User login
Phenotype HNPP (Hereditary Neuropathy With Liability to Pressure Palsies) Induced by Medical Procedures
PMP22 is a tetra-span membrane protein primarily expressed in myelinating Schwann cells. Heterozygous deletion of the PMP22 gene (1 copy) causes HNPP (hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies).1 Interestingly, a reciprocal genetic disorder with 3 copies of human PMP22 causes the most common inherited neuropathy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A).2,3 As the reciprocal mutations occur at initiation of gestation, it is expected that HNPP and CMT1A have a similar prevalence. However, studies have shown HNPP prevalence of 2 to 5 cases per 100,000, far below the CMT1A prevalence of 1:5000.4 This finding prompted speculation that many patients with HNPP may be undiagnosed because of the subtlety of the phenotypes.5
Patients with HNPP typically present with focal sensory loss and muscle weakness related to mechanical stress–induced failure of action potential propagation.6,7 In this article, we report the case of an asymptomatic woman with the HNPP mutation. Her focal neurologic deficits occurred only after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which in healthy patients is not expected to induce focal sensory and motor symptoms. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
The patient, a healthy 57-year-old woman, had a normal developmental history. For decades, she had practiced ballet without any physical difficulties. She underwent left TKA and woke up with a footdrop on the left side. The left foot was less sensitive to temperature. Ankle strength returned 2 months later. There was no family history of HNPP.
The patient was examined by a local neurologist, who found steppage gait, weak ankle dorsiflexion (4 on Medical Research Council scale), and diminished touch on the lateral aspect of the left leg. Deep tendon reflexes were present in the arms but not the legs.
A nerve conduction study (NCS) performed after the footdrop revealed prolonged distal latency and decreased amplitude in the left peroneal and tibial nerves. The left sural nerve was normal. Needle electromyogram revealed denervation changes in the muscles innervated by the left peroneal nerve (Table). In addition, we also performed an NCS on the arm (Table), which was unaffected by the surgical procedure. This NCS revealed severely prolonged distal latency across the left wrist in the median nerve and focal slowing of conduction velocity of the ulnar nerve across the left elbow. These changes provide evidence of asymptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome and ulnar nerve entrapment, typical electrophysiologic abnormalities of HNPP.8As there was no explanation for the footdrop from the surgery, we had a DNA test performed (Athena Diagnostics). This test identified a heterozygous deletion of chromosome 17p12 containing the PMP22 gene, the HNPP mutation.
Discussion
This case had several important features. First, though the patient developed an electrophysiologic phenotype of HNPP, she was completely asymptomatic clinically and very athletic before her medical procedure. She would not have been diagnosed with HNPP if her clinical deficits had not been induced by TKA. Therefore, the prevalence of HNPP is likely underestimated. Second, for patients with the HNPP mutation, there may be serious neurologic consequences of certain medical procedures. The diagnosis of HNPP should be pursued if there is no explanation from the medical procedure per se. In addition, patients with a family history of HNPP should be carefully evaluated before any procedure that may put them at risk for severe peripheral nerve damage, and they should be counseled regarding the risks. It is important to determine the prevalence of HNPP among patients who develop footdrop after knee arthroplasty, as this information could potentially be used to revise ideas about the etiology of peripheral nerve complications of knee arthroplasty. We now describe possible revisions of these ideas.
Footdrop is a rare complication of TKA. Retrospective studies have found its incidence ranging from 0.3% to 1.3%.9-11 The investigators in those studies postulated 3 main causes for peroneal nerve palsy. First, traction may put pressure on the peroneal nerve during normalization of the mechanical axis of a valgus knee. Our patient did not have a valgus knee. Second, epidural hematoma by anesthetic procedure may compress the spinal roots. Our patient received general anesthesia during the procedure; epidural or spinal anesthesia was not used. Third, postoperative dressing may compress the nerve. Our patient did not develop any signs of constrictive dressing, such as inordinate pain, which can be relieved by removing the dressing, and swelling of the leg distal to the dressing. Therefore, her footdrop likely was not a complication of surgery.
This case demonstrates how a patient with undiagnosed HNPP can manifest the HNPP phenotype only after undergoing a particular surgical procedure. HNPP is unfamiliar to most orthopedic surgeons.
1. Chance PF, Alderson MK, Leppig KA, et al. DNA deletion associated with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Cell. 1993;72(1):143-151.
2. Lupski JR, de Oca-Luna RM, Slaugenhaupt S, et al. DNA duplication associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Cell. 1991;66(2):219-232.
3. Raeymaekers P, Timmerman V, Nelis E, et al. Estimation of the size of the chromosome 17p11.2 duplication in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy type 1a (CMT1a). HMSN Collaborative Research Group. J Med Genet. 1992;29(1):5-11.
4. Meretoja P, Silander K, Kalimo H, Aula P, Meretoja A, Savontaus ML. Epidemiology of hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP) in south western Finland. Neuromuscul Disord. 1997;7(8):529-532.
5. Li J, Parker B, Martyn C, Natarajan C, Guo J. The PMP22 gene and its related diseases. Mol Neurobiol. 2013;47(2):673-698.
6. Bai Y, Zhang X, Katona I, et al. Conduction block in PMP22 deficiency. J Neurosci. 2010;30(2):600-608.
7. Guo J, Wang L, Zhang Y, et al. Abnormal junctions and permeability of myelin in PMP22-deficient nerves. Ann Neurol. 2014;75(2):255-265.
8. Li J, Krajewski K, Shy ME, Lewis RA. Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy: the electrophysiology fits the name. Neurology. 2002;58(12):1769-1773.
9. Rose HA, Hood RW, Otis JC, Ranawat CS, Insall JN. Peroneal-nerve palsy following total knee arthroplasty. A review of the Hospital for Special Surgery experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(3):347-351.
10. Schinsky MF, Macaulay W, Parks ML, Kiernan H, Nercessian OA. Nerve injury after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(8):1048-1054.
11. Nercessian OA, Ugwonali OF, Park S. Peroneal nerve palsy after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(8):1068-1073.
PMP22 is a tetra-span membrane protein primarily expressed in myelinating Schwann cells. Heterozygous deletion of the PMP22 gene (1 copy) causes HNPP (hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies).1 Interestingly, a reciprocal genetic disorder with 3 copies of human PMP22 causes the most common inherited neuropathy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A).2,3 As the reciprocal mutations occur at initiation of gestation, it is expected that HNPP and CMT1A have a similar prevalence. However, studies have shown HNPP prevalence of 2 to 5 cases per 100,000, far below the CMT1A prevalence of 1:5000.4 This finding prompted speculation that many patients with HNPP may be undiagnosed because of the subtlety of the phenotypes.5
Patients with HNPP typically present with focal sensory loss and muscle weakness related to mechanical stress–induced failure of action potential propagation.6,7 In this article, we report the case of an asymptomatic woman with the HNPP mutation. Her focal neurologic deficits occurred only after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which in healthy patients is not expected to induce focal sensory and motor symptoms. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
The patient, a healthy 57-year-old woman, had a normal developmental history. For decades, she had practiced ballet without any physical difficulties. She underwent left TKA and woke up with a footdrop on the left side. The left foot was less sensitive to temperature. Ankle strength returned 2 months later. There was no family history of HNPP.
The patient was examined by a local neurologist, who found steppage gait, weak ankle dorsiflexion (4 on Medical Research Council scale), and diminished touch on the lateral aspect of the left leg. Deep tendon reflexes were present in the arms but not the legs.
A nerve conduction study (NCS) performed after the footdrop revealed prolonged distal latency and decreased amplitude in the left peroneal and tibial nerves. The left sural nerve was normal. Needle electromyogram revealed denervation changes in the muscles innervated by the left peroneal nerve (Table). In addition, we also performed an NCS on the arm (Table), which was unaffected by the surgical procedure. This NCS revealed severely prolonged distal latency across the left wrist in the median nerve and focal slowing of conduction velocity of the ulnar nerve across the left elbow. These changes provide evidence of asymptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome and ulnar nerve entrapment, typical electrophysiologic abnormalities of HNPP.8As there was no explanation for the footdrop from the surgery, we had a DNA test performed (Athena Diagnostics). This test identified a heterozygous deletion of chromosome 17p12 containing the PMP22 gene, the HNPP mutation.
Discussion
This case had several important features. First, though the patient developed an electrophysiologic phenotype of HNPP, she was completely asymptomatic clinically and very athletic before her medical procedure. She would not have been diagnosed with HNPP if her clinical deficits had not been induced by TKA. Therefore, the prevalence of HNPP is likely underestimated. Second, for patients with the HNPP mutation, there may be serious neurologic consequences of certain medical procedures. The diagnosis of HNPP should be pursued if there is no explanation from the medical procedure per se. In addition, patients with a family history of HNPP should be carefully evaluated before any procedure that may put them at risk for severe peripheral nerve damage, and they should be counseled regarding the risks. It is important to determine the prevalence of HNPP among patients who develop footdrop after knee arthroplasty, as this information could potentially be used to revise ideas about the etiology of peripheral nerve complications of knee arthroplasty. We now describe possible revisions of these ideas.
Footdrop is a rare complication of TKA. Retrospective studies have found its incidence ranging from 0.3% to 1.3%.9-11 The investigators in those studies postulated 3 main causes for peroneal nerve palsy. First, traction may put pressure on the peroneal nerve during normalization of the mechanical axis of a valgus knee. Our patient did not have a valgus knee. Second, epidural hematoma by anesthetic procedure may compress the spinal roots. Our patient received general anesthesia during the procedure; epidural or spinal anesthesia was not used. Third, postoperative dressing may compress the nerve. Our patient did not develop any signs of constrictive dressing, such as inordinate pain, which can be relieved by removing the dressing, and swelling of the leg distal to the dressing. Therefore, her footdrop likely was not a complication of surgery.
This case demonstrates how a patient with undiagnosed HNPP can manifest the HNPP phenotype only after undergoing a particular surgical procedure. HNPP is unfamiliar to most orthopedic surgeons.
PMP22 is a tetra-span membrane protein primarily expressed in myelinating Schwann cells. Heterozygous deletion of the PMP22 gene (1 copy) causes HNPP (hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies).1 Interestingly, a reciprocal genetic disorder with 3 copies of human PMP22 causes the most common inherited neuropathy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A).2,3 As the reciprocal mutations occur at initiation of gestation, it is expected that HNPP and CMT1A have a similar prevalence. However, studies have shown HNPP prevalence of 2 to 5 cases per 100,000, far below the CMT1A prevalence of 1:5000.4 This finding prompted speculation that many patients with HNPP may be undiagnosed because of the subtlety of the phenotypes.5
Patients with HNPP typically present with focal sensory loss and muscle weakness related to mechanical stress–induced failure of action potential propagation.6,7 In this article, we report the case of an asymptomatic woman with the HNPP mutation. Her focal neurologic deficits occurred only after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which in healthy patients is not expected to induce focal sensory and motor symptoms. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
The patient, a healthy 57-year-old woman, had a normal developmental history. For decades, she had practiced ballet without any physical difficulties. She underwent left TKA and woke up with a footdrop on the left side. The left foot was less sensitive to temperature. Ankle strength returned 2 months later. There was no family history of HNPP.
The patient was examined by a local neurologist, who found steppage gait, weak ankle dorsiflexion (4 on Medical Research Council scale), and diminished touch on the lateral aspect of the left leg. Deep tendon reflexes were present in the arms but not the legs.
A nerve conduction study (NCS) performed after the footdrop revealed prolonged distal latency and decreased amplitude in the left peroneal and tibial nerves. The left sural nerve was normal. Needle electromyogram revealed denervation changes in the muscles innervated by the left peroneal nerve (Table). In addition, we also performed an NCS on the arm (Table), which was unaffected by the surgical procedure. This NCS revealed severely prolonged distal latency across the left wrist in the median nerve and focal slowing of conduction velocity of the ulnar nerve across the left elbow. These changes provide evidence of asymptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome and ulnar nerve entrapment, typical electrophysiologic abnormalities of HNPP.8As there was no explanation for the footdrop from the surgery, we had a DNA test performed (Athena Diagnostics). This test identified a heterozygous deletion of chromosome 17p12 containing the PMP22 gene, the HNPP mutation.
Discussion
This case had several important features. First, though the patient developed an electrophysiologic phenotype of HNPP, she was completely asymptomatic clinically and very athletic before her medical procedure. She would not have been diagnosed with HNPP if her clinical deficits had not been induced by TKA. Therefore, the prevalence of HNPP is likely underestimated. Second, for patients with the HNPP mutation, there may be serious neurologic consequences of certain medical procedures. The diagnosis of HNPP should be pursued if there is no explanation from the medical procedure per se. In addition, patients with a family history of HNPP should be carefully evaluated before any procedure that may put them at risk for severe peripheral nerve damage, and they should be counseled regarding the risks. It is important to determine the prevalence of HNPP among patients who develop footdrop after knee arthroplasty, as this information could potentially be used to revise ideas about the etiology of peripheral nerve complications of knee arthroplasty. We now describe possible revisions of these ideas.
Footdrop is a rare complication of TKA. Retrospective studies have found its incidence ranging from 0.3% to 1.3%.9-11 The investigators in those studies postulated 3 main causes for peroneal nerve palsy. First, traction may put pressure on the peroneal nerve during normalization of the mechanical axis of a valgus knee. Our patient did not have a valgus knee. Second, epidural hematoma by anesthetic procedure may compress the spinal roots. Our patient received general anesthesia during the procedure; epidural or spinal anesthesia was not used. Third, postoperative dressing may compress the nerve. Our patient did not develop any signs of constrictive dressing, such as inordinate pain, which can be relieved by removing the dressing, and swelling of the leg distal to the dressing. Therefore, her footdrop likely was not a complication of surgery.
This case demonstrates how a patient with undiagnosed HNPP can manifest the HNPP phenotype only after undergoing a particular surgical procedure. HNPP is unfamiliar to most orthopedic surgeons.
1. Chance PF, Alderson MK, Leppig KA, et al. DNA deletion associated with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Cell. 1993;72(1):143-151.
2. Lupski JR, de Oca-Luna RM, Slaugenhaupt S, et al. DNA duplication associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Cell. 1991;66(2):219-232.
3. Raeymaekers P, Timmerman V, Nelis E, et al. Estimation of the size of the chromosome 17p11.2 duplication in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy type 1a (CMT1a). HMSN Collaborative Research Group. J Med Genet. 1992;29(1):5-11.
4. Meretoja P, Silander K, Kalimo H, Aula P, Meretoja A, Savontaus ML. Epidemiology of hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP) in south western Finland. Neuromuscul Disord. 1997;7(8):529-532.
5. Li J, Parker B, Martyn C, Natarajan C, Guo J. The PMP22 gene and its related diseases. Mol Neurobiol. 2013;47(2):673-698.
6. Bai Y, Zhang X, Katona I, et al. Conduction block in PMP22 deficiency. J Neurosci. 2010;30(2):600-608.
7. Guo J, Wang L, Zhang Y, et al. Abnormal junctions and permeability of myelin in PMP22-deficient nerves. Ann Neurol. 2014;75(2):255-265.
8. Li J, Krajewski K, Shy ME, Lewis RA. Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy: the electrophysiology fits the name. Neurology. 2002;58(12):1769-1773.
9. Rose HA, Hood RW, Otis JC, Ranawat CS, Insall JN. Peroneal-nerve palsy following total knee arthroplasty. A review of the Hospital for Special Surgery experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(3):347-351.
10. Schinsky MF, Macaulay W, Parks ML, Kiernan H, Nercessian OA. Nerve injury after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(8):1048-1054.
11. Nercessian OA, Ugwonali OF, Park S. Peroneal nerve palsy after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(8):1068-1073.
1. Chance PF, Alderson MK, Leppig KA, et al. DNA deletion associated with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. Cell. 1993;72(1):143-151.
2. Lupski JR, de Oca-Luna RM, Slaugenhaupt S, et al. DNA duplication associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A. Cell. 1991;66(2):219-232.
3. Raeymaekers P, Timmerman V, Nelis E, et al. Estimation of the size of the chromosome 17p11.2 duplication in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy type 1a (CMT1a). HMSN Collaborative Research Group. J Med Genet. 1992;29(1):5-11.
4. Meretoja P, Silander K, Kalimo H, Aula P, Meretoja A, Savontaus ML. Epidemiology of hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP) in south western Finland. Neuromuscul Disord. 1997;7(8):529-532.
5. Li J, Parker B, Martyn C, Natarajan C, Guo J. The PMP22 gene and its related diseases. Mol Neurobiol. 2013;47(2):673-698.
6. Bai Y, Zhang X, Katona I, et al. Conduction block in PMP22 deficiency. J Neurosci. 2010;30(2):600-608.
7. Guo J, Wang L, Zhang Y, et al. Abnormal junctions and permeability of myelin in PMP22-deficient nerves. Ann Neurol. 2014;75(2):255-265.
8. Li J, Krajewski K, Shy ME, Lewis RA. Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy: the electrophysiology fits the name. Neurology. 2002;58(12):1769-1773.
9. Rose HA, Hood RW, Otis JC, Ranawat CS, Insall JN. Peroneal-nerve palsy following total knee arthroplasty. A review of the Hospital for Special Surgery experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(3):347-351.
10. Schinsky MF, Macaulay W, Parks ML, Kiernan H, Nercessian OA. Nerve injury after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(8):1048-1054.
11. Nercessian OA, Ugwonali OF, Park S. Peroneal nerve palsy after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(8):1068-1073.
Combined Tibial Tubercle Avulsion Fracture and Patellar Avulsion Fracture: An Unusual Variant in an Adolescent Patient
Tibial tubercle fractures are rare injuries accounting for less than 1% of all pediatric physeal injuries.1 The original classification scheme for such fractures was proposed by Watson-Jones.2 Initially modified by Ogden and colleagues,3 the classification system has had numerous additions and modifications as new patterns of injury have been identified.4-6 Patellar fractures are also rare in children, making up 1% of all pediatric fractures, with less than 2% of these occurring in skeletally immature children.7
We present a case of an unreported combined tibial tubercle avulsion fracture and patellar avulsion fracture in an adolescent boy. The patient and his guardian provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
A 12-year-old boy presented to the emergency department with acute onset of right-knee pain and inability to ambulate after falling off a skateboard on the day of the injury. The patient was otherwise healthy and had no noteworthy medical or surgical history, including no prior fractures. On physical examination, he was noted to have a large right-knee effusion presumed to be hemarthrosis, and inability to perform a straight-leg raise against gravity. There were no neurologic deficits and his leg compartments were soft. Plain radiographs showed patella alta and numerous bony fragments believed to represent a complex tibial tubercle fracture. One bony fragment was identified closer to the patella, suggesting a possible concurrent patellar fracture (Figures 1A, 1B). A computed tomography (CT) scan further characterized both the tibial tubercle avulsion fracture and the lateral inferior pole patellar avulsion fracture (Figures 2A, 2B). The patient’s knee was immobilized, and he was admitted for soft-tissue rest and overnight observation to ensure that compartment syndrome did not develop.
Five days after injury, open reduction and internal fixation were performed. After limb exsanguination and tourniquet insufflation, the fracture was visualized through a direct midline approach. The patient was found to have a Z-type injury pattern to the extensor mechanism: an inferior lateral patellar avulsion fracture, longitudinal splits of the patellar tendon, and 2 large, mainly cartilaginous tibial tubercle fracture fragments, 1 of which extended into the proximal tibial epiphysis (Ogden type III) (Figures 3A-3C). Under direct visualization, the tibial tubercle fragments were reduced and stabilized with 3 cannulated 3.5-mm titanium, partially threaded screws with washers. Smaller screws were used to prevent fragmentation of these mostly cartilaginous fragments. Anatomic reduction was ensured along the articular surface, visualized through an arthrotomy, as well as on the distal cortex (Figures 4A, 4B). The patellar avulsion fracture included a very small section of articular surface and the decision was made to preserve the fragment. Because the patellar fragment was too small for screw fixation, the fracture was secured with suture fixation through bone tunnels over a patellar bony bridge using size 2 Phantom Fiber suture (Tornier) (Figure 5). Vicryl was used to repair the longitudinal patellar tendon split as well as the capsular and paratenon traumatic tears. Layered closure was completed and intraoperative radiographs were obtained (Figures 6A, 6B) prior to placement of a cylinder cast in full extension. Postoperatively, the patient remained overnight for observation and physical therapy evaluation. He was encouraged to bear weight in his cylinder cast as tolerated with crutches to assist with ambulation.
Postoperatively, the patient was maintained in full extension in the cylinder cast for 4 weeks. After cast removal, the patient was placed in a range-of-motion brace locked in extension for ambulation. He started physical therapy and was allowed to perform prone active-knee flexion limited to 90º, with passive extension, for an additional 4 weeks. At 8 weeks, the patient was allowed full-knee motion both active and passive, and the brace was discontinued. At his 18-week follow-up appointment, the patient reported successful return to all his normal activities, including skateboarding, with no apparent limitation in motion or weight-bearing. Examination at that time demonstrated knee range of motion from 5º in hyperextension to 135º in flexion, with his left knee having 5º in hyperextension and 145º in flexion. The patient appeared to have no gait abnormalities, and radiographs showed healed fractures. Because of a concern that continued compression across his tibial physis could lead to greater risk of growth arrest, the decision was made to remove the implants when radiographs showed healing. The patient returned to surgery at 20 weeks for implant removal. At 6 weeks after implant removal, the patient had returned to full activity with no residual pain and full-knee flexion equal to the uninvolved left knee. He was able to perform a stable single-leg squat on his affected leg, and his single-leg hop for distance was the same as his uninvolved leg. He was allowed to return to full sports activity. The patient will be followed with serial radiographs at 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months to look for premature physeal arrest. If an arrest occurs, treatment will be dictated by the extent of the arrest and the potential to cause either limb-length difference or angular deformity.
Discussion
Tibial tubercle fractures typically result from quadriceps contraction during sporting activities, predominantly in adolescent boys with open physes. Numerous modifications and additions have been made to the original classification of such fractures by Watson-Jones,2 most notably by Ogden and colleagues3 in 1980. These additions have included combined tendon avulsions and tubercle fractures as described by Frankl and coauthors,4 complete proximal tibial physeal separation now classified as type 4 by Ryu and Debenham,5 and a “Y” fracture configuration now termed type 5 by McKoy and Stanitski.6 Pandya and colleagues8 reported on 41 tibial tubercle fractures and described a new classification scheme based on the known anatomical closure pattern of the proximal tibial physis and tibial tubercle apophysis. The authors stressed the role of advanced imaging, such as CT or magnetic resonance imaging, in preoperative management of these complex high-energy fractures in adolescents, and the need for intraoperative arthroscopy or arthrotomy to ensure anatomical reduction of the articular involvement.
Tibial tubercle fractures and extensor mechanism injuries that do not fit these classification patterns have also been described. In 1979, Houghton and Ackroyd9 reported 3 cases of acute loss of extensor mechanism secondary to a traumatic patellar sleeve avulsion. In 1995, Berg10 described an ipsilateral inferior pole osteochondral patellar avulsion fracture with patellar tendon avulsion without fracture at the tubercle in a 12-year-old boy. Another variant was described in a 2002 case series of 3 adolescent boys who underwent operative fixation for tibial metaphyseal partial-sleeve avulsion injuries.11
Conclusion
We report a case of combined ipsilateral inferior lateral patellar avulsion fracture and an intra-articular tibial tubercle avulsion fracture with intervening longitudinal patellar tendon split. Preoperative standard radiographs were confusing, given the bony fragment high up by the patella, but use of advanced imaging, in this case CT, allowed us to fully characterize the origin of fracture fragments and realize we were dealing with a unique fracture pattern previously unreported in a pediatric patient. The CT findings allowed us to be better prepared preoperatively by having options for fixation of the patellar fracture, and the extent of articular involvement led us to decide that intra-articular evaluation would be required. Through the use of an open arthrotomy, anatomical articular reduction could be visualized and stabilized with screw fixation of the large, mostly cartilaginous tubercle fracture. Following the principles described by Pandya and colleagues,8 anatomical reduction was achieved, and, 6 months after the original surgery, the patient had return of full motion, clinical and radiographic union, and no clinical pain or limp, with no retained metallic implants across the tibial apophysis. Longer-term follow-up as planned will demonstrate any growth abnormality that would require further surgical intervention.
1. Mosier SM, Stanitski CL. Acute tibial tubercle avulsion fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24(2):181-184.
2. Watson-Jones R. Fractures and Joint Injuries. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1955.
3. Ogden JA, Tross RB, Murphy MJ. Fractures of the tibial tuberosity in adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(2):205-215.
4. Frankl U, Wasilewski SA, Healy WL. Avulsion fracture of the tibial tubercle with avulsion of the patellar ligament. Report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(9):1411-1413.
5. Ryu RK, Debenham JO. An unusual avulsion fracture of the proximal tibial epiphysis. Case report and proposed addition to the Watson-Jones classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;(194):181-184.
6. McKoy BE, Stanitski CL. Acute tibial tubercle avulsion fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003;34(3):397-403.
7. Hunt DM, Somashekar N. A review of sleeve fractures of the patella in children. Knee. 2005;12:3-7.
8. Pandya NK, Edmonds EW, Roocroft JH, Mubarak SJ. Tibial tubercle fractures: complications, classification, and the need for intra-articular assessment. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(8):749-759.
9. Houghton GR, Ackroyd CE. Sleeve fractures of the patella in children: a report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979;61(2):165-168.
10. Berg EE. Bipolar infrapatellar tendon rupture. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15(3):302-303.
11. Davidson D, Letts M. Partial sleeve fractures of the tibia in children: an unusual fracture pattern. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22(1):36-40.
Tibial tubercle fractures are rare injuries accounting for less than 1% of all pediatric physeal injuries.1 The original classification scheme for such fractures was proposed by Watson-Jones.2 Initially modified by Ogden and colleagues,3 the classification system has had numerous additions and modifications as new patterns of injury have been identified.4-6 Patellar fractures are also rare in children, making up 1% of all pediatric fractures, with less than 2% of these occurring in skeletally immature children.7
We present a case of an unreported combined tibial tubercle avulsion fracture and patellar avulsion fracture in an adolescent boy. The patient and his guardian provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
A 12-year-old boy presented to the emergency department with acute onset of right-knee pain and inability to ambulate after falling off a skateboard on the day of the injury. The patient was otherwise healthy and had no noteworthy medical or surgical history, including no prior fractures. On physical examination, he was noted to have a large right-knee effusion presumed to be hemarthrosis, and inability to perform a straight-leg raise against gravity. There were no neurologic deficits and his leg compartments were soft. Plain radiographs showed patella alta and numerous bony fragments believed to represent a complex tibial tubercle fracture. One bony fragment was identified closer to the patella, suggesting a possible concurrent patellar fracture (Figures 1A, 1B). A computed tomography (CT) scan further characterized both the tibial tubercle avulsion fracture and the lateral inferior pole patellar avulsion fracture (Figures 2A, 2B). The patient’s knee was immobilized, and he was admitted for soft-tissue rest and overnight observation to ensure that compartment syndrome did not develop.
Five days after injury, open reduction and internal fixation were performed. After limb exsanguination and tourniquet insufflation, the fracture was visualized through a direct midline approach. The patient was found to have a Z-type injury pattern to the extensor mechanism: an inferior lateral patellar avulsion fracture, longitudinal splits of the patellar tendon, and 2 large, mainly cartilaginous tibial tubercle fracture fragments, 1 of which extended into the proximal tibial epiphysis (Ogden type III) (Figures 3A-3C). Under direct visualization, the tibial tubercle fragments were reduced and stabilized with 3 cannulated 3.5-mm titanium, partially threaded screws with washers. Smaller screws were used to prevent fragmentation of these mostly cartilaginous fragments. Anatomic reduction was ensured along the articular surface, visualized through an arthrotomy, as well as on the distal cortex (Figures 4A, 4B). The patellar avulsion fracture included a very small section of articular surface and the decision was made to preserve the fragment. Because the patellar fragment was too small for screw fixation, the fracture was secured with suture fixation through bone tunnels over a patellar bony bridge using size 2 Phantom Fiber suture (Tornier) (Figure 5). Vicryl was used to repair the longitudinal patellar tendon split as well as the capsular and paratenon traumatic tears. Layered closure was completed and intraoperative radiographs were obtained (Figures 6A, 6B) prior to placement of a cylinder cast in full extension. Postoperatively, the patient remained overnight for observation and physical therapy evaluation. He was encouraged to bear weight in his cylinder cast as tolerated with crutches to assist with ambulation.
Postoperatively, the patient was maintained in full extension in the cylinder cast for 4 weeks. After cast removal, the patient was placed in a range-of-motion brace locked in extension for ambulation. He started physical therapy and was allowed to perform prone active-knee flexion limited to 90º, with passive extension, for an additional 4 weeks. At 8 weeks, the patient was allowed full-knee motion both active and passive, and the brace was discontinued. At his 18-week follow-up appointment, the patient reported successful return to all his normal activities, including skateboarding, with no apparent limitation in motion or weight-bearing. Examination at that time demonstrated knee range of motion from 5º in hyperextension to 135º in flexion, with his left knee having 5º in hyperextension and 145º in flexion. The patient appeared to have no gait abnormalities, and radiographs showed healed fractures. Because of a concern that continued compression across his tibial physis could lead to greater risk of growth arrest, the decision was made to remove the implants when radiographs showed healing. The patient returned to surgery at 20 weeks for implant removal. At 6 weeks after implant removal, the patient had returned to full activity with no residual pain and full-knee flexion equal to the uninvolved left knee. He was able to perform a stable single-leg squat on his affected leg, and his single-leg hop for distance was the same as his uninvolved leg. He was allowed to return to full sports activity. The patient will be followed with serial radiographs at 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months to look for premature physeal arrest. If an arrest occurs, treatment will be dictated by the extent of the arrest and the potential to cause either limb-length difference or angular deformity.
Discussion
Tibial tubercle fractures typically result from quadriceps contraction during sporting activities, predominantly in adolescent boys with open physes. Numerous modifications and additions have been made to the original classification of such fractures by Watson-Jones,2 most notably by Ogden and colleagues3 in 1980. These additions have included combined tendon avulsions and tubercle fractures as described by Frankl and coauthors,4 complete proximal tibial physeal separation now classified as type 4 by Ryu and Debenham,5 and a “Y” fracture configuration now termed type 5 by McKoy and Stanitski.6 Pandya and colleagues8 reported on 41 tibial tubercle fractures and described a new classification scheme based on the known anatomical closure pattern of the proximal tibial physis and tibial tubercle apophysis. The authors stressed the role of advanced imaging, such as CT or magnetic resonance imaging, in preoperative management of these complex high-energy fractures in adolescents, and the need for intraoperative arthroscopy or arthrotomy to ensure anatomical reduction of the articular involvement.
