Lymphoma & Plasma Cell Disorders

Adult patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) have a higher risk of secondary malignancies, according to a 20-year population-based cohort study. The researchers, from Bezmialem Vakif University in Istanbul, Turkey, say their findings support earlier research about a higher risk of, for instance, Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic leukemia, and lung cancer.

Between 1998 and 2015, the researchers documented 143 cases of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The majority of patients had early-stage disease.

The researchers also documented 13 cases (9%) of secondary malignancy diagnosed at least 3 months after the diagnosis of CTCL. The cancers included bladder cancer, nasopharynx cancer, renal cell carcinoma, lung cancer, and superficial spreading malignant melanoma.

Older age, stage IV disease, lymphomatoid papulosis, and having CTCL for > 10 years raised the chances of developing secondary solid tumors. In 60% of patients, the secondary malignancies occurred during the first year of diagnosis.

Research has suggested that antilymphoma drugs, particularly alkylating agents, may lead to leukemia, the researchers note. In this study, 6 patients with secondary cancers were getting systemic treatment with interferon or acitretin; 7 were getting no systemic treatment.

The researchers add that MF and hematologic malignancies may share genetic origin, carcinogens, or viruses that affect lymphocyte precursors. They also note that the first neoplasm may produce cytokines that induce development of the secondary neoplasm. The researchers cite research that found MF is a T helper cell 2–mediated disease associated with human leukocyte antigen 2 alleles. Viruses such as Epstein-Barr and herpes simplex also have been implicated.

“Extensive evaluation” for secondary malignancies in adult patients with MF is wise, the researchers advise, particularly if the patient has lymphomatoid papulosis.

Source:

Cengiz FP, Emiroğlu N, Onsun N. Turk J Haematol. 2017;34(4):378-379.

doi: 10.4274/tjh.2017.0234.

Adult patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) have a higher risk of secondary malignancies, according to a 20-year population-based cohort study. The researchers, from Bezmialem Vakif University in Istanbul, Turkey, say their findings support earlier research about a higher risk of, for instance, Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic leukemia, and lung cancer.

Between 1998 and 2015, the researchers documented 143 cases of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The majority of patients had early-stage disease.

The researchers also documented 13 cases (9%) of secondary malignancy diagnosed at least 3 months after the diagnosis of CTCL. The cancers included bladder cancer, nasopharynx cancer, renal cell carcinoma, lung cancer, and superficial spreading malignant melanoma.

Older age, stage IV disease, lymphomatoid papulosis, and having CTCL for > 10 years raised the chances of developing secondary solid tumors. In 60% of patients, the secondary malignancies occurred during the first year of diagnosis.

Research has suggested that antilymphoma drugs, particularly alkylating agents, may lead to leukemia, the researchers note. In this study, 6 patients with secondary cancers were getting systemic treatment with interferon or acitretin; 7 were getting no systemic treatment.

The researchers add that MF and hematologic malignancies may share genetic origin, carcinogens, or viruses that affect lymphocyte precursors. They also note that the first neoplasm may produce cytokines that induce development of the secondary neoplasm. The researchers cite research that found MF is a T helper cell 2–mediated disease associated with human leukocyte antigen 2 alleles. Viruses such as Epstein-Barr and herpes simplex also have been implicated.

“Extensive evaluation” for secondary malignancies in adult patients with MF is wise, the researchers advise, particularly if the patient has lymphomatoid papulosis.

Source:

Cengiz FP, Emiroğlu N, Onsun N. Turk J Haematol. 2017;34(4):378-379.

doi: 10.4274/tjh.2017.0234.

Adult patients with mycosis fungoides (MF) have a higher risk of secondary malignancies, according to a 20-year population-based cohort study. The researchers, from Bezmialem Vakif University in Istanbul, Turkey, say their findings support earlier research about a higher risk of, for instance, Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic leukemia, and lung cancer.

Between 1998 and 2015, the researchers documented 143 cases of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The majority of patients had early-stage disease.

The researchers also documented 13 cases (9%) of secondary malignancy diagnosed at least 3 months after the diagnosis of CTCL. The cancers included bladder cancer, nasopharynx cancer, renal cell carcinoma, lung cancer, and superficial spreading malignant melanoma.

Older age, stage IV disease, lymphomatoid papulosis, and having CTCL for > 10 years raised the chances of developing secondary solid tumors. In 60% of patients, the secondary malignancies occurred during the first year of diagnosis.

Research has suggested that antilymphoma drugs, particularly alkylating agents, may lead to leukemia, the researchers note. In this study, 6 patients with secondary cancers were getting systemic treatment with interferon or acitretin; 7 were getting no systemic treatment.

The researchers add that MF and hematologic malignancies may share genetic origin, carcinogens, or viruses that affect lymphocyte precursors. They also note that the first neoplasm may produce cytokines that induce development of the secondary neoplasm. The researchers cite research that found MF is a T helper cell 2–mediated disease associated with human leukocyte antigen 2 alleles. Viruses such as Epstein-Barr and herpes simplex also have been implicated.

“Extensive evaluation” for secondary malignancies in adult patients with MF is wise, the researchers advise, particularly if the patient has lymphomatoid papulosis.

Source:

Cengiz FP, Emiroğlu N, Onsun N. Turk J Haematol. 2017;34(4):378-379.

doi: 10.4274/tjh.2017.0234.

Photo courtesy of ASH

ATLANTA—Phase 3 trial results suggest one 4-drug combination may be more effective than another as frontline treatment for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

In the ECHELON-1 trial, treatment with brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) staved off progression, death, and the need for subsequent therapy more effectively than treatment with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD).

However, there was no significant difference between the treatment arms when it came to response rates or overall survival.

Neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with A+AVD, while pulmonary toxicity was more common with ABVD.

These data were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 6) and simultaneously published in The New England Journal of Medicine. The trial was funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals and Seattle Genetics, Inc.

“The standard of care in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma has not changed over the last several decades, and there remains an unmet need for additional regimens in frontline treatment,” said Joseph M. Connors, MD, of BC Cancer in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

With this in mind, he and his colleagues conducted ECHELON-1. The study enrolled 1334 patients who had stage III or IV HL and had not previously received systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Fifty-eight percent of patients were male, and the median age was 36 (range, 18-83). Sixty-four percent of patients had stage IV disease, 62% had extranodal involvement at diagnosis, and 58% had B symptoms.

The patients were randomized to receive A+AVD (n=664) or ABVD (n=670) on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the treatment arms.

The median follow-up was 24.9 months (range, 0-49.3).

Primary endpoint

The study’s primary endpoint is modified progression-free survival (PFS), which is defined as time to progression, death, or evidence of non-complete response after completion of frontline therapy followed by subsequent anticancer therapy.

According to an independent review facility, A+AVD provided a significant improvement in modified PFS compared to ABVD. The hazard ratio was 0.77 (P=0.035), which corresponds to a 23% reduction in the risk of progression, death, or the need for additional anticancer therapy.

“Reducing the risk of relapse is an important concern for patients and their physicians,” Dr Connors noted. “In the trial, 33% fewer patients [in the A+AVD arm] required subsequent salvage chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy and transplant compared to the patients treated with ABVD.”

According to the independent review facility, the 2-year modified PFS rate was 82.1% in the A+AVD arm and 77.2% in the ABVD arm.

Certain pre-specified subgroups of patients appeared to benefit more with A+AVD than with ABVD, including:

• Males
• Patients treated in North America
• Patients with involvement of more than 1 extranodal site
• Patients with International Prognostic Scores of 4 to 7
• Patients with stage IV disease
• Patients younger than 60.

