User login
Beloranib reduces weight in Prader-Willi syndrome, but concerns remain
BOSTON – Prader-Willi syndrome patients lost more than 4% of their body weight over a 26-week period with the investigative antiobesity drug beloranib, compared with a similar gain in patients taking placebo, in the phase III bestPWS trial.
Hunger-related behavior was also reduced, along with total and LDL cholesterol levels and other cardiometabolic risk factors, lead investigator Dr. Merlin G. Butler reported at the annual meeting of the Endocrinology Society.
However, because of concerns over venous thromboembolic events in patients on beloranib, the trial was halted before all patients reached 26 weeks of treatment.
“bestPWS is the first phase III clinical trial to show statistically and clinically significant weight loss and improvement in hyperphagia-related behaviors in PWS [Prader-Willi syndrome] patients. The reduction in hyperphagia-related behaviors in the beloranib-treated groups represents a clinically meaningful benefit to patients,” Dr. Butler said.
Beloranib is a novel, first-in-class injectable molecule that works by inhibiting MetAP2, an enzyme that modulates the activity of cellular processes that are important in the control of metabolism. Its benefits in preclinical studies and a phase II trial in reducing body weight and decreasing hyperplasia fueled optimism regarding the therapeutic value in Prader-Willi syndrome, the most common genetic cause of morbid obesity. Although rare, Prader-Willi syndrome is life threatening and life limiting, with most of those affected dying before the age of 50.
“There are currently no treatment options for the intractable obesity and hyperphagia in Prader-Willi syndrome,” said Dr. Butler of the University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kan.
In the bestPWS trial, 107 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive twice-weekly subcutaneous injections of beloranib or placebo for 26 weeks: 36 received 1.8 mg and 37 received 2.4 mg of beloranib, and 34 received placebo. Seventy-four patients completed the treatment. The coprimary efficacy endpoints were improvement in hyperphagia-related behaviors and reduction in body weight. Secondary endpoints included improvements in total body fat mass, lipids, and, as markers of cardiometabolic risk, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels.
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable in the three trial arms, with an average age of 20 years, average body mass index of 40 kg/m2, average body weight of 100 kg, average fat mass of 51 kg, and average Hyperphagia Questionnaire for Clinical Trials (HQ-CT) total score of 16.9.
Patients in the placebo arm displayed an increase in body weight of about 4% over the 26-week trial. In contrast, patients treated with beloranib lost weight (4.1% and 5.3% in the 1.8-mg and 2.4-mg arms, respectively; both P less than .0001, compared with placebo). The weight loss in the two treatment arms did not differ significantly. Beloranib was also associated with improvements in body composition, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, leptin, and adiponectin, compared with placebo.
Both beloranib doses also appreciably reduced hunger-associated behaviors, with reductions of 6.7-7.4 points with beloranib, compared with a reduction of 0.4 with placebo.
Adverse events most commonly included injection-site bruising, aggression, and hyperphagia; they were generally mild and transient.
There were five serious adverse events. Those that occurred in the treatment arms were psychiatric disorders, which are common background comorbidities in Prader-Willi patients, and so are not necessarily treatment related. In the bestPWS trial, two deep vein thrombosis events and two fatal pulmonary embolism events occurred. After the first pulmonary embolism death, the trial was discontinued; at that point, 27 randomized patients had not completed the full 26-week course.
Overall, 11 venous thrombotic events, including pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and superficial thrombophlebitis, have occurred in the roughly 400 patients who have so far received beloranib in the course of its development, including the adverse events in the bestPWS trial. None of these events has occurred in those receiving placebo.
Even in light of these sobering events, Dr. Butler said he remains optimistic. “In addition to the reduction in body weight and decrease in excessive eating behaviors previously reported from this study, [these data] demonstrate important reductions in cardiometabolic risk factors and further support a strong rationale for continued evaluation of beloranib as a potential treatment for Prader-Willi syndrome,” said Dr. Butler.
Beloranib is currently on clinical hold while the potential for a prothrombotic effect of beloranib and a heightened risk for Prader-Willi syndrome patients are assessed, Dr. Butler said.
Dr. Butler disclosed study funding by Zafgen, the manufacturer of Beloranib.
BOSTON – Prader-Willi syndrome patients lost more than 4% of their body weight over a 26-week period with the investigative antiobesity drug beloranib, compared with a similar gain in patients taking placebo, in the phase III bestPWS trial.
Hunger-related behavior was also reduced, along with total and LDL cholesterol levels and other cardiometabolic risk factors, lead investigator Dr. Merlin G. Butler reported at the annual meeting of the Endocrinology Society.
However, because of concerns over venous thromboembolic events in patients on beloranib, the trial was halted before all patients reached 26 weeks of treatment.
“bestPWS is the first phase III clinical trial to show statistically and clinically significant weight loss and improvement in hyperphagia-related behaviors in PWS [Prader-Willi syndrome] patients. The reduction in hyperphagia-related behaviors in the beloranib-treated groups represents a clinically meaningful benefit to patients,” Dr. Butler said.
Beloranib is a novel, first-in-class injectable molecule that works by inhibiting MetAP2, an enzyme that modulates the activity of cellular processes that are important in the control of metabolism. Its benefits in preclinical studies and a phase II trial in reducing body weight and decreasing hyperplasia fueled optimism regarding the therapeutic value in Prader-Willi syndrome, the most common genetic cause of morbid obesity. Although rare, Prader-Willi syndrome is life threatening and life limiting, with most of those affected dying before the age of 50.
“There are currently no treatment options for the intractable obesity and hyperphagia in Prader-Willi syndrome,” said Dr. Butler of the University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kan.
In the bestPWS trial, 107 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive twice-weekly subcutaneous injections of beloranib or placebo for 26 weeks: 36 received 1.8 mg and 37 received 2.4 mg of beloranib, and 34 received placebo. Seventy-four patients completed the treatment. The coprimary efficacy endpoints were improvement in hyperphagia-related behaviors and reduction in body weight. Secondary endpoints included improvements in total body fat mass, lipids, and, as markers of cardiometabolic risk, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels.
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable in the three trial arms, with an average age of 20 years, average body mass index of 40 kg/m2, average body weight of 100 kg, average fat mass of 51 kg, and average Hyperphagia Questionnaire for Clinical Trials (HQ-CT) total score of 16.9.
Patients in the placebo arm displayed an increase in body weight of about 4% over the 26-week trial. In contrast, patients treated with beloranib lost weight (4.1% and 5.3% in the 1.8-mg and 2.4-mg arms, respectively; both P less than .0001, compared with placebo). The weight loss in the two treatment arms did not differ significantly. Beloranib was also associated with improvements in body composition, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, leptin, and adiponectin, compared with placebo.
Both beloranib doses also appreciably reduced hunger-associated behaviors, with reductions of 6.7-7.4 points with beloranib, compared with a reduction of 0.4 with placebo.
Adverse events most commonly included injection-site bruising, aggression, and hyperphagia; they were generally mild and transient.
There were five serious adverse events. Those that occurred in the treatment arms were psychiatric disorders, which are common background comorbidities in Prader-Willi patients, and so are not necessarily treatment related. In the bestPWS trial, two deep vein thrombosis events and two fatal pulmonary embolism events occurred. After the first pulmonary embolism death, the trial was discontinued; at that point, 27 randomized patients had not completed the full 26-week course.
Overall, 11 venous thrombotic events, including pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and superficial thrombophlebitis, have occurred in the roughly 400 patients who have so far received beloranib in the course of its development, including the adverse events in the bestPWS trial. None of these events has occurred in those receiving placebo.
Even in light of these sobering events, Dr. Butler said he remains optimistic. “In addition to the reduction in body weight and decrease in excessive eating behaviors previously reported from this study, [these data] demonstrate important reductions in cardiometabolic risk factors and further support a strong rationale for continued evaluation of beloranib as a potential treatment for Prader-Willi syndrome,” said Dr. Butler.
Beloranib is currently on clinical hold while the potential for a prothrombotic effect of beloranib and a heightened risk for Prader-Willi syndrome patients are assessed, Dr. Butler said.
Dr. Butler disclosed study funding by Zafgen, the manufacturer of Beloranib.
BOSTON – Prader-Willi syndrome patients lost more than 4% of their body weight over a 26-week period with the investigative antiobesity drug beloranib, compared with a similar gain in patients taking placebo, in the phase III bestPWS trial.
Hunger-related behavior was also reduced, along with total and LDL cholesterol levels and other cardiometabolic risk factors, lead investigator Dr. Merlin G. Butler reported at the annual meeting of the Endocrinology Society.
However, because of concerns over venous thromboembolic events in patients on beloranib, the trial was halted before all patients reached 26 weeks of treatment.
“bestPWS is the first phase III clinical trial to show statistically and clinically significant weight loss and improvement in hyperphagia-related behaviors in PWS [Prader-Willi syndrome] patients. The reduction in hyperphagia-related behaviors in the beloranib-treated groups represents a clinically meaningful benefit to patients,” Dr. Butler said.
Beloranib is a novel, first-in-class injectable molecule that works by inhibiting MetAP2, an enzyme that modulates the activity of cellular processes that are important in the control of metabolism. Its benefits in preclinical studies and a phase II trial in reducing body weight and decreasing hyperplasia fueled optimism regarding the therapeutic value in Prader-Willi syndrome, the most common genetic cause of morbid obesity. Although rare, Prader-Willi syndrome is life threatening and life limiting, with most of those affected dying before the age of 50.
“There are currently no treatment options for the intractable obesity and hyperphagia in Prader-Willi syndrome,” said Dr. Butler of the University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kan.
In the bestPWS trial, 107 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive twice-weekly subcutaneous injections of beloranib or placebo for 26 weeks: 36 received 1.8 mg and 37 received 2.4 mg of beloranib, and 34 received placebo. Seventy-four patients completed the treatment. The coprimary efficacy endpoints were improvement in hyperphagia-related behaviors and reduction in body weight. Secondary endpoints included improvements in total body fat mass, lipids, and, as markers of cardiometabolic risk, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels.
