Photo courtesy of Abbvie

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved venetoclax tablets (Venclexta ®) in combination with rituximab to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have received 1 prior therapy.

The combination is approved for patients with or without deletion of 17p (del 17p).

The FDA based its approval on the phase 3 MURANO trial, in which venetoclax in combination with rituximab (VEN+R) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in relapsed or refractory CLL patients compared to the chemoimmunotherapy regimen of bendamustine plus rituximab(B+R).

This approval, according to the drug’s developers, makes venetoclax plus rituximab the first oral-based, chemotherapy-free combination with a fixed treatment duration for CLL.

The FDA has also converted venetoclax's accelerated approval to a full approval. The drug was previously granted accelerated approval as a single agent for the treatment of people with CLL with 17p deletion.

Venetoclax is being developed by AbbVie and Roche and jointly commercialized by AbbVie and Genentech in the US and by AbbVie outside the US.

Phase 3 MURANO trial (NCT02005471)

The multicenter, open-label trial randomized 389 patients to VEN+R (194 patients) or B+R (195 patients). Median age of the patients was 65 years (range, 22 – 85).

Patients in the VEN+R arm completed a 5-week ramp-up of venetoclax followed by venetoclax 400 mg once daily for 24 months measured from the rituximab start date.

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), caused by a rapid reduction in tumor volume, is an identified risk with venetoclax treatment. The dose ramp-up was intended to mitigate this risk.

Rituximab was initiated after venetoclax ramp-up and given for 6 cycles (375 mg/m² intravenously on cycle 1 day 1 and 500 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 of cycles 2-6, with a 28-day cycle length).

Patients in the B+R arm received 6 cycles of B+R (bendamustine 70 mg/m² on days 1 and 2 of each 28-day cycle and rituximab at the above described dose and schedule).

Efficacy was based on PFS as assessed by an independent review committee.

After a median follow-up of 23 months, the median PFS was not reached in the VEN+R arm and was 18.1 months in the B+R arm (P<0.0001).

The overall response rate was 92% for patients treated with VEN+R compared to 72% for those treated with B+R.

Safety

The most common adverse events (AEs) in the VEN+R arms that occurred in 20% or more patients were neutropenia (65%), diarrhea (40%), upper respiratory tract infection (39%), fatigue (22%), cough (22%), and nausea (21%).

Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia developed in 64% of patients, and grade 4 neutropenia in 31%.

Serious adverse events (SAEs) developed in 46% of patients and serious infections in 21%, consisting most frequently of pneumonia (9%).

The incidence of TLS was 3%, occurring in 6 of  194 patients.

In the VEN+R arm, discontinuations due to any AEs occurred in 16% of patients, dose reductions in 15%, and dose interruptions in 71%.

Neutropenia led to dose interruptions in 46% of patients and discontinuations in 3%. Thrombocytopenia led to discontinuations in 3% of patients.

Fatal AEs that occurred in the absence of disease progression and within 30 days of the last VEN+R treatment and/or 90 days of the last rituximab infusion were reported in 2% (4/194) of patients.

In the B+R arm, AEs led to treatment discontinuations in 10% of patients, dose reductions in 15%, and dose interruptions in 40 %.

Investigators previously reported data from the phase 3 MURANO study as a late-breaking abstract at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and published the findings in NEJM.

John Seymour, MBBS, PhD, lead investigator of the MURANO study, said in the corporate release, the approval "validates the results seen in the phase 3 trial, including the significant improvement in progression-free survival over a standard of care comparator arm."

"Progression-free survival is considered a gold standard for demonstrating clinical benefit in oncology," he added.

Full prescribing information for venetoclax is available here. 

Photo courtesy of Abbvie

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved venetoclax tablets (Venclexta ®) in combination with rituximab to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have received 1 prior therapy.

The combination is approved for patients with or without deletion of 17p (del 17p).

The FDA based its approval on the phase 3 MURANO trial, in which venetoclax in combination with rituximab (VEN+R) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in relapsed or refractory CLL patients compared to the chemoimmunotherapy regimen of bendamustine plus rituximab(B+R).

This approval, according to the drug’s developers, makes venetoclax plus rituximab the first oral-based, chemotherapy-free combination with a fixed treatment duration for CLL.

The FDA has also converted venetoclax's accelerated approval to a full approval. The drug was previously granted accelerated approval as a single agent for the treatment of people with CLL with 17p deletion.

Venetoclax is being developed by AbbVie and Roche and jointly commercialized by AbbVie and Genentech in the US and by AbbVie outside the US.

Phase 3 MURANO trial (NCT02005471)

The multicenter, open-label trial randomized 389 patients to VEN+R (194 patients) or B+R (195 patients). Median age of the patients was 65 years (range, 22 – 85).

Patients in the VEN+R arm completed a 5-week ramp-up of venetoclax followed by venetoclax 400 mg once daily for 24 months measured from the rituximab start date.

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), caused by a rapid reduction in tumor volume, is an identified risk with venetoclax treatment. The dose ramp-up was intended to mitigate this risk.

Rituximab was initiated after venetoclax ramp-up and given for 6 cycles (375 mg/m² intravenously on cycle 1 day 1 and 500 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 of cycles 2-6, with a 28-day cycle length).

Patients in the B+R arm received 6 cycles of B+R (bendamustine 70 mg/m² on days 1 and 2 of each 28-day cycle and rituximab at the above described dose and schedule).

Efficacy was based on PFS as assessed by an independent review committee.

After a median follow-up of 23 months, the median PFS was not reached in the VEN+R arm and was 18.1 months in the B+R arm (P<0.0001).

The overall response rate was 92% for patients treated with VEN+R compared to 72% for those treated with B+R.

Safety

The most common adverse events (AEs) in the VEN+R arms that occurred in 20% or more patients were neutropenia (65%), diarrhea (40%), upper respiratory tract infection (39%), fatigue (22%), cough (22%), and nausea (21%).

Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia developed in 64% of patients, and grade 4 neutropenia in 31%.

Serious adverse events (SAEs) developed in 46% of patients and serious infections in 21%, consisting most frequently of pneumonia (9%).

The incidence of TLS was 3%, occurring in 6 of  194 patients.

In the VEN+R arm, discontinuations due to any AEs occurred in 16% of patients, dose reductions in 15%, and dose interruptions in 71%.

Neutropenia led to dose interruptions in 46% of patients and discontinuations in 3%. Thrombocytopenia led to discontinuations in 3% of patients.

Fatal AEs that occurred in the absence of disease progression and within 30 days of the last VEN+R treatment and/or 90 days of the last rituximab infusion were reported in 2% (4/194) of patients.

In the B+R arm, AEs led to treatment discontinuations in 10% of patients, dose reductions in 15%, and dose interruptions in 40 %.

Investigators previously reported data from the phase 3 MURANO study as a late-breaking abstract at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and published the findings in NEJM.

John Seymour, MBBS, PhD, lead investigator of the MURANO study, said in the corporate release, the approval "validates the results seen in the phase 3 trial, including the significant improvement in progression-free survival over a standard of care comparator arm."

"Progression-free survival is considered a gold standard for demonstrating clinical benefit in oncology," he added.

Full prescribing information for venetoclax is available here. 

Photo courtesy of Abbvie

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved venetoclax tablets (Venclexta ®) in combination with rituximab to treat patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have received 1 prior therapy.

