User login
Ustekinumab quells aortic inflammation in patients with severe psoriasis
SAN DIEGO – A 12-week course of ustekinumab significantly reduced inflammation in the aorta – an effect on par with the benefit of statins – in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Whether or not the reduction in aortic inflammation will translate into a reduction in cardiovascular risk remains to be determined, but investigators are very encouraged by the results of the Vascular Inflammation in Psoriasis-Ustekinumab (VIP-U) study, Joel M. Gelfand, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
For the past decade, researchers have worked on the assumption that the chronic systemic inflammation of severe psoriasis overlaps with similar inflammatory pathways that drive atherosclerosis, plaques that rupture, and cardiovascular events.
Recently, they have employed fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to confirm some of this. Studies in 2011, 2015, and 2017 confirm that patients with severe plaque psoriasis can develop diffuse vascular inflammation with increased noncalcified coronary artery plaques. These more fragile plaques are the type that are prone to rupture and cause cardiovascular events, Dr. Gelfand said.
“In these studies, the more imaging signal we saw in the aorta, the higher the risk of a future cardiovascular event. In fact, we determined that patients with severe psoriasis can have increased aortic inflammation equivalent to a decade of aging. As your PASI [Psoriasis Area and Severity Index] score goes up, so does the amount of aortic inflammation. The anatomic consequence is that people develop a high risk of atherosclerotic plaques, and a higher rate of noncalcified coronary plaques that are more likely to lead to these events.”
The VIP-U study was conceived to examine whether calming psoriatic inflammation with ustekinumab (Stelara), an anti interleukin-12 and -23 antibody, could also improve vascular inflammation as measured by FDG-PET. The small study comprised 43 patients, half of whom received placebo and half of whom received two injections of ustekinumab: 45 or 90 mg depending on weight, at baseline and at week 4. There was an imaging assessment at week 12, after which the placebo patients crossed over to open-label ustekinumab every 2 weeks. Everyone was followed out to 64 weeks.
Dr. Gelfand reported the 12-week data; the 64-week data will be forthcoming later this year, he said.
The patients were typical for such a study, with a mean age of about 43 and a mean disease duration of 18 years. The mean body surface area was about 25%, and the mean PASI was 20. Most had been on prior therapy, including phototherapy, oral agents, and biologics.
Unsurprisingly, ustekinumab was significantly more effective than placebo in treating the psoriasis. At week 12, 10% of the placebo patients had achieved a PASI 75, compared with 77% of the ustekinumab patients. A Physicians Global Assessment (PGA) score of clear or almost clear occurred in 10% of those taking placebo and 64% of those taking the biologic.
However, the drug was also highly effective in reducing total aortic inflammation, Dr. Gelfand said. “In just 12 weeks, we saw a 6.6% reduction in total aortic inflammation among those taking ustekinumab, but a 12.1% increase in inflammation among those taking placebo. When you compare the delta, you see a highly statistically significant improvement in aortic inflammation in ustekinumab-treated patients, with the effect size similar to statin therapy.”
The benefit may be a class-associated one. Two recent similar studies of adalimumab, a tumor necrosis factor–alpha inhibitor, failed to find any improvement in vascular inflammation, compared with placebo.
“We need more information about the longer-term effects of ustekinumab treatment, as well as cardiometabolic biomarkers, and these are currently underway,” Dr. Gelfand said. “We also need additional trials to determine if this effect is due to the inhibition of IL-12, IL-23, or a combination. Cardiovascular studies will be necessary to fully determine the clinical implications of our findings.”
To refer a patient into the VIP studies, call 215-662-SKIN or email SkinVIP@upenn.edu.
The National Institutes of Health and University of Pennsylvania sponsored the study. Dr. Gelfand reported no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Gelfand J et al. AAD 2018 Abstract 6645
SAN DIEGO – A 12-week course of ustekinumab significantly reduced inflammation in the aorta – an effect on par with the benefit of statins – in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Whether or not the reduction in aortic inflammation will translate into a reduction in cardiovascular risk remains to be determined, but investigators are very encouraged by the results of the Vascular Inflammation in Psoriasis-Ustekinumab (VIP-U) study, Joel M. Gelfand, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
For the past decade, researchers have worked on the assumption that the chronic systemic inflammation of severe psoriasis overlaps with similar inflammatory pathways that drive atherosclerosis, plaques that rupture, and cardiovascular events.
Recently, they have employed fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to confirm some of this. Studies in 2011, 2015, and 2017 confirm that patients with severe plaque psoriasis can develop diffuse vascular inflammation with increased noncalcified coronary artery plaques. These more fragile plaques are the type that are prone to rupture and cause cardiovascular events, Dr. Gelfand said.
“In these studies, the more imaging signal we saw in the aorta, the higher the risk of a future cardiovascular event. In fact, we determined that patients with severe psoriasis can have increased aortic inflammation equivalent to a decade of aging. As your PASI [Psoriasis Area and Severity Index] score goes up, so does the amount of aortic inflammation. The anatomic consequence is that people develop a high risk of atherosclerotic plaques, and a higher rate of noncalcified coronary plaques that are more likely to lead to these events.”
The VIP-U study was conceived to examine whether calming psoriatic inflammation with ustekinumab (Stelara), an anti interleukin-12 and -23 antibody, could also improve vascular inflammation as measured by FDG-PET. The small study comprised 43 patients, half of whom received placebo and half of whom received two injections of ustekinumab: 45 or 90 mg depending on weight, at baseline and at week 4. There was an imaging assessment at week 12, after which the placebo patients crossed over to open-label ustekinumab every 2 weeks. Everyone was followed out to 64 weeks.
Dr. Gelfand reported the 12-week data; the 64-week data will be forthcoming later this year, he said.
The patients were typical for such a study, with a mean age of about 43 and a mean disease duration of 18 years. The mean body surface area was about 25%, and the mean PASI was 20. Most had been on prior therapy, including phototherapy, oral agents, and biologics.
Unsurprisingly, ustekinumab was significantly more effective than placebo in treating the psoriasis. At week 12, 10% of the placebo patients had achieved a PASI 75, compared with 77% of the ustekinumab patients. A Physicians Global Assessment (PGA) score of clear or almost clear occurred in 10% of those taking placebo and 64% of those taking the biologic.
However, the drug was also highly effective in reducing total aortic inflammation, Dr. Gelfand said. “In just 12 weeks, we saw a 6.6% reduction in total aortic inflammation among those taking ustekinumab, but a 12.1% increase in inflammation among those taking placebo. When you compare the delta, you see a highly statistically significant improvement in aortic inflammation in ustekinumab-treated patients, with the effect size similar to statin therapy.”
The benefit may be a class-associated one. Two recent similar studies of adalimumab, a tumor necrosis factor–alpha inhibitor, failed to find any improvement in vascular inflammation, compared with placebo.
“We need more information about the longer-term effects of ustekinumab treatment, as well as cardiometabolic biomarkers, and these are currently underway,” Dr. Gelfand said. “We also need additional trials to determine if this effect is due to the inhibition of IL-12, IL-23, or a combination. Cardiovascular studies will be necessary to fully determine the clinical implications of our findings.”
To refer a patient into the VIP studies, call 215-662-SKIN or email SkinVIP@upenn.edu.
The National Institutes of Health and University of Pennsylvania sponsored the study. Dr. Gelfand reported no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Gelfand J et al. AAD 2018 Abstract 6645
SAN DIEGO – A 12-week course of ustekinumab significantly reduced inflammation in the aorta – an effect on par with the benefit of statins – in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Whether or not the reduction in aortic inflammation will translate into a reduction in cardiovascular risk remains to be determined, but investigators are very encouraged by the results of the Vascular Inflammation in Psoriasis-Ustekinumab (VIP-U) study, Joel M. Gelfand, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
For the past decade, researchers have worked on the assumption that the chronic systemic inflammation of severe psoriasis overlaps with similar inflammatory pathways that drive atherosclerosis, plaques that rupture, and cardiovascular events.
Recently, they have employed fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to confirm some of this. Studies in 2011, 2015, and 2017 confirm that patients with severe plaque psoriasis can develop diffuse vascular inflammation with increased noncalcified coronary artery plaques. These more fragile plaques are the type that are prone to rupture and cause cardiovascular events, Dr. Gelfand said.
“In these studies, the more imaging signal we saw in the aorta, the higher the risk of a future cardiovascular event. In fact, we determined that patients with severe psoriasis can have increased aortic inflammation equivalent to a decade of aging. As your PASI [Psoriasis Area and Severity Index] score goes up, so does the amount of aortic inflammation. The anatomic consequence is that people develop a high risk of atherosclerotic plaques, and a higher rate of noncalcified coronary plaques that are more likely to lead to these events.”
The VIP-U study was conceived to examine whether calming psoriatic inflammation with ustekinumab (Stelara), an anti interleukin-12 and -23 antibody, could also improve vascular inflammation as measured by FDG-PET. The small study comprised 43 patients, half of whom received placebo and half of whom received two injections of ustekinumab: 45 or 90 mg depending on weight, at baseline and at week 4. There was an imaging assessment at week 12, after which the placebo patients crossed over to open-label ustekinumab every 2 weeks. Everyone was followed out to 64 weeks.
Dr. Gelfand reported the 12-week data; the 64-week data will be forthcoming later this year, he said.
The patients were typical for such a study, with a mean age of about 43 and a mean disease duration of 18 years. The mean body surface area was about 25%, and the mean PASI was 20. Most had been on prior therapy, including phototherapy, oral agents, and biologics.
Unsurprisingly, ustekinumab was significantly more effective than placebo in treating the psoriasis. At week 12, 10% of the placebo patients had achieved a PASI 75, compared with 77% of the ustekinumab patients. A Physicians Global Assessment (PGA) score of clear or almost clear occurred in 10% of those taking placebo and 64% of those taking the biologic.
However, the drug was also highly effective in reducing total aortic inflammation, Dr. Gelfand said. “In just 12 weeks, we saw a 6.6% reduction in total aortic inflammation among those taking ustekinumab, but a 12.1% increase in inflammation among those taking placebo. When you compare the delta, you see a highly statistically significant improvement in aortic inflammation in ustekinumab-treated patients, with the effect size similar to statin therapy.”
