For Residents

Veterans Health Administration (VA) hospitals have received notoriety due to episodes of misdiagnosis, poor management, and negligent care described in many recent reports and news articles.^1-3 While veterans are appropriately the primary focus of these investigative reports, physicians are also challenged in this setting, as they often meet resistance when advocating for patients and attempting to improve a flawed system.² Although my residency training includes 6 months at a VA hospital mired in controversy, the hospital has played a critical role in my training.³

Despite my many frustrations with the VA and the daily stresses incurred because of barriers impeding the timing and quality of care, I have several reasons to see the glass as “half full” when reflecting on my experiences as an orthopedic surgery resident at a VA medical center. This editorial will focus on the most important of these reasons—the special opportunity and pride associated with caring for veterans and these patients’ extremely appreciative nature.

The VA is one of the largest integrated health care systems in the United States, offering both inpatient and outpatient care to eligible veterans. Although eligibility has historically been based on military service–related medical conditions, disability, and financial need, reforms from 1996 to 2002 expanded enrollment to veteran populations previously deemed ineligible for VA care.^4,5 Despite this, studies suggest that some uninsured veterans do not seek VA care, even when eligible for VA coverage. This troubling notion is further complicated by research suggesting that veterans who use the VA for all of their health care are more likely to be from poor, less-educated, and minority populations, and are more likely to report fair or poor health and seek more disability days.⁶

Such disheartening realities can mask the most important attributes of VA patients, which pertain to their selfless commitment to our country. Orthopedic surgery residents must appreciate these attributes as well as the tremendous need for musculoskeletal care in this setting, as musculoskeletal conditions are some of the most common reasons for patient visits at the VA.⁷ Although combat-related high-energy blast injuries and the reconstructive procedures used to treat them have received a lot of attention, it is the more common musculoskeletal disorders that are most responsible for the tremendous burden of musculoskeletal disease in the VA. In a study by Dominick and colleagues,⁸ veterans had significantly greater odds of reporting doctor-diagnosed arthritis compared with nonveterans. Furthermore, veterans are also more vulnerable to overuse injuries, a finding attributed to the intense physical activity associated with military training and service.⁹

The busy orthopedic surgery clinic at my VA hospital is a fulfilling experience and a reminder of the large demand for musculoskeletal care. However, it is the patient population that makes it most gratifying. Most of the veterans seeking care are appreciative, regularly expressing their gratitude. They view me and the other residents as their physicians, not simply as doctors in training, like so many other non-VA patients do. Despite the fact that VA patients sometimes have to wait several hours to be seen in clinic and several months for surgery, I have never been subjected to their inevitable disdain or frustration. This is true in even the most trying and infuriating times, such as when an operation is cancelled on the day of surgery for reasons that many surgeons in non-VA hospitals would consider trivial. And even when witness to my visible irritation with the VA system, the veterans remain respectful and understanding; if they ever share similar feelings, they most certainly never voice them to me.

I cannot refute the notion that the VA must change and that the veterans deserve an improved health care system. However, this editorial is not written as a call to action. Instead, I hope it helps to humanize the patients of the VA, serving as a reminder to residents and other providers that the VA is a unique and extraordinary opportunity to give back and say thank you to veterans.

This editorial is dedicated to CPT David Huskie, USAR (Ret.), a veteran of Operation Desert Storm and orthopedic nurse at my VA hospital. It was he who first reminded me, and the other orthopedic residents, of the importance of our time at the VA. The Figure depicts the letter he gives to orthopedic residents at our program, along with a pewter coin, after their first VA rotation.

Veterans Health Administration (VA) hospitals have received notoriety due to episodes of misdiagnosis, poor management, and negligent care described in many recent reports and news articles.^1-3 While veterans are appropriately the primary focus of these investigative reports, physicians are also challenged in this setting, as they often meet resistance when advocating for patients and attempting to improve a flawed system.² Although my residency training includes 6 months at a VA hospital mired in controversy, the hospital has played a critical role in my training.³

Despite my many frustrations with the VA and the daily stresses incurred because of barriers impeding the timing and quality of care, I have several reasons to see the glass as “half full” when reflecting on my experiences as an orthopedic surgery resident at a VA medical center. This editorial will focus on the most important of these reasons—the special opportunity and pride associated with caring for veterans and these patients’ extremely appreciative nature.

The VA is one of the largest integrated health care systems in the United States, offering both inpatient and outpatient care to eligible veterans. Although eligibility has historically been based on military service–related medical conditions, disability, and financial need, reforms from 1996 to 2002 expanded enrollment to veteran populations previously deemed ineligible for VA care.^4,5 Despite this, studies suggest that some uninsured veterans do not seek VA care, even when eligible for VA coverage. This troubling notion is further complicated by research suggesting that veterans who use the VA for all of their health care are more likely to be from poor, less-educated, and minority populations, and are more likely to report fair or poor health and seek more disability days.⁶

Such disheartening realities can mask the most important attributes of VA patients, which pertain to their selfless commitment to our country. Orthopedic surgery residents must appreciate these attributes as well as the tremendous need for musculoskeletal care in this setting, as musculoskeletal conditions are some of the most common reasons for patient visits at the VA.⁷ Although combat-related high-energy blast injuries and the reconstructive procedures used to treat them have received a lot of attention, it is the more common musculoskeletal disorders that are most responsible for the tremendous burden of musculoskeletal disease in the VA. In a study by Dominick and colleagues,⁸ veterans had significantly greater odds of reporting doctor-diagnosed arthritis compared with nonveterans. Furthermore, veterans are also more vulnerable to overuse injuries, a finding attributed to the intense physical activity associated with military training and service.⁹

The busy orthopedic surgery clinic at my VA hospital is a fulfilling experience and a reminder of the large demand for musculoskeletal care. However, it is the patient population that makes it most gratifying. Most of the veterans seeking care are appreciative, regularly expressing their gratitude. They view me and the other residents as their physicians, not simply as doctors in training, like so many other non-VA patients do. Despite the fact that VA patients sometimes have to wait several hours to be seen in clinic and several months for surgery, I have never been subjected to their inevitable disdain or frustration. This is true in even the most trying and infuriating times, such as when an operation is cancelled on the day of surgery for reasons that many surgeons in non-VA hospitals would consider trivial. And even when witness to my visible irritation with the VA system, the veterans remain respectful and understanding; if they ever share similar feelings, they most certainly never voice them to me.

I cannot refute the notion that the VA must change and that the veterans deserve an improved health care system. However, this editorial is not written as a call to action. Instead, I hope it helps to humanize the patients of the VA, serving as a reminder to residents and other providers that the VA is a unique and extraordinary opportunity to give back and say thank you to veterans.

This editorial is dedicated to CPT David Huskie, USAR (Ret.), a veteran of Operation Desert Storm and orthopedic nurse at my VA hospital. It was he who first reminded me, and the other orthopedic residents, of the importance of our time at the VA. The Figure depicts the letter he gives to orthopedic residents at our program, along with a pewter coin, after their first VA rotation.

Veterans Health Administration (VA) hospitals have received notoriety due to episodes of misdiagnosis, poor management, and negligent care described in many recent reports and news articles.^1-3 While veterans are appropriately the primary focus of these investigative reports, physicians are also challenged in this setting, as they often meet resistance when advocating for patients and attempting to improve a flawed system.² Although my residency training includes 6 months at a VA hospital mired in controversy, the hospital has played a critical role in my training.³

Despite my many frustrations with the VA and the daily stresses incurred because of barriers impeding the timing and quality of care, I have several reasons to see the glass as “half full” when reflecting on my experiences as an orthopedic surgery resident at a VA medical center. This editorial will focus on the most important of these reasons—the special opportunity and pride associated with caring for veterans and these patients’ extremely appreciative nature.

