Lymphoma & Plasma Cell Disorders

ATLANTA – Intravenous treatment with mogamulizumab, an investigational antibody targeting CC chemokine receptor 4, more than doubled progression-free survival (PFS), compared with oral vorinostat in a phase 3 trial of 372 patients with heavily pretreated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).

Courtesy ASH

After a median of three treatment cycles, median PFS with mogamulizumab was 7.7 months vs. 3.1 months with vorinostat (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.69; P less than .0001), Youn H. Kim, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Mogamulizumab also topped vorinostat in terms of overall response to treatment (28% vs 5%; P less than 001) and on several quality of life scales, said Dr. Kim, the Joanne and Peter Haas, Jr. Professor for Cutaneous Lymphoma Research at Stanford (Calif.) University. Adverse effects, such as infusion reactions, were expected and manageable, she added.

Mogamulizumab is approved in Japan for treating CTCL and received an FDA breakthrough therapy designation in August 2017.

Based on audits so far, the agency might green-light mogamulizumab for previously treated CTCL by early 2018 – its first approval in the United States, Dr. Kim said in an interview.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma responds poorly to treatments that work in other, more common types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Moreover, extensive disease can destroy quality of life.

“There’s a major psychosocial impact because if you’re infected, you smell bad,” Dr. Kim said during a press briefing. “Itch is very severe – patients often cannot sleep because of it.”

Mogamulizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4), which facilitates trafficking of lymphocytes to skin and other organs. It is defucosylated, augmenting its toxicity against malignant T cells. In a prior phase 1/2 study in the United States, mogamulizumab showed a tolerable safety profile and a 37% overall response rate – “a good response, considering that other CTCL drugs are usually in the 30% range,” Dr. Kim said.

For the phase 3 study (MAVORIC), 372 patients with previously treated stage IB to stage IVB CTCL (mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome) without large-cell transformation received mogamulizumab (1.0 mg/kg IV weekly for 28 days; days 1 and 15 of subsequent 28-day cycles) or vorinostat (400 mg per oral daily). Treatment continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Researchers evaluated PFS based on a global composite response score that covers the skin, blood, lymph nodes, and viscera, in accordance with international consensus guidelines (J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 20;29(18):2598-607; doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.0630).

Treatment groups resembled each other at baseline. Most had received three systemic therapies for CTCL, and some had received as many as 18. Median duration of response was 14 months in the mogamulizumab arm and 9 months in the vorinostat arm. Patients tended to respond to mogamulizumab 2 months sooner than to vorinostat (3.3 vs. 5.1 months), Dr. Kim said.

Mogamulizumab also significantly improved quality of life on the Skindex-29 Symptoms (P less than .05), Skindex-29 Function (P less than 05), and FACT-G Functional Well-Being (P less than .05) quality of life scales, which is part of what earned it a breakthrough therapy designation, Dr. Kim said.

MAVORIC is the largest randomized study to compare systemic therapies in CTCL and the first to use PFS as the primary endpoint, Dr. Kim noted. Patients’ level of CCR4 expression was not a criterion for enrollment because CCR4 is consistently and highly expressed in this disease, she noted. Thus, using mogamulizumab to treat CTCL in the United States would not require CCR4 testing.

Joseph M. Connors, MD, who specializes in lymphoid cancers at the BC Cancer Agency, a division of the British Columbia Provincial Health Services Authority, and who was not involved in the study, agreed that these data represent real headway in treating CTCL.

“I can state unequivocally that we just haven’t had effective therapy for CTCL,” he said at the press briefing. “We’ve had treatments that might help patients feel somewhat better, but we’ve had no consensus on a treatment that is right for this disease. These data provide an opportunity to have that consensus. They could create a platform for making further progress.”

Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development provided funding. Dr. Kim disclosed research and advisory relationships with Kyowa Kirin and ties to Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Seattle Genetics, Soligenix, and other companies.

SOURCE: Kim YH et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 817.

ATLANTA – Intravenous treatment with mogamulizumab, an investigational antibody targeting CC chemokine receptor 4, more than doubled progression-free survival (PFS), compared with oral vorinostat in a phase 3 trial of 372 patients with heavily pretreated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).

Courtesy ASH

After a median of three treatment cycles, median PFS with mogamulizumab was 7.7 months vs. 3.1 months with vorinostat (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.69; P less than .0001), Youn H. Kim, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Mogamulizumab also topped vorinostat in terms of overall response to treatment (28% vs 5%; P less than 001) and on several quality of life scales, said Dr. Kim, the Joanne and Peter Haas, Jr. Professor for Cutaneous Lymphoma Research at Stanford (Calif.) University. Adverse effects, such as infusion reactions, were expected and manageable, she added.

Mogamulizumab is approved in Japan for treating CTCL and received an FDA breakthrough therapy designation in August 2017.

Based on audits so far, the agency might green-light mogamulizumab for previously treated CTCL by early 2018 – its first approval in the United States, Dr. Kim said in an interview.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma responds poorly to treatments that work in other, more common types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Moreover, extensive disease can destroy quality of life.

“There’s a major psychosocial impact because if you’re infected, you smell bad,” Dr. Kim said during a press briefing. “Itch is very severe – patients often cannot sleep because of it.”

Mogamulizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4), which facilitates trafficking of lymphocytes to skin and other organs. It is defucosylated, augmenting its toxicity against malignant T cells. In a prior phase 1/2 study in the United States, mogamulizumab showed a tolerable safety profile and a 37% overall response rate – “a good response, considering that other CTCL drugs are usually in the 30% range,” Dr. Kim said.

For the phase 3 study (MAVORIC), 372 patients with previously treated stage IB to stage IVB CTCL (mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome) without large-cell transformation received mogamulizumab (1.0 mg/kg IV weekly for 28 days; days 1 and 15 of subsequent 28-day cycles) or vorinostat (400 mg per oral daily). Treatment continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Researchers evaluated PFS based on a global composite response score that covers the skin, blood, lymph nodes, and viscera, in accordance with international consensus guidelines (J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 20;29(18):2598-607; doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.0630).

Treatment groups resembled each other at baseline. Most had received three systemic therapies for CTCL, and some had received as many as 18. Median duration of response was 14 months in the mogamulizumab arm and 9 months in the vorinostat arm. Patients tended to respond to mogamulizumab 2 months sooner than to vorinostat (3.3 vs. 5.1 months), Dr. Kim said.

Mogamulizumab also significantly improved quality of life on the Skindex-29 Symptoms (P less than .05), Skindex-29 Function (P less than 05), and FACT-G Functional Well-Being (P less than .05) quality of life scales, which is part of what earned it a breakthrough therapy designation, Dr. Kim said.

MAVORIC is the largest randomized study to compare systemic therapies in CTCL and the first to use PFS as the primary endpoint, Dr. Kim noted. Patients’ level of CCR4 expression was not a criterion for enrollment because CCR4 is consistently and highly expressed in this disease, she noted. Thus, using mogamulizumab to treat CTCL in the United States would not require CCR4 testing.

Joseph M. Connors, MD, who specializes in lymphoid cancers at the BC Cancer Agency, a division of the British Columbia Provincial Health Services Authority, and who was not involved in the study, agreed that these data represent real headway in treating CTCL.

“I can state unequivocally that we just haven’t had effective therapy for CTCL,” he said at the press briefing. “We’ve had treatments that might help patients feel somewhat better, but we’ve had no consensus on a treatment that is right for this disease. These data provide an opportunity to have that consensus. They could create a platform for making further progress.”

Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development provided funding. Dr. Kim disclosed research and advisory relationships with Kyowa Kirin and ties to Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Seattle Genetics, Soligenix, and other companies.

SOURCE: Kim YH et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 817.

ATLANTA – Intravenous treatment with mogamulizumab, an investigational antibody targeting CC chemokine receptor 4, more than doubled progression-free survival (PFS), compared with oral vorinostat in a phase 3 trial of 372 patients with heavily pretreated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).

Courtesy ASH

After a median of three treatment cycles, median PFS with mogamulizumab was 7.7 months vs. 3.1 months with vorinostat (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.69; P less than .0001), Youn H. Kim, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Mogamulizumab also topped vorinostat in terms of overall response to treatment (28% vs 5%; P less than 001) and on several quality of life scales, said Dr. Kim, the Joanne and Peter Haas, Jr. Professor for Cutaneous Lymphoma Research at Stanford (Calif.) University. Adverse effects, such as infusion reactions, were expected and manageable, she added.

Mogamulizumab is approved in Japan for treating CTCL and received an FDA breakthrough therapy designation in August 2017.

Based on audits so far, the agency might green-light mogamulizumab for previously treated CTCL by early 2018 – its first approval in the United States, Dr. Kim said in an interview.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma responds poorly to treatments that work in other, more common types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Moreover, extensive disease can destroy quality of life.

“There’s a major psychosocial impact because if you’re infected, you smell bad,” Dr. Kim said during a press briefing. “Itch is very severe – patients often cannot sleep because of it.”

Mogamulizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4), which facilitates trafficking of lymphocytes to skin and other organs. It is defucosylated, augmenting its toxicity against malignant T cells. In a prior phase 1/2 study in the United States, mogamulizumab showed a tolerable safety profile and a 37% overall response rate – “a good response, considering that other CTCL drugs are usually in the 30% range,” Dr. Kim said.

For the phase 3 study (MAVORIC), 372 patients with previously treated stage IB to stage IVB CTCL (mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome) without large-cell transformation received mogamulizumab (1.0 mg/kg IV weekly for 28 days; days 1 and 15 of subsequent 28-day cycles) or vorinostat (400 mg per oral daily). Treatment continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Researchers evaluated PFS based on a global composite response score that covers the skin, blood, lymph nodes, and viscera, in accordance with international consensus guidelines (J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 20;29(18):2598-607; doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.0630).

