User login
Index discriminates prognostic groups in CLL
An international prognostic index for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may help to inform treatment decisions, based on a meta-analysis presented at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
The International Prognostic Index for patients with CLL (CLL-IPI) combines the most important genetic risk factors and traditional clinical stage, age, and serum beta-2-microglobulin measures. By discriminating between prognostic groups, the index may aid in informing treatment of CLL patients, Dr. Jasmin Bahlo of the University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany, said.
The CLL-IPI consists of five risk factors – age, clinical stage, IgHV (immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable-region) gene mutation status, serum beta-2-microglobulin measure, and the presence of del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation, Dr. Bahlo said.
To develop the index, Dr. Bahlo and colleagues performed an analysis of 26 possible prognostic factors by using data from eight phase III trials from France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Poland. The data included a full analysis set of 3,742 previously untreated patients at early and advanced stages of disease. The median age of the patients was 61 years, the median observation time was 80 months, and the main endpoint was overall survival.
From the 26 variables, the researchers identified five independent predictors for overall survival: age (65 years or more), clinical stage (Binet A/Rai 0 vs. Binet B-C/Rai I-IV), del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation status, IgHV mutation status, and serum beta-2-microglobulin measure (3.5 mg/L or more).
The index was used to identify four risk groups – low risk (score 0-1), intermediate (score 2-3), high (score 4-6), and very high (score 7-10)) – with significantly different overall survival rates at 5 years of 93%, 79%, 64%, and 23%, respectively.
The value of the index was then confirmed in 575 patients, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 91%, 80%, 52%, and 19%, respectively.
Similar findings were seen in an external data set of patients from the Mayo Clinic data set, with 5-year overall survivals of 97%, 91%, 68%, and 21%, respectively. The CLL-IPI also provided accurate estimation regarding time to first treatment; 81%, 47%, 30%, and 19% of patients in the respective risk groups were free from treatment at 5 years.
In the era of more effective treatments for CLL, the established clinical staging systems (Rai and Binet) do not accurately discriminate between prognostic groups because they do not integrate the major clinical, biologic, and genetic variables into one widely accepted prognostic system, Dr. Bahlo noted. The CLL-IPI is, therefore, an important contribution to management of this condition.
The researchers had no relevant financial disclosures.
Until very recently, most treatment decisions in CLL have been based on age, overall fitness of the patient and presence of cytopenias. Biologic prognostic markers have been delineated, but not acted upon, with the recent exception of del17p given the advent of effective novel agents in this setting. This is an admirable attempt to establish a better prognostic index, building upon prior German CLL group data (Pflug et al Blood 2014), but it has limitations. It is a weighted score, heavily dependent on p53 mutation/del17p, which is uncommon at initial diagnosis, and today such patients should be receiving a targeted agent. It would be useful to have a CLL-IPI for patients without del17p. Further, while its ability to predict time to require therapy will remain useful, its survival predictions are likely already outdated given the array of new agents already, or soon to be, available.
Until very recently, most treatment decisions in CLL have been based on age, overall fitness of the patient and presence of cytopenias. Biologic prognostic markers have been delineated, but not acted upon, with the recent exception of del17p given the advent of effective novel agents in this setting. This is an admirable attempt to establish a better prognostic index, building upon prior German CLL group data (Pflug et al Blood 2014), but it has limitations. It is a weighted score, heavily dependent on p53 mutation/del17p, which is uncommon at initial diagnosis, and today such patients should be receiving a targeted agent. It would be useful to have a CLL-IPI for patients without del17p. Further, while its ability to predict time to require therapy will remain useful, its survival predictions are likely already outdated given the array of new agents already, or soon to be, available.
Until very recently, most treatment decisions in CLL have been based on age, overall fitness of the patient and presence of cytopenias. Biologic prognostic markers have been delineated, but not acted upon, with the recent exception of del17p given the advent of effective novel agents in this setting. This is an admirable attempt to establish a better prognostic index, building upon prior German CLL group data (Pflug et al Blood 2014), but it has limitations. It is a weighted score, heavily dependent on p53 mutation/del17p, which is uncommon at initial diagnosis, and today such patients should be receiving a targeted agent. It would be useful to have a CLL-IPI for patients without del17p. Further, while its ability to predict time to require therapy will remain useful, its survival predictions are likely already outdated given the array of new agents already, or soon to be, available.
An international prognostic index for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may help to inform treatment decisions, based on a meta-analysis presented at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
The International Prognostic Index for patients with CLL (CLL-IPI) combines the most important genetic risk factors and traditional clinical stage, age, and serum beta-2-microglobulin measures. By discriminating between prognostic groups, the index may aid in informing treatment of CLL patients, Dr. Jasmin Bahlo of the University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany, said.
The CLL-IPI consists of five risk factors – age, clinical stage, IgHV (immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable-region) gene mutation status, serum beta-2-microglobulin measure, and the presence of del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation, Dr. Bahlo said.
To develop the index, Dr. Bahlo and colleagues performed an analysis of 26 possible prognostic factors by using data from eight phase III trials from France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Poland. The data included a full analysis set of 3,742 previously untreated patients at early and advanced stages of disease. The median age of the patients was 61 years, the median observation time was 80 months, and the main endpoint was overall survival.
From the 26 variables, the researchers identified five independent predictors for overall survival: age (65 years or more), clinical stage (Binet A/Rai 0 vs. Binet B-C/Rai I-IV), del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation status, IgHV mutation status, and serum beta-2-microglobulin measure (3.5 mg/L or more).
The index was used to identify four risk groups – low risk (score 0-1), intermediate (score 2-3), high (score 4-6), and very high (score 7-10)) – with significantly different overall survival rates at 5 years of 93%, 79%, 64%, and 23%, respectively.
The value of the index was then confirmed in 575 patients, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 91%, 80%, 52%, and 19%, respectively.
Similar findings were seen in an external data set of patients from the Mayo Clinic data set, with 5-year overall survivals of 97%, 91%, 68%, and 21%, respectively. The CLL-IPI also provided accurate estimation regarding time to first treatment; 81%, 47%, 30%, and 19% of patients in the respective risk groups were free from treatment at 5 years.
In the era of more effective treatments for CLL, the established clinical staging systems (Rai and Binet) do not accurately discriminate between prognostic groups because they do not integrate the major clinical, biologic, and genetic variables into one widely accepted prognostic system, Dr. Bahlo noted. The CLL-IPI is, therefore, an important contribution to management of this condition.
The researchers had no relevant financial disclosures.
An international prognostic index for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may help to inform treatment decisions, based on a meta-analysis presented at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
The International Prognostic Index for patients with CLL (CLL-IPI) combines the most important genetic risk factors and traditional clinical stage, age, and serum beta-2-microglobulin measures. By discriminating between prognostic groups, the index may aid in informing treatment of CLL patients, Dr. Jasmin Bahlo of the University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany, said.