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable in the three trial arms, with an average age of 20 years, average body mass index of 40 kg/m2, average body weight of 100 kg, average fat mass of 51 kg, and average Hyperphagia Questionnaire for Clinical Trials (HQ-CT) total score of 16.9.
Patients in the placebo arm displayed an increase in body weight of about 4% over the 26-week trial. In contrast, patients treated with beloranib lost weight (4.1% and 5.3% in the 1.8-mg and 2.4-mg arms, respectively; both P less than .0001, compared with placebo). The weight loss in the two treatment arms did not differ significantly. Beloranib was also associated with improvements in body composition, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, leptin, and adiponectin, compared with placebo.
Both beloranib doses also appreciably reduced hunger-associated behaviors, with reductions of 6.7-7.4 points with beloranib, compared with a reduction of 0.4 with placebo.
Adverse events most commonly included injection-site bruising, aggression, and hyperphagia; they were generally mild and transient.
There were five serious adverse events. Those that occurred in the treatment arms were psychiatric disorders, which are common background comorbidities in Prader-Willi patients, and so are not necessarily treatment related. In the bestPWS trial, two deep vein thrombosis events and two fatal pulmonary embolism events occurred. After the first pulmonary embolism death, the trial was discontinued; at that point, 27 randomized patients had not completed the full 26-week course.
Overall, 11 venous thrombotic events, including pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and superficial thrombophlebitis, have occurred in the roughly 400 patients who have so far received beloranib in the course of its development, including the adverse events in the bestPWS trial. None of these events has occurred in those receiving placebo.
Even in light of these sobering events, Dr. Butler said he remains optimistic. “In addition to the reduction in body weight and decrease in excessive eating behaviors previously reported from this study, [these data] demonstrate important reductions in cardiometabolic risk factors and further support a strong rationale for continued evaluation of beloranib as a potential treatment for Prader-Willi syndrome,” said Dr. Butler.
Beloranib is currently on clinical hold while the potential for a prothrombotic effect of beloranib and a heightened risk for Prader-Willi syndrome patients are assessed, Dr. Butler said.
Dr. Butler disclosed study funding by Zafgen, the manufacturer of Beloranib.
AT ENDO 2016
Key clinical point: Beloranib produces significant weight loss in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome, but concerns have arisen about associated pulmonary emboli.
Major finding: Patients with Prader-Willi syndrome on beloranib lost 4.1%-5.3% of their body weight, compared with a gain of 4% in placebo patients; however, 11 venous thrombotic events occurred in the beloranib patients.
Data source: bestPWS, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 107 patients.
Disclosures: Dr. Butler disclosed study funding by Zafgen, the manufacturer of Beloranib.
One-time AMH level predicts rapid perimenopausal bone loss
BOSTON – Anti-Müllerian hormone levels strongly predict the rate of perimenopausal loss of bone mineral density and might help identify women who need early intervention to prevent future osteoporotic fractures, according to data from a review of 474 perimenopausal women that was presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The team matched anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements taken 2-4 years before the final menstrual period to BMD measurements taken 3 years later. The women were part of the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN), an ongoing multicenter study of women during their middle years.
When perimenopausal AMH “goes below 250 pg/mL, you are beginning to lose bone, and, when it goes below 200 pg/mL, you are losing bone fast, so that’s when you might want to intervene.” The finding “opens up the possibility of identifying women who are going to lose the most bone mass during the transition and targeting them before they have lost a substantial amount,” said lead investigator Dr. Arun Karlamangla of the department of geriatrics at the University of California, Los Angeles.
BMD loss is normal during menopause but rates of decline vary among women. AMH is a product of ovarian granulosa cells commonly used in fertility clinics to gauge ovarian reserve, but AMH levels also decline during menopause, and in a fairly stable fashion, he explained.
The women in SWAN were 42-52 years old at baseline with an intact uterus, at least one ovary, and no use of exogenous hormones. Blood was drawn during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.
The median rate of BMD decline was 1.26% per year in the lumbar spine and 1.03% per year in the femoral neck. The median AMH was 49 pg/mL but varied widely.
Adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking, race, and study site, the team found that for each 75% (or fourfold) decrement in AMH level, there was a 0.15% per year faster decline in spine BMD and 0.13% per year faster decline in femoral neck BMD. Each fourfold decrement was also associated with an 18% increase in the odds of faster than median decline in spine BMD and 17% increase in the odds of faster than median decline in femoral neck BMD. The fast losers lost more than 2% of their BMD per year in both the lumbar spine and femoral neck.
The results were the same after adjustment for follicle-stimulating hormone and estrogen levels, “so AMH provides information that cannot be obtained from estrogen and FSH,” Dr. Karlamangla said.
He cautioned that the technique needs further development and validation before it’s ready for the clinic. The team used the PicoAMH test from Ansh Labs in Webster, Tex.
The investigators had no disclosures. Ansh provided the assays for free. SWAN is funded by the National Institutes of Health.
The current recommendation is to start bone mineral density screening in women at age 65 years. All of us who see patients in the menopause years worry that we are missing someone with faster than normal bone loss. Fast losers are critical to identify because if we wait until they are 65 years old, it’s too late. A clinical test such as this to identify fast losers for earlier BMD measurement would be a tremendous benefit.
Dr. Cynthia Stuenkel is a clinical professor of endocrinology at the University of California, San Diego. She moderated the presentation and was not involved in the research.
The current recommendation is to start bone mineral density screening in women at age 65 years. All of us who see patients in the menopause years worry that we are missing someone with faster than normal bone loss. Fast losers are critical to identify because if we wait until they are 65 years old, it’s too late. A clinical test such as this to identify fast losers for earlier BMD measurement would be a tremendous benefit.
Dr. Cynthia Stuenkel is a clinical professor of endocrinology at the University of California, San Diego. She moderated the presentation and was not involved in the research.
The current recommendation is to start bone mineral density screening in women at age 65 years. All of us who see patients in the menopause years worry that we are missing someone with faster than normal bone loss. Fast losers are critical to identify because if we wait until they are 65 years old, it’s too late. A clinical test such as this to identify fast losers for earlier BMD measurement would be a tremendous benefit.
Dr. Cynthia Stuenkel is a clinical professor of endocrinology at the University of California, San Diego. She moderated the presentation and was not involved in the research.
BOSTON – Anti-Müllerian hormone levels strongly predict the rate of perimenopausal loss of bone mineral density and might help identify women who need early intervention to prevent future osteoporotic fractures, according to data from a review of 474 perimenopausal women that was presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The team matched anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements taken 2-4 years before the final menstrual period to BMD measurements taken 3 years later. The women were part of the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN), an ongoing multicenter study of women during their middle years.
When perimenopausal AMH “goes below 250 pg/mL, you are beginning to lose bone, and, when it goes below 200 pg/mL, you are losing bone fast, so that’s when you might want to intervene.” The finding “opens up the possibility of identifying women who are going to lose the most bone mass during the transition and targeting them before they have lost a substantial amount,” said lead investigator Dr. Arun Karlamangla of the department of geriatrics at the University of California, Los Angeles.
BMD loss is normal during menopause but rates of decline vary among women. AMH is a product of ovarian granulosa cells commonly used in fertility clinics to gauge ovarian reserve, but AMH levels also decline during menopause, and in a fairly stable fashion, he explained.
The women in SWAN were 42-52 years old at baseline with an intact uterus, at least one ovary, and no use of exogenous hormones. Blood was drawn during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.
The median rate of BMD decline was 1.26% per year in the lumbar spine and 1.03% per year in the femoral neck. The median AMH was 49 pg/mL but varied widely.
Adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking, race, and study site, the team found that for each 75% (or fourfold) decrement in AMH level, there was a 0.15% per year faster decline in spine BMD and 0.13% per year faster decline in femoral neck BMD. Each fourfold decrement was also associated with an 18% increase in the odds of faster than median decline in spine BMD and 17% increase in the odds of faster than median decline in femoral neck BMD. The fast losers lost more than 2% of their BMD per year in both the lumbar spine and femoral neck.
The results were the same after adjustment for follicle-stimulating hormone and estrogen levels, “so AMH provides information that cannot be obtained from estrogen and FSH,” Dr. Karlamangla said.
He cautioned that the technique needs further development and validation before it’s ready for the clinic. The team used the PicoAMH test from Ansh Labs in Webster, Tex.
The investigators had no disclosures. Ansh provided the assays for free. SWAN is funded by the National Institutes of Health.
BOSTON – Anti-Müllerian hormone levels strongly predict the rate of perimenopausal loss of bone mineral density and might help identify women who need early intervention to prevent future osteoporotic fractures, according to data from a review of 474 perimenopausal women that was presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The team matched anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements taken 2-4 years before the final menstrual period to BMD measurements taken 3 years later. The women were part of the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN), an ongoing multicenter study of women during their middle years.
When perimenopausal AMH “goes below 250 pg/mL, you are beginning to lose bone, and, when it goes below 200 pg/mL, you are losing bone fast, so that’s when you might want to intervene.” The finding “opens up the possibility of identifying women who are going to lose the most bone mass during the transition and targeting them before they have lost a substantial amount,” said lead investigator Dr. Arun Karlamangla of the department of geriatrics at the University of California, Los Angeles.
BMD loss is normal during menopause but rates of decline vary among women. AMH is a product of ovarian granulosa cells commonly used in fertility clinics to gauge ovarian reserve, but AMH levels also decline during menopause, and in a fairly stable fashion, he explained.
The women in SWAN were 42-52 years old at baseline with an intact uterus, at least one ovary, and no use of exogenous hormones. Blood was drawn during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.
The median rate of BMD decline was 1.26% per year in the lumbar spine and 1.03% per year in the femoral neck. The median AMH was 49 pg/mL but varied widely.
Adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking, race, and study site, the team found that for each 75% (or fourfold) decrement in AMH level, there was a 0.15% per year faster decline in spine BMD and 0.13% per year faster decline in femoral neck BMD. Each fourfold decrement was also associated with an 18% increase in the odds of faster than median decline in spine BMD and 17% increase in the odds of faster than median decline in femoral neck BMD. The fast losers lost more than 2% of their BMD per year in both the lumbar spine and femoral neck.
The results were the same after adjustment for follicle-stimulating hormone and estrogen levels, “so AMH provides information that cannot be obtained from estrogen and FSH,” Dr. Karlamangla said.
He cautioned that the technique needs further development and validation before it’s ready for the clinic. The team used the PicoAMH test from Ansh Labs in Webster, Tex.
The investigators had no disclosures. Ansh provided the assays for free. SWAN is funded by the National Institutes of Health.
AT ENDO 2016
Key clinical point: Anti-Müllerian hormone levels strongly predict the rate of perimenopausal bone mineral density loss and might help identify women who need early intervention to prevent future osteoporotic fractures, according to a review of 474 perimenopausal women that was presented at the Endocrine Society annual meeting.
Major finding: Adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking, race, and study site, the team found that for each 75% (or fourfold) decrement in AMH level, there was a 0.15% per year faster decline in lumbar spine BMD and 0.13% per year faster decline in femoral neck BMD.
Data source: Review of 474 perimenopausal women in the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation.
Disclosures: The investigators had no disclosures. Ansh Labs provided the assays for free. SWAN is funded by the National Institutes of Health.
TSH antibody levels predict Graves relapse after thionamides
BOSTON – Eighty-six percent of Graves disease patients with TSH receptor antibody levels of at least 2.0 mU/L at the end of thionamide therapy will relapse within 4 years, according to a British review.
TSH receptor antibody (TRAb) levels “are useful not only as a diagnostic tool but also as a prognostic tool. In patients where the risks of recurrent thyrotoxicosis are unacceptably high” – the elderly and those at risk for cardiovascular disease – “strong consideration should be given to primary radioiodine therapy” instead of thionamides, said investigator Nyo Nyo Tun of the Edinburgh Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes.
Previous studies have suggested age and other risk factors for relapse after thionamides, but “have not [definitively] shown if elevation of TRAb levels” are predictive, she said at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
Primary therapy with thionamides is more common in Europe than in the United States, where radioiodine tends to be the first choice. Part of the problem is that recurrence is known to be high after thionamides. The study suggests that using TRAb can help weed out patients who are likely to fail so that thionamides can be used with greater long-term success. Ms. Tun said the Edinburgh center routinely uses TRAb to guide Graves treatment; patients with high levels either stay on thionamide for prolonged periods or opt for radioiodine.
The investigators retrospectively studied 266 patients with a first presentation of Graves disease who completed a course of thionamide at two U.K. hospitals. In addition to TRAb levels at diagnosis and cessation of thionamide, they assessed age, sex, smoking status, free T4 levels, total T3, and time to normalization of thyroid function over 4 years of follow-up.
After thionamide cessation, thyrotoxicosis recurred in 31% of patients (82/266) at 1 year, 43% (111/261) at 2 years, 54% (125/232) at 3 years, and 66% (128/193) at 4 years.
Very high TRAb levels at diagnosis – those above 12 mU/L – were associated with a statistically significant 84% risk of recurrence over a 4-year period, compared with a 57% risk with diagnosis levels below 5mU/L (P = .002).
TRAb levels below 0.9 mU/L at cessation of an 18-month course of thionamide treatment were associated with a 22% risk of recurrence at 1 year and a 58% risk at 4 years. Those risks were significantly higher in patients whose TRAb levels were at least 2 mU/L at thionamide cessation, who had a 51% risk at 1 year and an 86% risk at 4 years (P less than 0.001). Relapse risk was highest in the first 18 months after cessation.
Younger age and time to TSH normalization also predicted relapse to some extent. Among patients who stayed in remission for 4 years, TSH normalized at a median of about 4 months after the start of drug treatment, but 6 months in those who relapsed. Similarly, patients who relapsed were a median of 39 years old at diagnosis; those who did not were a median of 47.
The investigators had no relevant financial disclosures.
The measurement of antibodies to the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor is a useful clinical test that should be much more widely used in the United States. It’s a very accurate predictor of who’s going to get recurrent Grave’s disease after antithyroid drugs, but it’s misunderstood and not trusted.
Dr. Terry Davies |
When the test was first introduced, many major thyroid experts didn’t accept it and didn’t believe it was useful based on research at the time. The difference with the current study is that it was done carefully.
Dr. Terry Davies is the director of the division of endocrinology, diabetes, and bone diseases at the Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center in New York. He moderated the presentation and was not involved in the work.
The measurement of antibodies to the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor is a useful clinical test that should be much more widely used in the United States. It’s a very accurate predictor of who’s going to get recurrent Grave’s disease after antithyroid drugs, but it’s misunderstood and not trusted.
Dr. Terry Davies |
When the test was first introduced, many major thyroid experts didn’t accept it and didn’t believe it was useful based on research at the time. The difference with the current study is that it was done carefully.
Dr. Terry Davies is the director of the division of endocrinology, diabetes, and bone diseases at the Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center in New York. He moderated the presentation and was not involved in the work.
The measurement of antibodies to the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor is a useful clinical test that should be much more widely used in the United States. It’s a very accurate predictor of who’s going to get recurrent Grave’s disease after antithyroid drugs, but it’s misunderstood and not trusted.
Dr. Terry Davies |
When the test was first introduced, many major thyroid experts didn’t accept it and didn’t believe it was useful based on research at the time. The difference with the current study is that it was done carefully.
Dr. Terry Davies is the director of the division of endocrinology, diabetes, and bone diseases at the Mount Sinai Beth Israel Medical Center in New York. He moderated the presentation and was not involved in the work.
BOSTON – Eighty-six percent of Graves disease patients with TSH receptor antibody levels of at least 2.0 mU/L at the end of thionamide therapy will relapse within 4 years, according to a British review.
TSH receptor antibody (TRAb) levels “are useful not only as a diagnostic tool but also as a prognostic tool. In patients where the risks of recurrent thyrotoxicosis are unacceptably high” – the elderly and those at risk for cardiovascular disease – “strong consideration should be given to primary radioiodine therapy” instead of thionamides, said investigator Nyo Nyo Tun of the Edinburgh Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes.
Previous studies have suggested age and other risk factors for relapse after thionamides, but “have not [definitively] shown if elevation of TRAb levels” are predictive, she said at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
Primary therapy with thionamides is more common in Europe than in the United States, where radioiodine tends to be the first choice. Part of the problem is that recurrence is known to be high after thionamides. The study suggests that using TRAb can help weed out patients who are likely to fail so that thionamides can be used with greater long-term success. Ms. Tun said the Edinburgh center routinely uses TRAb to guide Graves treatment; patients with high levels either stay on thionamide for prolonged periods or opt for radioiodine.
The investigators retrospectively studied 266 patients with a first presentation of Graves disease who completed a course of thionamide at two U.K. hospitals. In addition to TRAb levels at diagnosis and cessation of thionamide, they assessed age, sex, smoking status, free T4 levels, total T3, and time to normalization of thyroid function over 4 years of follow-up.
After thionamide cessation, thyrotoxicosis recurred in 31% of patients (82/266) at 1 year, 43% (111/261) at 2 years, 54% (125/232) at 3 years, and 66% (128/193) at 4 years.
Very high TRAb levels at diagnosis – those above 12 mU/L – were associated with a statistically significant 84% risk of recurrence over a 4-year period, compared with a 57% risk with diagnosis levels below 5mU/L (P = .002).
TRAb levels below 0.9 mU/L at cessation of an 18-month course of thionamide treatment were associated with a 22% risk of recurrence at 1 year and a 58% risk at 4 years. Those risks were significantly higher in patients whose TRAb levels were at least 2 mU/L at thionamide cessation, who had a 51% risk at 1 year and an 86% risk at 4 years (P less than 0.001). Relapse risk was highest in the first 18 months after cessation.
Younger age and time to TSH normalization also predicted relapse to some extent. Among patients who stayed in remission for 4 years, TSH normalized at a median of about 4 months after the start of drug treatment, but 6 months in those who relapsed. Similarly, patients who relapsed were a median of 39 years old at diagnosis; those who did not were a median of 47.
The investigators had no relevant financial disclosures.
BOSTON – Eighty-six percent of Graves disease patients with TSH receptor antibody levels of at least 2.0 mU/L at the end of thionamide therapy will relapse within 4 years, according to a British review.
TSH receptor antibody (TRAb) levels “are useful not only as a diagnostic tool but also as a prognostic tool. In patients where the risks of recurrent thyrotoxicosis are unacceptably high” – the elderly and those at risk for cardiovascular disease – “strong consideration should be given to primary radioiodine therapy” instead of thionamides, said investigator Nyo Nyo Tun of the Edinburgh Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes.
Previous studies have suggested age and other risk factors for relapse after thionamides, but “have not [definitively] shown if elevation of TRAb levels” are predictive, she said at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
Primary therapy with thionamides is more common in Europe than in the United States, where radioiodine tends to be the first choice. Part of the problem is that recurrence is known to be high after thionamides. The study suggests that using TRAb can help weed out patients who are likely to fail so that thionamides can be used with greater long-term success. Ms. Tun said the Edinburgh center routinely uses TRAb to guide Graves treatment; patients with high levels either stay on thionamide for prolonged periods or opt for radioiodine.
The investigators retrospectively studied 266 patients with a first presentation of Graves disease who completed a course of thionamide at two U.K. hospitals. In addition to TRAb levels at diagnosis and cessation of thionamide, they assessed age, sex, smoking status, free T4 levels, total T3, and time to normalization of thyroid function over 4 years of follow-up.
After thionamide cessation, thyrotoxicosis recurred in 31% of patients (82/266) at 1 year, 43% (111/261) at 2 years, 54% (125/232) at 3 years, and 66% (128/193) at 4 years.