Treatment groups resembled each other at baseline. Most had received three systemic therapies for CTCL, and some had received as many as 18. Median duration of response was 14 months in the mogamulizumab arm and 9 months in the vorinostat arm. Patients tended to respond to mogamulizumab 2 months sooner than to vorinostat (3.3 vs. 5.1 months), Dr. Kim said.

Mogamulizumab also significantly improved quality of life on the Skindex-29 Symptoms (P less than .05), Skindex-29 Function (P less than 05), and FACT-G Functional Well-Being (P less than .05) quality of life scales, which is part of what earned it a breakthrough therapy designation, Dr. Kim said.

MAVORIC is the largest randomized study to compare systemic therapies in CTCL and the first to use PFS as the primary endpoint, Dr. Kim noted. Patients’ level of CCR4 expression was not a criterion for enrollment because CCR4 is consistently and highly expressed in this disease, she noted. Thus, using mogamulizumab to treat CTCL in the United States would not require CCR4 testing.

Joseph M. Connors, MD, who specializes in lymphoid cancers at the BC Cancer Agency, a division of the British Columbia Provincial Health Services Authority, and who was not involved in the study, agreed that these data represent real headway in treating CTCL.

“I can state unequivocally that we just haven’t had effective therapy for CTCL,” he said at the press briefing. “We’ve had treatments that might help patients feel somewhat better, but we’ve had no consensus on a treatment that is right for this disease. These data provide an opportunity to have that consensus. They could create a platform for making further progress.”

Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development provided funding. Dr. Kim disclosed research and advisory relationships with Kyowa Kirin and ties to Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Seattle Genetics, Soligenix, and other companies.

SOURCE: Kim YH et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 817.

ATLANTA – More than one-third of patients with refractory large B-cell lymphomas treated with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta), often called axi-cel, had durable responses, with some patients having complete responses lasting more than 1 year after a single infusion, according to investigators in the ZUMA-1 trial.

Neil Osterweil/Frontline Medical News

Updated combined phase 1 and phase 2 results in 108 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL) showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 82%, including 58% complete responses, after a median follow-up of 15.4 months, reported Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“Axi-cel is highly effective in patients with large B-cell lymphoma who otherwise have no curative treatment options,” he said in a briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, prior to his presentation of the data in an oral session.

The trial results were also published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.As previously reported, in the multicenter phase 2 ZUMA-1 trial, 111 patients with treatment refractory DLBCL, PMBCL, or TFL were enrolled and treated with axi-cel at a target dose of 2 x 10⁶ cells/kg, following a conditioning regimen with low-dose cyclophosphamide and fludarabine.

The median patient age was 58 years. Patients had stage III or IV disease, 48% had International Prognostic Index scores of 3-4, 76% had disease that was refractory to third-line therapies or beyond, and 21% had disease that relapsed within 12 months of an autologous bone marrow transplant

Axi-cel was successfully manufactured with sufficient cells for transfusion in all but one of the 111 patients, and 101 patients eventually received infusions in phase 2 (modified intention-to-treat population). The average turnaround time from apheresis to the clinical site was 17 days.

Dr. Neelapu also presented data on seven patients enrolled in phase 1; the data were combined with the phase 2 results for an updated analysis of those patients who had at least 1 year of follow-up.

The phase 2 trial met its primary endpoint at the time of the primary analysis, with an 82% ORR, consisting of 54% complete responses and 28% partial responses at a median follow-up of 8.7 months.

In the updated analysis, the ORR and respective remission rates were 82%, 58%, and 34%, at a median of 15.4 months follow-up.

The median duration of response in the updated analysis was 11.1 months. The median duration of complete responses had not been reached at the time of data cutoff in August 2017. The median duration of partial responses was 1.9 months.

At the 15.4-month mark, 42% of patients remained free of disease progression, and 56% were alive, with the median overall survival not yet reached.

The treatment had generally acceptable toxicities, with only 13% of patients in phase 2 experiencing grade 3 or greater cytokine release syndrome (CRS), although one patient with CRS died from hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and one with CRS died from cardiac arrest. Grade 3 or greater neurologic events occurred in 28% of patients, and included encephalopathy, confusional state, aphasia, and somnolence.

The events were generally reversible, and the rates of each declined over time. The use of tocilizumab or steroids to control adverse events did not have a negative effect on responses.

Since the primary analysis with at least 6 months of follow-up, there have been no new axi-cel–related cases of CRS, neurologic events, or deaths.

Dr. Neelapu also presented safety data on serious adverse events occurring more than 6 months after therapy in 10 patients who developed symptoms after the data cutoff.

Grade 3 events in these patients included lung infection, recurrent upper respiratory viral infection, and rotavirus infection, pneumonias, atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, lung infection, febrile neutropenia, and influenza B infection. One patient had grade 4 sepsis.

In an editorial accompanying the study in the New England Journal of Medicine, Eric Tran, PhD, and Walter J. Urba, MD, PhD, from the Earle A. Chiles Research Institute and the Providence Portland (Ore.) Medical Center, and Dan L. Longo, MD, deputy editor of the journal, praised ZUMA-1 as “a landmark study because it involved 22 institutions and showed that a personalized gene-engineered T-cell product could be rapidly generated at a centralized cell-manufacturing facility and safely administered to patients at transplantation-capable medical centers.”

They noted, however, that about half of all patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas will not have durable responses to CAR T-cell therapy directed against CD19, and that new strategies will be needed to improve responses (N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 10; doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1714680).

In the question and answer session at the end of the briefing, Dr. Neelapu said the preliminary observations of mechanisms of relapse or disease progression in some patients may be related to the loss of the CD19 antigen, which occurs in about one-third of patients who experience relapse, and to high expression of the programmed death ligand-1, which can potentially inhibit CAR-T cell function. A clinical trial is currently underway to evaluate potential strategies for improving response rates to CAR-T therapies, he said.

ZUMA-1 is supported by Kite Pharma and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program. Dr. Neelapu reported receiving advisory board fees from the company. Myriad coauthors also reported financial relationship with multiple companies.

SOURCE: Neelapu S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 578.

ATLANTA – More than one-third of patients with refractory large B-cell lymphomas treated with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta), often called axi-cel, had durable responses, with some patients having complete responses lasting more than 1 year after a single infusion, according to investigators in the ZUMA-1 trial.

Neil Osterweil/Frontline Medical News

Updated combined phase 1 and phase 2 results in 108 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL) showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 82%, including 58% complete responses, after a median follow-up of 15.4 months, reported Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“Axi-cel is highly effective in patients with large B-cell lymphoma who otherwise have no curative treatment options,” he said in a briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, prior to his presentation of the data in an oral session.

The trial results were also published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.As previously reported, in the multicenter phase 2 ZUMA-1 trial, 111 patients with treatment refractory DLBCL, PMBCL, or TFL were enrolled and treated with axi-cel at a target dose of 2 x 10⁶ cells/kg, following a conditioning regimen with low-dose cyclophosphamide and fludarabine.

The median patient age was 58 years. Patients had stage III or IV disease, 48% had International Prognostic Index scores of 3-4, 76% had disease that was refractory to third-line therapies or beyond, and 21% had disease that relapsed within 12 months of an autologous bone marrow transplant

Axi-cel was successfully manufactured with sufficient cells for transfusion in all but one of the 111 patients, and 101 patients eventually received infusions in phase 2 (modified intention-to-treat population). The average turnaround time from apheresis to the clinical site was 17 days.

Dr. Neelapu also presented data on seven patients enrolled in phase 1; the data were combined with the phase 2 results for an updated analysis of those patients who had at least 1 year of follow-up.

The phase 2 trial met its primary endpoint at the time of the primary analysis, with an 82% ORR, consisting of 54% complete responses and 28% partial responses at a median follow-up of 8.7 months.

In the updated analysis, the ORR and respective remission rates were 82%, 58%, and 34%, at a median of 15.4 months follow-up.

The median duration of response in the updated analysis was 11.1 months. The median duration of complete responses had not been reached at the time of data cutoff in August 2017. The median duration of partial responses was 1.9 months.

At the 15.4-month mark, 42% of patients remained free of disease progression, and 56% were alive, with the median overall survival not yet reached.

The treatment had generally acceptable toxicities, with only 13% of patients in phase 2 experiencing grade 3 or greater cytokine release syndrome (CRS), although one patient with CRS died from hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and one with CRS died from cardiac arrest. Grade 3 or greater neurologic events occurred in 28% of patients, and included encephalopathy, confusional state, aphasia, and somnolence.

The events were generally reversible, and the rates of each declined over time. The use of tocilizumab or steroids to control adverse events did not have a negative effect on responses.

Since the primary analysis with at least 6 months of follow-up, there have been no new axi-cel–related cases of CRS, neurologic events, or deaths.

Dr. Neelapu also presented safety data on serious adverse events occurring more than 6 months after therapy in 10 patients who developed symptoms after the data cutoff.

Grade 3 events in these patients included lung infection, recurrent upper respiratory viral infection, and rotavirus infection, pneumonias, atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, lung infection, febrile neutropenia, and influenza B infection. One patient had grade 4 sepsis.

In an editorial accompanying the study in the New England Journal of Medicine, Eric Tran, PhD, and Walter J. Urba, MD, PhD, from the Earle A. Chiles Research Institute and the Providence Portland (Ore.) Medical Center, and Dan L. Longo, MD, deputy editor of the journal, praised ZUMA-1 as “a landmark study because it involved 22 institutions and showed that a personalized gene-engineered T-cell product could be rapidly generated at a centralized cell-manufacturing facility and safely administered to patients at transplantation-capable medical centers.”

