ABSTRACT

This study is the first biomechanical research of headless compression screws for fixation of vertical shear fractures of the medial malleolus, a promising alternative that potentially offers several advantages for fixation.

Vertical shear fractures were simulated by osteotomies in 20 synthetic distal tibiae. Models were randomly assigned to fixation with either 2 parallel cancellous screws or 2 parallel Acutrak 2 headless compression screws (Acumed). Specimens were subjected to offset axial loading to simulate supination-adduction loading and tracked using high-resolution video.

The headless compression screw construct was significantly stiffer (P < .0001) (360 ± 131 N/mm) than the partially threaded cancellous screws (180 ± 48 N/mm) and demonstrated a significantly increased (P < .0001) mean load to clinical failure (719 ± 91 N vs 343 ± 83 N). When specimens were displaced to 6 mm and allowed to relax, the headless compression screw constructs demonstrated an elastic recoil and were reduced to the pretesting fragment alignment, whereas the parallel cancellous screw constructs remained displaced.

Along with the headless design that may decrease soft tissue irritation, the increased stiffness and elastic recoil of the headless compression screw construct offers improved fixation of medial malleolus vertical shear fractures over the traditional methods.

Continue to: Headless compressions screws...

Headless compressions screws are cannulated tapered titanium screws with variable thread pitch angle, allowing a fully threaded screw to apply compression along its entire length. These screws have been most commonly used for scaphoid fractures¹ but have also been studied in fractures of small bones, such as capitellum, midfoot, and talar neck,^2-4 and arthrodesis in the foot, ankle, and hand.^5-7 Headless compression screws have been found to produce equivalent fragment compression to partially threaded cancellous screws while allowing less fragment displacement.^8,9 The lack of a head may decrease soft tissue irritation compared with the partially threaded cancellous screws. Finally, headless compression screws are independent of cortical integrity, as the entire length of the screw features a wide thread diameter to capture cancellous bone in the proximal fragment, unlike partially threaded cancellous screws, which only possess a thread purchase in the distal fragment and depend on an intact cortex.

Vertical shear fractures of the medial malleolus occur through the supination-adduction of the talus exerted onto the articular surface of the medial malleolus.¹⁰ Optimal fixation of these fractures must be sufficient to maintain stable anatomic reduction of the ankle joint articular surface, allowing early range of motion, maintaining congruency of the ankle joint, and decreasing the risk of future post-traumatic arthritis to maximize functional outcome.¹¹

A wide variety of techniques are available for fixation of these fractures, including various configurations of cortical screws, cancellous screws, tension bands, and antiglide plates. Clinically, 2 parallel 4.0-mm partially threaded cancellous screws are most often used. Limited evidence indicates that headless compression screws may be a viable option for fixation of medial malleolus fractures. One case reports the use of a headless compression screw for a horizontal medial malleolar fracture,¹² and a small retrospective case series that used headless compression screws for all medial malleolar fractures showed satisfactory outcomes, a high union rate, and low patient-reported pain.¹³

We evaluate the stiffness, force to 2-mm displacement of the joint surface, and elastic properties of these 2 different constructs in vertical medial malleolar fractures in synthetic distal tibiae. We hypothesize that the parallel headless compression screw fixation will be stiffer and require more force to 2-mm displacement than parallel unicortical cancellous screw fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Identical vertical osteotomies (17.5 mm) were made from the medial border of the medial malleolus using a custom jig in 20 left 4th-generation composite synthetic distal tibiae (Sawbones, Pacific Research Labs; Model No. 3401) to simulate an Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 44-A2.3 fracture. The tibiae were then cut 18 cm from the tibial plafond and randomized to 2 fixation groups (n = 10 specimens for each group): parallel unicortical screw fixation or parallel unicortical headless compression screw fixation (Figures 1A-1D). Custom polymethylmethacrylate jigs were used to reproducibly drill identical holes with a 3.2-mm drill for the parallel unicortical screw construct and the drill bits provided by the Acutrak 2 Headless Compression Screw System (Acumed). The parallel unicortical screw construct consisted of 2 parallel 4.0-mm-diameter, 40-mm partially threaded cancellous screws (Depuy Synthes), and the headless compression fixation construct consisted of 2 parallel 4.7-mm-diameter, 45-mm titanium Acutrak 2 screws parallel to each other in the transverse plane. The Acutrak screws were placed per manufacturer instructions by first drilling with the Acutrak 2-4.7 Long Drill bit (Acumed), followed by the Acutrak 2-4.7 Profile Drill bit for the near cortex.

Continue to: Specimens...

Specimens were fixed to the base of a servohydraulic testing machine (Model 809, MTS Systems Corporation) with an axial-torsional load transducer (Model No. 662.20-01; Axial capacity of 250 kg, torsional capacity 2.88 kg-m; MTS Systems Corporation). The specimens were set in a vice tilted at 17° in the coronal plane to allow the MTS crosshead to apply an offset axial load simulating supination-adduction loading, which has been described previously (Figure 2).^14,15 Load was applied to the inferolateral articular surface of the medial malleolus at 1 mm/s to a crosshead displacement of 6 mm and then cycled back to 0 mm. Load and axial displacement were measured at 60 Hz. The markers on the distal tibia and medial malleolus fracture fragment were tracked using high-resolution video (Fastcam PCI, Photron USA Inc). The motion of the video markers was determined using digitization and motion analysis software (Motus 9, Vicon).

Stiffness was calculated as the slope of the linear portion of the load-displacement curve over a range of 0.5 to 2.0 mm (Figure 3) and reported as mean (standard deviation). The force at 2 mm of fragment displacement was defined as a clinical failure.^16,17 Student’s t test was used to determine the difference in construct stiffness and force for 2 mm displacement of the 2 groups. Significance was defined as P < .05. Institutional Review Board approval was not required for this study.

RESULTS

With offset axial testing to simulate supination-adduction force along with video motion analysis, the mean stiffness (± standard deviation) measured 180 ± 48 N/mm for the parallel unicortical screw fixation construct and 360 ± 131 N/mm for the headless compression screw fixation construct (Figure 4A). The headless compression screw fixation construct was over 2 times stiffer than the parallel unicortical construct during initial displacement of the fracture, indicating a statistically significant difference (P < .0001).

The mean force for 2 mm of fracture displacement, defined as clinical failure, reached 342 ± 83 N for the parallel unicortical screw fixation construct and 719 ± 91 N for the headless compression screw fixation construct (Figure 4B). The headless compression screw fixation construct resisted displacement significantly more (P = .0001) than the parallel unicortical screw construct, presenting a 100% increase.

Upon cycling of the servohydraulic testing machine back to 0-mm displacement, the parallel unicortical construct demonstrated no elastic recoil, remaining displaced at 4 mm, whereas the headless compression screw construct rebounded to almost 0-mm displacement, which is well below the clinical definition of fixation failure of 2 mm (Figure 5).

Continue to: Discussion...

DISCUSSION

When subjected to offset axial load, we observed that the headless compression screw construct exhibited significantly increased stiffness and load to 2 mm of displacement compared with a parallel unicortical screw construct. The headless compression screw also demonstrated elastic recoil to almost 0 mm of displacement, which is well below the 2-mm displacement. 

We made reproducible fractures and fixation methods in synthetic distal tibiae, which feature less variability in size and quality than the cadaveric bone. Offset axial loading, rather than direct axial loading previously described by Amanatullah and colleagues,¹⁸ is the most physiologically relevant mode of force application to simulate the loading of the tauls onto the medial malleolus in the supination-adduction mechanism of injury.

The limitations of this study include the use of synthetic rather than cadaveric bone. Fourth-generation sawbones have been validated as possessing similar biomechanical properties as real bone.^7,19 These results may also be inapplicable to osteoporotic bone, which would be significantly less dense than sawbones. This study is also an artificial situation designed to only test construct stiffness and load to clinical failure in a single mode of stress, offset axial loading and neglects other possible modes of force. This testing setup also disregards the structures surrounding the medial malleolus and tibia, including the talus, fibula, or soft tissue attachments, including the deltoid ligament and flexor retinaculum. These results are only relevant immediately after fixation and before bone healing occurs. We also tested the load to clinical failure rather than cyclic loading. Our testing more closely modeled a single traumatic force rather than the considerably smaller stresses that would be repeatedly exerted on the construct over several weeks after fixation in a clinical situation. This research is also not a clinical outcome study, rather, it suggests that headless compression screws are a viable, stronger, and possibly superior method for the initial fixation of vertical medial malleolar fractures.

As the load is offset axial, the larger thread purchase of the headless compression screws may lead to increased pullout strength, possibly increasing headless compression screw construct stiffness. Also, the variable diameter of headless compression screw, which reaches up to 4.7 mm, would increase the stiffness of the construct compared with the diameter of the cancellous screws. The elasticity of the headless compression construct may be because screws are made of titanium rather than stainless steel. Such property and given that the screws are cannulated rather than solid may also play a role, although several studies have shown variable results for cannulated vs solid screws of the same diameter.^20,21 The elastic section modulus of both screws would have to be calculated to determine their exact effect on fixation.

CONCLUSION

The headless compression screw construct was found to be stiffer and features a higher load to clinical failure than a parallel unicortical cancellous screw construct for fixation of vertical medial malleolus fractures. Although significantly increased cost occurs with this construct, the headless design may decrease soft tissue irritation, and the elastic recoil of the construct after displacement may decrease clinical failure rates of this fixation method. This condition would eliminate the need for revision surgeries and thus be a cost effective alternative overall.

This paper will be judged for the Resident Writer’s Award.

ABSTRACT

This study is the first biomechanical research of headless compression screws for fixation of vertical shear fractures of the medial malleolus, a promising alternative that potentially offers several advantages for fixation.

Vertical shear fractures were simulated by osteotomies in 20 synthetic distal tibiae. Models were randomly assigned to fixation with either 2 parallel cancellous screws or 2 parallel Acutrak 2 headless compression screws (Acumed). Specimens were subjected to offset axial loading to simulate supination-adduction loading and tracked using high-resolution video.

The headless compression screw construct was significantly stiffer (P < .0001) (360 ± 131 N/mm) than the partially threaded cancellous screws (180 ± 48 N/mm) and demonstrated a significantly increased (P < .0001) mean load to clinical failure (719 ± 91 N vs 343 ± 83 N). When specimens were displaced to 6 mm and allowed to relax, the headless compression screw constructs demonstrated an elastic recoil and were reduced to the pretesting fragment alignment, whereas the parallel cancellous screw constructs remained displaced.

Along with the headless design that may decrease soft tissue irritation, the increased stiffness and elastic recoil of the headless compression screw construct offers improved fixation of medial malleolus vertical shear fractures over the traditional methods.

Continue to: Headless compressions screws...

Headless compressions screws are cannulated tapered titanium screws with variable thread pitch angle, allowing a fully threaded screw to apply compression along its entire length. These screws have been most commonly used for scaphoid fractures¹ but have also been studied in fractures of small bones, such as capitellum, midfoot, and talar neck,^2-4 and arthrodesis in the foot, ankle, and hand.^5-7 Headless compression screws have been found to produce equivalent fragment compression to partially threaded cancellous screws while allowing less fragment displacement.^8,9 The lack of a head may decrease soft tissue irritation compared with the partially threaded cancellous screws. Finally, headless compression screws are independent of cortical integrity, as the entire length of the screw features a wide thread diameter to capture cancellous bone in the proximal fragment, unlike partially threaded cancellous screws, which only possess a thread purchase in the distal fragment and depend on an intact cortex.

Vertical shear fractures of the medial malleolus occur through the supination-adduction of the talus exerted onto the articular surface of the medial malleolus.¹⁰ Optimal fixation of these fractures must be sufficient to maintain stable anatomic reduction of the ankle joint articular surface, allowing early range of motion, maintaining congruency of the ankle joint, and decreasing the risk of future post-traumatic arthritis to maximize functional outcome.¹¹

A wide variety of techniques are available for fixation of these fractures, including various configurations of cortical screws, cancellous screws, tension bands, and antiglide plates. Clinically, 2 parallel 4.0-mm partially threaded cancellous screws are most often used. Limited evidence indicates that headless compression screws may be a viable option for fixation of medial malleolus fractures. One case reports the use of a headless compression screw for a horizontal medial malleolar fracture,¹² and a small retrospective case series that used headless compression screws for all medial malleolar fractures showed satisfactory outcomes, a high union rate, and low patient-reported pain.¹³

We evaluate the stiffness, force to 2-mm displacement of the joint surface, and elastic properties of these 2 different constructs in vertical medial malleolar fractures in synthetic distal tibiae. We hypothesize that the parallel headless compression screw fixation will be stiffer and require more force to 2-mm displacement than parallel unicortical cancellous screw fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Identical vertical osteotomies (17.5 mm) were made from the medial border of the medial malleolus using a custom jig in 20 left 4th-generation composite synthetic distal tibiae (Sawbones, Pacific Research Labs; Model No. 3401) to simulate an Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 44-A2.3 fracture. The tibiae were then cut 18 cm from the tibial plafond and randomized to 2 fixation groups (n = 10 specimens for each group): parallel unicortical screw fixation or parallel unicortical headless compression screw fixation (Figures 1A-1D). Custom polymethylmethacrylate jigs were used to reproducibly drill identical holes with a 3.2-mm drill for the parallel unicortical screw construct and the drill bits provided by the Acutrak 2 Headless Compression Screw System (Acumed). The parallel unicortical screw construct consisted of 2 parallel 4.0-mm-diameter, 40-mm partially threaded cancellous screws (Depuy Synthes), and the headless compression fixation construct consisted of 2 parallel 4.7-mm-diameter, 45-mm titanium Acutrak 2 screws parallel to each other in the transverse plane. The Acutrak screws were placed per manufacturer instructions by first drilling with the Acutrak 2-4.7 Long Drill bit (Acumed), followed by the Acutrak 2-4.7 Profile Drill bit for the near cortex.

Continue to: Specimens...

Specimens were fixed to the base of a servohydraulic testing machine (Model 809, MTS Systems Corporation) with an axial-torsional load transducer (Model No. 662.20-01; Axial capacity of 250 kg, torsional capacity 2.88 kg-m; MTS Systems Corporation). The specimens were set in a vice tilted at 17° in the coronal plane to allow the MTS crosshead to apply an offset axial load simulating supination-adduction loading, which has been described previously (Figure 2).^14,15 Load was applied to the inferolateral articular surface of the medial malleolus at 1 mm/s to a crosshead displacement of 6 mm and then cycled back to 0 mm. Load and axial displacement were measured at 60 Hz. The markers on the distal tibia and medial malleolus fracture fragment were tracked using high-resolution video (Fastcam PCI, Photron USA Inc). The motion of the video markers was determined using digitization and motion analysis software (Motus 9, Vicon).

Stiffness was calculated as the slope of the linear portion of the load-displacement curve over a range of 0.5 to 2.0 mm (Figure 3) and reported as mean (standard deviation). The force at 2 mm of fragment displacement was defined as a clinical failure.^16,17 Student’s t test was used to determine the difference in construct stiffness and force for 2 mm displacement of the 2 groups. Significance was defined as P < .05. Institutional Review Board approval was not required for this study.

RESULTS

With offset axial testing to simulate supination-adduction force along with video motion analysis, the mean stiffness (± standard deviation) measured 180 ± 48 N/mm for the parallel unicortical screw fixation construct and 360 ± 131 N/mm for the headless compression screw fixation construct (Figure 4A). The headless compression screw fixation construct was over 2 times stiffer than the parallel unicortical construct during initial displacement of the fracture, indicating a statistically significant difference (P < .0001).

The mean force for 2 mm of fracture displacement, defined as clinical failure, reached 342 ± 83 N for the parallel unicortical screw fixation construct and 719 ± 91 N for the headless compression screw fixation construct (Figure 4B). The headless compression screw fixation construct resisted displacement significantly more (P = .0001) than the parallel unicortical screw construct, presenting a 100% increase.

Upon cycling of the servohydraulic testing machine back to 0-mm displacement, the parallel unicortical construct demonstrated no elastic recoil, remaining displaced at 4 mm, whereas the headless compression screw construct rebounded to almost 0-mm displacement, which is well below the clinical definition of fixation failure of 2 mm (Figure 5).

Continue to: Discussion...

DISCUSSION

When subjected to offset axial load, we observed that the headless compression screw construct exhibited significantly increased stiffness and load to 2 mm of displacement compared with a parallel unicortical screw construct. The headless compression screw also demonstrated elastic recoil to almost 0 mm of displacement, which is well below the 2-mm displacement. 

We made reproducible fractures and fixation methods in synthetic distal tibiae, which feature less variability in size and quality than the cadaveric bone. Offset axial loading, rather than direct axial loading previously described by Amanatullah and colleagues,¹⁸ is the most physiologically relevant mode of force application to simulate the loading of the tauls onto the medial malleolus in the supination-adduction mechanism of injury.