The combination is approved for patients with or without deletion of 17p (del 17p).

The FDA based its approval on the phase 3 MURANO trial, in which venetoclax in combination with rituximab (VEN+R) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in relapsed or refractory CLL patients compared to the chemoimmunotherapy regimen of bendamustine plus rituximab(B+R).

This approval, according to the drug’s developers, makes venetoclax plus rituximab the first oral-based, chemotherapy-free combination with a fixed treatment duration for CLL.

The FDA has also converted venetoclax's accelerated approval to a full approval. The drug was previously granted accelerated approval as a single agent for the treatment of people with CLL with 17p deletion.

Venetoclax is being developed by AbbVie and Roche and jointly commercialized by AbbVie and Genentech in the US and by AbbVie outside the US.

Phase 3 MURANO trial (NCT02005471)

The multicenter, open-label trial randomized 389 patients to VEN+R (194 patients) or B+R (195 patients). Median age of the patients was 65 years (range, 22 – 85).

Patients in the VEN+R arm completed a 5-week ramp-up of venetoclax followed by venetoclax 400 mg once daily for 24 months measured from the rituximab start date.

Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), caused by a rapid reduction in tumor volume, is an identified risk with venetoclax treatment. The dose ramp-up was intended to mitigate this risk.

Rituximab was initiated after venetoclax ramp-up and given for 6 cycles (375 mg/m² intravenously on cycle 1 day 1 and 500 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 of cycles 2-6, with a 28-day cycle length).

Patients in the B+R arm received 6 cycles of B+R (bendamustine 70 mg/m² on days 1 and 2 of each 28-day cycle and rituximab at the above described dose and schedule).

Efficacy was based on PFS as assessed by an independent review committee.

After a median follow-up of 23 months, the median PFS was not reached in the VEN+R arm and was 18.1 months in the B+R arm (P<0.0001).

The overall response rate was 92% for patients treated with VEN+R compared to 72% for those treated with B+R.

Safety

The most common adverse events (AEs) in the VEN+R arms that occurred in 20% or more patients were neutropenia (65%), diarrhea (40%), upper respiratory tract infection (39%), fatigue (22%), cough (22%), and nausea (21%).

Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia developed in 64% of patients, and grade 4 neutropenia in 31%.

Serious adverse events (SAEs) developed in 46% of patients and serious infections in 21%, consisting most frequently of pneumonia (9%).

The incidence of TLS was 3%, occurring in 6 of  194 patients.

In the VEN+R arm, discontinuations due to any AEs occurred in 16% of patients, dose reductions in 15%, and dose interruptions in 71%.

Neutropenia led to dose interruptions in 46% of patients and discontinuations in 3%. Thrombocytopenia led to discontinuations in 3% of patients.

Fatal AEs that occurred in the absence of disease progression and within 30 days of the last VEN+R treatment and/or 90 days of the last rituximab infusion were reported in 2% (4/194) of patients.

In the B+R arm, AEs led to treatment discontinuations in 10% of patients, dose reductions in 15%, and dose interruptions in 40 %.

Investigators previously reported data from the phase 3 MURANO study as a late-breaking abstract at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and published the findings in NEJM.

John Seymour, MBBS, PhD, lead investigator of the MURANO study, said in the corporate release, the approval "validates the results seen in the phase 3 trial, including the significant improvement in progression-free survival over a standard of care comparator arm."

"Progression-free survival is considered a gold standard for demonstrating clinical benefit in oncology," he added.

Full prescribing information for venetoclax is available here. 

BOSTON – Though sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are the bariatric procedures most patients will receive, other surgical approaches to weight loss are occasionally performed. Knowing these various techniques and their likely efficacy and safety can help physicians who care for patients with obesity, whether a patient is considering a less common option, or whether a post-vagal blockade patient shows up on the schedule with long-term issues.

A common theme among many of these procedures is that overall numbers are low, long-term follow-up may be lacking, and research quality is variable, said Travis McKenzie, MD, speaking at a bariatric surgery-focused session of the annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

One minimally invasive approach targets stomach functions and the appetite and satiety signaling system. In vagal blockade via an electronic implant (vBloc), an indwelling, removable device produces electronically-induced intermittent blockade of the vagal nerve.

In one randomized controlled trial, excess weight loss in patients receiving this procedure was 24%, significantly more than the 16% seen in the group that received a sham procedure (P = .002); both groups received regular follow-up and counseling, according to the study protocol. Overall, at 1 year, 52% of those in the treatment group had seen at least 20% reduction in excess weight; just 3.7% of vBloc recipients had adverse events, mostly some dyspepsia and pain at the implant site, said Dr. McKenzie, an endocrine surgeon at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

The vBloc procedure, said Dr. McKenzie, “demonstrated modest weight loss at 2 years, with a reasonable risk profile.”

A variation of the duodenal switch is known as single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy, or SADI-S. This procedure both resects the greater curve of the stomach to create a gastric sleeve, and uses a single intestinal anastomosis to create a common channel of 200, 250 or 300 cm, bypassing most of the small intestine.

In this procedure, also known as the one-anastomosis duodenal switch (OADS), weight loss occurs both because of intestinal malabsorption and because of the reduced stomach volume.

koakes@mdedge.com

SOURCE: McKenzie, T. AACE 2018, presentation SGS4.

BOSTON – Though sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are the bariatric procedures most patients will receive, other surgical approaches to weight loss are occasionally performed. Knowing these various techniques and their likely efficacy and safety can help physicians who care for patients with obesity, whether a patient is considering a less common option, or whether a post-vagal blockade patient shows up on the schedule with long-term issues.

A common theme among many of these procedures is that overall numbers are low, long-term follow-up may be lacking, and research quality is variable, said Travis McKenzie, MD, speaking at a bariatric surgery-focused session of the annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

One minimally invasive approach targets stomach functions and the appetite and satiety signaling system. In vagal blockade via an electronic implant (vBloc), an indwelling, removable device produces electronically-induced intermittent blockade of the vagal nerve.

In one randomized controlled trial, excess weight loss in patients receiving this procedure was 24%, significantly more than the 16% seen in the group that received a sham procedure (P = .002); both groups received regular follow-up and counseling, according to the study protocol. Overall, at 1 year, 52% of those in the treatment group had seen at least 20% reduction in excess weight; just 3.7% of vBloc recipients had adverse events, mostly some dyspepsia and pain at the implant site, said Dr. McKenzie, an endocrine surgeon at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

The vBloc procedure, said Dr. McKenzie, “demonstrated modest weight loss at 2 years, with a reasonable risk profile.”

A variation of the duodenal switch is known as single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy, or SADI-S. This procedure both resects the greater curve of the stomach to create a gastric sleeve, and uses a single intestinal anastomosis to create a common channel of 200, 250 or 300 cm, bypassing most of the small intestine.

In this procedure, also known as the one-anastomosis duodenal switch (OADS), weight loss occurs both because of intestinal malabsorption and because of the reduced stomach volume.

koakes@mdedge.com

SOURCE: McKenzie, T. AACE 2018, presentation SGS4.

BOSTON – Though sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are the bariatric procedures most patients will receive, other surgical approaches to weight loss are occasionally performed. Knowing these various techniques and their likely efficacy and safety can help physicians who care for patients with obesity, whether a patient is considering a less common option, or whether a post-vagal blockade patient shows up on the schedule with long-term issues.