They noted, however, that about half of all patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas will not have durable responses to CAR T-cell therapy directed against CD19, and that new strategies will be needed to improve responses (N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 10; doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1714680).

In the question and answer session at the end of the briefing, Dr. Neelapu said the preliminary observations of mechanisms of relapse or disease progression in some patients may be related to the loss of the CD19 antigen, which occurs in about one-third of patients who experience relapse, and to high expression of the programmed death ligand-1, which can potentially inhibit CAR-T cell function. A clinical trial is currently underway to evaluate potential strategies for improving response rates to CAR-T therapies, he said.

ZUMA-1 is supported by Kite Pharma and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program. Dr. Neelapu reported receiving advisory board fees from the company. Myriad coauthors also reported financial relationship with multiple companies.

SOURCE: Neelapu S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 578.

ATLANTA – More than one-third of patients with refractory large B-cell lymphomas treated with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta), often called axi-cel, had durable responses, with some patients having complete responses lasting more than 1 year after a single infusion, according to investigators in the ZUMA-1 trial.

Neil Osterweil/Frontline Medical News

Updated combined phase 1 and phase 2 results in 108 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL) showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 82%, including 58% complete responses, after a median follow-up of 15.4 months, reported Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“Axi-cel is highly effective in patients with large B-cell lymphoma who otherwise have no curative treatment options,” he said in a briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, prior to his presentation of the data in an oral session.

The trial results were also published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine.As previously reported, in the multicenter phase 2 ZUMA-1 trial, 111 patients with treatment refractory DLBCL, PMBCL, or TFL were enrolled and treated with axi-cel at a target dose of 2 x 10⁶ cells/kg, following a conditioning regimen with low-dose cyclophosphamide and fludarabine.

The median patient age was 58 years. Patients had stage III or IV disease, 48% had International Prognostic Index scores of 3-4, 76% had disease that was refractory to third-line therapies or beyond, and 21% had disease that relapsed within 12 months of an autologous bone marrow transplant

Axi-cel was successfully manufactured with sufficient cells for transfusion in all but one of the 111 patients, and 101 patients eventually received infusions in phase 2 (modified intention-to-treat population). The average turnaround time from apheresis to the clinical site was 17 days.

Dr. Neelapu also presented data on seven patients enrolled in phase 1; the data were combined with the phase 2 results for an updated analysis of those patients who had at least 1 year of follow-up.

The phase 2 trial met its primary endpoint at the time of the primary analysis, with an 82% ORR, consisting of 54% complete responses and 28% partial responses at a median follow-up of 8.7 months.

In the updated analysis, the ORR and respective remission rates were 82%, 58%, and 34%, at a median of 15.4 months follow-up.

The median duration of response in the updated analysis was 11.1 months. The median duration of complete responses had not been reached at the time of data cutoff in August 2017. The median duration of partial responses was 1.9 months.

At the 15.4-month mark, 42% of patients remained free of disease progression, and 56% were alive, with the median overall survival not yet reached.

The treatment had generally acceptable toxicities, with only 13% of patients in phase 2 experiencing grade 3 or greater cytokine release syndrome (CRS), although one patient with CRS died from hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and one with CRS died from cardiac arrest. Grade 3 or greater neurologic events occurred in 28% of patients, and included encephalopathy, confusional state, aphasia, and somnolence.

The events were generally reversible, and the rates of each declined over time. The use of tocilizumab or steroids to control adverse events did not have a negative effect on responses.

Since the primary analysis with at least 6 months of follow-up, there have been no new axi-cel–related cases of CRS, neurologic events, or deaths.

Dr. Neelapu also presented safety data on serious adverse events occurring more than 6 months after therapy in 10 patients who developed symptoms after the data cutoff.

Grade 3 events in these patients included lung infection, recurrent upper respiratory viral infection, and rotavirus infection, pneumonias, atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, lung infection, febrile neutropenia, and influenza B infection. One patient had grade 4 sepsis.

In an editorial accompanying the study in the New England Journal of Medicine, Eric Tran, PhD, and Walter J. Urba, MD, PhD, from the Earle A. Chiles Research Institute and the Providence Portland (Ore.) Medical Center, and Dan L. Longo, MD, deputy editor of the journal, praised ZUMA-1 as “a landmark study because it involved 22 institutions and showed that a personalized gene-engineered T-cell product could be rapidly generated at a centralized cell-manufacturing facility and safely administered to patients at transplantation-capable medical centers.”

They noted, however, that about half of all patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas will not have durable responses to CAR T-cell therapy directed against CD19, and that new strategies will be needed to improve responses (N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 10; doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1714680).

In the question and answer session at the end of the briefing, Dr. Neelapu said the preliminary observations of mechanisms of relapse or disease progression in some patients may be related to the loss of the CD19 antigen, which occurs in about one-third of patients who experience relapse, and to high expression of the programmed death ligand-1, which can potentially inhibit CAR-T cell function. A clinical trial is currently underway to evaluate potential strategies for improving response rates to CAR-T therapies, he said.

ZUMA-1 is supported by Kite Pharma and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program. Dr. Neelapu reported receiving advisory board fees from the company. Myriad coauthors also reported financial relationship with multiple companies.

SOURCE: Neelapu S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 578.

Photo by Linda Bartlett

Combination treatment with 2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has demonstrated preclinical efficacy against B-cell lymphomas, according to researchers.

The investigators tested different combinations of mAbs to see how they interact with each other and what effect this has on how the immune system fights cancer.

One combination—an anti-CD27 mAb and anti-CD20 mAb—greatly increased survival in mouse models of B-cell lymphoma.

The researchers reported these results in Cancer Cell.

“By combining 2 specific antibodies—anti-CD27 and anti-CD20—we’ve increased the ability of the immune system to destroy cancer cells,” said study author Sean Lim, MBChB, PhD, of the University of Southampton in the UK.

“It’s very exciting to see that this drug combination has an impact on survival of mice with lymphoma, as improvements in treatment are urgently needed. The next stage will be to see if what we’ve discovered can be replicated in patients.”

For this study, Dr Lim and her colleagues tested combinations of tumor-targeting mAbs and immunomodulatory mAbs. The group found that an anti-CD27 mAb enhanced anti-CD20 therapy in various preclinical models.

The investigators first tested anti-CD20 and anti-CD27 (both alone and in combination) in the murine B-cell lymphoma model BCL1.

All control BCL1 mice had died by 30 days from baseline, all mice that received anti-CD20 alone died by day 40, and 30% of mice that received anti-CD27 alone were still alive past 100 days.

In contrast, 100% of mice that received anti-CD20 and anti-CD27 in combination were still alive and lymphoma-free past the 100-day mark.

The researchers also tested the mAbs in the A31 B-cell lymphoma model and the Eµ-TCL1 B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia model.

Results were similar to those observed with the BCL1 model. The combination of anti-CD20 and anti-CD27 significantly improved survival in A31 and Eµ-TCL1 mice, with all mice that received this combination surviving past 100 days.

As far as mechanisms of action, the investigators noted that anti-CD20 binds to B cells and mediates antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis of the mAb-opsonized cells.

The researchers said the addition of anti-CD27 stimulates CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells, which induces the release of CCL3, CCL4, and CCL5, and this potentially attracts myeloid cells.

In addition, anti-CD27 (via the stimulation of CD8+ T and natural killer cells) induces the release of interferon gamma, which activates macrophages to express more Fc gamma receptor IV and promotes their inflammatory capacity. This increases the number of macrophages available for antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis as well as the cells’ phagocytic ability.

Based on these findings, researchers are now conducting a phase 2 trial to test the anti-CD20 mAb rituximab and the anti-CD27 mAb varililumab in patients with relapsed and/or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. 

Photo by Linda Bartlett

Combination treatment with 2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has demonstrated preclinical efficacy against B-cell lymphomas, according to researchers.

The investigators tested different combinations of mAbs to see how they interact with each other and what effect this has on how the immune system fights cancer.

One combination—an anti-CD27 mAb and anti-CD20 mAb—greatly increased survival in mouse models of B-cell lymphoma.

The researchers reported these results in Cancer Cell.

“By combining 2 specific antibodies—anti-CD27 and anti-CD20—we’ve increased the ability of the immune system to destroy cancer cells,” said study author Sean Lim, MBChB, PhD, of the University of Southampton in the UK.

“It’s very exciting to see that this drug combination has an impact on survival of mice with lymphoma, as improvements in treatment are urgently needed. The next stage will be to see if what we’ve discovered can be replicated in patients.”

For this study, Dr Lim and her colleagues tested combinations of tumor-targeting mAbs and immunomodulatory mAbs. The group found that an anti-CD27 mAb enhanced anti-CD20 therapy in various preclinical models.

The investigators first tested anti-CD20 and anti-CD27 (both alone and in combination) in the murine B-cell lymphoma model BCL1.

All control BCL1 mice had died by 30 days from baseline, all mice that received anti-CD20 alone died by day 40, and 30% of mice that received anti-CD27 alone were still alive past 100 days.

In contrast, 100% of mice that received anti-CD20 and anti-CD27 in combination were still alive and lymphoma-free past the 100-day mark.

The researchers also tested the mAbs in the A31 B-cell lymphoma model and the Eµ-TCL1 B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia model.

Results were similar to those observed with the BCL1 model. The combination of anti-CD20 and anti-CD27 significantly improved survival in A31 and Eµ-TCL1 mice, with all mice that received this combination surviving past 100 days.

