Don’t choose hormones to protect postmenopausal women

Rely on randomized trials when possible
Article Type
Changed

 

Hormone therapy should not be used to prevent chronic conditions in postmenopausal women, according to updated recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The recommendations were published online Dec. 12 in JAMA.

In the latest recommendation statement, the USPSTF issued D recommendations against using combination estrogen and progestin to prevent chronic conditions in postmenopausal women and against using estrogen only to prevent chronic conditions in postmenopausal women who have undergone hysterectomies (JAMA. 2017 Dec 12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18261). A grade D recommendation is defined as “The USPSTF recommends against the service. There is moderate or high certainty that the service has no net benefit or that the harms outweigh the benefits.”

Judith Flacke/Thinkstock
However, the recommendation does not apply to women attempting to manage menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes, noted lead author David C. Grossman, MD, of Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, and his colleagues.

In response to public comments, the USPSTF team made several changes including adjusting the language to clarify that the recommendations apply only to postmenopausal women, and adding tables showing estimates of increased or decreased risk of various outcomes for postmenopausal women receiving different hormone therapies.

Approximately 40,000 women aged 53-79 years were included in an evidence report from Gerald Gartlehner, MD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and his colleagues that accompanied the recommendations (JAMA. 2017 Dec 12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.16952).

The researchers found that women taking estrogen alone had significantly lower risk of breast cancer, diabetes, and osteoporotic fractures, but significantly higher risk of gallbladder disease, stroke, urinary incontinence, and venous thromboembolism, compared with women taking placebo. In addition, women using a combination of estrogen and progestin had significantly lower risk of colorectal cancer, diabetes, and osteoporotic fractures, but significantly higher risk of breast cancer, probable dementia, gallbladder disease, stroke, urinary incontinence, and venous thromboembolism, compared with women taking placebo.

“Hormone therapy for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in menopausal women is associated with some beneficial effects but also with a substantial increase of risks for harms,” and the current evidence for the risks and benefits of hormone therapy is inconclusive, the researchers said.

The final recommendation remains consistent with the USPSTF draft statement issued earlier in 2017 and with the final recommendation statements issued in 2012.

The researchers had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.

Body

 

Twenty-five years ago, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force advised clinicians to consider hormone therapy for the prevention of disease in all women, particularly those at risk for coronary heart disease, Deborah Grady, MD, wrote in an editorial (JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 12. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7861). Dr. Grady was one of the coauthors of a literature review supporting the American College of Physicians’ recommendation to counsel asymptomatic postmenopausal women about hormone therapy based on data from observational studies. “No randomized trials with clinical outcomes had been conducted,” Dr. Grady said. By 2002, data from three large randomized trials told a different story, and the Task Force recommended against using estrogen alone as a strategy to prevent chronic conditions in postmenopausal women, she noted.

“I believe that the fear of hormone therapy is overblown,” Dr. Grady wrote. “When adequately informed, women with moderate to severe symptoms and without contraindications should be able to take such small risks if hormone therapy improves symptoms and quality of life,” she said.

In fact, professional societies, including the North American Menopause Society, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Endocrine Society support hormone therapy for symptomatic women who are recently menopausal, said Dr. Grady. However, a key lesson learned from the ongoing research on hormone therapy is the importance of conducting clinical trials that are large enough to identify serious adverse effects, she added.
 

Dr. Grady is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco. She had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Body

 

Twenty-five years ago, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force advised clinicians to consider hormone therapy for the prevention of disease in all women, particularly those at risk for coronary heart disease, Deborah Grady, MD, wrote in an editorial (JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 12. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7861). Dr. Grady was one of the coauthors of a literature review supporting the American College of Physicians’ recommendation to counsel asymptomatic postmenopausal women about hormone therapy based on data from observational studies. “No randomized trials with clinical outcomes had been conducted,” Dr. Grady said. By 2002, data from three large randomized trials told a different story, and the Task Force recommended against using estrogen alone as a strategy to prevent chronic conditions in postmenopausal women, she noted.

“I believe that the fear of hormone therapy is overblown,” Dr. Grady wrote. “When adequately informed, women with moderate to severe symptoms and without contraindications should be able to take such small risks if hormone therapy improves symptoms and quality of life,” she said.

In fact, professional societies, including the North American Menopause Society, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Endocrine Society support hormone therapy for symptomatic women who are recently menopausal, said Dr. Grady. However, a key lesson learned from the ongoing research on hormone therapy is the importance of conducting clinical trials that are large enough to identify serious adverse effects, she added.
 

Dr. Grady is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco. She had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Body

 

Twenty-five years ago, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force advised clinicians to consider hormone therapy for the prevention of disease in all women, particularly those at risk for coronary heart disease, Deborah Grady, MD, wrote in an editorial (JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 12. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7861). Dr. Grady was one of the coauthors of a literature review supporting the American College of Physicians’ recommendation to counsel asymptomatic postmenopausal women about hormone therapy based on data from observational studies. “No randomized trials with clinical outcomes had been conducted,” Dr. Grady said. By 2002, data from three large randomized trials told a different story, and the Task Force recommended against using estrogen alone as a strategy to prevent chronic conditions in postmenopausal women, she noted.

“I believe that the fear of hormone therapy is overblown,” Dr. Grady wrote. “When adequately informed, women with moderate to severe symptoms and without contraindications should be able to take such small risks if hormone therapy improves symptoms and quality of life,” she said.

In fact, professional societies, including the North American Menopause Society, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Endocrine Society support hormone therapy for symptomatic women who are recently menopausal, said Dr. Grady. However, a key lesson learned from the ongoing research on hormone therapy is the importance of conducting clinical trials that are large enough to identify serious adverse effects, she added.
 

Dr. Grady is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco. She had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Title
Rely on randomized trials when possible
Rely on randomized trials when possible

 

Hormone therapy should not be used to prevent chronic conditions in postmenopausal women, according to updated recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The recommendations were published online Dec. 12 in JAMA.

In the latest recommendation statement, the USPSTF issued D recommendations against using combination estrogen and progestin to prevent chronic conditions in postmenopausal women and against using estrogen only to prevent chronic conditions in postmenopausal women who have undergone hysterectomies (JAMA. 2017 Dec 12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18261). A grade D recommendation is defined as “The USPSTF recommends against the service. There is moderate or high certainty that the service has no net benefit or that the harms outweigh the benefits.”

Judith Flacke/Thinkstock
However, the recommendation does not apply to women attempting to manage menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes, noted lead author David C. Grossman, MD, of Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, and his colleagues.

In response to public comments, the USPSTF team made several changes including adjusting the language to clarify that the recommendations apply only to postmenopausal women, and adding tables showing estimates of increased or decreased risk of various outcomes for postmenopausal women receiving different hormone therapies.

Approximately 40,000 women aged 53-79 years were included in an evidence report from Gerald Gartlehner, MD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and his colleagues that accompanied the recommendations (JAMA. 2017 Dec 12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.16952).

The researchers found that women taking estrogen alone had significantly lower risk of breast cancer, diabetes, and osteoporotic fractures, but significantly higher risk of gallbladder disease, stroke, urinary incontinence, and venous thromboembolism, compared with women taking placebo. In addition, women using a combination of estrogen and progestin had significantly lower risk of colorectal cancer, diabetes, and osteoporotic fractures, but significantly higher risk of breast cancer, probable dementia, gallbladder disease, stroke, urinary incontinence, and venous thromboembolism, compared with women taking placebo.

“Hormone therapy for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in menopausal women is associated with some beneficial effects but also with a substantial increase of risks for harms,” and the current evidence for the risks and benefits of hormone therapy is inconclusive, the researchers said.

The final recommendation remains consistent with the USPSTF draft statement issued earlier in 2017 and with the final recommendation statements issued in 2012.

The researchers had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.

 

Hormone therapy should not be used to prevent chronic conditions in postmenopausal women, according to updated recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The recommendations were published online Dec. 12 in JAMA.

In the latest recommendation statement, the USPSTF issued D recommendations against using combination estrogen and progestin to prevent chronic conditions in postmenopausal women and against using estrogen only to prevent chronic conditions in postmenopausal women who have undergone hysterectomies (JAMA. 2017 Dec 12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18261). A grade D recommendation is defined as “The USPSTF recommends against the service. There is moderate or high certainty that the service has no net benefit or that the harms outweigh the benefits.”

Judith Flacke/Thinkstock
However, the recommendation does not apply to women attempting to manage menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes, noted lead author David C. Grossman, MD, of Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, and his colleagues.

In response to public comments, the USPSTF team made several changes including adjusting the language to clarify that the recommendations apply only to postmenopausal women, and adding tables showing estimates of increased or decreased risk of various outcomes for postmenopausal women receiving different hormone therapies.

Approximately 40,000 women aged 53-79 years were included in an evidence report from Gerald Gartlehner, MD, of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and his colleagues that accompanied the recommendations (JAMA. 2017 Dec 12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.16952).

The researchers found that women taking estrogen alone had significantly lower risk of breast cancer, diabetes, and osteoporotic fractures, but significantly higher risk of gallbladder disease, stroke, urinary incontinence, and venous thromboembolism, compared with women taking placebo. In addition, women using a combination of estrogen and progestin had significantly lower risk of colorectal cancer, diabetes, and osteoporotic fractures, but significantly higher risk of breast cancer, probable dementia, gallbladder disease, stroke, urinary incontinence, and venous thromboembolism, compared with women taking placebo.

“Hormone therapy for the primary prevention of chronic conditions in menopausal women is associated with some beneficial effects but also with a substantial increase of risks for harms,” and the current evidence for the risks and benefits of hormone therapy is inconclusive, the researchers said.

The final recommendation remains consistent with the USPSTF draft statement issued earlier in 2017 and with the final recommendation statements issued in 2012.

The researchers had no relevant financial conflicts to disclose.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM JAMA

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Early weight change has no special effect on mortality in RA

Article Type
Changed

 

Weight loss at the time of rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis had the same impact on mortality in patients with and without RA, according to research trying to solve the so-called obesity paradox in RA, which has been related to prior observations of a protective effect of obesity on mortality in RA patients.

© Stu Rosner
Senior author Dr. Elizabeth Karlson (left) and first author Dr. Jeffrey Sparks
“Our findings are significant because they show that weight gain did not offer a benefit for mortality among patients with RA,” Dr. Sparks said in an interview. “Prior to the study, there was the suggestion that weight gain or continued obesity might offer a protection from death for patients with RA,” he said.

