Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) system. He had undergone a prior double lung transplant and his lymph node dissection showed no nodal metastasis. He declined radiotherapy and died within 2 months of the biopsy, of unclear causes that were not related to his skin cancer.

Patient No. 2 had a primary lesion on the right cheek, and a history of kidney transplant. His cancer was stage 2 by the AJCC system and 2b by the BWH system. His lymph node dissection of the right parotid and neck was negative. At last follow-up of 3.5 years, he was cancer free. However, Dr. Lopez noted, the patient died at 4 years’ follow-up of unknown causes.

The final patient had a primary lesion on the right conchal bowl. It was a stage 2 cancer by the AJCC system and 2a by the BWH system. His sentinel node biopsy was negative. However, the otolaryngologist who performed the biopsy also took seven superficial parotid nodes and one of those was positive. This patient had no recurrence at the last visit, 1.5 years after the biopsy.

The sentinel node biopsies were negative in the 21 other patients. Of these, 14 had no evidence of recurrence at a mean of 3 years’ follow-up after the sentinel lymph node biopsy. Two developed local recurrence and two others, both of whom had a history of multiple squamous cell carcinomas, developed nodal spread and died of metastatic disease. Three have died of causes unrelated to their cancer.

Dr. Lopez had no financial disclosures.

msullivan@frontlinemedcom.com

ORLANDO – Matrilin-2 – a matrix protein found in peritumoral stroma – reliably distinguished invasive basal cell carcinoma from the often difficult-to-distinguish basaloid follicular hamartoma (BFH), in a study that evaluated the protein as a marker in this setting.

The protein marked 41 of 42 cancers and none of the hamartomas, Dr. Renato Goreshi reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery. The one cancer it failed to identify was a superficial basal cell tumor – a finding that makes sense, since dermal fibroblasts appear to secrete matrilin-2 as a response to invasive skin tumors, said Dr. Goreshi of the Roger Williams Cancer Center, Providence, R.I.

Mohs surgery typically employs hematoxylin and eosin staining to delineate tumor boundary. But, Dr. Goreshi said, that stain doesn’t always reliably differentiate adnexal tumors from basal cell carcinomas. “Basaloid follicular hamartoma can be particularly difficult to distinguish from basal cell carcinoma,” he said.

BFH typically presents as individual or linearly arranged, small skin-colored to brown papules or plaques, or as multiple lesions in a generalized distribution on the face, scalp, and occasionally, the trunk (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010 Aug;134[8]:1215-9). These are often stable for many years. The differential diagnosis includes basal cell carcinoma and trichoepithelioma.

BFH sometimes occurs near a BCC, although there are no data on how often this happens.

Dr. Goreshi cited a 2007 case report of a young woman that illustrates this problem. The patient presented with a basal cell carcinoma on the side of her nose. The adjacent BFH was unrecognized, however. She underwent a multiple-stage Mohs that was unnecessarily extended because tumor margins included sections of the BFH.

“The lesion was interpreted as malignancy by both the Mohs surgeon and the dermatopathologist, but was later determined to have been a hamartoma. This highlights the importance of finding an effective marker,” Dr. Goreshi said.

He and his fellowship director, Dr. Satori Iwamoto, chief of Mohs micrographic surgery at Roger Williams, looked for a reliable way to differentiate these tumors, capitalizing on the invasive nature of BCC. The peritumoral stroma plays a role in tumor growth and invasion. It involves fibroblasts, inflammatory and endothelial cells, and extracellular matrix proteins. Matrilin-2, which is involved in the formation of filamentous networks, was a promising candidate and the initial investigations looked good, said Dr. Goreshi said.

Their confirmatory study comprised 42 BCC and seven BFH sections that were obtained during Mohs surgery. All were stained for matrilin-2 and scored for location and intensity of staining by two reviewers. The investigators also conducted flow cytometry to determine the source of the protein.

The BCC set consisted of 11 morpheaform/infiltrative BCCs, 25 nodular BCCs, and 6 superficial BCCs. With the exception of one superficial lesion, all of these stained positive for matrilin-2 in the peritumoral stroma. None of the BFH sections stained positive for the protein, however. Flow cytometry determined that the protein was coming from dermal fibroblasts in the stroma.

This is actually a key point, Dr. Goreshi noted. “Matrilin-2 is not acting as a conventional tumor marker would, but as a marker of invasion.”