The limitations of this study include the use of synthetic rather than cadaveric bone. Fourth-generation sawbones have been validated as possessing similar biomechanical properties as real bone.^7,19 These results may also be inapplicable to osteoporotic bone, which would be significantly less dense than sawbones. This study is also an artificial situation designed to only test construct stiffness and load to clinical failure in a single mode of stress, offset axial loading and neglects other possible modes of force. This testing setup also disregards the structures surrounding the medial malleolus and tibia, including the talus, fibula, or soft tissue attachments, including the deltoid ligament and flexor retinaculum. These results are only relevant immediately after fixation and before bone healing occurs. We also tested the load to clinical failure rather than cyclic loading. Our testing more closely modeled a single traumatic force rather than the considerably smaller stresses that would be repeatedly exerted on the construct over several weeks after fixation in a clinical situation. This research is also not a clinical outcome study, rather, it suggests that headless compression screws are a viable, stronger, and possibly superior method for the initial fixation of vertical medial malleolar fractures.

As the load is offset axial, the larger thread purchase of the headless compression screws may lead to increased pullout strength, possibly increasing headless compression screw construct stiffness. Also, the variable diameter of headless compression screw, which reaches up to 4.7 mm, would increase the stiffness of the construct compared with the diameter of the cancellous screws. The elasticity of the headless compression construct may be because screws are made of titanium rather than stainless steel. Such property and given that the screws are cannulated rather than solid may also play a role, although several studies have shown variable results for cannulated vs solid screws of the same diameter.^20,21 The elastic section modulus of both screws would have to be calculated to determine their exact effect on fixation.

CONCLUSION

The headless compression screw construct was found to be stiffer and features a higher load to clinical failure than a parallel unicortical cancellous screw construct for fixation of vertical medial malleolus fractures. Although significantly increased cost occurs with this construct, the headless design may decrease soft tissue irritation, and the elastic recoil of the construct after displacement may decrease clinical failure rates of this fixation method. This condition would eliminate the need for revision surgeries and thus be a cost effective alternative overall.

This paper will be judged for the Resident Writer’s Award.

ABSTRACT

This study is the first biomechanical research of headless compression screws for fixation of vertical shear fractures of the medial malleolus, a promising alternative that potentially offers several advantages for fixation.

Vertical shear fractures were simulated by osteotomies in 20 synthetic distal tibiae. Models were randomly assigned to fixation with either 2 parallel cancellous screws or 2 parallel Acutrak 2 headless compression screws (Acumed). Specimens were subjected to offset axial loading to simulate supination-adduction loading and tracked using high-resolution video.

The headless compression screw construct was significantly stiffer (P < .0001) (360 ± 131 N/mm) than the partially threaded cancellous screws (180 ± 48 N/mm) and demonstrated a significantly increased (P < .0001) mean load to clinical failure (719 ± 91 N vs 343 ± 83 N). When specimens were displaced to 6 mm and allowed to relax, the headless compression screw constructs demonstrated an elastic recoil and were reduced to the pretesting fragment alignment, whereas the parallel cancellous screw constructs remained displaced.

Along with the headless design that may decrease soft tissue irritation, the increased stiffness and elastic recoil of the headless compression screw construct offers improved fixation of medial malleolus vertical shear fractures over the traditional methods.

Continue to: Headless compressions screws...

Headless compressions screws are cannulated tapered titanium screws with variable thread pitch angle, allowing a fully threaded screw to apply compression along its entire length. These screws have been most commonly used for scaphoid fractures¹ but have also been studied in fractures of small bones, such as capitellum, midfoot, and talar neck,^2-4 and arthrodesis in the foot, ankle, and hand.^5-7 Headless compression screws have been found to produce equivalent fragment compression to partially threaded cancellous screws while allowing less fragment displacement.^8,9 The lack of a head may decrease soft tissue irritation compared with the partially threaded cancellous screws. Finally, headless compression screws are independent of cortical integrity, as the entire length of the screw features a wide thread diameter to capture cancellous bone in the proximal fragment, unlike partially threaded cancellous screws, which only possess a thread purchase in the distal fragment and depend on an intact cortex.

Vertical shear fractures of the medial malleolus occur through the supination-adduction of the talus exerted onto the articular surface of the medial malleolus.¹⁰ Optimal fixation of these fractures must be sufficient to maintain stable anatomic reduction of the ankle joint articular surface, allowing early range of motion, maintaining congruency of the ankle joint, and decreasing the risk of future post-traumatic arthritis to maximize functional outcome.¹¹

A wide variety of techniques are available for fixation of these fractures, including various configurations of cortical screws, cancellous screws, tension bands, and antiglide plates. Clinically, 2 parallel 4.0-mm partially threaded cancellous screws are most often used. Limited evidence indicates that headless compression screws may be a viable option for fixation of medial malleolus fractures. One case reports the use of a headless compression screw for a horizontal medial malleolar fracture,¹² and a small retrospective case series that used headless compression screws for all medial malleolar fractures showed satisfactory outcomes, a high union rate, and low patient-reported pain.¹³

We evaluate the stiffness, force to 2-mm displacement of the joint surface, and elastic properties of these 2 different constructs in vertical medial malleolar fractures in synthetic distal tibiae. We hypothesize that the parallel headless compression screw fixation will be stiffer and require more force to 2-mm displacement than parallel unicortical cancellous screw fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Identical vertical osteotomies (17.5 mm) were made from the medial border of the medial malleolus using a custom jig in 20 left 4th-generation composite synthetic distal tibiae (Sawbones, Pacific Research Labs; Model No. 3401) to simulate an Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 44-A2.3 fracture. The tibiae were then cut 18 cm from the tibial plafond and randomized to 2 fixation groups (n = 10 specimens for each group): parallel unicortical screw fixation or parallel unicortical headless compression screw fixation (Figures 1A-1D). Custom polymethylmethacrylate jigs were used to reproducibly drill identical holes with a 3.2-mm drill for the parallel unicortical screw construct and the drill bits provided by the Acutrak 2 Headless Compression Screw System (Acumed). The parallel unicortical screw construct consisted of 2 parallel 4.0-mm-diameter, 40-mm partially threaded cancellous screws (Depuy Synthes), and the headless compression fixation construct consisted of 2 parallel 4.7-mm-diameter, 45-mm titanium Acutrak 2 screws parallel to each other in the transverse plane. The Acutrak screws were placed per manufacturer instructions by first drilling with the Acutrak 2-4.7 Long Drill bit (Acumed), followed by the Acutrak 2-4.7 Profile Drill bit for the near cortex.

Continue to: Specimens...

Specimens were fixed to the base of a servohydraulic testing machine (Model 809, MTS Systems Corporation) with an axial-torsional load transducer (Model No. 662.20-01; Axial capacity of 250 kg, torsional capacity 2.88 kg-m; MTS Systems Corporation). The specimens were set in a vice tilted at 17° in the coronal plane to allow the MTS crosshead to apply an offset axial load simulating supination-adduction loading, which has been described previously (Figure 2).^14,15 Load was applied to the inferolateral articular surface of the medial malleolus at 1 mm/s to a crosshead displacement of 6 mm and then cycled back to 0 mm. Load and axial displacement were measured at 60 Hz. The markers on the distal tibia and medial malleolus fracture fragment were tracked using high-resolution video (Fastcam PCI, Photron USA Inc). The motion of the video markers was determined using digitization and motion analysis software (Motus 9, Vicon).

Stiffness was calculated as the slope of the linear portion of the load-displacement curve over a range of 0.5 to 2.0 mm (Figure 3) and reported as mean (standard deviation). The force at 2 mm of fragment displacement was defined as a clinical failure.^16,17 Student’s t test was used to determine the difference in construct stiffness and force for 2 mm displacement of the 2 groups. Significance was defined as P < .05. Institutional Review Board approval was not required for this study.

RESULTS

With offset axial testing to simulate supination-adduction force along with video motion analysis, the mean stiffness (± standard deviation) measured 180 ± 48 N/mm for the parallel unicortical screw fixation construct and 360 ± 131 N/mm for the headless compression screw fixation construct (Figure 4A). The headless compression screw fixation construct was over 2 times stiffer than the parallel unicortical construct during initial displacement of the fracture, indicating a statistically significant difference (P < .0001).

The mean force for 2 mm of fracture displacement, defined as clinical failure, reached 342 ± 83 N for the parallel unicortical screw fixation construct and 719 ± 91 N for the headless compression screw fixation construct (Figure 4B). The headless compression screw fixation construct resisted displacement significantly more (P = .0001) than the parallel unicortical screw construct, presenting a 100% increase.

Upon cycling of the servohydraulic testing machine back to 0-mm displacement, the parallel unicortical construct demonstrated no elastic recoil, remaining displaced at 4 mm, whereas the headless compression screw construct rebounded to almost 0-mm displacement, which is well below the clinical definition of fixation failure of 2 mm (Figure 5).

Continue to: Discussion...

DISCUSSION

When subjected to offset axial load, we observed that the headless compression screw construct exhibited significantly increased stiffness and load to 2 mm of displacement compared with a parallel unicortical screw construct. The headless compression screw also demonstrated elastic recoil to almost 0 mm of displacement, which is well below the 2-mm displacement. 

We made reproducible fractures and fixation methods in synthetic distal tibiae, which feature less variability in size and quality than the cadaveric bone. Offset axial loading, rather than direct axial loading previously described by Amanatullah and colleagues,¹⁸ is the most physiologically relevant mode of force application to simulate the loading of the tauls onto the medial malleolus in the supination-adduction mechanism of injury.

The limitations of this study include the use of synthetic rather than cadaveric bone. Fourth-generation sawbones have been validated as possessing similar biomechanical properties as real bone.^7,19 These results may also be inapplicable to osteoporotic bone, which would be significantly less dense than sawbones. This study is also an artificial situation designed to only test construct stiffness and load to clinical failure in a single mode of stress, offset axial loading and neglects other possible modes of force. This testing setup also disregards the structures surrounding the medial malleolus and tibia, including the talus, fibula, or soft tissue attachments, including the deltoid ligament and flexor retinaculum. These results are only relevant immediately after fixation and before bone healing occurs. We also tested the load to clinical failure rather than cyclic loading. Our testing more closely modeled a single traumatic force rather than the considerably smaller stresses that would be repeatedly exerted on the construct over several weeks after fixation in a clinical situation. This research is also not a clinical outcome study, rather, it suggests that headless compression screws are a viable, stronger, and possibly superior method for the initial fixation of vertical medial malleolar fractures.

As the load is offset axial, the larger thread purchase of the headless compression screws may lead to increased pullout strength, possibly increasing headless compression screw construct stiffness. Also, the variable diameter of headless compression screw, which reaches up to 4.7 mm, would increase the stiffness of the construct compared with the diameter of the cancellous screws. The elasticity of the headless compression construct may be because screws are made of titanium rather than stainless steel. Such property and given that the screws are cannulated rather than solid may also play a role, although several studies have shown variable results for cannulated vs solid screws of the same diameter.^20,21 The elastic section modulus of both screws would have to be calculated to determine their exact effect on fixation.

CONCLUSION

The headless compression screw construct was found to be stiffer and features a higher load to clinical failure than a parallel unicortical cancellous screw construct for fixation of vertical medial malleolus fractures. Although significantly increased cost occurs with this construct, the headless design may decrease soft tissue irritation, and the elastic recoil of the construct after displacement may decrease clinical failure rates of this fixation method. This condition would eliminate the need for revision surgeries and thus be a cost effective alternative overall.

This paper will be judged for the Resident Writer’s Award.

ATLANTA – Patient sharing among hospital facilities contributed substantially to the overall Clostridium difficile infection rate, an analysis of interhospital contamination effects showed.

In fact, 7.6% of all Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) cases at the nearly 400 California hospitals included in the study were directly attributable to the patient-sharing network, Daniel Sewell, PhD, reported at the International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases.

“The methods that we employed allowed us to estimate the expected increase in CDI cases due to transfers as a function of the CDI rate at the hospital from which those patients were brought. These transfer patients were responsible for about 3.06 times the number of CDI cases as a normal patient,” said Dr. Sewell, a biostatistician at the University of Iowa, Iowa City.

The findings, which underscored the importance of regional (rather than local) efforts to minimize the spread of health care–associated infections, are based on an analysis of 27,200,873 hospital admissions and 532,320 same-day patient transfers identified from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project California State Inpatient Database for 2005-2011.

Transfer networks based on the monthly average number of patients discharged from one hospital and admitted to another on the same day were constructed, and the monthly average number of CDI cases per hospital were considered, along with hospital-level characteristics such as patient length of stay, age, and number of diagnoses. Network autocorrelation models that help eliminate bias were then used to assess the contamination effects between hospitals, he explained.

This led to development of an equation that can be used to determine the expected number of CDI cases in a hospital as a function of the number of transfers coming in and the contamination level of the source hospitals. The ability to calculate the expected number of CDI cases in this fashion is an important factor for the success of regional versus local intervention efforts, which are increasingly thought to be important for reducing health care–associated infections.

“If we want to design a coordinated or regional approach, we’ve got to have a much better understanding of the role that patient transfers have in these diseases,” Dr. Sewell said.

As most hospitals included in the study had a low CDI rate and a low transfer rate, the CDIs attributable to transfers represent a minority of cases, but they are a substantial minority, he said, noting that the main concern is with the “perfect storm” of high CDI rate plus high transfer rate.

The methodological approach used in this study to estimate CDI rates can be used for any health care–associated infection of interest, he added.

Dr. Sewell reported that he had no disclosures.

The AGA Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) National Registry will assess short- and long-term patient outcomes associated with FMT. Learn more at http://ow.ly/WdQE30lBuSu

sworcester@mdedge.com

ATLANTA – Patient sharing among hospital facilities contributed substantially to the overall Clostridium difficile infection rate, an analysis of interhospital contamination effects showed.

In fact, 7.6% of all Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) cases at the nearly 400 California hospitals included in the study were directly attributable to the patient-sharing network, Daniel Sewell, PhD, reported at the International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases.

“The methods that we employed allowed us to estimate the expected increase in CDI cases due to transfers as a function of the CDI rate at the hospital from which those patients were brought. These transfer patients were responsible for about 3.06 times the number of CDI cases as a normal patient,” said Dr. Sewell, a biostatistician at the University of Iowa, Iowa City.

The findings, which underscored the importance of regional (rather than local) efforts to minimize the spread of health care–associated infections, are based on an analysis of 27,200,873 hospital admissions and 532,320 same-day patient transfers identified from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project California State Inpatient Database for 2005-2011.

Transfer networks based on the monthly average number of patients discharged from one hospital and admitted to another on the same day were constructed, and the monthly average number of CDI cases per hospital were considered, along with hospital-level characteristics such as patient length of stay, age, and number of diagnoses. Network autocorrelation models that help eliminate bias were then used to assess the contamination effects between hospitals, he explained.

This led to development of an equation that can be used to determine the expected number of CDI cases in a hospital as a function of the number of transfers coming in and the contamination level of the source hospitals. The ability to calculate the expected number of CDI cases in this fashion is an important factor for the success of regional versus local intervention efforts, which are increasingly thought to be important for reducing health care–associated infections.

“If we want to design a coordinated or regional approach, we’ve got to have a much better understanding of the role that patient transfers have in these diseases,” Dr. Sewell said.

As most hospitals included in the study had a low CDI rate and a low transfer rate, the CDIs attributable to transfers represent a minority of cases, but they are a substantial minority, he said, noting that the main concern is with the “perfect storm” of high CDI rate plus high transfer rate.

The methodological approach used in this study to estimate CDI rates can be used for any health care–associated infection of interest, he added.

Dr. Sewell reported that he had no disclosures.

The AGA Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) National Registry will assess short- and long-term patient outcomes associated with FMT. Learn more at http://ow.ly/WdQE30lBuSu

sworcester@mdedge.com

ATLANTA – Patient sharing among hospital facilities contributed substantially to the overall Clostridium difficile infection rate, an analysis of interhospital contamination effects showed.

In fact, 7.6% of all Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) cases at the nearly 400 California hospitals included in the study were directly attributable to the patient-sharing network, Daniel Sewell, PhD, reported at the International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases.

“The methods that we employed allowed us to estimate the expected increase in CDI cases due to transfers as a function of the CDI rate at the hospital from which those patients were brought. These transfer patients were responsible for about 3.06 times the number of CDI cases as a normal patient,” said Dr. Sewell, a biostatistician at the University of Iowa, Iowa City.

The findings, which underscored the importance of regional (rather than local) efforts to minimize the spread of health care–associated infections, are based on an analysis of 27,200,873 hospital admissions and 532,320 same-day patient transfers identified from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project California State Inpatient Database for 2005-2011.

Transfer networks based on the monthly average number of patients discharged from one hospital and admitted to another on the same day were constructed, and the monthly average number of CDI cases per hospital were considered, along with hospital-level characteristics such as patient length of stay, age, and number of diagnoses. Network autocorrelation models that help eliminate bias were then used to assess the contamination effects between hospitals, he explained.

This led to development of an equation that can be used to determine the expected number of CDI cases in a hospital as a function of the number of transfers coming in and the contamination level of the source hospitals. The ability to calculate the expected number of CDI cases in this fashion is an important factor for the success of regional versus local intervention efforts, which are increasingly thought to be important for reducing health care–associated infections.

“If we want to design a coordinated or regional approach, we’ve got to have a much better understanding of the role that patient transfers have in these diseases,” Dr. Sewell said.