The CLL-IPI consists of five risk factors – age, clinical stage, IgHV (immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable-region) gene mutation status, serum beta-2-microglobulin measure, and the presence of del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation, Dr. Bahlo said.
To develop the index, Dr. Bahlo and colleagues performed an analysis of 26 possible prognostic factors by using data from eight phase III trials from France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Poland. The data included a full analysis set of 3,742 previously untreated patients at early and advanced stages of disease. The median age of the patients was 61 years, the median observation time was 80 months, and the main endpoint was overall survival.
From the 26 variables, the researchers identified five independent predictors for overall survival: age (65 years or more), clinical stage (Binet A/Rai 0 vs. Binet B-C/Rai I-IV), del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation status, IgHV mutation status, and serum beta-2-microglobulin measure (3.5 mg/L or more).
The index was used to identify four risk groups – low risk (score 0-1), intermediate (score 2-3), high (score 4-6), and very high (score 7-10)) – with significantly different overall survival rates at 5 years of 93%, 79%, 64%, and 23%, respectively.
The value of the index was then confirmed in 575 patients, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 91%, 80%, 52%, and 19%, respectively.
Similar findings were seen in an external data set of patients from the Mayo Clinic data set, with 5-year overall survivals of 97%, 91%, 68%, and 21%, respectively. The CLL-IPI also provided accurate estimation regarding time to first treatment; 81%, 47%, 30%, and 19% of patients in the respective risk groups were free from treatment at 5 years.
In the era of more effective treatments for CLL, the established clinical staging systems (Rai and Binet) do not accurately discriminate between prognostic groups because they do not integrate the major clinical, biologic, and genetic variables into one widely accepted prognostic system, Dr. Bahlo noted. The CLL-IPI is, therefore, an important contribution to management of this condition.
The researchers had no relevant financial disclosures.
FROM 13-ICML
Key clinical point: An international prognostic index for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia may help to inform treatment decisions.
Major finding: The index was used to identify four risk groups – low risk (score 0-1), intermediate (score 2-3), high (score 4-6), and very high (score 7-10)) – with significantly different overall survival rates at 5 years of 93%, 79%, 64%, and 23%, respectively.
Data source: A multivariate analysis of 3,742 previously untreated patients at early and advanced CLL stages.
Disclosures: The researchers had no relevant financial disclosures.
Interim PET results guide ongoing therapy in Hodgkin lymphoma
Bleomycin can be eliminated after two cycles of the ABVD chemotherapeutic regimen based on a negative interim PET scan finding in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, according to the 3-year findings of the RATHL study.
Being able to omit bleomycin after a negative interim PET scan was associated with a lower rate of pulmonary toxicity, but no loss in efficacy. For patients with positive interim PET scans, a more aggressive therapy was associated with good outcomes, suggesting that response-adapted therapy can yield good results, Dr. Peter Johnson said at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
In the large international RATHL study (Response-Adapted Therapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma study) 1,137 adults with newly diagnosed disease (41% stage II, 31% stage III, 28% stage IV) underwent PET-CT scans at baseline and after completing two cycles of ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine). The patients’ PET images were centrally reviewed using a 5-point scale as either negative (1-3) or positive (4-5),
The majority of patients (84%) had negative scans after two cycles of the ABVD regimen and were randomized to receive four additional cycles either with or without bleomycin (ABVD or AVD). Consolidation radiotherapy was not advised for patients whose interim PET scans were negative, regardless of baseline bulk or residual masses, Dr. Johnson, of the Cancer Research UK Centre at University of Southampton, England, reported.
Patients with positive interim PET scans received escalated therapy with a BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin [Adriamycin], cyclophosphamide, vincristine [Oncovin], procarbazine, prednisolone) regimen. They received either eBEACOPP and BEASCOPP-14.
At the 3-year follow-up, progression-free survival in the PET-negative group was 85% for both the ABVD- and AVD-treated patients. Similarly, overall survival was 97% for both groups.
Factors that predicted treatment failure after a negative interim PET scan were initial tumor stage and international prognostic score, but not bulk, B symptoms, or score of the interim PET scan.
ABVD was associated with more pulmonary toxicity than was AVD.
Of 174 patients who had a positive interim PET scan and received escalated therapy, 74% had a subsequent negative PET scan after treatment. Their 3-year, progression-free survival rate was 68%, and their overall survival was 86% with no difference in outcome between two variations of BEACOPP (eBEACOPP and BEASCOPP-14).
Of the 53 deaths in the study, 19 were caused by Hodgkin lymphoma. The overall 3-year progression-free survival is 83%, and overall survival is 95%.
The results of the RATHL study have important implications for therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma, Dr. Johnson stated. First, interim PET scans are highly predictive for response to ABVD, providing valuable prognostic information to support decisions related to escalation of therapy. Secondly, after two cycles of ABVD, “it is safe to omit bleomycin from subsequent cycles, without consolidation radiotherapy,” he reported.
Omitting bleomycin has the potential to reduce pulmonary toxicity from chemotherapy, especially dyspnea, thromboembolism, and neutropenic fever, Dr. Johnson added. In the RATHL study, rates of pulmonary toxicity were significantly higher in the group receiving bleomycin.
This large randomized phase 3 RATHL trial has practice changing implications for advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma. This trial had a simple straightforward design uniting two themes in Hodgkin research: (1) desire to minimizeor omit bleomycin due to its somewhat unpredictable pulmonary toxicity; and (2) utilizing early PET response- adapted strategies, though most such studies have focused on early stage patients. This trial demonstrates that patients with advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma who achieve PET negativity after 2 cycles of ABVD, representing 84% of patients, do not need to be exposed to bleomycin during the last 4 cycles, reducing pulmonary toxicity. This has immediate clinical utility. Whether this can be extrapolated to early stage patients remains an interesting research question.
This large randomized phase 3 RATHL trial has practice changing implications for advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma. This trial had a simple straightforward design uniting two themes in Hodgkin research: (1) desire to minimizeor omit bleomycin due to its somewhat unpredictable pulmonary toxicity; and (2) utilizing early PET response- adapted strategies, though most such studies have focused on early stage patients. This trial demonstrates that patients with advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma who achieve PET negativity after 2 cycles of ABVD, representing 84% of patients, do not need to be exposed to bleomycin during the last 4 cycles, reducing pulmonary toxicity. This has immediate clinical utility. Whether this can be extrapolated to early stage patients remains an interesting research question.
This large randomized phase 3 RATHL trial has practice changing implications for advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma. This trial had a simple straightforward design uniting two themes in Hodgkin research: (1) desire to minimizeor omit bleomycin due to its somewhat unpredictable pulmonary toxicity; and (2) utilizing early PET response- adapted strategies, though most such studies have focused on early stage patients. This trial demonstrates that patients with advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma who achieve PET negativity after 2 cycles of ABVD, representing 84% of patients, do not need to be exposed to bleomycin during the last 4 cycles, reducing pulmonary toxicity. This has immediate clinical utility. Whether this can be extrapolated to early stage patients remains an interesting research question.
