Making sense of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 genotype vs phenotype

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 11/02/2018 - 10:14
Display Headline
Making sense of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 genotype vs phenotype

Practice Points

The clinical response to the same dose of a drug may vary among individuals. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and 1A2 are enzymes that metabolize many psychotropic medications. Genetic variations in these enzymes may cause changes in their activity and result in differences in effectiveness and adverse effects. Although pharmacogenetic testing is available for CYP2D6 and CYP1A2, interpretation and clinical application of the results may not be straightforward.

 

Genetic variations in CYP450 enzymes determine enzymatic activity, which can have a large effect on drug levels, efficacy, and toxicity. However, there are many other important factors that clinicians should consider when trying to predict the effects of medications. While clinicians often focus on a patient’s genotype, this only provides information on a chromosomal level, and this information never changes. In contrast, a patient’s phenotype, or status of metabolism, is subject to change throughout the patient’s life.

 

Many circumstances influence phenotype, including the use of medications that induce or inhibit CYP450 enzymes, environmental factors, and comorbidities. Phenoconversion occurs when these factors result in a phenotype that is different from that predicted by genotype. Because of the possibility of phenoconversion, knowing a patient’s genotype may be of limited value in making clinical decisions. This article provides guidance on interpreting both the genotype and phenotype of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2. Case 1 and Case 2 illustrate these concepts.

CYP2D6 allele activity

CYP2D6

The enzyme activity of CYP2D6 varies among individuals and may include no activity, decreased activity, normal activity, or increased activity. After obtaining the genotype, the activity level of the CYP2D6 alleles may be determined. The frequency with which certain alleles occur varies with ancestry. More than 100 allelic variants and subvariants have been discovered, and new alleles are continuing to be discovered.1Table 12 lists some of the most common CYP2D6 alleles.

CYP2D6 enzyme activity

Based on the CYP2D6 enzyme activity determined from the alleles, 4 “traditional” phenotypes can be predicted from the genotype (Table 22). The 7-category phenotypes reported by some laboratory companies provide a more explicit method for reporting phenotypes.

CYP2D6 inhibitors

Evidence suggests that, unlike most other CYP450 enzymes, CYP2D6 is not very susceptible to enzyme induction.2 Thus, genetics, rather than drug therapy, accounts for most ultra-rapid CYP2D6 metabolizers. CYP2D6 can be inhibited by the use of medications (Table 32-5) and/or substrates (Table 42,6). Similar to inhibitors, substrates may be saturating high affinity-low capacity enzymes such as CYP2D6, resulting in phenoconversion to poor metabolizers. However, this is unlikely to be the case for substrates of low affinity-high capacity enzymes such as CYP3A4.7 Ultimately, substrates and/or inhibitors of CYP2D6 may result in a phenotype that does not correspond to genotype.

CYP2D6 substrates

Phenoconversion

Genotyping may not reflect the true prevalence of the CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype when using multiple medications that are substrates and/or inhibitors of CYP2D6.8 In the presence of strong CYP2D6 inhibitors, up to 80% of individuals with a non-poor metabolizer genotype are converted to a poor metabolizer phenotype.8 While the phenotype provides a clearer representation of metabolism status than genotype, this information may not always be available.

Continue to: Determining CYP2D6 phenotype

 

 

Determining CYP2D6 phenotype

Risperidone and venlafaxine levels are useful tools for predicting CYP2D6 phenotype.3,8 When a risperidone level is ordered, the results include a risperidone level and a 9-hydroxyrisperidone level. The active metabolite of risperidone is 9-hydroxyrisperidone (paliperidone). The risperidone-to-9-hydroxyrisperidone (R-to-9-OHR) concentration ratio is an indicator of CYP2D6 phenotype.3 While considerable overlap may exist using R-to-9-OHR concentration ratios as a predictor of CYP2D6 phenotype, this provides a practical and economically viable option for guiding drug therapy and recommending CYP2D6 genetic testing. The median R-to-9-OHR concentration ratios with the 25th to 75th percentiles are listed below as indicators of CYP2D6 phenotypes9:

  • Ultra-rapid metabolizer: 0.03 (0.02 to 0.06)
  • Extensive metabolizer: 0.08 (0.04 to 0.17)
  • Intermediate metabolizer: 0.56 (0.30 to 1.0)
  • Poor metabolizer: 2.5 (1.8 to 4.1).

Although a R-to-9-OHR concentration ratio >1 generally indicates a poor metabolizer, it could also indicate the presence of a powerful CYP2D6 inhibitor.9

 

When a venlafaxine level is ordered, the results include a venlafaxine level and an O-desmethylvenlafaxine level. O-desmethylvenlafaxine (desvenlafaxine) is the active metabolite of venlafaxine. The O-desmethylvenlafaxine-to-venlafaxine concentration ratio is an indicator of CYP2D6 phenotype.8 In this instance, a ratio ≥1 indicates an extensive metabolizer, whereas <1 indicates a poor metabolizer.

CYP1A2 allele activity level

CYP1A2

While the activity of CYP2D6 alleles is determined primarily by genetic factors and medications, the activity of CYP1A2 alleles is largely determined by environmental factors (diet, medications, disease) and genetic variability.2 Consequently, CYP1A2 genotyping may be less clinically useful than CYP2D6 genotyping. The CYP1A2 genotype–phenotype relationship incorporates the degree of allele activity (Table 52), and inducibility in the presence of environmental factors.

Continue to: CYP1A2 inhibiton

 

 

CYP1A2 inhibition

A variety of medications and environmental factors may inhibit CYP1A2.

Medications. Medications that may inhibit CYP1A2 include atazanavir, ciprofloxacin, ethinyl estradiol, and fluvoxamine.3

Caffeine. A significant increase in caffeine consumption can result in inhibition.3 Among non-tobacco smokers, an increase of 1 cup/d of coffee or 2 cans/d of caffeinated soda would be considered significant.3 However, tobacco smokers would require an increase of 3 cups/d of coffee or 6 cans/d of soda.

Diet. An increase in the daily dietary intake of certain vegetables for 6 days has been shown to result in inhibition.10 Apiaceous (Apiaceae or Umbelliferae) vegetables such as carrots (3/4 cup), celery (1/2 cup), dill (1 teaspoon), parsley (3 tablespoons), and parsnips (1¼ cup) can decrease CYP1A2 activity by approximately 13% to 25%. Allium (Liliaceae) vegetables, such as garlic, leeks, and onions, have no effect on CYP1A2 activity.

Infection. Pneumonia, upper respiratory infections with fever, pyelonephritis or appendicitis, or inflammation are suspected to decrease CYP1A2 activity.8

Continue to: CYP1A2 induction

 

 

CYP1A2 induction

A variety of medications and environmental factors may induce CYP1A2.

Medications. Certain medications may induce CYP1A2, including carbamazepine, phenytoin, rifampin, and primidone.

Cigarette smoking. A significant increase in smoking after 1 to 3 weeks may decrease drug levels, whereas a significant decrease in smoking after 1 to 3 weeks may result in elevated drug levels.3 Nicotine is not the causative agent of induction, but rather hydrocarbons found in cigarette smoke.11

Diet. An increase in daily dietary intake of certain vegetables for 6 days has been shown to result in induction.3 Brassica (Cruciferae) vegetables such as broccoli (2 cups), cauliflower (1 cup), cabbage (1 cup), and radish sprouts (1/2 cup) have been found to increase CYP1A2 activity by 18% to 37%.10 Grilled meat also plays a role in induction.10

Related Resource

  • Ellingrod VL, Ward KM. Using pharmacogenetics guidelines when prescribing: What's available. Current Psychiatry. 2018;17(1):43-46.

