User login
CHEST philanthropy: Moving into the future
In an ideal world, change would be progressive, the direction would be clear, and adoption would be easy. We learned in these past few years that sometimes change cannot wait. The vulnerabilities of the health care system were laid bare by the pandemic, including vast disparities in treatment and the urgent need to grow our profession.
In the light of these truths, CHEST looked within and asked a difficult question: Are we doing everything we can? This question probably sounds very familiar – one you ask every day, one you know the importance of asking. It was time we asked it of ourselves.
Milestones are a good time to reevaluate
Philanthropy is not new to CHEST. We celebrated 25 years of the CHEST Foundation in Nashville during CHEST 2022. Stories about community and clinical research grants were circulated in website blogs, emails, and newsletters and on social media for years. Our committee member volunteers worked hard developing accurate and credible patient education content for the CHEST Foundation website. Because of our faithful donors, communities around the world had access to better medical care and healthier environments.
This is amazing work, but it was time to ask:
- What can CHEST provide that others cannot?
- Where are the gaps we can fill?
- What is our community passionate about changing?
Working collectively, CHEST and CHEST Foundation leadership, along with staff, rigorously reviewed the success of our past fundraising efforts, areas of commitment our donors had specified, and the direction of interest our membership was leading us toward – like social accountability, growth and diversification of our profession, grassroots community impact, and partnerships to expand our reach. The process took nearly a year to complete – but, in the realm of big changes, that’s equal to the time needed for one good, deep breath.
Focusing on significant change means narrowing our scope
Meeting these goals would mean changing how we worked and letting go of areas better served elsewhere. CHEST needed to:
1. Align philanthropy with our mission to elevate the value placed on giving, making it a core priority and responsibility of CHEST as an organization.
2. Consolidate philanthropy under CHEST to reduce administrative costs and create efficiencies, allowing more funds to go directly to our philanthropic efforts.
3. Establish clear and transparent areas of giving that resonate with our members as a way to grow our impact and make real change.
With the full support of the CHEST Board of Regents, the CHEST Foundation Board of Advisors – under the guidance of Advisory Chair, Robert De Marco, MD, FCCP, and CHEST Foundation President, Ian Nathanson, MD, FCCP – approved a merger of the CHEST Foundation with CHEST.
In order to increase our impact and create greater awareness of CHEST philanthropic efforts, the Board of Advisors got to work defining a giving strategy that would meet the philanthropic goals and priorities of the CHEST membership. Four areas were defined and are referred to as our philanthropic pillars: clinical research, community impact, support of the profession, and dedication to education.
These pillars were approved by the Board of Regents at their spring leadership meeting.
Giving goals without support are just dreams
This transition puts the responsibility for funding the giving pillars in the hands of CHEST. The first step is ensuring the members see the impact of their donations.
“When you see your donation in action, you never doubt that you made a good decision,” said CHEST CEO, Robert A. Musacchio, PhD. “If we can show that to every member, the next 25 years of CHEST philanthropy are limitless.”
Helping connect donors to that experience is Meggie Cramer, the new Director of Philanthropy and Advancement , who has experience working directly with health care systems like Rush University Medical Center in Chicago and Hospital Sister Health System in Green Bay, Wisconsin.
“When you are giving to programs you are passionate about, you feel good about being a part of making a difference,” explained Cramer. “That’s my goal – to help our members find areas they care about and know their gift is part of creating real change.”
For frequently asked questions about the transition, please visit our website.
In an ideal world, change would be progressive, the direction would be clear, and adoption would be easy. We learned in these past few years that sometimes change cannot wait. The vulnerabilities of the health care system were laid bare by the pandemic, including vast disparities in treatment and the urgent need to grow our profession.
In the light of these truths, CHEST looked within and asked a difficult question: Are we doing everything we can? This question probably sounds very familiar – one you ask every day, one you know the importance of asking. It was time we asked it of ourselves.
Milestones are a good time to reevaluate
Philanthropy is not new to CHEST. We celebrated 25 years of the CHEST Foundation in Nashville during CHEST 2022. Stories about community and clinical research grants were circulated in website blogs, emails, and newsletters and on social media for years. Our committee member volunteers worked hard developing accurate and credible patient education content for the CHEST Foundation website. Because of our faithful donors, communities around the world had access to better medical care and healthier environments.
This is amazing work, but it was time to ask:
- What can CHEST provide that others cannot?
- Where are the gaps we can fill?
- What is our community passionate about changing?
Working collectively, CHEST and CHEST Foundation leadership, along with staff, rigorously reviewed the success of our past fundraising efforts, areas of commitment our donors had specified, and the direction of interest our membership was leading us toward – like social accountability, growth and diversification of our profession, grassroots community impact, and partnerships to expand our reach. The process took nearly a year to complete – but, in the realm of big changes, that’s equal to the time needed for one good, deep breath.
Focusing on significant change means narrowing our scope
Meeting these goals would mean changing how we worked and letting go of areas better served elsewhere. CHEST needed to:
1. Align philanthropy with our mission to elevate the value placed on giving, making it a core priority and responsibility of CHEST as an organization.
2. Consolidate philanthropy under CHEST to reduce administrative costs and create efficiencies, allowing more funds to go directly to our philanthropic efforts.
3. Establish clear and transparent areas of giving that resonate with our members as a way to grow our impact and make real change.
With the full support of the CHEST Board of Regents, the CHEST Foundation Board of Advisors – under the guidance of Advisory Chair, Robert De Marco, MD, FCCP, and CHEST Foundation President, Ian Nathanson, MD, FCCP – approved a merger of the CHEST Foundation with CHEST.
In order to increase our impact and create greater awareness of CHEST philanthropic efforts, the Board of Advisors got to work defining a giving strategy that would meet the philanthropic goals and priorities of the CHEST membership. Four areas were defined and are referred to as our philanthropic pillars: clinical research, community impact, support of the profession, and dedication to education.
These pillars were approved by the Board of Regents at their spring leadership meeting.
Giving goals without support are just dreams
This transition puts the responsibility for funding the giving pillars in the hands of CHEST. The first step is ensuring the members see the impact of their donations.
“When you see your donation in action, you never doubt that you made a good decision,” said CHEST CEO, Robert A. Musacchio, PhD. “If we can show that to every member, the next 25 years of CHEST philanthropy are limitless.”
Helping connect donors to that experience is Meggie Cramer, the new Director of Philanthropy and Advancement , who has experience working directly with health care systems like Rush University Medical Center in Chicago and Hospital Sister Health System in Green Bay, Wisconsin.
“When you are giving to programs you are passionate about, you feel good about being a part of making a difference,” explained Cramer. “That’s my goal – to help our members find areas they care about and know their gift is part of creating real change.”