Tibial tubercle fractures and extensor mechanism injuries that do not fit these classification patterns have also been described. In 1979, Houghton and Ackroyd9 reported 3 cases of acute loss of extensor mechanism secondary to a traumatic patellar sleeve avulsion. In 1995, Berg10 described an ipsilateral inferior pole osteochondral patellar avulsion fracture with patellar tendon avulsion without fracture at the tubercle in a 12-year-old boy. Another variant was described in a 2002 case series of 3 adolescent boys who underwent operative fixation for tibial metaphyseal partial-sleeve avulsion injuries.11
Conclusion
We report a case of combined ipsilateral inferior lateral patellar avulsion fracture and an intra-articular tibial tubercle avulsion fracture with intervening longitudinal patellar tendon split. Preoperative standard radiographs were confusing, given the bony fragment high up by the patella, but use of advanced imaging, in this case CT, allowed us to fully characterize the origin of fracture fragments and realize we were dealing with a unique fracture pattern previously unreported in a pediatric patient. The CT findings allowed us to be better prepared preoperatively by having options for fixation of the patellar fracture, and the extent of articular involvement led us to decide that intra-articular evaluation would be required. Through the use of an open arthrotomy, anatomical articular reduction could be visualized and stabilized with screw fixation of the large, mostly cartilaginous tubercle fracture. Following the principles described by Pandya and colleagues,8 anatomical reduction was achieved, and, 6 months after the original surgery, the patient had return of full motion, clinical and radiographic union, and no clinical pain or limp, with no retained metallic implants across the tibial apophysis. Longer-term follow-up as planned will demonstrate any growth abnormality that would require further surgical intervention.
Tibial tubercle fractures are rare injuries accounting for less than 1% of all pediatric physeal injuries.1 The original classification scheme for such fractures was proposed by Watson-Jones.2 Initially modified by Ogden and colleagues,3 the classification system has had numerous additions and modifications as new patterns of injury have been identified.4-6 Patellar fractures are also rare in children, making up 1% of all pediatric fractures, with less than 2% of these occurring in skeletally immature children.7
We present a case of an unreported combined tibial tubercle avulsion fracture and patellar avulsion fracture in an adolescent boy. The patient and his guardian provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
A 12-year-old boy presented to the emergency department with acute onset of right-knee pain and inability to ambulate after falling off a skateboard on the day of the injury. The patient was otherwise healthy and had no noteworthy medical or surgical history, including no prior fractures. On physical examination, he was noted to have a large right-knee effusion presumed to be hemarthrosis, and inability to perform a straight-leg raise against gravity. There were no neurologic deficits and his leg compartments were soft. Plain radiographs showed patella alta and numerous bony fragments believed to represent a complex tibial tubercle fracture. One bony fragment was identified closer to the patella, suggesting a possible concurrent patellar fracture (Figures 1A, 1B). A computed tomography (CT) scan further characterized both the tibial tubercle avulsion fracture and the lateral inferior pole patellar avulsion fracture (Figures 2A, 2B). The patient’s knee was immobilized, and he was admitted for soft-tissue rest and overnight observation to ensure that compartment syndrome did not develop.
Five days after injury, open reduction and internal fixation were performed. After limb exsanguination and tourniquet insufflation, the fracture was visualized through a direct midline approach. The patient was found to have a Z-type injury pattern to the extensor mechanism: an inferior lateral patellar avulsion fracture, longitudinal splits of the patellar tendon, and 2 large, mainly cartilaginous tibial tubercle fracture fragments, 1 of which extended into the proximal tibial epiphysis (Ogden type III) (Figures 3A-3C). Under direct visualization, the tibial tubercle fragments were reduced and stabilized with 3 cannulated 3.5-mm titanium, partially threaded screws with washers. Smaller screws were used to prevent fragmentation of these mostly cartilaginous fragments. Anatomic reduction was ensured along the articular surface, visualized through an arthrotomy, as well as on the distal cortex (Figures 4A, 4B). The patellar avulsion fracture included a very small section of articular surface and the decision was made to preserve the fragment. Because the patellar fragment was too small for screw fixation, the fracture was secured with suture fixation through bone tunnels over a patellar bony bridge using size 2 Phantom Fiber suture (Tornier) (Figure 5). Vicryl was used to repair the longitudinal patellar tendon split as well as the capsular and paratenon traumatic tears. Layered closure was completed and intraoperative radiographs were obtained (Figures 6A, 6B) prior to placement of a cylinder cast in full extension. Postoperatively, the patient remained overnight for observation and physical therapy evaluation. He was encouraged to bear weight in his cylinder cast as tolerated with crutches to assist with ambulation.
Postoperatively, the patient was maintained in full extension in the cylinder cast for 4 weeks. After cast removal, the patient was placed in a range-of-motion brace locked in extension for ambulation. He started physical therapy and was allowed to perform prone active-knee flexion limited to 90º, with passive extension, for an additional 4 weeks. At 8 weeks, the patient was allowed full-knee motion both active and passive, and the brace was discontinued. At his 18-week follow-up appointment, the patient reported successful return to all his normal activities, including skateboarding, with no apparent limitation in motion or weight-bearing. Examination at that time demonstrated knee range of motion from 5º in hyperextension to 135º in flexion, with his left knee having 5º in hyperextension and 145º in flexion. The patient appeared to have no gait abnormalities, and radiographs showed healed fractures. Because of a concern that continued compression across his tibial physis could lead to greater risk of growth arrest, the decision was made to remove the implants when radiographs showed healing. The patient returned to surgery at 20 weeks for implant removal. At 6 weeks after implant removal, the patient had returned to full activity with no residual pain and full-knee flexion equal to the uninvolved left knee. He was able to perform a stable single-leg squat on his affected leg, and his single-leg hop for distance was the same as his uninvolved leg. He was allowed to return to full sports activity. The patient will be followed with serial radiographs at 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months to look for premature physeal arrest. If an arrest occurs, treatment will be dictated by the extent of the arrest and the potential to cause either limb-length difference or angular deformity.
Discussion
Tibial tubercle fractures typically result from quadriceps contraction during sporting activities, predominantly in adolescent boys with open physes. Numerous modifications and additions have been made to the original classification of such fractures by Watson-Jones,2 most notably by Ogden and colleagues3 in 1980. These additions have included combined tendon avulsions and tubercle fractures as described by Frankl and coauthors,4 complete proximal tibial physeal separation now classified as type 4 by Ryu and Debenham,5 and a “Y” fracture configuration now termed type 5 by McKoy and Stanitski.6 Pandya and colleagues8 reported on 41 tibial tubercle fractures and described a new classification scheme based on the known anatomical closure pattern of the proximal tibial physis and tibial tubercle apophysis. The authors stressed the role of advanced imaging, such as CT or magnetic resonance imaging, in preoperative management of these complex high-energy fractures in adolescents, and the need for intraoperative arthroscopy or arthrotomy to ensure anatomical reduction of the articular involvement.
Tibial tubercle fractures and extensor mechanism injuries that do not fit these classification patterns have also been described. In 1979, Houghton and Ackroyd9 reported 3 cases of acute loss of extensor mechanism secondary to a traumatic patellar sleeve avulsion. In 1995, Berg10 described an ipsilateral inferior pole osteochondral patellar avulsion fracture with patellar tendon avulsion without fracture at the tubercle in a 12-year-old boy. Another variant was described in a 2002 case series of 3 adolescent boys who underwent operative fixation for tibial metaphyseal partial-sleeve avulsion injuries.11
Conclusion
We report a case of combined ipsilateral inferior lateral patellar avulsion fracture and an intra-articular tibial tubercle avulsion fracture with intervening longitudinal patellar tendon split. Preoperative standard radiographs were confusing, given the bony fragment high up by the patella, but use of advanced imaging, in this case CT, allowed us to fully characterize the origin of fracture fragments and realize we were dealing with a unique fracture pattern previously unreported in a pediatric patient. The CT findings allowed us to be better prepared preoperatively by having options for fixation of the patellar fracture, and the extent of articular involvement led us to decide that intra-articular evaluation would be required. Through the use of an open arthrotomy, anatomical articular reduction could be visualized and stabilized with screw fixation of the large, mostly cartilaginous tubercle fracture. Following the principles described by Pandya and colleagues,8 anatomical reduction was achieved, and, 6 months after the original surgery, the patient had return of full motion, clinical and radiographic union, and no clinical pain or limp, with no retained metallic implants across the tibial apophysis. Longer-term follow-up as planned will demonstrate any growth abnormality that would require further surgical intervention.
1. Mosier SM, Stanitski CL. Acute tibial tubercle avulsion fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24(2):181-184.
2. Watson-Jones R. Fractures and Joint Injuries. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1955.
3. Ogden JA, Tross RB, Murphy MJ. Fractures of the tibial tuberosity in adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(2):205-215.
4. Frankl U, Wasilewski SA, Healy WL. Avulsion fracture of the tibial tubercle with avulsion of the patellar ligament. Report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(9):1411-1413.
5. Ryu RK, Debenham JO. An unusual avulsion fracture of the proximal tibial epiphysis. Case report and proposed addition to the Watson-Jones classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;(194):181-184.
6. McKoy BE, Stanitski CL. Acute tibial tubercle avulsion fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003;34(3):397-403.
7. Hunt DM, Somashekar N. A review of sleeve fractures of the patella in children. Knee. 2005;12:3-7.
8. Pandya NK, Edmonds EW, Roocroft JH, Mubarak SJ. Tibial tubercle fractures: complications, classification, and the need for intra-articular assessment. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(8):749-759.
9. Houghton GR, Ackroyd CE. Sleeve fractures of the patella in children: a report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979;61(2):165-168.
10. Berg EE. Bipolar infrapatellar tendon rupture. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15(3):302-303.
11. Davidson D, Letts M. Partial sleeve fractures of the tibia in children: an unusual fracture pattern. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22(1):36-40.
1. Mosier SM, Stanitski CL. Acute tibial tubercle avulsion fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24(2):181-184.
2. Watson-Jones R. Fractures and Joint Injuries. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1955.
3. Ogden JA, Tross RB, Murphy MJ. Fractures of the tibial tuberosity in adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(2):205-215.
4. Frankl U, Wasilewski SA, Healy WL. Avulsion fracture of the tibial tubercle with avulsion of the patellar ligament. Report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(9):1411-1413.
5. Ryu RK, Debenham JO. An unusual avulsion fracture of the proximal tibial epiphysis. Case report and proposed addition to the Watson-Jones classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;(194):181-184.
6. McKoy BE, Stanitski CL. Acute tibial tubercle avulsion fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003;34(3):397-403.
7. Hunt DM, Somashekar N. A review of sleeve fractures of the patella in children. Knee. 2005;12:3-7.
8. Pandya NK, Edmonds EW, Roocroft JH, Mubarak SJ. Tibial tubercle fractures: complications, classification, and the need for intra-articular assessment. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(8):749-759.
9. Houghton GR, Ackroyd CE. Sleeve fractures of the patella in children: a report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979;61(2):165-168.
10. Berg EE. Bipolar infrapatellar tendon rupture. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15(3):302-303.
11. Davidson D, Letts M. Partial sleeve fractures of the tibia in children: an unusual fracture pattern. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22(1):36-40.
Pure Intrathoracic Scapular Dislocation
Scapular dislocation, which is also termed locked scapula or scapulothoracic dislocation, is an unusual condition that can be described as extrathoracic or intrathoracic dislocation, depending on the penetration of scapula into the thoracic cavity.
There have been 3 reported cases of intrathoracic scapular dislocations in the literature,1-3all associated with a preexisting condition (eg, sternoclavicular separation, prior rib fracture, thoracotomy for a lung transplant procedure, or surgical resection of superior ribs during breast or pulmonary tumor excisions). Three published cases of intrathoracic scapular impaction involve comminuted scapular fractures with intrathoracic impaction of the inferior fragment through intercostal space.4-6
Here we report an intrathoracic scapular dislocation that was not associated with fracture of the scapula or predisposing factors. To our knowledge, this is the first case of pure intrathoracic dislocation. The possibility of intrathoracic scapular dislocation should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis even in patients with a negative anamnesis for predisposing factors, such as lung or chest surgery. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
A 29-year-old woman presented to the emergency department after a motor vehicle accident. She had tenderness over the left shoulder and left elbow with decreased range of motion; however, motor and sensory examination of the wrist and fingers were normal. No distal neurovascular deficit was noted.
Physical examination revealed pain on pelvic compression. We observed an asymmetrical appearance between shoulders; the left shoulder was superior when compared with the right side (Figure 1). Palpation of the scapula aggravated the pain. The inferior angle of the left scapula was not palpable, and the medial border was palpated through the intercostal space between the third and fourth ribs.
Initial radiographs showed additional left olecranon and bilateral ramus pubis fractures. A chest radiograph showed nondisplaced fractures of the second and third ribs without any obvious hemothorax or pneumothorax. No other pathology involving the chest, such as resection of the ribs or congenital anomaly, was observed. The patient reported no history of thoracic trauma or lung surgery. There were no fractures of the scapula, humerus, or clavicles. Thoracic computed tomography was performed, and 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction showed that the inferior angle of scapula penetrated into the thoracic cavity through the third intercostal space (Figure 2).
Given the intrathoracic scapular dislocation diagnosis, closed reduction under sedation was planned. The patient was placed in the supine position, and reduction was performed by applying pressure on the shoulder anteriorly. This maneuver increased deformity. At the same time, another physician pulled the spine of the scapula superiorly, releasing the scapula out of the thoracic cavity. When the arm was slightly lowered to neutral position, scapular deformity was no longer present (Figure 3). A shoulder sling was applied, and the patient was hospitalized for surgical fixation of pelvic and olecranon fractures. The arm was immobilized in a sling for 1 week, and shoulder exercises were started immediately afterward.
At 1-month follow-up, full shoulder range of motion was achieved, although rehabilitation for the elbow continued. Final follow-up examination at 4 months revealed no difference between shoulders, and no recurrence occurred.
Discussion
Intrathoracic scapular dislocation is a rare injury. There are only a few cases reported in the literature, and most of them are well associated with a predisposing factor. Nettrour and colleagues1 described the first intrathoracic scapular dislocation, which occurred 6 weeks after sternoclavicular separation and fracture of a rib. In the case reports of Ward and colleagues2 and Fowler and colleagues,3 the predisposing factor was resection of the ribs due to pancoast tumor and breast carcinoma, respectively. The mechanism of these dislocations depends on a weak area over the thoracic cage, creating a fulcrum point for levering the scapula into the thoracic cavity.
There are other cases of scapular dislocations that are accompanied by a comminuted fracture of scapula; a review of the literature revealed 3 cases.4-6 In our opinion, fracture of the inferior pole of the scapula leads to injury of the soft tissues and also results in intrathoracic impaction by creating a weak area over the thoracic cavity. This mechanism can be referred to as penetration.
Our case is singular because it is the first case that is not associated with fracture of the scapula or predisposing factors. Consequently, we report the first pure intrathoracic scapular dislocation in the literature. It is important to suspect intrathoracic scapular dislocation in the case of deformity (Figure 1), even in the absence of any predisposing factors or scapular fracture.
Although plain radiographs may not be elucidative, 3D reconstruction of computed tomography (Figure 2) reveals the pathology and plays an important role in guiding treatment.
In the treatment of our patient, relying on the unique dislocation mechanism without any fracture of the scapula or ribs, we started early active shoulder movement after 1 week of immobilization in a shoulder sling, which prevented recurrence of dislocation. In addition to presenting the first pure intrathoracic scapular dislocation, this case demonstrated satisfactory clinical results with short-term immobilization and early rehabilitation.
Conclusion
Contrary to the literature, the possibility of intrathoracic scapular dislocation should be considered in the differential diagnosis even in patients with a negative anamnesis for predisposing factors, such as lung or chest surgery, and when no fractures are detected. Shoulder or thorax computed tomography, especially 3D reconstructions, are helpful in diagnosing the condition and in guiding treatment. Closed reduction under sedation followed by early rehabilitation is an appropriate treatment method, which resulted in a full return of function in 1 month in our patient.
1. Nettrour LF, Krufky EL, Mueller RE, Raycroft JF. Locked scapula: intrathoracic dislocation of the inferior angle. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54(2):413-416.
2. Ward WG, Weaver JP, Garrett WE Jr. Locked scapula: A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(10):1558-1159.
3. Fowler TT, Taylor BC, Fankhauser RA. Recurrent low-energy intrathoracic dislocation of the scapula. Am J Orthop. 2013;42(1):E1-E4.
4. Blue JM, Anglen JO, Helikson MA. Fracture of the scapula with intrathoracic penetration. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(7):1076-1078.
5. Schwartzbach CC, Seoudi H, Ross AE, Hendershot K, Robinson L, Malekzadeh A. Fracture of the scapula with intrathoracic penetration in a skeletally mature patient. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(12):2735-2738.
6. Porte AN, Wirtzfeld DA, Mann C. Intrathoracic scapular impaction: an unusual complication of scapular fractures. Can J Surg. 2009;52(3):E62-E63.
Scapular dislocation, which is also termed locked scapula or scapulothoracic dislocation, is an unusual condition that can be described as extrathoracic or intrathoracic dislocation, depending on the penetration of scapula into the thoracic cavity.
There have been 3 reported cases of intrathoracic scapular dislocations in the literature,1-3all associated with a preexisting condition (eg, sternoclavicular separation, prior rib fracture, thoracotomy for a lung transplant procedure, or surgical resection of superior ribs during breast or pulmonary tumor excisions). Three published cases of intrathoracic scapular impaction involve comminuted scapular fractures with intrathoracic impaction of the inferior fragment through intercostal space.4-6
Here we report an intrathoracic scapular dislocation that was not associated with fracture of the scapula or predisposing factors. To our knowledge, this is the first case of pure intrathoracic dislocation. The possibility of intrathoracic scapular dislocation should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis even in patients with a negative anamnesis for predisposing factors, such as lung or chest surgery. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
A 29-year-old woman presented to the emergency department after a motor vehicle accident. She had tenderness over the left shoulder and left elbow with decreased range of motion; however, motor and sensory examination of the wrist and fingers were normal. No distal neurovascular deficit was noted.
Physical examination revealed pain on pelvic compression. We observed an asymmetrical appearance between shoulders; the left shoulder was superior when compared with the right side (Figure 1). Palpation of the scapula aggravated the pain. The inferior angle of the left scapula was not palpable, and the medial border was palpated through the intercostal space between the third and fourth ribs.
Initial radiographs showed additional left olecranon and bilateral ramus pubis fractures. A chest radiograph showed nondisplaced fractures of the second and third ribs without any obvious hemothorax or pneumothorax. No other pathology involving the chest, such as resection of the ribs or congenital anomaly, was observed. The patient reported no history of thoracic trauma or lung surgery. There were no fractures of the scapula, humerus, or clavicles. Thoracic computed tomography was performed, and 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction showed that the inferior angle of scapula penetrated into the thoracic cavity through the third intercostal space (Figure 2).
Given the intrathoracic scapular dislocation diagnosis, closed reduction under sedation was planned. The patient was placed in the supine position, and reduction was performed by applying pressure on the shoulder anteriorly. This maneuver increased deformity. At the same time, another physician pulled the spine of the scapula superiorly, releasing the scapula out of the thoracic cavity. When the arm was slightly lowered to neutral position, scapular deformity was no longer present (Figure 3). A shoulder sling was applied, and the patient was hospitalized for surgical fixation of pelvic and olecranon fractures. The arm was immobilized in a sling for 1 week, and shoulder exercises were started immediately afterward.
At 1-month follow-up, full shoulder range of motion was achieved, although rehabilitation for the elbow continued. Final follow-up examination at 4 months revealed no difference between shoulders, and no recurrence occurred.
Discussion
Intrathoracic scapular dislocation is a rare injury. There are only a few cases reported in the literature, and most of them are well associated with a predisposing factor. Nettrour and colleagues1 described the first intrathoracic scapular dislocation, which occurred 6 weeks after sternoclavicular separation and fracture of a rib. In the case reports of Ward and colleagues2 and Fowler and colleagues,3 the predisposing factor was resection of the ribs due to pancoast tumor and breast carcinoma, respectively. The mechanism of these dislocations depends on a weak area over the thoracic cage, creating a fulcrum point for levering the scapula into the thoracic cavity.
There are other cases of scapular dislocations that are accompanied by a comminuted fracture of scapula; a review of the literature revealed 3 cases.4-6 In our opinion, fracture of the inferior pole of the scapula leads to injury of the soft tissues and also results in intrathoracic impaction by creating a weak area over the thoracic cavity. This mechanism can be referred to as penetration.
Our case is singular because it is the first case that is not associated with fracture of the scapula or predisposing factors. Consequently, we report the first pure intrathoracic scapular dislocation in the literature. It is important to suspect intrathoracic scapular dislocation in the case of deformity (Figure 1), even in the absence of any predisposing factors or scapular fracture.
Although plain radiographs may not be elucidative, 3D reconstruction of computed tomography (Figure 2) reveals the pathology and plays an important role in guiding treatment.
In the treatment of our patient, relying on the unique dislocation mechanism without any fracture of the scapula or ribs, we started early active shoulder movement after 1 week of immobilization in a shoulder sling, which prevented recurrence of dislocation. In addition to presenting the first pure intrathoracic scapular dislocation, this case demonstrated satisfactory clinical results with short-term immobilization and early rehabilitation.
Conclusion
Contrary to the literature, the possibility of intrathoracic scapular dislocation should be considered in the differential diagnosis even in patients with a negative anamnesis for predisposing factors, such as lung or chest surgery, and when no fractures are detected. Shoulder or thorax computed tomography, especially 3D reconstructions, are helpful in diagnosing the condition and in guiding treatment. Closed reduction under sedation followed by early rehabilitation is an appropriate treatment method, which resulted in a full return of function in 1 month in our patient.
Scapular dislocation, which is also termed locked scapula or scapulothoracic dislocation, is an unusual condition that can be described as extrathoracic or intrathoracic dislocation, depending on the penetration of scapula into the thoracic cavity.
There have been 3 reported cases of intrathoracic scapular dislocations in the literature,1-3all associated with a preexisting condition (eg, sternoclavicular separation, prior rib fracture, thoracotomy for a lung transplant procedure, or surgical resection of superior ribs during breast or pulmonary tumor excisions). Three published cases of intrathoracic scapular impaction involve comminuted scapular fractures with intrathoracic impaction of the inferior fragment through intercostal space.4-6
Here we report an intrathoracic scapular dislocation that was not associated with fracture of the scapula or predisposing factors. To our knowledge, this is the first case of pure intrathoracic dislocation. The possibility of intrathoracic scapular dislocation should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis even in patients with a negative anamnesis for predisposing factors, such as lung or chest surgery. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
A 29-year-old woman presented to the emergency department after a motor vehicle accident. She had tenderness over the left shoulder and left elbow with decreased range of motion; however, motor and sensory examination of the wrist and fingers were normal. No distal neurovascular deficit was noted.
Physical examination revealed pain on pelvic compression. We observed an asymmetrical appearance between shoulders; the left shoulder was superior when compared with the right side (Figure 1). Palpation of the scapula aggravated the pain. The inferior angle of the left scapula was not palpable, and the medial border was palpated through the intercostal space between the third and fourth ribs.
Initial radiographs showed additional left olecranon and bilateral ramus pubis fractures. A chest radiograph showed nondisplaced fractures of the second and third ribs without any obvious hemothorax or pneumothorax. No other pathology involving the chest, such as resection of the ribs or congenital anomaly, was observed. The patient reported no history of thoracic trauma or lung surgery. There were no fractures of the scapula, humerus, or clavicles. Thoracic computed tomography was performed, and 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction showed that the inferior angle of scapula penetrated into the thoracic cavity through the third intercostal space (Figure 2).
Given the intrathoracic scapular dislocation diagnosis, closed reduction under sedation was planned. The patient was placed in the supine position, and reduction was performed by applying pressure on the shoulder anteriorly. This maneuver increased deformity. At the same time, another physician pulled the spine of the scapula superiorly, releasing the scapula out of the thoracic cavity. When the arm was slightly lowered to neutral position, scapular deformity was no longer present (Figure 3). A shoulder sling was applied, and the patient was hospitalized for surgical fixation of pelvic and olecranon fractures. The arm was immobilized in a sling for 1 week, and shoulder exercises were started immediately afterward.
At 1-month follow-up, full shoulder range of motion was achieved, although rehabilitation for the elbow continued. Final follow-up examination at 4 months revealed no difference between shoulders, and no recurrence occurred.
Discussion
Intrathoracic scapular dislocation is a rare injury. There are only a few cases reported in the literature, and most of them are well associated with a predisposing factor. Nettrour and colleagues1 described the first intrathoracic scapular dislocation, which occurred 6 weeks after sternoclavicular separation and fracture of a rib. In the case reports of Ward and colleagues2 and Fowler and colleagues,3 the predisposing factor was resection of the ribs due to pancoast tumor and breast carcinoma, respectively. The mechanism of these dislocations depends on a weak area over the thoracic cage, creating a fulcrum point for levering the scapula into the thoracic cavity.
There are other cases of scapular dislocations that are accompanied by a comminuted fracture of scapula; a review of the literature revealed 3 cases.4-6 In our opinion, fracture of the inferior pole of the scapula leads to injury of the soft tissues and also results in intrathoracic impaction by creating a weak area over the thoracic cavity. This mechanism can be referred to as penetration.
Our case is singular because it is the first case that is not associated with fracture of the scapula or predisposing factors. Consequently, we report the first pure intrathoracic scapular dislocation in the literature. It is important to suspect intrathoracic scapular dislocation in the case of deformity (Figure 1), even in the absence of any predisposing factors or scapular fracture.
Although plain radiographs may not be elucidative, 3D reconstruction of computed tomography (Figure 2) reveals the pathology and plays an important role in guiding treatment.
In the treatment of our patient, relying on the unique dislocation mechanism without any fracture of the scapula or ribs, we started early active shoulder movement after 1 week of immobilization in a shoulder sling, which prevented recurrence of dislocation. In addition to presenting the first pure intrathoracic scapular dislocation, this case demonstrated satisfactory clinical results with short-term immobilization and early rehabilitation.
Conclusion
Contrary to the literature, the possibility of intrathoracic scapular dislocation should be considered in the differential diagnosis even in patients with a negative anamnesis for predisposing factors, such as lung or chest surgery, and when no fractures are detected. Shoulder or thorax computed tomography, especially 3D reconstructions, are helpful in diagnosing the condition and in guiding treatment. Closed reduction under sedation followed by early rehabilitation is an appropriate treatment method, which resulted in a full return of function in 1 month in our patient.
1. Nettrour LF, Krufky EL, Mueller RE, Raycroft JF. Locked scapula: intrathoracic dislocation of the inferior angle. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54(2):413-416.
2. Ward WG, Weaver JP, Garrett WE Jr. Locked scapula: A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(10):1558-1159.
3. Fowler TT, Taylor BC, Fankhauser RA. Recurrent low-energy intrathoracic dislocation of the scapula. Am J Orthop. 2013;42(1):E1-E4.
4. Blue JM, Anglen JO, Helikson MA. Fracture of the scapula with intrathoracic penetration. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(7):1076-1078.
5. Schwartzbach CC, Seoudi H, Ross AE, Hendershot K, Robinson L, Malekzadeh A. Fracture of the scapula with intrathoracic penetration in a skeletally mature patient. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(12):2735-2738.
6. Porte AN, Wirtzfeld DA, Mann C. Intrathoracic scapular impaction: an unusual complication of scapular fractures. Can J Surg. 2009;52(3):E62-E63.
1. Nettrour LF, Krufky EL, Mueller RE, Raycroft JF. Locked scapula: intrathoracic dislocation of the inferior angle. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54(2):413-416.
2. Ward WG, Weaver JP, Garrett WE Jr. Locked scapula: A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(10):1558-1159.
3. Fowler TT, Taylor BC, Fankhauser RA. Recurrent low-energy intrathoracic dislocation of the scapula. Am J Orthop. 2013;42(1):E1-E4.
4. Blue JM, Anglen JO, Helikson MA. Fracture of the scapula with intrathoracic penetration. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(7):1076-1078.
5. Schwartzbach CC, Seoudi H, Ross AE, Hendershot K, Robinson L, Malekzadeh A. Fracture of the scapula with intrathoracic penetration in a skeletally mature patient. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(12):2735-2738.
6. Porte AN, Wirtzfeld DA, Mann C. Intrathoracic scapular impaction: an unusual complication of scapular fractures. Can J Surg. 2009;52(3):E62-E63.
Geriatric Trauma Patients and Altered Mental Status
Case
A 76-year-old woman presented to the ED with right rib pain after tripping on a rug and sustaining a fall down the stairs in her home. The patient’s chart review showed a history of multiple falls over the past year, with injuries including left rib fracture, right distal radius fracture, ankle sprain, forehead contusion, and left hip contusion. Regarding her social history, the patient denied any alcohol or drug use. She was not on any prescription medications and had no known medication or food allergies.
Introduction
Geriatric patients aged 65 years and older represent a large, growing segment of the US population and, according to US Census Bureau data, represent an estimated 14% of the population.1 Moreover, this population accounts for 36% of all ambulance transports, 25% of hospitalizations, and 25% of total trauma costs.2 Although geriatric patients are less likely to be involved in trauma compared with other age groups, they are more likely to have fatal outcomes when injured. Approximately 28% of deaths due to accidental causes involve persons aged 65 and older. The highest mortality rates from trauma are noted in patients in the 8th decade and older.3
Mechanism of Injury and Preexisting Conditions
The presence of preexisting conditions, which affect a patient’s physiological age, is associated with increased mortality rates.7,8 As with other age groups, outcomes for geriatric trauma patients can also be predicted using the Injury Severity Score.9 Conditions associated with altered mental status in the geriatric trauma population and are listed in Table 1.
Review Data
The issue of traumatic injury in the aging population was studied at the authors’ institution through a retrospective chart review at the ED of Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, Ohio, an urban hospital with an annual patient census of 95,000 visits.10 This study was approved by the Wright State University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Miami Valley Hospital Human Investigation and Research Committee (HIRC).
Laboratory Findings
Mortality
Although traumatic injury is a common presentation among geriatric emergency patients, this population is overall less likely to be involved in a traumatic event compared to other age groups. However, when injured, geriatric trauma patients are more likely to have fatal outcomes.
