ALL

Micrograph showing B-ALL

Researchers say they have reported the first results demonstrating clinical activity of a CD22-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

The team conducted a phase 1 study of the therapy in 21 children and adults with relapsed/refractory B-ALL.

Twelve patients achieved a complete response (CR) to the treatment, with 3 patients still in CR at last follow-up.

Sixteen patients developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS), all grade 1 or 2.

Crystal Mackall, MD, of Stanford University in California, and her colleagues reported these results in Nature Medicine.*

“This is the first time that we’ve seen response rates anything like we achieved when we were first testing the CD19 CAR T therapy,” Dr Mackall said.

“We were all a little worried that we wouldn’t find anything comparable, but this study gives hope to the idea that there may be another similar, very potent treatment.”

Patients

Dr Mackall and her colleagues studied the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy in 21 patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. They had a median age of 19 (range, 7 to 30).

All of the patients had received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant at least once, and 2 patients had 2 prior transplants each. Seventeen patients had received prior CD19-directed immunotherapy. Fifteen had received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, and 2 had received blinatumomab.

Lymphoblasts were CD19⁻ or CD19^dim in 10 patients (9 who had received a CD19-CAR and 1 treated with blinatumomab).

The median CD22 site density was 2839 molecules per cell (range, 613 to 13,452).

Dosing and DLTs

Patients received the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy at 1 of 3 dose levels:

• 0.3 × 10⁶ CD22-CAR T cells per kg body weight (n=6)
• 1 × 10⁶ cells per kg (n=13)
• 3 × 10⁶ cells per kg (n=2).

There was 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the first dose level. It was grade 3, self-limited, noninfectious diarrhea that occurred during CRS and resolved with supportive care.

The other DLT occurred in a patient who received treatment at the third dose level. This patient had grade 4 hypoxia that was associated with rapid disease progression. The patient required brief intubation, and the hypoxia was resolved within 24 hours of starting steroid treatment.

Based on these results, the second dose level became the recommended phase 2 dose.

Other adverse events

The researchers said the primary toxicity was CRS, which occurred in 16 patients. Nine patients had grade 1 CRS, and 7 had grade 2.

There were no cases of irreversible neurotoxicity or seizure reported. Among the first 16 patients with complete assessments, there were cases of transient visual hallucinations (n=2), mild unresponsiveness (n=1), mild disorientation (n=1), and mild to moderate pain (n=2). However, these incidents resolved by day 28.

One patient died from gram-negative rod sepsis that developed after the resolution of CRS and neutrophil count recovery to >1000 cells/μL blood. The patient had a history of multi-organ failure due to sepsis.

Response

Twelve patients (57%) had a CR, and 9 of them were minimal residual disease negative.

One CR occurred at the lowest dose of therapy, 1 occurred at the highest dose, and the remaining 10 CRs occurred in patients who received dose level 2.

The researchers said there was no evidence to suggest that previous CD19-directed immunotherapy or diminished surface expression of CD19 impacted response to the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy.

Of the 9 patients who did not respond, 4 progressed and 5 had stable disease.

The researchers said 4 non-responders had “very high disease burden with rapid disease progression.” And 2 non-responders expressed diminished or partial CD22 on leukemic blasts at the time of enrollment.

The median duration of response was 6 months (range, 1.5 to 21+ months). Three patients are still in CR at 6, 9, and 21 months of follow-up.

“The take-home message is that we’ve found another CAR T-cell therapy that displays high-level activity in this phase 1 trial,” Dr Mackall said. “But the relapse rate was also high. So this forces the field to get even more sophisticated. How much of a target is needed for successful, long-lasting treatment? What happens if we target both CD19 and CD22 simultaneously?”

The researchers are already tackling the last question by testing a CAR T-cell therapy that recognizes both CD19 and CD22. They’ve confirmed this therapy can kill cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Now, they’re testing it in a clinical trial that has opened at Stanford University and will open soon at the National Cancer Institute.

*This research was supported, in part, by the Intramural Research Program, National Cancer Institute and NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health; by a Stand Up to Cancer–St. Baldrick’s Pediatric Dream Team translational research grant; and by a St. Baldrick’s Foundation Scholar Award.

Micrograph showing B-ALL

Researchers say they have reported the first results demonstrating clinical activity of a CD22-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

The team conducted a phase 1 study of the therapy in 21 children and adults with relapsed/refractory B-ALL.

Twelve patients achieved a complete response (CR) to the treatment, with 3 patients still in CR at last follow-up.

Sixteen patients developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS), all grade 1 or 2.

Crystal Mackall, MD, of Stanford University in California, and her colleagues reported these results in Nature Medicine.*

“This is the first time that we’ve seen response rates anything like we achieved when we were first testing the CD19 CAR T therapy,” Dr Mackall said.

“We were all a little worried that we wouldn’t find anything comparable, but this study gives hope to the idea that there may be another similar, very potent treatment.”

Patients

Dr Mackall and her colleagues studied the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy in 21 patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. They had a median age of 19 (range, 7 to 30).

All of the patients had received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant at least once, and 2 patients had 2 prior transplants each. Seventeen patients had received prior CD19-directed immunotherapy. Fifteen had received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, and 2 had received blinatumomab.

Lymphoblasts were CD19⁻ or CD19^dim in 10 patients (9 who had received a CD19-CAR and 1 treated with blinatumomab).

The median CD22 site density was 2839 molecules per cell (range, 613 to 13,452).

Dosing and DLTs

Patients received the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy at 1 of 3 dose levels:

• 0.3 × 10⁶ CD22-CAR T cells per kg body weight (n=6)
• 1 × 10⁶ cells per kg (n=13)
• 3 × 10⁶ cells per kg (n=2).

There was 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the first dose level. It was grade 3, self-limited, noninfectious diarrhea that occurred during CRS and resolved with supportive care.

The other DLT occurred in a patient who received treatment at the third dose level. This patient had grade 4 hypoxia that was associated with rapid disease progression. The patient required brief intubation, and the hypoxia was resolved within 24 hours of starting steroid treatment.

Based on these results, the second dose level became the recommended phase 2 dose.

Other adverse events

The researchers said the primary toxicity was CRS, which occurred in 16 patients. Nine patients had grade 1 CRS, and 7 had grade 2.

There were no cases of irreversible neurotoxicity or seizure reported. Among the first 16 patients with complete assessments, there were cases of transient visual hallucinations (n=2), mild unresponsiveness (n=1), mild disorientation (n=1), and mild to moderate pain (n=2). However, these incidents resolved by day 28.

One patient died from gram-negative rod sepsis that developed after the resolution of CRS and neutrophil count recovery to >1000 cells/μL blood. The patient had a history of multi-organ failure due to sepsis.

Response

Twelve patients (57%) had a CR, and 9 of them were minimal residual disease negative.

One CR occurred at the lowest dose of therapy, 1 occurred at the highest dose, and the remaining 10 CRs occurred in patients who received dose level 2.

The researchers said there was no evidence to suggest that previous CD19-directed immunotherapy or diminished surface expression of CD19 impacted response to the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy.

Of the 9 patients who did not respond, 4 progressed and 5 had stable disease.

The researchers said 4 non-responders had “very high disease burden with rapid disease progression.” And 2 non-responders expressed diminished or partial CD22 on leukemic blasts at the time of enrollment.

The median duration of response was 6 months (range, 1.5 to 21+ months). Three patients are still in CR at 6, 9, and 21 months of follow-up.

“The take-home message is that we’ve found another CAR T-cell therapy that displays high-level activity in this phase 1 trial,” Dr Mackall said. “But the relapse rate was also high. So this forces the field to get even more sophisticated. How much of a target is needed for successful, long-lasting treatment? What happens if we target both CD19 and CD22 simultaneously?”

The researchers are already tackling the last question by testing a CAR T-cell therapy that recognizes both CD19 and CD22. They’ve confirmed this therapy can kill cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Now, they’re testing it in a clinical trial that has opened at Stanford University and will open soon at the National Cancer Institute.

*This research was supported, in part, by the Intramural Research Program, National Cancer Institute and NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health; by a Stand Up to Cancer–St. Baldrick’s Pediatric Dream Team translational research grant; and by a St. Baldrick’s Foundation Scholar Award.

Micrograph showing B-ALL

Researchers say they have reported the first results demonstrating clinical activity of a CD22-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

The team conducted a phase 1 study of the therapy in 21 children and adults with relapsed/refractory B-ALL.

Twelve patients achieved a complete response (CR) to the treatment, with 3 patients still in CR at last follow-up.

Sixteen patients developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS), all grade 1 or 2.

Crystal Mackall, MD, of Stanford University in California, and her colleagues reported these results in Nature Medicine.*

“This is the first time that we’ve seen response rates anything like we achieved when we were first testing the CD19 CAR T therapy,” Dr Mackall said.

“We were all a little worried that we wouldn’t find anything comparable, but this study gives hope to the idea that there may be another similar, very potent treatment.”

Patients

Dr Mackall and her colleagues studied the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy in 21 patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. They had a median age of 19 (range, 7 to 30).

All of the patients had received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant at least once, and 2 patients had 2 prior transplants each. Seventeen patients had received prior CD19-directed immunotherapy. Fifteen had received CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy, and 2 had received blinatumomab.