For frequently asked questions about the transition, please visit our website.
In an ideal world, change would be progressive, the direction would be clear, and adoption would be easy. We learned in these past few years that sometimes change cannot wait. The vulnerabilities of the health care system were laid bare by the pandemic, including vast disparities in treatment and the urgent need to grow our profession.
In the light of these truths, CHEST looked within and asked a difficult question: Are we doing everything we can? This question probably sounds very familiar – one you ask every day, one you know the importance of asking. It was time we asked it of ourselves.
Milestones are a good time to reevaluate
Philanthropy is not new to CHEST. We celebrated 25 years of the CHEST Foundation in Nashville during CHEST 2022. Stories about community and clinical research grants were circulated in website blogs, emails, and newsletters and on social media for years. Our committee member volunteers worked hard developing accurate and credible patient education content for the CHEST Foundation website. Because of our faithful donors, communities around the world had access to better medical care and healthier environments.
This is amazing work, but it was time to ask:
- What can CHEST provide that others cannot?
- Where are the gaps we can fill?
- What is our community passionate about changing?
Working collectively, CHEST and CHEST Foundation leadership, along with staff, rigorously reviewed the success of our past fundraising efforts, areas of commitment our donors had specified, and the direction of interest our membership was leading us toward – like social accountability, growth and diversification of our profession, grassroots community impact, and partnerships to expand our reach. The process took nearly a year to complete – but, in the realm of big changes, that’s equal to the time needed for one good, deep breath.
Focusing on significant change means narrowing our scope
Meeting these goals would mean changing how we worked and letting go of areas better served elsewhere. CHEST needed to:
1. Align philanthropy with our mission to elevate the value placed on giving, making it a core priority and responsibility of CHEST as an organization.
2. Consolidate philanthropy under CHEST to reduce administrative costs and create efficiencies, allowing more funds to go directly to our philanthropic efforts.
3. Establish clear and transparent areas of giving that resonate with our members as a way to grow our impact and make real change.
With the full support of the CHEST Board of Regents, the CHEST Foundation Board of Advisors – under the guidance of Advisory Chair, Robert De Marco, MD, FCCP, and CHEST Foundation President, Ian Nathanson, MD, FCCP – approved a merger of the CHEST Foundation with CHEST.
In order to increase our impact and create greater awareness of CHEST philanthropic efforts, the Board of Advisors got to work defining a giving strategy that would meet the philanthropic goals and priorities of the CHEST membership. Four areas were defined and are referred to as our philanthropic pillars: clinical research, community impact, support of the profession, and dedication to education.
These pillars were approved by the Board of Regents at their spring leadership meeting.
Giving goals without support are just dreams
This transition puts the responsibility for funding the giving pillars in the hands of CHEST. The first step is ensuring the members see the impact of their donations.
“When you see your donation in action, you never doubt that you made a good decision,” said CHEST CEO, Robert A. Musacchio, PhD. “If we can show that to every member, the next 25 years of CHEST philanthropy are limitless.”
Helping connect donors to that experience is Meggie Cramer, the new Director of Philanthropy and Advancement , who has experience working directly with health care systems like Rush University Medical Center in Chicago and Hospital Sister Health System in Green Bay, Wisconsin.
“When you are giving to programs you are passionate about, you feel good about being a part of making a difference,” explained Cramer. “That’s my goal – to help our members find areas they care about and know their gift is part of creating real change.”
For frequently asked questions about the transition, please visit our website.
CHEST Advocates raises awareness against tobacco use
“Ew, gross.”
“Um, no way.”
“Of course not.”
Earlier this summer, I partnered with Dr. Melissa Keene, the medical director of a federally qualified health center in southwest Virginia, to talk about tobacco with middle school students. A few minutes after our arrival, it was clear to us that cigarettes weren’t cool anymore.
We asked hundreds of kids if they or their friends smoked cigarettes. The above quoted responses were repeated over and over.
Tobacco health advocates have spent decades working on public health messaging surrounding cigarette use, which is clearly working in this Virginian middle school.
But our patients, friends, and family who are already dependent on tobacco products still face addiction, morbidity, and premature mortality. And the ever-changing forms of tobacco delivery pose new challenges for our collective cessation efforts.
The Summer 2023 issue of CHEST Advocates features parents, lawyers, doctors, and nonprofit leaders who all share their inspiring stories of action in the fight against tobacco use.
Learn from tobacco experts, Dr. Susan Walley and Dr. Evan Stepp, about evidence-based approaches to tobacco cessation in young people –including why we should start having conversations by age 11 about smoking or vaping and why it’s important to inform youth about big tobacco marketing strategies.
Read an interview with Dr. Anne Melzer, who shares lessons from her career in tobacco advocacy centered in a US veteran population. Dr. Melzer suggests free resources that are available to all clinicians who sometimes struggle to help patients find the best way to quit.
Watch a video of Dr. Iyaad Hasan and Dr. Roy St. John, who run The Breathing Association, a nonprofit in Ohio serving individuals who are underinsured or uninsured. This organization offers a mobile medical unit that provides a free, evidenced-based program to help with smoking cessation via education, counseling, and personalized quit plans.
Learn from Natasha Phelps, JD, the Director of Equity-Centered Policies at The Center for Black Health & Equity. For more than 2 decades, this organization has focused on building community capacity to give local constituents the tools needed for sustainable health improvements, including tobacco cessation.
Hear from Dr. Panagiotis Behrakis, who – after decades of advocacy against tobacco use—the World Health Organization recognized in May for his Smoke Free Greece program. He explains why his work focuses on a two-pronged approach that places equal emphasis on both cessation and prevention.
Listen to a podcast featuring an amazing organization called Parents Against Vaping e-cigarettes, which started in response to a predatory marketing strategy by a tobacco company in a school system.
See how CHEST is fighting the battle against smoking and vaping, as told by Dr. Frank Leone, Chair of the Tobacco/Vaping Work Group for the CHEST Health Policy and Advocacy Committee. And, lastly, interact with a timeline of CHEST’s advocacy work in tobacco cessation and regulation through the decades.
As Dr. Melzer so eloquently stated in her interview featured in this issue, “tobacco cessation is a process that belongs to everybody, and, therefore, sometimes to nobody.” We hope this issue will inspire you to advocate for your patients and partner with your communities in our shared mission to improve education, awareness, and action against tobacco use.
“Ew, gross.”
“Um, no way.”
“Of course not.”
Earlier this summer, I partnered with Dr. Melissa Keene, the medical director of a federally qualified health center in southwest Virginia, to talk about tobacco with middle school students. A few minutes after our arrival, it was clear to us that cigarettes weren’t cool anymore.
