EMRs: Tyranny vs triumph

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
EMRs: Tyranny vs triumph

I’m a rural family doc and employing RNs to make EMRs work in my practice is not financially feasible (Success with team care. J Fam Pract. 2013;62:225). Neither is employing 2 medical assistants per physician. So I end up taking up the slack. Because of the EMR, I see 2 or 3 fewer patients per day and do 3 to 4 hours of extra data entry at night—with no proven benefit for the patients.

Perhaps we should have insisted on evidence that EMRs work prior to mandating them. Team care indeed!

Frank Moskos, MD
Canton, NC

I’m proud of the fact that I have sufficient time to see 30 patients a day, and—with the use of EMR templates and open text voice-activated dictation—get home no later than 6:15 pm.

I bring a laptop on a mobile stand into the room so I can make eye contact with patients while I review their history. I complete prescriptions and test ordering in the room with the patient, then dictate and enter the data into templates on a desktop with a secure line from my office. This satisfies P4P metrics, meaningful use criteria, and National Committee for Quality Assurance standards.

Patient satisfaction has little to do with technology and much more to do with maintaining eye contact, listening without interrupting, and demonstrating respect for what the patient has to say.

Andrew Selinger, MD
Bristol, Conn

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 62(7)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
334-336
Legacy Keywords
Frank Moskos; MD; EMRs; electronic medical records; office management; efficiency; team care; National Committee for Quality Assurance
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Article PDF
Article PDF

I’m a rural family doc and employing RNs to make EMRs work in my practice is not financially feasible (Success with team care. J Fam Pract. 2013;62:225). Neither is employing 2 medical assistants per physician. So I end up taking up the slack. Because of the EMR, I see 2 or 3 fewer patients per day and do 3 to 4 hours of extra data entry at night—with no proven benefit for the patients.

Perhaps we should have insisted on evidence that EMRs work prior to mandating them. Team care indeed!

Frank Moskos, MD
Canton, NC

I’m proud of the fact that I have sufficient time to see 30 patients a day, and—with the use of EMR templates and open text voice-activated dictation—get home no later than 6:15 pm.

I bring a laptop on a mobile stand into the room so I can make eye contact with patients while I review their history. I complete prescriptions and test ordering in the room with the patient, then dictate and enter the data into templates on a desktop with a secure line from my office. This satisfies P4P metrics, meaningful use criteria, and National Committee for Quality Assurance standards.

Patient satisfaction has little to do with technology and much more to do with maintaining eye contact, listening without interrupting, and demonstrating respect for what the patient has to say.

Andrew Selinger, MD
Bristol, Conn

I’m a rural family doc and employing RNs to make EMRs work in my practice is not financially feasible (Success with team care. J Fam Pract. 2013;62:225). Neither is employing 2 medical assistants per physician. So I end up taking up the slack. Because of the EMR, I see 2 or 3 fewer patients per day and do 3 to 4 hours of extra data entry at night—with no proven benefit for the patients.

Perhaps we should have insisted on evidence that EMRs work prior to mandating them. Team care indeed!

Frank Moskos, MD
Canton, NC

I’m proud of the fact that I have sufficient time to see 30 patients a day, and—with the use of EMR templates and open text voice-activated dictation—get home no later than 6:15 pm.

I bring a laptop on a mobile stand into the room so I can make eye contact with patients while I review their history. I complete prescriptions and test ordering in the room with the patient, then dictate and enter the data into templates on a desktop with a secure line from my office. This satisfies P4P metrics, meaningful use criteria, and National Committee for Quality Assurance standards.

Patient satisfaction has little to do with technology and much more to do with maintaining eye contact, listening without interrupting, and demonstrating respect for what the patient has to say.

Andrew Selinger, MD
Bristol, Conn

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 62(7)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 62(7)
Page Number
334-336
Page Number
334-336
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
EMRs: Tyranny vs triumph
Display Headline
EMRs: Tyranny vs triumph
Legacy Keywords
Frank Moskos; MD; EMRs; electronic medical records; office management; efficiency; team care; National Committee for Quality Assurance
Legacy Keywords
Frank Moskos; MD; EMRs; electronic medical records; office management; efficiency; team care; National Committee for Quality Assurance
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media