Lymphoblasts were CD19⁻ or CD19^dim in 10 patients (9 who had received a CD19-CAR and 1 treated with blinatumomab).

The median CD22 site density was 2839 molecules per cell (range, 613 to 13,452).

Dosing and DLTs

Patients received the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy at 1 of 3 dose levels:

• 0.3 × 10⁶ CD22-CAR T cells per kg body weight (n=6)
• 1 × 10⁶ cells per kg (n=13)
• 3 × 10⁶ cells per kg (n=2).

There was 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the first dose level. It was grade 3, self-limited, noninfectious diarrhea that occurred during CRS and resolved with supportive care.

The other DLT occurred in a patient who received treatment at the third dose level. This patient had grade 4 hypoxia that was associated with rapid disease progression. The patient required brief intubation, and the hypoxia was resolved within 24 hours of starting steroid treatment.

Based on these results, the second dose level became the recommended phase 2 dose.

Other adverse events

The researchers said the primary toxicity was CRS, which occurred in 16 patients. Nine patients had grade 1 CRS, and 7 had grade 2.

There were no cases of irreversible neurotoxicity or seizure reported. Among the first 16 patients with complete assessments, there were cases of transient visual hallucinations (n=2), mild unresponsiveness (n=1), mild disorientation (n=1), and mild to moderate pain (n=2). However, these incidents resolved by day 28.

One patient died from gram-negative rod sepsis that developed after the resolution of CRS and neutrophil count recovery to >1000 cells/μL blood. The patient had a history of multi-organ failure due to sepsis.

Response

Twelve patients (57%) had a CR, and 9 of them were minimal residual disease negative.

One CR occurred at the lowest dose of therapy, 1 occurred at the highest dose, and the remaining 10 CRs occurred in patients who received dose level 2.

The researchers said there was no evidence to suggest that previous CD19-directed immunotherapy or diminished surface expression of CD19 impacted response to the CD22-CAR T-cell therapy.

Of the 9 patients who did not respond, 4 progressed and 5 had stable disease.

The researchers said 4 non-responders had “very high disease burden with rapid disease progression.” And 2 non-responders expressed diminished or partial CD22 on leukemic blasts at the time of enrollment.

The median duration of response was 6 months (range, 1.5 to 21+ months). Three patients are still in CR at 6, 9, and 21 months of follow-up.

“The take-home message is that we’ve found another CAR T-cell therapy that displays high-level activity in this phase 1 trial,” Dr Mackall said. “But the relapse rate was also high. So this forces the field to get even more sophisticated. How much of a target is needed for successful, long-lasting treatment? What happens if we target both CD19 and CD22 simultaneously?”

The researchers are already tackling the last question by testing a CAR T-cell therapy that recognizes both CD19 and CD22. They’ve confirmed this therapy can kill cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Now, they’re testing it in a clinical trial that has opened at Stanford University and will open soon at the National Cancer Institute.

*This research was supported, in part, by the Intramural Research Program, National Cancer Institute and NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health; by a Stand Up to Cancer–St. Baldrick’s Pediatric Dream Team translational research grant; and by a St. Baldrick’s Foundation Scholar Award.

acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd.’s Clofarabine Injection, a therapeutic equivalent generic version of Clolar® (clofarabine) Injection.

The generic drug is now approved to treat patients age 1 to 21 who have relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia and have received at least 2 prior treatment regimens.

Dr. Reddy’s Clofarabine Injection is available in single-dose, 20 mL flint vials containing 20 mg of clofarabine in 20 mL of solution (1 mg/mL).

acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd.’s Clofarabine Injection, a therapeutic equivalent generic version of Clolar® (clofarabine) Injection.

The generic drug is now approved to treat patients age 1 to 21 who have relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia and have received at least 2 prior treatment regimens.

Dr. Reddy’s Clofarabine Injection is available in single-dose, 20 mL flint vials containing 20 mg of clofarabine in 20 mL of solution (1 mg/mL).

acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd.’s Clofarabine Injection, a therapeutic equivalent generic version of Clolar® (clofarabine) Injection.

The generic drug is now approved to treat patients age 1 to 21 who have relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia and have received at least 2 prior treatment regimens.

Dr. Reddy’s Clofarabine Injection is available in single-dose, 20 mL flint vials containing 20 mg of clofarabine in 20 mL of solution (1 mg/mL).

VICTORIA, B.C. – When it comes to the adverse effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), hypothyroidism appears to have a bright side, according to a retrospective cohort study among patients with nonthyroid cancers.

While taking one of these targeted agents, roughly a quarter of patients became overtly hypothyroid, an adverse effect that appears to be due in part to immune destruction. Risk was higher for women and earlier in therapy.

Relative to counterparts who remained euthyroid, overtly hypothyroid patients were 44% less likely to die after other factors were taken into account.

Susan London, Frontline Medical News

VICTORIA, B.C. – When it comes to the adverse effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), hypothyroidism appears to have a bright side, according to a retrospective cohort study among patients with nonthyroid cancers.

While taking one of these targeted agents, roughly a quarter of patients became overtly hypothyroid, an adverse effect that appears to be due in part to immune destruction. Risk was higher for women and earlier in therapy.

Relative to counterparts who remained euthyroid, overtly hypothyroid patients were 44% less likely to die after other factors were taken into account.

Susan London, Frontline Medical News

VICTORIA, B.C. – When it comes to the adverse effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), hypothyroidism appears to have a bright side, according to a retrospective cohort study among patients with nonthyroid cancers.

While taking one of these targeted agents, roughly a quarter of patients became overtly hypothyroid, an adverse effect that appears to be due in part to immune destruction. Risk was higher for women and earlier in therapy.

Relative to counterparts who remained euthyroid, overtly hypothyroid patients were 44% less likely to die after other factors were taken into account.

Susan London, Frontline Medical News

Among children with average-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), those with impairments in physical and emotional functioning at 2 months after diagnosis are likely to have continuing difficulties over 2 years later, based on the results of a 594-patient study published online in Cancer (2017 Nov 7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31085).

Evaluations of quality of life and family functioning as early as 2 months after diagnosis identified those at highest risk of continued impairment, and can be used to target patients and their families for interventions and risk factor modification, the researchers said.

“These results provide a compelling rationale to screen patients for physical and emotional functioning early in therapy to target interventions toward patients at the highest risk of later impairment,” wrote lead author Daniel J. Zheng, MD, of the section of pediatric hematology-oncology at Yale University, New Haven, Conn., and coauthors.

Dr. Zheng and his colleagues measured impairments in children with average-risk ALL using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales Version 4.0 (PedsQL4.0), a 23-item survey that measures a child’s quality of life, and the 12-question General Functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD-GF). Both are quick and low-cost screening measures that can be conducted in the clinic, they added. Evaluations occurred at approximately 2 months, 8 months, 17 months, 26 months, and 38 months (boys only) after diagnosis. The mean age of participants at diagnosis was 6.0 years (standard deviation, 1.6 years).

At 2 months after diagnosis, 36.5% of the children had impairments in physical functioning, and 26.2% had impairments in emotional functioning. The population norms for these measures are 2.3% for both scales, investigators wrote. At a 26-month evaluation, levels of impairment were still 11.9% for physical and 9.8% for emotional functioning.

Boys had an additional 38-month evaluation, at which time there were no significant differences in quality of life outcomes versus those observed at 26 months in the girls.

Unhealthy family functioning was a significant predictor of emotional impairment (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.1) in multivariate models controlling for age and sex.

Strategies are needed to “intervene early and help the substantial proportion of children” with quality of life impairments, the researchers said. In particular, family functioning is “potentially modifiable with early intervention,” as suggested by a series of promising studies of techniques such as stress management sessions for parents. Most techniques feature a “targeted family-centered approach to psychosocial needs” that includes “embedded psychologists” as part of the multidisciplinary cancer care team.

Study funding came from the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, and the St. Baldrick’s Foundation. Dr. Zheng reported funding from a Yale Medical Student research fellowship, while coauthors reported conflict of interest disclosures from entities including Amgen, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, and Shire Pharmaceuticals.

Among children with average-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), those with impairments in physical and emotional functioning at 2 months after diagnosis are likely to have continuing difficulties over 2 years later, based on the results of a 594-patient study published online in Cancer (2017 Nov 7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31085).

Evaluations of quality of life and family functioning as early as 2 months after diagnosis identified those at highest risk of continued impairment, and can be used to target patients and their families for interventions and risk factor modification, the researchers said.

“These results provide a compelling rationale to screen patients for physical and emotional functioning early in therapy to target interventions toward patients at the highest risk of later impairment,” wrote lead author Daniel J. Zheng, MD, of the section of pediatric hematology-oncology at Yale University, New Haven, Conn., and coauthors.

Dr. Zheng and his colleagues measured impairments in children with average-risk ALL using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales Version 4.0 (PedsQL4.0), a 23-item survey that measures a child’s quality of life, and the 12-question General Functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD-GF). Both are quick and low-cost screening measures that can be conducted in the clinic, they added. Evaluations occurred at approximately 2 months, 8 months, 17 months, 26 months, and 38 months (boys only) after diagnosis. The mean age of participants at diagnosis was 6.0 years (standard deviation, 1.6 years).