This was again played out in the variation of staining intensity in the tumor subtypes. It was most intense around the infiltrative subtypes. There was also adnexal staining, but it was significantly less than what was seen in the peritumoral stroma. There was virtually no staining in or around the hamartoma.

Staining was not as intense around the superficial BCC subtypes. In fact, it was not significantly different from what was seen in the adnexal structures. Again, however, there was no staining in or around the hamartoma.

“Now we are looking at the staining patterns of other lesions, including melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma, and trying to figure out why the dermal fibroblasts are secreting matrilin-2,” Dr. Goreshi said.

The study was the winner of the 2016 Theodore Tromovitch Award, presented for original research conducted by a fellow-in-training during his or her year of training.

Neither Dr. Goreshi nor Dr. Iwamoto had any relevant financial disclosures.

msullivan@frontlinemedcom.com

ORLANDO – Matrilin-2 – a matrix protein found in peritumoral stroma – reliably distinguished invasive basal cell carcinoma from the often difficult-to-distinguish basaloid follicular hamartoma (BFH), in a study that evaluated the protein as a marker in this setting.

The protein marked 41 of 42 cancers and none of the hamartomas, Dr. Renato Goreshi reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery. The one cancer it failed to identify was a superficial basal cell tumor – a finding that makes sense, since dermal fibroblasts appear to secrete matrilin-2 as a response to invasive skin tumors, said Dr. Goreshi of the Roger Williams Cancer Center, Providence, R.I.

Mohs surgery typically employs hematoxylin and eosin staining to delineate tumor boundary. But, Dr. Goreshi said, that stain doesn’t always reliably differentiate adnexal tumors from basal cell carcinomas. “Basaloid follicular hamartoma can be particularly difficult to distinguish from basal cell carcinoma,” he said.

BFH typically presents as individual or linearly arranged, small skin-colored to brown papules or plaques, or as multiple lesions in a generalized distribution on the face, scalp, and occasionally, the trunk (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010 Aug;134[8]:1215-9). These are often stable for many years. The differential diagnosis includes basal cell carcinoma and trichoepithelioma.

BFH sometimes occurs near a BCC, although there are no data on how often this happens.

Dr. Goreshi cited a 2007 case report of a young woman that illustrates this problem. The patient presented with a basal cell carcinoma on the side of her nose. The adjacent BFH was unrecognized, however. She underwent a multiple-stage Mohs that was unnecessarily extended because tumor margins included sections of the BFH.

“The lesion was interpreted as malignancy by both the Mohs surgeon and the dermatopathologist, but was later determined to have been a hamartoma. This highlights the importance of finding an effective marker,” Dr. Goreshi said.

He and his fellowship director, Dr. Satori Iwamoto, chief of Mohs micrographic surgery at Roger Williams, looked for a reliable way to differentiate these tumors, capitalizing on the invasive nature of BCC. The peritumoral stroma plays a role in tumor growth and invasion. It involves fibroblasts, inflammatory and endothelial cells, and extracellular matrix proteins. Matrilin-2, which is involved in the formation of filamentous networks, was a promising candidate and the initial investigations looked good, said Dr. Goreshi said.

Their confirmatory study comprised 42 BCC and seven BFH sections that were obtained during Mohs surgery. All were stained for matrilin-2 and scored for location and intensity of staining by two reviewers. The investigators also conducted flow cytometry to determine the source of the protein.

The BCC set consisted of 11 morpheaform/infiltrative BCCs, 25 nodular BCCs, and 6 superficial BCCs. With the exception of one superficial lesion, all of these stained positive for matrilin-2 in the peritumoral stroma. None of the BFH sections stained positive for the protein, however. Flow cytometry determined that the protein was coming from dermal fibroblasts in the stroma.

This is actually a key point, Dr. Goreshi noted. “Matrilin-2 is not acting as a conventional tumor marker would, but as a marker of invasion.”

This was again played out in the variation of staining intensity in the tumor subtypes. It was most intense around the infiltrative subtypes. There was also adnexal staining, but it was significantly less than what was seen in the peritumoral stroma. There was virtually no staining in or around the hamartoma.

Staining was not as intense around the superficial BCC subtypes. In fact, it was not significantly different from what was seen in the adnexal structures. Again, however, there was no staining in or around the hamartoma.

“Now we are looking at the staining patterns of other lesions, including melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma, and trying to figure out why the dermal fibroblasts are secreting matrilin-2,” Dr. Goreshi said.

The study was the winner of the 2016 Theodore Tromovitch Award, presented for original research conducted by a fellow-in-training during his or her year of training.

