Leveraging Community Asset Mapping to Improve Suicide Prevention for Veterans

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 04/07/2025 - 09:50
Display Headline

Leveraging Community Asset Mapping to Improve Suicide Prevention for Veterans

Suicide prevention is the leading clinical priority for the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).1 An average of 18 veterans died by suicide each day in 2021.2 Numerous risk factors for veteran suicide have been identified, including mental health disorders, comorbidities, access to firearms, and potentially lethal medications.3-5 To better understand groups of patients at risk of suicide in medical settings, the authors have previously compared demographic and clinical risk factors between patients who died by suicide by using firearms or other means with matched patients who did not die by suicide (control group) to examine the impact of lack of social support, financial stress,6 legal problems,7 homelessness,8 and discrimination.9 The number of cooccurring risk factors a veteran experiences is associated with a greater likelihood of suicide attempts over time.10 In addition, some risk factors are social and environmental risk factors known as social determinants of health (SDoH), including financial stability and access to health care, food, housing, and education. 11 SDoH may influence health outcomes more broadly and are associated with greater risk of suicide.12,13

The VA offers programming to address suicide risk factors. However, not all veterans are eligible for VA care. Further, some veterans prefer to obtain non-VA services in their communities. Providing veterans with community resources that address risk factors, particularly SDoH, may be a worthwhile strategy for reducing suicide. Such resources have demonstrated success; for example, greater use of housing services was associated with a reduced risk for suicide-related mortality among unhoused veterans.12

The challenges that veterans experience can go beyond the scope of services the VA provides. For example, while the VA provides some services related to homelessness, justice involvement, and assistance with home loans, these services are often limited. Other services for veterans to address SDoH may require access to community resources, including food banks, employment assistance, respite and childcare services, and transportation assistance. Some veterans also may have experienced institutional betrayal, which could be a barrier to VA care and may motivate veterans to address their needs in the community.14 Veterans therefore may need a range of services beyond those within the VA. Leveraging community resources for veterans at risk for suicide is critical, as these resources may help to mitigate suicide risk.

An emerging emphasis of the VA is improving coordination with community partners to prevent veteran suicide. In 2019, the VA launched an improved Veterans Community Care Program, which implemented portions of the VA MISSION Act of 2018 to create additional connection to community care for VA-enrolled veterans. This includes assisting veterans in gaining access to specialty services not offered at a local VA medical center (VAMC), getting access to services sooner, and receiving care if they do not live near a VAMC.15 In addition, the COMPACT Act allows veterans in acute suicidal crisis to receive emergency health care through either VA or non-VA facilities at no cost.16 The VA National Strategy for Preventing Veteran Suicide 2018-2028 is a 10-year plan to reduce veteran suicide rates that includes initiatives to increase connections between VA and community agencies.17 A suicide prevention community toolkit is available online for health care professionals (HCPs) (and others, including employers) outside of the VA who may be unfamiliar with best practices for working with veterans at risk for suicide.18

The challenge, however, is that there is often a lack of “connectedness” between VA suicide prevention coordinators and community resources to address suicide risk factors and related social determinants of health. These services include, but are not limited to suicide prevention, mental health counseling (particularly no/low-cost services), unemployment resources, financial assistance and counseling, housing assistance, and identity-related supportive spaces. A major stumbling block in connecting resources with veterans (regardless of discharge status) who need them is there is no single, national organization with a comprehensive, community-based network that can serve in this intermediary role.

Community asset mapping (CAM), also known as asset mapping or environmental scanning, is a way to bridge the gap.19 CAM provides a method for identifying and aligning community resources relative to a specific need.20 CAM may be used to build community relationships in service of veteran suicide prevention. This process can help individuals learn about and make use of organizations and services within their communities. CAM also helps connect HCPs so they can network, exchange ideas, and collaborate with an eye toward increasing the availability of services and enhancing care coordination. CAM also allows community members (eg, leaders, organizations, individuals) to identify possible gaps in services that address suicide risk factors and solve these problems.

This article details CAM for suicide prevention, which can be utilized by the VA and community organizations alike. Within the VA, CAM can be used by HCPs and administrators, such as VA community engagement and partnership coordinators, to identify potential partnering organizations. For those who serve veterans outside of the VA, CAM can be used to connect at-risk individuals to resources that can enhance their care. This process can help increase the overall knowledge of, and access to, community resources.

COMMUNITY ASSET MAPPING

The University of California, Los Angeles Center for Health Policy Research provides 6 steps for the CAM process.21 These steps include: (1) defining the boundaries of people and places that comprise the community; (2) identifying people and organizations who share similar interests and goals; (3) determining the assets to include; (4) creating an inventory of all organizations’ assets; (5) creating an inventory of individuals’ assets; and (6) organizing the assets on a map. To address the needs of the veteran population, we’ve taken these 6 steps and adapted them to create a CAM for veterans at risk for suicide (Figure). The discussion that follows details how these steps can be implemented to identify community resources that address social determinants of health that may contribute to suicide risk. The goal is to prevent veteran suicide.

0425FED-MH-MAP_F1

Step 1: Define Community Reach. The first step is to identify the geographical boundaries of the community. This may include all veterans within a catchment area (eg, veterans within 60 miles of a VAMC). Defining the geographical parameters of the community will provide structure to the effort so that the resource list is as comprehensive as possible.

Steps 2 and 3: Identify Community Members with Shared Goals; Identify Assets. It is important to identify community members who share similar interests and goals, including people with specific knowledge and skills, organizations with particular goals, and community partners with a broad reach. To begin building a list of referrals, reach out to colleagues within the VA system who are familiar with community resources for those with suicide risk factors. The local VA Transition and Care Management (TCM) office is a resource that connects those transitioning from military to civilian sectors with needed resources, and thus may be a helpful resource while building a CAM. Additionally, each office has a transition patient advocate, who is trained to resolve care-related concerns and may be familiar with community resources.

VA HCPs that can assist include Community Engagement and Partnership Coordinators, Suicide Prevention Coordinators, Local Recovery Coordinators, and substance abuse counselors. In addition, VA patient services, patient safety, and public affairs office staff—as well as VA Homeless Programs—may be good resources. Every VA health care system has care coordinators focused on military sexual trauma, intimate partner violence, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer+ care. These care coordinators may be able to provide information on community resources that address social determinants of health (eg, discrimination, violence).

Reaching out to key community resources and asking for recommendations of other groups that provide assistance to veterans can also be productive. You can start by connecting with veterans service organizations (VSOs), Vet Centers, Veterans Experience Offices (VEO), and Community Veterans Engagement Boards (CVEBs). The VEO is an office designed around VA and community engagement efforts. This office utilizes the CVEBs to foster a 2-way communication feedback loop between veterans and local VA facilities regarding community engagement efforts and outreach.22 CVEBs are particularly valuable sources of information because veterans directly contribute to the conversation about community engagement by describing the difficulties and successes they’ve experienced. Veteran feedback about how a particular resource met their needs can inform which community services are prioritized for inclusion in the resource list. In addition, CVEBs may have a listing of local government, military, and/or community resources that provide services for veterans. Consider, too, organizations that are unrelated to an individual’s veteran status, but speak to their race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, spirituality, socioeconomic status, or disability.

Step 4: Continue to Build Inventory. Use online searches to identify additional resources in the community that are known to have local relationships. These include state suicide prevention coordinators, mental health organizations, and other resources that address social determinants of health (eg, public health and human service organizations, faith-based organizations, collegial organizations). A list of links and search tips are available in the Table.

0425FED-MH-MAP_T1

Steps 5 and 6: Create Document; Organize and Disseminate Information. A spreadsheet can be used to document organization information (Appendix). It is critical to record: (1) the name of the organization or individual; (2) the local address and a point of contact with contact information; (3) services offered to veterans; (4) services specific to suicide prevention, or that address risk factors for suicide; and (5) whether the referral organization is partnered with the VA Community Care Network, which is comprised of contracted HCPs who contract with the VA to provide care to veterans.23

0425FED-MH-MAP_A1

Once a document is created, it can be disseminated through VA offices and among community partners who work with veterans at risk for suicide. It should also be stored in a centralized location such as a shared folder so that it can be continuously updated.

Regularly updating the list is vital so the resource list can continue to be helpful in addressing veterans’ needs and reducing suicide risk factors. Continued collaboration with those in the community can help ensure the resource list is up to date with all available services and pertinent contact information. It can also go far in strengthening collaborative bonds.

IMPLEMENTATION

To illustrate the use of CAM for veteran suicide prevention, we offer a case example of CAM conducted by the VA Patient Safety Center of Inquiry — Suicide Prevention Collaborative (VA PSCI-SPC) team, consisting of 4 team members. A veteran was included as a team member and assisted with the CAM process.

The VA PSCI-SPC sought to identify community services for veterans in Colorado who were not enrolled in VA health care and had risk factors for suicide. Next, the team reached out to colleagues and asked about community organizations that work with individuals at risk for suicide. VA PSCI-SPC outreach resulted in a list of assets that included resources to address mental health, legal concerns, employment, homelessness/housing, finances, religion, peer support, food insecurity, exercise, intimate partner violence, sexual and gender identity needs, and peer support. VSOs and CVEBs were also added to the list.

Next, the team continued to build on the inventory and identified state suicide prevention coordinators; health care systems; regional suicide prevention commissions; Colorado Department of Health and Human Services; program coordinators for Governor’s and Mayor’s Challenges to Prevent Suicide Among Service Members, Veterans, and their Families; veterans councils; universities (eg, counseling clinics, legal clinics); and foundations devoted to general and veteran-specific suicide prevention within the region.

All the identified resources were inventoried. Details were gathered about each of the organizations, including addresses, points of contact and phone numbers, descriptions of services offered for veterans, descriptions of suicide prevention services offered, whether or not organizations were not-for-profit, the mission of the organizations, and whether or not the organizations were under contract for VA Community Care. Finally, the resource spreadsheet was created and disseminated among stakeholders to be used to enhance veteran suicide care. Stakeholders included social workers, psychologists, and nurse practitioners working with veterans. The list was circulated to VA and community partners as needed.

The VA PSCI-SPC resource document was only 1 benefit of CAM. The asset mapping also resulted in the creation of a learning collaborative comprised of VA and community partners, designed to share knowledge of best practices in suicide prevention and create an established referral network for veterans at risk for suicide.24 Ultimately, the goal of the CAM and the creation of the learning collaborative was to better connect veterans to care in order to decrease suicide risk. A secondary benefit of this community connectedness is that the list of resources produced by CAM became a living document that was, and continues to be, updated as the network became aware of new resources and resources that were no longer available. The VA PSCI-SPC learning collaborative met quarterly to discuss implementation of suicide prevention best practices within their organization.

Data from the VA PSCI-SPC learning collaborative via CAM revealed that organizations felt more efficacious in implementing suicide prevention best practices, noticed increased connections and collaborations with community organizations with the goal of providing services to veterans, and resulted in staff training that improved services provided to veterans.24 This is supported by other findings of a literature review of suicide prevention interventions, which indicated that programs with an established community support network were more effective at reducing suicide rates.25 CAM therefore may be a process through which greater community connection and increased knowledge of resources may help prevent suicide among veterans.

It seems reasonable that the CAM processes used by the VA PSCI-SPC can be implemented within the regional Veterans Integrated Service Networks to identify assets in a specific geographical area to address challenges with social determinants of health and potentially decrease veteran suicide risk.

CONCLUSIONS

CAM can be used to identify and build relationships with community resources that address the stressors that place veterans at risk for suicide. Six proposed steps to CAM for veterans at risk for suicide include: defining community reach (the map); identifying community members and organizations with shared goals; identifying assets within the community; continuing to build inventory; creating a document; and organizing and disseminating the information (while continuing to update the resources).21

CAM can be used to connect veterans with resources to address needs related to adverse social determinants of health that may heighten their risk for suicide. For example, veterans facing legal challenges can connect with a legal clinic; those having difficulties paying bills can obtain financial assistance; those who need help completing their VA claims can connect with the Veterans Benefits Administration or VSOs to assist them with their claims; and those experiencing discrimination can connect with organizations where they may experience acceptance, safety, and support. Broad community support surrounding suicide risk factors can be critical for effective suicide prevention.25

CAM may also be helpful for HCPs and others involved in veteran health care. For example, community mapping can be utilized by newly hired community engagement and partnership coordinators as a tool for outlining resources available for veterans in their community and as a framework to continually update their resource network. CAM develops community awareness, integrates resources, and enhances service utilization, which may assist in veteran suicide prevention by increasing care coordination.17 Finally, mapping community resources can create awareness of the many resources available to help veterans, even before suicide becomes a consideration.

References
  1. Rice L. VA Secretary Robert Wilkie says suicide prevention is his agency’s top ‘clinical’ priority. June 17, 2019. Accessed January 30, 2025. https://www.kut.org/post/va-secretary-robert-wilkie-says-suicide-prevention-his-agencys-top-clinical-priority
  2. US Department of Veterans Affairs. 2023 national veteran suicide prevention annual report. November 2023. Accessed January 30, 2025. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/2023/2023-National-Veteran-Suicide-Prevention-Annual-Report-FINAL-508.pdf
  3. DeBeer BB, Meyer EC, Kimbrel NA, Kittel JA, Gulliver SB, Morissette SB. Psychological inflexibility predicts of suicidal ideation over time in veterans of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2018;48(6):627–641. doi:10.1111/sltb.12388
  4. Ilgen MA, Bohnert ASB, Ignacio RV, et al. Psychiatric diagnoses and risk of suicide in veterans. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(11):1152–1158. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.129
  5. Kimbrel NA, Meyer EC, DeBeer BB, Gulliver SB, Morissette SB. A 12-month prospective study of the effects of PTSD-depression comorbidity on suicidal behavior in Iraq/ Afghanistan-era veterans. Psychiatry Res. 2016;243:97–99. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.011
  6. Hoffmire CA, Borowski S, Vogt D. Contribution of veterans’ initial post-separation vocational, financial, and social experiences to their suicidal ideation trajectories following military service. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2023;53(3):443- 456. doi:10.1111/sltb.12955
  7. Holliday R, Martin WB, Monteith LL, Clark SC, LePage JP. Suicide among justice-involved veterans: a brief overview of extant research, theoretical conceptualization, and recommendations for future research. J Soc Distress Homeless. 2020;30(1):41-49. doi:10.1080/10530789.2019.1711306
  8. Holliday R, Liu S, Brenner LA, et al. Preventing suicide among homeless veterans: a consensus statement by the Veterans Affairs suicide prevention among veterans experiencing homelessness workgroup. Med Care. 2021;59(Suppl 2):S103- S105. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001399
  9. Carter SP, Allred KM, Tucker RP, Simpson TL, Shipherd JC, Lehavot K. Discrimination and suicidal ideation among transgender veterans: The role of social supsupport and connection. LGBT Health. 2019;6(2):43-50. doi:10.1089/lgbt.2018.0239
  10. Lee DJ, Kearns JC, Wisco BE, et al. A longitudinal study of risk factors for suicide attempts among Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans. Depress Anxiety. 2018;35(7): 609-618. doi:10.1002/da.22736
  11. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Social determinants of health (SDOH). Accessed January 30, 2025. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health
  12. Montgomery AE, Dichter M, Byrne T, Blosnich J. Intervention to address homelessness and all-cause and suicide mortality among unstably housed US veterans, 2012- 2016. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021;75:380-386. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214664
  13. Llamocca EN, Yeh HH, Miller-Matero LR, et al. Association between adverse social determinants of health and suicide death. Med Care. 2023;61(11):744-749. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001918
  14. Monteith LL, Holliday R, Schneider AL, et al. Institutional betrayal and help-seeking among women survivors of military sexual trauma. Psychol Trauma. 2021;13(7):814-823. doi:10.1037/tra0001027
  15. VA launches new health care options under MISSION Act. News release. US Department of Veterans Affairs. June 6, 2019. Accessed January 31, 2025. https://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=5264
  16. COMPACT Act expands free emergency suicide care for veterans. News release. US Department of Veterans Affairs. February 1, 2023. Accessed January 31,2025. https://www.va.gov/poplar-bluff-health-care/news-releases/compact-act-expands-free-emergency-suicide-care-for-veterans/
  17. US Department of Veterans Affairs. National strategy for preventing Veteran suicide 2018-2028. 2018. Accessed January 31, 2025. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/suicide_prevention/docs/Office-of-Mental-Health-and-Suicide-Prevention-National-Strategy-for-Preventing-Veterans-Suicide.pdf
  18. US Department of Veterans Affairs. Veteran outreach toolkit: preventing veteran suicide is everyone’s business. A community call to action. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://floridavets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/VA-Suicide-Prevention-Community-Outreach-Toolkit.pdf
  19. Crane K, Mooney M. Essential tools: community resource mapping. 2005. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/172995/NCSET_EssentialTools_ResourceMapping.pdf
  20. Community Tool Box. 2. Assessing Community Needs and Resources. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://ctb.ku.edu/en/assessing-community-needs-and-resources
  21. UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. Section 1: asset mapping. 2012. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/programs/healthdata/trainings/documents/tw_cba20.pdf
  22. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Experience Office. 4th quarter 2018 community engagement news. October 2, 2018. Accessed February 4, 2025. https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USVAVEO/bulletins/211836e
  23. US Department of Veterans Affairs. About our VA community care network and covered services. Accessed February 6, 2025. https://www.va.gov/resources/aboutour-va-community-care-network-and-covered-services/
  24. DeBeer B, Mignogna J, Borah E, et al. A pilot of a veteran suicide prevention learning collaborative among community organizations: Initial results and outcomes. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2023;53(4):628-641. doi:10.1111/sltb.12969
  25. Fountoulakis KN, Gonda X, Rihmer Z. Suicide prevention programs through community intervention. J Affect Disord. 2011;130(1-2):10–16. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.06.009
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Bryann DeBeer, PhDa,b; Margaret Talbot, PhDc; Patricia Russell, PhDa,b; Lindsey L. Monteith, PhDa,b; Joseph Mignogna, PhDa,b; Nathaniel Mohatt, PhDd,e; Elisa Borah, PhDf,g; Edgar Villarreal, PhDh; Craig Bryan, PsyDi; Alan Peterson, PhDj,k,l; Meredith Mealer, PhDa,b; Juliana Scheihing, BAa; Kathryn Bongiovanni, LCSWm; Claire Hoffmire, PhDa,b; Jenna Heise, MAn,o; Sylvia Baack, PhD, RNp; Kimberly Weinberg, LCSW-Sq; Marcy Polk, DNP, RN, NEA-BCa; Justin Benzer, PhDg,r

Author affiliations
aVeterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora; bUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; cVeterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts; dYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; eBooz Allen Hamilton, Arlington, Virginia; fSteve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin; gDell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin; hVeterans Affairs Central Office, Washington, DC; iThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus; jThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; kSouth Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio; lUniversity of Texas at San Antonio; mVeterans Affairs Texas Valley Coastal Bend Health Care System, Harlingen; nSuicide Prevention Center of New York, Albany; oZero Suicide Institute, Waltham, Massachusetts; pMichael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas; qVeterans Affairs Central Texas Health Care System, Temple; rVISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans, Waco, Texas