As previously noted, falls are the most common mechanism of injury in patients older than age 65 years. The trend of fall-related mortality increases with advanced age. It has been estimated that 36% of geriatric patients who fall will require a repeat ED visit or will die within 1 year following the fall.11 Previous reports have demonstrated that mortality is associated with advanced age, injury severity score, shock index, transfusion, head injury, hypotension, and treatment site.12-16
Cerebral Hemorrhage
In the study conducted at the authors’ institution, most patients receiving a head CT scan had at least one abnormality.10 Subdural hemorrhage was the most commonly reported abnormality followed by subarachnoid and intraparenchymal hemorrhages, respectively.10
Falls are a common cause of intracranial hemorrhage, and 30% to 40% of patients over age 65 years will experience at least one fall each year.17 Consistent with these statistics, fall was the most common mechanism of injury in the patient population at the authors’ institution. Intracranial hemorrhage can cause altered mental status by increasing the intracranial pressure and decreasing the cerebral perfusion pressure. These abnormalities are often amenable to medical and/or surgical treatment if identified in time.18
Hyperglycemia
Hyperglycemia was one of the most common diagnostic test abnormalities associated with altered mental status in the authors' study.10 Although increased blood glucose is part of the stress response to injury, geriatric patients experience a higher incidence of stress hyperglycemia and are unable to mount an adequate insulin response in trauma.19,20 High-glucose levels are associated with significantly higher mortality rates among trauma patients.21-24
Alcohol Intoxication
Alcohol intoxication was common among the patients in the author’s study.10 In contrast, a smaller percentage of patients were tested and found to be positive for opioids or benzodiazepines. The risk of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) increases significantly if the patient sustained the injury while under the influence of alcohol.25 Alcohol increases the mortality after trauma especially in patients over the age of 40.26 Alcohol-related TBIs are associated with poorer outcomes with increasing age.27 Falls at ground level after alcohol consumption are associated with more casualties than nonalcohol-related falls.28,29
Differential Diagnosis
As the case in this review illustrates, among geriatric trauma patients with altered mental status, the most common mechanism of injury is fall. The differential diagnosis should be considered, including intracranial hemorrhage, alcohol intoxication, nonprescription drug use, prescription-drug effects, infection, and/or metabolic or endocrine disorders. Appropriate laboratory and radiographic tests should be obtained, and may include CT of the brain and cervical spine, chemistry profile, complete blood count, chest X-ray, urinalysis, alcohol level, and toxicology screen.
Conclusion
This case represents one of many common presentations of trauma among geriatric patients. There was evidence of multiple falls by chart review and physical examination. Evidence of multiple traumatic events of various stages should raise the suspicion of neurological deficits, substance or prescription-medication effects, or physical abuse of the elderly patient. The ED workup should include brain CT, electrolytes, complete blood count, chest radiograph, and urinalysis. The patient should be admitted for observation and workup for medical and traumatic etiologies of multiple falls. When discharged, home-health services or rehabilitation services should be considered.
The results of the authors’ chart-review study confirmed that falls are the most common mechanism of injury in geriatric trauma patients presenting to the ED with altered mental status.10 The most common diagnostic test abnormalities associated with altered mental status in this study included hyperglycemia, abnormal CT results, anemia, and alcohol intoxication. Future studies are needed to access relations between ethanol or opioid intoxication and the presence of positive CT findings to guide clinicians’ judgment when ordering CT scans and other tests.
Dr Marco is a professor of emergency medicine and surgery, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Kettering, Ohio; and an emergency physician at Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, Ohio. Ms Edgell, Ms Eggers, and Mr Fagan are students at Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio. Dr Olson is the director of the research laboratory and professor of emergency medicine at Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Kettering, Ohio.
- Geriatric Trauma Patients and Altered Mental Status
- The United States Census Bureau. Quick Facts. New Jersey. http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045214/34,00 Accessed May 20, 2015.
- Schwab CW, Kauder DR: Trauma in the geriatric patient. Arch Surg. 1992;127(6):701-706.
- Ley EJ, Clond MA, Hussain ON, et al. Mortality by decade in trauma patients with Glascow Coma Scale 3. Am Surg. 2011;77(10):1342-1345.
- Smith DP, Enderson BL, Maull KI. Trauma in the elderly: determinants of outcome. South Med J. 1990;83(2):171-177.
- Sise RG, Calvo RY, Spain DA, Weiser TG, Staudenmayer KL. The epidemiology of trauma-related mortality in the United States from 2002 to 2010. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(4):913-919; discussion 920.
- Morris JA, MacKenzie EJ, Edelstein SL. The effect of preexisting conditions on mortality in trauma patients. JAMA. 1990;263(4):1942-1946.
- Morris JA, MacKenzie EJ, Damiano AM, Bass SM. Mortality in trauma patients: the interaction between host factors and severity. J Trauma. 1990;30(12):1476-1482.
- Milzmann DP, Boulanger BR, Rodriguez A, Soderstrom CA, Mitchell KA, Magnant CM. Pre-existing disease in trauma patients: a predictor of fate independent of age and injury severity score. J Trauma. 1992;32(2):236-243.
- Knudson MM, Lieberman J, Morris JA Jr, Cushing BM, Stubbs HA. Mortality factors in geriatric blunt trauma patients. Arch Surg. 1994;129(4):448-453.
- Edgell A, Eggers C, Fagan C, Olson J, Marco CA. Altered mental status among geriatric trauma patients. Poster presented at: Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine Seventh Annual Medical Student Research Symposium: Celebrating Medical Student Scholarship; April 8, 2015; Dayton, Ohio. Poster 22. http://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=ra_symp. Accessed December 17, 2015.
- Liu SW, Obermeyer Z, Chang Y, Shankar KN. Frequency of ED revisits and death among older adults after a fall. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(8):1012-1018.
- Zhao FZ, Wolf SE, Nakonezny PA, et al. Estimating geriatric mortality after injury using age, injury severity, and performance of a transfusion: the Geriatric Trauma Outcome score. J Palliat Med. 2015;18(8):677-681.
- Tornetta P 3rd, Mostafavi H, Riina J, et al. Morbidity and mortality in elderly trauma patients. J Trauma. 1999;46(4):702-706.
- Meldon SW, Reilly M, Drew BL, Mancuso C, Fallon W Jr. Trauma in the very elderly: a community-based study of outcomes at trauma and nontrauma centers. J Trauma. 2002;52(1):79-84.
- Hashmi A, Ibrahim-Zada I, Rhee P, et al. Predictors of mortality in geriatric trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(3):894-901.
- Pandit V, Rhee P, Hashmi A, et al. Shock index predicts mortality in geriatric trauma patients: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(4):1111-1115.
- Ambrose AF, Paul G, Hausdorff JM. Risk factors for falls among older adults: a review of the literature. Maturitas. 2013;75(1):51-61.
- Kolias AG, Guilfoyle MR, Helmy A, Allanson J, Hutchinson PJ. Traumatic brain injury in adults. Pract Neurol. 2013;13(4):228-235.
- Kerby JD, Griffin RL, McLennan P, Rue LW 3rd. Stress-induced hyperglycemia, not diabetic hyperglycemia is associated with higher mortality in trauma. Ann Surg. 2012;2256(3):446-452.
- Paladino L, Subramania RA, Nabors S, Bhardwaj S, Sinert R. Triage hyperglycemia as a prognostic indicator of major trauma. J Trauma. 2010;69(1):41-45.
- Desai D, March R, Watter JM. Hyperglycemia after trauma increases with age. J Trauma. 1989;29(6):719-723.
- McCowen KC, Malhotra A, Bistrian BR. Stress-induced hyperglycemia. Crit Care Clin. 2001;17(1):107-124.
- Liu-DeRyke X, Collingridge DS, Orme J, Roller D, Zurasky J, Rhoney DH. Clinical impact of early hyperglycemia during acute phase of traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(2):151-157.
- Laird AM, Miller PR, Kilgo PD, Meredith JW, Chang MC. Relationship of early hyperglycemia to mortality in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2004;56(5):1058-1062.
- Salim A, Hadjizacharia P, Dubose J, et al. Persistent hyperglycemia in severe traumatic brain injury: an independent predictor of outcome. Am Surg. 2009;75(1): 25-29.
- Vaaramo K, Puljula J, Tetri S, Juvela S, Hillbom M. Head trauma sustained under the influence of alcohol is a predictor for future traumatic brain injury: a long-term follow up study. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21(2):293-298.
- Kowalenko T, Burgess B, Szpunar SM, Irvin-Babcock CB. Alcohol and trauma--in every age group. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(4):705-709.
- Chen CM, Yi HY, Yoon TH, Dong C. Alcohol use at time of injury and survival following traumatic brain injury: results from the National Trauma Data Bank. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012;73(4):531-541.
- Thierauf A, Preuss J, Lignitz E, Madea B. Retrospective analysis of fatal falls. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;198(1-3):92-96
Case
A 76-year-old woman presented to the ED with right rib pain after tripping on a rug and sustaining a fall down the stairs in her home. The patient’s chart review showed a history of multiple falls over the past year, with injuries including left rib fracture, right distal radius fracture, ankle sprain, forehead contusion, and left hip contusion. Regarding her social history, the patient denied any alcohol or drug use. She was not on any prescription medications and had no known medication or food allergies.
Introduction
Geriatric patients aged 65 years and older represent a large, growing segment of the US population and, according to US Census Bureau data, represent an estimated 14% of the population.1 Moreover, this population accounts for 36% of all ambulance transports, 25% of hospitalizations, and 25% of total trauma costs.2 Although geriatric patients are less likely to be involved in trauma compared with other age groups, they are more likely to have fatal outcomes when injured. Approximately 28% of deaths due to accidental causes involve persons aged 65 and older. The highest mortality rates from trauma are noted in patients in the 8th decade and older.3
Mechanism of Injury and Preexisting Conditions
The presence of preexisting conditions, which affect a patient’s physiological age, is associated with increased mortality rates.7,8 As with other age groups, outcomes for geriatric trauma patients can also be predicted using the Injury Severity Score.9 Conditions associated with altered mental status in the geriatric trauma population and are listed in Table 1.
Review Data
The issue of traumatic injury in the aging population was studied at the authors’ institution through a retrospective chart review at the ED of Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, Ohio, an urban hospital with an annual patient census of 95,000 visits.10 This study was approved by the Wright State University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Miami Valley Hospital Human Investigation and Research Committee (HIRC).
Laboratory Findings
Mortality
Although traumatic injury is a common presentation among geriatric emergency patients, this population is overall less likely to be involved in a traumatic event compared to other age groups. However, when injured, geriatric trauma patients are more likely to have fatal outcomes.
As previously noted, falls are the most common mechanism of injury in patients older than age 65 years. The trend of fall-related mortality increases with advanced age. It has been estimated that 36% of geriatric patients who fall will require a repeat ED visit or will die within 1 year following the fall.11 Previous reports have demonstrated that mortality is associated with advanced age, injury severity score, shock index, transfusion, head injury, hypotension, and treatment site.12-16
Cerebral Hemorrhage
In the study conducted at the authors’ institution, most patients receiving a head CT scan had at least one abnormality.10 Subdural hemorrhage was the most commonly reported abnormality followed by subarachnoid and intraparenchymal hemorrhages, respectively.10
Falls are a common cause of intracranial hemorrhage, and 30% to 40% of patients over age 65 years will experience at least one fall each year.17 Consistent with these statistics, fall was the most common mechanism of injury in the patient population at the authors’ institution. Intracranial hemorrhage can cause altered mental status by increasing the intracranial pressure and decreasing the cerebral perfusion pressure. These abnormalities are often amenable to medical and/or surgical treatment if identified in time.18
Hyperglycemia
Hyperglycemia was one of the most common diagnostic test abnormalities associated with altered mental status in the authors' study.10 Although increased blood glucose is part of the stress response to injury, geriatric patients experience a higher incidence of stress hyperglycemia and are unable to mount an adequate insulin response in trauma.19,20 High-glucose levels are associated with significantly higher mortality rates among trauma patients.21-24
Alcohol Intoxication
Alcohol intoxication was common among the patients in the author’s study.10 In contrast, a smaller percentage of patients were tested and found to be positive for opioids or benzodiazepines. The risk of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) increases significantly if the patient sustained the injury while under the influence of alcohol.25 Alcohol increases the mortality after trauma especially in patients over the age of 40.26 Alcohol-related TBIs are associated with poorer outcomes with increasing age.27 Falls at ground level after alcohol consumption are associated with more casualties than nonalcohol-related falls.28,29
Differential Diagnosis
As the case in this review illustrates, among geriatric trauma patients with altered mental status, the most common mechanism of injury is fall. The differential diagnosis should be considered, including intracranial hemorrhage, alcohol intoxication, nonprescription drug use, prescription-drug effects, infection, and/or metabolic or endocrine disorders. Appropriate laboratory and radiographic tests should be obtained, and may include CT of the brain and cervical spine, chemistry profile, complete blood count, chest X-ray, urinalysis, alcohol level, and toxicology screen.
Conclusion
This case represents one of many common presentations of trauma among geriatric patients. There was evidence of multiple falls by chart review and physical examination. Evidence of multiple traumatic events of various stages should raise the suspicion of neurological deficits, substance or prescription-medication effects, or physical abuse of the elderly patient. The ED workup should include brain CT, electrolytes, complete blood count, chest radiograph, and urinalysis. The patient should be admitted for observation and workup for medical and traumatic etiologies of multiple falls. When discharged, home-health services or rehabilitation services should be considered.
The results of the authors’ chart-review study confirmed that falls are the most common mechanism of injury in geriatric trauma patients presenting to the ED with altered mental status.10 The most common diagnostic test abnormalities associated with altered mental status in this study included hyperglycemia, abnormal CT results, anemia, and alcohol intoxication. Future studies are needed to access relations between ethanol or opioid intoxication and the presence of positive CT findings to guide clinicians’ judgment when ordering CT scans and other tests.
Dr Marco is a professor of emergency medicine and surgery, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Kettering, Ohio; and an emergency physician at Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, Ohio. Ms Edgell, Ms Eggers, and Mr Fagan are students at Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio. Dr Olson is the director of the research laboratory and professor of emergency medicine at Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Kettering, Ohio.
Case
A 76-year-old woman presented to the ED with right rib pain after tripping on a rug and sustaining a fall down the stairs in her home. The patient’s chart review showed a history of multiple falls over the past year, with injuries including left rib fracture, right distal radius fracture, ankle sprain, forehead contusion, and left hip contusion. Regarding her social history, the patient denied any alcohol or drug use. She was not on any prescription medications and had no known medication or food allergies.
Introduction
Geriatric patients aged 65 years and older represent a large, growing segment of the US population and, according to US Census Bureau data, represent an estimated 14% of the population.1 Moreover, this population accounts for 36% of all ambulance transports, 25% of hospitalizations, and 25% of total trauma costs.2 Although geriatric patients are less likely to be involved in trauma compared with other age groups, they are more likely to have fatal outcomes when injured. Approximately 28% of deaths due to accidental causes involve persons aged 65 and older. The highest mortality rates from trauma are noted in patients in the 8th decade and older.3
Mechanism of Injury and Preexisting Conditions
The presence of preexisting conditions, which affect a patient’s physiological age, is associated with increased mortality rates.7,8 As with other age groups, outcomes for geriatric trauma patients can also be predicted using the Injury Severity Score.9 Conditions associated with altered mental status in the geriatric trauma population and are listed in Table 1.
Review Data
The issue of traumatic injury in the aging population was studied at the authors’ institution through a retrospective chart review at the ED of Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, Ohio, an urban hospital with an annual patient census of 95,000 visits.10 This study was approved by the Wright State University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Miami Valley Hospital Human Investigation and Research Committee (HIRC).
Laboratory Findings
Mortality
Although traumatic injury is a common presentation among geriatric emergency patients, this population is overall less likely to be involved in a traumatic event compared to other age groups. However, when injured, geriatric trauma patients are more likely to have fatal outcomes.
As previously noted, falls are the most common mechanism of injury in patients older than age 65 years. The trend of fall-related mortality increases with advanced age. It has been estimated that 36% of geriatric patients who fall will require a repeat ED visit or will die within 1 year following the fall.11 Previous reports have demonstrated that mortality is associated with advanced age, injury severity score, shock index, transfusion, head injury, hypotension, and treatment site.12-16
Cerebral Hemorrhage
In the study conducted at the authors’ institution, most patients receiving a head CT scan had at least one abnormality.10 Subdural hemorrhage was the most commonly reported abnormality followed by subarachnoid and intraparenchymal hemorrhages, respectively.10
Falls are a common cause of intracranial hemorrhage, and 30% to 40% of patients over age 65 years will experience at least one fall each year.17 Consistent with these statistics, fall was the most common mechanism of injury in the patient population at the authors’ institution. Intracranial hemorrhage can cause altered mental status by increasing the intracranial pressure and decreasing the cerebral perfusion pressure. These abnormalities are often amenable to medical and/or surgical treatment if identified in time.18
Hyperglycemia
Hyperglycemia was one of the most common diagnostic test abnormalities associated with altered mental status in the authors' study.10 Although increased blood glucose is part of the stress response to injury, geriatric patients experience a higher incidence of stress hyperglycemia and are unable to mount an adequate insulin response in trauma.19,20 High-glucose levels are associated with significantly higher mortality rates among trauma patients.21-24
Alcohol Intoxication
Alcohol intoxication was common among the patients in the author’s study.10 In contrast, a smaller percentage of patients were tested and found to be positive for opioids or benzodiazepines. The risk of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) increases significantly if the patient sustained the injury while under the influence of alcohol.25 Alcohol increases the mortality after trauma especially in patients over the age of 40.26 Alcohol-related TBIs are associated with poorer outcomes with increasing age.27 Falls at ground level after alcohol consumption are associated with more casualties than nonalcohol-related falls.28,29
Differential Diagnosis
As the case in this review illustrates, among geriatric trauma patients with altered mental status, the most common mechanism of injury is fall. The differential diagnosis should be considered, including intracranial hemorrhage, alcohol intoxication, nonprescription drug use, prescription-drug effects, infection, and/or metabolic or endocrine disorders. Appropriate laboratory and radiographic tests should be obtained, and may include CT of the brain and cervical spine, chemistry profile, complete blood count, chest X-ray, urinalysis, alcohol level, and toxicology screen.
Conclusion
This case represents one of many common presentations of trauma among geriatric patients. There was evidence of multiple falls by chart review and physical examination. Evidence of multiple traumatic events of various stages should raise the suspicion of neurological deficits, substance or prescription-medication effects, or physical abuse of the elderly patient. The ED workup should include brain CT, electrolytes, complete blood count, chest radiograph, and urinalysis. The patient should be admitted for observation and workup for medical and traumatic etiologies of multiple falls. When discharged, home-health services or rehabilitation services should be considered.
The results of the authors’ chart-review study confirmed that falls are the most common mechanism of injury in geriatric trauma patients presenting to the ED with altered mental status.10 The most common diagnostic test abnormalities associated with altered mental status in this study included hyperglycemia, abnormal CT results, anemia, and alcohol intoxication. Future studies are needed to access relations between ethanol or opioid intoxication and the presence of positive CT findings to guide clinicians’ judgment when ordering CT scans and other tests.
Dr Marco is a professor of emergency medicine and surgery, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Kettering, Ohio; and an emergency physician at Miami Valley Hospital, Dayton, Ohio. Ms Edgell, Ms Eggers, and Mr Fagan are students at Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio. Dr Olson is the director of the research laboratory and professor of emergency medicine at Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Kettering, Ohio.
- Geriatric Trauma Patients and Altered Mental Status
- The United States Census Bureau. Quick Facts. New Jersey. http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045214/34,00 Accessed May 20, 2015.
- Schwab CW, Kauder DR: Trauma in the geriatric patient. Arch Surg. 1992;127(6):701-706.
- Ley EJ, Clond MA, Hussain ON, et al. Mortality by decade in trauma patients with Glascow Coma Scale 3. Am Surg. 2011;77(10):1342-1345.
- Smith DP, Enderson BL, Maull KI. Trauma in the elderly: determinants of outcome. South Med J. 1990;83(2):171-177.
- Sise RG, Calvo RY, Spain DA, Weiser TG, Staudenmayer KL. The epidemiology of trauma-related mortality in the United States from 2002 to 2010. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(4):913-919; discussion 920.
- Morris JA, MacKenzie EJ, Edelstein SL. The effect of preexisting conditions on mortality in trauma patients. JAMA. 1990;263(4):1942-1946.
- Morris JA, MacKenzie EJ, Damiano AM, Bass SM. Mortality in trauma patients: the interaction between host factors and severity. J Trauma. 1990;30(12):1476-1482.
- Milzmann DP, Boulanger BR, Rodriguez A, Soderstrom CA, Mitchell KA, Magnant CM. Pre-existing disease in trauma patients: a predictor of fate independent of age and injury severity score. J Trauma. 1992;32(2):236-243.
- Knudson MM, Lieberman J, Morris JA Jr, Cushing BM, Stubbs HA. Mortality factors in geriatric blunt trauma patients. Arch Surg. 1994;129(4):448-453.
- Edgell A, Eggers C, Fagan C, Olson J, Marco CA. Altered mental status among geriatric trauma patients. Poster presented at: Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine Seventh Annual Medical Student Research Symposium: Celebrating Medical Student Scholarship; April 8, 2015; Dayton, Ohio. Poster 22. http://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=ra_symp. Accessed December 17, 2015.
- Liu SW, Obermeyer Z, Chang Y, Shankar KN. Frequency of ED revisits and death among older adults after a fall. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(8):1012-1018.
- Zhao FZ, Wolf SE, Nakonezny PA, et al. Estimating geriatric mortality after injury using age, injury severity, and performance of a transfusion: the Geriatric Trauma Outcome score. J Palliat Med. 2015;18(8):677-681.
- Tornetta P 3rd, Mostafavi H, Riina J, et al. Morbidity and mortality in elderly trauma patients. J Trauma. 1999;46(4):702-706.
- Meldon SW, Reilly M, Drew BL, Mancuso C, Fallon W Jr. Trauma in the very elderly: a community-based study of outcomes at trauma and nontrauma centers. J Trauma. 2002;52(1):79-84.
- Hashmi A, Ibrahim-Zada I, Rhee P, et al. Predictors of mortality in geriatric trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(3):894-901.
- Pandit V, Rhee P, Hashmi A, et al. Shock index predicts mortality in geriatric trauma patients: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(4):1111-1115.
- Ambrose AF, Paul G, Hausdorff JM. Risk factors for falls among older adults: a review of the literature. Maturitas. 2013;75(1):51-61.
- Kolias AG, Guilfoyle MR, Helmy A, Allanson J, Hutchinson PJ. Traumatic brain injury in adults. Pract Neurol. 2013;13(4):228-235.
- Kerby JD, Griffin RL, McLennan P, Rue LW 3rd. Stress-induced hyperglycemia, not diabetic hyperglycemia is associated with higher mortality in trauma. Ann Surg. 2012;2256(3):446-452.
- Paladino L, Subramania RA, Nabors S, Bhardwaj S, Sinert R. Triage hyperglycemia as a prognostic indicator of major trauma. J Trauma. 2010;69(1):41-45.
- Desai D, March R, Watter JM. Hyperglycemia after trauma increases with age. J Trauma. 1989;29(6):719-723.
- McCowen KC, Malhotra A, Bistrian BR. Stress-induced hyperglycemia. Crit Care Clin. 2001;17(1):107-124.
- Liu-DeRyke X, Collingridge DS, Orme J, Roller D, Zurasky J, Rhoney DH. Clinical impact of early hyperglycemia during acute phase of traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(2):151-157.
- Laird AM, Miller PR, Kilgo PD, Meredith JW, Chang MC. Relationship of early hyperglycemia to mortality in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2004;56(5):1058-1062.
- Salim A, Hadjizacharia P, Dubose J, et al. Persistent hyperglycemia in severe traumatic brain injury: an independent predictor of outcome. Am Surg. 2009;75(1): 25-29.
- Vaaramo K, Puljula J, Tetri S, Juvela S, Hillbom M. Head trauma sustained under the influence of alcohol is a predictor for future traumatic brain injury: a long-term follow up study. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21(2):293-298.
- Kowalenko T, Burgess B, Szpunar SM, Irvin-Babcock CB. Alcohol and trauma--in every age group. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(4):705-709.
- Chen CM, Yi HY, Yoon TH, Dong C. Alcohol use at time of injury and survival following traumatic brain injury: results from the National Trauma Data Bank. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012;73(4):531-541.
- Thierauf A, Preuss J, Lignitz E, Madea B. Retrospective analysis of fatal falls. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;198(1-3):92-96
- Geriatric Trauma Patients and Altered Mental Status
- The United States Census Bureau. Quick Facts. New Jersey. http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045214/34,00 Accessed May 20, 2015.
- Schwab CW, Kauder DR: Trauma in the geriatric patient. Arch Surg. 1992;127(6):701-706.
- Ley EJ, Clond MA, Hussain ON, et al. Mortality by decade in trauma patients with Glascow Coma Scale 3. Am Surg. 2011;77(10):1342-1345.
- Smith DP, Enderson BL, Maull KI. Trauma in the elderly: determinants of outcome. South Med J. 1990;83(2):171-177.
- Sise RG, Calvo RY, Spain DA, Weiser TG, Staudenmayer KL. The epidemiology of trauma-related mortality in the United States from 2002 to 2010. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(4):913-919; discussion 920.
- Morris JA, MacKenzie EJ, Edelstein SL. The effect of preexisting conditions on mortality in trauma patients. JAMA. 1990;263(4):1942-1946.
- Morris JA, MacKenzie EJ, Damiano AM, Bass SM. Mortality in trauma patients: the interaction between host factors and severity. J Trauma. 1990;30(12):1476-1482.
- Milzmann DP, Boulanger BR, Rodriguez A, Soderstrom CA, Mitchell KA, Magnant CM. Pre-existing disease in trauma patients: a predictor of fate independent of age and injury severity score. J Trauma. 1992;32(2):236-243.
- Knudson MM, Lieberman J, Morris JA Jr, Cushing BM, Stubbs HA. Mortality factors in geriatric blunt trauma patients. Arch Surg. 1994;129(4):448-453.
- Edgell A, Eggers C, Fagan C, Olson J, Marco CA. Altered mental status among geriatric trauma patients. Poster presented at: Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine Seventh Annual Medical Student Research Symposium: Celebrating Medical Student Scholarship; April 8, 2015; Dayton, Ohio. Poster 22. http://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=ra_symp. Accessed December 17, 2015.
- Liu SW, Obermeyer Z, Chang Y, Shankar KN. Frequency of ED revisits and death among older adults after a fall. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(8):1012-1018.
- Zhao FZ, Wolf SE, Nakonezny PA, et al. Estimating geriatric mortality after injury using age, injury severity, and performance of a transfusion: the Geriatric Trauma Outcome score. J Palliat Med. 2015;18(8):677-681.
- Tornetta P 3rd, Mostafavi H, Riina J, et al. Morbidity and mortality in elderly trauma patients. J Trauma. 1999;46(4):702-706.
- Meldon SW, Reilly M, Drew BL, Mancuso C, Fallon W Jr. Trauma in the very elderly: a community-based study of outcomes at trauma and nontrauma centers. J Trauma. 2002;52(1):79-84.
- Hashmi A, Ibrahim-Zada I, Rhee P, et al. Predictors of mortality in geriatric trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(3):894-901.
- Pandit V, Rhee P, Hashmi A, et al. Shock index predicts mortality in geriatric trauma patients: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(4):1111-1115.
- Ambrose AF, Paul G, Hausdorff JM. Risk factors for falls among older adults: a review of the literature. Maturitas. 2013;75(1):51-61.
- Kolias AG, Guilfoyle MR, Helmy A, Allanson J, Hutchinson PJ. Traumatic brain injury in adults. Pract Neurol. 2013;13(4):228-235.
- Kerby JD, Griffin RL, McLennan P, Rue LW 3rd. Stress-induced hyperglycemia, not diabetic hyperglycemia is associated with higher mortality in trauma. Ann Surg. 2012;2256(3):446-452.
- Paladino L, Subramania RA, Nabors S, Bhardwaj S, Sinert R. Triage hyperglycemia as a prognostic indicator of major trauma. J Trauma. 2010;69(1):41-45.
- Desai D, March R, Watter JM. Hyperglycemia after trauma increases with age. J Trauma. 1989;29(6):719-723.
- McCowen KC, Malhotra A, Bistrian BR. Stress-induced hyperglycemia. Crit Care Clin. 2001;17(1):107-124.
- Liu-DeRyke X, Collingridge DS, Orme J, Roller D, Zurasky J, Rhoney DH. Clinical impact of early hyperglycemia during acute phase of traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(2):151-157.
- Laird AM, Miller PR, Kilgo PD, Meredith JW, Chang MC. Relationship of early hyperglycemia to mortality in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2004;56(5):1058-1062.
- Salim A, Hadjizacharia P, Dubose J, et al. Persistent hyperglycemia in severe traumatic brain injury: an independent predictor of outcome. Am Surg. 2009;75(1): 25-29.
- Vaaramo K, Puljula J, Tetri S, Juvela S, Hillbom M. Head trauma sustained under the influence of alcohol is a predictor for future traumatic brain injury: a long-term follow up study. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21(2):293-298.
- Kowalenko T, Burgess B, Szpunar SM, Irvin-Babcock CB. Alcohol and trauma--in every age group. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(4):705-709.
- Chen CM, Yi HY, Yoon TH, Dong C. Alcohol use at time of injury and survival following traumatic brain injury: results from the National Trauma Data Bank. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012;73(4):531-541.
- Thierauf A, Preuss J, Lignitz E, Madea B. Retrospective analysis of fatal falls. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;198(1-3):92-96
Case Report: Perianal Streptococcal Infection
Case
The mother of a 3-year-old boy presented her son to the ED for evaluation after she noticed peeling of the skin in his perianal region. She stated that the peeling had started 1 day prior to presentation. Two days earlier, the mother had brought the same patient to the ED for evaluation of a fever, sore throat, and a slight rash over his face. The boy’s vital signs at the initial presentation were: temperature, 101.8°F; heart rate, 102 beats/minute; and respiratory rate, 28 breaths/minute. Oxygen saturation was 98% on room air.
During this first visit, the mother denied the child having had any fever, chills, headache, sore throat, facial rash, joint pain, or pain on defecation. He had no significant medical history and no known drug allergies. After examination, a throat culture was taken, and the patient was given acetaminophen and discharged home with a diagnosis of viral syndrome.
At the second presentation, physical examination revealed a well-developed child in no distress. The examination was negative except for a 4 x 2 cm area of desquamation present over the perianal region (Figure).
The area of desquamation was dry, mildly erythematous without discharge, and nontender. The patient’s vital signs at this presentation were stable, and he was afebrile. The remaining physical examination findings were normal. The throat culture taken during the first ED presentation was reported as negative. A perianal swab was sent for culture and sensitivity. This was later reported to be positive for group A β-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS), which is sensitive to penicillin. The patient was discharged home in the care of his mother with a prescription of penicillin. A 10-day follow-up showed complete resolution of the skin rash.
Discussion
The rash in this case was most likely the result of scarlet fever with an unusual presentation of PSD; the signs and symptoms of which include perianal erythema, itching, rectal pain, sometimes blood-streaked stools, rectal bleeding, irritation or pruritus, tissue loss and exudation, secondary constipation, and cellulitis. Perianal streptococcal dermatitis has also been described in the adult literature.2 As with pediatric cases, PSD in adults is usually caused by GABHS.
Evaluation and Diagnosis
A rapid streptococcal test of suspicious areas can confirm the diagnosis. Fever, sore throat, and arthralgia are rare; however, culture from the perianal region grows GABHS. Titers are usually not elevated in laboratory evaluation. A routine skin culture is an alternative diagnostic aid.