Drug Brand Names

Amiodarone • Cordarone, Pacerone
Amitriptyline • Elavil, Endep
Aripiprazole • Abilify
Asenapine • Saphris
Atazanavir • Reyataz  
Brexpiprazole • Rexulti
Bupropion • Wellbutrin, Zyban  
Carbamazepine • Carbatrol, Tegretol  
Chlorpromazine • Thorazine  
Chloroquine • Aralen
Cinacalcet • Sensipar
Ciprofloxacin • Cipro
Citalopram • Celexa
Clozapine • Clozaril
Desipramine • Norpramin  
Desvenlafaxine • Pristiq
Diphenhydramine • Benadryl
Doxepin • Silenor
Duloxetine • Cymbalta
Escitalopram • Lexapro
Ethinyl estradiol • Estinyl
Fluoxetine • Prozac
Fluvoxamine • Luvox
Haloperidol • Haldol  
Iloperidone • Fanapt
Imatinib • Gleevec
Imipramine • Tofranil
Mirtazapine • Remeron
Nortriptyline • Pamelor
Olanzapine • Zyprexa
Paliperidone • Invega
Paroxetine • Paxil
Perphenazine • Trilafon
Phenytoin • Dilantin
Pimavanserin • Nuplazid
Primidone • Mysoline
Quetiapine • Seroquel
Quinidine • Cardioquin
Rifampin • Rifadin
Risperidone • Risperdal
Sertraline • Zoloft
Terbinafine • Lamisil
Thioridazine • Mellaril
Trazodone • Desyrel, Oleptro
Venlafaxine • Effexor
Vilazodone • Viibryd  
Vortioxetine • Trintellix
Ziprasidone • Geodon

References

1. Pharmacogene Variation Consoritum. CYP2D6 allele nomenclature. https://www.pharmvar.org/gene/CYP2D6. Updated May 22, 2018. Accessed June 11, 2018.
2. Mrazek D. Psychiatric pharmacogenomics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010:33,42,44,45,85.
3. Spina E, de Leon J. Clinical applications of CYP genotyping in psychiatry. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2015;122(1):5-28.
4. Adedoyin A, Frye RF, Mauro K, et al. Chloroquine modulation of specific metabolizing enzymes activities: investigation with selective five drug cocktail. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;46(3):215-219.
5. Filppula AM, Laitila J, Neuvonen PJ, et al. Potent mechanism-based inhibition of CYP3A4 by imatinib explains its liability to interact with CYP3A4 substrates. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;165(8):2787-2798.
6. U.S. National Library of Medicine. DailyMed. http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/about.cfm. Accessed April 26, 2018.
7. Monte AA, Heard KJ, Campbell J, et al. The effect of CYP2D6 drug-drug interactions on hydrocodone effectiveness. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(8):879-885.
8. Preskorn SH, Kane CP, Lobello K, et al. Cytochrome P450 2D6 phenoconversion is common in patients being treated for depression: implications for personalized medicine. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(6):614-621.
9. de Leon, J, Susce, MT, Johnson, M, et al. DNA microarray technology in the clinical environment: the AmpliChip CYP450 test for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotyping. CNS Spectr. 2009;14(1):19-34.
10. Lampe JW, King IB, Li S, et al. Brassica vegetables increase and apiaceous vegetables decrease cytochrome P450 1A2 activity in humans: changes in caffeine metabolite ratios in response to controlled vegetable diets. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21(6):1157-1162.
11. Zevin S, Benowitz NL. Drug interaction with tobacco smoking. An update. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;36(3):425-438.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Deardorff is Clinical Manager, Fulton State Hospital, Fulton, Missouri; Adjunct Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Pharmacy, Kansas City, Missouri; Adjunct Clinical Faculty, St. Louis College of Pharmacy, St. Louis, Missouri; and Adjunct Clinical Faculty, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri. Dr. Jenne is a Clinical Pharmacist, and Dr. Leonard is a Pharmacy Manager, St. Louis Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center, St. Louis, Missouri.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with the manufacturers of competing products.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 17(7)
Publications
Page Number
41-45
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Deardorff is Clinical Manager, Fulton State Hospital, Fulton, Missouri; Adjunct Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Pharmacy, Kansas City, Missouri; Adjunct Clinical Faculty, St. Louis College of Pharmacy, St. Louis, Missouri; and Adjunct Clinical Faculty, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri. Dr. Jenne is a Clinical Pharmacist, and Dr. Leonard is a Pharmacy Manager, St. Louis Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center, St. Louis, Missouri.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with the manufacturers of competing products.

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Deardorff is Clinical Manager, Fulton State Hospital, Fulton, Missouri; Adjunct Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Pharmacy, Kansas City, Missouri; Adjunct Clinical Faculty, St. Louis College of Pharmacy, St. Louis, Missouri; and Adjunct Clinical Faculty, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri. Dr. Jenne is a Clinical Pharmacist, and Dr. Leonard is a Pharmacy Manager, St. Louis Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center, St. Louis, Missouri.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationships with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with the manufacturers of competing products.

Article PDF
Article PDF

Practice Points

The clinical response to the same dose of a drug may vary among individuals. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and 1A2 are enzymes that metabolize many psychotropic medications. Genetic variations in these enzymes may cause changes in their activity and result in differences in effectiveness and adverse effects. Although pharmacogenetic testing is available for CYP2D6 and CYP1A2, interpretation and clinical application of the results may not be straightforward.

 

Genetic variations in CYP450 enzymes determine enzymatic activity, which can have a large effect on drug levels, efficacy, and toxicity. However, there are many other important factors that clinicians should consider when trying to predict the effects of medications. While clinicians often focus on a patient’s genotype, this only provides information on a chromosomal level, and this information never changes. In contrast, a patient’s phenotype, or status of metabolism, is subject to change throughout the patient’s life.

 

Many circumstances influence phenotype, including the use of medications that induce or inhibit CYP450 enzymes, environmental factors, and comorbidities. Phenoconversion occurs when these factors result in a phenotype that is different from that predicted by genotype. Because of the possibility of phenoconversion, knowing a patient’s genotype may be of limited value in making clinical decisions. This article provides guidance on interpreting both the genotype and phenotype of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2. Case 1 and Case 2 illustrate these concepts.

CYP2D6 allele activity

CYP2D6

The enzyme activity of CYP2D6 varies among individuals and may include no activity, decreased activity, normal activity, or increased activity. After obtaining the genotype, the activity level of the CYP2D6 alleles may be determined. The frequency with which certain alleles occur varies with ancestry. More than 100 allelic variants and subvariants have been discovered, and new alleles are continuing to be discovered.1Table 12 lists some of the most common CYP2D6 alleles.

CYP2D6 enzyme activity

Based on the CYP2D6 enzyme activity determined from the alleles, 4 “traditional” phenotypes can be predicted from the genotype (Table 22). The 7-category phenotypes reported by some laboratory companies provide a more explicit method for reporting phenotypes.

CYP2D6 inhibitors

Evidence suggests that, unlike most other CYP450 enzymes, CYP2D6 is not very susceptible to enzyme induction.2 Thus, genetics, rather than drug therapy, accounts for most ultra-rapid CYP2D6 metabolizers. CYP2D6 can be inhibited by the use of medications (Table 32-5) and/or substrates (Table 42,6). Similar to inhibitors, substrates may be saturating high affinity-low capacity enzymes such as CYP2D6, resulting in phenoconversion to poor metabolizers. However, this is unlikely to be the case for substrates of low affinity-high capacity enzymes such as CYP3A4.7 Ultimately, substrates and/or inhibitors of CYP2D6 may result in a phenotype that does not correspond to genotype.

CYP2D6 substrates

Phenoconversion

Genotyping may not reflect the true prevalence of the CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype when using multiple medications that are substrates and/or inhibitors of CYP2D6.8 In the presence of strong CYP2D6 inhibitors, up to 80% of individuals with a non-poor metabolizer genotype are converted to a poor metabolizer phenotype.8 While the phenotype provides a clearer representation of metabolism status than genotype, this information may not always be available.

Continue to: Determining CYP2D6 phenotype

 

 

Determining CYP2D6 phenotype

Risperidone and venlafaxine levels are useful tools for predicting CYP2D6 phenotype.3,8 When a risperidone level is ordered, the results include a risperidone level and a 9-hydroxyrisperidone level. The active metabolite of risperidone is 9-hydroxyrisperidone (paliperidone). The risperidone-to-9-hydroxyrisperidone (R-to-9-OHR) concentration ratio is an indicator of CYP2D6 phenotype.3 While considerable overlap may exist using R-to-9-OHR concentration ratios as a predictor of CYP2D6 phenotype, this provides a practical and economically viable option for guiding drug therapy and recommending CYP2D6 genetic testing. The median R-to-9-OHR concentration ratios with the 25th to 75th percentiles are listed below as indicators of CYP2D6 phenotypes9:

  • Ultra-rapid metabolizer: 0.03 (0.02 to 0.06)
  • Extensive metabolizer: 0.08 (0.04 to 0.17)
  • Intermediate metabolizer: 0.56 (0.30 to 1.0)
  • Poor metabolizer: 2.5 (1.8 to 4.1).

Although a R-to-9-OHR concentration ratio >1 generally indicates a poor metabolizer, it could also indicate the presence of a powerful CYP2D6 inhibitor.9

 

When a venlafaxine level is ordered, the results include a venlafaxine level and an O-desmethylvenlafaxine level. O-desmethylvenlafaxine (desvenlafaxine) is the active metabolite of venlafaxine. The O-desmethylvenlafaxine-to-venlafaxine concentration ratio is an indicator of CYP2D6 phenotype.8 In this instance, a ratio ≥1 indicates an extensive metabolizer, whereas <1 indicates a poor metabolizer.