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Correspondence: Bryann DeBeer (bryann.debeer@va.gov)

Fed Pract. 2025;42(Suppl1):e0570. Published online April 18. doi:10.12788/fp.0570

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 42(4)s
Publications
Topics
Page Number
S1-S7
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Bryann DeBeer, PhDa,b; Margaret Talbot, PhDc; Patricia Russell, PhDa,b; Lindsey L. Monteith, PhDa,b; Joseph Mignogna, PhDa,b; Nathaniel Mohatt, PhDd,e; Elisa Borah, PhDf,g; Edgar Villarreal, PhDh; Craig Bryan, PsyDi; Alan Peterson, PhDj,k,l; Meredith Mealer, PhDa,b; Juliana Scheihing, BAa; Kathryn Bongiovanni, LCSWm; Claire Hoffmire, PhDa,b; Jenna Heise, MAn,o; Sylvia Baack, PhD, RNp; Kimberly Weinberg, LCSW-Sq; Marcy Polk, DNP, RN, NEA-BCa; Justin Benzer, PhDg,r

Author affiliations
aVeterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora; bUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; cVeterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts; dYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; eBooz Allen Hamilton, Arlington, Virginia; fSteve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin; gDell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin; hVeterans Affairs Central Office, Washington, DC; iThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus; jThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; kSouth Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio; lUniversity of Texas at San Antonio; mVeterans Affairs Texas Valley Coastal Bend Health Care System, Harlingen; nSuicide Prevention Center of New York, Albany; oZero Suicide Institute, Waltham, Massachusetts; pMichael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas; qVeterans Affairs Central Texas Health Care System, Temple; rVISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans, Waco, Texas

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Correspondence: Bryann DeBeer (bryann.debeer@va.gov)

Fed Pract. 2025;42(Suppl1):e0570. Published online April 18. doi:10.12788/fp.0570

Author and Disclosure Information

Bryann DeBeer, PhDa,b; Margaret Talbot, PhDc; Patricia Russell, PhDa,b; Lindsey L. Monteith, PhDa,b; Joseph Mignogna, PhDa,b; Nathaniel Mohatt, PhDd,e; Elisa Borah, PhDf,g; Edgar Villarreal, PhDh; Craig Bryan, PsyDi; Alan Peterson, PhDj,k,l; Meredith Mealer, PhDa,b; Juliana Scheihing, BAa; Kathryn Bongiovanni, LCSWm; Claire Hoffmire, PhDa,b; Jenna Heise, MAn,o; Sylvia Baack, PhD, RNp; Kimberly Weinberg, LCSW-Sq; Marcy Polk, DNP, RN, NEA-BCa; Justin Benzer, PhDg,r

Author affiliations
aVeterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora; bUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora; cVeterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts; dYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; eBooz Allen Hamilton, Arlington, Virginia; fSteve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin; gDell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin; hVeterans Affairs Central Office, Washington, DC; iThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus; jThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; kSouth Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio; lUniversity of Texas at San Antonio; mVeterans Affairs Texas Valley Coastal Bend Health Care System, Harlingen; nSuicide Prevention Center of New York, Albany; oZero Suicide Institute, Waltham, Massachusetts; pMichael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas; qVeterans Affairs Central Texas Health Care System, Temple; rVISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans, Waco, Texas

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest or outside sources of funding with regard to this article.

Correspondence: Bryann DeBeer (bryann.debeer@va.gov)

Fed Pract. 2025;42(Suppl1):e0570. Published online April 18. doi:10.12788/fp.0570

Article PDF
Article PDF

Suicide prevention is the leading clinical priority for the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).1 An average of 18 veterans died by suicide each day in 2021.2 Numerous risk factors for veteran suicide have been identified, including mental health disorders, comorbidities, access to firearms, and potentially lethal medications.3-5 To better understand groups of patients at risk of suicide in medical settings, the authors have previously compared demographic and clinical risk factors between patients who died by suicide by using firearms or other means with matched patients who did not die by suicide (control group) to examine the impact of lack of social support, financial stress,6 legal problems,7 homelessness,8 and discrimination.9 The number of cooccurring risk factors a veteran experiences is associated with a greater likelihood of suicide attempts over time.10 In addition, some risk factors are social and environmental risk factors known as social determinants of health (SDoH), including financial stability and access to health care, food, housing, and education. 11 SDoH may influence health outcomes more broadly and are associated with greater risk of suicide.12,13

The VA offers programming to address suicide risk factors. However, not all veterans are eligible for VA care. Further, some veterans prefer to obtain non-VA services in their communities. Providing veterans with community resources that address risk factors, particularly SDoH, may be a worthwhile strategy for reducing suicide. Such resources have demonstrated success; for example, greater use of housing services was associated with a reduced risk for suicide-related mortality among unhoused veterans.12

The challenges that veterans experience can go beyond the scope of services the VA provides. For example, while the VA provides some services related to homelessness, justice involvement, and assistance with home loans, these services are often limited. Other services for veterans to address SDoH may require access to community resources, including food banks, employment assistance, respite and childcare services, and transportation assistance. Some veterans also may have experienced institutional betrayal, which could be a barrier to VA care and may motivate veterans to address their needs in the community.14 Veterans therefore may need a range of services beyond those within the VA. Leveraging community resources for veterans at risk for suicide is critical, as these resources may help to mitigate suicide risk.

An emerging emphasis of the VA is improving coordination with community partners to prevent veteran suicide. In 2019, the VA launched an improved Veterans Community Care Program, which implemented portions of the VA MISSION Act of 2018 to create additional connection to community care for VA-enrolled veterans. This includes assisting veterans in gaining access to specialty services not offered at a local VA medical center (VAMC), getting access to services sooner, and receiving care if they do not live near a VAMC.15 In addition, the COMPACT Act allows veterans in acute suicidal crisis to receive emergency health care through either VA or non-VA facilities at no cost.16 The VA National Strategy for Preventing Veteran Suicide 2018-2028 is a 10-year plan to reduce veteran suicide rates that includes initiatives to increase connections between VA and community agencies.17 A suicide prevention community toolkit is available online for health care professionals (HCPs) (and others, including employers) outside of the VA who may be unfamiliar with best practices for working with veterans at risk for suicide.18

The challenge, however, is that there is often a lack of “connectedness” between VA suicide prevention coordinators and community resources to address suicide risk factors and related social determinants of health. These services include, but are not limited to suicide prevention, mental health counseling (particularly no/low-cost services), unemployment resources, financial assistance and counseling, housing assistance, and identity-related supportive spaces. A major stumbling block in connecting resources with veterans (regardless of discharge status) who need them is there is no single, national organization with a comprehensive, community-based network that can serve in this intermediary role.

Community asset mapping (CAM), also known as asset mapping or environmental scanning, is a way to bridge the gap.19 CAM provides a method for identifying and aligning community resources relative to a specific need.20 CAM may be used to build community relationships in service of veteran suicide prevention. This process can help individuals learn about and make use of organizations and services within their communities. CAM also helps connect HCPs so they can network, exchange ideas, and collaborate with an eye toward increasing the availability of services and enhancing care coordination. CAM also allows community members (eg, leaders, organizations, individuals) to identify possible gaps in services that address suicide risk factors and solve these problems.

This article details CAM for suicide prevention, which can be utilized by the VA and community organizations alike. Within the VA, CAM can be used by HCPs and administrators, such as VA community engagement and partnership coordinators, to identify potential partnering organizations. For those who serve veterans outside of the VA, CAM can be used to connect at-risk individuals to resources that can enhance their care. This process can help increase the overall knowledge of, and access to, community resources.

COMMUNITY ASSET MAPPING

The University of California, Los Angeles Center for Health Policy Research provides 6 steps for the CAM process.21 These steps include: (1) defining the boundaries of people and places that comprise the community; (2) identifying people and organizations who share similar interests and goals; (3) determining the assets to include; (4) creating an inventory of all organizations’ assets; (5) creating an inventory of individuals’ assets; and (6) organizing the assets on a map. To address the needs of the veteran population, we’ve taken these 6 steps and adapted them to create a CAM for veterans at risk for suicide (Figure). The discussion that follows details how these steps can be implemented to identify community resources that address social determinants of health that may contribute to suicide risk. The goal is to prevent veteran suicide.

0425FED-MH-MAP_F1

Step 1: Define Community Reach. The first step is to identify the geographical boundaries of the community. This may include all veterans within a catchment area (eg, veterans within 60 miles of a VAMC). Defining the geographical parameters of the community will provide structure to the effort so that the resource list is as comprehensive as possible.

Steps 2 and 3: Identify Community Members with Shared Goals; Identify Assets. It is important to identify community members who share similar interests and goals, including people with specific knowledge and skills, organizations with particular goals, and community partners with a broad reach. To begin building a list of referrals, reach out to colleagues within the VA system who are familiar with community resources for those with suicide risk factors. The local VA Transition and Care Management (TCM) office is a resource that connects those transitioning from military to civilian sectors with needed resources, and thus may be a helpful resource while building a CAM. Additionally, each office has a transition patient advocate, who is trained to resolve care-related concerns and may be familiar with community resources.

VA HCPs that can assist include Community Engagement and Partnership Coordinators, Suicide Prevention Coordinators, Local Recovery Coordinators, and substance abuse counselors. In addition, VA patient services, patient safety, and public affairs office staff—as well as VA Homeless Programs—may be good resources. Every VA health care system has care coordinators focused on military sexual trauma, intimate partner violence, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer+ care. These care coordinators may be able to provide information on community resources that address social determinants of health (eg, discrimination, violence).

Reaching out to key community resources and asking for recommendations of other groups that provide assistance to veterans can also be productive. You can start by connecting with veterans service organizations (VSOs), Vet Centers, Veterans Experience Offices (VEO), and Community Veterans Engagement Boards (CVEBs). The VEO is an office designed around VA and community engagement efforts. This office utilizes the CVEBs to foster a 2-way communication feedback loop between veterans and local VA facilities regarding community engagement efforts and outreach.22 CVEBs are particularly valuable sources of information because veterans directly contribute to the conversation about community engagement by describing the difficulties and successes they’ve experienced. Veteran feedback about how a particular resource met their needs can inform which community services are prioritized for inclusion in the resource list. In addition, CVEBs may have a listing of local government, military, and/or community resources that provide services for veterans. Consider, too, organizations that are unrelated to an individual’s veteran status, but speak to their race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, spirituality, socioeconomic status, or disability.

Step 4: Continue to Build Inventory. Use online searches to identify additional resources in the community that are known to have local relationships. These include state suicide prevention coordinators, mental health organizations, and other resources that address social determinants of health (eg, public health and human service organizations, faith-based organizations, collegial organizations). A list of links and search tips are available in the Table.

0425FED-MH-MAP_T1

Steps 5 and 6: Create Document; Organize and Disseminate Information. A spreadsheet can be used to document organization information (Appendix). It is critical to record: (1) the name of the organization or individual; (2) the local address and a point of contact with contact information; (3) services offered to veterans; (4) services specific to suicide prevention, or that address risk factors for suicide; and (5) whether the referral organization is partnered with the VA Community Care Network, which is comprised of contracted HCPs who contract with the VA to provide care to veterans.23

0425FED-MH-MAP_A1

Once a document is created, it can be disseminated through VA offices and among community partners who work with veterans at risk for suicide. It should also be stored in a centralized location such as a shared folder so that it can be continuously updated.

Regularly updating the list is vital so the resource list can continue to be helpful in addressing veterans’ needs and reducing suicide risk factors. Continued collaboration with those in the community can help ensure the resource list is up to date with all available services and pertinent contact information. It can also go far in strengthening collaborative bonds.

IMPLEMENTATION

To illustrate the use of CAM for veteran suicide prevention, we offer a case example of CAM conducted by the VA Patient Safety Center of Inquiry — Suicide Prevention Collaborative (VA PSCI-SPC) team, consisting of 4 team members. A veteran was included as a team member and assisted with the CAM process.

The VA PSCI-SPC sought to identify community services for veterans in Colorado who were not enrolled in VA health care and had risk factors for suicide. Next, the team reached out to colleagues and asked about community organizations that work with individuals at risk for suicide. VA PSCI-SPC outreach resulted in a list of assets that included resources to address mental health, legal concerns, employment, homelessness/housing, finances, religion, peer support, food insecurity, exercise, intimate partner violence, sexual and gender identity needs, and peer support. VSOs and CVEBs were also added to the list.

Next, the team continued to build on the inventory and identified state suicide prevention coordinators; health care systems; regional suicide prevention commissions; Colorado Department of Health and Human Services; program coordinators for Governor’s and Mayor’s Challenges to Prevent Suicide Among Service Members, Veterans, and their Families; veterans councils; universities (eg, counseling clinics, legal clinics); and foundations devoted to general and veteran-specific suicide prevention within the region.

All the identified resources were inventoried. Details were gathered about each of the organizations, including addresses, points of contact and phone numbers, descriptions of services offered for veterans, descriptions of suicide prevention services offered, whether or not organizations were not-for-profit, the mission of the organizations, and whether or not the organizations were under contract for VA Community Care. Finally, the resource spreadsheet was created and disseminated among stakeholders to be used to enhance veteran suicide care. Stakeholders included social workers, psychologists, and nurse practitioners working with veterans. The list was circulated to VA and community partners as needed.

The VA PSCI-SPC resource document was only 1 benefit of CAM. The asset mapping also resulted in the creation of a learning collaborative comprised of VA and community partners, designed to share knowledge of best practices in suicide prevention and create an established referral network for veterans at risk for suicide.24 Ultimately, the goal of the CAM and the creation of the learning collaborative was to better connect veterans to care in order to decrease suicide risk. A secondary benefit of this community connectedness is that the list of resources produced by CAM became a living document that was, and continues to be, updated as the network became aware of new resources and resources that were no longer available. The VA PSCI-SPC learning collaborative met quarterly to discuss implementation of suicide prevention best practices within their organization.

Data from the VA PSCI-SPC learning collaborative via CAM revealed that organizations felt more efficacious in implementing suicide prevention best practices, noticed increased connections and collaborations with community organizations with the goal of providing services to veterans, and resulted in staff training that improved services provided to veterans.24 This is supported by other findings of a literature review of suicide prevention interventions, which indicated that programs with an established community support network were more effective at reducing suicide rates.25 CAM therefore may be a process through which greater community connection and increased knowledge of resources may help prevent suicide among veterans.

It seems reasonable that the CAM processes used by the VA PSCI-SPC can be implemented within the regional Veterans Integrated Service Networks to identify assets in a specific geographical area to address challenges with social determinants of health and potentially decrease veteran suicide risk.

CONCLUSIONS

CAM can be used to identify and build relationships with community resources that address the stressors that place veterans at risk for suicide. Six proposed steps to CAM for veterans at risk for suicide include: defining community reach (the map); identifying community members and organizations with shared goals; identifying assets within the community; continuing to build inventory; creating a document; and organizing and disseminating the information (while continuing to update the resources).21

CAM can be used to connect veterans with resources to address needs related to adverse social determinants of health that may heighten their risk for suicide. For example, veterans facing legal challenges can connect with a legal clinic; those having difficulties paying bills can obtain financial assistance; those who need help completing their VA claims can connect with the Veterans Benefits Administration or VSOs to assist them with their claims; and those experiencing discrimination can connect with organizations where they may experience acceptance, safety, and support. Broad community support surrounding suicide risk factors can be critical for effective suicide prevention.25

CAM may also be helpful for HCPs and others involved in veteran health care. For example, community mapping can be utilized by newly hired community engagement and partnership coordinators as a tool for outlining resources available for veterans in their community and as a framework to continually update their resource network. CAM develops community awareness, integrates resources, and enhances service utilization, which may assist in veteran suicide prevention by increasing care coordination.17 Finally, mapping community resources can create awareness of the many resources available to help veterans, even before suicide becomes a consideration.

Suicide prevention is the leading clinical priority for the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).1 An average of 18 veterans died by suicide each day in 2021.2 Numerous risk factors for veteran suicide have been identified, including mental health disorders, comorbidities, access to firearms, and potentially lethal medications.3-5 To better understand groups of patients at risk of suicide in medical settings, the authors have previously compared demographic and clinical risk factors between patients who died by suicide by using firearms or other means with matched patients who did not die by suicide (control group) to examine the impact of lack of social support, financial stress,6 legal problems,7 homelessness,8 and discrimination.9 The number of cooccurring risk factors a veteran experiences is associated with a greater likelihood of suicide attempts over time.10 In addition, some risk factors are social and environmental risk factors known as social determinants of health (SDoH), including financial stability and access to health care, food, housing, and education. 11 SDoH may influence health outcomes more broadly and are associated with greater risk of suicide.12,13

The VA offers programming to address suicide risk factors. However, not all veterans are eligible for VA care. Further, some veterans prefer to obtain non-VA services in their communities. Providing veterans with community resources that address risk factors, particularly SDoH, may be a worthwhile strategy for reducing suicide. Such resources have demonstrated success; for example, greater use of housing services was associated with a reduced risk for suicide-related mortality among unhoused veterans.12

The challenges that veterans experience can go beyond the scope of services the VA provides. For example, while the VA provides some services related to homelessness, justice involvement, and assistance with home loans, these services are often limited. Other services for veterans to address SDoH may require access to community resources, including food banks, employment assistance, respite and childcare services, and transportation assistance. Some veterans also may have experienced institutional betrayal, which could be a barrier to VA care and may motivate veterans to address their needs in the community.14 Veterans therefore may need a range of services beyond those within the VA. Leveraging community resources for veterans at risk for suicide is critical, as these resources may help to mitigate suicide risk.

An emerging emphasis of the VA is improving coordination with community partners to prevent veteran suicide. In 2019, the VA launched an improved Veterans Community Care Program, which implemented portions of the VA MISSION Act of 2018 to create additional connection to community care for VA-enrolled veterans. This includes assisting veterans in gaining access to specialty services not offered at a local VA medical center (VAMC), getting access to services sooner, and receiving care if they do not live near a VAMC.15 In addition, the COMPACT Act allows veterans in acute suicidal crisis to receive emergency health care through either VA or non-VA facilities at no cost.16 The VA National Strategy for Preventing Veteran Suicide 2018-2028 is a 10-year plan to reduce veteran suicide rates that includes initiatives to increase connections between VA and community agencies.17 A suicide prevention community toolkit is available online for health care professionals (HCPs) (and others, including employers) outside of the VA who may be unfamiliar with best practices for working with veterans at risk for suicide.18

The challenge, however, is that there is often a lack of “connectedness” between VA suicide prevention coordinators and community resources to address suicide risk factors and related social determinants of health. These services include, but are not limited to suicide prevention, mental health counseling (particularly no/low-cost services), unemployment resources, financial assistance and counseling, housing assistance, and identity-related supportive spaces. A major stumbling block in connecting resources with veterans (regardless of discharge status) who need them is there is no single, national organization with a comprehensive, community-based network that can serve in this intermediary role.