As most hospitals included in the study had a low CDI rate and a low transfer rate, the CDIs attributable to transfers represent a minority of cases, but they are a substantial minority, he said, noting that the main concern is with the “perfect storm” of high CDI rate plus high transfer rate.

The methodological approach used in this study to estimate CDI rates can be used for any health care–associated infection of interest, he added.

Dr. Sewell reported that he had no disclosures.

The AGA Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) National Registry will assess short- and long-term patient outcomes associated with FMT. Learn more at http://ow.ly/WdQE30lBuSu

sworcester@mdedge.com

Diabetic foot ulcers and infections can lead to osteomyelitis, a potentially devastating infection in the bone.

WILLSIE/Getty Images

How much of a difference can osteomyelitis make to a patient’s prognosis? A 2014 commentary by Benjamin A. Lipsky, MD, a prominent expert in problems associated with diabetic patients’ feet who’s with the University of Washington, Seattle, hints at the potential toll: “Overall, about 20% of patients with a diabetic foot infection (and over 60% of those with severe infections) have underlying osteomyelitis, which dramatically increases the risk of lower-extremity amputation” (Diabetes Care. 2014 Mar;37[3]:593-5).

Diagnosis of osteomyelitis, which relies on a bone biopsy, is clearly important. But there’s a big gap in diagnostic findings depending on whether doctors request culture or histology results, according to a new study released at the 2018 scientific meeting of the American Diabetes Association (Diabetes. 2018 Jul. doi: 10.2337/db18-110-OR).

In an interview, lead author and podiatrist Peter A. Crisologo, DPM, of University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, explained the study findings and offered guidance for requesting bone biopsies in possible cases of osteomyelitis.

Q: What makes diagnosis and treatment of osteomyelitis unique?

A: In the foot, there’s not a lot of soft tissue between the outside world and your bone. If the wounds on the feet go deep enough, they can spread a bacterial infection to the bone. This changes how foot infections are treated.
 

If you have a skin infection, it requires 11-12 days of antibiotics. Things start ramping up once you start getting into the bone. You’re talking potential surgery and 6 weeks of antibiotics through IV treatments. This is why it’s really important that you get your diagnosis right.

A lot of people say “I’m going to do the safe thing” and treat a bone infection with an extended course of antibiotics.

That’s not necessarily safe. If you’re overdiagnosing – for example, you identify bacteria that’s just a contaminant – you could put a patient through 6 weeks of IV treatment along with the risks of a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter ) line infection, complications from IV placement, and complications from the antibiotic.

Also, acute kidney injury develops in at least a third of the patients who undergo 6 weeks of antibiotics. That’s not to mention the cost of the visits and the labs you have to draw. But we don’t want to underdiagnose either. If osteomyelitis is underdiagnosed and then not treated, the infection can smolder and continue to progress and worsen.

Q: Your study looks at the bone biopsy. How does it fit into care of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot?

A: A bone biopsy is the standard for diagnosis under the guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54[12]:e132-73 ).
 

But beyond that, nobody says anything. Everyone has an operational definition of how a bone biopsy is interpreted, and there’s a need for a consensus on how a bone biopsy can be used to diagnose osteomyelitis.

You’ll get different percentages of your patients diagnosed with osteomyelitis. For example, someone may say the biopsy is only positive if the histology is positive, while another says the histology doesn’t matter if the culture is positive.

Q: Your study looks at histology and culture analyses. What do these reveal?

A: A traditional culture helps you identify the bacteria, as well as guide your treatment when it’s tested against antibiotics.
 

A traditional histology allows the pathologist to look under a microscope for signs of osteomyelitis: Do they see the right inflammatory cells, white cells, lymphocytes, combinations of cells? Does this look like an acute or chronic osteomyelitis?

Q: Why might it be wise to combine culture and histology analyses?

A: If you have bacteria that’s difficult to culture via traditional methods, it may be a bacteria that doesn’t grow well or easily. If you combine culture with histology, pathologists can look and say, “Your culture was negative but we see these other signs, so we feel this is osteomyelitis.”



Q: Your study examined 35 consecutive patients aged at least 21 years who had moderate or severe infections bone infections in the foot linked with type 1 diabetes (n = 4) or type 2 diabetes (n = 31).

The samples were analyzed via culture, histology, and culture/histology examinations. You also performed genetic sequencing (quantitative polymerase chain reaction targeting 16S rRNA). How does this test fit in to bone biopsies in the clinic?

A: That’s a newer method and not a standard of care treatment for the diabetic foot. This analysis looks at DNA that’s present, bypassing the analysis of difficult-to-grow bacteria.



Q: What did you discover?

A: In this study, histology had the lowest incidence of positively detecting osteomyelitis. (45.7%). The level increases when a culture is taken (68.6% vs. histology; P = .02).
 

Then it goes up when DNA is used because it’s catching everything (82.9%, P = .001 vs. histology and P = .31 vs. culture).

[The study also found that adding histology to culture or to genetic sequencing did not change positive findings.]

Q: Does the study suggest one approach is better than the others?

A: This paper doesn’t provide enough evidence to use one method over another. The main purpose was to raise the concern that diagnosis can change dramatically depending on how the gold standard of bone biopsy is interpreted.



Q: What were the pros and cons of the genetic sequencing approach?

A: When we use this approach, our positive diagnostic rate significantly increases. But there are also downsides. We don’t know whether the bacteria we see is alive or dead. We just know it was there. So are the patients truly positive? That’s a question we can’t answer.
 

Genetic sequencing also doesn’t tell us about susceptibilities to antibiotics.

Q: What is the take-home message here for physicians who may order bone biopsies?

A: The thing to do is request both traditional culture and traditional histology.
 

As far as DNA sequencing, that not something I’d recommend as a standard of care.

Q: Can you comment on cost and insurance coverage for these approaches?

A: As far as I know, genetic sequencing is not covered as it is not standard of care in the diabetic foot and is used mainly for research at this time.
 

Pathology and culture are standard of care when evaluating for osteomyelitis and should be a covered service. However, a patient should call their insurance company first prior to having the procedure done to see whether it is covered.

Q: What’s next for research in this area?

A: From here, the next step is bigger numbers: Increase the study size and look at this again. Also, we may be able to identify susceptibilities by identifying resistance within the DNA.



Dr. Crisologo and two other study authors report no relevant disclosures. One study author reported various disclosures including research support, consulting, and service on speakers' bureaus.
 

Diabetic foot ulcers and infections can lead to osteomyelitis, a potentially devastating infection in the bone.

WILLSIE/Getty Images

How much of a difference can osteomyelitis make to a patient’s prognosis? A 2014 commentary by Benjamin A. Lipsky, MD, a prominent expert in problems associated with diabetic patients’ feet who’s with the University of Washington, Seattle, hints at the potential toll: “Overall, about 20% of patients with a diabetic foot infection (and over 60% of those with severe infections) have underlying osteomyelitis, which dramatically increases the risk of lower-extremity amputation” (Diabetes Care. 2014 Mar;37[3]:593-5).

Diagnosis of osteomyelitis, which relies on a bone biopsy, is clearly important. But there’s a big gap in diagnostic findings depending on whether doctors request culture or histology results, according to a new study released at the 2018 scientific meeting of the American Diabetes Association (Diabetes. 2018 Jul. doi: 10.2337/db18-110-OR).

In an interview, lead author and podiatrist Peter A. Crisologo, DPM, of University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, explained the study findings and offered guidance for requesting bone biopsies in possible cases of osteomyelitis.

Q: What makes diagnosis and treatment of osteomyelitis unique?

A: In the foot, there’s not a lot of soft tissue between the outside world and your bone. If the wounds on the feet go deep enough, they can spread a bacterial infection to the bone. This changes how foot infections are treated.
 

If you have a skin infection, it requires 11-12 days of antibiotics. Things start ramping up once you start getting into the bone. You’re talking potential surgery and 6 weeks of antibiotics through IV treatments. This is why it’s really important that you get your diagnosis right.

A lot of people say “I’m going to do the safe thing” and treat a bone infection with an extended course of antibiotics.

That’s not necessarily safe. If you’re overdiagnosing – for example, you identify bacteria that’s just a contaminant – you could put a patient through 6 weeks of IV treatment along with the risks of a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter ) line infection, complications from IV placement, and complications from the antibiotic.

Also, acute kidney injury develops in at least a third of the patients who undergo 6 weeks of antibiotics. That’s not to mention the cost of the visits and the labs you have to draw. But we don’t want to underdiagnose either. If osteomyelitis is underdiagnosed and then not treated, the infection can smolder and continue to progress and worsen.

Q: Your study looks at the bone biopsy. How does it fit into care of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot?

A: A bone biopsy is the standard for diagnosis under the guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54[12]:e132-73 ).
 

But beyond that, nobody says anything. Everyone has an operational definition of how a bone biopsy is interpreted, and there’s a need for a consensus on how a bone biopsy can be used to diagnose osteomyelitis.

You’ll get different percentages of your patients diagnosed with osteomyelitis. For example, someone may say the biopsy is only positive if the histology is positive, while another says the histology doesn’t matter if the culture is positive.

Q: Your study looks at histology and culture analyses. What do these reveal?

A: A traditional culture helps you identify the bacteria, as well as guide your treatment when it’s tested against antibiotics.
 

A traditional histology allows the pathologist to look under a microscope for signs of osteomyelitis: Do they see the right inflammatory cells, white cells, lymphocytes, combinations of cells? Does this look like an acute or chronic osteomyelitis?

Q: Why might it be wise to combine culture and histology analyses?

A: If you have bacteria that’s difficult to culture via traditional methods, it may be a bacteria that doesn’t grow well or easily. If you combine culture with histology, pathologists can look and say, “Your culture was negative but we see these other signs, so we feel this is osteomyelitis.”



Q: Your study examined 35 consecutive patients aged at least 21 years who had moderate or severe infections bone infections in the foot linked with type 1 diabetes (n = 4) or type 2 diabetes (n = 31).

The samples were analyzed via culture, histology, and culture/histology examinations. You also performed genetic sequencing (quantitative polymerase chain reaction targeting 16S rRNA). How does this test fit in to bone biopsies in the clinic?

A: That’s a newer method and not a standard of care treatment for the diabetic foot. This analysis looks at DNA that’s present, bypassing the analysis of difficult-to-grow bacteria.



Q: What did you discover?

A: In this study, histology had the lowest incidence of positively detecting osteomyelitis. (45.7%). The level increases when a culture is taken (68.6% vs. histology; P = .02).
 

Then it goes up when DNA is used because it’s catching everything (82.9%, P = .001 vs. histology and P = .31 vs. culture).

[The study also found that adding histology to culture or to genetic sequencing did not change positive findings.]

Q: Does the study suggest one approach is better than the others?

A: This paper doesn’t provide enough evidence to use one method over another. The main purpose was to raise the concern that diagnosis can change dramatically depending on how the gold standard of bone biopsy is interpreted.



Q: What were the pros and cons of the genetic sequencing approach?

A: When we use this approach, our positive diagnostic rate significantly increases. But there are also downsides. We don’t know whether the bacteria we see is alive or dead. We just know it was there. So are the patients truly positive? That’s a question we can’t answer.
 

Genetic sequencing also doesn’t tell us about susceptibilities to antibiotics.

Q: What is the take-home message here for physicians who may order bone biopsies?

A: The thing to do is request both traditional culture and traditional histology.
 

As far as DNA sequencing, that not something I’d recommend as a standard of care.

Q: Can you comment on cost and insurance coverage for these approaches?

A: As far as I know, genetic sequencing is not covered as it is not standard of care in the diabetic foot and is used mainly for research at this time.
 

Pathology and culture are standard of care when evaluating for osteomyelitis and should be a covered service. However, a patient should call their insurance company first prior to having the procedure done to see whether it is covered.

Q: What’s next for research in this area?

A: From here, the next step is bigger numbers: Increase the study size and look at this again. Also, we may be able to identify susceptibilities by identifying resistance within the DNA.



Dr. Crisologo and two other study authors report no relevant disclosures. One study author reported various disclosures including research support, consulting, and service on speakers' bureaus.
 

Diabetic foot ulcers and infections can lead to osteomyelitis, a potentially devastating infection in the bone.

WILLSIE/Getty Images

How much of a difference can osteomyelitis make to a patient’s prognosis? A 2014 commentary by Benjamin A. Lipsky, MD, a prominent expert in problems associated with diabetic patients’ feet who’s with the University of Washington, Seattle, hints at the potential toll: “Overall, about 20% of patients with a diabetic foot infection (and over 60% of those with severe infections) have underlying osteomyelitis, which dramatically increases the risk of lower-extremity amputation” (Diabetes Care. 2014 Mar;37[3]:593-5).

Diagnosis of osteomyelitis, which relies on a bone biopsy, is clearly important. But there’s a big gap in diagnostic findings depending on whether doctors request culture or histology results, according to a new study released at the 2018 scientific meeting of the American Diabetes Association (Diabetes. 2018 Jul. doi: 10.2337/db18-110-OR).

In an interview, lead author and podiatrist Peter A. Crisologo, DPM, of University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, explained the study findings and offered guidance for requesting bone biopsies in possible cases of osteomyelitis.

Q: What makes diagnosis and treatment of osteomyelitis unique?

A: In the foot, there’s not a lot of soft tissue between the outside world and your bone. If the wounds on the feet go deep enough, they can spread a bacterial infection to the bone. This changes how foot infections are treated.
 

If you have a skin infection, it requires 11-12 days of antibiotics. Things start ramping up once you start getting into the bone. You’re talking potential surgery and 6 weeks of antibiotics through IV treatments. This is why it’s really important that you get your diagnosis right.

A lot of people say “I’m going to do the safe thing” and treat a bone infection with an extended course of antibiotics.

That’s not necessarily safe. If you’re overdiagnosing – for example, you identify bacteria that’s just a contaminant – you could put a patient through 6 weeks of IV treatment along with the risks of a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter ) line infection, complications from IV placement, and complications from the antibiotic.

Also, acute kidney injury develops in at least a third of the patients who undergo 6 weeks of antibiotics. That’s not to mention the cost of the visits and the labs you have to draw. But we don’t want to underdiagnose either. If osteomyelitis is underdiagnosed and then not treated, the infection can smolder and continue to progress and worsen.

Q: Your study looks at the bone biopsy. How does it fit into care of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot?

A: A bone biopsy is the standard for diagnosis under the guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54[12]:e132-73 ).
 

But beyond that, nobody says anything. Everyone has an operational definition of how a bone biopsy is interpreted, and there’s a need for a consensus on how a bone biopsy can be used to diagnose osteomyelitis.

You’ll get different percentages of your patients diagnosed with osteomyelitis. For example, someone may say the biopsy is only positive if the histology is positive, while another says the histology doesn’t matter if the culture is positive.

Q: Your study looks at histology and culture analyses. What do these reveal?

A: A traditional culture helps you identify the bacteria, as well as guide your treatment when it’s tested against antibiotics.
 

A traditional histology allows the pathologist to look under a microscope for signs of osteomyelitis: Do they see the right inflammatory cells, white cells, lymphocytes, combinations of cells? Does this look like an acute or chronic osteomyelitis?

Q: Why might it be wise to combine culture and histology analyses?

A: If you have bacteria that’s difficult to culture via traditional methods, it may be a bacteria that doesn’t grow well or easily. If you combine culture with histology, pathologists can look and say, “Your culture was negative but we see these other signs, so we feel this is osteomyelitis.”



Q: Your study examined 35 consecutive patients aged at least 21 years who had moderate or severe infections bone infections in the foot linked with type 1 diabetes (n = 4) or type 2 diabetes (n = 31).

The samples were analyzed via culture, histology, and culture/histology examinations. You also performed genetic sequencing (quantitative polymerase chain reaction targeting 16S rRNA). How does this test fit in to bone biopsies in the clinic?

A: That’s a newer method and not a standard of care treatment for the diabetic foot. This analysis looks at DNA that’s present, bypassing the analysis of difficult-to-grow bacteria.



Q: What did you discover?

A: In this study, histology had the lowest incidence of positively detecting osteomyelitis. (45.7%). The level increases when a culture is taken (68.6% vs. histology; P = .02).
 

Then it goes up when DNA is used because it’s catching everything (82.9%, P = .001 vs. histology and P = .31 vs. culture).

[The study also found that adding histology to culture or to genetic sequencing did not change positive findings.]

Q: Does the study suggest one approach is better than the others?

A: This paper doesn’t provide enough evidence to use one method over another. The main purpose was to raise the concern that diagnosis can change dramatically depending on how the gold standard of bone biopsy is interpreted.



Q: What were the pros and cons of the genetic sequencing approach?

A: When we use this approach, our positive diagnostic rate significantly increases. But there are also downsides. We don’t know whether the bacteria we see is alive or dead. We just know it was there. So are the patients truly positive? That’s a question we can’t answer.
 

Genetic sequencing also doesn’t tell us about susceptibilities to antibiotics.

Q: What is the take-home message here for physicians who may order bone biopsies?

A: The thing to do is request both traditional culture and traditional histology.
 