At 2 months after diagnosis, 36.5% of the children had impairments in physical functioning, and 26.2% had impairments in emotional functioning. The population norms for these measures are 2.3% for both scales, investigators wrote. At a 26-month evaluation, levels of impairment were still 11.9% for physical and 9.8% for emotional functioning.

Boys had an additional 38-month evaluation, at which time there were no significant differences in quality of life outcomes versus those observed at 26 months in the girls.

Unhealthy family functioning was a significant predictor of emotional impairment (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.1) in multivariate models controlling for age and sex.

Strategies are needed to “intervene early and help the substantial proportion of children” with quality of life impairments, the researchers said. In particular, family functioning is “potentially modifiable with early intervention,” as suggested by a series of promising studies of techniques such as stress management sessions for parents. Most techniques feature a “targeted family-centered approach to psychosocial needs” that includes “embedded psychologists” as part of the multidisciplinary cancer care team.

Study funding came from the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, and the St. Baldrick’s Foundation. Dr. Zheng reported funding from a Yale Medical Student research fellowship, while coauthors reported conflict of interest disclosures from entities including Amgen, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, and Shire Pharmaceuticals.

Among children with average-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), those with impairments in physical and emotional functioning at 2 months after diagnosis are likely to have continuing difficulties over 2 years later, based on the results of a 594-patient study published online in Cancer (2017 Nov 7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31085).

Evaluations of quality of life and family functioning as early as 2 months after diagnosis identified those at highest risk of continued impairment, and can be used to target patients and their families for interventions and risk factor modification, the researchers said.

“These results provide a compelling rationale to screen patients for physical and emotional functioning early in therapy to target interventions toward patients at the highest risk of later impairment,” wrote lead author Daniel J. Zheng, MD, of the section of pediatric hematology-oncology at Yale University, New Haven, Conn., and coauthors.

Dr. Zheng and his colleagues measured impairments in children with average-risk ALL using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales Version 4.0 (PedsQL4.0), a 23-item survey that measures a child’s quality of life, and the 12-question General Functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD-GF). Both are quick and low-cost screening measures that can be conducted in the clinic, they added. Evaluations occurred at approximately 2 months, 8 months, 17 months, 26 months, and 38 months (boys only) after diagnosis. The mean age of participants at diagnosis was 6.0 years (standard deviation, 1.6 years).

At 2 months after diagnosis, 36.5% of the children had impairments in physical functioning, and 26.2% had impairments in emotional functioning. The population norms for these measures are 2.3% for both scales, investigators wrote. At a 26-month evaluation, levels of impairment were still 11.9% for physical and 9.8% for emotional functioning.

Boys had an additional 38-month evaluation, at which time there were no significant differences in quality of life outcomes versus those observed at 26 months in the girls.

Unhealthy family functioning was a significant predictor of emotional impairment (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.1) in multivariate models controlling for age and sex.

Strategies are needed to “intervene early and help the substantial proportion of children” with quality of life impairments, the researchers said. In particular, family functioning is “potentially modifiable with early intervention,” as suggested by a series of promising studies of techniques such as stress management sessions for parents. Most techniques feature a “targeted family-centered approach to psychosocial needs” that includes “embedded psychologists” as part of the multidisciplinary cancer care team.

Study funding came from the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, and the St. Baldrick’s Foundation. Dr. Zheng reported funding from a Yale Medical Student research fellowship, while coauthors reported conflict of interest disclosures from entities including Amgen, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, and Shire Pharmaceuticals.

The generic clofarabine injection for treatment of children with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is now available on the U.S. market.

The generic version of the drug was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in May 2017 for children up to age 21 years with relapsed or refractory ALL after at least two prior regimens.

The injection, marketed by Mylan N.V., is available in 20 mg/20 mL (1 mg/mL) single-dose vials. It is a generic version of Genzyme’s Clolar.

mschneider@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @maryellenny

The generic clofarabine injection for treatment of children with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is now available on the U.S. market.

The generic version of the drug was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in May 2017 for children up to age 21 years with relapsed or refractory ALL after at least two prior regimens.

The injection, marketed by Mylan N.V., is available in 20 mg/20 mL (1 mg/mL) single-dose vials. It is a generic version of Genzyme’s Clolar.

mschneider@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @maryellenny

The generic clofarabine injection for treatment of children with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is now available on the U.S. market.

The generic version of the drug was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in May 2017 for children up to age 21 years with relapsed or refractory ALL after at least two prior regimens.

The injection, marketed by Mylan N.V., is available in 20 mg/20 mL (1 mg/mL) single-dose vials. It is a generic version of Genzyme’s Clolar.

mschneider@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @maryellenny

Photo by Bill Branson

Cancer drug costs in the US increase substantially after launch, regardless of competition, according to a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.*

Researchers studied 24 cancer drugs approved over the last 20 years and found a mean cumulative cost increase of about 37%, or 19% when adjusted for inflation.

Among drugs approved to treat hematologic malignancies, the greatest inflation-adjusted price increases were for arsenic trioxide (57%), nelarabine (55%), and rituximab (49%).

The lowest inflation-adjusted price increases were for ofatumumab (8%), clofarabine (8%), and liposomal vincristine (18%).

For this study, Daniel A. Goldstein, MD, of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, and his colleagues measured the monthly price trajectories of 24 cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. This included 10 drugs approved to treat hematologic malignancies between 1997 and 2011.

To account for discounts and rebates, the researchers used the average sales prices published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and adjusted to general and health-related inflation rates. For each drug, the researchers calculated the cumulative and annual drug cost changes.

Results

The mean follow-up was 8 years. The mean cumulative cost increase for all 24 drugs was +36.5% (95% CI, 24.7% to 48.3%).

The general inflation-adjusted increase was +19.1% (95% CI, 11.0% to 27.2%), and the health-related inflation-adjusted increase was +8.4% (95% CI, 1.4% to 15.4%).

Only 1 of the 24 drugs studied had a price decrease over time. That drug is ziv-aflibercept, which was approved to treat metastatic colorectal cancer in 2012.

Ziv-aflibercept was launched with an annual price exceeding $110,000. After public outcry, the drug’s manufacturer, Sanofi, cut the price in half. By the end of the study’s follow-up period in 2017, the cost of ziv-aflibercept had decreased 13% (inflation-adjusted decrease of 15%, health-related inflation-adjusted decrease of 20%).

Cost changes for the drugs approved to treat hematologic malignancies are listed in the following table.

Abbreviations: ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; APL, acute promyelocytic leukemia; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; MM, multiple myeloma; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; SD, standard deviation.

The researchers noted that there was a steady increase in drug costs over the study period, regardless of whether a drug was granted a new supplemental indication, the drug had a new off-label indication, or a competitor drug was approved.

The only variable that was significantly associated with price change was the amount of time that had elapsed from a drug’s launch.

This association was significant in models in which the researchers used prices adjusted to inflation (P=0.002) and health-related inflation (P=0.023). However, it was not significant when the researchers used the actual drug price (P=0.085).

*Data in the abstract differ from data in the body of the JCO paper. This article includes data from the body of the JCO paper.

Photo by Bill Branson

Cancer drug costs in the US increase substantially after launch, regardless of competition, according to a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.*

Researchers studied 24 cancer drugs approved over the last 20 years and found a mean cumulative cost increase of about 37%, or 19% when adjusted for inflation.

Among drugs approved to treat hematologic malignancies, the greatest inflation-adjusted price increases were for arsenic trioxide (57%), nelarabine (55%), and rituximab (49%).

The lowest inflation-adjusted price increases were for ofatumumab (8%), clofarabine (8%), and liposomal vincristine (18%).

For this study, Daniel A. Goldstein, MD, of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, and his colleagues measured the monthly price trajectories of 24 cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. This included 10 drugs approved to treat hematologic malignancies between 1997 and 2011.

To account for discounts and rebates, the researchers used the average sales prices published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and adjusted to general and health-related inflation rates. For each drug, the researchers calculated the cumulative and annual drug cost changes.

Results

The mean follow-up was 8 years. The mean cumulative cost increase for all 24 drugs was +36.5% (95% CI, 24.7% to 48.3%).

The general inflation-adjusted increase was +19.1% (95% CI, 11.0% to 27.2%), and the health-related inflation-adjusted increase was +8.4% (95% CI, 1.4% to 15.4%).

Only 1 of the 24 drugs studied had a price decrease over time. That drug is ziv-aflibercept, which was approved to treat metastatic colorectal cancer in 2012.

Ziv-aflibercept was launched with an annual price exceeding $110,000. After public outcry, the drug’s manufacturer, Sanofi, cut the price in half. By the end of the study’s follow-up period in 2017, the cost of ziv-aflibercept had decreased 13% (inflation-adjusted decrease of 15%, health-related inflation-adjusted decrease of 20%).

Cost changes for the drugs approved to treat hematologic malignancies are listed in the following table.

Abbreviations: ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; APL, acute promyelocytic leukemia; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; MM, multiple myeloma; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; SD, standard deviation.

The researchers noted that there was a steady increase in drug costs over the study period, regardless of whether a drug was granted a new supplemental indication, the drug had a new off-label indication, or a competitor drug was approved.