The VA is one of the largest integrated health care systems in the United States, offering both inpatient and outpatient care to eligible veterans. Although eligibility has historically been based on military service–related medical conditions, disability, and financial need, reforms from 1996 to 2002 expanded enrollment to veteran populations previously deemed ineligible for VA care.^4,5 Despite this, studies suggest that some uninsured veterans do not seek VA care, even when eligible for VA coverage. This troubling notion is further complicated by research suggesting that veterans who use the VA for all of their health care are more likely to be from poor, less-educated, and minority populations, and are more likely to report fair or poor health and seek more disability days.⁶

Such disheartening realities can mask the most important attributes of VA patients, which pertain to their selfless commitment to our country. Orthopedic surgery residents must appreciate these attributes as well as the tremendous need for musculoskeletal care in this setting, as musculoskeletal conditions are some of the most common reasons for patient visits at the VA.⁷ Although combat-related high-energy blast injuries and the reconstructive procedures used to treat them have received a lot of attention, it is the more common musculoskeletal disorders that are most responsible for the tremendous burden of musculoskeletal disease in the VA. In a study by Dominick and colleagues,⁸ veterans had significantly greater odds of reporting doctor-diagnosed arthritis compared with nonveterans. Furthermore, veterans are also more vulnerable to overuse injuries, a finding attributed to the intense physical activity associated with military training and service.⁹

The busy orthopedic surgery clinic at my VA hospital is a fulfilling experience and a reminder of the large demand for musculoskeletal care. However, it is the patient population that makes it most gratifying. Most of the veterans seeking care are appreciative, regularly expressing their gratitude. They view me and the other residents as their physicians, not simply as doctors in training, like so many other non-VA patients do. Despite the fact that VA patients sometimes have to wait several hours to be seen in clinic and several months for surgery, I have never been subjected to their inevitable disdain or frustration. This is true in even the most trying and infuriating times, such as when an operation is cancelled on the day of surgery for reasons that many surgeons in non-VA hospitals would consider trivial. And even when witness to my visible irritation with the VA system, the veterans remain respectful and understanding; if they ever share similar feelings, they most certainly never voice them to me.

I cannot refute the notion that the VA must change and that the veterans deserve an improved health care system. However, this editorial is not written as a call to action. Instead, I hope it helps to humanize the patients of the VA, serving as a reminder to residents and other providers that the VA is a unique and extraordinary opportunity to give back and say thank you to veterans.

This editorial is dedicated to CPT David Huskie, USAR (Ret.), a veteran of Operation Desert Storm and orthopedic nurse at my VA hospital. It was he who first reminded me, and the other orthopedic residents, of the importance of our time at the VA. The Figure depicts the letter he gives to orthopedic residents at our program, along with a pewter coin, after their first VA rotation.

Dermatology residency is busy with 3 years of clinical duties, academic responsibilities, and administrative work. In addition, it is a time to maximize educational experiences in dermatology from didactics to hands-on learning. It also is a time to take advantage of special opportunities that are available to residents, including attending academic meetings and giving oral 
and/or poster presentations. Major dermatology conferences often have designated sessions for residents that provide an excellent chance for residents to share interesting cases or present their research. This article provides a review of selected presentation opportunities available to residents at the major academic dermatology meetings.

American Academy of Dermatology

The Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) accepts abstracts for oral presentation from both residents and fellows for its “Residents and Fellows Symposium” and “Gross and Microscopic Symposium.” The “Residents and Fellows Symposium” is an opportunity to present either clinical or laboratory research in a 9-minute oral format. Up to 20 abstracts are chosen for presentation along with 4 alternate abstracts. Furthermore, awards are given to the top 3 abstracts in both the clinical and laboratory categories. Those accepted for the “Gross and Microscopic Symposium” give a 5-minute oral presentation of a case with interesting clinical and histopathological findings. Submission guidelines for these presentations are available 
on the AAD Web site (https://www.aad.org/symposium/am2016).

Residents and fellows also are eligible to submit abstracts for the AAD’s electronic poster exhibits and presentations. The posters are presented electronically and are displayed and/or are available to be viewed throughout the meeting. The abstracts are blind reviewed by the Poster Exhibits Task Force on a scale from 1 (unsatisfactory) to 10 (outstanding). Presenters with abstracts that receive a passing score (2.5 or higher) by judges are allowed to discuss their poster in a live 5-minute oral presentation.

The AAD’s Summer Academy Meeting, which also takes place annually, does not have separate resident-specific poster or oral presentation sessions; however, it does offer an electronic poster exhibit and presentation session.

Pediatric Dermatology

The Annual Meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology (https://pedsderm.net/meetings/annual-meeting/) accepts abstract submissions for its “Cases of the Year” session as well as poster presentations. Residents, medical students, and fellows who are chosen for a “Cases of the Year” or poster presentation are eligible for a travel award that is available on a competitive basis. The American Academy of Pediatrics’ Section on Dermatology also offers an additional travel award for a resident or fellow who presents a case or poster at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology.

American Society for Dermatologic Surgery

The American Society for Dermatologic Surgery has an Annual Meeting (https://www.asds.net/ 
annualmeeting/) that includes a competitive “Resident Oral Abstracts” session. If selected, residents give a 5-minute presentation and abstracts are published in the Annual Meeting program book.

American Society of Dermatopathology

The American Society of Dermatopathology Annual Meeting has several opportunities for residents and fellows to present abstracts (https://www.asdp.org/meetings-events/annual-meeting/52nd/call-for 
-abtracts/). Submissions to the “General Abstracts” category are selected for either oral or poster presentation. Ambitious dermatology or pathology residents may choose to submit their case report abstracts to the “Duel in Dermatopathology” competition, which includes an oral presentation and publication of abstracts in the meeting program book. Finally, the “Dermatopathology Fellows Abstract” category is a special category for dermatopathology fellows to present an oral or poster presentation. Any resident or fellow who is accepted for oral or poster presentations is eligible for a “Physician-in-Training Award” (except winners of the “Duel in Dermatopathology” competition), which are granted to the best oral and poster presentations.

Conclusion

Beyond dermatology residency, there are many opportunities for resident education through attendance at academic meetings as well as presentation of case reports and research. The major dermatology meetings often have specific sessions to give residents a chance to share their work or interesting cases. This guide may be helpful to residents who are hoping for such venues to enhance their education and even their curriculum vitae.

Dermatology residency is busy with 3 years of clinical duties, academic responsibilities, and administrative work. In addition, it is a time to maximize educational experiences in dermatology from didactics to hands-on learning. It also is a time to take advantage of special opportunities that are available to residents, including attending academic meetings and giving oral 
and/or poster presentations. Major dermatology conferences often have designated sessions for residents that provide an excellent chance for residents to share interesting cases or present their research. This article provides a review of selected presentation opportunities available to residents at the major academic dermatology meetings.

American Academy of Dermatology

The Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) accepts abstracts for oral presentation from both residents and fellows for its “Residents and Fellows Symposium” and “Gross and Microscopic Symposium.” The “Residents and Fellows Symposium” is an opportunity to present either clinical or laboratory research in a 9-minute oral format. Up to 20 abstracts are chosen for presentation along with 4 alternate abstracts. Furthermore, awards are given to the top 3 abstracts in both the clinical and laboratory categories. Those accepted for the “Gross and Microscopic Symposium” give a 5-minute oral presentation of a case with interesting clinical and histopathological findings. Submission guidelines for these presentations are available 
on the AAD Web site (https://www.aad.org/symposium/am2016).

Residents and fellows also are eligible to submit abstracts for the AAD’s electronic poster exhibits and presentations. The posters are presented electronically and are displayed and/or are available to be viewed throughout the meeting. The abstracts are blind reviewed by the Poster Exhibits Task Force on a scale from 1 (unsatisfactory) to 10 (outstanding). Presenters with abstracts that receive a passing score (2.5 or higher) by judges are allowed to discuss their poster in a live 5-minute oral presentation.

The AAD’s Summer Academy Meeting, which also takes place annually, does not have separate resident-specific poster or oral presentation sessions; however, it does offer an electronic poster exhibit and presentation session.

Pediatric Dermatology

The Annual Meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology (https://pedsderm.net/meetings/annual-meeting/) accepts abstract submissions for its “Cases of the Year” session as well as poster presentations. Residents, medical students, and fellows who are chosen for a “Cases of the Year” or poster presentation are eligible for a travel award that is available on a competitive basis. The American Academy of Pediatrics’ Section on Dermatology also offers an additional travel award for a resident or fellow who presents a case or poster at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology.

American Society for Dermatologic Surgery

The American Society for Dermatologic Surgery has an Annual Meeting (https://www.asds.net/ 
annualmeeting/) that includes a competitive “Resident Oral Abstracts” session. If selected, residents give a 5-minute presentation and abstracts are published in the Annual Meeting program book.

American Society of Dermatopathology

The American Society of Dermatopathology Annual Meeting has several opportunities for residents and fellows to present abstracts (https://www.asdp.org/meetings-events/annual-meeting/52nd/call-for 
-abtracts/). Submissions to the “General Abstracts” category are selected for either oral or poster presentation. Ambitious dermatology or pathology residents may choose to submit their case report abstracts to the “Duel in Dermatopathology” competition, which includes an oral presentation and publication of abstracts in the meeting program book. Finally, the “Dermatopathology Fellows Abstract” category is a special category for dermatopathology fellows to present an oral or poster presentation. Any resident or fellow who is accepted for oral or poster presentations is eligible for a “Physician-in-Training Award” (except winners of the “Duel in Dermatopathology” competition), which are granted to the best oral and poster presentations.