As far as DNA sequencing, that not something I’d recommend as a standard of care.

Q: Can you comment on cost and insurance coverage for these approaches?

A: As far as I know, genetic sequencing is not covered as it is not standard of care in the diabetic foot and is used mainly for research at this time.
 

Pathology and culture are standard of care when evaluating for osteomyelitis and should be a covered service. However, a patient should call their insurance company first prior to having the procedure done to see whether it is covered.

Q: What’s next for research in this area?

A: From here, the next step is bigger numbers: Increase the study size and look at this again. Also, we may be able to identify susceptibilities by identifying resistance within the DNA.



Dr. Crisologo and two other study authors report no relevant disclosures. One study author reported various disclosures including research support, consulting, and service on speakers' bureaus.
 

BALTIMORE—Sleeping with a bed partner’s smartphone notifications within earshot relates to daytime sleepiness. Insomnia symptoms and sleep duration may explain associations between technology use and depressive symptoms in teens. Among students, nighttime cell phone use reduces the likelihood of getting at least eight hours of sleep per night and increases the likelihood of receiving hurtful messages.

Those were among the findings from three studies about technology use and sleep that researchers presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Associated Professional Sleep Societies. The results suggest possible interventions such as education and regulating screen time to improve patients’ sleep and overall health, investigators said.

Screen Time, Depressive Symptoms, and Sleep

“Although screen-based activities, insomnia symptoms, and insufficient sleep are known risk factors for adolescent depressive symptoms, limited research has investigated whether sleep mediates the association between screen time and depressive symptoms,” said Xian Stella Li, PhD, a postdoctoral researcher at Stony Brook University in New York, and colleagues.

To examine how screen activities are associated with depressive symptoms and how sleep mediates these associations, Dr. Li and colleagues analyzed data from 2,865 participants (51% male) in the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study’s teen survey. Participants completed the survey at age 15 and reported problems falling asleep, problems staying asleep, and habitual weeknight sleep duration, as well as depressive symptoms. They also reported the typical daily time spent on four screen-based activities—social messaging, web surfing, watching TV or movies, and gaming. The investigators constructed a multiple mediation model to examine associations between screen time, insomnia symptoms and sleep duration, and depressive symptoms. Covariates included gender, age, race, family structure and income, and primary caregiver’s education.

For social messaging, web surfing, and watching TV or movies, “insomnia symptoms and sleep duration fully mediated the association between screen activities and depressive symptoms,” the researchers said. Furthermore, all four types of screen-based activities “have significant associations with teens’ depressive symptoms mediated by insomnia symptoms and sleep duration.”

Can a Bed Partner’s Phone Affect Daytime Sleepiness?

Studies have found that the use of interactive social technology around bedtime is related to difficulty falling asleep, unrefreshing sleep, and nighttime awakenings. At the same time, “evidence suggests that bed partners can play a role in the onset and maintenance of insomnia” and that “sleep problems might better be treated as a couple-level phenomenon,” said David F. Mastin, PhD, Professor of Psychology at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, and colleagues.

To examine whether a bed partner’s passive social technology use is a useful addition to the Sleep Hygiene Index, Dr. Mastin and colleagues analyzed data from 220 introductory psychology students (mean age, 20.1). Participants completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the Sleep Hygiene Index. “For this study, three additional questions were added [to the Sleep Hygiene Index], two assessing self-bedtime social technology use (active and passive) and one assessing partner (passive) use (ie, I sleep with my bed partner’s phone sounds or vibrations turned on where I could hear them if I were awake).”

In addition, participants indicated how frequently they experienced daytime sleepiness, preoccupation with sleep, mood disturbance, avolition (ie, decreased motivation), and impaired cognition.

Many students frequently or always used social technology at bedtime themselves (60% actively and 64% passively) or were able to hear a partner’s social technology at bedtime (35%).

“Both self and partner social technology use during sleep time were associated with greater daytime sleepiness,” the researchers said. In addition, six of the of the 13 original sleep hygiene items, as well as passive, active, and partner technology use, significantly correlated with greater daytime sleepiness. “The addition of self-use sleep-time technology items strengthened the correlation between the Sleep Hygiene Index and daytime sleepiness, and the addition of partner sleep-time technology use strengthened it even further,” Dr. Mastin and colleagues said. “We suggest social technology use in a dyadic context is an important new aspect of understanding sleep hygiene. Future research should investigate whether bed partner active social technology use similarly disrupts sleep.”

Nighttime Cell Phone Use by Students as Young as 7

Cell phone use at night may be common among children as young as 7, according to an Australian study. This practice “may not only impact negatively on sleep, but may also increase angry or hurtful communication and mental health issues,” researchers said. “On the other hand, it may also facilitate friendship building. Interventions must consider the benefits and potential losses associated with change.”

To study nighttime smartphone use by students and its associations with sleep, indicators of impaired communication, mental health, and relationship building, Jillian Dorrian, PhD, Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of South Australia in Adelaide, and colleagues analyzed data from more than 160,000 Australian students.

Primary and high school students completed an in-class survey about phone use, sleep, and friendships, as well as the General Health Questionnaire. The researchers included data from 169,352 students between ages 7 and 18 (49.9% male) in their analyses.

Fifty-five percent of respondents reported phone use between 10 PM and 6 AM at least once in the past week, including 25% of 7- and 8-year-olds and 83% of 17- and 18-year-olds.

After controlling for age and gender, nighttime phone use was associated with significantly increased odds of having responded to a text in anger (odds ratio, 4.9), having received hurtful messages (odds ratio, 4), or having been cyberbullied in the past month (odds ratio, 2.8). It also increased the likelihood of building friendships, however (odd ratio, 1.2).

In addition, nighttime phone use was associated with reduced odds of getting eight or more hours of sleep per night (odds ratio, 0.5) and less favorable General Health Questionnaire scores.

“Smartphones in the bedroom rob sleep time and facilitate communication during the circadian low,” Dr. Dorrian and colleagues said. “These factors may lead to impaired communication and disturbed mental health. However, nighttime messaging may also foster social connection…. These data highlight the ubiquity of smartphones in the bedroom, and the potential for health-related costs for developing teens, as well as a potential social cost if smartphones are removed without attention to the complete biopsychosocial context.”

—Jake Remaly

BALTIMORE—Sleeping with a bed partner’s smartphone notifications within earshot relates to daytime sleepiness. Insomnia symptoms and sleep duration may explain associations between technology use and depressive symptoms in teens. Among students, nighttime cell phone use reduces the likelihood of getting at least eight hours of sleep per night and increases the likelihood of receiving hurtful messages.

Those were among the findings from three studies about technology use and sleep that researchers presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Associated Professional Sleep Societies. The results suggest possible interventions such as education and regulating screen time to improve patients’ sleep and overall health, investigators said.

Screen Time, Depressive Symptoms, and Sleep

“Although screen-based activities, insomnia symptoms, and insufficient sleep are known risk factors for adolescent depressive symptoms, limited research has investigated whether sleep mediates the association between screen time and depressive symptoms,” said Xian Stella Li, PhD, a postdoctoral researcher at Stony Brook University in New York, and colleagues.

To examine how screen activities are associated with depressive symptoms and how sleep mediates these associations, Dr. Li and colleagues analyzed data from 2,865 participants (51% male) in the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study’s teen survey. Participants completed the survey at age 15 and reported problems falling asleep, problems staying asleep, and habitual weeknight sleep duration, as well as depressive symptoms. They also reported the typical daily time spent on four screen-based activities—social messaging, web surfing, watching TV or movies, and gaming. The investigators constructed a multiple mediation model to examine associations between screen time, insomnia symptoms and sleep duration, and depressive symptoms. Covariates included gender, age, race, family structure and income, and primary caregiver’s education.

For social messaging, web surfing, and watching TV or movies, “insomnia symptoms and sleep duration fully mediated the association between screen activities and depressive symptoms,” the researchers said. Furthermore, all four types of screen-based activities “have significant associations with teens’ depressive symptoms mediated by insomnia symptoms and sleep duration.”

Can a Bed Partner’s Phone Affect Daytime Sleepiness?

Studies have found that the use of interactive social technology around bedtime is related to difficulty falling asleep, unrefreshing sleep, and nighttime awakenings. At the same time, “evidence suggests that bed partners can play a role in the onset and maintenance of insomnia” and that “sleep problems might better be treated as a couple-level phenomenon,” said David F. Mastin, PhD, Professor of Psychology at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, and colleagues.

To examine whether a bed partner’s passive social technology use is a useful addition to the Sleep Hygiene Index, Dr. Mastin and colleagues analyzed data from 220 introductory psychology students (mean age, 20.1). Participants completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the Sleep Hygiene Index. “For this study, three additional questions were added [to the Sleep Hygiene Index], two assessing self-bedtime social technology use (active and passive) and one assessing partner (passive) use (ie, I sleep with my bed partner’s phone sounds or vibrations turned on where I could hear them if I were awake).”

In addition, participants indicated how frequently they experienced daytime sleepiness, preoccupation with sleep, mood disturbance, avolition (ie, decreased motivation), and impaired cognition.

Many students frequently or always used social technology at bedtime themselves (60% actively and 64% passively) or were able to hear a partner’s social technology at bedtime (35%).

“Both self and partner social technology use during sleep time were associated with greater daytime sleepiness,” the researchers said. In addition, six of the of the 13 original sleep hygiene items, as well as passive, active, and partner technology use, significantly correlated with greater daytime sleepiness. “The addition of self-use sleep-time technology items strengthened the correlation between the Sleep Hygiene Index and daytime sleepiness, and the addition of partner sleep-time technology use strengthened it even further,” Dr. Mastin and colleagues said. “We suggest social technology use in a dyadic context is an important new aspect of understanding sleep hygiene. Future research should investigate whether bed partner active social technology use similarly disrupts sleep.”

Nighttime Cell Phone Use by Students as Young as 7

Cell phone use at night may be common among children as young as 7, according to an Australian study. This practice “may not only impact negatively on sleep, but may also increase angry or hurtful communication and mental health issues,” researchers said. “On the other hand, it may also facilitate friendship building. Interventions must consider the benefits and potential losses associated with change.”

To study nighttime smartphone use by students and its associations with sleep, indicators of impaired communication, mental health, and relationship building, Jillian Dorrian, PhD, Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of South Australia in Adelaide, and colleagues analyzed data from more than 160,000 Australian students.

Primary and high school students completed an in-class survey about phone use, sleep, and friendships, as well as the General Health Questionnaire. The researchers included data from 169,352 students between ages 7 and 18 (49.9% male) in their analyses.

Fifty-five percent of respondents reported phone use between 10 PM and 6 AM at least once in the past week, including 25% of 7- and 8-year-olds and 83% of 17- and 18-year-olds.

After controlling for age and gender, nighttime phone use was associated with significantly increased odds of having responded to a text in anger (odds ratio, 4.9), having received hurtful messages (odds ratio, 4), or having been cyberbullied in the past month (odds ratio, 2.8). It also increased the likelihood of building friendships, however (odd ratio, 1.2).

In addition, nighttime phone use was associated with reduced odds of getting eight or more hours of sleep per night (odds ratio, 0.5) and less favorable General Health Questionnaire scores.

“Smartphones in the bedroom rob sleep time and facilitate communication during the circadian low,” Dr. Dorrian and colleagues said. “These factors may lead to impaired communication and disturbed mental health. However, nighttime messaging may also foster social connection…. These data highlight the ubiquity of smartphones in the bedroom, and the potential for health-related costs for developing teens, as well as a potential social cost if smartphones are removed without attention to the complete biopsychosocial context.”

—Jake Remaly

BALTIMORE—Sleeping with a bed partner’s smartphone notifications within earshot relates to daytime sleepiness. Insomnia symptoms and sleep duration may explain associations between technology use and depressive symptoms in teens. Among students, nighttime cell phone use reduces the likelihood of getting at least eight hours of sleep per night and increases the likelihood of receiving hurtful messages.

Those were among the findings from three studies about technology use and sleep that researchers presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Associated Professional Sleep Societies. The results suggest possible interventions such as education and regulating screen time to improve patients’ sleep and overall health, investigators said.

Screen Time, Depressive Symptoms, and Sleep

“Although screen-based activities, insomnia symptoms, and insufficient sleep are known risk factors for adolescent depressive symptoms, limited research has investigated whether sleep mediates the association between screen time and depressive symptoms,” said Xian Stella Li, PhD, a postdoctoral researcher at Stony Brook University in New York, and colleagues.

To examine how screen activities are associated with depressive symptoms and how sleep mediates these associations, Dr. Li and colleagues analyzed data from 2,865 participants (51% male) in the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study’s teen survey. Participants completed the survey at age 15 and reported problems falling asleep, problems staying asleep, and habitual weeknight sleep duration, as well as depressive symptoms. They also reported the typical daily time spent on four screen-based activities—social messaging, web surfing, watching TV or movies, and gaming. The investigators constructed a multiple mediation model to examine associations between screen time, insomnia symptoms and sleep duration, and depressive symptoms. Covariates included gender, age, race, family structure and income, and primary caregiver’s education.

For social messaging, web surfing, and watching TV or movies, “insomnia symptoms and sleep duration fully mediated the association between screen activities and depressive symptoms,” the researchers said. Furthermore, all four types of screen-based activities “have significant associations with teens’ depressive symptoms mediated by insomnia symptoms and sleep duration.”

Can a Bed Partner’s Phone Affect Daytime Sleepiness?

Studies have found that the use of interactive social technology around bedtime is related to difficulty falling asleep, unrefreshing sleep, and nighttime awakenings. At the same time, “evidence suggests that bed partners can play a role in the onset and maintenance of insomnia” and that “sleep problems might better be treated as a couple-level phenomenon,” said David F. Mastin, PhD, Professor of Psychology at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, and colleagues.

To examine whether a bed partner’s passive social technology use is a useful addition to the Sleep Hygiene Index, Dr. Mastin and colleagues analyzed data from 220 introductory psychology students (mean age, 20.1). Participants completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the Sleep Hygiene Index. “For this study, three additional questions were added [to the Sleep Hygiene Index], two assessing self-bedtime social technology use (active and passive) and one assessing partner (passive) use (ie, I sleep with my bed partner’s phone sounds or vibrations turned on where I could hear them if I were awake).”

In addition, participants indicated how frequently they experienced daytime sleepiness, preoccupation with sleep, mood disturbance, avolition (ie, decreased motivation), and impaired cognition.

Many students frequently or always used social technology at bedtime themselves (60% actively and 64% passively) or were able to hear a partner’s social technology at bedtime (35%).

“Both self and partner social technology use during sleep time were associated with greater daytime sleepiness,” the researchers said. In addition, six of the of the 13 original sleep hygiene items, as well as passive, active, and partner technology use, significantly correlated with greater daytime sleepiness. “The addition of self-use sleep-time technology items strengthened the correlation between the Sleep Hygiene Index and daytime sleepiness, and the addition of partner sleep-time technology use strengthened it even further,” Dr. Mastin and colleagues said. “We suggest social technology use in a dyadic context is an important new aspect of understanding sleep hygiene. Future research should investigate whether bed partner active social technology use similarly disrupts sleep.”

Nighttime Cell Phone Use by Students as Young as 7

Cell phone use at night may be common among children as young as 7, according to an Australian study. This practice “may not only impact negatively on sleep, but may also increase angry or hurtful communication and mental health issues,” researchers said. “On the other hand, it may also facilitate friendship building. Interventions must consider the benefits and potential losses associated with change.”

To study nighttime smartphone use by students and its associations with sleep, indicators of impaired communication, mental health, and relationship building, Jillian Dorrian, PhD, Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of South Australia in Adelaide, and colleagues analyzed data from more than 160,000 Australian students.

Primary and high school students completed an in-class survey about phone use, sleep, and friendships, as well as the General Health Questionnaire. The researchers included data from 169,352 students between ages 7 and 18 (49.9% male) in their analyses.

Fifty-five percent of respondents reported phone use between 10 PM and 6 AM at least once in the past week, including 25% of 7- and 8-year-olds and 83% of 17- and 18-year-olds.

After controlling for age and gender, nighttime phone use was associated with significantly increased odds of having responded to a text in anger (odds ratio, 4.9), having received hurtful messages (odds ratio, 4), or having been cyberbullied in the past month (odds ratio, 2.8). It also increased the likelihood of building friendships, however (odd ratio, 1.2).

In addition, nighttime phone use was associated with reduced odds of getting eight or more hours of sleep per night (odds ratio, 0.5) and less favorable General Health Questionnaire scores.

“Smartphones in the bedroom rob sleep time and facilitate communication during the circadian low,” Dr. Dorrian and colleagues said. “These factors may lead to impaired communication and disturbed mental health. However, nighttime messaging may also foster social connection…. These data highlight the ubiquity of smartphones in the bedroom, and the potential for health-related costs for developing teens, as well as a potential social cost if smartphones are removed without attention to the complete biopsychosocial context.”