Very high TRAb levels at diagnosis – those above 12 mU/L – were associated with a statistically significant 84% risk of recurrence over a 4-year period, compared with a 57% risk with diagnosis levels below 5mU/L (P = .002).
TRAb levels below 0.9 mU/L at cessation of an 18-month course of thionamide treatment were associated with a 22% risk of recurrence at 1 year and a 58% risk at 4 years. Those risks were significantly higher in patients whose TRAb levels were at least 2 mU/L at thionamide cessation, who had a 51% risk at 1 year and an 86% risk at 4 years (P less than 0.001). Relapse risk was highest in the first 18 months after cessation.
Younger age and time to TSH normalization also predicted relapse to some extent. Among patients who stayed in remission for 4 years, TSH normalized at a median of about 4 months after the start of drug treatment, but 6 months in those who relapsed. Similarly, patients who relapsed were a median of 39 years old at diagnosis; those who did not were a median of 47.
The investigators had no relevant financial disclosures.
AT ENDO 2016
Key clinical point: Opt for radioiodine when Grave’s patients present with thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody levels above 12 mU/L.
Major finding: Eighty-six percent of Grave’s disease patients with TSH receptor antibody levels of at least 2.0 mU/L at the end of thionamide therapy will relapse within 4 years.
Data source: A British review of 266 Grave’s patients treated with thionamides for 18 months.
Disclosures: The investigators had no relevant financial disclosures.
VIDEO: Proposed revision of medullary thyroid cancer staging improves risk-stratification analysis
BOSTON – An analysis of data from medullary thyroid cancer patients that partitioned the patients into groups with similar overall survival has spurred a rethink of the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system.
The results from researchers at Duke University, Durham, N.C., presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society by Dr. Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam, are timely, as the AJCC has embarked on a reconsideration of the staging of cancers, including medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), as part revisions for the eighth edition of the staging system.
“The existing AJCC staging system for MTC appears to be less than optimal in discriminating the risk of mortality among disease stage groups,” said Dr. Adam, who discussed the findings in a video interview.
MTC, a neuroendocrine tumor that affects C cells of the thyroid, comprises 3%-5% of all cases of thyroid cancer and it can be a more aggressive disease than differentiated thyroid cancer. Yet the current AJCC MTC staging system has been extrapolated from differentiated thyroid cancer data.
“We sought to evaluate how well the current AJCC seventh edition stage groupings predict survival for patients with MTC, to suggest a possible staging revision to sharpen estimates of prognosis,” said Dr. Adam.
The researchers utilized the National Cancer Data Base, representing over 70% of incident cancer cases in the United States.
MTC patients who underwent thyroid surgery from 1998 to 2012 were identified. Patients with missing values for pathologic T, N, or M were excluded. The primary outcome in the 3,315 patients was survival.
The researchers used a form of decision-tree analysis called recursive partitioning. In general, recursive partitioning is able to classify a population by splitting subjects into subgroups, each of which is homogeneous based on the particular outcome. In this study, the subgroup allocations were based on T, N, and M stages, with the outcome being overall survival. Kaplan-Meier and adjusted survival analyses enabled survival differences among the four subgroups (groups I, II, III and IV) to be explored.
The four groups were distinct in terms of survival time and allowed more accurate risk stratification. In particular, groups I and II were markedly better distinguished from one another than is the case with the current staging system. Survival differences across the stages were more distinct with the newly created T, N, and M groupings, compared with the current AJCC staging system.
After adjustment, survival differences across TNM groups were more distinct with the newly created TNM groupings (compared to subgroup I, hazard ratio of 3.06 for subgroup II; HR, 6.79 for III; and HR, 17.03 for IV), compared with the current AJCC staging (compared to stage I, HR, 1.45 for stage II; HR, 2.17 for III; and HR, 5.33 for IV).
“The AJCC is reevaluating all staging schemas, including MTC. The current AJCC staging system could be improved with the newly identified TNM groupings suggested here for more accurate patient risk stratification and possibly treatment selection,” said Dr. Adam.
Dr. Adam had no disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
BOSTON – An analysis of data from medullary thyroid cancer patients that partitioned the patients into groups with similar overall survival has spurred a rethink of the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system.
The results from researchers at Duke University, Durham, N.C., presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society by Dr. Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam, are timely, as the AJCC has embarked on a reconsideration of the staging of cancers, including medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), as part revisions for the eighth edition of the staging system.
“The existing AJCC staging system for MTC appears to be less than optimal in discriminating the risk of mortality among disease stage groups,” said Dr. Adam, who discussed the findings in a video interview.
MTC, a neuroendocrine tumor that affects C cells of the thyroid, comprises 3%-5% of all cases of thyroid cancer and it can be a more aggressive disease than differentiated thyroid cancer. Yet the current AJCC MTC staging system has been extrapolated from differentiated thyroid cancer data.
“We sought to evaluate how well the current AJCC seventh edition stage groupings predict survival for patients with MTC, to suggest a possible staging revision to sharpen estimates of prognosis,” said Dr. Adam.
The researchers utilized the National Cancer Data Base, representing over 70% of incident cancer cases in the United States.
MTC patients who underwent thyroid surgery from 1998 to 2012 were identified. Patients with missing values for pathologic T, N, or M were excluded. The primary outcome in the 3,315 patients was survival.
The researchers used a form of decision-tree analysis called recursive partitioning. In general, recursive partitioning is able to classify a population by splitting subjects into subgroups, each of which is homogeneous based on the particular outcome. In this study, the subgroup allocations were based on T, N, and M stages, with the outcome being overall survival. Kaplan-Meier and adjusted survival analyses enabled survival differences among the four subgroups (groups I, II, III and IV) to be explored.
The four groups were distinct in terms of survival time and allowed more accurate risk stratification. In particular, groups I and II were markedly better distinguished from one another than is the case with the current staging system. Survival differences across the stages were more distinct with the newly created T, N, and M groupings, compared with the current AJCC staging system.
After adjustment, survival differences across TNM groups were more distinct with the newly created TNM groupings (compared to subgroup I, hazard ratio of 3.06 for subgroup II; HR, 6.79 for III; and HR, 17.03 for IV), compared with the current AJCC staging (compared to stage I, HR, 1.45 for stage II; HR, 2.17 for III; and HR, 5.33 for IV).
“The AJCC is reevaluating all staging schemas, including MTC. The current AJCC staging system could be improved with the newly identified TNM groupings suggested here for more accurate patient risk stratification and possibly treatment selection,” said Dr. Adam.
Dr. Adam had no disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
BOSTON – An analysis of data from medullary thyroid cancer patients that partitioned the patients into groups with similar overall survival has spurred a rethink of the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system.
The results from researchers at Duke University, Durham, N.C., presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society by Dr. Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam, are timely, as the AJCC has embarked on a reconsideration of the staging of cancers, including medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), as part revisions for the eighth edition of the staging system.
“The existing AJCC staging system for MTC appears to be less than optimal in discriminating the risk of mortality among disease stage groups,” said Dr. Adam, who discussed the findings in a video interview.
MTC, a neuroendocrine tumor that affects C cells of the thyroid, comprises 3%-5% of all cases of thyroid cancer and it can be a more aggressive disease than differentiated thyroid cancer. Yet the current AJCC MTC staging system has been extrapolated from differentiated thyroid cancer data.
“We sought to evaluate how well the current AJCC seventh edition stage groupings predict survival for patients with MTC, to suggest a possible staging revision to sharpen estimates of prognosis,” said Dr. Adam.
The researchers utilized the National Cancer Data Base, representing over 70% of incident cancer cases in the United States.
MTC patients who underwent thyroid surgery from 1998 to 2012 were identified. Patients with missing values for pathologic T, N, or M were excluded. The primary outcome in the 3,315 patients was survival.
The researchers used a form of decision-tree analysis called recursive partitioning. In general, recursive partitioning is able to classify a population by splitting subjects into subgroups, each of which is homogeneous based on the particular outcome. In this study, the subgroup allocations were based on T, N, and M stages, with the outcome being overall survival. Kaplan-Meier and adjusted survival analyses enabled survival differences among the four subgroups (groups I, II, III and IV) to be explored.
The four groups were distinct in terms of survival time and allowed more accurate risk stratification. In particular, groups I and II were markedly better distinguished from one another than is the case with the current staging system. Survival differences across the stages were more distinct with the newly created T, N, and M groupings, compared with the current AJCC staging system.
After adjustment, survival differences across TNM groups were more distinct with the newly created TNM groupings (compared to subgroup I, hazard ratio of 3.06 for subgroup II; HR, 6.79 for III; and HR, 17.03 for IV), compared with the current AJCC staging (compared to stage I, HR, 1.45 for stage II; HR, 2.17 for III; and HR, 5.33 for IV).
“The AJCC is reevaluating all staging schemas, including MTC. The current AJCC staging system could be improved with the newly identified TNM groupings suggested here for more accurate patient risk stratification and possibly treatment selection,” said Dr. Adam.
Dr. Adam had no disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Key clinical point: A proposed revision of the AJCC thyroid cancer staging system improves risk stratification analysis.
Major finding: In the proposed staging system, compared to subgroup I, hazard ratio for survival was 3.06 for subgroup II; HR, 6.79 for III; and HR, 17.03 for IV, compared with the current AJCC staging of HR, 1.45 for stage II; HR, 2.17 for III; and HR, 5.33 for IV.
Data source: Data from 3,315 patients with medullary thyroid cancer was drawn from the National Cancer Database.
Disclosures: Dr. Adam had no disclosures.
VIDEO: Weight cycling common following weight loss in obese individuals
BOSTON – Examination of weight-loss patterns in over 177,000 people has revealed that, regardless of the initial 6-month weight loss, after 2 years the majority of patients become “cyclers,” with periods of weight gain and loss rather than maintenance of the initial weight loss.