We asked hundreds of kids if they or their friends smoked cigarettes. The above quoted responses were repeated over and over.
Tobacco health advocates have spent decades working on public health messaging surrounding cigarette use, which is clearly working in this Virginian middle school.
But our patients, friends, and family who are already dependent on tobacco products still face addiction, morbidity, and premature mortality. And the ever-changing forms of tobacco delivery pose new challenges for our collective cessation efforts.
The Summer 2023 issue of CHEST Advocates features parents, lawyers, doctors, and nonprofit leaders who all share their inspiring stories of action in the fight against tobacco use.
Learn from tobacco experts, Dr. Susan Walley and Dr. Evan Stepp, about evidence-based approaches to tobacco cessation in young people –including why we should start having conversations by age 11 about smoking or vaping and why it’s important to inform youth about big tobacco marketing strategies.
Read an interview with Dr. Anne Melzer, who shares lessons from her career in tobacco advocacy centered in a US veteran population. Dr. Melzer suggests free resources that are available to all clinicians who sometimes struggle to help patients find the best way to quit.
Watch a video of Dr. Iyaad Hasan and Dr. Roy St. John, who run The Breathing Association, a nonprofit in Ohio serving individuals who are underinsured or uninsured. This organization offers a mobile medical unit that provides a free, evidenced-based program to help with smoking cessation via education, counseling, and personalized quit plans.
Learn from Natasha Phelps, JD, the Director of Equity-Centered Policies at The Center for Black Health & Equity. For more than 2 decades, this organization has focused on building community capacity to give local constituents the tools needed for sustainable health improvements, including tobacco cessation.
Hear from Dr. Panagiotis Behrakis, who – after decades of advocacy against tobacco use—the World Health Organization recognized in May for his Smoke Free Greece program. He explains why his work focuses on a two-pronged approach that places equal emphasis on both cessation and prevention.
Listen to a podcast featuring an amazing organization called Parents Against Vaping e-cigarettes, which started in response to a predatory marketing strategy by a tobacco company in a school system.
See how CHEST is fighting the battle against smoking and vaping, as told by Dr. Frank Leone, Chair of the Tobacco/Vaping Work Group for the CHEST Health Policy and Advocacy Committee. And, lastly, interact with a timeline of CHEST’s advocacy work in tobacco cessation and regulation through the decades.
As Dr. Melzer so eloquently stated in her interview featured in this issue, “tobacco cessation is a process that belongs to everybody, and, therefore, sometimes to nobody.” We hope this issue will inspire you to advocate for your patients and partner with your communities in our shared mission to improve education, awareness, and action against tobacco use.
“Ew, gross.”
“Um, no way.”
“Of course not.”
Earlier this summer, I partnered with Dr. Melissa Keene, the medical director of a federally qualified health center in southwest Virginia, to talk about tobacco with middle school students. A few minutes after our arrival, it was clear to us that cigarettes weren’t cool anymore.
We asked hundreds of kids if they or their friends smoked cigarettes. The above quoted responses were repeated over and over.
Tobacco health advocates have spent decades working on public health messaging surrounding cigarette use, which is clearly working in this Virginian middle school.
But our patients, friends, and family who are already dependent on tobacco products still face addiction, morbidity, and premature mortality. And the ever-changing forms of tobacco delivery pose new challenges for our collective cessation efforts.
The Summer 2023 issue of CHEST Advocates features parents, lawyers, doctors, and nonprofit leaders who all share their inspiring stories of action in the fight against tobacco use.
Learn from tobacco experts, Dr. Susan Walley and Dr. Evan Stepp, about evidence-based approaches to tobacco cessation in young people –including why we should start having conversations by age 11 about smoking or vaping and why it’s important to inform youth about big tobacco marketing strategies.
Read an interview with Dr. Anne Melzer, who shares lessons from her career in tobacco advocacy centered in a US veteran population. Dr. Melzer suggests free resources that are available to all clinicians who sometimes struggle to help patients find the best way to quit.
Watch a video of Dr. Iyaad Hasan and Dr. Roy St. John, who run The Breathing Association, a nonprofit in Ohio serving individuals who are underinsured or uninsured. This organization offers a mobile medical unit that provides a free, evidenced-based program to help with smoking cessation via education, counseling, and personalized quit plans.
Learn from Natasha Phelps, JD, the Director of Equity-Centered Policies at The Center for Black Health & Equity. For more than 2 decades, this organization has focused on building community capacity to give local constituents the tools needed for sustainable health improvements, including tobacco cessation.
Hear from Dr. Panagiotis Behrakis, who – after decades of advocacy against tobacco use—the World Health Organization recognized in May for his Smoke Free Greece program. He explains why his work focuses on a two-pronged approach that places equal emphasis on both cessation and prevention.
Listen to a podcast featuring an amazing organization called Parents Against Vaping e-cigarettes, which started in response to a predatory marketing strategy by a tobacco company in a school system.
See how CHEST is fighting the battle against smoking and vaping, as told by Dr. Frank Leone, Chair of the Tobacco/Vaping Work Group for the CHEST Health Policy and Advocacy Committee. And, lastly, interact with a timeline of CHEST’s advocacy work in tobacco cessation and regulation through the decades.
As Dr. Melzer so eloquently stated in her interview featured in this issue, “tobacco cessation is a process that belongs to everybody, and, therefore, sometimes to nobody.” We hope this issue will inspire you to advocate for your patients and partner with your communities in our shared mission to improve education, awareness, and action against tobacco use.
New AGA podcast series explores the latest in C. difficile
AGA’s new on-demand program, “C. difficile: Preparing the Field for Change,” is a six-part podcast series that outlines effective approaches to patient-centered care that will transform your practice.
Each 30-minute episode delves into a different topic – from microbiome therapy and FMT to documenting patient history – that will help you improve patient outcomes and reduce the risk of complications.
Tune in and subscribe to our channel Inside Scope wherever you listen to podcasts (Apple or Google). To claim CME credit for listening, visit AGA University (agau.gastro.org).
Episode breakdown
Risk factors
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna cover risk factors for initial and recurrent C. difficile infection.
Microbiota changes
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna describe the shifts in the microbiota with C. difficile infection.
Reconciling guideline differences for testing and treatment
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna are joined by guest Dr. Colleen Kelly to discuss how to reconcile guideline differences for testing and treatment of C. difficile.
Case management and transitions of care
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna are joined by guests Rebecca Perez and Cheri Lattimer to discuss case management and transitions of care in C. difficile infection.
Impact of rCDI on patients and their lives
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna are joined by guests Dr. Kevin Garey and a patient to discuss the impact of recurrent CDI on patients and their lives.