—Jake Remaly

Residents of Denmark who seek medical attention for traumatic brain injury (TBI) have an increased risk of suicide, compared with the general Danish population without TBI, according to a study published in the August 14 issue of JAMA. “Additional analyses revealed that the risk of suicide was higher for individuals with severe TBI, numerous medical contacts, and longer hospital stays,” said lead author Trine Madsen, PhD. Individuals were at highest risk in the first six months after discharge, said Dr. Madsen, who is a postdoctoral fellow at the Danish Research Institute for Suicide Prevention in Hellerup.

A history of TBI previously has been associated with higher rates of self-harm, suicide, and death than are found in the general population. However, previous studies have been limited by methodological shortcomings, such as small sample sizes and low numbers of suicide cases with TBI. Dr. Madsen and colleagues conducted a retrospective cohort study using nationwide registers covering 7,418,391 individuals living in Denmark between 1980 and 2014 with 164,265,624 person-years’ follow-up. Of these people, 567,823 (7.6%) had a medical contact for TBI, which included mild TBI (ie, concussion), skull fracture without documented TBI, and severe TBI (ie, head injuries with evidence of structural brain injury).

Of 34,529 individuals who died by suicide, 3,536 (10.2%) had medical contact for TBI, including 2,701 for mild TBI, 174 for skull fracture without documented TBI, and 661 for severe TBI. The absolute suicide rate was 41 per 100,000 person-years among those with TBI versus 20 per 100,000 person-years among those with no diagnosis of TBI. After accounting for relevant covariates such as fractures not involving the skull, psychiatric diagnoses, and deliberate self-harm, the adjusted incidence ratio was 1.90.

This study “provides insights into the underappreciated relationship between TBI and suicide,” said Lee Goldstein, MD, PhD, and Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, MD, PhD, in an accompanying editorial. “The results … point to an important clinical triad—TBI history, recent injury (especially with long hospital stays), and more numerous postinjury medical contacts for TBI—that serves as a red flag for increased suicide risk,” said Dr. Goldstein, who is affiliated with Boston University School of Medicine, and Dr. Diaz-Arrastia, of the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine in Philadelphia. The results “indicate that increased suicide risk is relevant across all TBI severity levels, including the far more common mild injuries. Clinicians, health care professionals, and mental health practitioners must take notice of this important information.”

—Glenn S. Williams

Suggested Reading

Goldstein L, Diaz-Arrastia R. Traumatic brain injury and risk of suicide. JAMA. 2018;320(6):554-556.

Madsen T, Erlangsen A, Orlovska S, et al. Association between traumatic brain injury and risk of suicide. JAMA. 2018;320(6):580-588.

Residents of Denmark who seek medical attention for traumatic brain injury (TBI) have an increased risk of suicide, compared with the general Danish population without TBI, according to a study published in the August 14 issue of JAMA. “Additional analyses revealed that the risk of suicide was higher for individuals with severe TBI, numerous medical contacts, and longer hospital stays,” said lead author Trine Madsen, PhD. Individuals were at highest risk in the first six months after discharge, said Dr. Madsen, who is a postdoctoral fellow at the Danish Research Institute for Suicide Prevention in Hellerup.

A history of TBI previously has been associated with higher rates of self-harm, suicide, and death than are found in the general population. However, previous studies have been limited by methodological shortcomings, such as small sample sizes and low numbers of suicide cases with TBI. Dr. Madsen and colleagues conducted a retrospective cohort study using nationwide registers covering 7,418,391 individuals living in Denmark between 1980 and 2014 with 164,265,624 person-years’ follow-up. Of these people, 567,823 (7.6%) had a medical contact for TBI, which included mild TBI (ie, concussion), skull fracture without documented TBI, and severe TBI (ie, head injuries with evidence of structural brain injury).

Of 34,529 individuals who died by suicide, 3,536 (10.2%) had medical contact for TBI, including 2,701 for mild TBI, 174 for skull fracture without documented TBI, and 661 for severe TBI. The absolute suicide rate was 41 per 100,000 person-years among those with TBI versus 20 per 100,000 person-years among those with no diagnosis of TBI. After accounting for relevant covariates such as fractures not involving the skull, psychiatric diagnoses, and deliberate self-harm, the adjusted incidence ratio was 1.90.

This study “provides insights into the underappreciated relationship between TBI and suicide,” said Lee Goldstein, MD, PhD, and Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, MD, PhD, in an accompanying editorial. “The results … point to an important clinical triad—TBI history, recent injury (especially with long hospital stays), and more numerous postinjury medical contacts for TBI—that serves as a red flag for increased suicide risk,” said Dr. Goldstein, who is affiliated with Boston University School of Medicine, and Dr. Diaz-Arrastia, of the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine in Philadelphia. The results “indicate that increased suicide risk is relevant across all TBI severity levels, including the far more common mild injuries. Clinicians, health care professionals, and mental health practitioners must take notice of this important information.”

—Glenn S. Williams

Suggested Reading

Goldstein L, Diaz-Arrastia R. Traumatic brain injury and risk of suicide. JAMA. 2018;320(6):554-556.

Madsen T, Erlangsen A, Orlovska S, et al. Association between traumatic brain injury and risk of suicide. JAMA. 2018;320(6):580-588.

Residents of Denmark who seek medical attention for traumatic brain injury (TBI) have an increased risk of suicide, compared with the general Danish population without TBI, according to a study published in the August 14 issue of JAMA. “Additional analyses revealed that the risk of suicide was higher for individuals with severe TBI, numerous medical contacts, and longer hospital stays,” said lead author Trine Madsen, PhD. Individuals were at highest risk in the first six months after discharge, said Dr. Madsen, who is a postdoctoral fellow at the Danish Research Institute for Suicide Prevention in Hellerup.

A history of TBI previously has been associated with higher rates of self-harm, suicide, and death than are found in the general population. However, previous studies have been limited by methodological shortcomings, such as small sample sizes and low numbers of suicide cases with TBI. Dr. Madsen and colleagues conducted a retrospective cohort study using nationwide registers covering 7,418,391 individuals living in Denmark between 1980 and 2014 with 164,265,624 person-years’ follow-up. Of these people, 567,823 (7.6%) had a medical contact for TBI, which included mild TBI (ie, concussion), skull fracture without documented TBI, and severe TBI (ie, head injuries with evidence of structural brain injury).

Of 34,529 individuals who died by suicide, 3,536 (10.2%) had medical contact for TBI, including 2,701 for mild TBI, 174 for skull fracture without documented TBI, and 661 for severe TBI. The absolute suicide rate was 41 per 100,000 person-years among those with TBI versus 20 per 100,000 person-years among those with no diagnosis of TBI. After accounting for relevant covariates such as fractures not involving the skull, psychiatric diagnoses, and deliberate self-harm, the adjusted incidence ratio was 1.90.

This study “provides insights into the underappreciated relationship between TBI and suicide,” said Lee Goldstein, MD, PhD, and Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, MD, PhD, in an accompanying editorial. “The results … point to an important clinical triad—TBI history, recent injury (especially with long hospital stays), and more numerous postinjury medical contacts for TBI—that serves as a red flag for increased suicide risk,” said Dr. Goldstein, who is affiliated with Boston University School of Medicine, and Dr. Diaz-Arrastia, of the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine in Philadelphia. The results “indicate that increased suicide risk is relevant across all TBI severity levels, including the far more common mild injuries. Clinicians, health care professionals, and mental health practitioners must take notice of this important information.”

—Glenn S. Williams

Suggested Reading

Goldstein L, Diaz-Arrastia R. Traumatic brain injury and risk of suicide. JAMA. 2018;320(6):554-556.

Madsen T, Erlangsen A, Orlovska S, et al. Association between traumatic brain injury and risk of suicide. JAMA. 2018;320(6):580-588.

CHICAGO—Transdermal buprenorphine is associated with a significant increase in harmful side effects in people with dementia, according to data described at AAIC 2018.

About half of people with dementia who are living in nursing homes have clinically significant pain. Previous research has suggested that pain often is underdiagnosed and poorly managed in people with dementia. These shortcomings affect patients’ quality of life.

Opioid-based painkillers often are second-line treatments for people with dementia, and clinicians prescribe them to approximately 40% of people with dementia who live in nursing homes. These drugs reduce pain effectively, yet current prescribing guidance does not account for the fact that people with dementia get effective pain relief from smaller doses than are commonly prescribed. In addition, people with dementia are particularly sensitive to adverse drug effects.

Clive Ballard, MD, Professor of Age-Related Diseases at the University of Exeter Medical School in the United Kingdom, and colleagues conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the safety of the buprenorphine transdermal system in patients with dementia. They also analyzed the extent to which adverse events led patients to discontinue treatment with buprenorphine. The trial’s primary objective had been to examine the safety and efficacy of analgesic treatment for depression in this population.

Suggested Reading

Erdal A, Flo E, Aarsland D, et al. Efficacy and safety of analgesic treatment for depression in people with advanced dementia: randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (DEP.PAIN.DEM). Drugs Aging. 2018;35(6):545-558.

CHICAGO—Transdermal buprenorphine is associated with a significant increase in harmful side effects in people with dementia, according to data described at AAIC 2018.

About half of people with dementia who are living in nursing homes have clinically significant pain. Previous research has suggested that pain often is underdiagnosed and poorly managed in people with dementia. These shortcomings affect patients’ quality of life.

Opioid-based painkillers often are second-line treatments for people with dementia, and clinicians prescribe them to approximately 40% of people with dementia who live in nursing homes. These drugs reduce pain effectively, yet current prescribing guidance does not account for the fact that people with dementia get effective pain relief from smaller doses than are commonly prescribed. In addition, people with dementia are particularly sensitive to adverse drug effects.

Clive Ballard, MD, Professor of Age-Related Diseases at the University of Exeter Medical School in the United Kingdom, and colleagues conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the safety of the buprenorphine transdermal system in patients with dementia. They also analyzed the extent to which adverse events led patients to discontinue treatment with buprenorphine. The trial’s primary objective had been to examine the safety and efficacy of analgesic treatment for depression in this population.

Suggested Reading

Erdal A, Flo E, Aarsland D, et al. Efficacy and safety of analgesic treatment for depression in people with advanced dementia: randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (DEP.PAIN.DEM). Drugs Aging. 2018;35(6):545-558.

CHICAGO—Transdermal buprenorphine is associated with a significant increase in harmful side effects in people with dementia, according to data described at AAIC 2018.

About half of people with dementia who are living in nursing homes have clinically significant pain. Previous research has suggested that pain often is underdiagnosed and poorly managed in people with dementia. These shortcomings affect patients’ quality of life.

Opioid-based painkillers often are second-line treatments for people with dementia, and clinicians prescribe them to approximately 40% of people with dementia who live in nursing homes. These drugs reduce pain effectively, yet current prescribing guidance does not account for the fact that people with dementia get effective pain relief from smaller doses than are commonly prescribed. In addition, people with dementia are particularly sensitive to adverse drug effects.

Clive Ballard, MD, Professor of Age-Related Diseases at the University of Exeter Medical School in the United Kingdom, and colleagues conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the safety of the buprenorphine transdermal system in patients with dementia. They also analyzed the extent to which adverse events led patients to discontinue treatment with buprenorphine. The trial’s primary objective had been to examine the safety and efficacy of analgesic treatment for depression in this population.

Suggested Reading

Erdal A, Flo E, Aarsland D, et al. Efficacy and safety of analgesic treatment for depression in people with advanced dementia: randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (DEP.PAIN.DEM). Drugs Aging. 2018;35(6):545-558.

ILLUSTRATIVE CASE

A 65-year-old man with moderately severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee presents to your office for his annual exam. During the medication review, the patient mentions he is using glucosamine and chondroitin for his knee pain, which was recommended by a family member.

Should you tell the patient it’s okay to continue the medication?

Knee OA in the United States is a common condition and affects an estimated 12% of adults 60 years and older and 16% of adults 70 years and older.² The primary goals of OA therapy are to minimize pain and improve function. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) agree that first-line treatment recommendations include aerobic exercise, resistance training, and weight loss.

Initial pharmacologic therapies include full-strength acetaminophen or oral/topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (either initially or if unresponsive to acetaminophen).^3,4 Alternative medication options for patients with an inadequate response to initial therapy include tramadol, other opioids, duloxetine, or intra-articular injections with corticosteroids or hyaluronate.^3,4 Total knee replacement may be indicated in moderate or severe knee OA with radiographic evidence of OA.⁵ Vitamin D, lateral wedge insoles, and antioxidants are not currently recommended.⁶

Prior studies evaluating glucosamine and/or chondroitin have provided conflicting results regarding evidence on pain reduction, function, and quality of life. Therefore, guidelines on OA management do not recommend their use (AAOS, strong; ACR, conditional recommendation).^3,4 However, consumption remains high, with 6.5 million US adults reporting use of glucosamine and/or chondroitin in the prior 30 days.⁷

A 2015 systematic review of 43 randomized trials evaluating oral chondroitin sulfate for OA of varying severity suggested there may be a significant decrease in short-term and long-term pain with doses of ≥800 mg/d compared with placebo (level of evidence, low; risk of bias, high).⁸ However, no significant difference was noted in short- or long-term function, and the trials were highly heterogeneous.

[polldaddy:10097537]

Studies included in the 2015 systematic review found that glucosamine plus chondroitin did not have a significant effect on short- or long-term pain or physical function compared with placebo. Although glucosamine plus chondroitin led to significantly decreased pain compared with other medication, sensitivity analyses conducted for larger studies (N>200) with adequate methods of blinding and allocation concealment found no difference in pain.⁸

Continue to: Three studies included...

Three studies included in the 2015 systematic review provided data on adverse events when comparing glucosamine plus chondroitin vs placebo, and found no statistically significant difference.⁸

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) from Roman-Blas et al¹ evaluated chondroitin and glucosamine vs placebo in patients with more severe OA. The study was supported by Tedec-Meiji Farma (Madrid, Spain) maker of the combination of chondroitin plus glucosamine used in the study.

STUDY SUMMARY

Chondroitin + glucosamine was not better than placebo for pain

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 9 rheumatology referral centers and one orthopedic center in Spain. The trial evaluated the efficacy of chondroitin sulfate 1200 mg plus glucosamine sulfate 1500 mg (CS/GS) compared with placebo in 164 patients with Grade 2 or 3 knee OA and moderate to severe knee pain. OA grade was ascertained using the Kellgren-Lawrence scale, corresponding to osteophytes and either possible (Grade 2) or definite (Grade 3) joint space narrowing. Level of knee pain was defined by a self-reported global pain score of 40-80 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS).

Placebo was more effective than chondroitin sulfate/glucosamine sulfate in patients with knee OA.

No significant difference was noted in group characteristics, and the average age in the CS/GS group was 67 years vs 65 years in the placebo group. Exclusion criteria included body mass index of ≥35 kg/m², concurrent arthritic conditions, and any coexisting chronic disease that would prevent successful completion of the trial.¹

The primary end point was mean reduction in global pain score on a 0- to 100-mm VAS at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included mean reduction in total and subscale scores in pain and function on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index (0–100-mm VAS for each) and the use of rescue medication.

Continue to: Baseline global pain scores were...

Baseline global pain scores were 62 mm in both groups. Acetaminophen, up to 3 g/d, was the only allowed rescue medication. Clinic visits occurred at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. A statistically significant difference between groups was defined as P<.03.¹

Results. In the intention-to-treat analysis at 6 months, patients in the placebo group had a greater reduction in pain than the CS/GC group (-20 mm vs -12 mm; P=.029). No other difference was noted between the placebo and CS/GS groups in the total or subscales of the WOMAC index, and no difference was noted in use of acetaminophen. More patients in the placebo group had at least a 50% improvement in pain or function compared with the CS/GS group (47.4% vs 27.5%; P=.01).

In the CS/GS group, 31% did not complete the 6-month treatment period, compared with 18% in the placebo group. More patients dropped out because of adverse effects (diarrhea, upper abdominal pain, and constipation) in the CS/GS group than the placebo group (33 vs 19; P=.018).¹

WHAT’S NEW

A pharma-sponsored study finds treatment ineffective

The effectiveness of CS/GS for the treatment of knee OA has been in question for years, but this RCT is the first trial sponsored by a pharmaceutical company to evaluate CS/GS efficacy. This trial found evidence of a lack of efficacy. In patients with more severe OA of the knee, placebo was more effective than CS/GS, and CS/GS had significantly more adverse events. Therefore, it may be time to advise patients to stop taking their CS/GS supplement.

CAVEATS

Cannot generalize findings to CS or GS alone, or different dosages

The study compared only one medication dosing regimen using a combination of CS and GS. Whether either agent alone or different dosing would lead to the same outcome is unknown.

Continue to: CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION

CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION

An all-too-common product presents challenges

CS/GC is available over the counter and advertised directly to consumers. With this medication so readily available, identifying patients who are taking the supplement and encouraging discontinuation can be a challenge.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The PURLs Surveillance System was supported in part by Grant Number UL1RR024999 from the National Center For Research Resources, a Clinical Translational Science Award to the University of Chicago. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center For Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health.

ILLUSTRATIVE CASE

A 65-year-old man with moderately severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee presents to your office for his annual exam. During the medication review, the patient mentions he is using glucosamine and chondroitin for his knee pain, which was recommended by a family member.

Should you tell the patient it’s okay to continue the medication?