“One-third of American adults are obese. In 2010, the cost of obesity and obesity-related comorbidities in the United States was estimated to be $315.8 billion. Achieving and maintaining weight loss has proven to be difficult,” said Joanna Huang, PharmD, senior manager of health economics and outcomes research at Novo Nordisk, Plainsboro, N.J., and lead investigator of the study presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The study examined the electronic records of about 178,000 obese patients whose weight loss had been by deliberate intent and not due to illness. The subjects were allocated into four groups based on the extent of weight loss in terms of body mass index (BMI) over 6 months: Those who remained stable and lost less than 5% (n = 151,902), those who lost 5%-10% (modest loss; n = 16,637), those who lost 10%-15% (moderate loss; n = 4,035), and those who lost in excess of 15% (high loss; n = 5,945).
The subjects who were at least 18 years of age at baseline (mean age 54-58 years), had at least one BMI measurement that was indicative of obesity (greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2), with at least four BMI determinations done over at least 5 years. Subjects were mostly white (about 66% in all four groups) and mostly from the southern United States.
Regardless of the amount that the participants lost in the first 6 months, regain of 50% of more of body weight was common in the modest weight-loss group (40%) and moderate weight-loss group (36%), while only 19% of those in the high weight-loss group cycled back up in weight, reported study presenter Maral DerSarkissian, PhD, of the Analysis Group in Boston.
More than 73% and about 70% of those in the moderate and modest weight-loss group, respectively, experienced weight cycling within 2 years. In the stable and high weight-loss groups, the situation was somewhat more optimistic, with about 60% of participants cycling in weight within 2 years. Total regain of lost weight occurred in about 23%, 16%, and 7% of the modest, moderate, and high weight-loss group, respectively.
“Weight loss maintenance, even in the moderate and high weight-loss groups, is very difficult to achieve,” said Dr. Huang.
Interventions that seek to maintain the weight conventionally are directed at dietary changes. But, according to Dr. DerSarkissian, “these modifications alone might not be enough to achieve and maintain weight loss.”
Pharmacotherapy is another weight-loss option. The data indicated that only 2% of the participants were receiving weight-loss pharmacotherapy. Whether this figure is accurate is an open question, according to Dr. Huang, since a lot of the data were compiled from physicians’ notes. Since clinicians may not record weight-loss advice offered to their patients, the data base may well not reflect lifestyle interventions, including pharmacotherapy.
In addition, since the data captured only primary outpatient care, whether or not a patient ever had bariatric surgery was unknown. Other unrecorded factors that can influence weight over time included comorbidities, use of medications, diet changes, and changes in physical activity.
The data points to a multifactor approach to weight loss that includes counseling, positive reinforcement, dietary advice, pharmacotherapy where appropriate, and, in some cases, bariatric surgery.
“Successful and sustained clinically meaningful weight loss requires chronic and effective weight management strategies,” said Dr. Huang.
Dr. Huang is an employee of Novo Nordisk and Dr. DerSarkissian is a researcher for Novo Nordisk.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
BOSTON – Examination of weight-loss patterns in over 177,000 people has revealed that, regardless of the initial 6-month weight loss, after 2 years the majority of patients become “cyclers,” with periods of weight gain and loss rather than maintenance of the initial weight loss.
“One-third of American adults are obese. In 2010, the cost of obesity and obesity-related comorbidities in the United States was estimated to be $315.8 billion. Achieving and maintaining weight loss has proven to be difficult,” said Joanna Huang, PharmD, senior manager of health economics and outcomes research at Novo Nordisk, Plainsboro, N.J., and lead investigator of the study presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The study examined the electronic records of about 178,000 obese patients whose weight loss had been by deliberate intent and not due to illness. The subjects were allocated into four groups based on the extent of weight loss in terms of body mass index (BMI) over 6 months: Those who remained stable and lost less than 5% (n = 151,902), those who lost 5%-10% (modest loss; n = 16,637), those who lost 10%-15% (moderate loss; n = 4,035), and those who lost in excess of 15% (high loss; n = 5,945).
The subjects who were at least 18 years of age at baseline (mean age 54-58 years), had at least one BMI measurement that was indicative of obesity (greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2), with at least four BMI determinations done over at least 5 years. Subjects were mostly white (about 66% in all four groups) and mostly from the southern United States.
Regardless of the amount that the participants lost in the first 6 months, regain of 50% of more of body weight was common in the modest weight-loss group (40%) and moderate weight-loss group (36%), while only 19% of those in the high weight-loss group cycled back up in weight, reported study presenter Maral DerSarkissian, PhD, of the Analysis Group in Boston.
More than 73% and about 70% of those in the moderate and modest weight-loss group, respectively, experienced weight cycling within 2 years. In the stable and high weight-loss groups, the situation was somewhat more optimistic, with about 60% of participants cycling in weight within 2 years. Total regain of lost weight occurred in about 23%, 16%, and 7% of the modest, moderate, and high weight-loss group, respectively.
“Weight loss maintenance, even in the moderate and high weight-loss groups, is very difficult to achieve,” said Dr. Huang.
Interventions that seek to maintain the weight conventionally are directed at dietary changes. But, according to Dr. DerSarkissian, “these modifications alone might not be enough to achieve and maintain weight loss.”
Pharmacotherapy is another weight-loss option. The data indicated that only 2% of the participants were receiving weight-loss pharmacotherapy. Whether this figure is accurate is an open question, according to Dr. Huang, since a lot of the data were compiled from physicians’ notes. Since clinicians may not record weight-loss advice offered to their patients, the data base may well not reflect lifestyle interventions, including pharmacotherapy.
In addition, since the data captured only primary outpatient care, whether or not a patient ever had bariatric surgery was unknown. Other unrecorded factors that can influence weight over time included comorbidities, use of medications, diet changes, and changes in physical activity.
The data points to a multifactor approach to weight loss that includes counseling, positive reinforcement, dietary advice, pharmacotherapy where appropriate, and, in some cases, bariatric surgery.
“Successful and sustained clinically meaningful weight loss requires chronic and effective weight management strategies,” said Dr. Huang.
Dr. Huang is an employee of Novo Nordisk and Dr. DerSarkissian is a researcher for Novo Nordisk.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
BOSTON – Examination of weight-loss patterns in over 177,000 people has revealed that, regardless of the initial 6-month weight loss, after 2 years the majority of patients become “cyclers,” with periods of weight gain and loss rather than maintenance of the initial weight loss.
“One-third of American adults are obese. In 2010, the cost of obesity and obesity-related comorbidities in the United States was estimated to be $315.8 billion. Achieving and maintaining weight loss has proven to be difficult,” said Joanna Huang, PharmD, senior manager of health economics and outcomes research at Novo Nordisk, Plainsboro, N.J., and lead investigator of the study presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The study examined the electronic records of about 178,000 obese patients whose weight loss had been by deliberate intent and not due to illness. The subjects were allocated into four groups based on the extent of weight loss in terms of body mass index (BMI) over 6 months: Those who remained stable and lost less than 5% (n = 151,902), those who lost 5%-10% (modest loss; n = 16,637), those who lost 10%-15% (moderate loss; n = 4,035), and those who lost in excess of 15% (high loss; n = 5,945).
The subjects who were at least 18 years of age at baseline (mean age 54-58 years), had at least one BMI measurement that was indicative of obesity (greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2), with at least four BMI determinations done over at least 5 years. Subjects were mostly white (about 66% in all four groups) and mostly from the southern United States.
Regardless of the amount that the participants lost in the first 6 months, regain of 50% of more of body weight was common in the modest weight-loss group (40%) and moderate weight-loss group (36%), while only 19% of those in the high weight-loss group cycled back up in weight, reported study presenter Maral DerSarkissian, PhD, of the Analysis Group in Boston.
More than 73% and about 70% of those in the moderate and modest weight-loss group, respectively, experienced weight cycling within 2 years. In the stable and high weight-loss groups, the situation was somewhat more optimistic, with about 60% of participants cycling in weight within 2 years. Total regain of lost weight occurred in about 23%, 16%, and 7% of the modest, moderate, and high weight-loss group, respectively.
“Weight loss maintenance, even in the moderate and high weight-loss groups, is very difficult to achieve,” said Dr. Huang.
Interventions that seek to maintain the weight conventionally are directed at dietary changes. But, according to Dr. DerSarkissian, “these modifications alone might not be enough to achieve and maintain weight loss.”
Pharmacotherapy is another weight-loss option. The data indicated that only 2% of the participants were receiving weight-loss pharmacotherapy. Whether this figure is accurate is an open question, according to Dr. Huang, since a lot of the data were compiled from physicians’ notes. Since clinicians may not record weight-loss advice offered to their patients, the data base may well not reflect lifestyle interventions, including pharmacotherapy.
In addition, since the data captured only primary outpatient care, whether or not a patient ever had bariatric surgery was unknown. Other unrecorded factors that can influence weight over time included comorbidities, use of medications, diet changes, and changes in physical activity.
The data points to a multifactor approach to weight loss that includes counseling, positive reinforcement, dietary advice, pharmacotherapy where appropriate, and, in some cases, bariatric surgery.
“Successful and sustained clinically meaningful weight loss requires chronic and effective weight management strategies,” said Dr. Huang.
Dr. Huang is an employee of Novo Nordisk and Dr. DerSarkissian is a researcher for Novo Nordisk.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
AT ENDO 2016
Key clinical point: Most patients who lose modest or moderate amounts of weight experience periods of both gain and loss within 2 years.
Major finding: More than 73% and about 70% of those in the moderate and modest weight-loss group, respectively, experienced weight cycling within 2 years. Total regain of lost weight occurred in about 23%, 16%, and 7% of the modest, moderate, and high weight-loss group, respectively.
Data source: Electronic records of 177,743 obese patients whose weight loss had been by deliberate intent and not due to illness.
Disclosures: Dr. Huang is an employee of Novo Nordisk and Dr. DerSarkissian is a researcher for Novo Nordisk.