A common theme among many of these procedures is that overall numbers are low, long-term follow-up may be lacking, and research quality is variable, said Travis McKenzie, MD, speaking at a bariatric surgery-focused session of the annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

One minimally invasive approach targets stomach functions and the appetite and satiety signaling system. In vagal blockade via an electronic implant (vBloc), an indwelling, removable device produces electronically-induced intermittent blockade of the vagal nerve.

In one randomized controlled trial, excess weight loss in patients receiving this procedure was 24%, significantly more than the 16% seen in the group that received a sham procedure (P = .002); both groups received regular follow-up and counseling, according to the study protocol. Overall, at 1 year, 52% of those in the treatment group had seen at least 20% reduction in excess weight; just 3.7% of vBloc recipients had adverse events, mostly some dyspepsia and pain at the implant site, said Dr. McKenzie, an endocrine surgeon at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

The vBloc procedure, said Dr. McKenzie, “demonstrated modest weight loss at 2 years, with a reasonable risk profile.”

A variation of the duodenal switch is known as single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy, or SADI-S. This procedure both resects the greater curve of the stomach to create a gastric sleeve, and uses a single intestinal anastomosis to create a common channel of 200, 250 or 300 cm, bypassing most of the small intestine.

In this procedure, also known as the one-anastomosis duodenal switch (OADS), weight loss occurs both because of intestinal malabsorption and because of the reduced stomach volume.

koakes@mdedge.com

SOURCE: McKenzie, T. AACE 2018, presentation SGS4.

SAN DIEGO – The use of aclidinium bromide 400 mcg b.i.d. did not increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events or mortality in patients with moderate to very severe COPD with significant cardiovascular risk factors, compared with placebo.

Those are two key findings from the ASCENT COPD trial presented by Robert A. Wise, MD, at an international conference of the American Thoracic Society. “Cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities are prevalent in patients with COPD, and about 30% of COPD patients die of cardiovascular disease,” said Dr. Wise, who serves as director of research for the division of pulmonary and critical care medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore. “However, patients who have cardiovascular disease are often excluded from, or not enrolled in, COPD clinical trials. Moreover, there has been controversy as to whether or not treatment with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. That’s been seen in randomized trials, meta-analyses, as well as in observational studies.”

Aclidinium bromide 400 mcg b.i.d., administered by the Pressair inhaler, is approved as a maintenance treatment for patients with COPD. However, during the registration studies, there were not an adequate number of cardiovascular events in order to ascertain clearly whether or not the drug was associated with increased risk, Dr. Wise said. Therefore, he and his associates in the ASCENT COPD study set out to assess the long-term cardiovascular safety profile of aclidinium 400 mcg b.i.d. in patients with moderate to very severe COPD at risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for up to 3 years (Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2018;5[1]:5-15). For the randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, patients received treatment with aclidinium bromide or a placebo inhaler of similar appearance. The study was designed to be terminated when at least 122 patients experienced an adjudicated MACE. The primary safety endpoint was time to first MACE during follow-up of up to 3 years, while the primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of moderate to severe exacerbations per patient per year during the first year of treatment.

To be included in the study, patients had to be at least 40 years of age with moderate to very severe stable COPD, have a smoking history of at least 10 pack-years, and have at least one of the following significant risk factors: cerebrovascular disease; coronary artery disease; peripheral vascular disease, or history of claudication; or at least two atherothrombotic risk factors (male at least 65 years of age, female at least 70 years of age; waist circumference of at least 40 inches among males or at least 38 inches among females; an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min and microalbuminuria; dyslipidemia; or hypertension).

The researchers randomized 1,791 patients to the aclidinium group and 1,798 to the placebo group. Their mean age was 67 years, and about 60% of patients had an exacerbation in the preceding year. Nearly two-thirds of patients (63%) were receiving concomitant long-acting beta 2-agonists (LABA) or LABA/inhaled corticosteroid therapy. In addition, 44% of patients entered the study with a history of a prior cardiovascular event plus at least two atherothrombotic risk factors, 52% reported at least two atherothrombotic risk factors without any prior cardiovascular events, and 4% had a history of a prior cardiovascular event only.

Dr. Wise reported that aclidinium did not increase the risk of MACE in patients with moderate to very severe COPD with significant cardiovascular risk factors, compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.89; P = .469); non-inferiority was concluded as the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval was less than 1.8). In terms of all-cause mortality, aclidinium did not increase the risk of death, compared with placebo (HR 0.99; P = .929).

During the first year of treatment, Dr. Wise and his associates also observed a 22% reduction in COPD exacerbation rate for aclidinium vs. placebo groups (HR 0.44 vs. 0.57, respectively; P less than .001), and a 35% reduction in the rate of COPD exacerbations leading to hospitalizations (HR 0.07 vs. 0.10; P = .006). “The reduction in exacerbation risk was similar, whether or not patients had an exacerbation in the past year,” Dr. Wise said. He reported being a consultant to, and receiving research support from, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, and ContraFect.

dbrunk@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Wise, R., et al., Abstract 7711, ATS 2018.

SAN DIEGO – The use of aclidinium bromide 400 mcg b.i.d. did not increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events or mortality in patients with moderate to very severe COPD with significant cardiovascular risk factors, compared with placebo.

Those are two key findings from the ASCENT COPD trial presented by Robert A. Wise, MD, at an international conference of the American Thoracic Society. “Cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities are prevalent in patients with COPD, and about 30% of COPD patients die of cardiovascular disease,” said Dr. Wise, who serves as director of research for the division of pulmonary and critical care medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore. “However, patients who have cardiovascular disease are often excluded from, or not enrolled in, COPD clinical trials. Moreover, there has been controversy as to whether or not treatment with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. That’s been seen in randomized trials, meta-analyses, as well as in observational studies.”

Aclidinium bromide 400 mcg b.i.d., administered by the Pressair inhaler, is approved as a maintenance treatment for patients with COPD. However, during the registration studies, there were not an adequate number of cardiovascular events in order to ascertain clearly whether or not the drug was associated with increased risk, Dr. Wise said. Therefore, he and his associates in the ASCENT COPD study set out to assess the long-term cardiovascular safety profile of aclidinium 400 mcg b.i.d. in patients with moderate to very severe COPD at risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for up to 3 years (Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2018;5[1]:5-15). For the randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, patients received treatment with aclidinium bromide or a placebo inhaler of similar appearance. The study was designed to be terminated when at least 122 patients experienced an adjudicated MACE. The primary safety endpoint was time to first MACE during follow-up of up to 3 years, while the primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of moderate to severe exacerbations per patient per year during the first year of treatment.

To be included in the study, patients had to be at least 40 years of age with moderate to very severe stable COPD, have a smoking history of at least 10 pack-years, and have at least one of the following significant risk factors: cerebrovascular disease; coronary artery disease; peripheral vascular disease, or history of claudication; or at least two atherothrombotic risk factors (male at least 65 years of age, female at least 70 years of age; waist circumference of at least 40 inches among males or at least 38 inches among females; an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min and microalbuminuria; dyslipidemia; or hypertension).

The researchers randomized 1,791 patients to the aclidinium group and 1,798 to the placebo group. Their mean age was 67 years, and about 60% of patients had an exacerbation in the preceding year. Nearly two-thirds of patients (63%) were receiving concomitant long-acting beta 2-agonists (LABA) or LABA/inhaled corticosteroid therapy. In addition, 44% of patients entered the study with a history of a prior cardiovascular event plus at least two atherothrombotic risk factors, 52% reported at least two atherothrombotic risk factors without any prior cardiovascular events, and 4% had a history of a prior cardiovascular event only.