As far as mechanisms of action, the investigators noted that anti-CD20 binds to B cells and mediates antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis of the mAb-opsonized cells.

The researchers said the addition of anti-CD27 stimulates CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells, which induces the release of CCL3, CCL4, and CCL5, and this potentially attracts myeloid cells.

In addition, anti-CD27 (via the stimulation of CD8+ T and natural killer cells) induces the release of interferon gamma, which activates macrophages to express more Fc gamma receptor IV and promotes their inflammatory capacity. This increases the number of macrophages available for antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis as well as the cells’ phagocytic ability.

Based on these findings, researchers are now conducting a phase 2 trial to test the anti-CD20 mAb rituximab and the anti-CD27 mAb varililumab in patients with relapsed and/or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. 

Photo by Linda Bartlett

Combination treatment with 2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has demonstrated preclinical efficacy against B-cell lymphomas, according to researchers.

The investigators tested different combinations of mAbs to see how they interact with each other and what effect this has on how the immune system fights cancer.

One combination—an anti-CD27 mAb and anti-CD20 mAb—greatly increased survival in mouse models of B-cell lymphoma.

The researchers reported these results in Cancer Cell.

“By combining 2 specific antibodies—anti-CD27 and anti-CD20—we’ve increased the ability of the immune system to destroy cancer cells,” said study author Sean Lim, MBChB, PhD, of the University of Southampton in the UK.

“It’s very exciting to see that this drug combination has an impact on survival of mice with lymphoma, as improvements in treatment are urgently needed. The next stage will be to see if what we’ve discovered can be replicated in patients.”

For this study, Dr Lim and her colleagues tested combinations of tumor-targeting mAbs and immunomodulatory mAbs. The group found that an anti-CD27 mAb enhanced anti-CD20 therapy in various preclinical models.

The investigators first tested anti-CD20 and anti-CD27 (both alone and in combination) in the murine B-cell lymphoma model BCL1.

All control BCL1 mice had died by 30 days from baseline, all mice that received anti-CD20 alone died by day 40, and 30% of mice that received anti-CD27 alone were still alive past 100 days.

In contrast, 100% of mice that received anti-CD20 and anti-CD27 in combination were still alive and lymphoma-free past the 100-day mark.

The researchers also tested the mAbs in the A31 B-cell lymphoma model and the Eµ-TCL1 B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia model.

Results were similar to those observed with the BCL1 model. The combination of anti-CD20 and anti-CD27 significantly improved survival in A31 and Eµ-TCL1 mice, with all mice that received this combination surviving past 100 days.

As far as mechanisms of action, the investigators noted that anti-CD20 binds to B cells and mediates antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis of the mAb-opsonized cells.

The researchers said the addition of anti-CD27 stimulates CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells, which induces the release of CCL3, CCL4, and CCL5, and this potentially attracts myeloid cells.

In addition, anti-CD27 (via the stimulation of CD8+ T and natural killer cells) induces the release of interferon gamma, which activates macrophages to express more Fc gamma receptor IV and promotes their inflammatory capacity. This increases the number of macrophages available for antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis as well as the cells’ phagocytic ability.

Based on these findings, researchers are now conducting a phase 2 trial to test the anti-CD20 mAb rituximab and the anti-CD27 mAb varililumab in patients with relapsed and/or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. 

NEW YORK – For patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma and other indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the combination of bendamustine (Treanda) and rituximab is associated with significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and longer time-to-next treatment than is rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy, results of the BRIGHT study indicate.

But when a patient with follicular lymphoma experiences early disease progression on bendamustine, what should the next treatment be? Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)? Novel therapies? That was the question taken on in a debate at an international congress on hematologic malignancies by Carla Casulo, MD of the James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute at the University of Rochester (N.Y.), and Brian K. Link, MD, of the University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics in Iowa City.
 

Dr. Casulo: ASCT

“Follicular lymphoma with a short remission duration has been established as a poor prognostic marker for survival, and the optimal therapy for these patients is really not known,” Dr. Casulo said.

“Of course, [novel] therapies can be considered, I think, for the appropriate patient, and hopefully in the context of a clinical study,” she added.

Dr. Link: Novel agents

“I actually happen to agree with very much of what Carla had to share, but I do have a couple of caveats,” Dr. Link said.

“The focus of this discussion is on patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma, as Carla very carefully defined in her analysis of the NLCS. These are the early progressors,” he said.

NEW YORK – For patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma and other indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the combination of bendamustine (Treanda) and rituximab is associated with significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and longer time-to-next treatment than is rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy, results of the BRIGHT study indicate.

But when a patient with follicular lymphoma experiences early disease progression on bendamustine, what should the next treatment be? Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)? Novel therapies? That was the question taken on in a debate at an international congress on hematologic malignancies by Carla Casulo, MD of the James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute at the University of Rochester (N.Y.), and Brian K. Link, MD, of the University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics in Iowa City.
 

Dr. Casulo: ASCT

“Follicular lymphoma with a short remission duration has been established as a poor prognostic marker for survival, and the optimal therapy for these patients is really not known,” Dr. Casulo said.

“Of course, [novel] therapies can be considered, I think, for the appropriate patient, and hopefully in the context of a clinical study,” she added.

Dr. Link: Novel agents

“I actually happen to agree with very much of what Carla had to share, but I do have a couple of caveats,” Dr. Link said.

“The focus of this discussion is on patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma, as Carla very carefully defined in her analysis of the NLCS. These are the early progressors,” he said.

NEW YORK – For patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma and other indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the combination of bendamustine (Treanda) and rituximab is associated with significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and longer time-to-next treatment than is rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy, results of the BRIGHT study indicate.

But when a patient with follicular lymphoma experiences early disease progression on bendamustine, what should the next treatment be? Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)? Novel therapies? That was the question taken on in a debate at an international congress on hematologic malignancies by Carla Casulo, MD of the James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute at the University of Rochester (N.Y.), and Brian K. Link, MD, of the University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics in Iowa City.
 

Dr. Casulo: ASCT

“Follicular lymphoma with a short remission duration has been established as a poor prognostic marker for survival, and the optimal therapy for these patients is really not known,” Dr. Casulo said.

“Of course, [novel] therapies can be considered, I think, for the appropriate patient, and hopefully in the context of a clinical study,” she added.

Dr. Link: Novel agents

“I actually happen to agree with very much of what Carla had to share, but I do have a couple of caveats,” Dr. Link said.

“The focus of this discussion is on patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma, as Carla very carefully defined in her analysis of the NLCS. These are the early progressors,” he said.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

Preclinical research suggests the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor PQR309 has activity against several types of lymphoma and works well in combination with other agents.

PQR309 exhibited anti-lymphoma activity as a single agent and in combination with venetoclax, panobinostat, ibrutinib, lenalidomide, ARV-825, marizomib, and rituximab.

PQR309 demonstrated greater activity against B-cell lymphoma than T-cell lymphoma, and the inhibitor was able to overcome both primary and acquired resistance to idelalisib.

Francesco Bertoni, MD, of the Institute of Oncology Research in Bellinzona, Switzerland, and his colleagues conducted this research and reported the results in Clinical Cancer Research.

The work was funded by PIQUR Therapeutics AG, the company developing PQR309, and some study authors are PIQUR employees.

The researchers tested PQR309 in 49 human lymphoma cell lines—7 activated B-cell-like (ABC) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 18 germinal center B-cell (GCB) DLBCL, 10 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), 3 splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL), 2 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 4 Hodgkin lymphoma, and 5 anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).

In most cell lines, PQR309 halted proliferation, mainly due to cell-cycle arrest with a block in G1. However, PQR309 induced apoptosis in 2 cell lines tested—SU-DHL-4 and TMD8.

The researchers noted that PQR309 was significantly more active in the B-cell lymphoma cell lines (DLBCL, MCL, CLL, and SMZL) than in the T-cell lymphoma cell line ALCL (P=0.028).

PQR309 exhibited similar activity in ABC and GCB DLBCL cell lines, de novo DLBCL, and DLBCL derived from transformed follicular lymphoma. TP53, MYC, and BCL2 status also had no significant effect on PQR309 activity.

The researchers compared cell lines that were very sensitive to PQR309 to those with low sensitivity to the drug and identified differences.

The team said that transcripts preferentially expressed in PQR309-sensitive cell lines were significantly enriched of genes involved in BCR pathway/signaling and BLIMP1 targets. Transcripts associated with less sensitive cell lines were enriched of members of proteasome pathway, response to unfolded proteins, MYC targets, XBP1 targets, genes downregulated by mTOR inhibitors, and genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation.

PQR309 demonstrated synergistic effects when combined with the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib, the immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide, the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab, and the proteasome inhibitor marizomib.

PQR309 demonstrated synergistic or additive effects when combined with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax, the HDAC inhibitor panobinostat, and the PROTAC BET inhibitor ARV-825.

In addition, PQR309 was active in lymphoma cell lines with primary and secondary resistance to the PI3K inhibitor idelalisib.

The researchers believe the results of this study, together with ongoing clinical studies of PQR309, can lead to better treatments for lymphoma patients and better understanding of the mechanisms of anti-lymphoma agents.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

Preclinical research suggests the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor PQR309 has activity against several types of lymphoma and works well in combination with other agents.

PQR309 exhibited anti-lymphoma activity as a single agent and in combination with venetoclax, panobinostat, ibrutinib, lenalidomide, ARV-825, marizomib, and rituximab.

PQR309 demonstrated greater activity against B-cell lymphoma than T-cell lymphoma, and the inhibitor was able to overcome both primary and acquired resistance to idelalisib.