Community asset mapping (CAM), also known as asset mapping or environmental scanning, is a way to bridge the gap.19 CAM provides a method for identifying and aligning community resources relative to a specific need.20 CAM may be used to build community relationships in service of veteran suicide prevention. This process can help individuals learn about and make use of organizations and services within their communities. CAM also helps connect HCPs so they can network, exchange ideas, and collaborate with an eye toward increasing the availability of services and enhancing care coordination. CAM also allows community members (eg, leaders, organizations, individuals) to identify possible gaps in services that address suicide risk factors and solve these problems.

This article details CAM for suicide prevention, which can be utilized by the VA and community organizations alike. Within the VA, CAM can be used by HCPs and administrators, such as VA community engagement and partnership coordinators, to identify potential partnering organizations. For those who serve veterans outside of the VA, CAM can be used to connect at-risk individuals to resources that can enhance their care. This process can help increase the overall knowledge of, and access to, community resources.

COMMUNITY ASSET MAPPING

The University of California, Los Angeles Center for Health Policy Research provides 6 steps for the CAM process.21 These steps include: (1) defining the boundaries of people and places that comprise the community; (2) identifying people and organizations who share similar interests and goals; (3) determining the assets to include; (4) creating an inventory of all organizations’ assets; (5) creating an inventory of individuals’ assets; and (6) organizing the assets on a map. To address the needs of the veteran population, we’ve taken these 6 steps and adapted them to create a CAM for veterans at risk for suicide (Figure). The discussion that follows details how these steps can be implemented to identify community resources that address social determinants of health that may contribute to suicide risk. The goal is to prevent veteran suicide.

0425FED-MH-MAP_F1

Step 1: Define Community Reach. The first step is to identify the geographical boundaries of the community. This may include all veterans within a catchment area (eg, veterans within 60 miles of a VAMC). Defining the geographical parameters of the community will provide structure to the effort so that the resource list is as comprehensive as possible.

Steps 2 and 3: Identify Community Members with Shared Goals; Identify Assets. It is important to identify community members who share similar interests and goals, including people with specific knowledge and skills, organizations with particular goals, and community partners with a broad reach. To begin building a list of referrals, reach out to colleagues within the VA system who are familiar with community resources for those with suicide risk factors. The local VA Transition and Care Management (TCM) office is a resource that connects those transitioning from military to civilian sectors with needed resources, and thus may be a helpful resource while building a CAM. Additionally, each office has a transition patient advocate, who is trained to resolve care-related concerns and may be familiar with community resources.

VA HCPs that can assist include Community Engagement and Partnership Coordinators, Suicide Prevention Coordinators, Local Recovery Coordinators, and substance abuse counselors. In addition, VA patient services, patient safety, and public affairs office staff—as well as VA Homeless Programs—may be good resources. Every VA health care system has care coordinators focused on military sexual trauma, intimate partner violence, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer+ care. These care coordinators may be able to provide information on community resources that address social determinants of health (eg, discrimination, violence).

Reaching out to key community resources and asking for recommendations of other groups that provide assistance to veterans can also be productive. You can start by connecting with veterans service organizations (VSOs), Vet Centers, Veterans Experience Offices (VEO), and Community Veterans Engagement Boards (CVEBs). The VEO is an office designed around VA and community engagement efforts. This office utilizes the CVEBs to foster a 2-way communication feedback loop between veterans and local VA facilities regarding community engagement efforts and outreach.22 CVEBs are particularly valuable sources of information because veterans directly contribute to the conversation about community engagement by describing the difficulties and successes they’ve experienced. Veteran feedback about how a particular resource met their needs can inform which community services are prioritized for inclusion in the resource list. In addition, CVEBs may have a listing of local government, military, and/or community resources that provide services for veterans. Consider, too, organizations that are unrelated to an individual’s veteran status, but speak to their race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, spirituality, socioeconomic status, or disability.

Step 4: Continue to Build Inventory. Use online searches to identify additional resources in the community that are known to have local relationships. These include state suicide prevention coordinators, mental health organizations, and other resources that address social determinants of health (eg, public health and human service organizations, faith-based organizations, collegial organizations). A list of links and search tips are available in the Table.

0425FED-MH-MAP_T1

Steps 5 and 6: Create Document; Organize and Disseminate Information. A spreadsheet can be used to document organization information (Appendix). It is critical to record: (1) the name of the organization or individual; (2) the local address and a point of contact with contact information; (3) services offered to veterans; (4) services specific to suicide prevention, or that address risk factors for suicide; and (5) whether the referral organization is partnered with the VA Community Care Network, which is comprised of contracted HCPs who contract with the VA to provide care to veterans.23

0425FED-MH-MAP_A1

Once a document is created, it can be disseminated through VA offices and among community partners who work with veterans at risk for suicide. It should also be stored in a centralized location such as a shared folder so that it can be continuously updated.

Regularly updating the list is vital so the resource list can continue to be helpful in addressing veterans’ needs and reducing suicide risk factors. Continued collaboration with those in the community can help ensure the resource list is up to date with all available services and pertinent contact information. It can also go far in strengthening collaborative bonds.

IMPLEMENTATION

To illustrate the use of CAM for veteran suicide prevention, we offer a case example of CAM conducted by the VA Patient Safety Center of Inquiry — Suicide Prevention Collaborative (VA PSCI-SPC) team, consisting of 4 team members. A veteran was included as a team member and assisted with the CAM process.

The VA PSCI-SPC sought to identify community services for veterans in Colorado who were not enrolled in VA health care and had risk factors for suicide. Next, the team reached out to colleagues and asked about community organizations that work with individuals at risk for suicide. VA PSCI-SPC outreach resulted in a list of assets that included resources to address mental health, legal concerns, employment, homelessness/housing, finances, religion, peer support, food insecurity, exercise, intimate partner violence, sexual and gender identity needs, and peer support. VSOs and CVEBs were also added to the list.

Next, the team continued to build on the inventory and identified state suicide prevention coordinators; health care systems; regional suicide prevention commissions; Colorado Department of Health and Human Services; program coordinators for Governor’s and Mayor’s Challenges to Prevent Suicide Among Service Members, Veterans, and their Families; veterans councils; universities (eg, counseling clinics, legal clinics); and foundations devoted to general and veteran-specific suicide prevention within the region.

All the identified resources were inventoried. Details were gathered about each of the organizations, including addresses, points of contact and phone numbers, descriptions of services offered for veterans, descriptions of suicide prevention services offered, whether or not organizations were not-for-profit, the mission of the organizations, and whether or not the organizations were under contract for VA Community Care. Finally, the resource spreadsheet was created and disseminated among stakeholders to be used to enhance veteran suicide care. Stakeholders included social workers, psychologists, and nurse practitioners working with veterans. The list was circulated to VA and community partners as needed.

The VA PSCI-SPC resource document was only 1 benefit of CAM. The asset mapping also resulted in the creation of a learning collaborative comprised of VA and community partners, designed to share knowledge of best practices in suicide prevention and create an established referral network for veterans at risk for suicide.24 Ultimately, the goal of the CAM and the creation of the learning collaborative was to better connect veterans to care in order to decrease suicide risk. A secondary benefit of this community connectedness is that the list of resources produced by CAM became a living document that was, and continues to be, updated as the network became aware of new resources and resources that were no longer available. The VA PSCI-SPC learning collaborative met quarterly to discuss implementation of suicide prevention best practices within their organization.

Data from the VA PSCI-SPC learning collaborative via CAM revealed that organizations felt more efficacious in implementing suicide prevention best practices, noticed increased connections and collaborations with community organizations with the goal of providing services to veterans, and resulted in staff training that improved services provided to veterans.24 This is supported by other findings of a literature review of suicide prevention interventions, which indicated that programs with an established community support network were more effective at reducing suicide rates.25 CAM therefore may be a process through which greater community connection and increased knowledge of resources may help prevent suicide among veterans.

It seems reasonable that the CAM processes used by the VA PSCI-SPC can be implemented within the regional Veterans Integrated Service Networks to identify assets in a specific geographical area to address challenges with social determinants of health and potentially decrease veteran suicide risk.

CONCLUSIONS

CAM can be used to identify and build relationships with community resources that address the stressors that place veterans at risk for suicide. Six proposed steps to CAM for veterans at risk for suicide include: defining community reach (the map); identifying community members and organizations with shared goals; identifying assets within the community; continuing to build inventory; creating a document; and organizing and disseminating the information (while continuing to update the resources).21

CAM can be used to connect veterans with resources to address needs related to adverse social determinants of health that may heighten their risk for suicide. For example, veterans facing legal challenges can connect with a legal clinic; those having difficulties paying bills can obtain financial assistance; those who need help completing their VA claims can connect with the Veterans Benefits Administration or VSOs to assist them with their claims; and those experiencing discrimination can connect with organizations where they may experience acceptance, safety, and support. Broad community support surrounding suicide risk factors can be critical for effective suicide prevention.25

CAM may also be helpful for HCPs and others involved in veteran health care. For example, community mapping can be utilized by newly hired community engagement and partnership coordinators as a tool for outlining resources available for veterans in their community and as a framework to continually update their resource network. CAM develops community awareness, integrates resources, and enhances service utilization, which may assist in veteran suicide prevention by increasing care coordination.17 Finally, mapping community resources can create awareness of the many resources available to help veterans, even before suicide becomes a consideration.

References
  1. Rice L. VA Secretary Robert Wilkie says suicide prevention is his agency’s top ‘clinical’ priority. June 17, 2019. Accessed January 30, 2025. https://www.kut.org/post/va-secretary-robert-wilkie-says-suicide-prevention-his-agencys-top-clinical-priority
  2. US Department of Veterans Affairs. 2023 national veteran suicide prevention annual report. November 2023. Accessed January 30, 2025. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/2023/2023-National-Veteran-Suicide-Prevention-Annual-Report-FINAL-508.pdf
  3. DeBeer BB, Meyer EC, Kimbrel NA, Kittel JA, Gulliver SB, Morissette SB. Psychological inflexibility predicts of suicidal ideation over time in veterans of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2018;48(6):627–641. doi:10.1111/sltb.12388
  4. Ilgen MA, Bohnert ASB, Ignacio RV, et al. Psychiatric diagnoses and risk of suicide in veterans. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(11):1152–1158. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.129
  5. Kimbrel NA, Meyer EC, DeBeer BB, Gulliver SB, Morissette SB. A 12-month prospective study of the effects of PTSD-depression comorbidity on suicidal behavior in Iraq/ Afghanistan-era veterans. Psychiatry Res. 2016;243:97–99. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.011
  6. Hoffmire CA, Borowski S, Vogt D. Contribution of veterans’ initial post-separation vocational, financial, and social experiences to their suicidal ideation trajectories following military service. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2023;53(3):443- 456. doi:10.1111/sltb.12955
  7. Holliday R, Martin WB, Monteith LL, Clark SC, LePage JP. Suicide among justice-involved veterans: a brief overview of extant research, theoretical conceptualization, and recommendations for future research. J Soc Distress Homeless. 2020;30(1):41-49. doi:10.1080/10530789.2019.1711306
  8. Holliday R, Liu S, Brenner LA, et al. Preventing suicide among homeless veterans: a consensus statement by the Veterans Affairs suicide prevention among veterans experiencing homelessness workgroup. Med Care. 2021;59(Suppl 2):S103- S105. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001399
  9. Carter SP, Allred KM, Tucker RP, Simpson TL, Shipherd JC, Lehavot K. Discrimination and suicidal ideation among transgender veterans: The role of social supsupport and connection. LGBT Health. 2019;6(2):43-50. doi:10.1089/lgbt.2018.0239
  10. Lee DJ, Kearns JC, Wisco BE, et al. A longitudinal study of risk factors for suicide attempts among Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans. Depress Anxiety. 2018;35(7): 609-618. doi:10.1002/da.22736
  11. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Social determinants of health (SDOH). Accessed January 30, 2025. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health
  12. Montgomery AE, Dichter M, Byrne T, Blosnich J. Intervention to address homelessness and all-cause and suicide mortality among unstably housed US veterans, 2012- 2016. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021;75:380-386. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214664
  13. Llamocca EN, Yeh HH, Miller-Matero LR, et al. Association between adverse social determinants of health and suicide death. Med Care. 2023;61(11):744-749. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001918
  14. Monteith LL, Holliday R, Schneider AL, et al. Institutional betrayal and help-seeking among women survivors of military sexual trauma. Psychol Trauma. 2021;13(7):814-823. doi:10.1037/tra0001027
  15. VA launches new health care options under MISSION Act. News release. US Department of Veterans Affairs. June 6, 2019. Accessed January 31, 2025. https://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=5264
  16. COMPACT Act expands free emergency suicide care for veterans. News release. US Department of Veterans Affairs. February 1, 2023. Accessed January 31,2025. https://www.va.gov/poplar-bluff-health-care/news-releases/compact-act-expands-free-emergency-suicide-care-for-veterans/
  17. US Department of Veterans Affairs. National strategy for preventing Veteran suicide 2018-2028. 2018. Accessed January 31, 2025. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/suicide_prevention/docs/Office-of-Mental-Health-and-Suicide-Prevention-National-Strategy-for-Preventing-Veterans-Suicide.pdf
  18. US Department of Veterans Affairs. Veteran outreach toolkit: preventing veteran suicide is everyone’s business. A community call to action. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://floridavets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/VA-Suicide-Prevention-Community-Outreach-Toolkit.pdf
  19. Crane K, Mooney M. Essential tools: community resource mapping. 2005. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/172995/NCSET_EssentialTools_ResourceMapping.pdf
  20. Community Tool Box. 2. Assessing Community Needs and Resources. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://ctb.ku.edu/en/assessing-community-needs-and-resources
  21. UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. Section 1: asset mapping. 2012. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/programs/healthdata/trainings/documents/tw_cba20.pdf
  22. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Experience Office. 4th quarter 2018 community engagement news. October 2, 2018. Accessed February 4, 2025. https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USVAVEO/bulletins/211836e
  23. US Department of Veterans Affairs. About our VA community care network and covered services. Accessed February 6, 2025. https://www.va.gov/resources/aboutour-va-community-care-network-and-covered-services/
  24. DeBeer B, Mignogna J, Borah E, et al. A pilot of a veteran suicide prevention learning collaborative among community organizations: Initial results and outcomes. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2023;53(4):628-641. doi:10.1111/sltb.12969
  25. Fountoulakis KN, Gonda X, Rihmer Z. Suicide prevention programs through community intervention. J Affect Disord. 2011;130(1-2):10–16. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.06.009
References
  1. Rice L. VA Secretary Robert Wilkie says suicide prevention is his agency’s top ‘clinical’ priority. June 17, 2019. Accessed January 30, 2025. https://www.kut.org/post/va-secretary-robert-wilkie-says-suicide-prevention-his-agencys-top-clinical-priority
  2. US Department of Veterans Affairs. 2023 national veteran suicide prevention annual report. November 2023. Accessed January 30, 2025. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/2023/2023-National-Veteran-Suicide-Prevention-Annual-Report-FINAL-508.pdf
  3. DeBeer BB, Meyer EC, Kimbrel NA, Kittel JA, Gulliver SB, Morissette SB. Psychological inflexibility predicts of suicidal ideation over time in veterans of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2018;48(6):627–641. doi:10.1111/sltb.12388
  4. Ilgen MA, Bohnert ASB, Ignacio RV, et al. Psychiatric diagnoses and risk of suicide in veterans. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(11):1152–1158. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.129
  5. Kimbrel NA, Meyer EC, DeBeer BB, Gulliver SB, Morissette SB. A 12-month prospective study of the effects of PTSD-depression comorbidity on suicidal behavior in Iraq/ Afghanistan-era veterans. Psychiatry Res. 2016;243:97–99. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.011
  6. Hoffmire CA, Borowski S, Vogt D. Contribution of veterans’ initial post-separation vocational, financial, and social experiences to their suicidal ideation trajectories following military service. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2023;53(3):443- 456. doi:10.1111/sltb.12955
  7. Holliday R, Martin WB, Monteith LL, Clark SC, LePage JP. Suicide among justice-involved veterans: a brief overview of extant research, theoretical conceptualization, and recommendations for future research. J Soc Distress Homeless. 2020;30(1):41-49. doi:10.1080/10530789.2019.1711306
  8. Holliday R, Liu S, Brenner LA, et al. Preventing suicide among homeless veterans: a consensus statement by the Veterans Affairs suicide prevention among veterans experiencing homelessness workgroup. Med Care. 2021;59(Suppl 2):S103- S105. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001399
  9. Carter SP, Allred KM, Tucker RP, Simpson TL, Shipherd JC, Lehavot K. Discrimination and suicidal ideation among transgender veterans: The role of social supsupport and connection. LGBT Health. 2019;6(2):43-50. doi:10.1089/lgbt.2018.0239
  10. Lee DJ, Kearns JC, Wisco BE, et al. A longitudinal study of risk factors for suicide attempts among Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans. Depress Anxiety. 2018;35(7): 609-618. doi:10.1002/da.22736
  11. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Social determinants of health (SDOH). Accessed January 30, 2025. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health
  12. Montgomery AE, Dichter M, Byrne T, Blosnich J. Intervention to address homelessness and all-cause and suicide mortality among unstably housed US veterans, 2012- 2016. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021;75:380-386. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214664
  13. Llamocca EN, Yeh HH, Miller-Matero LR, et al. Association between adverse social determinants of health and suicide death. Med Care. 2023;61(11):744-749. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001918
  14. Monteith LL, Holliday R, Schneider AL, et al. Institutional betrayal and help-seeking among women survivors of military sexual trauma. Psychol Trauma. 2021;13(7):814-823. doi:10.1037/tra0001027
  15. VA launches new health care options under MISSION Act. News release. US Department of Veterans Affairs. June 6, 2019. Accessed January 31, 2025. https://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/pressrelease.cfm?id=5264
  16. COMPACT Act expands free emergency suicide care for veterans. News release. US Department of Veterans Affairs. February 1, 2023. Accessed January 31,2025. https://www.va.gov/poplar-bluff-health-care/news-releases/compact-act-expands-free-emergency-suicide-care-for-veterans/
  17. US Department of Veterans Affairs. National strategy for preventing Veteran suicide 2018-2028. 2018. Accessed January 31, 2025. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/suicide_prevention/docs/Office-of-Mental-Health-and-Suicide-Prevention-National-Strategy-for-Preventing-Veterans-Suicide.pdf
  18. US Department of Veterans Affairs. Veteran outreach toolkit: preventing veteran suicide is everyone’s business. A community call to action. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://floridavets.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/VA-Suicide-Prevention-Community-Outreach-Toolkit.pdf
  19. Crane K, Mooney M. Essential tools: community resource mapping. 2005. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/172995/NCSET_EssentialTools_ResourceMapping.pdf
  20. Community Tool Box. 2. Assessing Community Needs and Resources. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://ctb.ku.edu/en/assessing-community-needs-and-resources
  21. UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. Section 1: asset mapping. 2012. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/programs/healthdata/trainings/documents/tw_cba20.pdf
  22. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Experience Office. 4th quarter 2018 community engagement news. October 2, 2018. Accessed February 4, 2025. https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USVAVEO/bulletins/211836e
  23. US Department of Veterans Affairs. About our VA community care network and covered services. Accessed February 6, 2025. https://www.va.gov/resources/aboutour-va-community-care-network-and-covered-services/
  24. DeBeer B, Mignogna J, Borah E, et al. A pilot of a veteran suicide prevention learning collaborative among community organizations: Initial results and outcomes. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2023;53(4):628-641. doi:10.1111/sltb.12969
  25. Fountoulakis KN, Gonda X, Rihmer Z. Suicide prevention programs through community intervention. J Affect Disord. 2011;130(1-2):10–16. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.06.009
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 42(4)s
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 42(4)s
Page Number
S1-S7
Page Number
S1-S7
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline

Leveraging Community Asset Mapping to Improve Suicide Prevention for Veterans

Display Headline

Leveraging Community Asset Mapping to Improve Suicide Prevention for Veterans

Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Thu, 04/03/2025 - 15:26
Un-Gate On Date
Thu, 04/03/2025 - 15:26
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Thu, 04/03/2025 - 15:26
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
survey writer start date
Thu, 04/03/2025 - 15:26

The Veterans Affairs Patient Safety Center of Inquiry—Suicide Prevention Collaborative: Creating Novel Approaches to Suicide Prevention Among Veterans Receiving Community Services

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 11/12/2020 - 08:29

Since 2008, suicide has ranked as the tenth leading cause of death for all ages in the US, with rates of suicide continuing to rise.1-3 Suicide is even more urgent to address in veteran populations. The age- and sex-adjusted suicide rate in 2017 was more than 1.5 times greater for veterans than it was for nonveteran adults.2 Of importance, rates of suicide are increasing at a faster rate in veterans who are not connected to Veterans Health Administration (VHA) care.4,5 These at-risk veterans include individuals who are eligible for VHA care yet have not had a VHA appointment within the year before death; veterans who may be ineligible to receive VHA care due to complex rules set by legislation; and veterans who are eligible but not enrolled in VHA care. Notably, between 2005 and 2016, the number of veterans not enrolled in VHA care rose more quickly than did the number of veterans enrolled in VHA care.5,6 Thus, to impact the high veteran suicide rates, an emergent challenge for VHA is to prevent suicide among unenrolled veterans and veterans receiving community care, while continuing to increase access to mental health services for veterans enrolled in VHA health care.