The only variable that was significantly associated with price change was the amount of time that had elapsed from a drug’s launch.

This association was significant in models in which the researchers used prices adjusted to inflation (P=0.002) and health-related inflation (P=0.023). However, it was not significant when the researchers used the actual drug price (P=0.085).

*Data in the abstract differ from data in the body of the JCO paper. This article includes data from the body of the JCO paper.

Photo by Bill Branson

Cancer drug costs in the US increase substantially after launch, regardless of competition, according to a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.*

Researchers studied 24 cancer drugs approved over the last 20 years and found a mean cumulative cost increase of about 37%, or 19% when adjusted for inflation.

Among drugs approved to treat hematologic malignancies, the greatest inflation-adjusted price increases were for arsenic trioxide (57%), nelarabine (55%), and rituximab (49%).

The lowest inflation-adjusted price increases were for ofatumumab (8%), clofarabine (8%), and liposomal vincristine (18%).

For this study, Daniel A. Goldstein, MD, of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, and his colleagues measured the monthly price trajectories of 24 cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. This included 10 drugs approved to treat hematologic malignancies between 1997 and 2011.

To account for discounts and rebates, the researchers used the average sales prices published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and adjusted to general and health-related inflation rates. For each drug, the researchers calculated the cumulative and annual drug cost changes.

Results

The mean follow-up was 8 years. The mean cumulative cost increase for all 24 drugs was +36.5% (95% CI, 24.7% to 48.3%).

The general inflation-adjusted increase was +19.1% (95% CI, 11.0% to 27.2%), and the health-related inflation-adjusted increase was +8.4% (95% CI, 1.4% to 15.4%).

Only 1 of the 24 drugs studied had a price decrease over time. That drug is ziv-aflibercept, which was approved to treat metastatic colorectal cancer in 2012.

Ziv-aflibercept was launched with an annual price exceeding $110,000. After public outcry, the drug’s manufacturer, Sanofi, cut the price in half. By the end of the study’s follow-up period in 2017, the cost of ziv-aflibercept had decreased 13% (inflation-adjusted decrease of 15%, health-related inflation-adjusted decrease of 20%).

Cost changes for the drugs approved to treat hematologic malignancies are listed in the following table.

Abbreviations: ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; APL, acute promyelocytic leukemia; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; MM, multiple myeloma; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; SD, standard deviation.

The researchers noted that there was a steady increase in drug costs over the study period, regardless of whether a drug was granted a new supplemental indication, the drug had a new off-label indication, or a competitor drug was approved.

The only variable that was significantly associated with price change was the amount of time that had elapsed from a drug’s launch.

This association was significant in models in which the researchers used prices adjusted to inflation (P=0.002) and health-related inflation (P=0.023). However, it was not significant when the researchers used the actual drug price (P=0.085).

*Data in the abstract differ from data in the body of the JCO paper. This article includes data from the body of the JCO paper.

multiple myeloma

Preclinical research has revealed a potential method of overcoming resistance to proteasome inhibitors.

By studying a rare genetic disease known as NGLY1 deficiency, researchers have gained new understanding of resistance to proteasome inhibitors.

The team found that treatment with a NGLY1 inhibitor can enhance the activity of the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib against multiple myeloma (MM) and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL).

Carolyn Bertozzi, PhD, of Stanford University in California, and her colleagues reported these findings in ACS Central Science.

Previous studies have suggested that proteasome inhibitor resistance could be linked to a protein called Nrf1. When proteasome inhibitors swing into action, Nrf1 is spurred into overdrive to restore cancer cells’ normal activities and keep them alive.

Researchers theorized that, if they could block Nrf1, they might be able to overcome proteasome inhibitor resistance.

Through studying NGLY1 deficiency, Dr Bertozzi and her colleagues may have hit upon an approach to do just that.

The researchers were investigating how lacking NGLY1 causes a host of debilitating symptoms, and they found that NGLY1 is responsible for activating Nrf1.

Further testing revealed that inhibiting NGLY1 eliminated interference from Nrf1 and enhanced the cytotoxicity of carfilzomib in MM and T-ALL cell lines.

The researchers treated the MM cell lines U266 and H929 with the NGLY1 inhibitor, known as WRR139, and carfilzomib and observed a significant decrease in cell survival when compared to treatment with carfilzomib alone. The team observed the same results when testing the T-ALL Jurkat cell line.

The addition of WRR139 resulted in a 2.6-fold reduction in carfilzomib’s LD50 for U266, a 2.0-fold reduction for H929, and a 1.5-fold reduction for Jurkat cells.

The researchers said these findings hold promise for the development of combination therapies for hematologic malignancies.

multiple myeloma

Preclinical research has revealed a potential method of overcoming resistance to proteasome inhibitors.

By studying a rare genetic disease known as NGLY1 deficiency, researchers have gained new understanding of resistance to proteasome inhibitors.

The team found that treatment with a NGLY1 inhibitor can enhance the activity of the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib against multiple myeloma (MM) and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL).

Carolyn Bertozzi, PhD, of Stanford University in California, and her colleagues reported these findings in ACS Central Science.

Previous studies have suggested that proteasome inhibitor resistance could be linked to a protein called Nrf1. When proteasome inhibitors swing into action, Nrf1 is spurred into overdrive to restore cancer cells’ normal activities and keep them alive.

Researchers theorized that, if they could block Nrf1, they might be able to overcome proteasome inhibitor resistance.

Through studying NGLY1 deficiency, Dr Bertozzi and her colleagues may have hit upon an approach to do just that.

The researchers were investigating how lacking NGLY1 causes a host of debilitating symptoms, and they found that NGLY1 is responsible for activating Nrf1.

Further testing revealed that inhibiting NGLY1 eliminated interference from Nrf1 and enhanced the cytotoxicity of carfilzomib in MM and T-ALL cell lines.

The researchers treated the MM cell lines U266 and H929 with the NGLY1 inhibitor, known as WRR139, and carfilzomib and observed a significant decrease in cell survival when compared to treatment with carfilzomib alone. The team observed the same results when testing the T-ALL Jurkat cell line.

The addition of WRR139 resulted in a 2.6-fold reduction in carfilzomib’s LD50 for U266, a 2.0-fold reduction for H929, and a 1.5-fold reduction for Jurkat cells.

The researchers said these findings hold promise for the development of combination therapies for hematologic malignancies.

multiple myeloma

Preclinical research has revealed a potential method of overcoming resistance to proteasome inhibitors.

By studying a rare genetic disease known as NGLY1 deficiency, researchers have gained new understanding of resistance to proteasome inhibitors.

The team found that treatment with a NGLY1 inhibitor can enhance the activity of the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib against multiple myeloma (MM) and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL).

Carolyn Bertozzi, PhD, of Stanford University in California, and her colleagues reported these findings in ACS Central Science.

Previous studies have suggested that proteasome inhibitor resistance could be linked to a protein called Nrf1. When proteasome inhibitors swing into action, Nrf1 is spurred into overdrive to restore cancer cells’ normal activities and keep them alive.

Researchers theorized that, if they could block Nrf1, they might be able to overcome proteasome inhibitor resistance.

Through studying NGLY1 deficiency, Dr Bertozzi and her colleagues may have hit upon an approach to do just that.

The researchers were investigating how lacking NGLY1 causes a host of debilitating symptoms, and they found that NGLY1 is responsible for activating Nrf1.

Further testing revealed that inhibiting NGLY1 eliminated interference from Nrf1 and enhanced the cytotoxicity of carfilzomib in MM and T-ALL cell lines.

The researchers treated the MM cell lines U266 and H929 with the NGLY1 inhibitor, known as WRR139, and carfilzomib and observed a significant decrease in cell survival when compared to treatment with carfilzomib alone. The team observed the same results when testing the T-ALL Jurkat cell line.

The addition of WRR139 resulted in a 2.6-fold reduction in carfilzomib’s LD50 for U266, a 2.0-fold reduction for H929, and a 1.5-fold reduction for Jurkat cells.

The researchers said these findings hold promise for the development of combination therapies for hematologic malignancies.

Image from PLOS ONE

Results of a phase 3 trial suggest rabbit anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) can reduce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but also decrease survival in patients who have received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from a matched, unrelated donor.

In this randomized trial, ATLG significantly decreased the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD and acute grade 2-4 GVHD, when compared to placebo.

However, patients who received ATLG also had significantly lower progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than placebo-treated patients.

On the other hand, the data also suggest that patients who receive conditioning regimens that do not lower absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) substantially may not experience a significant decrease in survival with ATLG.

These results were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The study was sponsored by Neovii Pharmaceuticals AG, which is developing ATLG as Grafalon®.

The study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial conducted in North America and Australia (NCT01295710). It enrolled 254 patients, ages 18 to 65, who had acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes. All patients were undergoing myeloablative, HLA-matched, unrelated HSCT.

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive ATLG (given at 20 mg/kg/day, n=126) or placebo (250 ml of normal saline, n=128) on days -3, -2, and -1 prior to HSCT.

In addition, all patients received antihistamine and methylprednisolone (at 2 mg/kg on day -3 and 1 mg/kg on days -2 and -1).