Francesco Bertoni, MD, of the Institute of Oncology Research in Bellinzona, Switzerland, and his colleagues conducted this research and reported the results in Clinical Cancer Research.

The work was funded by PIQUR Therapeutics AG, the company developing PQR309, and some study authors are PIQUR employees.

The researchers tested PQR309 in 49 human lymphoma cell lines—7 activated B-cell-like (ABC) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 18 germinal center B-cell (GCB) DLBCL, 10 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), 3 splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL), 2 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 4 Hodgkin lymphoma, and 5 anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).

In most cell lines, PQR309 halted proliferation, mainly due to cell-cycle arrest with a block in G1. However, PQR309 induced apoptosis in 2 cell lines tested—SU-DHL-4 and TMD8.

The researchers noted that PQR309 was significantly more active in the B-cell lymphoma cell lines (DLBCL, MCL, CLL, and SMZL) than in the T-cell lymphoma cell line ALCL (P=0.028).

PQR309 exhibited similar activity in ABC and GCB DLBCL cell lines, de novo DLBCL, and DLBCL derived from transformed follicular lymphoma. TP53, MYC, and BCL2 status also had no significant effect on PQR309 activity.

The researchers compared cell lines that were very sensitive to PQR309 to those with low sensitivity to the drug and identified differences.

The team said that transcripts preferentially expressed in PQR309-sensitive cell lines were significantly enriched of genes involved in BCR pathway/signaling and BLIMP1 targets. Transcripts associated with less sensitive cell lines were enriched of members of proteasome pathway, response to unfolded proteins, MYC targets, XBP1 targets, genes downregulated by mTOR inhibitors, and genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation.

PQR309 demonstrated synergistic effects when combined with the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib, the immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide, the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab, and the proteasome inhibitor marizomib.

PQR309 demonstrated synergistic or additive effects when combined with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax, the HDAC inhibitor panobinostat, and the PROTAC BET inhibitor ARV-825.

In addition, PQR309 was active in lymphoma cell lines with primary and secondary resistance to the PI3K inhibitor idelalisib.

The researchers believe the results of this study, together with ongoing clinical studies of PQR309, can lead to better treatments for lymphoma patients and better understanding of the mechanisms of anti-lymphoma agents.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

Preclinical research suggests the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor PQR309 has activity against several types of lymphoma and works well in combination with other agents.

PQR309 exhibited anti-lymphoma activity as a single agent and in combination with venetoclax, panobinostat, ibrutinib, lenalidomide, ARV-825, marizomib, and rituximab.

PQR309 demonstrated greater activity against B-cell lymphoma than T-cell lymphoma, and the inhibitor was able to overcome both primary and acquired resistance to idelalisib.

Francesco Bertoni, MD, of the Institute of Oncology Research in Bellinzona, Switzerland, and his colleagues conducted this research and reported the results in Clinical Cancer Research.

The work was funded by PIQUR Therapeutics AG, the company developing PQR309, and some study authors are PIQUR employees.

The researchers tested PQR309 in 49 human lymphoma cell lines—7 activated B-cell-like (ABC) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 18 germinal center B-cell (GCB) DLBCL, 10 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), 3 splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL), 2 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 4 Hodgkin lymphoma, and 5 anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).

In most cell lines, PQR309 halted proliferation, mainly due to cell-cycle arrest with a block in G1. However, PQR309 induced apoptosis in 2 cell lines tested—SU-DHL-4 and TMD8.

The researchers noted that PQR309 was significantly more active in the B-cell lymphoma cell lines (DLBCL, MCL, CLL, and SMZL) than in the T-cell lymphoma cell line ALCL (P=0.028).

PQR309 exhibited similar activity in ABC and GCB DLBCL cell lines, de novo DLBCL, and DLBCL derived from transformed follicular lymphoma. TP53, MYC, and BCL2 status also had no significant effect on PQR309 activity.

The researchers compared cell lines that were very sensitive to PQR309 to those with low sensitivity to the drug and identified differences.

The team said that transcripts preferentially expressed in PQR309-sensitive cell lines were significantly enriched of genes involved in BCR pathway/signaling and BLIMP1 targets. Transcripts associated with less sensitive cell lines were enriched of members of proteasome pathway, response to unfolded proteins, MYC targets, XBP1 targets, genes downregulated by mTOR inhibitors, and genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation.

PQR309 demonstrated synergistic effects when combined with the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib, the immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide, the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab, and the proteasome inhibitor marizomib.

PQR309 demonstrated synergistic or additive effects when combined with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax, the HDAC inhibitor panobinostat, and the PROTAC BET inhibitor ARV-825.

In addition, PQR309 was active in lymphoma cell lines with primary and secondary resistance to the PI3K inhibitor idelalisib.

The researchers believe the results of this study, together with ongoing clinical studies of PQR309, can lead to better treatments for lymphoma patients and better understanding of the mechanisms of anti-lymphoma agents.

mycosis fungoides

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review the biologics license application (BLA) for mogamulizumab.

Mogamulizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CCR4 that is being developed by Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.

The company is seeking FDA approval for mogamulizumab as a treatment for patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy.

The FDA expects to make a decision on the BLA by June 4, 2018.

The FDA’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The BLA for mogamulizumab is supported by data from the MAVORIC study, the largest global randomized clinical trial of systemic therapy in CTCL.

MAVORIC is a phase 3 trial in which researchers evaluated mogamulizumab and an active comparator in 372 patients with CTCL who had failed at least 1 prior systemic treatment. The study was conducted in the US, Europe, Japan, and Australia.

Results from this trial are scheduled to be presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 817).

The FDA previously granted mogamulizumab breakthrough therapy designation as a treatment for CTCL patients who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy.

Breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of new treatments for serious or life-threatening conditions. The designation entitles the company developing a therapy to more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient and accelerated development program, as well as eligibility for other actions to expedite FDA review, such as rolling submission and priority review.

To earn breakthrough designation, a treatment must show encouraging early clinical results demonstrating substantial improvement over available therapies with regard to a clinically significant endpoint, or it must fulfill an unmet need.

mycosis fungoides

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review the biologics license application (BLA) for mogamulizumab.

Mogamulizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CCR4 that is being developed by Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.

The company is seeking FDA approval for mogamulizumab as a treatment for patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy.

The FDA expects to make a decision on the BLA by June 4, 2018.

The FDA’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The BLA for mogamulizumab is supported by data from the MAVORIC study, the largest global randomized clinical trial of systemic therapy in CTCL.

MAVORIC is a phase 3 trial in which researchers evaluated mogamulizumab and an active comparator in 372 patients with CTCL who had failed at least 1 prior systemic treatment. The study was conducted in the US, Europe, Japan, and Australia.

Results from this trial are scheduled to be presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 817).

The FDA previously granted mogamulizumab breakthrough therapy designation as a treatment for CTCL patients who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy.

Breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of new treatments for serious or life-threatening conditions. The designation entitles the company developing a therapy to more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient and accelerated development program, as well as eligibility for other actions to expedite FDA review, such as rolling submission and priority review.

To earn breakthrough designation, a treatment must show encouraging early clinical results demonstrating substantial improvement over available therapies with regard to a clinically significant endpoint, or it must fulfill an unmet need.

mycosis fungoides

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review the biologics license application (BLA) for mogamulizumab.

Mogamulizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CCR4 that is being developed by Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.

The company is seeking FDA approval for mogamulizumab as a treatment for patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy.

The FDA expects to make a decision on the BLA by June 4, 2018.

The FDA’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The BLA for mogamulizumab is supported by data from the MAVORIC study, the largest global randomized clinical trial of systemic therapy in CTCL.

MAVORIC is a phase 3 trial in which researchers evaluated mogamulizumab and an active comparator in 372 patients with CTCL who had failed at least 1 prior systemic treatment. The study was conducted in the US, Europe, Japan, and Australia.

Results from this trial are scheduled to be presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 817).

The FDA previously granted mogamulizumab breakthrough therapy designation as a treatment for CTCL patients who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy.

Breakthrough designation is intended to expedite the development and review of new treatments for serious or life-threatening conditions. The designation entitles the company developing a therapy to more intensive FDA guidance on an efficient and accelerated development program, as well as eligibility for other actions to expedite FDA review, such as rolling submission and priority review.

To earn breakthrough designation, a treatment must show encouraging early clinical results demonstrating substantial improvement over available therapies with regard to a clinically significant endpoint, or it must fulfill an unmet need.

Epidermotropic marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), a rare cutaneous B-cell lymphoma identified in only eight patients to date, appears to be responsive to rituximab, according to authors of a case report.

A 69-year-old man who presented with a generalized papulosquamous eruption that was eventually diagnosed as epidermotropic MZL achieved a near total remission within 3 months of receiving four total weekly rituximab infusions, reported Cynthia M. Magro, MD, from Cornell University, New York, and her colleagues from the University of Arizona, Tucson (JAAD Case Rep. 2017 Sep 23;3[6]:474-6).

“Epidermotropic MZL represents a distinctive nosologic B-cell lymphoma that should be considered a diagnostic possibility in older men who present with an unexplained papulosquamous eruption resembling pityriasis rosea,” the researchers wrote.

“Epidermotropism refers to a state of abnormal colonization of the epidermis by leukocytes, which often reflects a clonal T-cell or monocyte dyscrasia. Epidermotropism is a distinctive pattern of passive migration into epithelial structures that is not otherwise attributable to the normal function of innate and adaptive immunity,” the researchers explained.

They described the case of the aforementioned patient, who presented with asymptomatic indurated, red-to-brown papules and plaques on his chest, abdomen, back, and buttocks, which gave the clinical impression of pityriasis rosea or a similarly appearing drug reaction.