Secondary endpoints

Secondary endpoints trended in favor of the A+AVD arm, although there were no significant differences between the treatment arms.

The objective response rate at the end of the randomized regimen was 86% in the A+AVD arm and 83% in the ABVD arm (P=0.12). The complete response rate was 73% and 70%, respectively (P=0.22).

The proportion of patients with a Deauville score ≤2 after the completion of frontline therapy was 85% in the A+AVD arm and 80% in the ABVD arm (P=0.03).

The interim 2-year overall survival rate was 97% in the A+AVD arm and 95% in the ABVD arm (hazard ratio=0.72; P=0.19).

Safety

“[T]he safety profile [of A+AVD] was generally consistent with that known for the single-agent components of the regimen,” Dr Connors said.

The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 99% in the A+AVD arm and 98% in the ABVD arm. The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 83% and 66%, respectively, and the incidence of serious AEs was 43% and 27%, respectively.

Common AEs (in the A+AVD and ABVD arms, respectively) included neutropenia (58% and 45%), constipation (42% and 37%), vomiting (33% and 28%), fatigue (both 32%), diarrhea (27% and 18%), pyrexia (27% and 22%), abdominal pain (21% and 10%), and stomatitis (21% and 16%).

Peripheral neuropathy events were observed in 67% of patients in the A+AVD arm and 43% in the ABVD arm. Grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy was reported in 11% and 2%, respectively.

Febrile neutropenia occurred in 19% of patients in the A+AVD arm and 8% of those in the ABVD arm. However, prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was able to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia. In the A+AVD arm, the rate of febrile neutropenia was 11% among patients who received G-CSF and 21% among patients who did not.

Pulmonary toxicity occurred in 2% of patients in the A+AVD arm and 7% of those in the ABVD arm. Grade 3 or higher pulmonary toxicity was reported in 0.76% and 3%, respectively.

There were 9 deaths during treatment in the A+AVD arm. Seven were due to neutropenia or associated complications, and 2 were due to myocardial infarction. One of the patients who died of neutropenia had the condition prior to trial enrollment. The remaining 6 patients did not receive G-CSF prophylaxis.

In the ABVD arm, there were 13 deaths during treatment. Eleven were due to or associated with pulmonary-related toxicity, 1 was due to cardiopulmonary failure, and 1 death had an unknown cause.

Photo courtesy of ASH

ATLANTA—Phase 3 trial results suggest one 4-drug combination may be more effective than another as frontline treatment for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

In the ECHELON-1 trial, treatment with brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) staved off progression, death, and the need for subsequent therapy more effectively than treatment with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD).

However, there was no significant difference between the treatment arms when it came to response rates or overall survival.

Neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with A+AVD, while pulmonary toxicity was more common with ABVD.

These data were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 6) and simultaneously published in The New England Journal of Medicine. The trial was funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals and Seattle Genetics, Inc.

“The standard of care in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma has not changed over the last several decades, and there remains an unmet need for additional regimens in frontline treatment,” said Joseph M. Connors, MD, of BC Cancer in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

With this in mind, he and his colleagues conducted ECHELON-1. The study enrolled 1334 patients who had stage III or IV HL and had not previously received systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Fifty-eight percent of patients were male, and the median age was 36 (range, 18-83). Sixty-four percent of patients had stage IV disease, 62% had extranodal involvement at diagnosis, and 58% had B symptoms.

The patients were randomized to receive A+AVD (n=664) or ABVD (n=670) on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the treatment arms.

The median follow-up was 24.9 months (range, 0-49.3).

Primary endpoint

The study’s primary endpoint is modified progression-free survival (PFS), which is defined as time to progression, death, or evidence of non-complete response after completion of frontline therapy followed by subsequent anticancer therapy.

According to an independent review facility, A+AVD provided a significant improvement in modified PFS compared to ABVD. The hazard ratio was 0.77 (P=0.035), which corresponds to a 23% reduction in the risk of progression, death, or the need for additional anticancer therapy.

“Reducing the risk of relapse is an important concern for patients and their physicians,” Dr Connors noted. “In the trial, 33% fewer patients [in the A+AVD arm] required subsequent salvage chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy and transplant compared to the patients treated with ABVD.”

According to the independent review facility, the 2-year modified PFS rate was 82.1% in the A+AVD arm and 77.2% in the ABVD arm.

Certain pre-specified subgroups of patients appeared to benefit more with A+AVD than with ABVD, including:

• Males
• Patients treated in North America
• Patients with involvement of more than 1 extranodal site
• Patients with International Prognostic Scores of 4 to 7
• Patients with stage IV disease
• Patients younger than 60.

Secondary endpoints

Secondary endpoints trended in favor of the A+AVD arm, although there were no significant differences between the treatment arms.

The objective response rate at the end of the randomized regimen was 86% in the A+AVD arm and 83% in the ABVD arm (P=0.12). The complete response rate was 73% and 70%, respectively (P=0.22).

The proportion of patients with a Deauville score ≤2 after the completion of frontline therapy was 85% in the A+AVD arm and 80% in the ABVD arm (P=0.03).

The interim 2-year overall survival rate was 97% in the A+AVD arm and 95% in the ABVD arm (hazard ratio=0.72; P=0.19).

Safety

“[T]he safety profile [of A+AVD] was generally consistent with that known for the single-agent components of the regimen,” Dr Connors said.

The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 99% in the A+AVD arm and 98% in the ABVD arm. The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 83% and 66%, respectively, and the incidence of serious AEs was 43% and 27%, respectively.

Common AEs (in the A+AVD and ABVD arms, respectively) included neutropenia (58% and 45%), constipation (42% and 37%), vomiting (33% and 28%), fatigue (both 32%), diarrhea (27% and 18%), pyrexia (27% and 22%), abdominal pain (21% and 10%), and stomatitis (21% and 16%).

Peripheral neuropathy events were observed in 67% of patients in the A+AVD arm and 43% in the ABVD arm. Grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy was reported in 11% and 2%, respectively.

Febrile neutropenia occurred in 19% of patients in the A+AVD arm and 8% of those in the ABVD arm. However, prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was able to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia. In the A+AVD arm, the rate of febrile neutropenia was 11% among patients who received G-CSF and 21% among patients who did not.

Pulmonary toxicity occurred in 2% of patients in the A+AVD arm and 7% of those in the ABVD arm. Grade 3 or higher pulmonary toxicity was reported in 0.76% and 3%, respectively.

There were 9 deaths during treatment in the A+AVD arm. Seven were due to neutropenia or associated complications, and 2 were due to myocardial infarction. One of the patients who died of neutropenia had the condition prior to trial enrollment. The remaining 6 patients did not receive G-CSF prophylaxis.

In the ABVD arm, there were 13 deaths during treatment. Eleven were due to or associated with pulmonary-related toxicity, 1 was due to cardiopulmonary failure, and 1 death had an unknown cause.

Photo courtesy of ASH

ATLANTA—Phase 3 trial results suggest one 4-drug combination may be more effective than another as frontline treatment for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

In the ECHELON-1 trial, treatment with brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) staved off progression, death, and the need for subsequent therapy more effectively than treatment with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD).

However, there was no significant difference between the treatment arms when it came to response rates or overall survival.

Neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with A+AVD, while pulmonary toxicity was more common with ABVD.

These data were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 6) and simultaneously published in The New England Journal of Medicine. The trial was funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals and Seattle Genetics, Inc.