Neither Dr. Goreshi nor Dr. Iwamoto had any relevant financial disclosures.

msullivan@frontlinemedcom.com

ORLANDO – Matrilin-2 – a matrix protein found in peritumoral stroma – reliably distinguished invasive basal cell carcinoma from the often difficult-to-distinguish basaloid follicular hamartoma (BFH), in a study that evaluated the protein as a marker in this setting.

The protein marked 41 of 42 cancers and none of the hamartomas, Dr. Renato Goreshi reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Mohs Surgery. The one cancer it failed to identify was a superficial basal cell tumor – a finding that makes sense, since dermal fibroblasts appear to secrete matrilin-2 as a response to invasive skin tumors, said Dr. Goreshi of the Roger Williams Cancer Center, Providence, R.I.

Mohs surgery typically employs hematoxylin and eosin staining to delineate tumor boundary. But, Dr. Goreshi said, that stain doesn’t always reliably differentiate adnexal tumors from basal cell carcinomas. “Basaloid follicular hamartoma can be particularly difficult to distinguish from basal cell carcinoma,” he said.

BFH typically presents as individual or linearly arranged, small skin-colored to brown papules or plaques, or as multiple lesions in a generalized distribution on the face, scalp, and occasionally, the trunk (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010 Aug;134[8]:1215-9). These are often stable for many years. The differential diagnosis includes basal cell carcinoma and trichoepithelioma.

BFH sometimes occurs near a BCC, although there are no data on how often this happens.

Dr. Goreshi cited a 2007 case report of a young woman that illustrates this problem. The patient presented with a basal cell carcinoma on the side of her nose. The adjacent BFH was unrecognized, however. She underwent a multiple-stage Mohs that was unnecessarily extended because tumor margins included sections of the BFH.

“The lesion was interpreted as malignancy by both the Mohs surgeon and the dermatopathologist, but was later determined to have been a hamartoma. This highlights the importance of finding an effective marker,” Dr. Goreshi said.

He and his fellowship director, Dr. Satori Iwamoto, chief of Mohs micrographic surgery at Roger Williams, looked for a reliable way to differentiate these tumors, capitalizing on the invasive nature of BCC. The peritumoral stroma plays a role in tumor growth and invasion. It involves fibroblasts, inflammatory and endothelial cells, and extracellular matrix proteins. Matrilin-2, which is involved in the formation of filamentous networks, was a promising candidate and the initial investigations looked good, said Dr. Goreshi said.

Their confirmatory study comprised 42 BCC and seven BFH sections that were obtained during Mohs surgery. All were stained for matrilin-2 and scored for location and intensity of staining by two reviewers. The investigators also conducted flow cytometry to determine the source of the protein.

The BCC set consisted of 11 morpheaform/infiltrative BCCs, 25 nodular BCCs, and 6 superficial BCCs. With the exception of one superficial lesion, all of these stained positive for matrilin-2 in the peritumoral stroma. None of the BFH sections stained positive for the protein, however. Flow cytometry determined that the protein was coming from dermal fibroblasts in the stroma.

This is actually a key point, Dr. Goreshi noted. “Matrilin-2 is not acting as a conventional tumor marker would, but as a marker of invasion.”

This was again played out in the variation of staining intensity in the tumor subtypes. It was most intense around the infiltrative subtypes. There was also adnexal staining, but it was significantly less than what was seen in the peritumoral stroma. There was virtually no staining in or around the hamartoma.

Staining was not as intense around the superficial BCC subtypes. In fact, it was not significantly different from what was seen in the adnexal structures. Again, however, there was no staining in or around the hamartoma.

“Now we are looking at the staining patterns of other lesions, including melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma, and trying to figure out why the dermal fibroblasts are secreting matrilin-2,” Dr. Goreshi said.

The study was the winner of the 2016 Theodore Tromovitch Award, presented for original research conducted by a fellow-in-training during his or her year of training.

Neither Dr. Goreshi nor Dr. Iwamoto had any relevant financial disclosures.

msullivan@frontlinemedcom.com

SCOTTSDALE – A single course of topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prevented 62% more actinic keratoses than placebo, and this chemopreventive effect persisted for up to 3 years, according to an analysis of the Veterans Affairs Keratinocyte Carcinoma Chemoprevention Trial (VAKCCT) trial.

Other studies have shown that 5-FU effectively treats precancerous AKs, but have not examined whether 5-FU can prevent AKs, Dr. Joanna Walker said in an interview at the annual meeting of the Society for Investigative Dermatology.