CYP1A2 allele activity level

CYP1A2

While the activity of CYP2D6 alleles is determined primarily by genetic factors and medications, the activity of CYP1A2 alleles is largely determined by environmental factors (diet, medications, disease) and genetic variability.2 Consequently, CYP1A2 genotyping may be less clinically useful than CYP2D6 genotyping. The CYP1A2 genotype–phenotype relationship incorporates the degree of allele activity (Table 52), and inducibility in the presence of environmental factors.

Continue to: CYP1A2 inhibiton

 

 

CYP1A2 inhibition

A variety of medications and environmental factors may inhibit CYP1A2.

Medications. Medications that may inhibit CYP1A2 include atazanavir, ciprofloxacin, ethinyl estradiol, and fluvoxamine.3

Caffeine. A significant increase in caffeine consumption can result in inhibition.3 Among non-tobacco smokers, an increase of 1 cup/d of coffee or 2 cans/d of caffeinated soda would be considered significant.3 However, tobacco smokers would require an increase of 3 cups/d of coffee or 6 cans/d of soda.

Diet. An increase in the daily dietary intake of certain vegetables for 6 days has been shown to result in inhibition.10 Apiaceous (Apiaceae or Umbelliferae) vegetables such as carrots (3/4 cup), celery (1/2 cup), dill (1 teaspoon), parsley (3 tablespoons), and parsnips (1¼ cup) can decrease CYP1A2 activity by approximately 13% to 25%. Allium (Liliaceae) vegetables, such as garlic, leeks, and onions, have no effect on CYP1A2 activity.

Infection. Pneumonia, upper respiratory infections with fever, pyelonephritis or appendicitis, or inflammation are suspected to decrease CYP1A2 activity.8

Continue to: CYP1A2 induction

 

 

CYP1A2 induction

A variety of medications and environmental factors may induce CYP1A2.

Medications. Certain medications may induce CYP1A2, including carbamazepine, phenytoin, rifampin, and primidone.

Cigarette smoking. A significant increase in smoking after 1 to 3 weeks may decrease drug levels, whereas a significant decrease in smoking after 1 to 3 weeks may result in elevated drug levels.3 Nicotine is not the causative agent of induction, but rather hydrocarbons found in cigarette smoke.11

Diet. An increase in daily dietary intake of certain vegetables for 6 days has been shown to result in induction.3 Brassica (Cruciferae) vegetables such as broccoli (2 cups), cauliflower (1 cup), cabbage (1 cup), and radish sprouts (1/2 cup) have been found to increase CYP1A2 activity by 18% to 37%.10 Grilled meat also plays a role in induction.10

Related Resource

  • Ellingrod VL, Ward KM. Using pharmacogenetics guidelines when prescribing: What's available. Current Psychiatry. 2018;17(1):43-46.

Drug Brand Names

Amiodarone • Cordarone, Pacerone
Amitriptyline • Elavil, Endep
Aripiprazole • Abilify
Asenapine • Saphris
Atazanavir • Reyataz  
Brexpiprazole • Rexulti
Bupropion • Wellbutrin, Zyban  
Carbamazepine • Carbatrol, Tegretol  
Chlorpromazine • Thorazine  
Chloroquine • Aralen
Cinacalcet • Sensipar
Ciprofloxacin • Cipro
Citalopram • Celexa
Clozapine • Clozaril
Desipramine • Norpramin  
Desvenlafaxine • Pristiq
Diphenhydramine • Benadryl
Doxepin • Silenor
Duloxetine • Cymbalta
Escitalopram • Lexapro
Ethinyl estradiol • Estinyl
Fluoxetine • Prozac
Fluvoxamine • Luvox
Haloperidol • Haldol  
Iloperidone • Fanapt
Imatinib • Gleevec
Imipramine • Tofranil
Mirtazapine • Remeron
Nortriptyline • Pamelor
Olanzapine • Zyprexa
Paliperidone • Invega
Paroxetine • Paxil
Perphenazine • Trilafon
Phenytoin • Dilantin
Pimavanserin • Nuplazid
Primidone • Mysoline
Quetiapine • Seroquel
Quinidine • Cardioquin
Rifampin • Rifadin
Risperidone • Risperdal
Sertraline • Zoloft
Terbinafine • Lamisil
Thioridazine • Mellaril
Trazodone • Desyrel, Oleptro
Venlafaxine • Effexor
Vilazodone • Viibryd  
Vortioxetine • Trintellix
Ziprasidone • Geodon

Practice Points

The clinical response to the same dose of a drug may vary among individuals. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and 1A2 are enzymes that metabolize many psychotropic medications. Genetic variations in these enzymes may cause changes in their activity and result in differences in effectiveness and adverse effects. Although pharmacogenetic testing is available for CYP2D6 and CYP1A2, interpretation and clinical application of the results may not be straightforward.

 

Genetic variations in CYP450 enzymes determine enzymatic activity, which can have a large effect on drug levels, efficacy, and toxicity. However, there are many other important factors that clinicians should consider when trying to predict the effects of medications. While clinicians often focus on a patient’s genotype, this only provides information on a chromosomal level, and this information never changes. In contrast, a patient’s phenotype, or status of metabolism, is subject to change throughout the patient’s life.

 

Many circumstances influence phenotype, including the use of medications that induce or inhibit CYP450 enzymes, environmental factors, and comorbidities. Phenoconversion occurs when these factors result in a phenotype that is different from that predicted by genotype. Because of the possibility of phenoconversion, knowing a patient’s genotype may be of limited value in making clinical decisions. This article provides guidance on interpreting both the genotype and phenotype of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2. Case 1 and Case 2 illustrate these concepts.

CYP2D6 allele activity

CYP2D6

The enzyme activity of CYP2D6 varies among individuals and may include no activity, decreased activity, normal activity, or increased activity. After obtaining the genotype, the activity level of the CYP2D6 alleles may be determined. The frequency with which certain alleles occur varies with ancestry. More than 100 allelic variants and subvariants have been discovered, and new alleles are continuing to be discovered.1Table 12 lists some of the most common CYP2D6 alleles.

CYP2D6 enzyme activity

Based on the CYP2D6 enzyme activity determined from the alleles, 4 “traditional” phenotypes can be predicted from the genotype (Table 22). The 7-category phenotypes reported by some laboratory companies provide a more explicit method for reporting phenotypes.

CYP2D6 inhibitors

Evidence suggests that, unlike most other CYP450 enzymes, CYP2D6 is not very susceptible to enzyme induction.2 Thus, genetics, rather than drug therapy, accounts for most ultra-rapid CYP2D6 metabolizers. CYP2D6 can be inhibited by the use of medications (Table 32-5) and/or substrates (Table 42,6). Similar to inhibitors, substrates may be saturating high affinity-low capacity enzymes such as CYP2D6, resulting in phenoconversion to poor metabolizers. However, this is unlikely to be the case for substrates of low affinity-high capacity enzymes such as CYP3A4.7 Ultimately, substrates and/or inhibitors of CYP2D6 may result in a phenotype that does not correspond to genotype.

CYP2D6 substrates

Phenoconversion

Genotyping may not reflect the true prevalence of the CYP2D6 poor metabolizer phenotype when using multiple medications that are substrates and/or inhibitors of CYP2D6.8 In the presence of strong CYP2D6 inhibitors, up to 80% of individuals with a non-poor metabolizer genotype are converted to a poor metabolizer phenotype.8 While the phenotype provides a clearer representation of metabolism status than genotype, this information may not always be available.

Continue to: Determining CYP2D6 phenotype

 

 

Determining CYP2D6 phenotype

Risperidone and venlafaxine levels are useful tools for predicting CYP2D6 phenotype.3,8 When a risperidone level is ordered, the results include a risperidone level and a 9-hydroxyrisperidone level. The active metabolite of risperidone is 9-hydroxyrisperidone (paliperidone). The risperidone-to-9-hydroxyrisperidone (R-to-9-OHR) concentration ratio is an indicator of CYP2D6 phenotype.3 While considerable overlap may exist using R-to-9-OHR concentration ratios as a predictor of CYP2D6 phenotype, this provides a practical and economically viable option for guiding drug therapy and recommending CYP2D6 genetic testing. The median R-to-9-OHR concentration ratios with the 25th to 75th percentiles are listed below as indicators of CYP2D6 phenotypes9:

  • Ultra-rapid metabolizer: 0.03 (0.02 to 0.06)
  • Extensive metabolizer: 0.08 (0.04 to 0.17)
  • Intermediate metabolizer: 0.56 (0.30 to 1.0)
  • Poor metabolizer: 2.5 (1.8 to 4.1).