FMT and new microbiome therapies
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna are joined by guest Dr. Jessica Allegretti to discuss FMT and new microbiome therapies.
This series is supported by educational grants from Aimmune Therapeutics, Seres Therapeutics, and Ferring Pharmaceuticals.
AGA’s new on-demand program, “C. difficile: Preparing the Field for Change,” is a six-part podcast series that outlines effective approaches to patient-centered care that will transform your practice.
Each 30-minute episode delves into a different topic – from microbiome therapy and FMT to documenting patient history – that will help you improve patient outcomes and reduce the risk of complications.
Tune in and subscribe to our channel Inside Scope wherever you listen to podcasts (Apple or Google). To claim CME credit for listening, visit AGA University (agau.gastro.org).
Episode breakdown
Risk factors
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna cover risk factors for initial and recurrent C. difficile infection.
Microbiota changes
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna describe the shifts in the microbiota with C. difficile infection.
Reconciling guideline differences for testing and treatment
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna are joined by guest Dr. Colleen Kelly to discuss how to reconcile guideline differences for testing and treatment of C. difficile.
Case management and transitions of care
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna are joined by guests Rebecca Perez and Cheri Lattimer to discuss case management and transitions of care in C. difficile infection.
Impact of rCDI on patients and their lives
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna are joined by guests Dr. Kevin Garey and a patient to discuss the impact of recurrent CDI on patients and their lives.
FMT and new microbiome therapies
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna are joined by guest Dr. Jessica Allegretti to discuss FMT and new microbiome therapies.
This series is supported by educational grants from Aimmune Therapeutics, Seres Therapeutics, and Ferring Pharmaceuticals.
AGA’s new on-demand program, “C. difficile: Preparing the Field for Change,” is a six-part podcast series that outlines effective approaches to patient-centered care that will transform your practice.
Each 30-minute episode delves into a different topic – from microbiome therapy and FMT to documenting patient history – that will help you improve patient outcomes and reduce the risk of complications.
Tune in and subscribe to our channel Inside Scope wherever you listen to podcasts (Apple or Google). To claim CME credit for listening, visit AGA University (agau.gastro.org).
Episode breakdown
Risk factors
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna cover risk factors for initial and recurrent C. difficile infection.
Microbiota changes
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna describe the shifts in the microbiota with C. difficile infection.
Reconciling guideline differences for testing and treatment
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna are joined by guest Dr. Colleen Kelly to discuss how to reconcile guideline differences for testing and treatment of C. difficile.
Case management and transitions of care
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna are joined by guests Rebecca Perez and Cheri Lattimer to discuss case management and transitions of care in C. difficile infection.
Impact of rCDI on patients and their lives
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna are joined by guests Dr. Kevin Garey and a patient to discuss the impact of recurrent CDI on patients and their lives.
FMT and new microbiome therapies
Dr. Paul Feuerstadt and Dr. Sahil Khanna are joined by guest Dr. Jessica Allegretti to discuss FMT and new microbiome therapies.
This series is supported by educational grants from Aimmune Therapeutics, Seres Therapeutics, and Ferring Pharmaceuticals.
Talking to your patients: Colorectal cancer screening starts at age 45
Your patients may be confused by conflicting guidance about when to start getting screened for colorectal cancer (CRC). AGA stands firmly behind our Multi-Society Task Force on CRC recommendations, and those of the U.S. Preventive Services Taskforce, the American Cancer Society, and other national medical societies and advocacy organizations, that colorectal cancer screening for average risk individuals should start at age 45.
But
View the talking points below to help your patients understand screening guidelines and why they need to get screened for colorectal cancer.
One outlier medical group says colorectal cancer screening can wait until age 50, but the consensus of the government and multiple expert groups, including the American Gastroenterological Association, is that getting screened starting at age 45 could save your life.
Colorectal cancer will be the leading cause of cancer-related death among 20- to 49-year-olds by 2030. Putting off screening until age 50 is a grave mistake.
Screening for colorectal cancer can help find polyps in your colon and rectum early, sometimes even before they become cancer. A polyp is a mushroom-like or flat growth on the inside wall of your colon or rectum. Polyps grow slowly over many years and not all turn into cancer. I can remove these growths, which might mean that I can help stop the cancer before it starts, remove tissue that shows cancer, or let us start treatment early if cancer has already started.
There are several tests for colorectal cancer screening, including colonoscopy, but there are also tests that are noninvasive, meaning they don’t need tools that enter your body. Let’s talk about each test and which one you feel most comfortable using.
For more resources to share with your patients, visit the AGA GI Patient Center.
Your patients may be confused by conflicting guidance about when to start getting screened for colorectal cancer (CRC). AGA stands firmly behind our Multi-Society Task Force on CRC recommendations, and those of the U.S. Preventive Services Taskforce, the American Cancer Society, and other national medical societies and advocacy organizations, that colorectal cancer screening for average risk individuals should start at age 45.
But
View the talking points below to help your patients understand screening guidelines and why they need to get screened for colorectal cancer.
One outlier medical group says colorectal cancer screening can wait until age 50, but the consensus of the government and multiple expert groups, including the American Gastroenterological Association, is that getting screened starting at age 45 could save your life.
Colorectal cancer will be the leading cause of cancer-related death among 20- to 49-year-olds by 2030. Putting off screening until age 50 is a grave mistake.
Screening for colorectal cancer can help find polyps in your colon and rectum early, sometimes even before they become cancer. A polyp is a mushroom-like or flat growth on the inside wall of your colon or rectum. Polyps grow slowly over many years and not all turn into cancer. I can remove these growths, which might mean that I can help stop the cancer before it starts, remove tissue that shows cancer, or let us start treatment early if cancer has already started.
There are several tests for colorectal cancer screening, including colonoscopy, but there are also tests that are noninvasive, meaning they don’t need tools that enter your body. Let’s talk about each test and which one you feel most comfortable using.
For more resources to share with your patients, visit the AGA GI Patient Center.
Your patients may be confused by conflicting guidance about when to start getting screened for colorectal cancer (CRC). AGA stands firmly behind our Multi-Society Task Force on CRC recommendations, and those of the U.S. Preventive Services Taskforce, the American Cancer Society, and other national medical societies and advocacy organizations, that colorectal cancer screening for average risk individuals should start at age 45.
But
View the talking points below to help your patients understand screening guidelines and why they need to get screened for colorectal cancer.
One outlier medical group says colorectal cancer screening can wait until age 50, but the consensus of the government and multiple expert groups, including the American Gastroenterological Association, is that getting screened starting at age 45 could save your life.
Colorectal cancer will be the leading cause of cancer-related death among 20- to 49-year-olds by 2030. Putting off screening until age 50 is a grave mistake.