“The standard of care in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma has not changed over the last several decades, and there remains an unmet need for additional regimens in frontline treatment,” said Joseph M. Connors, MD, of BC Cancer in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

With this in mind, he and his colleagues conducted ECHELON-1. The study enrolled 1334 patients who had stage III or IV HL and had not previously received systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Fifty-eight percent of patients were male, and the median age was 36 (range, 18-83). Sixty-four percent of patients had stage IV disease, 62% had extranodal involvement at diagnosis, and 58% had B symptoms.

The patients were randomized to receive A+AVD (n=664) or ABVD (n=670) on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the treatment arms.

The median follow-up was 24.9 months (range, 0-49.3).

Primary endpoint

The study’s primary endpoint is modified progression-free survival (PFS), which is defined as time to progression, death, or evidence of non-complete response after completion of frontline therapy followed by subsequent anticancer therapy.

According to an independent review facility, A+AVD provided a significant improvement in modified PFS compared to ABVD. The hazard ratio was 0.77 (P=0.035), which corresponds to a 23% reduction in the risk of progression, death, or the need for additional anticancer therapy.

“Reducing the risk of relapse is an important concern for patients and their physicians,” Dr Connors noted. “In the trial, 33% fewer patients [in the A+AVD arm] required subsequent salvage chemotherapy or high-dose chemotherapy and transplant compared to the patients treated with ABVD.”

According to the independent review facility, the 2-year modified PFS rate was 82.1% in the A+AVD arm and 77.2% in the ABVD arm.

Certain pre-specified subgroups of patients appeared to benefit more with A+AVD than with ABVD, including:

• Males
• Patients treated in North America
• Patients with involvement of more than 1 extranodal site
• Patients with International Prognostic Scores of 4 to 7
• Patients with stage IV disease
• Patients younger than 60.

Secondary endpoints

Secondary endpoints trended in favor of the A+AVD arm, although there were no significant differences between the treatment arms.

The objective response rate at the end of the randomized regimen was 86% in the A+AVD arm and 83% in the ABVD arm (P=0.12). The complete response rate was 73% and 70%, respectively (P=0.22).

The proportion of patients with a Deauville score ≤2 after the completion of frontline therapy was 85% in the A+AVD arm and 80% in the ABVD arm (P=0.03).

The interim 2-year overall survival rate was 97% in the A+AVD arm and 95% in the ABVD arm (hazard ratio=0.72; P=0.19).

Safety

“[T]he safety profile [of A+AVD] was generally consistent with that known for the single-agent components of the regimen,” Dr Connors said.

The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 99% in the A+AVD arm and 98% in the ABVD arm. The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 83% and 66%, respectively, and the incidence of serious AEs was 43% and 27%, respectively.

Common AEs (in the A+AVD and ABVD arms, respectively) included neutropenia (58% and 45%), constipation (42% and 37%), vomiting (33% and 28%), fatigue (both 32%), diarrhea (27% and 18%), pyrexia (27% and 22%), abdominal pain (21% and 10%), and stomatitis (21% and 16%).

Peripheral neuropathy events were observed in 67% of patients in the A+AVD arm and 43% in the ABVD arm. Grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy was reported in 11% and 2%, respectively.

Febrile neutropenia occurred in 19% of patients in the A+AVD arm and 8% of those in the ABVD arm. However, prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was able to reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia. In the A+AVD arm, the rate of febrile neutropenia was 11% among patients who received G-CSF and 21% among patients who did not.

Pulmonary toxicity occurred in 2% of patients in the A+AVD arm and 7% of those in the ABVD arm. Grade 3 or higher pulmonary toxicity was reported in 0.76% and 3%, respectively.

There were 9 deaths during treatment in the A+AVD arm. Seven were due to neutropenia or associated complications, and 2 were due to myocardial infarction. One of the patients who died of neutropenia had the condition prior to trial enrollment. The remaining 6 patients did not receive G-CSF prophylaxis.

In the ABVD arm, there were 13 deaths during treatment. Eleven were due to or associated with pulmonary-related toxicity, 1 was due to cardiopulmonary failure, and 1 death had an unknown cause.

Photo from Georgia State University

Preclinical research suggests infrared spectroscopy could be used to diagnose non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Researchers used mid-infrared spectroscopy to analyze blood serum derived from mice and differentiate mice with NHL and subcutaneous melanoma from each other and from healthy control mice.

The findings suggest infrared spectroscopy can detect biochemical changes induced by NHL and melanoma and therefore has diagnostic potential as a screening technique for these cancers.

A.G. Unil Perera, PhD, of Georgia State University in Atlanta, and his colleagues detailed these findings in Scientific Reports.

The researchers said that Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy in Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) sampling mode provides high-quality results with better reproducibility compared to other vibrational spectroscopy.

With previous work, Dr Perera and his colleagues discovered that a blood test for ulcerative colitis using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy could provide a cheaper, less invasive alternative for screening compared to colonoscopy.

In the current study, the researchers tested ATR-FTIR spectroscopy in mouse models of malignancy—EL4 NHL and B16 subcutaneous melanoma.

The team extracted blood serum from these mice and control mice. Droplets of serum were placed on an ATR crystal of the FTIR instrument.

Incident infrared beams were absorbed and reflected by the serum, creating a wave that was recorded and used to produce an absorbance curve with peaks that identified the presence of certain biomarkers in the sample.

The researchers compared the absorbance curves from the control and cancer mice and assessed biochemical changes induced by NHL and melanoma.

The team found “remarkable” differences between the ATR-FTIR spectra of serum samples from tumor-bearing mice and control mice.

Dr Perera said these findings are applicable to humans because mice and humans have some biomarkers and chemicals in common.

Using the data collected on the biomarkers for NHL and melanoma, the researchers could develop detectors for these particular absorbance peaks, which doctors could use to test patients’ blood samples for these cancers.

“Our final goal is to say we can use this infrared technique to identify various diseases,” Dr Perera said. “This study shows infrared spectroscopy can identify cancer. Right now, when you go to the doctor, they do blood tests for sugar and several other things but not for serious diseases like cancer and colitis.”

“One day, we hope that even these serious diseases can be rapidly screened. Your primary doctor could keep a record of your number and check that every time you come back. Then, if there is some indication of cancer or colitis, they can do biopsies, colonoscopies, etc.”

Photo from Georgia State University

Preclinical research suggests infrared spectroscopy could be used to diagnose non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Researchers used mid-infrared spectroscopy to analyze blood serum derived from mice and differentiate mice with NHL and subcutaneous melanoma from each other and from healthy control mice.

The findings suggest infrared spectroscopy can detect biochemical changes induced by NHL and melanoma and therefore has diagnostic potential as a screening technique for these cancers.

A.G. Unil Perera, PhD, of Georgia State University in Atlanta, and his colleagues detailed these findings in Scientific Reports.

The researchers said that Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy in Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) sampling mode provides high-quality results with better reproducibility compared to other vibrational spectroscopy.

With previous work, Dr Perera and his colleagues discovered that a blood test for ulcerative colitis using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy could provide a cheaper, less invasive alternative for screening compared to colonoscopy.

In the current study, the researchers tested ATR-FTIR spectroscopy in mouse models of malignancy—EL4 NHL and B16 subcutaneous melanoma.

The team extracted blood serum from these mice and control mice. Droplets of serum were placed on an ATR crystal of the FTIR instrument.

Incident infrared beams were absorbed and reflected by the serum, creating a wave that was recorded and used to produce an absorbance curve with peaks that identified the presence of certain biomarkers in the sample.

The researchers compared the absorbance curves from the control and cancer mice and assessed biochemical changes induced by NHL and melanoma.

The team found “remarkable” differences between the ATR-FTIR spectra of serum samples from tumor-bearing mice and control mice.