Knee OA in the United States is a common condition and affects an estimated 12% of adults 60 years and older and 16% of adults 70 years and older.² The primary goals of OA therapy are to minimize pain and improve function. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) agree that first-line treatment recommendations include aerobic exercise, resistance training, and weight loss.

Initial pharmacologic therapies include full-strength acetaminophen or oral/topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (either initially or if unresponsive to acetaminophen).^3,4 Alternative medication options for patients with an inadequate response to initial therapy include tramadol, other opioids, duloxetine, or intra-articular injections with corticosteroids or hyaluronate.^3,4 Total knee replacement may be indicated in moderate or severe knee OA with radiographic evidence of OA.⁵ Vitamin D, lateral wedge insoles, and antioxidants are not currently recommended.⁶

Prior studies evaluating glucosamine and/or chondroitin have provided conflicting results regarding evidence on pain reduction, function, and quality of life. Therefore, guidelines on OA management do not recommend their use (AAOS, strong; ACR, conditional recommendation).^3,4 However, consumption remains high, with 6.5 million US adults reporting use of glucosamine and/or chondroitin in the prior 30 days.⁷

A 2015 systematic review of 43 randomized trials evaluating oral chondroitin sulfate for OA of varying severity suggested there may be a significant decrease in short-term and long-term pain with doses of ≥800 mg/d compared with placebo (level of evidence, low; risk of bias, high).⁸ However, no significant difference was noted in short- or long-term function, and the trials were highly heterogeneous.

[polldaddy:10097537]

Studies included in the 2015 systematic review found that glucosamine plus chondroitin did not have a significant effect on short- or long-term pain or physical function compared with placebo. Although glucosamine plus chondroitin led to significantly decreased pain compared with other medication, sensitivity analyses conducted for larger studies (N>200) with adequate methods of blinding and allocation concealment found no difference in pain.⁸

Continue to: Three studies included...

Three studies included in the 2015 systematic review provided data on adverse events when comparing glucosamine plus chondroitin vs placebo, and found no statistically significant difference.⁸

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) from Roman-Blas et al¹ evaluated chondroitin and glucosamine vs placebo in patients with more severe OA. The study was supported by Tedec-Meiji Farma (Madrid, Spain) maker of the combination of chondroitin plus glucosamine used in the study.

STUDY SUMMARY

Chondroitin + glucosamine was not better than placebo for pain

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 9 rheumatology referral centers and one orthopedic center in Spain. The trial evaluated the efficacy of chondroitin sulfate 1200 mg plus glucosamine sulfate 1500 mg (CS/GS) compared with placebo in 164 patients with Grade 2 or 3 knee OA and moderate to severe knee pain. OA grade was ascertained using the Kellgren-Lawrence scale, corresponding to osteophytes and either possible (Grade 2) or definite (Grade 3) joint space narrowing. Level of knee pain was defined by a self-reported global pain score of 40-80 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS).

Placebo was more effective than chondroitin sulfate/glucosamine sulfate in patients with knee OA.

No significant difference was noted in group characteristics, and the average age in the CS/GS group was 67 years vs 65 years in the placebo group. Exclusion criteria included body mass index of ≥35 kg/m², concurrent arthritic conditions, and any coexisting chronic disease that would prevent successful completion of the trial.¹

The primary end point was mean reduction in global pain score on a 0- to 100-mm VAS at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included mean reduction in total and subscale scores in pain and function on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index (0–100-mm VAS for each) and the use of rescue medication.

Continue to: Baseline global pain scores were...

Baseline global pain scores were 62 mm in both groups. Acetaminophen, up to 3 g/d, was the only allowed rescue medication. Clinic visits occurred at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. A statistically significant difference between groups was defined as P<.03.¹

Results. In the intention-to-treat analysis at 6 months, patients in the placebo group had a greater reduction in pain than the CS/GC group (-20 mm vs -12 mm; P=.029). No other difference was noted between the placebo and CS/GS groups in the total or subscales of the WOMAC index, and no difference was noted in use of acetaminophen. More patients in the placebo group had at least a 50% improvement in pain or function compared with the CS/GS group (47.4% vs 27.5%; P=.01).

In the CS/GS group, 31% did not complete the 6-month treatment period, compared with 18% in the placebo group. More patients dropped out because of adverse effects (diarrhea, upper abdominal pain, and constipation) in the CS/GS group than the placebo group (33 vs 19; P=.018).¹

WHAT’S NEW

A pharma-sponsored study finds treatment ineffective

The effectiveness of CS/GS for the treatment of knee OA has been in question for years, but this RCT is the first trial sponsored by a pharmaceutical company to evaluate CS/GS efficacy. This trial found evidence of a lack of efficacy. In patients with more severe OA of the knee, placebo was more effective than CS/GS, and CS/GS had significantly more adverse events. Therefore, it may be time to advise patients to stop taking their CS/GS supplement.

CAVEATS

Cannot generalize findings to CS or GS alone, or different dosages

The study compared only one medication dosing regimen using a combination of CS and GS. Whether either agent alone or different dosing would lead to the same outcome is unknown.

Continue to: CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION

CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION

An all-too-common product presents challenges

CS/GC is available over the counter and advertised directly to consumers. With this medication so readily available, identifying patients who are taking the supplement and encouraging discontinuation can be a challenge.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The PURLs Surveillance System was supported in part by Grant Number UL1RR024999 from the National Center For Research Resources, a Clinical Translational Science Award to the University of Chicago. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center For Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health.

ILLUSTRATIVE CASE

A 65-year-old man with moderately severe osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee presents to your office for his annual exam. During the medication review, the patient mentions he is using glucosamine and chondroitin for his knee pain, which was recommended by a family member.

Should you tell the patient it’s okay to continue the medication?

Knee OA in the United States is a common condition and affects an estimated 12% of adults 60 years and older and 16% of adults 70 years and older.² The primary goals of OA therapy are to minimize pain and improve function. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) agree that first-line treatment recommendations include aerobic exercise, resistance training, and weight loss.

Initial pharmacologic therapies include full-strength acetaminophen or oral/topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (either initially or if unresponsive to acetaminophen).^3,4 Alternative medication options for patients with an inadequate response to initial therapy include tramadol, other opioids, duloxetine, or intra-articular injections with corticosteroids or hyaluronate.^3,4 Total knee replacement may be indicated in moderate or severe knee OA with radiographic evidence of OA.⁵ Vitamin D, lateral wedge insoles, and antioxidants are not currently recommended.⁶

Prior studies evaluating glucosamine and/or chondroitin have provided conflicting results regarding evidence on pain reduction, function, and quality of life. Therefore, guidelines on OA management do not recommend their use (AAOS, strong; ACR, conditional recommendation).^3,4 However, consumption remains high, with 6.5 million US adults reporting use of glucosamine and/or chondroitin in the prior 30 days.⁷

A 2015 systematic review of 43 randomized trials evaluating oral chondroitin sulfate for OA of varying severity suggested there may be a significant decrease in short-term and long-term pain with doses of ≥800 mg/d compared with placebo (level of evidence, low; risk of bias, high).⁸ However, no significant difference was noted in short- or long-term function, and the trials were highly heterogeneous.

[polldaddy:10097537]

Studies included in the 2015 systematic review found that glucosamine plus chondroitin did not have a significant effect on short- or long-term pain or physical function compared with placebo. Although glucosamine plus chondroitin led to significantly decreased pain compared with other medication, sensitivity analyses conducted for larger studies (N>200) with adequate methods of blinding and allocation concealment found no difference in pain.⁸

Continue to: Three studies included...

Three studies included in the 2015 systematic review provided data on adverse events when comparing glucosamine plus chondroitin vs placebo, and found no statistically significant difference.⁸

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) from Roman-Blas et al¹ evaluated chondroitin and glucosamine vs placebo in patients with more severe OA. The study was supported by Tedec-Meiji Farma (Madrid, Spain) maker of the combination of chondroitin plus glucosamine used in the study.

STUDY SUMMARY

Chondroitin + glucosamine was not better than placebo for pain

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 9 rheumatology referral centers and one orthopedic center in Spain. The trial evaluated the efficacy of chondroitin sulfate 1200 mg plus glucosamine sulfate 1500 mg (CS/GS) compared with placebo in 164 patients with Grade 2 or 3 knee OA and moderate to severe knee pain. OA grade was ascertained using the Kellgren-Lawrence scale, corresponding to osteophytes and either possible (Grade 2) or definite (Grade 3) joint space narrowing. Level of knee pain was defined by a self-reported global pain score of 40-80 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS).

Placebo was more effective than chondroitin sulfate/glucosamine sulfate in patients with knee OA.

No significant difference was noted in group characteristics, and the average age in the CS/GS group was 67 years vs 65 years in the placebo group. Exclusion criteria included body mass index of ≥35 kg/m², concurrent arthritic conditions, and any coexisting chronic disease that would prevent successful completion of the trial.¹

The primary end point was mean reduction in global pain score on a 0- to 100-mm VAS at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included mean reduction in total and subscale scores in pain and function on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index (0–100-mm VAS for each) and the use of rescue medication.

Continue to: Baseline global pain scores were...

Baseline global pain scores were 62 mm in both groups. Acetaminophen, up to 3 g/d, was the only allowed rescue medication. Clinic visits occurred at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. A statistically significant difference between groups was defined as P<.03.¹

Results. In the intention-to-treat analysis at 6 months, patients in the placebo group had a greater reduction in pain than the CS/GC group (-20 mm vs -12 mm; P=.029). No other difference was noted between the placebo and CS/GS groups in the total or subscales of the WOMAC index, and no difference was noted in use of acetaminophen. More patients in the placebo group had at least a 50% improvement in pain or function compared with the CS/GS group (47.4% vs 27.5%; P=.01).

In the CS/GS group, 31% did not complete the 6-month treatment period, compared with 18% in the placebo group. More patients dropped out because of adverse effects (diarrhea, upper abdominal pain, and constipation) in the CS/GS group than the placebo group (33 vs 19; P=.018).¹

WHAT’S NEW

A pharma-sponsored study finds treatment ineffective

The effectiveness of CS/GS for the treatment of knee OA has been in question for years, but this RCT is the first trial sponsored by a pharmaceutical company to evaluate CS/GS efficacy. This trial found evidence of a lack of efficacy. In patients with more severe OA of the knee, placebo was more effective than CS/GS, and CS/GS had significantly more adverse events. Therefore, it may be time to advise patients to stop taking their CS/GS supplement.

CAVEATS

Cannot generalize findings to CS or GS alone, or different dosages

The study compared only one medication dosing regimen using a combination of CS and GS. Whether either agent alone or different dosing would lead to the same outcome is unknown.

Continue to: CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION

CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTATION

An all-too-common product presents challenges

CS/GC is available over the counter and advertised directly to consumers. With this medication so readily available, identifying patients who are taking the supplement and encouraging discontinuation can be a challenge.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The PURLs Surveillance System was supported in part by Grant Number UL1RR024999 from the National Center For Research Resources, a Clinical Translational Science Award to the University of Chicago. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center For Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health.

MIAMI—Healthy, middle-aged adults may have a fear of falling, but unlike in older adults, this fear does not appear to affect gait and balance, according to a study presented at the Second Pan American Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Congress.

Since ptophobia, the fear of standing or walking, was described in the 1980s, “fear of falling has gained recognition as a health problem of older adults,” said Maria Sheila G. Rocha, MD, PhD, a researcher at Hospital Santa Marcelina in São Paulo, Brazil, and colleagues. In adults older than 65, fear of falling increases the likelihood of falls and injury and limits daily activities. The incidence and impact of fear of falling in younger adults is not known, however.

Dr. Rocha and colleagues aimed to evaluate the prevalence of fear of falling among urban, middle-aged, healthy adults, as well as associated risk factors and fear of falling’s impact on gait and balance in this population.

Their study included 111 healthy participants ages 18 to 95 who lived in São Paulo. The investigators assessed fear of falling using the following four variables from the Brazilian version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International: history of falls, functional dependency in activities of daily living, cognitive screening test, and activity level. The researchers assessed gait and balance using the Berg Balance Scale, Dynamic Gait Index, Short Physical Performance Battery, and the Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment.

Of the 111 participants, 52.2% were female, mean age was 51.8, and mean Mini-Mental State Examination score was 29.5. Fear of falling was present in 25.2%, and prevalence increased with age. Fear of falling was present in 18.4% of adults younger than 65 and in 48% of those 65 and older.

Fear of walking on an uneven surface and fear of going up or down a slope were the most common fear of falling variables. Being female and older were the main risk factors associated with fear of falling.

Participants with fear of falling performed worse on the Berg Balance Scale and Short Physical Performance Battery than those without. Those younger than 65, however, “had similar gait and balance performance despite the presence of fear of falling,” Dr. Rocha and colleagues said. In addition, physically active participants had less fear of falling.

“Fear of falling creates a psychologic barrier to performing activities for many older adults,” Dr. Rocha and colleagues said. The results suggest that physical activity is a protective factor against fear offalling, the researchers concluded.

MIAMI—Healthy, middle-aged adults may have a fear of falling, but unlike in older adults, this fear does not appear to affect gait and balance, according to a study presented at the Second Pan American Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Congress.

Since ptophobia, the fear of standing or walking, was described in the 1980s, “fear of falling has gained recognition as a health problem of older adults,” said Maria Sheila G. Rocha, MD, PhD, a researcher at Hospital Santa Marcelina in São Paulo, Brazil, and colleagues. In adults older than 65, fear of falling increases the likelihood of falls and injury and limits daily activities. The incidence and impact of fear of falling in younger adults is not known, however.

Dr. Rocha and colleagues aimed to evaluate the prevalence of fear of falling among urban, middle-aged, healthy adults, as well as associated risk factors and fear of falling’s impact on gait and balance in this population.

Their study included 111 healthy participants ages 18 to 95 who lived in São Paulo. The investigators assessed fear of falling using the following four variables from the Brazilian version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International: history of falls, functional dependency in activities of daily living, cognitive screening test, and activity level. The researchers assessed gait and balance using the Berg Balance Scale, Dynamic Gait Index, Short Physical Performance Battery, and the Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment.

Of the 111 participants, 52.2% were female, mean age was 51.8, and mean Mini-Mental State Examination score was 29.5. Fear of falling was present in 25.2%, and prevalence increased with age. Fear of falling was present in 18.4% of adults younger than 65 and in 48% of those 65 and older.

Fear of walking on an uneven surface and fear of going up or down a slope were the most common fear of falling variables. Being female and older were the main risk factors associated with fear of falling.

Participants with fear of falling performed worse on the Berg Balance Scale and Short Physical Performance Battery than those without. Those younger than 65, however, “had similar gait and balance performance despite the presence of fear of falling,” Dr. Rocha and colleagues said. In addition, physically active participants had less fear of falling.

“Fear of falling creates a psychologic barrier to performing activities for many older adults,” Dr. Rocha and colleagues said. The results suggest that physical activity is a protective factor against fear offalling, the researchers concluded.

MIAMI—Healthy, middle-aged adults may have a fear of falling, but unlike in older adults, this fear does not appear to affect gait and balance, according to a study presented at the Second Pan American Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Congress.

Since ptophobia, the fear of standing or walking, was described in the 1980s, “fear of falling has gained recognition as a health problem of older adults,” said Maria Sheila G. Rocha, MD, PhD, a researcher at Hospital Santa Marcelina in São Paulo, Brazil, and colleagues. In adults older than 65, fear of falling increases the likelihood of falls and injury and limits daily activities. The incidence and impact of fear of falling in younger adults is not known, however.

Dr. Rocha and colleagues aimed to evaluate the prevalence of fear of falling among urban, middle-aged, healthy adults, as well as associated risk factors and fear of falling’s impact on gait and balance in this population.

Their study included 111 healthy participants ages 18 to 95 who lived in São Paulo. The investigators assessed fear of falling using the following four variables from the Brazilian version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International: history of falls, functional dependency in activities of daily living, cognitive screening test, and activity level. The researchers assessed gait and balance using the Berg Balance Scale, Dynamic Gait Index, Short Physical Performance Battery, and the Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment.

Of the 111 participants, 52.2% were female, mean age was 51.8, and mean Mini-Mental State Examination score was 29.5. Fear of falling was present in 25.2%, and prevalence increased with age. Fear of falling was present in 18.4% of adults younger than 65 and in 48% of those 65 and older.

Fear of walking on an uneven surface and fear of going up or down a slope were the most common fear of falling variables. Being female and older were the main risk factors associated with fear of falling.

Participants with fear of falling performed worse on the Berg Balance Scale and Short Physical Performance Battery than those without. Those younger than 65, however, “had similar gait and balance performance despite the presence of fear of falling,” Dr. Rocha and colleagues said. In addition, physically active participants had less fear of falling.

“Fear of falling creates a psychologic barrier to performing activities for many older adults,” Dr. Rocha and colleagues said. The results suggest that physical activity is a protective factor against fear offalling, the researchers concluded.