Brilliant2 described the bright red color of PSD as a sharply demarcated rash that is caused by GABHS. As previously stated, symptoms include perianal rash, itching, and rectal pain; blood-streaked stools may also be seen in one-third of patients. It primarily occurs in children between 6 months and 10 years of age and is often misdiagnosed and treated inappropriately.3
Prompt diagnosis of GABHS is important. If untreated, it can cause serious systemic infections, especially in elderly and in newborn patients. Treatment with antibiotics resolves the condition in the majority of patients.2 In the acute stage, a white pseudomembrane may be present. As the rash becomes more chronic, the perianal eruption may consist of painful fissures, a dry mucoid discharge, or psoriasiform plaques. Perianal dermatitis can also be caused by Staphylococcus aureus or Candida. Confirmation of the diagnosis is accomplished by culturing a moderate-to-heavy growth of GABHS on 5% sheep-blood agar.
Treatment
A 10-day course of oral penicillin produces resolution of the dermatitis and other symptoms in most patients, but a relapse rate as high as 39% has been reported. Other treatment plans include amoxicillin, 40 mg/kg per day, divided into three doses, and/or topical applications of mupirocin 2% three times per day for 10 days. Penicillin, clindamycin phosphate, and erythromycin have also been used.
Although penicillin is generally recommended for treatment of GABHS infection, amoxicillin is often better tolerated in the pediatric population due to its superior palatability. Early antibiotic treatment causes a dramatic and rapid improvement of symptoms. However, according to Olson et al,4 PSD initially treated with amoxicillin or penicillin is consistently associated with a high risk of clinical recurrence. Whether treatment with a β-lactamase–resistant agent reduces this risk is uncertain.
Conclusion
This case represents an unusual presentation of scarlet fever manifesting as perianal dermatitis caused by GABHS. Although more common in the pediatric population, adult cases have been documented in the literature. As this case illustrates, early recognition and treatment with penicillin (or amoxicillin) produces rapid improvement and resolution of symptoms.
Dr Nibhanipudi is a professor of clinical emergency medicine at New York Medical College - Metropolitan Hospital Center, New York.
- Case Report: Perianal Streptococcal Infection
- Landolt M, Heininger U. Prevalence of perianal streptococcal dermatitis in children and adolescents [in German]. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2005;94(38):1467-1471.
- Kahlke V, Jongen J, Peleikis HG, Herbst RA. Perianal streptococcal dermatitis in adults: its association with pruritic anorectal diseases is mainly caused by group B Streptococci. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(5):602-607.
- Brilliant LC. Perianal streptococcal dermatitis. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61(2):391-393.
- Olson D, Edmonson MB. Outcomes in children treated for perineal group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal dermatitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(11):933-936.
Case
The mother of a 3-year-old boy presented her son to the ED for evaluation after she noticed peeling of the skin in his perianal region. She stated that the peeling had started 1 day prior to presentation. Two days earlier, the mother had brought the same patient to the ED for evaluation of a fever, sore throat, and a slight rash over his face. The boy’s vital signs at the initial presentation were: temperature, 101.8°F; heart rate, 102 beats/minute; and respiratory rate, 28 breaths/minute. Oxygen saturation was 98% on room air.
During this first visit, the mother denied the child having had any fever, chills, headache, sore throat, facial rash, joint pain, or pain on defecation. He had no significant medical history and no known drug allergies. After examination, a throat culture was taken, and the patient was given acetaminophen and discharged home with a diagnosis of viral syndrome.
At the second presentation, physical examination revealed a well-developed child in no distress. The examination was negative except for a 4 x 2 cm area of desquamation present over the perianal region (Figure).
The area of desquamation was dry, mildly erythematous without discharge, and nontender. The patient’s vital signs at this presentation were stable, and he was afebrile. The remaining physical examination findings were normal. The throat culture taken during the first ED presentation was reported as negative. A perianal swab was sent for culture and sensitivity. This was later reported to be positive for group A β-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS), which is sensitive to penicillin. The patient was discharged home in the care of his mother with a prescription of penicillin. A 10-day follow-up showed complete resolution of the skin rash.
Discussion
The rash in this case was most likely the result of scarlet fever with an unusual presentation of PSD; the signs and symptoms of which include perianal erythema, itching, rectal pain, sometimes blood-streaked stools, rectal bleeding, irritation or pruritus, tissue loss and exudation, secondary constipation, and cellulitis. Perianal streptococcal dermatitis has also been described in the adult literature.2 As with pediatric cases, PSD in adults is usually caused by GABHS.
Evaluation and Diagnosis
A rapid streptococcal test of suspicious areas can confirm the diagnosis. Fever, sore throat, and arthralgia are rare; however, culture from the perianal region grows GABHS. Titers are usually not elevated in laboratory evaluation. A routine skin culture is an alternative diagnostic aid.
Brilliant2 described the bright red color of PSD as a sharply demarcated rash that is caused by GABHS. As previously stated, symptoms include perianal rash, itching, and rectal pain; blood-streaked stools may also be seen in one-third of patients. It primarily occurs in children between 6 months and 10 years of age and is often misdiagnosed and treated inappropriately.3
Prompt diagnosis of GABHS is important. If untreated, it can cause serious systemic infections, especially in elderly and in newborn patients. Treatment with antibiotics resolves the condition in the majority of patients.2 In the acute stage, a white pseudomembrane may be present. As the rash becomes more chronic, the perianal eruption may consist of painful fissures, a dry mucoid discharge, or psoriasiform plaques. Perianal dermatitis can also be caused by Staphylococcus aureus or Candida. Confirmation of the diagnosis is accomplished by culturing a moderate-to-heavy growth of GABHS on 5% sheep-blood agar.
Treatment
A 10-day course of oral penicillin produces resolution of the dermatitis and other symptoms in most patients, but a relapse rate as high as 39% has been reported. Other treatment plans include amoxicillin, 40 mg/kg per day, divided into three doses, and/or topical applications of mupirocin 2% three times per day for 10 days. Penicillin, clindamycin phosphate, and erythromycin have also been used.
Although penicillin is generally recommended for treatment of GABHS infection, amoxicillin is often better tolerated in the pediatric population due to its superior palatability. Early antibiotic treatment causes a dramatic and rapid improvement of symptoms. However, according to Olson et al,4 PSD initially treated with amoxicillin or penicillin is consistently associated with a high risk of clinical recurrence. Whether treatment with a β-lactamase–resistant agent reduces this risk is uncertain.
Conclusion
This case represents an unusual presentation of scarlet fever manifesting as perianal dermatitis caused by GABHS. Although more common in the pediatric population, adult cases have been documented in the literature. As this case illustrates, early recognition and treatment with penicillin (or amoxicillin) produces rapid improvement and resolution of symptoms.
Dr Nibhanipudi is a professor of clinical emergency medicine at New York Medical College - Metropolitan Hospital Center, New York.
Case
The mother of a 3-year-old boy presented her son to the ED for evaluation after she noticed peeling of the skin in his perianal region. She stated that the peeling had started 1 day prior to presentation. Two days earlier, the mother had brought the same patient to the ED for evaluation of a fever, sore throat, and a slight rash over his face. The boy’s vital signs at the initial presentation were: temperature, 101.8°F; heart rate, 102 beats/minute; and respiratory rate, 28 breaths/minute. Oxygen saturation was 98% on room air.
During this first visit, the mother denied the child having had any fever, chills, headache, sore throat, facial rash, joint pain, or pain on defecation. He had no significant medical history and no known drug allergies. After examination, a throat culture was taken, and the patient was given acetaminophen and discharged home with a diagnosis of viral syndrome.
At the second presentation, physical examination revealed a well-developed child in no distress. The examination was negative except for a 4 x 2 cm area of desquamation present over the perianal region (Figure).
The area of desquamation was dry, mildly erythematous without discharge, and nontender. The patient’s vital signs at this presentation were stable, and he was afebrile. The remaining physical examination findings were normal. The throat culture taken during the first ED presentation was reported as negative. A perianal swab was sent for culture and sensitivity. This was later reported to be positive for group A β-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS), which is sensitive to penicillin. The patient was discharged home in the care of his mother with a prescription of penicillin. A 10-day follow-up showed complete resolution of the skin rash.
Discussion
The rash in this case was most likely the result of scarlet fever with an unusual presentation of PSD; the signs and symptoms of which include perianal erythema, itching, rectal pain, sometimes blood-streaked stools, rectal bleeding, irritation or pruritus, tissue loss and exudation, secondary constipation, and cellulitis. Perianal streptococcal dermatitis has also been described in the adult literature.2 As with pediatric cases, PSD in adults is usually caused by GABHS.
Evaluation and Diagnosis
A rapid streptococcal test of suspicious areas can confirm the diagnosis. Fever, sore throat, and arthralgia are rare; however, culture from the perianal region grows GABHS. Titers are usually not elevated in laboratory evaluation. A routine skin culture is an alternative diagnostic aid.
Brilliant2 described the bright red color of PSD as a sharply demarcated rash that is caused by GABHS. As previously stated, symptoms include perianal rash, itching, and rectal pain; blood-streaked stools may also be seen in one-third of patients. It primarily occurs in children between 6 months and 10 years of age and is often misdiagnosed and treated inappropriately.3
Prompt diagnosis of GABHS is important. If untreated, it can cause serious systemic infections, especially in elderly and in newborn patients. Treatment with antibiotics resolves the condition in the majority of patients.2 In the acute stage, a white pseudomembrane may be present. As the rash becomes more chronic, the perianal eruption may consist of painful fissures, a dry mucoid discharge, or psoriasiform plaques. Perianal dermatitis can also be caused by Staphylococcus aureus or Candida. Confirmation of the diagnosis is accomplished by culturing a moderate-to-heavy growth of GABHS on 5% sheep-blood agar.
Treatment
A 10-day course of oral penicillin produces resolution of the dermatitis and other symptoms in most patients, but a relapse rate as high as 39% has been reported. Other treatment plans include amoxicillin, 40 mg/kg per day, divided into three doses, and/or topical applications of mupirocin 2% three times per day for 10 days. Penicillin, clindamycin phosphate, and erythromycin have also been used.
Although penicillin is generally recommended for treatment of GABHS infection, amoxicillin is often better tolerated in the pediatric population due to its superior palatability. Early antibiotic treatment causes a dramatic and rapid improvement of symptoms. However, according to Olson et al,4 PSD initially treated with amoxicillin or penicillin is consistently associated with a high risk of clinical recurrence. Whether treatment with a β-lactamase–resistant agent reduces this risk is uncertain.
Conclusion
This case represents an unusual presentation of scarlet fever manifesting as perianal dermatitis caused by GABHS. Although more common in the pediatric population, adult cases have been documented in the literature. As this case illustrates, early recognition and treatment with penicillin (or amoxicillin) produces rapid improvement and resolution of symptoms.
Dr Nibhanipudi is a professor of clinical emergency medicine at New York Medical College - Metropolitan Hospital Center, New York.
- Case Report: Perianal Streptococcal Infection
- Landolt M, Heininger U. Prevalence of perianal streptococcal dermatitis in children and adolescents [in German]. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2005;94(38):1467-1471.
- Kahlke V, Jongen J, Peleikis HG, Herbst RA. Perianal streptococcal dermatitis in adults: its association with pruritic anorectal diseases is mainly caused by group B Streptococci. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(5):602-607.
- Brilliant LC. Perianal streptococcal dermatitis. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61(2):391-393.
- Olson D, Edmonson MB. Outcomes in children treated for perineal group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal dermatitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(11):933-936.
- Case Report: Perianal Streptococcal Infection
- Landolt M, Heininger U. Prevalence of perianal streptococcal dermatitis in children and adolescents [in German]. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2005;94(38):1467-1471.
- Kahlke V, Jongen J, Peleikis HG, Herbst RA. Perianal streptococcal dermatitis in adults: its association with pruritic anorectal diseases is mainly caused by group B Streptococci. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(5):602-607.
- Brilliant LC. Perianal streptococcal dermatitis. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61(2):391-393.
- Olson D, Edmonson MB. Outcomes in children treated for perineal group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal dermatitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(11):933-936.
Severe anal pain • perianal swelling • no history of injury to the area • Dx?
THE CASE
An 80-year-old man sought medical advice over the phone because he’d had sharp anal pain for 4 days. The pain increased during sitting and defecation. He was told he most likely had an acute anal fissure and was instructed to treat it with sitz baths, a stool-bulking agent, and a topical anesthetic. Despite these treatments, he continued to have intense anal pain.
Two days later, he presented to our practice complaining of severe anal discomfort and perianal swelling that made it almost impossible to sit. The patient led an active lifestyle and was otherwise healthy. He did not recall any injury to the perianal area.
THE DIAGNOSIS
During examination, we noted tender, erythematous swelling over the right perianal region at the 9 o’clock position without fluctuance, discharge, or ulceration. A digital rectal examination revealed a foreign body lying transversely across the anus about 2.5 cm from the anal verge. A pelvic x-ray confirmed the presence of a foreign body—a pin (FIGURE 1).
DISCUSSION
Anal pain is a common symptom that is usually caused by hemorrhoids, fissures, fistulas, or abscesses.1 Anal pain is rarely reported to be secondary to the ingestion of sharp foreign bodies, which can produce problems in the lower gastrointestinal tract.
Foreign body ingestion is most common in children ages 6 months to 6 years.2 When it occurs in adults, it tends to involve those who are older, patients without teeth, prisoners, patients under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or those with intellectual disabilities or psychiatric disorders.2,3
The foreign bodies that adults most commonly unintentionally ingest are bones from fish or other animals.2,4 Most of these pass through the alimentary tract uneventfully within a week.2,5,6 Swallowed bones have been known to cause perianal abscesses and anal fistulae, which can cause extreme pain.7
The presence of foreign bodies is not always easy to spot
In our patient’s case, the diagnosis was made by a careful digital rectal examination; however, a foreign body in an abscess cavity can be missed during a digital exam.8 In our patient’s case, a pelvic x-ray confirmed the presence and location of the pin.
Radiography is recommended as an initial screening method and is especially useful for determining the location of radiodense foreign bodies.2 However, most swallowed foreign bodies, such as non-radiodense fish bones, wood, thorns, plastic, small aluminum objects, and glass, cannot be detected by this method.3 Non-radiodense foreign bodies can be identified using computed tomography scanning.9
Removal is typically straightforward
The best method of removing a foreign body in the perianal region is by dilating the anus and then cutting the object in half. Alternatively, the object can be carefully dislodged from the anal canal by freeing one of the impacted ends. Care must be taken while removing the object to avoid accidental injury.
This procedure can be performed in any primary care setting that is adequately equipped for minor surgical services. Consider referral to a secondary care specialist based on the level of risk involved and the physician’s skills and training.
Our patient. After a complete assessment, we prepared the patient for gentle anal dilatation under intravenous conscious sedation. We carefully transected the 3.5 cm pin using a nail splitter (FIGURE 2). Because there was no abscess cavity, no other procedure was needed. We prescribed oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 500/125 mg every 8 hours for 7 days to treat a local infection.
After the procedure, we asked the patient about the pin. He said he had no idea how he could have ingested it and didn’t recall any abdominal pain during the previous month. Follow-up was normal, and he recovered without any complications.
THE TAKEAWAY
Consider the possibility of ingested sharp foreign bodies as a cause of severe anal pain, and perform a local and digital rectal examination. Radiography is recommended as an initial screening method. Following anal dilatation, the object can be removed by cutting it in half or by freeing one of the impacted ends.
1. Villalba H, Villalba S, Abbas MA. Anal fissure: a common cause of anal pain. Perm J. 2007;11:62-65.
2. Ambe P, Weber SA, Schauer M, et al. Swallowed foreign bodies in adults. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109:869-875.
3. Erbil B, Karaca MA, Aslaner MA, et al. Emergency admissions due to swallowed foreign bodies in adults. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:6447-6452.
4. Kuo CC, Jen TK, Wen CH, et al. Medical treatment for a fish bone-induced ileal micro-perforation: a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:5994-5998.
5. Low VHS, Killius JS. Animal, vegetable, or mineral: A collection of abdominal and alimentary foreign bodies. Appl Radiol. 2000;29:23-30.
6. McCanse DE, Kurchin A, Hinshaw JR. Gastrointestinal foreign bodies. Am J Surg. 1981;142:335-337.
7. Goligher JC, Nixon HH, Duthie HL. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 3rd ed. London: Baillière Tindall;1975:205-255.
8. Doublali M, Chouaib A, Elfassi MJ, et al. Perianal abscesses due to ingested foreign bodies. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3:395-397.
9. Coulier B, Tancredi MH, Ramboux A. Spiral CT and multidetector-row CT diagnosis of perforation of the small intestine caused by ingested foreign bodies. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1918-1925.
THE CASE
An 80-year-old man sought medical advice over the phone because he’d had sharp anal pain for 4 days. The pain increased during sitting and defecation. He was told he most likely had an acute anal fissure and was instructed to treat it with sitz baths, a stool-bulking agent, and a topical anesthetic. Despite these treatments, he continued to have intense anal pain.
Two days later, he presented to our practice complaining of severe anal discomfort and perianal swelling that made it almost impossible to sit. The patient led an active lifestyle and was otherwise healthy. He did not recall any injury to the perianal area.
THE DIAGNOSIS
During examination, we noted tender, erythematous swelling over the right perianal region at the 9 o’clock position without fluctuance, discharge, or ulceration. A digital rectal examination revealed a foreign body lying transversely across the anus about 2.5 cm from the anal verge. A pelvic x-ray confirmed the presence of a foreign body—a pin (FIGURE 1).
DISCUSSION
Anal pain is a common symptom that is usually caused by hemorrhoids, fissures, fistulas, or abscesses.1 Anal pain is rarely reported to be secondary to the ingestion of sharp foreign bodies, which can produce problems in the lower gastrointestinal tract.
Foreign body ingestion is most common in children ages 6 months to 6 years.2 When it occurs in adults, it tends to involve those who are older, patients without teeth, prisoners, patients under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or those with intellectual disabilities or psychiatric disorders.2,3
The foreign bodies that adults most commonly unintentionally ingest are bones from fish or other animals.2,4 Most of these pass through the alimentary tract uneventfully within a week.2,5,6 Swallowed bones have been known to cause perianal abscesses and anal fistulae, which can cause extreme pain.7
The presence of foreign bodies is not always easy to spot
In our patient’s case, the diagnosis was made by a careful digital rectal examination; however, a foreign body in an abscess cavity can be missed during a digital exam.8 In our patient’s case, a pelvic x-ray confirmed the presence and location of the pin.
Radiography is recommended as an initial screening method and is especially useful for determining the location of radiodense foreign bodies.2 However, most swallowed foreign bodies, such as non-radiodense fish bones, wood, thorns, plastic, small aluminum objects, and glass, cannot be detected by this method.3 Non-radiodense foreign bodies can be identified using computed tomography scanning.9
Removal is typically straightforward
The best method of removing a foreign body in the perianal region is by dilating the anus and then cutting the object in half. Alternatively, the object can be carefully dislodged from the anal canal by freeing one of the impacted ends. Care must be taken while removing the object to avoid accidental injury.
This procedure can be performed in any primary care setting that is adequately equipped for minor surgical services. Consider referral to a secondary care specialist based on the level of risk involved and the physician’s skills and training.
Our patient. After a complete assessment, we prepared the patient for gentle anal dilatation under intravenous conscious sedation. We carefully transected the 3.5 cm pin using a nail splitter (FIGURE 2). Because there was no abscess cavity, no other procedure was needed. We prescribed oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 500/125 mg every 8 hours for 7 days to treat a local infection.
After the procedure, we asked the patient about the pin. He said he had no idea how he could have ingested it and didn’t recall any abdominal pain during the previous month. Follow-up was normal, and he recovered without any complications.
THE TAKEAWAY
Consider the possibility of ingested sharp foreign bodies as a cause of severe anal pain, and perform a local and digital rectal examination. Radiography is recommended as an initial screening method. Following anal dilatation, the object can be removed by cutting it in half or by freeing one of the impacted ends.
THE CASE
An 80-year-old man sought medical advice over the phone because he’d had sharp anal pain for 4 days. The pain increased during sitting and defecation. He was told he most likely had an acute anal fissure and was instructed to treat it with sitz baths, a stool-bulking agent, and a topical anesthetic. Despite these treatments, he continued to have intense anal pain.
Two days later, he presented to our practice complaining of severe anal discomfort and perianal swelling that made it almost impossible to sit. The patient led an active lifestyle and was otherwise healthy. He did not recall any injury to the perianal area.
THE DIAGNOSIS
During examination, we noted tender, erythematous swelling over the right perianal region at the 9 o’clock position without fluctuance, discharge, or ulceration. A digital rectal examination revealed a foreign body lying transversely across the anus about 2.5 cm from the anal verge. A pelvic x-ray confirmed the presence of a foreign body—a pin (FIGURE 1).
DISCUSSION
Anal pain is a common symptom that is usually caused by hemorrhoids, fissures, fistulas, or abscesses.1 Anal pain is rarely reported to be secondary to the ingestion of sharp foreign bodies, which can produce problems in the lower gastrointestinal tract.
Foreign body ingestion is most common in children ages 6 months to 6 years.2 When it occurs in adults, it tends to involve those who are older, patients without teeth, prisoners, patients under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or those with intellectual disabilities or psychiatric disorders.2,3
The foreign bodies that adults most commonly unintentionally ingest are bones from fish or other animals.2,4 Most of these pass through the alimentary tract uneventfully within a week.2,5,6 Swallowed bones have been known to cause perianal abscesses and anal fistulae, which can cause extreme pain.7
The presence of foreign bodies is not always easy to spot
In our patient’s case, the diagnosis was made by a careful digital rectal examination; however, a foreign body in an abscess cavity can be missed during a digital exam.8 In our patient’s case, a pelvic x-ray confirmed the presence and location of the pin.
Radiography is recommended as an initial screening method and is especially useful for determining the location of radiodense foreign bodies.2 However, most swallowed foreign bodies, such as non-radiodense fish bones, wood, thorns, plastic, small aluminum objects, and glass, cannot be detected by this method.3 Non-radiodense foreign bodies can be identified using computed tomography scanning.9
Removal is typically straightforward
The best method of removing a foreign body in the perianal region is by dilating the anus and then cutting the object in half. Alternatively, the object can be carefully dislodged from the anal canal by freeing one of the impacted ends. Care must be taken while removing the object to avoid accidental injury.
This procedure can be performed in any primary care setting that is adequately equipped for minor surgical services. Consider referral to a secondary care specialist based on the level of risk involved and the physician’s skills and training.
Our patient. After a complete assessment, we prepared the patient for gentle anal dilatation under intravenous conscious sedation. We carefully transected the 3.5 cm pin using a nail splitter (FIGURE 2). Because there was no abscess cavity, no other procedure was needed. We prescribed oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 500/125 mg every 8 hours for 7 days to treat a local infection.
After the procedure, we asked the patient about the pin. He said he had no idea how he could have ingested it and didn’t recall any abdominal pain during the previous month. Follow-up was normal, and he recovered without any complications.
THE TAKEAWAY
Consider the possibility of ingested sharp foreign bodies as a cause of severe anal pain, and perform a local and digital rectal examination. Radiography is recommended as an initial screening method. Following anal dilatation, the object can be removed by cutting it in half or by freeing one of the impacted ends.
1. Villalba H, Villalba S, Abbas MA. Anal fissure: a common cause of anal pain. Perm J. 2007;11:62-65.
2. Ambe P, Weber SA, Schauer M, et al. Swallowed foreign bodies in adults. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109:869-875.
3. Erbil B, Karaca MA, Aslaner MA, et al. Emergency admissions due to swallowed foreign bodies in adults. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:6447-6452.
4. Kuo CC, Jen TK, Wen CH, et al. Medical treatment for a fish bone-induced ileal micro-perforation: a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:5994-5998.
5. Low VHS, Killius JS. Animal, vegetable, or mineral: A collection of abdominal and alimentary foreign bodies. Appl Radiol. 2000;29:23-30.
6. McCanse DE, Kurchin A, Hinshaw JR. Gastrointestinal foreign bodies. Am J Surg. 1981;142:335-337.
7. Goligher JC, Nixon HH, Duthie HL. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 3rd ed. London: Baillière Tindall;1975:205-255.
8. Doublali M, Chouaib A, Elfassi MJ, et al. Perianal abscesses due to ingested foreign bodies. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3:395-397.
9. Coulier B, Tancredi MH, Ramboux A. Spiral CT and multidetector-row CT diagnosis of perforation of the small intestine caused by ingested foreign bodies. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1918-1925.
1. Villalba H, Villalba S, Abbas MA. Anal fissure: a common cause of anal pain. Perm J. 2007;11:62-65.
2. Ambe P, Weber SA, Schauer M, et al. Swallowed foreign bodies in adults. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109:869-875.
3. Erbil B, Karaca MA, Aslaner MA, et al. Emergency admissions due to swallowed foreign bodies in adults. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:6447-6452.
4. Kuo CC, Jen TK, Wen CH, et al. Medical treatment for a fish bone-induced ileal micro-perforation: a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:5994-5998.
5. Low VHS, Killius JS. Animal, vegetable, or mineral: A collection of abdominal and alimentary foreign bodies. Appl Radiol. 2000;29:23-30.
6. McCanse DE, Kurchin A, Hinshaw JR. Gastrointestinal foreign bodies. Am J Surg. 1981;142:335-337.
7. Goligher JC, Nixon HH, Duthie HL. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 3rd ed. London: Baillière Tindall;1975:205-255.
8. Doublali M, Chouaib A, Elfassi MJ, et al. Perianal abscesses due to ingested foreign bodies. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3:395-397.
9. Coulier B, Tancredi MH, Ramboux A. Spiral CT and multidetector-row CT diagnosis of perforation of the small intestine caused by ingested foreign bodies. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1918-1925.
Isolated Brachialis Muscle Atrophy
Isolated brachialis muscle atrophy has been rarely reported. Among the few cases in the literature, 1 was attributed to a presumed compartment syndrome,1 1 to a displaced clavicle fracture,2 and 3 to neuralgic amyotrophy.3,4 We present a case of isolated brachialis muscle atrophy of unknown etiology, the presentation of which is consistent with neuralgic amyotrophy, also known as Parsonage-Turner syndrome or brachial plexitis. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
A 37-year-old right-handed highway worker presented for evaluation of right-arm muscle atrophy. One year earlier, while lifting heavy bags at work, he felt a painful strain in his right arm, although there was no bruising or swelling. Approximately 4 weeks after this incident, he developed right shoulder pain and began to notice a slight decrease in the muscle mass of his right anterior arm. On evaluation at an outside facility, the physician noted some brachialis muscle atrophy. His shoulder pain was attributed to acromioclavicular joint problems. After an initial trial of physical therapy that did not alleviate this joint pain, an acromioclavicular joint resection was performed, and his pain improved. The brachialis muscle atrophy continued to progress, however. Over the course of the next 6 months, the patient noticed a continually decreasing muscle mass in his right arm, as well as arm fatigue with routine recreational activities. On follow-up, again at an outside institution, the treating physicians noted continued atrophy of the distal arm corresponding to the region of the brachialis musculature. Magnetic resonance imaging showed continuity of the brachialis muscle and tendon, with muscle atrophy. The patient was able to return to work, although with a subjective decrease in right elbow flexion strength.
On presentation at our institution, the patient complained of right arm weakness with heavy use but did not have pain or sensory complaints. His medical history was otherwise unremarkable. Physical examination revealed obvious wasting of the right brachialis muscle, most notable on the lateral aspect of the distal arm (Figures 1, 2A, 2B). His biceps muscle was functioning with full strength and had a normal bulk. He had a normal range of active and passive motion, including full extension and flexion of both elbows, as well as complete pronosupination of the forearms. There was no focal tenderness. Manual muscle testing of both upper extremities was completely normal except for 4/5 flexion strength of the right elbow. Neurovascular examination also revealed normal findings, including intact sensation over the radiolateral forearm. A second magnetic resonance image showed that the brachialis muscle had completely atrophied. Because the clinical examination and imaging studies both indicated isolated brachialis atrophy without deficit elsewhere along the musculocutaneous nerve, electromyography was not performed. The patient was fully functional and working at his usual occupation, and no further intervention was recommended.
Discussion
Isolated wasting of the brachialis muscle is extremely rare with few reports in the literature. Farmer and colleagues1 reported a case of brachialis atrophy that was presumed to have resulted from exercise-induced chronic compartment syndrome. In that case, the patient developed a prodrome of arm pain followed by brachialis muscle atrophy. This patient was treated with oral anti-inflammatory agents with improvement in pain but without recovery of the brachialis muscle. While this case was attributed to compartment syndrome, it is likely that it represented neuralgic amyotrophy because there was no evidence of elbow flexion contracture, which would have accompanied true necrosis of the brachialis muscle as seen in compartment syndrome. However, acute compartment syndrome of the brachialis muscle after minor trauma has been reported.5 In that case, full-scale compartment syndrome was treated with rapid fasciotomy, with complete recovery of the brachialis.
Isolated brachialis atrophy has also been described in the setting of a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture in an elite athlete.2 Two fracture fragments were thought to have injured the brachial plexus, separately causing brachialis atrophy and altered sensation over the clavicular head of the deltoid muscle. Atrophy remained 1 year after injury.
Although it had been occasionally reported, the first large series of patients with sporadic neuralgic amyotrophy in the upper extremity was reported by Parsonage and Turner6 in 1948. They described 136 patients who developed flaccid paralysis and atrophy of various muscles of the shoulder girdle and/or upper extremity. This was generally preceded by acute pain in the shoulder girdle, often associated with antecedent viral infection, stress, illness, or other precipitating factors.
To our knowledge, there have been 3 other reported cases of neuralgic amyotrophy of the brachialis muscle. Watson and colleagues3 presented 2 patients with nonspecific, neurogenic shoulder pain after which an indolent, progressive atrophy of the brachialis muscle ensued.3 Van Tongel and colleagues4 described a more traditional case of Parsonage-Turner syndrome, with bilateral wasting of the shoulder girdle that also exhibited unilateral brachialis atrophy without affecting other muscles in the arm.4 Our case, with shoulder pain followed by muscle atrophy, fits the pattern of neuralgic amyotrophy.
Others have similarly described isolated wasting of 1 muscle with the sparing of other muscles with a common innervation. Isolated atrophy of the extensor or flexor pollicis longus has been reported as variants of either posterior or anterior interosseous neuropathy, respectively.7,8 Nerve fibers in the brachial plexus destined to innervate muscles supplied by the anterior interosseous nerve may be the cause of the motor deficit in cases of anterior interosseous nerve palsy, which seem to be associated with brachial plexitis.9
We present a case of isolated brachialis muscle atrophy after a minor trauma that may have resulted from Parsonage-Turner syndrome or a variant of brachial plexitis. The constellation of shoulder and arm pain, with subsequent muscle atrophy, makes this diagnosis likely.
1. Farmer KW, McFarland EG, Sonin A, Cosgarea AJ, Roehrig GJ. Isolated necrosis of the brachialis muscle due to exercise. Orthopedics. 2002;25(6):682-684.