Although a R-to-9-OHR concentration ratio >1 generally indicates a poor metabolizer, it could also indicate the presence of a powerful CYP2D6 inhibitor.9

 

When a venlafaxine level is ordered, the results include a venlafaxine level and an O-desmethylvenlafaxine level. O-desmethylvenlafaxine (desvenlafaxine) is the active metabolite of venlafaxine. The O-desmethylvenlafaxine-to-venlafaxine concentration ratio is an indicator of CYP2D6 phenotype.8 In this instance, a ratio ≥1 indicates an extensive metabolizer, whereas <1 indicates a poor metabolizer.

CYP1A2 allele activity level

CYP1A2

While the activity of CYP2D6 alleles is determined primarily by genetic factors and medications, the activity of CYP1A2 alleles is largely determined by environmental factors (diet, medications, disease) and genetic variability.2 Consequently, CYP1A2 genotyping may be less clinically useful than CYP2D6 genotyping. The CYP1A2 genotype–phenotype relationship incorporates the degree of allele activity (Table 52), and inducibility in the presence of environmental factors.

Continue to: CYP1A2 inhibiton

 

 

CYP1A2 inhibition

A variety of medications and environmental factors may inhibit CYP1A2.

Medications. Medications that may inhibit CYP1A2 include atazanavir, ciprofloxacin, ethinyl estradiol, and fluvoxamine.3

Caffeine. A significant increase in caffeine consumption can result in inhibition.3 Among non-tobacco smokers, an increase of 1 cup/d of coffee or 2 cans/d of caffeinated soda would be considered significant.3 However, tobacco smokers would require an increase of 3 cups/d of coffee or 6 cans/d of soda.

Diet. An increase in the daily dietary intake of certain vegetables for 6 days has been shown to result in inhibition.10 Apiaceous (Apiaceae or Umbelliferae) vegetables such as carrots (3/4 cup), celery (1/2 cup), dill (1 teaspoon), parsley (3 tablespoons), and parsnips (1¼ cup) can decrease CYP1A2 activity by approximately 13% to 25%. Allium (Liliaceae) vegetables, such as garlic, leeks, and onions, have no effect on CYP1A2 activity.

Infection. Pneumonia, upper respiratory infections with fever, pyelonephritis or appendicitis, or inflammation are suspected to decrease CYP1A2 activity.8

Continue to: CYP1A2 induction

 

 

CYP1A2 induction

A variety of medications and environmental factors may induce CYP1A2.

Medications. Certain medications may induce CYP1A2, including carbamazepine, phenytoin, rifampin, and primidone.

Cigarette smoking. A significant increase in smoking after 1 to 3 weeks may decrease drug levels, whereas a significant decrease in smoking after 1 to 3 weeks may result in elevated drug levels.3 Nicotine is not the causative agent of induction, but rather hydrocarbons found in cigarette smoke.11

Diet. An increase in daily dietary intake of certain vegetables for 6 days has been shown to result in induction.3 Brassica (Cruciferae) vegetables such as broccoli (2 cups), cauliflower (1 cup), cabbage (1 cup), and radish sprouts (1/2 cup) have been found to increase CYP1A2 activity by 18% to 37%.10 Grilled meat also plays a role in induction.10

Related Resource

  • Ellingrod VL, Ward KM. Using pharmacogenetics guidelines when prescribing: What's available. Current Psychiatry. 2018;17(1):43-46.

Drug Brand Names

Amiodarone • Cordarone, Pacerone
Amitriptyline • Elavil, Endep
Aripiprazole • Abilify
Asenapine • Saphris
Atazanavir • Reyataz  
Brexpiprazole • Rexulti
Bupropion • Wellbutrin, Zyban  
Carbamazepine • Carbatrol, Tegretol  
Chlorpromazine • Thorazine  
Chloroquine • Aralen
Cinacalcet • Sensipar
Ciprofloxacin • Cipro
Citalopram • Celexa
Clozapine • Clozaril
Desipramine • Norpramin  
Desvenlafaxine • Pristiq
Diphenhydramine • Benadryl
Doxepin • Silenor
Duloxetine • Cymbalta
Escitalopram • Lexapro
Ethinyl estradiol • Estinyl
Fluoxetine • Prozac
Fluvoxamine • Luvox
Haloperidol • Haldol  
Iloperidone • Fanapt
Imatinib • Gleevec
Imipramine • Tofranil
Mirtazapine • Remeron
Nortriptyline • Pamelor
Olanzapine • Zyprexa
Paliperidone • Invega
Paroxetine • Paxil
Perphenazine • Trilafon
Phenytoin • Dilantin
Pimavanserin • Nuplazid
Primidone • Mysoline
Quetiapine • Seroquel
Quinidine • Cardioquin
Rifampin • Rifadin
Risperidone • Risperdal
Sertraline • Zoloft
Terbinafine • Lamisil
Thioridazine • Mellaril
Trazodone • Desyrel, Oleptro
Venlafaxine • Effexor
Vilazodone • Viibryd  
Vortioxetine • Trintellix
Ziprasidone • Geodon

References

1. Pharmacogene Variation Consoritum. CYP2D6 allele nomenclature. https://www.pharmvar.org/gene/CYP2D6. Updated May 22, 2018. Accessed June 11, 2018.
2. Mrazek D. Psychiatric pharmacogenomics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010:33,42,44,45,85.
3. Spina E, de Leon J. Clinical applications of CYP genotyping in psychiatry. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2015;122(1):5-28.
4. Adedoyin A, Frye RF, Mauro K, et al. Chloroquine modulation of specific metabolizing enzymes activities: investigation with selective five drug cocktail. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;46(3):215-219.
5. Filppula AM, Laitila J, Neuvonen PJ, et al. Potent mechanism-based inhibition of CYP3A4 by imatinib explains its liability to interact with CYP3A4 substrates. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;165(8):2787-2798.
6. U.S. National Library of Medicine. DailyMed. http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/about.cfm. Accessed April 26, 2018.
7. Monte AA, Heard KJ, Campbell J, et al. The effect of CYP2D6 drug-drug interactions on hydrocodone effectiveness. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(8):879-885.
8. Preskorn SH, Kane CP, Lobello K, et al. Cytochrome P450 2D6 phenoconversion is common in patients being treated for depression: implications for personalized medicine. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(6):614-621.
9. de Leon, J, Susce, MT, Johnson, M, et al. DNA microarray technology in the clinical environment: the AmpliChip CYP450 test for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotyping. CNS Spectr. 2009;14(1):19-34.
10. Lampe JW, King IB, Li S, et al. Brassica vegetables increase and apiaceous vegetables decrease cytochrome P450 1A2 activity in humans: changes in caffeine metabolite ratios in response to controlled vegetable diets. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21(6):1157-1162.
11. Zevin S, Benowitz NL. Drug interaction with tobacco smoking. An update. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;36(3):425-438.

References

1. Pharmacogene Variation Consoritum. CYP2D6 allele nomenclature. https://www.pharmvar.org/gene/CYP2D6. Updated May 22, 2018. Accessed June 11, 2018.
2. Mrazek D. Psychiatric pharmacogenomics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010:33,42,44,45,85.
3. Spina E, de Leon J. Clinical applications of CYP genotyping in psychiatry. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2015;122(1):5-28.
4. Adedoyin A, Frye RF, Mauro K, et al. Chloroquine modulation of specific metabolizing enzymes activities: investigation with selective five drug cocktail. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;46(3):215-219.
5. Filppula AM, Laitila J, Neuvonen PJ, et al. Potent mechanism-based inhibition of CYP3A4 by imatinib explains its liability to interact with CYP3A4 substrates. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;165(8):2787-2798.
6. U.S. National Library of Medicine. DailyMed. http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/about.cfm. Accessed April 26, 2018.
7. Monte AA, Heard KJ, Campbell J, et al. The effect of CYP2D6 drug-drug interactions on hydrocodone effectiveness. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(8):879-885.
8. Preskorn SH, Kane CP, Lobello K, et al. Cytochrome P450 2D6 phenoconversion is common in patients being treated for depression: implications for personalized medicine. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(6):614-621.
9. de Leon, J, Susce, MT, Johnson, M, et al. DNA microarray technology in the clinical environment: the AmpliChip CYP450 test for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotyping. CNS Spectr. 2009;14(1):19-34.
10. Lampe JW, King IB, Li S, et al. Brassica vegetables increase and apiaceous vegetables decrease cytochrome P450 1A2 activity in humans: changes in caffeine metabolite ratios in response to controlled vegetable diets. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21(6):1157-1162.
11. Zevin S, Benowitz NL. Drug interaction with tobacco smoking. An update. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;36(3):425-438.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 17(7)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 17(7)
Page Number
41-45
Page Number
41-45
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Making sense of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 genotype vs phenotype
Display Headline
Making sense of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 genotype vs phenotype
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

Aggressive and delusional about his alien origins, but refusing treatment

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 05/13/2019 - 15:50
Display Headline
Aggressive and delusional about his alien origins, but refusing treatment

CASE Alien thoughts
Mr. C, age 23, is admitted to an intermediate-security facility because of unmanageable aggression. He is not charged with a crime and his legal status is admission by guardian. He is taking haloperidol decanoate, 300 mg IM every 28 days, and divalproex sodium, 1500 mg/d, but he continues to experience auditory hallucina­tions and the delusion that he is an alien.