Amy Karon/Frontline Medical News

Clinicians should consider preventive 5-FU in patients who are at high risk for basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas, especially if a skin check reveals multiple AKs, said Dr. Walker of the department of dermatology, Brown University, Providence, RI.

The VAKCCT was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at 12 Veterans Affairs dermatology clinics. The 319 patients in the analysis were nearly all elderly men with extensive sun damage, with a total of 2,386 AKs at baseline, for an average of five lesions per patient. Patients also had a history of at least two keratinocyte carcinomas in the past 5 years, including at least one lesion on the face or ears, and no recent history of 5-FU exposure.

The clinically and demographically similar study arms were randomized to either 5% topical 5-FU cream or a vehicle control cream, applied twice daily for 2-4 weeks. Both groups received cryotherapy for existing AKs, and were given free SPF 30 sunscreen. At each 6-month follow-up visit, the researchers counted existing AKs and new lesions.

At month 6, the treatment group had 62% fewer new AKs than the placebo group (average per patient, 1.78 and 4.73, respectively), a statistically significant difference. At months 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36, respectively, the treatment group had 50%, 40%, 41%, 25%, and 35% fewer new AKs than the placebo group, and these differences all were statistically significant. Furthermore, at month 6, only 56% of treated patients had at least one new AK, compared with 78% of the control group (incidence rate ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.95).

This chemopreventive effect remained significant for 24 months, the investigators reported. “Individuals with at least five AKs at the time of 5-FU treatment had an even more dramatic reduction in new AKs,” Dr. Walker noted. “There is now high-quality evidence supporting the use of topical 5-FU for AK chemoprevention. I think this is important information that we can take back to the clinic when we are trying to convince our patients to go through a course of 5-FU.”

The rate of new AKs in the placebo group fell during the first 2.5 years of the study and then stabilized. “For both groups, there was a dramatic increase in the use of sunscreen during the trial, and we hypothesized that the decrease in AKs in the control group was due to increased use of sun-protective measures,” Dr. Walker said.

The research was funded by the Cooperative Studies Program of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Dr. Walker had no disclosures.

SCOTTSDALE – A single course of topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prevented 62% more actinic keratoses than placebo, and this chemopreventive effect persisted for up to 3 years, according to an analysis of the Veterans Affairs Keratinocyte Carcinoma Chemoprevention Trial (VAKCCT) trial.

Other studies have shown that 5-FU effectively treats precancerous AKs, but have not examined whether 5-FU can prevent AKs, Dr. Joanna Walker said in an interview at the annual meeting of the Society for Investigative Dermatology.

Amy Karon/Frontline Medical News

Clinicians should consider preventive 5-FU in patients who are at high risk for basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas, especially if a skin check reveals multiple AKs, said Dr. Walker of the department of dermatology, Brown University, Providence, RI.

The VAKCCT was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at 12 Veterans Affairs dermatology clinics. The 319 patients in the analysis were nearly all elderly men with extensive sun damage, with a total of 2,386 AKs at baseline, for an average of five lesions per patient. Patients also had a history of at least two keratinocyte carcinomas in the past 5 years, including at least one lesion on the face or ears, and no recent history of 5-FU exposure.

The clinically and demographically similar study arms were randomized to either 5% topical 5-FU cream or a vehicle control cream, applied twice daily for 2-4 weeks. Both groups received cryotherapy for existing AKs, and were given free SPF 30 sunscreen. At each 6-month follow-up visit, the researchers counted existing AKs and new lesions.

At month 6, the treatment group had 62% fewer new AKs than the placebo group (average per patient, 1.78 and 4.73, respectively), a statistically significant difference. At months 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36, respectively, the treatment group had 50%, 40%, 41%, 25%, and 35% fewer new AKs than the placebo group, and these differences all were statistically significant. Furthermore, at month 6, only 56% of treated patients had at least one new AK, compared with 78% of the control group (incidence rate ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.95).

This chemopreventive effect remained significant for 24 months, the investigators reported. “Individuals with at least five AKs at the time of 5-FU treatment had an even more dramatic reduction in new AKs,” Dr. Walker noted. “There is now high-quality evidence supporting the use of topical 5-FU for AK chemoprevention. I think this is important information that we can take back to the clinic when we are trying to convince our patients to go through a course of 5-FU.”