Patients also received GVHD prophylaxis in the form of tacrolimus (with a target serum trough level of 5 to 15 ng/mL) and methotrexate (15 mg/m² on day 1, then 10 mg/m² on days 3, 6, and 11). If patients did not develop clinical GVHD, tacrolimus was tapered starting on day 50 or later over a minimum of 26 weeks and ultimately discontinued.

Patients received 1 of 3 conditioning regimens, which were declared prior to randomization and included:

• Cyclophosphamide at 120 mg/kg intravenously (IV) and fractionated total body irradiation (TBI, ≥12 Gy)
• Busulfan at 16 mg/kg orally or 12.8 mg/kg IV and cyclophosphamide at 120 mg/kg IV
• Busulfan at 16 mg/kg orally or 12.8 mg/kg IV and fludarabine at 120 mg/m2 IV.

Overall results

Compared to placebo-treated patients, those who received ATLG had a significant reduction in grade 2-4 acute GVHD—23% and 40%, respectively (P=0.004)—and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD—12% and 33%, respectively (P<0.001).

However, there was no significant difference between the ATLG and placebo arms with regard to moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival. The 2-year estimate was 48% and 44%, respectively (P=0.47).

In addition, PFS and OS were significantly lower in patients who received ATLG. The estimated 2-year PFS was 47% in the ATLG arm and 65% in the placebo arm (P=0.04). The estimated 2-year OS was 59% and 74%, respectively (P=0.034).

In a multivariable analysis, ATLG remained significantly associated with inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.55, P=0.026) and OS (hazard ratio=1.74, P=0.01).

Role of conditioning, ALC

The researchers found evidence to suggest that conditioning regimen and ALC played a role in patient outcomes.

For patients who received cyclophosphamide and TBI, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 61% in the placebo arm and 38% in the ATLG arm (P=0.080). Two-year OS was 88% and 48%, respectively (P=0.006). And 2-year PFS was 75% and 29%, respectively (P=0.007).

For patients who received busulfan and cyclophosphamide, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 47% in the placebo arm and 53% in the ATLG arm (P=0.650). Two-year OS was 77% and 71%, respectively (P=0.350). And 2-year PFS was 73% and 60%, respectively (P=0.460).

For patients who received busulfan and fludarabine, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 33% in the placebo arm and 49% in the ATLG arm (P=0.047). Two-year OS was 66% and 53%, respectively (P=0.520). And 2-year PFS was 58% and 48%, respectively (P=0.540).

The researchers noted that the choice of conditioning regimen had a “profound effect” on ALC at day -3 (the time of ATLG/placebo initiation). More than 70% of patients who received TBI had an ALC <0.1 x 10⁹/L, compared to less than 35% of patients who received busulfan-based conditioning.

ALC, in turn, had an impact on PFS and OS. In patients with an ALC ≥ 0.1 x 10⁹/L on day -3, ATLG did not compromise PFS or OS, but PFS and OS were negatively affected in patients with an ALC < 0.1.

ATLG recipients with an ALC < 0.1 had significantly worse OS (HR=4.13, P<0.001) and PFS (HR=3.19, P<0.001) than patients with an ALC ≥ 0.1.

Image from PLOS ONE

Results of a phase 3 trial suggest rabbit anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) can reduce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but also decrease survival in patients who have received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from a matched, unrelated donor.

In this randomized trial, ATLG significantly decreased the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD and acute grade 2-4 GVHD, when compared to placebo.

However, patients who received ATLG also had significantly lower progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than placebo-treated patients.

On the other hand, the data also suggest that patients who receive conditioning regimens that do not lower absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) substantially may not experience a significant decrease in survival with ATLG.

These results were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The study was sponsored by Neovii Pharmaceuticals AG, which is developing ATLG as Grafalon®.

The study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial conducted in North America and Australia (NCT01295710). It enrolled 254 patients, ages 18 to 65, who had acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes. All patients were undergoing myeloablative, HLA-matched, unrelated HSCT.

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive ATLG (given at 20 mg/kg/day, n=126) or placebo (250 ml of normal saline, n=128) on days -3, -2, and -1 prior to HSCT.

In addition, all patients received antihistamine and methylprednisolone (at 2 mg/kg on day -3 and 1 mg/kg on days -2 and -1).

Patients also received GVHD prophylaxis in the form of tacrolimus (with a target serum trough level of 5 to 15 ng/mL) and methotrexate (15 mg/m² on day 1, then 10 mg/m² on days 3, 6, and 11). If patients did not develop clinical GVHD, tacrolimus was tapered starting on day 50 or later over a minimum of 26 weeks and ultimately discontinued.

Patients received 1 of 3 conditioning regimens, which were declared prior to randomization and included:

• Cyclophosphamide at 120 mg/kg intravenously (IV) and fractionated total body irradiation (TBI, ≥12 Gy)
• Busulfan at 16 mg/kg orally or 12.8 mg/kg IV and cyclophosphamide at 120 mg/kg IV
• Busulfan at 16 mg/kg orally or 12.8 mg/kg IV and fludarabine at 120 mg/m2 IV.

Overall results

Compared to placebo-treated patients, those who received ATLG had a significant reduction in grade 2-4 acute GVHD—23% and 40%, respectively (P=0.004)—and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD—12% and 33%, respectively (P<0.001).

However, there was no significant difference between the ATLG and placebo arms with regard to moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival. The 2-year estimate was 48% and 44%, respectively (P=0.47).

In addition, PFS and OS were significantly lower in patients who received ATLG. The estimated 2-year PFS was 47% in the ATLG arm and 65% in the placebo arm (P=0.04). The estimated 2-year OS was 59% and 74%, respectively (P=0.034).

In a multivariable analysis, ATLG remained significantly associated with inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.55, P=0.026) and OS (hazard ratio=1.74, P=0.01).

Role of conditioning, ALC

The researchers found evidence to suggest that conditioning regimen and ALC played a role in patient outcomes.

For patients who received cyclophosphamide and TBI, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 61% in the placebo arm and 38% in the ATLG arm (P=0.080). Two-year OS was 88% and 48%, respectively (P=0.006). And 2-year PFS was 75% and 29%, respectively (P=0.007).

For patients who received busulfan and cyclophosphamide, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 47% in the placebo arm and 53% in the ATLG arm (P=0.650). Two-year OS was 77% and 71%, respectively (P=0.350). And 2-year PFS was 73% and 60%, respectively (P=0.460).

For patients who received busulfan and fludarabine, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 33% in the placebo arm and 49% in the ATLG arm (P=0.047). Two-year OS was 66% and 53%, respectively (P=0.520). And 2-year PFS was 58% and 48%, respectively (P=0.540).

The researchers noted that the choice of conditioning regimen had a “profound effect” on ALC at day -3 (the time of ATLG/placebo initiation). More than 70% of patients who received TBI had an ALC <0.1 x 10⁹/L, compared to less than 35% of patients who received busulfan-based conditioning.

ALC, in turn, had an impact on PFS and OS. In patients with an ALC ≥ 0.1 x 10⁹/L on day -3, ATLG did not compromise PFS or OS, but PFS and OS were negatively affected in patients with an ALC < 0.1.

ATLG recipients with an ALC < 0.1 had significantly worse OS (HR=4.13, P<0.001) and PFS (HR=3.19, P<0.001) than patients with an ALC ≥ 0.1.

Image from PLOS ONE

Results of a phase 3 trial suggest rabbit anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) can reduce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but also decrease survival in patients who have received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from a matched, unrelated donor.

In this randomized trial, ATLG significantly decreased the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD and acute grade 2-4 GVHD, when compared to placebo.

However, patients who received ATLG also had significantly lower progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than placebo-treated patients.

On the other hand, the data also suggest that patients who receive conditioning regimens that do not lower absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) substantially may not experience a significant decrease in survival with ATLG.

These results were published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. The study was sponsored by Neovii Pharmaceuticals AG, which is developing ATLG as Grafalon®.

The study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial conducted in North America and Australia (NCT01295710). It enrolled 254 patients, ages 18 to 65, who had acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes. All patients were undergoing myeloablative, HLA-matched, unrelated HSCT.

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive ATLG (given at 20 mg/kg/day, n=126) or placebo (250 ml of normal saline, n=128) on days -3, -2, and -1 prior to HSCT.

In addition, all patients received antihistamine and methylprednisolone (at 2 mg/kg on day -3 and 1 mg/kg on days -2 and -1).

Patients also received GVHD prophylaxis in the form of tacrolimus (with a target serum trough level of 5 to 15 ng/mL) and methotrexate (15 mg/m² on day 1, then 10 mg/m² on days 3, 6, and 11). If patients did not develop clinical GVHD, tacrolimus was tapered starting on day 50 or later over a minimum of 26 weeks and ultimately discontinued.

Patients received 1 of 3 conditioning regimens, which were declared prior to randomization and included:

• Cyclophosphamide at 120 mg/kg intravenously (IV) and fractionated total body irradiation (TBI, ≥12 Gy)
• Busulfan at 16 mg/kg orally or 12.8 mg/kg IV and cyclophosphamide at 120 mg/kg IV
• Busulfan at 16 mg/kg orally or 12.8 mg/kg IV and fludarabine at 120 mg/m2 IV.