Dr. Wise reported that aclidinium did not increase the risk of MACE in patients with moderate to very severe COPD with significant cardiovascular risk factors, compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.89; P = .469); non-inferiority was concluded as the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval was less than 1.8). In terms of all-cause mortality, aclidinium did not increase the risk of death, compared with placebo (HR 0.99; P = .929).

During the first year of treatment, Dr. Wise and his associates also observed a 22% reduction in COPD exacerbation rate for aclidinium vs. placebo groups (HR 0.44 vs. 0.57, respectively; P less than .001), and a 35% reduction in the rate of COPD exacerbations leading to hospitalizations (HR 0.07 vs. 0.10; P = .006). “The reduction in exacerbation risk was similar, whether or not patients had an exacerbation in the past year,” Dr. Wise said. He reported being a consultant to, and receiving research support from, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, and ContraFect.

dbrunk@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Wise, R., et al., Abstract 7711, ATS 2018.

SAN DIEGO – The use of aclidinium bromide 400 mcg b.i.d. did not increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events or mortality in patients with moderate to very severe COPD with significant cardiovascular risk factors, compared with placebo.

Those are two key findings from the ASCENT COPD trial presented by Robert A. Wise, MD, at an international conference of the American Thoracic Society. “Cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities are prevalent in patients with COPD, and about 30% of COPD patients die of cardiovascular disease,” said Dr. Wise, who serves as director of research for the division of pulmonary and critical care medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore. “However, patients who have cardiovascular disease are often excluded from, or not enrolled in, COPD clinical trials. Moreover, there has been controversy as to whether or not treatment with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. That’s been seen in randomized trials, meta-analyses, as well as in observational studies.”

Aclidinium bromide 400 mcg b.i.d., administered by the Pressair inhaler, is approved as a maintenance treatment for patients with COPD. However, during the registration studies, there were not an adequate number of cardiovascular events in order to ascertain clearly whether or not the drug was associated with increased risk, Dr. Wise said. Therefore, he and his associates in the ASCENT COPD study set out to assess the long-term cardiovascular safety profile of aclidinium 400 mcg b.i.d. in patients with moderate to very severe COPD at risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for up to 3 years (Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2018;5[1]:5-15). For the randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, patients received treatment with aclidinium bromide or a placebo inhaler of similar appearance. The study was designed to be terminated when at least 122 patients experienced an adjudicated MACE. The primary safety endpoint was time to first MACE during follow-up of up to 3 years, while the primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of moderate to severe exacerbations per patient per year during the first year of treatment.

To be included in the study, patients had to be at least 40 years of age with moderate to very severe stable COPD, have a smoking history of at least 10 pack-years, and have at least one of the following significant risk factors: cerebrovascular disease; coronary artery disease; peripheral vascular disease, or history of claudication; or at least two atherothrombotic risk factors (male at least 65 years of age, female at least 70 years of age; waist circumference of at least 40 inches among males or at least 38 inches among females; an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min and microalbuminuria; dyslipidemia; or hypertension).

The researchers randomized 1,791 patients to the aclidinium group and 1,798 to the placebo group. Their mean age was 67 years, and about 60% of patients had an exacerbation in the preceding year. Nearly two-thirds of patients (63%) were receiving concomitant long-acting beta 2-agonists (LABA) or LABA/inhaled corticosteroid therapy. In addition, 44% of patients entered the study with a history of a prior cardiovascular event plus at least two atherothrombotic risk factors, 52% reported at least two atherothrombotic risk factors without any prior cardiovascular events, and 4% had a history of a prior cardiovascular event only.

Dr. Wise reported that aclidinium did not increase the risk of MACE in patients with moderate to very severe COPD with significant cardiovascular risk factors, compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0.89; P = .469); non-inferiority was concluded as the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval was less than 1.8). In terms of all-cause mortality, aclidinium did not increase the risk of death, compared with placebo (HR 0.99; P = .929).

During the first year of treatment, Dr. Wise and his associates also observed a 22% reduction in COPD exacerbation rate for aclidinium vs. placebo groups (HR 0.44 vs. 0.57, respectively; P less than .001), and a 35% reduction in the rate of COPD exacerbations leading to hospitalizations (HR 0.07 vs. 0.10; P = .006). “The reduction in exacerbation risk was similar, whether or not patients had an exacerbation in the past year,” Dr. Wise said. He reported being a consultant to, and receiving research support from, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, and ContraFect.

dbrunk@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Wise, R., et al., Abstract 7711, ATS 2018.

A brief patient-directed education program delivered at the time of hospitalization for an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) improved disease-specific knowledge, according to results of a pilot randomized trial.

Patients who participated in education sessions had a significant improvement in their scores on the Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire (BCKQ), compared with control patients who received no education, study investigators reported in the journal Chest.

“Early education may be a bridge to more active approaches and could provide an important contribution to self-management interventions post-AECOPD,” wrote first author Tania Janaudis-Ferreira, PhD, of the School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, and her co-authors.

In the study, patients admitted to a community hospital with an AECOPD were randomized to standard care plus brief education or standard care alone. The education consisted of two 30-minute sessions delivered by a physiotherapist, either in the hospital or at home up to 2 weeks after the admission.

Before and after the intervention period, participant knowledge was measured using both the BCKQ and the Lung Information Needs Questionnaire (LINQ).

A total of 31 patients participated, including 15 in the intervention group and 16 in the control group, although 3 patients in the control group did not complete the follow-up testing, investigators said in their report.

The mean change in BCKQ was 8 points for the educational intervention group, and 3.4 for the control group (P = 0.02). That result was in keeping with findings of a previous randomized study noting an 8.3-point change in BCKQ scores for COPD patients who received education in the primary care setting, Dr. Janaudis-Ferreira and co-authors said.

“The change itself is relatively modest, suggesting more frequent sessions might result in greater improvements,” they wrote. For example, they said, an 8-week educational intervention delivered in the context of pulmonary rehabilitation program in one study yielded a mean change of 18.3 points on the BCKQ in the intervention group.

By contrast, the investigators found no significant difference in LINQ score changes between the intervention and control groups (P = .8).

That may indicate that two 30-minute sessions were not sufficient to attend to patients’ learning needs, authors said, though it could also have been an issue with the instrument itself in the setting of this study.

“The majority of the questions in the LINQ ask whether or not a doctor or nurse has explained a specific question to the patient,” authors explained. “Since a physiotherapist delivered the program, had the wording been altered to include physiotherapists or a more general term for healthcare professionals, we may have seen a change in these results.”

Dr. Janaudis-Ferreira and co-authors had no conflicts of interest to disclose. The study was funded by a grant from the Canadian Respiratory Health Professionals, which did not have input in research or manuscript development.

SOURCE: Janaudis-Ferreira T, et al.  Chest
 

A brief patient-directed education program delivered at the time of hospitalization for an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) improved disease-specific knowledge, according to results of a pilot randomized trial.

Patients who participated in education sessions had a significant improvement in their scores on the Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire (BCKQ), compared with control patients who received no education, study investigators reported in the journal Chest.