Bleomycin can be eliminated after two cycles of the ABVD chemotherapeutic regimen based on a negative interim PET scan finding in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, according to the 3-year findings of the RATHL study.
Being able to omit bleomycin after a negative interim PET scan was associated with a lower rate of pulmonary toxicity, but no loss in efficacy. For patients with positive interim PET scans, a more aggressive therapy was associated with good outcomes, suggesting that response-adapted therapy can yield good results, Dr. Peter Johnson said at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
In the large international RATHL study (Response-Adapted Therapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma study) 1,137 adults with newly diagnosed disease (41% stage II, 31% stage III, 28% stage IV) underwent PET-CT scans at baseline and after completing two cycles of ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine). The patients’ PET images were centrally reviewed using a 5-point scale as either negative (1-3) or positive (4-5),
The majority of patients (84%) had negative scans after two cycles of the ABVD regimen and were randomized to receive four additional cycles either with or without bleomycin (ABVD or AVD). Consolidation radiotherapy was not advised for patients whose interim PET scans were negative, regardless of baseline bulk or residual masses, Dr. Johnson, of the Cancer Research UK Centre at University of Southampton, England, reported.
Patients with positive interim PET scans received escalated therapy with a BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin [Adriamycin], cyclophosphamide, vincristine [Oncovin], procarbazine, prednisolone) regimen. They received either eBEACOPP and BEASCOPP-14.
At the 3-year follow-up, progression-free survival in the PET-negative group was 85% for both the ABVD- and AVD-treated patients. Similarly, overall survival was 97% for both groups.
Factors that predicted treatment failure after a negative interim PET scan were initial tumor stage and international prognostic score, but not bulk, B symptoms, or score of the interim PET scan.
ABVD was associated with more pulmonary toxicity than was AVD.
Of 174 patients who had a positive interim PET scan and received escalated therapy, 74% had a subsequent negative PET scan after treatment. Their 3-year, progression-free survival rate was 68%, and their overall survival was 86% with no difference in outcome between two variations of BEACOPP (eBEACOPP and BEASCOPP-14).
Of the 53 deaths in the study, 19 were caused by Hodgkin lymphoma. The overall 3-year progression-free survival is 83%, and overall survival is 95%.
The results of the RATHL study have important implications for therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma, Dr. Johnson stated. First, interim PET scans are highly predictive for response to ABVD, providing valuable prognostic information to support decisions related to escalation of therapy. Secondly, after two cycles of ABVD, “it is safe to omit bleomycin from subsequent cycles, without consolidation radiotherapy,” he reported.
Omitting bleomycin has the potential to reduce pulmonary toxicity from chemotherapy, especially dyspnea, thromboembolism, and neutropenic fever, Dr. Johnson added. In the RATHL study, rates of pulmonary toxicity were significantly higher in the group receiving bleomycin.
Bleomycin can be eliminated after two cycles of the ABVD chemotherapeutic regimen based on a negative interim PET scan finding in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, according to the 3-year findings of the RATHL study.
Being able to omit bleomycin after a negative interim PET scan was associated with a lower rate of pulmonary toxicity, but no loss in efficacy. For patients with positive interim PET scans, a more aggressive therapy was associated with good outcomes, suggesting that response-adapted therapy can yield good results, Dr. Peter Johnson said at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
In the large international RATHL study (Response-Adapted Therapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma study) 1,137 adults with newly diagnosed disease (41% stage II, 31% stage III, 28% stage IV) underwent PET-CT scans at baseline and after completing two cycles of ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine). The patients’ PET images were centrally reviewed using a 5-point scale as either negative (1-3) or positive (4-5),
The majority of patients (84%) had negative scans after two cycles of the ABVD regimen and were randomized to receive four additional cycles either with or without bleomycin (ABVD or AVD). Consolidation radiotherapy was not advised for patients whose interim PET scans were negative, regardless of baseline bulk or residual masses, Dr. Johnson, of the Cancer Research UK Centre at University of Southampton, England, reported.
Patients with positive interim PET scans received escalated therapy with a BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin [Adriamycin], cyclophosphamide, vincristine [Oncovin], procarbazine, prednisolone) regimen. They received either eBEACOPP and BEASCOPP-14.
At the 3-year follow-up, progression-free survival in the PET-negative group was 85% for both the ABVD- and AVD-treated patients. Similarly, overall survival was 97% for both groups.
Factors that predicted treatment failure after a negative interim PET scan were initial tumor stage and international prognostic score, but not bulk, B symptoms, or score of the interim PET scan.
ABVD was associated with more pulmonary toxicity than was AVD.
Of 174 patients who had a positive interim PET scan and received escalated therapy, 74% had a subsequent negative PET scan after treatment. Their 3-year, progression-free survival rate was 68%, and their overall survival was 86% with no difference in outcome between two variations of BEACOPP (eBEACOPP and BEASCOPP-14).
Of the 53 deaths in the study, 19 were caused by Hodgkin lymphoma. The overall 3-year progression-free survival is 83%, and overall survival is 95%.
The results of the RATHL study have important implications for therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma, Dr. Johnson stated. First, interim PET scans are highly predictive for response to ABVD, providing valuable prognostic information to support decisions related to escalation of therapy. Secondly, after two cycles of ABVD, “it is safe to omit bleomycin from subsequent cycles, without consolidation radiotherapy,” he reported.
Omitting bleomycin has the potential to reduce pulmonary toxicity from chemotherapy, especially dyspnea, thromboembolism, and neutropenic fever, Dr. Johnson added. In the RATHL study, rates of pulmonary toxicity were significantly higher in the group receiving bleomycin.
AT 13-ICML
Key clinical point: Bleomycin can be eliminated after two cycles of the ABVD chemotherapeutic regimen based on a negative interim PET scan finding in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.
Major finding: At the 3-year follow-up, progression-free survival in the PET-negative group was 85% for both the ABVD- and AVD-treated patients. Similarly, overall survival was 97% for both groups.
Data source: The international RATHL study (Response-Adapted Therapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma study).
Disclosures: The study was supported by Cancer Research UK, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre (ECMC), and the National Institute for Health Research Cancer Research Network (NCRN). The researchers had no relevant financial disclosures.
RBAC500 safe, effective for elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma
Reducing the dose of cytarabine from 800 mg/m2 to 500 mg/m2 allowed a regimen of rituximab, bendamustine, and cytarabine to be safely administered as first-line therapy to elderly patients who had mantle cell lymphoma and were not candidates for autologous stem cell transplant, according to Dr. Carlo Visco of the San Bortolo Hospital in Vicenza, Italy.
“Hematologic toxicity was substantially reduced, compared to the earlier study, Dr. Visco said, calling the R-BAC500 regimen “a highly effective treatment” for patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Speaking at the at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland, Dr. Visco noted the “encouraging results, but high hematologic toxicity” seen in a previous study that employed the higher cytarabine dose. In that previous study, transient grades 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 76% of cycles.