“Our study is the first to focus on weight change around RA diagnosis and risk of death, rather than weight change in patients who had RA for many years,” Dr. Sparks noted.

By examining changes in weight near the time of RA diagnosis, Dr. Sparks and his colleagues said that they hoped to extract information about RA-specific processes rather than the underlying pathologies that might cause weight changes near the end of life.

In the study published in Arthritis & Rheumatology, the researchers compared women diagnosed with RA during follow-up to women without RA during the same index time period of 1976-2016. The study population included 121,701 women. Of these, 902 developed incident RA and were matched with 7,884 non-RA controls.

During an average of 18 years of follow-up, 41% of the RA cohort and 29% of the controls died. The risk of death was approximately twice as high (hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-4.89) among those with weight loss greater than 30 pounds at the time of RA diagnosis, compared with those whose weight remained stable. However, the risk for mortality was similarly increased (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.61-2.88) among the controls with weight loss greater than 30 pounds, compared with those with stable weight. No association with mortality was noted in either group among women who gained more than 30 pounds at the time of RA diagnosis.

Dr. Sparks said he was somewhat surprised by the findings.

“We expected severe, pathologic weight loss to be associated with increased risk of death among patients with RA and comparators. It was somewhat surprising that the risks in both groups were similar,” he said. “Conversely, prior studies suggested that weight gain might have been associated with increased risk of death. However, we found no association of weight gain with risk of death,” he noted.

In addition, “Our findings argue that there is not an RA-specific mortality risk based on either weight loss or gain,” he said. “While we found that weight loss was associated with increased mortality, this was most pronounced in the severe weight loss group, so was likely due to unintentional weight loss.”

Joshua F. Baker, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and his colleagues identified an association between weight change and risk of death in RA patients in a study first published online in Arthritis & Rheumatology in 2015 (Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;67[7]:1711-17). That study addressed the so-called obesity paradox in RA, and Dr. Baker and his colleagues noted that weight loss associated with the development of chronic illness is a significant confounder that may explain the observed protective effect of obesity on mortality.

Dr. Joshua F. Baker
Dr. Sparks and his coauthors “felt it was important to determine if the associations between weight loss and mortality that have been observed in RA were similar to associations seen in the general population,” Dr. Baker said in an interview. Their findings make a lot of sense, and the authors were able to confirm that weight loss (and likely unintentional weight loss) “is a poor prognostic sign, regardless of its cause,” he said. “This study confirms prior studies that weight loss is a poor prognostic sign in RA, as it is in other conditions and settings,” he added. “Since weight loss is more commonly observed in RA, rheumatologists may see this occur more frequently. This also means that the bias that we see in epidemiologic studies when looking at weight and mortality is likely to be worse in studies of RA, though this study didn’t look at this question,” he said.

“It is not clear how best to monitor changes in weight, when exactly to become concerned, and what to do when changes are observed,” Dr. Baker noted. “RA patients may lose weight for a number of reasons, not all related to their arthritis, and it is unlikely that there is a ‘one size fits all’ approach,” he said.

The study was limited in part by the women-only study population, so the results might not be generalizable to men, Dr. Sparks said. “The reason for weight change was unavailable,” he added. Directions for further research include investigation of how factors such as physical activity, diet, and weight loss may affect the risk of death among individuals with and without RA, he said.

Dr. Sparks had no financial conflicts to disclose. The study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health and the Rheumatology Research Foundation’s Disease-Targeted Innovative Award and Scientist Development Awards.

SOURCE: Sparks J et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Nov 30. doi: 10.1002/art.40346.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Related Articles

 

Weight loss at the time of rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis had the same impact on mortality in patients with and without RA, according to research trying to solve the so-called obesity paradox in RA, which has been related to prior observations of a protective effect of obesity on mortality in RA patients.

© Stu Rosner
Senior author Dr. Elizabeth Karlson (left) and first author Dr. Jeffrey Sparks
“Our findings are significant because they show that weight gain did not offer a benefit for mortality among patients with RA,” Dr. Sparks said in an interview. “Prior to the study, there was the suggestion that weight gain or continued obesity might offer a protection from death for patients with RA,” he said.

“Our study is the first to focus on weight change around RA diagnosis and risk of death, rather than weight change in patients who had RA for many years,” Dr. Sparks noted.

By examining changes in weight near the time of RA diagnosis, Dr. Sparks and his colleagues said that they hoped to extract information about RA-specific processes rather than the underlying pathologies that might cause weight changes near the end of life.

In the study published in Arthritis & Rheumatology, the researchers compared women diagnosed with RA during follow-up to women without RA during the same index time period of 1976-2016. The study population included 121,701 women. Of these, 902 developed incident RA and were matched with 7,884 non-RA controls.

During an average of 18 years of follow-up, 41% of the RA cohort and 29% of the controls died. The risk of death was approximately twice as high (hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-4.89) among those with weight loss greater than 30 pounds at the time of RA diagnosis, compared with those whose weight remained stable. However, the risk for mortality was similarly increased (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.61-2.88) among the controls with weight loss greater than 30 pounds, compared with those with stable weight. No association with mortality was noted in either group among women who gained more than 30 pounds at the time of RA diagnosis.

Dr. Sparks said he was somewhat surprised by the findings.

“We expected severe, pathologic weight loss to be associated with increased risk of death among patients with RA and comparators. It was somewhat surprising that the risks in both groups were similar,” he said. “Conversely, prior studies suggested that weight gain might have been associated with increased risk of death. However, we found no association of weight gain with risk of death,” he noted.

In addition, “Our findings argue that there is not an RA-specific mortality risk based on either weight loss or gain,” he said. “While we found that weight loss was associated with increased mortality, this was most pronounced in the severe weight loss group, so was likely due to unintentional weight loss.”

Joshua F. Baker, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and his colleagues identified an association between weight change and risk of death in RA patients in a study first published online in Arthritis & Rheumatology in 2015 (Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;67[7]:1711-17). That study addressed the so-called obesity paradox in RA, and Dr. Baker and his colleagues noted that weight loss associated with the development of chronic illness is a significant confounder that may explain the observed protective effect of obesity on mortality.

Dr. Joshua F. Baker
Dr. Sparks and his coauthors “felt it was important to determine if the associations between weight loss and mortality that have been observed in RA were similar to associations seen in the general population,” Dr. Baker said in an interview. Their findings make a lot of sense, and the authors were able to confirm that weight loss (and likely unintentional weight loss) “is a poor prognostic sign, regardless of its cause,” he said. “This study confirms prior studies that weight loss is a poor prognostic sign in RA, as it is in other conditions and settings,” he added. “Since weight loss is more commonly observed in RA, rheumatologists may see this occur more frequently. This also means that the bias that we see in epidemiologic studies when looking at weight and mortality is likely to be worse in studies of RA, though this study didn’t look at this question,” he said.

“It is not clear how best to monitor changes in weight, when exactly to become concerned, and what to do when changes are observed,” Dr. Baker noted. “RA patients may lose weight for a number of reasons, not all related to their arthritis, and it is unlikely that there is a ‘one size fits all’ approach,” he said.

The study was limited in part by the women-only study population, so the results might not be generalizable to men, Dr. Sparks said. “The reason for weight change was unavailable,” he added. Directions for further research include investigation of how factors such as physical activity, diet, and weight loss may affect the risk of death among individuals with and without RA, he said.

Dr. Sparks had no financial conflicts to disclose. The study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health and the Rheumatology Research Foundation’s Disease-Targeted Innovative Award and Scientist Development Awards.

SOURCE: Sparks J et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Nov 30. doi: 10.1002/art.40346.

 

Weight loss at the time of rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis had the same impact on mortality in patients with and without RA, according to research trying to solve the so-called obesity paradox in RA, which has been related to prior observations of a protective effect of obesity on mortality in RA patients.

© Stu Rosner
Senior author Dr. Elizabeth Karlson (left) and first author Dr. Jeffrey Sparks
“Our findings are significant because they show that weight gain did not offer a benefit for mortality among patients with RA,” Dr. Sparks said in an interview. “Prior to the study, there was the suggestion that weight gain or continued obesity might offer a protection from death for patients with RA,” he said.

“Our study is the first to focus on weight change around RA diagnosis and risk of death, rather than weight change in patients who had RA for many years,” Dr. Sparks noted.

By examining changes in weight near the time of RA diagnosis, Dr. Sparks and his colleagues said that they hoped to extract information about RA-specific processes rather than the underlying pathologies that might cause weight changes near the end of life.

In the study published in Arthritis & Rheumatology, the researchers compared women diagnosed with RA during follow-up to women without RA during the same index time period of 1976-2016. The study population included 121,701 women. Of these, 902 developed incident RA and were matched with 7,884 non-RA controls.

During an average of 18 years of follow-up, 41% of the RA cohort and 29% of the controls died. The risk of death was approximately twice as high (hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-4.89) among those with weight loss greater than 30 pounds at the time of RA diagnosis, compared with those whose weight remained stable. However, the risk for mortality was similarly increased (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.61-2.88) among the controls with weight loss greater than 30 pounds, compared with those with stable weight. No association with mortality was noted in either group among women who gained more than 30 pounds at the time of RA diagnosis.

Dr. Sparks said he was somewhat surprised by the findings.

“We expected severe, pathologic weight loss to be associated with increased risk of death among patients with RA and comparators. It was somewhat surprising that the risks in both groups were similar,” he said. “Conversely, prior studies suggested that weight gain might have been associated with increased risk of death. However, we found no association of weight gain with risk of death,” he noted.

In addition, “Our findings argue that there is not an RA-specific mortality risk based on either weight loss or gain,” he said. “While we found that weight loss was associated with increased mortality, this was most pronounced in the severe weight loss group, so was likely due to unintentional weight loss.”

Joshua F. Baker, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and his colleagues identified an association between weight change and risk of death in RA patients in a study first published online in Arthritis & Rheumatology in 2015 (Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;67[7]:1711-17). That study addressed the so-called obesity paradox in RA, and Dr. Baker and his colleagues noted that weight loss associated with the development of chronic illness is a significant confounder that may explain the observed protective effect of obesity on mortality.