Childhood Obesity Predicted by Infant BMI
BOSTON – Infants above the 85th percentile for body mass index at 6 months are up to nine times more likely to be severely obese by the age of 6, according to a Cincinnati Children’s Hospital investigation.
The finding means that pediatricians should routinely plot and follow body mass index (BMI) from an early age, just like height, weight, and head circumference, said investigator Dr. Allison Smego, an endocrinology fellow.
She and her colleagues reviewed the charts from birth to age 6 of 783 lean children and 480 children above the 99th BMI percentile. BMI started differentiating when children were as young as 4 months old, about a year and half before the onset of clinical obesity. The predictive value of the 85th percentile threshold held at 6, 12, and 18 months. The finding was subsequently validated in over 2,600 children.
In an interview at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society, Dr. Smego explained how to use the findings.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
BOSTON – Infants above the 85th percentile for body mass index at 6 months are up to nine times more likely to be severely obese by the age of 6, according to a Cincinnati Children’s Hospital investigation.
The finding means that pediatricians should routinely plot and follow body mass index (BMI) from an early age, just like height, weight, and head circumference, said investigator Dr. Allison Smego, an endocrinology fellow.
She and her colleagues reviewed the charts from birth to age 6 of 783 lean children and 480 children above the 99th BMI percentile. BMI started differentiating when children were as young as 4 months old, about a year and half before the onset of clinical obesity. The predictive value of the 85th percentile threshold held at 6, 12, and 18 months. The finding was subsequently validated in over 2,600 children.
In an interview at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society, Dr. Smego explained how to use the findings.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
BOSTON – Infants above the 85th percentile for body mass index at 6 months are up to nine times more likely to be severely obese by the age of 6, according to a Cincinnati Children’s Hospital investigation.
The finding means that pediatricians should routinely plot and follow body mass index (BMI) from an early age, just like height, weight, and head circumference, said investigator Dr. Allison Smego, an endocrinology fellow.
She and her colleagues reviewed the charts from birth to age 6 of 783 lean children and 480 children above the 99th BMI percentile. BMI started differentiating when children were as young as 4 months old, about a year and half before the onset of clinical obesity. The predictive value of the 85th percentile threshold held at 6, 12, and 18 months. The finding was subsequently validated in over 2,600 children.
In an interview at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society, Dr. Smego explained how to use the findings.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
AT ENDO 2016
VIDEO: Childhood obesity predicted by infant BMI
BOSTON – Infants above the 85th percentile for body mass index at 6 months are up to nine times more likely to be severely obese by the age of 6, according to a Cincinnati Children’s Hospital investigation.
The finding means that pediatricians should routinely plot and follow body mass index (BMI) from an early age, just like height, weight, and head circumference, said investigator Dr. Allison Smego, an endocrinology fellow.
She and her colleagues reviewed the charts from birth to age 6 of 783 lean children and 480 children above the 99th BMI percentile. BMI started differentiating when children were as young as 4 months old, about a year and half before the onset of clinical obesity. The predictive value of the 85th percentile threshold held at 6, 12, and 18 months. The finding was subsequently validated in over 2,600 children.
In an interview at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society, Dr. Smego explained how to use the findings.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
BOSTON – Infants above the 85th percentile for body mass index at 6 months are up to nine times more likely to be severely obese by the age of 6, according to a Cincinnati Children’s Hospital investigation.
The finding means that pediatricians should routinely plot and follow body mass index (BMI) from an early age, just like height, weight, and head circumference, said investigator Dr. Allison Smego, an endocrinology fellow.
She and her colleagues reviewed the charts from birth to age 6 of 783 lean children and 480 children above the 99th BMI percentile. BMI started differentiating when children were as young as 4 months old, about a year and half before the onset of clinical obesity. The predictive value of the 85th percentile threshold held at 6, 12, and 18 months. The finding was subsequently validated in over 2,600 children.
In an interview at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society, Dr. Smego explained how to use the findings.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
BOSTON – Infants above the 85th percentile for body mass index at 6 months are up to nine times more likely to be severely obese by the age of 6, according to a Cincinnati Children’s Hospital investigation.
The finding means that pediatricians should routinely plot and follow body mass index (BMI) from an early age, just like height, weight, and head circumference, said investigator Dr. Allison Smego, an endocrinology fellow.
She and her colleagues reviewed the charts from birth to age 6 of 783 lean children and 480 children above the 99th BMI percentile. BMI started differentiating when children were as young as 4 months old, about a year and half before the onset of clinical obesity. The predictive value of the 85th percentile threshold held at 6, 12, and 18 months. The finding was subsequently validated in over 2,600 children.
In an interview at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society, Dr. Smego explained how to use the findings.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
AT ENDO 2016
T2DM Patients on Combination Therapy Benefit in Switch From Sitagliptin to Liraglutide
BOSTON – Switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide, in combination with metformin, improved control of hypoglycemia and resulted in greater weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes, reported Dr. Maximo Maislos at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
Results of a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled 26-week trial have indicated that liraglutide can be used as an add-on to metformin for patients with type 2 diabetes who have remained hyperglycemic.
“Switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide resulted in superior [glycated hemoglobin] and body weight reductions, compared with continued sitagliptin treatment,” said Dr. Maximo Maislos of Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
The LIRA-SWITCH trial (Efficacy and Safety of Switching From Sitagliptin to Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Not Achieving Adequate Glycaemic Control on Sitagliptin and Metformin) involved 407 patients. The majority (60%) were male; mean age was 56 years and mean body mass index was 32 kg/m2. The subjects had all been treated with sitagliptin (100 mg/day) and metformin (greater than or equal to 1,500 mg/day or a maximum tolerated dose greater than or equal to 1,000 mg/day) for at least 90 days. Hyperglycemia had not been well controlled, with a mean hemoglobin A1C (HbAIC) level of 8.3% (67 mmol/mol). The mean duration of type 2 diabetes was 8 years.
Subjects were randomized to continued sitagliptin along with metformin (n = 204) or liraglutide (1.8 mg daily) along with metformin (n = 203).
After 26 weeks of treatment, reduction in HbAIC was significantly greater in the liraglutide arm than in the sitagliptin arm (1.14% vs. 0.54%; estimated treatment difference [ETD], –0.61%; 95% confidence interval, –0.82 to –0.40; P less than .0001). Those receiving liraglutide had statistically significantly greater weight loss, compared with those who continued on sitagliptin.
The less than 7% and less than or equal to 6.5% target levels of HbAIC were achieved by 50.6% and 29.5%, respectively, of patients in the liraglutide arm. These percentages were significantly higher than the respective 26.9% and 9.9% of patients in the sitagliptin arm (P less than .0001 for both). Fasting plasma glucose levels were significantly reduced with liraglutide treatment while decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were similar in the two study arms.
Adverse events (AEs) occurred more often in the liraglutide group than in the sitagliptin group (68.8% vs. 56.9%). Thirteen patients receiving liraglutide discontinued treatment, compared with five in the sitagliptin arm. The most common AEs in the liraglutide group were gastrointestinal disorders, principally nausea (21.8% with liraglutide vs. 7.8% with sitagliptin) and diarrhea (16.3% with liraglutide vs. 9.3% with sitagliptin), followed by decreased appetite (8.9% vs. 3.4%, respectively). These AEs tended to subside within the first few weeks of treatment.
Serious AEs occurred in eight patients in both arms. Rescue medication was needed for 30 patients receiving sitagliptin and 11 patients receiving liraglutide. No cases of pancreatitis were reported. In the sitagliptin group, one subject each developed bladder cancer and squamous cell carcinoma. Nocturnal hypoglycemia did not develop in either trial arm.
Funding was provided by liraglutide maker Novo Nordisk. Dr. Maislos had no disclosures.
BOSTON – Switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide, in combination with metformin, improved control of hypoglycemia and resulted in greater weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes, reported Dr. Maximo Maislos at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
Results of a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled 26-week trial have indicated that liraglutide can be used as an add-on to metformin for patients with type 2 diabetes who have remained hyperglycemic.
“Switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide resulted in superior [glycated hemoglobin] and body weight reductions, compared with continued sitagliptin treatment,” said Dr. Maximo Maislos of Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
The LIRA-SWITCH trial (Efficacy and Safety of Switching From Sitagliptin to Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Not Achieving Adequate Glycaemic Control on Sitagliptin and Metformin) involved 407 patients. The majority (60%) were male; mean age was 56 years and mean body mass index was 32 kg/m2. The subjects had all been treated with sitagliptin (100 mg/day) and metformin (greater than or equal to 1,500 mg/day or a maximum tolerated dose greater than or equal to 1,000 mg/day) for at least 90 days. Hyperglycemia had not been well controlled, with a mean hemoglobin A1C (HbAIC) level of 8.3% (67 mmol/mol). The mean duration of type 2 diabetes was 8 years.
Subjects were randomized to continued sitagliptin along with metformin (n = 204) or liraglutide (1.8 mg daily) along with metformin (n = 203).
After 26 weeks of treatment, reduction in HbAIC was significantly greater in the liraglutide arm than in the sitagliptin arm (1.14% vs. 0.54%; estimated treatment difference [ETD], –0.61%; 95% confidence interval, –0.82 to –0.40; P less than .0001). Those receiving liraglutide had statistically significantly greater weight loss, compared with those who continued on sitagliptin.
The less than 7% and less than or equal to 6.5% target levels of HbAIC were achieved by 50.6% and 29.5%, respectively, of patients in the liraglutide arm. These percentages were significantly higher than the respective 26.9% and 9.9% of patients in the sitagliptin arm (P less than .0001 for both). Fasting plasma glucose levels were significantly reduced with liraglutide treatment while decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were similar in the two study arms.
Adverse events (AEs) occurred more often in the liraglutide group than in the sitagliptin group (68.8% vs. 56.9%). Thirteen patients receiving liraglutide discontinued treatment, compared with five in the sitagliptin arm. The most common AEs in the liraglutide group were gastrointestinal disorders, principally nausea (21.8% with liraglutide vs. 7.8% with sitagliptin) and diarrhea (16.3% with liraglutide vs. 9.3% with sitagliptin), followed by decreased appetite (8.9% vs. 3.4%, respectively). These AEs tended to subside within the first few weeks of treatment.