 

 

In response to the high rates of veteran suicide deaths, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has developed a broad, multicomponent suicide prevention program that is unparalleled in private US health care systems.4,7 Suicide prevention efforts are led and implemented by both the VHA National Center for Patient Safety and the VHA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention. Program components are numerous and multifaceted, falling within the broad promotion and prevention strategies outlined by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM).1,8-11 The NAM continuum of prevention model encompassing multiple strategies is also referred to as the Universal, Selective, Indicated (USI) Model.7,8,10 The VHA suicide prevention program contains a wide spread of program components, making it both comprehensive and innovative (Table 1).

Although significant momentum and progress has been made within the VHA, policy set by legislation has historically limited access to VHA health care services to VHA-eligible veterans. This is particularly concerning given the rising suicide rates among veterans not engaged in VHA care.2 Adding to this complexity, recent legislation has increased veterans’ access to non-VHA health care, in addition to their existing access through Medicare, Medicaid, and other health care programs.12-14 Best practices for suicide prevention are not often implemented in the private sector; thus, these systems are ill prepared to adequately meet the suicide prevention care needs of veterans.4,15-18 Furthermore, VHA and non-VHA services generally are not well coordinated, and private sector health care providers (HCPs) are not required to complete a commensurate level of suicide prevention training as are VHA HCPs.16-18 Most non-VHA HCPs do not receive military cultural competence training.19 These issues create a significant gap in suicide prevention services and may contribute to the increases in suicide rates in veterans who do not receive VHA care. Thus, changes in policy to increase access through private sector care may have paradoxical effects on veteran suicide deaths. To impact the veteran suicide rate, VHA must develop and disseminate best practices for veterans who use non-VHA services.

A Roadmap to Suicide Prevention

There is significant momentum at the federal level regarding this issue. The President’s Roadmap to Empower Veterans and End the National Tragedy of Suicide (Executive Order 13,861) directs the VHA to work closely with community organizations to improve veteran suicide prevention.20 The VHA and partners, such as the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), are bridging this gap with collaborative efforts that increase suicide prevention resources for veterans living in the community through programs such as the Governor’s Challenges to Prevent Suicide Among Service Members, Veterans, and their Families. These programs intend to empower communities to develop statewide, strategic action plans to prevent veteran suicide.7,21-24

In addition to partnerships, VHA has built other aspects of outreach and intervention into its programming. A key VHA initiative is to “know all veterans” by committing to identifying and reaching out to all veterans who may be at risk for suicide.22 The VHA has committed to offering “emergency stabilization care for former service members who present at the facility with an emergent mental health need” regardless of eligibility.25 The intent is to provide temporary emergent mental health care to veterans who are otherwise ineligible for care, such as those who were discharged under other-than-honorable conditions while the VHA determines eligibility status.26 However, veterans must meet certain criteria, and there is a limit on services.

Although services are being expanded to reach veterans who do not access VHA health care, how to best implement these new directives with regard to suicide prevention is unclear. Strategic development and innovations to expand suicide prevention care to veterans outside the current reach of VHA are desperately needed.

 

 

Program Overview 

VHA Patient Safety Center of Inquiry-Suicide Prevention Collaborative (PSCI-SPC), funded by the VHA National Center for Patient Safety, aims to help fill the gap in community-based suicide prevention for veterans. PSCI-SPC is located within the VHA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center in Aurora, Colorado. The overarching mission of PSCI-SPC is to develop, implement, and evaluate practical solutions to reduce suicide among veterans not receiving VHA care. PSCI-SPC serves as a national clinical innovation and dissemination center for best practices in suicide prevention for organizations that serve veterans who receive care in the community. PSCI-SPC creates products to support dissemination of these practices to other VAMCs and works to ensure these programs are sustainable. PSCI-SPC focuses on 3 primary objectives. All PSCI-SPC projects are currently underway.

Objective 1: Growing a Community Learning Collaborative

Acknowledging that nearly two-thirds of veterans who die by suicide do not use VHA services, PSCI-SPC aims to reduce suicide among all veterans by expanding the reach of best practices for suicide prevention to veterans who receive myriad services in the community.27 Community organizations are defined here as organizations that may in some way serve, interact with, or work with veterans, and/or employ veterans. Examples include non-VHA health care systems, public services such as police and fire departments, nonprofit organizations, mental health clinics, and veterans’ courts. As veterans increasingly seek health care and other services within their communities, the success of suicide prevention will be influenced by the capability of non-VHA public and private organizations. Objective 1, therefore, seeks to develop a VHA-community collaborative that can be leveraged to improve systems of suicide prevention.

Current programs in the VHA have focused on implementation of suicide prevention awareness and prevention education campaigns instead of grassroots partnerships that are intended to be sustainable. Additionally, these programs typically lack the capacity and systems to sustain numerous meaningful community partnerships. Traditionally, community organizations have been hesitant to partner with government agencies, such as the VHA, due to histories of institutional mistrust and bureaucracy.28

The PSCI-SPC model for developing a VHA-community collaborative partnership draws from the tradition of community-based participatory research. The best community-based participatory research practices are to build on strengths and resources within the local community; develop collaborative, equitable partnerships that involve an empowering and power-sharing process; foster colearning, heuristics, and capacity building among partners; and focus on systems development using an iterative process. These practices also are consistent with the literature on learning collaboratives.29-31

The premise for a learning collaborative is to bridge the gap between knowledge and practice in health care.31 Figure 1 depicts how this collaborative was developed, and how it supports Objectives 2 and 3. To achieve Objective 1, we developed a VHA-learning collaborative of 13 influential community partners in the Denver and Colorado Springs region of Colorado. The VHA team consists of a learning collaborative leader, a program manager, and a program support assistant. The principal investigator attends and contributes to all meetings. Learning collaborative partners include a university psychology clinic that focuses on veterans’ care, 3 veterans service organizations, a mental health private practice, a university school of nursing, a community mental health center, veterans’ courts, and 5 city departments.



These partners participated in qualitative interviews to identify where gaps and breakdowns were occurring. With this information, the PSCI-SPC team and VHA-learning collaborative held a kickoff event. At this meeting the team discussed the qualitative findings, provided veteran suicide prevention information, and basic information regarding suicide prevention program building and implementation science.

Throughout quarterly learning collaborative meetings and monthly facilitation calls, we have worked to develop a blueprint and an action plan for each partner to develop best practices for dissemination to aid in providing consistency in the standard of care. A postimplementation event will be held to identify successes and challenges encountered while operationalizing project action plans.

Currently, activities of the learning collaborative are making a large impact on the community. Not all collaborative members track information regarding their populations served, nor specific metrics on veterans encountered. Even so, of those who do capture metrics, suicide prevention program components implemented by the collaborative will impact more than 21,000 individuals and at least 2,500 known veterans. In addition, 52 new connections have been made between community organizations or between community organizations and the VHA, and > 300 individuals have been trained.The learning collaborative support team has assisted in the dissemination of a large resource list for veterans. As the learning collaborative is ongoing and we are working with organizations to improve their data collection and analytics, we expect these numbers to increase. We anticipate that the learning collaborative will develop a stronger suicide prevention safety net within the community. In addition, we expect increased referrals of at-risk veterans to the VHA and enhance the long-term continuity of care between community and VHA services.

 

 

Objective 2: Implementation Toolkit

The second PSCI-SPC objective is to develop a toolkit for the implementation of best practices within a VHA-community suicide prevention learning collaborative. Lessons from the development of a successful suicide prevention learning collaborative will be shared through an online guide that other VHA facilities can use to support similar collaborative efforts within their communities. The toolkit will be disseminated across the VHA to assist suicide prevention coordinators and other staff in developing a suicide prevention learning collaborative at their facilities.

PSCI-SPC uses the Zero Suicide framework and the VA/US Department of Defense (DoD) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide as models for preventing suicide in veterans not enrolled in VHA care.11,32 This implementation toolkit focuses on how to implement suicide prevention best practices into organizations that serve veterans. This toolkit differs from clinical practice guidelines in that it focuses on implementation strategies to promote success and effectively address challenges.

In order to provide a menu of available options for the learning collaborative and resulting toolkit, PSCI-SPC uses a logic model to compare the components of the VHA suicide prevention program, as well as other similar veteran and military suicide prevention programs.7,12,14,21,33,34 These programs are categorized into 2 types of prevention frameworks, the USI model as described above, and the SAMHSA Strategic Prevention Framework (Table 2).35 The SAMHSA framework was designed to promote mental health and prevent substance abuse, yet the derived classification is also applicable to suicide prevention programs.35 The results of the logic model comparison form the basis of the best practice interventions for the learning collaborative and initial toolkit. In addition to the best practice interventions, the toolkit consists of documents describing how to develop a veteran suicide prevention learning collaborative, as well as tools for learning collaborative members. Current tool development includes workbooks to guide collaborative members through the implementation process, guides for community organizations in implementing suicide prevention screening and risk assessment, a standard operating procedure for suicide prevention in a veterans court, and peer support training for veteran suicide prevention.



The methods to achieve Objective 2 include regular discussions with the VHA-learning collaborative on current best practices, identifying gaps and overlap of community programs. Successes and challenges of implementing suicide prevention best practices into learning collaborative organizations will be documented and incorporated into the toolkit. The learning collaborative will work iteratively as a team to improve the toolkit. Once complete, the toolkit will be disseminated to other VHA health care systems nationally, as well as to other state or regional partners that the learning collaborative identifies. A plan is under development for national suicide prevention entities to also disseminate the toolkit to lessen the burden of veteran suicide through their stakeholder base.

Objective 3: High-Risk Veterans Not Receiving VHA Care

Although veterans not receiving VHA care account for a number of veteran deaths by suicide, we are not aware of any current VHA programs that provide temporary psychotherapy and intensive case management to at-risk veterans ineligible for VHA care who are in need of immediate care while an appropriate permanent community placement is identified. In the current system, veterans in the community can present to VHA suicide prevention services through several different systems, including referrals to VHA and the Veterans Crisis Line (VCL). However, a portion of VCL calls are from veterans whose VHA eligibility is unknown or who are ineligible for services. If veterans are at imminent risk for suicide, emergency care is coordinated for them. However, if veterans are not at imminent suicide risk they are referred to the local suicide prevention coordinator and instructed to independently work toward determining their VHA eligibility.

 

 

It is currently unknown how many veterans follow through with these instructions. Nonetheless, if veterans are deemed eligible, they may present to VHA to obtain a same-day appointment. If not eligible, a suicide prevention coordinator may give them the phone number of a community referral. However, this practice is not standardized across VA medical centers, and the provided resources are up to the suicide prevention coordinator to research. Additionally, when a VHA suicide prevention coordinator leaves the position, knowledge of these community resources and rapport with community HCPs are often lost, leaving the next coordinator to develop these again, which reduces the efficiency and effectiveness of limited resources. It is also unknown how many veterans complete this contact and receive evidence-based treatment following referral. This is a complex system to navigate, particularly when at risk for suicide and in need of immediate but not emergency services.

Suicide prevention in such circumstances may be improved by adapting current suicide prevention practices, including evidence-based interventions, and the new VHA intensive case management program,11,36 within a Zero Suicide framework. PSCI-SPC has developed a brief intervention to transition ineligible veterans to permanent community treatment and provide them with additional resources to meet their varied needs. The brief 1 to 3 session intervention combines practices from brief cognitive behavioral therapy (BCBT) for suicide prevention, crisis response planning (CRP), and intensive case management within a Zero Suicide framework. Both the 2019 VA/DoD suicide prevention clinical practice guidelines and Zero Suicide recommend using cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based interventions for suicide prevention.11,32 These interventions are packaged into a single intervention delivered by a PSCI-SPC therapist, typically a licensed clinical social worker, a licensed clinical psychologist, or an unlicensed psychologist under the supervision of a licensed clinical psychologist.

BCBT is one type of CBT that has shown initial efficacy in reducing suicide attempts.37 BCBT reduces the risk for suicide attempts both at the conclusion of treatment and at 24-month follow-up.37 BCBT is boiled down to its most essential components so it can be delivered in a distilled format. An essential element of BCBT that will remain is the CRP. A CRP11,37,38 entails collaboratively identifying effective, appropriate coping strategies and specific individuals to contact during a crisis. CRPs demonstrated efficacy as a stand-alone intervention to existing suicide prevention methods in a randomized clinical trial, such that individuals who received CRP had faster reductions in suicidal ideation and were 76% less likely to make a suicide attempt during the 6-month follow-up period.39 These results demonstrate that use of a CRP is connected to a decrease in suicidal behavior among suicidal patients.

The VHA has developed and is piloting a new initiative focused on restructuring its intensive case management services. RACETIME to Integrated Care (eg, Risk stratification, Assessment of complexity, Coordinator of lead assignment, Evaluate whole health needs, Trusting partnerships, Integrate care, Monitor progress, Experience of the veteran and employee) is a framework that assists VHA case managers in transitioning from a traditional case management mind-set to a more integrated and holistic method of care.36 RACETIME intensive case management practices will be incorporated into the intervention. However, RACETIME focuses on case management internally to the VHA. A modification for this treatment will be to focus on intensive case management from a mental health perspective and connecting to external community resources. Community referrals are mapped within a structured process and stored on a shared drive. This improves continuity between suicide prevention coordinators when they leave for a new position.

This intervention is conducted within a Zero Suicide framework. Pertinent to PSCI-SPC innovation to enhance care for non-VHA veterans is the care transitions element within the Zero Suicide framework, which has developed comprehensive suicide prevention guidance, including a pathway to care.32 This pathway refers a process to conduct follow-up supportive contacts that are tracked and recorded.

The PSCI-SPC pilot program incorporates the elements of CRP and brief CBT within a Zero Suicide framework. The PSCI-SPC team is developing and testing a protocol for providing brief treatment and community referrals to ineligible veterans that integrates these programming elements (Figure 2). A PSCI-SPC social worker will coordinate with the eligibility office to determine VHA eligibility. Ineligible veterans are referred to community partners and nonenrolled, eligible veterans are linked to VHA HCPs if they desire. These transitions will be coordinated, closely monitored, and verified. The PSCI-SPC team receives referrals from the VCL and other VHA programs that are in contact with ineligible veterans. Other program eligibility criteria include meeting 1 of 3 criteria: (1) a lifetime suicide attempt; (2) suicidal ideation in the past 6 months; or (3) a current mental health disorder. At the outset of the program, it is explained that the purpose of the intervention is to provide short-term, transitional services to assist the veteran in attaining a permanent mental health placement.



Once the eligibility is determined, and the veteran’s preference is assessed, the team will perform a warm handoff to a VHA representative for enrollment into VHA care or to a community placement. We have sourced multiple community placements at varied payor levels. All veterans who are ineligible for care or who do not desire to be enrolled in VHA care will be provided the intervention package described above. After the veteran is placed in community care, PSCI-SPC team will follow up regularly with the veteran for 3 months to ensure continuity of care. If additional sessions are needed while the veteran needs a community placement, the PSCI team can accommodate this and will track the number of participants who needed additional sessions. If the veteran is deemed to be at imminent risk for suicide at any time during the pilot, he/she is transferred to emergency care. The veteran is allowed to participate once stabilized.

Findings from the pilot program will inform a manual intended for dissemination to patient safety and suicide prevention coordinators nationally across the VHA. The products from this objective will be integrated with the other objectives in training that will be provided on how to develop a local collaborative (Objective 1), disseminate the toolkit (Objective 2), and receive referrals into VHA or refer veterans to community clinical partners through the pilot program (Objective 3). Products developed and disseminated throughout PSCI-SPC aim to create momentum to reduce rates of suicide in veterans who are not connected to the VHA at the local community level.

 

 

Discussion

Improving suicide prevention for veterans who receive non-VHA health care is essential to significantly reduce veteran suicide rates. For the past decade, VHA suicide prevention initiatives have largely focused on veterans eligible for care, although the fastest increase in veteran suicide rates has occurred among veterans not connected to VHA services. Currently, if a veteran is deemed ineligible for care, it is up to the veteran to find other health care services in his or her community. There is not always a clear next step for the veteran to take, nor clear guidance provided to the VHA registration staff to assist with this care transition. This is particularly concerning for veterans at high risk for suicide as this could further thwart the veteran’s sense of belongingness and increase perceived burdensomeness, both suicide risk factors, and discourage them from attaining help.40 Overall, while the VHA has successfully implemented diverse suicide prevention initiatives and services, the need for continued system improvement focused on non-VHA veterans remains. PSCI-SPC was developed for this purpose.