Dr. Joshua F. Baker
Dr. Sparks and his coauthors “felt it was important to determine if the associations between weight loss and mortality that have been observed in RA were similar to associations seen in the general population,” Dr. Baker said in an interview. Their findings make a lot of sense, and the authors were able to confirm that weight loss (and likely unintentional weight loss) “is a poor prognostic sign, regardless of its cause,” he said. “This study confirms prior studies that weight loss is a poor prognostic sign in RA, as it is in other conditions and settings,” he added. “Since weight loss is more commonly observed in RA, rheumatologists may see this occur more frequently. This also means that the bias that we see in epidemiologic studies when looking at weight and mortality is likely to be worse in studies of RA, though this study didn’t look at this question,” he said.

“It is not clear how best to monitor changes in weight, when exactly to become concerned, and what to do when changes are observed,” Dr. Baker noted. “RA patients may lose weight for a number of reasons, not all related to their arthritis, and it is unlikely that there is a ‘one size fits all’ approach,” he said.

The study was limited in part by the women-only study population, so the results might not be generalizable to men, Dr. Sparks said. “The reason for weight change was unavailable,” he added. Directions for further research include investigation of how factors such as physical activity, diet, and weight loss may affect the risk of death among individuals with and without RA, he said.

Dr. Sparks had no financial conflicts to disclose. The study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health and the Rheumatology Research Foundation’s Disease-Targeted Innovative Award and Scientist Development Awards.

SOURCE: Sparks J et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Nov 30. doi: 10.1002/art.40346.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Weight gain or loss did not have a protective effect against mortality among patients with RA as some past research has suggested.

Major finding: The risk of death was approximately twice as high among women with weight loss greater than 30 pounds both for those diagnosed around the same time with RA (hazard ratio, 2.78) and for controls (HR, 2.16), compared with those whose weight remained stable.

Study details: A case-control study of 8,786 participants in the Nurses’ Health Study during 1976-2016.

Disclosures: Dr. Sparks had no financial conflicts to disclose. The study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health and the Rheumatology Research Foundation’s Disease-Targeted Innovative Award and Scientist Development Awards.

Source: Sparks J et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Nov 30. doi: 10.1002/art.40346.

Disqus Comments
Default

Elevated antiphospholipid antibodies in celiac disease unrelated to gluten

Article Type
Changed

 

Levels of antiphospholipid antibodies were significantly higher in adults with celiac disease compared with healthy controls, and gluten was not a factor, according to a study published in Digestive and Liver Disease (Dig Liver Dis. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.11.018).

“In inflammatory bowel diseases active prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic complications is considered appropriate despite the increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding,” wrote Outi Laine, MD, of Tampere University, Finland, and colleagues.

Results from previous studies suggest that thrombophilic autoantibodies are increased in celiac disease patients, but data are limited, the researchers wrote. In this study, the researchers measured antiphospholipid antibodies (cardiolipin IgG and M, prothrombin IgG, and aPS/PT IgG) in 179 adults with celiac disease (89 untreated, 90 on long-term gluten-free diets) and 91 nonceliac controls. Demographic characteristics were similar among the groups; the average age of the patients was 48 years in the untreated celiac disease group, 58 years in the treated group, and 45 years in the control group. In addition, the presentation of disease (gastrointestinal symptoms, malabsorption or anemia, and extraintestinal symptoms or screen-detected celiac disease) was similar among the groups.

Overall, the levels of antiphospholipid antibodies were significantly higher among celiac disease patients compared with controls 4.9 U/mL vs. 2.2 U/mL respectively, for anticardiolipin; 2.9 U/mL vs. 2.1 U/mL for antiprothrombin IgG, and 6.9 U/mL vs. 2.3 U/mL for antiphosphatidylserine-prothrombin. All three were higher among the untreated celiac disease patients compared with the treated patients.

“Treated patients with the highest levels of cardiolipin IgG and prothrombin IgG antibodies and aPS/PT were older than the newly diagnosed, untreated patients. This observation suggests that the formation of antibodies is not triggered by gluten but is related to the autoimmune-based celiac disease itself,” the researchers wrote.

The study was not designed to assess the impact of antiphospholipid antibodies on thrombosis, the researchers noted. However, “To guide therapeutic decisions, the optimal predictive biomarkers for thromboembolic episodes in patients with celiac disease should be determined,” and future areas of research should include identifying patients at high risk for thromboembolic episodes, they said.

The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. The study was funded in part by organizations including the Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere University Hospital, the Academy of Finland, and the Finnish Association of Hematology.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Levels of antiphospholipid antibodies were significantly higher in adults with celiac disease compared with healthy controls, and gluten was not a factor, according to a study published in Digestive and Liver Disease (Dig Liver Dis. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.11.018).

“In inflammatory bowel diseases active prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic complications is considered appropriate despite the increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding,” wrote Outi Laine, MD, of Tampere University, Finland, and colleagues.

Results from previous studies suggest that thrombophilic autoantibodies are increased in celiac disease patients, but data are limited, the researchers wrote. In this study, the researchers measured antiphospholipid antibodies (cardiolipin IgG and M, prothrombin IgG, and aPS/PT IgG) in 179 adults with celiac disease (89 untreated, 90 on long-term gluten-free diets) and 91 nonceliac controls. Demographic characteristics were similar among the groups; the average age of the patients was 48 years in the untreated celiac disease group, 58 years in the treated group, and 45 years in the control group. In addition, the presentation of disease (gastrointestinal symptoms, malabsorption or anemia, and extraintestinal symptoms or screen-detected celiac disease) was similar among the groups.

Overall, the levels of antiphospholipid antibodies were significantly higher among celiac disease patients compared with controls 4.9 U/mL vs. 2.2 U/mL respectively, for anticardiolipin; 2.9 U/mL vs. 2.1 U/mL for antiprothrombin IgG, and 6.9 U/mL vs. 2.3 U/mL for antiphosphatidylserine-prothrombin. All three were higher among the untreated celiac disease patients compared with the treated patients.

“Treated patients with the highest levels of cardiolipin IgG and prothrombin IgG antibodies and aPS/PT were older than the newly diagnosed, untreated patients. This observation suggests that the formation of antibodies is not triggered by gluten but is related to the autoimmune-based celiac disease itself,” the researchers wrote.

The study was not designed to assess the impact of antiphospholipid antibodies on thrombosis, the researchers noted. However, “To guide therapeutic decisions, the optimal predictive biomarkers for thromboembolic episodes in patients with celiac disease should be determined,” and future areas of research should include identifying patients at high risk for thromboembolic episodes, they said.

The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. The study was funded in part by organizations including the Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere University Hospital, the Academy of Finland, and the Finnish Association of Hematology.

 

Levels of antiphospholipid antibodies were significantly higher in adults with celiac disease compared with healthy controls, and gluten was not a factor, according to a study published in Digestive and Liver Disease (Dig Liver Dis. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.11.018).

“In inflammatory bowel diseases active prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic complications is considered appropriate despite the increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding,” wrote Outi Laine, MD, of Tampere University, Finland, and colleagues.

Results from previous studies suggest that thrombophilic autoantibodies are increased in celiac disease patients, but data are limited, the researchers wrote. In this study, the researchers measured antiphospholipid antibodies (cardiolipin IgG and M, prothrombin IgG, and aPS/PT IgG) in 179 adults with celiac disease (89 untreated, 90 on long-term gluten-free diets) and 91 nonceliac controls. Demographic characteristics were similar among the groups; the average age of the patients was 48 years in the untreated celiac disease group, 58 years in the treated group, and 45 years in the control group. In addition, the presentation of disease (gastrointestinal symptoms, malabsorption or anemia, and extraintestinal symptoms or screen-detected celiac disease) was similar among the groups.

Overall, the levels of antiphospholipid antibodies were significantly higher among celiac disease patients compared with controls 4.9 U/mL vs. 2.2 U/mL respectively, for anticardiolipin; 2.9 U/mL vs. 2.1 U/mL for antiprothrombin IgG, and 6.9 U/mL vs. 2.3 U/mL for antiphosphatidylserine-prothrombin. All three were higher among the untreated celiac disease patients compared with the treated patients.

“Treated patients with the highest levels of cardiolipin IgG and prothrombin IgG antibodies and aPS/PT were older than the newly diagnosed, untreated patients. This observation suggests that the formation of antibodies is not triggered by gluten but is related to the autoimmune-based celiac disease itself,” the researchers wrote.

The study was not designed to assess the impact of antiphospholipid antibodies on thrombosis, the researchers noted. However, “To guide therapeutic decisions, the optimal predictive biomarkers for thromboembolic episodes in patients with celiac disease should be determined,” and future areas of research should include identifying patients at high risk for thromboembolic episodes, they said.

The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. The study was funded in part by organizations including the Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere University Hospital, the Academy of Finland, and the Finnish Association of Hematology.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Antiphospholipid antibodies are elevated in celiac patients, and highest in those on a gluten-free diet.

Major finding: Levels among celiac patients vs. controls were 4.9 U/mL vs. 2.2 U/mL respectively, for anticardiolipin; 2.9 U/mL vs. 2.1 U/mL for antiprothrombin IgG, and 6.9 U/mL vs. 2.3 U/mL for antiphosphatidylserine-prothrombin.

Data source: Study of 179 adults with confirmed celiac disease and 91 controls.

Disclosures: The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. The study was funded in part by organizations including the Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere University Hospital, the Academy of Finland, and the Finnish Association of Hematology.

Disqus Comments
Default

Pulmonary hypertension treatment gets under the skin

Implant may improve quality of life for stable PAH patients
Article Type
Changed

 

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients with moderate, stable disease can benefit from an implantable drug delivery system, based on data from a review of 60 adults with successful implantations. The findings were published in the December issue of CHEST.

“A fully implanted system offers patients the hope of returning to more normal activities such as bathing, swimming, and reduced risk of infections from externalized central venous catheter contamination or reduced subcutaneous pain from subcutaneous infusion,” wrote Aaron B. Waxman, MD, PhD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and his colleagues (Chest. 2017 June 3. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.188).

In the DelIVery Trial, clinicians at 10 locations in the United States placed a fully implantable delivery system in adults aged 18 years and older with stable PAH who were previously receiving treprostinil via an external pump at an average dose of 71 ng/kg per min.

All 60 patients were successfully implanted with a system consisting of a drug infusion pump placed in an abdominal pocket and an intravascular catheter linking the implanted pump to the superior vena cava.