In an attempt to reduce hematologic toxicity, the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi designed a phase II trial in which the cytarabine dose was lowered to 500 mg/m2 (R-BAC500). The administration schedule of cytarabine (on days 2-4) and the other components of the original regimen (rituximab, 375 mg/m2, on day 1 and bendamustine, 70 mg/m2, on days 2 and 3) remained unchanged.
The 57 study subjects, median age 71, had newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma, and were not eligible for autologous transplant as determined by the comprehensive geriatric assessment; 75% of the patients were males and 91% had Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease.
The Mantle Cell International Prognostic Index (MIPI) was low in 15%, intermediate in 40%, and high in 45%; 9% had the blastoid variant of the disease.
The primary endpoints were complete remission rate, as measured by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose–PET, according to Cheson criteria 2007, and safety. Secondary endpoints included molecular response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.
The overall response rate was 96%, and the complete remission rate was 93%. The molecular response rate at the end of treatment was 76% on peripheral blood and 55% on bone marrow samples. With a median follow-up of 18 months, the projected 2-year progression-free survival was 83%, and the overall survival was 91% without maintenance therapy.
Nearly all patients, 53 of 57, received at least four cycles of therapy, and 36 had six cycles. Treatment was discontinued because of toxicity (primarily hematologic) in 15 patients. Only one patient discontinued because of progressive disease.
Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in about half of administered cycles. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 6%. Extrahematologic toxicity was mainly cardiac (5%).
BR is a commonly used regimen for older, less fit patients with MCL. Inclusion of high dose cytarabine appears to be beneficial n younger patients with MCL, particularly in induction pre-SCT. The FIL has been investigating intermediate doses of cytarabine combined, rather than alternating, with BR. This phase 2 study utilized cytarabine 500 mg/m2 daily x 3 with BR (slightly lower than standard dose bendamustine). The patient population was older with predominantly intermediate-high MIPI, yet results were impressive, particularly the PET negative rate of 93% and marrow MRD negative rate of 55%. Follow-up is short, but remissions do appear durable. Concerns are the high number of patients unable to complete planned therapy, the high rate of grade 3 and 4 cytopenias, and the frequency of visits required for close blood count monitoring and blood product support.
BR is a commonly used regimen for older, less fit patients with MCL. Inclusion of high dose cytarabine appears to be beneficial n younger patients with MCL, particularly in induction pre-SCT. The FIL has been investigating intermediate doses of cytarabine combined, rather than alternating, with BR. This phase 2 study utilized cytarabine 500 mg/m2 daily x 3 with BR (slightly lower than standard dose bendamustine). The patient population was older with predominantly intermediate-high MIPI, yet results were impressive, particularly the PET negative rate of 93% and marrow MRD negative rate of 55%. Follow-up is short, but remissions do appear durable. Concerns are the high number of patients unable to complete planned therapy, the high rate of grade 3 and 4 cytopenias, and the frequency of visits required for close blood count monitoring and blood product support.
BR is a commonly used regimen for older, less fit patients with MCL. Inclusion of high dose cytarabine appears to be beneficial n younger patients with MCL, particularly in induction pre-SCT. The FIL has been investigating intermediate doses of cytarabine combined, rather than alternating, with BR. This phase 2 study utilized cytarabine 500 mg/m2 daily x 3 with BR (slightly lower than standard dose bendamustine). The patient population was older with predominantly intermediate-high MIPI, yet results were impressive, particularly the PET negative rate of 93% and marrow MRD negative rate of 55%. Follow-up is short, but remissions do appear durable. Concerns are the high number of patients unable to complete planned therapy, the high rate of grade 3 and 4 cytopenias, and the frequency of visits required for close blood count monitoring and blood product support.
Reducing the dose of cytarabine from 800 mg/m2 to 500 mg/m2 allowed a regimen of rituximab, bendamustine, and cytarabine to be safely administered as first-line therapy to elderly patients who had mantle cell lymphoma and were not candidates for autologous stem cell transplant, according to Dr. Carlo Visco of the San Bortolo Hospital in Vicenza, Italy.
“Hematologic toxicity was substantially reduced, compared to the earlier study, Dr. Visco said, calling the R-BAC500 regimen “a highly effective treatment” for patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Speaking at the at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland, Dr. Visco noted the “encouraging results, but high hematologic toxicity” seen in a previous study that employed the higher cytarabine dose. In that previous study, transient grades 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 76% of cycles.
In an attempt to reduce hematologic toxicity, the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi designed a phase II trial in which the cytarabine dose was lowered to 500 mg/m2 (R-BAC500). The administration schedule of cytarabine (on days 2-4) and the other components of the original regimen (rituximab, 375 mg/m2, on day 1 and bendamustine, 70 mg/m2, on days 2 and 3) remained unchanged.
The 57 study subjects, median age 71, had newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma, and were not eligible for autologous transplant as determined by the comprehensive geriatric assessment; 75% of the patients were males and 91% had Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease.
The Mantle Cell International Prognostic Index (MIPI) was low in 15%, intermediate in 40%, and high in 45%; 9% had the blastoid variant of the disease.
The primary endpoints were complete remission rate, as measured by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose–PET, according to Cheson criteria 2007, and safety. Secondary endpoints included molecular response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.
The overall response rate was 96%, and the complete remission rate was 93%. The molecular response rate at the end of treatment was 76% on peripheral blood and 55% on bone marrow samples. With a median follow-up of 18 months, the projected 2-year progression-free survival was 83%, and the overall survival was 91% without maintenance therapy.
Nearly all patients, 53 of 57, received at least four cycles of therapy, and 36 had six cycles. Treatment was discontinued because of toxicity (primarily hematologic) in 15 patients. Only one patient discontinued because of progressive disease.
Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in about half of administered cycles. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 6%. Extrahematologic toxicity was mainly cardiac (5%).
Reducing the dose of cytarabine from 800 mg/m2 to 500 mg/m2 allowed a regimen of rituximab, bendamustine, and cytarabine to be safely administered as first-line therapy to elderly patients who had mantle cell lymphoma and were not candidates for autologous stem cell transplant, according to Dr. Carlo Visco of the San Bortolo Hospital in Vicenza, Italy.
“Hematologic toxicity was substantially reduced, compared to the earlier study, Dr. Visco said, calling the R-BAC500 regimen “a highly effective treatment” for patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Speaking at the at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland, Dr. Visco noted the “encouraging results, but high hematologic toxicity” seen in a previous study that employed the higher cytarabine dose. In that previous study, transient grades 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 76% of cycles.
In an attempt to reduce hematologic toxicity, the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi designed a phase II trial in which the cytarabine dose was lowered to 500 mg/m2 (R-BAC500). The administration schedule of cytarabine (on days 2-4) and the other components of the original regimen (rituximab, 375 mg/m2, on day 1 and bendamustine, 70 mg/m2, on days 2 and 3) remained unchanged.