2. Rüst CA, Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Rosemann T. Atrophy of the brachialis muscle after a displaced clavicle fracture in an Ironman triathlete: case report. J Brachial Plex Periph Nerve Inj. 2011;6(1):e44-e47.
3. Watson BV, Rose-Innes A, Engstrom JW, Brown JD. Isolated brachialis wasting: an unusual presentation of neuralgic amyotrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2001;24(12):1699-1702.
4. Van Tongel A, Schreurs M, Bruyninckx F, Debeer P. Bilateral Parsonage-Turner syndrome with unilateral brachialis muscle wasting: a case report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(8):e14-e16.
5. Jenkins NH, Mintowt-Czyz WJ. Compression of the biceps-brachialis compartment after trivial trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68(3):374.
6. Parsonage MJ, Turner JW. Neuralgic amyotrophy; the shoulder-girdle syndrome. Lancet. 1948;1(6513):973-978.
7. Horton TC. Isolated paralysis of the extensor pollicis longus muscle: a further variation of posterior interosseous nerve palsy. J Hand Surg Br. 2000;25(2):225-226.
8. Hill NA, Howard FM, Huffer BR. The incomplete anterior interosseous nerve syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 1985;10(1):4-16.
9. Rennels GD, Ochoa J. Neuralgic amyotrophy manifesting as anterior interosseous nerve palsy. Muscle Nerve. 1980;3(2):160-164.
Isolated brachialis muscle atrophy has been rarely reported. Among the few cases in the literature, 1 was attributed to a presumed compartment syndrome,1 1 to a displaced clavicle fracture,2 and 3 to neuralgic amyotrophy.3,4 We present a case of isolated brachialis muscle atrophy of unknown etiology, the presentation of which is consistent with neuralgic amyotrophy, also known as Parsonage-Turner syndrome or brachial plexitis. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
A 37-year-old right-handed highway worker presented for evaluation of right-arm muscle atrophy. One year earlier, while lifting heavy bags at work, he felt a painful strain in his right arm, although there was no bruising or swelling. Approximately 4 weeks after this incident, he developed right shoulder pain and began to notice a slight decrease in the muscle mass of his right anterior arm. On evaluation at an outside facility, the physician noted some brachialis muscle atrophy. His shoulder pain was attributed to acromioclavicular joint problems. After an initial trial of physical therapy that did not alleviate this joint pain, an acromioclavicular joint resection was performed, and his pain improved. The brachialis muscle atrophy continued to progress, however. Over the course of the next 6 months, the patient noticed a continually decreasing muscle mass in his right arm, as well as arm fatigue with routine recreational activities. On follow-up, again at an outside institution, the treating physicians noted continued atrophy of the distal arm corresponding to the region of the brachialis musculature. Magnetic resonance imaging showed continuity of the brachialis muscle and tendon, with muscle atrophy. The patient was able to return to work, although with a subjective decrease in right elbow flexion strength.
On presentation at our institution, the patient complained of right arm weakness with heavy use but did not have pain or sensory complaints. His medical history was otherwise unremarkable. Physical examination revealed obvious wasting of the right brachialis muscle, most notable on the lateral aspect of the distal arm (Figures 1, 2A, 2B). His biceps muscle was functioning with full strength and had a normal bulk. He had a normal range of active and passive motion, including full extension and flexion of both elbows, as well as complete pronosupination of the forearms. There was no focal tenderness. Manual muscle testing of both upper extremities was completely normal except for 4/5 flexion strength of the right elbow. Neurovascular examination also revealed normal findings, including intact sensation over the radiolateral forearm. A second magnetic resonance image showed that the brachialis muscle had completely atrophied. Because the clinical examination and imaging studies both indicated isolated brachialis atrophy without deficit elsewhere along the musculocutaneous nerve, electromyography was not performed. The patient was fully functional and working at his usual occupation, and no further intervention was recommended.
Discussion
Isolated wasting of the brachialis muscle is extremely rare with few reports in the literature. Farmer and colleagues1 reported a case of brachialis atrophy that was presumed to have resulted from exercise-induced chronic compartment syndrome. In that case, the patient developed a prodrome of arm pain followed by brachialis muscle atrophy. This patient was treated with oral anti-inflammatory agents with improvement in pain but without recovery of the brachialis muscle. While this case was attributed to compartment syndrome, it is likely that it represented neuralgic amyotrophy because there was no evidence of elbow flexion contracture, which would have accompanied true necrosis of the brachialis muscle as seen in compartment syndrome. However, acute compartment syndrome of the brachialis muscle after minor trauma has been reported.5 In that case, full-scale compartment syndrome was treated with rapid fasciotomy, with complete recovery of the brachialis.
Isolated brachialis atrophy has also been described in the setting of a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture in an elite athlete.2 Two fracture fragments were thought to have injured the brachial plexus, separately causing brachialis atrophy and altered sensation over the clavicular head of the deltoid muscle. Atrophy remained 1 year after injury.
Although it had been occasionally reported, the first large series of patients with sporadic neuralgic amyotrophy in the upper extremity was reported by Parsonage and Turner6 in 1948. They described 136 patients who developed flaccid paralysis and atrophy of various muscles of the shoulder girdle and/or upper extremity. This was generally preceded by acute pain in the shoulder girdle, often associated with antecedent viral infection, stress, illness, or other precipitating factors.
To our knowledge, there have been 3 other reported cases of neuralgic amyotrophy of the brachialis muscle. Watson and colleagues3 presented 2 patients with nonspecific, neurogenic shoulder pain after which an indolent, progressive atrophy of the brachialis muscle ensued.3 Van Tongel and colleagues4 described a more traditional case of Parsonage-Turner syndrome, with bilateral wasting of the shoulder girdle that also exhibited unilateral brachialis atrophy without affecting other muscles in the arm.4 Our case, with shoulder pain followed by muscle atrophy, fits the pattern of neuralgic amyotrophy.
Others have similarly described isolated wasting of 1 muscle with the sparing of other muscles with a common innervation. Isolated atrophy of the extensor or flexor pollicis longus has been reported as variants of either posterior or anterior interosseous neuropathy, respectively.7,8 Nerve fibers in the brachial plexus destined to innervate muscles supplied by the anterior interosseous nerve may be the cause of the motor deficit in cases of anterior interosseous nerve palsy, which seem to be associated with brachial plexitis.9
We present a case of isolated brachialis muscle atrophy after a minor trauma that may have resulted from Parsonage-Turner syndrome or a variant of brachial plexitis. The constellation of shoulder and arm pain, with subsequent muscle atrophy, makes this diagnosis likely.
Isolated brachialis muscle atrophy has been rarely reported. Among the few cases in the literature, 1 was attributed to a presumed compartment syndrome,1 1 to a displaced clavicle fracture,2 and 3 to neuralgic amyotrophy.3,4 We present a case of isolated brachialis muscle atrophy of unknown etiology, the presentation of which is consistent with neuralgic amyotrophy, also known as Parsonage-Turner syndrome or brachial plexitis. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
A 37-year-old right-handed highway worker presented for evaluation of right-arm muscle atrophy. One year earlier, while lifting heavy bags at work, he felt a painful strain in his right arm, although there was no bruising or swelling. Approximately 4 weeks after this incident, he developed right shoulder pain and began to notice a slight decrease in the muscle mass of his right anterior arm. On evaluation at an outside facility, the physician noted some brachialis muscle atrophy. His shoulder pain was attributed to acromioclavicular joint problems. After an initial trial of physical therapy that did not alleviate this joint pain, an acromioclavicular joint resection was performed, and his pain improved. The brachialis muscle atrophy continued to progress, however. Over the course of the next 6 months, the patient noticed a continually decreasing muscle mass in his right arm, as well as arm fatigue with routine recreational activities. On follow-up, again at an outside institution, the treating physicians noted continued atrophy of the distal arm corresponding to the region of the brachialis musculature. Magnetic resonance imaging showed continuity of the brachialis muscle and tendon, with muscle atrophy. The patient was able to return to work, although with a subjective decrease in right elbow flexion strength.
On presentation at our institution, the patient complained of right arm weakness with heavy use but did not have pain or sensory complaints. His medical history was otherwise unremarkable. Physical examination revealed obvious wasting of the right brachialis muscle, most notable on the lateral aspect of the distal arm (Figures 1, 2A, 2B). His biceps muscle was functioning with full strength and had a normal bulk. He had a normal range of active and passive motion, including full extension and flexion of both elbows, as well as complete pronosupination of the forearms. There was no focal tenderness. Manual muscle testing of both upper extremities was completely normal except for 4/5 flexion strength of the right elbow. Neurovascular examination also revealed normal findings, including intact sensation over the radiolateral forearm. A second magnetic resonance image showed that the brachialis muscle had completely atrophied. Because the clinical examination and imaging studies both indicated isolated brachialis atrophy without deficit elsewhere along the musculocutaneous nerve, electromyography was not performed. The patient was fully functional and working at his usual occupation, and no further intervention was recommended.
Discussion
Isolated wasting of the brachialis muscle is extremely rare with few reports in the literature. Farmer and colleagues1 reported a case of brachialis atrophy that was presumed to have resulted from exercise-induced chronic compartment syndrome. In that case, the patient developed a prodrome of arm pain followed by brachialis muscle atrophy. This patient was treated with oral anti-inflammatory agents with improvement in pain but without recovery of the brachialis muscle. While this case was attributed to compartment syndrome, it is likely that it represented neuralgic amyotrophy because there was no evidence of elbow flexion contracture, which would have accompanied true necrosis of the brachialis muscle as seen in compartment syndrome. However, acute compartment syndrome of the brachialis muscle after minor trauma has been reported.5 In that case, full-scale compartment syndrome was treated with rapid fasciotomy, with complete recovery of the brachialis.
Isolated brachialis atrophy has also been described in the setting of a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture in an elite athlete.2 Two fracture fragments were thought to have injured the brachial plexus, separately causing brachialis atrophy and altered sensation over the clavicular head of the deltoid muscle. Atrophy remained 1 year after injury.
Although it had been occasionally reported, the first large series of patients with sporadic neuralgic amyotrophy in the upper extremity was reported by Parsonage and Turner6 in 1948. They described 136 patients who developed flaccid paralysis and atrophy of various muscles of the shoulder girdle and/or upper extremity. This was generally preceded by acute pain in the shoulder girdle, often associated with antecedent viral infection, stress, illness, or other precipitating factors.
To our knowledge, there have been 3 other reported cases of neuralgic amyotrophy of the brachialis muscle. Watson and colleagues3 presented 2 patients with nonspecific, neurogenic shoulder pain after which an indolent, progressive atrophy of the brachialis muscle ensued.3 Van Tongel and colleagues4 described a more traditional case of Parsonage-Turner syndrome, with bilateral wasting of the shoulder girdle that also exhibited unilateral brachialis atrophy without affecting other muscles in the arm.4 Our case, with shoulder pain followed by muscle atrophy, fits the pattern of neuralgic amyotrophy.
Others have similarly described isolated wasting of 1 muscle with the sparing of other muscles with a common innervation. Isolated atrophy of the extensor or flexor pollicis longus has been reported as variants of either posterior or anterior interosseous neuropathy, respectively.7,8 Nerve fibers in the brachial plexus destined to innervate muscles supplied by the anterior interosseous nerve may be the cause of the motor deficit in cases of anterior interosseous nerve palsy, which seem to be associated with brachial plexitis.9
We present a case of isolated brachialis muscle atrophy after a minor trauma that may have resulted from Parsonage-Turner syndrome or a variant of brachial plexitis. The constellation of shoulder and arm pain, with subsequent muscle atrophy, makes this diagnosis likely.
1. Farmer KW, McFarland EG, Sonin A, Cosgarea AJ, Roehrig GJ. Isolated necrosis of the brachialis muscle due to exercise. Orthopedics. 2002;25(6):682-684.
2. Rüst CA, Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Rosemann T. Atrophy of the brachialis muscle after a displaced clavicle fracture in an Ironman triathlete: case report. J Brachial Plex Periph Nerve Inj. 2011;6(1):e44-e47.
3. Watson BV, Rose-Innes A, Engstrom JW, Brown JD. Isolated brachialis wasting: an unusual presentation of neuralgic amyotrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2001;24(12):1699-1702.
4. Van Tongel A, Schreurs M, Bruyninckx F, Debeer P. Bilateral Parsonage-Turner syndrome with unilateral brachialis muscle wasting: a case report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(8):e14-e16.
5. Jenkins NH, Mintowt-Czyz WJ. Compression of the biceps-brachialis compartment after trivial trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68(3):374.
6. Parsonage MJ, Turner JW. Neuralgic amyotrophy; the shoulder-girdle syndrome. Lancet. 1948;1(6513):973-978.
7. Horton TC. Isolated paralysis of the extensor pollicis longus muscle: a further variation of posterior interosseous nerve palsy. J Hand Surg Br. 2000;25(2):225-226.
8. Hill NA, Howard FM, Huffer BR. The incomplete anterior interosseous nerve syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 1985;10(1):4-16.
9. Rennels GD, Ochoa J. Neuralgic amyotrophy manifesting as anterior interosseous nerve palsy. Muscle Nerve. 1980;3(2):160-164.
1. Farmer KW, McFarland EG, Sonin A, Cosgarea AJ, Roehrig GJ. Isolated necrosis of the brachialis muscle due to exercise. Orthopedics. 2002;25(6):682-684.
2. Rüst CA, Knechtle B, Knechtle P, Rosemann T. Atrophy of the brachialis muscle after a displaced clavicle fracture in an Ironman triathlete: case report. J Brachial Plex Periph Nerve Inj. 2011;6(1):e44-e47.
3. Watson BV, Rose-Innes A, Engstrom JW, Brown JD. Isolated brachialis wasting: an unusual presentation of neuralgic amyotrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2001;24(12):1699-1702.
4. Van Tongel A, Schreurs M, Bruyninckx F, Debeer P. Bilateral Parsonage-Turner syndrome with unilateral brachialis muscle wasting: a case report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(8):e14-e16.
5. Jenkins NH, Mintowt-Czyz WJ. Compression of the biceps-brachialis compartment after trivial trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68(3):374.
6. Parsonage MJ, Turner JW. Neuralgic amyotrophy; the shoulder-girdle syndrome. Lancet. 1948;1(6513):973-978.
7. Horton TC. Isolated paralysis of the extensor pollicis longus muscle: a further variation of posterior interosseous nerve palsy. J Hand Surg Br. 2000;25(2):225-226.
8. Hill NA, Howard FM, Huffer BR. The incomplete anterior interosseous nerve syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 1985;10(1):4-16.
9. Rennels GD, Ochoa J. Neuralgic amyotrophy manifesting as anterior interosseous nerve palsy. Muscle Nerve. 1980;3(2):160-164.
Giant Bone Island of the Tibia in a Child
A bone island is a focus of normal cortical bone located within the medullary cavity. The vast majority of bone islands are small, measuring from 1 mm to 2 cm in size. They are found more frequently in adults than in children. The lesion can be virtually diagnosed on the basis of its characteristic clinical and imaging features. Differential diagnosis may be difficult when the lesion manifests itself uncharacteristically by being symptomatic, very large, and hot on bone scan.1-4
The term giant bone island has been used to describe a large lesion1 that measures more than 2 cm in any dimension.5 Giant bone islands have been described only in adults,1,5-15 and the longest bone island length reported is 10.5 cm.10 They are usually symptomatic and associated with increased radionuclide uptake on bone scintigraphy.14
The history and the clinical and imaging presentation of an even longer, symptomatic, and scintigraphically hot lesion in the tibial diaphysis of a 10-year-old boy is reported. The lesion further exhibited several atypical imaging features necessitating an open biopsy, which confirmed the diagnosis of a giant bone island. The pertinent differential diagnosis and the clinical and radiographic findings after 15-year follow-up are also presented and discussed. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
A 10-year-old boy was admitted for surgical repair of an inguinal hernia. Physical examination revealed a painless but tender anterior bowing of the right tibial diaphysis. The patient was a healthy-appearing white male with normal vital signs, gait, and posture. His parents noticed a slight protuberance of the tibia at age 2.5 years. No medical advice was asked for the bone swelling after that time. After recovery from the inguinal hernia repair 3 weeks later, the bone lesion was thoroughly examined. Radiographs showed an oblong, homogenous region of dense sclerosis in the diaphysis of the right tibia. The lesion had relatively well-defined margins and was located in the medullary cavity. Speculations were not obvious in the periphery of the lesion, which exhibited a sharp circumscription (Figures 1A, 1B). A well-defined lytic area was evident at the distal part of the lesion (Figure 1B). There was no periosteal reaction. Blood and serum chemistries were within normal limits, including serum calcium, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase. A conventional 3-phase bone scintigraphy (300 MBq) with technetium-99m HDP (hydroxydiphosphonate) indicated increased uptake in the area of the lesion but no other skeletal abnormality (Figure 2). Computed tomography (CT) showed that the lesion was purely intramedullary and densely blastic. The lesion originated from the medial cortex, which was thickened (Figure 3A). The lesion extended to the anterolateral cortex, which was thinned and included a lytic area. In the distal part of the lesion, the anterolateral cortex was thickened, included lytic areas, and exhibited an anterior portion of cortical destruction (Figure 3B). The fatty marrow adjacent to the region of sclerosis appeared normal. There was no evidence of extraosseous soft-tissue changes. On both T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the lesion exhibited low-signal intensity. The lesion measured 10.8×2.2×1 cm. It originated from the medial cortical bone of the tibia, blended into the medullary cavity, and extended anteriorly towards and through the anterior cortex. The area of cortical destruction was clearly evident on the axial MRI. The periosteum was displaced and eroded anteriorly by focal radiating bony streaks. No enhancement was seen after the intravenous administration of gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) as a contrast medium. There were no extraosseous soft-tissue changes. In the distal part of the lesion, sagittal and axial MRI showed a 1.2×0.8×0.7-cm well-defined ovoid focus, with characteristics of cystic degeneration that exhibited intermediate-signal intensity on T1-weighted MRI (Figure 4) and high-signal intensity on T2-weighted MRI.
An open biopsy was performed. Macroscopically, a wedge of compact bone measuring 3×1.7×0.6 cm was taken. Microscopic examination showed a thinned periphery of lamellar (mature) bone with haversian canals and, beneath it, woven (immature) bone with long-surface processes projecting within adjacent cancellous bone (Figure 5A). The woven bone contained loose vascular fibrous tissue. No osteoclasts were noted, and the very few osteoblasts lining the bone trabeculae were small, single-layered, and flat (Figure 5B). There was no evidence of neoplastic cells. There was no abnormality of the periosteum and the surrounding soft tissues.
The histology was pathognomonic of a giant bone island. No additional surgical intervention was recommended.
The postoperative course was uncomplicated, and the patient was discharged 2 weeks later. An above-the-knee plaster was recommended for 3 months and a below-the-knee splint for an additional 2-month period. Full weight-bearing was allowed only after the postsurgical sixth month to prevent an impending fracture. The tibial bowing was tender to pressure or palpation, and the patient reported mild spontaneous pain during follow-up. Radiographs 1 year after surgery indicated that the bone area removed for biopsy was replaced by compact bone. MRI performed 4 years after surgery showed that the volume of the lesion in relation to the host bone was not changed.
At the last follow-up 15 years after surgery, the anterior tibial bowing was not changed (Figure 6A), but the patient additionally complained of skin irritation after intense training wearing boots during military service. The radiographic appearance of the lesion was also not changed, while the periphery of the lesion exhibited scarce radiating bony streaks with rounded contours (Figures 6B, 6C). The clinical symptoms and signs from wearing military boots completely subsided after a couple of weeks’ rest from daily army activities, but the mild spontaneous pain and the local tenderness over the tibial bowing persisted.
Discussion
Giant bone islands are more likely to be associated with clinical symptoms than the usual small-sized bone island. Some degree of pain was detected in 8 of 10 patients with a giant bone island presented in the literature, but it was induced by trauma in 3 of them.14
Radiographic appearance is among the distinguishing diagnostic features of a giant bone island. It appears as an ovoid, round, or oblong, homogenously dense, single or multiple focus of sclerosis within the medullary cavity; it is oriented along the long axis of the host bone, and it exhibits peripheral pseudopodia or radiating spicules producing the typical “thorny” or “paintbrush” appearance.8,16,17 It does not exhibit cortical penetration and it is not associated with periosteal reaction.10
The CT findings include a sclerotic and hyperdense focus with spiculated margins extending into the adjacent cancellous bone. The lack of bone destruction and soft-tissue mass are also diagnostic.3,7 MRI findings will reflect the low-signal intensity characteristics of cortical bone on all pulse sequences.18
Enostoses usually exhibit no activity on skeletal scintigraphy, while giant lesions generally show increased radiotracer uptake.5,9-11,14,19-27 The latter may result from the increased amount of bone turnover, which is seen more often with larger lesions because of active bone deposition and remodeling.20,21,23,28 Histopathology of a giant bone island appears identical to the well-described pathologic appearance of smaller bone islands. The lesion is composed of compact lamellar bone and haversian systems, which blend with the adjacent spongiosa. The surrounding cancellous bone forms thorn-like trabeculae radiating from the lesion and merging with the cancellous bone.1,4,5,8,28
The presumptive diagnosis of a bone island is based on the clinical findings, imaging features, and follow-up examinations. An asymptomatic, isolated, sclerotic bone lesion showing the typical features of a bone island on plain radiography, CT, and MRI, whatever its size, that is nonactive on bone scan may be easily diagnosed. However, a symptomatic patient with a hot lesion on scintigraphy should be carefully observed. In addition, larger lesions may raise the suspicion of a neoplasm, such as a sclerotic variant of osteosarcoma. In such cases, an open biopsy may be undertaken. No specific treatment is required after the diagnosis has been confirmed. There is no literature to suggest that, after adequate biopsy confirmation, excision or resection is necessary. Follow-up radiographic examination of the lesion should be suggested to monitor for any potential growth.2,10,23
The first giant bone island appearing in a child is presented in this report. The lack of a causative factor leading to the anterior tibial bowing indicated that the bone deformity was caused primarily by the lesion. The present case is unusual for the appearance of several atypical features, some of which have not been previously described. Peripheral radiating spiculated margin was absent on the patient’s initial radiographs and CT imaging. MRI indicated only the presence of radiating bony streaks that displaced and eroded the periosteum on the anterior border of the lesion. The CT findings that the lesion likely originated or was in close proximity with the medial cortex of the tibia were also atypical. It has been previously reported that spinal lesions located immediately below the cortex tend to fuse with the endosteal surface, while similar features may also be seen in the appendicular enostoses.4,29 Other CT findings, such as the thinning of the overlying anterolateral cortical bone, as well as the cortical thickening at the periphery of the lesion associated with areas of soft-tissue attenuation and anterior cortical destruction, have not been described even in the atypical features of a giant bone island. The lytic area resembling a nidus that was evident at the distal part of the lesion was more likely consistent with an area of resorption, which, although rare, has been described on giant lesions.2,9,29 The substantial amount of woven bone transforming to lamellar bone that was evident in the present patient’s microscopic features is also an atypical finding, although it may be expected to some degree in scintigraphically hot, large lesions.28 The clinical and imaging progress of the lesion supported the diagnosis of a giant bone island. The degree of the anterior tibial bowing and the volume of the lesion in relation to the host bone were not changed throughout the follow-up period, indicating that the growth of the lesion followed the growth of the normal bone.
The differential diagnosis of a giant bone island includes a variety of benign tumors and tumor-like lesions, as well as malignant bone lesions.2,4,23,28,30,31 In the patient presented in this report, the diagnosis of an atypical sclerotic presentation of a nonossifying fibroma or healing stage of this lesion could be consistent with some of the CT findings, including the eccentric origin from the cortex associated with medial cortical thickening, the anterolateral cortical thinning, and the soft-tissue attenuation of cortical areas. In addition, unifocal osteofibrous dysplasia may also present with a long intracortical diaphyseal lucency within an area of marked cortical sclerosis and cause a bowing deformity. Both diagnoses were excluded, since no fibrous stroma was evident on the histologic examination of the lesion. A large or giant long-bone osteoma would be associated with the outer cortical margin of bone but would not involve the intramedullary space. The scintigraphically increased uptake of radioisotope, as well as the CT and MRI findings, were not consistent with the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, or osteomyelitis. Although most imaging findings were consistent with a benign lesion, and contrast-enhanced MRI showed no increased vascularity, anterior cortical disruption necessitated a bone biopsy to rule out any potential malignancy.
The histopathology in association with the clinical and imaging findings indicated the diagnosis of a giant bone island. The increased proportion of maturing woven bone over lamellar bone indicated an active remodeling lesion that could be related to the patient’s age, since the clinical and radiographic features of the lesion were not changed after 15-year follow-up.
Conclusion
This is the first giant bone island diagnosed in a patient before puberty. Its greatest length was 10.8 cm, which is the longest reported in the literature. The imaging appearance included several atypical features that are very rare or have not been reported. Microscopic features indicated less mature lamellar bone and a prominent proportion of maturing woven bone. The clinical and the radiographic appearance of the lesion were not changed after 15-year follow-up.
1. Smith J. Giant bone islands. Radiology. 1973;7(1):35-36.
2. Mirra JM. Bone Tumors: Clinical, Radiologic and Pathologic Correlations. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1989.
3. Greenspan A. Bone island (enostosis): current concept - a review. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24(2):111-115.
4. Kransdorf MJ, Peterson JJ, Bancroft LW. MR imaging of the knee: incidental osseous lesions. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45(6):943-954.
5. Gold RH, Mirra JM, Remotti F, Pignatti G. Case report 527: Giant bone island of tibia. Skeletal Radiol. 1989;18(2):129-132.
6. Onitsuka H. Roentgenologic aspects of bone islands. Radiology. 1977;123(3):607-612.
7. Ehara S, Kattapuram SV, Rosenberg AE. Giant bone island. Computed tomography findings. Clin Imaging. 1989;13(3):231-233.
8. Greenspan A, Steiner G, Knutzon R. Bone island (enostosis): clinical significance and radiologic and pathologic correlations. Skeletal Radiol. 1991;20(2):85-90.
9. Avery GR, Wilsdon JB, Malcolm AJ. Giant bone island with some central resorption. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24(1):59-60.
10. Brien EW, Mirra JM, Latanza L, Fedenko A, Luck J Jr. Giant bone island of femur. Case report, literature review, and its distinction from low grade osteosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24(7):546-550.
11. Greenspan A, Klein MJ. Giant bone island. Skeletal Radiol. 1996;25(1):67-69.
12. Trombetti A, Noël E. Giant bone islands: a case with 31 years of follow-up. Joint Bone Spine. 2002;69(1):81-84.
13. Dhaon BK, Gautam VK, Jain P, Jaiswal A, Nigam V. Giant bone island of femur complicating replacement arthroplasty: a report of two cases. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2004;13(4):220-223.
14. Park HS, Kim JR, Lee SY, Jang KY. Symptomatic giant (10-cm) bone island of the tibia. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34(6):347-350.
15. Ikeuchi M, Komatsu M, Tani T. Giant bone island of femur with femoral head necrosis: a case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(4):447-450.
16. Kim SK, Barry WF Jr. Bone island. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1964;92:1301-1306.
17. Kim SK, Barry WF Jr. Bone islands. Radiology. 1968;90(1):77-78.
18. Cerase A, Priolo F. Skeletal benign bone-forming lesions. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27:S91–S97.
19. Go RT, El-Khoury GY, Wehbe MA. Radionuclide bone image in growing and stable bone island. Skeletal Radiol. 1980;5(1):15-18.
20. Hall FM, Goldberg RP, Davies JA, Fainsinger MH. Scintigraphic assessment of bone islands. Radiology. 1980;135(3):737-742.
21. Greenspan A, Stadalnik RC. Bone island: scintigraphic findings and their clinical application. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1995;46(5):368-379.
22. Sickles EA, Genant HK, Hoffer PB. Increased localization of 99mTc-pyrophosphate in a bone island: case report. J Nucl Med. 1976;17(2):113-115.
23. Dorfman HD, Czerniak B. Bone Tumors. St Louis: Mosby; 1998.
24. Ngan H. Growing bone islands. Clin Radiol. 1972;23(2):199-201.
25. Davies JA, Hall FM, Goldberg RP, Kasdon EJ. Positive bone scan in a bone island. Case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(6):943-945.
26. Simon K, Mulligan ME. Growing bone islands revisited. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(5):809-811.
27. Blank N, Lieber A. The significance of growing bone islands. Radiology. 1965;85(3):508-511.
28. Greenspan A, Gernot J, Wolfgang R. Differential Diagnosis of Orthopaedic Oncology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
29. Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. Osseous tumors. In: Davies AM, Sundaram M, James SLJ, eds. Imaging of Bone Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2009.
30. Mödder B, Guhl B, Schaefer HE. Growing bone islands as differential diagnosis of osteoplastic metastases. Rontgenblatter. 1980;33(6):286-288.
31. Flechner RE, Mills SE. Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Bones and Joints. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1993.
A bone island is a focus of normal cortical bone located within the medullary cavity. The vast majority of bone islands are small, measuring from 1 mm to 2 cm in size. They are found more frequently in adults than in children. The lesion can be virtually diagnosed on the basis of its characteristic clinical and imaging features. Differential diagnosis may be difficult when the lesion manifests itself uncharacteristically by being symptomatic, very large, and hot on bone scan.1-4
The term giant bone island has been used to describe a large lesion1 that measures more than 2 cm in any dimension.5 Giant bone islands have been described only in adults,1,5-15 and the longest bone island length reported is 10.5 cm.10 They are usually symptomatic and associated with increased radionuclide uptake on bone scintigraphy.14
The history and the clinical and imaging presentation of an even longer, symptomatic, and scintigraphically hot lesion in the tibial diaphysis of a 10-year-old boy is reported. The lesion further exhibited several atypical imaging features necessitating an open biopsy, which confirmed the diagnosis of a giant bone island. The pertinent differential diagnosis and the clinical and radiographic findings after 15-year follow-up are also presented and discussed. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
A 10-year-old boy was admitted for surgical repair of an inguinal hernia. Physical examination revealed a painless but tender anterior bowing of the right tibial diaphysis. The patient was a healthy-appearing white male with normal vital signs, gait, and posture. His parents noticed a slight protuberance of the tibia at age 2.5 years. No medical advice was asked for the bone swelling after that time. After recovery from the inguinal hernia repair 3 weeks later, the bone lesion was thoroughly examined. Radiographs showed an oblong, homogenous region of dense sclerosis in the diaphysis of the right tibia. The lesion had relatively well-defined margins and was located in the medullary cavity. Speculations were not obvious in the periphery of the lesion, which exhibited a sharp circumscription (Figures 1A, 1B). A well-defined lytic area was evident at the distal part of the lesion (Figure 1B). There was no periosteal reaction. Blood and serum chemistries were within normal limits, including serum calcium, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase. A conventional 3-phase bone scintigraphy (300 MBq) with technetium-99m HDP (hydroxydiphosphonate) indicated increased uptake in the area of the lesion but no other skeletal abnormality (Figure 2). Computed tomography (CT) showed that the lesion was purely intramedullary and densely blastic. The lesion originated from the medial cortex, which was thickened (Figure 3A). The lesion extended to the anterolateral cortex, which was thinned and included a lytic area. In the distal part of the lesion, the anterolateral cortex was thickened, included lytic areas, and exhibited an anterior portion of cortical destruction (Figure 3B). The fatty marrow adjacent to the region of sclerosis appeared normal. There was no evidence of extraosseous soft-tissue changes. On both T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the lesion exhibited low-signal intensity. The lesion measured 10.8×2.2×1 cm. It originated from the medial cortical bone of the tibia, blended into the medullary cavity, and extended anteriorly towards and through the anterior cortex. The area of cortical destruction was clearly evident on the axial MRI. The periosteum was displaced and eroded anteriorly by focal radiating bony streaks. No enhancement was seen after the intravenous administration of gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) as a contrast medium. There were no extraosseous soft-tissue changes. In the distal part of the lesion, sagittal and axial MRI showed a 1.2×0.8×0.7-cm well-defined ovoid focus, with characteristics of cystic degeneration that exhibited intermediate-signal intensity on T1-weighted MRI (Figure 4) and high-signal intensity on T2-weighted MRI.