Conclusion

Beyond dermatology residency, there are many opportunities for resident education through attendance at academic meetings as well as presentation of case reports and research. The major dermatology meetings often have specific sessions to give residents a chance to share their work or interesting cases. This guide may be helpful to residents who are hoping for such venues to enhance their education and even their curriculum vitae.

Dermatology residency is busy with 3 years of clinical duties, academic responsibilities, and administrative work. In addition, it is a time to maximize educational experiences in dermatology from didactics to hands-on learning. It also is a time to take advantage of special opportunities that are available to residents, including attending academic meetings and giving oral 
and/or poster presentations. Major dermatology conferences often have designated sessions for residents that provide an excellent chance for residents to share interesting cases or present their research. This article provides a review of selected presentation opportunities available to residents at the major academic dermatology meetings.

American Academy of Dermatology

The Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) accepts abstracts for oral presentation from both residents and fellows for its “Residents and Fellows Symposium” and “Gross and Microscopic Symposium.” The “Residents and Fellows Symposium” is an opportunity to present either clinical or laboratory research in a 9-minute oral format. Up to 20 abstracts are chosen for presentation along with 4 alternate abstracts. Furthermore, awards are given to the top 3 abstracts in both the clinical and laboratory categories. Those accepted for the “Gross and Microscopic Symposium” give a 5-minute oral presentation of a case with interesting clinical and histopathological findings. Submission guidelines for these presentations are available 
on the AAD Web site (https://www.aad.org/symposium/am2016).

Residents and fellows also are eligible to submit abstracts for the AAD’s electronic poster exhibits and presentations. The posters are presented electronically and are displayed and/or are available to be viewed throughout the meeting. The abstracts are blind reviewed by the Poster Exhibits Task Force on a scale from 1 (unsatisfactory) to 10 (outstanding). Presenters with abstracts that receive a passing score (2.5 or higher) by judges are allowed to discuss their poster in a live 5-minute oral presentation.

The AAD’s Summer Academy Meeting, which also takes place annually, does not have separate resident-specific poster or oral presentation sessions; however, it does offer an electronic poster exhibit and presentation session.

Pediatric Dermatology

The Annual Meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology (https://pedsderm.net/meetings/annual-meeting/) accepts abstract submissions for its “Cases of the Year” session as well as poster presentations. Residents, medical students, and fellows who are chosen for a “Cases of the Year” or poster presentation are eligible for a travel award that is available on a competitive basis. The American Academy of Pediatrics’ Section on Dermatology also offers an additional travel award for a resident or fellow who presents a case or poster at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology.

American Society for Dermatologic Surgery

The American Society for Dermatologic Surgery has an Annual Meeting (https://www.asds.net/ 
annualmeeting/) that includes a competitive “Resident Oral Abstracts” session. If selected, residents give a 5-minute presentation and abstracts are published in the Annual Meeting program book.

American Society of Dermatopathology

The American Society of Dermatopathology Annual Meeting has several opportunities for residents and fellows to present abstracts (https://www.asdp.org/meetings-events/annual-meeting/52nd/call-for 
-abtracts/). Submissions to the “General Abstracts” category are selected for either oral or poster presentation. Ambitious dermatology or pathology residents may choose to submit their case report abstracts to the “Duel in Dermatopathology” competition, which includes an oral presentation and publication of abstracts in the meeting program book. Finally, the “Dermatopathology Fellows Abstract” category is a special category for dermatopathology fellows to present an oral or poster presentation. Any resident or fellow who is accepted for oral or poster presentations is eligible for a “Physician-in-Training Award” (except winners of the “Duel in Dermatopathology” competition), which are granted to the best oral and poster presentations.

Conclusion

Beyond dermatology residency, there are many opportunities for resident education through attendance at academic meetings as well as presentation of case reports and research. The major dermatology meetings often have specific sessions to give residents a chance to share their work or interesting cases. This guide may be helpful to residents who are hoping for such venues to enhance their education and even their curriculum vitae.

Applying for a residency program can be a stressful process for medical students. It is a combination of applying for a job in the “real world” and applying to a college or medical school. In certain fields of medicine or surgery, there may be over 600 residency applications for 40 to 80 interviewee slots. Different specialties, as well as programs within a given specialty, take a different number of residents per year. This can vary from 1 to over 20 available spots, depending on the field of medicine or surgery as well as the specific program. Orthopedic surgery residencies, for example, can match between 2 and 12 residents each year. During the 2013–2014 academic year at our institution, there were over 600 applications received for approximately 50 interview slots for a class of 5 orthopedic surgery residents. Nationally, according to publicly available 2013 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) data, a total of 1038 applicants (833 US medical school seniors) applied for 693 spots in orthopedic surgery, of which 692 were filled, indicating that orthopedic surgery remains one of the most desired fields among medical school seniors.¹ Looking at the statistics provided by the NRMP data, orthopedic applicants remain some of the most competitive, with proportionally higher board scores, publication numbers, and grades, among other factors.¹

Each individual program has its own method for sifting through the applications. At some institutions, the individual “in charge” of the selection committee may look through all applications initially, narrow them down, and then distribute them to the other members of the selection committee to determine the final interviewee list. At other institutions, the initial group of applications may be divided and distributed to the committee members so that each member reviews the applications and ultimately decides upon the interview candidates.

The Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) application includes the applicant’s name, birth city, current place of residence, education history, standardized test scores, grades achieved during medical school, letters of recommendation, personal statement, extracurricular activities, volunteer activities, research experience, and languages spoken, along with several other pieces of data, all intended to be able to give the committee a better understanding of the applicant. Interestingly, however, the application also includes a photograph of the applicant.

Countless authors have demonstrated that we make assumptions and reach conclusions without even being aware that this is occurring. This is the theory of “unconscious bias.”^2-5 Unconscious bias applies to how we perceive other people, and occurs when subconscious beliefs or unrecognized stereotypes about specific characteristics, including gender, ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic status, age, and sexual orientation, result in an automatic and unconscious reaction and/or behavior.⁶ Unconscious bias has the ability to affect everything from how health care is delivered to how employees are hired.^7-12 We are all biased, and becoming aware of our biases will help us mitigate them in the workplace.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that employers rely solely on job-related qualifications, and not physical characteristics, in their interviewing and hiring process. The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency that enforces Title VII, includes asking for photographs during the application stage on its list of prohibited practices for employers.¹³ It is our belief that including a photograph in the ERAS application, prior to the selection of interview candidates, may produce unconscious bias in the decision for granting (or not granting) an interview, and this component of the application should be eliminated.

Using a wide spectrum of cultural backgrounds in employers, Dion and colleagues¹⁴ demonstrated that the “what is beautiful is good” bias is present in all cultures when prospective employees are closely matched in qualification. Attractive individuals are thought to have better professional lives and stable marital relationships and personalities, according to previous studies.¹⁴ There has been much research aimed at determining if physical attractiveness is a factor in hiring, and the evidence suggests that the more attractive the applicant is, the greater the chances of being hired.¹⁵ Specifically, Watkins and Johnston¹⁵ have found that attractive people are thought to have better personalities than less attractive people, and that a photograph can influence the hiring decision process.

Bradley Ruffle at Ben-Gurion University and Ze’ev Shtudiner at Ariel University looked at what happens when job hunters include photographs with their curricula vitae (CV), as is the norm in much of Europe and Asia.¹⁶ For over 2500 job postings, they sent 2 identical résumés: one with a photograph and one without a photograph. An equal number of male and female applicants were sent to each posting, as were an equal number of attractive and plain-looking photographs; applications without photographs were also sent as a control group. For men, the results were as expected: CVs of “attractive” men were more likely to elicit a response from the employer (19.7%) compared with those of no-picture men (13.7%) and plain-looking men (9.2%). Interestingly, men who were viewed as “plain-looking” were better off not including a photograph. For the female applicants, however, the results were unexpected: CVs of women without a picture elicited the highest response rate (16.6%), while CVs of “plain-looking” women (13.6%) and of “attractive” women (12.8%) were less likely to receive a response.¹⁶

It is an unfortunate reality that personal preference, bias, and, in some cases, discriminatory hiring practices all factor into the selection process.¹⁷ This is why, as described above, the EEOC includes asking for photographs during the application stage on its list of prohibited practices for employers.¹³ The EEOC website also states: “If needed for identification purposes, a photograph may be obtained after an offer of employment is made and accepted.”¹³ In the residency application scenario, once an applicant has been granted an interview, a photograph can be taken on the day of the interview. With so many interviewees, this may help the interviewers to remember the interviewee. At this point in the process, the applicant has already been granted the interview. The bias associated with merely looking at a photograph is thus eliminated. This is in accordance with Title VII and is clearly different than including a photograph in the initial application, which directly violates Title VII.