The 57 study subjects, median age 71, had newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma, and were not eligible for autologous transplant as determined by the comprehensive geriatric assessment; 75% of the patients were males and 91% had Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease.
The Mantle Cell International Prognostic Index (MIPI) was low in 15%, intermediate in 40%, and high in 45%; 9% had the blastoid variant of the disease.
The primary endpoints were complete remission rate, as measured by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose–PET, according to Cheson criteria 2007, and safety. Secondary endpoints included molecular response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.
The overall response rate was 96%, and the complete remission rate was 93%. The molecular response rate at the end of treatment was 76% on peripheral blood and 55% on bone marrow samples. With a median follow-up of 18 months, the projected 2-year progression-free survival was 83%, and the overall survival was 91% without maintenance therapy.
Nearly all patients, 53 of 57, received at least four cycles of therapy, and 36 had six cycles. Treatment was discontinued because of toxicity (primarily hematologic) in 15 patients. Only one patient discontinued because of progressive disease.
Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in about half of administered cycles. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 6%. Extrahematologic toxicity was mainly cardiac (5%).
FROM 13-ICML
Key clinical point: Reducing the dose of cytarabine from 800 mg/m2 to 500 mg/m2 allowed a regimen of rituximab, bendamustine, and cytarabine to be safely administered as first-line therapy to elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Major finding: Nearly all patients, 53 of 57, received at least four cycles of therapy, and 36 had six cycles. Treatment was discontinued because of toxicity (primarily hematologic) in 15 patients.
Data source: 57 study subjects, median age 71, who had newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma and were not eligible for autologous transplant as determined by the comprehensive geriatric assessment.
Disclosures: The trial was conducted by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. There were no relevant financial disclosures.
No signal for the superiority of autologous versus allogenic stem-cell transplants in T-cell lymphoma
A randomized trial designed to compare autologous to allogeneic stem cell transplantation as first-line therapy in younger patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma was discontinued early because nearly 40% of the patients had early disease progression and did not undergo transplantation.
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma generally yields a poor prognosis when treated with conventional chemotherapy, but autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplants were thought to be an option for patients with relapsing or refractory disease. Based on this hypothesis, the AATT (Autologous or Allogeneic Transplantation in T-Cell Lymphoma) study explored stem cell transplant as a first-line therapy, enrolling 104 patients aged 18-60 between 2011 and 2014.
All patients received four courses of chemotherapy with CHOEP-14 (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone).
Those in the autologous stem cell group and those without a suitable donor proceeded to one course of DHAP (high-dose ara-C, cis-platinum, and dexamethasone) and stem cell collection. Patients randomized to autologous transplantation received high dose therapy (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan: BEAM) followed 4-6 weeks later by transplantation of autologous stem cells.
Patients randomized to allogeneic transplantation received high dose therapy (fludarabine, busulfan, cyclophosphamide: FBC) followed by transplantation of allogeneic stem cells. GvHD prophylaxis included antithymocyte globuline (ATG), cyclosporine A, and mycophenolate mofetil.
Among the 58 patients eligible for the interim analysis, the mean age was 50 and 64% were male. Thirteen of the 28 patients randomized for allogeneic transplants underwent transplants; the others were not allografted because of progressive disease or lack of a donor. Of the 30 patients randomized to autologous SCT, 19 had the procedure; 11 did not receive transplants because of progressive disease or infection, Dr. Norbert Schmitz of Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany, reported at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
The primary outcome, 1-year event-free survival (EFS), was 41% in the intent-to-treat population (95% CI, 27%–54%).
Causes of death included lymphoma (seven autologous, five allogeneic), salvage therapy (two), early or late infections (four), and graft vs. host disease (two).
Survival rates did not significantly differ in the two stem cell transplant groups, but the findings lend themselves to limited interpretation as more than 30% of patients did not receive the procedure. Based on the low probability of meeting the primary outcome, the data safety monitoring board decided to stop patient accrual and discontinue the trial.
*This article was updated 7/8/2015.
As outcomes for patients with PTCL are suboptimal with standard therapy, usually CHOP/CHOEP, young and fit patients are commonly offered high dose chemotherapy with stem cell support (SCT) to consolidate 1st remission, though no firm data support this approach. As a trial of SCT vs observation would be difficult to accomplish, the AATT trail was undertaken to compare autologous vs allogeneic transplantation. The trial was not able to answer this question as it was halted early due to the high proportion of patients unable to proceed to SCT. One lesson here is that data reported for PTCL patients who receive SCT in 1st remission suffers from selection bias, unless accompanied by an intent-to-treat analysis. There is a clear need for improved induction therapy for PTCL.
As outcomes for patients with PTCL are suboptimal with standard therapy, usually CHOP/CHOEP, young and fit patients are commonly offered high dose chemotherapy with stem cell support (SCT) to consolidate 1st remission, though no firm data support this approach. As a trial of SCT vs observation would be difficult to accomplish, the AATT trail was undertaken to compare autologous vs allogeneic transplantation. The trial was not able to answer this question as it was halted early due to the high proportion of patients unable to proceed to SCT. One lesson here is that data reported for PTCL patients who receive SCT in 1st remission suffers from selection bias, unless accompanied by an intent-to-treat analysis. There is a clear need for improved induction therapy for PTCL.
As outcomes for patients with PTCL are suboptimal with standard therapy, usually CHOP/CHOEP, young and fit patients are commonly offered high dose chemotherapy with stem cell support (SCT) to consolidate 1st remission, though no firm data support this approach. As a trial of SCT vs observation would be difficult to accomplish, the AATT trail was undertaken to compare autologous vs allogeneic transplantation. The trial was not able to answer this question as it was halted early due to the high proportion of patients unable to proceed to SCT. One lesson here is that data reported for PTCL patients who receive SCT in 1st remission suffers from selection bias, unless accompanied by an intent-to-treat analysis. There is a clear need for improved induction therapy for PTCL.
A randomized trial designed to compare autologous to allogeneic stem cell transplantation as first-line therapy in younger patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma was discontinued early because nearly 40% of the patients had early disease progression and did not undergo transplantation.
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma generally yields a poor prognosis when treated with conventional chemotherapy, but autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplants were thought to be an option for patients with relapsing or refractory disease. Based on this hypothesis, the AATT (Autologous or Allogeneic Transplantation in T-Cell Lymphoma) study explored stem cell transplant as a first-line therapy, enrolling 104 patients aged 18-60 between 2011 and 2014.
All patients received four courses of chemotherapy with CHOEP-14 (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone).
Those in the autologous stem cell group and those without a suitable donor proceeded to one course of DHAP (high-dose ara-C, cis-platinum, and dexamethasone) and stem cell collection. Patients randomized to autologous transplantation received high dose therapy (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan: BEAM) followed 4-6 weeks later by transplantation of autologous stem cells.
Patients randomized to allogeneic transplantation received high dose therapy (fludarabine, busulfan, cyclophosphamide: FBC) followed by transplantation of allogeneic stem cells. GvHD prophylaxis included antithymocyte globuline (ATG), cyclosporine A, and mycophenolate mofetil.