An open biopsy was performed. Macroscopically, a wedge of compact bone measuring 3×1.7×0.6 cm was taken. Microscopic examination showed a thinned periphery of lamellar (mature) bone with haversian canals and, beneath it, woven (immature) bone with long-surface processes projecting within adjacent cancellous bone (Figure 5A). The woven bone contained loose vascular fibrous tissue. No osteoclasts were noted, and the very few osteoblasts lining the bone trabeculae were small, single-layered, and flat (Figure 5B). There was no evidence of neoplastic cells. There was no abnormality of the periosteum and the surrounding soft tissues.
The histology was pathognomonic of a giant bone island. No additional surgical intervention was recommended.
The postoperative course was uncomplicated, and the patient was discharged 2 weeks later. An above-the-knee plaster was recommended for 3 months and a below-the-knee splint for an additional 2-month period. Full weight-bearing was allowed only after the postsurgical sixth month to prevent an impending fracture. The tibial bowing was tender to pressure or palpation, and the patient reported mild spontaneous pain during follow-up. Radiographs 1 year after surgery indicated that the bone area removed for biopsy was replaced by compact bone. MRI performed 4 years after surgery showed that the volume of the lesion in relation to the host bone was not changed.
At the last follow-up 15 years after surgery, the anterior tibial bowing was not changed (Figure 6A), but the patient additionally complained of skin irritation after intense training wearing boots during military service. The radiographic appearance of the lesion was also not changed, while the periphery of the lesion exhibited scarce radiating bony streaks with rounded contours (Figures 6B, 6C). The clinical symptoms and signs from wearing military boots completely subsided after a couple of weeks’ rest from daily army activities, but the mild spontaneous pain and the local tenderness over the tibial bowing persisted.
Discussion
Giant bone islands are more likely to be associated with clinical symptoms than the usual small-sized bone island. Some degree of pain was detected in 8 of 10 patients with a giant bone island presented in the literature, but it was induced by trauma in 3 of them.14
Radiographic appearance is among the distinguishing diagnostic features of a giant bone island. It appears as an ovoid, round, or oblong, homogenously dense, single or multiple focus of sclerosis within the medullary cavity; it is oriented along the long axis of the host bone, and it exhibits peripheral pseudopodia or radiating spicules producing the typical “thorny” or “paintbrush” appearance.8,16,17 It does not exhibit cortical penetration and it is not associated with periosteal reaction.10
The CT findings include a sclerotic and hyperdense focus with spiculated margins extending into the adjacent cancellous bone. The lack of bone destruction and soft-tissue mass are also diagnostic.3,7 MRI findings will reflect the low-signal intensity characteristics of cortical bone on all pulse sequences.18
Enostoses usually exhibit no activity on skeletal scintigraphy, while giant lesions generally show increased radiotracer uptake.5,9-11,14,19-27 The latter may result from the increased amount of bone turnover, which is seen more often with larger lesions because of active bone deposition and remodeling.20,21,23,28 Histopathology of a giant bone island appears identical to the well-described pathologic appearance of smaller bone islands. The lesion is composed of compact lamellar bone and haversian systems, which blend with the adjacent spongiosa. The surrounding cancellous bone forms thorn-like trabeculae radiating from the lesion and merging with the cancellous bone.1,4,5,8,28
The presumptive diagnosis of a bone island is based on the clinical findings, imaging features, and follow-up examinations. An asymptomatic, isolated, sclerotic bone lesion showing the typical features of a bone island on plain radiography, CT, and MRI, whatever its size, that is nonactive on bone scan may be easily diagnosed. However, a symptomatic patient with a hot lesion on scintigraphy should be carefully observed. In addition, larger lesions may raise the suspicion of a neoplasm, such as a sclerotic variant of osteosarcoma. In such cases, an open biopsy may be undertaken. No specific treatment is required after the diagnosis has been confirmed. There is no literature to suggest that, after adequate biopsy confirmation, excision or resection is necessary. Follow-up radiographic examination of the lesion should be suggested to monitor for any potential growth.2,10,23
The first giant bone island appearing in a child is presented in this report. The lack of a causative factor leading to the anterior tibial bowing indicated that the bone deformity was caused primarily by the lesion. The present case is unusual for the appearance of several atypical features, some of which have not been previously described. Peripheral radiating spiculated margin was absent on the patient’s initial radiographs and CT imaging. MRI indicated only the presence of radiating bony streaks that displaced and eroded the periosteum on the anterior border of the lesion. The CT findings that the lesion likely originated or was in close proximity with the medial cortex of the tibia were also atypical. It has been previously reported that spinal lesions located immediately below the cortex tend to fuse with the endosteal surface, while similar features may also be seen in the appendicular enostoses.4,29 Other CT findings, such as the thinning of the overlying anterolateral cortical bone, as well as the cortical thickening at the periphery of the lesion associated with areas of soft-tissue attenuation and anterior cortical destruction, have not been described even in the atypical features of a giant bone island. The lytic area resembling a nidus that was evident at the distal part of the lesion was more likely consistent with an area of resorption, which, although rare, has been described on giant lesions.2,9,29 The substantial amount of woven bone transforming to lamellar bone that was evident in the present patient’s microscopic features is also an atypical finding, although it may be expected to some degree in scintigraphically hot, large lesions.28 The clinical and imaging progress of the lesion supported the diagnosis of a giant bone island. The degree of the anterior tibial bowing and the volume of the lesion in relation to the host bone were not changed throughout the follow-up period, indicating that the growth of the lesion followed the growth of the normal bone.
The differential diagnosis of a giant bone island includes a variety of benign tumors and tumor-like lesions, as well as malignant bone lesions.2,4,23,28,30,31 In the patient presented in this report, the diagnosis of an atypical sclerotic presentation of a nonossifying fibroma or healing stage of this lesion could be consistent with some of the CT findings, including the eccentric origin from the cortex associated with medial cortical thickening, the anterolateral cortical thinning, and the soft-tissue attenuation of cortical areas. In addition, unifocal osteofibrous dysplasia may also present with a long intracortical diaphyseal lucency within an area of marked cortical sclerosis and cause a bowing deformity. Both diagnoses were excluded, since no fibrous stroma was evident on the histologic examination of the lesion. A large or giant long-bone osteoma would be associated with the outer cortical margin of bone but would not involve the intramedullary space. The scintigraphically increased uptake of radioisotope, as well as the CT and MRI findings, were not consistent with the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, or osteomyelitis. Although most imaging findings were consistent with a benign lesion, and contrast-enhanced MRI showed no increased vascularity, anterior cortical disruption necessitated a bone biopsy to rule out any potential malignancy.
The histopathology in association with the clinical and imaging findings indicated the diagnosis of a giant bone island. The increased proportion of maturing woven bone over lamellar bone indicated an active remodeling lesion that could be related to the patient’s age, since the clinical and radiographic features of the lesion were not changed after 15-year follow-up.
Conclusion
This is the first giant bone island diagnosed in a patient before puberty. Its greatest length was 10.8 cm, which is the longest reported in the literature. The imaging appearance included several atypical features that are very rare or have not been reported. Microscopic features indicated less mature lamellar bone and a prominent proportion of maturing woven bone. The clinical and the radiographic appearance of the lesion were not changed after 15-year follow-up.
A bone island is a focus of normal cortical bone located within the medullary cavity. The vast majority of bone islands are small, measuring from 1 mm to 2 cm in size. They are found more frequently in adults than in children. The lesion can be virtually diagnosed on the basis of its characteristic clinical and imaging features. Differential diagnosis may be difficult when the lesion manifests itself uncharacteristically by being symptomatic, very large, and hot on bone scan.1-4
The term giant bone island has been used to describe a large lesion1 that measures more than 2 cm in any dimension.5 Giant bone islands have been described only in adults,1,5-15 and the longest bone island length reported is 10.5 cm.10 They are usually symptomatic and associated with increased radionuclide uptake on bone scintigraphy.14
The history and the clinical and imaging presentation of an even longer, symptomatic, and scintigraphically hot lesion in the tibial diaphysis of a 10-year-old boy is reported. The lesion further exhibited several atypical imaging features necessitating an open biopsy, which confirmed the diagnosis of a giant bone island. The pertinent differential diagnosis and the clinical and radiographic findings after 15-year follow-up are also presented and discussed. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
A 10-year-old boy was admitted for surgical repair of an inguinal hernia. Physical examination revealed a painless but tender anterior bowing of the right tibial diaphysis. The patient was a healthy-appearing white male with normal vital signs, gait, and posture. His parents noticed a slight protuberance of the tibia at age 2.5 years. No medical advice was asked for the bone swelling after that time. After recovery from the inguinal hernia repair 3 weeks later, the bone lesion was thoroughly examined. Radiographs showed an oblong, homogenous region of dense sclerosis in the diaphysis of the right tibia. The lesion had relatively well-defined margins and was located in the medullary cavity. Speculations were not obvious in the periphery of the lesion, which exhibited a sharp circumscription (Figures 1A, 1B). A well-defined lytic area was evident at the distal part of the lesion (Figure 1B). There was no periosteal reaction. Blood and serum chemistries were within normal limits, including serum calcium, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase. A conventional 3-phase bone scintigraphy (300 MBq) with technetium-99m HDP (hydroxydiphosphonate) indicated increased uptake in the area of the lesion but no other skeletal abnormality (Figure 2). Computed tomography (CT) showed that the lesion was purely intramedullary and densely blastic. The lesion originated from the medial cortex, which was thickened (Figure 3A). The lesion extended to the anterolateral cortex, which was thinned and included a lytic area. In the distal part of the lesion, the anterolateral cortex was thickened, included lytic areas, and exhibited an anterior portion of cortical destruction (Figure 3B). The fatty marrow adjacent to the region of sclerosis appeared normal. There was no evidence of extraosseous soft-tissue changes. On both T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the lesion exhibited low-signal intensity. The lesion measured 10.8×2.2×1 cm. It originated from the medial cortical bone of the tibia, blended into the medullary cavity, and extended anteriorly towards and through the anterior cortex. The area of cortical destruction was clearly evident on the axial MRI. The periosteum was displaced and eroded anteriorly by focal radiating bony streaks. No enhancement was seen after the intravenous administration of gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) as a contrast medium. There were no extraosseous soft-tissue changes. In the distal part of the lesion, sagittal and axial MRI showed a 1.2×0.8×0.7-cm well-defined ovoid focus, with characteristics of cystic degeneration that exhibited intermediate-signal intensity on T1-weighted MRI (Figure 4) and high-signal intensity on T2-weighted MRI.
An open biopsy was performed. Macroscopically, a wedge of compact bone measuring 3×1.7×0.6 cm was taken. Microscopic examination showed a thinned periphery of lamellar (mature) bone with haversian canals and, beneath it, woven (immature) bone with long-surface processes projecting within adjacent cancellous bone (Figure 5A). The woven bone contained loose vascular fibrous tissue. No osteoclasts were noted, and the very few osteoblasts lining the bone trabeculae were small, single-layered, and flat (Figure 5B). There was no evidence of neoplastic cells. There was no abnormality of the periosteum and the surrounding soft tissues.
The histology was pathognomonic of a giant bone island. No additional surgical intervention was recommended.
The postoperative course was uncomplicated, and the patient was discharged 2 weeks later. An above-the-knee plaster was recommended for 3 months and a below-the-knee splint for an additional 2-month period. Full weight-bearing was allowed only after the postsurgical sixth month to prevent an impending fracture. The tibial bowing was tender to pressure or palpation, and the patient reported mild spontaneous pain during follow-up. Radiographs 1 year after surgery indicated that the bone area removed for biopsy was replaced by compact bone. MRI performed 4 years after surgery showed that the volume of the lesion in relation to the host bone was not changed.
At the last follow-up 15 years after surgery, the anterior tibial bowing was not changed (Figure 6A), but the patient additionally complained of skin irritation after intense training wearing boots during military service. The radiographic appearance of the lesion was also not changed, while the periphery of the lesion exhibited scarce radiating bony streaks with rounded contours (Figures 6B, 6C). The clinical symptoms and signs from wearing military boots completely subsided after a couple of weeks’ rest from daily army activities, but the mild spontaneous pain and the local tenderness over the tibial bowing persisted.
Discussion
Giant bone islands are more likely to be associated with clinical symptoms than the usual small-sized bone island. Some degree of pain was detected in 8 of 10 patients with a giant bone island presented in the literature, but it was induced by trauma in 3 of them.14
Radiographic appearance is among the distinguishing diagnostic features of a giant bone island. It appears as an ovoid, round, or oblong, homogenously dense, single or multiple focus of sclerosis within the medullary cavity; it is oriented along the long axis of the host bone, and it exhibits peripheral pseudopodia or radiating spicules producing the typical “thorny” or “paintbrush” appearance.8,16,17 It does not exhibit cortical penetration and it is not associated with periosteal reaction.10
The CT findings include a sclerotic and hyperdense focus with spiculated margins extending into the adjacent cancellous bone. The lack of bone destruction and soft-tissue mass are also diagnostic.3,7 MRI findings will reflect the low-signal intensity characteristics of cortical bone on all pulse sequences.18
Enostoses usually exhibit no activity on skeletal scintigraphy, while giant lesions generally show increased radiotracer uptake.5,9-11,14,19-27 The latter may result from the increased amount of bone turnover, which is seen more often with larger lesions because of active bone deposition and remodeling.20,21,23,28 Histopathology of a giant bone island appears identical to the well-described pathologic appearance of smaller bone islands. The lesion is composed of compact lamellar bone and haversian systems, which blend with the adjacent spongiosa. The surrounding cancellous bone forms thorn-like trabeculae radiating from the lesion and merging with the cancellous bone.1,4,5,8,28
The presumptive diagnosis of a bone island is based on the clinical findings, imaging features, and follow-up examinations. An asymptomatic, isolated, sclerotic bone lesion showing the typical features of a bone island on plain radiography, CT, and MRI, whatever its size, that is nonactive on bone scan may be easily diagnosed. However, a symptomatic patient with a hot lesion on scintigraphy should be carefully observed. In addition, larger lesions may raise the suspicion of a neoplasm, such as a sclerotic variant of osteosarcoma. In such cases, an open biopsy may be undertaken. No specific treatment is required after the diagnosis has been confirmed. There is no literature to suggest that, after adequate biopsy confirmation, excision or resection is necessary. Follow-up radiographic examination of the lesion should be suggested to monitor for any potential growth.2,10,23
The first giant bone island appearing in a child is presented in this report. The lack of a causative factor leading to the anterior tibial bowing indicated that the bone deformity was caused primarily by the lesion. The present case is unusual for the appearance of several atypical features, some of which have not been previously described. Peripheral radiating spiculated margin was absent on the patient’s initial radiographs and CT imaging. MRI indicated only the presence of radiating bony streaks that displaced and eroded the periosteum on the anterior border of the lesion. The CT findings that the lesion likely originated or was in close proximity with the medial cortex of the tibia were also atypical. It has been previously reported that spinal lesions located immediately below the cortex tend to fuse with the endosteal surface, while similar features may also be seen in the appendicular enostoses.4,29 Other CT findings, such as the thinning of the overlying anterolateral cortical bone, as well as the cortical thickening at the periphery of the lesion associated with areas of soft-tissue attenuation and anterior cortical destruction, have not been described even in the atypical features of a giant bone island. The lytic area resembling a nidus that was evident at the distal part of the lesion was more likely consistent with an area of resorption, which, although rare, has been described on giant lesions.2,9,29 The substantial amount of woven bone transforming to lamellar bone that was evident in the present patient’s microscopic features is also an atypical finding, although it may be expected to some degree in scintigraphically hot, large lesions.28 The clinical and imaging progress of the lesion supported the diagnosis of a giant bone island. The degree of the anterior tibial bowing and the volume of the lesion in relation to the host bone were not changed throughout the follow-up period, indicating that the growth of the lesion followed the growth of the normal bone.
The differential diagnosis of a giant bone island includes a variety of benign tumors and tumor-like lesions, as well as malignant bone lesions.2,4,23,28,30,31 In the patient presented in this report, the diagnosis of an atypical sclerotic presentation of a nonossifying fibroma or healing stage of this lesion could be consistent with some of the CT findings, including the eccentric origin from the cortex associated with medial cortical thickening, the anterolateral cortical thinning, and the soft-tissue attenuation of cortical areas. In addition, unifocal osteofibrous dysplasia may also present with a long intracortical diaphyseal lucency within an area of marked cortical sclerosis and cause a bowing deformity. Both diagnoses were excluded, since no fibrous stroma was evident on the histologic examination of the lesion. A large or giant long-bone osteoma would be associated with the outer cortical margin of bone but would not involve the intramedullary space. The scintigraphically increased uptake of radioisotope, as well as the CT and MRI findings, were not consistent with the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, or osteomyelitis. Although most imaging findings were consistent with a benign lesion, and contrast-enhanced MRI showed no increased vascularity, anterior cortical disruption necessitated a bone biopsy to rule out any potential malignancy.
The histopathology in association with the clinical and imaging findings indicated the diagnosis of a giant bone island. The increased proportion of maturing woven bone over lamellar bone indicated an active remodeling lesion that could be related to the patient’s age, since the clinical and radiographic features of the lesion were not changed after 15-year follow-up.
Conclusion
This is the first giant bone island diagnosed in a patient before puberty. Its greatest length was 10.8 cm, which is the longest reported in the literature. The imaging appearance included several atypical features that are very rare or have not been reported. Microscopic features indicated less mature lamellar bone and a prominent proportion of maturing woven bone. The clinical and the radiographic appearance of the lesion were not changed after 15-year follow-up.
1. Smith J. Giant bone islands. Radiology. 1973;7(1):35-36.
2. Mirra JM. Bone Tumors: Clinical, Radiologic and Pathologic Correlations. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1989.
3. Greenspan A. Bone island (enostosis): current concept - a review. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24(2):111-115.
4. Kransdorf MJ, Peterson JJ, Bancroft LW. MR imaging of the knee: incidental osseous lesions. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45(6):943-954.
5. Gold RH, Mirra JM, Remotti F, Pignatti G. Case report 527: Giant bone island of tibia. Skeletal Radiol. 1989;18(2):129-132.
6. Onitsuka H. Roentgenologic aspects of bone islands. Radiology. 1977;123(3):607-612.
7. Ehara S, Kattapuram SV, Rosenberg AE. Giant bone island. Computed tomography findings. Clin Imaging. 1989;13(3):231-233.
8. Greenspan A, Steiner G, Knutzon R. Bone island (enostosis): clinical significance and radiologic and pathologic correlations. Skeletal Radiol. 1991;20(2):85-90.
9. Avery GR, Wilsdon JB, Malcolm AJ. Giant bone island with some central resorption. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24(1):59-60.
10. Brien EW, Mirra JM, Latanza L, Fedenko A, Luck J Jr. Giant bone island of femur. Case report, literature review, and its distinction from low grade osteosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24(7):546-550.
11. Greenspan A, Klein MJ. Giant bone island. Skeletal Radiol. 1996;25(1):67-69.
12. Trombetti A, Noël E. Giant bone islands: a case with 31 years of follow-up. Joint Bone Spine. 2002;69(1):81-84.
13. Dhaon BK, Gautam VK, Jain P, Jaiswal A, Nigam V. Giant bone island of femur complicating replacement arthroplasty: a report of two cases. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2004;13(4):220-223.
14. Park HS, Kim JR, Lee SY, Jang KY. Symptomatic giant (10-cm) bone island of the tibia. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34(6):347-350.
15. Ikeuchi M, Komatsu M, Tani T. Giant bone island of femur with femoral head necrosis: a case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(4):447-450.
16. Kim SK, Barry WF Jr. Bone island. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1964;92:1301-1306.
17. Kim SK, Barry WF Jr. Bone islands. Radiology. 1968;90(1):77-78.
18. Cerase A, Priolo F. Skeletal benign bone-forming lesions. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27:S91–S97.
19. Go RT, El-Khoury GY, Wehbe MA. Radionuclide bone image in growing and stable bone island. Skeletal Radiol. 1980;5(1):15-18.
20. Hall FM, Goldberg RP, Davies JA, Fainsinger MH. Scintigraphic assessment of bone islands. Radiology. 1980;135(3):737-742.
21. Greenspan A, Stadalnik RC. Bone island: scintigraphic findings and their clinical application. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1995;46(5):368-379.
22. Sickles EA, Genant HK, Hoffer PB. Increased localization of 99mTc-pyrophosphate in a bone island: case report. J Nucl Med. 1976;17(2):113-115.
23. Dorfman HD, Czerniak B. Bone Tumors. St Louis: Mosby; 1998.
24. Ngan H. Growing bone islands. Clin Radiol. 1972;23(2):199-201.
25. Davies JA, Hall FM, Goldberg RP, Kasdon EJ. Positive bone scan in a bone island. Case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(6):943-945.
26. Simon K, Mulligan ME. Growing bone islands revisited. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(5):809-811.
27. Blank N, Lieber A. The significance of growing bone islands. Radiology. 1965;85(3):508-511.
28. Greenspan A, Gernot J, Wolfgang R. Differential Diagnosis of Orthopaedic Oncology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
29. Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. Osseous tumors. In: Davies AM, Sundaram M, James SLJ, eds. Imaging of Bone Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2009.
30. Mödder B, Guhl B, Schaefer HE. Growing bone islands as differential diagnosis of osteoplastic metastases. Rontgenblatter. 1980;33(6):286-288.
31. Flechner RE, Mills SE. Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Bones and Joints. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1993.
1. Smith J. Giant bone islands. Radiology. 1973;7(1):35-36.
2. Mirra JM. Bone Tumors: Clinical, Radiologic and Pathologic Correlations. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1989.
3. Greenspan A. Bone island (enostosis): current concept - a review. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24(2):111-115.
4. Kransdorf MJ, Peterson JJ, Bancroft LW. MR imaging of the knee: incidental osseous lesions. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45(6):943-954.
5. Gold RH, Mirra JM, Remotti F, Pignatti G. Case report 527: Giant bone island of tibia. Skeletal Radiol. 1989;18(2):129-132.
6. Onitsuka H. Roentgenologic aspects of bone islands. Radiology. 1977;123(3):607-612.
7. Ehara S, Kattapuram SV, Rosenberg AE. Giant bone island. Computed tomography findings. Clin Imaging. 1989;13(3):231-233.
8. Greenspan A, Steiner G, Knutzon R. Bone island (enostosis): clinical significance and radiologic and pathologic correlations. Skeletal Radiol. 1991;20(2):85-90.
9. Avery GR, Wilsdon JB, Malcolm AJ. Giant bone island with some central resorption. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24(1):59-60.
10. Brien EW, Mirra JM, Latanza L, Fedenko A, Luck J Jr. Giant bone island of femur. Case report, literature review, and its distinction from low grade osteosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24(7):546-550.
11. Greenspan A, Klein MJ. Giant bone island. Skeletal Radiol. 1996;25(1):67-69.
12. Trombetti A, Noël E. Giant bone islands: a case with 31 years of follow-up. Joint Bone Spine. 2002;69(1):81-84.
13. Dhaon BK, Gautam VK, Jain P, Jaiswal A, Nigam V. Giant bone island of femur complicating replacement arthroplasty: a report of two cases. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2004;13(4):220-223.
14. Park HS, Kim JR, Lee SY, Jang KY. Symptomatic giant (10-cm) bone island of the tibia. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34(6):347-350.
15. Ikeuchi M, Komatsu M, Tani T. Giant bone island of femur with femoral head necrosis: a case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(4):447-450.
16. Kim SK, Barry WF Jr. Bone island. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1964;92:1301-1306.
17. Kim SK, Barry WF Jr. Bone islands. Radiology. 1968;90(1):77-78.
18. Cerase A, Priolo F. Skeletal benign bone-forming lesions. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27:S91–S97.
19. Go RT, El-Khoury GY, Wehbe MA. Radionuclide bone image in growing and stable bone island. Skeletal Radiol. 1980;5(1):15-18.
20. Hall FM, Goldberg RP, Davies JA, Fainsinger MH. Scintigraphic assessment of bone islands. Radiology. 1980;135(3):737-742.
21. Greenspan A, Stadalnik RC. Bone island: scintigraphic findings and their clinical application. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1995;46(5):368-379.
22. Sickles EA, Genant HK, Hoffer PB. Increased localization of 99mTc-pyrophosphate in a bone island: case report. J Nucl Med. 1976;17(2):113-115.
23. Dorfman HD, Czerniak B. Bone Tumors. St Louis: Mosby; 1998.
24. Ngan H. Growing bone islands. Clin Radiol. 1972;23(2):199-201.
25. Davies JA, Hall FM, Goldberg RP, Kasdon EJ. Positive bone scan in a bone island. Case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(6):943-945.
26. Simon K, Mulligan ME. Growing bone islands revisited. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(5):809-811.
27. Blank N, Lieber A. The significance of growing bone islands. Radiology. 1965;85(3):508-511.
28. Greenspan A, Gernot J, Wolfgang R. Differential Diagnosis of Orthopaedic Oncology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
29. Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. Osseous tumors. In: Davies AM, Sundaram M, James SLJ, eds. Imaging of Bone Tumors and Tumor-Like Lesions. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2009.
30. Mödder B, Guhl B, Schaefer HE. Growing bone islands as differential diagnosis of osteoplastic metastases. Rontgenblatter. 1980;33(6):286-288.
31. Flechner RE, Mills SE. Atlas of Tumor Pathology: Tumors of the Bones and Joints. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1993.
Acquired Port-wine Stain With Superimposed Eczema Following Penetrating Abdominal Trauma
Port-wine stains (PWSs) are common congenital capillary vascular malformations with an incidence of 3 per 1000 neonates.1 Rarely, acquired PWSs are seen, sometimes appearing following trauma.2-5 Port-wine stains are diagnosed clinically and present as painless, partially or entirely blanchable pink patches that respect the median (midline) plane.6 Although histopathologic examination is not necessary for diagnosis of PWS, typical findings include dilated, ectatic capillaries.7,8 Since it was first reported by Traub9 in 1939, more than 60 cases of acquired PWSs have been reported.10 A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the search terms acquired port-wine stain and port-wine stain and eczema yielded no cases of acquired PWS with associated eczematous changes and only 30 cases of congenital PWS with superimposed eczema.11-18 We report the case of an acquired PWS with superimposed eczema in an 18-year-old man following penetrating abdominal trauma.
Case Report
An otherwise healthy 18-year-old man presented to our dermatology office for evaluation of an eruption that had developed at the site of an abdominal stab wound he sustained 2 to 3 years prior. One year after he was stabbed, the patient developed a nonpruritic, painless red patch located 1 cm anterior to the healed wound on the left abdomen. The patch gradually grew larger to involve the entire left abdomen, extending to the left lower back. The site of the healed stab wound also became raised and pruritic, and the patient noted another pruritic plaque that formed within the larger patch. The patient reported no other skin conditions prior to the current eruption. His medical history was notable for seasonal allergies and asthma, but no childhood eczema.
Physical examination revealed a healthy, well-nourished man with Fitzpatrick skin type IV. A red, purpuric, coalescent patch with slightly arcuate borders extending from the mid abdomen to the left posterior flank was noted. The left lateral aspect of the patch blanched with pressure and respected the median plane. Within the larger patch, a 4-cm×2-cm lichenified, slightly macerated, hyperpigmented plaque was noted at the site of the stab wound (Figure 1). Based on these clinical findings, a presumptive diagnosis of an acquired PWS with superimposed eczema was made.
Punch biopsy specimens were taken from the large vascular patch and the smaller lichenified plaque. Histopathologic examination of the vascular patch showed an increased number of small vessels in the superficial dermis with thickened vessel walls, ectatic lumens, and no vasculopathy, consistent with a vascular malformation or a reactive vascular proliferation (Figure 2). On histopathology, the plaque showed epidermal spongiosis and hyperplasia with serum crust and a papillary dermis containing a mixed inflammatory infiltrate with occasional eosinophils, consistent with an eczematous dermatitis (Figure 3). The histologic findings confirmed the clinical diagnosis.
The pruritic, lichenified plaque improved with application of triamcinolone ointment 0.1% twice daily for 2 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging to rule out an underlying arteriovenous malformation was recommended, but the patient declined.
Comment
The exact cause of PWS is unknown. There have been a multitude of genomic suspects for congenital lesions, including a somatic activating mutation (ie, a mutation acquired during fetal development) of the GNAQ (guanine nucleotide binding protein [G protein], q polypeptide) gene, which may contribute to abnormal cell proliferation including the regulation of blood vessels, and inactivating mutations in the RASA1 (RAS p21 protein activator [GTPase activating protein] 1) gene, which controls endothelial cell organization.19-22 Later mutations (ie, those occurring after the first trimester) may be more likely to result in isolated PWSs as opposed to syndromic PWSs.19 Whatever the source of genetic misinformation, it is thought that the diminished neuronal control of blood flow and the resulting alterations in dermal structure contribute to the pathogenesis of PWS and its associated histologic features.7,23
The clinical and histopathologic features of acquired PWSs are indistinguishable from those of congenital lesions, indicating that different processes may lead to the same presentation.4 Abnormal innervation and decreased supportive stroma have both been identified as contributing factors in the development of congenital and acquired PWSs.7,23-25 Rosen and Smoller23 found that diminished nerve density affects vascular tone and caliber in PWSs and had hypothesized in a prior report that decreased perivascular Schwann cells may indicate abnormal sympathetic innervation.7 Since then, PWS has been shown to lack both somatic and sensory innervation.24 Tsuji and Sawabe25 indicated that alterations to the perivascular stroma, whether congenital or as a result of trauma, decrease support for vessels, leading to ectasia.