Reviewers of applicants may have an unconscious bias due to the applicant’s attractiveness, race, sex, ethnicity, etc. Other, subtler forms of bias may also be present. Without realizing it, people may judge the quality of the photograph, or even what the applicant was wearing in the photograph. In orthopedic surgery, for example, there may be bias in the “size” of the applicant regardless of sex. Reviewers may unconsciously think how is he/she going to hold the leg, cut a rod, reduce a hip, etc. Without even realizing it, this may sway the person reviewing the application to choose one applicant over another. This may occur regardless of the applicant’s actual qualifications as based on the previously described factors, including test scores, grades during medical school, letters of recommendation, personal statement, extracurricular activities, volunteer activities, and research experience.

Unconscious bias is present in everyone. In an ideal world, one would be able to eliminate all sources of unconscious bias in the application process. Bias due to attending an Ivy League school versus a state school, bias due to where the applicant is from, bias due to who wrote the letter of recommendation, along with various other sources of unconscious bias, would be able to be eliminated. Unfortunately, this is not possible. What is possible, however, is to remove the photograph from the application process and to comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Applying for a residency program can be a stressful process for medical students. It is a combination of applying for a job in the “real world” and applying to a college or medical school. In certain fields of medicine or surgery, there may be over 600 residency applications for 40 to 80 interviewee slots. Different specialties, as well as programs within a given specialty, take a different number of residents per year. This can vary from 1 to over 20 available spots, depending on the field of medicine or surgery as well as the specific program. Orthopedic surgery residencies, for example, can match between 2 and 12 residents each year. During the 2013–2014 academic year at our institution, there were over 600 applications received for approximately 50 interview slots for a class of 5 orthopedic surgery residents. Nationally, according to publicly available 2013 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) data, a total of 1038 applicants (833 US medical school seniors) applied for 693 spots in orthopedic surgery, of which 692 were filled, indicating that orthopedic surgery remains one of the most desired fields among medical school seniors.¹ Looking at the statistics provided by the NRMP data, orthopedic applicants remain some of the most competitive, with proportionally higher board scores, publication numbers, and grades, among other factors.¹

Each individual program has its own method for sifting through the applications. At some institutions, the individual “in charge” of the selection committee may look through all applications initially, narrow them down, and then distribute them to the other members of the selection committee to determine the final interviewee list. At other institutions, the initial group of applications may be divided and distributed to the committee members so that each member reviews the applications and ultimately decides upon the interview candidates.

The Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) application includes the applicant’s name, birth city, current place of residence, education history, standardized test scores, grades achieved during medical school, letters of recommendation, personal statement, extracurricular activities, volunteer activities, research experience, and languages spoken, along with several other pieces of data, all intended to be able to give the committee a better understanding of the applicant. Interestingly, however, the application also includes a photograph of the applicant.

Countless authors have demonstrated that we make assumptions and reach conclusions without even being aware that this is occurring. This is the theory of “unconscious bias.”^2-5 Unconscious bias applies to how we perceive other people, and occurs when subconscious beliefs or unrecognized stereotypes about specific characteristics, including gender, ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic status, age, and sexual orientation, result in an automatic and unconscious reaction and/or behavior.⁶ Unconscious bias has the ability to affect everything from how health care is delivered to how employees are hired.^7-12 We are all biased, and becoming aware of our biases will help us mitigate them in the workplace.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that employers rely solely on job-related qualifications, and not physical characteristics, in their interviewing and hiring process. The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency that enforces Title VII, includes asking for photographs during the application stage on its list of prohibited practices for employers.¹³ It is our belief that including a photograph in the ERAS application, prior to the selection of interview candidates, may produce unconscious bias in the decision for granting (or not granting) an interview, and this component of the application should be eliminated.

Using a wide spectrum of cultural backgrounds in employers, Dion and colleagues¹⁴ demonstrated that the “what is beautiful is good” bias is present in all cultures when prospective employees are closely matched in qualification. Attractive individuals are thought to have better professional lives and stable marital relationships and personalities, according to previous studies.¹⁴ There has been much research aimed at determining if physical attractiveness is a factor in hiring, and the evidence suggests that the more attractive the applicant is, the greater the chances of being hired.¹⁵ Specifically, Watkins and Johnston¹⁵ have found that attractive people are thought to have better personalities than less attractive people, and that a photograph can influence the hiring decision process.

Bradley Ruffle at Ben-Gurion University and Ze’ev Shtudiner at Ariel University looked at what happens when job hunters include photographs with their curricula vitae (CV), as is the norm in much of Europe and Asia.¹⁶ For over 2500 job postings, they sent 2 identical résumés: one with a photograph and one without a photograph. An equal number of male and female applicants were sent to each posting, as were an equal number of attractive and plain-looking photographs; applications without photographs were also sent as a control group. For men, the results were as expected: CVs of “attractive” men were more likely to elicit a response from the employer (19.7%) compared with those of no-picture men (13.7%) and plain-looking men (9.2%). Interestingly, men who were viewed as “plain-looking” were better off not including a photograph. For the female applicants, however, the results were unexpected: CVs of women without a picture elicited the highest response rate (16.6%), while CVs of “plain-looking” women (13.6%) and of “attractive” women (12.8%) were less likely to receive a response.¹⁶

It is an unfortunate reality that personal preference, bias, and, in some cases, discriminatory hiring practices all factor into the selection process.¹⁷ This is why, as described above, the EEOC includes asking for photographs during the application stage on its list of prohibited practices for employers.¹³ The EEOC website also states: “If needed for identification purposes, a photograph may be obtained after an offer of employment is made and accepted.”¹³ In the residency application scenario, once an applicant has been granted an interview, a photograph can be taken on the day of the interview. With so many interviewees, this may help the interviewers to remember the interviewee. At this point in the process, the applicant has already been granted the interview. The bias associated with merely looking at a photograph is thus eliminated. This is in accordance with Title VII and is clearly different than including a photograph in the initial application, which directly violates Title VII.

Reviewers of applicants may have an unconscious bias due to the applicant’s attractiveness, race, sex, ethnicity, etc. Other, subtler forms of bias may also be present. Without realizing it, people may judge the quality of the photograph, or even what the applicant was wearing in the photograph. In orthopedic surgery, for example, there may be bias in the “size” of the applicant regardless of sex. Reviewers may unconsciously think how is he/she going to hold the leg, cut a rod, reduce a hip, etc. Without even realizing it, this may sway the person reviewing the application to choose one applicant over another. This may occur regardless of the applicant’s actual qualifications as based on the previously described factors, including test scores, grades during medical school, letters of recommendation, personal statement, extracurricular activities, volunteer activities, and research experience.

Unconscious bias is present in everyone. In an ideal world, one would be able to eliminate all sources of unconscious bias in the application process. Bias due to attending an Ivy League school versus a state school, bias due to where the applicant is from, bias due to who wrote the letter of recommendation, along with various other sources of unconscious bias, would be able to be eliminated. Unfortunately, this is not possible. What is possible, however, is to remove the photograph from the application process and to comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Applying for a residency program can be a stressful process for medical students. It is a combination of applying for a job in the “real world” and applying to a college or medical school. In certain fields of medicine or surgery, there may be over 600 residency applications for 40 to 80 interviewee slots. Different specialties, as well as programs within a given specialty, take a different number of residents per year. This can vary from 1 to over 20 available spots, depending on the field of medicine or surgery as well as the specific program. Orthopedic surgery residencies, for example, can match between 2 and 12 residents each year. During the 2013–2014 academic year at our institution, there were over 600 applications received for approximately 50 interview slots for a class of 5 orthopedic surgery residents. Nationally, according to publicly available 2013 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) data, a total of 1038 applicants (833 US medical school seniors) applied for 693 spots in orthopedic surgery, of which 692 were filled, indicating that orthopedic surgery remains one of the most desired fields among medical school seniors.¹ Looking at the statistics provided by the NRMP data, orthopedic applicants remain some of the most competitive, with proportionally higher board scores, publication numbers, and grades, among other factors.¹

Each individual program has its own method for sifting through the applications. At some institutions, the individual “in charge” of the selection committee may look through all applications initially, narrow them down, and then distribute them to the other members of the selection committee to determine the final interviewee list. At other institutions, the initial group of applications may be divided and distributed to the committee members so that each member reviews the applications and ultimately decides upon the interview candidates.

The Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) application includes the applicant’s name, birth city, current place of residence, education history, standardized test scores, grades achieved during medical school, letters of recommendation, personal statement, extracurricular activities, volunteer activities, research experience, and languages spoken, along with several other pieces of data, all intended to be able to give the committee a better understanding of the applicant. Interestingly, however, the application also includes a photograph of the applicant.

Countless authors have demonstrated that we make assumptions and reach conclusions without even being aware that this is occurring. This is the theory of “unconscious bias.”^2-5 Unconscious bias applies to how we perceive other people, and occurs when subconscious beliefs or unrecognized stereotypes about specific characteristics, including gender, ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic status, age, and sexual orientation, result in an automatic and unconscious reaction and/or behavior.⁶ Unconscious bias has the ability to affect everything from how health care is delivered to how employees are hired.^7-12 We are all biased, and becoming aware of our biases will help us mitigate them in the workplace.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that employers rely solely on job-related qualifications, and not physical characteristics, in their interviewing and hiring process. The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency that enforces Title VII, includes asking for photographs during the application stage on its list of prohibited practices for employers.¹³ It is our belief that including a photograph in the ERAS application, prior to the selection of interview candidates, may produce unconscious bias in the decision for granting (or not granting) an interview, and this component of the application should be eliminated.

Using a wide spectrum of cultural backgrounds in employers, Dion and colleagues¹⁴ demonstrated that the “what is beautiful is good” bias is present in all cultures when prospective employees are closely matched in qualification. Attractive individuals are thought to have better professional lives and stable marital relationships and personalities, according to previous studies.¹⁴ There has been much research aimed at determining if physical attractiveness is a factor in hiring, and the evidence suggests that the more attractive the applicant is, the greater the chances of being hired.¹⁵ Specifically, Watkins and Johnston¹⁵ have found that attractive people are thought to have better personalities than less attractive people, and that a photograph can influence the hiring decision process.

Bradley Ruffle at Ben-Gurion University and Ze’ev Shtudiner at Ariel University looked at what happens when job hunters include photographs with their curricula vitae (CV), as is the norm in much of Europe and Asia.¹⁶ For over 2500 job postings, they sent 2 identical résumés: one with a photograph and one without a photograph. An equal number of male and female applicants were sent to each posting, as were an equal number of attractive and plain-looking photographs; applications without photographs were also sent as a control group. For men, the results were as expected: CVs of “attractive” men were more likely to elicit a response from the employer (19.7%) compared with those of no-picture men (13.7%) and plain-looking men (9.2%). Interestingly, men who were viewed as “plain-looking” were better off not including a photograph. For the female applicants, however, the results were unexpected: CVs of women without a picture elicited the highest response rate (16.6%), while CVs of “plain-looking” women (13.6%) and of “attractive” women (12.8%) were less likely to receive a response.¹⁶

It is an unfortunate reality that personal preference, bias, and, in some cases, discriminatory hiring practices all factor into the selection process.¹⁷ This is why, as described above, the EEOC includes asking for photographs during the application stage on its list of prohibited practices for employers.¹³ The EEOC website also states: “If needed for identification purposes, a photograph may be obtained after an offer of employment is made and accepted.”¹³ In the residency application scenario, once an applicant has been granted an interview, a photograph can be taken on the day of the interview. With so many interviewees, this may help the interviewers to remember the interviewee. At this point in the process, the applicant has already been granted the interview. The bias associated with merely looking at a photograph is thus eliminated. This is in accordance with Title VII and is clearly different than including a photograph in the initial application, which directly violates Title VII.

Reviewers of applicants may have an unconscious bias due to the applicant’s attractiveness, race, sex, ethnicity, etc. Other, subtler forms of bias may also be present. Without realizing it, people may judge the quality of the photograph, or even what the applicant was wearing in the photograph. In orthopedic surgery, for example, there may be bias in the “size” of the applicant regardless of sex. Reviewers may unconsciously think how is he/she going to hold the leg, cut a rod, reduce a hip, etc. Without even realizing it, this may sway the person reviewing the application to choose one applicant over another. This may occur regardless of the applicant’s actual qualifications as based on the previously described factors, including test scores, grades during medical school, letters of recommendation, personal statement, extracurricular activities, volunteer activities, and research experience.

Unconscious bias is present in everyone. In an ideal world, one would be able to eliminate all sources of unconscious bias in the application process. Bias due to attending an Ivy League school versus a state school, bias due to where the applicant is from, bias due to who wrote the letter of recommendation, along with various other sources of unconscious bias, would be able to be eliminated. Unfortunately, this is not possible. What is possible, however, is to remove the photograph from the application process and to comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Perhaps more than any other medical specialty, psychiatry enjoys a longstanding and, at times, complicated relationship with cinema. Recent award-winning films, such as Still Alice, Silver Linings Playbook, and Birdman: Or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) continue traditions rooted in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Martha Marcy May Marlene, Spellbound, and dozens of other films. Through these films, psychiatry is afforded exposure unavailable to most medical specialties. This exposure has proven to be a double-edged sword, however.

Exposure vs accurate portrayal
Relative benefits and disadvantages of psychiatry’s position in film and popular media are difficult to calculate. A film such as Still Alice can provide a vivid, concrete personal narrative of a patient with Alzheimer’s disease, equipping millions of viewers with knowledge that might otherwise remain esoteric and inaccessible. Martha Marcy May Marlene offers a similar stage for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as does Spellbound for dissociative amnesia.

Such exposure comes at a cost, inevitably, because information about psychiatry is incorporated into a dramatic storyline assembled by filmmakers who are not medical professionals and who are bound by conflicting pressures. At times, those pressures outweigh the desire to accurately portray psychiatric illness.

‘Magical realism’
Two of last year’s celebrated films, Birdman and Still Alice, have continued the longstanding tradition of portraying mental illness in film. Medicine often is touted as art and science; film likewise sits at this intersection. However, filmmakers are artists, primarily, and the nature of storytelling is to emphasize art over scientific accuracy.

The main character in Birdman, for example, manifests psychosis, but many of his presenting signs and symptoms are incongruent with any diagnosable form of psychosis. To tell its story, the film employs magical realism, a celebrated literary and film technique. Although magical realism might detract from the accuracy of the condition portrayed, it adds cinematic appeal to the film, likely creates more entertainment value, and, in turn, garners appreciation from a broader audience.

Expansion of medical information, accurate and otherwise
As in the 1970’s, we are, today, in the midst of rapidly evolving societal norms. One of the most rapid changes is in how the public acquires information. We are in the midst of the “Googlification” of medical knowledge and the expansion of online medical resources. These resources can, simultaneously, inform and mislead the public.

Popular films behave in much the same way. There is no motion picture-guild requirement that mentally ill characters in films such as Birdman meet any set of psychiatric criteria, from DSM-5 or elsewhere. Similarly, the fact that psychiatrists do not control the information in films that portray mental illness comes as no surprise.

‘One flew East, one flew West…’
The tension between engaging storytelling and medical accuracy certainly is not a new phenomenon, extending not only to representations of disease but to representations of treatment. Consider director Miloš Forman’s seminal 1975 film, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, whose chief importance for psychiatry rests not in its individualized representations of patients but in a portrayal of the environment in which they are treated. Louise Fletcher’s Academy Award-winning portrayal of cruel Nurse Ratched has lingered in the public consciousness, remaining a prominent image for many Americans when they think of a psychiatric institution.

When Cuckoo’s Nest was released, it was considered by critics to be an “exploration of society’s enforcement of conformism” that “almost willfully overlooked the realities of mental illness”¹ so that it could vivify its protagonist’s struggle against tyrannical Nurse Ratched. The film’s primary intent might not have been to make a statement about the injustices of the time, but it has certainly had a lasting effect on the public’s perception of psychiatric illness and treatment.

Films offer an opportunity for discussion
Films on the theme of psychiatry and mental illness have long held a distinctive position in the canon of Western cinema. In this vein, films from the past year have made timely contributions to the genre. Although Still Alice and Birdman might prove to be ground-breaking in changing societal views over time, we must not expect them to do so.

Nevertheless, psychiatry ought to take advantage of popular films’ wide exposure and ability to destigmatize mental illness—rather than lament medical inaccuracies in these films.

Cinema is, first and foremost, an art. Although patients and the public might pick up misconceptions about psychosis, Alzheimer’s disease, or PTSD because popular films take artistic liberty about mental illness, psychiatrists are available to set the record straight. After all, psychiatry has long been about managing perceptions, and patient education is at the core of our specialty.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Perhaps more than any other medical specialty, psychiatry enjoys a longstanding and, at times, complicated relationship with cinema. Recent award-winning films, such as Still Alice, Silver Linings Playbook, and Birdman: Or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) continue traditions rooted in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Martha Marcy May Marlene, Spellbound, and dozens of other films. Through these films, psychiatry is afforded exposure unavailable to most medical specialties. This exposure has proven to be a double-edged sword, however.