The benefit may be a class-associated one. Two recent similar studies of adalimumab, a tumor necrosis factor–alpha inhibitor, failed to find any improvement in vascular inflammation, compared with placebo.
“We need more information about the longer-term effects of ustekinumab treatment, as well as cardiometabolic biomarkers, and these are currently underway,” Dr. Gelfand said. “We also need additional trials to determine if this effect is due to the inhibition of IL-12, IL-23, or a combination. Cardiovascular studies will be necessary to fully determine the clinical implications of our findings.”
To refer a patient into the VIP studies, call 215-662-SKIN or email SkinVIP@upenn.edu.
The National Institutes of Health and University of Pennsylvania sponsored the study. Dr. Gelfand reported no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Gelfand J et al. AAD 2018 Abstract 6645
REPORTING FROM AAD 2018
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Aortic inflammation decreased by 6.6% in those taking ustekinumab, but increased by 12.1% in those taking placebo.
Study details: The randomized trial comprised 43 patients.
Disclosures: The National Institutes of Health and University of Pennsylvania sponsored the study. Dr. Gelfand made no financial disclosures.
Source: Gelfand J et al. AAD 2018 Abstract 6645.
VIDEO: With new therapies available, it’s the ‘decade of eczema,’ researcher says
SAN DIEGO – A long dry spell in the development of new atopic dermatitis (AD) medications came to an end in 2016 with the approval of a topical treatment, and last year brought the first biologic for AD to the market. With more targets and potential treatments being studied, “it’s the decade of eczema,” according to a leading researcher.
And I think we’ll have many more approvals in the next few years,” said Emma Guttman, MD, PhD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, where she was presenting a talk on the translational revolution in atopic dermatitis.
In the interview, she also discussed research showing that children with AD don’t have the same distribution of lesions as adults, and a study of young children, which found that during an early stage of the disease, when compared with adults, they showed much higher increases in Th17 similar to that seen in psoriasis. It will be interesting to see if “some drugs that work for psoriasis may work in children,” said Dr. Guttman, professor of dermatology and director of the laboratory of inflammatory skin diseases at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.
Dr. Guttman disclosed research support, consulting, or lecture fees from Regeneron, Sanofi, Pfizer, and other companies developing AD treatments.
SAN DIEGO – A long dry spell in the development of new atopic dermatitis (AD) medications came to an end in 2016 with the approval of a topical treatment, and last year brought the first biologic for AD to the market. With more targets and potential treatments being studied, “it’s the decade of eczema,” according to a leading researcher.
And I think we’ll have many more approvals in the next few years,” said Emma Guttman, MD, PhD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, where she was presenting a talk on the translational revolution in atopic dermatitis.
In the interview, she also discussed research showing that children with AD don’t have the same distribution of lesions as adults, and a study of young children, which found that during an early stage of the disease, when compared with adults, they showed much higher increases in Th17 similar to that seen in psoriasis. It will be interesting to see if “some drugs that work for psoriasis may work in children,” said Dr. Guttman, professor of dermatology and director of the laboratory of inflammatory skin diseases at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.
Dr. Guttman disclosed research support, consulting, or lecture fees from Regeneron, Sanofi, Pfizer, and other companies developing AD treatments.
SAN DIEGO – A long dry spell in the development of new atopic dermatitis (AD) medications came to an end in 2016 with the approval of a topical treatment, and last year brought the first biologic for AD to the market. With more targets and potential treatments being studied, “it’s the decade of eczema,” according to a leading researcher.
And I think we’ll have many more approvals in the next few years,” said Emma Guttman, MD, PhD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, where she was presenting a talk on the translational revolution in atopic dermatitis.
In the interview, she also discussed research showing that children with AD don’t have the same distribution of lesions as adults, and a study of young children, which found that during an early stage of the disease, when compared with adults, they showed much higher increases in Th17 similar to that seen in psoriasis. It will be interesting to see if “some drugs that work for psoriasis may work in children,” said Dr. Guttman, professor of dermatology and director of the laboratory of inflammatory skin diseases at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.
Dr. Guttman disclosed research support, consulting, or lecture fees from Regeneron, Sanofi, Pfizer, and other companies developing AD treatments.
REPORTING FROM AAD 18
Biologics have best chance of achieving PASI 90 in psoriasis
The biologics ixekizumab, secukinumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, certolizumab pegol, and ustekinumab provide the best chances for achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 when compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, according to Emilie Sbidian, MD, and her associates.
Dr. Sbidian of Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France, and her colleagues conducted a network meta-analysis of 109 randomized, controlled trials that collectively had a total of 39,882 participants. The results showed that all of the interventions appeared superior to placebo in terms of reaching PASI 90.
The investigators also found that there was no significant difference between the three anti–IL-17 agents (brodalumab, ixekizumab, and secukinumab) and the two anti–IL-23 (tildrakizumab and guselkumab) monoclonal antibodies in terms of reaching PASI 90. However, all of the anti–IL-17 drugs (brodalumab, ixekizumab, and secukinumab) and guselkumab (an anti–IL-23) were significantly more effective than three anti–TNF-alpha agents (infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept).
Additionally, in the network meta-analysis, anti–IL-17 drugs were the best for achieving PASI 90, compared with placebo (RR, 30.81), followed by anti–IL-12/23 (RR, 23.16), anti–IL-23 (RR, 16.53), and anti–TNF-alpha (RR, 11.58). At the individual drug level, results showed ixekizumab was the best treatment for attaining PASI 90 when compared with placebo (RR, 32.45), followed by secukinumab (RR, 26.55), brodalumab (RR, 25.45), guselkumab (RR, 21.03), certolizumab pegol (RR, 24.58), and ustekinumab (RR, 19.91). The investigators found that “there was no significant difference between all of the interventions and the placebo regarding the risk of serious adverse effects.”
“Our main results do not reflect the way patients are managed in ‘real life,’ ” the researchers concluded. “Currently, biological treatments have been positioned as third-line therapies by regulatory bodies, with mandatory reimbursement criteria that patients must meet before being considered for these treatments (moderate to severe disease after failure, intolerance or contraindication to conventional systemic agents).”
SOURCE: Sbidian E et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
The biologics ixekizumab, secukinumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, certolizumab pegol, and ustekinumab provide the best chances for achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 when compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, according to Emilie Sbidian, MD, and her associates.
Dr. Sbidian of Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France, and her colleagues conducted a network meta-analysis of 109 randomized, controlled trials that collectively had a total of 39,882 participants. The results showed that all of the interventions appeared superior to placebo in terms of reaching PASI 90.
The investigators also found that there was no significant difference between the three anti–IL-17 agents (brodalumab, ixekizumab, and secukinumab) and the two anti–IL-23 (tildrakizumab and guselkumab) monoclonal antibodies in terms of reaching PASI 90. However, all of the anti–IL-17 drugs (brodalumab, ixekizumab, and secukinumab) and guselkumab (an anti–IL-23) were significantly more effective than three anti–TNF-alpha agents (infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept).
Additionally, in the network meta-analysis, anti–IL-17 drugs were the best for achieving PASI 90, compared with placebo (RR, 30.81), followed by anti–IL-12/23 (RR, 23.16), anti–IL-23 (RR, 16.53), and anti–TNF-alpha (RR, 11.58). At the individual drug level, results showed ixekizumab was the best treatment for attaining PASI 90 when compared with placebo (RR, 32.45), followed by secukinumab (RR, 26.55), brodalumab (RR, 25.45), guselkumab (RR, 21.03), certolizumab pegol (RR, 24.58), and ustekinumab (RR, 19.91). The investigators found that “there was no significant difference between all of the interventions and the placebo regarding the risk of serious adverse effects.”
“Our main results do not reflect the way patients are managed in ‘real life,’ ” the researchers concluded. “Currently, biological treatments have been positioned as third-line therapies by regulatory bodies, with mandatory reimbursement criteria that patients must meet before being considered for these treatments (moderate to severe disease after failure, intolerance or contraindication to conventional systemic agents).”
SOURCE: Sbidian E et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
The biologics ixekizumab, secukinumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, certolizumab pegol, and ustekinumab provide the best chances for achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 when compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, according to Emilie Sbidian, MD, and her associates.
Dr. Sbidian of Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France, and her colleagues conducted a network meta-analysis of 109 randomized, controlled trials that collectively had a total of 39,882 participants. The results showed that all of the interventions appeared superior to placebo in terms of reaching PASI 90.
The investigators also found that there was no significant difference between the three anti–IL-17 agents (brodalumab, ixekizumab, and secukinumab) and the two anti–IL-23 (tildrakizumab and guselkumab) monoclonal antibodies in terms of reaching PASI 90. However, all of the anti–IL-17 drugs (brodalumab, ixekizumab, and secukinumab) and guselkumab (an anti–IL-23) were significantly more effective than three anti–TNF-alpha agents (infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept).
Additionally, in the network meta-analysis, anti–IL-17 drugs were the best for achieving PASI 90, compared with placebo (RR, 30.81), followed by anti–IL-12/23 (RR, 23.16), anti–IL-23 (RR, 16.53), and anti–TNF-alpha (RR, 11.58). At the individual drug level, results showed ixekizumab was the best treatment for attaining PASI 90 when compared with placebo (RR, 32.45), followed by secukinumab (RR, 26.55), brodalumab (RR, 25.45), guselkumab (RR, 21.03), certolizumab pegol (RR, 24.58), and ustekinumab (RR, 19.91). The investigators found that “there was no significant difference between all of the interventions and the placebo regarding the risk of serious adverse effects.”
“Our main results do not reflect the way patients are managed in ‘real life,’ ” the researchers concluded. “Currently, biological treatments have been positioned as third-line therapies by regulatory bodies, with mandatory reimbursement criteria that patients must meet before being considered for these treatments (moderate to severe disease after failure, intolerance or contraindication to conventional systemic agents).”