In addition to an acquired PWS, our patient also had associated eczema within the PWS. Eczematous lesions were absent elsewhere, and he did not have a history of childhood eczema. Our review of the literature yielded 8 studies since 1996 that collectively described 30 cases of eczema within PWSs.11-18 Only 2 of these reports described adult patients with concomitant eczema and PWS and none described acquired PWS.13,18
Few studies have addressed the relationship between PWSs and eczema. It is unclear if concomitant PWS and localized eczema are collision dermatoses or if a PWS may predispose the affected skin to eczema.11-13 It has been hypothesized that the increased dermal vasculature in PWSs predisposes the skin to the development of eczema—more specifically, that ectasia may lead to increased inflammation.12,17 The concept of the “immunocompromised district” proposed by Ruocco et al26 is a unifying theory that may underlie the association noted between cases of trauma and later development of a PWS and superimposed eczematous dermatitis, such as in our case. Trauma is noted as one of a number of possible disruptive forces affecting both immunomodulation and neuromodulation within a local area of skin, leading to increased susceptibility of that district to various cutaneous diseases.26
Although our patient’s eczema responded to conservative treatment with a topical steroid, several case series have reported success with laser therapy in the treatment of PWS while preventing recurrence of associated eczematous dermatitis.12,17 Following the cessation of eczema treatment with topical steroid, which causes vasoconstriction, we suggest postponing laser therapy several weeks to allow resolution of vasoconstriction, thus providing enhanced therapeutic targeting with a vascular laser. Of particular relevance to our case, a recent study showed efficacy of the pulsed dye laser in treating PWSs in Fitzpatrick skin types IV and V.27
Conclusion
Although acquired PWS is rare, it can present later in life as an acquired lesion at a site of previous trauma.1-5 Congenital capillary malformations also can be associated with superimposed, localized eczema.11-18 We present a rarely reported case of an acquired PWS with superimposed, localized eczema. As in cases of congenital PWS with concomitant eczema, the associated eczema in our case was responsive to topical corticosteroid therapy. Additionally, pulsed dye laser has been shown to treat PWSs while preventing the recurrence of eczema, and it has been deemed effective for individuals with darker skin types.12,17, 27 Further studies are needed to explore the relationship between PWS and eczema.
- Jacobs AH, Walton RG. The incidence of birthmarks in the neonate. Pediatrics. 1976;58:218-222.
- Fegeler F. Naevus flammeus im trigeminusgebiet nach trauma im rahmen eines posttraumatisch-vegetativen syndroms. Arch Dermatol Syphilol. 1949;188:416-422.
- Kirkland CR, Mutasim DF. Acquired port-wine stain following repetitive trauma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:462-463.
- Adams BB, Lucky AW. Acquired port-wine stains and antecedent trauma: case report and review of the literature. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:897-899.
- Colver GB, Ryan TJ. Acquired port-wine stain. Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:1415-1416.
- Nigro J, Swerlick RA, Sepp NT, et al. Angiogenesis, vascular malformations and proliferations. In: Arndt KA, LeBoit PE, Robinson JK, Wintroub BU, eds. Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery: An Integrated Program in Dermatology. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 1996:1492-1521.
- Smoller BR, Rosen S. Port-wine stains. a disease of altered neural modulation of blood vessels? Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:177-179.
- Chang CJ, Yu JS, Nelson JS. Confocal microscopy study of neurovascular distribution in facial port wine stains(capillary malformation). J Formos Med Assoc. 2008;107:559-666.
- Traub EF. Naevus flammeus appearing at the age of twenty three. Arch Dermatol. 1939;39:752.
- Freysz M, Cribier B, Lipsker, D. Fegelers syndrome, acquired port-wine stain or acquired capillary malformation: three cases and a literature review [article in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2013;140:341-346.
- Tay YK, Morelli J, Weston WL. Inflammatory nuchal-occipital port-wine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35:811-813.
- Sidwell RU, Syed S, Harper JI. Port-wine stains and eczema. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144:1269-1270.
- Hofer T. Meyerson phenomenon within a nevus flammeus. Dermatology. 2002;205:180-183.
- Raff K, Landthaler M, Hoheleutner U. Port-wine stains with eczema. Phlebologie. 2003;32:15-17.
- Tsuboi H, Miyata T, Katsuoka K. Eczema in a port-wine stain. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2003;28:322-323.
- Rajan N, Natarahan S. Impetiginized eczema arising within a port-wine stain of the arm. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20:1009-1010.
- Fonder MA, Mamelak AJ, Kazin RA, et al. Port-wine-stain-associated dermatitis: implications for cutaneous vascular laser therapy. Pediatr Dermatol. 2007;24:376-379.
- Simon V, Wolfgan H, Katharina F. Meyerson-Phenomenon hides a nevus flammeus. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2011;9:305-307.
- Shirley MD, Tang H, Gallione CJ, et al. Sturge-Weber syndrome and port-wine stains caused by somatic mutation in GNAQ. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1971-1979.
- Hershkovitz D, Bercovich D, Sprecher E, et al. RASA1 mutations may cause hereditary capillary malformations without arteriovenous malformations. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158:1035-1040.
- Eerola I, Boon LM, Mulliken JB, et al. Capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation, a new clinical and genetic disorder caused by RASA1 mutations. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:1240-1249.
- Henkemeyer M, Rossi DJ, Holmyard DP, et al. Vascular system defects and neuronal apoptosis in mice lacking ras GTPase-activating protein. Nature. 1995;377:695-701.
- Rosen S, Smoller BR. Port-wine stains: a new hypothesis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:164-166.
- Rydh M, Malm BM, Jernmeck J, et al. Ectatic blood vessels in port-wine stains lack innervation: possible role in pathogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:419-422.
- Tsuji T, Sawabe M. A new type of telangiectasia following trauma. J Cutan Pathol. 1988;15:22-26.
- Ruocco V, Ruocco E, Brunnetti G, et al. Opportunistic localization of skin lesions on vulnerable areas. Clin Dermatol. 2011;29:483-488.
- Thajudeheen CP, Jyothy K, Pryadarshi A. Treatment of port-wine stains with flash lamp pumped pulsed dye laser on Indian skin: a six year study. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2014;7:32-36.
Port-wine stains (PWSs) are common congenital capillary vascular malformations with an incidence of 3 per 1000 neonates.1 Rarely, acquired PWSs are seen, sometimes appearing following trauma.2-5 Port-wine stains are diagnosed clinically and present as painless, partially or entirely blanchable pink patches that respect the median (midline) plane.6 Although histopathologic examination is not necessary for diagnosis of PWS, typical findings include dilated, ectatic capillaries.7,8 Since it was first reported by Traub9 in 1939, more than 60 cases of acquired PWSs have been reported.10 A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the search terms acquired port-wine stain and port-wine stain and eczema yielded no cases of acquired PWS with associated eczematous changes and only 30 cases of congenital PWS with superimposed eczema.11-18 We report the case of an acquired PWS with superimposed eczema in an 18-year-old man following penetrating abdominal trauma.
Case Report
An otherwise healthy 18-year-old man presented to our dermatology office for evaluation of an eruption that had developed at the site of an abdominal stab wound he sustained 2 to 3 years prior. One year after he was stabbed, the patient developed a nonpruritic, painless red patch located 1 cm anterior to the healed wound on the left abdomen. The patch gradually grew larger to involve the entire left abdomen, extending to the left lower back. The site of the healed stab wound also became raised and pruritic, and the patient noted another pruritic plaque that formed within the larger patch. The patient reported no other skin conditions prior to the current eruption. His medical history was notable for seasonal allergies and asthma, but no childhood eczema.
Physical examination revealed a healthy, well-nourished man with Fitzpatrick skin type IV. A red, purpuric, coalescent patch with slightly arcuate borders extending from the mid abdomen to the left posterior flank was noted. The left lateral aspect of the patch blanched with pressure and respected the median plane. Within the larger patch, a 4-cm×2-cm lichenified, slightly macerated, hyperpigmented plaque was noted at the site of the stab wound (Figure 1). Based on these clinical findings, a presumptive diagnosis of an acquired PWS with superimposed eczema was made.
Punch biopsy specimens were taken from the large vascular patch and the smaller lichenified plaque. Histopathologic examination of the vascular patch showed an increased number of small vessels in the superficial dermis with thickened vessel walls, ectatic lumens, and no vasculopathy, consistent with a vascular malformation or a reactive vascular proliferation (Figure 2). On histopathology, the plaque showed epidermal spongiosis and hyperplasia with serum crust and a papillary dermis containing a mixed inflammatory infiltrate with occasional eosinophils, consistent with an eczematous dermatitis (Figure 3). The histologic findings confirmed the clinical diagnosis.
The pruritic, lichenified plaque improved with application of triamcinolone ointment 0.1% twice daily for 2 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging to rule out an underlying arteriovenous malformation was recommended, but the patient declined.
Comment
The exact cause of PWS is unknown. There have been a multitude of genomic suspects for congenital lesions, including a somatic activating mutation (ie, a mutation acquired during fetal development) of the GNAQ (guanine nucleotide binding protein [G protein], q polypeptide) gene, which may contribute to abnormal cell proliferation including the regulation of blood vessels, and inactivating mutations in the RASA1 (RAS p21 protein activator [GTPase activating protein] 1) gene, which controls endothelial cell organization.19-22 Later mutations (ie, those occurring after the first trimester) may be more likely to result in isolated PWSs as opposed to syndromic PWSs.19 Whatever the source of genetic misinformation, it is thought that the diminished neuronal control of blood flow and the resulting alterations in dermal structure contribute to the pathogenesis of PWS and its associated histologic features.7,23
The clinical and histopathologic features of acquired PWSs are indistinguishable from those of congenital lesions, indicating that different processes may lead to the same presentation.4 Abnormal innervation and decreased supportive stroma have both been identified as contributing factors in the development of congenital and acquired PWSs.7,23-25 Rosen and Smoller23 found that diminished nerve density affects vascular tone and caliber in PWSs and had hypothesized in a prior report that decreased perivascular Schwann cells may indicate abnormal sympathetic innervation.7 Since then, PWS has been shown to lack both somatic and sensory innervation.24 Tsuji and Sawabe25 indicated that alterations to the perivascular stroma, whether congenital or as a result of trauma, decrease support for vessels, leading to ectasia.
In addition to an acquired PWS, our patient also had associated eczema within the PWS. Eczematous lesions were absent elsewhere, and he did not have a history of childhood eczema. Our review of the literature yielded 8 studies since 1996 that collectively described 30 cases of eczema within PWSs.11-18 Only 2 of these reports described adult patients with concomitant eczema and PWS and none described acquired PWS.13,18
Few studies have addressed the relationship between PWSs and eczema. It is unclear if concomitant PWS and localized eczema are collision dermatoses or if a PWS may predispose the affected skin to eczema.11-13 It has been hypothesized that the increased dermal vasculature in PWSs predisposes the skin to the development of eczema—more specifically, that ectasia may lead to increased inflammation.12,17 The concept of the “immunocompromised district” proposed by Ruocco et al26 is a unifying theory that may underlie the association noted between cases of trauma and later development of a PWS and superimposed eczematous dermatitis, such as in our case. Trauma is noted as one of a number of possible disruptive forces affecting both immunomodulation and neuromodulation within a local area of skin, leading to increased susceptibility of that district to various cutaneous diseases.26
Although our patient’s eczema responded to conservative treatment with a topical steroid, several case series have reported success with laser therapy in the treatment of PWS while preventing recurrence of associated eczematous dermatitis.12,17 Following the cessation of eczema treatment with topical steroid, which causes vasoconstriction, we suggest postponing laser therapy several weeks to allow resolution of vasoconstriction, thus providing enhanced therapeutic targeting with a vascular laser. Of particular relevance to our case, a recent study showed efficacy of the pulsed dye laser in treating PWSs in Fitzpatrick skin types IV and V.27
Conclusion
Although acquired PWS is rare, it can present later in life as an acquired lesion at a site of previous trauma.1-5 Congenital capillary malformations also can be associated with superimposed, localized eczema.11-18 We present a rarely reported case of an acquired PWS with superimposed, localized eczema. As in cases of congenital PWS with concomitant eczema, the associated eczema in our case was responsive to topical corticosteroid therapy. Additionally, pulsed dye laser has been shown to treat PWSs while preventing the recurrence of eczema, and it has been deemed effective for individuals with darker skin types.12,17, 27 Further studies are needed to explore the relationship between PWS and eczema.
Port-wine stains (PWSs) are common congenital capillary vascular malformations with an incidence of 3 per 1000 neonates.1 Rarely, acquired PWSs are seen, sometimes appearing following trauma.2-5 Port-wine stains are diagnosed clinically and present as painless, partially or entirely blanchable pink patches that respect the median (midline) plane.6 Although histopathologic examination is not necessary for diagnosis of PWS, typical findings include dilated, ectatic capillaries.7,8 Since it was first reported by Traub9 in 1939, more than 60 cases of acquired PWSs have been reported.10 A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the search terms acquired port-wine stain and port-wine stain and eczema yielded no cases of acquired PWS with associated eczematous changes and only 30 cases of congenital PWS with superimposed eczema.11-18 We report the case of an acquired PWS with superimposed eczema in an 18-year-old man following penetrating abdominal trauma.
Case Report
An otherwise healthy 18-year-old man presented to our dermatology office for evaluation of an eruption that had developed at the site of an abdominal stab wound he sustained 2 to 3 years prior. One year after he was stabbed, the patient developed a nonpruritic, painless red patch located 1 cm anterior to the healed wound on the left abdomen. The patch gradually grew larger to involve the entire left abdomen, extending to the left lower back. The site of the healed stab wound also became raised and pruritic, and the patient noted another pruritic plaque that formed within the larger patch. The patient reported no other skin conditions prior to the current eruption. His medical history was notable for seasonal allergies and asthma, but no childhood eczema.
Physical examination revealed a healthy, well-nourished man with Fitzpatrick skin type IV. A red, purpuric, coalescent patch with slightly arcuate borders extending from the mid abdomen to the left posterior flank was noted. The left lateral aspect of the patch blanched with pressure and respected the median plane. Within the larger patch, a 4-cm×2-cm lichenified, slightly macerated, hyperpigmented plaque was noted at the site of the stab wound (Figure 1). Based on these clinical findings, a presumptive diagnosis of an acquired PWS with superimposed eczema was made.
Punch biopsy specimens were taken from the large vascular patch and the smaller lichenified plaque. Histopathologic examination of the vascular patch showed an increased number of small vessels in the superficial dermis with thickened vessel walls, ectatic lumens, and no vasculopathy, consistent with a vascular malformation or a reactive vascular proliferation (Figure 2). On histopathology, the plaque showed epidermal spongiosis and hyperplasia with serum crust and a papillary dermis containing a mixed inflammatory infiltrate with occasional eosinophils, consistent with an eczematous dermatitis (Figure 3). The histologic findings confirmed the clinical diagnosis.
The pruritic, lichenified plaque improved with application of triamcinolone ointment 0.1% twice daily for 2 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging to rule out an underlying arteriovenous malformation was recommended, but the patient declined.
Comment
The exact cause of PWS is unknown. There have been a multitude of genomic suspects for congenital lesions, including a somatic activating mutation (ie, a mutation acquired during fetal development) of the GNAQ (guanine nucleotide binding protein [G protein], q polypeptide) gene, which may contribute to abnormal cell proliferation including the regulation of blood vessels, and inactivating mutations in the RASA1 (RAS p21 protein activator [GTPase activating protein] 1) gene, which controls endothelial cell organization.19-22 Later mutations (ie, those occurring after the first trimester) may be more likely to result in isolated PWSs as opposed to syndromic PWSs.19 Whatever the source of genetic misinformation, it is thought that the diminished neuronal control of blood flow and the resulting alterations in dermal structure contribute to the pathogenesis of PWS and its associated histologic features.7,23
The clinical and histopathologic features of acquired PWSs are indistinguishable from those of congenital lesions, indicating that different processes may lead to the same presentation.4 Abnormal innervation and decreased supportive stroma have both been identified as contributing factors in the development of congenital and acquired PWSs.7,23-25 Rosen and Smoller23 found that diminished nerve density affects vascular tone and caliber in PWSs and had hypothesized in a prior report that decreased perivascular Schwann cells may indicate abnormal sympathetic innervation.7 Since then, PWS has been shown to lack both somatic and sensory innervation.24 Tsuji and Sawabe25 indicated that alterations to the perivascular stroma, whether congenital or as a result of trauma, decrease support for vessels, leading to ectasia.
In addition to an acquired PWS, our patient also had associated eczema within the PWS. Eczematous lesions were absent elsewhere, and he did not have a history of childhood eczema. Our review of the literature yielded 8 studies since 1996 that collectively described 30 cases of eczema within PWSs.11-18 Only 2 of these reports described adult patients with concomitant eczema and PWS and none described acquired PWS.13,18
Few studies have addressed the relationship between PWSs and eczema. It is unclear if concomitant PWS and localized eczema are collision dermatoses or if a PWS may predispose the affected skin to eczema.11-13 It has been hypothesized that the increased dermal vasculature in PWSs predisposes the skin to the development of eczema—more specifically, that ectasia may lead to increased inflammation.12,17 The concept of the “immunocompromised district” proposed by Ruocco et al26 is a unifying theory that may underlie the association noted between cases of trauma and later development of a PWS and superimposed eczematous dermatitis, such as in our case. Trauma is noted as one of a number of possible disruptive forces affecting both immunomodulation and neuromodulation within a local area of skin, leading to increased susceptibility of that district to various cutaneous diseases.26
Although our patient’s eczema responded to conservative treatment with a topical steroid, several case series have reported success with laser therapy in the treatment of PWS while preventing recurrence of associated eczematous dermatitis.12,17 Following the cessation of eczema treatment with topical steroid, which causes vasoconstriction, we suggest postponing laser therapy several weeks to allow resolution of vasoconstriction, thus providing enhanced therapeutic targeting with a vascular laser. Of particular relevance to our case, a recent study showed efficacy of the pulsed dye laser in treating PWSs in Fitzpatrick skin types IV and V.27
Conclusion
Although acquired PWS is rare, it can present later in life as an acquired lesion at a site of previous trauma.1-5 Congenital capillary malformations also can be associated with superimposed, localized eczema.11-18 We present a rarely reported case of an acquired PWS with superimposed, localized eczema. As in cases of congenital PWS with concomitant eczema, the associated eczema in our case was responsive to topical corticosteroid therapy. Additionally, pulsed dye laser has been shown to treat PWSs while preventing the recurrence of eczema, and it has been deemed effective for individuals with darker skin types.12,17, 27 Further studies are needed to explore the relationship between PWS and eczema.
- Jacobs AH, Walton RG. The incidence of birthmarks in the neonate. Pediatrics. 1976;58:218-222.
- Fegeler F. Naevus flammeus im trigeminusgebiet nach trauma im rahmen eines posttraumatisch-vegetativen syndroms. Arch Dermatol Syphilol. 1949;188:416-422.
- Kirkland CR, Mutasim DF. Acquired port-wine stain following repetitive trauma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:462-463.
- Adams BB, Lucky AW. Acquired port-wine stains and antecedent trauma: case report and review of the literature. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:897-899.
- Colver GB, Ryan TJ. Acquired port-wine stain. Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:1415-1416.
- Nigro J, Swerlick RA, Sepp NT, et al. Angiogenesis, vascular malformations and proliferations. In: Arndt KA, LeBoit PE, Robinson JK, Wintroub BU, eds. Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery: An Integrated Program in Dermatology. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 1996:1492-1521.
- Smoller BR, Rosen S. Port-wine stains. a disease of altered neural modulation of blood vessels? Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:177-179.
- Chang CJ, Yu JS, Nelson JS. Confocal microscopy study of neurovascular distribution in facial port wine stains(capillary malformation). J Formos Med Assoc. 2008;107:559-666.
- Traub EF. Naevus flammeus appearing at the age of twenty three. Arch Dermatol. 1939;39:752.
- Freysz M, Cribier B, Lipsker, D. Fegelers syndrome, acquired port-wine stain or acquired capillary malformation: three cases and a literature review [article in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2013;140:341-346.
- Tay YK, Morelli J, Weston WL. Inflammatory nuchal-occipital port-wine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35:811-813.
- Sidwell RU, Syed S, Harper JI. Port-wine stains and eczema. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144:1269-1270.
- Hofer T. Meyerson phenomenon within a nevus flammeus. Dermatology. 2002;205:180-183.
- Raff K, Landthaler M, Hoheleutner U. Port-wine stains with eczema. Phlebologie. 2003;32:15-17.
- Tsuboi H, Miyata T, Katsuoka K. Eczema in a port-wine stain. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2003;28:322-323.
- Rajan N, Natarahan S. Impetiginized eczema arising within a port-wine stain of the arm. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20:1009-1010.
- Fonder MA, Mamelak AJ, Kazin RA, et al. Port-wine-stain-associated dermatitis: implications for cutaneous vascular laser therapy. Pediatr Dermatol. 2007;24:376-379.
- Simon V, Wolfgan H, Katharina F. Meyerson-Phenomenon hides a nevus flammeus. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2011;9:305-307.
- Shirley MD, Tang H, Gallione CJ, et al. Sturge-Weber syndrome and port-wine stains caused by somatic mutation in GNAQ. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1971-1979.
- Hershkovitz D, Bercovich D, Sprecher E, et al. RASA1 mutations may cause hereditary capillary malformations without arteriovenous malformations. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158:1035-1040.
- Eerola I, Boon LM, Mulliken JB, et al. Capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation, a new clinical and genetic disorder caused by RASA1 mutations. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:1240-1249.
- Henkemeyer M, Rossi DJ, Holmyard DP, et al. Vascular system defects and neuronal apoptosis in mice lacking ras GTPase-activating protein. Nature. 1995;377:695-701.
- Rosen S, Smoller BR. Port-wine stains: a new hypothesis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:164-166.
- Rydh M, Malm BM, Jernmeck J, et al. Ectatic blood vessels in port-wine stains lack innervation: possible role in pathogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:419-422.
- Tsuji T, Sawabe M. A new type of telangiectasia following trauma. J Cutan Pathol. 1988;15:22-26.
- Ruocco V, Ruocco E, Brunnetti G, et al. Opportunistic localization of skin lesions on vulnerable areas. Clin Dermatol. 2011;29:483-488.
- Thajudeheen CP, Jyothy K, Pryadarshi A. Treatment of port-wine stains with flash lamp pumped pulsed dye laser on Indian skin: a six year study. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2014;7:32-36.
- Jacobs AH, Walton RG. The incidence of birthmarks in the neonate. Pediatrics. 1976;58:218-222.
- Fegeler F. Naevus flammeus im trigeminusgebiet nach trauma im rahmen eines posttraumatisch-vegetativen syndroms. Arch Dermatol Syphilol. 1949;188:416-422.
- Kirkland CR, Mutasim DF. Acquired port-wine stain following repetitive trauma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:462-463.
- Adams BB, Lucky AW. Acquired port-wine stains and antecedent trauma: case report and review of the literature. Arch Dermatol. 2000;136:897-899.
- Colver GB, Ryan TJ. Acquired port-wine stain. Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:1415-1416.
- Nigro J, Swerlick RA, Sepp NT, et al. Angiogenesis, vascular malformations and proliferations. In: Arndt KA, LeBoit PE, Robinson JK, Wintroub BU, eds. Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery: An Integrated Program in Dermatology. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; 1996:1492-1521.
- Smoller BR, Rosen S. Port-wine stains. a disease of altered neural modulation of blood vessels? Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:177-179.
- Chang CJ, Yu JS, Nelson JS. Confocal microscopy study of neurovascular distribution in facial port wine stains(capillary malformation). J Formos Med Assoc. 2008;107:559-666.
- Traub EF. Naevus flammeus appearing at the age of twenty three. Arch Dermatol. 1939;39:752.
- Freysz M, Cribier B, Lipsker, D. Fegelers syndrome, acquired port-wine stain or acquired capillary malformation: three cases and a literature review [article in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2013;140:341-346.
- Tay YK, Morelli J, Weston WL. Inflammatory nuchal-occipital port-wine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35:811-813.
- Sidwell RU, Syed S, Harper JI. Port-wine stains and eczema. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144:1269-1270.
- Hofer T. Meyerson phenomenon within a nevus flammeus. Dermatology. 2002;205:180-183.
- Raff K, Landthaler M, Hoheleutner U. Port-wine stains with eczema. Phlebologie. 2003;32:15-17.
- Tsuboi H, Miyata T, Katsuoka K. Eczema in a port-wine stain. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2003;28:322-323.
- Rajan N, Natarahan S. Impetiginized eczema arising within a port-wine stain of the arm. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20:1009-1010.
- Fonder MA, Mamelak AJ, Kazin RA, et al. Port-wine-stain-associated dermatitis: implications for cutaneous vascular laser therapy. Pediatr Dermatol. 2007;24:376-379.
- Simon V, Wolfgan H, Katharina F. Meyerson-Phenomenon hides a nevus flammeus. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2011;9:305-307.
- Shirley MD, Tang H, Gallione CJ, et al. Sturge-Weber syndrome and port-wine stains caused by somatic mutation in GNAQ. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1971-1979.
- Hershkovitz D, Bercovich D, Sprecher E, et al. RASA1 mutations may cause hereditary capillary malformations without arteriovenous malformations. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158:1035-1040.
- Eerola I, Boon LM, Mulliken JB, et al. Capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation, a new clinical and genetic disorder caused by RASA1 mutations. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:1240-1249.
- Henkemeyer M, Rossi DJ, Holmyard DP, et al. Vascular system defects and neuronal apoptosis in mice lacking ras GTPase-activating protein. Nature. 1995;377:695-701.
- Rosen S, Smoller BR. Port-wine stains: a new hypothesis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:164-166.
- Rydh M, Malm BM, Jernmeck J, et al. Ectatic blood vessels in port-wine stains lack innervation: possible role in pathogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:419-422.
- Tsuji T, Sawabe M. A new type of telangiectasia following trauma. J Cutan Pathol. 1988;15:22-26.
- Ruocco V, Ruocco E, Brunnetti G, et al. Opportunistic localization of skin lesions on vulnerable areas. Clin Dermatol. 2011;29:483-488.
- Thajudeheen CP, Jyothy K, Pryadarshi A. Treatment of port-wine stains with flash lamp pumped pulsed dye laser on Indian skin: a six year study. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2014;7:32-36.
Practice Points
- Port-wine stains (PWSs) most often are congenital lesions but can present later in life as acquired lesions with the same clinical and histologic findings.
- Magnetic resonance imaging of acquired PWSs should be considered to rule out underlying vascular anomalies (eg, deeper arteriovenous malformations).
- Pulsed dye laser therapy is safe for darker skin types and is the treatment of choice for acquired PWSs.
Nonconsecutive Pars Interarticularis Defects
Spondylolysis is a bone defect of the pars interarticularis. It is usually seen in adolescents who participate in sporting activities that involve repetitive axial loads to a hyperextended lower back, such as football offensive lineman, throwing athletes, and gymnasts. It occurs frequently in the L5 pars and can be unilateral or bilateral. The majority of reported multiple-level spondylolysis is at consecutive lumbar segments.1-6 Rarely, it affects noncontiguous levels. Most patients respond well to conservative treatment in the form of activity modification and orthosis.7 Surgical intervention is considered if 6 months of conservative management fails, spondylolisthesis develops, or intractable neurologic symptoms arise.
This case report presents an 18-year-old man with noncontiguous spondylolysis at L2 and L5 who was successfully treated with a 1-level pars repair at L2 after failed conservative management. This unique case highlights the importance of using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scan and diagnostic pars block when planning for surgical treatment in the rare cases of noncontiguous spondylolysis. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
An 18-year-old man presented to the clinic with worsening lower back pain for the previous 4 weeks. He was playing high school baseball and stated the pain was worse when he swung his bat. He had no history of trauma or back pain. Rest was the only alleviating factor, and he was beginning to experience pain when he stood after sitting. He denied any radicular pain. On examination, he had midline tenderness along the upper lumbar spine and pain with lumbar spine extension. His neurologic examination showed normal sensation with 5/5 strength in all key muscle groups. Plain radiograph of the lumbar spine showed an L5 pars defect (Figures 1A, 1B). A SPECT scan showed increased uptake at L2 pars bilaterally; the L5 pars did not show increased uptake (Figures 2A, 2B). A computed tomography (CT) scan confirmed bilateral L2 pars fractures and a left L5 pars fracture (Figures 3A, 3B). Bony changes in the form of marginal sclerosis at the L5, but not the L2, pars suggested that the L2 fracture was acute while the L5 fracture was chronic (Figures 4A, 4B).
The patient had conservative management for 6 months in the form of lumbosacral orthosis (LSO), cessation of sports activities, and physical therapy. The patient was initially treated with an LSO brace for 3 months, after which he had physical therapy. At 6 month follow-up, he reported continuing, significant back pain. A repeat CT scan of the lumbar spine showed no interval healing of the bilateral L2 or the unilateral L5 pars fractures. As a result of the patient’s noncontiguous pars fractures, a diagnostic CT-guided block of L2 pars was performed to identify which level was his main pain generator (Figure 5). He reported a brief period of complete pain relief after the L2 pars block. With failure of 6 months’ conservative management and positive SPECT scan and diagnostic block, surgical treatment was recommended. Prior to surgical intervention, magnetic resonance imaging was obtained to rule out pathology (eg, disc degeneration, infection, or tumor) other than the pars defect that could require fusion instead of pars repair (Figures 6A, 6B). Because of the patient’s young age, bilateral L2 pars repair rather than fusion was indicated. After 8 months of persistent back pain, he underwent bilateral L2 pars repair with iliac crest autograft, pedicle screws, and sublaminar hook fixation (Figures 7A, 7B). The patient had an uneventful immediate postoperative course. A 6-month postoperative CT scan showed bridging callus at the L2 pars; however, the left L5 pars fracture was still visible (Figures 8A-8C). Over a 6-month postoperative period, the patient had continued improvement in his back pain, advanced his activity as tolerated without problem, and was allowed to resume his sports activities. At 2-year follow-up, he was playing baseball and basketball, and denied any back pain.
Discussion
Lumbar spondylolysis is commonly seen at the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae, and accounts for more than 95% of spondylolysis cases.8 Multiple-level spondylolysis is a relatively rare finding with an incidence varying between 1.2% and 5.6%. The majority of the reported multiple-level cases are adjacent.1-3,6 Adolescents often present with a history of insidious-onset low back pain without radicular symptoms that is exacerbated by activity. Occasionally, an acute injury may elicit the onset of pain. A thorough history with emphasis on pain in relation to activity and sports involvement is beneficial. The patient in the current study was a throwing athlete and presented with 4 weeks of back pain that worsened with activity; he had no history of trauma.
Radiographic assessment using standing anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine is useful in the initial assessment. A SPECT scan of the lumbosacral spine is highly sensitive for identifying spondylolytic defects when plain radiographs are within normal limits, yet a high index of suspicion remains given the patient’s history and physical examination findings.9,10 Increased radionuclide uptake within the pars indicates a stress reaction and, possibly, a more acute pathology. The plain radiographs of the patient showed only L5 spondylolysis. However, a SPECT scan showed only increased uptake in L2 pars on both sides. These findings suggested chronic L5 and acute L2 pars defects. A thin-cut CT scan gives the best visualization of pars defect and can help in differentiating chronic defect with sclerotic margins versus acute defect with hazy irregular margins. In the current case, the CT scan showed changes consistent with unilateral chronic L5 and bilateral acute L2 pars defects.