Opioids were involved in 42,249 deaths in the United States in 2016, and opioid overdoses have quintupled since 1999.¹ Among the causes behind these statistics is increased opiate prescribing by physicians—with primary care providers accounting for about one half of opiate prescriptions.² As a result, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has issued a 4-part response for physicians,³ which includes careful opiate prescribing, expanded access to naloxone, prevention of opioid use disorder (OUD), and expanded use of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) of addiction—with the goal of preventing and managing OUD.

CASE

Fred R, a 55-year-old man who has been taking oxycodone, 70 mg/d, for chronic pain for longer than 10 years, visits your clinic for a prescription refill. His prescription monitoring program confirms the long history of regular oxycodone use, with the dosage escalating over the past 6 months. He recently was discharged from the hospital after an overdose of opiates.

Treat addiction as you would any chronic disease: Anticipate relapse, engage support systems, and work with the patient to obtain a higher level of care.

Mr. R admits to using heroin after running out of oxycodone. He is in mild withdrawal, with a score of 8 (of a possible 48) on the Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale⁴ (COWS, which assigns point values to 11 common symptoms to gauge the severity of opioid withdrawal and, by inference, the patient’s degree of physical dependence). You determine that Mr. R is frightened about his use of oxycodone and would like to stop; he has tried to stop several times on his own but always relapses when withdrawal becomes severe.

How would you proceed with the care of this patient?

What is OUD? How is the diagnosis made?

OUD is a combination of cognitive, behavioral, and physiologic symptoms arising from continued use of opioids despite significant health, legal, or relationship problems related to their use. The disorder is diagnosed based on specific criteria provided in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5)(TABLE 1)⁵ and is revealed by 1) a careful history that delineates a problematic pattern of opioid use, 2) physical examination, and 3) urine toxicology screen.

Identification of acute opioid intoxication can also be useful when working up a patient in whom OUD is suspected; findings of acute opioid intoxication on physical examination include constricted pupils, head-nodding, excessive sleepiness, and drooping eyelids. Other physical signs of illicit opioid use include track marks around veins of the arm, evidence of repeated trauma, and stigmata of liver dysfunction. Withdrawal can present as agitation, rhinorrhea, dilated pupils, nausea, diarrhea, yawning, and gooseflesh. The COWS, which, as noted in the case, assigns point values to withdrawal symptoms, can be helpful in determining the severity of withdrawal.⁴

What is the differential Dx of OUD?

When OUD is likely, but not clearly diagnosable, on the basis of findings, consider a mental health disorder: depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder, personality disorder, and polysubstance use disorder. Concurrent diagnosis of substance abuse and a mental health disorder is common; treatment requires that both disorders be addressed simultaneously.⁶ Assessing for use or abuse of, and addiction to, other substances is vital to ensure proper diagnosis and effective therapy. Polysubstance dependence can be more difficult to treat than single-substance abuse or addiction alone.

Continue to: How is OUD treated?

How is OUD treated?

This article reviews MAT with buprenorphine; other MAT options include methadone and naltrexone. Regardless of the indicated agent chosen, MAT has been shown to be superior to abstinence alone or abstinence with counseling interventions in maintaining sobriety.⁷

Evidence of efficacy. In a longitudinal cohort study of patients who received MAT with buprenorphine initiated in general practice, patients in whom buprenorphine therapy was interrupted had a greatly increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio=29.04; 95% confidence interval, 10.04-83.99).⁸ The study highlights the harm-reduction treatment philosophy of MAT with buprenorphine: The regimen can be used to keep a patient alive while working toward sobriety.

We encourage physicians to treat addiction as they would any chronic disease. The strategy includes anticipating relapse, engaging support systems (eg, family, counselors, social groups, Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous [NA]), and working with the patient to obtain a higher level of care, as indicated.

Pharmacology and induction. Alone or in combination with naloxone, buprenorphine can be used as in-office-based MAT. Buprenorphine is a partial opiate agonist that binds tightly to opioid receptors and can block the effects of other opiates. An advantage of buprenorphine is its low likelihood of overdose, due to the drug’s so-called ceiling effect at a dosage of 24 mg/d;⁹ dosages above this amount have little increased medication effect.

Dosing of buprenorphine is variable from patient to patient, with a maximum dosage of 24 mg/d. Therapy can be initiated safely at home, although some physicians prefer in-office induction. It is important that the patient be in moderate withdrawal (as determined by the score on the COWS) before initiation, because buprenorphine, as a partial agonist, can precipitate withdrawal by displacing full opiate agonists from opioid receptors.

Continue to: In our experience...

In our experience, a common induction method is to give 2 to 4 mg buprenorphine, followed by a 1-hour assessment of withdrawal symptoms. This can be repeated for multiple doses until withdrawal is relieved, usually with a maximum dosage of 6 to 8 mg in the initial 1 or 2 days of treatment. Rapid reassessment is required after induction, preferably in 1 to 3 days. Dosing should be gradually increased in 2- to 4-mg increments until 1) the patient has no withdrawal symptoms in a 24-hour period and 2) craving for opiates is adequately controlled.

Note: Primary care physicians must complete an 8-hour online training course to obtain a US Drug Enforcement Administration waiver to prescribe buprenorphine.

How should coordination of care be approached?

Actual prescribing and monitoring of buprenorphine is not complex, but many physicians are intimidated by the perceived difficulty of coordination of care. The American Society of Addiction Medicine's national practice guideline recommends that buprenorphine and other MAT protocols be offered as a part of a comprehensive treatment plan that includes psychosocial treatment.⁷ This combination leads to the greatest potential for ongoing remission of OUD. Although many primary care clinics do not have chemical dependency counseling available at their primary location, partnering with community organizations and other mental health resources can meet this need. Coordination of care with home services, behavioral health, and psychiatry is common in primary care, and is no different for OUD.

There are administrative requirements for a clinic that offers MAT (TABLE 2),⁷ including tracking of numbers of patients who are taking buprenorphine. During the first year of prescribing buprenorphine, a physician or other provider is permitted to care for only 30 patients; once the first year has passed, that provider can apply to care for as many as 100 patients. In addition, the Drug Enforcement Administration might conduct site visits to ensure that proper documentation and tracking of patients is being undertaken. These requirements can seem daunting, but careful monitoring of patient panels can alleviate concerns. For clinics that use an electronic medical record, we recommend developing the capability to pull lists by either buprenorphine prescriptions or diagnosis codes.

Continue to: CASE

CASE

After you and Mr. R discuss his addiction, you decide to initiate treatment that includes buprenorphine. You have a specimen collected for a urine toxicology screen and blood drawn for a baseline liver function panel, hepatitis panel, and human immunodeficiency virus screen, and provide him with resources (nearby treatment center, an NA meeting location) for treating OUD. You write a prescription for #8 buprenorphine and naloxone, 2 mg/0.5 mg films, and instruct Mr. R to: take 1 film when withdrawal symptoms become worse; wait 1 hour; and take another film if he is still experiencing withdrawal symptoms. He can repeat this dosing regimen until he reaches 8 mg/d of buprenorphine (4 films). You schedule follow-up in 2 days.

At follow-up, the patient reports that taking 3 films alleviated withdrawal symptoms, but that symptoms returned approximately 12 hours later, at which time he took the fourth film. This helped him through until the next day, when he again took 3 films in the morning and 1 film in the late evening. He feels that this regimen is helping relieve withdrawal symptoms and cravings. You provide a prescription for buprenorphine and naloxone, 8 mg/2 mg daily, and request a follow-up visit in 5 days.

At the next visit, Mr. R reports that he still has cravings for oxycodone. You increase the dosage of buprenorphine and naloxone to 12 mg/3 mg daily.

At the next visit, he reports no longer having cravings.

You continue to monitor Mr. R with urine drug screening and discussion of his recovery with the help of his family and support network. After 3 months of consistent visits, he fails to show up for his every-2-or-3-week appointment.

Continue to: Four days later...

Four days later, Mr. R shows up at the clinic, apologizing for missing the appointment and assuring you that this won’t happen again. Rapid urine drug screening is positive for morphine. When confronted, he admits using heroin. He reports that his cravings had increased, for which he took buprenorphine and naloxone above the prescribed dosage, and ran out of films early. He then used heroin 3 times to prevent withdrawal.

In our experience, a common induction method is to give 2 to 4 mg buprenorphine, followed by a 1-hour assessment of withdrawal symptoms.

Mr. R admits that he has been having cravings for oxycodone since the start of treatment for addiction, but thought he was strong enough to overcome the cravings. He feels disappointed and embarrassed about this; he wants to continue with buprenorphine, he tells you, but worries that you will refuse to continue seeing him now.

Using shared decision-making, you opt to increase the buprenorphine dosage by 4 mg (to 16 mg/d—ie, 2 films of buprenorphine and naloxone, 8 mg/2 mg) to alleviate cravings. You instruct him to engage his support network, including his family and NA sponsor, and to start outpatient group therapy. He tells you that he is willing to go back to weekly clinic visits until he is stabilized.

CORRESPONDENCE
Tanner Nissly, DO, University of Minnesota Medical School Twin Cities, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, 1020 West Broadway Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55411; nissl003@umn.edu.

Opioids were involved in 42,249 deaths in the United States in 2016, and opioid overdoses have quintupled since 1999.¹ Among the causes behind these statistics is increased opiate prescribing by physicians—with primary care providers accounting for about one half of opiate prescriptions.² As a result, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has issued a 4-part response for physicians,³ which includes careful opiate prescribing, expanded access to naloxone, prevention of opioid use disorder (OUD), and expanded use of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) of addiction—with the goal of preventing and managing OUD.

CASE

Fred R, a 55-year-old man who has been taking oxycodone, 70 mg/d, for chronic pain for longer than 10 years, visits your clinic for a prescription refill. His prescription monitoring program confirms the long history of regular oxycodone use, with the dosage escalating over the past 6 months. He recently was discharged from the hospital after an overdose of opiates.

Treat addiction as you would any chronic disease: Anticipate relapse, engage support systems, and work with the patient to obtain a higher level of care.

Mr. R admits to using heroin after running out of oxycodone. He is in mild withdrawal, with a score of 8 (of a possible 48) on the Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale⁴ (COWS, which assigns point values to 11 common symptoms to gauge the severity of opioid withdrawal and, by inference, the patient’s degree of physical dependence). You determine that Mr. R is frightened about his use of oxycodone and would like to stop; he has tried to stop several times on his own but always relapses when withdrawal becomes severe.

How would you proceed with the care of this patient?

What is OUD? How is the diagnosis made?

OUD is a combination of cognitive, behavioral, and physiologic symptoms arising from continued use of opioids despite significant health, legal, or relationship problems related to their use. The disorder is diagnosed based on specific criteria provided in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5)(TABLE 1)⁵ and is revealed by 1) a careful history that delineates a problematic pattern of opioid use, 2) physical examination, and 3) urine toxicology screen.

Identification of acute opioid intoxication can also be useful when working up a patient in whom OUD is suspected; findings of acute opioid intoxication on physical examination include constricted pupils, head-nodding, excessive sleepiness, and drooping eyelids. Other physical signs of illicit opioid use include track marks around veins of the arm, evidence of repeated trauma, and stigmata of liver dysfunction. Withdrawal can present as agitation, rhinorrhea, dilated pupils, nausea, diarrhea, yawning, and gooseflesh. The COWS, which, as noted in the case, assigns point values to withdrawal symptoms, can be helpful in determining the severity of withdrawal.⁴

What is the differential Dx of OUD?

When OUD is likely, but not clearly diagnosable, on the basis of findings, consider a mental health disorder: depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder, personality disorder, and polysubstance use disorder. Concurrent diagnosis of substance abuse and a mental health disorder is common; treatment requires that both disorders be addressed simultaneously.⁶ Assessing for use or abuse of, and addiction to, other substances is vital to ensure proper diagnosis and effective therapy. Polysubstance dependence can be more difficult to treat than single-substance abuse or addiction alone.

Continue to: How is OUD treated?

How is OUD treated?

This article reviews MAT with buprenorphine; other MAT options include methadone and naltrexone. Regardless of the indicated agent chosen, MAT has been shown to be superior to abstinence alone or abstinence with counseling interventions in maintaining sobriety.⁷

Evidence of efficacy. In a longitudinal cohort study of patients who received MAT with buprenorphine initiated in general practice, patients in whom buprenorphine therapy was interrupted had a greatly increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio=29.04; 95% confidence interval, 10.04-83.99).⁸ The study highlights the harm-reduction treatment philosophy of MAT with buprenorphine: The regimen can be used to keep a patient alive while working toward sobriety.

We encourage physicians to treat addiction as they would any chronic disease. The strategy includes anticipating relapse, engaging support systems (eg, family, counselors, social groups, Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous [NA]), and working with the patient to obtain a higher level of care, as indicated.

Pharmacology and induction. Alone or in combination with naloxone, buprenorphine can be used as in-office-based MAT. Buprenorphine is a partial opiate agonist that binds tightly to opioid receptors and can block the effects of other opiates. An advantage of buprenorphine is its low likelihood of overdose, due to the drug’s so-called ceiling effect at a dosage of 24 mg/d;⁹ dosages above this amount have little increased medication effect.

Dosing of buprenorphine is variable from patient to patient, with a maximum dosage of 24 mg/d. Therapy can be initiated safely at home, although some physicians prefer in-office induction. It is important that the patient be in moderate withdrawal (as determined by the score on the COWS) before initiation, because buprenorphine, as a partial agonist, can precipitate withdrawal by displacing full opiate agonists from opioid receptors.

Continue to: In our experience...

In our experience, a common induction method is to give 2 to 4 mg buprenorphine, followed by a 1-hour assessment of withdrawal symptoms. This can be repeated for multiple doses until withdrawal is relieved, usually with a maximum dosage of 6 to 8 mg in the initial 1 or 2 days of treatment. Rapid reassessment is required after induction, preferably in 1 to 3 days. Dosing should be gradually increased in 2- to 4-mg increments until 1) the patient has no withdrawal symptoms in a 24-hour period and 2) craving for opiates is adequately controlled.

Note: Primary care physicians must complete an 8-hour online training course to obtain a US Drug Enforcement Administration waiver to prescribe buprenorphine.

How should coordination of care be approached?

Actual prescribing and monitoring of buprenorphine is not complex, but many physicians are intimidated by the perceived difficulty of coordination of care. The American Society of Addiction Medicine's national practice guideline recommends that buprenorphine and other MAT protocols be offered as a part of a comprehensive treatment plan that includes psychosocial treatment.⁷ This combination leads to the greatest potential for ongoing remission of OUD. Although many primary care clinics do not have chemical dependency counseling available at their primary location, partnering with community organizations and other mental health resources can meet this need. Coordination of care with home services, behavioral health, and psychiatry is common in primary care, and is no different for OUD.

There are administrative requirements for a clinic that offers MAT (TABLE 2),⁷ including tracking of numbers of patients who are taking buprenorphine. During the first year of prescribing buprenorphine, a physician or other provider is permitted to care for only 30 patients; once the first year has passed, that provider can apply to care for as many as 100 patients. In addition, the Drug Enforcement Administration might conduct site visits to ensure that proper documentation and tracking of patients is being undertaken. These requirements can seem daunting, but careful monitoring of patient panels can alleviate concerns. For clinics that use an electronic medical record, we recommend developing the capability to pull lists by either buprenorphine prescriptions or diagnosis codes.

Continue to: CASE

CASE

After you and Mr. R discuss his addiction, you decide to initiate treatment that includes buprenorphine. You have a specimen collected for a urine toxicology screen and blood drawn for a baseline liver function panel, hepatitis panel, and human immunodeficiency virus screen, and provide him with resources (nearby treatment center, an NA meeting location) for treating OUD. You write a prescription for #8 buprenorphine and naloxone, 2 mg/0.5 mg films, and instruct Mr. R to: take 1 film when withdrawal symptoms become worse; wait 1 hour; and take another film if he is still experiencing withdrawal symptoms. He can repeat this dosing regimen until he reaches 8 mg/d of buprenorphine (4 films). You schedule follow-up in 2 days.

At follow-up, the patient reports that taking 3 films alleviated withdrawal symptoms, but that symptoms returned approximately 12 hours later, at which time he took the fourth film. This helped him through until the next day, when he again took 3 films in the morning and 1 film in the late evening. He feels that this regimen is helping relieve withdrawal symptoms and cravings. You provide a prescription for buprenorphine and naloxone, 8 mg/2 mg daily, and request a follow-up visit in 5 days.

At the next visit, Mr. R reports that he still has cravings for oxycodone. You increase the dosage of buprenorphine and naloxone to 12 mg/3 mg daily.

At the next visit, he reports no longer having cravings.

You continue to monitor Mr. R with urine drug screening and discussion of his recovery with the help of his family and support network. After 3 months of consistent visits, he fails to show up for his every-2-or-3-week appointment.

Continue to: Four days later...

Four days later, Mr. R shows up at the clinic, apologizing for missing the appointment and assuring you that this won’t happen again. Rapid urine drug screening is positive for morphine. When confronted, he admits using heroin. He reports that his cravings had increased, for which he took buprenorphine and naloxone above the prescribed dosage, and ran out of films early. He then used heroin 3 times to prevent withdrawal.

In our experience, a common induction method is to give 2 to 4 mg buprenorphine, followed by a 1-hour assessment of withdrawal symptoms.