“The location of the pump pocket was determined in partnership with the patient and was based on consideration of clothing styles, belt line and subcutaneous fat depth,” the researchers noted.

Procedure-related complications deemed clinically significant included one atrial fibrillation, two incidences of pneumothorax, two infections unrelated to catheter placement, and three catheter dislocations (two in the same patient). The most common patient complaints were expected implant site pain in 83% and bruising in 17%.

The findings were limited by the small number of patients, but the researchers identified several factors that contributed to the success of the procedure, including selecting patients who have shown response to treprostinil and are motivated to comply with pump refill visits, performing the procedure at centers with a high volume of PAH patients, keeping the procedure consistent for each patient, and using the same implant team in each case. “The implant procedure was successfully performed with a low complication rate by clinicians with a diverse range of specialty training,” the researchers added.

Patients reported satisfaction with the implant system at 6 weeks and 6 months, and said they spent an average of 75% less time managing their delivery system, according to previously published data on the patients’ perspective (CHEST 2016;150[1]:27-34).

Medtronic sponsored the study. The lead author, Dr. Waxman, had no financial conflicts to disclose; several coauthors reported relationships with companies including Medtronic, Actelion, Bayer, Gilead, Merck, and United Therapeutics.

Body

 

The development of an implantable therapy for pulmonary hypertension could expand the use of treprostinil, a demonstrated effective treatment for PAH that has been limited in its use because of a range of side effects when given intravenously, orally, subcutaneously, or by inhalation, Joel A. Wirth, MD, FCCP, and Harold I. Palevsky, MD, FCCP, wrote in an editorial.

The use of an intravenous pump and catheter infusion system for stable PAH patients could help them return more quickly to normal activities and curb the risk of catheter-related infections, they said. “Having the potential to remove some of the burden and risk incumbent with an external delivery system may reduce several of the overall barriers to continuous intravenous prostanoid acceptance by both patients and providers,” they noted (Chest. 2017 Dec 6. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.07.006).

Clinicians must be educated to perform the implant procedure itself, and care centers must be trained in identifying patient management issues and refilling the pump reservoir as needed, Dr. Wirth and Dr. Palevsky emphasized. Patients must be educated in what to expect, including how to monitor the pump and track the need for refills, they said. Although the pump is not appropriate for patients with severe PAH, “a planned staged approach of transitioning PAH patients from IV therapy to a less complex system could lend itself to employing prostanoid use earlier and for less severely affected PAH patients,” they said.
 

Dr. Wirth is affiliated with Tufts University, Boston. Dr. Palevsky is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Both Dr. Wirth and Dr. Palevsky disclosed serving as consultants and as principal investigators for United Therapeutics.

Publications
Topics
Sections
Body

 

The development of an implantable therapy for pulmonary hypertension could expand the use of treprostinil, a demonstrated effective treatment for PAH that has been limited in its use because of a range of side effects when given intravenously, orally, subcutaneously, or by inhalation, Joel A. Wirth, MD, FCCP, and Harold I. Palevsky, MD, FCCP, wrote in an editorial.

The use of an intravenous pump and catheter infusion system for stable PAH patients could help them return more quickly to normal activities and curb the risk of catheter-related infections, they said. “Having the potential to remove some of the burden and risk incumbent with an external delivery system may reduce several of the overall barriers to continuous intravenous prostanoid acceptance by both patients and providers,” they noted (Chest. 2017 Dec 6. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.07.006).

Clinicians must be educated to perform the implant procedure itself, and care centers must be trained in identifying patient management issues and refilling the pump reservoir as needed, Dr. Wirth and Dr. Palevsky emphasized. Patients must be educated in what to expect, including how to monitor the pump and track the need for refills, they said. Although the pump is not appropriate for patients with severe PAH, “a planned staged approach of transitioning PAH patients from IV therapy to a less complex system could lend itself to employing prostanoid use earlier and for less severely affected PAH patients,” they said.
 

Dr. Wirth is affiliated with Tufts University, Boston. Dr. Palevsky is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Both Dr. Wirth and Dr. Palevsky disclosed serving as consultants and as principal investigators for United Therapeutics.

Body

 

The development of an implantable therapy for pulmonary hypertension could expand the use of treprostinil, a demonstrated effective treatment for PAH that has been limited in its use because of a range of side effects when given intravenously, orally, subcutaneously, or by inhalation, Joel A. Wirth, MD, FCCP, and Harold I. Palevsky, MD, FCCP, wrote in an editorial.

The use of an intravenous pump and catheter infusion system for stable PAH patients could help them return more quickly to normal activities and curb the risk of catheter-related infections, they said. “Having the potential to remove some of the burden and risk incumbent with an external delivery system may reduce several of the overall barriers to continuous intravenous prostanoid acceptance by both patients and providers,” they noted (Chest. 2017 Dec 6. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.07.006).

Clinicians must be educated to perform the implant procedure itself, and care centers must be trained in identifying patient management issues and refilling the pump reservoir as needed, Dr. Wirth and Dr. Palevsky emphasized. Patients must be educated in what to expect, including how to monitor the pump and track the need for refills, they said. Although the pump is not appropriate for patients with severe PAH, “a planned staged approach of transitioning PAH patients from IV therapy to a less complex system could lend itself to employing prostanoid use earlier and for less severely affected PAH patients,” they said.
 

Dr. Wirth is affiliated with Tufts University, Boston. Dr. Palevsky is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Both Dr. Wirth and Dr. Palevsky disclosed serving as consultants and as principal investigators for United Therapeutics.

Title
Implant may improve quality of life for stable PAH patients
Implant may improve quality of life for stable PAH patients

 

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients with moderate, stable disease can benefit from an implantable drug delivery system, based on data from a review of 60 adults with successful implantations. The findings were published in the December issue of CHEST.

“A fully implanted system offers patients the hope of returning to more normal activities such as bathing, swimming, and reduced risk of infections from externalized central venous catheter contamination or reduced subcutaneous pain from subcutaneous infusion,” wrote Aaron B. Waxman, MD, PhD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and his colleagues (Chest. 2017 June 3. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.188).

In the DelIVery Trial, clinicians at 10 locations in the United States placed a fully implantable delivery system in adults aged 18 years and older with stable PAH who were previously receiving treprostinil via an external pump at an average dose of 71 ng/kg per min.

All 60 patients were successfully implanted with a system consisting of a drug infusion pump placed in an abdominal pocket and an intravascular catheter linking the implanted pump to the superior vena cava.

“The location of the pump pocket was determined in partnership with the patient and was based on consideration of clothing styles, belt line and subcutaneous fat depth,” the researchers noted.

Procedure-related complications deemed clinically significant included one atrial fibrillation, two incidences of pneumothorax, two infections unrelated to catheter placement, and three catheter dislocations (two in the same patient). The most common patient complaints were expected implant site pain in 83% and bruising in 17%.

The findings were limited by the small number of patients, but the researchers identified several factors that contributed to the success of the procedure, including selecting patients who have shown response to treprostinil and are motivated to comply with pump refill visits, performing the procedure at centers with a high volume of PAH patients, keeping the procedure consistent for each patient, and using the same implant team in each case. “The implant procedure was successfully performed with a low complication rate by clinicians with a diverse range of specialty training,” the researchers added.

Patients reported satisfaction with the implant system at 6 weeks and 6 months, and said they spent an average of 75% less time managing their delivery system, according to previously published data on the patients’ perspective (CHEST 2016;150[1]:27-34).

Medtronic sponsored the study. The lead author, Dr. Waxman, had no financial conflicts to disclose; several coauthors reported relationships with companies including Medtronic, Actelion, Bayer, Gilead, Merck, and United Therapeutics.

 

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients with moderate, stable disease can benefit from an implantable drug delivery system, based on data from a review of 60 adults with successful implantations. The findings were published in the December issue of CHEST.

“A fully implanted system offers patients the hope of returning to more normal activities such as bathing, swimming, and reduced risk of infections from externalized central venous catheter contamination or reduced subcutaneous pain from subcutaneous infusion,” wrote Aaron B. Waxman, MD, PhD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and his colleagues (Chest. 2017 June 3. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.188).

In the DelIVery Trial, clinicians at 10 locations in the United States placed a fully implantable delivery system in adults aged 18 years and older with stable PAH who were previously receiving treprostinil via an external pump at an average dose of 71 ng/kg per min.

All 60 patients were successfully implanted with a system consisting of a drug infusion pump placed in an abdominal pocket and an intravascular catheter linking the implanted pump to the superior vena cava.

“The location of the pump pocket was determined in partnership with the patient and was based on consideration of clothing styles, belt line and subcutaneous fat depth,” the researchers noted.

Procedure-related complications deemed clinically significant included one atrial fibrillation, two incidences of pneumothorax, two infections unrelated to catheter placement, and three catheter dislocations (two in the same patient). The most common patient complaints were expected implant site pain in 83% and bruising in 17%.

The findings were limited by the small number of patients, but the researchers identified several factors that contributed to the success of the procedure, including selecting patients who have shown response to treprostinil and are motivated to comply with pump refill visits, performing the procedure at centers with a high volume of PAH patients, keeping the procedure consistent for each patient, and using the same implant team in each case. “The implant procedure was successfully performed with a low complication rate by clinicians with a diverse range of specialty training,” the researchers added.

Patients reported satisfaction with the implant system at 6 weeks and 6 months, and said they spent an average of 75% less time managing their delivery system, according to previously published data on the patients’ perspective (CHEST 2016;150[1]:27-34).

Medtronic sponsored the study. The lead author, Dr. Waxman, had no financial conflicts to disclose; several coauthors reported relationships with companies including Medtronic, Actelion, Bayer, Gilead, Merck, and United Therapeutics.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM CHEST

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: An implantable drug delivery system was successfully placed in 100% of adult PAH patients with no serious complications.

Major finding: The most common complaints among patients who received an implant system to deliver treprostinil were implant site pain (83%) and bruising (17%).

Data source: A multicenter, prospective study of 60 adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension who received implantable pumps to deliver treprostinil.

Disclosures: Medtronic sponsored the study. The lead author, Dr. Waxman, had no financial conflicts to disclose; several coauthors reported relationships with companies including Medtronic, Actelion, Bayer, Gilead, Merck, and United Therapeutics.