Among the 58 patients eligible for the interim analysis, the mean age was 50 and 64% were male. Thirteen of the 28 patients randomized for allogeneic transplants underwent transplants; the others were not allografted because of progressive disease or lack of a donor. Of the 30 patients randomized to autologous SCT, 19 had the procedure; 11 did not receive transplants because of progressive disease or infection, Dr. Norbert Schmitz of Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany, reported at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
The primary outcome, 1-year event-free survival (EFS), was 41% in the intent-to-treat population (95% CI, 27%–54%).
Causes of death included lymphoma (seven autologous, five allogeneic), salvage therapy (two), early or late infections (four), and graft vs. host disease (two).
Survival rates did not significantly differ in the two stem cell transplant groups, but the findings lend themselves to limited interpretation as more than 30% of patients did not receive the procedure. Based on the low probability of meeting the primary outcome, the data safety monitoring board decided to stop patient accrual and discontinue the trial.
*This article was updated 7/8/2015.
A randomized trial designed to compare autologous to allogeneic stem cell transplantation as first-line therapy in younger patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma was discontinued early because nearly 40% of the patients had early disease progression and did not undergo transplantation.
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma generally yields a poor prognosis when treated with conventional chemotherapy, but autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplants were thought to be an option for patients with relapsing or refractory disease. Based on this hypothesis, the AATT (Autologous or Allogeneic Transplantation in T-Cell Lymphoma) study explored stem cell transplant as a first-line therapy, enrolling 104 patients aged 18-60 between 2011 and 2014.
All patients received four courses of chemotherapy with CHOEP-14 (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone).
Those in the autologous stem cell group and those without a suitable donor proceeded to one course of DHAP (high-dose ara-C, cis-platinum, and dexamethasone) and stem cell collection. Patients randomized to autologous transplantation received high dose therapy (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan: BEAM) followed 4-6 weeks later by transplantation of autologous stem cells.
Patients randomized to allogeneic transplantation received high dose therapy (fludarabine, busulfan, cyclophosphamide: FBC) followed by transplantation of allogeneic stem cells. GvHD prophylaxis included antithymocyte globuline (ATG), cyclosporine A, and mycophenolate mofetil.
Among the 58 patients eligible for the interim analysis, the mean age was 50 and 64% were male. Thirteen of the 28 patients randomized for allogeneic transplants underwent transplants; the others were not allografted because of progressive disease or lack of a donor. Of the 30 patients randomized to autologous SCT, 19 had the procedure; 11 did not receive transplants because of progressive disease or infection, Dr. Norbert Schmitz of Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany, reported at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
The primary outcome, 1-year event-free survival (EFS), was 41% in the intent-to-treat population (95% CI, 27%–54%).
Causes of death included lymphoma (seven autologous, five allogeneic), salvage therapy (two), early or late infections (four), and graft vs. host disease (two).
Survival rates did not significantly differ in the two stem cell transplant groups, but the findings lend themselves to limited interpretation as more than 30% of patients did not receive the procedure. Based on the low probability of meeting the primary outcome, the data safety monitoring board decided to stop patient accrual and discontinue the trial.
*This article was updated 7/8/2015.
FROM 13-ICML
Key clinical point: Survival rates did not significantly differ for autologous versus allogenic stem cell transplant in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma, but the findings lend themselves to limited interpretation as more than 30% of patients did not receive the procedures.
Major finding: Early disease progression led to the discontinuation of a randomized trial comparing autologous to allogeneic stem cell transplantation in younger patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma.
Data source: Results from 58 patients eligible for the interim analysis.
Disclosures: There were no relevant financial disclosures.
Bendamustine regimen may be induction-therapy option in mantle cell lymphoma
Rituximab plus bendamustine may prove to be an induction-therapy option for younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma, Dr. Richard Chen and his colleagues in a SWOG (Southwest Oncology Group) trial reported at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
Compared with a more aggressive combination regimen, a rituximab plus bendamustine (Treanda) option is a simple regimen that can be given in an outpatient setting and was associated with fewer adverse events and similar 2-year outcomes, the researchers found. The more aggressive regimen, however, was associated with lower-than-expected stem cell mobilization rates and the trial was prematurely closed, allowing no significant results.
For this study, two induction-therapy regimens were compared in 53 patients with untreated stage III or IV (or bulky stage II) mantle cell lymphoma. All patients were less than age 65 years and received rituximab (R) in combination with one of two regimens: 18 patients received four cycles of R-HyperCVAD + methotrexate + cytarabine (R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C) and 35 patients received six cycles of R-bendamustine.
The overall response rate was 94% with R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 86% with R-bendamustine; the complete response rates were 31% and 43%, respectively; the partial response rates were 62% and 43%, respectively, Dr. Chen and his associates reported.
The median follow-up for surviving patients is nearly 24 months. The estimated 2-year progression-free survival was 87% for patients in both treatment groups.
Significantly higher rates of bone marrow toxicity occurred in the group receiving the R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C regimen, compared with the bendamustine regimen. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 69% given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 17% given R-bendamustine. Anemia affected 56% of those given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 8.6% given R-bendamustine. Neutropenia was seen in 63% given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 34% of patients given R-bendamustine. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 31% given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 14% given R-bendamustine.
The study was discontinued prematurely because of the low mobilization of stem cells at the transplant phase of the study in patients given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C. Just 4 of 16 patients on R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 21 of 35 patients given R-bendamustine underwent autologous stem cell transplants.
The R-bendamustine regimen seems less myelosuppressive. Because of the premature closure of the trial, the study did not reach statistical significance for 2-year progression-free survival, the researchers reported. Since bendamustine in combination with rituximab was associated with lower rates of hematologic toxicity, however, it warrants further study as an induction regimen, they concluded.
Young, fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are often treated with intensive, though non-curative, therapy. While some centers still use R-HyperCVAD/MA alone, most use alternating R-CHOP-based and high dose cytarabine-based regimens, followed by SCT. The U.S. Intergroup trial, led by SWOG, was designed to gather information about a strategy using a limited number of cycles of R-HyperCVAD/MA followed by SCT, and an alternative strategy using an effective but less-intense induction, bendamustine-rituximab (BR), also followed by SCT. The R-HyperCVAD/MA arm was closed early due to difficulties with stem cell collection. While there are technical reasons for this that likely could be overcome, results with other pre-SCT regimens are good enough that this is not likely to be further studied. The BR followed by SCT arm was closed after accrual of 35 patients, enough to get a sense that this was feasible, although it will be important to see further updates regarding how many of these patients did go on to SCT, and their ultimate outcomes. A key question is whether a study comparing BR induction with a different, commonly used intense regimen pre-SCT is worth the commitment of resources, given the range of novel agents now available for MCL.
Dr. Mitchell Smith is a medical oncologist affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic.