Screening for colorectal cancer can help find polyps in your colon and rectum early, sometimes even before they become cancer. A polyp is a mushroom-like or flat growth on the inside wall of your colon or rectum. Polyps grow slowly over many years and not all turn into cancer. I can remove these growths, which might mean that I can help stop the cancer before it starts, remove tissue that shows cancer, or let us start treatment early if cancer has already started.
There are several tests for colorectal cancer screening, including colonoscopy, but there are also tests that are noninvasive, meaning they don’t need tools that enter your body. Let’s talk about each test and which one you feel most comfortable using.
For more resources to share with your patients, visit the AGA GI Patient Center.
AGA patient and physician advocates visit Capitol Hill to push for prior authorization reform
In our first in-person Advocacy Day on Capitol Hill since 2019, AGA leaders and patient advocates from 22 total states met with House and Senate offices to educate members of Congress and their staff about policies affecting GI patient care such as prior authorization and step therapy. Federal research funding and Medicare reimbursement were also on the agenda.
In the meetings, the patient shared their stories of living with various gastrointestinal diseases, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, and the struggles they’ve gone through to get treatments approved by their insurers. AGA physicians shared the provider perspective of how policies like prior authorization negatively impact practices. According to a 2023 AGA member survey, 95% of respondents say that prior authorization restrictions have impacted patient access to clinically appropriate treatments and patient clinical outcomes and 84% described that the burden associated with prior authorization policies have increased “significantly” or “somewhat” over the last 5 years. AGA’s advocacy day came not long after UnitedHealthcare’s announcement of a new “Gold Card” prior authorization policy to be implemented in 2024, which will impact most colonoscopies and endoscopies for its 27 million commercial beneficiaries. The group expressed serious concerns about the proposed policy to lawmakers. 
“It was a wonderful and empowering experience to share my personal story with my Representative/Senator and know that they were really listening to my concerns about insurer overreach,” said Aaron Blocker, a Crohn’s disease patient and advocate. “I hope Congress acts swiftly on passing prior authorization reform, so no more patients are forced to live in pain while they wait for treatments to be approved.” As gastroenterologists, too much administrative time is spent submitting onerous prior authorization requests on a near daily basis. We hope Congress takes our concerns seriously and comes together to rein in prior authorization.
AGA thanks the patient and physician advocates who participated in this year’s Advocacy Day and looks forward to continuing our work to ensure timely access to care.
In our first in-person Advocacy Day on Capitol Hill since 2019, AGA leaders and patient advocates from 22 total states met with House and Senate offices to educate members of Congress and their staff about policies affecting GI patient care such as prior authorization and step therapy. Federal research funding and Medicare reimbursement were also on the agenda.
In the meetings, the patient shared their stories of living with various gastrointestinal diseases, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, and the struggles they’ve gone through to get treatments approved by their insurers. AGA physicians shared the provider perspective of how policies like prior authorization negatively impact practices. According to a 2023 AGA member survey, 95% of respondents say that prior authorization restrictions have impacted patient access to clinically appropriate treatments and patient clinical outcomes and 84% described that the burden associated with prior authorization policies have increased “significantly” or “somewhat” over the last 5 years. AGA’s advocacy day came not long after UnitedHealthcare’s announcement of a new “Gold Card” prior authorization policy to be implemented in 2024, which will impact most colonoscopies and endoscopies for its 27 million commercial beneficiaries. The group expressed serious concerns about the proposed policy to lawmakers.
“It was a wonderful and empowering experience to share my personal story with my Representative/Senator and know that they were really listening to my concerns about insurer overreach,” said Aaron Blocker, a Crohn’s disease patient and advocate. “I hope Congress acts swiftly on passing prior authorization reform, so no more patients are forced to live in pain while they wait for treatments to be approved.” As gastroenterologists, too much administrative time is spent submitting onerous prior authorization requests on a near daily basis. We hope Congress takes our concerns seriously and comes together to rein in prior authorization.
AGA thanks the patient and physician advocates who participated in this year’s Advocacy Day and looks forward to continuing our work to ensure timely access to care.
In our first in-person Advocacy Day on Capitol Hill since 2019, AGA leaders and patient advocates from 22 total states met with House and Senate offices to educate members of Congress and their staff about policies affecting GI patient care such as prior authorization and step therapy. Federal research funding and Medicare reimbursement were also on the agenda.
In the meetings, the patient shared their stories of living with various gastrointestinal diseases, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, and the struggles they’ve gone through to get treatments approved by their insurers. AGA physicians shared the provider perspective of how policies like prior authorization negatively impact practices. According to a 2023 AGA member survey, 95% of respondents say that prior authorization restrictions have impacted patient access to clinically appropriate treatments and patient clinical outcomes and 84% described that the burden associated with prior authorization policies have increased “significantly” or “somewhat” over the last 5 years. AGA’s advocacy day came not long after UnitedHealthcare’s announcement of a new “Gold Card” prior authorization policy to be implemented in 2024, which will impact most colonoscopies and endoscopies for its 27 million commercial beneficiaries. The group expressed serious concerns about the proposed policy to lawmakers.
“It was a wonderful and empowering experience to share my personal story with my Representative/Senator and know that they were really listening to my concerns about insurer overreach,” said Aaron Blocker, a Crohn’s disease patient and advocate. “I hope Congress acts swiftly on passing prior authorization reform, so no more patients are forced to live in pain while they wait for treatments to be approved.” As gastroenterologists, too much administrative time is spent submitting onerous prior authorization requests on a near daily basis. We hope Congress takes our concerns seriously and comes together to rein in prior authorization.
AGA thanks the patient and physician advocates who participated in this year’s Advocacy Day and looks forward to continuing our work to ensure timely access to care.
Rethinking how we promote cancer screening?
Except possibly for colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy, common cancer screening tests do not extend life, according to a new study published in JAMA Internal Medicine.
The study, which was a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 long-term randomized clinical trials involving 2.1 million individuals, found that colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy prolonged lifetime by 110 days, while fecal testing and mammography screening did not prolong life. An extension of 37 days was noted for prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen testing and 107 days with lung cancer screening using CT. The study involved more than 1 decade of follow-up reporting all-cause mortality of people who had undergone mammography screening for breast cancer; colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer; CT screening for lung cancer in smokers and former smokers; or prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer.
The study received a fair amount of attention in the press, but
“Cancer prevention and earlier stage diagnoses through colorectal cancer screening provides significant morbidity and cost benefits, even if all-cause mortality is not reduced,” said Lawrence Kim, MD, AGAF, AGA vice president.