Overall results

Compared to placebo-treated patients, those who received ATLG had a significant reduction in grade 2-4 acute GVHD—23% and 40%, respectively (P=0.004)—and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD—12% and 33%, respectively (P<0.001).

However, there was no significant difference between the ATLG and placebo arms with regard to moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival. The 2-year estimate was 48% and 44%, respectively (P=0.47).

In addition, PFS and OS were significantly lower in patients who received ATLG. The estimated 2-year PFS was 47% in the ATLG arm and 65% in the placebo arm (P=0.04). The estimated 2-year OS was 59% and 74%, respectively (P=0.034).

In a multivariable analysis, ATLG remained significantly associated with inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.55, P=0.026) and OS (hazard ratio=1.74, P=0.01).

Role of conditioning, ALC

The researchers found evidence to suggest that conditioning regimen and ALC played a role in patient outcomes.

For patients who received cyclophosphamide and TBI, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 61% in the placebo arm and 38% in the ATLG arm (P=0.080). Two-year OS was 88% and 48%, respectively (P=0.006). And 2-year PFS was 75% and 29%, respectively (P=0.007).

For patients who received busulfan and cyclophosphamide, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 47% in the placebo arm and 53% in the ATLG arm (P=0.650). Two-year OS was 77% and 71%, respectively (P=0.350). And 2-year PFS was 73% and 60%, respectively (P=0.460).

For patients who received busulfan and fludarabine, 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD-free survival was 33% in the placebo arm and 49% in the ATLG arm (P=0.047). Two-year OS was 66% and 53%, respectively (P=0.520). And 2-year PFS was 58% and 48%, respectively (P=0.540).

The researchers noted that the choice of conditioning regimen had a “profound effect” on ALC at day -3 (the time of ATLG/placebo initiation). More than 70% of patients who received TBI had an ALC <0.1 x 10⁹/L, compared to less than 35% of patients who received busulfan-based conditioning.

ALC, in turn, had an impact on PFS and OS. In patients with an ALC ≥ 0.1 x 10⁹/L on day -3, ATLG did not compromise PFS or OS, but PFS and OS were negatively affected in patients with an ALC < 0.1.

ATLG recipients with an ALC < 0.1 had significantly worse OS (HR=4.13, P<0.001) and PFS (HR=3.19, P<0.001) than patients with an ALC ≥ 0.1.

Outrage over the high cost of cancer care has focused on skyrocketing drug prices, including the $475,000 price tag for the country’s first gene therapy, Novartis’ Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel), a leukemia treatment approved in August.

But the total costs of tisagenlecleucel and the 21 similar drugs in development – known as CAR T-cell therapies – will be far higher than many have imagined, reaching $1 million or more per patient, according to leading cancer experts. The next CAR T-cell drug could be approved as soon as November.

Although Kymriah’s price tag has “shattered oncology drug pricing norms,” said Leonard Saltz, MD, chief of gastrointestinal oncology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, “the sticker price is just the starting point.”

These therapies lead to a cascade of costs, propelled by serious side effects that require sophisticated management, Dr. Saltz said. For this class of drugs, Dr, Saltz advised consumers to “think of the $475,000 as parts, not labor.”

Hagop Kantarjian, MD, leukemia specialist and professor at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, estimates tisagenlecleucel’s total cost could reach $1.5 million.

CAR T-cell therapy is expensive because of the unique way that it works. Doctors harvest patients’ immune cells, genetically alter them to rev up their ability to fight cancer, then reinfuse them into patients.

Taking the brakes off the immune system, Dr. Kantarjian said, can lead to life-threatening complications that require lengthy hospitalizations and expensive medications, which are prescribed in addition to conventional cancer therapy, rather than in place of it.

Keith D. Eaton, MD, a Seattle oncologist, said he ran up medical bills of $500,000 when he participated in a clinical trial of CAR T cells in 2013, even though all patients in the study received the medication for free. Dr. Eaton, who was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), spent nearly 2 months in the hospital.

Like Dr. Eaton, nearly half of patients who receive CAR T cells develop cytokine storm. Other serious side effects include strokelike symptoms and coma.

The cytokine storm felt like “the worst flu of your life,” said Dr. Eaton, now aged 51 years. His fever spiked so high that a hospital nurse assumed the thermometer was broken. Dr. Eaton replied, “It’s not broken. My temperature is too high to register on the thermometer.”

Although Dr. Eaton recovered, he wasn’t done with treatment. His doctors recommended a bone marrow transplant, another harrowing procedure, at a cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Dr. Eaton said he feels fortunate to be healthy today, with tests showing no evidence of leukemia. His insurer paid for almost everything.

Kymriah’s sticker price is especially “outrageous” given its relatively low manufacturing costs, said Walid F. Gellad, MD, codirector of the Center for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing at the University of Pittsburgh.

The gene therapy process used to create tisagenlecleucel costs about $15,000, according to a 2012 presentation by Carl H. June, MD, who pioneered CAR T-cell research at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. Dr. June could not be reached for comment.

To quell unrest about price, Novartis has offered patients and insurers a new twist on the money-back guarantee.

Novartis will charge for the drug only if patients go into remission within 1 month of treatment. In a key clinical trial, 83% of the children and young adults treated with tisagenlecleucel went into remission within 3 months. Novartis calls the plan “outcomes-based pricing.”

Novartis is “working through the specific details” of how the pricing plan will affect the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which pays for care for many cancer patients, company spokesperson Julie Masow said. “There are many hurdles” to this type of pricing plan but, Ms. Masow said, “Novartis is committed to making this happen.”

She also said that Kymriah’s manufacturing costs are much higher than $15,000, although she didn’t cite a specific dollar amount. She noted that Novartis has invested heavily in the technology, designing “an innovative manufacturing facility and process specifically for cellular therapies.”

As for Kymriah-related hospital and medication charges, “costs will vary from patient to patient and treatment center to treatment center, based on the level of care each patient requires,” Ms. Masow said. “Kymriah is a one-time treatment that has shown remarkable early, deep, and durable responses in these children who are very sick and often out of options.”

Some doctors said tisagenlecleucel, which could be used by about 600 patients a year, offers an incalculable benefit for desperately ill young people. The drug is approved for children and young adults with B-cell ALL who already have been treated with at least two other cancer therapies.

“A kid’s life is priceless,” said Michelle Hermiston, MD, director of pediatric immunotherapy at Benioff Children’s Hospital, at the University of California, San Francisco. “Any given kid has the potential to make financial impacts over a lifetime that far outweigh the cost of their cure. From this perspective, every child in my mind deserves the best curative therapy we can offer.”

Other cancer doctors say the Novartis plan is no bargain.

About 36% of patients who go into remission with tisagenlecleucel relapse within 1 year, said Vinay Prasad, MD, of Oregon Health & Science University, Portland. Many of these patients will need additional treatment, said Dr. Prasad, who wrote an editorial about tisagenlecleucel’s price Oct. 4 in Nature.

“If you’ve paid half a million dollars for drugs and half a million dollars for care, and a year later your cancer is back, is that a good deal?” asked Dr. Saltz, who cowrote a recent editorial on tisagenlecleucel’s price in JAMA.

Steve Miller, MD, chief medical officer for Express Scripts, said it would be more fair to judge Kymriah’s success after 6 months of treatment, rather than 1 month. Dr. Prasad goes even further. He said Novartis should issue refunds for any patient who relapses within 3 years.

A consumer-advocate group called Patients for Affordable Drugs also has said that tisagenlecleucel costs too much, given that the federal government spent more than $200 million over 2 decades to support the basic research into CAR T-cell therapy, long before Novartis bought the rights.

Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) wrote a letter to the Medicare program’s director last month asking for details on how the Novartis payment deal will work.

“As Big Pharma continues to put price gouging before patient access, companies will point more and more proudly at their pricing agreements,” Rep. Doggett wrote. “But taxpayers deserve to know more about how these agreements will work – whether they will actually save the government money, defray these massive costs, and ensure that they can access lifesaving medications.”
 

KHN’s coverage related to aging & improving care of older adults is supported by The John A. Hartford Foundation. Kaiser Health News is a national health policy news service that is part of the nonpartisan Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Outrage over the high cost of cancer care has focused on skyrocketing drug prices, including the $475,000 price tag for the country’s first gene therapy, Novartis’ Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel), a leukemia treatment approved in August.

But the total costs of tisagenlecleucel and the 21 similar drugs in development – known as CAR T-cell therapies – will be far higher than many have imagined, reaching $1 million or more per patient, according to leading cancer experts. The next CAR T-cell drug could be approved as soon as November.

Although Kymriah’s price tag has “shattered oncology drug pricing norms,” said Leonard Saltz, MD, chief of gastrointestinal oncology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, “the sticker price is just the starting point.”

These therapies lead to a cascade of costs, propelled by serious side effects that require sophisticated management, Dr. Saltz said. For this class of drugs, Dr, Saltz advised consumers to “think of the $475,000 as parts, not labor.”

Hagop Kantarjian, MD, leukemia specialist and professor at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, estimates tisagenlecleucel’s total cost could reach $1.5 million.

CAR T-cell therapy is expensive because of the unique way that it works. Doctors harvest patients’ immune cells, genetically alter them to rev up their ability to fight cancer, then reinfuse them into patients.