Dr Perera said these findings are applicable to humans because mice and humans have some biomarkers and chemicals in common.

Using the data collected on the biomarkers for NHL and melanoma, the researchers could develop detectors for these particular absorbance peaks, which doctors could use to test patients’ blood samples for these cancers.

“Our final goal is to say we can use this infrared technique to identify various diseases,” Dr Perera said. “This study shows infrared spectroscopy can identify cancer. Right now, when you go to the doctor, they do blood tests for sugar and several other things but not for serious diseases like cancer and colitis.”

“One day, we hope that even these serious diseases can be rapidly screened. Your primary doctor could keep a record of your number and check that every time you come back. Then, if there is some indication of cancer or colitis, they can do biopsies, colonoscopies, etc.”

Photo from Georgia State University

Preclinical research suggests infrared spectroscopy could be used to diagnose non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

Researchers used mid-infrared spectroscopy to analyze blood serum derived from mice and differentiate mice with NHL and subcutaneous melanoma from each other and from healthy control mice.

The findings suggest infrared spectroscopy can detect biochemical changes induced by NHL and melanoma and therefore has diagnostic potential as a screening technique for these cancers.

A.G. Unil Perera, PhD, of Georgia State University in Atlanta, and his colleagues detailed these findings in Scientific Reports.

The researchers said that Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy in Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) sampling mode provides high-quality results with better reproducibility compared to other vibrational spectroscopy.

With previous work, Dr Perera and his colleagues discovered that a blood test for ulcerative colitis using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy could provide a cheaper, less invasive alternative for screening compared to colonoscopy.

In the current study, the researchers tested ATR-FTIR spectroscopy in mouse models of malignancy—EL4 NHL and B16 subcutaneous melanoma.

The team extracted blood serum from these mice and control mice. Droplets of serum were placed on an ATR crystal of the FTIR instrument.

Incident infrared beams were absorbed and reflected by the serum, creating a wave that was recorded and used to produce an absorbance curve with peaks that identified the presence of certain biomarkers in the sample.

The researchers compared the absorbance curves from the control and cancer mice and assessed biochemical changes induced by NHL and melanoma.

The team found “remarkable” differences between the ATR-FTIR spectra of serum samples from tumor-bearing mice and control mice.

Dr Perera said these findings are applicable to humans because mice and humans have some biomarkers and chemicals in common.

Using the data collected on the biomarkers for NHL and melanoma, the researchers could develop detectors for these particular absorbance peaks, which doctors could use to test patients’ blood samples for these cancers.

“Our final goal is to say we can use this infrared technique to identify various diseases,” Dr Perera said. “This study shows infrared spectroscopy can identify cancer. Right now, when you go to the doctor, they do blood tests for sugar and several other things but not for serious diseases like cancer and colitis.”

“One day, we hope that even these serious diseases can be rapidly screened. Your primary doctor could keep a record of your number and check that every time you come back. Then, if there is some indication of cancer or colitis, they can do biopsies, colonoscopies, etc.”

ATLANTA – Ibrutinib yielded a median progression-free survival (PFS) of nearly 3 years for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treated with the agent after just one prior line of therapy, according to pooled long-term follow-up data presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

With a 3.5-year median follow-up, a median PFS of 33.6 months was reported for MCL patients with one prior line of therapy, compared to 8.4 months for patients who had two or more prior lines of therapy, reported lead study author Simon Rule, MD, of Plymouth (England) University Medical School.

“I think the take-home message from the ibrutinib data is the earlier you use the drug in the relapse setting, the better the outcomes you’re going to get,” Dr. Rule said in an interview. “It is quite dramatic, the difference between one prior line of therapy and subsequent lines of therapy.”

Response rates were also higher in MCL patients who had only one prior line of therapy, Dr. Rule said.

The overall and complete response rates for that group were 77.8% and 36.4%, respectively, according to data Dr. Rule presented in an oral presentation. For patients receiving more than one line of therapy prior to ibrutinib, overall and complete response rates were 66.8% and 22.9%.

The pooled analysis presented by Dr. Rule included 370 patients enrolled in ibrutinib trials between 2011 and 2013. Patients in those trials received oral ibrutinib 560 mg daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients achieving a CR had an “extraordinary” PFS of nearly 4 years and a median duration of response of 55 months, Dr. Rule said.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) rates were reported to be 5.7% (21/370 patients). A total of 53 patients in the analysis had ongoing controlled AF/arrhythmia or had a history of it. Over the course of follow-up, 70% of them (37 patients) had no recurrences, according to Dr. Rule and his colleagues.

No patients discontinued ibrutinib because of grade 3-4 AF, they reported. Moreover, less than 2% of the 370 patients discontinued or reduced dose of ibrutinib because of grade 3-4 bleeding or AF.

New onset grade 3-4 adverse events were more common in the first year of treatment and generally were less frequent over time, Dr. Rule said.

Patients with only one prior line of therapy were less likely to have grade 3-4 adverse events, suggesting again that “the earlier you use [ibrutinib], the fewer side effects you get, particularly with hematologic toxicity,” Dr. Rule said.

Sponsorship for the research came from Janssen, and funding for writing assistance came from Janssen Global Services. Dr. Rule reported financial relationships with Janssen and several other companies.

SOURCE: Rule S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 151.

ATLANTA – Ibrutinib yielded a median progression-free survival (PFS) of nearly 3 years for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treated with the agent after just one prior line of therapy, according to pooled long-term follow-up data presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

With a 3.5-year median follow-up, a median PFS of 33.6 months was reported for MCL patients with one prior line of therapy, compared to 8.4 months for patients who had two or more prior lines of therapy, reported lead study author Simon Rule, MD, of Plymouth (England) University Medical School.

“I think the take-home message from the ibrutinib data is the earlier you use the drug in the relapse setting, the better the outcomes you’re going to get,” Dr. Rule said in an interview. “It is quite dramatic, the difference between one prior line of therapy and subsequent lines of therapy.”

Response rates were also higher in MCL patients who had only one prior line of therapy, Dr. Rule said.

The overall and complete response rates for that group were 77.8% and 36.4%, respectively, according to data Dr. Rule presented in an oral presentation. For patients receiving more than one line of therapy prior to ibrutinib, overall and complete response rates were 66.8% and 22.9%.

The pooled analysis presented by Dr. Rule included 370 patients enrolled in ibrutinib trials between 2011 and 2013. Patients in those trials received oral ibrutinib 560 mg daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients achieving a CR had an “extraordinary” PFS of nearly 4 years and a median duration of response of 55 months, Dr. Rule said.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) rates were reported to be 5.7% (21/370 patients). A total of 53 patients in the analysis had ongoing controlled AF/arrhythmia or had a history of it. Over the course of follow-up, 70% of them (37 patients) had no recurrences, according to Dr. Rule and his colleagues.

No patients discontinued ibrutinib because of grade 3-4 AF, they reported. Moreover, less than 2% of the 370 patients discontinued or reduced dose of ibrutinib because of grade 3-4 bleeding or AF.

New onset grade 3-4 adverse events were more common in the first year of treatment and generally were less frequent over time, Dr. Rule said.

Patients with only one prior line of therapy were less likely to have grade 3-4 adverse events, suggesting again that “the earlier you use [ibrutinib], the fewer side effects you get, particularly with hematologic toxicity,” Dr. Rule said.

Sponsorship for the research came from Janssen, and funding for writing assistance came from Janssen Global Services. Dr. Rule reported financial relationships with Janssen and several other companies.

SOURCE: Rule S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 151.