The authors of the study, who were led by Michael Bretthauer, MD, PhD, of the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, are not suggesting that cancer screenings be abandoned. However, they do suggest that “organizations, institutions, and policy makers who promote cancer screening tests by their effect to save lives may find other ways of encouraging screening. It might be wise to reconsider priorities and dispassionately inform interested people about the absolute benefits, harms, and burden of screening tests that they consider undertaking.”
Except possibly for colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy, common cancer screening tests do not extend life, according to a new study published in JAMA Internal Medicine.
The study, which was a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 long-term randomized clinical trials involving 2.1 million individuals, found that colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy prolonged lifetime by 110 days, while fecal testing and mammography screening did not prolong life. An extension of 37 days was noted for prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen testing and 107 days with lung cancer screening using CT. The study involved more than 1 decade of follow-up reporting all-cause mortality of people who had undergone mammography screening for breast cancer; colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer; CT screening for lung cancer in smokers and former smokers; or prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer.
The study received a fair amount of attention in the press, but
“Cancer prevention and earlier stage diagnoses through colorectal cancer screening provides significant morbidity and cost benefits, even if all-cause mortality is not reduced,” said Lawrence Kim, MD, AGAF, AGA vice president.
The authors of the study, who were led by Michael Bretthauer, MD, PhD, of the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, are not suggesting that cancer screenings be abandoned. However, they do suggest that “organizations, institutions, and policy makers who promote cancer screening tests by their effect to save lives may find other ways of encouraging screening. It might be wise to reconsider priorities and dispassionately inform interested people about the absolute benefits, harms, and burden of screening tests that they consider undertaking.”
Except possibly for colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy, common cancer screening tests do not extend life, according to a new study published in JAMA Internal Medicine.
The study, which was a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 long-term randomized clinical trials involving 2.1 million individuals, found that colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy prolonged lifetime by 110 days, while fecal testing and mammography screening did not prolong life. An extension of 37 days was noted for prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen testing and 107 days with lung cancer screening using CT. The study involved more than 1 decade of follow-up reporting all-cause mortality of people who had undergone mammography screening for breast cancer; colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer; CT screening for lung cancer in smokers and former smokers; or prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer.
The study received a fair amount of attention in the press, but
“Cancer prevention and earlier stage diagnoses through colorectal cancer screening provides significant morbidity and cost benefits, even if all-cause mortality is not reduced,” said Lawrence Kim, MD, AGAF, AGA vice president.
The authors of the study, who were led by Michael Bretthauer, MD, PhD, of the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, are not suggesting that cancer screenings be abandoned. However, they do suggest that “organizations, institutions, and policy makers who promote cancer screening tests by their effect to save lives may find other ways of encouraging screening. It might be wise to reconsider priorities and dispassionately inform interested people about the absolute benefits, harms, and burden of screening tests that they consider undertaking.”
New co–editors-in-chief named for CMGH
will be taking over their new roles beginning July 1, 2024.
“In my role as co–editor-in-chief of CMGH, I look forward to working with Jonathan Katz to advance its longstanding mission to disseminate rigorous, reproducible, and impactful digestive biology research. I am excited to launch new initiatives including the addition of special topic editors who will cover themes relating to early career investigators and diversity, equity, and inclusion,” said Dr. Battle, who is a professor in the department of cell biology, neurobiology, and anatomy at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
“I am honored to work with Michele Battle and the rest of our new CMGH board of editors. Some of our goals are to expand CMGH outreach and engagement, incorporate more programs and opportunities for junior investigators, and provide rapid advancements and technical reports that drive research in the field. As such, we will strive to ensure that CMGH remains the preeminent journal focused on high-impact, basic, mechanistic research in GI and hepatology,” said Dr. Katz, an associate professor of medicine in the department of medicine gastroenterology division, director of molecular pathology and imaging care, and director of the undergraduate student scholars program at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. He is also currently an associate editor for CMGH.
Dr. Battle and Dr. Katz are former AGA Research Foundation awardees, with Dr. Battle receiving an AGA Research Scholar Award in 2009 and Dr. Katz receiving the AGA Astra Merck Advanced Research Training Award in 1998.
Over the next year, they will meet with the current editorial board and start to plan and develop new special sections and initiatives to bring to CMGH during their term.
Please join us in congratulating Dr. Battle and Dr. Katz on their new role as incoming co–editors-in chief.
will be taking over their new roles beginning July 1, 2024.
“In my role as co–editor-in-chief of CMGH, I look forward to working with Jonathan Katz to advance its longstanding mission to disseminate rigorous, reproducible, and impactful digestive biology research. I am excited to launch new initiatives including the addition of special topic editors who will cover themes relating to early career investigators and diversity, equity, and inclusion,” said Dr. Battle, who is a professor in the department of cell biology, neurobiology, and anatomy at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
“I am honored to work with Michele Battle and the rest of our new CMGH board of editors. Some of our goals are to expand CMGH outreach and engagement, incorporate more programs and opportunities for junior investigators, and provide rapid advancements and technical reports that drive research in the field. As such, we will strive to ensure that CMGH remains the preeminent journal focused on high-impact, basic, mechanistic research in GI and hepatology,” said Dr. Katz, an associate professor of medicine in the department of medicine gastroenterology division, director of molecular pathology and imaging care, and director of the undergraduate student scholars program at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. He is also currently an associate editor for CMGH.
Dr. Battle and Dr. Katz are former AGA Research Foundation awardees, with Dr. Battle receiving an AGA Research Scholar Award in 2009 and Dr. Katz receiving the AGA Astra Merck Advanced Research Training Award in 1998.
Over the next year, they will meet with the current editorial board and start to plan and develop new special sections and initiatives to bring to CMGH during their term.
Please join us in congratulating Dr. Battle and Dr. Katz on their new role as incoming co–editors-in chief.
will be taking over their new roles beginning July 1, 2024.
“In my role as co–editor-in-chief of CMGH, I look forward to working with Jonathan Katz to advance its longstanding mission to disseminate rigorous, reproducible, and impactful digestive biology research. I am excited to launch new initiatives including the addition of special topic editors who will cover themes relating to early career investigators and diversity, equity, and inclusion,” said Dr. Battle, who is a professor in the department of cell biology, neurobiology, and anatomy at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
“I am honored to work with Michele Battle and the rest of our new CMGH board of editors. Some of our goals are to expand CMGH outreach and engagement, incorporate more programs and opportunities for junior investigators, and provide rapid advancements and technical reports that drive research in the field. As such, we will strive to ensure that CMGH remains the preeminent journal focused on high-impact, basic, mechanistic research in GI and hepatology,” said Dr. Katz, an associate professor of medicine in the department of medicine gastroenterology division, director of molecular pathology and imaging care, and director of the undergraduate student scholars program at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. He is also currently an associate editor for CMGH.