Exposure vs accurate portrayal
Relative benefits and disadvantages of psychiatry’s position in film and popular media are difficult to calculate. A film such as Still Alice can provide a vivid, concrete personal narrative of a patient with Alzheimer’s disease, equipping millions of viewers with knowledge that might otherwise remain esoteric and inaccessible. Martha Marcy May Marlene offers a similar stage for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as does Spellbound for dissociative amnesia.

Such exposure comes at a cost, inevitably, because information about psychiatry is incorporated into a dramatic storyline assembled by filmmakers who are not medical professionals and who are bound by conflicting pressures. At times, those pressures outweigh the desire to accurately portray psychiatric illness.

‘Magical realism’
Two of last year’s celebrated films, Birdman and Still Alice, have continued the longstanding tradition of portraying mental illness in film. Medicine often is touted as art and science; film likewise sits at this intersection. However, filmmakers are artists, primarily, and the nature of storytelling is to emphasize art over scientific accuracy.

The main character in Birdman, for example, manifests psychosis, but many of his presenting signs and symptoms are incongruent with any diagnosable form of psychosis. To tell its story, the film employs magical realism, a celebrated literary and film technique. Although magical realism might detract from the accuracy of the condition portrayed, it adds cinematic appeal to the film, likely creates more entertainment value, and, in turn, garners appreciation from a broader audience.

Expansion of medical information, accurate and otherwise
As in the 1970’s, we are, today, in the midst of rapidly evolving societal norms. One of the most rapid changes is in how the public acquires information. We are in the midst of the “Googlification” of medical knowledge and the expansion of online medical resources. These resources can, simultaneously, inform and mislead the public.

Popular films behave in much the same way. There is no motion picture-guild requirement that mentally ill characters in films such as Birdman meet any set of psychiatric criteria, from DSM-5 or elsewhere. Similarly, the fact that psychiatrists do not control the information in films that portray mental illness comes as no surprise.

‘One flew East, one flew West…’
The tension between engaging storytelling and medical accuracy certainly is not a new phenomenon, extending not only to representations of disease but to representations of treatment. Consider director Miloš Forman’s seminal 1975 film, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, whose chief importance for psychiatry rests not in its individualized representations of patients but in a portrayal of the environment in which they are treated. Louise Fletcher’s Academy Award-winning portrayal of cruel Nurse Ratched has lingered in the public consciousness, remaining a prominent image for many Americans when they think of a psychiatric institution.

When Cuckoo’s Nest was released, it was considered by critics to be an “exploration of society’s enforcement of conformism” that “almost willfully overlooked the realities of mental illness”¹ so that it could vivify its protagonist’s struggle against tyrannical Nurse Ratched. The film’s primary intent might not have been to make a statement about the injustices of the time, but it has certainly had a lasting effect on the public’s perception of psychiatric illness and treatment.

Films offer an opportunity for discussion
Films on the theme of psychiatry and mental illness have long held a distinctive position in the canon of Western cinema. In this vein, films from the past year have made timely contributions to the genre. Although Still Alice and Birdman might prove to be ground-breaking in changing societal views over time, we must not expect them to do so.

Nevertheless, psychiatry ought to take advantage of popular films’ wide exposure and ability to destigmatize mental illness—rather than lament medical inaccuracies in these films.

Cinema is, first and foremost, an art. Although patients and the public might pick up misconceptions about psychosis, Alzheimer’s disease, or PTSD because popular films take artistic liberty about mental illness, psychiatrists are available to set the record straight. After all, psychiatry has long been about managing perceptions, and patient education is at the core of our specialty.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Perhaps more than any other medical specialty, psychiatry enjoys a longstanding and, at times, complicated relationship with cinema. Recent award-winning films, such as Still Alice, Silver Linings Playbook, and Birdman: Or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) continue traditions rooted in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Martha Marcy May Marlene, Spellbound, and dozens of other films. Through these films, psychiatry is afforded exposure unavailable to most medical specialties. This exposure has proven to be a double-edged sword, however.

Exposure vs accurate portrayal
Relative benefits and disadvantages of psychiatry’s position in film and popular media are difficult to calculate. A film such as Still Alice can provide a vivid, concrete personal narrative of a patient with Alzheimer’s disease, equipping millions of viewers with knowledge that might otherwise remain esoteric and inaccessible. Martha Marcy May Marlene offers a similar stage for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as does Spellbound for dissociative amnesia.

Such exposure comes at a cost, inevitably, because information about psychiatry is incorporated into a dramatic storyline assembled by filmmakers who are not medical professionals and who are bound by conflicting pressures. At times, those pressures outweigh the desire to accurately portray psychiatric illness.

‘Magical realism’
Two of last year’s celebrated films, Birdman and Still Alice, have continued the longstanding tradition of portraying mental illness in film. Medicine often is touted as art and science; film likewise sits at this intersection. However, filmmakers are artists, primarily, and the nature of storytelling is to emphasize art over scientific accuracy.

The main character in Birdman, for example, manifests psychosis, but many of his presenting signs and symptoms are incongruent with any diagnosable form of psychosis. To tell its story, the film employs magical realism, a celebrated literary and film technique. Although magical realism might detract from the accuracy of the condition portrayed, it adds cinematic appeal to the film, likely creates more entertainment value, and, in turn, garners appreciation from a broader audience.

Expansion of medical information, accurate and otherwise
As in the 1970’s, we are, today, in the midst of rapidly evolving societal norms. One of the most rapid changes is in how the public acquires information. We are in the midst of the “Googlification” of medical knowledge and the expansion of online medical resources. These resources can, simultaneously, inform and mislead the public.

Popular films behave in much the same way. There is no motion picture-guild requirement that mentally ill characters in films such as Birdman meet any set of psychiatric criteria, from DSM-5 or elsewhere. Similarly, the fact that psychiatrists do not control the information in films that portray mental illness comes as no surprise.

‘One flew East, one flew West…’
The tension between engaging storytelling and medical accuracy certainly is not a new phenomenon, extending not only to representations of disease but to representations of treatment. Consider director Miloš Forman’s seminal 1975 film, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, whose chief importance for psychiatry rests not in its individualized representations of patients but in a portrayal of the environment in which they are treated. Louise Fletcher’s Academy Award-winning portrayal of cruel Nurse Ratched has lingered in the public consciousness, remaining a prominent image for many Americans when they think of a psychiatric institution.

When Cuckoo’s Nest was released, it was considered by critics to be an “exploration of society’s enforcement of conformism” that “almost willfully overlooked the realities of mental illness”¹ so that it could vivify its protagonist’s struggle against tyrannical Nurse Ratched. The film’s primary intent might not have been to make a statement about the injustices of the time, but it has certainly had a lasting effect on the public’s perception of psychiatric illness and treatment.

Films offer an opportunity for discussion
Films on the theme of psychiatry and mental illness have long held a distinctive position in the canon of Western cinema. In this vein, films from the past year have made timely contributions to the genre. Although Still Alice and Birdman might prove to be ground-breaking in changing societal views over time, we must not expect them to do so.

Nevertheless, psychiatry ought to take advantage of popular films’ wide exposure and ability to destigmatize mental illness—rather than lament medical inaccuracies in these films.

Cinema is, first and foremost, an art. Although patients and the public might pick up misconceptions about psychosis, Alzheimer’s disease, or PTSD because popular films take artistic liberty about mental illness, psychiatrists are available to set the record straight. After all, psychiatry has long been about managing perceptions, and patient education is at the core of our specialty.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common inflammatory skin condition that affects more than 14 million Americans each year.¹ It has been estimated that the economic burden of ACD is nearly $3 billion per year due to school absences, work time lost, and medical expenditures.^1,2 In fact, skin diseases rank second to traumatic injuries as the most common type of occupational disease.³ As dermatology residents, we will encounter many patients with ACD, a potentially debilitating skin condition. In this column, I will discuss the different types of ACD as well as their differential diagnoses and management options according to the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology’s updated practice parameter for contact dermatitis.⁴ The 2015 American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS) Allergen of the Year and the ACDS’s Contact Allergen Management Program also will be discussed.