ATLANTA – Ibrutinib yielded a median progression-free survival (PFS) of nearly 3 years for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treated with the agent after just one prior line of therapy, according to pooled long-term follow-up data presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

With a 3.5-year median follow-up, a median PFS of 33.6 months was reported for MCL patients with one prior line of therapy, compared to 8.4 months for patients who had two or more prior lines of therapy, reported lead study author Simon Rule, MD, of Plymouth (England) University Medical School.

“I think the take-home message from the ibrutinib data is the earlier you use the drug in the relapse setting, the better the outcomes you’re going to get,” Dr. Rule said in an interview. “It is quite dramatic, the difference between one prior line of therapy and subsequent lines of therapy.”

Response rates were also higher in MCL patients who had only one prior line of therapy, Dr. Rule said.

The overall and complete response rates for that group were 77.8% and 36.4%, respectively, according to data Dr. Rule presented in an oral presentation. For patients receiving more than one line of therapy prior to ibrutinib, overall and complete response rates were 66.8% and 22.9%.

The pooled analysis presented by Dr. Rule included 370 patients enrolled in ibrutinib trials between 2011 and 2013. Patients in those trials received oral ibrutinib 560 mg daily until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients achieving a CR had an “extraordinary” PFS of nearly 4 years and a median duration of response of 55 months, Dr. Rule said.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) rates were reported to be 5.7% (21/370 patients). A total of 53 patients in the analysis had ongoing controlled AF/arrhythmia or had a history of it. Over the course of follow-up, 70% of them (37 patients) had no recurrences, according to Dr. Rule and his colleagues.

No patients discontinued ibrutinib because of grade 3-4 AF, they reported. Moreover, less than 2% of the 370 patients discontinued or reduced dose of ibrutinib because of grade 3-4 bleeding or AF.

New onset grade 3-4 adverse events were more common in the first year of treatment and generally were less frequent over time, Dr. Rule said.

Patients with only one prior line of therapy were less likely to have grade 3-4 adverse events, suggesting again that “the earlier you use [ibrutinib], the fewer side effects you get, particularly with hematologic toxicity,” Dr. Rule said.

Sponsorship for the research came from Janssen, and funding for writing assistance came from Janssen Global Services. Dr. Rule reported financial relationships with Janssen and several other companies.

SOURCE: Rule S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 151.

ATLANTA – The rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) treated with lenalidomide is similar to that seen in multiple myeloma, according to results of recent systematic review and meta-analysis of trials representing more than 10,000 treatment cycles.

Although rates of VTE for NHL and myeloma could not be directly compared statistically, the finding may have clinical implications for NHL patients, said lead study author Samuel Yamshon, MD, an internal medicine resident at Cornell University, New York.

“Although outpatient VTE prophylaxis is not currently recommended, it should be carefully considered in patients with lymphoma being treated with lenalidomide, especially those receiving lenalidomide as a single agent,” Dr. Yamshon said in a presentation of the results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The rate of thrombosis in patients with B cell NHL who received lenalidomide treatment was 0.75 events per 100 patient-cycles, according to results of the meta-analysis, which was based on 28 articles including 10,332 cycles of lenalidomide received by patients with B-cell NHL.

Reported rates of thrombosis in previously untreated myeloma patients treated with lenalidomide are between 0.7 and 0.8 per 100 patient-cycles, Dr. Yamshon said in his presentation.

Notably, single-agent lenalidomide was linked with a significantly increased risk of thrombosis compared with lenalidomide treatment in combinations. The relative risk of VTE for lenalidomide as a single agent versus lenalidomide in combination was 2.01 (95% confidence interval, 1.28-3.16; P = .002), according to the presented data.

The investigators were unsure why single-agent lenalidomide appeared to have caused increased rates of thrombosis compared to lenalidomide in combinations. “Perhaps patients treated with additional agents have a lower tumor burden, leading to less venous obstruction causing clots, or perhaps there’s a direct interaction between lenalidomide and tumor leading to effects on the vasculature and mediators of coagulation,” Dr. Yamshon said.

Chemotherapy and biologic combinations had somewhat different VTE rates when compared to single-agent lenalidomide. The rate in patients receiving lenalidomide alone was 1.06 events per 100 patient-cycles, compared with 0.73 and 0.41 events per 100 patient-cycles, respectively, for lenalidomide plus chemotherapy and lenalidomide plus biologics.

However, the lower event rate with lenalidomide and biologics compared with lenalidomide and chemotherapy was a “nonsignificant trend” that was likely caused by differences in patient characteristics between the two cohorts, according to Dr. Yamshon.

None of the studies included in the meta-analysis were prospectively designed to measure VTE as a primary or secondary outcome, Dr. Yamshon noted in a discussion of the study’s limitations.

Further studies are warranted to determine lenalidomide’s effect on the vasculature and how it effects mediators of coagulation, he added.

Based on the current results, Dr. Yamshon said it may be reasonable to consider VTE prophylaxis in NHL patients receiving lenalidomide.

“If we’re going to be recommending outpatient VTE prophylaxis in everyone on lenalidomide in multiple myeloma, and the rates (of VTE) are the same, I think it certainly makes sense based on the data to recommend it,” he said in a question-and-answer session.

Dr. Yamshon reported no conflicts related to the study. Coauthors reported disclosures related to Roche, Celgene, Seattle Genetics, Pharmacyclics, Cell Medica, Janssen, and AstraZeneca.

SOURCE: Yamshon S et al. Abstract 677.

ATLANTA – The rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) treated with lenalidomide is similar to that seen in multiple myeloma, according to results of recent systematic review and meta-analysis of trials representing more than 10,000 treatment cycles.

Although rates of VTE for NHL and myeloma could not be directly compared statistically, the finding may have clinical implications for NHL patients, said lead study author Samuel Yamshon, MD, an internal medicine resident at Cornell University, New York.

“Although outpatient VTE prophylaxis is not currently recommended, it should be carefully considered in patients with lymphoma being treated with lenalidomide, especially those receiving lenalidomide as a single agent,” Dr. Yamshon said in a presentation of the results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The rate of thrombosis in patients with B cell NHL who received lenalidomide treatment was 0.75 events per 100 patient-cycles, according to results of the meta-analysis, which was based on 28 articles including 10,332 cycles of lenalidomide received by patients with B-cell NHL.

Reported rates of thrombosis in previously untreated myeloma patients treated with lenalidomide are between 0.7 and 0.8 per 100 patient-cycles, Dr. Yamshon said in his presentation.

Notably, single-agent lenalidomide was linked with a significantly increased risk of thrombosis compared with lenalidomide treatment in combinations. The relative risk of VTE for lenalidomide as a single agent versus lenalidomide in combination was 2.01 (95% confidence interval, 1.28-3.16; P = .002), according to the presented data.

The investigators were unsure why single-agent lenalidomide appeared to have caused increased rates of thrombosis compared to lenalidomide in combinations. “Perhaps patients treated with additional agents have a lower tumor burden, leading to less venous obstruction causing clots, or perhaps there’s a direct interaction between lenalidomide and tumor leading to effects on the vasculature and mediators of coagulation,” Dr. Yamshon said.

Chemotherapy and biologic combinations had somewhat different VTE rates when compared to single-agent lenalidomide. The rate in patients receiving lenalidomide alone was 1.06 events per 100 patient-cycles, compared with 0.73 and 0.41 events per 100 patient-cycles, respectively, for lenalidomide plus chemotherapy and lenalidomide plus biologics.

However, the lower event rate with lenalidomide and biologics compared with lenalidomide and chemotherapy was a “nonsignificant trend” that was likely caused by differences in patient characteristics between the two cohorts, according to Dr. Yamshon.