Young, fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are often treated with intensive, though non-curative, therapy. While some centers still use R-HyperCVAD/MA alone, most use alternating R-CHOP-based and high dose cytarabine-based regimens, followed by SCT. The U.S. Intergroup trial, led by SWOG, was designed to gather information about a strategy using a limited number of cycles of R-HyperCVAD/MA followed by SCT, and an alternative strategy using an effective but less-intense induction, bendamustine-rituximab (BR), also followed by SCT. The R-HyperCVAD/MA arm was closed early due to difficulties with stem cell collection. While there are technical reasons for this that likely could be overcome, results with other pre-SCT regimens are good enough that this is not likely to be further studied. The BR followed by SCT arm was closed after accrual of 35 patients, enough to get a sense that this was feasible, although it will be important to see further updates regarding how many of these patients did go on to SCT, and their ultimate outcomes. A key question is whether a study comparing BR induction with a different, commonly used intense regimen pre-SCT is worth the commitment of resources, given the range of novel agents now available for MCL.
Dr. Mitchell Smith is a medical oncologist affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic.
Young, fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are often treated with intensive, though non-curative, therapy. While some centers still use R-HyperCVAD/MA alone, most use alternating R-CHOP-based and high dose cytarabine-based regimens, followed by SCT. The U.S. Intergroup trial, led by SWOG, was designed to gather information about a strategy using a limited number of cycles of R-HyperCVAD/MA followed by SCT, and an alternative strategy using an effective but less-intense induction, bendamustine-rituximab (BR), also followed by SCT. The R-HyperCVAD/MA arm was closed early due to difficulties with stem cell collection. While there are technical reasons for this that likely could be overcome, results with other pre-SCT regimens are good enough that this is not likely to be further studied. The BR followed by SCT arm was closed after accrual of 35 patients, enough to get a sense that this was feasible, although it will be important to see further updates regarding how many of these patients did go on to SCT, and their ultimate outcomes. A key question is whether a study comparing BR induction with a different, commonly used intense regimen pre-SCT is worth the commitment of resources, given the range of novel agents now available for MCL.
Dr. Mitchell Smith is a medical oncologist affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic.
Rituximab plus bendamustine may prove to be an induction-therapy option for younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma, Dr. Richard Chen and his colleagues in a SWOG (Southwest Oncology Group) trial reported at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
Compared with a more aggressive combination regimen, a rituximab plus bendamustine (Treanda) option is a simple regimen that can be given in an outpatient setting and was associated with fewer adverse events and similar 2-year outcomes, the researchers found. The more aggressive regimen, however, was associated with lower-than-expected stem cell mobilization rates and the trial was prematurely closed, allowing no significant results.
For this study, two induction-therapy regimens were compared in 53 patients with untreated stage III or IV (or bulky stage II) mantle cell lymphoma. All patients were less than age 65 years and received rituximab (R) in combination with one of two regimens: 18 patients received four cycles of R-HyperCVAD + methotrexate + cytarabine (R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C) and 35 patients received six cycles of R-bendamustine.
The overall response rate was 94% with R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 86% with R-bendamustine; the complete response rates were 31% and 43%, respectively; the partial response rates were 62% and 43%, respectively, Dr. Chen and his associates reported.
The median follow-up for surviving patients is nearly 24 months. The estimated 2-year progression-free survival was 87% for patients in both treatment groups.
Significantly higher rates of bone marrow toxicity occurred in the group receiving the R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C regimen, compared with the bendamustine regimen. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 69% given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 17% given R-bendamustine. Anemia affected 56% of those given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 8.6% given R-bendamustine. Neutropenia was seen in 63% given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 34% of patients given R-bendamustine. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 31% given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 14% given R-bendamustine.
The study was discontinued prematurely because of the low mobilization of stem cells at the transplant phase of the study in patients given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C. Just 4 of 16 patients on R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 21 of 35 patients given R-bendamustine underwent autologous stem cell transplants.
The R-bendamustine regimen seems less myelosuppressive. Because of the premature closure of the trial, the study did not reach statistical significance for 2-year progression-free survival, the researchers reported. Since bendamustine in combination with rituximab was associated with lower rates of hematologic toxicity, however, it warrants further study as an induction regimen, they concluded.
Rituximab plus bendamustine may prove to be an induction-therapy option for younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma, Dr. Richard Chen and his colleagues in a SWOG (Southwest Oncology Group) trial reported at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
Compared with a more aggressive combination regimen, a rituximab plus bendamustine (Treanda) option is a simple regimen that can be given in an outpatient setting and was associated with fewer adverse events and similar 2-year outcomes, the researchers found. The more aggressive regimen, however, was associated with lower-than-expected stem cell mobilization rates and the trial was prematurely closed, allowing no significant results.
For this study, two induction-therapy regimens were compared in 53 patients with untreated stage III or IV (or bulky stage II) mantle cell lymphoma. All patients were less than age 65 years and received rituximab (R) in combination with one of two regimens: 18 patients received four cycles of R-HyperCVAD + methotrexate + cytarabine (R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C) and 35 patients received six cycles of R-bendamustine.
The overall response rate was 94% with R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 86% with R-bendamustine; the complete response rates were 31% and 43%, respectively; the partial response rates were 62% and 43%, respectively, Dr. Chen and his associates reported.
The median follow-up for surviving patients is nearly 24 months. The estimated 2-year progression-free survival was 87% for patients in both treatment groups.
Significantly higher rates of bone marrow toxicity occurred in the group receiving the R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C regimen, compared with the bendamustine regimen. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 69% given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 17% given R-bendamustine. Anemia affected 56% of those given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 8.6% given R-bendamustine. Neutropenia was seen in 63% given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 34% of patients given R-bendamustine. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 31% given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 14% given R-bendamustine.
The study was discontinued prematurely because of the low mobilization of stem cells at the transplant phase of the study in patients given R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C. Just 4 of 16 patients on R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 21 of 35 patients given R-bendamustine underwent autologous stem cell transplants.
The R-bendamustine regimen seems less myelosuppressive. Because of the premature closure of the trial, the study did not reach statistical significance for 2-year progression-free survival, the researchers reported. Since bendamustine in combination with rituximab was associated with lower rates of hematologic toxicity, however, it warrants further study as an induction regimen, they concluded.
FROM 13-ICML
Key clinical point: Rituximab plus bendamustine may prove to be an option for induction therapy prior to autologous stem cell transplant in patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Major finding: The overall response rate was 94% with R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARA-C and 86% with R-bendamustine; the complete response rates were 31% and 43%, respectively; the partial response rates were 62% and 43%, respectively.
Data source: 53 patients with untreated stage III or IV (or bulky stage II) mantle cell lymphoma.
Disclosures: The investigators did not report any conflicts.
Second pathology review boosts diagnostic accuracy in lymphoma
In patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma and suspected lymphoma, a second pathological review found inaccuracies in the original diagnosis among 17% of more than 42,000 cases, based on data presented at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
In more than 25% of all discrepancies, tumors were reclassified at the second pathology review as the result of findings from additional immunostaining and molecular studies – polymerase chain reaction and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
In 15% of cases, diagnostic changes were expected to result in a change in patient management.