SOURCE: Sbidian E et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
FROM COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
Risankizumab outpaced ustekinumab for complete clearance of plaque psoriasis
SAN DIEGO – Risankizumab outperformed ustekinumab in two phase 3 trials investigating the IL-23 blocker for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
In two year-long studies, 56% and 59% of those taking risankizumab and 21% and 30% of those taking ustekinumab achieved completely clear skin, Kenneth B. Gordon, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
“One of the things we are striving for now is complete skin clearance,” said Dr. Gordon, chair of the dermatology department the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. “In the past, people have said that it wasn’t important to reach that, yet here we are, getting more than 50% of patients to that point.”
Risankizumab is an investigational monoclonal antibody that selectively blocks IL-23, a key inflammatory protein. The drug is also in phase 3 trials for Crohn's disease, and being investigated for psoriatic arthritis. AbbVie, which is developing risankizumab, plans future trials for treating ulcerative colitis.
Dr. Gordon reported the results of UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2, identical three-armed studies that randomized a total of 797 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis to risankizumab 150 mg, ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg (based on weight), or to a crossover group that took placebo for the first 16 weeks of the study and then were switched to risankizumab 150 mg for the remainder of the study. Study drugs were delivered at weeks 0, 4, 16, 28, and 40.
The coprimary endpoints were at least a 90% improvement in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index score (PASI 90) at week 16 and a score of 0 or 1 on the Static Physicians’ Assessment scale (sPGA 0/1) at week 16, compared with placebo. Key secondary endpoints compared risankizumab with ustekinumab: PASI 90, sPGA score of clear (sPGA 0), sPGA 0/1, and Dermatology Quality of Life (DLQI) score of 0/1 at week 16, and PASI 90, PASI 100 and sPGA 0 at week 52.
In both trials, patients were 48 years old on average; about 20% had severe plaque psoriasis. The mean PASI score was about 20 at trial entry. Prior therapy included biologics in 30%-43%, depending on the trial, and TNF-alpha inhibitors in about 25%.
Patient retention in the study was good, Dr. Gordon noted, with 95% of risankizumab patients still taking the drug at 52 weeks. Patients also stayed on ustekinumab, with 94% of UltIMMa-1 patients and 91% of UltIMMa-2 patients still taking the drug at 52 weeks.
At week 16, risankizumab was clearly superior to placebo in both endpoints. In both studies, 75% of actively treated patients achieved PASI 90, compared to 5% of those taking placebo. In UltIMMa-1, a clear or almost clear sPGA was seen in 88% of risankizumab patients as compared to 8% of those taking placebo. In UltIMMa-2, these numbers were 84% and 5%, respectively.
In the secondary comparison of the two active drugs, risankizumab significantly outperformed ustekinumab on PASI90 at 16 weeks in UltIMMa-1 (75% vs. 42%) and in UltIMMa-2 (75% vs. 47%). The PASI90 outcomes similarly favored risankizumab at 52 weeks in UltIMMa-1 (82% vs. 44%) and in UltIMMa-2 (81% vs. 50%).
As compared with ustekinumab, risankizumab aced the secondary endpoint of complete skin clearance in UltIMMa-1 and (36% vs. 12%) and UltIMMa-2 (51% vs. 24%). The results similarly favored risankizumab at 52 weeks in both trials (56% vs. 21% and 59% vs. 30%).
Another secondary endpoint looked at how the crossover group fared. At week 51, the PASI90 for this group was 78% in UltIMMa-1 and 85% in UltIMMa-2; the PASI100 at 52 weeks for these patients was 55% and 67%.
A responder time curve demonstrated just how quickly the crossover patients made up for lost time after switching to risankizumab. Although these patients made no progress toward disease clearance during their placebo period, they quickly caught up with the primary risankizumab group. At 16 weeks, 5% in this group had a PASI 90; by week 28, 51% did; and by week 52, PASI 90 topped out at 78%.
“The time course seen in this trial is very important,” Dr. Gordon said. “By 8 weeks, almost 44% [of the primary risankizumab group] was already at PASI90. They reached an extremely high level of response that was very consistent over 1 year. In the ustekinumab group, we saw some saw-toothing of response, indicating that people were losing effectiveness at the end of the dosing period. With risankizumab, we did not see that, indicating that the once every 12 weeks dosing period is effective.”
The DLQI 0/1 outcome occurred at 16 and 52 weeks in significantly more patients taking risankizumab in both studies. By week 52 in UltIMMa-1, 75% of patients on risankizumab had achieved a DLQ1 0/1, compared with 47% of the ustekinumab group. In UltIMMa-2, these numbers were 71% and 44%, with the crossover group posting scores similar to the primary risankizumab group in both studies (62% and 68%).
Risankizumab proved safe and well tolerated, Dr. Gordon said. Less than 1% of patients discontinued the medication due to an adverse event. In both the UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2 trials, the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse event in the risankizumab groups was upper respiratory tract infection. In UltIMMa-1, one patient receiving risankizumab presented with latent tuberculosis and was treated with rifampicin. There were no new cases of tuberculosis.
The serious adverse event rate hovered between 2%-3% in both trials. The rate of serious infection was 1%. The rate of malignancy was 0.3%, but fell to 0 when nonmelanoma skin cancer was excluded. There were no major cardiovascular events.
"Not only do these data show significant rates of clear skin, but because we know the burden of psoriasis extends beyond the skin, we are encouraged by the patient-reported improvement in quality of life after one year of treatment," he said. "Given the significant impact of psoriasis, it is important to continue to investigate additional treatment options."
AbbVie sponsored the trials. Dr. Gordon is a consultant for the company.
SOURCE: Gordon et al. AAD, Abstract 6495
SAN DIEGO – Risankizumab outperformed ustekinumab in two phase 3 trials investigating the IL-23 blocker for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
In two year-long studies, 56% and 59% of those taking risankizumab and 21% and 30% of those taking ustekinumab achieved completely clear skin, Kenneth B. Gordon, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
“One of the things we are striving for now is complete skin clearance,” said Dr. Gordon, chair of the dermatology department the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. “In the past, people have said that it wasn’t important to reach that, yet here we are, getting more than 50% of patients to that point.”
Risankizumab is an investigational monoclonal antibody that selectively blocks IL-23, a key inflammatory protein. The drug is also in phase 3 trials for Crohn's disease, and being investigated for psoriatic arthritis. AbbVie, which is developing risankizumab, plans future trials for treating ulcerative colitis.
Dr. Gordon reported the results of UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2, identical three-armed studies that randomized a total of 797 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis to risankizumab 150 mg, ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg (based on weight), or to a crossover group that took placebo for the first 16 weeks of the study and then were switched to risankizumab 150 mg for the remainder of the study. Study drugs were delivered at weeks 0, 4, 16, 28, and 40.
The coprimary endpoints were at least a 90% improvement in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index score (PASI 90) at week 16 and a score of 0 or 1 on the Static Physicians’ Assessment scale (sPGA 0/1) at week 16, compared with placebo. Key secondary endpoints compared risankizumab with ustekinumab: PASI 90, sPGA score of clear (sPGA 0), sPGA 0/1, and Dermatology Quality of Life (DLQI) score of 0/1 at week 16, and PASI 90, PASI 100 and sPGA 0 at week 52.
In both trials, patients were 48 years old on average; about 20% had severe plaque psoriasis. The mean PASI score was about 20 at trial entry. Prior therapy included biologics in 30%-43%, depending on the trial, and TNF-alpha inhibitors in about 25%.
Patient retention in the study was good, Dr. Gordon noted, with 95% of risankizumab patients still taking the drug at 52 weeks. Patients also stayed on ustekinumab, with 94% of UltIMMa-1 patients and 91% of UltIMMa-2 patients still taking the drug at 52 weeks.
At week 16, risankizumab was clearly superior to placebo in both endpoints. In both studies, 75% of actively treated patients achieved PASI 90, compared to 5% of those taking placebo. In UltIMMa-1, a clear or almost clear sPGA was seen in 88% of risankizumab patients as compared to 8% of those taking placebo. In UltIMMa-2, these numbers were 84% and 5%, respectively.
In the secondary comparison of the two active drugs, risankizumab significantly outperformed ustekinumab on PASI90 at 16 weeks in UltIMMa-1 (75% vs. 42%) and in UltIMMa-2 (75% vs. 47%). The PASI90 outcomes similarly favored risankizumab at 52 weeks in UltIMMa-1 (82% vs. 44%) and in UltIMMa-2 (81% vs. 50%).
As compared with ustekinumab, risankizumab aced the secondary endpoint of complete skin clearance in UltIMMa-1 and (36% vs. 12%) and UltIMMa-2 (51% vs. 24%). The results similarly favored risankizumab at 52 weeks in both trials (56% vs. 21% and 59% vs. 30%).
Another secondary endpoint looked at how the crossover group fared. At week 51, the PASI90 for this group was 78% in UltIMMa-1 and 85% in UltIMMa-2; the PASI100 at 52 weeks for these patients was 55% and 67%.
A responder time curve demonstrated just how quickly the crossover patients made up for lost time after switching to risankizumab. Although these patients made no progress toward disease clearance during their placebo period, they quickly caught up with the primary risankizumab group. At 16 weeks, 5% in this group had a PASI 90; by week 28, 51% did; and by week 52, PASI 90 topped out at 78%.
“The time course seen in this trial is very important,” Dr. Gordon said. “By 8 weeks, almost 44% [of the primary risankizumab group] was already at PASI90. They reached an extremely high level of response that was very consistent over 1 year. In the ustekinumab group, we saw some saw-toothing of response, indicating that people were losing effectiveness at the end of the dosing period. With risankizumab, we did not see that, indicating that the once every 12 weeks dosing period is effective.”
The DLQI 0/1 outcome occurred at 16 and 52 weeks in significantly more patients taking risankizumab in both studies. By week 52 in UltIMMa-1, 75% of patients on risankizumab had achieved a DLQ1 0/1, compared with 47% of the ustekinumab group. In UltIMMa-2, these numbers were 71% and 44%, with the crossover group posting scores similar to the primary risankizumab group in both studies (62% and 68%).