Taking the brakes off the immune system, Dr. Kantarjian said, can lead to life-threatening complications that require lengthy hospitalizations and expensive medications, which are prescribed in addition to conventional cancer therapy, rather than in place of it.

Keith D. Eaton, MD, a Seattle oncologist, said he ran up medical bills of $500,000 when he participated in a clinical trial of CAR T cells in 2013, even though all patients in the study received the medication for free. Dr. Eaton, who was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), spent nearly 2 months in the hospital.

Like Dr. Eaton, nearly half of patients who receive CAR T cells develop cytokine storm. Other serious side effects include strokelike symptoms and coma.

The cytokine storm felt like “the worst flu of your life,” said Dr. Eaton, now aged 51 years. His fever spiked so high that a hospital nurse assumed the thermometer was broken. Dr. Eaton replied, “It’s not broken. My temperature is too high to register on the thermometer.”

Although Dr. Eaton recovered, he wasn’t done with treatment. His doctors recommended a bone marrow transplant, another harrowing procedure, at a cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Dr. Eaton said he feels fortunate to be healthy today, with tests showing no evidence of leukemia. His insurer paid for almost everything.

Kymriah’s sticker price is especially “outrageous” given its relatively low manufacturing costs, said Walid F. Gellad, MD, codirector of the Center for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing at the University of Pittsburgh.

The gene therapy process used to create tisagenlecleucel costs about $15,000, according to a 2012 presentation by Carl H. June, MD, who pioneered CAR T-cell research at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. Dr. June could not be reached for comment.

To quell unrest about price, Novartis has offered patients and insurers a new twist on the money-back guarantee.

Novartis will charge for the drug only if patients go into remission within 1 month of treatment. In a key clinical trial, 83% of the children and young adults treated with tisagenlecleucel went into remission within 3 months. Novartis calls the plan “outcomes-based pricing.”

Novartis is “working through the specific details” of how the pricing plan will affect the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which pays for care for many cancer patients, company spokesperson Julie Masow said. “There are many hurdles” to this type of pricing plan but, Ms. Masow said, “Novartis is committed to making this happen.”

She also said that Kymriah’s manufacturing costs are much higher than $15,000, although she didn’t cite a specific dollar amount. She noted that Novartis has invested heavily in the technology, designing “an innovative manufacturing facility and process specifically for cellular therapies.”

As for Kymriah-related hospital and medication charges, “costs will vary from patient to patient and treatment center to treatment center, based on the level of care each patient requires,” Ms. Masow said. “Kymriah is a one-time treatment that has shown remarkable early, deep, and durable responses in these children who are very sick and often out of options.”

Some doctors said tisagenlecleucel, which could be used by about 600 patients a year, offers an incalculable benefit for desperately ill young people. The drug is approved for children and young adults with B-cell ALL who already have been treated with at least two other cancer therapies.

“A kid’s life is priceless,” said Michelle Hermiston, MD, director of pediatric immunotherapy at Benioff Children’s Hospital, at the University of California, San Francisco. “Any given kid has the potential to make financial impacts over a lifetime that far outweigh the cost of their cure. From this perspective, every child in my mind deserves the best curative therapy we can offer.”

Other cancer doctors say the Novartis plan is no bargain.

About 36% of patients who go into remission with tisagenlecleucel relapse within 1 year, said Vinay Prasad, MD, of Oregon Health & Science University, Portland. Many of these patients will need additional treatment, said Dr. Prasad, who wrote an editorial about tisagenlecleucel’s price Oct. 4 in Nature.

“If you’ve paid half a million dollars for drugs and half a million dollars for care, and a year later your cancer is back, is that a good deal?” asked Dr. Saltz, who cowrote a recent editorial on tisagenlecleucel’s price in JAMA.

Steve Miller, MD, chief medical officer for Express Scripts, said it would be more fair to judge Kymriah’s success after 6 months of treatment, rather than 1 month. Dr. Prasad goes even further. He said Novartis should issue refunds for any patient who relapses within 3 years.

A consumer-advocate group called Patients for Affordable Drugs also has said that tisagenlecleucel costs too much, given that the federal government spent more than $200 million over 2 decades to support the basic research into CAR T-cell therapy, long before Novartis bought the rights.

Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) wrote a letter to the Medicare program’s director last month asking for details on how the Novartis payment deal will work.

“As Big Pharma continues to put price gouging before patient access, companies will point more and more proudly at their pricing agreements,” Rep. Doggett wrote. “But taxpayers deserve to know more about how these agreements will work – whether they will actually save the government money, defray these massive costs, and ensure that they can access lifesaving medications.”
 

KHN’s coverage related to aging & improving care of older adults is supported by The John A. Hartford Foundation. Kaiser Health News is a national health policy news service that is part of the nonpartisan Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Outrage over the high cost of cancer care has focused on skyrocketing drug prices, including the $475,000 price tag for the country’s first gene therapy, Novartis’ Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel), a leukemia treatment approved in August.

But the total costs of tisagenlecleucel and the 21 similar drugs in development – known as CAR T-cell therapies – will be far higher than many have imagined, reaching $1 million or more per patient, according to leading cancer experts. The next CAR T-cell drug could be approved as soon as November.

Although Kymriah’s price tag has “shattered oncology drug pricing norms,” said Leonard Saltz, MD, chief of gastrointestinal oncology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, “the sticker price is just the starting point.”

These therapies lead to a cascade of costs, propelled by serious side effects that require sophisticated management, Dr. Saltz said. For this class of drugs, Dr, Saltz advised consumers to “think of the $475,000 as parts, not labor.”

Hagop Kantarjian, MD, leukemia specialist and professor at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, estimates tisagenlecleucel’s total cost could reach $1.5 million.

CAR T-cell therapy is expensive because of the unique way that it works. Doctors harvest patients’ immune cells, genetically alter them to rev up their ability to fight cancer, then reinfuse them into patients.

Taking the brakes off the immune system, Dr. Kantarjian said, can lead to life-threatening complications that require lengthy hospitalizations and expensive medications, which are prescribed in addition to conventional cancer therapy, rather than in place of it.

Keith D. Eaton, MD, a Seattle oncologist, said he ran up medical bills of $500,000 when he participated in a clinical trial of CAR T cells in 2013, even though all patients in the study received the medication for free. Dr. Eaton, who was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), spent nearly 2 months in the hospital.

Like Dr. Eaton, nearly half of patients who receive CAR T cells develop cytokine storm. Other serious side effects include strokelike symptoms and coma.

The cytokine storm felt like “the worst flu of your life,” said Dr. Eaton, now aged 51 years. His fever spiked so high that a hospital nurse assumed the thermometer was broken. Dr. Eaton replied, “It’s not broken. My temperature is too high to register on the thermometer.”

Although Dr. Eaton recovered, he wasn’t done with treatment. His doctors recommended a bone marrow transplant, another harrowing procedure, at a cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Dr. Eaton said he feels fortunate to be healthy today, with tests showing no evidence of leukemia. His insurer paid for almost everything.

Kymriah’s sticker price is especially “outrageous” given its relatively low manufacturing costs, said Walid F. Gellad, MD, codirector of the Center for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing at the University of Pittsburgh.

The gene therapy process used to create tisagenlecleucel costs about $15,000, according to a 2012 presentation by Carl H. June, MD, who pioneered CAR T-cell research at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. Dr. June could not be reached for comment.

To quell unrest about price, Novartis has offered patients and insurers a new twist on the money-back guarantee.

Novartis will charge for the drug only if patients go into remission within 1 month of treatment. In a key clinical trial, 83% of the children and young adults treated with tisagenlecleucel went into remission within 3 months. Novartis calls the plan “outcomes-based pricing.”

Novartis is “working through the specific details” of how the pricing plan will affect the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which pays for care for many cancer patients, company spokesperson Julie Masow said. “There are many hurdles” to this type of pricing plan but, Ms. Masow said, “Novartis is committed to making this happen.”

She also said that Kymriah’s manufacturing costs are much higher than $15,000, although she didn’t cite a specific dollar amount. She noted that Novartis has invested heavily in the technology, designing “an innovative manufacturing facility and process specifically for cellular therapies.”

As for Kymriah-related hospital and medication charges, “costs will vary from patient to patient and treatment center to treatment center, based on the level of care each patient requires,” Ms. Masow said. “Kymriah is a one-time treatment that has shown remarkable early, deep, and durable responses in these children who are very sick and often out of options.”

Some doctors said tisagenlecleucel, which could be used by about 600 patients a year, offers an incalculable benefit for desperately ill young people. The drug is approved for children and young adults with B-cell ALL who already have been treated with at least two other cancer therapies.

“A kid’s life is priceless,” said Michelle Hermiston, MD, director of pediatric immunotherapy at Benioff Children’s Hospital, at the University of California, San Francisco. “Any given kid has the potential to make financial impacts over a lifetime that far outweigh the cost of their cure. From this perspective, every child in my mind deserves the best curative therapy we can offer.”

Other cancer doctors say the Novartis plan is no bargain.

About 36% of patients who go into remission with tisagenlecleucel relapse within 1 year, said Vinay Prasad, MD, of Oregon Health & Science University, Portland. Many of these patients will need additional treatment, said Dr. Prasad, who wrote an editorial about tisagenlecleucel’s price Oct. 4 in Nature.