Mr. C is given a primary diagnosis of chronic undifferentiated schizophrenia. He is started on risperidone tablets, 3 mg/d, and then switched to risperidone orally disintegrating tablets, titrated to 8 mg/d, to ensure compliance. Later, he receives separate trials of high-dose que­tiapine (up to 1200 mg/d) and olanzapine orally disintegrating tablets (up to 30 mg/d). Lithium, 1200 mg/d, sertraline, 100 mg/d, and long-acting propranolol, 120 mg/d, were added at various periods of his treatment.

He continues to experience hallucinations and delusions, is intermittently aggressive, is not engaged in the treatment program, and needs prompting for basic hygiene. Several times, we discuss with Mr. C using clozap­ine, but he refuses, mainly because of weekly blood draws.

How would you proceed with Mr. C’s care?
a) consider electroconvulsive therapy
b) order aripiprazole and an omega-3 fish oil supplement
c) consider involuntary clozapine therapy and lab testing

The author’s observations
Schizophrenia remains a chronic and often refractory illness. Patients suffer from intru­sive hallucinations; social and self-care defi­cits; cognitive impairment; and increased risk of violence, suicide, and premature death from medical causes. Pharmacotherapy is the mainstay of treatment, supplemented by individual and group therapies, psycho­social rehabilitation, housing assistance, and income support. Antipsychotics are funda­mental and clozapine has been established as the most effective antipsychotic in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials for Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study,1 but it remains underutilized.2

 

 


In 2008, clozapine accounted for only 4.4% of antipsychotic prescriptions in the United States.3 In our state forensic facility, only 10% of patients on an antipsychotic received clozapine in 2011. Despite the CATIE trial, there were no significant increases in clo­zapine prescribing after the results were published4 and patients often experience a substantial delay before clozapine is ini­tiated.5 In the last several years, we have looked at methods to increase clozapine use in our hospital and have described some of our experiences. Despite enthusiasm for, and good experi­ence with, clozapine, barriers limit the use of this medication (Table 1). One signifi­cant barrier is patient acceptance. Although most of our patients taking an atypical anti­psychotic will accept a blood draws every 6 months for metabolic monitoring, many will reject clozapine because of the initial weekly blood draw. Other patients will reject a trial of clozapine because of fears of serious adverse reactions.

 

Clinicians may be reluctant to initiate clo­zapine treatment because of increased time demands to obtain and document informed consent, complete initial paperwork, initi­ate a clozapine titration protocol, and order laboratory work. Clinicians also may fear more serious adverse reactions with clozap­ine such as agranulocytosis, acute diabetes, severe constipation, and myocarditis. With close monitoring, however, these outcomes can be avoided, and clozapine therapy can decrease mortality.6 With the increasing avail­ability and decreasing cost of genetic analy­sis, in the near future we may be able to better predict clozapine responders and the risk of agranulocytosis before initiating clozapine.7,8

Overcoming barriers
When initiating clozapine, it is helpful to reduce barriers to treatment. One strategy to improve patient acceptance of blood test­ing is to use fingerstick hematology profiles rather than the typical venipuncture tech­nique. The Micros 60 analyzer can provide a complete blood count and granulocyte count from a blood specimen collected in a mini capillary tube.

National clozapine registries accept results derived from this method of blood analysis. Using preprinted medication and treatment orders can ease the paperwork burden for the psychiatrist. To help ensure safe use of clozapine, clinical pharmacists can help interface with the clozapine reg­istry (see this article at CurrentPsychiatry. com for a list of clozapine registry Web sites), assist with monitoring laboratory and medication orders, and anticipate drug interactions and side effects. Staff mem­bers directly involved in the patient’s care can try to improve the patient’s insight of his (her) illness. Nursing staff can provide medication education.

Many efforts have been made to educate medical staff to reduce adverse effects and improve patients’ experience with clozapine. Employing agents such as polyethylene gly­col, desmopressin, terazosin, and topiramate can help to manage adverse effects of clozap­ine such as constipation, nocturnal enuresis, drooling, and weight gain, respectively. Lithium can help boost a low neutrophil count9; a lithium level >0.4 mEq/L may be needed to achieve this response. Although generally well tolerated, adding lithium can increase the risk of seizures with clozapine. A final hurdle has been the dilemma of an unwilling, but obviously ill and suffering, patient who has failed several medication trials and other therapeutic interventions.

 

 


TREATMENT Involuntary clozapine
Mr. C continues to believe that he is an alien. He also thinks he is involved in a mission for God. He has physically assaulted staff on occasion. Overall, his mood shows no persis­tent abnormality and his sleep and appetite are normal. Family history reveals that Mr. C’s brother has schizophrenia. Because of Mr. C’s refractory illness, we seek the guardian’s con­sent for a trial of clozapine and ask for per­mission to give backup medication and lab testing involuntarily if necessary.

We obtain informed consent and orders are written. Mr. C refuses the first 2 doses of clozapine (12.5 mg at bedtime) and receives a backup order of IM olanzapine, 5 mg. He initially refuses baseline and 1-week hematology pro­files, which then are obtained involuntarily by manual hold. Subsequently, Mr. C no longer refused medication or lab tests. His clozap­ine dosage is titrated to 400 mg/d, guided by clinical response and plasma level.

The authors’ observations
We work in a public forensic psychiatry facility, where the average length of stay is 680 days. In a public psychiatry facil­ity there may be pressure to reduce the length of stay by moving patients to a less restrictive setting and thereby reducing the overall census. Many patients at our facil­ity likely would benefit from clozapine. In an effort to provide this important therapy to patients who refuse it despite refrac­tory symptoms, chronic hospitalization, and dangerous behaviors, we have devel­oped an option of involuntary clozapine administration. When efforts to convince the patient to agree to clozapine treatment fail, approval for the involuntary adminis­tration of medication and laboratory testing can be requested.

Involuntary clozapine treatment may be an important option for patients who have a guardian (as do approximately one-half of patients at our facility). It also might be an option for patients who have a court order or other legal document approving a trial of involuntary clozapine. When seeking approval from a guardian, explain the ben­efits and risks of treatment. Some guardians are public administrators, such as elected officials who serve as conservators and guardians, and may be familiar with clo­zapine and successes with other patients, and quickly support the request. In other cases, the guardian is a family member and might require more education and time to make a decision.

After obtaining approval from a guard­ian, inform the patient of the plan to initi­ate clozapine, with the goal of gradually reducing some or most of the other psy­chotropics. Describe to your patient why weekly hematology profiles are necessary. In collaboration with the treatment team, a convenient time is scheduled for the baseline lab draw. If lab results meet the baseline requirements, clozapine is initi­ated, usually using the orally disintegrat­ing formulation. The patient is informed about the lab results, medication orders, and potential side effects. If the patient refuses medication, an IM backup of another atypical antipsychotic may be ordered in place of the missed clozapine dose, after obtaining the guardian’s per­mission. Employing physical restraint such as a manual hold to obtain labora­tory testing or to administer medication triggers restraint and seclusion policies.

How do you ensure compliance with clozapine therapy in an unwilling patient?
a) mouth check
b) medication watch (sitting in a public area for 30 minutes after a dose)
c) dissolving clozapine tablets
d) monitoring therapy with clozapine/nor­clozapine plasma levels

 

 

The authors’ observations
At times we have instituted all of the meth­ods noted in Table 2. We have most often used dissolving tablets and plasma monitoring.



OUTCOME Improvement, transfer
Mr. C gradually improves over 6 months. The voices, delusions, and aggression resolve. He remains mildly disorganized and has poor insight, with unrealistic goals. Approximately 3 years after admission and 1 year after clo­zapine was initiated, Mr. C is transferred to a minimum-security facility.

The authors’ observations
Overall, our experience has been success­ful with the approach we have described. Patients often do not resist the treatment plan once they see our commitment to their well-being. When they do resist, it has been only for 1 to 3 doses of medica­tion, and 1 or 2 blood draws. Of 6 recent cases under this protocol, we have dis­charged 3; 1 is approaching discharge; 1 has had minimal improvement to date; and 1 required discontinuation because of neutropenia. We recommend considering involuntary clozapine therapy for refractory patients who have a poor prognosis.

Bottom Line
Clozapine is an underutilized treatment for refractory schizophrenia, often because of patient refusal. In a case presentation format we review the barriers to clozapine therapy. We discuss clinical and legal issues for administering clozapine to an unwilling patient.