None of the studies included in the meta-analysis were prospectively designed to measure VTE as a primary or secondary outcome, Dr. Yamshon noted in a discussion of the study’s limitations.

Further studies are warranted to determine lenalidomide’s effect on the vasculature and how it effects mediators of coagulation, he added.

Based on the current results, Dr. Yamshon said it may be reasonable to consider VTE prophylaxis in NHL patients receiving lenalidomide.

“If we’re going to be recommending outpatient VTE prophylaxis in everyone on lenalidomide in multiple myeloma, and the rates (of VTE) are the same, I think it certainly makes sense based on the data to recommend it,” he said in a question-and-answer session.

Dr. Yamshon reported no conflicts related to the study. Coauthors reported disclosures related to Roche, Celgene, Seattle Genetics, Pharmacyclics, Cell Medica, Janssen, and AstraZeneca.

SOURCE: Yamshon S et al. Abstract 677.

ATLANTA – The rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) treated with lenalidomide is similar to that seen in multiple myeloma, according to results of recent systematic review and meta-analysis of trials representing more than 10,000 treatment cycles.

Although rates of VTE for NHL and myeloma could not be directly compared statistically, the finding may have clinical implications for NHL patients, said lead study author Samuel Yamshon, MD, an internal medicine resident at Cornell University, New York.

“Although outpatient VTE prophylaxis is not currently recommended, it should be carefully considered in patients with lymphoma being treated with lenalidomide, especially those receiving lenalidomide as a single agent,” Dr. Yamshon said in a presentation of the results at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The rate of thrombosis in patients with B cell NHL who received lenalidomide treatment was 0.75 events per 100 patient-cycles, according to results of the meta-analysis, which was based on 28 articles including 10,332 cycles of lenalidomide received by patients with B-cell NHL.

Reported rates of thrombosis in previously untreated myeloma patients treated with lenalidomide are between 0.7 and 0.8 per 100 patient-cycles, Dr. Yamshon said in his presentation.

Notably, single-agent lenalidomide was linked with a significantly increased risk of thrombosis compared with lenalidomide treatment in combinations. The relative risk of VTE for lenalidomide as a single agent versus lenalidomide in combination was 2.01 (95% confidence interval, 1.28-3.16; P = .002), according to the presented data.

The investigators were unsure why single-agent lenalidomide appeared to have caused increased rates of thrombosis compared to lenalidomide in combinations. “Perhaps patients treated with additional agents have a lower tumor burden, leading to less venous obstruction causing clots, or perhaps there’s a direct interaction between lenalidomide and tumor leading to effects on the vasculature and mediators of coagulation,” Dr. Yamshon said.

Chemotherapy and biologic combinations had somewhat different VTE rates when compared to single-agent lenalidomide. The rate in patients receiving lenalidomide alone was 1.06 events per 100 patient-cycles, compared with 0.73 and 0.41 events per 100 patient-cycles, respectively, for lenalidomide plus chemotherapy and lenalidomide plus biologics.

However, the lower event rate with lenalidomide and biologics compared with lenalidomide and chemotherapy was a “nonsignificant trend” that was likely caused by differences in patient characteristics between the two cohorts, according to Dr. Yamshon.

None of the studies included in the meta-analysis were prospectively designed to measure VTE as a primary or secondary outcome, Dr. Yamshon noted in a discussion of the study’s limitations.

Further studies are warranted to determine lenalidomide’s effect on the vasculature and how it effects mediators of coagulation, he added.

Based on the current results, Dr. Yamshon said it may be reasonable to consider VTE prophylaxis in NHL patients receiving lenalidomide.

“If we’re going to be recommending outpatient VTE prophylaxis in everyone on lenalidomide in multiple myeloma, and the rates (of VTE) are the same, I think it certainly makes sense based on the data to recommend it,” he said in a question-and-answer session.

Dr. Yamshon reported no conflicts related to the study. Coauthors reported disclosures related to Roche, Celgene, Seattle Genetics, Pharmacyclics, Cell Medica, Janssen, and AstraZeneca.

SOURCE: Yamshon S et al. Abstract 677.

ATLANTA – The VMP regimen, consisting of bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone, is a standard of care in Europe for frontline therapy for patients with multiple myeloma who, for reasons of age or infirmity, are not good candidates for autologous stem cell transplant.

In this video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Jesus San-Miguel, MD, of the Clinical University of Navarra in Pamplona, Spain, discusses the results of the phase 3 international ALCYONE trial, comparing VMP with the same regimen plus the addition of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab (Darzalex).

Adding daratumumab to VMP regimen as first-line therapy for 706 patients with multiple myeloma cut in half the risk of disease progression or death and substantially improved the rate of minimal residual disease negativity, Dr. San-Miguel reported. There were no new safety signals from adding the monoclonal antibody to VMP.

The ALCYONE study was supported by Janssen Research & Development. Dr. San-Miguel reported serving as an adviser to the company and several others.

ATLANTA – The VMP regimen, consisting of bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone, is a standard of care in Europe for frontline therapy for patients with multiple myeloma who, for reasons of age or infirmity, are not good candidates for autologous stem cell transplant.

In this video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Jesus San-Miguel, MD, of the Clinical University of Navarra in Pamplona, Spain, discusses the results of the phase 3 international ALCYONE trial, comparing VMP with the same regimen plus the addition of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab (Darzalex).

Adding daratumumab to VMP regimen as first-line therapy for 706 patients with multiple myeloma cut in half the risk of disease progression or death and substantially improved the rate of minimal residual disease negativity, Dr. San-Miguel reported. There were no new safety signals from adding the monoclonal antibody to VMP.

The ALCYONE study was supported by Janssen Research & Development. Dr. San-Miguel reported serving as an adviser to the company and several others.

ATLANTA – The VMP regimen, consisting of bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone, is a standard of care in Europe for frontline therapy for patients with multiple myeloma who, for reasons of age or infirmity, are not good candidates for autologous stem cell transplant.

In this video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Jesus San-Miguel, MD, of the Clinical University of Navarra in Pamplona, Spain, discusses the results of the phase 3 international ALCYONE trial, comparing VMP with the same regimen plus the addition of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab (Darzalex).

Adding daratumumab to VMP regimen as first-line therapy for 706 patients with multiple myeloma cut in half the risk of disease progression or death and substantially improved the rate of minimal residual disease negativity, Dr. San-Miguel reported. There were no new safety signals from adding the monoclonal antibody to VMP.

The ALCYONE study was supported by Janssen Research & Development. Dr. San-Miguel reported serving as an adviser to the company and several others.

ATLANTA – Adding the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab (Darzalex) to the standard VMP regimen as first-line therapy for patients with multiple myeloma cut in half the risk of disease progression or death and substantially improved the rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, investigators in the ALCYONE trial reported.

Neil Osterweil/ Frontline Medical News

SOURCE: Mateos MV et al. ASH Abstract LBA-4.

ATLANTA – Adding the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab (Darzalex) to the standard VMP regimen as first-line therapy for patients with multiple myeloma cut in half the risk of disease progression or death and substantially improved the rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, investigators in the ALCYONE trial reported.

Neil Osterweil/ Frontline Medical News

SOURCE: Mateos MV et al. ASH Abstract LBA-4.

ATLANTA – Adding the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab (Darzalex) to the standard VMP regimen as first-line therapy for patients with multiple myeloma cut in half the risk of disease progression or death and substantially improved the rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, investigators in the ALCYONE trial reported.

Neil Osterweil/ Frontline Medical News

SOURCE: Mateos MV et al. ASH Abstract LBA-4.