“If you’ve paid half a million dollars for drugs and half a million dollars for care, and a year later your cancer is back, is that a good deal?” asked Dr. Saltz, who cowrote a recent editorial on tisagenlecleucel’s price in JAMA.

Steve Miller, MD, chief medical officer for Express Scripts, said it would be more fair to judge Kymriah’s success after 6 months of treatment, rather than 1 month. Dr. Prasad goes even further. He said Novartis should issue refunds for any patient who relapses within 3 years.

A consumer-advocate group called Patients for Affordable Drugs also has said that tisagenlecleucel costs too much, given that the federal government spent more than $200 million over 2 decades to support the basic research into CAR T-cell therapy, long before Novartis bought the rights.

Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) wrote a letter to the Medicare program’s director last month asking for details on how the Novartis payment deal will work.

“As Big Pharma continues to put price gouging before patient access, companies will point more and more proudly at their pricing agreements,” Rep. Doggett wrote. “But taxpayers deserve to know more about how these agreements will work – whether they will actually save the government money, defray these massive costs, and ensure that they can access lifesaving medications.”
 

KHN’s coverage related to aging & improving care of older adults is supported by The John A. Hartford Foundation. Kaiser Health News is a national health policy news service that is part of the nonpartisan Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Photo by Bill Branson

Vaccination may fail to protect young leukemia patients from developing influenza during cancer treatment, according to research published in the Journal of Pediatrics.

Researchers found that young patients with acute leukemia who received flu shots were just as likely as their unvaccinated peers to develop the flu.

The team said these results are preliminary, but they suggest a need for more research and additional efforts to prevent flu in young patients with leukemia.

“The annual flu shot, whose side effects are generally mild and short-lived, is still recommended for patients with acute leukemia who are being treated for their disease,” said study author Elisabeth Adderson, MD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

“However, the results do highlight the need for additional research in this area and for us to redouble our efforts to protect our patients through other means.”

In this retrospective study, Dr Adderson and her colleagues looked at rates of flu infection during 3 successive flu seasons (2010-2013) in 498 patients treated for acute leukemia at St. Jude.

The patients’ median age was 6 years (range, 1-21). Most patients had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, 94%), though some had acute myeloid leukemia (4.8%) or mixed-lineage leukemia (1.2%).

Most patients (n=354) received flu shots, including 98 patients who received booster doses. The remaining 144 patients were not vaccinated.

The vaccinated patients received the trivalent vaccine, which is designed to protect against 3 flu strains predicted to be in wide circulation during a particular flu season. The vaccine was a fairly good match for circulating flu viruses during the flu seasons included in this analysis.

Demographic characteristic were largely similar between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. The exceptions were that more vaccinated patients had ALL (95.5% vs 90.3%; P=0.034) and vaccinated patients were more likely to be in a low-intensity phase of cancer therapy (90.7% vs 73.6%, P<0.0001).

Results

There were no significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients when it came to flu rates or rates of flu-like illnesses.

There were 37 episodes of flu in vaccinated patients and 16 episodes in unvaccinated patients. The rates (per 1000 patient days) were 0.73 and 0.70, respectively (P=0.874).

There were 123 cases of flu-like illnesses in vaccinated patients and 55 cases in unvaccinated patients. The rates were 2.44 and 2.41, respectively (P=0.932).

Likewise, there was no significant difference in the rates of flu or flu-like illnesses between patients who received 1 dose of flu vaccine and those who received 2 doses.

The flu rates were 0.60 and 1.02, respectively (P=0.107). And the rates of flu-like illnesses were 2.42 and 2.73, respectively (P=0.529).

Dr Adderson said additional research is needed to determine if a subset of young leukemia patients may benefit from vaccination.

She added that patients at risk of flu should practice good hand hygiene and avoid crowds during the flu season. Patients may also benefit from “cocooning,” a process that focuses on getting family members, healthcare providers, and others in close contact with at-risk patients vaccinated.

Photo by Bill Branson

Vaccination may fail to protect young leukemia patients from developing influenza during cancer treatment, according to research published in the Journal of Pediatrics.

Researchers found that young patients with acute leukemia who received flu shots were just as likely as their unvaccinated peers to develop the flu.

The team said these results are preliminary, but they suggest a need for more research and additional efforts to prevent flu in young patients with leukemia.

“The annual flu shot, whose side effects are generally mild and short-lived, is still recommended for patients with acute leukemia who are being treated for their disease,” said study author Elisabeth Adderson, MD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

“However, the results do highlight the need for additional research in this area and for us to redouble our efforts to protect our patients through other means.”

In this retrospective study, Dr Adderson and her colleagues looked at rates of flu infection during 3 successive flu seasons (2010-2013) in 498 patients treated for acute leukemia at St. Jude.

The patients’ median age was 6 years (range, 1-21). Most patients had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, 94%), though some had acute myeloid leukemia (4.8%) or mixed-lineage leukemia (1.2%).

Most patients (n=354) received flu shots, including 98 patients who received booster doses. The remaining 144 patients were not vaccinated.

The vaccinated patients received the trivalent vaccine, which is designed to protect against 3 flu strains predicted to be in wide circulation during a particular flu season. The vaccine was a fairly good match for circulating flu viruses during the flu seasons included in this analysis.

Demographic characteristic were largely similar between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. The exceptions were that more vaccinated patients had ALL (95.5% vs 90.3%; P=0.034) and vaccinated patients were more likely to be in a low-intensity phase of cancer therapy (90.7% vs 73.6%, P<0.0001).

Results

There were no significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients when it came to flu rates or rates of flu-like illnesses.

There were 37 episodes of flu in vaccinated patients and 16 episodes in unvaccinated patients. The rates (per 1000 patient days) were 0.73 and 0.70, respectively (P=0.874).

There were 123 cases of flu-like illnesses in vaccinated patients and 55 cases in unvaccinated patients. The rates were 2.44 and 2.41, respectively (P=0.932).

Likewise, there was no significant difference in the rates of flu or flu-like illnesses between patients who received 1 dose of flu vaccine and those who received 2 doses.

The flu rates were 0.60 and 1.02, respectively (P=0.107). And the rates of flu-like illnesses were 2.42 and 2.73, respectively (P=0.529).

Dr Adderson said additional research is needed to determine if a subset of young leukemia patients may benefit from vaccination.

She added that patients at risk of flu should practice good hand hygiene and avoid crowds during the flu season. Patients may also benefit from “cocooning,” a process that focuses on getting family members, healthcare providers, and others in close contact with at-risk patients vaccinated.

Photo by Bill Branson

Vaccination may fail to protect young leukemia patients from developing influenza during cancer treatment, according to research published in the Journal of Pediatrics.

Researchers found that young patients with acute leukemia who received flu shots were just as likely as their unvaccinated peers to develop the flu.

The team said these results are preliminary, but they suggest a need for more research and additional efforts to prevent flu in young patients with leukemia.

“The annual flu shot, whose side effects are generally mild and short-lived, is still recommended for patients with acute leukemia who are being treated for their disease,” said study author Elisabeth Adderson, MD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

“However, the results do highlight the need for additional research in this area and for us to redouble our efforts to protect our patients through other means.”

In this retrospective study, Dr Adderson and her colleagues looked at rates of flu infection during 3 successive flu seasons (2010-2013) in 498 patients treated for acute leukemia at St. Jude.

The patients’ median age was 6 years (range, 1-21). Most patients had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, 94%), though some had acute myeloid leukemia (4.8%) or mixed-lineage leukemia (1.2%).

Most patients (n=354) received flu shots, including 98 patients who received booster doses. The remaining 144 patients were not vaccinated.

The vaccinated patients received the trivalent vaccine, which is designed to protect against 3 flu strains predicted to be in wide circulation during a particular flu season. The vaccine was a fairly good match for circulating flu viruses during the flu seasons included in this analysis.

Demographic characteristic were largely similar between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. The exceptions were that more vaccinated patients had ALL (95.5% vs 90.3%; P=0.034) and vaccinated patients were more likely to be in a low-intensity phase of cancer therapy (90.7% vs 73.6%, P<0.0001).

Results

There were no significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients when it came to flu rates or rates of flu-like illnesses.

There were 37 episodes of flu in vaccinated patients and 16 episodes in unvaccinated patients. The rates (per 1000 patient days) were 0.73 and 0.70, respectively (P=0.874).

There were 123 cases of flu-like illnesses in vaccinated patients and 55 cases in unvaccinated patients. The rates were 2.44 and 2.41, respectively (P=0.932).

Likewise, there was no significant difference in the rates of flu or flu-like illnesses between patients who received 1 dose of flu vaccine and those who received 2 doses.

The flu rates were 0.60 and 1.02, respectively (P=0.107). And the rates of flu-like illnesses were 2.42 and 2.73, respectively (P=0.529).

Dr Adderson said additional research is needed to determine if a subset of young leukemia patients may benefit from vaccination.

She added that patients at risk of flu should practice good hand hygiene and avoid crowds during the flu season. Patients may also benefit from “cocooning,” a process that focuses on getting family members, healthcare providers, and others in close contact with at-risk patients vaccinated.