“Early education may be a bridge to more active approaches and could provide an important contribution to self-management interventions post-AECOPD,” wrote first author Tania Janaudis-Ferreira, PhD, of the School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, and her co-authors.

In the study, patients admitted to a community hospital with an AECOPD were randomized to standard care plus brief education or standard care alone. The education consisted of two 30-minute sessions delivered by a physiotherapist, either in the hospital or at home up to 2 weeks after the admission.

Before and after the intervention period, participant knowledge was measured using both the BCKQ and the Lung Information Needs Questionnaire (LINQ).

A total of 31 patients participated, including 15 in the intervention group and 16 in the control group, although 3 patients in the control group did not complete the follow-up testing, investigators said in their report.

The mean change in BCKQ was 8 points for the educational intervention group, and 3.4 for the control group (P = 0.02). That result was in keeping with findings of a previous randomized study noting an 8.3-point change in BCKQ scores for COPD patients who received education in the primary care setting, Dr. Janaudis-Ferreira and co-authors said.

“The change itself is relatively modest, suggesting more frequent sessions might result in greater improvements,” they wrote. For example, they said, an 8-week educational intervention delivered in the context of pulmonary rehabilitation program in one study yielded a mean change of 18.3 points on the BCKQ in the intervention group.

By contrast, the investigators found no significant difference in LINQ score changes between the intervention and control groups (P = .8).

That may indicate that two 30-minute sessions were not sufficient to attend to patients’ learning needs, authors said, though it could also have been an issue with the instrument itself in the setting of this study.

“The majority of the questions in the LINQ ask whether or not a doctor or nurse has explained a specific question to the patient,” authors explained. “Since a physiotherapist delivered the program, had the wording been altered to include physiotherapists or a more general term for healthcare professionals, we may have seen a change in these results.”

Dr. Janaudis-Ferreira and co-authors had no conflicts of interest to disclose. The study was funded by a grant from the Canadian Respiratory Health Professionals, which did not have input in research or manuscript development.

SOURCE: Janaudis-Ferreira T, et al.  Chest
 

A brief patient-directed education program delivered at the time of hospitalization for an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) improved disease-specific knowledge, according to results of a pilot randomized trial.

Patients who participated in education sessions had a significant improvement in their scores on the Bristol COPD Knowledge Questionnaire (BCKQ), compared with control patients who received no education, study investigators reported in the journal Chest.

“Early education may be a bridge to more active approaches and could provide an important contribution to self-management interventions post-AECOPD,” wrote first author Tania Janaudis-Ferreira, PhD, of the School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, and her co-authors.

In the study, patients admitted to a community hospital with an AECOPD were randomized to standard care plus brief education or standard care alone. The education consisted of two 30-minute sessions delivered by a physiotherapist, either in the hospital or at home up to 2 weeks after the admission.

Before and after the intervention period, participant knowledge was measured using both the BCKQ and the Lung Information Needs Questionnaire (LINQ).

A total of 31 patients participated, including 15 in the intervention group and 16 in the control group, although 3 patients in the control group did not complete the follow-up testing, investigators said in their report.

The mean change in BCKQ was 8 points for the educational intervention group, and 3.4 for the control group (P = 0.02). That result was in keeping with findings of a previous randomized study noting an 8.3-point change in BCKQ scores for COPD patients who received education in the primary care setting, Dr. Janaudis-Ferreira and co-authors said.

“The change itself is relatively modest, suggesting more frequent sessions might result in greater improvements,” they wrote. For example, they said, an 8-week educational intervention delivered in the context of pulmonary rehabilitation program in one study yielded a mean change of 18.3 points on the BCKQ in the intervention group.

By contrast, the investigators found no significant difference in LINQ score changes between the intervention and control groups (P = .8).

That may indicate that two 30-minute sessions were not sufficient to attend to patients’ learning needs, authors said, though it could also have been an issue with the instrument itself in the setting of this study.

“The majority of the questions in the LINQ ask whether or not a doctor or nurse has explained a specific question to the patient,” authors explained. “Since a physiotherapist delivered the program, had the wording been altered to include physiotherapists or a more general term for healthcare professionals, we may have seen a change in these results.”

Dr. Janaudis-Ferreira and co-authors had no conflicts of interest to disclose. The study was funded by a grant from the Canadian Respiratory Health Professionals, which did not have input in research or manuscript development.

SOURCE: Janaudis-Ferreira T, et al.  Chest
 

When young people successfully complete an Indian Health Service (IHS) Youth Regional Treatment Center (YRTC) program, they often leave the structured environment to return to a community and family that cannot provide them with the necessary aftercare. The IHS has launched the YRTC Aftercare Pilot Project to fill that gap.

The 12 federal and tribal YRTCs provide a range of clinical services “rooted in culturally relevant, holistic models of care” to American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) adolescents who abuse alcohol or drugs. But without aftercare and case management, the young people are at risk for falling back into old ways.

The YRTC project will identify transitional services that can be culturally adapted to meet the needs of AI/AN youth to support resiliency and coping skills and provide support systems. The project developers aim to establish community-based approaches to reduce relapse and encourage reintegration.

The IHS has awarded $1.62 million for YRTC Aftercare Pilot Projects to Healing Lodge of the Seven Nations in Spokane Valley, Washington, and Desert Sage Youth Wellness Center in Hemet, California. The awards are for 3 years. Both sites will develop innovative, collaborative strategies to improve the health of Native youth as they transition back to their communities.

When young people successfully complete an Indian Health Service (IHS) Youth Regional Treatment Center (YRTC) program, they often leave the structured environment to return to a community and family that cannot provide them with the necessary aftercare. The IHS has launched the YRTC Aftercare Pilot Project to fill that gap.

The 12 federal and tribal YRTCs provide a range of clinical services “rooted in culturally relevant, holistic models of care” to American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) adolescents who abuse alcohol or drugs. But without aftercare and case management, the young people are at risk for falling back into old ways.

The YRTC project will identify transitional services that can be culturally adapted to meet the needs of AI/AN youth to support resiliency and coping skills and provide support systems. The project developers aim to establish community-based approaches to reduce relapse and encourage reintegration.

The IHS has awarded $1.62 million for YRTC Aftercare Pilot Projects to Healing Lodge of the Seven Nations in Spokane Valley, Washington, and Desert Sage Youth Wellness Center in Hemet, California. The awards are for 3 years. Both sites will develop innovative, collaborative strategies to improve the health of Native youth as they transition back to their communities.

When young people successfully complete an Indian Health Service (IHS) Youth Regional Treatment Center (YRTC) program, they often leave the structured environment to return to a community and family that cannot provide them with the necessary aftercare. The IHS has launched the YRTC Aftercare Pilot Project to fill that gap.

The 12 federal and tribal YRTCs provide a range of clinical services “rooted in culturally relevant, holistic models of care” to American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) adolescents who abuse alcohol or drugs. But without aftercare and case management, the young people are at risk for falling back into old ways.

The YRTC project will identify transitional services that can be culturally adapted to meet the needs of AI/AN youth to support resiliency and coping skills and provide support systems. The project developers aim to establish community-based approaches to reduce relapse and encourage reintegration.

The IHS has awarded $1.62 million for YRTC Aftercare Pilot Projects to Healing Lodge of the Seven Nations in Spokane Valley, Washington, and Desert Sage Youth Wellness Center in Hemet, California. The awards are for 3 years. Both sites will develop innovative, collaborative strategies to improve the health of Native youth as they transition back to their communities.