Disqus Comments
Default

Biosimilars and sources show mostly parallel safety profiles

Article Type
Changed

 

Biosimilars are primarily as safe as their originators, based on data from a review of current European regulatory documents. The findings were published online in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Biosimilars are primarily as safe as their originators, based on data from a review of current European regulatory documents. The findings were published online in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

 

Biosimilars are primarily as safe as their originators, based on data from a review of current European regulatory documents. The findings were published online in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Most biosimilars show safety profiles comparable to their originators.

Major finding: Infliximab biosimilars demonstrated three more general safety concerns than the originator.

Data source: The data come from a cross-sectional analysis 19 biosimilars and 6 originators.

Disclosures: The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Disqus Comments
Default

Emerging treatments tackling hair loss challenges include light therapies

Article Type
Changed

 

The use of JAK inhibitors is not the only notable development in the treatment of hair loss; light-based options show potential as well, according to Maria Hordinsky, MD.

Dr. Maria Hordinsky
Photobiomodulation devices – low-level laser therapy ranging from 650 nm to 678 nm in wavelength – are used to treat hair loss, with treatments costing $195-$3,000, according to Dr. Hordinsky, professor and chair of the department of dermatology at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Types of devices include combs, bands, hats, caps, and helmets, with treatments recommended two to four times a week.

She referred to one trial, which found that men with androgenetic alopecia who used the HairMax Lasercomb showed an increase in mean hair density at 26 weeks of daily use, compared with a group that used a sham device.

Photobiomodulation devices use either laser light or light-emitting diodes. Comparing the two types is a challenge, and the question of which is more effective remains unanswered, Dr. Hordinsky said.

Other issues to be addressed in future research include finding the optimal wavelength to use for different indications for light-based treatments, determining whether pulse or continuous wave is more effective, and evaluating the potential for systemic side effects of these therapies, she noted.

No treatment for alopecia areata is currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration, but factors to consider when choosing a treatment include the patient’s age, location and extent of hair loss, and the presence of other medical problems, as well as a scalp biopsy report with information on the hair cycle and inflammation. Patients and/or their parents should understand the risks and benefits associated with various treatments to make an informed decision, Dr. Hordinsky said.

Patients and their families “have heard the ‘buzz’ about potential new treatments for alopecia areata, and the discussion needs to include a conversation about ongoing and future clinical research opportunities, as well as off-label use of Janus kinase inhibitors,” particularly oral tofacitinib, she said.

Approximately two-thirds of patients in recent studies of oral tofacitinib have had clinically acceptable hair regrowth after 6 months, Dr. Hordinsky said. Ruxolitinib is also being studied. However, “until clinical research studies are completed, there will be ongoing debate regarding the risks and benefits, cost, and sustainability” of JAK inhibitors or other new treatments, she said.

Dr. Hordinsky disclosed that she is a consultant for companies including Procter & Gamble and Concert, and has received grant/research support from Incyte, Allergan, and the National Alopecia Areata Foundation.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by Frontline Medical Communications.
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles

 

The use of JAK inhibitors is not the only notable development in the treatment of hair loss; light-based options show potential as well, according to Maria Hordinsky, MD.

Dr. Maria Hordinsky
Photobiomodulation devices – low-level laser therapy ranging from 650 nm to 678 nm in wavelength – are used to treat hair loss, with treatments costing $195-$3,000, according to Dr. Hordinsky, professor and chair of the department of dermatology at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Types of devices include combs, bands, hats, caps, and helmets, with treatments recommended two to four times a week.

She referred to one trial, which found that men with androgenetic alopecia who used the HairMax Lasercomb showed an increase in mean hair density at 26 weeks of daily use, compared with a group that used a sham device.

Photobiomodulation devices use either laser light or light-emitting diodes. Comparing the two types is a challenge, and the question of which is more effective remains unanswered, Dr. Hordinsky said.

Other issues to be addressed in future research include finding the optimal wavelength to use for different indications for light-based treatments, determining whether pulse or continuous wave is more effective, and evaluating the potential for systemic side effects of these therapies, she noted.

No treatment for alopecia areata is currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration, but factors to consider when choosing a treatment include the patient’s age, location and extent of hair loss, and the presence of other medical problems, as well as a scalp biopsy report with information on the hair cycle and inflammation. Patients and/or their parents should understand the risks and benefits associated with various treatments to make an informed decision, Dr. Hordinsky said.

Patients and their families “have heard the ‘buzz’ about potential new treatments for alopecia areata, and the discussion needs to include a conversation about ongoing and future clinical research opportunities, as well as off-label use of Janus kinase inhibitors,” particularly oral tofacitinib, she said.

Approximately two-thirds of patients in recent studies of oral tofacitinib have had clinically acceptable hair regrowth after 6 months, Dr. Hordinsky said. Ruxolitinib is also being studied. However, “until clinical research studies are completed, there will be ongoing debate regarding the risks and benefits, cost, and sustainability” of JAK inhibitors or other new treatments, she said.

Dr. Hordinsky disclosed that she is a consultant for companies including Procter & Gamble and Concert, and has received grant/research support from Incyte, Allergan, and the National Alopecia Areata Foundation.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by Frontline Medical Communications.

 

The use of JAK inhibitors is not the only notable development in the treatment of hair loss; light-based options show potential as well, according to Maria Hordinsky, MD.

Dr. Maria Hordinsky
Photobiomodulation devices – low-level laser therapy ranging from 650 nm to 678 nm in wavelength – are used to treat hair loss, with treatments costing $195-$3,000, according to Dr. Hordinsky, professor and chair of the department of dermatology at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Types of devices include combs, bands, hats, caps, and helmets, with treatments recommended two to four times a week.

She referred to one trial, which found that men with androgenetic alopecia who used the HairMax Lasercomb showed an increase in mean hair density at 26 weeks of daily use, compared with a group that used a sham device.

Photobiomodulation devices use either laser light or light-emitting diodes. Comparing the two types is a challenge, and the question of which is more effective remains unanswered, Dr. Hordinsky said.

Other issues to be addressed in future research include finding the optimal wavelength to use for different indications for light-based treatments, determining whether pulse or continuous wave is more effective, and evaluating the potential for systemic side effects of these therapies, she noted.

No treatment for alopecia areata is currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration, but factors to consider when choosing a treatment include the patient’s age, location and extent of hair loss, and the presence of other medical problems, as well as a scalp biopsy report with information on the hair cycle and inflammation. Patients and/or their parents should understand the risks and benefits associated with various treatments to make an informed decision, Dr. Hordinsky said.

Patients and their families “have heard the ‘buzz’ about potential new treatments for alopecia areata, and the discussion needs to include a conversation about ongoing and future clinical research opportunities, as well as off-label use of Janus kinase inhibitors,” particularly oral tofacitinib, she said.

Approximately two-thirds of patients in recent studies of oral tofacitinib have had clinically acceptable hair regrowth after 6 months, Dr. Hordinsky said. Ruxolitinib is also being studied. However, “until clinical research studies are completed, there will be ongoing debate regarding the risks and benefits, cost, and sustainability” of JAK inhibitors or other new treatments, she said.

Dr. Hordinsky disclosed that she is a consultant for companies including Procter & Gamble and Concert, and has received grant/research support from Incyte, Allergan, and the National Alopecia Areata Foundation.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by Frontline Medical Communications.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM SDEF WOMEN’S & PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

How to decide which ‘birthmarks’ spell trouble

Article Type
Changed

 

When evaluating lumps and bumps in infants, categorizing them can help determine whether they need immediate attention, said James R. Treat, MD, a pediatric dermatologist at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

When evaluating lumps and bumps in infants, categorizing them can help determine whether they need immediate attention, said James R. Treat, MD, a pediatric dermatologist at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

 

When evaluating lumps and bumps in infants, categorizing them can help determine whether they need immediate attention, said James R. Treat, MD, a pediatric dermatologist at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM SDEF WOMEN’S & PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Times change, but children still come first

Article Type
Changed

 

After decades of pediatric practice, Thomas K. McInerny, MD, still accentuates the positive. “I decided to become a pediatrician in my third year of medical school after my pediatrics rotation. I loved working with the children and their families so full of joy and hope,” he said. “I still feel that pediatrics is the greatest profession despite some frustrations with rules, regulations, and computer work.”

Many childhood diseases, including birth defects and forms of cancer that were fatal 50 years ago, now can be treated successfully, he noted. “However, there are more children with emotional, behavioral, and school problems, which pediatricians are now treating as there is a great shortage of mental health professionals for children.”

Although the dedication of pediatricians to their specialty has remained strong over the past 50 years, their work environment has evolved in many ways.

Courtesy Dr. Thomas K. McInerny
Dr. Thomas K. McInerny
“Our work days 50 years ago were longer as we saw more patients with various infectious diseases, especially upper respiratory infections, pharyngitis, and ear infections,” recalled Dr. McInerny, a past president of the American Academy of Pediatrics and emeritus professor at the University of Rochester, N.Y. “We actually did not spend more time with our patients in years past as most of their illnesses were able to be diagnosed and treated quickly. We spend more time with our patients now as we are counseling them for behavioral and school problem issues, and seeing fewer patients with infectious diseases.”

David T. Tayloe Jr., MD, also a past president of the AAP, currently practices in Goldsboro, N.C. When he established a solo community practice in 1977, he was one of a few pediatricians in the area, and he was busy. “I was the only pediatrician who could take care of really sick newborns and hospital patients, so I basically was available 24-7 for those first 2 years; there were two older pediatricians in town, and they took routine night call with me, giving me some time with my family,” he said. “With 1,500 deliveries a year at our hospital, there were always sick babies who needed my services. My office hours were 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. but often, in the cooler months, we saw patients until 8 p.m.” These days, Dr. Tayloe said he works 3-4 days in the office, and “my practice is largely behavioral health, school problems, obesity, asthma, and well-baby/child care.”

“In the last 20 years, my typical work day has changed in many ways,” said Julia Richerson, MD, who practices at the Family Health Center Iroquois office in South Louisville, Ky.

Courtesy Dr. Julia Richerson
Dr. Julia Richerson
“In medical school, I had no interaction with computers, and in residency we were introduced to email within the training program. Now, of course, I am on the computer documenting notes, reviewing outside reports, submitting lab and consultation requests, and creating patient problem lists and other documentation that captures what I do in the office, then submitting charges electronically to our billing staff,” said Dr. Richerson, who currently serves as chair of the AAP Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine and on several AAP task forces.