By creating a collaborative that will connect VHA and community organizations, there will be better utilization of resources and more appropriate referrals throughout systems that interact with veterans. Sharing suicide prevention best practices between VHA and community partners is expected to increase access to mental health treatment to all veterans. Finally, by allowing best practices for suicide prevention in the VHA to serve as a guide in the development of best practices for suicide prevention between the VHA and the local health and behavioral health care community, PSCI-SPC will create a new suicide prevention intervention for veterans with mental health needs. Through these initiatives, PSCI-SPC will support providers’ and concerned citizens’ efforts to ensure that fewer veterans fall through the cracks of disjointed systems and will promote healthier communities where, regardless of VHA enrollment status, veterans receive suicide prevention care.

Conclusions

PSCI-SPC is a novel center for the innovation and dissemination of the nation’s best practices in suicide prevention for veterans who are ineligible for or otherwise not engaged in VHA services and who turn to their community for health care. PSCI-SPC not only seeks to create, develop, and measure various solutions to reduce suicide among veterans who receive non-VHA care, but also seeks to facilitate the overall quality of existing practices for suicide prevention and care coordination for enrolled veterans who use community resources. By bridging the gap between the VHA, civilian health care systems, and other community partners striving to prevent veteran suicides, we can create better access to care and a more seamless path of communication among these important entities that impact the lives of our veterans daily

References

1. US Department of Veterans Affairs. National strategy for preventing veteran suicide 2018-2028. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/suicide_prevention/docs/Office-of-Mental-Health-and-Suicide-Prevention-National-Strategy-for-Preventing-Veterans-Suicide.pdf. Published September 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

2. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention. National veteran suicide prevention annual report. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/suicide_prevention/data.asp. Accessed October 14, 2020.

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system (WISQARS). 2014. https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html. Updated July 1, 2020. Accessed October 14, 2020.

4. Lemle RB. Choice program expansion jeopardizes high-quality VHA mental health services. Fed Pract. 2018;35(3):18-24.

5. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention. VA national suicide data report 2005-2016. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/OMHSP_National_Suicide_Data_Report_2005-2016_508.pdf. Published September 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

6. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Suicide Prevention. VA national suicide data report 2005-2015. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/2015/OMHSP_National_Suicide_Data_Report_2005-2015_06-14-18_508.pdf. Published June 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

7. US Department of Veterans Affairs. National strategy for preventing veteran suicide 2018-2028. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/suicide_prevention/docs/Office-of-Mental-Health-and-Suicide-Prevention-National-Strategy-for-Preventing-Veterans-Suicide.pdf. Published 2018. Accessed October 30, 2020.

8. Gordon RS. An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Rep. 1983;98(2):107-109.

9. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. O’Connell ME, Boat T, Warner KE, eds. Preventing Mental, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders Among Young People: Progress and Possibilities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.

10. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Office of Science Policy and Communications. Drug Abuse Prevention: What Works. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health; 1997.

11. US Department of Veterans Affairs, US Department of Defense. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the assessment and management of patients at risk for suicide. https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/MH/srb. Published 2019. Updated July 30, 2020. Accessed October 14, 2020.

12. US Department of Veterans Affairs. Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-113publ146/pdf/PLAW-113publ146.pdf. Accessed October 14, 2020.

13. US Department of Veterans Affairs. Strategic Health Care. VA MISSION Act: Extension of the VA choice program. https://strategichealthcare.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/052718-VA-MISSION-Act-Summary.pdf. Accessed October 14, 2020.

14. US Congress. H.R.5674—VA MISSION Act of 2018. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5674. Accessed October 15, 2020.

15. Grumet JG, Hogan MF, Chu A, Covington DW, Johnson KE. Compliance standards pave the way for reducing suicide in health care systems. J Health Care Compliance. 2019;17-26.

16. Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1103-1117. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.110

17. Porter ME, Pabo EA, Lee TH. Redesigning primary care: a strategic vision to improve value by organizing around patients’ needs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(3):516-525. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0961

18. Nevedal AL, Wagner TH, Ellerbe LS, Asch SM, Koenig CJ. A qualitative study of primary care providers’ experiences with the Veterans Choice Program. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:598-603. doi:10.1007/s11606-018-4810-2

19. Tanielian T, Farris C, Epley C, et al. Ready to serve: community-based provider capacity to deliver culturally competent, quality mental health care to veterans and their families. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR800/RR806/RAND_RR806.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed October 15, 2020.

20. White House. Executive Order 13861: President’s roadmap to empower veterans and end the national tragedy of suicide (PREVENTS). https://www.va.gov/PREVENTS/docs/PRE-007-The-PREVENTS-Roadmap-1-2_508.pdf. Published June 17, 2020. Accessed October 15, 2020.

21. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of the Under Secretary for Health. Memorandum. VA continues community suicide prevention challenge at another mayor’s challenge policy academy. https://www.blogs.va.gov/VAntage/58468/va-continues-community-suicide-prevention-challenge-another-mayors-challenge-policy-academy. Published April 4, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

22. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2019 Operational Plan. www.navao.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/USH-Memo-10-2018-03-VHA_FY_2018-2019_Operational_Plan-4-19-18.pdf. Published April 19, 2018. Accessed October 15, 2020.

23. US Department of Veterans Affairs. VA, Health and Human Services announce governor’s challenge to prevent suicide. https://www.blogs.va.gov/VAntage/55707/va-health-human-services-announce-governors-challenge-prevent-suicide. Published January 17, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

24. VA’s suicide prevention campaign “Be There’’ kicks off in Times Square. https://www.blogs.va.gov/VAntage/57272/vas-suicide-prevention-campaign-kicks-off-times-square. Published March 6, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

25. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Public Affairs Media Relations. Emergent mental health care for former service members. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/Fact_Sheet-Emergent_Mental_Health_Care_Former_Service_Members.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed October 15, 2020.

26. US Department of Veterans Affairs. VA secretary formalizes expansion of emergency mental health care to former service members with other-than-honorable discharges. https://www.blogs.va.gov/VAntage/39092/va-secretary-formalizes-expansion-emergency-mental-health-care-former-service-members-honorable-discharges. Published June 27, 2017. Accessed October 15, 2020.

27. Shane L. New veteran suicide numbers raise concerns among experts hoping for positive news. Military Times. https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2019/10/09/new-veteran-suicide-numbers-raise-concerns-among-experts-hoping-for-positive-news. Published October 9, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

28. US Department of Veterans Affairs. Department of Veterans Affairs FY 2018-2024 Strategic Plan. https://www.va.gov/oei/docs/VA2018-2024strategicPlan.pdf. Updated May 31, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

29. Komaie G, Goodman M, McCall A, et al. Training community members in public health research: development and implementation of a community participatory research pilot project. Health Equity. 2018;2(1):282-287. doi:10.1089/heq.2018.0043

30. Wang KH, Ray NJ, Berg DN, et al. Using community-based participatory research and organizational diagnosis to characterize relationships between community leaders and academic researchers. Prev Med Reports. 2017;7:180-186. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.06.007

31. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. The breakthrough series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/IHIWhitePapers/TheBreakthroughSeriesIHIsCollaborativeModelforAchievingBreakthroughImprovement.aspx. Published 2003. Accessed October 15, 2020.

32. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Zero suicide toolkit. https://zerosuicide.sprc.org/toolkit. Accessed October 15, 2020.

<--pagebreak-->

33. Preventing suicide: a technical package of policy, programs, and practices. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/suicideTechnicalPackage.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed October 30, 2020.

34. US Department of Veterans Affairs. VA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention guidebook. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/VA-Office-of-Mental-Health-and-Suicide-Prevention-Guidebook-June-2018-FINAL-508.pdf. Published June 2018. Accessed October 15, 2020.

35. US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services, Administration Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. Focus on prevention: strategies and programs to prevent substance abuse. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 10-4120. https://helpandhopewv.org/docs/Focus%20on%20Prevention.pdf. Revised 2017. Accessed October 15, 2020.

36. Misiti R, Risinger A. RACETIME: an organizational care coordination approach to improving patient outcomes in a complex healthcare setting. Presentation at the Military Social Work & Behavioral Health Conference Austin, Texas. July 23, 2020. https://sites.utexas.edu/military-social-work-conference/misiti-risinger. Accessed October 23, 2020.

37. Rudd MD, Bryan CJ, Wertenberger EG, et al. Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy effects on post-treatment suicide attempts in a military sample: results of a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(5):441-449. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14070843

38. Rudd MD, Mandrusiak M, Joiner TE Jr. The case against no-suicide contracts: The commitment to treatment statement as a practice alternative. Clin Psychol. 2006;62(2):243-251.

39. Bryan CJ, Mintz J, Clemans TA, et al. Effect of crisis response planning vs. contracts for safety on suicide risk in US Army soldiers: a randomized clinical trial. J Affect Disord. 2017;212:64-72. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.028

40. Joiner TE. Why People Die by Suicide. Cambridge, MA: First Harvard University Press; 2005:27.

41. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. DoD Instruction 6490.16: Defense suicide prevention program. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/649016p.pdf?ver=2020-09-11-122632-850. Published November 6, 2017. Updated September 11, 2020. Accessed October 14, 2020.

42. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Engage: engaging patients. http://zerosuicide.edc.org/toolkit/engage#quicktabs-engage=0. Accessed October 14, 2020.

43. Stone D, Holland K, Bartholow B, Crosby A, Davis S, Wilkins N. Preventing Suicide: A technical package of policy, programs, and practices. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/suicidetechnicalpackage.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed October 14, 2020.

44. Mills PD, Watts BV, Miller S, et al. A checklist to identify inpatient suicide hazards in veterans affairs hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(2):87-93. doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(10)36015-6

45. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Research and Development. Crisis prevention: study evaluates VA program that identifies vets at highest risk for suicide. https://www.research.va.gov/currents/0918-Study-evaluates-VA-program-that-identifies-Vets-at-highest-risk-for-suicide.cfm. Updated September, 20, 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

46. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Engage: active engagement for safer suicide care--reducing access to lethal means. http://zerosuicide.edc.org/toolkit/engage#quicktabs-engage=1. Published 2017. Accessed October 14, 2020.

47. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Train: training for all. http://zerosuicide.sprc.org/toolkit/train. Accessed October 14, 2020.

48. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention (OMHSP). Facts about veteran suicide. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/FINAL_VA_OMHSP_Suicide_Prevention_Fact_Sheet_508.pdf. Published June 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

49. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Treat: direct treatment. http://zerosuicide.edc.org/toolkit/treat. Accessed October 14, 2020.

50. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. DoD Instruction 6490.04: Mental health evaluations of members of the military services. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/649004p.pdf. Published March 4, 2013. Updated April 22, 2020. Accessed October 14, 2020.

51. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Frequently asked questions: VA National Suicide Data Report. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/2015_Data_Release_FAQs_508.pdf. Published September 2018. Updated June 22, 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

52. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. ZERO Suicide engage: active engagement for safer suicide care safety planning. http://zerosuicide.edc.org/toolkit/engage#quicktabs-engage=1. Accessed October 14, 2020.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Bryann DeBeer is the Director of the VA Patient Safety Center of Inquiry – Suicide Prevention Collaborative and a Clinical Research Psychologist; Claire Hoffmire is an Epidemiologist and Health Science Specialist; Nathaniel Mohatt is a Research Psychologist; Germaine Franciosi is a Quality Management Specialist; Edgar Villarreal is a Clinical Psychologist and Program Manager for Suicide Prevention; all at the VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System (VAECHCS). Lindsey Monteith is a Clinical Research Psychologist; Dawn Pierson is a Program Specialist; and Samantha Synett is Suicide Prevention Coordinator; all at the Rocky Mountain Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) for Suicide Prevention, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Administration Medical Center in Aurora, Colorado. Bryann DeBeer is a Visiting Associate Professor; Claire Hoffmire is an Assistant Professor; and Nathaniel Mohatt is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Lindsey Monteith is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry; all at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora, Colorado. Joseph Mignogna is a Clinical Research Psychologist; and Justin Benzer is the Implementation Core Chief; both at the VA VISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans in Waco and the Central Texas Veterans Health Care System. Sylvia Baack is the Director of Quality, Safety, and Value; Kathryn Bongiovanni and Kattina Bryant are Suicide Prevention Coordinators; Stephanie Clafferty and Kimberly Weinberg are Social Work Supervisors; Marjory Williams is the Associate Chief Nurse, Research; all at the Central Texas Veterans Health Care System in Waco, Temple, and Austin. Elisa Borah is the Director of the Institute for Military and Veteran Family Wellness and a Research Associate Professor at the Steve Hicks School of Social Work at the University of Texas at Austin. Craig Bryan is the Stress, Trauma, and Resilience (STAR) Professor at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in Columbus. Ruth Cassidy is the Navy Suicide Prevention Program Manager/Lead Analyst in the 21st Century Sailor Office, Compliance and Competencies Branch in the US Navy, Millington, Tennessee. Jenna Heise is Texas State Suicide Prevention Coordinator in theOffice of Mental Health Coordination, Suicide Prevention Team, Health and Human Services Commission in Austin and Zero Suicide Faculty at Zero Suicide Institute, Education Development Center in Waltham, Massachusetts. Robin Keene is not affiliated with an organization. Joseph Mignogna is an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the College of Medicine, in Temple, Texas. Alan Peterson is a Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; a Research Health Scientist in the Research and Development Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System; and a Professor in the Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio. Nathaniel Mohatt is a Clinical Instructor in the Division of Prevention and Community Research, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine. Justin Benzer is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article. This work was supported by a Patient Safety Center of Inquiry Grant from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Center for Patient Safety.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, any of its agencies, or any other affiliates

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 37(11)a
Publications
Topics
Page Number
512-521
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Bryann DeBeer is the Director of the VA Patient Safety Center of Inquiry – Suicide Prevention Collaborative and a Clinical Research Psychologist; Claire Hoffmire is an Epidemiologist and Health Science Specialist; Nathaniel Mohatt is a Research Psychologist; Germaine Franciosi is a Quality Management Specialist; Edgar Villarreal is a Clinical Psychologist and Program Manager for Suicide Prevention; all at the VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System (VAECHCS). Lindsey Monteith is a Clinical Research Psychologist; Dawn Pierson is a Program Specialist; and Samantha Synett is Suicide Prevention Coordinator; all at the Rocky Mountain Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) for Suicide Prevention, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Administration Medical Center in Aurora, Colorado. Bryann DeBeer is a Visiting Associate Professor; Claire Hoffmire is an Assistant Professor; and Nathaniel Mohatt is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Lindsey Monteith is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry; all at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora, Colorado. Joseph Mignogna is a Clinical Research Psychologist; and Justin Benzer is the Implementation Core Chief; both at the VA VISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans in Waco and the Central Texas Veterans Health Care System. Sylvia Baack is the Director of Quality, Safety, and Value; Kathryn Bongiovanni and Kattina Bryant are Suicide Prevention Coordinators; Stephanie Clafferty and Kimberly Weinberg are Social Work Supervisors; Marjory Williams is the Associate Chief Nurse, Research; all at the Central Texas Veterans Health Care System in Waco, Temple, and Austin. Elisa Borah is the Director of the Institute for Military and Veteran Family Wellness and a Research Associate Professor at the Steve Hicks School of Social Work at the University of Texas at Austin. Craig Bryan is the Stress, Trauma, and Resilience (STAR) Professor at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in Columbus. Ruth Cassidy is the Navy Suicide Prevention Program Manager/Lead Analyst in the 21st Century Sailor Office, Compliance and Competencies Branch in the US Navy, Millington, Tennessee. Jenna Heise is Texas State Suicide Prevention Coordinator in theOffice of Mental Health Coordination, Suicide Prevention Team, Health and Human Services Commission in Austin and Zero Suicide Faculty at Zero Suicide Institute, Education Development Center in Waltham, Massachusetts. Robin Keene is not affiliated with an organization. Joseph Mignogna is an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the College of Medicine, in Temple, Texas. Alan Peterson is a Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; a Research Health Scientist in the Research and Development Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System; and a Professor in the Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio. Nathaniel Mohatt is a Clinical Instructor in the Division of Prevention and Community Research, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine. Justin Benzer is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article. This work was supported by a Patient Safety Center of Inquiry Grant from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Center for Patient Safety.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, any of its agencies, or any other affiliates

Author and Disclosure Information

Bryann DeBeer is the Director of the VA Patient Safety Center of Inquiry – Suicide Prevention Collaborative and a Clinical Research Psychologist; Claire Hoffmire is an Epidemiologist and Health Science Specialist; Nathaniel Mohatt is a Research Psychologist; Germaine Franciosi is a Quality Management Specialist; Edgar Villarreal is a Clinical Psychologist and Program Manager for Suicide Prevention; all at the VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System (VAECHCS). Lindsey Monteith is a Clinical Research Psychologist; Dawn Pierson is a Program Specialist; and Samantha Synett is Suicide Prevention Coordinator; all at the Rocky Mountain Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) for Suicide Prevention, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Administration Medical Center in Aurora, Colorado. Bryann DeBeer is a Visiting Associate Professor; Claire Hoffmire is an Assistant Professor; and Nathaniel Mohatt is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Lindsey Monteith is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry; all at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora, Colorado. Joseph Mignogna is a Clinical Research Psychologist; and Justin Benzer is the Implementation Core Chief; both at the VA VISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans in Waco and the Central Texas Veterans Health Care System. Sylvia Baack is the Director of Quality, Safety, and Value; Kathryn Bongiovanni and Kattina Bryant are Suicide Prevention Coordinators; Stephanie Clafferty and Kimberly Weinberg are Social Work Supervisors; Marjory Williams is the Associate Chief Nurse, Research; all at the Central Texas Veterans Health Care System in Waco, Temple, and Austin. Elisa Borah is the Director of the Institute for Military and Veteran Family Wellness and a Research Associate Professor at the Steve Hicks School of Social Work at the University of Texas at Austin. Craig Bryan is the Stress, Trauma, and Resilience (STAR) Professor at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in Columbus. Ruth Cassidy is the Navy Suicide Prevention Program Manager/Lead Analyst in the 21st Century Sailor Office, Compliance and Competencies Branch in the US Navy, Millington, Tennessee. Jenna Heise is Texas State Suicide Prevention Coordinator in theOffice of Mental Health Coordination, Suicide Prevention Team, Health and Human Services Commission in Austin and Zero Suicide Faculty at Zero Suicide Institute, Education Development Center in Waltham, Massachusetts. Robin Keene is not affiliated with an organization. Joseph Mignogna is an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the College of Medicine, in Temple, Texas. Alan Peterson is a Professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; a Research Health Scientist in the Research and Development Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System; and a Professor in the Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio. Nathaniel Mohatt is a Clinical Instructor in the Division of Prevention and Community Research, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine. Justin Benzer is an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin.

Author disclosures
The authors report no actual or potential conflicts of interest with regard to this article. This work was supported by a Patient Safety Center of Inquiry Grant from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Center for Patient Safety.