Clinical Presentation and Pathophysiology

Allergic contact dermatitis is a widespread skin condition characterized by erythematous and pruritic skin lesions that occur after contact with external stimuli.⁵ It is caused by a type IV, T cell–mediated, delayed hypersensitivity reaction in which a foreign substance comes into contact with the skin and forms an antigen complex that subsequently leads to sensitization. Upon reexposure to the antigen, the sensitized T cells induce an inflammatory cascade causing the skin changes associated with ACD. Clinical presentations of ACD include vesicles and bullae with distinct angles, lines, and borders.⁶

Differential Diagnosis

In contrast to ACD, irritant contact dermatitis (the more common form of contact dermatitis) is a non–immune-modulated skin reaction that occurs when an individual is exposed to a substance that causes irritation and damage to the keratinocytes.^6,7 It can be an acute reaction to a household cleaning product or a chronic reaction to soap if the patient has had exposure to the product for a prolonged period of time.⁷ The clinical presentation of irritant contact dermatitis includes dry and fissured skin with less distinct borders and negative patch test results.⁶

Some other skin diseases that should be considered in the differential diagnosis for suspected ACD include atopic dermatitis, dyshidrotic eczema, inverse psoriasis, latex allergy, palmoplantar psoriasis, scabies, and tinea pedis.⁵ When ACD is suspected, our diagnostic approach as dermatology residents should be based on a combination of the following factors: the clinical features of the skin reaction (eg, morphology, location, symptoms), the patient’s history of exposure to an alleged allergen and lack of exposure after treatment and/or avoidance, patch test results, laboratory test results, and/or histopathologic examination to exclude other disorders with similar clinical features.⁸

Management

Localized acute lesions of ACD can be successfully treated with mid- or high-potency topical steroids such as triamcinolone 0.1% or clobetasol 0.05%. If an extensive area of the skin (>20%) is affected, systemic steroid therapy often is required, generally offering relief within 12 to 24 hours. Caution should be taken when prescribing oral prednisone, such as for poison ivy, as it should be tapered over a few weeks to prevent rebound dermatitis. If treatment fails and the diagnosis or specific allergen remains unknown, patch testing should be performed.^3,5

Updated Practice Parameter

Practice parameters for contact dermatitis were updated in 2015, as commissioned by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, to address recent advances in the field of contact dermatitis and the most recommended methods for diagnosis and management based on the current scientific literature.⁴ Prior to this update, the most recent recommendations were from 2006.³

Since the publication of the original practice parameter, new questions have been addressed related to emerging clinical problems such as preoperative screening and postimplantation patch testing for metal allergy in patients undergoing joint replacement surgery. In the updated practice parameter, statements have been added that more comprehensively address evaluation and management of occupational contact dermatitis.⁴ The potential benefits and limitations of drug patch testing in patients with maculopapular rashes, erythroderma, and nonimmediate cutaneous reactions also have been addressed. New summary statements have been included that make recommendations on the management of ACD, particularly avoidance and prevention.⁴

ACDS Allergen of the Year

The purpose of this “award” is to recognize the agents that cause the most remarkable clinical effects, those that draw less attention, or those that exhibit exposure patterns that have changed. The ACDS’s 2015 Allergen of the Year is formaldehyde, an inexpensive biocidal preservative used in a wide range of products such as tissue specimen and cadaveric preservation solutions, nail polish, hair-smoothing treatments, and wrinkle-free fabrics.⁹

Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (FRPs) are among the leading contact allergens and are found in many personal hygiene products, medications, and household cleansers.⁸ Specific sources of FRPs include shampoos, bodywashes, hand soaps, lotions, creams, baby wipes, mascara, disinfectants, fabric softeners, topical wart remedies, adhesives, and tissue specimen preservation solutions.^10-13 According to de Groot et al,¹⁴ the US Food and Drug Administration’s Voluntary Cosmetic Registration Program database has estimated that approximately 20% of personal hygiene products and cosmetics contain an FRP, with imidazolidinyl urea as the most common.

It is important for patients to be aware of sources of formaldehyde exposure and understand that many products containing formaldehyde or FRPs may not list this information on their labels. In fact, one study reported that 33% of 67 moisturizers evaluated did not have proper labeling with regard to their formaldehyde/FRP content.¹⁵

Contact Allergen Management Program

During medical school I served as the Dermatology Interest Group Contact Dermatitis Awareness Chair at the University of Texas Medical Branch (Galveston, Texas) and was fortunate to have attended the annual meeting of the ACDS where I learned about the ACDS Contact Allergen Management Program (CAMP), an online resource for dermatologists to access that provides patients a printout list of allergen and cross-reactivity information for more than 1200 products (http://www.contactderm.org/i4a/pages/indexcfm?pageID=3489). This information helps consumers to choose the right products based on their allergies.

Final Thoughts

A thorough review of a patient’s medical history and, if needed, skin patch testing can identify the responsible allergen and initiate an appropriate avoidance plan for the patient. With appropriate avoidance, patients can achieve resolution of their dermatitis and prevent further episodes to substantially improve their quality of life and decrease health care costs.¹ If left untreated, ACD can evolve from an acute form to a subacute form and eventually chronic eczematous dermatitis or progression to systemic disease.^16,17 Allergic contact dermatitis can negatively impact an individual’s health-related quality of life, particularly in social functioning and psychological well-being.^18,19 Therefore, it is pertinent in our role as dermatology residents to recognize ACD before its progression to a chronic state.

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common inflammatory skin condition that affects more than 14 million Americans each year.¹ It has been estimated that the economic burden of ACD is nearly $3 billion per year due to school absences, work time lost, and medical expenditures.^1,2 In fact, skin diseases rank second to traumatic injuries as the most common type of occupational disease.³ As dermatology residents, we will encounter many patients with ACD, a potentially debilitating skin condition. In this column, I will discuss the different types of ACD as well as their differential diagnoses and management options according to the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology’s updated practice parameter for contact dermatitis.⁴ The 2015 American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS) Allergen of the Year and the ACDS’s Contact Allergen Management Program also will be discussed.

Clinical Presentation and Pathophysiology

Allergic contact dermatitis is a widespread skin condition characterized by erythematous and pruritic skin lesions that occur after contact with external stimuli.⁵ It is caused by a type IV, T cell–mediated, delayed hypersensitivity reaction in which a foreign substance comes into contact with the skin and forms an antigen complex that subsequently leads to sensitization. Upon reexposure to the antigen, the sensitized T cells induce an inflammatory cascade causing the skin changes associated with ACD. Clinical presentations of ACD include vesicles and bullae with distinct angles, lines, and borders.⁶

Differential Diagnosis

In contrast to ACD, irritant contact dermatitis (the more common form of contact dermatitis) is a non–immune-modulated skin reaction that occurs when an individual is exposed to a substance that causes irritation and damage to the keratinocytes.^6,7 It can be an acute reaction to a household cleaning product or a chronic reaction to soap if the patient has had exposure to the product for a prolonged period of time.⁷ The clinical presentation of irritant contact dermatitis includes dry and fissured skin with less distinct borders and negative patch test results.⁶

Some other skin diseases that should be considered in the differential diagnosis for suspected ACD include atopic dermatitis, dyshidrotic eczema, inverse psoriasis, latex allergy, palmoplantar psoriasis, scabies, and tinea pedis.⁵ When ACD is suspected, our diagnostic approach as dermatology residents should be based on a combination of the following factors: the clinical features of the skin reaction (eg, morphology, location, symptoms), the patient’s history of exposure to an alleged allergen and lack of exposure after treatment and/or avoidance, patch test results, laboratory test results, and/or histopathologic examination to exclude other disorders with similar clinical features.⁸

Management

Localized acute lesions of ACD can be successfully treated with mid- or high-potency topical steroids such as triamcinolone 0.1% or clobetasol 0.05%. If an extensive area of the skin (>20%) is affected, systemic steroid therapy often is required, generally offering relief within 12 to 24 hours. Caution should be taken when prescribing oral prednisone, such as for poison ivy, as it should be tapered over a few weeks to prevent rebound dermatitis. If treatment fails and the diagnosis or specific allergen remains unknown, patch testing should be performed.^3,5

Updated Practice Parameter

Practice parameters for contact dermatitis were updated in 2015, as commissioned by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, to address recent advances in the field of contact dermatitis and the most recommended methods for diagnosis and management based on the current scientific literature.⁴ Prior to this update, the most recent recommendations were from 2006.³

Since the publication of the original practice parameter, new questions have been addressed related to emerging clinical problems such as preoperative screening and postimplantation patch testing for metal allergy in patients undergoing joint replacement surgery. In the updated practice parameter, statements have been added that more comprehensively address evaluation and management of occupational contact dermatitis.⁴ The potential benefits and limitations of drug patch testing in patients with maculopapular rashes, erythroderma, and nonimmediate cutaneous reactions also have been addressed. New summary statements have been included that make recommendations on the management of ACD, particularly avoidance and prevention.⁴

ACDS Allergen of the Year

The purpose of this “award” is to recognize the agents that cause the most remarkable clinical effects, those that draw less attention, or those that exhibit exposure patterns that have changed. The ACDS’s 2015 Allergen of the Year is formaldehyde, an inexpensive biocidal preservative used in a wide range of products such as tissue specimen and cadaveric preservation solutions, nail polish, hair-smoothing treatments, and wrinkle-free fabrics.⁹

Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (FRPs) are among the leading contact allergens and are found in many personal hygiene products, medications, and household cleansers.⁸ Specific sources of FRPs include shampoos, bodywashes, hand soaps, lotions, creams, baby wipes, mascara, disinfectants, fabric softeners, topical wart remedies, adhesives, and tissue specimen preservation solutions.^10-13 According to de Groot et al,¹⁴ the US Food and Drug Administration’s Voluntary Cosmetic Registration Program database has estimated that approximately 20% of personal hygiene products and cosmetics contain an FRP, with imidazolidinyl urea as the most common.