“I use electronic resources to find patient education, to look up current treatments, and research complicated diagnosis,” she noted.

“I feel that having the computer in the room isn’t a barrier to communication with my patients and families. Using the EHR doesn’t take me more time to see a patient,” she said. “However, the review of consult and ER records is harder and takes longer to complete. Consult, ER, and other outside records are much larger with the key clinical data more disorganized and harder to find among the pages and pages of nonrelevant content. This makes the workday much longer.”

The conditions that take up most of a pediatric office visit have changed as well, and include more complex medical, behavioral, and social issues, Dr. Richerson observed. “Obesity, ADHD, autism, complications of prematurity, behavioral health issues, developmental delays, and asthma are commonly seen in practice now. One in five children nationally have a chronic illness or special health care need. And we strive to help ease the challenges for families struggling with economic insecurity, and children growing up experiencing significant adversities.”
 

The office and the EHR

EHRs are a fact of life in all specialties today, but should not get in the way of interacting with patients, Dr. McInerny said. Many pediatricians complete their medical records after hours at home because they don’t have time to complete them in the office.

 

 

“I would advise the younger pediatricians to be sure to look at and interact with their families as much as possible while working on the computer, and showing the families entries and graphs from the computer. We were able to interact with families much more easily when writing out notes with pen and paper,” he said.

In his early years of practice, Dr. Tayloe recalled, “I spent less time with each patient; my focus was infectious disease, and I treated many patients with what today are vaccine-preventable diseases. I could see patients much faster with paper charts, but my documentation left much to be desired,” he said. “With the electronic record, I spend more time with each patient, but I type really fast and finish my charts in the exam rooms with the patients.”

“EHRs have made daily practice easier and more complicated for pediatricians,” said Dr. Richerson. “In the moment-to-moment use of EHRs while seeing patients, we can fairly quickly document the information we need to for patient care.” However, she said, “It takes some additional time to document all the data points required for quality- and value-based reimbursement programs, and it takes a significant amount of additional time in most EHRs to retrieve relevant information because you cannot query the system for clinical content on a patient. Also, reviewing incoming records is difficult because the information is voluminous and poorly organized,” she noted. “There are so many opportunities for improvement, and hopefully 20 years from now we will have EHRs that significantly improve quality and safety of patient care.”
 

Money and malpractice

The Vaccines for Children program led to an increase in incomes for pediatricians in the United States after 1994, according to Dr. Tayloe. “We began to be paid by insurance companies for most of what we do during the mid-90s and that boosted revenues,” he said. However, “On the flip side, we are now at the mercy of private payers, and must participate in all their very burdensome quality improvement/assurance programs if we are to be paid fairly. Our incomes were pretty flat over the last 5-10 years, especially for practices that participate fully in Medicaid/CHIP.”

Over the past 50 years, malpractice claims against pediatricians have remained consistently among the lowest for any medical specialty, according to Paul Greve, JD, a registered professional liability underwriter and executive vice president and senior consultant at Willis Towers Watson Health Care Practice.

Paul Greve
“Pediatricians don’t get sued that often,” said Mr. Greve. “They are very careful, and they have some of the best relationships with parents and families of any specialty,” he said. “The problem is that when there is a mistake, there is usually a severe injury to that child, so they fall within the top 4-5 specialties for payouts.”

The impact of EHRs on pediatric practice from a legal standpoint depends on the format of the EHR itself, Mr. Greve said. “Many of the EHRs that are designed for physicians, particularly the ones used in acute care settings, don’t allow the doctor to really highlight their thinking as they work through the diagnostic process, and that is very important in the defense of a malpractice case against a pediatrician,” he said.

“The pediatrician doesn’t have to be correct all the time, but it is important for the lawyers defending the case to see what the pediatrician’s thought process was. If the EHR allows for capturing the doctor’s thought process, that’s a well-designed EHR, and that’s critical,” he emphasized.

Diagnostic error is one of the most entrenched problems in medical malpractice, said Mr. Greve. Failure to diagnose and delay in diagnosis remain the most common allegations against pediatricians, he noted. Also, being aware of the environment is important to risk management in the office.

“The American Academy of Pediatrics has excellent publications on safety and risk management that all pediatricians should be aware of,” he said.
 

Inspiration and intangibles

“I think the changes that we are starting to see will continue to evolve over the next 50 years,” said Dr. Richerson. “Increased medical and social complexity of patients, changes in health technology, EHRs, personal health data monitoring, and continued changes in value based payment methods will be key.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

After decades of pediatric practice, Thomas K. McInerny, MD, still accentuates the positive. “I decided to become a pediatrician in my third year of medical school after my pediatrics rotation. I loved working with the children and their families so full of joy and hope,” he said. “I still feel that pediatrics is the greatest profession despite some frustrations with rules, regulations, and computer work.”

Many childhood diseases, including birth defects and forms of cancer that were fatal 50 years ago, now can be treated successfully, he noted. “However, there are more children with emotional, behavioral, and school problems, which pediatricians are now treating as there is a great shortage of mental health professionals for children.”

Although the dedication of pediatricians to their specialty has remained strong over the past 50 years, their work environment has evolved in many ways.

Courtesy Dr. Thomas K. McInerny
Dr. Thomas K. McInerny
“Our work days 50 years ago were longer as we saw more patients with various infectious diseases, especially upper respiratory infections, pharyngitis, and ear infections,” recalled Dr. McInerny, a past president of the American Academy of Pediatrics and emeritus professor at the University of Rochester, N.Y. “We actually did not spend more time with our patients in years past as most of their illnesses were able to be diagnosed and treated quickly. We spend more time with our patients now as we are counseling them for behavioral and school problem issues, and seeing fewer patients with infectious diseases.”

David T. Tayloe Jr., MD, also a past president of the AAP, currently practices in Goldsboro, N.C. When he established a solo community practice in 1977, he was one of a few pediatricians in the area, and he was busy. “I was the only pediatrician who could take care of really sick newborns and hospital patients, so I basically was available 24-7 for those first 2 years; there were two older pediatricians in town, and they took routine night call with me, giving me some time with my family,” he said. “With 1,500 deliveries a year at our hospital, there were always sick babies who needed my services. My office hours were 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. but often, in the cooler months, we saw patients until 8 p.m.” These days, Dr. Tayloe said he works 3-4 days in the office, and “my practice is largely behavioral health, school problems, obesity, asthma, and well-baby/child care.”

“In the last 20 years, my typical work day has changed in many ways,” said Julia Richerson, MD, who practices at the Family Health Center Iroquois office in South Louisville, Ky.

Courtesy Dr. Julia Richerson
Dr. Julia Richerson
“In medical school, I had no interaction with computers, and in residency we were introduced to email within the training program. Now, of course, I am on the computer documenting notes, reviewing outside reports, submitting lab and consultation requests, and creating patient problem lists and other documentation that captures what I do in the office, then submitting charges electronically to our billing staff,” said Dr. Richerson, who currently serves as chair of the AAP Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine and on several AAP task forces.

“I use electronic resources to find patient education, to look up current treatments, and research complicated diagnosis,” she noted.

“I feel that having the computer in the room isn’t a barrier to communication with my patients and families. Using the EHR doesn’t take me more time to see a patient,” she said. “However, the review of consult and ER records is harder and takes longer to complete. Consult, ER, and other outside records are much larger with the key clinical data more disorganized and harder to find among the pages and pages of nonrelevant content. This makes the workday much longer.”

The conditions that take up most of a pediatric office visit have changed as well, and include more complex medical, behavioral, and social issues, Dr. Richerson observed. “Obesity, ADHD, autism, complications of prematurity, behavioral health issues, developmental delays, and asthma are commonly seen in practice now. One in five children nationally have a chronic illness or special health care need. And we strive to help ease the challenges for families struggling with economic insecurity, and children growing up experiencing significant adversities.”
 

The office and the EHR

EHRs are a fact of life in all specialties today, but should not get in the way of interacting with patients, Dr. McInerny said. Many pediatricians complete their medical records after hours at home because they don’t have time to complete them in the office.

 

 

“I would advise the younger pediatricians to be sure to look at and interact with their families as much as possible while working on the computer, and showing the families entries and graphs from the computer. We were able to interact with families much more easily when writing out notes with pen and paper,” he said.

In his early years of practice, Dr. Tayloe recalled, “I spent less time with each patient; my focus was infectious disease, and I treated many patients with what today are vaccine-preventable diseases. I could see patients much faster with paper charts, but my documentation left much to be desired,” he said. “With the electronic record, I spend more time with each patient, but I type really fast and finish my charts in the exam rooms with the patients.”

“EHRs have made daily practice easier and more complicated for pediatricians,” said Dr. Richerson. “In the moment-to-moment use of EHRs while seeing patients, we can fairly quickly document the information we need to for patient care.” However, she said, “It takes some additional time to document all the data points required for quality- and value-based reimbursement programs, and it takes a significant amount of additional time in most EHRs to retrieve relevant information because you cannot query the system for clinical content on a patient. Also, reviewing incoming records is difficult because the information is voluminous and poorly organized,” she noted. “There are so many opportunities for improvement, and hopefully 20 years from now we will have EHRs that significantly improve quality and safety of patient care.”
 

Money and malpractice

The Vaccines for Children program led to an increase in incomes for pediatricians in the United States after 1994, according to Dr. Tayloe. “We began to be paid by insurance companies for most of what we do during the mid-90s and that boosted revenues,” he said. However, “On the flip side, we are now at the mercy of private payers, and must participate in all their very burdensome quality improvement/assurance programs if we are to be paid fairly. Our incomes were pretty flat over the last 5-10 years, especially for practices that participate fully in Medicaid/CHIP.”

Over the past 50 years, malpractice claims against pediatricians have remained consistently among the lowest for any medical specialty, according to Paul Greve, JD, a registered professional liability underwriter and executive vice president and senior consultant at Willis Towers Watson Health Care Practice.

Paul Greve
“Pediatricians don’t get sued that often,” said Mr. Greve. “They are very careful, and they have some of the best relationships with parents and families of any specialty,” he said. “The problem is that when there is a mistake, there is usually a severe injury to that child, so they fall within the top 4-5 specialties for payouts.”