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Federal Practitioner, Frontline Medical Communications Inc., the US Government, any of its agencies, or any other affiliates

Article PDF
Article PDF

Since 2008, suicide has ranked as the tenth leading cause of death for all ages in the US, with rates of suicide continuing to rise.1-3 Suicide is even more urgent to address in veteran populations. The age- and sex-adjusted suicide rate in 2017 was more than 1.5 times greater for veterans than it was for nonveteran adults.2 Of importance, rates of suicide are increasing at a faster rate in veterans who are not connected to Veterans Health Administration (VHA) care.4,5 These at-risk veterans include individuals who are eligible for VHA care yet have not had a VHA appointment within the year before death; veterans who may be ineligible to receive VHA care due to complex rules set by legislation; and veterans who are eligible but not enrolled in VHA care. Notably, between 2005 and 2016, the number of veterans not enrolled in VHA care rose more quickly than did the number of veterans enrolled in VHA care.5,6 Thus, to impact the high veteran suicide rates, an emergent challenge for VHA is to prevent suicide among unenrolled veterans and veterans receiving community care, while continuing to increase access to mental health services for veterans enrolled in VHA health care.

 

 

In response to the high rates of veteran suicide deaths, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has developed a broad, multicomponent suicide prevention program that is unparalleled in private US health care systems.4,7 Suicide prevention efforts are led and implemented by both the VHA National Center for Patient Safety and the VHA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention. Program components are numerous and multifaceted, falling within the broad promotion and prevention strategies outlined by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM).1,8-11 The NAM continuum of prevention model encompassing multiple strategies is also referred to as the Universal, Selective, Indicated (USI) Model.7,8,10 The VHA suicide prevention program contains a wide spread of program components, making it both comprehensive and innovative (Table 1).

Although significant momentum and progress has been made within the VHA, policy set by legislation has historically limited access to VHA health care services to VHA-eligible veterans. This is particularly concerning given the rising suicide rates among veterans not engaged in VHA care.2 Adding to this complexity, recent legislation has increased veterans’ access to non-VHA health care, in addition to their existing access through Medicare, Medicaid, and other health care programs.12-14 Best practices for suicide prevention are not often implemented in the private sector; thus, these systems are ill prepared to adequately meet the suicide prevention care needs of veterans.4,15-18 Furthermore, VHA and non-VHA services generally are not well coordinated, and private sector health care providers (HCPs) are not required to complete a commensurate level of suicide prevention training as are VHA HCPs.16-18 Most non-VHA HCPs do not receive military cultural competence training.19 These issues create a significant gap in suicide prevention services and may contribute to the increases in suicide rates in veterans who do not receive VHA care. Thus, changes in policy to increase access through private sector care may have paradoxical effects on veteran suicide deaths. To impact the veteran suicide rate, VHA must develop and disseminate best practices for veterans who use non-VHA services.

A Roadmap to Suicide Prevention

There is significant momentum at the federal level regarding this issue. The President’s Roadmap to Empower Veterans and End the National Tragedy of Suicide (Executive Order 13,861) directs the VHA to work closely with community organizations to improve veteran suicide prevention.20 The VHA and partners, such as the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), are bridging this gap with collaborative efforts that increase suicide prevention resources for veterans living in the community through programs such as the Governor’s Challenges to Prevent Suicide Among Service Members, Veterans, and their Families. These programs intend to empower communities to develop statewide, strategic action plans to prevent veteran suicide.7,21-24

In addition to partnerships, VHA has built other aspects of outreach and intervention into its programming. A key VHA initiative is to “know all veterans” by committing to identifying and reaching out to all veterans who may be at risk for suicide.22 The VHA has committed to offering “emergency stabilization care for former service members who present at the facility with an emergent mental health need” regardless of eligibility.25 The intent is to provide temporary emergent mental health care to veterans who are otherwise ineligible for care, such as those who were discharged under other-than-honorable conditions while the VHA determines eligibility status.26 However, veterans must meet certain criteria, and there is a limit on services.

Although services are being expanded to reach veterans who do not access VHA health care, how to best implement these new directives with regard to suicide prevention is unclear. Strategic development and innovations to expand suicide prevention care to veterans outside the current reach of VHA are desperately needed.

 

 

Program Overview 

VHA Patient Safety Center of Inquiry-Suicide Prevention Collaborative (PSCI-SPC), funded by the VHA National Center for Patient Safety, aims to help fill the gap in community-based suicide prevention for veterans. PSCI-SPC is located within the VHA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center in Aurora, Colorado. The overarching mission of PSCI-SPC is to develop, implement, and evaluate practical solutions to reduce suicide among veterans not receiving VHA care. PSCI-SPC serves as a national clinical innovation and dissemination center for best practices in suicide prevention for organizations that serve veterans who receive care in the community. PSCI-SPC creates products to support dissemination of these practices to other VAMCs and works to ensure these programs are sustainable. PSCI-SPC focuses on 3 primary objectives. All PSCI-SPC projects are currently underway.

Objective 1: Growing a Community Learning Collaborative

Acknowledging that nearly two-thirds of veterans who die by suicide do not use VHA services, PSCI-SPC aims to reduce suicide among all veterans by expanding the reach of best practices for suicide prevention to veterans who receive myriad services in the community.27 Community organizations are defined here as organizations that may in some way serve, interact with, or work with veterans, and/or employ veterans. Examples include non-VHA health care systems, public services such as police and fire departments, nonprofit organizations, mental health clinics, and veterans’ courts. As veterans increasingly seek health care and other services within their communities, the success of suicide prevention will be influenced by the capability of non-VHA public and private organizations. Objective 1, therefore, seeks to develop a VHA-community collaborative that can be leveraged to improve systems of suicide prevention.

Current programs in the VHA have focused on implementation of suicide prevention awareness and prevention education campaigns instead of grassroots partnerships that are intended to be sustainable. Additionally, these programs typically lack the capacity and systems to sustain numerous meaningful community partnerships. Traditionally, community organizations have been hesitant to partner with government agencies, such as the VHA, due to histories of institutional mistrust and bureaucracy.28

The PSCI-SPC model for developing a VHA-community collaborative partnership draws from the tradition of community-based participatory research. The best community-based participatory research practices are to build on strengths and resources within the local community; develop collaborative, equitable partnerships that involve an empowering and power-sharing process; foster colearning, heuristics, and capacity building among partners; and focus on systems development using an iterative process. These practices also are consistent with the literature on learning collaboratives.29-31

The premise for a learning collaborative is to bridge the gap between knowledge and practice in health care.31 Figure 1 depicts how this collaborative was developed, and how it supports Objectives 2 and 3. To achieve Objective 1, we developed a VHA-learning collaborative of 13 influential community partners in the Denver and Colorado Springs region of Colorado. The VHA team consists of a learning collaborative leader, a program manager, and a program support assistant. The principal investigator attends and contributes to all meetings. Learning collaborative partners include a university psychology clinic that focuses on veterans’ care, 3 veterans service organizations, a mental health private practice, a university school of nursing, a community mental health center, veterans’ courts, and 5 city departments.



These partners participated in qualitative interviews to identify where gaps and breakdowns were occurring. With this information, the PSCI-SPC team and VHA-learning collaborative held a kickoff event. At this meeting the team discussed the qualitative findings, provided veteran suicide prevention information, and basic information regarding suicide prevention program building and implementation science.

Throughout quarterly learning collaborative meetings and monthly facilitation calls, we have worked to develop a blueprint and an action plan for each partner to develop best practices for dissemination to aid in providing consistency in the standard of care. A postimplementation event will be held to identify successes and challenges encountered while operationalizing project action plans.

Currently, activities of the learning collaborative are making a large impact on the community. Not all collaborative members track information regarding their populations served, nor specific metrics on veterans encountered. Even so, of those who do capture metrics, suicide prevention program components implemented by the collaborative will impact more than 21,000 individuals and at least 2,500 known veterans. In addition, 52 new connections have been made between community organizations or between community organizations and the VHA, and > 300 individuals have been trained.The learning collaborative support team has assisted in the dissemination of a large resource list for veterans. As the learning collaborative is ongoing and we are working with organizations to improve their data collection and analytics, we expect these numbers to increase. We anticipate that the learning collaborative will develop a stronger suicide prevention safety net within the community. In addition, we expect increased referrals of at-risk veterans to the VHA and enhance the long-term continuity of care between community and VHA services.

 

 

Objective 2: Implementation Toolkit

The second PSCI-SPC objective is to develop a toolkit for the implementation of best practices within a VHA-community suicide prevention learning collaborative. Lessons from the development of a successful suicide prevention learning collaborative will be shared through an online guide that other VHA facilities can use to support similar collaborative efforts within their communities. The toolkit will be disseminated across the VHA to assist suicide prevention coordinators and other staff in developing a suicide prevention learning collaborative at their facilities.

PSCI-SPC uses the Zero Suicide framework and the VA/US Department of Defense (DoD) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide as models for preventing suicide in veterans not enrolled in VHA care.11,32 This implementation toolkit focuses on how to implement suicide prevention best practices into organizations that serve veterans. This toolkit differs from clinical practice guidelines in that it focuses on implementation strategies to promote success and effectively address challenges.

In order to provide a menu of available options for the learning collaborative and resulting toolkit, PSCI-SPC uses a logic model to compare the components of the VHA suicide prevention program, as well as other similar veteran and military suicide prevention programs.7,12,14,21,33,34 These programs are categorized into 2 types of prevention frameworks, the USI model as described above, and the SAMHSA Strategic Prevention Framework (Table 2).35 The SAMHSA framework was designed to promote mental health and prevent substance abuse, yet the derived classification is also applicable to suicide prevention programs.35 The results of the logic model comparison form the basis of the best practice interventions for the learning collaborative and initial toolkit. In addition to the best practice interventions, the toolkit consists of documents describing how to develop a veteran suicide prevention learning collaborative, as well as tools for learning collaborative members. Current tool development includes workbooks to guide collaborative members through the implementation process, guides for community organizations in implementing suicide prevention screening and risk assessment, a standard operating procedure for suicide prevention in a veterans court, and peer support training for veteran suicide prevention.



The methods to achieve Objective 2 include regular discussions with the VHA-learning collaborative on current best practices, identifying gaps and overlap of community programs. Successes and challenges of implementing suicide prevention best practices into learning collaborative organizations will be documented and incorporated into the toolkit. The learning collaborative will work iteratively as a team to improve the toolkit. Once complete, the toolkit will be disseminated to other VHA health care systems nationally, as well as to other state or regional partners that the learning collaborative identifies. A plan is under development for national suicide prevention entities to also disseminate the toolkit to lessen the burden of veteran suicide through their stakeholder base.

Objective 3: High-Risk Veterans Not Receiving VHA Care

Although veterans not receiving VHA care account for a number of veteran deaths by suicide, we are not aware of any current VHA programs that provide temporary psychotherapy and intensive case management to at-risk veterans ineligible for VHA care who are in need of immediate care while an appropriate permanent community placement is identified. In the current system, veterans in the community can present to VHA suicide prevention services through several different systems, including referrals to VHA and the Veterans Crisis Line (VCL). However, a portion of VCL calls are from veterans whose VHA eligibility is unknown or who are ineligible for services. If veterans are at imminent risk for suicide, emergency care is coordinated for them. However, if veterans are not at imminent suicide risk they are referred to the local suicide prevention coordinator and instructed to independently work toward determining their VHA eligibility.

 

 

It is currently unknown how many veterans follow through with these instructions. Nonetheless, if veterans are deemed eligible, they may present to VHA to obtain a same-day appointment. If not eligible, a suicide prevention coordinator may give them the phone number of a community referral. However, this practice is not standardized across VA medical centers, and the provided resources are up to the suicide prevention coordinator to research. Additionally, when a VHA suicide prevention coordinator leaves the position, knowledge of these community resources and rapport with community HCPs are often lost, leaving the next coordinator to develop these again, which reduces the efficiency and effectiveness of limited resources. It is also unknown how many veterans complete this contact and receive evidence-based treatment following referral. This is a complex system to navigate, particularly when at risk for suicide and in need of immediate but not emergency services.

Suicide prevention in such circumstances may be improved by adapting current suicide prevention practices, including evidence-based interventions, and the new VHA intensive case management program,11,36 within a Zero Suicide framework. PSCI-SPC has developed a brief intervention to transition ineligible veterans to permanent community treatment and provide them with additional resources to meet their varied needs. The brief 1 to 3 session intervention combines practices from brief cognitive behavioral therapy (BCBT) for suicide prevention, crisis response planning (CRP), and intensive case management within a Zero Suicide framework. Both the 2019 VA/DoD suicide prevention clinical practice guidelines and Zero Suicide recommend using cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based interventions for suicide prevention.11,32 These interventions are packaged into a single intervention delivered by a PSCI-SPC therapist, typically a licensed clinical social worker, a licensed clinical psychologist, or an unlicensed psychologist under the supervision of a licensed clinical psychologist.

BCBT is one type of CBT that has shown initial efficacy in reducing suicide attempts.37 BCBT reduces the risk for suicide attempts both at the conclusion of treatment and at 24-month follow-up.37 BCBT is boiled down to its most essential components so it can be delivered in a distilled format. An essential element of BCBT that will remain is the CRP. A CRP11,37,38 entails collaboratively identifying effective, appropriate coping strategies and specific individuals to contact during a crisis. CRPs demonstrated efficacy as a stand-alone intervention to existing suicide prevention methods in a randomized clinical trial, such that individuals who received CRP had faster reductions in suicidal ideation and were 76% less likely to make a suicide attempt during the 6-month follow-up period.39 These results demonstrate that use of a CRP is connected to a decrease in suicidal behavior among suicidal patients.

The VHA has developed and is piloting a new initiative focused on restructuring its intensive case management services. RACETIME to Integrated Care (eg, Risk stratification, Assessment of complexity, Coordinator of lead assignment, Evaluate whole health needs, Trusting partnerships, Integrate care, Monitor progress, Experience of the veteran and employee) is a framework that assists VHA case managers in transitioning from a traditional case management mind-set to a more integrated and holistic method of care.36 RACETIME intensive case management practices will be incorporated into the intervention. However, RACETIME focuses on case management internally to the VHA. A modification for this treatment will be to focus on intensive case management from a mental health perspective and connecting to external community resources. Community referrals are mapped within a structured process and stored on a shared drive. This improves continuity between suicide prevention coordinators when they leave for a new position.

This intervention is conducted within a Zero Suicide framework. Pertinent to PSCI-SPC innovation to enhance care for non-VHA veterans is the care transitions element within the Zero Suicide framework, which has developed comprehensive suicide prevention guidance, including a pathway to care.32 This pathway refers a process to conduct follow-up supportive contacts that are tracked and recorded.

The PSCI-SPC pilot program incorporates the elements of CRP and brief CBT within a Zero Suicide framework. The PSCI-SPC team is developing and testing a protocol for providing brief treatment and community referrals to ineligible veterans that integrates these programming elements (Figure 2). A PSCI-SPC social worker will coordinate with the eligibility office to determine VHA eligibility. Ineligible veterans are referred to community partners and nonenrolled, eligible veterans are linked to VHA HCPs if they desire. These transitions will be coordinated, closely monitored, and verified. The PSCI-SPC team receives referrals from the VCL and other VHA programs that are in contact with ineligible veterans. Other program eligibility criteria include meeting 1 of 3 criteria: (1) a lifetime suicide attempt; (2) suicidal ideation in the past 6 months; or (3) a current mental health disorder. At the outset of the program, it is explained that the purpose of the intervention is to provide short-term, transitional services to assist the veteran in attaining a permanent mental health placement.



Once the eligibility is determined, and the veteran’s preference is assessed, the team will perform a warm handoff to a VHA representative for enrollment into VHA care or to a community placement. We have sourced multiple community placements at varied payor levels. All veterans who are ineligible for care or who do not desire to be enrolled in VHA care will be provided the intervention package described above. After the veteran is placed in community care, PSCI-SPC team will follow up regularly with the veteran for 3 months to ensure continuity of care. If additional sessions are needed while the veteran needs a community placement, the PSCI team can accommodate this and will track the number of participants who needed additional sessions. If the veteran is deemed to be at imminent risk for suicide at any time during the pilot, he/she is transferred to emergency care. The veteran is allowed to participate once stabilized.

Findings from the pilot program will inform a manual intended for dissemination to patient safety and suicide prevention coordinators nationally across the VHA. The products from this objective will be integrated with the other objectives in training that will be provided on how to develop a local collaborative (Objective 1), disseminate the toolkit (Objective 2), and receive referrals into VHA or refer veterans to community clinical partners through the pilot program (Objective 3). Products developed and disseminated throughout PSCI-SPC aim to create momentum to reduce rates of suicide in veterans who are not connected to the VHA at the local community level.

 

 

Discussion

Improving suicide prevention for veterans who receive non-VHA health care is essential to significantly reduce veteran suicide rates. For the past decade, VHA suicide prevention initiatives have largely focused on veterans eligible for care, although the fastest increase in veteran suicide rates has occurred among veterans not connected to VHA services. Currently, if a veteran is deemed ineligible for care, it is up to the veteran to find other health care services in his or her community. There is not always a clear next step for the veteran to take, nor clear guidance provided to the VHA registration staff to assist with this care transition. This is particularly concerning for veterans at high risk for suicide as this could further thwart the veteran’s sense of belongingness and increase perceived burdensomeness, both suicide risk factors, and discourage them from attaining help.40 Overall, while the VHA has successfully implemented diverse suicide prevention initiatives and services, the need for continued system improvement focused on non-VHA veterans remains. PSCI-SPC was developed for this purpose.

By creating a collaborative that will connect VHA and community organizations, there will be better utilization of resources and more appropriate referrals throughout systems that interact with veterans. Sharing suicide prevention best practices between VHA and community partners is expected to increase access to mental health treatment to all veterans. Finally, by allowing best practices for suicide prevention in the VHA to serve as a guide in the development of best practices for suicide prevention between the VHA and the local health and behavioral health care community, PSCI-SPC will create a new suicide prevention intervention for veterans with mental health needs. Through these initiatives, PSCI-SPC will support providers’ and concerned citizens’ efforts to ensure that fewer veterans fall through the cracks of disjointed systems and will promote healthier communities where, regardless of VHA enrollment status, veterans receive suicide prevention care.

Conclusions

PSCI-SPC is a novel center for the innovation and dissemination of the nation’s best practices in suicide prevention for veterans who are ineligible for or otherwise not engaged in VHA services and who turn to their community for health care. PSCI-SPC not only seeks to create, develop, and measure various solutions to reduce suicide among veterans who receive non-VHA care, but also seeks to facilitate the overall quality of existing practices for suicide prevention and care coordination for enrolled veterans who use community resources. By bridging the gap between the VHA, civilian health care systems, and other community partners striving to prevent veteran suicides, we can create better access to care and a more seamless path of communication among these important entities that impact the lives of our veterans daily

Since 2008, suicide has ranked as the tenth leading cause of death for all ages in the US, with rates of suicide continuing to rise.1-3 Suicide is even more urgent to address in veteran populations. The age- and sex-adjusted suicide rate in 2017 was more than 1.5 times greater for veterans than it was for nonveteran adults.2 Of importance, rates of suicide are increasing at a faster rate in veterans who are not connected to Veterans Health Administration (VHA) care.4,5 These at-risk veterans include individuals who are eligible for VHA care yet have not had a VHA appointment within the year before death; veterans who may be ineligible to receive VHA care due to complex rules set by legislation; and veterans who are eligible but not enrolled in VHA care. Notably, between 2005 and 2016, the number of veterans not enrolled in VHA care rose more quickly than did the number of veterans enrolled in VHA care.5,6 Thus, to impact the high veteran suicide rates, an emergent challenge for VHA is to prevent suicide among unenrolled veterans and veterans receiving community care, while continuing to increase access to mental health services for veterans enrolled in VHA health care.