“Our study highlights the importance of specialized centralized review of lymphoma diagnosis, not only in the setting of clinical trials but also in routine clinical practice, for optimal patient management,” reported Dr. Camille Laurent of the Institut Universitaire du Cancer Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
In 2010, the French National Cancer Agency (INCa) established the Lymphopath Network, comprising 33 reference centers, to provide a review by expert hematopathologists of every newly diagnosed lymphoma or suspected lymphoma prior to treatment. These new diagnoses were entered in a central national database. Between 2010 and 2015, 42,146 samples were reviewed: 35,753 were newly diagnosed as lymphomas, while the remaining 6,393 cases included 4,610 reactive lymphoid conditions and 1,783 nonlymphoid malignancies, including especially myeloma and leukemic disorders.
Discordant diagnoses among extra-cutaneous lymphomas were carefully examined by a hematologist and recorded as major or minor depending on the expected therapeutic impact. Dr. Laurent said.
The discordance rate between the referral diagnosis and the final diagnosis was 17.2%. Small B-cell lymphomas and peripheral T-cell lymphoma subtyping were the most common discrepancies; 6.4% of discordances were due to an unspecified lymphoma diagnosis, Dr. Laurent stated.
Less than 2% of discrepancies were due to misclassifications of benign versus malignant lymphoid conditions and of Hodgkin lymphoma versus non-Hodgkin lymphoma. There were minor discrepancies (2.2%) in follicular lymphoma misgrading and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtypes.
Given the complexity of lymphoma classification, it is not surprising that expert hematopathologists can refine diagnoses. As we progress in understanding the specific pathogenesis of lymphoma subtypes and utility of targeted therapy, it becomes even more critical to make correct diagnoses. This study reiterates the importance of expert review for many, if not all, lymphoma samples, particularly any T-cell lymphoma and non—follicular small B-cell lymphoma.
Given the complexity of lymphoma classification, it is not surprising that expert hematopathologists can refine diagnoses. As we progress in understanding the specific pathogenesis of lymphoma subtypes and utility of targeted therapy, it becomes even more critical to make correct diagnoses. This study reiterates the importance of expert review for many, if not all, lymphoma samples, particularly any T-cell lymphoma and non—follicular small B-cell lymphoma.
Given the complexity of lymphoma classification, it is not surprising that expert hematopathologists can refine diagnoses. As we progress in understanding the specific pathogenesis of lymphoma subtypes and utility of targeted therapy, it becomes even more critical to make correct diagnoses. This study reiterates the importance of expert review for many, if not all, lymphoma samples, particularly any T-cell lymphoma and non—follicular small B-cell lymphoma.
In patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma and suspected lymphoma, a second pathological review found inaccuracies in the original diagnosis among 17% of more than 42,000 cases, based on data presented at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
In more than 25% of all discrepancies, tumors were reclassified at the second pathology review as the result of findings from additional immunostaining and molecular studies – polymerase chain reaction and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
In 15% of cases, diagnostic changes were expected to result in a change in patient management.
“Our study highlights the importance of specialized centralized review of lymphoma diagnosis, not only in the setting of clinical trials but also in routine clinical practice, for optimal patient management,” reported Dr. Camille Laurent of the Institut Universitaire du Cancer Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
In 2010, the French National Cancer Agency (INCa) established the Lymphopath Network, comprising 33 reference centers, to provide a review by expert hematopathologists of every newly diagnosed lymphoma or suspected lymphoma prior to treatment. These new diagnoses were entered in a central national database. Between 2010 and 2015, 42,146 samples were reviewed: 35,753 were newly diagnosed as lymphomas, while the remaining 6,393 cases included 4,610 reactive lymphoid conditions and 1,783 nonlymphoid malignancies, including especially myeloma and leukemic disorders.
Discordant diagnoses among extra-cutaneous lymphomas were carefully examined by a hematologist and recorded as major or minor depending on the expected therapeutic impact. Dr. Laurent said.
The discordance rate between the referral diagnosis and the final diagnosis was 17.2%. Small B-cell lymphomas and peripheral T-cell lymphoma subtyping were the most common discrepancies; 6.4% of discordances were due to an unspecified lymphoma diagnosis, Dr. Laurent stated.
Less than 2% of discrepancies were due to misclassifications of benign versus malignant lymphoid conditions and of Hodgkin lymphoma versus non-Hodgkin lymphoma. There were minor discrepancies (2.2%) in follicular lymphoma misgrading and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtypes.
In patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma and suspected lymphoma, a second pathological review found inaccuracies in the original diagnosis among 17% of more than 42,000 cases, based on data presented at the International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland.
In more than 25% of all discrepancies, tumors were reclassified at the second pathology review as the result of findings from additional immunostaining and molecular studies – polymerase chain reaction and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
In 15% of cases, diagnostic changes were expected to result in a change in patient management.
“Our study highlights the importance of specialized centralized review of lymphoma diagnosis, not only in the setting of clinical trials but also in routine clinical practice, for optimal patient management,” reported Dr. Camille Laurent of the Institut Universitaire du Cancer Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
In 2010, the French National Cancer Agency (INCa) established the Lymphopath Network, comprising 33 reference centers, to provide a review by expert hematopathologists of every newly diagnosed lymphoma or suspected lymphoma prior to treatment. These new diagnoses were entered in a central national database. Between 2010 and 2015, 42,146 samples were reviewed: 35,753 were newly diagnosed as lymphomas, while the remaining 6,393 cases included 4,610 reactive lymphoid conditions and 1,783 nonlymphoid malignancies, including especially myeloma and leukemic disorders.
Discordant diagnoses among extra-cutaneous lymphomas were carefully examined by a hematologist and recorded as major or minor depending on the expected therapeutic impact. Dr. Laurent said.
The discordance rate between the referral diagnosis and the final diagnosis was 17.2%. Small B-cell lymphomas and peripheral T-cell lymphoma subtyping were the most common discrepancies; 6.4% of discordances were due to an unspecified lymphoma diagnosis, Dr. Laurent stated.
Less than 2% of discrepancies were due to misclassifications of benign versus malignant lymphoid conditions and of Hodgkin lymphoma versus non-Hodgkin lymphoma. There were minor discrepancies (2.2%) in follicular lymphoma misgrading and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtypes.
FROM 13-ICML
Key clinical point: A second pathological review of newly-diagnosed lymphoma or suspected lymphoma found discrepancies in 17% of cases.
Major finding: Small B-cell lymphomas and peripheral T-cell lymphoma subtyping were the most common discrepancies; 6.4% of discordances were due to an unspecified lymphoma diagnosis.
Data source: 42,146 samples from the French National Cancer Agency’s Lymphopath Network, comprising 33 reference centers.
Disclosures: Dr. Laurent had no relevant financial disclosures.