Too little training in acute care

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Too little training in acute care

I read Dr. Hickner’s editorial, “Have family physicians abandoned acute care?” (J Fam Pract. 62;7:333) shortly after graduating from residency and starting my job as a full-spectrum family physician at a federally qualified health center, and it really resonated with me.

In the residency program, we managed many patients with chronic conditions. But they tended to use the emergency department or urgent care for acute conditions, at least in part because we could never figure out a way to offer extended hours.

Now I see many acute care patients, especially among the uninsured.  I’ve come to see that my residency training was a bit weak in this area, but I’m learning on the job. I’ve discovered that chronic conditions tend not to improve without first addressing the things the patient acutely cares about.

Dan Krebs, MD
Tacoma, Wash

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 62(10)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
538
Legacy Keywords
Dan Krebs; MD; have family physician's abandoned acute care?; acute conditions; acute care; chronic conditions
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

I read Dr. Hickner’s editorial, “Have family physicians abandoned acute care?” (J Fam Pract. 62;7:333) shortly after graduating from residency and starting my job as a full-spectrum family physician at a federally qualified health center, and it really resonated with me.

In the residency program, we managed many patients with chronic conditions. But they tended to use the emergency department or urgent care for acute conditions, at least in part because we could never figure out a way to offer extended hours.

Now I see many acute care patients, especially among the uninsured.  I’ve come to see that my residency training was a bit weak in this area, but I’m learning on the job. I’ve discovered that chronic conditions tend not to improve without first addressing the things the patient acutely cares about.

Dan Krebs, MD
Tacoma, Wash

I read Dr. Hickner’s editorial, “Have family physicians abandoned acute care?” (J Fam Pract. 62;7:333) shortly after graduating from residency and starting my job as a full-spectrum family physician at a federally qualified health center, and it really resonated with me.

In the residency program, we managed many patients with chronic conditions. But they tended to use the emergency department or urgent care for acute conditions, at least in part because we could never figure out a way to offer extended hours.

Now I see many acute care patients, especially among the uninsured.  I’ve come to see that my residency training was a bit weak in this area, but I’m learning on the job. I’ve discovered that chronic conditions tend not to improve without first addressing the things the patient acutely cares about.

Dan Krebs, MD
Tacoma, Wash

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 62(10)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 62(10)
Page Number
538
Page Number
538
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Too little training in acute care
Display Headline
Too little training in acute care
Legacy Keywords
Dan Krebs; MD; have family physician's abandoned acute care?; acute conditions; acute care; chronic conditions
Legacy Keywords
Dan Krebs; MD; have family physician's abandoned acute care?; acute conditions; acute care; chronic conditions
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media