 

 

In response to the high rates of veteran suicide deaths, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has developed a broad, multicomponent suicide prevention program that is unparalleled in private US health care systems.4,7 Suicide prevention efforts are led and implemented by both the VHA National Center for Patient Safety and the VHA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention. Program components are numerous and multifaceted, falling within the broad promotion and prevention strategies outlined by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM).1,8-11 The NAM continuum of prevention model encompassing multiple strategies is also referred to as the Universal, Selective, Indicated (USI) Model.7,8,10 The VHA suicide prevention program contains a wide spread of program components, making it both comprehensive and innovative (Table 1).

Although significant momentum and progress has been made within the VHA, policy set by legislation has historically limited access to VHA health care services to VHA-eligible veterans. This is particularly concerning given the rising suicide rates among veterans not engaged in VHA care.2 Adding to this complexity, recent legislation has increased veterans’ access to non-VHA health care, in addition to their existing access through Medicare, Medicaid, and other health care programs.12-14 Best practices for suicide prevention are not often implemented in the private sector; thus, these systems are ill prepared to adequately meet the suicide prevention care needs of veterans.4,15-18 Furthermore, VHA and non-VHA services generally are not well coordinated, and private sector health care providers (HCPs) are not required to complete a commensurate level of suicide prevention training as are VHA HCPs.16-18 Most non-VHA HCPs do not receive military cultural competence training.19 These issues create a significant gap in suicide prevention services and may contribute to the increases in suicide rates in veterans who do not receive VHA care. Thus, changes in policy to increase access through private sector care may have paradoxical effects on veteran suicide deaths. To impact the veteran suicide rate, VHA must develop and disseminate best practices for veterans who use non-VHA services.

A Roadmap to Suicide Prevention

There is significant momentum at the federal level regarding this issue. The President’s Roadmap to Empower Veterans and End the National Tragedy of Suicide (Executive Order 13,861) directs the VHA to work closely with community organizations to improve veteran suicide prevention.20 The VHA and partners, such as the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), are bridging this gap with collaborative efforts that increase suicide prevention resources for veterans living in the community through programs such as the Governor’s Challenges to Prevent Suicide Among Service Members, Veterans, and their Families. These programs intend to empower communities to develop statewide, strategic action plans to prevent veteran suicide.7,21-24

In addition to partnerships, VHA has built other aspects of outreach and intervention into its programming. A key VHA initiative is to “know all veterans” by committing to identifying and reaching out to all veterans who may be at risk for suicide.22 The VHA has committed to offering “emergency stabilization care for former service members who present at the facility with an emergent mental health need” regardless of eligibility.25 The intent is to provide temporary emergent mental health care to veterans who are otherwise ineligible for care, such as those who were discharged under other-than-honorable conditions while the VHA determines eligibility status.26 However, veterans must meet certain criteria, and there is a limit on services.

Although services are being expanded to reach veterans who do not access VHA health care, how to best implement these new directives with regard to suicide prevention is unclear. Strategic development and innovations to expand suicide prevention care to veterans outside the current reach of VHA are desperately needed.

 

 

Program Overview 

VHA Patient Safety Center of Inquiry-Suicide Prevention Collaborative (PSCI-SPC), funded by the VHA National Center for Patient Safety, aims to help fill the gap in community-based suicide prevention for veterans. PSCI-SPC is located within the VHA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center in Aurora, Colorado. The overarching mission of PSCI-SPC is to develop, implement, and evaluate practical solutions to reduce suicide among veterans not receiving VHA care. PSCI-SPC serves as a national clinical innovation and dissemination center for best practices in suicide prevention for organizations that serve veterans who receive care in the community. PSCI-SPC creates products to support dissemination of these practices to other VAMCs and works to ensure these programs are sustainable. PSCI-SPC focuses on 3 primary objectives. All PSCI-SPC projects are currently underway.

Objective 1: Growing a Community Learning Collaborative

Acknowledging that nearly two-thirds of veterans who die by suicide do not use VHA services, PSCI-SPC aims to reduce suicide among all veterans by expanding the reach of best practices for suicide prevention to veterans who receive myriad services in the community.27 Community organizations are defined here as organizations that may in some way serve, interact with, or work with veterans, and/or employ veterans. Examples include non-VHA health care systems, public services such as police and fire departments, nonprofit organizations, mental health clinics, and veterans’ courts. As veterans increasingly seek health care and other services within their communities, the success of suicide prevention will be influenced by the capability of non-VHA public and private organizations. Objective 1, therefore, seeks to develop a VHA-community collaborative that can be leveraged to improve systems of suicide prevention.

Current programs in the VHA have focused on implementation of suicide prevention awareness and prevention education campaigns instead of grassroots partnerships that are intended to be sustainable. Additionally, these programs typically lack the capacity and systems to sustain numerous meaningful community partnerships. Traditionally, community organizations have been hesitant to partner with government agencies, such as the VHA, due to histories of institutional mistrust and bureaucracy.28

The PSCI-SPC model for developing a VHA-community collaborative partnership draws from the tradition of community-based participatory research. The best community-based participatory research practices are to build on strengths and resources within the local community; develop collaborative, equitable partnerships that involve an empowering and power-sharing process; foster colearning, heuristics, and capacity building among partners; and focus on systems development using an iterative process. These practices also are consistent with the literature on learning collaboratives.29-31

The premise for a learning collaborative is to bridge the gap between knowledge and practice in health care.31 Figure 1 depicts how this collaborative was developed, and how it supports Objectives 2 and 3. To achieve Objective 1, we developed a VHA-learning collaborative of 13 influential community partners in the Denver and Colorado Springs region of Colorado. The VHA team consists of a learning collaborative leader, a program manager, and a program support assistant. The principal investigator attends and contributes to all meetings. Learning collaborative partners include a university psychology clinic that focuses on veterans’ care, 3 veterans service organizations, a mental health private practice, a university school of nursing, a community mental health center, veterans’ courts, and 5 city departments.



These partners participated in qualitative interviews to identify where gaps and breakdowns were occurring. With this information, the PSCI-SPC team and VHA-learning collaborative held a kickoff event. At this meeting the team discussed the qualitative findings, provided veteran suicide prevention information, and basic information regarding suicide prevention program building and implementation science.

Throughout quarterly learning collaborative meetings and monthly facilitation calls, we have worked to develop a blueprint and an action plan for each partner to develop best practices for dissemination to aid in providing consistency in the standard of care. A postimplementation event will be held to identify successes and challenges encountered while operationalizing project action plans.

Currently, activities of the learning collaborative are making a large impact on the community. Not all collaborative members track information regarding their populations served, nor specific metrics on veterans encountered. Even so, of those who do capture metrics, suicide prevention program components implemented by the collaborative will impact more than 21,000 individuals and at least 2,500 known veterans. In addition, 52 new connections have been made between community organizations or between community organizations and the VHA, and > 300 individuals have been trained.The learning collaborative support team has assisted in the dissemination of a large resource list for veterans. As the learning collaborative is ongoing and we are working with organizations to improve their data collection and analytics, we expect these numbers to increase. We anticipate that the learning collaborative will develop a stronger suicide prevention safety net within the community. In addition, we expect increased referrals of at-risk veterans to the VHA and enhance the long-term continuity of care between community and VHA services.

 

 

Objective 2: Implementation Toolkit

The second PSCI-SPC objective is to develop a toolkit for the implementation of best practices within a VHA-community suicide prevention learning collaborative. Lessons from the development of a successful suicide prevention learning collaborative will be shared through an online guide that other VHA facilities can use to support similar collaborative efforts within their communities. The toolkit will be disseminated across the VHA to assist suicide prevention coordinators and other staff in developing a suicide prevention learning collaborative at their facilities.

PSCI-SPC uses the Zero Suicide framework and the VA/US Department of Defense (DoD) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide as models for preventing suicide in veterans not enrolled in VHA care.11,32 This implementation toolkit focuses on how to implement suicide prevention best practices into organizations that serve veterans. This toolkit differs from clinical practice guidelines in that it focuses on implementation strategies to promote success and effectively address challenges.

In order to provide a menu of available options for the learning collaborative and resulting toolkit, PSCI-SPC uses a logic model to compare the components of the VHA suicide prevention program, as well as other similar veteran and military suicide prevention programs.7,12,14,21,33,34 These programs are categorized into 2 types of prevention frameworks, the USI model as described above, and the SAMHSA Strategic Prevention Framework (Table 2).35 The SAMHSA framework was designed to promote mental health and prevent substance abuse, yet the derived classification is also applicable to suicide prevention programs.35 The results of the logic model comparison form the basis of the best practice interventions for the learning collaborative and initial toolkit. In addition to the best practice interventions, the toolkit consists of documents describing how to develop a veteran suicide prevention learning collaborative, as well as tools for learning collaborative members. Current tool development includes workbooks to guide collaborative members through the implementation process, guides for community organizations in implementing suicide prevention screening and risk assessment, a standard operating procedure for suicide prevention in a veterans court, and peer support training for veteran suicide prevention.



The methods to achieve Objective 2 include regular discussions with the VHA-learning collaborative on current best practices, identifying gaps and overlap of community programs. Successes and challenges of implementing suicide prevention best practices into learning collaborative organizations will be documented and incorporated into the toolkit. The learning collaborative will work iteratively as a team to improve the toolkit. Once complete, the toolkit will be disseminated to other VHA health care systems nationally, as well as to other state or regional partners that the learning collaborative identifies. A plan is under development for national suicide prevention entities to also disseminate the toolkit to lessen the burden of veteran suicide through their stakeholder base.

Objective 3: High-Risk Veterans Not Receiving VHA Care

Although veterans not receiving VHA care account for a number of veteran deaths by suicide, we are not aware of any current VHA programs that provide temporary psychotherapy and intensive case management to at-risk veterans ineligible for VHA care who are in need of immediate care while an appropriate permanent community placement is identified. In the current system, veterans in the community can present to VHA suicide prevention services through several different systems, including referrals to VHA and the Veterans Crisis Line (VCL). However, a portion of VCL calls are from veterans whose VHA eligibility is unknown or who are ineligible for services. If veterans are at imminent risk for suicide, emergency care is coordinated for them. However, if veterans are not at imminent suicide risk they are referred to the local suicide prevention coordinator and instructed to independently work toward determining their VHA eligibility.

 

 

It is currently unknown how many veterans follow through with these instructions. Nonetheless, if veterans are deemed eligible, they may present to VHA to obtain a same-day appointment. If not eligible, a suicide prevention coordinator may give them the phone number of a community referral. However, this practice is not standardized across VA medical centers, and the provided resources are up to the suicide prevention coordinator to research. Additionally, when a VHA suicide prevention coordinator leaves the position, knowledge of these community resources and rapport with community HCPs are often lost, leaving the next coordinator to develop these again, which reduces the efficiency and effectiveness of limited resources. It is also unknown how many veterans complete this contact and receive evidence-based treatment following referral. This is a complex system to navigate, particularly when at risk for suicide and in need of immediate but not emergency services.

Suicide prevention in such circumstances may be improved by adapting current suicide prevention practices, including evidence-based interventions, and the new VHA intensive case management program,11,36 within a Zero Suicide framework. PSCI-SPC has developed a brief intervention to transition ineligible veterans to permanent community treatment and provide them with additional resources to meet their varied needs. The brief 1 to 3 session intervention combines practices from brief cognitive behavioral therapy (BCBT) for suicide prevention, crisis response planning (CRP), and intensive case management within a Zero Suicide framework. Both the 2019 VA/DoD suicide prevention clinical practice guidelines and Zero Suicide recommend using cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based interventions for suicide prevention.11,32 These interventions are packaged into a single intervention delivered by a PSCI-SPC therapist, typically a licensed clinical social worker, a licensed clinical psychologist, or an unlicensed psychologist under the supervision of a licensed clinical psychologist.

BCBT is one type of CBT that has shown initial efficacy in reducing suicide attempts.37 BCBT reduces the risk for suicide attempts both at the conclusion of treatment and at 24-month follow-up.37 BCBT is boiled down to its most essential components so it can be delivered in a distilled format. An essential element of BCBT that will remain is the CRP. A CRP11,37,38 entails collaboratively identifying effective, appropriate coping strategies and specific individuals to contact during a crisis. CRPs demonstrated efficacy as a stand-alone intervention to existing suicide prevention methods in a randomized clinical trial, such that individuals who received CRP had faster reductions in suicidal ideation and were 76% less likely to make a suicide attempt during the 6-month follow-up period.39 These results demonstrate that use of a CRP is connected to a decrease in suicidal behavior among suicidal patients.

The VHA has developed and is piloting a new initiative focused on restructuring its intensive case management services. RACETIME to Integrated Care (eg, Risk stratification, Assessment of complexity, Coordinator of lead assignment, Evaluate whole health needs, Trusting partnerships, Integrate care, Monitor progress, Experience of the veteran and employee) is a framework that assists VHA case managers in transitioning from a traditional case management mind-set to a more integrated and holistic method of care.36 RACETIME intensive case management practices will be incorporated into the intervention. However, RACETIME focuses on case management internally to the VHA. A modification for this treatment will be to focus on intensive case management from a mental health perspective and connecting to external community resources. Community referrals are mapped within a structured process and stored on a shared drive. This improves continuity between suicide prevention coordinators when they leave for a new position.

This intervention is conducted within a Zero Suicide framework. Pertinent to PSCI-SPC innovation to enhance care for non-VHA veterans is the care transitions element within the Zero Suicide framework, which has developed comprehensive suicide prevention guidance, including a pathway to care.32 This pathway refers a process to conduct follow-up supportive contacts that are tracked and recorded.

The PSCI-SPC pilot program incorporates the elements of CRP and brief CBT within a Zero Suicide framework. The PSCI-SPC team is developing and testing a protocol for providing brief treatment and community referrals to ineligible veterans that integrates these programming elements (Figure 2). A PSCI-SPC social worker will coordinate with the eligibility office to determine VHA eligibility. Ineligible veterans are referred to community partners and nonenrolled, eligible veterans are linked to VHA HCPs if they desire. These transitions will be coordinated, closely monitored, and verified. The PSCI-SPC team receives referrals from the VCL and other VHA programs that are in contact with ineligible veterans. Other program eligibility criteria include meeting 1 of 3 criteria: (1) a lifetime suicide attempt; (2) suicidal ideation in the past 6 months; or (3) a current mental health disorder. At the outset of the program, it is explained that the purpose of the intervention is to provide short-term, transitional services to assist the veteran in attaining a permanent mental health placement.



Once the eligibility is determined, and the veteran’s preference is assessed, the team will perform a warm handoff to a VHA representative for enrollment into VHA care or to a community placement. We have sourced multiple community placements at varied payor levels. All veterans who are ineligible for care or who do not desire to be enrolled in VHA care will be provided the intervention package described above. After the veteran is placed in community care, PSCI-SPC team will follow up regularly with the veteran for 3 months to ensure continuity of care. If additional sessions are needed while the veteran needs a community placement, the PSCI team can accommodate this and will track the number of participants who needed additional sessions. If the veteran is deemed to be at imminent risk for suicide at any time during the pilot, he/she is transferred to emergency care. The veteran is allowed to participate once stabilized.

Findings from the pilot program will inform a manual intended for dissemination to patient safety and suicide prevention coordinators nationally across the VHA. The products from this objective will be integrated with the other objectives in training that will be provided on how to develop a local collaborative (Objective 1), disseminate the toolkit (Objective 2), and receive referrals into VHA or refer veterans to community clinical partners through the pilot program (Objective 3). Products developed and disseminated throughout PSCI-SPC aim to create momentum to reduce rates of suicide in veterans who are not connected to the VHA at the local community level.

 

 

Discussion

Improving suicide prevention for veterans who receive non-VHA health care is essential to significantly reduce veteran suicide rates. For the past decade, VHA suicide prevention initiatives have largely focused on veterans eligible for care, although the fastest increase in veteran suicide rates has occurred among veterans not connected to VHA services. Currently, if a veteran is deemed ineligible for care, it is up to the veteran to find other health care services in his or her community. There is not always a clear next step for the veteran to take, nor clear guidance provided to the VHA registration staff to assist with this care transition. This is particularly concerning for veterans at high risk for suicide as this could further thwart the veteran’s sense of belongingness and increase perceived burdensomeness, both suicide risk factors, and discourage them from attaining help.40 Overall, while the VHA has successfully implemented diverse suicide prevention initiatives and services, the need for continued system improvement focused on non-VHA veterans remains. PSCI-SPC was developed for this purpose.

By creating a collaborative that will connect VHA and community organizations, there will be better utilization of resources and more appropriate referrals throughout systems that interact with veterans. Sharing suicide prevention best practices between VHA and community partners is expected to increase access to mental health treatment to all veterans. Finally, by allowing best practices for suicide prevention in the VHA to serve as a guide in the development of best practices for suicide prevention between the VHA and the local health and behavioral health care community, PSCI-SPC will create a new suicide prevention intervention for veterans with mental health needs. Through these initiatives, PSCI-SPC will support providers’ and concerned citizens’ efforts to ensure that fewer veterans fall through the cracks of disjointed systems and will promote healthier communities where, regardless of VHA enrollment status, veterans receive suicide prevention care.

Conclusions

PSCI-SPC is a novel center for the innovation and dissemination of the nation’s best practices in suicide prevention for veterans who are ineligible for or otherwise not engaged in VHA services and who turn to their community for health care. PSCI-SPC not only seeks to create, develop, and measure various solutions to reduce suicide among veterans who receive non-VHA care, but also seeks to facilitate the overall quality of existing practices for suicide prevention and care coordination for enrolled veterans who use community resources. By bridging the gap between the VHA, civilian health care systems, and other community partners striving to prevent veteran suicides, we can create better access to care and a more seamless path of communication among these important entities that impact the lives of our veterans daily

References

1. US Department of Veterans Affairs. National strategy for preventing veteran suicide 2018-2028. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/suicide_prevention/docs/Office-of-Mental-Health-and-Suicide-Prevention-National-Strategy-for-Preventing-Veterans-Suicide.pdf. Published September 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

2. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention. National veteran suicide prevention annual report. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/suicide_prevention/data.asp. Accessed October 14, 2020.

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system (WISQARS). 2014. https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html. Updated July 1, 2020. Accessed October 14, 2020.