Histopathologic examination of two biopsied lesions “demonstrated a dense superficial lymphocytic infiltrate that expanded and effaced the papillary and superficial reticular dermis.”

After epidermotropic MZL was diagnosed, the patient was evaluated for systemic disease with a bone marrow biopsy, which revealed a low-grade B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, and with a PET scan showing lymphomatous infiltration of the spleen. The patient was treated with four weekly infusions of rituximab 375 mg/m².

“Within 3 months, he experienced marked regression of his cutaneous disease. Repeat radiographic imaging found an interval decrease in the size of his spleen, signifying an objective response. Since achieving near total clinical remission, the patient remains under the close observation of medical oncology services,” the researchers wrote.

The investigators noted that if histopathology is the only method used to diagnosis the condition, epidermotropic MZL could be mistaken for a T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, such as mycosis fungoides, because of the similar architecture at low resolution.

“In these settings, immunohistochemical staining for B-cell markers represents an indispensable diagnostic test,” they wrote.

The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

hematologynews@frontlinemedcom.com

Epidermotropic marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), a rare cutaneous B-cell lymphoma identified in only eight patients to date, appears to be responsive to rituximab, according to authors of a case report.

A 69-year-old man who presented with a generalized papulosquamous eruption that was eventually diagnosed as epidermotropic MZL achieved a near total remission within 3 months of receiving four total weekly rituximab infusions, reported Cynthia M. Magro, MD, from Cornell University, New York, and her colleagues from the University of Arizona, Tucson (JAAD Case Rep. 2017 Sep 23;3[6]:474-6).

“Epidermotropic MZL represents a distinctive nosologic B-cell lymphoma that should be considered a diagnostic possibility in older men who present with an unexplained papulosquamous eruption resembling pityriasis rosea,” the researchers wrote.

“Epidermotropism refers to a state of abnormal colonization of the epidermis by leukocytes, which often reflects a clonal T-cell or monocyte dyscrasia. Epidermotropism is a distinctive pattern of passive migration into epithelial structures that is not otherwise attributable to the normal function of innate and adaptive immunity,” the researchers explained.

They described the case of the aforementioned patient, who presented with asymptomatic indurated, red-to-brown papules and plaques on his chest, abdomen, back, and buttocks, which gave the clinical impression of pityriasis rosea or a similarly appearing drug reaction.

Histopathologic examination of two biopsied lesions “demonstrated a dense superficial lymphocytic infiltrate that expanded and effaced the papillary and superficial reticular dermis.”

After epidermotropic MZL was diagnosed, the patient was evaluated for systemic disease with a bone marrow biopsy, which revealed a low-grade B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, and with a PET scan showing lymphomatous infiltration of the spleen. The patient was treated with four weekly infusions of rituximab 375 mg/m².

“Within 3 months, he experienced marked regression of his cutaneous disease. Repeat radiographic imaging found an interval decrease in the size of his spleen, signifying an objective response. Since achieving near total clinical remission, the patient remains under the close observation of medical oncology services,” the researchers wrote.

The investigators noted that if histopathology is the only method used to diagnosis the condition, epidermotropic MZL could be mistaken for a T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, such as mycosis fungoides, because of the similar architecture at low resolution.

“In these settings, immunohistochemical staining for B-cell markers represents an indispensable diagnostic test,” they wrote.

The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

hematologynews@frontlinemedcom.com

Epidermotropic marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), a rare cutaneous B-cell lymphoma identified in only eight patients to date, appears to be responsive to rituximab, according to authors of a case report.

A 69-year-old man who presented with a generalized papulosquamous eruption that was eventually diagnosed as epidermotropic MZL achieved a near total remission within 3 months of receiving four total weekly rituximab infusions, reported Cynthia M. Magro, MD, from Cornell University, New York, and her colleagues from the University of Arizona, Tucson (JAAD Case Rep. 2017 Sep 23;3[6]:474-6).

“Epidermotropic MZL represents a distinctive nosologic B-cell lymphoma that should be considered a diagnostic possibility in older men who present with an unexplained papulosquamous eruption resembling pityriasis rosea,” the researchers wrote.

“Epidermotropism refers to a state of abnormal colonization of the epidermis by leukocytes, which often reflects a clonal T-cell or monocyte dyscrasia. Epidermotropism is a distinctive pattern of passive migration into epithelial structures that is not otherwise attributable to the normal function of innate and adaptive immunity,” the researchers explained.

They described the case of the aforementioned patient, who presented with asymptomatic indurated, red-to-brown papules and plaques on his chest, abdomen, back, and buttocks, which gave the clinical impression of pityriasis rosea or a similarly appearing drug reaction.

Histopathologic examination of two biopsied lesions “demonstrated a dense superficial lymphocytic infiltrate that expanded and effaced the papillary and superficial reticular dermis.”

After epidermotropic MZL was diagnosed, the patient was evaluated for systemic disease with a bone marrow biopsy, which revealed a low-grade B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, and with a PET scan showing lymphomatous infiltration of the spleen. The patient was treated with four weekly infusions of rituximab 375 mg/m².

“Within 3 months, he experienced marked regression of his cutaneous disease. Repeat radiographic imaging found an interval decrease in the size of his spleen, signifying an objective response. Since achieving near total clinical remission, the patient remains under the close observation of medical oncology services,” the researchers wrote.

The investigators noted that if histopathology is the only method used to diagnosis the condition, epidermotropic MZL could be mistaken for a T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder, such as mycosis fungoides, because of the similar architecture at low resolution.

“In these settings, immunohistochemical staining for B-cell markers represents an indispensable diagnostic test,” they wrote.

The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest.

hematologynews@frontlinemedcom.com

For patients with advanced or recurrent marginal zone lymphomas (MZL) typically treated with radiotherapy, antibiotics, single-agent therapy, or observation, upfront chemotherapy was associated with high rates of both failure-free and overall survival at 10 years.

A retrospective analysis of data on 44 patients with either extranodal MZL (MALT), splenic MZL (SMZL), or nodal MZL (NMZL) treated with either the standard of care (for early-stage MALT) or with chemotherapy plus rituximab (for patients with advanced MALT, SMZL, or NMZL) showed a projected 10-year failure-free survival rate of 80%, and an overall survival rate of 100%, reported José L. Ortega, MD, of the University of Puerto Rico in San Juan, and his colleagues (Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017 Sep 23. pii: S2152-2650[17]30632-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.09.014).

“Although the watch and wait modality is still the most-used strategy for patients with advanced MZLs, with chemotherapy traditionally reserved for relapsed or advanced symptomatic disease, our data suggest that upfront chemotherapy is very effective for patients with advanced MALT, SMZL, and NMZL. However, it was not possible to definitely exclude that a less-aggressive approach such as single-agent rituximab could yield similar results,” the investigators wrote.

The standard of care for patients with localized MALT has traditionally been either antibiotic therapy for gastric MALT, or radiotherapy when antibiotics are not feasible. There is no standard of care, however, for either SMZL or NMZL, which are typically managed with either observation or single-agent rituximab, the investigators stated.

To see whether upfront chemotherapy with either FND-R (fludarabine, mitoxantrone, dexamethasone, and rituximab) or CHOP-R (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and rituximab) could improve outcomes in patients with advanced or recurrent MZLs, the investigators conducted a retrospective study of outcomes for 44 patients treated at their institution.

Group 1 comprised 22 patients with early-stage MALT treated with either radiotherapy or antibiotics, with or without surgery. Group 2 comprised 9 patients with advanced MALT, 9 with SMZL, and 4 with NMZL. Patients in this group underwent upfront chemotherapy with either FND-R (14 patients) or CHOP-R (8 patients). In addition, 16 patients in group 2 received maintenance rituximab.

All patients in each group had complete remissions. Two patients in group 1 had relapses (one at 70 months and one at 75 months) of stage I MALT that had previously been treated with radiotherapy. Both patients underwent salvage FND-R, and remained disease free at 27 and 39 months after relapse. There were no relapses in group 2.

The investigators deemed long-term toxicities to be “acceptable,” with most adverse effects in group 2 being hematologic in origin, including grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 70%, thrombocytopenia in 22%, and anemia in 17%. Nonhematologic adverse events were mostly grade 1 or 2. There were no second malignancies reported at the most recent follow-up.

The investigators noted that the high complete remission rate and durable remissions with FND-R suggest that it has excellent activity against MZL, and that the long failure-free survival suggests the possibility of cure. They acknowledged, however, that their impressions were based on retrospective data and a small sample size, and that larger clinical trials are needed to confirm their results.

The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

hematologynews@frontlinemedcom.com

For patients with advanced or recurrent marginal zone lymphomas (MZL) typically treated with radiotherapy, antibiotics, single-agent therapy, or observation, upfront chemotherapy was associated with high rates of both failure-free and overall survival at 10 years.

A retrospective analysis of data on 44 patients with either extranodal MZL (MALT), splenic MZL (SMZL), or nodal MZL (NMZL) treated with either the standard of care (for early-stage MALT) or with chemotherapy plus rituximab (for patients with advanced MALT, SMZL, or NMZL) showed a projected 10-year failure-free survival rate of 80%, and an overall survival rate of 100%, reported José L. Ortega, MD, of the University of Puerto Rico in San Juan, and his colleagues (Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017 Sep 23. pii: S2152-2650[17]30632-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.09.014).

“Although the watch and wait modality is still the most-used strategy for patients with advanced MZLs, with chemotherapy traditionally reserved for relapsed or advanced symptomatic disease, our data suggest that upfront chemotherapy is very effective for patients with advanced MALT, SMZL, and NMZL. However, it was not possible to definitely exclude that a less-aggressive approach such as single-agent rituximab could yield similar results,” the investigators wrote.