ATLANTA – In the ZUMA-1 trial, more than one-third of patients with refractory large B-cell lymphomas treated with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta; axi-cel) had durable responses, with some patients having complete responses lasting more than 1 year after a single infusion.

Updated combined phase 1 and 2 results in 108 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, or transformed follicular lymphoma showed an objective response rate of 82% of patients – including 58% showing complete responses – after a median follow-up of 15.4 months.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston discusses the use of CAR T cells directed against the CD19 antigen in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas and describes efforts to improve responses while managing adverse events common to CAR T-cell therapies, notably cytokine release syndrome.

ZUMA-1 is supported by Kite Pharma, which developed axicabtagene ciloleucel, and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society’s Therapy Acceleration Program. Dr. Neelapu reported receiving advisory board fees from the company.

ATLANTA – In the ZUMA-1 trial, more than one-third of patients with refractory large B-cell lymphomas treated with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta; axi-cel) had durable responses, with some patients having complete responses lasting more than 1 year after a single infusion.

Updated combined phase 1 and 2 results in 108 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, or transformed follicular lymphoma showed an objective response rate of 82% of patients – including 58% showing complete responses – after a median follow-up of 15.4 months.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston discusses the use of CAR T cells directed against the CD19 antigen in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas and describes efforts to improve responses while managing adverse events common to CAR T-cell therapies, notably cytokine release syndrome.

ZUMA-1 is supported by Kite Pharma, which developed axicabtagene ciloleucel, and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society’s Therapy Acceleration Program. Dr. Neelapu reported receiving advisory board fees from the company.

ATLANTA – In the ZUMA-1 trial, more than one-third of patients with refractory large B-cell lymphomas treated with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta; axi-cel) had durable responses, with some patients having complete responses lasting more than 1 year after a single infusion.

Updated combined phase 1 and 2 results in 108 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, or transformed follicular lymphoma showed an objective response rate of 82% of patients – including 58% showing complete responses – after a median follow-up of 15.4 months.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston discusses the use of CAR T cells directed against the CD19 antigen in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas and describes efforts to improve responses while managing adverse events common to CAR T-cell therapies, notably cytokine release syndrome.

ZUMA-1 is supported by Kite Pharma, which developed axicabtagene ciloleucel, and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society’s Therapy Acceleration Program. Dr. Neelapu reported receiving advisory board fees from the company.

ATLANTA – Responses 3 months after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy look durable in adults with transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to updated results from the single-arm, global, phase 2 JULIET trial.

Fully 95% of patients who had a complete response to CTL019 (tisagenlecleucel; Kymriah) at 3 months maintained that complete response at 6 months, Stephen J. Schuster, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Courtesy American Society of Hematology

SOURCE: Schuster S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 577.

ATLANTA – Responses 3 months after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy look durable in adults with transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to updated results from the single-arm, global, phase 2 JULIET trial.

Fully 95% of patients who had a complete response to CTL019 (tisagenlecleucel; Kymriah) at 3 months maintained that complete response at 6 months, Stephen J. Schuster, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Courtesy American Society of Hematology

SOURCE: Schuster S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 577.

ATLANTA – Responses 3 months after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy look durable in adults with transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to updated results from the single-arm, global, phase 2 JULIET trial.

Fully 95% of patients who had a complete response to CTL019 (tisagenlecleucel; Kymriah) at 3 months maintained that complete response at 6 months, Stephen J. Schuster, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Courtesy American Society of Hematology

SOURCE: Schuster S et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 577.

Atlanta – The potential of two- and three-drug combinations to induce deep, minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative responses in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was demonstrated in multiple studies presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Previous studies have suggested that, in contrast to single-agent kinase inhibitor treatment, combinations of treatments, namely kinase or B-cell lyphoma 2 inhibitors combined with anti-CD20 antibodies, can induce MRD negativity at a high rate. For example, in a report on the CLL14 trial, 11 of 12 previously untreated patients were MRD negative after treatment with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax and anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab (Blood. 2017;129:2702-5. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-01-761973).

This new batch of studies presented at ASH 2017 provided additional evidence for the venetoclax and obinutuzumab combination, as well as other combinations that appear to provide favorable rates of MRD-negative CLL, including obinutuzumab and venetoclax plus ibrutinib and, notably, a combination that included venetoclax and ibrutinib but no anti-CD20 antibody.

A phase II trial presented by Nitin Jain, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, looked at the combination of venetoclax and ibrutinib for patients with previously untreated high-risk CLL or relapsed/refractory CLL. The regimen under evaluation starts with daily ibrutinib monotherapy for 3 months before venetoclax is added.

For the first line cohort of 36 patients, the bone marrow MRD-negativity proportion was 0% after 3 months of ibrutinib and 21% after 3 months of ibrutinib plus venetoclax, then 45%, 80%, and 100%, respectively, after 6, 9, and 12 months of combination therapy, Dr. Jain reported. In the relapsed/refractory cohort, MRD negativity was 8% after 3 months of combination therapy and 40% after 12 months. “Responses continue to improve with time, with many patients achieving bone marrow MRD-negative remission,” Dr. Jain said.

The study showed “very impressive MRD rates,” commented Ian W. Flinn, MD, of Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn. “I think it’s still up for further discussion and research to find which is the best combination.”

Dr. Flinn presented results from a phase Ib GP28331 study of venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with previously untreated CLL in which MRD was assessed in peripheral blood and bone marrow.

All 32 patients achieved peripheral blood negativity at some point on study, Dr. Flinn said, and 75% achieved bone marrow negativity. The complete response rate was 72% (23/32), but notably, high rates of undetectable bone marrow MRD were seen irrespective of response status, Dr. Flinn said.

All patients had at least one adverse event, with grade 3-4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia reported most commonly.

Preliminary progression-free survival data (PFS) suggested “durable clinical outcomes” for the combination, with an estimated 18-month PFS of 90.5%, he said.

A third study assessed the combination of obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax, finding that the combination induced MRD negativity in 14 of 24 (58%) treatment-naive CLL patients, according to Kerry A. Rogers, MD, of Ohio State University, Columbus.

The combination had a 96% response rate and is “extremely effective at eliminating detectable CLL,” Dr. Rogers noted.

Most adverse events were hematologic, and high-grade adverse events were rare, she said.

Results for the study’s primary endpoint, rate of MRD-negative complete remission, are expected by May 2018, Dr. Rogers said, adding that further follow-up will be needed to determine PFS for the combination.

Session attendees asked presenters whether they felt there was scientific justification for inclusion of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab in future trials designed in part to assess MRD negativity.

“I think that obinutuzumab has greater efficacy in patients with CLL, compared to rituximab, and so our hypothesis is that it is a superior antibody to combine with venetoclax,” Dr. Flinn said.

AbbVie provided funding for the study on venetoclax and ibrutinib. Dr. Jain reported disclosures from venetoclax makers AbbVie and Genentech, ibrutinib makers Janssen and Pharmacyclics, and others.

Genentech and AbbVie provided support for the study on venetoclax and obinutuzumab. Dr. Flinn reported disclosures related to both companies and others.

Dr. Rogers reported no conflicts related to the study on obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax. One of her associates reported disclosures related to ibrutinib makers Novartis and Pharmacylics, among others.

SOURCE: Jain N et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 429; Flinn I et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 430; Rogers K et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 431.