Related Resources
• Hill M, Freundenrich O. Clozapine: key discussion points for pre­scribers. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2013;6(4):177-185.
• Nielsen J, Correll C, Manu P, et al. Termination of clozapine treat­ment due to medical reasons: when is it warranted and how can it be avoided? J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(6):603-613.


Drug Brand Names
Aripiprazole • Abilify                            
Polyethylene glycol • MiraLax
Clozapine • Clozaril, FazaClo                
ropranolol • Inderal LA
Desmopressin • DDAVP                     
Quetiapine • Seroquel
Divalproex sodium • Depakote             
Risperidone • Risperdal
Haloperidol • Haldol                            
Sertraline • Zoloft
Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid   
Terazosin • Hytrin
Olanzapine • Zyprexa            
Topiramate • Topamax

References


1. McEvoy JP, Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, et al; CATIE Investigators. Effectiveness of clozapine versus olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia who did not respond to prior atypical antipsychotic treatment. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(4): 600-610.
2. Stroup TS, Lieberman JA, McEvoy JP, et al; CATIE Investigators. Results of phase 3 of the CATIE schizophrenia trial. Schizophr Res. 2009;107(1):1-12.
3. Meltzer HY. Clozapine: balancing safety with superior antipsychotic efficacy. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2012;6(3):134-144.
4. Berkowitz RL, Patel U, Ni Q, et al. The impact of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) on prescribing practices: an analysis of data from a large midwestern state. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(4):498-503.
5. Howes OD, Vergunst F, Gee S, et al. Adherence to treatment guidelines in clinical practice: study of antipsychotic treatment prior to clozapine initiation. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201(6):481-485.
6. Tiihonen J, Lönnqvist J, Wahlbeck K, et al. 11-year follow-up of mortality in patients with schizophrenia: a population-based cohort study (FIN11 study). Lancet. 2009;374(9690):620-627.
7. Arranz MJ, Munro J, Birkett J, et al. Pharmacogenetic prediction of clozapine response. Lancet. 2000;355(9215): 1615-1616.
8. Athanasiou MC, Dettling M, Cascorbi I, et al. Candidate gene analysis identifies a polymorphism on HLA-DQB1 associated with clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(4):458-463.
9. Paton C, Esop R. Managing clozapine-induced neutropenia with lithium. Psychiatric Bulletin. 2005;29(5):186-188.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

John Lyskowski, MD
Medical Director
Guhleman Forensic Center
Fulton State Hospital
Fulton, Missouri

Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry
University of Missouri School of Medicine
Columbia, Missouri


Victoria Jenne, PharmD, MPH, BCPS
Staff Pharmacist
Fulton State Hospital
Fulton, Missouri

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 13(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
61-64, A
Legacy Keywords
clozapine, schizophrenia, hallucinations, antipsychotic, weekly blood draws
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

John Lyskowski, MD
Medical Director
Guhleman Forensic Center
Fulton State Hospital
Fulton, Missouri

Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry
University of Missouri School of Medicine
Columbia, Missouri


Victoria Jenne, PharmD, MPH, BCPS
Staff Pharmacist
Fulton State Hospital
Fulton, Missouri

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Author and Disclosure Information

John Lyskowski, MD
Medical Director
Guhleman Forensic Center
Fulton State Hospital
Fulton, Missouri

Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry
University of Missouri School of Medicine
Columbia, Missouri


Victoria Jenne, PharmD, MPH, BCPS
Staff Pharmacist
Fulton State Hospital
Fulton, Missouri

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Article PDF
Article PDF

CASE Alien thoughts
Mr. C, age 23, is admitted to an intermediate-security facility because of unmanageable aggression. He is not charged with a crime and his legal status is admission by guardian. He is taking haloperidol decanoate, 300 mg IM every 28 days, and divalproex sodium, 1500 mg/d, but he continues to experience auditory hallucina­tions and the delusion that he is an alien.

Mr. C is given a primary diagnosis of chronic undifferentiated schizophrenia. He is started on risperidone tablets, 3 mg/d, and then switched to risperidone orally disintegrating tablets, titrated to 8 mg/d, to ensure compliance. Later, he receives separate trials of high-dose que­tiapine (up to 1200 mg/d) and olanzapine orally disintegrating tablets (up to 30 mg/d). Lithium, 1200 mg/d, sertraline, 100 mg/d, and long-acting propranolol, 120 mg/d, were added at various periods of his treatment.

He continues to experience hallucinations and delusions, is intermittently aggressive, is not engaged in the treatment program, and needs prompting for basic hygiene. Several times, we discuss with Mr. C using clozap­ine, but he refuses, mainly because of weekly blood draws.

How would you proceed with Mr. C’s care?
a) consider electroconvulsive therapy
b) order aripiprazole and an omega-3 fish oil supplement
c) consider involuntary clozapine therapy and lab testing

The author’s observations
Schizophrenia remains a chronic and often refractory illness. Patients suffer from intru­sive hallucinations; social and self-care defi­cits; cognitive impairment; and increased risk of violence, suicide, and premature death from medical causes. Pharmacotherapy is the mainstay of treatment, supplemented by individual and group therapies, psycho­social rehabilitation, housing assistance, and income support. Antipsychotics are funda­mental and clozapine has been established as the most effective antipsychotic in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials for Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study,1 but it remains underutilized.2

 

 


In 2008, clozapine accounted for only 4.4% of antipsychotic prescriptions in the United States.3 In our state forensic facility, only 10% of patients on an antipsychotic received clozapine in 2011. Despite the CATIE trial, there were no significant increases in clo­zapine prescribing after the results were published4 and patients often experience a substantial delay before clozapine is ini­tiated.5 In the last several years, we have looked at methods to increase clozapine use in our hospital and have described some of our experiences. Despite enthusiasm for, and good experi­ence with, clozapine, barriers limit the use of this medication (Table 1). One signifi­cant barrier is patient acceptance. Although most of our patients taking an atypical anti­psychotic will accept a blood draws every 6 months for metabolic monitoring, many will reject clozapine because of the initial weekly blood draw. Other patients will reject a trial of clozapine because of fears of serious adverse reactions.

 

Clinicians may be reluctant to initiate clo­zapine treatment because of increased time demands to obtain and document informed consent, complete initial paperwork, initi­ate a clozapine titration protocol, and order laboratory work. Clinicians also may fear more serious adverse reactions with clozap­ine such as agranulocytosis, acute diabetes, severe constipation, and myocarditis. With close monitoring, however, these outcomes can be avoided, and clozapine therapy can decrease mortality.6 With the increasing avail­ability and decreasing cost of genetic analy­sis, in the near future we may be able to better predict clozapine responders and the risk of agranulocytosis before initiating clozapine.7,8

Overcoming barriers
When initiating clozapine, it is helpful to reduce barriers to treatment. One strategy to improve patient acceptance of blood test­ing is to use fingerstick hematology profiles rather than the typical venipuncture tech­nique. The Micros 60 analyzer can provide a complete blood count and granulocyte count from a blood specimen collected in a mini capillary tube.

National clozapine registries accept results derived from this method of blood analysis. Using preprinted medication and treatment orders can ease the paperwork burden for the psychiatrist. To help ensure safe use of clozapine, clinical pharmacists can help interface with the clozapine reg­istry (see this article at CurrentPsychiatry. com for a list of clozapine registry Web sites), assist with monitoring laboratory and medication orders, and anticipate drug interactions and side effects. Staff mem­bers directly involved in the patient’s care can try to improve the patient’s insight of his (her) illness. Nursing staff can provide medication education.

Many efforts have been made to educate medical staff to reduce adverse effects and improve patients’ experience with clozapine. Employing agents such as polyethylene gly­col, desmopressin, terazosin, and topiramate can help to manage adverse effects of clozap­ine such as constipation, nocturnal enuresis, drooling, and weight gain, respectively. Lithium can help boost a low neutrophil count9; a lithium level >0.4 mEq/L may be needed to achieve this response. Although generally well tolerated, adding lithium can increase the risk of seizures with clozapine. A final hurdle has been the dilemma of an unwilling, but obviously ill and suffering, patient who has failed several medication trials and other therapeutic interventions.

 

 


TREATMENT Involuntary clozapine
Mr. C continues to believe that he is an alien. He also thinks he is involved in a mission for God. He has physically assaulted staff on occasion. Overall, his mood shows no persis­tent abnormality and his sleep and appetite are normal. Family history reveals that Mr. C’s brother has schizophrenia. Because of Mr. C’s refractory illness, we seek the guardian’s con­sent for a trial of clozapine and ask for per­mission to give backup medication and lab testing involuntarily if necessary.