Dr. Battle and Dr. Katz are former AGA Research Foundation awardees, with Dr. Battle receiving an AGA Research Scholar Award in 2009 and Dr. Katz receiving the AGA Astra Merck Advanced Research Training Award in 1998.
Over the next year, they will meet with the current editorial board and start to plan and develop new special sections and initiatives to bring to CMGH during their term.
Please join us in congratulating Dr. Battle and Dr. Katz on their new role as incoming co–editors-in chief.
Watch the inaugural Gastro Journal Club
We are delighted to introduce the Gastro Journal Club in which an author of a study published in Gastroenterology will present their paper followed by a Q&A. The inaugural Gastro Journal Club features Loren Laine, MD, professor of medicine (digestive diseases) at Yale University, New Haven, Conn., and was hosted by the McMaster University gastroenterology division. Dr. Laine presented his article “Vonoprazan Versus Lansoprazole for Healing and Maintenance of Healing of Erosive Esophagitis: A Randomized Trial,” published in the January 2023 issue of Gastroenterology.
If you are interested in participating, please contact mpogachar@gastro.org.
Watch the inaugural Gastro Journal Club: https://rb.gy/j8mqm
We are delighted to introduce the Gastro Journal Club in which an author of a study published in Gastroenterology will present their paper followed by a Q&A. The inaugural Gastro Journal Club features Loren Laine, MD, professor of medicine (digestive diseases) at Yale University, New Haven, Conn., and was hosted by the McMaster University gastroenterology division. Dr. Laine presented his article “Vonoprazan Versus Lansoprazole for Healing and Maintenance of Healing of Erosive Esophagitis: A Randomized Trial,” published in the January 2023 issue of Gastroenterology.
If you are interested in participating, please contact mpogachar@gastro.org.
Watch the inaugural Gastro Journal Club: https://rb.gy/j8mqm
We are delighted to introduce the Gastro Journal Club in which an author of a study published in Gastroenterology will present their paper followed by a Q&A. The inaugural Gastro Journal Club features Loren Laine, MD, professor of medicine (digestive diseases) at Yale University, New Haven, Conn., and was hosted by the McMaster University gastroenterology division. Dr. Laine presented his article “Vonoprazan Versus Lansoprazole for Healing and Maintenance of Healing of Erosive Esophagitis: A Randomized Trial,” published in the January 2023 issue of Gastroenterology.
If you are interested in participating, please contact mpogachar@gastro.org.
Watch the inaugural Gastro Journal Club: https://rb.gy/j8mqm
Landmark obesity legislation reintroduced in Congress
(TROA) (H.R. 4818/S. 2407). This legislation is a vital first step in expanding access to obesity treatment as it would expand Medicare coverage to include screening and treatment of obesity by a diverse range of health care providers who provide obesity care. The bill also includes coverage of behavioral counseling, prescription drugs for long-term weight management, and other prevention and treatment options.
The passage of TROA could lead to improved obesity care options because many private insurance companies model their covered health benefits to reflect Medicare.
You can help lawmakers understand the urgent need for expanded access to affordable, effective obesity treatments and how greater access to these tools will equip you to better care for your patients.
Use the new obesity advocacy toolkit to find the tools and resources you need, including an email template, sample phone script, op-ed template, and more, to assist you in reaching out to your elected officials and urging them to support the passage of TROA.
(TROA) (H.R. 4818/S. 2407). This legislation is a vital first step in expanding access to obesity treatment as it would expand Medicare coverage to include screening and treatment of obesity by a diverse range of health care providers who provide obesity care. The bill also includes coverage of behavioral counseling, prescription drugs for long-term weight management, and other prevention and treatment options.
The passage of TROA could lead to improved obesity care options because many private insurance companies model their covered health benefits to reflect Medicare.
You can help lawmakers understand the urgent need for expanded access to affordable, effective obesity treatments and how greater access to these tools will equip you to better care for your patients.
Use the new obesity advocacy toolkit to find the tools and resources you need, including an email template, sample phone script, op-ed template, and more, to assist you in reaching out to your elected officials and urging them to support the passage of TROA.
(TROA) (H.R. 4818/S. 2407). This legislation is a vital first step in expanding access to obesity treatment as it would expand Medicare coverage to include screening and treatment of obesity by a diverse range of health care providers who provide obesity care. The bill also includes coverage of behavioral counseling, prescription drugs for long-term weight management, and other prevention and treatment options.
The passage of TROA could lead to improved obesity care options because many private insurance companies model their covered health benefits to reflect Medicare.
You can help lawmakers understand the urgent need for expanded access to affordable, effective obesity treatments and how greater access to these tools will equip you to better care for your patients.
Use the new obesity advocacy toolkit to find the tools and resources you need, including an email template, sample phone script, op-ed template, and more, to assist you in reaching out to your elected officials and urging them to support the passage of TROA.
CHEST SEEK releases key points feature and new print edition
Two exciting updates have come to the CHEST SEEK™ portfolio this summer.
The latest book, CHEST SEEK™ Pulmonary Medicine: 33rd Edition, was released in August. And in this newest book and certain CHEST SEEK Library collections, a feature called key points is included in the recently published 150 pulmonary medicine questions.
Key points are concise summaries of the most important takeaways of SEEK questions. Knowing the key point can help learners focus their studies.
“SEEK questions can be quite robust and intentionally detailed in their response as to why the answer options are correct or incorrect. But because of the level of detail, it can be difficult at times for the learner to correctly hone in on the author’s teaching point,” said CHEST Director, Product Strategy and Evaluation, Martha Zaborowski Pascale, CPM.
“Key points concisely summarize each question’s most important details, potentially saving the learner study time.”
CHEST SEEK™ Pulmonary Medicine: 33rd Edition was developed from the pulmonary medicine board subspecialty examination content blueprints. It tests recall, interpretation, and problem-solving skills.
Rationales provide thorough explanations and reasoning for the correct and incorrect answers. Key points are easy to find at the bottom of the pages and in a tab within SEEK Library questions.
From a printed booklet to the classic book and subscription-based library, learners have engaged with case-based questions in multiple ways. As SEEK has transformed through the years, it’s continued to be a timeless, reliable study partner.
“SEEK has evolved in many ways over its 30-year history. As technologic involvement has permitted greater advances in imaging and data presentation, SEEK has sought to make such advances from the bedside as part of the SEEK experience,” said Pascale.
“The strength of peer-reviewed, expert-written content has remained the same, but modalities such as digital flash cards and behind-the-scenes peer review discussions have enhanced this enduring product in ways that help it stand the test of time.”