The impact of EHRs on pediatric practice from a legal standpoint depends on the format of the EHR itself, Mr. Greve said. “Many of the EHRs that are designed for physicians, particularly the ones used in acute care settings, don’t allow the doctor to really highlight their thinking as they work through the diagnostic process, and that is very important in the defense of a malpractice case against a pediatrician,” he said.

“The pediatrician doesn’t have to be correct all the time, but it is important for the lawyers defending the case to see what the pediatrician’s thought process was. If the EHR allows for capturing the doctor’s thought process, that’s a well-designed EHR, and that’s critical,” he emphasized.

Diagnostic error is one of the most entrenched problems in medical malpractice, said Mr. Greve. Failure to diagnose and delay in diagnosis remain the most common allegations against pediatricians, he noted. Also, being aware of the environment is important to risk management in the office.

“The American Academy of Pediatrics has excellent publications on safety and risk management that all pediatricians should be aware of,” he said.
 

Inspiration and intangibles

“I think the changes that we are starting to see will continue to evolve over the next 50 years,” said Dr. Richerson. “Increased medical and social complexity of patients, changes in health technology, EHRs, personal health data monitoring, and continued changes in value based payment methods will be key.

 

After decades of pediatric practice, Thomas K. McInerny, MD, still accentuates the positive. “I decided to become a pediatrician in my third year of medical school after my pediatrics rotation. I loved working with the children and their families so full of joy and hope,” he said. “I still feel that pediatrics is the greatest profession despite some frustrations with rules, regulations, and computer work.”

Many childhood diseases, including birth defects and forms of cancer that were fatal 50 years ago, now can be treated successfully, he noted. “However, there are more children with emotional, behavioral, and school problems, which pediatricians are now treating as there is a great shortage of mental health professionals for children.”

Although the dedication of pediatricians to their specialty has remained strong over the past 50 years, their work environment has evolved in many ways.

Courtesy Dr. Thomas K. McInerny
Dr. Thomas K. McInerny
“Our work days 50 years ago were longer as we saw more patients with various infectious diseases, especially upper respiratory infections, pharyngitis, and ear infections,” recalled Dr. McInerny, a past president of the American Academy of Pediatrics and emeritus professor at the University of Rochester, N.Y. “We actually did not spend more time with our patients in years past as most of their illnesses were able to be diagnosed and treated quickly. We spend more time with our patients now as we are counseling them for behavioral and school problem issues, and seeing fewer patients with infectious diseases.”

David T. Tayloe Jr., MD, also a past president of the AAP, currently practices in Goldsboro, N.C. When he established a solo community practice in 1977, he was one of a few pediatricians in the area, and he was busy. “I was the only pediatrician who could take care of really sick newborns and hospital patients, so I basically was available 24-7 for those first 2 years; there were two older pediatricians in town, and they took routine night call with me, giving me some time with my family,” he said. “With 1,500 deliveries a year at our hospital, there were always sick babies who needed my services. My office hours were 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. but often, in the cooler months, we saw patients until 8 p.m.” These days, Dr. Tayloe said he works 3-4 days in the office, and “my practice is largely behavioral health, school problems, obesity, asthma, and well-baby/child care.”

“In the last 20 years, my typical work day has changed in many ways,” said Julia Richerson, MD, who practices at the Family Health Center Iroquois office in South Louisville, Ky.

Courtesy Dr. Julia Richerson
Dr. Julia Richerson
“In medical school, I had no interaction with computers, and in residency we were introduced to email within the training program. Now, of course, I am on the computer documenting notes, reviewing outside reports, submitting lab and consultation requests, and creating patient problem lists and other documentation that captures what I do in the office, then submitting charges electronically to our billing staff,” said Dr. Richerson, who currently serves as chair of the AAP Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine and on several AAP task forces.

“I use electronic resources to find patient education, to look up current treatments, and research complicated diagnosis,” she noted.

“I feel that having the computer in the room isn’t a barrier to communication with my patients and families. Using the EHR doesn’t take me more time to see a patient,” she said. “However, the review of consult and ER records is harder and takes longer to complete. Consult, ER, and other outside records are much larger with the key clinical data more disorganized and harder to find among the pages and pages of nonrelevant content. This makes the workday much longer.”

The conditions that take up most of a pediatric office visit have changed as well, and include more complex medical, behavioral, and social issues, Dr. Richerson observed. “Obesity, ADHD, autism, complications of prematurity, behavioral health issues, developmental delays, and asthma are commonly seen in practice now. One in five children nationally have a chronic illness or special health care need. And we strive to help ease the challenges for families struggling with economic insecurity, and children growing up experiencing significant adversities.”
 

The office and the EHR

EHRs are a fact of life in all specialties today, but should not get in the way of interacting with patients, Dr. McInerny said. Many pediatricians complete their medical records after hours at home because they don’t have time to complete them in the office.

 

 

“I would advise the younger pediatricians to be sure to look at and interact with their families as much as possible while working on the computer, and showing the families entries and graphs from the computer. We were able to interact with families much more easily when writing out notes with pen and paper,” he said.

In his early years of practice, Dr. Tayloe recalled, “I spent less time with each patient; my focus was infectious disease, and I treated many patients with what today are vaccine-preventable diseases. I could see patients much faster with paper charts, but my documentation left much to be desired,” he said. “With the electronic record, I spend more time with each patient, but I type really fast and finish my charts in the exam rooms with the patients.”

“EHRs have made daily practice easier and more complicated for pediatricians,” said Dr. Richerson. “In the moment-to-moment use of EHRs while seeing patients, we can fairly quickly document the information we need to for patient care.” However, she said, “It takes some additional time to document all the data points required for quality- and value-based reimbursement programs, and it takes a significant amount of additional time in most EHRs to retrieve relevant information because you cannot query the system for clinical content on a patient. Also, reviewing incoming records is difficult because the information is voluminous and poorly organized,” she noted. “There are so many opportunities for improvement, and hopefully 20 years from now we will have EHRs that significantly improve quality and safety of patient care.”
 

Money and malpractice

The Vaccines for Children program led to an increase in incomes for pediatricians in the United States after 1994, according to Dr. Tayloe. “We began to be paid by insurance companies for most of what we do during the mid-90s and that boosted revenues,” he said. However, “On the flip side, we are now at the mercy of private payers, and must participate in all their very burdensome quality improvement/assurance programs if we are to be paid fairly. Our incomes were pretty flat over the last 5-10 years, especially for practices that participate fully in Medicaid/CHIP.”

Over the past 50 years, malpractice claims against pediatricians have remained consistently among the lowest for any medical specialty, according to Paul Greve, JD, a registered professional liability underwriter and executive vice president and senior consultant at Willis Towers Watson Health Care Practice.

Paul Greve
“Pediatricians don’t get sued that often,” said Mr. Greve. “They are very careful, and they have some of the best relationships with parents and families of any specialty,” he said. “The problem is that when there is a mistake, there is usually a severe injury to that child, so they fall within the top 4-5 specialties for payouts.”

The impact of EHRs on pediatric practice from a legal standpoint depends on the format of the EHR itself, Mr. Greve said. “Many of the EHRs that are designed for physicians, particularly the ones used in acute care settings, don’t allow the doctor to really highlight their thinking as they work through the diagnostic process, and that is very important in the defense of a malpractice case against a pediatrician,” he said.

“The pediatrician doesn’t have to be correct all the time, but it is important for the lawyers defending the case to see what the pediatrician’s thought process was. If the EHR allows for capturing the doctor’s thought process, that’s a well-designed EHR, and that’s critical,” he emphasized.

Diagnostic error is one of the most entrenched problems in medical malpractice, said Mr. Greve. Failure to diagnose and delay in diagnosis remain the most common allegations against pediatricians, he noted. Also, being aware of the environment is important to risk management in the office.

“The American Academy of Pediatrics has excellent publications on safety and risk management that all pediatricians should be aware of,” he said.
 

Inspiration and intangibles

“I think the changes that we are starting to see will continue to evolve over the next 50 years,” said Dr. Richerson. “Increased medical and social complexity of patients, changes in health technology, EHRs, personal health data monitoring, and continued changes in value based payment methods will be key.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Consider different T. capitis presentations in children with hair loss

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Consider different T. capitis presentations in children with hair loss

 

Categorizing hair loss in children depends on many factors, but it is important to rule out an infectious etiology as early as possible, according to Sheila Fallon Friedlander, MD.

“What can Tinea capitis look like? Anything,” she said in a presentation at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s Women’s & Pediatric Dermatology Seminar.

Although T. capitis most often presents in children aged 3-7 years as a pattern of localized hair loss, often with scaling, sometimes with nodules, other possibilities include pustules, boggy masses, and diffuse hair loss, said Dr. Friedlander, professor of pediatrics and dermatology at the University of California, San Diego.

Sometimes the hair loss may be so subtle that families come in complaining of “dandruff” rather than hair loss, she noted. Evaluating the patient for the presence of cervical or occipital lymph nodes is crucial; big nodes are usually a tip-off that infection is present.

Dr. Sheila Fallon Friedlander
The prevalence and etiology of tinea remains a moving target, and T. capitis varies with place and time, Dr. Friedlander observed. Historically, T. capitis has been most common in inner-city communities and developing countries, but “change is in the air,” she said, citing recent epidemiologic data from countries including Egypt, Palestine, Kuwait, Tunisia, and Saudi Arabia showing Microsporum canis overtaking Trichophyton violaceum as the dominant organism causing T. capitis. The upswing in M. canis traces back to family pets, especially cats and dogs, but “don’t forget hamsters,” she said.

Clinicians treating T. capitis should ask about family pets, advised Dr. Friedlander, adding that city dwellers’ conditions may be more likely caused by Trichophyton tonsurans, T. violaceum, or Trichophyton soudanense. Also consider immigration status and family history when evaluating T. capitis, and use a Wood’s lamp for diagnosis if one is available, she advised. M. canis will fluoresce and T. tonsurans will not, she pointed out.

Other strategies to evaluate the condition include KOH, culture, polymerase chain reaction, and trichoscopy.
 
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

Categorizing hair loss in children depends on many factors, but it is important to rule out an infectious etiology as early as possible, according to Sheila Fallon Friedlander, MD.

“What can Tinea capitis look like? Anything,” she said in a presentation at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s Women’s & Pediatric Dermatology Seminar.