We obtain informed consent and orders are written. Mr. C refuses the first 2 doses of clozapine (12.5 mg at bedtime) and receives a backup order of IM olanzapine, 5 mg. He initially refuses baseline and 1-week hematology pro­files, which then are obtained involuntarily by manual hold. Subsequently, Mr. C no longer refused medication or lab tests. His clozap­ine dosage is titrated to 400 mg/d, guided by clinical response and plasma level.

The authors’ observations
We work in a public forensic psychiatry facility, where the average length of stay is 680 days. In a public psychiatry facil­ity there may be pressure to reduce the length of stay by moving patients to a less restrictive setting and thereby reducing the overall census. Many patients at our facil­ity likely would benefit from clozapine. In an effort to provide this important therapy to patients who refuse it despite refrac­tory symptoms, chronic hospitalization, and dangerous behaviors, we have devel­oped an option of involuntary clozapine administration. When efforts to convince the patient to agree to clozapine treatment fail, approval for the involuntary adminis­tration of medication and laboratory testing can be requested.

Involuntary clozapine treatment may be an important option for patients who have a guardian (as do approximately one-half of patients at our facility). It also might be an option for patients who have a court order or other legal document approving a trial of involuntary clozapine. When seeking approval from a guardian, explain the ben­efits and risks of treatment. Some guardians are public administrators, such as elected officials who serve as conservators and guardians, and may be familiar with clo­zapine and successes with other patients, and quickly support the request. In other cases, the guardian is a family member and might require more education and time to make a decision.

After obtaining approval from a guard­ian, inform the patient of the plan to initi­ate clozapine, with the goal of gradually reducing some or most of the other psy­chotropics. Describe to your patient why weekly hematology profiles are necessary. In collaboration with the treatment team, a convenient time is scheduled for the baseline lab draw. If lab results meet the baseline requirements, clozapine is initi­ated, usually using the orally disintegrat­ing formulation. The patient is informed about the lab results, medication orders, and potential side effects. If the patient refuses medication, an IM backup of another atypical antipsychotic may be ordered in place of the missed clozapine dose, after obtaining the guardian’s per­mission. Employing physical restraint such as a manual hold to obtain labora­tory testing or to administer medication triggers restraint and seclusion policies.

How do you ensure compliance with clozapine therapy in an unwilling patient?
a) mouth check
b) medication watch (sitting in a public area for 30 minutes after a dose)
c) dissolving clozapine tablets
d) monitoring therapy with clozapine/nor­clozapine plasma levels

 

 

The authors’ observations
At times we have instituted all of the meth­ods noted in Table 2. We have most often used dissolving tablets and plasma monitoring.



OUTCOME Improvement, transfer
Mr. C gradually improves over 6 months. The voices, delusions, and aggression resolve. He remains mildly disorganized and has poor insight, with unrealistic goals. Approximately 3 years after admission and 1 year after clo­zapine was initiated, Mr. C is transferred to a minimum-security facility.

The authors’ observations
Overall, our experience has been success­ful with the approach we have described. Patients often do not resist the treatment plan once they see our commitment to their well-being. When they do resist, it has been only for 1 to 3 doses of medica­tion, and 1 or 2 blood draws. Of 6 recent cases under this protocol, we have dis­charged 3; 1 is approaching discharge; 1 has had minimal improvement to date; and 1 required discontinuation because of neutropenia. We recommend considering involuntary clozapine therapy for refractory patients who have a poor prognosis.

Bottom Line
Clozapine is an underutilized treatment for refractory schizophrenia, often because of patient refusal. In a case presentation format we review the barriers to clozapine therapy. We discuss clinical and legal issues for administering clozapine to an unwilling patient.

Related Resources
• Hill M, Freundenrich O. Clozapine: key discussion points for pre­scribers. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2013;6(4):177-185.
• Nielsen J, Correll C, Manu P, et al. Termination of clozapine treat­ment due to medical reasons: when is it warranted and how can it be avoided? J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(6):603-613.


Drug Brand Names
Aripiprazole • Abilify                            
Polyethylene glycol • MiraLax
Clozapine • Clozaril, FazaClo                
ropranolol • Inderal LA
Desmopressin • DDAVP                     
Quetiapine • Seroquel
Divalproex sodium • Depakote             
Risperidone • Risperdal
Haloperidol • Haldol                            
Sertraline • Zoloft
Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid   
Terazosin • Hytrin
Olanzapine • Zyprexa            
Topiramate • Topamax

CASE Alien thoughts
Mr. C, age 23, is admitted to an intermediate-security facility because of unmanageable aggression. He is not charged with a crime and his legal status is admission by guardian. He is taking haloperidol decanoate, 300 mg IM every 28 days, and divalproex sodium, 1500 mg/d, but he continues to experience auditory hallucina­tions and the delusion that he is an alien.

Mr. C is given a primary diagnosis of chronic undifferentiated schizophrenia. He is started on risperidone tablets, 3 mg/d, and then switched to risperidone orally disintegrating tablets, titrated to 8 mg/d, to ensure compliance. Later, he receives separate trials of high-dose que­tiapine (up to 1200 mg/d) and olanzapine orally disintegrating tablets (up to 30 mg/d). Lithium, 1200 mg/d, sertraline, 100 mg/d, and long-acting propranolol, 120 mg/d, were added at various periods of his treatment.

He continues to experience hallucinations and delusions, is intermittently aggressive, is not engaged in the treatment program, and needs prompting for basic hygiene. Several times, we discuss with Mr. C using clozap­ine, but he refuses, mainly because of weekly blood draws.

How would you proceed with Mr. C’s care?
a) consider electroconvulsive therapy
b) order aripiprazole and an omega-3 fish oil supplement
c) consider involuntary clozapine therapy and lab testing

The author’s observations
Schizophrenia remains a chronic and often refractory illness. Patients suffer from intru­sive hallucinations; social and self-care defi­cits; cognitive impairment; and increased risk of violence, suicide, and premature death from medical causes. Pharmacotherapy is the mainstay of treatment, supplemented by individual and group therapies, psycho­social rehabilitation, housing assistance, and income support. Antipsychotics are funda­mental and clozapine has been established as the most effective antipsychotic in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials for Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study,1 but it remains underutilized.2

 

 


In 2008, clozapine accounted for only 4.4% of antipsychotic prescriptions in the United States.3 In our state forensic facility, only 10% of patients on an antipsychotic received clozapine in 2011. Despite the CATIE trial, there were no significant increases in clo­zapine prescribing after the results were published4 and patients often experience a substantial delay before clozapine is ini­tiated.5 In the last several years, we have looked at methods to increase clozapine use in our hospital and have described some of our experiences. Despite enthusiasm for, and good experi­ence with, clozapine, barriers limit the use of this medication (Table 1). One signifi­cant barrier is patient acceptance. Although most of our patients taking an atypical anti­psychotic will accept a blood draws every 6 months for metabolic monitoring, many will reject clozapine because of the initial weekly blood draw. Other patients will reject a trial of clozapine because of fears of serious adverse reactions.

 

Clinicians may be reluctant to initiate clo­zapine treatment because of increased time demands to obtain and document informed consent, complete initial paperwork, initi­ate a clozapine titration protocol, and order laboratory work. Clinicians also may fear more serious adverse reactions with clozap­ine such as agranulocytosis, acute diabetes, severe constipation, and myocarditis. With close monitoring, however, these outcomes can be avoided, and clozapine therapy can decrease mortality.6 With the increasing avail­ability and decreasing cost of genetic analy­sis, in the near future we may be able to better predict clozapine responders and the risk of agranulocytosis before initiating clozapine.7,8

Overcoming barriers
When initiating clozapine, it is helpful to reduce barriers to treatment. One strategy to improve patient acceptance of blood test­ing is to use fingerstick hematology profiles rather than the typical venipuncture tech­nique. The Micros 60 analyzer can provide a complete blood count and granulocyte count from a blood specimen collected in a mini capillary tube.

National clozapine registries accept results derived from this method of blood analysis. Using preprinted medication and treatment orders can ease the paperwork burden for the psychiatrist. To help ensure safe use of clozapine, clinical pharmacists can help interface with the clozapine reg­istry (see this article at CurrentPsychiatry. com for a list of clozapine registry Web sites), assist with monitoring laboratory and medication orders, and anticipate drug interactions and side effects. Staff mem­bers directly involved in the patient’s care can try to improve the patient’s insight of his (her) illness. Nursing staff can provide medication education.

Many efforts have been made to educate medical staff to reduce adverse effects and improve patients’ experience with clozapine. Employing agents such as polyethylene gly­col, desmopressin, terazosin, and topiramate can help to manage adverse effects of clozap­ine such as constipation, nocturnal enuresis, drooling, and weight gain, respectively. Lithium can help boost a low neutrophil count9; a lithium level >0.4 mEq/L may be needed to achieve this response. Although generally well tolerated, adding lithium can increase the risk of seizures with clozapine. A final hurdle has been the dilemma of an unwilling, but obviously ill and suffering, patient who has failed several medication trials and other therapeutic interventions.