The rate of new AKs in the placebo group fell during the first 2.5 years of the study and then stabilized. “For both groups, there was a dramatic increase in the use of sunscreen during the trial, and we hypothesized that the decrease in AKs in the control group was due to increased use of sun-protective measures,” Dr. Walker said.

The research was funded by the Cooperative Studies Program of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Dr. Walker had no disclosures.

SCOTTSDALE – A single course of topical 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prevented 62% more actinic keratoses than placebo, and this chemopreventive effect persisted for up to 3 years, according to an analysis of the Veterans Affairs Keratinocyte Carcinoma Chemoprevention Trial (VAKCCT) trial.

Other studies have shown that 5-FU effectively treats precancerous AKs, but have not examined whether 5-FU can prevent AKs, Dr. Joanna Walker said in an interview at the annual meeting of the Society for Investigative Dermatology.

Amy Karon/Frontline Medical News

Clinicians should consider preventive 5-FU in patients who are at high risk for basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas, especially if a skin check reveals multiple AKs, said Dr. Walker of the department of dermatology, Brown University, Providence, RI.

The VAKCCT was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at 12 Veterans Affairs dermatology clinics. The 319 patients in the analysis were nearly all elderly men with extensive sun damage, with a total of 2,386 AKs at baseline, for an average of five lesions per patient. Patients also had a history of at least two keratinocyte carcinomas in the past 5 years, including at least one lesion on the face or ears, and no recent history of 5-FU exposure.

The clinically and demographically similar study arms were randomized to either 5% topical 5-FU cream or a vehicle control cream, applied twice daily for 2-4 weeks. Both groups received cryotherapy for existing AKs, and were given free SPF 30 sunscreen. At each 6-month follow-up visit, the researchers counted existing AKs and new lesions.

At month 6, the treatment group had 62% fewer new AKs than the placebo group (average per patient, 1.78 and 4.73, respectively), a statistically significant difference. At months 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36, respectively, the treatment group had 50%, 40%, 41%, 25%, and 35% fewer new AKs than the placebo group, and these differences all were statistically significant. Furthermore, at month 6, only 56% of treated patients had at least one new AK, compared with 78% of the control group (incidence rate ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.95).

This chemopreventive effect remained significant for 24 months, the investigators reported. “Individuals with at least five AKs at the time of 5-FU treatment had an even more dramatic reduction in new AKs,” Dr. Walker noted. “There is now high-quality evidence supporting the use of topical 5-FU for AK chemoprevention. I think this is important information that we can take back to the clinic when we are trying to convince our patients to go through a course of 5-FU.”

The rate of new AKs in the placebo group fell during the first 2.5 years of the study and then stabilized. “For both groups, there was a dramatic increase in the use of sunscreen during the trial, and we hypothesized that the decrease in AKs in the control group was due to increased use of sun-protective measures,” Dr. Walker said.

The research was funded by the Cooperative Studies Program of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Dr. Walker had no disclosures.

Men do not know as much about skin cancer prevention and detection techniques as women, according to a recent survey conducted by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). This lack of knowledge may delay or prevent early diagnosis and treatment of melanoma and other nonmelanoma skin cancers in this patient population.

The survey results showed that only 56% of men versus 76% of women know there is no such thing as a healthy tan, and only 54% of men versus 70% of women know that getting a base tan is not a healthy way to protect skin from the sun. Furthermore, only 56% of men surveyed were aware that skin cancer could occur on areas of the skin not typically exposed to the sun compared to 65% of women.

“While our survey results indicate that men don’t know as much about skin cancer prevention and detection as women, men over 50 have a higher risk of developing melanoma, so it’s especially important for them to be vigilant about protecting and monitoring their skin,” said AAD President Abel Torres, MD, JD.

More resources on the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma.

May is skin cancer awareness month and the AAD is encouraging patients to make sure their skin is “Looking Good in 2016” by using sun protection and regularly examining skin for signs of skin cancer. The campaign features a public service announcement encouraging men to check their skin for signs of skin cancer and find a partner to help. The AAD also released a new infographic with tips on performing a skin cancer self-examination that dermatologists can share with patients to promote early detection of skin cancer.

More resources on nonmelanoma skin cancers. 