The standard of care for patients with localized MALT has traditionally been either antibiotic therapy for gastric MALT, or radiotherapy when antibiotics are not feasible. There is no standard of care, however, for either SMZL or NMZL, which are typically managed with either observation or single-agent rituximab, the investigators stated.

To see whether upfront chemotherapy with either FND-R (fludarabine, mitoxantrone, dexamethasone, and rituximab) or CHOP-R (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and rituximab) could improve outcomes in patients with advanced or recurrent MZLs, the investigators conducted a retrospective study of outcomes for 44 patients treated at their institution.

Group 1 comprised 22 patients with early-stage MALT treated with either radiotherapy or antibiotics, with or without surgery. Group 2 comprised 9 patients with advanced MALT, 9 with SMZL, and 4 with NMZL. Patients in this group underwent upfront chemotherapy with either FND-R (14 patients) or CHOP-R (8 patients). In addition, 16 patients in group 2 received maintenance rituximab.

All patients in each group had complete remissions. Two patients in group 1 had relapses (one at 70 months and one at 75 months) of stage I MALT that had previously been treated with radiotherapy. Both patients underwent salvage FND-R, and remained disease free at 27 and 39 months after relapse. There were no relapses in group 2.

The investigators deemed long-term toxicities to be “acceptable,” with most adverse effects in group 2 being hematologic in origin, including grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 70%, thrombocytopenia in 22%, and anemia in 17%. Nonhematologic adverse events were mostly grade 1 or 2. There were no second malignancies reported at the most recent follow-up.

The investigators noted that the high complete remission rate and durable remissions with FND-R suggest that it has excellent activity against MZL, and that the long failure-free survival suggests the possibility of cure. They acknowledged, however, that their impressions were based on retrospective data and a small sample size, and that larger clinical trials are needed to confirm their results.

The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

hematologynews@frontlinemedcom.com

For patients with advanced or recurrent marginal zone lymphomas (MZL) typically treated with radiotherapy, antibiotics, single-agent therapy, or observation, upfront chemotherapy was associated with high rates of both failure-free and overall survival at 10 years.

A retrospective analysis of data on 44 patients with either extranodal MZL (MALT), splenic MZL (SMZL), or nodal MZL (NMZL) treated with either the standard of care (for early-stage MALT) or with chemotherapy plus rituximab (for patients with advanced MALT, SMZL, or NMZL) showed a projected 10-year failure-free survival rate of 80%, and an overall survival rate of 100%, reported José L. Ortega, MD, of the University of Puerto Rico in San Juan, and his colleagues (Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017 Sep 23. pii: S2152-2650[17]30632-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.09.014).

“Although the watch and wait modality is still the most-used strategy for patients with advanced MZLs, with chemotherapy traditionally reserved for relapsed or advanced symptomatic disease, our data suggest that upfront chemotherapy is very effective for patients with advanced MALT, SMZL, and NMZL. However, it was not possible to definitely exclude that a less-aggressive approach such as single-agent rituximab could yield similar results,” the investigators wrote.

The standard of care for patients with localized MALT has traditionally been either antibiotic therapy for gastric MALT, or radiotherapy when antibiotics are not feasible. There is no standard of care, however, for either SMZL or NMZL, which are typically managed with either observation or single-agent rituximab, the investigators stated.

To see whether upfront chemotherapy with either FND-R (fludarabine, mitoxantrone, dexamethasone, and rituximab) or CHOP-R (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and rituximab) could improve outcomes in patients with advanced or recurrent MZLs, the investigators conducted a retrospective study of outcomes for 44 patients treated at their institution.

Group 1 comprised 22 patients with early-stage MALT treated with either radiotherapy or antibiotics, with or without surgery. Group 2 comprised 9 patients with advanced MALT, 9 with SMZL, and 4 with NMZL. Patients in this group underwent upfront chemotherapy with either FND-R (14 patients) or CHOP-R (8 patients). In addition, 16 patients in group 2 received maintenance rituximab.

All patients in each group had complete remissions. Two patients in group 1 had relapses (one at 70 months and one at 75 months) of stage I MALT that had previously been treated with radiotherapy. Both patients underwent salvage FND-R, and remained disease free at 27 and 39 months after relapse. There were no relapses in group 2.

The investigators deemed long-term toxicities to be “acceptable,” with most adverse effects in group 2 being hematologic in origin, including grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 70%, thrombocytopenia in 22%, and anemia in 17%. Nonhematologic adverse events were mostly grade 1 or 2. There were no second malignancies reported at the most recent follow-up.

The investigators noted that the high complete remission rate and durable remissions with FND-R suggest that it has excellent activity against MZL, and that the long failure-free survival suggests the possibility of cure. They acknowledged, however, that their impressions were based on retrospective data and a small sample size, and that larger clinical trials are needed to confirm their results.

The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

hematologynews@frontlinemedcom.com

Micrograph showing CLL

New research suggests patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are willing to trade treatment efficacy for a reduced risk of side effects, but the cost of treatment may trump other factors.

The patients studied placed the highest value on treatments that deliver the longest progression-free survival (PFS), but the patients were also willing to swap some efficacy for a reduced risk of serious adverse events (AEs).

Study results also indicated that factoring out-of-pocket costs into the decision-making process can significantly influence a patient’s choice of treatment.

Carol Mansfield, PhD, of RTI Health Solutions in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and her colleagues conducted this study and reported the results in Blood Advances. The study was supported by funding from Genentech, Inc., to RTI Health Solutions.

The researchers surveyed 384 patients with CLL. Patients were asked to choose between hypothetical treatment options, each of which was defined by 5 variable attributes—PFS, mode of administration, typical severity of diarrhea, chance of serious infection, and chance of organ damage.

The attribute patients ranked highest was a change in PFS from 10 months to 60 months. This was followed by a change in infection risk from 30% to 0%, a change in the risk of organ damage from 8% to 0%, a change in diarrhea from severe to none, and a change in the mode of administration from intravenous to oral.

On average, a gain in PFS of 35.9 months was needed for patients to accept a 30% risk of serious infection. A gain in PFS of 26.3 months was needed for patients to accept an 8% risk of organ damage.

A gain in PFS of 21.6 months was needed for patients to accept severe diarrhea. And a gain in PFS of 3.5 months was needed for patients to accept the change from a daily pill to intravenous administration for 6 months.

There were no significant differences in preferences among treatment-naïve patients, first-line patients, and relapsed/refractory patients.

Impact of cost

When the researchers conducted a supplemental cost analysis, they found that out-of-pocket cost had a substantial impact on treatment choice.

The cost analysis included 2 treatments—medicines A and B. Based on the prior analysis, the researchers predicted that 91% of patients would choose medicine B if cost were not a concern because B offered longer PFS than A.

“We used the results from the discrete-choice experiment to forecast the probability that a respondent would pick each hypothetical drug without any mention of cost and then compared that to the choices people made when out-of-pocket costs for these medicines were included,” Dr Mansfield explained.

Patients were asked to choose between medicines A and B under 2 circumstances in which B cost more than A.

When medicine B had a monthly out-of-pocket cost that was $75 more than medicine A, 50% of patients chose medicine A.

When medicine B had a monthly out-of-pocket cost that was $400 more than medicine A, 74% of patients chose medicine A.

“Cost is clearly something that has an impact,” Dr Mansfield said. “When patients get prescribed something they can’t afford, they have to make very difficult choices.”

Dr Mansfield and her colleagues believe their findings will help doctors and patients focus on treatments that account for a patient’s unique circumstances and goals.

“Patients don’t always know that they could be making these tradeoffs,” Dr Mansfield said. “We hope that our findings can help doctors to have frank discussions with their patients about the differences between treatments and how these might affect their lives.”

Micrograph showing CLL

New research suggests patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are willing to trade treatment efficacy for a reduced risk of side effects, but the cost of treatment may trump other factors.

The patients studied placed the highest value on treatments that deliver the longest progression-free survival (PFS), but the patients were also willing to swap some efficacy for a reduced risk of serious adverse events (AEs).

Study results also indicated that factoring out-of-pocket costs into the decision-making process can significantly influence a patient’s choice of treatment.

Carol Mansfield, PhD, of RTI Health Solutions in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and her colleagues conducted this study and reported the results in Blood Advances. The study was supported by funding from Genentech, Inc., to RTI Health Solutions.

The researchers surveyed 384 patients with CLL. Patients were asked to choose between hypothetical treatment options, each of which was defined by 5 variable attributes—PFS, mode of administration, typical severity of diarrhea, chance of serious infection, and chance of organ damage.

The attribute patients ranked highest was a change in PFS from 10 months to 60 months. This was followed by a change in infection risk from 30% to 0%, a change in the risk of organ damage from 8% to 0%, a change in diarrhea from severe to none, and a change in the mode of administration from intravenous to oral.

On average, a gain in PFS of 35.9 months was needed for patients to accept a 30% risk of serious infection. A gain in PFS of 26.3 months was needed for patients to accept an 8% risk of organ damage.

A gain in PFS of 21.6 months was needed for patients to accept severe diarrhea. And a gain in PFS of 3.5 months was needed for patients to accept the change from a daily pill to intravenous administration for 6 months.

There were no significant differences in preferences among treatment-naïve patients, first-line patients, and relapsed/refractory patients.

Impact of cost

When the researchers conducted a supplemental cost analysis, they found that out-of-pocket cost had a substantial impact on treatment choice.

The cost analysis included 2 treatments—medicines A and B. Based on the prior analysis, the researchers predicted that 91% of patients would choose medicine B if cost were not a concern because B offered longer PFS than A.