Risankizumab proved safe and well tolerated, Dr. Gordon said. Less than 1% of patients discontinued the medication due to an adverse event. In both the UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2 trials, the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse event in the risankizumab groups was upper respiratory tract infection. In UltIMMa-1, one patient receiving risankizumab presented with latent tuberculosis and was treated with rifampicin. There were no new cases of tuberculosis.
The serious adverse event rate hovered between 2%-3% in both trials. The rate of serious infection was 1%. The rate of malignancy was 0.3%, but fell to 0 when nonmelanoma skin cancer was excluded. There were no major cardiovascular events.
"Not only do these data show significant rates of clear skin, but because we know the burden of psoriasis extends beyond the skin, we are encouraged by the patient-reported improvement in quality of life after one year of treatment," he said. "Given the significant impact of psoriasis, it is important to continue to investigate additional treatment options."
AbbVie sponsored the trials. Dr. Gordon is a consultant for the company.
SOURCE: Gordon et al. AAD, Abstract 6495
SAN DIEGO – Risankizumab outperformed ustekinumab in two phase 3 trials investigating the IL-23 blocker for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
In two year-long studies, 56% and 59% of those taking risankizumab and 21% and 30% of those taking ustekinumab achieved completely clear skin, Kenneth B. Gordon, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
“One of the things we are striving for now is complete skin clearance,” said Dr. Gordon, chair of the dermatology department the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. “In the past, people have said that it wasn’t important to reach that, yet here we are, getting more than 50% of patients to that point.”
Risankizumab is an investigational monoclonal antibody that selectively blocks IL-23, a key inflammatory protein. The drug is also in phase 3 trials for Crohn's disease, and being investigated for psoriatic arthritis. AbbVie, which is developing risankizumab, plans future trials for treating ulcerative colitis.
Dr. Gordon reported the results of UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2, identical three-armed studies that randomized a total of 797 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis to risankizumab 150 mg, ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg (based on weight), or to a crossover group that took placebo for the first 16 weeks of the study and then were switched to risankizumab 150 mg for the remainder of the study. Study drugs were delivered at weeks 0, 4, 16, 28, and 40.
The coprimary endpoints were at least a 90% improvement in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index score (PASI 90) at week 16 and a score of 0 or 1 on the Static Physicians’ Assessment scale (sPGA 0/1) at week 16, compared with placebo. Key secondary endpoints compared risankizumab with ustekinumab: PASI 90, sPGA score of clear (sPGA 0), sPGA 0/1, and Dermatology Quality of Life (DLQI) score of 0/1 at week 16, and PASI 90, PASI 100 and sPGA 0 at week 52.
In both trials, patients were 48 years old on average; about 20% had severe plaque psoriasis. The mean PASI score was about 20 at trial entry. Prior therapy included biologics in 30%-43%, depending on the trial, and TNF-alpha inhibitors in about 25%.
Patient retention in the study was good, Dr. Gordon noted, with 95% of risankizumab patients still taking the drug at 52 weeks. Patients also stayed on ustekinumab, with 94% of UltIMMa-1 patients and 91% of UltIMMa-2 patients still taking the drug at 52 weeks.
At week 16, risankizumab was clearly superior to placebo in both endpoints. In both studies, 75% of actively treated patients achieved PASI 90, compared to 5% of those taking placebo. In UltIMMa-1, a clear or almost clear sPGA was seen in 88% of risankizumab patients as compared to 8% of those taking placebo. In UltIMMa-2, these numbers were 84% and 5%, respectively.
In the secondary comparison of the two active drugs, risankizumab significantly outperformed ustekinumab on PASI90 at 16 weeks in UltIMMa-1 (75% vs. 42%) and in UltIMMa-2 (75% vs. 47%). The PASI90 outcomes similarly favored risankizumab at 52 weeks in UltIMMa-1 (82% vs. 44%) and in UltIMMa-2 (81% vs. 50%).
As compared with ustekinumab, risankizumab aced the secondary endpoint of complete skin clearance in UltIMMa-1 and (36% vs. 12%) and UltIMMa-2 (51% vs. 24%). The results similarly favored risankizumab at 52 weeks in both trials (56% vs. 21% and 59% vs. 30%).
Another secondary endpoint looked at how the crossover group fared. At week 51, the PASI90 for this group was 78% in UltIMMa-1 and 85% in UltIMMa-2; the PASI100 at 52 weeks for these patients was 55% and 67%.
A responder time curve demonstrated just how quickly the crossover patients made up for lost time after switching to risankizumab. Although these patients made no progress toward disease clearance during their placebo period, they quickly caught up with the primary risankizumab group. At 16 weeks, 5% in this group had a PASI 90; by week 28, 51% did; and by week 52, PASI 90 topped out at 78%.
“The time course seen in this trial is very important,” Dr. Gordon said. “By 8 weeks, almost 44% [of the primary risankizumab group] was already at PASI90. They reached an extremely high level of response that was very consistent over 1 year. In the ustekinumab group, we saw some saw-toothing of response, indicating that people were losing effectiveness at the end of the dosing period. With risankizumab, we did not see that, indicating that the once every 12 weeks dosing period is effective.”
The DLQI 0/1 outcome occurred at 16 and 52 weeks in significantly more patients taking risankizumab in both studies. By week 52 in UltIMMa-1, 75% of patients on risankizumab had achieved a DLQ1 0/1, compared with 47% of the ustekinumab group. In UltIMMa-2, these numbers were 71% and 44%, with the crossover group posting scores similar to the primary risankizumab group in both studies (62% and 68%).
Risankizumab proved safe and well tolerated, Dr. Gordon said. Less than 1% of patients discontinued the medication due to an adverse event. In both the UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2 trials, the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse event in the risankizumab groups was upper respiratory tract infection. In UltIMMa-1, one patient receiving risankizumab presented with latent tuberculosis and was treated with rifampicin. There were no new cases of tuberculosis.
The serious adverse event rate hovered between 2%-3% in both trials. The rate of serious infection was 1%. The rate of malignancy was 0.3%, but fell to 0 when nonmelanoma skin cancer was excluded. There were no major cardiovascular events.
"Not only do these data show significant rates of clear skin, but because we know the burden of psoriasis extends beyond the skin, we are encouraged by the patient-reported improvement in quality of life after one year of treatment," he said. "Given the significant impact of psoriasis, it is important to continue to investigate additional treatment options."
AbbVie sponsored the trials. Dr. Gordon is a consultant for the company.
SOURCE: Gordon et al. AAD, Abstract 6495
REPORTING FROM AAD 18
Key clinical point: Risankizumab outperformed placebo and the active comparator ustekinumab.
Major finding: In the two studies, 56% and 59% of those taking risankizumab had clear skin as compared to 21% and 30% of those taking ustekinumab.
Study details: The twin placebo-crossover active comparator trials randomized 797 patients.
Disclosures: AbbVie sponsored the studies. Dr. Gordon is a consultant for the company.
Source: Gordon et al. AAD abstract 6495
Biologics gaining traction in children with moderate to severe psoriasis
SAN DIEGO – Systemic therapies are increasingly being used for children with moderate to severe psoriasis; methotrexate is still the mainstay of systemic treatment, but biologics appear to achieve superior results with fewer side effects, Amy S. Paller, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Etanercept was approved in 2016 for children ages 6 and up, and ustekinumab was approved for use in patients aged 12 years or older in October 2017. Ongoing trials are examining adalimumab, apremilast, ustekinumab, and ixekizumab for use in adolescents and younger children. Trials are also being planned for other therapies that inhibit the Th17/IL-23 pathway, said Dr. Paller, the Walter J. Hamlin Professor and chair of dermatology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago.
Further, the study found that biologic agents, primarily etanercept, were used by 27%, acitretin by nearly 15%, cyclosporine by about 8%, and fumaric acid esters by 5%. More than 1 medication was used by 19%, according to the study results.
Adverse events affected the ability to tolerate therapy, and methotrexate and biologic agents were taken for a mean duration that was 2-fold greater than the mean duration for cyclosporine or fumaric acid esters. “A prospective registry is needed to track the long-term risks of systemic agents for pediatric psoriasis,” the authors concluded.
Dr. Paller reported that, in her practice, "we're still primarily using methotrexate. It takes time to see an effect with methotrexate, and you have to let people know this up front.” She pointed to a 2015 single-site prospective study of 25 children that found just 40% achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 at 12 weeks, with that number rising to 80% by 36 weeks. (J Derm Treat 2015; 26: 406-12)
Dr. Paller recommends baseline and annual TB testing, updated vaccinations and pregnancy counseling for all patients taking immunosuppressant therapies.
"I don't use a lot of retinoids for plaque psoriasis in kids," Dr. Paller said, "but for pustular psoriasis, I use (them) quite a bit. The beauty of retinoids is that they are not immunosuppressants, and you can start and stop them without loss of efficacy. There are many potential side effects, primarily skin and mucosal dryness."
Cyclosporine "has the greatest potential toxicity, which leaves it lower on the therapeutic ladder," Dr. Paller said. "But it has a pretty good safety record. The nice thing we can say is that (cyclosporine has) been around a long time. We have decades of experience in children, and we're using a low dose."
Benefits of biologics include convenience, infrequent dosing, and, potentially, fewer lab tests, Dr. Paller said. She added that there's no consensus about whether lab tests beyond annual TB tests are a good idea for patients on biologics.
Long-term risks are unclear, however, and drug holidays could spell trouble for efficacy when kids return to the medications.
Dr. Paller noted that biologics can cost tens of thousands of dollars for several weeks of treatment, and insurers may not cover them.
A 2014 meta-analysis of 48 randomized, controlled trials of 16,696 adult patients with psoriasis put biologics as the most effective therapies, with infliximab at the top (risk difference 76%), followed by adalimumab (RD 61%) and ustekinumab (RD 63%).
“These biologics are more effective than etanercept and all conventional treatments. Head-to-head trials indicate the superiority of adalimumab and infliximab over methotrexate (MTX), the superiority of ustekinumab over etanercept …” the meta-analysis concluded. (Br J Dermatol. 2014 Feb;170(2):274-303)
Dr. Paller disclosed that she is an investigator for Abbvie; Celgene; Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo Foundation; Novartis. She is a consultant with honorarium for Amgen; Celgene; Eli Lilly; and Novartis.