The origin of the pain in spondylolysis is from the tissues rich in nociceptive nerve endings in the loose posterior arch. A CT-guided pars block is a very useful diagnostic preoperative tool that confirms the symptomatic level in cases of multilevel pars defect, especially if they are noncontiguous. In this case, the diagnostic preoperative bilateral L2 pars block confirmed that the pain generator was the acute L2 rather than the chronic L5 pars defect. This step assured that surgical treatment involving only the L2 level would be beneficial in alleviating the patient’s back pain after the failure of 6 months of conservative treatment.
Most patients with single-level spondylolysis respond to conservative treatment, especially after early diagnosis and treatment. The traditional nonoperative treatment of children and adolescents with a symptomatic spondylolytic lesion was a period of rest and progressive increased activity with physical therapy. Immobilization with an LSO was reserved for individuals who did not respond to rest and physical therapy.11 However, multiple studies revealed early immobilization achieved results superior to activity restriction alone, and individuals who underwent a period of activity restriction prior to bracing were more likely to experience persistent symptoms.12-14 Our patient underwent conservative treatment for 6 months, in the form of LSO, cessation of sport activities, and physical therapy, which failed to give him relief of his back pain.
Surgical intervention is warranted for adolescents with persistent, debilitating pain intractable to at least a 6-month period of nonoperative management. Additional indications for surgical management are those individuals who present with neurologic deficits and isthmic spondylolisthesis. Surgical treatment involves direct pars repair with iliac crest bone graft and use of a sublaminar hook/pedicle screw construct, cerclage wire, or pars screw.15-18
In contrast to single-level pars defects that respond well to conservative treatment, there are conflicting reports regarding the management of multiple-level pars fractures; a few reports suggest good outcome with conservative management, but the majority state that surgery is often required and conservative measures are rarely useful.1-4,6 Nayeemuddin and colleagues19 reported a case of a 16-year-old football player who presented with a 4-month history of constant low back pain related to bilateral L3 and L5 pars defects that responded to 1 year of conservative management, when the more acute fractures at L3 showed complete bony union and the patient had symptomatic pain relief and was able to return to full sporting activity.
Chang and colleagues2 reported 10 patients with adjacent 2-level bilateral spondylolysis treated successfully using a pedicle screw–hook construct with autogenous bone grafting. Ogawa and colleagues5 reported adjacent 2-level spondylolysis in 5 patients and 3-level spondylolysis in 2 patients, who were treated successfully by segmental wire fixation and bone grafting. Ivanic and colleagues15 retrospectively reviewed 113 patients with spondylolysis who were treated with direct repair using a hook-screw construct and showed a pseudoarthrosis rate of 13.3%. Superior fusion rates were observed in patients 14 years and younger compared with older patients, particularly those 20 years and older.15 Roca and colleagues16 prospectively analyzed 19 consecutive cases of spondylolysis that were repaired using a hook-screw construct. Twelve of 13 patients (92%) who were 20 years or younger at the time of the study (average age, 17.2 years) had fusion, whereas, in 6 patients 21 years and older (average age, 27.5 years), no cases of fusion were observed. The patients 20 years or younger had significantly better clinical results than those obtained in the patients 21 years and older. The authors concluded that pedicle screw–hook fixation is a useful alternative in the treatment of spondylolysis in adolescents, but did not recommend this procedure in patients older than 20 years.16
Conclusion
The current case demonstrates a unique example of rare noncontiguous pars defects successfully treated with primary repair of 1 level when conservative management failed and the symptomatic defect was isolated. It also highlights the importance of investigating the entirety of the lumbar spine when diagnosis of L5 spondylolysis rules out noncontiguous pars defects. The treatment of noncontiguous pars defects is not well defined; this case showed the importance of using a SPECT scan and a diagnostic pars block to help isolate the symptomatic level when surgical management is considered after a failure of conservative treatment. This case shows 2 possible results: the chronic unilateral L5 defect responded to nonsurgical treatment with asymptomatic fibrous nonunion, while the more acute bilateral L2 defect responded to pars repair with pedicle screw–hook fixation and iliac crest bone graft.
1. Al-Sebai MW, Al-Khawashki H. Spondyloptosis and multiple-level spondylolysis. Eur Spine J. 1999;8(1):75-77.
2. Chang JH, Lee CH, Wu SS, Lin LC, et al. Management of multiple level spondylolysis of the lumbar spine in young males: a report of six cases. J Formos Med Assoc. 2001;100(7)2:497-502.
3. Eingorn D, Pizzutillo PD. Pars interarticularis fusion of multiple levels of lumbar spondylolysis. A case report. Spine. 1985;10(3):250-252.
4. Nozawa S, Shimizu K, Miyamoto K, Tanaka M. Repair of pars interarticularis defect by segmental wire fixation in young athletes with spondylolysis. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(3):359-364.
5. Ogawa H, Nishimoto H, Hosoe H, Suzuki N, Kanamori Y, Shimizu K. Clinical outcome after segmental wire fixation and bone grafting for repair of the defects in multiple level lumbar spondylolysis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20(7):521-525.
6. Ravichandran G. Multiple lumbar spondylolyses. Spine. 1980;5(6):552-557.
7. Sys J, Michielsen J, Bracke P, Martens M, Verstreken J. Nonoperative treatment of active spondylolysis in elite athletes with normal X-ray findings: literature review and results of conservative treatment. Eur Spine J. 2001;10(6):498-504.
8. Saraste H. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1993;251:84-86.
9. Anderson K, Sarwark JF, Conway JJ, Logue ES, Schafer MS. Quantitative assessment with SPECT imaging of stress injuries of the pars interarticularis and response to bracing. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(1):28-33.
10. Bodner RJ, Heyman S, Drummond DS, Gregg JR. The use of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the diagnosis of low-back pain in young patients. Spine. 1988;13(10):1155-1160.
11. Steiner ME, Micheli LJ. Treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis with the modified Boston brace. Spine. 1985;10(10):937-943.
12. Blanda J, Bethem D, Moats W, Lew M. Defects of pars interarticularis in athletes: a protocol for nonoperative treatment. J Spinal Disord. 1993;6(5):406-411.
13. Kurd MF, Patel D, Norton R, Picetti G, Friel B, Vaccaro AR. Nonoperative treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20(8):560-564.
14. Pizzutillo PD, Hummer CD 3rd. Nonoperative treatment for painful adolescent spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989;9(5):538-540.
15. Ivanic GM, Pink TP, Achatz W, Ward JC, Homann NC, May M. Direct stabilization of lumbar spondylolysis with a hook screw: mean 11-year follow-up period for 113 patients. Spine. 2003;28(3):255-259.
16. Roca J, Iborra M, Cavanilles-Walker JM, Alberti G. Direct repair of spondylolysis using a new pedicle screw hook fixation: clinical and CT-assessed study: an analysis of 19 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(suppl):S82-S89.
17. Schlenzka D, Remes V, Helenius I, et al. Direct repair for treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients: no benefit in comparison to segmental fusion after a mean follow-up of 14.8 years. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(10):1437-1447.
18. Buck JE. Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1970;52(3):432-437.
19. Nayeemuddin M, Richards PJ, Ahmed EB. The imaging and management of nonconsecutive pars interarticularis defects: a case report and review of literature. Spine J. 2011;11(12):1157-1163.
Spondylolysis is a bone defect of the pars interarticularis. It is usually seen in adolescents who participate in sporting activities that involve repetitive axial loads to a hyperextended lower back, such as football offensive lineman, throwing athletes, and gymnasts. It occurs frequently in the L5 pars and can be unilateral or bilateral. The majority of reported multiple-level spondylolysis is at consecutive lumbar segments.1-6 Rarely, it affects noncontiguous levels. Most patients respond well to conservative treatment in the form of activity modification and orthosis.7 Surgical intervention is considered if 6 months of conservative management fails, spondylolisthesis develops, or intractable neurologic symptoms arise.
This case report presents an 18-year-old man with noncontiguous spondylolysis at L2 and L5 who was successfully treated with a 1-level pars repair at L2 after failed conservative management. This unique case highlights the importance of using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scan and diagnostic pars block when planning for surgical treatment in the rare cases of noncontiguous spondylolysis. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
An 18-year-old man presented to the clinic with worsening lower back pain for the previous 4 weeks. He was playing high school baseball and stated the pain was worse when he swung his bat. He had no history of trauma or back pain. Rest was the only alleviating factor, and he was beginning to experience pain when he stood after sitting. He denied any radicular pain. On examination, he had midline tenderness along the upper lumbar spine and pain with lumbar spine extension. His neurologic examination showed normal sensation with 5/5 strength in all key muscle groups. Plain radiograph of the lumbar spine showed an L5 pars defect (Figures 1A, 1B). A SPECT scan showed increased uptake at L2 pars bilaterally; the L5 pars did not show increased uptake (Figures 2A, 2B). A computed tomography (CT) scan confirmed bilateral L2 pars fractures and a left L5 pars fracture (Figures 3A, 3B). Bony changes in the form of marginal sclerosis at the L5, but not the L2, pars suggested that the L2 fracture was acute while the L5 fracture was chronic (Figures 4A, 4B).
The patient had conservative management for 6 months in the form of lumbosacral orthosis (LSO), cessation of sports activities, and physical therapy. The patient was initially treated with an LSO brace for 3 months, after which he had physical therapy. At 6 month follow-up, he reported continuing, significant back pain. A repeat CT scan of the lumbar spine showed no interval healing of the bilateral L2 or the unilateral L5 pars fractures. As a result of the patient’s noncontiguous pars fractures, a diagnostic CT-guided block of L2 pars was performed to identify which level was his main pain generator (Figure 5). He reported a brief period of complete pain relief after the L2 pars block. With failure of 6 months’ conservative management and positive SPECT scan and diagnostic block, surgical treatment was recommended. Prior to surgical intervention, magnetic resonance imaging was obtained to rule out pathology (eg, disc degeneration, infection, or tumor) other than the pars defect that could require fusion instead of pars repair (Figures 6A, 6B). Because of the patient’s young age, bilateral L2 pars repair rather than fusion was indicated. After 8 months of persistent back pain, he underwent bilateral L2 pars repair with iliac crest autograft, pedicle screws, and sublaminar hook fixation (Figures 7A, 7B). The patient had an uneventful immediate postoperative course. A 6-month postoperative CT scan showed bridging callus at the L2 pars; however, the left L5 pars fracture was still visible (Figures 8A-8C). Over a 6-month postoperative period, the patient had continued improvement in his back pain, advanced his activity as tolerated without problem, and was allowed to resume his sports activities. At 2-year follow-up, he was playing baseball and basketball, and denied any back pain.
Discussion
Lumbar spondylolysis is commonly seen at the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae, and accounts for more than 95% of spondylolysis cases.8 Multiple-level spondylolysis is a relatively rare finding with an incidence varying between 1.2% and 5.6%. The majority of the reported multiple-level cases are adjacent.1-3,6 Adolescents often present with a history of insidious-onset low back pain without radicular symptoms that is exacerbated by activity. Occasionally, an acute injury may elicit the onset of pain. A thorough history with emphasis on pain in relation to activity and sports involvement is beneficial. The patient in the current study was a throwing athlete and presented with 4 weeks of back pain that worsened with activity; he had no history of trauma.
Radiographic assessment using standing anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine is useful in the initial assessment. A SPECT scan of the lumbosacral spine is highly sensitive for identifying spondylolytic defects when plain radiographs are within normal limits, yet a high index of suspicion remains given the patient’s history and physical examination findings.9,10 Increased radionuclide uptake within the pars indicates a stress reaction and, possibly, a more acute pathology. The plain radiographs of the patient showed only L5 spondylolysis. However, a SPECT scan showed only increased uptake in L2 pars on both sides. These findings suggested chronic L5 and acute L2 pars defects. A thin-cut CT scan gives the best visualization of pars defect and can help in differentiating chronic defect with sclerotic margins versus acute defect with hazy irregular margins. In the current case, the CT scan showed changes consistent with unilateral chronic L5 and bilateral acute L2 pars defects.
The origin of the pain in spondylolysis is from the tissues rich in nociceptive nerve endings in the loose posterior arch. A CT-guided pars block is a very useful diagnostic preoperative tool that confirms the symptomatic level in cases of multilevel pars defect, especially if they are noncontiguous. In this case, the diagnostic preoperative bilateral L2 pars block confirmed that the pain generator was the acute L2 rather than the chronic L5 pars defect. This step assured that surgical treatment involving only the L2 level would be beneficial in alleviating the patient’s back pain after the failure of 6 months of conservative treatment.
Most patients with single-level spondylolysis respond to conservative treatment, especially after early diagnosis and treatment. The traditional nonoperative treatment of children and adolescents with a symptomatic spondylolytic lesion was a period of rest and progressive increased activity with physical therapy. Immobilization with an LSO was reserved for individuals who did not respond to rest and physical therapy.11 However, multiple studies revealed early immobilization achieved results superior to activity restriction alone, and individuals who underwent a period of activity restriction prior to bracing were more likely to experience persistent symptoms.12-14 Our patient underwent conservative treatment for 6 months, in the form of LSO, cessation of sport activities, and physical therapy, which failed to give him relief of his back pain.
Surgical intervention is warranted for adolescents with persistent, debilitating pain intractable to at least a 6-month period of nonoperative management. Additional indications for surgical management are those individuals who present with neurologic deficits and isthmic spondylolisthesis. Surgical treatment involves direct pars repair with iliac crest bone graft and use of a sublaminar hook/pedicle screw construct, cerclage wire, or pars screw.15-18
In contrast to single-level pars defects that respond well to conservative treatment, there are conflicting reports regarding the management of multiple-level pars fractures; a few reports suggest good outcome with conservative management, but the majority state that surgery is often required and conservative measures are rarely useful.1-4,6 Nayeemuddin and colleagues19 reported a case of a 16-year-old football player who presented with a 4-month history of constant low back pain related to bilateral L3 and L5 pars defects that responded to 1 year of conservative management, when the more acute fractures at L3 showed complete bony union and the patient had symptomatic pain relief and was able to return to full sporting activity.
Chang and colleagues2 reported 10 patients with adjacent 2-level bilateral spondylolysis treated successfully using a pedicle screw–hook construct with autogenous bone grafting. Ogawa and colleagues5 reported adjacent 2-level spondylolysis in 5 patients and 3-level spondylolysis in 2 patients, who were treated successfully by segmental wire fixation and bone grafting. Ivanic and colleagues15 retrospectively reviewed 113 patients with spondylolysis who were treated with direct repair using a hook-screw construct and showed a pseudoarthrosis rate of 13.3%. Superior fusion rates were observed in patients 14 years and younger compared with older patients, particularly those 20 years and older.15 Roca and colleagues16 prospectively analyzed 19 consecutive cases of spondylolysis that were repaired using a hook-screw construct. Twelve of 13 patients (92%) who were 20 years or younger at the time of the study (average age, 17.2 years) had fusion, whereas, in 6 patients 21 years and older (average age, 27.5 years), no cases of fusion were observed. The patients 20 years or younger had significantly better clinical results than those obtained in the patients 21 years and older. The authors concluded that pedicle screw–hook fixation is a useful alternative in the treatment of spondylolysis in adolescents, but did not recommend this procedure in patients older than 20 years.16
Conclusion
The current case demonstrates a unique example of rare noncontiguous pars defects successfully treated with primary repair of 1 level when conservative management failed and the symptomatic defect was isolated. It also highlights the importance of investigating the entirety of the lumbar spine when diagnosis of L5 spondylolysis rules out noncontiguous pars defects. The treatment of noncontiguous pars defects is not well defined; this case showed the importance of using a SPECT scan and a diagnostic pars block to help isolate the symptomatic level when surgical management is considered after a failure of conservative treatment. This case shows 2 possible results: the chronic unilateral L5 defect responded to nonsurgical treatment with asymptomatic fibrous nonunion, while the more acute bilateral L2 defect responded to pars repair with pedicle screw–hook fixation and iliac crest bone graft.
Spondylolysis is a bone defect of the pars interarticularis. It is usually seen in adolescents who participate in sporting activities that involve repetitive axial loads to a hyperextended lower back, such as football offensive lineman, throwing athletes, and gymnasts. It occurs frequently in the L5 pars and can be unilateral or bilateral. The majority of reported multiple-level spondylolysis is at consecutive lumbar segments.1-6 Rarely, it affects noncontiguous levels. Most patients respond well to conservative treatment in the form of activity modification and orthosis.7 Surgical intervention is considered if 6 months of conservative management fails, spondylolisthesis develops, or intractable neurologic symptoms arise.
This case report presents an 18-year-old man with noncontiguous spondylolysis at L2 and L5 who was successfully treated with a 1-level pars repair at L2 after failed conservative management. This unique case highlights the importance of using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scan and diagnostic pars block when planning for surgical treatment in the rare cases of noncontiguous spondylolysis. The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Case Report
An 18-year-old man presented to the clinic with worsening lower back pain for the previous 4 weeks. He was playing high school baseball and stated the pain was worse when he swung his bat. He had no history of trauma or back pain. Rest was the only alleviating factor, and he was beginning to experience pain when he stood after sitting. He denied any radicular pain. On examination, he had midline tenderness along the upper lumbar spine and pain with lumbar spine extension. His neurologic examination showed normal sensation with 5/5 strength in all key muscle groups. Plain radiograph of the lumbar spine showed an L5 pars defect (Figures 1A, 1B). A SPECT scan showed increased uptake at L2 pars bilaterally; the L5 pars did not show increased uptake (Figures 2A, 2B). A computed tomography (CT) scan confirmed bilateral L2 pars fractures and a left L5 pars fracture (Figures 3A, 3B). Bony changes in the form of marginal sclerosis at the L5, but not the L2, pars suggested that the L2 fracture was acute while the L5 fracture was chronic (Figures 4A, 4B).
The patient had conservative management for 6 months in the form of lumbosacral orthosis (LSO), cessation of sports activities, and physical therapy. The patient was initially treated with an LSO brace for 3 months, after which he had physical therapy. At 6 month follow-up, he reported continuing, significant back pain. A repeat CT scan of the lumbar spine showed no interval healing of the bilateral L2 or the unilateral L5 pars fractures. As a result of the patient’s noncontiguous pars fractures, a diagnostic CT-guided block of L2 pars was performed to identify which level was his main pain generator (Figure 5). He reported a brief period of complete pain relief after the L2 pars block. With failure of 6 months’ conservative management and positive SPECT scan and diagnostic block, surgical treatment was recommended. Prior to surgical intervention, magnetic resonance imaging was obtained to rule out pathology (eg, disc degeneration, infection, or tumor) other than the pars defect that could require fusion instead of pars repair (Figures 6A, 6B). Because of the patient’s young age, bilateral L2 pars repair rather than fusion was indicated. After 8 months of persistent back pain, he underwent bilateral L2 pars repair with iliac crest autograft, pedicle screws, and sublaminar hook fixation (Figures 7A, 7B). The patient had an uneventful immediate postoperative course. A 6-month postoperative CT scan showed bridging callus at the L2 pars; however, the left L5 pars fracture was still visible (Figures 8A-8C). Over a 6-month postoperative period, the patient had continued improvement in his back pain, advanced his activity as tolerated without problem, and was allowed to resume his sports activities. At 2-year follow-up, he was playing baseball and basketball, and denied any back pain.
Discussion
Lumbar spondylolysis is commonly seen at the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae, and accounts for more than 95% of spondylolysis cases.8 Multiple-level spondylolysis is a relatively rare finding with an incidence varying between 1.2% and 5.6%. The majority of the reported multiple-level cases are adjacent.1-3,6 Adolescents often present with a history of insidious-onset low back pain without radicular symptoms that is exacerbated by activity. Occasionally, an acute injury may elicit the onset of pain. A thorough history with emphasis on pain in relation to activity and sports involvement is beneficial. The patient in the current study was a throwing athlete and presented with 4 weeks of back pain that worsened with activity; he had no history of trauma.
Radiographic assessment using standing anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine is useful in the initial assessment. A SPECT scan of the lumbosacral spine is highly sensitive for identifying spondylolytic defects when plain radiographs are within normal limits, yet a high index of suspicion remains given the patient’s history and physical examination findings.9,10 Increased radionuclide uptake within the pars indicates a stress reaction and, possibly, a more acute pathology. The plain radiographs of the patient showed only L5 spondylolysis. However, a SPECT scan showed only increased uptake in L2 pars on both sides. These findings suggested chronic L5 and acute L2 pars defects. A thin-cut CT scan gives the best visualization of pars defect and can help in differentiating chronic defect with sclerotic margins versus acute defect with hazy irregular margins. In the current case, the CT scan showed changes consistent with unilateral chronic L5 and bilateral acute L2 pars defects.
The origin of the pain in spondylolysis is from the tissues rich in nociceptive nerve endings in the loose posterior arch. A CT-guided pars block is a very useful diagnostic preoperative tool that confirms the symptomatic level in cases of multilevel pars defect, especially if they are noncontiguous. In this case, the diagnostic preoperative bilateral L2 pars block confirmed that the pain generator was the acute L2 rather than the chronic L5 pars defect. This step assured that surgical treatment involving only the L2 level would be beneficial in alleviating the patient’s back pain after the failure of 6 months of conservative treatment.
Most patients with single-level spondylolysis respond to conservative treatment, especially after early diagnosis and treatment. The traditional nonoperative treatment of children and adolescents with a symptomatic spondylolytic lesion was a period of rest and progressive increased activity with physical therapy. Immobilization with an LSO was reserved for individuals who did not respond to rest and physical therapy.11 However, multiple studies revealed early immobilization achieved results superior to activity restriction alone, and individuals who underwent a period of activity restriction prior to bracing were more likely to experience persistent symptoms.12-14 Our patient underwent conservative treatment for 6 months, in the form of LSO, cessation of sport activities, and physical therapy, which failed to give him relief of his back pain.
Surgical intervention is warranted for adolescents with persistent, debilitating pain intractable to at least a 6-month period of nonoperative management. Additional indications for surgical management are those individuals who present with neurologic deficits and isthmic spondylolisthesis. Surgical treatment involves direct pars repair with iliac crest bone graft and use of a sublaminar hook/pedicle screw construct, cerclage wire, or pars screw.15-18
In contrast to single-level pars defects that respond well to conservative treatment, there are conflicting reports regarding the management of multiple-level pars fractures; a few reports suggest good outcome with conservative management, but the majority state that surgery is often required and conservative measures are rarely useful.1-4,6 Nayeemuddin and colleagues19 reported a case of a 16-year-old football player who presented with a 4-month history of constant low back pain related to bilateral L3 and L5 pars defects that responded to 1 year of conservative management, when the more acute fractures at L3 showed complete bony union and the patient had symptomatic pain relief and was able to return to full sporting activity.
Chang and colleagues2 reported 10 patients with adjacent 2-level bilateral spondylolysis treated successfully using a pedicle screw–hook construct with autogenous bone grafting. Ogawa and colleagues5 reported adjacent 2-level spondylolysis in 5 patients and 3-level spondylolysis in 2 patients, who were treated successfully by segmental wire fixation and bone grafting. Ivanic and colleagues15 retrospectively reviewed 113 patients with spondylolysis who were treated with direct repair using a hook-screw construct and showed a pseudoarthrosis rate of 13.3%. Superior fusion rates were observed in patients 14 years and younger compared with older patients, particularly those 20 years and older.15 Roca and colleagues16 prospectively analyzed 19 consecutive cases of spondylolysis that were repaired using a hook-screw construct. Twelve of 13 patients (92%) who were 20 years or younger at the time of the study (average age, 17.2 years) had fusion, whereas, in 6 patients 21 years and older (average age, 27.5 years), no cases of fusion were observed. The patients 20 years or younger had significantly better clinical results than those obtained in the patients 21 years and older. The authors concluded that pedicle screw–hook fixation is a useful alternative in the treatment of spondylolysis in adolescents, but did not recommend this procedure in patients older than 20 years.16
Conclusion
The current case demonstrates a unique example of rare noncontiguous pars defects successfully treated with primary repair of 1 level when conservative management failed and the symptomatic defect was isolated. It also highlights the importance of investigating the entirety of the lumbar spine when diagnosis of L5 spondylolysis rules out noncontiguous pars defects. The treatment of noncontiguous pars defects is not well defined; this case showed the importance of using a SPECT scan and a diagnostic pars block to help isolate the symptomatic level when surgical management is considered after a failure of conservative treatment. This case shows 2 possible results: the chronic unilateral L5 defect responded to nonsurgical treatment with asymptomatic fibrous nonunion, while the more acute bilateral L2 defect responded to pars repair with pedicle screw–hook fixation and iliac crest bone graft.
1. Al-Sebai MW, Al-Khawashki H. Spondyloptosis and multiple-level spondylolysis. Eur Spine J. 1999;8(1):75-77.
2. Chang JH, Lee CH, Wu SS, Lin LC, et al. Management of multiple level spondylolysis of the lumbar spine in young males: a report of six cases. J Formos Med Assoc. 2001;100(7)2:497-502.
3. Eingorn D, Pizzutillo PD. Pars interarticularis fusion of multiple levels of lumbar spondylolysis. A case report. Spine. 1985;10(3):250-252.
4. Nozawa S, Shimizu K, Miyamoto K, Tanaka M. Repair of pars interarticularis defect by segmental wire fixation in young athletes with spondylolysis. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(3):359-364.
5. Ogawa H, Nishimoto H, Hosoe H, Suzuki N, Kanamori Y, Shimizu K. Clinical outcome after segmental wire fixation and bone grafting for repair of the defects in multiple level lumbar spondylolysis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20(7):521-525.
6. Ravichandran G. Multiple lumbar spondylolyses. Spine. 1980;5(6):552-557.
7. Sys J, Michielsen J, Bracke P, Martens M, Verstreken J. Nonoperative treatment of active spondylolysis in elite athletes with normal X-ray findings: literature review and results of conservative treatment. Eur Spine J. 2001;10(6):498-504.
8. Saraste H. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1993;251:84-86.
9. Anderson K, Sarwark JF, Conway JJ, Logue ES, Schafer MS. Quantitative assessment with SPECT imaging of stress injuries of the pars interarticularis and response to bracing. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(1):28-33.
10. Bodner RJ, Heyman S, Drummond DS, Gregg JR. The use of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the diagnosis of low-back pain in young patients. Spine. 1988;13(10):1155-1160.
11. Steiner ME, Micheli LJ. Treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis with the modified Boston brace. Spine. 1985;10(10):937-943.
12. Blanda J, Bethem D, Moats W, Lew M. Defects of pars interarticularis in athletes: a protocol for nonoperative treatment. J Spinal Disord. 1993;6(5):406-411.
13. Kurd MF, Patel D, Norton R, Picetti G, Friel B, Vaccaro AR. Nonoperative treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20(8):560-564.
14. Pizzutillo PD, Hummer CD 3rd. Nonoperative treatment for painful adolescent spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989;9(5):538-540.
15. Ivanic GM, Pink TP, Achatz W, Ward JC, Homann NC, May M. Direct stabilization of lumbar spondylolysis with a hook screw: mean 11-year follow-up period for 113 patients. Spine. 2003;28(3):255-259.
16. Roca J, Iborra M, Cavanilles-Walker JM, Alberti G. Direct repair of spondylolysis using a new pedicle screw hook fixation: clinical and CT-assessed study: an analysis of 19 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(suppl):S82-S89.
17. Schlenzka D, Remes V, Helenius I, et al. Direct repair for treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients: no benefit in comparison to segmental fusion after a mean follow-up of 14.8 years. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(10):1437-1447.
18. Buck JE. Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1970;52(3):432-437.
19. Nayeemuddin M, Richards PJ, Ahmed EB. The imaging and management of nonconsecutive pars interarticularis defects: a case report and review of literature. Spine J. 2011;11(12):1157-1163.
1. Al-Sebai MW, Al-Khawashki H. Spondyloptosis and multiple-level spondylolysis. Eur Spine J. 1999;8(1):75-77.
2. Chang JH, Lee CH, Wu SS, Lin LC, et al. Management of multiple level spondylolysis of the lumbar spine in young males: a report of six cases. J Formos Med Assoc. 2001;100(7)2:497-502.
3. Eingorn D, Pizzutillo PD. Pars interarticularis fusion of multiple levels of lumbar spondylolysis. A case report. Spine. 1985;10(3):250-252.
4. Nozawa S, Shimizu K, Miyamoto K, Tanaka M. Repair of pars interarticularis defect by segmental wire fixation in young athletes with spondylolysis. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(3):359-364.
5. Ogawa H, Nishimoto H, Hosoe H, Suzuki N, Kanamori Y, Shimizu K. Clinical outcome after segmental wire fixation and bone grafting for repair of the defects in multiple level lumbar spondylolysis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20(7):521-525.
6. Ravichandran G. Multiple lumbar spondylolyses. Spine. 1980;5(6):552-557.
7. Sys J, Michielsen J, Bracke P, Martens M, Verstreken J. Nonoperative treatment of active spondylolysis in elite athletes with normal X-ray findings: literature review and results of conservative treatment. Eur Spine J. 2001;10(6):498-504.
8. Saraste H. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1993;251:84-86.
9. Anderson K, Sarwark JF, Conway JJ, Logue ES, Schafer MS. Quantitative assessment with SPECT imaging of stress injuries of the pars interarticularis and response to bracing. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(1):28-33.
10. Bodner RJ, Heyman S, Drummond DS, Gregg JR. The use of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the diagnosis of low-back pain in young patients. Spine. 1988;13(10):1155-1160.
11. Steiner ME, Micheli LJ. Treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis with the modified Boston brace. Spine. 1985;10(10):937-943.
12. Blanda J, Bethem D, Moats W, Lew M. Defects of pars interarticularis in athletes: a protocol for nonoperative treatment. J Spinal Disord. 1993;6(5):406-411.
13. Kurd MF, Patel D, Norton R, Picetti G, Friel B, Vaccaro AR. Nonoperative treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20(8):560-564.
14. Pizzutillo PD, Hummer CD 3rd. Nonoperative treatment for painful adolescent spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989;9(5):538-540.
15. Ivanic GM, Pink TP, Achatz W, Ward JC, Homann NC, May M. Direct stabilization of lumbar spondylolysis with a hook screw: mean 11-year follow-up period for 113 patients. Spine. 2003;28(3):255-259.
16. Roca J, Iborra M, Cavanilles-Walker JM, Alberti G. Direct repair of spondylolysis using a new pedicle screw hook fixation: clinical and CT-assessed study: an analysis of 19 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(suppl):S82-S89.
17. Schlenzka D, Remes V, Helenius I, et al. Direct repair for treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients: no benefit in comparison to segmental fusion after a mean follow-up of 14.8 years. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(10):1437-1447.
18. Buck JE. Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1970;52(3):432-437.
19. Nayeemuddin M, Richards PJ, Ahmed EB. The imaging and management of nonconsecutive pars interarticularis defects: a case report and review of literature. Spine J. 2011;11(12):1157-1163.