Atlanta – The potential of two- and three-drug combinations to induce deep, minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative responses in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was demonstrated in multiple studies presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Previous studies have suggested that, in contrast to single-agent kinase inhibitor treatment, combinations of treatments, namely kinase or B-cell lyphoma 2 inhibitors combined with anti-CD20 antibodies, can induce MRD negativity at a high rate. For example, in a report on the CLL14 trial, 11 of 12 previously untreated patients were MRD negative after treatment with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax and anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab (Blood. 2017;129:2702-5. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-01-761973).

This new batch of studies presented at ASH 2017 provided additional evidence for the venetoclax and obinutuzumab combination, as well as other combinations that appear to provide favorable rates of MRD-negative CLL, including obinutuzumab and venetoclax plus ibrutinib and, notably, a combination that included venetoclax and ibrutinib but no anti-CD20 antibody.

A phase II trial presented by Nitin Jain, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, looked at the combination of venetoclax and ibrutinib for patients with previously untreated high-risk CLL or relapsed/refractory CLL. The regimen under evaluation starts with daily ibrutinib monotherapy for 3 months before venetoclax is added.

For the first line cohort of 36 patients, the bone marrow MRD-negativity proportion was 0% after 3 months of ibrutinib and 21% after 3 months of ibrutinib plus venetoclax, then 45%, 80%, and 100%, respectively, after 6, 9, and 12 months of combination therapy, Dr. Jain reported. In the relapsed/refractory cohort, MRD negativity was 8% after 3 months of combination therapy and 40% after 12 months. “Responses continue to improve with time, with many patients achieving bone marrow MRD-negative remission,” Dr. Jain said.

The study showed “very impressive MRD rates,” commented Ian W. Flinn, MD, of Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn. “I think it’s still up for further discussion and research to find which is the best combination.”

Dr. Flinn presented results from a phase Ib GP28331 study of venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with previously untreated CLL in which MRD was assessed in peripheral blood and bone marrow.

All 32 patients achieved peripheral blood negativity at some point on study, Dr. Flinn said, and 75% achieved bone marrow negativity. The complete response rate was 72% (23/32), but notably, high rates of undetectable bone marrow MRD were seen irrespective of response status, Dr. Flinn said.

All patients had at least one adverse event, with grade 3-4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia reported most commonly.

Preliminary progression-free survival data (PFS) suggested “durable clinical outcomes” for the combination, with an estimated 18-month PFS of 90.5%, he said.

A third study assessed the combination of obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax, finding that the combination induced MRD negativity in 14 of 24 (58%) treatment-naive CLL patients, according to Kerry A. Rogers, MD, of Ohio State University, Columbus.

The combination had a 96% response rate and is “extremely effective at eliminating detectable CLL,” Dr. Rogers noted.

Most adverse events were hematologic, and high-grade adverse events were rare, she said.

Results for the study’s primary endpoint, rate of MRD-negative complete remission, are expected by May 2018, Dr. Rogers said, adding that further follow-up will be needed to determine PFS for the combination.

Session attendees asked presenters whether they felt there was scientific justification for inclusion of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab in future trials designed in part to assess MRD negativity.

“I think that obinutuzumab has greater efficacy in patients with CLL, compared to rituximab, and so our hypothesis is that it is a superior antibody to combine with venetoclax,” Dr. Flinn said.

AbbVie provided funding for the study on venetoclax and ibrutinib. Dr. Jain reported disclosures from venetoclax makers AbbVie and Genentech, ibrutinib makers Janssen and Pharmacyclics, and others.

Genentech and AbbVie provided support for the study on venetoclax and obinutuzumab. Dr. Flinn reported disclosures related to both companies and others.

Dr. Rogers reported no conflicts related to the study on obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax. One of her associates reported disclosures related to ibrutinib makers Novartis and Pharmacylics, among others.

SOURCE: Jain N et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 429; Flinn I et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 430; Rogers K et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 431.

Atlanta – The potential of two- and three-drug combinations to induce deep, minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative responses in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was demonstrated in multiple studies presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Previous studies have suggested that, in contrast to single-agent kinase inhibitor treatment, combinations of treatments, namely kinase or B-cell lyphoma 2 inhibitors combined with anti-CD20 antibodies, can induce MRD negativity at a high rate. For example, in a report on the CLL14 trial, 11 of 12 previously untreated patients were MRD negative after treatment with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax and anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab (Blood. 2017;129:2702-5. doi:10.1182/blood-2017-01-761973).

This new batch of studies presented at ASH 2017 provided additional evidence for the venetoclax and obinutuzumab combination, as well as other combinations that appear to provide favorable rates of MRD-negative CLL, including obinutuzumab and venetoclax plus ibrutinib and, notably, a combination that included venetoclax and ibrutinib but no anti-CD20 antibody.

A phase II trial presented by Nitin Jain, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, looked at the combination of venetoclax and ibrutinib for patients with previously untreated high-risk CLL or relapsed/refractory CLL. The regimen under evaluation starts with daily ibrutinib monotherapy for 3 months before venetoclax is added.

For the first line cohort of 36 patients, the bone marrow MRD-negativity proportion was 0% after 3 months of ibrutinib and 21% after 3 months of ibrutinib plus venetoclax, then 45%, 80%, and 100%, respectively, after 6, 9, and 12 months of combination therapy, Dr. Jain reported. In the relapsed/refractory cohort, MRD negativity was 8% after 3 months of combination therapy and 40% after 12 months. “Responses continue to improve with time, with many patients achieving bone marrow MRD-negative remission,” Dr. Jain said.

The study showed “very impressive MRD rates,” commented Ian W. Flinn, MD, of Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn. “I think it’s still up for further discussion and research to find which is the best combination.”

Dr. Flinn presented results from a phase Ib GP28331 study of venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with previously untreated CLL in which MRD was assessed in peripheral blood and bone marrow.

All 32 patients achieved peripheral blood negativity at some point on study, Dr. Flinn said, and 75% achieved bone marrow negativity. The complete response rate was 72% (23/32), but notably, high rates of undetectable bone marrow MRD were seen irrespective of response status, Dr. Flinn said.

All patients had at least one adverse event, with grade 3-4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia reported most commonly.

Preliminary progression-free survival data (PFS) suggested “durable clinical outcomes” for the combination, with an estimated 18-month PFS of 90.5%, he said.

A third study assessed the combination of obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax, finding that the combination induced MRD negativity in 14 of 24 (58%) treatment-naive CLL patients, according to Kerry A. Rogers, MD, of Ohio State University, Columbus.

The combination had a 96% response rate and is “extremely effective at eliminating detectable CLL,” Dr. Rogers noted.

Most adverse events were hematologic, and high-grade adverse events were rare, she said.

Results for the study’s primary endpoint, rate of MRD-negative complete remission, are expected by May 2018, Dr. Rogers said, adding that further follow-up will be needed to determine PFS for the combination.

Session attendees asked presenters whether they felt there was scientific justification for inclusion of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab in future trials designed in part to assess MRD negativity.

“I think that obinutuzumab has greater efficacy in patients with CLL, compared to rituximab, and so our hypothesis is that it is a superior antibody to combine with venetoclax,” Dr. Flinn said.

AbbVie provided funding for the study on venetoclax and ibrutinib. Dr. Jain reported disclosures from venetoclax makers AbbVie and Genentech, ibrutinib makers Janssen and Pharmacyclics, and others.

Genentech and AbbVie provided support for the study on venetoclax and obinutuzumab. Dr. Flinn reported disclosures related to both companies and others.

Dr. Rogers reported no conflicts related to the study on obinutuzumab, ibrutinib, and venetoclax. One of her associates reported disclosures related to ibrutinib makers Novartis and Pharmacylics, among others.

SOURCE: Jain N et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 429; Flinn I et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 430; Rogers K et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 431.