SOURCE: Paller, A. et al, Session F025 Update on systemic therapies and emerging treatments
SAN DIEGO – Systemic therapies are increasingly being used for children with moderate to severe psoriasis; methotrexate is still the mainstay of systemic treatment, but biologics appear to achieve superior results with fewer side effects, Amy S. Paller, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Etanercept was approved in 2016 for children ages 6 and up, and ustekinumab was approved for use in patients aged 12 years or older in October 2017. Ongoing trials are examining adalimumab, apremilast, ustekinumab, and ixekizumab for use in adolescents and younger children. Trials are also being planned for other therapies that inhibit the Th17/IL-23 pathway, said Dr. Paller, the Walter J. Hamlin Professor and chair of dermatology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago.
Further, the study found that biologic agents, primarily etanercept, were used by 27%, acitretin by nearly 15%, cyclosporine by about 8%, and fumaric acid esters by 5%. More than 1 medication was used by 19%, according to the study results.
Adverse events affected the ability to tolerate therapy, and methotrexate and biologic agents were taken for a mean duration that was 2-fold greater than the mean duration for cyclosporine or fumaric acid esters. “A prospective registry is needed to track the long-term risks of systemic agents for pediatric psoriasis,” the authors concluded.
Dr. Paller reported that, in her practice, "we're still primarily using methotrexate. It takes time to see an effect with methotrexate, and you have to let people know this up front.” She pointed to a 2015 single-site prospective study of 25 children that found just 40% achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 at 12 weeks, with that number rising to 80% by 36 weeks. (J Derm Treat 2015; 26: 406-12)
Dr. Paller recommends baseline and annual TB testing, updated vaccinations and pregnancy counseling for all patients taking immunosuppressant therapies.
"I don't use a lot of retinoids for plaque psoriasis in kids," Dr. Paller said, "but for pustular psoriasis, I use (them) quite a bit. The beauty of retinoids is that they are not immunosuppressants, and you can start and stop them without loss of efficacy. There are many potential side effects, primarily skin and mucosal dryness."
Cyclosporine "has the greatest potential toxicity, which leaves it lower on the therapeutic ladder," Dr. Paller said. "But it has a pretty good safety record. The nice thing we can say is that (cyclosporine has) been around a long time. We have decades of experience in children, and we're using a low dose."
Benefits of biologics include convenience, infrequent dosing, and, potentially, fewer lab tests, Dr. Paller said. She added that there's no consensus about whether lab tests beyond annual TB tests are a good idea for patients on biologics.
Long-term risks are unclear, however, and drug holidays could spell trouble for efficacy when kids return to the medications.
Dr. Paller noted that biologics can cost tens of thousands of dollars for several weeks of treatment, and insurers may not cover them.
A 2014 meta-analysis of 48 randomized, controlled trials of 16,696 adult patients with psoriasis put biologics as the most effective therapies, with infliximab at the top (risk difference 76%), followed by adalimumab (RD 61%) and ustekinumab (RD 63%).
“These biologics are more effective than etanercept and all conventional treatments. Head-to-head trials indicate the superiority of adalimumab and infliximab over methotrexate (MTX), the superiority of ustekinumab over etanercept …” the meta-analysis concluded. (Br J Dermatol. 2014 Feb;170(2):274-303)
Dr. Paller disclosed that she is an investigator for Abbvie; Celgene; Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo Foundation; Novartis. She is a consultant with honorarium for Amgen; Celgene; Eli Lilly; and Novartis.
SOURCE: Paller, A. et al, Session F025 Update on systemic therapies and emerging treatments
SAN DIEGO – Systemic therapies are increasingly being used for children with moderate to severe psoriasis; methotrexate is still the mainstay of systemic treatment, but biologics appear to achieve superior results with fewer side effects, Amy S. Paller, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Etanercept was approved in 2016 for children ages 6 and up, and ustekinumab was approved for use in patients aged 12 years or older in October 2017. Ongoing trials are examining adalimumab, apremilast, ustekinumab, and ixekizumab for use in adolescents and younger children. Trials are also being planned for other therapies that inhibit the Th17/IL-23 pathway, said Dr. Paller, the Walter J. Hamlin Professor and chair of dermatology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago.
Further, the study found that biologic agents, primarily etanercept, were used by 27%, acitretin by nearly 15%, cyclosporine by about 8%, and fumaric acid esters by 5%. More than 1 medication was used by 19%, according to the study results.
Adverse events affected the ability to tolerate therapy, and methotrexate and biologic agents were taken for a mean duration that was 2-fold greater than the mean duration for cyclosporine or fumaric acid esters. “A prospective registry is needed to track the long-term risks of systemic agents for pediatric psoriasis,” the authors concluded.
Dr. Paller reported that, in her practice, "we're still primarily using methotrexate. It takes time to see an effect with methotrexate, and you have to let people know this up front.” She pointed to a 2015 single-site prospective study of 25 children that found just 40% achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 50 at 12 weeks, with that number rising to 80% by 36 weeks. (J Derm Treat 2015; 26: 406-12)
Dr. Paller recommends baseline and annual TB testing, updated vaccinations and pregnancy counseling for all patients taking immunosuppressant therapies.
"I don't use a lot of retinoids for plaque psoriasis in kids," Dr. Paller said, "but for pustular psoriasis, I use (them) quite a bit. The beauty of retinoids is that they are not immunosuppressants, and you can start and stop them without loss of efficacy. There are many potential side effects, primarily skin and mucosal dryness."
Cyclosporine "has the greatest potential toxicity, which leaves it lower on the therapeutic ladder," Dr. Paller said. "But it has a pretty good safety record. The nice thing we can say is that (cyclosporine has) been around a long time. We have decades of experience in children, and we're using a low dose."
Benefits of biologics include convenience, infrequent dosing, and, potentially, fewer lab tests, Dr. Paller said. She added that there's no consensus about whether lab tests beyond annual TB tests are a good idea for patients on biologics.
Long-term risks are unclear, however, and drug holidays could spell trouble for efficacy when kids return to the medications.
Dr. Paller noted that biologics can cost tens of thousands of dollars for several weeks of treatment, and insurers may not cover them.
A 2014 meta-analysis of 48 randomized, controlled trials of 16,696 adult patients with psoriasis put biologics as the most effective therapies, with infliximab at the top (risk difference 76%), followed by adalimumab (RD 61%) and ustekinumab (RD 63%).
“These biologics are more effective than etanercept and all conventional treatments. Head-to-head trials indicate the superiority of adalimumab and infliximab over methotrexate (MTX), the superiority of ustekinumab over etanercept …” the meta-analysis concluded. (Br J Dermatol. 2014 Feb;170(2):274-303)
Dr. Paller disclosed that she is an investigator for Abbvie; Celgene; Eli Lilly, Janssen, Leo Foundation; Novartis. She is a consultant with honorarium for Amgen; Celgene; Eli Lilly; and Novartis.
SOURCE: Paller, A. et al, Session F025 Update on systemic therapies and emerging treatments
EXPERT ANALYSIS AT AAD 18
Here comes bimekizumab, the newest IL-17 inhibitor
KAUAI, HAWAII –
And that’s not all: Much the same was true in patients with psoriatic arthritis in the parallel phase 2b BE ACTIVE study and for ankylosing spondylitis in the BE AGILE study. BE ABLE was a double-blind, 12-week, multicenter, five-arm, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of 250 psoriasis patients randomized to various doses of subcutaneous bimekizumab or placebo every 4 weeks. The primary outcome – the PASI 90 response rate at 12 weeks, rather than the lower-bar PASI 75 endpoint more typically used in clinical trials – was 79% at the optimal dose. The PASI 100 rate – complete clearance of disease – at 12 weeks was 60%, Craig L. Leonardi, MD, said at the Hawaii Dermatology Seminar provided by Global Academy for Medical Education/Skin Disease Education Foundation.
lthough Dr. Leonardi is a distinguished psoriasis clinical trialist, he wasn’t involved in the BE ABLE study. Only top line results have been announced to date, although publication of the BE ABLE, BE AGILE, and BE ACTIVE results and presentations at major medical meetings are pending.
Bimekizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody which uniquely neutralizes both IL-17A and IL-17F. In contrast, secukinumab (Cosentyx) and ixekizumab (Taltz) specifically inhibit IL-17A, while brodalumab (Siliq) is a pan-IL-17 receptor antagonist, inhibiting the IL-17 A, A/F, E, F, and C receptors. The impressive clinical outcomes of the three BE phase 2b studies validate the notion that IL-17F is an important cytokine in tissue inflammation across a range of dermatologic and rheumatologic diseases.
A long-term extension of BE ABLE is ongoing. In addition, a phase 3 randomized trial of bimekizumab versus adalimumab (Humira) versus placebo in 450 psoriasis patients is now recruiting, as is a separate phase 3 placebo-controlled head to head comparison of bimekizumab versus ustekinumab (Stelara).
The BE ACTIVE study included 206 psoriatic arthritis patients. At the top dose of bimekizumab, the week 12 rate of at least a 50% improvement in joint symptoms, or ACR 50 response, was 46%, compared with 7% in placebo-treated controls. Patients with concomitant psoriasis over at least 3% of their body surface area demonstrated a 65% PASI 90 response rate at 12 weeks.
BE AGILE included 303 patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Forty-seven percent of those randomized to the top-performing dose of bimekizumab had at least a 40% improvement in their Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Score, or ASAS 40, at week 12, as did 13% in the placebo arm.
Bimekizumab is being developed by UCB, which is planning additional studies advancing the biologic in all three diseases studied in the phase 2b trials.
Dr. Leonardi reported receiving research grants from well over a dozen pharmaceutical companies and serving as a consultant to UCB and others.