4. Lemle RB. Choice program expansion jeopardizes high-quality VHA mental health services. Fed Pract. 2018;35(3):18-24.

5. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention. VA national suicide data report 2005-2016. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/OMHSP_National_Suicide_Data_Report_2005-2016_508.pdf. Published September 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

6. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Suicide Prevention. VA national suicide data report 2005-2015. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/2015/OMHSP_National_Suicide_Data_Report_2005-2015_06-14-18_508.pdf. Published June 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

7. US Department of Veterans Affairs. National strategy for preventing veteran suicide 2018-2028. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/suicide_prevention/docs/Office-of-Mental-Health-and-Suicide-Prevention-National-Strategy-for-Preventing-Veterans-Suicide.pdf. Published 2018. Accessed October 30, 2020.

8. Gordon RS. An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Rep. 1983;98(2):107-109.

9. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. O’Connell ME, Boat T, Warner KE, eds. Preventing Mental, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders Among Young People: Progress and Possibilities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.

10. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Office of Science Policy and Communications. Drug Abuse Prevention: What Works. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health; 1997.

11. US Department of Veterans Affairs, US Department of Defense. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the assessment and management of patients at risk for suicide. https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/MH/srb. Published 2019. Updated July 30, 2020. Accessed October 14, 2020.

12. US Department of Veterans Affairs. Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-113publ146/pdf/PLAW-113publ146.pdf. Accessed October 14, 2020.

13. US Department of Veterans Affairs. Strategic Health Care. VA MISSION Act: Extension of the VA choice program. https://strategichealthcare.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/052718-VA-MISSION-Act-Summary.pdf. Accessed October 14, 2020.

14. US Congress. H.R.5674—VA MISSION Act of 2018. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5674. Accessed October 15, 2020.

15. Grumet JG, Hogan MF, Chu A, Covington DW, Johnson KE. Compliance standards pave the way for reducing suicide in health care systems. J Health Care Compliance. 2019;17-26.

16. Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1103-1117. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.110

17. Porter ME, Pabo EA, Lee TH. Redesigning primary care: a strategic vision to improve value by organizing around patients’ needs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(3):516-525. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0961

18. Nevedal AL, Wagner TH, Ellerbe LS, Asch SM, Koenig CJ. A qualitative study of primary care providers’ experiences with the Veterans Choice Program. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:598-603. doi:10.1007/s11606-018-4810-2

19. Tanielian T, Farris C, Epley C, et al. Ready to serve: community-based provider capacity to deliver culturally competent, quality mental health care to veterans and their families. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR800/RR806/RAND_RR806.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed October 15, 2020.

20. White House. Executive Order 13861: President’s roadmap to empower veterans and end the national tragedy of suicide (PREVENTS). https://www.va.gov/PREVENTS/docs/PRE-007-The-PREVENTS-Roadmap-1-2_508.pdf. Published June 17, 2020. Accessed October 15, 2020.

21. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of the Under Secretary for Health. Memorandum. VA continues community suicide prevention challenge at another mayor’s challenge policy academy. https://www.blogs.va.gov/VAntage/58468/va-continues-community-suicide-prevention-challenge-another-mayors-challenge-policy-academy. Published April 4, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

22. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2019 Operational Plan. www.navao.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/USH-Memo-10-2018-03-VHA_FY_2018-2019_Operational_Plan-4-19-18.pdf. Published April 19, 2018. Accessed October 15, 2020.

23. US Department of Veterans Affairs. VA, Health and Human Services announce governor’s challenge to prevent suicide. https://www.blogs.va.gov/VAntage/55707/va-health-human-services-announce-governors-challenge-prevent-suicide. Published January 17, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

24. VA’s suicide prevention campaign “Be There’’ kicks off in Times Square. https://www.blogs.va.gov/VAntage/57272/vas-suicide-prevention-campaign-kicks-off-times-square. Published March 6, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

25. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Public Affairs Media Relations. Emergent mental health care for former service members. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/Fact_Sheet-Emergent_Mental_Health_Care_Former_Service_Members.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed October 15, 2020.

26. US Department of Veterans Affairs. VA secretary formalizes expansion of emergency mental health care to former service members with other-than-honorable discharges. https://www.blogs.va.gov/VAntage/39092/va-secretary-formalizes-expansion-emergency-mental-health-care-former-service-members-honorable-discharges. Published June 27, 2017. Accessed October 15, 2020.

27. Shane L. New veteran suicide numbers raise concerns among experts hoping for positive news. Military Times. https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2019/10/09/new-veteran-suicide-numbers-raise-concerns-among-experts-hoping-for-positive-news. Published October 9, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

28. US Department of Veterans Affairs. Department of Veterans Affairs FY 2018-2024 Strategic Plan. https://www.va.gov/oei/docs/VA2018-2024strategicPlan.pdf. Updated May 31, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

29. Komaie G, Goodman M, McCall A, et al. Training community members in public health research: development and implementation of a community participatory research pilot project. Health Equity. 2018;2(1):282-287. doi:10.1089/heq.2018.0043

30. Wang KH, Ray NJ, Berg DN, et al. Using community-based participatory research and organizational diagnosis to characterize relationships between community leaders and academic researchers. Prev Med Reports. 2017;7:180-186. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.06.007

31. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. The breakthrough series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/IHIWhitePapers/TheBreakthroughSeriesIHIsCollaborativeModelforAchievingBreakthroughImprovement.aspx. Published 2003. Accessed October 15, 2020.

32. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Zero suicide toolkit. https://zerosuicide.sprc.org/toolkit. Accessed October 15, 2020.

<--pagebreak-->

33. Preventing suicide: a technical package of policy, programs, and practices. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/suicideTechnicalPackage.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed October 30, 2020.

34. US Department of Veterans Affairs. VA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention guidebook. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/VA-Office-of-Mental-Health-and-Suicide-Prevention-Guidebook-June-2018-FINAL-508.pdf. Published June 2018. Accessed October 15, 2020.

35. US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services, Administration Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. Focus on prevention: strategies and programs to prevent substance abuse. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 10-4120. https://helpandhopewv.org/docs/Focus%20on%20Prevention.pdf. Revised 2017. Accessed October 15, 2020.

36. Misiti R, Risinger A. RACETIME: an organizational care coordination approach to improving patient outcomes in a complex healthcare setting. Presentation at the Military Social Work & Behavioral Health Conference Austin, Texas. July 23, 2020. https://sites.utexas.edu/military-social-work-conference/misiti-risinger. Accessed October 23, 2020.

37. Rudd MD, Bryan CJ, Wertenberger EG, et al. Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy effects on post-treatment suicide attempts in a military sample: results of a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(5):441-449. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14070843

38. Rudd MD, Mandrusiak M, Joiner TE Jr. The case against no-suicide contracts: The commitment to treatment statement as a practice alternative. Clin Psychol. 2006;62(2):243-251.

39. Bryan CJ, Mintz J, Clemans TA, et al. Effect of crisis response planning vs. contracts for safety on suicide risk in US Army soldiers: a randomized clinical trial. J Affect Disord. 2017;212:64-72. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.028

40. Joiner TE. Why People Die by Suicide. Cambridge, MA: First Harvard University Press; 2005:27.

41. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. DoD Instruction 6490.16: Defense suicide prevention program. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/649016p.pdf?ver=2020-09-11-122632-850. Published November 6, 2017. Updated September 11, 2020. Accessed October 14, 2020.

42. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Engage: engaging patients. http://zerosuicide.edc.org/toolkit/engage#quicktabs-engage=0. Accessed October 14, 2020.

43. Stone D, Holland K, Bartholow B, Crosby A, Davis S, Wilkins N. Preventing Suicide: A technical package of policy, programs, and practices. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/suicidetechnicalpackage.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed October 14, 2020.

44. Mills PD, Watts BV, Miller S, et al. A checklist to identify inpatient suicide hazards in veterans affairs hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(2):87-93. doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(10)36015-6

45. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Research and Development. Crisis prevention: study evaluates VA program that identifies vets at highest risk for suicide. https://www.research.va.gov/currents/0918-Study-evaluates-VA-program-that-identifies-Vets-at-highest-risk-for-suicide.cfm. Updated September, 20, 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

46. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Engage: active engagement for safer suicide care--reducing access to lethal means. http://zerosuicide.edc.org/toolkit/engage#quicktabs-engage=1. Published 2017. Accessed October 14, 2020.

47. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Train: training for all. http://zerosuicide.sprc.org/toolkit/train. Accessed October 14, 2020.

48. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention (OMHSP). Facts about veteran suicide. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/FINAL_VA_OMHSP_Suicide_Prevention_Fact_Sheet_508.pdf. Published June 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

49. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Treat: direct treatment. http://zerosuicide.edc.org/toolkit/treat. Accessed October 14, 2020.

50. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. DoD Instruction 6490.04: Mental health evaluations of members of the military services. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/649004p.pdf. Published March 4, 2013. Updated April 22, 2020. Accessed October 14, 2020.

51. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Frequently asked questions: VA National Suicide Data Report. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/2015_Data_Release_FAQs_508.pdf. Published September 2018. Updated June 22, 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

52. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. ZERO Suicide engage: active engagement for safer suicide care safety planning. http://zerosuicide.edc.org/toolkit/engage#quicktabs-engage=1. Accessed October 14, 2020.

References

1. US Department of Veterans Affairs. National strategy for preventing veteran suicide 2018-2028. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/suicide_prevention/docs/Office-of-Mental-Health-and-Suicide-Prevention-National-Strategy-for-Preventing-Veterans-Suicide.pdf. Published September 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

2. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention. National veteran suicide prevention annual report. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/suicide_prevention/data.asp. Accessed October 14, 2020.

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system (WISQARS). 2014. https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html. Updated July 1, 2020. Accessed October 14, 2020.

4. Lemle RB. Choice program expansion jeopardizes high-quality VHA mental health services. Fed Pract. 2018;35(3):18-24.

5. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention. VA national suicide data report 2005-2016. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/OMHSP_National_Suicide_Data_Report_2005-2016_508.pdf. Published September 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

6. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Suicide Prevention. VA national suicide data report 2005-2015. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/2015/OMHSP_National_Suicide_Data_Report_2005-2015_06-14-18_508.pdf. Published June 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

7. US Department of Veterans Affairs. National strategy for preventing veteran suicide 2018-2028. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/suicide_prevention/docs/Office-of-Mental-Health-and-Suicide-Prevention-National-Strategy-for-Preventing-Veterans-Suicide.pdf. Published 2018. Accessed October 30, 2020.

8. Gordon RS. An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Rep. 1983;98(2):107-109.

9. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. O’Connell ME, Boat T, Warner KE, eds. Preventing Mental, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders Among Young People: Progress and Possibilities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.

10. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Office of Science Policy and Communications. Drug Abuse Prevention: What Works. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Health; 1997.

11. US Department of Veterans Affairs, US Department of Defense. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the assessment and management of patients at risk for suicide. https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/MH/srb. Published 2019. Updated July 30, 2020. Accessed October 14, 2020.

12. US Department of Veterans Affairs. Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-113publ146/pdf/PLAW-113publ146.pdf. Accessed October 14, 2020.

13. US Department of Veterans Affairs. Strategic Health Care. VA MISSION Act: Extension of the VA choice program. https://strategichealthcare.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/052718-VA-MISSION-Act-Summary.pdf. Accessed October 14, 2020.

14. US Congress. H.R.5674—VA MISSION Act of 2018. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5674. Accessed October 15, 2020.

15. Grumet JG, Hogan MF, Chu A, Covington DW, Johnson KE. Compliance standards pave the way for reducing suicide in health care systems. J Health Care Compliance. 2019;17-26.

16. Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1103-1117. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.110

17. Porter ME, Pabo EA, Lee TH. Redesigning primary care: a strategic vision to improve value by organizing around patients’ needs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(3):516-525. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0961

18. Nevedal AL, Wagner TH, Ellerbe LS, Asch SM, Koenig CJ. A qualitative study of primary care providers’ experiences with the Veterans Choice Program. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34:598-603. doi:10.1007/s11606-018-4810-2

19. Tanielian T, Farris C, Epley C, et al. Ready to serve: community-based provider capacity to deliver culturally competent, quality mental health care to veterans and their families. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR800/RR806/RAND_RR806.pdf. Published 2014. Accessed October 15, 2020.

20. White House. Executive Order 13861: President’s roadmap to empower veterans and end the national tragedy of suicide (PREVENTS). https://www.va.gov/PREVENTS/docs/PRE-007-The-PREVENTS-Roadmap-1-2_508.pdf. Published June 17, 2020. Accessed October 15, 2020.

21. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of the Under Secretary for Health. Memorandum. VA continues community suicide prevention challenge at another mayor’s challenge policy academy. https://www.blogs.va.gov/VAntage/58468/va-continues-community-suicide-prevention-challenge-another-mayors-challenge-policy-academy. Published April 4, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

22. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2019 Operational Plan. www.navao.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/USH-Memo-10-2018-03-VHA_FY_2018-2019_Operational_Plan-4-19-18.pdf. Published April 19, 2018. Accessed October 15, 2020.

23. US Department of Veterans Affairs. VA, Health and Human Services announce governor’s challenge to prevent suicide. https://www.blogs.va.gov/VAntage/55707/va-health-human-services-announce-governors-challenge-prevent-suicide. Published January 17, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

24. VA’s suicide prevention campaign “Be There’’ kicks off in Times Square. https://www.blogs.va.gov/VAntage/57272/vas-suicide-prevention-campaign-kicks-off-times-square. Published March 6, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

25. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Public Affairs Media Relations. Emergent mental health care for former service members. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/Fact_Sheet-Emergent_Mental_Health_Care_Former_Service_Members.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed October 15, 2020.

26. US Department of Veterans Affairs. VA secretary formalizes expansion of emergency mental health care to former service members with other-than-honorable discharges. https://www.blogs.va.gov/VAntage/39092/va-secretary-formalizes-expansion-emergency-mental-health-care-former-service-members-honorable-discharges. Published June 27, 2017. Accessed October 15, 2020.

27. Shane L. New veteran suicide numbers raise concerns among experts hoping for positive news. Military Times. https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2019/10/09/new-veteran-suicide-numbers-raise-concerns-among-experts-hoping-for-positive-news. Published October 9, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

28. US Department of Veterans Affairs. Department of Veterans Affairs FY 2018-2024 Strategic Plan. https://www.va.gov/oei/docs/VA2018-2024strategicPlan.pdf. Updated May 31, 2019. Accessed October 15, 2020.

29. Komaie G, Goodman M, McCall A, et al. Training community members in public health research: development and implementation of a community participatory research pilot project. Health Equity. 2018;2(1):282-287. doi:10.1089/heq.2018.0043

30. Wang KH, Ray NJ, Berg DN, et al. Using community-based participatory research and organizational diagnosis to characterize relationships between community leaders and academic researchers. Prev Med Reports. 2017;7:180-186. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.06.007

31. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. The breakthrough series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/IHIWhitePapers/TheBreakthroughSeriesIHIsCollaborativeModelforAchievingBreakthroughImprovement.aspx. Published 2003. Accessed October 15, 2020.

32. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Zero suicide toolkit. https://zerosuicide.sprc.org/toolkit. Accessed October 15, 2020.

<--pagebreak-->

33. Preventing suicide: a technical package of policy, programs, and practices. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/suicideTechnicalPackage.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed October 30, 2020.

34. US Department of Veterans Affairs. VA Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention guidebook. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/VA-Office-of-Mental-Health-and-Suicide-Prevention-Guidebook-June-2018-FINAL-508.pdf. Published June 2018. Accessed October 15, 2020.

35. US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services, Administration Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. Focus on prevention: strategies and programs to prevent substance abuse. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 10-4120. https://helpandhopewv.org/docs/Focus%20on%20Prevention.pdf. Revised 2017. Accessed October 15, 2020.

36. Misiti R, Risinger A. RACETIME: an organizational care coordination approach to improving patient outcomes in a complex healthcare setting. Presentation at the Military Social Work & Behavioral Health Conference Austin, Texas. July 23, 2020. https://sites.utexas.edu/military-social-work-conference/misiti-risinger. Accessed October 23, 2020.

37. Rudd MD, Bryan CJ, Wertenberger EG, et al. Brief cognitive-behavioral therapy effects on post-treatment suicide attempts in a military sample: results of a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(5):441-449. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14070843

38. Rudd MD, Mandrusiak M, Joiner TE Jr. The case against no-suicide contracts: The commitment to treatment statement as a practice alternative. Clin Psychol. 2006;62(2):243-251.

39. Bryan CJ, Mintz J, Clemans TA, et al. Effect of crisis response planning vs. contracts for safety on suicide risk in US Army soldiers: a randomized clinical trial. J Affect Disord. 2017;212:64-72. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.028

40. Joiner TE. Why People Die by Suicide. Cambridge, MA: First Harvard University Press; 2005:27.

41. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. DoD Instruction 6490.16: Defense suicide prevention program. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/649016p.pdf?ver=2020-09-11-122632-850. Published November 6, 2017. Updated September 11, 2020. Accessed October 14, 2020.

42. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Engage: engaging patients. http://zerosuicide.edc.org/toolkit/engage#quicktabs-engage=0. Accessed October 14, 2020.

43. Stone D, Holland K, Bartholow B, Crosby A, Davis S, Wilkins N. Preventing Suicide: A technical package of policy, programs, and practices. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/suicidetechnicalpackage.pdf. Published 2017. Accessed October 14, 2020.

44. Mills PD, Watts BV, Miller S, et al. A checklist to identify inpatient suicide hazards in veterans affairs hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(2):87-93. doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(10)36015-6

45. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Research and Development. Crisis prevention: study evaluates VA program that identifies vets at highest risk for suicide. https://www.research.va.gov/currents/0918-Study-evaluates-VA-program-that-identifies-Vets-at-highest-risk-for-suicide.cfm. Updated September, 20, 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

46. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Engage: active engagement for safer suicide care--reducing access to lethal means. http://zerosuicide.edc.org/toolkit/engage#quicktabs-engage=1. Published 2017. Accessed October 14, 2020.

47. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Train: training for all. http://zerosuicide.sprc.org/toolkit/train. Accessed October 14, 2020.

48. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention (OMHSP). Facts about veteran suicide. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/FINAL_VA_OMHSP_Suicide_Prevention_Fact_Sheet_508.pdf. Published June 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

49. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. Treat: direct treatment. http://zerosuicide.edc.org/toolkit/treat. Accessed October 14, 2020.

50. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness. DoD Instruction 6490.04: Mental health evaluations of members of the military services. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/649004p.pdf. Published March 4, 2013. Updated April 22, 2020. Accessed October 14, 2020.

51. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Frequently asked questions: VA National Suicide Data Report. https://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/data-sheets/2015_Data_Release_FAQs_508.pdf. Published September 2018. Updated June 22, 2018. Accessed October 14, 2020.

52. Zero Suicide in Health and Behavioral Health Care Institute. ZERO Suicide engage: active engagement for safer suicide care safety planning. http://zerosuicide.edc.org/toolkit/engage#quicktabs-engage=1. Accessed October 14, 2020.

Issue
Federal Practitioner - 37(11)a
Issue
Federal Practitioner - 37(11)a
Page Number
512-521
Page Number
512-521
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Article PDF Media