“We used the results from the discrete-choice experiment to forecast the probability that a respondent would pick each hypothetical drug without any mention of cost and then compared that to the choices people made when out-of-pocket costs for these medicines were included,” Dr Mansfield explained.

Patients were asked to choose between medicines A and B under 2 circumstances in which B cost more than A.

When medicine B had a monthly out-of-pocket cost that was $75 more than medicine A, 50% of patients chose medicine A.

When medicine B had a monthly out-of-pocket cost that was $400 more than medicine A, 74% of patients chose medicine A.

“Cost is clearly something that has an impact,” Dr Mansfield said. “When patients get prescribed something they can’t afford, they have to make very difficult choices.”

Dr Mansfield and her colleagues believe their findings will help doctors and patients focus on treatments that account for a patient’s unique circumstances and goals.

“Patients don’t always know that they could be making these tradeoffs,” Dr Mansfield said. “We hope that our findings can help doctors to have frank discussions with their patients about the differences between treatments and how these might affect their lives.”

Micrograph showing CLL

New research suggests patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are willing to trade treatment efficacy for a reduced risk of side effects, but the cost of treatment may trump other factors.

The patients studied placed the highest value on treatments that deliver the longest progression-free survival (PFS), but the patients were also willing to swap some efficacy for a reduced risk of serious adverse events (AEs).

Study results also indicated that factoring out-of-pocket costs into the decision-making process can significantly influence a patient’s choice of treatment.

Carol Mansfield, PhD, of RTI Health Solutions in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, and her colleagues conducted this study and reported the results in Blood Advances. The study was supported by funding from Genentech, Inc., to RTI Health Solutions.

The researchers surveyed 384 patients with CLL. Patients were asked to choose between hypothetical treatment options, each of which was defined by 5 variable attributes—PFS, mode of administration, typical severity of diarrhea, chance of serious infection, and chance of organ damage.

The attribute patients ranked highest was a change in PFS from 10 months to 60 months. This was followed by a change in infection risk from 30% to 0%, a change in the risk of organ damage from 8% to 0%, a change in diarrhea from severe to none, and a change in the mode of administration from intravenous to oral.

On average, a gain in PFS of 35.9 months was needed for patients to accept a 30% risk of serious infection. A gain in PFS of 26.3 months was needed for patients to accept an 8% risk of organ damage.

A gain in PFS of 21.6 months was needed for patients to accept severe diarrhea. And a gain in PFS of 3.5 months was needed for patients to accept the change from a daily pill to intravenous administration for 6 months.

There were no significant differences in preferences among treatment-naïve patients, first-line patients, and relapsed/refractory patients.

Impact of cost

When the researchers conducted a supplemental cost analysis, they found that out-of-pocket cost had a substantial impact on treatment choice.

The cost analysis included 2 treatments—medicines A and B. Based on the prior analysis, the researchers predicted that 91% of patients would choose medicine B if cost were not a concern because B offered longer PFS than A.

“We used the results from the discrete-choice experiment to forecast the probability that a respondent would pick each hypothetical drug without any mention of cost and then compared that to the choices people made when out-of-pocket costs for these medicines were included,” Dr Mansfield explained.

Patients were asked to choose between medicines A and B under 2 circumstances in which B cost more than A.

When medicine B had a monthly out-of-pocket cost that was $75 more than medicine A, 50% of patients chose medicine A.

When medicine B had a monthly out-of-pocket cost that was $400 more than medicine A, 74% of patients chose medicine A.

“Cost is clearly something that has an impact,” Dr Mansfield said. “When patients get prescribed something they can’t afford, they have to make very difficult choices.”

Dr Mansfield and her colleagues believe their findings will help doctors and patients focus on treatments that account for a patient’s unique circumstances and goals.

“Patients don’t always know that they could be making these tradeoffs,” Dr Mansfield said. “We hope that our findings can help doctors to have frank discussions with their patients about the differences between treatments and how these might affect their lives.”

and Drug Administration

Results of a safety review suggest there is a low incidence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) in Canada.

Health Canada undertook the review because of an increase in reporting of BIA-ALCL internationally.

The review showed that 5 confirmed cases of BIA-ALCL have been reported by Canadian manufacturers in the last 10 years.

This is equal to 1 case of BIA-ALCL per 77,190 implants sold, or 0.0013%.

However, Health Canada acknowledges that some cases may not have been reported to the manufacturers or Health Canada.

Available data suggest that BIA-ALCL is more frequently reported with textured surface implants than smooth surface implants. Textured surface implants account for a quarter of all breast implants sold in Canada.

Four of the 5 reported Canadian cases of BIA-ALCL involved textured implants. The surface type was not reported in the remaining case.

The rate of occurrence of BIA‑ALCL per textured implant sold in Canada is 1 case per 24,177 or 0.0041%.

As a result of its safety review, Health Canada is working with manufacturers to update the safety information on the product labeling for all breast implants.

The agency is also communicating this safety information to Canadians through the Recalls and Safety Alerts database on the Healthy Canadians website.

Health Canada continues to monitor the safety profile of breast implants through its post-market surveillance program.

The agency will also monitor cases of BIA-ALCL through an annual follow-up with manufacturers of breast implants.

Health Canada is recommending that healthcare professionals learn about the signs, symptoms, and testing steps to recognize and diagnose BIA‑ALCL.

In addition, healthcare professionals in Canada should report incidents of BIA-ALCL to Health Canada. These reports should include specific details, such as symptoms, how BIA-ALCL was discovered, the age of the patient at implantation, prior implant history, the age of the patient at discovery, tests conducted to diagnose BIA-ALCL, staging information, the course of therapy, and clinical outcomes.

Reports can be made by calling Health Canada at 1-866-234-2345. Alternatively, visit Health Canada’s webpage on Adverse Reaction Reporting for information on how to report online, by mail, or by fax.

and Drug Administration

Results of a safety review suggest there is a low incidence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) in Canada.

Health Canada undertook the review because of an increase in reporting of BIA-ALCL internationally.

The review showed that 5 confirmed cases of BIA-ALCL have been reported by Canadian manufacturers in the last 10 years.

This is equal to 1 case of BIA-ALCL per 77,190 implants sold, or 0.0013%.

However, Health Canada acknowledges that some cases may not have been reported to the manufacturers or Health Canada.

Available data suggest that BIA-ALCL is more frequently reported with textured surface implants than smooth surface implants. Textured surface implants account for a quarter of all breast implants sold in Canada.

Four of the 5 reported Canadian cases of BIA-ALCL involved textured implants. The surface type was not reported in the remaining case.

The rate of occurrence of BIA‑ALCL per textured implant sold in Canada is 1 case per 24,177 or 0.0041%.

As a result of its safety review, Health Canada is working with manufacturers to update the safety information on the product labeling for all breast implants.

The agency is also communicating this safety information to Canadians through the Recalls and Safety Alerts database on the Healthy Canadians website.

Health Canada continues to monitor the safety profile of breast implants through its post-market surveillance program.

The agency will also monitor cases of BIA-ALCL through an annual follow-up with manufacturers of breast implants.

Health Canada is recommending that healthcare professionals learn about the signs, symptoms, and testing steps to recognize and diagnose BIA‑ALCL.

In addition, healthcare professionals in Canada should report incidents of BIA-ALCL to Health Canada. These reports should include specific details, such as symptoms, how BIA-ALCL was discovered, the age of the patient at implantation, prior implant history, the age of the patient at discovery, tests conducted to diagnose BIA-ALCL, staging information, the course of therapy, and clinical outcomes.

Reports can be made by calling Health Canada at 1-866-234-2345. Alternatively, visit Health Canada’s webpage on Adverse Reaction Reporting for information on how to report online, by mail, or by fax.

and Drug Administration

Results of a safety review suggest there is a low incidence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) in Canada.

Health Canada undertook the review because of an increase in reporting of BIA-ALCL internationally.

The review showed that 5 confirmed cases of BIA-ALCL have been reported by Canadian manufacturers in the last 10 years.

This is equal to 1 case of BIA-ALCL per 77,190 implants sold, or 0.0013%.

However, Health Canada acknowledges that some cases may not have been reported to the manufacturers or Health Canada.

Available data suggest that BIA-ALCL is more frequently reported with textured surface implants than smooth surface implants. Textured surface implants account for a quarter of all breast implants sold in Canada.

Four of the 5 reported Canadian cases of BIA-ALCL involved textured implants. The surface type was not reported in the remaining case.

The rate of occurrence of BIA‑ALCL per textured implant sold in Canada is 1 case per 24,177 or 0.0041%.

As a result of its safety review, Health Canada is working with manufacturers to update the safety information on the product labeling for all breast implants.

The agency is also communicating this safety information to Canadians through the Recalls and Safety Alerts database on the Healthy Canadians website.

Health Canada continues to monitor the safety profile of breast implants through its post-market surveillance program.

The agency will also monitor cases of BIA-ALCL through an annual follow-up with manufacturers of breast implants.

Health Canada is recommending that healthcare professionals learn about the signs, symptoms, and testing steps to recognize and diagnose BIA‑ALCL.

In addition, healthcare professionals in Canada should report incidents of BIA-ALCL to Health Canada. These reports should include specific details, such as symptoms, how BIA-ALCL was discovered, the age of the patient at implantation, prior implant history, the age of the patient at discovery, tests conducted to diagnose BIA-ALCL, staging information, the course of therapy, and clinical outcomes.

Reports can be made by calling Health Canada at 1-866-234-2345. Alternatively, visit Health Canada’s webpage on Adverse Reaction Reporting for information on how to report online, by mail, or by fax.