Mr. R admits that he has been having cravings for oxycodone since the start of treatment for addiction, but thought he was strong enough to overcome the cravings. He feels disappointed and embarrassed about this; he wants to continue with buprenorphine, he tells you, but worries that you will refuse to continue seeing him now.

Using shared decision-making, you opt to increase the buprenorphine dosage by 4 mg (to 16 mg/d—ie, 2 films of buprenorphine and naloxone, 8 mg/2 mg) to alleviate cravings. You instruct him to engage his support network, including his family and NA sponsor, and to start outpatient group therapy. He tells you that he is willing to go back to weekly clinic visits until he is stabilized.

CORRESPONDENCE
Tanner Nissly, DO, University of Minnesota Medical School Twin Cities, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, 1020 West Broadway Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55411; nissl003@umn.edu.

Opioids were involved in 42,249 deaths in the United States in 2016, and opioid overdoses have quintupled since 1999.¹ Among the causes behind these statistics is increased opiate prescribing by physicians—with primary care providers accounting for about one half of opiate prescriptions.² As a result, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has issued a 4-part response for physicians,³ which includes careful opiate prescribing, expanded access to naloxone, prevention of opioid use disorder (OUD), and expanded use of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) of addiction—with the goal of preventing and managing OUD.

CASE

Fred R, a 55-year-old man who has been taking oxycodone, 70 mg/d, for chronic pain for longer than 10 years, visits your clinic for a prescription refill. His prescription monitoring program confirms the long history of regular oxycodone use, with the dosage escalating over the past 6 months. He recently was discharged from the hospital after an overdose of opiates.

Treat addiction as you would any chronic disease: Anticipate relapse, engage support systems, and work with the patient to obtain a higher level of care.

Mr. R admits to using heroin after running out of oxycodone. He is in mild withdrawal, with a score of 8 (of a possible 48) on the Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale⁴ (COWS, which assigns point values to 11 common symptoms to gauge the severity of opioid withdrawal and, by inference, the patient’s degree of physical dependence). You determine that Mr. R is frightened about his use of oxycodone and would like to stop; he has tried to stop several times on his own but always relapses when withdrawal becomes severe.

How would you proceed with the care of this patient?

What is OUD? How is the diagnosis made?

OUD is a combination of cognitive, behavioral, and physiologic symptoms arising from continued use of opioids despite significant health, legal, or relationship problems related to their use. The disorder is diagnosed based on specific criteria provided in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5)(TABLE 1)⁵ and is revealed by 1) a careful history that delineates a problematic pattern of opioid use, 2) physical examination, and 3) urine toxicology screen.

Identification of acute opioid intoxication can also be useful when working up a patient in whom OUD is suspected; findings of acute opioid intoxication on physical examination include constricted pupils, head-nodding, excessive sleepiness, and drooping eyelids. Other physical signs of illicit opioid use include track marks around veins of the arm, evidence of repeated trauma, and stigmata of liver dysfunction. Withdrawal can present as agitation, rhinorrhea, dilated pupils, nausea, diarrhea, yawning, and gooseflesh. The COWS, which, as noted in the case, assigns point values to withdrawal symptoms, can be helpful in determining the severity of withdrawal.⁴

What is the differential Dx of OUD?

When OUD is likely, but not clearly diagnosable, on the basis of findings, consider a mental health disorder: depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder, personality disorder, and polysubstance use disorder. Concurrent diagnosis of substance abuse and a mental health disorder is common; treatment requires that both disorders be addressed simultaneously.⁶ Assessing for use or abuse of, and addiction to, other substances is vital to ensure proper diagnosis and effective therapy. Polysubstance dependence can be more difficult to treat than single-substance abuse or addiction alone.

Continue to: How is OUD treated?

How is OUD treated?

This article reviews MAT with buprenorphine; other MAT options include methadone and naltrexone. Regardless of the indicated agent chosen, MAT has been shown to be superior to abstinence alone or abstinence with counseling interventions in maintaining sobriety.⁷

Evidence of efficacy. In a longitudinal cohort study of patients who received MAT with buprenorphine initiated in general practice, patients in whom buprenorphine therapy was interrupted had a greatly increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio=29.04; 95% confidence interval, 10.04-83.99).⁸ The study highlights the harm-reduction treatment philosophy of MAT with buprenorphine: The regimen can be used to keep a patient alive while working toward sobriety.

We encourage physicians to treat addiction as they would any chronic disease. The strategy includes anticipating relapse, engaging support systems (eg, family, counselors, social groups, Alcoholics Anonymous, Narcotics Anonymous [NA]), and working with the patient to obtain a higher level of care, as indicated.

Pharmacology and induction. Alone or in combination with naloxone, buprenorphine can be used as in-office-based MAT. Buprenorphine is a partial opiate agonist that binds tightly to opioid receptors and can block the effects of other opiates. An advantage of buprenorphine is its low likelihood of overdose, due to the drug’s so-called ceiling effect at a dosage of 24 mg/d;⁹ dosages above this amount have little increased medication effect.

Dosing of buprenorphine is variable from patient to patient, with a maximum dosage of 24 mg/d. Therapy can be initiated safely at home, although some physicians prefer in-office induction. It is important that the patient be in moderate withdrawal (as determined by the score on the COWS) before initiation, because buprenorphine, as a partial agonist, can precipitate withdrawal by displacing full opiate agonists from opioid receptors.

Continue to: In our experience...

In our experience, a common induction method is to give 2 to 4 mg buprenorphine, followed by a 1-hour assessment of withdrawal symptoms. This can be repeated for multiple doses until withdrawal is relieved, usually with a maximum dosage of 6 to 8 mg in the initial 1 or 2 days of treatment. Rapid reassessment is required after induction, preferably in 1 to 3 days. Dosing should be gradually increased in 2- to 4-mg increments until 1) the patient has no withdrawal symptoms in a 24-hour period and 2) craving for opiates is adequately controlled.

Note: Primary care physicians must complete an 8-hour online training course to obtain a US Drug Enforcement Administration waiver to prescribe buprenorphine.

How should coordination of care be approached?

Actual prescribing and monitoring of buprenorphine is not complex, but many physicians are intimidated by the perceived difficulty of coordination of care. The American Society of Addiction Medicine's national practice guideline recommends that buprenorphine and other MAT protocols be offered as a part of a comprehensive treatment plan that includes psychosocial treatment.⁷ This combination leads to the greatest potential for ongoing remission of OUD. Although many primary care clinics do not have chemical dependency counseling available at their primary location, partnering with community organizations and other mental health resources can meet this need. Coordination of care with home services, behavioral health, and psychiatry is common in primary care, and is no different for OUD.

There are administrative requirements for a clinic that offers MAT (TABLE 2),⁷ including tracking of numbers of patients who are taking buprenorphine. During the first year of prescribing buprenorphine, a physician or other provider is permitted to care for only 30 patients; once the first year has passed, that provider can apply to care for as many as 100 patients. In addition, the Drug Enforcement Administration might conduct site visits to ensure that proper documentation and tracking of patients is being undertaken. These requirements can seem daunting, but careful monitoring of patient panels can alleviate concerns. For clinics that use an electronic medical record, we recommend developing the capability to pull lists by either buprenorphine prescriptions or diagnosis codes.

Continue to: CASE

CASE

After you and Mr. R discuss his addiction, you decide to initiate treatment that includes buprenorphine. You have a specimen collected for a urine toxicology screen and blood drawn for a baseline liver function panel, hepatitis panel, and human immunodeficiency virus screen, and provide him with resources (nearby treatment center, an NA meeting location) for treating OUD. You write a prescription for #8 buprenorphine and naloxone, 2 mg/0.5 mg films, and instruct Mr. R to: take 1 film when withdrawal symptoms become worse; wait 1 hour; and take another film if he is still experiencing withdrawal symptoms. He can repeat this dosing regimen until he reaches 8 mg/d of buprenorphine (4 films). You schedule follow-up in 2 days.

At follow-up, the patient reports that taking 3 films alleviated withdrawal symptoms, but that symptoms returned approximately 12 hours later, at which time he took the fourth film. This helped him through until the next day, when he again took 3 films in the morning and 1 film in the late evening. He feels that this regimen is helping relieve withdrawal symptoms and cravings. You provide a prescription for buprenorphine and naloxone, 8 mg/2 mg daily, and request a follow-up visit in 5 days.

At the next visit, Mr. R reports that he still has cravings for oxycodone. You increase the dosage of buprenorphine and naloxone to 12 mg/3 mg daily.

At the next visit, he reports no longer having cravings.

You continue to monitor Mr. R with urine drug screening and discussion of his recovery with the help of his family and support network. After 3 months of consistent visits, he fails to show up for his every-2-or-3-week appointment.

Continue to: Four days later...

Four days later, Mr. R shows up at the clinic, apologizing for missing the appointment and assuring you that this won’t happen again. Rapid urine drug screening is positive for morphine. When confronted, he admits using heroin. He reports that his cravings had increased, for which he took buprenorphine and naloxone above the prescribed dosage, and ran out of films early. He then used heroin 3 times to prevent withdrawal.

In our experience, a common induction method is to give 2 to 4 mg buprenorphine, followed by a 1-hour assessment of withdrawal symptoms.

Mr. R admits that he has been having cravings for oxycodone since the start of treatment for addiction, but thought he was strong enough to overcome the cravings. He feels disappointed and embarrassed about this; he wants to continue with buprenorphine, he tells you, but worries that you will refuse to continue seeing him now.

Using shared decision-making, you opt to increase the buprenorphine dosage by 4 mg (to 16 mg/d—ie, 2 films of buprenorphine and naloxone, 8 mg/2 mg) to alleviate cravings. You instruct him to engage his support network, including his family and NA sponsor, and to start outpatient group therapy. He tells you that he is willing to go back to weekly clinic visits until he is stabilized.

CORRESPONDENCE
Tanner Nissly, DO, University of Minnesota Medical School Twin Cities, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, 1020 West Broadway Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55411; nissl003@umn.edu.

About one-third of enlisted soldiers who attempt suicide do not have a history of mental illness, say the authors of a retrospective longitudinal study among U.S. Army personnel.

However, health care use, exposure to violent crime, and first year of service all were significantly associated with suicide attempts.

The study, published online Aug. 29 in JAMA Psychiatry, analyzed administrative data from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS) for 9,650 enlisted soldiers (74.8% male) who had a documented suicide attempt.

Overall, 36.3% of the soldiers studied who attempted suicide did not have a previous diagnosis of a mental health disorder. Having a history of mental illness was associated with sixfold higher odds of suicide attempt after adjusting for sociodemographic and service-related variables.

Among those without a history of mental health disorders, the first year of service was associated with sixfold higher odds of a suicide attempt (95% confidence interval, 4.7-7.7), and nearly 60% of those without a previous diagnosis who attempted suicide did so in their first year of service.

“This factor is noteworthy, because, as in the general population, most transitions from ideation to attempt among soldiers occur within 1 year of ideation onset,” wrote Robert J. Ursano, MD, professor of psychiatry and neurosciences at the Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md., and his coauthors.

Among individuals without a history of mental health disorders, women had 2.6-fold higher odds (95% CI, 2.4-2.8) of a suicide attempt. The authors suggested that these women might be more likely to have undetected mental health problems, or have unreported experience of violence and discrimination.

“Given the large proportion of first-year soldiers in the group without previous [mental health diagnosis], it is possible that women face additional stressors and challenges in the initial months of service,” they wrote.

Previous deployment was associated with 2.4-fold higher odds of suicide attempt; a 2-month delay in promotion was associated with 2.1-fold higher odds. In addition, a demotion in the past year was associated with 60% higher odds of a suicide attempt.

Health care use also showed associations with suicide attempts. Individuals who had visited outpatient services eight or more times in the past 2 months had more than threefold higher odds of suicide attempt. Those with an injury-related visit to outpatient services in the previous month had threefold higher odds, and those who had an injury-related visit to inpatient services had a 3.8-fold higher odds.

Exposure to minor violent crime and perpetration of major violent crime or family violence also were associated with higher odds of suicide attempt.

The authors cited several limitations. One is that the study did not capture unreported suicide attempts, mental disorders, or crimes.

The Army STARRS was supported by the Department of the Army, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Mental Health and the Department of Defense. Two authors were employed by the NIMH, and two were Army liaisons or consultants.

SOURCE: Ursano RJ et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 29. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2069.
 

About one-third of enlisted soldiers who attempt suicide do not have a history of mental illness, say the authors of a retrospective longitudinal study among U.S. Army personnel.

However, health care use, exposure to violent crime, and first year of service all were significantly associated with suicide attempts.

The study, published online Aug. 29 in JAMA Psychiatry, analyzed administrative data from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS) for 9,650 enlisted soldiers (74.8% male) who had a documented suicide attempt.

Overall, 36.3% of the soldiers studied who attempted suicide did not have a previous diagnosis of a mental health disorder. Having a history of mental illness was associated with sixfold higher odds of suicide attempt after adjusting for sociodemographic and service-related variables.

Among those without a history of mental health disorders, the first year of service was associated with sixfold higher odds of a suicide attempt (95% confidence interval, 4.7-7.7), and nearly 60% of those without a previous diagnosis who attempted suicide did so in their first year of service.

“This factor is noteworthy, because, as in the general population, most transitions from ideation to attempt among soldiers occur within 1 year of ideation onset,” wrote Robert J. Ursano, MD, professor of psychiatry and neurosciences at the Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md., and his coauthors.

Among individuals without a history of mental health disorders, women had 2.6-fold higher odds (95% CI, 2.4-2.8) of a suicide attempt. The authors suggested that these women might be more likely to have undetected mental health problems, or have unreported experience of violence and discrimination.

“Given the large proportion of first-year soldiers in the group without previous [mental health diagnosis], it is possible that women face additional stressors and challenges in the initial months of service,” they wrote.

Previous deployment was associated with 2.4-fold higher odds of suicide attempt; a 2-month delay in promotion was associated with 2.1-fold higher odds. In addition, a demotion in the past year was associated with 60% higher odds of a suicide attempt.

Health care use also showed associations with suicide attempts. Individuals who had visited outpatient services eight or more times in the past 2 months had more than threefold higher odds of suicide attempt. Those with an injury-related visit to outpatient services in the previous month had threefold higher odds, and those who had an injury-related visit to inpatient services had a 3.8-fold higher odds.

Exposure to minor violent crime and perpetration of major violent crime or family violence also were associated with higher odds of suicide attempt.

The authors cited several limitations. One is that the study did not capture unreported suicide attempts, mental disorders, or crimes.

The Army STARRS was supported by the Department of the Army, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Mental Health and the Department of Defense. Two authors were employed by the NIMH, and two were Army liaisons or consultants.

SOURCE: Ursano RJ et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 29. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2069.
 

About one-third of enlisted soldiers who attempt suicide do not have a history of mental illness, say the authors of a retrospective longitudinal study among U.S. Army personnel.

However, health care use, exposure to violent crime, and first year of service all were significantly associated with suicide attempts.

The study, published online Aug. 29 in JAMA Psychiatry, analyzed administrative data from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS) for 9,650 enlisted soldiers (74.8% male) who had a documented suicide attempt.

Overall, 36.3% of the soldiers studied who attempted suicide did not have a previous diagnosis of a mental health disorder. Having a history of mental illness was associated with sixfold higher odds of suicide attempt after adjusting for sociodemographic and service-related variables.

Among those without a history of mental health disorders, the first year of service was associated with sixfold higher odds of a suicide attempt (95% confidence interval, 4.7-7.7), and nearly 60% of those without a previous diagnosis who attempted suicide did so in their first year of service.

“This factor is noteworthy, because, as in the general population, most transitions from ideation to attempt among soldiers occur within 1 year of ideation onset,” wrote Robert J. Ursano, MD, professor of psychiatry and neurosciences at the Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md., and his coauthors.

Among individuals without a history of mental health disorders, women had 2.6-fold higher odds (95% CI, 2.4-2.8) of a suicide attempt. The authors suggested that these women might be more likely to have undetected mental health problems, or have unreported experience of violence and discrimination.

“Given the large proportion of first-year soldiers in the group without previous [mental health diagnosis], it is possible that women face additional stressors and challenges in the initial months of service,” they wrote.

Previous deployment was associated with 2.4-fold higher odds of suicide attempt; a 2-month delay in promotion was associated with 2.1-fold higher odds. In addition, a demotion in the past year was associated with 60% higher odds of a suicide attempt.

Health care use also showed associations with suicide attempts. Individuals who had visited outpatient services eight or more times in the past 2 months had more than threefold higher odds of suicide attempt. Those with an injury-related visit to outpatient services in the previous month had threefold higher odds, and those who had an injury-related visit to inpatient services had a 3.8-fold higher odds.

Exposure to minor violent crime and perpetration of major violent crime or family violence also were associated with higher odds of suicide attempt.

The authors cited several limitations. One is that the study did not capture unreported suicide attempts, mental disorders, or crimes.

The Army STARRS was supported by the Department of the Army, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Mental Health and the Department of Defense. Two authors were employed by the NIMH, and two were Army liaisons or consultants.

SOURCE: Ursano RJ et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 29. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2069.