The Food and Drug Administration on May 29 issued a set of recommendations to medical professionals and health care facility staff to reduce the occurrence of surgical fires on or near a patient.

Surgical fires most often occur when there is an oxygen-enriched environment (a concentration of greater than 30%). In addition to an oxygen source, the other two necessary elements of the “fire triangle” are an ignition source and a fuel source.

The recommendations discuss the safe use of devices or items that may serve as a source of any one of those three elements.

Oxygen: Evaluate if supplemental oxygen is needed. If it is, titrate to the minimum concentration needed for adequate saturation. Closed oxygen delivery systems (such as a laryngeal mask or endotracheal tube) are safer than open oxygen delivery systems (such as a nasal cannula or mask). If you must use an open system, take additional precautions to exclude oxygen and flammable/combustible gases from the operative field, such as draping techniques that avoid accumulation of oxygen.

dwatson@mdedge.com

The Food and Drug Administration on May 29 issued a set of recommendations to medical professionals and health care facility staff to reduce the occurrence of surgical fires on or near a patient.

Surgical fires most often occur when there is an oxygen-enriched environment (a concentration of greater than 30%). In addition to an oxygen source, the other two necessary elements of the “fire triangle” are an ignition source and a fuel source.

The recommendations discuss the safe use of devices or items that may serve as a source of any one of those three elements.

Oxygen: Evaluate if supplemental oxygen is needed. If it is, titrate to the minimum concentration needed for adequate saturation. Closed oxygen delivery systems (such as a laryngeal mask or endotracheal tube) are safer than open oxygen delivery systems (such as a nasal cannula or mask). If you must use an open system, take additional precautions to exclude oxygen and flammable/combustible gases from the operative field, such as draping techniques that avoid accumulation of oxygen.

dwatson@mdedge.com

The Food and Drug Administration on May 29 issued a set of recommendations to medical professionals and health care facility staff to reduce the occurrence of surgical fires on or near a patient.

Surgical fires most often occur when there is an oxygen-enriched environment (a concentration of greater than 30%). In addition to an oxygen source, the other two necessary elements of the “fire triangle” are an ignition source and a fuel source.

The recommendations discuss the safe use of devices or items that may serve as a source of any one of those three elements.

Oxygen: Evaluate if supplemental oxygen is needed. If it is, titrate to the minimum concentration needed for adequate saturation. Closed oxygen delivery systems (such as a laryngeal mask or endotracheal tube) are safer than open oxygen delivery systems (such as a nasal cannula or mask). If you must use an open system, take additional precautions to exclude oxygen and flammable/combustible gases from the operative field, such as draping techniques that avoid accumulation of oxygen.

dwatson@mdedge.com

BOSTON – For patients with obesity and metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes (T2D), it may be hard to best bariatric surgery for optimizing cardiovascular and metabolic health over the lifespan.

“Behavioral changes in diet and activity may be effective over the short term, but they are often ineffective over the long term,” said Daniel L. Hurley, MD. By contrast, “Bariatric surgery is very effective long-term,” he said.

At the annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Dr. Hurley made the case for bariatric surgery in effective and durable management of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk, weighing risks and benefits for those with higher and lower levels of obesity.

Speaking during a morning session focused on bariatric surgery, Dr. Hurley, an endocrionologist at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., noted that bariatric surgery reduces not just weight, but also visceral adiposity. This, he said, is important when thinking about type 2 diabetes (T2D), because diabetes prevalence has climbed in the United States as obesity has also increased, according to examination of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Additionally, increased abdominal adiposity is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular-related deaths, myocardial infarctions, and all-cause deaths. Some of this relationship is mediated by T2D, which itself “is a major cause of cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality,” said Dr. Hurley.

From a population health perspective, the increased prevalence of T2D – expected to reach 10% in the United States by 2030 – will also boost cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, said Dr. Hurley. Those with T2D die 5 to 10 years earlier, and have double the risk for heart attack and stroke of their peers without diabetes. The risk of lower limb amputation can be as much as 40 times greater for an individual with T2D across the lifespan, he said.

The National Institutes of Health recognizes bariatric surgery as an appropriate weight loss therapy for individuals with a body mass index (BMI) of at least 35 kg/m² and comorbidity. Whether bariatric surgery might be appropriate for individuals with T2D and BMIs of less than 35 kg/m² is less settled, though at least some RCTs support the surgical approach, said Dr. Hurley.

koakes@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Hurley, D. AACE 2018, Session SGS-4.

BOSTON – For patients with obesity and metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes (T2D), it may be hard to best bariatric surgery for optimizing cardiovascular and metabolic health over the lifespan.

“Behavioral changes in diet and activity may be effective over the short term, but they are often ineffective over the long term,” said Daniel L. Hurley, MD. By contrast, “Bariatric surgery is very effective long-term,” he said.

At the annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Dr. Hurley made the case for bariatric surgery in effective and durable management of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk, weighing risks and benefits for those with higher and lower levels of obesity.

Speaking during a morning session focused on bariatric surgery, Dr. Hurley, an endocrionologist at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., noted that bariatric surgery reduces not just weight, but also visceral adiposity. This, he said, is important when thinking about type 2 diabetes (T2D), because diabetes prevalence has climbed in the United States as obesity has also increased, according to examination of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Additionally, increased abdominal adiposity is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular-related deaths, myocardial infarctions, and all-cause deaths. Some of this relationship is mediated by T2D, which itself “is a major cause of cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality,” said Dr. Hurley.

From a population health perspective, the increased prevalence of T2D – expected to reach 10% in the United States by 2030 – will also boost cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, said Dr. Hurley. Those with T2D die 5 to 10 years earlier, and have double the risk for heart attack and stroke of their peers without diabetes. The risk of lower limb amputation can be as much as 40 times greater for an individual with T2D across the lifespan, he said.

The National Institutes of Health recognizes bariatric surgery as an appropriate weight loss therapy for individuals with a body mass index (BMI) of at least 35 kg/m² and comorbidity. Whether bariatric surgery might be appropriate for individuals with T2D and BMIs of less than 35 kg/m² is less settled, though at least some RCTs support the surgical approach, said Dr. Hurley.

koakes@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Hurley, D. AACE 2018, Session SGS-4.

BOSTON – For patients with obesity and metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes (T2D), it may be hard to best bariatric surgery for optimizing cardiovascular and metabolic health over the lifespan.

“Behavioral changes in diet and activity may be effective over the short term, but they are often ineffective over the long term,” said Daniel L. Hurley, MD. By contrast, “Bariatric surgery is very effective long-term,” he said.

At the annual clinical and scientific meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Dr. Hurley made the case for bariatric surgery in effective and durable management of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk, weighing risks and benefits for those with higher and lower levels of obesity.

Speaking during a morning session focused on bariatric surgery, Dr. Hurley, an endocrionologist at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., noted that bariatric surgery reduces not just weight, but also visceral adiposity. This, he said, is important when thinking about type 2 diabetes (T2D), because diabetes prevalence has climbed in the United States as obesity has also increased, according to examination of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Additionally, increased abdominal adiposity is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular-related deaths, myocardial infarctions, and all-cause deaths. Some of this relationship is mediated by T2D, which itself “is a major cause of cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality,” said Dr. Hurley.