Dermatologist intervention in catching skin cancers when they are easier to treat also is key. At the 74th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology in Washington, DC, Dr. Orit Markowitz discussed noninvasive imaging tools that can help dermatologists diagnose skin cancers earlier. She noted that even when a lesion looks very small, tools such as dermoscopy can reveal features that indicate it already has depth and therefore may progress to a more serious malignancy. Early detection is particularly crucial in cases of rare aggressive tumors such as amelanotic melanoma. “If something is very pink clinically and then suddenly has pigmentation dermoscopically, you really have to be considering biopsying that lesion because you may be looking at an early amelanotic melanoma,” Dr. Markowitz explained. By the time the lesion develops more obvious clinical features suggesting malignancy, the tumor progression may be far more advanced.

Men do not know as much about skin cancer prevention and detection techniques as women, according to a recent survey conducted by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). This lack of knowledge may delay or prevent early diagnosis and treatment of melanoma and other nonmelanoma skin cancers in this patient population.

The survey results showed that only 56% of men versus 76% of women know there is no such thing as a healthy tan, and only 54% of men versus 70% of women know that getting a base tan is not a healthy way to protect skin from the sun. Furthermore, only 56% of men surveyed were aware that skin cancer could occur on areas of the skin not typically exposed to the sun compared to 65% of women.

“While our survey results indicate that men don’t know as much about skin cancer prevention and detection as women, men over 50 have a higher risk of developing melanoma, so it’s especially important for them to be vigilant about protecting and monitoring their skin,” said AAD President Abel Torres, MD, JD.

More resources on the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma.

May is skin cancer awareness month and the AAD is encouraging patients to make sure their skin is “Looking Good in 2016” by using sun protection and regularly examining skin for signs of skin cancer. The campaign features a public service announcement encouraging men to check their skin for signs of skin cancer and find a partner to help. The AAD also released a new infographic with tips on performing a skin cancer self-examination that dermatologists can share with patients to promote early detection of skin cancer.

More resources on nonmelanoma skin cancers. 

Dermatologist intervention in catching skin cancers when they are easier to treat also is key. At the 74th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology in Washington, DC, Dr. Orit Markowitz discussed noninvasive imaging tools that can help dermatologists diagnose skin cancers earlier. She noted that even when a lesion looks very small, tools such as dermoscopy can reveal features that indicate it already has depth and therefore may progress to a more serious malignancy. Early detection is particularly crucial in cases of rare aggressive tumors such as amelanotic melanoma. “If something is very pink clinically and then suddenly has pigmentation dermoscopically, you really have to be considering biopsying that lesion because you may be looking at an early amelanotic melanoma,” Dr. Markowitz explained. By the time the lesion develops more obvious clinical features suggesting malignancy, the tumor progression may be far more advanced.

Men do not know as much about skin cancer prevention and detection techniques as women, according to a recent survey conducted by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). This lack of knowledge may delay or prevent early diagnosis and treatment of melanoma and other nonmelanoma skin cancers in this patient population.

The survey results showed that only 56% of men versus 76% of women know there is no such thing as a healthy tan, and only 54% of men versus 70% of women know that getting a base tan is not a healthy way to protect skin from the sun. Furthermore, only 56% of men surveyed were aware that skin cancer could occur on areas of the skin not typically exposed to the sun compared to 65% of women.

“While our survey results indicate that men don’t know as much about skin cancer prevention and detection as women, men over 50 have a higher risk of developing melanoma, so it’s especially important for them to be vigilant about protecting and monitoring their skin,” said AAD President Abel Torres, MD, JD.

More resources on the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma.

May is skin cancer awareness month and the AAD is encouraging patients to make sure their skin is “Looking Good in 2016” by using sun protection and regularly examining skin for signs of skin cancer. The campaign features a public service announcement encouraging men to check their skin for signs of skin cancer and find a partner to help. The AAD also released a new infographic with tips on performing a skin cancer self-examination that dermatologists can share with patients to promote early detection of skin cancer.

More resources on nonmelanoma skin cancers. 

Dermatologist intervention in catching skin cancers when they are easier to treat also is key. At the 74th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology in Washington, DC, Dr. Orit Markowitz discussed noninvasive imaging tools that can help dermatologists diagnose skin cancers earlier. She noted that even when a lesion looks very small, tools such as dermoscopy can reveal features that indicate it already has depth and therefore may progress to a more serious malignancy. Early detection is particularly crucial in cases of rare aggressive tumors such as amelanotic melanoma. “If something is very pink clinically and then suddenly has pigmentation dermoscopically, you really have to be considering biopsying that lesion because you may be looking at an early amelanotic melanoma,” Dr. Markowitz explained. By the time the lesion develops more obvious clinical features suggesting malignancy, the tumor progression may be far more advanced.