It is important for patients to be aware of sources of formaldehyde exposure and understand that many products containing formaldehyde or FRPs may not list this information on their labels. In fact, one study reported that 33% of 67 moisturizers evaluated did not have proper labeling with regard to their formaldehyde/FRP content.¹⁵

Contact Allergen Management Program

During medical school I served as the Dermatology Interest Group Contact Dermatitis Awareness Chair at the University of Texas Medical Branch (Galveston, Texas) and was fortunate to have attended the annual meeting of the ACDS where I learned about the ACDS Contact Allergen Management Program (CAMP), an online resource for dermatologists to access that provides patients a printout list of allergen and cross-reactivity information for more than 1200 products (http://www.contactderm.org/i4a/pages/indexcfm?pageID=3489). This information helps consumers to choose the right products based on their allergies.

Final Thoughts

A thorough review of a patient’s medical history and, if needed, skin patch testing can identify the responsible allergen and initiate an appropriate avoidance plan for the patient. With appropriate avoidance, patients can achieve resolution of their dermatitis and prevent further episodes to substantially improve their quality of life and decrease health care costs.¹ If left untreated, ACD can evolve from an acute form to a subacute form and eventually chronic eczematous dermatitis or progression to systemic disease.^16,17 Allergic contact dermatitis can negatively impact an individual’s health-related quality of life, particularly in social functioning and psychological well-being.^18,19 Therefore, it is pertinent in our role as dermatology residents to recognize ACD before its progression to a chronic state.

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common inflammatory skin condition that affects more than 14 million Americans each year.¹ It has been estimated that the economic burden of ACD is nearly $3 billion per year due to school absences, work time lost, and medical expenditures.^1,2 In fact, skin diseases rank second to traumatic injuries as the most common type of occupational disease.³ As dermatology residents, we will encounter many patients with ACD, a potentially debilitating skin condition. In this column, I will discuss the different types of ACD as well as their differential diagnoses and management options according to the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology’s updated practice parameter for contact dermatitis.⁴ The 2015 American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS) Allergen of the Year and the ACDS’s Contact Allergen Management Program also will be discussed.

Clinical Presentation and Pathophysiology

Allergic contact dermatitis is a widespread skin condition characterized by erythematous and pruritic skin lesions that occur after contact with external stimuli.⁵ It is caused by a type IV, T cell–mediated, delayed hypersensitivity reaction in which a foreign substance comes into contact with the skin and forms an antigen complex that subsequently leads to sensitization. Upon reexposure to the antigen, the sensitized T cells induce an inflammatory cascade causing the skin changes associated with ACD. Clinical presentations of ACD include vesicles and bullae with distinct angles, lines, and borders.⁶

Differential Diagnosis

In contrast to ACD, irritant contact dermatitis (the more common form of contact dermatitis) is a non–immune-modulated skin reaction that occurs when an individual is exposed to a substance that causes irritation and damage to the keratinocytes.^6,7 It can be an acute reaction to a household cleaning product or a chronic reaction to soap if the patient has had exposure to the product for a prolonged period of time.⁷ The clinical presentation of irritant contact dermatitis includes dry and fissured skin with less distinct borders and negative patch test results.⁶

Some other skin diseases that should be considered in the differential diagnosis for suspected ACD include atopic dermatitis, dyshidrotic eczema, inverse psoriasis, latex allergy, palmoplantar psoriasis, scabies, and tinea pedis.⁵ When ACD is suspected, our diagnostic approach as dermatology residents should be based on a combination of the following factors: the clinical features of the skin reaction (eg, morphology, location, symptoms), the patient’s history of exposure to an alleged allergen and lack of exposure after treatment and/or avoidance, patch test results, laboratory test results, and/or histopathologic examination to exclude other disorders with similar clinical features.⁸

Management

Localized acute lesions of ACD can be successfully treated with mid- or high-potency topical steroids such as triamcinolone 0.1% or clobetasol 0.05%. If an extensive area of the skin (>20%) is affected, systemic steroid therapy often is required, generally offering relief within 12 to 24 hours. Caution should be taken when prescribing oral prednisone, such as for poison ivy, as it should be tapered over a few weeks to prevent rebound dermatitis. If treatment fails and the diagnosis or specific allergen remains unknown, patch testing should be performed.^3,5

Updated Practice Parameter

Practice parameters for contact dermatitis were updated in 2015, as commissioned by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, to address recent advances in the field of contact dermatitis and the most recommended methods for diagnosis and management based on the current scientific literature.⁴ Prior to this update, the most recent recommendations were from 2006.³

Since the publication of the original practice parameter, new questions have been addressed related to emerging clinical problems such as preoperative screening and postimplantation patch testing for metal allergy in patients undergoing joint replacement surgery. In the updated practice parameter, statements have been added that more comprehensively address evaluation and management of occupational contact dermatitis.⁴ The potential benefits and limitations of drug patch testing in patients with maculopapular rashes, erythroderma, and nonimmediate cutaneous reactions also have been addressed. New summary statements have been included that make recommendations on the management of ACD, particularly avoidance and prevention.⁴

ACDS Allergen of the Year

The purpose of this “award” is to recognize the agents that cause the most remarkable clinical effects, those that draw less attention, or those that exhibit exposure patterns that have changed. The ACDS’s 2015 Allergen of the Year is formaldehyde, an inexpensive biocidal preservative used in a wide range of products such as tissue specimen and cadaveric preservation solutions, nail polish, hair-smoothing treatments, and wrinkle-free fabrics.⁹

Formaldehyde-releasing preservatives (FRPs) are among the leading contact allergens and are found in many personal hygiene products, medications, and household cleansers.⁸ Specific sources of FRPs include shampoos, bodywashes, hand soaps, lotions, creams, baby wipes, mascara, disinfectants, fabric softeners, topical wart remedies, adhesives, and tissue specimen preservation solutions.^10-13 According to de Groot et al,¹⁴ the US Food and Drug Administration’s Voluntary Cosmetic Registration Program database has estimated that approximately 20% of personal hygiene products and cosmetics contain an FRP, with imidazolidinyl urea as the most common.

It is important for patients to be aware of sources of formaldehyde exposure and understand that many products containing formaldehyde or FRPs may not list this information on their labels. In fact, one study reported that 33% of 67 moisturizers evaluated did not have proper labeling with regard to their formaldehyde/FRP content.¹⁵

Contact Allergen Management Program

During medical school I served as the Dermatology Interest Group Contact Dermatitis Awareness Chair at the University of Texas Medical Branch (Galveston, Texas) and was fortunate to have attended the annual meeting of the ACDS where I learned about the ACDS Contact Allergen Management Program (CAMP), an online resource for dermatologists to access that provides patients a printout list of allergen and cross-reactivity information for more than 1200 products (http://www.contactderm.org/i4a/pages/indexcfm?pageID=3489). This information helps consumers to choose the right products based on their allergies.

Final Thoughts

A thorough review of a patient’s medical history and, if needed, skin patch testing can identify the responsible allergen and initiate an appropriate avoidance plan for the patient. With appropriate avoidance, patients can achieve resolution of their dermatitis and prevent further episodes to substantially improve their quality of life and decrease health care costs.¹ If left untreated, ACD can evolve from an acute form to a subacute form and eventually chronic eczematous dermatitis or progression to systemic disease.^16,17 Allergic contact dermatitis can negatively impact an individual’s health-related quality of life, particularly in social functioning and psychological well-being.^18,19 Therefore, it is pertinent in our role as dermatology residents to recognize ACD before its progression to a chronic state.