From a population health perspective, the increased prevalence of T2D – expected to reach 10% in the United States by 2030 – will also boost cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, said Dr. Hurley. Those with T2D die 5 to 10 years earlier, and have double the risk for heart attack and stroke of their peers without diabetes. The risk of lower limb amputation can be as much as 40 times greater for an individual with T2D across the lifespan, he said.

The National Institutes of Health recognizes bariatric surgery as an appropriate weight loss therapy for individuals with a body mass index (BMI) of at least 35 kg/m² and comorbidity. Whether bariatric surgery might be appropriate for individuals with T2D and BMIs of less than 35 kg/m² is less settled, though at least some RCTs support the surgical approach, said Dr. Hurley.

koakes@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Hurley, D. AACE 2018, Session SGS-4.

Photo by Bill Branson

Dasatinib used during induction and consolidation in the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) AALL0622 trial provided early response rates for children with Ph-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), according to investigators.

But the early response rates did not improve event-free survival (EFS) compared to the use of consolidation imatinib in the AALL0031 study.

Incidence of cranial relapse was more than doubled in AALL0622 compared to AALL0031.

The investigators believe the incidence of cranial relapse may explain the results of AALL0622.

“We cannot yet conclude that the current dasatinib plus chemotherapy combination is better than imatinib plus chemotherapy,” the authors stated.

AALL0622 was designed to be an improvement on AALL0031, which demonstrated that adding the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib to intensive chemotherapy in the consolidation phase significantly improved survival for children with Ph+ ALL.

In AALL0622 dasatinib was given early in induction (day 15) and then in consolidation with the hope that patients could achieve early remission.

Another departure from AALL0031 was that cranial irradiation was not provided for control of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis. Because dasatinib accumulates in the CNS, which is a ‘sanctuary site’ for leukemia, it was presumed that patients could benefit from a TKI yet be spared from cranial irradiation.

As expected, adding dasatinib mid-induction provided a complete remission rate of 98% at the end of induction (day 29), which was better than the 89% seen in AALL0031.

In addition, more patients in AALL0622 showed minimal residual disease (MRD) <0.01% at the end of induction: 59% vs 25% in AALL0031 (P <0.001). At the end of consolidation, corresponding rates were 89% vs 71% for AALL0031.

For the primary outcome, 3-year EFS was 84.6% for patients in AALL0622 in standard-risk patients. Five-year OS and EFS rates were 86% and 60%, respectively.

In patients with overt brain metastasis (CNS3 status), 5-year CNS relapse was 15% for patients in the AALL0622 study vs 6.6% for patients in the AALL031 study.

However, 5-year OS rates were similar in the two groups of patients: 86% for AALL0622 vs 81% for AALL0031.

HSCT

AALL0622 allowed the use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in high-risk patients as well as in standard-risk patients with a sibling donor.

Five-year OS and EFS for standard-risk patients (19% underwent HSCT at first remission) and high-risk patients (91% underwent HSCT in first remission) were similar.

Children who did not undergo HSCT had a similar 5-year OS of 88%, which suggested that children with Ph+ ALL should not undergo transplantation at first remission.

Samples from a subset of patients was analyzed for IKZF1 mutations and correlated with outcomes.

Five-year OS was 80% in those harboring the mutation versus 100% who had the wild-type gene (P=0.04); 4-year EFS was also significantly lower—10% vs 82% (P=0.04).

Screening for IKZF1 may be used to identify high-risk patients suitable for HSCT and/or alternate treatment, the authors note.

The investigators reported their findings in The Journal of Clinical Oncology. 

Photo by Bill Branson

Dasatinib used during induction and consolidation in the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) AALL0622 trial provided early response rates for children with Ph-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), according to investigators.

But the early response rates did not improve event-free survival (EFS) compared to the use of consolidation imatinib in the AALL0031 study.

Incidence of cranial relapse was more than doubled in AALL0622 compared to AALL0031.

The investigators believe the incidence of cranial relapse may explain the results of AALL0622.

“We cannot yet conclude that the current dasatinib plus chemotherapy combination is better than imatinib plus chemotherapy,” the authors stated.

AALL0622 was designed to be an improvement on AALL0031, which demonstrated that adding the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib to intensive chemotherapy in the consolidation phase significantly improved survival for children with Ph+ ALL.

In AALL0622 dasatinib was given early in induction (day 15) and then in consolidation with the hope that patients could achieve early remission.

Another departure from AALL0031 was that cranial irradiation was not provided for control of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis. Because dasatinib accumulates in the CNS, which is a ‘sanctuary site’ for leukemia, it was presumed that patients could benefit from a TKI yet be spared from cranial irradiation.

As expected, adding dasatinib mid-induction provided a complete remission rate of 98% at the end of induction (day 29), which was better than the 89% seen in AALL0031.

In addition, more patients in AALL0622 showed minimal residual disease (MRD) <0.01% at the end of induction: 59% vs 25% in AALL0031 (P <0.001). At the end of consolidation, corresponding rates were 89% vs 71% for AALL0031.

For the primary outcome, 3-year EFS was 84.6% for patients in AALL0622 in standard-risk patients. Five-year OS and EFS rates were 86% and 60%, respectively.

In patients with overt brain metastasis (CNS3 status), 5-year CNS relapse was 15% for patients in the AALL0622 study vs 6.6% for patients in the AALL031 study.

However, 5-year OS rates were similar in the two groups of patients: 86% for AALL0622 vs 81% for AALL0031.

HSCT

AALL0622 allowed the use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in high-risk patients as well as in standard-risk patients with a sibling donor.

Five-year OS and EFS for standard-risk patients (19% underwent HSCT at first remission) and high-risk patients (91% underwent HSCT in first remission) were similar.

Children who did not undergo HSCT had a similar 5-year OS of 88%, which suggested that children with Ph+ ALL should not undergo transplantation at first remission.

Samples from a subset of patients was analyzed for IKZF1 mutations and correlated with outcomes.

Five-year OS was 80% in those harboring the mutation versus 100% who had the wild-type gene (P=0.04); 4-year EFS was also significantly lower—10% vs 82% (P=0.04).

Screening for IKZF1 may be used to identify high-risk patients suitable for HSCT and/or alternate treatment, the authors note.

The investigators reported their findings in The Journal of Clinical Oncology. 

Photo by Bill Branson

Dasatinib used during induction and consolidation in the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) AALL0622 trial provided early response rates for children with Ph-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), according to investigators.

But the early response rates did not improve event-free survival (EFS) compared to the use of consolidation imatinib in the AALL0031 study.

Incidence of cranial relapse was more than doubled in AALL0622 compared to AALL0031.

The investigators believe the incidence of cranial relapse may explain the results of AALL0622.

“We cannot yet conclude that the current dasatinib plus chemotherapy combination is better than imatinib plus chemotherapy,” the authors stated.

AALL0622 was designed to be an improvement on AALL0031, which demonstrated that adding the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib to intensive chemotherapy in the consolidation phase significantly improved survival for children with Ph+ ALL.

In AALL0622 dasatinib was given early in induction (day 15) and then in consolidation with the hope that patients could achieve early remission.

Another departure from AALL0031 was that cranial irradiation was not provided for control of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis. Because dasatinib accumulates in the CNS, which is a ‘sanctuary site’ for leukemia, it was presumed that patients could benefit from a TKI yet be spared from cranial irradiation.

As expected, adding dasatinib mid-induction provided a complete remission rate of 98% at the end of induction (day 29), which was better than the 89% seen in AALL0031.

In addition, more patients in AALL0622 showed minimal residual disease (MRD) <0.01% at the end of induction: 59% vs 25% in AALL0031 (P <0.001). At the end of consolidation, corresponding rates were 89% vs 71% for AALL0031.

For the primary outcome, 3-year EFS was 84.6% for patients in AALL0622 in standard-risk patients. Five-year OS and EFS rates were 86% and 60%, respectively.

In patients with overt brain metastasis (CNS3 status), 5-year CNS relapse was 15% for patients in the AALL0622 study vs 6.6% for patients in the AALL031 study.

However, 5-year OS rates were similar in the two groups of patients: 86% for AALL0622 vs 81% for AALL0031.

HSCT

AALL0622 allowed the use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in high-risk patients as well as in standard-risk patients with a sibling donor.

Five-year OS and EFS for standard-risk patients (19% underwent HSCT at first remission) and high-risk patients (91% underwent HSCT in first remission) were similar.

Children who did not undergo HSCT had a similar 5-year OS of 88%, which suggested that children with Ph+ ALL should not undergo transplantation at first remission.

Samples from a subset of patients was analyzed for IKZF1 mutations and correlated with outcomes.

Five-year OS was 80% in those harboring the mutation versus 100% who had the wild-type gene (P=0.04); 4-year EFS was also significantly lower—10% vs 82% (P=0.04).

Screening for IKZF1 may be used to identify high-risk patients suitable for HSCT and/or alternate treatment, the authors note.

The investigators reported their findings in The Journal of Clinical Oncology. 

The Department of Justice is declining to interfere with a legal action that could have the significant impact on the Affordable Care Act, filing a brief stating that it will not defend the law in the case Texas v. The United States.

In February 2018, Texas and 19 other states filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, seeking to have the ACA’s individual mandate declared unconstitutional in light of the mandate’s penalty being reduced to zero effective Jan. 1, 2019. Congress eliminated the financial penalty for not carrying qualifying insurance coverage as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

gtwachtman@mdedge.com

The Department of Justice is declining to interfere with a legal action that could have the significant impact on the Affordable Care Act, filing a brief stating that it will not defend the law in the case Texas v. The United States.

In February 2018, Texas and 19 other states filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, seeking to have the ACA’s individual mandate declared unconstitutional in light of the mandate’s penalty being reduced to zero effective Jan. 1, 2019. Congress eliminated the financial penalty for not carrying qualifying insurance coverage as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

gtwachtman@mdedge.com

The Department of Justice is declining to interfere with a legal action that could have the significant impact on the Affordable Care Act, filing a brief stating that it will not defend the law in the case Texas v. The United States.

In February 2018, Texas and 19 other states filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, seeking to have the ACA’s individual mandate declared unconstitutional in light of the mandate’s penalty being reduced to zero effective Jan. 1, 2019. Congress eliminated the financial penalty for not carrying qualifying insurance coverage as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

gtwachtman@mdedge.com

ORLANDO – The more nevi a person has, the greater the risk of basal cell carcinoma, according to a review of over 200,000 subjects in decades-long health professional cohorts.

It’s well known that nevi increase the risk of melanoma, and the study confirmed that fact. The basal cell carcinoma finding, however, is novel. “The relationship between nevi and non-melanoma skin cancer has not [previously] been clearly demonstrated in large population cohorts,” said lead investigator Erin X. Wei, MD, a dermatologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston.

“Nevus count serves as a convenient maker to identify patients at risk for both melanoma and basal cell carcinoma. Providers should be aware of these increased risks in patients with any nevi on the extremity, particularly 15 or more,” she said at the International Investigative Dermatology meeting.

There was no association, meanwhile, between nevus counts and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

The team reviewed 176,317 women in the Nurses’ Health Study 1 and 2, as well as 32,383 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Subjects were enrolled in the 1980s and followed through 2012. They reported nevus counts on their arms or legs at baseline, and filled out questionnaires on a regular basis that, among many other things, asked about new skin cancer diagnoses.

Overall, there were 30,457 incident basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), 1,704 incident melanomas, and 2,296 incident SCCs. Melanomas and SCCs – as well as a portion of BCCs – were confirmed by histology.

The team correlated the skin cancer incidence with how many moles subjects reported at baseline: zero, 1-5, 6-14, or 15 or more.

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Wei EX et al. 2018 International Investigative Dermatology meeting abstract 233

ORLANDO – The more nevi a person has, the greater the risk of basal cell carcinoma, according to a review of over 200,000 subjects in decades-long health professional cohorts.

It’s well known that nevi increase the risk of melanoma, and the study confirmed that fact. The basal cell carcinoma finding, however, is novel. “The relationship between nevi and non-melanoma skin cancer has not [previously] been clearly demonstrated in large population cohorts,” said lead investigator Erin X. Wei, MD, a dermatologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston.

“Nevus count serves as a convenient maker to identify patients at risk for both melanoma and basal cell carcinoma. Providers should be aware of these increased risks in patients with any nevi on the extremity, particularly 15 or more,” she said at the International Investigative Dermatology meeting.

There was no association, meanwhile, between nevus counts and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

The team reviewed 176,317 women in the Nurses’ Health Study 1 and 2, as well as 32,383 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Subjects were enrolled in the 1980s and followed through 2012. They reported nevus counts on their arms or legs at baseline, and filled out questionnaires on a regular basis that, among many other things, asked about new skin cancer diagnoses.

Overall, there were 30,457 incident basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), 1,704 incident melanomas, and 2,296 incident SCCs. Melanomas and SCCs – as well as a portion of BCCs – were confirmed by histology.

The team correlated the skin cancer incidence with how many moles subjects reported at baseline: zero, 1-5, 6-14, or 15 or more.

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Wei EX et al. 2018 International Investigative Dermatology meeting abstract 233

ORLANDO – The more nevi a person has, the greater the risk of basal cell carcinoma, according to a review of over 200,000 subjects in decades-long health professional cohorts.

It’s well known that nevi increase the risk of melanoma, and the study confirmed that fact. The basal cell carcinoma finding, however, is novel. “The relationship between nevi and non-melanoma skin cancer has not [previously] been clearly demonstrated in large population cohorts,” said lead investigator Erin X. Wei, MD, a dermatologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston.

“Nevus count serves as a convenient maker to identify patients at risk for both melanoma and basal cell carcinoma. Providers should be aware of these increased risks in patients with any nevi on the extremity, particularly 15 or more,” she said at the International Investigative Dermatology meeting.

There was no association, meanwhile, between nevus counts and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

The team reviewed 176,317 women in the Nurses’ Health Study 1 and 2, as well as 32,383 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Subjects were enrolled in the 1980s and followed through 2012. They reported nevus counts on their arms or legs at baseline, and filled out questionnaires on a regular basis that, among many other things, asked about new skin cancer diagnoses.

Overall, there were 30,457 incident basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), 1,704 incident melanomas, and 2,296 incident SCCs. Melanomas and SCCs – as well as a portion of BCCs – were confirmed by histology.

The team correlated the skin cancer incidence with how many moles subjects reported at baseline: zero, 1-5, 6-14, or 15 or more.

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Wei EX et al. 2018 International Investigative Dermatology meeting abstract 233