SDEF/Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
KAUAI, HAWAII –
And that’s not all: Much the same was true in patients with psoriatic arthritis in the parallel phase 2b BE ACTIVE study and for ankylosing spondylitis in the BE AGILE study. BE ABLE was a double-blind, 12-week, multicenter, five-arm, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of 250 psoriasis patients randomized to various doses of subcutaneous bimekizumab or placebo every 4 weeks. The primary outcome – the PASI 90 response rate at 12 weeks, rather than the lower-bar PASI 75 endpoint more typically used in clinical trials – was 79% at the optimal dose. The PASI 100 rate – complete clearance of disease – at 12 weeks was 60%, Craig L. Leonardi, MD, said at the Hawaii Dermatology Seminar provided by Global Academy for Medical Education/Skin Disease Education Foundation.
lthough Dr. Leonardi is a distinguished psoriasis clinical trialist, he wasn’t involved in the BE ABLE study. Only top line results have been announced to date, although publication of the BE ABLE, BE AGILE, and BE ACTIVE results and presentations at major medical meetings are pending.
Bimekizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody which uniquely neutralizes both IL-17A and IL-17F. In contrast, secukinumab (Cosentyx) and ixekizumab (Taltz) specifically inhibit IL-17A, while brodalumab (Siliq) is a pan-IL-17 receptor antagonist, inhibiting the IL-17 A, A/F, E, F, and C receptors. The impressive clinical outcomes of the three BE phase 2b studies validate the notion that IL-17F is an important cytokine in tissue inflammation across a range of dermatologic and rheumatologic diseases.
A long-term extension of BE ABLE is ongoing. In addition, a phase 3 randomized trial of bimekizumab versus adalimumab (Humira) versus placebo in 450 psoriasis patients is now recruiting, as is a separate phase 3 placebo-controlled head to head comparison of bimekizumab versus ustekinumab (Stelara).
The BE ACTIVE study included 206 psoriatic arthritis patients. At the top dose of bimekizumab, the week 12 rate of at least a 50% improvement in joint symptoms, or ACR 50 response, was 46%, compared with 7% in placebo-treated controls. Patients with concomitant psoriasis over at least 3% of their body surface area demonstrated a 65% PASI 90 response rate at 12 weeks.
BE AGILE included 303 patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Forty-seven percent of those randomized to the top-performing dose of bimekizumab had at least a 40% improvement in their Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Score, or ASAS 40, at week 12, as did 13% in the placebo arm.
Bimekizumab is being developed by UCB, which is planning additional studies advancing the biologic in all three diseases studied in the phase 2b trials.
Dr. Leonardi reported receiving research grants from well over a dozen pharmaceutical companies and serving as a consultant to UCB and others.
SDEF/Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
KAUAI, HAWAII –
And that’s not all: Much the same was true in patients with psoriatic arthritis in the parallel phase 2b BE ACTIVE study and for ankylosing spondylitis in the BE AGILE study. BE ABLE was a double-blind, 12-week, multicenter, five-arm, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of 250 psoriasis patients randomized to various doses of subcutaneous bimekizumab or placebo every 4 weeks. The primary outcome – the PASI 90 response rate at 12 weeks, rather than the lower-bar PASI 75 endpoint more typically used in clinical trials – was 79% at the optimal dose. The PASI 100 rate – complete clearance of disease – at 12 weeks was 60%, Craig L. Leonardi, MD, said at the Hawaii Dermatology Seminar provided by Global Academy for Medical Education/Skin Disease Education Foundation.
lthough Dr. Leonardi is a distinguished psoriasis clinical trialist, he wasn’t involved in the BE ABLE study. Only top line results have been announced to date, although publication of the BE ABLE, BE AGILE, and BE ACTIVE results and presentations at major medical meetings are pending.
Bimekizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody which uniquely neutralizes both IL-17A and IL-17F. In contrast, secukinumab (Cosentyx) and ixekizumab (Taltz) specifically inhibit IL-17A, while brodalumab (Siliq) is a pan-IL-17 receptor antagonist, inhibiting the IL-17 A, A/F, E, F, and C receptors. The impressive clinical outcomes of the three BE phase 2b studies validate the notion that IL-17F is an important cytokine in tissue inflammation across a range of dermatologic and rheumatologic diseases.
A long-term extension of BE ABLE is ongoing. In addition, a phase 3 randomized trial of bimekizumab versus adalimumab (Humira) versus placebo in 450 psoriasis patients is now recruiting, as is a separate phase 3 placebo-controlled head to head comparison of bimekizumab versus ustekinumab (Stelara).
The BE ACTIVE study included 206 psoriatic arthritis patients. At the top dose of bimekizumab, the week 12 rate of at least a 50% improvement in joint symptoms, or ACR 50 response, was 46%, compared with 7% in placebo-treated controls. Patients with concomitant psoriasis over at least 3% of their body surface area demonstrated a 65% PASI 90 response rate at 12 weeks.
BE AGILE included 303 patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Forty-seven percent of those randomized to the top-performing dose of bimekizumab had at least a 40% improvement in their Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Score, or ASAS 40, at week 12, as did 13% in the placebo arm.
Bimekizumab is being developed by UCB, which is planning additional studies advancing the biologic in all three diseases studied in the phase 2b trials.
Dr. Leonardi reported receiving research grants from well over a dozen pharmaceutical companies and serving as a consultant to UCB and others.
SDEF/Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM SDEF HAWAII DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR
Tune in to cardiovascular risk in psoriasis
Stay attentive to cardiovascular disease risk in patients with psoriasis because effective treatment of psoriasis could improve their vascular risk as well, said Jeffrey M. Sobell, MD, of Tufts University in Boston.
he said at the Caribbean Dermatology Symposium.
The metabolic syndrome and its associated cardiovascular risk of myocardial infarction and stroke is significantly more prevalent in psoriasis patients, compared with controls, Dr. Sobell said at the meeting, provided by Global Academy for Medical Education.
A possible reason for this link may be that the chronic inflammation associated with psoriasis leads to atherosclerosis, Dr. Sobell noted. The inflammation is evident on PET imaging with a radiolabeled glucose known as fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) The technology, first used in cancer and neuroimaging, can detect early subclinical inflammation and allows for exact measurements of inflammatory activity, and measuring inflammation of the aorta can serve as a surrogate marker for treatment, he said.
Treating skin disease appears to impact vascular disease, Dr. Sobell said. In a study published in JAMA Cardiology, researchers followed 115 patients for 1 year using FDG-PET/CT (JAMA Cardiol. 2017. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1213)
Overall, when psoriasis improved, so did signs of vascular inflammation. “When the skin is more severe and treated more aggressively with anti-TNF therapy, the reduction in vascular disease is stronger,” Dr. Sobell said.
Data from another large study presented as a late-breaker at the American Academy of Dermatology in 2017 showed that treatment of psoriasis with tumor necrosis factor–alpha inhibitor therapy significantly reduced all-cause mortality in patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis, he noted.
Psoriasis patients often are underscreened for cardiac risk factors, but identifying them can help guide treatment, Dr. Sobell said.
“Dermatologists should at minimum direct patients to primary care physicians for appropriate screening and assessment,” he emphasized.
Dr. Sobell disclosed relationships with Amgen, AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sun Pharma.
Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
Stay attentive to cardiovascular disease risk in patients with psoriasis because effective treatment of psoriasis could improve their vascular risk as well, said Jeffrey M. Sobell, MD, of Tufts University in Boston.
he said at the Caribbean Dermatology Symposium.
The metabolic syndrome and its associated cardiovascular risk of myocardial infarction and stroke is significantly more prevalent in psoriasis patients, compared with controls, Dr. Sobell said at the meeting, provided by Global Academy for Medical Education.
A possible reason for this link may be that the chronic inflammation associated with psoriasis leads to atherosclerosis, Dr. Sobell noted. The inflammation is evident on PET imaging with a radiolabeled glucose known as fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) The technology, first used in cancer and neuroimaging, can detect early subclinical inflammation and allows for exact measurements of inflammatory activity, and measuring inflammation of the aorta can serve as a surrogate marker for treatment, he said.
Treating skin disease appears to impact vascular disease, Dr. Sobell said. In a study published in JAMA Cardiology, researchers followed 115 patients for 1 year using FDG-PET/CT (JAMA Cardiol. 2017. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1213)
Overall, when psoriasis improved, so did signs of vascular inflammation. “When the skin is more severe and treated more aggressively with anti-TNF therapy, the reduction in vascular disease is stronger,” Dr. Sobell said.
Data from another large study presented as a late-breaker at the American Academy of Dermatology in 2017 showed that treatment of psoriasis with tumor necrosis factor–alpha inhibitor therapy significantly reduced all-cause mortality in patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis, he noted.
Psoriasis patients often are underscreened for cardiac risk factors, but identifying them can help guide treatment, Dr. Sobell said.
“Dermatologists should at minimum direct patients to primary care physicians for appropriate screening and assessment,” he emphasized.
Dr. Sobell disclosed relationships with Amgen, AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sun Pharma.
Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
Stay attentive to cardiovascular disease risk in patients with psoriasis because effective treatment of psoriasis could improve their vascular risk as well, said Jeffrey M. Sobell, MD, of Tufts University in Boston.
he said at the Caribbean Dermatology Symposium.
The metabolic syndrome and its associated cardiovascular risk of myocardial infarction and stroke is significantly more prevalent in psoriasis patients, compared with controls, Dr. Sobell said at the meeting, provided by Global Academy for Medical Education.
A possible reason for this link may be that the chronic inflammation associated with psoriasis leads to atherosclerosis, Dr. Sobell noted. The inflammation is evident on PET imaging with a radiolabeled glucose known as fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) The technology, first used in cancer and neuroimaging, can detect early subclinical inflammation and allows for exact measurements of inflammatory activity, and measuring inflammation of the aorta can serve as a surrogate marker for treatment, he said.
Treating skin disease appears to impact vascular disease, Dr. Sobell said. In a study published in JAMA Cardiology, researchers followed 115 patients for 1 year using FDG-PET/CT (JAMA Cardiol. 2017. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1213)
Overall, when psoriasis improved, so did signs of vascular inflammation. “When the skin is more severe and treated more aggressively with anti-TNF therapy, the reduction in vascular disease is stronger,” Dr. Sobell said.