Although T. capitis most often presents in children aged 3-7 years as a pattern of localized hair loss, often with scaling, sometimes with nodules, other possibilities include pustules, boggy masses, and diffuse hair loss, said Dr. Friedlander, professor of pediatrics and dermatology at the University of California, San Diego.

Sometimes the hair loss may be so subtle that families come in complaining of “dandruff” rather than hair loss, she noted. Evaluating the patient for the presence of cervical or occipital lymph nodes is crucial; big nodes are usually a tip-off that infection is present.

Dr. Sheila Fallon Friedlander
The prevalence and etiology of tinea remains a moving target, and T. capitis varies with place and time, Dr. Friedlander observed. Historically, T. capitis has been most common in inner-city communities and developing countries, but “change is in the air,” she said, citing recent epidemiologic data from countries including Egypt, Palestine, Kuwait, Tunisia, and Saudi Arabia showing Microsporum canis overtaking Trichophyton violaceum as the dominant organism causing T. capitis. The upswing in M. canis traces back to family pets, especially cats and dogs, but “don’t forget hamsters,” she said.

Clinicians treating T. capitis should ask about family pets, advised Dr. Friedlander, adding that city dwellers’ conditions may be more likely caused by Trichophyton tonsurans, T. violaceum, or Trichophyton soudanense. Also consider immigration status and family history when evaluating T. capitis, and use a Wood’s lamp for diagnosis if one is available, she advised. M. canis will fluoresce and T. tonsurans will not, she pointed out.

Other strategies to evaluate the condition include KOH, culture, polymerase chain reaction, and trichoscopy.
 

 

Categorizing hair loss in children depends on many factors, but it is important to rule out an infectious etiology as early as possible, according to Sheila Fallon Friedlander, MD.

“What can Tinea capitis look like? Anything,” she said in a presentation at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s Women’s & Pediatric Dermatology Seminar.

Although T. capitis most often presents in children aged 3-7 years as a pattern of localized hair loss, often with scaling, sometimes with nodules, other possibilities include pustules, boggy masses, and diffuse hair loss, said Dr. Friedlander, professor of pediatrics and dermatology at the University of California, San Diego.

Sometimes the hair loss may be so subtle that families come in complaining of “dandruff” rather than hair loss, she noted. Evaluating the patient for the presence of cervical or occipital lymph nodes is crucial; big nodes are usually a tip-off that infection is present.

Dr. Sheila Fallon Friedlander
The prevalence and etiology of tinea remains a moving target, and T. capitis varies with place and time, Dr. Friedlander observed. Historically, T. capitis has been most common in inner-city communities and developing countries, but “change is in the air,” she said, citing recent epidemiologic data from countries including Egypt, Palestine, Kuwait, Tunisia, and Saudi Arabia showing Microsporum canis overtaking Trichophyton violaceum as the dominant organism causing T. capitis. The upswing in M. canis traces back to family pets, especially cats and dogs, but “don’t forget hamsters,” she said.

Clinicians treating T. capitis should ask about family pets, advised Dr. Friedlander, adding that city dwellers’ conditions may be more likely caused by Trichophyton tonsurans, T. violaceum, or Trichophyton soudanense. Also consider immigration status and family history when evaluating T. capitis, and use a Wood’s lamp for diagnosis if one is available, she advised. M. canis will fluoresce and T. tonsurans will not, she pointed out.

Other strategies to evaluate the condition include KOH, culture, polymerase chain reaction, and trichoscopy.
 
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Consider different T. capitis presentations in children with hair loss
Display Headline
Consider different T. capitis presentations in children with hair loss
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM SDEF WOMEN’S & PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Light therapy offers brighter future for scar patients

Article Type
Changed

Current treatment with available light-based devices, notably ablative fractional resurfacing, can greatly improve quality of life for patients struggling with scars, according to Kristen Kelly, MD, of the University of California, Irvine.

Using multiple devices, and combining devices with other therapies, are among the strategies that can improve pain and function in these patients, she said in a presentation at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

Dr. Kristen M. Kelly
In general, pulsed dye laser, intense pulsed light, and nonablative fractional resurfacing (NAFR) can improve the redness associated with scars, Dr. Kelly noted. Pigmentation may be managed with Q-switched lasers or 1927 nm NAFR, and either NAFR or ablative fractional resurfacing (AFR) may improve scar texture, she said.

Dr. Kelly recommends “a CO2 laser or an Er:YAG [erbium-doped YAG],” as AFR options for scar treatment. The Er:YAG is less painful, but may cause bleeding, she noted.

Tips for a scar treatment protocol with AFR include low density and treating the entire scar plus a 1-2 mm rim, Dr. Kelly said. AFR treatment of scars can start in some cases soon after an injury, but it depends on the cause of the scar and treatment timing is controversial, especially for burn scars, she said. Dr. Kelly outlined a plan of treatment every 2-3 months, with the option of adding triamcinolone suspension immediately after the AFR treatment, she noted.

Other medications used after AFR to improve results include 5-fluorouracil, bimatoprost, and poly-L-lactic acid. However, “you should only consider this for medications that you would safely inject into the skin or bloodstream,” she emphasized.

Combining AFR with other devices can improve results, depending on the type of scar, said Dr. Kelly. Atrophic scars may be treated with AFR or NAFR, while red atrophic scars may improve with a combination AFR or NAFR and a pulsed dye laser, she said. For red hypertrophic scars, consider a combination of AFR plus a steroid combined with a pulsed dye laser, she added.

When embarking on a scar treatment plan, be sure to define goals and remind patients that scars can be “improved but not removed,” said Dr. Kelly. “Laser therapy is often not monotherapy,” she added. A surgical revision, such as a Z-plasty, and the use of physical and occupational therapy also can improve results and improve quality of life for patients, she said.

Dr. Kelly disclosed relationships with multiple companies including Allergan, MundiPharma, Syneron Candela, Light Sciences Oncology, Novartis, Sciton, and ThermiRF.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

Current treatment with available light-based devices, notably ablative fractional resurfacing, can greatly improve quality of life for patients struggling with scars, according to Kristen Kelly, MD, of the University of California, Irvine.

Using multiple devices, and combining devices with other therapies, are among the strategies that can improve pain and function in these patients, she said in a presentation at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

Dr. Kristen M. Kelly
In general, pulsed dye laser, intense pulsed light, and nonablative fractional resurfacing (NAFR) can improve the redness associated with scars, Dr. Kelly noted. Pigmentation may be managed with Q-switched lasers or 1927 nm NAFR, and either NAFR or ablative fractional resurfacing (AFR) may improve scar texture, she said.

Dr. Kelly recommends “a CO2 laser or an Er:YAG [erbium-doped YAG],” as AFR options for scar treatment. The Er:YAG is less painful, but may cause bleeding, she noted.

Tips for a scar treatment protocol with AFR include low density and treating the entire scar plus a 1-2 mm rim, Dr. Kelly said. AFR treatment of scars can start in some cases soon after an injury, but it depends on the cause of the scar and treatment timing is controversial, especially for burn scars, she said. Dr. Kelly outlined a plan of treatment every 2-3 months, with the option of adding triamcinolone suspension immediately after the AFR treatment, she noted.

Other medications used after AFR to improve results include 5-fluorouracil, bimatoprost, and poly-L-lactic acid. However, “you should only consider this for medications that you would safely inject into the skin or bloodstream,” she emphasized.

Combining AFR with other devices can improve results, depending on the type of scar, said Dr. Kelly. Atrophic scars may be treated with AFR or NAFR, while red atrophic scars may improve with a combination AFR or NAFR and a pulsed dye laser, she said. For red hypertrophic scars, consider a combination of AFR plus a steroid combined with a pulsed dye laser, she added.

When embarking on a scar treatment plan, be sure to define goals and remind patients that scars can be “improved but not removed,” said Dr. Kelly. “Laser therapy is often not monotherapy,” she added. A surgical revision, such as a Z-plasty, and the use of physical and occupational therapy also can improve results and improve quality of life for patients, she said.

Dr. Kelly disclosed relationships with multiple companies including Allergan, MundiPharma, Syneron Candela, Light Sciences Oncology, Novartis, Sciton, and ThermiRF.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.

Current treatment with available light-based devices, notably ablative fractional resurfacing, can greatly improve quality of life for patients struggling with scars, according to Kristen Kelly, MD, of the University of California, Irvine.

Using multiple devices, and combining devices with other therapies, are among the strategies that can improve pain and function in these patients, she said in a presentation at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.

Dr. Kristen M. Kelly
In general, pulsed dye laser, intense pulsed light, and nonablative fractional resurfacing (NAFR) can improve the redness associated with scars, Dr. Kelly noted. Pigmentation may be managed with Q-switched lasers or 1927 nm NAFR, and either NAFR or ablative fractional resurfacing (AFR) may improve scar texture, she said.

Dr. Kelly recommends “a CO2 laser or an Er:YAG [erbium-doped YAG],” as AFR options for scar treatment. The Er:YAG is less painful, but may cause bleeding, she noted.

Tips for a scar treatment protocol with AFR include low density and treating the entire scar plus a 1-2 mm rim, Dr. Kelly said. AFR treatment of scars can start in some cases soon after an injury, but it depends on the cause of the scar and treatment timing is controversial, especially for burn scars, she said. Dr. Kelly outlined a plan of treatment every 2-3 months, with the option of adding triamcinolone suspension immediately after the AFR treatment, she noted.

Other medications used after AFR to improve results include 5-fluorouracil, bimatoprost, and poly-L-lactic acid. However, “you should only consider this for medications that you would safely inject into the skin or bloodstream,” she emphasized.

Combining AFR with other devices can improve results, depending on the type of scar, said Dr. Kelly. Atrophic scars may be treated with AFR or NAFR, while red atrophic scars may improve with a combination AFR or NAFR and a pulsed dye laser, she said. For red hypertrophic scars, consider a combination of AFR plus a steroid combined with a pulsed dye laser, she added.

When embarking on a scar treatment plan, be sure to define goals and remind patients that scars can be “improved but not removed,” said Dr. Kelly. “Laser therapy is often not monotherapy,” she added. A surgical revision, such as a Z-plasty, and the use of physical and occupational therapy also can improve results and improve quality of life for patients, she said.

Dr. Kelly disclosed relationships with multiple companies including Allergan, MundiPharma, Syneron Candela, Light Sciences Oncology, Novartis, Sciton, and ThermiRF.

SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM SDEF LAS VEGAS DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default