Serious AEs occurred in eight patients in both arms. Rescue medication was needed for 30 patients receiving sitagliptin and 11 patients receiving liraglutide. No cases of pancreatitis were reported. In the sitagliptin group, one subject each developed bladder cancer and squamous cell carcinoma. Nocturnal hypoglycemia did not develop in either trial arm.
Funding was provided by liraglutide maker Novo Nordisk. Dr. Maislos had no disclosures.
BOSTON – Switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide, in combination with metformin, improved control of hypoglycemia and resulted in greater weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes, reported Dr. Maximo Maislos at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
Results of a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled 26-week trial have indicated that liraglutide can be used as an add-on to metformin for patients with type 2 diabetes who have remained hyperglycemic.
“Switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide resulted in superior [glycated hemoglobin] and body weight reductions, compared with continued sitagliptin treatment,” said Dr. Maximo Maislos of Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
The LIRA-SWITCH trial (Efficacy and Safety of Switching From Sitagliptin to Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Not Achieving Adequate Glycaemic Control on Sitagliptin and Metformin) involved 407 patients. The majority (60%) were male; mean age was 56 years and mean body mass index was 32 kg/m2. The subjects had all been treated with sitagliptin (100 mg/day) and metformin (greater than or equal to 1,500 mg/day or a maximum tolerated dose greater than or equal to 1,000 mg/day) for at least 90 days. Hyperglycemia had not been well controlled, with a mean hemoglobin A1C (HbAIC) level of 8.3% (67 mmol/mol). The mean duration of type 2 diabetes was 8 years.
Subjects were randomized to continued sitagliptin along with metformin (n = 204) or liraglutide (1.8 mg daily) along with metformin (n = 203).
After 26 weeks of treatment, reduction in HbAIC was significantly greater in the liraglutide arm than in the sitagliptin arm (1.14% vs. 0.54%; estimated treatment difference [ETD], –0.61%; 95% confidence interval, –0.82 to –0.40; P less than .0001). Those receiving liraglutide had statistically significantly greater weight loss, compared with those who continued on sitagliptin.
The less than 7% and less than or equal to 6.5% target levels of HbAIC were achieved by 50.6% and 29.5%, respectively, of patients in the liraglutide arm. These percentages were significantly higher than the respective 26.9% and 9.9% of patients in the sitagliptin arm (P less than .0001 for both). Fasting plasma glucose levels were significantly reduced with liraglutide treatment while decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were similar in the two study arms.
Adverse events (AEs) occurred more often in the liraglutide group than in the sitagliptin group (68.8% vs. 56.9%). Thirteen patients receiving liraglutide discontinued treatment, compared with five in the sitagliptin arm. The most common AEs in the liraglutide group were gastrointestinal disorders, principally nausea (21.8% with liraglutide vs. 7.8% with sitagliptin) and diarrhea (16.3% with liraglutide vs. 9.3% with sitagliptin), followed by decreased appetite (8.9% vs. 3.4%, respectively). These AEs tended to subside within the first few weeks of treatment.
Serious AEs occurred in eight patients in both arms. Rescue medication was needed for 30 patients receiving sitagliptin and 11 patients receiving liraglutide. No cases of pancreatitis were reported. In the sitagliptin group, one subject each developed bladder cancer and squamous cell carcinoma. Nocturnal hypoglycemia did not develop in either trial arm.
Funding was provided by liraglutide maker Novo Nordisk. Dr. Maislos had no disclosures.
AT ENDO 2016
T2D patients on combination therapy benefit in switch from sitagliptin to liraglutide
BOSTON – Switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide, in combination with metformin, improved control of hypoglycemia and resulted in greater weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes, reported Dr. Maximo Maislos at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
Results of a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled 26-week trial have indicated that liraglutide can be used as an add-on to metformin for patients with type 2 diabetes who have remained hyperglycemic.
“Switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide resulted in superior [glycated hemoglobin] and body weight reductions, compared with continued sitagliptin treatment,” said Dr. Maximo Maislos of Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
The LIRA-SWITCH trial (Efficacy and Safety of Switching From Sitagliptin to Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Not Achieving Adequate Glycaemic Control on Sitagliptin and Metformin) involved 407 patients. The majority (60%) were male; mean age was 56 years and mean body mass index was 32 kg/m2. The subjects had all been treated with sitagliptin (100 mg/day) and metformin (greater than or equal to 1,500 mg/day or a maximum tolerated dose greater than or equal to 1,000 mg/day) for at least 90 days. Hyperglycemia had not been well controlled, with a mean hemoglobin A1C (HbAIC) level of 8.3% (67 mmol/mol). The mean duration of type 2 diabetes was 8 years.
Subjects were randomized to continued sitagliptin along with metformin (n = 204) or liraglutide (1.8 mg daily) along with metformin (n = 203).
After 26 weeks of treatment, reduction in HbAIC was significantly greater in the liraglutide arm than in the sitagliptin arm (1.14% vs. 0.54%; estimated treatment difference [ETD], –0.61%; 95% confidence interval, –0.82 to –0.40; P less than .0001). Those receiving liraglutide had statistically significantly greater weight loss, compared with those who continued on sitagliptin.
The less than 7% and less than or equal to 6.5% target levels of HbAIC were achieved by 50.6% and 29.5%, respectively, of patients in the liraglutide arm. These percentages were significantly higher than the respective 26.9% and 9.9% of patients in the sitagliptin arm (P less than .0001 for both). Fasting plasma glucose levels were significantly reduced with liraglutide treatment while decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were similar in the two study arms.
Adverse events (AEs) occurred more often in the liraglutide group than in the sitagliptin group (68.8% vs. 56.9%). Thirteen patients receiving liraglutide discontinued treatment, compared with five in the sitagliptin arm. The most common AEs in the liraglutide group were gastrointestinal disorders, principally nausea (21.8% with liraglutide vs. 7.8% with sitagliptin) and diarrhea (16.3% with liraglutide vs. 9.3% with sitagliptin), followed by decreased appetite (8.9% vs. 3.4%, respectively). These AEs tended to subside within the first few weeks of treatment.
Serious AEs occurred in eight patients in both arms. Rescue medication was needed for 30 patients receiving sitagliptin and 11 patients receiving liraglutide. No cases of pancreatitis were reported. In the sitagliptin group, one subject each developed bladder cancer and squamous cell carcinoma. Nocturnal hypoglycemia did not develop in either trial arm.
Funding was provided by liraglutide maker Novo Nordisk. Dr. Maislos had no disclosures.
BOSTON – Switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide, in combination with metformin, improved control of hypoglycemia and resulted in greater weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes, reported Dr. Maximo Maislos at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
Results of a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled 26-week trial have indicated that liraglutide can be used as an add-on to metformin for patients with type 2 diabetes who have remained hyperglycemic.
“Switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide resulted in superior [glycated hemoglobin] and body weight reductions, compared with continued sitagliptin treatment,” said Dr. Maximo Maislos of Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
The LIRA-SWITCH trial (Efficacy and Safety of Switching From Sitagliptin to Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Not Achieving Adequate Glycaemic Control on Sitagliptin and Metformin) involved 407 patients. The majority (60%) were male; mean age was 56 years and mean body mass index was 32 kg/m2. The subjects had all been treated with sitagliptin (100 mg/day) and metformin (greater than or equal to 1,500 mg/day or a maximum tolerated dose greater than or equal to 1,000 mg/day) for at least 90 days. Hyperglycemia had not been well controlled, with a mean hemoglobin A1C (HbAIC) level of 8.3% (67 mmol/mol). The mean duration of type 2 diabetes was 8 years.
Subjects were randomized to continued sitagliptin along with metformin (n = 204) or liraglutide (1.8 mg daily) along with metformin (n = 203).
After 26 weeks of treatment, reduction in HbAIC was significantly greater in the liraglutide arm than in the sitagliptin arm (1.14% vs. 0.54%; estimated treatment difference [ETD], –0.61%; 95% confidence interval, –0.82 to –0.40; P less than .0001). Those receiving liraglutide had statistically significantly greater weight loss, compared with those who continued on sitagliptin.
The less than 7% and less than or equal to 6.5% target levels of HbAIC were achieved by 50.6% and 29.5%, respectively, of patients in the liraglutide arm. These percentages were significantly higher than the respective 26.9% and 9.9% of patients in the sitagliptin arm (P less than .0001 for both). Fasting plasma glucose levels were significantly reduced with liraglutide treatment while decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were similar in the two study arms.
Adverse events (AEs) occurred more often in the liraglutide group than in the sitagliptin group (68.8% vs. 56.9%). Thirteen patients receiving liraglutide discontinued treatment, compared with five in the sitagliptin arm. The most common AEs in the liraglutide group were gastrointestinal disorders, principally nausea (21.8% with liraglutide vs. 7.8% with sitagliptin) and diarrhea (16.3% with liraglutide vs. 9.3% with sitagliptin), followed by decreased appetite (8.9% vs. 3.4%, respectively). These AEs tended to subside within the first few weeks of treatment.
Serious AEs occurred in eight patients in both arms. Rescue medication was needed for 30 patients receiving sitagliptin and 11 patients receiving liraglutide. No cases of pancreatitis were reported. In the sitagliptin group, one subject each developed bladder cancer and squamous cell carcinoma. Nocturnal hypoglycemia did not develop in either trial arm.
Funding was provided by liraglutide maker Novo Nordisk. Dr. Maislos had no disclosures.
BOSTON – Switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide, in combination with metformin, improved control of hypoglycemia and resulted in greater weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes, reported Dr. Maximo Maislos at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
Results of a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled 26-week trial have indicated that liraglutide can be used as an add-on to metformin for patients with type 2 diabetes who have remained hyperglycemic.
“Switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide resulted in superior [glycated hemoglobin] and body weight reductions, compared with continued sitagliptin treatment,” said Dr. Maximo Maislos of Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
The LIRA-SWITCH trial (Efficacy and Safety of Switching From Sitagliptin to Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Not Achieving Adequate Glycaemic Control on Sitagliptin and Metformin) involved 407 patients. The majority (60%) were male; mean age was 56 years and mean body mass index was 32 kg/m2. The subjects had all been treated with sitagliptin (100 mg/day) and metformin (greater than or equal to 1,500 mg/day or a maximum tolerated dose greater than or equal to 1,000 mg/day) for at least 90 days. Hyperglycemia had not been well controlled, with a mean hemoglobin A1C (HbAIC) level of 8.3% (67 mmol/mol). The mean duration of type 2 diabetes was 8 years.
Subjects were randomized to continued sitagliptin along with metformin (n = 204) or liraglutide (1.8 mg daily) along with metformin (n = 203).
After 26 weeks of treatment, reduction in HbAIC was significantly greater in the liraglutide arm than in the sitagliptin arm (1.14% vs. 0.54%; estimated treatment difference [ETD], –0.61%; 95% confidence interval, –0.82 to –0.40; P less than .0001). Those receiving liraglutide had statistically significantly greater weight loss, compared with those who continued on sitagliptin.
The less than 7% and less than or equal to 6.5% target levels of HbAIC were achieved by 50.6% and 29.5%, respectively, of patients in the liraglutide arm. These percentages were significantly higher than the respective 26.9% and 9.9% of patients in the sitagliptin arm (P less than .0001 for both). Fasting plasma glucose levels were significantly reduced with liraglutide treatment while decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were similar in the two study arms.
Adverse events (AEs) occurred more often in the liraglutide group than in the sitagliptin group (68.8% vs. 56.9%). Thirteen patients receiving liraglutide discontinued treatment, compared with five in the sitagliptin arm. The most common AEs in the liraglutide group were gastrointestinal disorders, principally nausea (21.8% with liraglutide vs. 7.8% with sitagliptin) and diarrhea (16.3% with liraglutide vs. 9.3% with sitagliptin), followed by decreased appetite (8.9% vs. 3.4%, respectively). These AEs tended to subside within the first few weeks of treatment.
Serious AEs occurred in eight patients in both arms. Rescue medication was needed for 30 patients receiving sitagliptin and 11 patients receiving liraglutide. No cases of pancreatitis were reported. In the sitagliptin group, one subject each developed bladder cancer and squamous cell carcinoma. Nocturnal hypoglycemia did not develop in either trial arm.
Funding was provided by liraglutide maker Novo Nordisk. Dr. Maislos had no disclosures.
AT ENDO 2016
Key clinical point: A switch from sitagliptin to liraglutide provides an option, in combination with metformin, to improve the management of type 2 diabetes, allowing patients to remain on dual therapy.
Major finding: After 26 weeks of treatment, reduction in HbAIC was significantly greater in the liraglutide arm than in the sitagliptin arm (–1.14% vs. –0.54%. Those receiving liraglutide had statistically significantly greater weight loss, compared with those who continued on sitagliptin.
Data source: 407 patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled 26-week trial.
Disclosures: Dr. Maislos had no disclosures.
Early Predictors of GDM Identified in Women With PCOS
BOSTON – A prospective cohort study of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome who developed gestational diabetes mellitus during pregnancy has implicated fasting blood glucose, non–high density lipoprotein, and sex hormone–binding globulin as significant predictive factors for the development of GDM.
“Polycystic ovarian syndrome [PCOS] is the most common reproductive disorder in women of reproductive age and is commonly associated with metabolic disorders including diabetes and obesity. In women with GDM, a history of PCOS is associated with higher incidence of complications and postpregnancy glucose intolerance. Risk factors during early pregnancy in women with PCOS for development of GDM have not been well characterized,” said Dr. Wenyu Huang of Northwestern University, Chicago.
To provide some clarity, Dr. Huang and his colleagues conducted a prospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were age 18-45 years, diagnosis of PCOS prior to conception, singlet pregnancy, and enrollment during the first trimester. Preexisting chronic disease including diabetes, hypertension, and thyroid, kidney, or cardiovascular disease was grounds for exclusion. The findings were presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The 248 women with PCOS enrolled from 2011 to 2013 from a screened population of 25,000 pregnant women were followed from their first prenatal visit (before week 18) to delivery. Blood was collected at the first visit for analysis of metabolic hormones. A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was carried out at week 24-28 and diagnosis of GDM was according to 2013 American Diabetes Association OGTT criteria.
Of the 248 women, 75 (30.2%) developed GDM, and 173 (69.8%) women had normal OGTT results. Examination over the same time period early in pregnancy revealed a higher incidence of GDM in women with PCOS.
In a univariate analysis, PCOS patients who developed GDM had higher fasting blood glucose (FBG), Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) score, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and free testosterone index. These patients also had lower levels of sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG) and higher likelihood of family history of diabetes and earlier delivery.
Multiple logistic regression revealed associations between increased incidence of GDM and FBG greater than or equal to 4.86 mmol/L, non-HDL cholesterol greater than or equal to 2.84 mmol/L, and SHBG greater than or equal to 222 nmol/L. The predictive power of the three factors for the development of GDM in PCOS was relatively strong.
Future studies could aim to validate the prediction model and clarify the pathogenic basis of GDM in PCOS women, according to the researchers .
The study was funded by the Beijing Science Committee. Dr. Huang had no disclosures.
BOSTON – A prospective cohort study of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome who developed gestational diabetes mellitus during pregnancy has implicated fasting blood glucose, non–high density lipoprotein, and sex hormone–binding globulin as significant predictive factors for the development of GDM.
“Polycystic ovarian syndrome [PCOS] is the most common reproductive disorder in women of reproductive age and is commonly associated with metabolic disorders including diabetes and obesity. In women with GDM, a history of PCOS is associated with higher incidence of complications and postpregnancy glucose intolerance. Risk factors during early pregnancy in women with PCOS for development of GDM have not been well characterized,” said Dr. Wenyu Huang of Northwestern University, Chicago.
To provide some clarity, Dr. Huang and his colleagues conducted a prospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were age 18-45 years, diagnosis of PCOS prior to conception, singlet pregnancy, and enrollment during the first trimester. Preexisting chronic disease including diabetes, hypertension, and thyroid, kidney, or cardiovascular disease was grounds for exclusion. The findings were presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The 248 women with PCOS enrolled from 2011 to 2013 from a screened population of 25,000 pregnant women were followed from their first prenatal visit (before week 18) to delivery. Blood was collected at the first visit for analysis of metabolic hormones. A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was carried out at week 24-28 and diagnosis of GDM was according to 2013 American Diabetes Association OGTT criteria.
Of the 248 women, 75 (30.2%) developed GDM, and 173 (69.8%) women had normal OGTT results. Examination over the same time period early in pregnancy revealed a higher incidence of GDM in women with PCOS.
In a univariate analysis, PCOS patients who developed GDM had higher fasting blood glucose (FBG), Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) score, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and free testosterone index. These patients also had lower levels of sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG) and higher likelihood of family history of diabetes and earlier delivery.
Multiple logistic regression revealed associations between increased incidence of GDM and FBG greater than or equal to 4.86 mmol/L, non-HDL cholesterol greater than or equal to 2.84 mmol/L, and SHBG greater than or equal to 222 nmol/L. The predictive power of the three factors for the development of GDM in PCOS was relatively strong.
Future studies could aim to validate the prediction model and clarify the pathogenic basis of GDM in PCOS women, according to the researchers .
The study was funded by the Beijing Science Committee. Dr. Huang had no disclosures.
BOSTON – A prospective cohort study of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome who developed gestational diabetes mellitus during pregnancy has implicated fasting blood glucose, non–high density lipoprotein, and sex hormone–binding globulin as significant predictive factors for the development of GDM.
“Polycystic ovarian syndrome [PCOS] is the most common reproductive disorder in women of reproductive age and is commonly associated with metabolic disorders including diabetes and obesity. In women with GDM, a history of PCOS is associated with higher incidence of complications and postpregnancy glucose intolerance. Risk factors during early pregnancy in women with PCOS for development of GDM have not been well characterized,” said Dr. Wenyu Huang of Northwestern University, Chicago.
To provide some clarity, Dr. Huang and his colleagues conducted a prospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were age 18-45 years, diagnosis of PCOS prior to conception, singlet pregnancy, and enrollment during the first trimester. Preexisting chronic disease including diabetes, hypertension, and thyroid, kidney, or cardiovascular disease was grounds for exclusion. The findings were presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The 248 women with PCOS enrolled from 2011 to 2013 from a screened population of 25,000 pregnant women were followed from their first prenatal visit (before week 18) to delivery. Blood was collected at the first visit for analysis of metabolic hormones. A 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was carried out at week 24-28 and diagnosis of GDM was according to 2013 American Diabetes Association OGTT criteria.
Of the 248 women, 75 (30.2%) developed GDM, and 173 (69.8%) women had normal OGTT results. Examination over the same time period early in pregnancy revealed a higher incidence of GDM in women with PCOS.
In a univariate analysis, PCOS patients who developed GDM had higher fasting blood glucose (FBG), Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) score, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and free testosterone index. These patients also had lower levels of sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG) and higher likelihood of family history of diabetes and earlier delivery.
Multiple logistic regression revealed associations between increased incidence of GDM and FBG greater than or equal to 4.86 mmol/L, non-HDL cholesterol greater than or equal to 2.84 mmol/L, and SHBG greater than or equal to 222 nmol/L. The predictive power of the three factors for the development of GDM in PCOS was relatively strong.
Future studies could aim to validate the prediction model and clarify the pathogenic basis of GDM in PCOS women, according to the researchers .
The study was funded by the Beijing Science Committee. Dr. Huang had no disclosures.