Data from another large study presented as a late-breaker at the American Academy of Dermatology in 2017 showed that treatment of psoriasis with tumor necrosis factor–alpha inhibitor therapy significantly reduced all-cause mortality in patients with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis, he noted.
Psoriasis patients often are underscreened for cardiac risk factors, but identifying them can help guide treatment, Dr. Sobell said.
“Dermatologists should at minimum direct patients to primary care physicians for appropriate screening and assessment,” he emphasized.
Dr. Sobell disclosed relationships with Amgen, AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sun Pharma.
Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM THE CARIBBEAN DERMATOLOGY SYMPOSIUM
Get ready for certolizumab for psoriasis
KAUAI, HAWAII – When certolizumab pegol receives marketing approval for moderate to severe psoriasis – which experts say is a virtual lock – it will offer a singular advantage over current anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologics: strong evidence of safety in pregnancy.
“ ” Kenneth B. Gordon, MD, observed at the Hawaii Dermatology Seminar provided by the Global Academy for Medical Education/Skin Disease Education Foundation.
Lots of women and their families are understandably deeply concerned about using powerful, transformative medications during pregnancy, even though they know from experience how debilitating inadequately treated psoriasis can be.
“Many women of childbearing potential would find [certolizumab] to be a preferential agent if they’re planning to become pregnant,” said Dr. Gordon, professor and chair of the department of dermatology at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
He cited the CRIB (A Multicenter, Postmarketing Study Evaluating the Transfer of Cimzia From the Mother to the Infant via the Placenta) study results presented by Alexa B. Kimball, MD, at the 2017 annual meeting of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology in Geneva as a major step forward in establishing the safety of certolizumab during pregnancy.
CRIB was a prospective postmarketing pharmacokinetic study that evaluated placental transfer of certolizumab from 16 pregnant women on the biologic to their infants. All of the mothers received their last dose of certolizumab for rheumatoid arthritis or other approved indications within 35 days of delivery. Blood samples were collected from mothers, newborns, and umbilical cords within 1 hour of delivery, and again from the infants at weeks 4 and 8 after delivery.
Only one infant had a detectable plasma level of certolizumab at birth, and it was barely measurable at 0.042 mcg/mL, as compared with 49.4 mcg/mL in the mother’s plasma. This is consistent with the fact that certolizumab’s pegylated arm allows only minimal or no placental transfer from mother to infant, so there is essentially no third trimester in utero fetal exposure. In contrast, as Dr. Kimball noted, other anti-TNF biologics lack a pegylated arm and thus preferentially cross the placenta, creating a theoretical increased risk of maternal pregnancy complications and/or congenital malformations.
Dr. Kimball, professor of dermatology at Harvard Medical School and chief executive officer of Harvard Medical Faculty Physicians at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, both in Boston, also has been deeply involved in an ongoing registry (sponsored by certolizumab manufacturer UCB) of several hundred women on certolizumab in pregnancy. The data have reassuringly shown no increased risk of maternal pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, or preterm birth, nor any increase in or pattern of congenital malformations, compared with background rates in the general population.
Dr. Gordon said that while he understands the concerns, he personally doesn’t think the class-wide safety of TNF inhibitors in pregnancy and lactation is a big issue.
“My argument is that anti-TNF agents have been used very frequently in women of childbearing age, and also in women who are pregnant or lactating. And there have not been any side effect signals from that,” he explained.
The prospects of gaining an expanded indication for certolizumab in psoriasis hinge in part on the impressive results of the pivotal phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled CIMPASI-1 and CIMPASI-2 trials. In CIMPASI-1, the week-48 Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 and PASI 90 response rates were 87.1% and 60.2%, respectively, in patients on the biologic at 400 mg every 2 weeks; among those on certolizumab at 200 mg every 2 weeks, the rates were 67.2% and 42.8%. In CIMPASI-2, the PASI 75 and PASI 90 rates were 81.3% and 62.0% at 400 mg and 78.7% and 59.6% with 200 mg every 2 weeks.
There were no cases of tuberculosis or any other significant safety concerns through 48 weeks, Dr. Gordon said.
“Certolizumab is coming soon for psoriasis,” predicted Craig L. Leonardi, MD, a psoriasis researcher at Saint Louis University. “The data are very impressive. It’s a high-performance drug. There’s no reason why this drug shouldn’t be approved.”
Since Dr. Kimball’s presentation of the CRIB data at the 2017 annual meeting of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, the study has been published (Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb;77[2]:228-33).
Dr. Gordon reported receiving research support from and serving as a paid consultant to numerous pharmaceutical companies developing new psoriasis therapies.
SDEF/Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
KAUAI, HAWAII – When certolizumab pegol receives marketing approval for moderate to severe psoriasis – which experts say is a virtual lock – it will offer a singular advantage over current anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologics: strong evidence of safety in pregnancy.
“ ” Kenneth B. Gordon, MD, observed at the Hawaii Dermatology Seminar provided by the Global Academy for Medical Education/Skin Disease Education Foundation.
Lots of women and their families are understandably deeply concerned about using powerful, transformative medications during pregnancy, even though they know from experience how debilitating inadequately treated psoriasis can be.
“Many women of childbearing potential would find [certolizumab] to be a preferential agent if they’re planning to become pregnant,” said Dr. Gordon, professor and chair of the department of dermatology at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
He cited the CRIB (A Multicenter, Postmarketing Study Evaluating the Transfer of Cimzia From the Mother to the Infant via the Placenta) study results presented by Alexa B. Kimball, MD, at the 2017 annual meeting of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology in Geneva as a major step forward in establishing the safety of certolizumab during pregnancy.
CRIB was a prospective postmarketing pharmacokinetic study that evaluated placental transfer of certolizumab from 16 pregnant women on the biologic to their infants. All of the mothers received their last dose of certolizumab for rheumatoid arthritis or other approved indications within 35 days of delivery. Blood samples were collected from mothers, newborns, and umbilical cords within 1 hour of delivery, and again from the infants at weeks 4 and 8 after delivery.
Only one infant had a detectable plasma level of certolizumab at birth, and it was barely measurable at 0.042 mcg/mL, as compared with 49.4 mcg/mL in the mother’s plasma. This is consistent with the fact that certolizumab’s pegylated arm allows only minimal or no placental transfer from mother to infant, so there is essentially no third trimester in utero fetal exposure. In contrast, as Dr. Kimball noted, other anti-TNF biologics lack a pegylated arm and thus preferentially cross the placenta, creating a theoretical increased risk of maternal pregnancy complications and/or congenital malformations.
Dr. Kimball, professor of dermatology at Harvard Medical School and chief executive officer of Harvard Medical Faculty Physicians at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, both in Boston, also has been deeply involved in an ongoing registry (sponsored by certolizumab manufacturer UCB) of several hundred women on certolizumab in pregnancy. The data have reassuringly shown no increased risk of maternal pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, or preterm birth, nor any increase in or pattern of congenital malformations, compared with background rates in the general population.
Dr. Gordon said that while he understands the concerns, he personally doesn’t think the class-wide safety of TNF inhibitors in pregnancy and lactation is a big issue.
“My argument is that anti-TNF agents have been used very frequently in women of childbearing age, and also in women who are pregnant or lactating. And there have not been any side effect signals from that,” he explained.
The prospects of gaining an expanded indication for certolizumab in psoriasis hinge in part on the impressive results of the pivotal phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled CIMPASI-1 and CIMPASI-2 trials. In CIMPASI-1, the week-48 Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 and PASI 90 response rates were 87.1% and 60.2%, respectively, in patients on the biologic at 400 mg every 2 weeks; among those on certolizumab at 200 mg every 2 weeks, the rates were 67.2% and 42.8%. In CIMPASI-2, the PASI 75 and PASI 90 rates were 81.3% and 62.0% at 400 mg and 78.7% and 59.6% with 200 mg every 2 weeks.
There were no cases of tuberculosis or any other significant safety concerns through 48 weeks, Dr. Gordon said.
“Certolizumab is coming soon for psoriasis,” predicted Craig L. Leonardi, MD, a psoriasis researcher at Saint Louis University. “The data are very impressive. It’s a high-performance drug. There’s no reason why this drug shouldn’t be approved.”
Since Dr. Kimball’s presentation of the CRIB data at the 2017 annual meeting of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, the study has been published (Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb;77[2]:228-33).
Dr. Gordon reported receiving research support from and serving as a paid consultant to numerous pharmaceutical companies developing new psoriasis therapies.
SDEF/Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
KAUAI, HAWAII – When certolizumab pegol receives marketing approval for moderate to severe psoriasis – which experts say is a virtual lock – it will offer a singular advantage over current anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biologics: strong evidence of safety in pregnancy.
“ ” Kenneth B. Gordon, MD, observed at the Hawaii Dermatology Seminar provided by the Global Academy for Medical Education/Skin Disease Education Foundation.
Lots of women and their families are understandably deeply concerned about using powerful, transformative medications during pregnancy, even though they know from experience how debilitating inadequately treated psoriasis can be.
“Many women of childbearing potential would find [certolizumab] to be a preferential agent if they’re planning to become pregnant,” said Dr. Gordon, professor and chair of the department of dermatology at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
He cited the CRIB (A Multicenter, Postmarketing Study Evaluating the Transfer of Cimzia From the Mother to the Infant via the Placenta) study results presented by Alexa B. Kimball, MD, at the 2017 annual meeting of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology in Geneva as a major step forward in establishing the safety of certolizumab during pregnancy.
CRIB was a prospective postmarketing pharmacokinetic study that evaluated placental transfer of certolizumab from 16 pregnant women on the biologic to their infants. All of the mothers received their last dose of certolizumab for rheumatoid arthritis or other approved indications within 35 days of delivery. Blood samples were collected from mothers, newborns, and umbilical cords within 1 hour of delivery, and again from the infants at weeks 4 and 8 after delivery.