Based on CHEST evaluation data, more than 90% of SEEK learners said their practice will change based on content found in the library. Plus, more than 95% of SEEK learners agreed that SEEK question authors are effective instructors.
“The success of SEEK in the past and the ability of this tool to be adapted to the changing needs of learners makes one excited about the editions to come,” said Jesse B. Hall, MD, FCCP, SEEK Editor-in-Chief and Chair of CHEST SEEK™ Pulmonary Medicine: 33rd Edition.
Looking toward the future, SEEK will continue to develop and serve the needs of chest medicine clinicians.
“One of the joys of our professional lives is the constant new discoveries and trials that change the way we practice,” said SEEK Pulmonary Medicine Vice-Chair and Deputy Editor, Jess Mandel, MD.
“However, with this comes the challenge of keeping up and staying current as the field evolves. SEEK is a terrific resource for keeping up with changes in practice and the underlying data that justify them.”
Subscribe to the SEEK Library and find CHEST SEEK™ Pulmonary Medicine: 33rd Edition at chestnet.org/Learning-and-Events/Learning/Seek-App.
Two exciting updates have come to the CHEST SEEK™ portfolio this summer.
The latest book, CHEST SEEK™ Pulmonary Medicine: 33rd Edition, was released in August. And in this newest book and certain CHEST SEEK Library collections, a feature called key points is included in the recently published 150 pulmonary medicine questions.
Key points are concise summaries of the most important takeaways of SEEK questions. Knowing the key point can help learners focus their studies.
“SEEK questions can be quite robust and intentionally detailed in their response as to why the answer options are correct or incorrect. But because of the level of detail, it can be difficult at times for the learner to correctly hone in on the author’s teaching point,” said CHEST Director, Product Strategy and Evaluation, Martha Zaborowski Pascale, CPM.
“Key points concisely summarize each question’s most important details, potentially saving the learner study time.”
CHEST SEEK™ Pulmonary Medicine: 33rd Edition was developed from the pulmonary medicine board subspecialty examination content blueprints. It tests recall, interpretation, and problem-solving skills.
Rationales provide thorough explanations and reasoning for the correct and incorrect answers. Key points are easy to find at the bottom of the pages and in a tab within SEEK Library questions.
From a printed booklet to the classic book and subscription-based library, learners have engaged with case-based questions in multiple ways. As SEEK has transformed through the years, it’s continued to be a timeless, reliable study partner.
“SEEK has evolved in many ways over its 30-year history. As technologic involvement has permitted greater advances in imaging and data presentation, SEEK has sought to make such advances from the bedside as part of the SEEK experience,” said Pascale.
“The strength of peer-reviewed, expert-written content has remained the same, but modalities such as digital flash cards and behind-the-scenes peer review discussions have enhanced this enduring product in ways that help it stand the test of time.”
Based on CHEST evaluation data, more than 90% of SEEK learners said their practice will change based on content found in the library. Plus, more than 95% of SEEK learners agreed that SEEK question authors are effective instructors.
“The success of SEEK in the past and the ability of this tool to be adapted to the changing needs of learners makes one excited about the editions to come,” said Jesse B. Hall, MD, FCCP, SEEK Editor-in-Chief and Chair of CHEST SEEK™ Pulmonary Medicine: 33rd Edition.
Looking toward the future, SEEK will continue to develop and serve the needs of chest medicine clinicians.
“One of the joys of our professional lives is the constant new discoveries and trials that change the way we practice,” said SEEK Pulmonary Medicine Vice-Chair and Deputy Editor, Jess Mandel, MD.
“However, with this comes the challenge of keeping up and staying current as the field evolves. SEEK is a terrific resource for keeping up with changes in practice and the underlying data that justify them.”
Subscribe to the SEEK Library and find CHEST SEEK™ Pulmonary Medicine: 33rd Edition at chestnet.org/Learning-and-Events/Learning/Seek-App.
Two exciting updates have come to the CHEST SEEK™ portfolio this summer.
The latest book, CHEST SEEK™ Pulmonary Medicine: 33rd Edition, was released in August. And in this newest book and certain CHEST SEEK Library collections, a feature called key points is included in the recently published 150 pulmonary medicine questions.
Key points are concise summaries of the most important takeaways of SEEK questions. Knowing the key point can help learners focus their studies.
“SEEK questions can be quite robust and intentionally detailed in their response as to why the answer options are correct or incorrect. But because of the level of detail, it can be difficult at times for the learner to correctly hone in on the author’s teaching point,” said CHEST Director, Product Strategy and Evaluation, Martha Zaborowski Pascale, CPM.
“Key points concisely summarize each question’s most important details, potentially saving the learner study time.”
CHEST SEEK™ Pulmonary Medicine: 33rd Edition was developed from the pulmonary medicine board subspecialty examination content blueprints. It tests recall, interpretation, and problem-solving skills.
Rationales provide thorough explanations and reasoning for the correct and incorrect answers. Key points are easy to find at the bottom of the pages and in a tab within SEEK Library questions.
From a printed booklet to the classic book and subscription-based library, learners have engaged with case-based questions in multiple ways. As SEEK has transformed through the years, it’s continued to be a timeless, reliable study partner.
“SEEK has evolved in many ways over its 30-year history. As technologic involvement has permitted greater advances in imaging and data presentation, SEEK has sought to make such advances from the bedside as part of the SEEK experience,” said Pascale.
“The strength of peer-reviewed, expert-written content has remained the same, but modalities such as digital flash cards and behind-the-scenes peer review discussions have enhanced this enduring product in ways that help it stand the test of time.”
Based on CHEST evaluation data, more than 90% of SEEK learners said their practice will change based on content found in the library. Plus, more than 95% of SEEK learners agreed that SEEK question authors are effective instructors.
“The success of SEEK in the past and the ability of this tool to be adapted to the changing needs of learners makes one excited about the editions to come,” said Jesse B. Hall, MD, FCCP, SEEK Editor-in-Chief and Chair of CHEST SEEK™ Pulmonary Medicine: 33rd Edition.
Looking toward the future, SEEK will continue to develop and serve the needs of chest medicine clinicians.
“One of the joys of our professional lives is the constant new discoveries and trials that change the way we practice,” said SEEK Pulmonary Medicine Vice-Chair and Deputy Editor, Jess Mandel, MD.
“However, with this comes the challenge of keeping up and staying current as the field evolves. SEEK is a terrific resource for keeping up with changes in practice and the underlying data that justify them.”
Subscribe to the SEEK Library and find CHEST SEEK™ Pulmonary Medicine: 33rd Edition at chestnet.org/Learning-and-Events/Learning/Seek-App.