 

 


TREATMENT Involuntary clozapine
Mr. C continues to believe that he is an alien. He also thinks he is involved in a mission for God. He has physically assaulted staff on occasion. Overall, his mood shows no persis­tent abnormality and his sleep and appetite are normal. Family history reveals that Mr. C’s brother has schizophrenia. Because of Mr. C’s refractory illness, we seek the guardian’s con­sent for a trial of clozapine and ask for per­mission to give backup medication and lab testing involuntarily if necessary.

We obtain informed consent and orders are written. Mr. C refuses the first 2 doses of clozapine (12.5 mg at bedtime) and receives a backup order of IM olanzapine, 5 mg. He initially refuses baseline and 1-week hematology pro­files, which then are obtained involuntarily by manual hold. Subsequently, Mr. C no longer refused medication or lab tests. His clozap­ine dosage is titrated to 400 mg/d, guided by clinical response and plasma level.

The authors’ observations
We work in a public forensic psychiatry facility, where the average length of stay is 680 days. In a public psychiatry facil­ity there may be pressure to reduce the length of stay by moving patients to a less restrictive setting and thereby reducing the overall census. Many patients at our facil­ity likely would benefit from clozapine. In an effort to provide this important therapy to patients who refuse it despite refrac­tory symptoms, chronic hospitalization, and dangerous behaviors, we have devel­oped an option of involuntary clozapine administration. When efforts to convince the patient to agree to clozapine treatment fail, approval for the involuntary adminis­tration of medication and laboratory testing can be requested.

Involuntary clozapine treatment may be an important option for patients who have a guardian (as do approximately one-half of patients at our facility). It also might be an option for patients who have a court order or other legal document approving a trial of involuntary clozapine. When seeking approval from a guardian, explain the ben­efits and risks of treatment. Some guardians are public administrators, such as elected officials who serve as conservators and guardians, and may be familiar with clo­zapine and successes with other patients, and quickly support the request. In other cases, the guardian is a family member and might require more education and time to make a decision.

After obtaining approval from a guard­ian, inform the patient of the plan to initi­ate clozapine, with the goal of gradually reducing some or most of the other psy­chotropics. Describe to your patient why weekly hematology profiles are necessary. In collaboration with the treatment team, a convenient time is scheduled for the baseline lab draw. If lab results meet the baseline requirements, clozapine is initi­ated, usually using the orally disintegrat­ing formulation. The patient is informed about the lab results, medication orders, and potential side effects. If the patient refuses medication, an IM backup of another atypical antipsychotic may be ordered in place of the missed clozapine dose, after obtaining the guardian’s per­mission. Employing physical restraint such as a manual hold to obtain labora­tory testing or to administer medication triggers restraint and seclusion policies.

How do you ensure compliance with clozapine therapy in an unwilling patient?
a) mouth check
b) medication watch (sitting in a public area for 30 minutes after a dose)
c) dissolving clozapine tablets
d) monitoring therapy with clozapine/nor­clozapine plasma levels

 

 

The authors’ observations
At times we have instituted all of the meth­ods noted in Table 2. We have most often used dissolving tablets and plasma monitoring.



OUTCOME Improvement, transfer
Mr. C gradually improves over 6 months. The voices, delusions, and aggression resolve. He remains mildly disorganized and has poor insight, with unrealistic goals. Approximately 3 years after admission and 1 year after clo­zapine was initiated, Mr. C is transferred to a minimum-security facility.

The authors’ observations
Overall, our experience has been success­ful with the approach we have described. Patients often do not resist the treatment plan once they see our commitment to their well-being. When they do resist, it has been only for 1 to 3 doses of medica­tion, and 1 or 2 blood draws. Of 6 recent cases under this protocol, we have dis­charged 3; 1 is approaching discharge; 1 has had minimal improvement to date; and 1 required discontinuation because of neutropenia. We recommend considering involuntary clozapine therapy for refractory patients who have a poor prognosis.

Bottom Line
Clozapine is an underutilized treatment for refractory schizophrenia, often because of patient refusal. In a case presentation format we review the barriers to clozapine therapy. We discuss clinical and legal issues for administering clozapine to an unwilling patient.

Related Resources
• Hill M, Freundenrich O. Clozapine: key discussion points for pre­scribers. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2013;6(4):177-185.
• Nielsen J, Correll C, Manu P, et al. Termination of clozapine treat­ment due to medical reasons: when is it warranted and how can it be avoided? J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(6):603-613.


Drug Brand Names
Aripiprazole • Abilify                            
Polyethylene glycol • MiraLax
Clozapine • Clozaril, FazaClo                
ropranolol • Inderal LA
Desmopressin • DDAVP                     
Quetiapine • Seroquel
Divalproex sodium • Depakote             
Risperidone • Risperdal
Haloperidol • Haldol                            
Sertraline • Zoloft
Lithium • Eskalith, Lithobid   
Terazosin • Hytrin
Olanzapine • Zyprexa            
Topiramate • Topamax

References


1. McEvoy JP, Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, et al; CATIE Investigators. Effectiveness of clozapine versus olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia who did not respond to prior atypical antipsychotic treatment. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(4): 600-610.
2. Stroup TS, Lieberman JA, McEvoy JP, et al; CATIE Investigators. Results of phase 3 of the CATIE schizophrenia trial. Schizophr Res. 2009;107(1):1-12.
3. Meltzer HY. Clozapine: balancing safety with superior antipsychotic efficacy. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2012;6(3):134-144.
4. Berkowitz RL, Patel U, Ni Q, et al. The impact of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) on prescribing practices: an analysis of data from a large midwestern state. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(4):498-503.
5. Howes OD, Vergunst F, Gee S, et al. Adherence to treatment guidelines in clinical practice: study of antipsychotic treatment prior to clozapine initiation. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201(6):481-485.
6. Tiihonen J, Lönnqvist J, Wahlbeck K, et al. 11-year follow-up of mortality in patients with schizophrenia: a population-based cohort study (FIN11 study). Lancet. 2009;374(9690):620-627.
7. Arranz MJ, Munro J, Birkett J, et al. Pharmacogenetic prediction of clozapine response. Lancet. 2000;355(9215): 1615-1616.
8. Athanasiou MC, Dettling M, Cascorbi I, et al. Candidate gene analysis identifies a polymorphism on HLA-DQB1 associated with clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(4):458-463.
9. Paton C, Esop R. Managing clozapine-induced neutropenia with lithium. Psychiatric Bulletin. 2005;29(5):186-188.

References


1. McEvoy JP, Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, et al; CATIE Investigators. Effectiveness of clozapine versus olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia who did not respond to prior atypical antipsychotic treatment. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(4): 600-610.
2. Stroup TS, Lieberman JA, McEvoy JP, et al; CATIE Investigators. Results of phase 3 of the CATIE schizophrenia trial. Schizophr Res. 2009;107(1):1-12.
3. Meltzer HY. Clozapine: balancing safety with superior antipsychotic efficacy. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses. 2012;6(3):134-144.
4. Berkowitz RL, Patel U, Ni Q, et al. The impact of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) on prescribing practices: an analysis of data from a large midwestern state. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012;73(4):498-503.
5. Howes OD, Vergunst F, Gee S, et al. Adherence to treatment guidelines in clinical practice: study of antipsychotic treatment prior to clozapine initiation. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201(6):481-485.
6. Tiihonen J, Lönnqvist J, Wahlbeck K, et al. 11-year follow-up of mortality in patients with schizophrenia: a population-based cohort study (FIN11 study). Lancet. 2009;374(9690):620-627.
7. Arranz MJ, Munro J, Birkett J, et al. Pharmacogenetic prediction of clozapine response. Lancet. 2000;355(9215): 1615-1616.
8. Athanasiou MC, Dettling M, Cascorbi I, et al. Candidate gene analysis identifies a polymorphism on HLA-DQB1 associated with clozapine-induced agranulocytosis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(4):458-463.
9. Paton C, Esop R. Managing clozapine-induced neutropenia with lithium. Psychiatric Bulletin. 2005;29(5):186-188.

Issue
Current Psychiatry - 13(6)
Issue
Current Psychiatry - 13(6)
Page Number
61-64, A
Page Number
61-64, A
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Aggressive and delusional about his alien origins, but refusing treatment
Display Headline
Aggressive and delusional about his alien origins, but refusing treatment
Legacy Keywords
clozapine, schizophrenia, hallucinations, antipsychotic, weekly blood draws
Legacy Keywords
clozapine, schizophrenia, hallucinations, antipsychotic, weekly blood draws
Sections
PURLs Copyright

Disallow All Ads
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media