Only one infant had a detectable plasma level of certolizumab at birth, and it was barely measurable at 0.042 mcg/mL, as compared with 49.4 mcg/mL in the mother’s plasma. This is consistent with the fact that certolizumab’s pegylated arm allows only minimal or no placental transfer from mother to infant, so there is essentially no third trimester in utero fetal exposure. In contrast, as Dr. Kimball noted, other anti-TNF biologics lack a pegylated arm and thus preferentially cross the placenta, creating a theoretical increased risk of maternal pregnancy complications and/or congenital malformations.
Dr. Kimball, professor of dermatology at Harvard Medical School and chief executive officer of Harvard Medical Faculty Physicians at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, both in Boston, also has been deeply involved in an ongoing registry (sponsored by certolizumab manufacturer UCB) of several hundred women on certolizumab in pregnancy. The data have reassuringly shown no increased risk of maternal pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, or preterm birth, nor any increase in or pattern of congenital malformations, compared with background rates in the general population.
Dr. Gordon said that while he understands the concerns, he personally doesn’t think the class-wide safety of TNF inhibitors in pregnancy and lactation is a big issue.
“My argument is that anti-TNF agents have been used very frequently in women of childbearing age, and also in women who are pregnant or lactating. And there have not been any side effect signals from that,” he explained.
The prospects of gaining an expanded indication for certolizumab in psoriasis hinge in part on the impressive results of the pivotal phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled CIMPASI-1 and CIMPASI-2 trials. In CIMPASI-1, the week-48 Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 and PASI 90 response rates were 87.1% and 60.2%, respectively, in patients on the biologic at 400 mg every 2 weeks; among those on certolizumab at 200 mg every 2 weeks, the rates were 67.2% and 42.8%. In CIMPASI-2, the PASI 75 and PASI 90 rates were 81.3% and 62.0% at 400 mg and 78.7% and 59.6% with 200 mg every 2 weeks.
There were no cases of tuberculosis or any other significant safety concerns through 48 weeks, Dr. Gordon said.
“Certolizumab is coming soon for psoriasis,” predicted Craig L. Leonardi, MD, a psoriasis researcher at Saint Louis University. “The data are very impressive. It’s a high-performance drug. There’s no reason why this drug shouldn’t be approved.”
Since Dr. Kimball’s presentation of the CRIB data at the 2017 annual meeting of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, the study has been published (Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb;77[2]:228-33).
Dr. Gordon reported receiving research support from and serving as a paid consultant to numerous pharmaceutical companies developing new psoriasis therapies.
SDEF/Global Academy for Medical Education and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM SDEF HAWAII DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR
CV risk factors go undiagnosed, untreated in many psoriatic patients
A significant proportion of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are underdiagnosed and undertreated for cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), according to Lihi Eder, MD, of the University of Toronto, and her associates.
In a cross-sectional analysis published in the Journal of Rheumatology, researchers examined 2,254 patients (58.9% with PsA, 41.1% with psoriasis only) from eight centers in Canada, the United States, and Israel. They found that 1,017 of the patients had hypertension (PsA: 48.5%, psoriasis: 40.2%), including 233 who were not previously diagnosed with hypertension and were not taking any blood pressure–lowering medications (PsA: 19.9%, psoriasis: 39.1%). Many patients had low adherence to hypertension treatment recommendations: A total of 602 (PsA: 55.9%, psoriasis: 64.8%) were untreated or undertreated. Undertreatment of hypertension occurred in 60.9% patients with cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus.
“In this large international study, we found significant gaps in screening and treating CVRF in patients with psoriasis and PsA,” the researchers concluded. “Although questions exist regarding the optimal treatment targets for CVRF in psoriatic patients, adherence by physicians to, at a minimum, the general treatment recommendations for primary CV prevention is warranted.”
SOURCE: Eder L et al. J Rheumatol. 2018 Feb 1. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170379.
A significant proportion of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are underdiagnosed and undertreated for cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), according to Lihi Eder, MD, of the University of Toronto, and her associates.
In a cross-sectional analysis published in the Journal of Rheumatology, researchers examined 2,254 patients (58.9% with PsA, 41.1% with psoriasis only) from eight centers in Canada, the United States, and Israel. They found that 1,017 of the patients had hypertension (PsA: 48.5%, psoriasis: 40.2%), including 233 who were not previously diagnosed with hypertension and were not taking any blood pressure–lowering medications (PsA: 19.9%, psoriasis: 39.1%). Many patients had low adherence to hypertension treatment recommendations: A total of 602 (PsA: 55.9%, psoriasis: 64.8%) were untreated or undertreated. Undertreatment of hypertension occurred in 60.9% patients with cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus.
“In this large international study, we found significant gaps in screening and treating CVRF in patients with psoriasis and PsA,” the researchers concluded. “Although questions exist regarding the optimal treatment targets for CVRF in psoriatic patients, adherence by physicians to, at a minimum, the general treatment recommendations for primary CV prevention is warranted.”
SOURCE: Eder L et al. J Rheumatol. 2018 Feb 1. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170379.
A significant proportion of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are underdiagnosed and undertreated for cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), according to Lihi Eder, MD, of the University of Toronto, and her associates.
In a cross-sectional analysis published in the Journal of Rheumatology, researchers examined 2,254 patients (58.9% with PsA, 41.1% with psoriasis only) from eight centers in Canada, the United States, and Israel. They found that 1,017 of the patients had hypertension (PsA: 48.5%, psoriasis: 40.2%), including 233 who were not previously diagnosed with hypertension and were not taking any blood pressure–lowering medications (PsA: 19.9%, psoriasis: 39.1%). Many patients had low adherence to hypertension treatment recommendations: A total of 602 (PsA: 55.9%, psoriasis: 64.8%) were untreated or undertreated. Undertreatment of hypertension occurred in 60.9% patients with cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus.
“In this large international study, we found significant gaps in screening and treating CVRF in patients with psoriasis and PsA,” the researchers concluded. “Although questions exist regarding the optimal treatment targets for CVRF in psoriatic patients, adherence by physicians to, at a minimum, the general treatment recommendations for primary CV prevention is warranted.”
SOURCE: Eder L et al. J Rheumatol. 2018 Feb 1. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170379.
FROM JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Make a PEST of your psoriasis patients
KAUAI, HAWAII – for the rheumatologic disease once per year, advised Jashin J. Wu, MD. The PEST is a simple, validated, five-question yes/no screening tool. It’s geared towards nonrheumatologists who may not feel competent to diagnose psoriatic arthritis or who just don’t have time to do so. Three or more “yes” answers is deemed a positive result warranting consideration of referral to a rheumatologist, explained Dr. Wu, the director of the psoriasis clinic and director of dermatology research at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center.
The five PEST questions are:
- Have you ever had a swollen joint (or joints)?
- Has a doctor ever told you that you have arthritis?
- Do your fingernails or toenails have holes or pits?
- Have you had pain in your heel?
- Have you had a finger or toe that was completely swollen and painful for no apparent reason?
The PEST has been shown to have 92% sensitivity and 78% specificity for diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009 May-Jun;27[3]:469-74).
Dr. Wu’s call for regular screening for psoriatic arthritis resonated with another psoriasis expert at the meeting, Craig L. Leonardi, MD.
“It’s our moral obligation to be on the lookout for that disease. Remember that patients who develop psoriatic arthritis usually have their skin disease for 10 years before they develop their first signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis. So that means they should be in the dermatologist’s office getting their skin treated as they start to have problems with their joints,” observed Dr. Leonardi, of Saint Louis University.
Dr. Wu reported receiving research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and Regeneron.
The SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
KAUAI, HAWAII – for the rheumatologic disease once per year, advised Jashin J. Wu, MD. The PEST is a simple, validated, five-question yes/no screening tool. It’s geared towards nonrheumatologists who may not feel competent to diagnose psoriatic arthritis or who just don’t have time to do so. Three or more “yes” answers is deemed a positive result warranting consideration of referral to a rheumatologist, explained Dr. Wu, the director of the psoriasis clinic and director of dermatology research at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center.
The five PEST questions are:
- Have you ever had a swollen joint (or joints)?
- Has a doctor ever told you that you have arthritis?
- Do your fingernails or toenails have holes or pits?
- Have you had pain in your heel?
- Have you had a finger or toe that was completely swollen and painful for no apparent reason?
The PEST has been shown to have 92% sensitivity and 78% specificity for diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009 May-Jun;27[3]:469-74).
Dr. Wu’s call for regular screening for psoriatic arthritis resonated with another psoriasis expert at the meeting, Craig L. Leonardi, MD.
“It’s our moral obligation to be on the lookout for that disease. Remember that patients who develop psoriatic arthritis usually have their skin disease for 10 years before they develop their first signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis. So that means they should be in the dermatologist’s office getting their skin treated as they start to have problems with their joints,” observed Dr. Leonardi, of Saint Louis University.
Dr. Wu reported receiving research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and Regeneron.
The SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
KAUAI, HAWAII – for the rheumatologic disease once per year, advised Jashin J. Wu, MD. The PEST is a simple, validated, five-question yes/no screening tool. It’s geared towards nonrheumatologists who may not feel competent to diagnose psoriatic arthritis or who just don’t have time to do so. Three or more “yes” answers is deemed a positive result warranting consideration of referral to a rheumatologist, explained Dr. Wu, the director of the psoriasis clinic and director of dermatology research at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center.
The five PEST questions are:
- Have you ever had a swollen joint (or joints)?
- Has a doctor ever told you that you have arthritis?
- Do your fingernails or toenails have holes or pits?
- Have you had pain in your heel?
- Have you had a finger or toe that was completely swollen and painful for no apparent reason?
The PEST has been shown to have 92% sensitivity and 78% specificity for diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009 May-Jun;27[3]:469-74).
Dr. Wu’s call for regular screening for psoriatic arthritis resonated with another psoriasis expert at the meeting, Craig L. Leonardi, MD.
“It’s our moral obligation to be on the lookout for that disease. Remember that patients who develop psoriatic arthritis usually have their skin disease for 10 years before they develop their first signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis. So that means they should be in the dermatologist’s office getting their skin treated as they start to have problems with their joints,” observed Dr. Leonardi, of Saint Louis University.
Dr. Wu reported receiving research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and Regeneron.
The SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM SDEF HAWAII DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR