Lymphoma & Plasma Cell Disorders

Pediatric cancer patient

Photo by Bill Branson

Children with cancer can benefit from “adapted” physical activities, according to a pilot study published in ecancermedicalscience.

Investigators followed 11 cancer patients, ages 10 to 18, on a dog sledding expedition, which involved adapted training activities.

All of the patients completed the training and the expedition, and they exhibited significant improvements in physical and psychological health after completing the program.

“What I learned from this study is that we doctors have the false belief that kids with cancer cannot practice sport because they are too tired or weak from their treatments,” said study author Nicolas André, MD, PhD, of Hôpital d'Enfants de la Timone in Marseille, France.

“These perceptions are at least partly wrong. Adapted physical activities can be performed by most children with cancer, even during their treatment, and can bring a lot to children.”

To arrive at these conclusions, Dr André and his colleagues measured the effects of a 6-week long adapted physical activity program on children and adolescents with cancer.

The study included 11 patients—4 girls and 7 boys—with a mean age of 14.3 ± 2.9 years. Seven of the patients were still receiving treatment.

About the program

The patients first completed a physical preparation program consisting of general conditioning to improve their strength, speed, endurance, flexibility, skill, and ability to handle greater workloads.

Typically, these activities lasted from 60 to 120 minutes and took place 1 to 5 times a week. The intensity of physical activity was adjusted to each subject.

After completing the preparation, the patients began a 5-day long expedition in Quebec, Canada. They completed a session of physical training in the snow and had their first contact with the pack of dogs and the sleds the day before departure.

Overall, the subjects engaged in physical activity 4 to 5 hours per day during the expedition.

Results

The patients performed a series of physical tests and completed psychological questionnaires before and after the program. The results showed improvements in all physical and psychological parameters.

After completing the program, the subjects reported significant improvements in global self-esteem (P=0.02), perceived sport competence (P=0.02), and perceived physical strength (P=0.001).

They also demonstrated significant improvements in their ability to do sit-ups (P=0.01), their muscle tone (P=0.01), and their resting heart rate (P=0.03).

“Based on our work over the last 8 years, we all are convinced that practicing adapted physical activity is very positive for children with cancer,” said study author Laurent Grélot, PhD, of Aix Marseille University in France.

“It avoids cardiovascular and muscular deconditioning, can decrease treatment-induced fatigue, and can help maintaining social integration.”

Based on the success of this pilot study, the investigators are conducting a randomized trial to evaluate the benefits of adapted physical activities for children with cancer.

Pediatric cancer patient

Photo by Bill Branson

Children with cancer can benefit from “adapted” physical activities, according to a pilot study published in ecancermedicalscience.

Investigators followed 11 cancer patients, ages 10 to 18, on a dog sledding expedition, which involved adapted training activities.

All of the patients completed the training and the expedition, and they exhibited significant improvements in physical and psychological health after completing the program.

“What I learned from this study is that we doctors have the false belief that kids with cancer cannot practice sport because they are too tired or weak from their treatments,” said study author Nicolas André, MD, PhD, of Hôpital d'Enfants de la Timone in Marseille, France.

“These perceptions are at least partly wrong. Adapted physical activities can be performed by most children with cancer, even during their treatment, and can bring a lot to children.”

To arrive at these conclusions, Dr André and his colleagues measured the effects of a 6-week long adapted physical activity program on children and adolescents with cancer.

The study included 11 patients—4 girls and 7 boys—with a mean age of 14.3 ± 2.9 years. Seven of the patients were still receiving treatment.

About the program

The patients first completed a physical preparation program consisting of general conditioning to improve their strength, speed, endurance, flexibility, skill, and ability to handle greater workloads.

Typically, these activities lasted from 60 to 120 minutes and took place 1 to 5 times a week. The intensity of physical activity was adjusted to each subject.

After completing the preparation, the patients began a 5-day long expedition in Quebec, Canada. They completed a session of physical training in the snow and had their first contact with the pack of dogs and the sleds the day before departure.

Overall, the subjects engaged in physical activity 4 to 5 hours per day during the expedition.

Results

The patients performed a series of physical tests and completed psychological questionnaires before and after the program. The results showed improvements in all physical and psychological parameters.

After completing the program, the subjects reported significant improvements in global self-esteem (P=0.02), perceived sport competence (P=0.02), and perceived physical strength (P=0.001).

They also demonstrated significant improvements in their ability to do sit-ups (P=0.01), their muscle tone (P=0.01), and their resting heart rate (P=0.03).

“Based on our work over the last 8 years, we all are convinced that practicing adapted physical activity is very positive for children with cancer,” said study author Laurent Grélot, PhD, of Aix Marseille University in France.

“It avoids cardiovascular and muscular deconditioning, can decrease treatment-induced fatigue, and can help maintaining social integration.”

Based on the success of this pilot study, the investigators are conducting a randomized trial to evaluate the benefits of adapted physical activities for children with cancer.

Pediatric cancer patient

Photo by Bill Branson

Children with cancer can benefit from “adapted” physical activities, according to a pilot study published in ecancermedicalscience.

Investigators followed 11 cancer patients, ages 10 to 18, on a dog sledding expedition, which involved adapted training activities.

All of the patients completed the training and the expedition, and they exhibited significant improvements in physical and psychological health after completing the program.

“What I learned from this study is that we doctors have the false belief that kids with cancer cannot practice sport because they are too tired or weak from their treatments,” said study author Nicolas André, MD, PhD, of Hôpital d'Enfants de la Timone in Marseille, France.

“These perceptions are at least partly wrong. Adapted physical activities can be performed by most children with cancer, even during their treatment, and can bring a lot to children.”

To arrive at these conclusions, Dr André and his colleagues measured the effects of a 6-week long adapted physical activity program on children and adolescents with cancer.

The study included 11 patients—4 girls and 7 boys—with a mean age of 14.3 ± 2.9 years. Seven of the patients were still receiving treatment.

About the program

The patients first completed a physical preparation program consisting of general conditioning to improve their strength, speed, endurance, flexibility, skill, and ability to handle greater workloads.

Typically, these activities lasted from 60 to 120 minutes and took place 1 to 5 times a week. The intensity of physical activity was adjusted to each subject.

After completing the preparation, the patients began a 5-day long expedition in Quebec, Canada. They completed a session of physical training in the snow and had their first contact with the pack of dogs and the sleds the day before departure.

Overall, the subjects engaged in physical activity 4 to 5 hours per day during the expedition.

Results

The patients performed a series of physical tests and completed psychological questionnaires before and after the program. The results showed improvements in all physical and psychological parameters.

After completing the program, the subjects reported significant improvements in global self-esteem (P=0.02), perceived sport competence (P=0.02), and perceived physical strength (P=0.001).

They also demonstrated significant improvements in their ability to do sit-ups (P=0.01), their muscle tone (P=0.01), and their resting heart rate (P=0.03).

“Based on our work over the last 8 years, we all are convinced that practicing adapted physical activity is very positive for children with cancer,” said study author Laurent Grélot, PhD, of Aix Marseille University in France.

“It avoids cardiovascular and muscular deconditioning, can decrease treatment-induced fatigue, and can help maintaining social integration.”

Based on the success of this pilot study, the investigators are conducting a randomized trial to evaluate the benefits of adapted physical activities for children with cancer.

Survivors of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma are twice as likely to develop melanoma as are survivors of other types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, according to a report published online Aug. 3 in Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Since patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) have profound and prolonged immune dysfunction characterized by B-cell and T-cell defects, this finding suggests that immune perturbation may account for the excess of melanoma diagnoses observed in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), said Dr. Clara J. K. Lam of the radiation epidemiology branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda Md., and her associates.

©National Cancer Institute

Although patients with NHL are known to be at increased risk for melanoma compared with the general population, the reasons remain unclear. Additional factors such as chemotherapy regimens and sunlight exposure likely complicate the picture, and no studies to date have been able to account for these confounders. To assess a large enough study sample to examine these issues, Dr. Lam and her associates analyzed data concerning 44,870 NHL survivors in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. They focused on older patients aged 66-83 years at NHL diagnosis (mean age, 74 years) who were followed for at least 1 year (mean follow-up, 5.5 years), of whom 13,950 had CLL/SLL.

A total of 202 melanomas developed, and the median interval between NHL diagnosis and melanoma diagnosis was 3 years (range, 1-15 years). Nearly half of these melanomas occurred in patients with CLL/SLL rather than other types of NHL; 41% occurred on the face, head, or neck, and 43% were 1 mm or more in thickness. In contrast, among survivors of other NHL types, melanoma occurred most often on the trunk, and only 28% were 1 mm or more in thickness. This aligns with previous reports that melanomas arising after NHL tend to be more advanced and aggressive than those in the general population, the investigators said (J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 3. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.60.2094).

Further analysis revealed that among patients with CLL/SLL, melanoma risk was significantly increased in those who received fludarabine rather than other treatments (HR, 1.90, 95% CI, 1.08 to 3.37)), with or without the addition of rituximab. In contrast, melanoma risks were unrelated to treatment among patients who had other types of NHL.

Similarly, patients with CLL/SLL who had T-cell-activating autoimmune disorders (such as Graves’ disease, localized scleroderma, psoriasis, chronic rheumatic heart disease, asthma, or skin-related conditions) either before or after diagnosis of their leukemia/lymphoma also had 2-4 times the risk of developing melanoma than that of patients without such autoimmune disorders. In contrast, melanoma risks were unrelated to autoimmune disorders in patients with other types of NHL. This finding underscores the importance of T-cell dysfunction as a contributor to melanoma risk after CLL/SLL, Dr. Lam and her associates said.

Taken together, their findings identify which survivors of NHL are at highest risk for developing melanoma and would benefit the most from undergoing regular full-skin examinations to facilitate early detection.

This study was limited in that it was confined to patients over age 65 with NHL. The results may not be generalizable to younger patients, Dr. Lam and her associates added.

Survivors of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma are twice as likely to develop melanoma as are survivors of other types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, according to a report published online Aug. 3 in Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Since patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) have profound and prolonged immune dysfunction characterized by B-cell and T-cell defects, this finding suggests that immune perturbation may account for the excess of melanoma diagnoses observed in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), said Dr. Clara J. K. Lam of the radiation epidemiology branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda Md., and her associates.

©National Cancer Institute

Although patients with NHL are known to be at increased risk for melanoma compared with the general population, the reasons remain unclear. Additional factors such as chemotherapy regimens and sunlight exposure likely complicate the picture, and no studies to date have been able to account for these confounders. To assess a large enough study sample to examine these issues, Dr. Lam and her associates analyzed data concerning 44,870 NHL survivors in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. They focused on older patients aged 66-83 years at NHL diagnosis (mean age, 74 years) who were followed for at least 1 year (mean follow-up, 5.5 years), of whom 13,950 had CLL/SLL.

A total of 202 melanomas developed, and the median interval between NHL diagnosis and melanoma diagnosis was 3 years (range, 1-15 years). Nearly half of these melanomas occurred in patients with CLL/SLL rather than other types of NHL; 41% occurred on the face, head, or neck, and 43% were 1 mm or more in thickness. In contrast, among survivors of other NHL types, melanoma occurred most often on the trunk, and only 28% were 1 mm or more in thickness. This aligns with previous reports that melanomas arising after NHL tend to be more advanced and aggressive than those in the general population, the investigators said (J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 3. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.60.2094).

Further analysis revealed that among patients with CLL/SLL, melanoma risk was significantly increased in those who received fludarabine rather than other treatments (HR, 1.90, 95% CI, 1.08 to 3.37)), with or without the addition of rituximab. In contrast, melanoma risks were unrelated to treatment among patients who had other types of NHL.

Similarly, patients with CLL/SLL who had T-cell-activating autoimmune disorders (such as Graves’ disease, localized scleroderma, psoriasis, chronic rheumatic heart disease, asthma, or skin-related conditions) either before or after diagnosis of their leukemia/lymphoma also had 2-4 times the risk of developing melanoma than that of patients without such autoimmune disorders. In contrast, melanoma risks were unrelated to autoimmune disorders in patients with other types of NHL. This finding underscores the importance of T-cell dysfunction as a contributor to melanoma risk after CLL/SLL, Dr. Lam and her associates said.

Taken together, their findings identify which survivors of NHL are at highest risk for developing melanoma and would benefit the most from undergoing regular full-skin examinations to facilitate early detection.

This study was limited in that it was confined to patients over age 65 with NHL. The results may not be generalizable to younger patients, Dr. Lam and her associates added.

Survivors of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma are twice as likely to develop melanoma as are survivors of other types of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, according to a report published online Aug. 3 in Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Since patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) have profound and prolonged immune dysfunction characterized by B-cell and T-cell defects, this finding suggests that immune perturbation may account for the excess of melanoma diagnoses observed in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), said Dr. Clara J. K. Lam of the radiation epidemiology branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda Md., and her associates.

©National Cancer Institute

Although patients with NHL are known to be at increased risk for melanoma compared with the general population, the reasons remain unclear. Additional factors such as chemotherapy regimens and sunlight exposure likely complicate the picture, and no studies to date have been able to account for these confounders. To assess a large enough study sample to examine these issues, Dr. Lam and her associates analyzed data concerning 44,870 NHL survivors in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. They focused on older patients aged 66-83 years at NHL diagnosis (mean age, 74 years) who were followed for at least 1 year (mean follow-up, 5.5 years), of whom 13,950 had CLL/SLL.

A total of 202 melanomas developed, and the median interval between NHL diagnosis and melanoma diagnosis was 3 years (range, 1-15 years). Nearly half of these melanomas occurred in patients with CLL/SLL rather than other types of NHL; 41% occurred on the face, head, or neck, and 43% were 1 mm or more in thickness. In contrast, among survivors of other NHL types, melanoma occurred most often on the trunk, and only 28% were 1 mm or more in thickness. This aligns with previous reports that melanomas arising after NHL tend to be more advanced and aggressive than those in the general population, the investigators said (J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 3. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.60.2094).

Further analysis revealed that among patients with CLL/SLL, melanoma risk was significantly increased in those who received fludarabine rather than other treatments (HR, 1.90, 95% CI, 1.08 to 3.37)), with or without the addition of rituximab. In contrast, melanoma risks were unrelated to treatment among patients who had other types of NHL.

Similarly, patients with CLL/SLL who had T-cell-activating autoimmune disorders (such as Graves’ disease, localized scleroderma, psoriasis, chronic rheumatic heart disease, asthma, or skin-related conditions) either before or after diagnosis of their leukemia/lymphoma also had 2-4 times the risk of developing melanoma than that of patients without such autoimmune disorders. In contrast, melanoma risks were unrelated to autoimmune disorders in patients with other types of NHL. This finding underscores the importance of T-cell dysfunction as a contributor to melanoma risk after CLL/SLL, Dr. Lam and her associates said.

Taken together, their findings identify which survivors of NHL are at highest risk for developing melanoma and would benefit the most from undergoing regular full-skin examinations to facilitate early detection.

This study was limited in that it was confined to patients over age 65 with NHL. The results may not be generalizable to younger patients, Dr. Lam and her associates added.

A macrophage stretching its

pseudopodia to engulf particles

The transcription factor C/EBPα reprograms B cells into macrophages by “short-circuiting” the cells so they re-express genes reserved for embryonic development, according to research published in Stem Cell Reports.

Over the past 28 years, researchers have shown that a number of specialized cell types can be forcibly converted into other cell types, but the science of how this change takes place is still emerging.

“For a long time, it was unclear whether forcing cell fate decisions by expressing transcription factors in the wrong cell type could teach us something about what happens normally during physiological differentiation,” said Thomas Graf, PhD, of the Center for Genomic Regulation in Barcelona, Spain.

“What we have now found is that the two processes are actually surprisingly similar.”

The researchers found that B-cell transdifferentiation takes place when C/EBPα binds to two regions of DNA that act as gene expression enhancers. One of these regions is normally active in immune cells, and the other is only turned on when macrophage precursors are ready to differentiate.

This indicates that the convergence of these two enhancer pathways can cause the B cell to act like a macrophage precursor, thus triggering the unnatural transdifferentiation.

“This has taught us a great deal about how a transcription factor can activate a new gene expression program (in our case, that of macrophages) but has left us in the dark about the other part of the equation; namely, how the factor silences the B-cell program, something that must happen if transdifferentiation is to work,” Dr Graf said. “This is one of the questions we are focusing on now.”

Dr Graf is interested in this pathway because C/EBPα-induced, B cell-to-macrophage transdifferentiation can convert both human B-cell lymphoma and leukemia cells into functional, non-cancerous macrophages.

He believes that induced transdifferentiation could become therapeutically relevant if a drug could be found that can replace the transcription factor. And understanding the mechanisms of the process could help labs that use this transdifferentiation approach to generate cells for regenerative purposes.

A macrophage stretching its

pseudopodia to engulf particles

The transcription factor C/EBPα reprograms B cells into macrophages by “short-circuiting” the cells so they re-express genes reserved for embryonic development, according to research published in Stem Cell Reports.

Over the past 28 years, researchers have shown that a number of specialized cell types can be forcibly converted into other cell types, but the science of how this change takes place is still emerging.

“For a long time, it was unclear whether forcing cell fate decisions by expressing transcription factors in the wrong cell type could teach us something about what happens normally during physiological differentiation,” said Thomas Graf, PhD, of the Center for Genomic Regulation in Barcelona, Spain.

“What we have now found is that the two processes are actually surprisingly similar.”

The researchers found that B-cell transdifferentiation takes place when C/EBPα binds to two regions of DNA that act as gene expression enhancers. One of these regions is normally active in immune cells, and the other is only turned on when macrophage precursors are ready to differentiate.

This indicates that the convergence of these two enhancer pathways can cause the B cell to act like a macrophage precursor, thus triggering the unnatural transdifferentiation.

“This has taught us a great deal about how a transcription factor can activate a new gene expression program (in our case, that of macrophages) but has left us in the dark about the other part of the equation; namely, how the factor silences the B-cell program, something that must happen if transdifferentiation is to work,” Dr Graf said. “This is one of the questions we are focusing on now.”

Dr Graf is interested in this pathway because C/EBPα-induced, B cell-to-macrophage transdifferentiation can convert both human B-cell lymphoma and leukemia cells into functional, non-cancerous macrophages.

He believes that induced transdifferentiation could become therapeutically relevant if a drug could be found that can replace the transcription factor. And understanding the mechanisms of the process could help labs that use this transdifferentiation approach to generate cells for regenerative purposes.

A macrophage stretching its

pseudopodia to engulf particles

The transcription factor C/EBPα reprograms B cells into macrophages by “short-circuiting” the cells so they re-express genes reserved for embryonic development, according to research published in Stem Cell Reports.

Over the past 28 years, researchers have shown that a number of specialized cell types can be forcibly converted into other cell types, but the science of how this change takes place is still emerging.

“For a long time, it was unclear whether forcing cell fate decisions by expressing transcription factors in the wrong cell type could teach us something about what happens normally during physiological differentiation,” said Thomas Graf, PhD, of the Center for Genomic Regulation in Barcelona, Spain.

“What we have now found is that the two processes are actually surprisingly similar.”

The researchers found that B-cell transdifferentiation takes place when C/EBPα binds to two regions of DNA that act as gene expression enhancers. One of these regions is normally active in immune cells, and the other is only turned on when macrophage precursors are ready to differentiate.

This indicates that the convergence of these two enhancer pathways can cause the B cell to act like a macrophage precursor, thus triggering the unnatural transdifferentiation.

“This has taught us a great deal about how a transcription factor can activate a new gene expression program (in our case, that of macrophages) but has left us in the dark about the other part of the equation; namely, how the factor silences the B-cell program, something that must happen if transdifferentiation is to work,” Dr Graf said. “This is one of the questions we are focusing on now.”

Dr Graf is interested in this pathway because C/EBPα-induced, B cell-to-macrophage transdifferentiation can convert both human B-cell lymphoma and leukemia cells into functional, non-cancerous macrophages.

He believes that induced transdifferentiation could become therapeutically relevant if a drug could be found that can replace the transcription factor. And understanding the mechanisms of the process could help labs that use this transdifferentiation approach to generate cells for regenerative purposes.

Time-lapse images of

apoptosis in cancer cells

Researchers say they have identified a new mechanism by which the tumor suppressor protein p53 triggers apoptosis, and they believe this process could be harnessed to kill cancer cells.

The team discovered how p53 acts in the cytoplasm to trigger cell death by binding to and activating the BAX protein.

The process involves a shape change in one of p53’s amino acids that serves as the “switch” to activate BAX and trigger the apoptotic pathway.

The team also identified the enzyme in the cytoplasm that promotes the change that controls the “switch.”

Richard Kriwacki, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleagues described these findings in Molecular Cell.

Like up to half of all proteins, p53 includes both structured and disordered regions. A disordered region is a segment that does not adopt a single shape but

remains flexible and constantly switches between different shapes until

it encounters a partner.

Dr Kriwacki and his colleagues showed that both structured and disordered regions of p53 play a role in BAX activation in the cytoplasm.

The process starts when a structured region of p53 known as the DNA-binding domain binds to BAX. That sets the stage for the unstructured region of p53 to form a second bond, which activates BAX and triggers apoptosis.

“There were no previous reports of this disordered region of p53 binding to BAX, so the finding that this region was the key to BAX activation was a total surprise,” Dr Kriwacki said.

The disordered p53 segment included the amino acid proline, which can change between two shapes, particularly in the presence of the enzyme Pin1.

Using NMR spectroscopy, the researchers showed that the proline shape change promotes p53 binding and activation of BAX.

“These results expand our understanding of the different ways p53 modulates cell behavior,” Dr Kriwacki said. “The findings also raise the possibility of killing tumor cells using small molecules to trigger BAX-dependent apoptosis.”

Time-lapse images of

apoptosis in cancer cells

Researchers say they have identified a new mechanism by which the tumor suppressor protein p53 triggers apoptosis, and they believe this process could be harnessed to kill cancer cells.

The team discovered how p53 acts in the cytoplasm to trigger cell death by binding to and activating the BAX protein.

The process involves a shape change in one of p53’s amino acids that serves as the “switch” to activate BAX and trigger the apoptotic pathway.

The team also identified the enzyme in the cytoplasm that promotes the change that controls the “switch.”

Richard Kriwacki, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleagues described these findings in Molecular Cell.

Like up to half of all proteins, p53 includes both structured and disordered regions. A disordered region is a segment that does not adopt a single shape but

remains flexible and constantly switches between different shapes until

it encounters a partner.

Dr Kriwacki and his colleagues showed that both structured and disordered regions of p53 play a role in BAX activation in the cytoplasm.

The process starts when a structured region of p53 known as the DNA-binding domain binds to BAX. That sets the stage for the unstructured region of p53 to form a second bond, which activates BAX and triggers apoptosis.

“There were no previous reports of this disordered region of p53 binding to BAX, so the finding that this region was the key to BAX activation was a total surprise,” Dr Kriwacki said.

The disordered p53 segment included the amino acid proline, which can change between two shapes, particularly in the presence of the enzyme Pin1.

Using NMR spectroscopy, the researchers showed that the proline shape change promotes p53 binding and activation of BAX.

“These results expand our understanding of the different ways p53 modulates cell behavior,” Dr Kriwacki said. “The findings also raise the possibility of killing tumor cells using small molecules to trigger BAX-dependent apoptosis.”

Time-lapse images of

apoptosis in cancer cells

Researchers say they have identified a new mechanism by which the tumor suppressor protein p53 triggers apoptosis, and they believe this process could be harnessed to kill cancer cells.

The team discovered how p53 acts in the cytoplasm to trigger cell death by binding to and activating the BAX protein.

The process involves a shape change in one of p53’s amino acids that serves as the “switch” to activate BAX and trigger the apoptotic pathway.

The team also identified the enzyme in the cytoplasm that promotes the change that controls the “switch.”

Richard Kriwacki, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee, and his colleagues described these findings in Molecular Cell.

Like up to half of all proteins, p53 includes both structured and disordered regions. A disordered region is a segment that does not adopt a single shape but

remains flexible and constantly switches between different shapes until

it encounters a partner.

Dr Kriwacki and his colleagues showed that both structured and disordered regions of p53 play a role in BAX activation in the cytoplasm.

The process starts when a structured region of p53 known as the DNA-binding domain binds to BAX. That sets the stage for the unstructured region of p53 to form a second bond, which activates BAX and triggers apoptosis.

“There were no previous reports of this disordered region of p53 binding to BAX, so the finding that this region was the key to BAX activation was a total surprise,” Dr Kriwacki said.

The disordered p53 segment included the amino acid proline, which can change between two shapes, particularly in the presence of the enzyme Pin1.

Using NMR spectroscopy, the researchers showed that the proline shape change promotes p53 binding and activation of BAX.

“These results expand our understanding of the different ways p53 modulates cell behavior,” Dr Kriwacki said. “The findings also raise the possibility of killing tumor cells using small molecules to trigger BAX-dependent apoptosis.”

Preparing drug capsules

for a clinical trial

Photo by Esther Dyson

Pharmaceutical companies “underinvest” in long-term research to develop new anticancer drugs, according to a study published in American Economic Review.

Investigators used historical data to show that companies are more likely to develop drugs for late-stage cancers than early stage cancers or cancer prevention, and this is likely because late-stage cancer drugs can be brought to market faster.

The team found that late-stage drugs extend patient survival for shorter periods so that clinical trials for these drugs get wrapped up more quickly. This, in turn, gives drug manufacturers more time to control patented drugs in the marketplace.

“There is a pattern where we get more investment in drugs that take a short time to complete and less investment in drugs that take a longer time to complete,” said study author Heidi Williams, PhD, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge.

To conduct this study, Dr Williams and her colleagues analyzed 4 decades of clinical trial data from a variety of sources, including the National Cancer Institute and the US Food and Drug Administration. The study encompassed more than 200 subcategories of cancers detected at different stages of development.

In analyzing the data, the investigators divided research and development (R&D) into 2 stages: invention (developing the basic idea for a product to the point where it is patentable) and commercialization (bringing an invented product to market).

They defined the “commercialization lag” of an R&D project as the amount of time between invention and commercialization.

The data showed that patient groups with longer commercialization lags (as proxied by longer survival times) tended to have lower levels of R&D investment than groups with shorter commercialization lags (and survival times).

The investigators also found that when surrogate endpoints (endpoints other than survival) were allowed, there were more trials and money poured into research. This supports the idea that companies are more likely to invest in drugs that will have shorter trials and take less time to develop.

Dr Williams and her colleagues used the surrogate endpoint variation to estimate improvements in cancer survival rates that would have been observed if commercialization lags were reduced. The team estimated that, among US cancer patients diagnosed in 2003, longer commercialization lags resulted in around 890,000 lost life-years.

The investigators noted that commercialization lags reduce both public and private R&D investments, but they found the commercialization lag-R&D correlation is significantly more negative for privately financed trials than publicly financed trials.

The team said that, due to either excessive discounting or the fixed patent term, private incentives decline more rapidly than public incentives, which is what gives rise to the distortion.

Based on their findings, Dr Williams and her colleagues devised 3 new policy approaches that could potentially spark the development of more drugs for early stage cancers or cancer prevention.

The first is expanded use of surrogate endpoints or more research to determine if wider use of surrogate endpoints is valid.

A second possible policy change is more public funding of R&D for anticancer drugs, since such funding is free of short-term, private-sector shareholder pressure to produce returns.

A third potential new policy would be changing the terms of drug patents, which typically run from the time of patent filing to when the drug hits the market.

Preparing drug capsules

for a clinical trial

Photo by Esther Dyson

Pharmaceutical companies “underinvest” in long-term research to develop new anticancer drugs, according to a study published in American Economic Review.

Investigators used historical data to show that companies are more likely to develop drugs for late-stage cancers than early stage cancers or cancer prevention, and this is likely because late-stage cancer drugs can be brought to market faster.

The team found that late-stage drugs extend patient survival for shorter periods so that clinical trials for these drugs get wrapped up more quickly. This, in turn, gives drug manufacturers more time to control patented drugs in the marketplace.

“There is a pattern where we get more investment in drugs that take a short time to complete and less investment in drugs that take a longer time to complete,” said study author Heidi Williams, PhD, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge.

To conduct this study, Dr Williams and her colleagues analyzed 4 decades of clinical trial data from a variety of sources, including the National Cancer Institute and the US Food and Drug Administration. The study encompassed more than 200 subcategories of cancers detected at different stages of development.

In analyzing the data, the investigators divided research and development (R&D) into 2 stages: invention (developing the basic idea for a product to the point where it is patentable) and commercialization (bringing an invented product to market).

They defined the “commercialization lag” of an R&D project as the amount of time between invention and commercialization.

The data showed that patient groups with longer commercialization lags (as proxied by longer survival times) tended to have lower levels of R&D investment than groups with shorter commercialization lags (and survival times).

The investigators also found that when surrogate endpoints (endpoints other than survival) were allowed, there were more trials and money poured into research. This supports the idea that companies are more likely to invest in drugs that will have shorter trials and take less time to develop.

Dr Williams and her colleagues used the surrogate endpoint variation to estimate improvements in cancer survival rates that would have been observed if commercialization lags were reduced. The team estimated that, among US cancer patients diagnosed in 2003, longer commercialization lags resulted in around 890,000 lost life-years.

The investigators noted that commercialization lags reduce both public and private R&D investments, but they found the commercialization lag-R&D correlation is significantly more negative for privately financed trials than publicly financed trials.

The team said that, due to either excessive discounting or the fixed patent term, private incentives decline more rapidly than public incentives, which is what gives rise to the distortion.

Based on their findings, Dr Williams and her colleagues devised 3 new policy approaches that could potentially spark the development of more drugs for early stage cancers or cancer prevention.

The first is expanded use of surrogate endpoints or more research to determine if wider use of surrogate endpoints is valid.

A second possible policy change is more public funding of R&D for anticancer drugs, since such funding is free of short-term, private-sector shareholder pressure to produce returns.

A third potential new policy would be changing the terms of drug patents, which typically run from the time of patent filing to when the drug hits the market.

Preparing drug capsules

for a clinical trial

Photo by Esther Dyson

Pharmaceutical companies “underinvest” in long-term research to develop new anticancer drugs, according to a study published in American Economic Review.

Investigators used historical data to show that companies are more likely to develop drugs for late-stage cancers than early stage cancers or cancer prevention, and this is likely because late-stage cancer drugs can be brought to market faster.

The team found that late-stage drugs extend patient survival for shorter periods so that clinical trials for these drugs get wrapped up more quickly. This, in turn, gives drug manufacturers more time to control patented drugs in the marketplace.

“There is a pattern where we get more investment in drugs that take a short time to complete and less investment in drugs that take a longer time to complete,” said study author Heidi Williams, PhD, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge.

To conduct this study, Dr Williams and her colleagues analyzed 4 decades of clinical trial data from a variety of sources, including the National Cancer Institute and the US Food and Drug Administration. The study encompassed more than 200 subcategories of cancers detected at different stages of development.

In analyzing the data, the investigators divided research and development (R&D) into 2 stages: invention (developing the basic idea for a product to the point where it is patentable) and commercialization (bringing an invented product to market).

They defined the “commercialization lag” of an R&D project as the amount of time between invention and commercialization.

The data showed that patient groups with longer commercialization lags (as proxied by longer survival times) tended to have lower levels of R&D investment than groups with shorter commercialization lags (and survival times).

The investigators also found that when surrogate endpoints (endpoints other than survival) were allowed, there were more trials and money poured into research. This supports the idea that companies are more likely to invest in drugs that will have shorter trials and take less time to develop.

Dr Williams and her colleagues used the surrogate endpoint variation to estimate improvements in cancer survival rates that would have been observed if commercialization lags were reduced. The team estimated that, among US cancer patients diagnosed in 2003, longer commercialization lags resulted in around 890,000 lost life-years.

The investigators noted that commercialization lags reduce both public and private R&D investments, but they found the commercialization lag-R&D correlation is significantly more negative for privately financed trials than publicly financed trials.

The team said that, due to either excessive discounting or the fixed patent term, private incentives decline more rapidly than public incentives, which is what gives rise to the distortion.

Based on their findings, Dr Williams and her colleagues devised 3 new policy approaches that could potentially spark the development of more drugs for early stage cancers or cancer prevention.

The first is expanded use of surrogate endpoints or more research to determine if wider use of surrogate endpoints is valid.

A second possible policy change is more public funding of R&D for anticancer drugs, since such funding is free of short-term, private-sector shareholder pressure to produce returns.

A third potential new policy would be changing the terms of drug patents, which typically run from the time of patent filing to when the drug hits the market.

Ibrutinib (Imbruvica) capsules

Photo courtesy of

Janssen Biotech, Inc.

Health Canada has granted conditional approval for the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (Imbruvica) to treat patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

This approval was based on data from a phase 2 trial in which ibrutinib conferred an overall response rate of 68% in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL.

For ibrutinib to gain full approval, Health Canada must receive additional data confirming the drug provides a clinical benefit.

Ibrutinib was first approved in Canada in November 2014 for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including those with 17p deletion, who have received at least one prior therapy, or for the frontline treatment of patients with CLL with 17p deletion. For this use, ibrutinib was issued marketing authorization without conditions.

Now, Health Canada has issued ibrutinib conditional marketing authorization for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MCL. This decision was based on data from the phase 2 PCYC-1104 trial, which was presented at ASH 2012 and published in NEJM in August 2013.

The study included 111 MCL patients who had received at least one prior therapy. The primary endpoint of the study was overall response rate according to the revised International Working Group criteria for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

The overall response rate was 68%, with a complete response rate of 21% and a partial response rate of 47%. With a median follow-up of 15.3 months, the median response duration was 17.5 months.

The estimated progression-free survival was 13.9 months, and the overall survival was not reached. The estimated rate of overall survival was 58% at 18 months.

Common nonhematologic adverse events included diarrhea (50%), fatigue (41%), nausea (31%), peripheral edema (28%), dyspnea (27%), constipation (25%), upper respiratory tract infection (23%), vomiting (23%), and decreased appetite (21%). The most common grade 3, 4, or 5 infection was pneumonia (6%).

Grade 3 and 4 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (16%), thrombocytopenia (11%), and anemia (10%). Grade 3 bleeding events occurred in 5 patients.

Eight patients (7%) had an adverse event that led to treatment discontinuation.

Sixteen patients (14%) died during the trial, 12 due to disease progression and 4 due to an adverse event. Two patients died of pneumonia, 1 from sepsis, and 1 from a cardiac arrest that was not considered drug-related.

Ibrutinib is co-developed by Cilag GmbH International (a member of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies) and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company. Janssen Inc. markets ibrutinib as Imbruvica in Canada.

Ibrutinib (Imbruvica) capsules

Photo courtesy of

Janssen Biotech, Inc.

Health Canada has granted conditional approval for the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (Imbruvica) to treat patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

This approval was based on data from a phase 2 trial in which ibrutinib conferred an overall response rate of 68% in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL.

For ibrutinib to gain full approval, Health Canada must receive additional data confirming the drug provides a clinical benefit.

Ibrutinib was first approved in Canada in November 2014 for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including those with 17p deletion, who have received at least one prior therapy, or for the frontline treatment of patients with CLL with 17p deletion. For this use, ibrutinib was issued marketing authorization without conditions.

Now, Health Canada has issued ibrutinib conditional marketing authorization for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MCL. This decision was based on data from the phase 2 PCYC-1104 trial, which was presented at ASH 2012 and published in NEJM in August 2013.

The study included 111 MCL patients who had received at least one prior therapy. The primary endpoint of the study was overall response rate according to the revised International Working Group criteria for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

The overall response rate was 68%, with a complete response rate of 21% and a partial response rate of 47%. With a median follow-up of 15.3 months, the median response duration was 17.5 months.

The estimated progression-free survival was 13.9 months, and the overall survival was not reached. The estimated rate of overall survival was 58% at 18 months.

Common nonhematologic adverse events included diarrhea (50%), fatigue (41%), nausea (31%), peripheral edema (28%), dyspnea (27%), constipation (25%), upper respiratory tract infection (23%), vomiting (23%), and decreased appetite (21%). The most common grade 3, 4, or 5 infection was pneumonia (6%).

Grade 3 and 4 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (16%), thrombocytopenia (11%), and anemia (10%). Grade 3 bleeding events occurred in 5 patients.

Eight patients (7%) had an adverse event that led to treatment discontinuation.

Sixteen patients (14%) died during the trial, 12 due to disease progression and 4 due to an adverse event. Two patients died of pneumonia, 1 from sepsis, and 1 from a cardiac arrest that was not considered drug-related.

Ibrutinib is co-developed by Cilag GmbH International (a member of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies) and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company. Janssen Inc. markets ibrutinib as Imbruvica in Canada.

Ibrutinib (Imbruvica) capsules

Photo courtesy of

Janssen Biotech, Inc.

Health Canada has granted conditional approval for the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (Imbruvica) to treat patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

This approval was based on data from a phase 2 trial in which ibrutinib conferred an overall response rate of 68% in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL.

For ibrutinib to gain full approval, Health Canada must receive additional data confirming the drug provides a clinical benefit.

Ibrutinib was first approved in Canada in November 2014 for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including those with 17p deletion, who have received at least one prior therapy, or for the frontline treatment of patients with CLL with 17p deletion. For this use, ibrutinib was issued marketing authorization without conditions.

Now, Health Canada has issued ibrutinib conditional marketing authorization for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MCL. This decision was based on data from the phase 2 PCYC-1104 trial, which was presented at ASH 2012 and published in NEJM in August 2013.

The study included 111 MCL patients who had received at least one prior therapy. The primary endpoint of the study was overall response rate according to the revised International Working Group criteria for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

The overall response rate was 68%, with a complete response rate of 21% and a partial response rate of 47%. With a median follow-up of 15.3 months, the median response duration was 17.5 months.

The estimated progression-free survival was 13.9 months, and the overall survival was not reached. The estimated rate of overall survival was 58% at 18 months.

Common nonhematologic adverse events included diarrhea (50%), fatigue (41%), nausea (31%), peripheral edema (28%), dyspnea (27%), constipation (25%), upper respiratory tract infection (23%), vomiting (23%), and decreased appetite (21%). The most common grade 3, 4, or 5 infection was pneumonia (6%).

Grade 3 and 4 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (16%), thrombocytopenia (11%), and anemia (10%). Grade 3 bleeding events occurred in 5 patients.

Eight patients (7%) had an adverse event that led to treatment discontinuation.

Sixteen patients (14%) died during the trial, 12 due to disease progression and 4 due to an adverse event. Two patients died of pneumonia, 1 from sepsis, and 1 from a cardiac arrest that was not considered drug-related.

Ibrutinib is co-developed by Cilag GmbH International (a member of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies) and Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company. Janssen Inc. markets ibrutinib as Imbruvica in Canada.

Aik Choon Tan, PhD

Photo courtesy of the

University of Colorado

Researchers say they have developed a tool that allows us to determine which tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) will be most effective against a certain type of cancer.

The tool, known as the Kinase Addiction Ranker (KAR), predicts the genetic abnormalities that are driving the cancer in any population of cells and chooses the best TKI or combination of TKIs to target these abnormalities.

The researchers described the tool in Bioinformatics.

“A lot of [TKIs] inhibit a lot more than what they’re supposed to inhibit,” said study author Aik Choon Tan, PhD, of the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora.

“Maybe drug A was designed to inhibit kinase B, but it also inhibits kinase C and D as well. Our approach centers on exploiting the promiscuity of these drugs, the ‘drug spillover.’”

For each TKI, there is a signature describing the kinases each drug fully or partially inhibits. Dr Tan and his colleagues combined these kinase inhibition signatures with the results of high-throughput screening. They used the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer database to determine which TKIs have already proven active against which cancer cell lines.

The result is KAR, which does 2 things. For any cancer cell line, the program ranks the kinases that are most important to the growth of the disease. Then, the program recommends the combination of existing TKIs that is likely to do the most good against the implicated kinases.

Dr Tan and his colleagues tested KAR using samples from 151 leukemia patients and found that, among the kinases analyzed, FLT3 had the highest variance in sensitivity to TKIs.

But EPHA5, EPHA3, and BTK were the kinases most commonly associated with drug sensitivity. They had significant associations in 72%, 58%, and 54% of the patient samples, respectively.

The researchers said the frequency of BTK dependence they observed is interesting given the fact that the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib produced favorable results in a phase 1b/2 trial of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The progression-free survival rate at 26 months was 75% in that trial.

Dr Tan and his colleagues said this was consistent with their findings, which showed that 70% of CLL patient data had a significant association between BTK inhibition and drug sensitivity.

The researchers also found that KAR could predict TKI sensitivity in 21 lung cancer cell lines. In addition, the tool was able to recommend a combination of TKIs that hindered proliferation in the lung cancer cell line H1581. KAR suggested ponatinib and the experimental anticancer agent AZD8055, and experiments showed that these drugs synergistically reduced proliferation in H1581.

KAR is available for download on the Tan lab’s website.

Aik Choon Tan, PhD

Photo courtesy of the

University of Colorado

Researchers say they have developed a tool that allows us to determine which tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) will be most effective against a certain type of cancer.

The tool, known as the Kinase Addiction Ranker (KAR), predicts the genetic abnormalities that are driving the cancer in any population of cells and chooses the best TKI or combination of TKIs to target these abnormalities.

The researchers described the tool in Bioinformatics.

“A lot of [TKIs] inhibit a lot more than what they’re supposed to inhibit,” said study author Aik Choon Tan, PhD, of the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora.

“Maybe drug A was designed to inhibit kinase B, but it also inhibits kinase C and D as well. Our approach centers on exploiting the promiscuity of these drugs, the ‘drug spillover.’”

For each TKI, there is a signature describing the kinases each drug fully or partially inhibits. Dr Tan and his colleagues combined these kinase inhibition signatures with the results of high-throughput screening. They used the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer database to determine which TKIs have already proven active against which cancer cell lines.

The result is KAR, which does 2 things. For any cancer cell line, the program ranks the kinases that are most important to the growth of the disease. Then, the program recommends the combination of existing TKIs that is likely to do the most good against the implicated kinases.

Dr Tan and his colleagues tested KAR using samples from 151 leukemia patients and found that, among the kinases analyzed, FLT3 had the highest variance in sensitivity to TKIs.

But EPHA5, EPHA3, and BTK were the kinases most commonly associated with drug sensitivity. They had significant associations in 72%, 58%, and 54% of the patient samples, respectively.

The researchers said the frequency of BTK dependence they observed is interesting given the fact that the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib produced favorable results in a phase 1b/2 trial of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The progression-free survival rate at 26 months was 75% in that trial.

Dr Tan and his colleagues said this was consistent with their findings, which showed that 70% of CLL patient data had a significant association between BTK inhibition and drug sensitivity.

The researchers also found that KAR could predict TKI sensitivity in 21 lung cancer cell lines. In addition, the tool was able to recommend a combination of TKIs that hindered proliferation in the lung cancer cell line H1581. KAR suggested ponatinib and the experimental anticancer agent AZD8055, and experiments showed that these drugs synergistically reduced proliferation in H1581.

KAR is available for download on the Tan lab’s website.

Aik Choon Tan, PhD

Photo courtesy of the

University of Colorado

Researchers say they have developed a tool that allows us to determine which tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) will be most effective against a certain type of cancer.

The tool, known as the Kinase Addiction Ranker (KAR), predicts the genetic abnormalities that are driving the cancer in any population of cells and chooses the best TKI or combination of TKIs to target these abnormalities.

The researchers described the tool in Bioinformatics.

“A lot of [TKIs] inhibit a lot more than what they’re supposed to inhibit,” said study author Aik Choon Tan, PhD, of the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora.

“Maybe drug A was designed to inhibit kinase B, but it also inhibits kinase C and D as well. Our approach centers on exploiting the promiscuity of these drugs, the ‘drug spillover.’”

For each TKI, there is a signature describing the kinases each drug fully or partially inhibits. Dr Tan and his colleagues combined these kinase inhibition signatures with the results of high-throughput screening. They used the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer database to determine which TKIs have already proven active against which cancer cell lines.

The result is KAR, which does 2 things. For any cancer cell line, the program ranks the kinases that are most important to the growth of the disease. Then, the program recommends the combination of existing TKIs that is likely to do the most good against the implicated kinases.

Dr Tan and his colleagues tested KAR using samples from 151 leukemia patients and found that, among the kinases analyzed, FLT3 had the highest variance in sensitivity to TKIs.

But EPHA5, EPHA3, and BTK were the kinases most commonly associated with drug sensitivity. They had significant associations in 72%, 58%, and 54% of the patient samples, respectively.

The researchers said the frequency of BTK dependence they observed is interesting given the fact that the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib produced favorable results in a phase 1b/2 trial of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The progression-free survival rate at 26 months was 75% in that trial.

Dr Tan and his colleagues said this was consistent with their findings, which showed that 70% of CLL patient data had a significant association between BTK inhibition and drug sensitivity.

The researchers also found that KAR could predict TKI sensitivity in 21 lung cancer cell lines. In addition, the tool was able to recommend a combination of TKIs that hindered proliferation in the lung cancer cell line H1581. KAR suggested ponatinib and the experimental anticancer agent AZD8055, and experiments showed that these drugs synergistically reduced proliferation in H1581.

KAR is available for download on the Tan lab’s website.

Micrograph showing CTCL

New research suggests cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is driven by a plethora of genetic mutations.

Investigators conducted a genomic analysis of normal and cancer cells from patients with CTCL and identified mutations in 17 genes that are implicated in CTCL pathogenesis.

They also found that somatic copy number variants (SCNVs) driving CTCL outnumbered somatic single-nucleotide variants (SSNVs) by more than 10 to 1.

The team reported these findings in Nature Genetics.

They performed exome and whole-genome DNA sequencing and RNA sequencing on purified CTCL cells and matched normal cells. And they identified genes implicated in CTCL pathogenesis by looking for:

• Genes with recurrent SSNVs altering the same amino acid more often than expected by chance
• Genes with SSNVs previously identified as recurrent mutations in other cancers
• Genes having a significantly increased burden of protein-altering SSNVs
• SCNVs that occurred more often than expected by chance.

This revealed mutations in 17 genes that are implicated in CTCL pathogenesis—TP53, ZEB1, ARID1A, DNMT3A, CDKN2A, FAS, NFKB2, CD28, RHOA, PLCG1, STAT5B, BRAF, ATM, CTCF, TNFAIP3, PRKCQ, and IRF4.

The investigators noted that these are genes involved in T-cell activation, apoptosis, NF-κB signaling, chromatin remodeling, and DNA damage response.

The team also discovered “a striking bias” for SCNVs as drivers of CTCL. They identified 12 statistically significant chromosome-arm SCNVs and 36 significant focal SCNVs.

Collectively, these SCNVs occurred 473 times in the CTCL samples analyzed—a mean of 7.5 focal deletions, 1.6 broad deletions, 1.0 focal amplification, and 1.8 broad amplifications per CTCL.

On the other hand, there were 38 SSNVs in CTCL driver genes—1.0 per tumor.

So, according to these data, SCNVs comprise 92% of all driver mutations in CTCL—a mean of 11.8 pathogenic SCNVs vs 1.0 SSNV per CTCL.

“This cancer has a very distinctive biology,” said Jaehyuk Choi, MD, PhD, of the Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut.

And decoding this biology has revealed potential treatment approaches, according to Dr Choi and his colleagues.

For example, the presence of mutations activating the NF-κB pathway suggests NF-κB inhibitors such as bortezomib may have therapeutic potential in CTCL, and the presence of CD28 mutations suggests inhibitors such as abatacept may be effective against the disease.

Micrograph showing CTCL

New research suggests cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is driven by a plethora of genetic mutations.

Investigators conducted a genomic analysis of normal and cancer cells from patients with CTCL and identified mutations in 17 genes that are implicated in CTCL pathogenesis.

They also found that somatic copy number variants (SCNVs) driving CTCL outnumbered somatic single-nucleotide variants (SSNVs) by more than 10 to 1.

The team reported these findings in Nature Genetics.

They performed exome and whole-genome DNA sequencing and RNA sequencing on purified CTCL cells and matched normal cells. And they identified genes implicated in CTCL pathogenesis by looking for:

• Genes with recurrent SSNVs altering the same amino acid more often than expected by chance
• Genes with SSNVs previously identified as recurrent mutations in other cancers
• Genes having a significantly increased burden of protein-altering SSNVs
• SCNVs that occurred more often than expected by chance.

This revealed mutations in 17 genes that are implicated in CTCL pathogenesis—TP53, ZEB1, ARID1A, DNMT3A, CDKN2A, FAS, NFKB2, CD28, RHOA, PLCG1, STAT5B, BRAF, ATM, CTCF, TNFAIP3, PRKCQ, and IRF4.

The investigators noted that these are genes involved in T-cell activation, apoptosis, NF-κB signaling, chromatin remodeling, and DNA damage response.

The team also discovered “a striking bias” for SCNVs as drivers of CTCL. They identified 12 statistically significant chromosome-arm SCNVs and 36 significant focal SCNVs.

Collectively, these SCNVs occurred 473 times in the CTCL samples analyzed—a mean of 7.5 focal deletions, 1.6 broad deletions, 1.0 focal amplification, and 1.8 broad amplifications per CTCL.

On the other hand, there were 38 SSNVs in CTCL driver genes—1.0 per tumor.

So, according to these data, SCNVs comprise 92% of all driver mutations in CTCL—a mean of 11.8 pathogenic SCNVs vs 1.0 SSNV per CTCL.

“This cancer has a very distinctive biology,” said Jaehyuk Choi, MD, PhD, of the Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut.

And decoding this biology has revealed potential treatment approaches, according to Dr Choi and his colleagues.

For example, the presence of mutations activating the NF-κB pathway suggests NF-κB inhibitors such as bortezomib may have therapeutic potential in CTCL, and the presence of CD28 mutations suggests inhibitors such as abatacept may be effective against the disease.

Micrograph showing CTCL

New research suggests cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is driven by a plethora of genetic mutations.

Investigators conducted a genomic analysis of normal and cancer cells from patients with CTCL and identified mutations in 17 genes that are implicated in CTCL pathogenesis.

They also found that somatic copy number variants (SCNVs) driving CTCL outnumbered somatic single-nucleotide variants (SSNVs) by more than 10 to 1.

The team reported these findings in Nature Genetics.

They performed exome and whole-genome DNA sequencing and RNA sequencing on purified CTCL cells and matched normal cells. And they identified genes implicated in CTCL pathogenesis by looking for:

• Genes with recurrent SSNVs altering the same amino acid more often than expected by chance
• Genes with SSNVs previously identified as recurrent mutations in other cancers
• Genes having a significantly increased burden of protein-altering SSNVs
• SCNVs that occurred more often than expected by chance.

This revealed mutations in 17 genes that are implicated in CTCL pathogenesis—TP53, ZEB1, ARID1A, DNMT3A, CDKN2A, FAS, NFKB2, CD28, RHOA, PLCG1, STAT5B, BRAF, ATM, CTCF, TNFAIP3, PRKCQ, and IRF4.

The investigators noted that these are genes involved in T-cell activation, apoptosis, NF-κB signaling, chromatin remodeling, and DNA damage response.

The team also discovered “a striking bias” for SCNVs as drivers of CTCL. They identified 12 statistically significant chromosome-arm SCNVs and 36 significant focal SCNVs.

Collectively, these SCNVs occurred 473 times in the CTCL samples analyzed—a mean of 7.5 focal deletions, 1.6 broad deletions, 1.0 focal amplification, and 1.8 broad amplifications per CTCL.

On the other hand, there were 38 SSNVs in CTCL driver genes—1.0 per tumor.

So, according to these data, SCNVs comprise 92% of all driver mutations in CTCL—a mean of 11.8 pathogenic SCNVs vs 1.0 SSNV per CTCL.

“This cancer has a very distinctive biology,” said Jaehyuk Choi, MD, PhD, of the Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut.

And decoding this biology has revealed potential treatment approaches, according to Dr Choi and his colleagues.

For example, the presence of mutations activating the NF-κB pathway suggests NF-κB inhibitors such as bortezomib may have therapeutic potential in CTCL, and the presence of CD28 mutations suggests inhibitors such as abatacept may be effective against the disease.

In vitro fertilization

Image courtesy of NHS

Young patients with cancer, particularly females, may be uninformed about their options for preserving fertility, according to a study published in Cancer.

The research showed that males were both more likely to have discussed fertility preservation with their physicians and more likely to have taken steps to preserve fertility.

Other factors such as education and insurance status also appeared to have an impact on fertility preservation.

Margarett Shnorhavorian, MD, of the University of Washington in Seattle, and her colleagues conducted this research.

The team enlisted 459 adolescents and young adults who were diagnosed with cancer in 2007 or 2008, asking them to complete questionnaires on fertility preservation.

Eighty percent of males and 74% of females said they had been told that cancer therapy might affect their fertility. For females, multivariable analysis revealed no significant factors associated with this discussion.

However, multivariable analysis showed that males with an unknown treatment fertility risk were more likely to be uninformed of the potential risk (odds ratio [OR]= 2.73; 95% CI, 1.09-6.86), as were males who did not consult a medical oncologist (OR=2.28; 95% CI, 1.03-5.00).

Twenty-nine percent of males and 56.3% of females said they did not discuss fertility preservation with their doctors before they began cancer treatment. Males raising children younger than 18 were more likely than males without children to miss out on the discussion (OR=2.45; 95% CI, 1.24-4.85).

Males were also more likely to miss the discussion if they had a treatment fertility risk classified as “none/low” rather than “intermediate/high” (OR=3.39; 95% CI, 1.60-7.16) and if they had no insurance or government insurance rather than private insurance (OR=2.91; 95% CI, 1.41-5.97).

Males diagnosed in 2008 were less likely than those diagnosed in 2007 to miss out on the discussion (OR=0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.80).

Females raising children under 18 were more likely than females without children to say they did not discuss fertility preservation with their doctors (OR=3.38; 95% CI, 1.43-8.02). Females without private insurance were more likely to miss the discussion as well (OR=5.46; 95% CI, 1.59-18.72).

Females diagnosed in 2008 were less likely to miss the discussion than those diagnosed in 2007 (OR=0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.85).

Sixty-nine percent of males and 93.2% of females said they did not make fertility preservation arrangements. Men were more likely to lack arrangements if they were raising children younger than 18 years (OR=3.53; 95% CI, 1.63-7.65) or had less than a college degree (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.00-3.97).

The researchers did not conduct a multivariable analysis for women because so few women made arrangements for fertility preservation.

“The access and health-related reasons for not making arrangements for fertility preservation reported by participants in this study further highlight the need for decreased cost, improved insurance coverage, and partnerships between cancer healthcare providers and fertility experts to develop strategies that increase awareness of fertility preservation options and decrease delays in cancer therapy as fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult cancer patients improves,” Dr Shnorhavorian concluded.

In vitro fertilization

Image courtesy of NHS

Young patients with cancer, particularly females, may be uninformed about their options for preserving fertility, according to a study published in Cancer.

The research showed that males were both more likely to have discussed fertility preservation with their physicians and more likely to have taken steps to preserve fertility.

Other factors such as education and insurance status also appeared to have an impact on fertility preservation.

Margarett Shnorhavorian, MD, of the University of Washington in Seattle, and her colleagues conducted this research.

The team enlisted 459 adolescents and young adults who were diagnosed with cancer in 2007 or 2008, asking them to complete questionnaires on fertility preservation.

Eighty percent of males and 74% of females said they had been told that cancer therapy might affect their fertility. For females, multivariable analysis revealed no significant factors associated with this discussion.

However, multivariable analysis showed that males with an unknown treatment fertility risk were more likely to be uninformed of the potential risk (odds ratio [OR]= 2.73; 95% CI, 1.09-6.86), as were males who did not consult a medical oncologist (OR=2.28; 95% CI, 1.03-5.00).

Twenty-nine percent of males and 56.3% of females said they did not discuss fertility preservation with their doctors before they began cancer treatment. Males raising children younger than 18 were more likely than males without children to miss out on the discussion (OR=2.45; 95% CI, 1.24-4.85).

Males were also more likely to miss the discussion if they had a treatment fertility risk classified as “none/low” rather than “intermediate/high” (OR=3.39; 95% CI, 1.60-7.16) and if they had no insurance or government insurance rather than private insurance (OR=2.91; 95% CI, 1.41-5.97).

Males diagnosed in 2008 were less likely than those diagnosed in 2007 to miss out on the discussion (OR=0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.80).

Females raising children under 18 were more likely than females without children to say they did not discuss fertility preservation with their doctors (OR=3.38; 95% CI, 1.43-8.02). Females without private insurance were more likely to miss the discussion as well (OR=5.46; 95% CI, 1.59-18.72).

Females diagnosed in 2008 were less likely to miss the discussion than those diagnosed in 2007 (OR=0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.85).

Sixty-nine percent of males and 93.2% of females said they did not make fertility preservation arrangements. Men were more likely to lack arrangements if they were raising children younger than 18 years (OR=3.53; 95% CI, 1.63-7.65) or had less than a college degree (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.00-3.97).

The researchers did not conduct a multivariable analysis for women because so few women made arrangements for fertility preservation.

“The access and health-related reasons for not making arrangements for fertility preservation reported by participants in this study further highlight the need for decreased cost, improved insurance coverage, and partnerships between cancer healthcare providers and fertility experts to develop strategies that increase awareness of fertility preservation options and decrease delays in cancer therapy as fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult cancer patients improves,” Dr Shnorhavorian concluded.

In vitro fertilization

Image courtesy of NHS

Young patients with cancer, particularly females, may be uninformed about their options for preserving fertility, according to a study published in Cancer.

The research showed that males were both more likely to have discussed fertility preservation with their physicians and more likely to have taken steps to preserve fertility.

Other factors such as education and insurance status also appeared to have an impact on fertility preservation.

Margarett Shnorhavorian, MD, of the University of Washington in Seattle, and her colleagues conducted this research.

The team enlisted 459 adolescents and young adults who were diagnosed with cancer in 2007 or 2008, asking them to complete questionnaires on fertility preservation.

Eighty percent of males and 74% of females said they had been told that cancer therapy might affect their fertility. For females, multivariable analysis revealed no significant factors associated with this discussion.

However, multivariable analysis showed that males with an unknown treatment fertility risk were more likely to be uninformed of the potential risk (odds ratio [OR]= 2.73; 95% CI, 1.09-6.86), as were males who did not consult a medical oncologist (OR=2.28; 95% CI, 1.03-5.00).

Twenty-nine percent of males and 56.3% of females said they did not discuss fertility preservation with their doctors before they began cancer treatment. Males raising children younger than 18 were more likely than males without children to miss out on the discussion (OR=2.45; 95% CI, 1.24-4.85).

Males were also more likely to miss the discussion if they had a treatment fertility risk classified as “none/low” rather than “intermediate/high” (OR=3.39; 95% CI, 1.60-7.16) and if they had no insurance or government insurance rather than private insurance (OR=2.91; 95% CI, 1.41-5.97).

Males diagnosed in 2008 were less likely than those diagnosed in 2007 to miss out on the discussion (OR=0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.80).

Females raising children under 18 were more likely than females without children to say they did not discuss fertility preservation with their doctors (OR=3.38; 95% CI, 1.43-8.02). Females without private insurance were more likely to miss the discussion as well (OR=5.46; 95% CI, 1.59-18.72).

Females diagnosed in 2008 were less likely to miss the discussion than those diagnosed in 2007 (OR=0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.85).

Sixty-nine percent of males and 93.2% of females said they did not make fertility preservation arrangements. Men were more likely to lack arrangements if they were raising children younger than 18 years (OR=3.53; 95% CI, 1.63-7.65) or had less than a college degree (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.00-3.97).

The researchers did not conduct a multivariable analysis for women because so few women made arrangements for fertility preservation.

“The access and health-related reasons for not making arrangements for fertility preservation reported by participants in this study further highlight the need for decreased cost, improved insurance coverage, and partnerships between cancer healthcare providers and fertility experts to develop strategies that increase awareness of fertility preservation options and decrease delays in cancer therapy as fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult cancer patients improves,” Dr Shnorhavorian concluded.

For HIV-positive patients with Burkitt lymphoma, a modified intensive chemotherapy regimen produced overall and progression-free survival rates comparable with those seen in HIV-free patients with Burkitt, with manageable toxicities, reported researchers in a multicenter clinical trial.

The AIDS Malignancy Consortium (AMC) 048 study looked at the use of a modified version of the dose intensive CODOX-M/IVAC regimen, consisting of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, high-dose methotrexate/ifosfamide, etoposide, and high-dose cytarabine. Compared with the standard regimen, the investigators added rituximab, reduced and/or rescheduled cyclophosphamide and methotrexate, limited the use of vincristine, and used combination intrathecal chemotherapy to prevent central nervous system involvement.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Ed Uthman, MD/Creative Commons License

The study included 34 HIV-positive patients (30 men and 4 women) with Burkitt, 26 of whom were also receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The patients ranged in age from 19-55 (median 42) years. Of the 34 patients, 25 had Ann Arbor stage IV disease, 2 had stage III, 1 had stage IIE, 2 had stage II, and 4 had stage I. Median age was 42 years (range, 19-55 years).

The median CD4 count was 195 cells/mL; five patients had fewer than 100 cells/mL

Progression-free survival at 1 year was 69%, and 1- and 2-year overall survival were 72% and 69%, respectively.

The modified CODOX-M/IVAC regimen was associated with a grade 3 to 4 toxicity rate of 79%, with no grade 3 or 4 mucositis reported. In contrast, virtually all patients who receive the unmodified regimen develop at least one grade 3 or greater toxicity.

In total, there were 20 hematologic, 14 infectious, and 6 metabolic toxicities. Five patients did not complete treatment because of adverse events.

There were 11 deaths, including 1 treatment-related death of a patient with encephalopathy, hepatic failure, hepatitis B, and pneumonia cited as contributing causes. Of the remaining 10 patients, 8 died from systemic disease progression, and 2 died during follow-up, 1 during remission from a fungal infection and 1 from nonmalignant complications of HIV.

The investigators say that the addition of rituximab may have contributed to the favorable outcomes, and that rescheduling and limiting the amount of high-dose methotrexate delivered likely contributed to lower incidences of both severe mucositis and neutropenic fever.

Although a separate trial is evaluating a different regimen (EPOCH-R; etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab) in Burkitt lymphoma, “the modified AMC 048 version of CODOX-M/IVAC-R may better serve patients who present with CNS disease or are at high risk for CNS relapse (e.g., patients with bone marrow, testicular, or multiple extranodal sites), because it contains high-dose cytarabine and methotrexate, drugs that cross the blood-brain barrier. Consequently, AMC048 represents a reasonable treatment option in the appropriate setting, possibly irrespective of HIV status.”

The study by Dr. Ariela Noy from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York and her colleagues, is published in Blood.

For HIV-positive patients with Burkitt lymphoma, a modified intensive chemotherapy regimen produced overall and progression-free survival rates comparable with those seen in HIV-free patients with Burkitt, with manageable toxicities, reported researchers in a multicenter clinical trial.

The AIDS Malignancy Consortium (AMC) 048 study looked at the use of a modified version of the dose intensive CODOX-M/IVAC regimen, consisting of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, high-dose methotrexate/ifosfamide, etoposide, and high-dose cytarabine. Compared with the standard regimen, the investigators added rituximab, reduced and/or rescheduled cyclophosphamide and methotrexate, limited the use of vincristine, and used combination intrathecal chemotherapy to prevent central nervous system involvement.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Ed Uthman, MD/Creative Commons License

The study included 34 HIV-positive patients (30 men and 4 women) with Burkitt, 26 of whom were also receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The patients ranged in age from 19-55 (median 42) years. Of the 34 patients, 25 had Ann Arbor stage IV disease, 2 had stage III, 1 had stage IIE, 2 had stage II, and 4 had stage I. Median age was 42 years (range, 19-55 years).

The median CD4 count was 195 cells/mL; five patients had fewer than 100 cells/mL

Progression-free survival at 1 year was 69%, and 1- and 2-year overall survival were 72% and 69%, respectively.

The modified CODOX-M/IVAC regimen was associated with a grade 3 to 4 toxicity rate of 79%, with no grade 3 or 4 mucositis reported. In contrast, virtually all patients who receive the unmodified regimen develop at least one grade 3 or greater toxicity.

In total, there were 20 hematologic, 14 infectious, and 6 metabolic toxicities. Five patients did not complete treatment because of adverse events.

There were 11 deaths, including 1 treatment-related death of a patient with encephalopathy, hepatic failure, hepatitis B, and pneumonia cited as contributing causes. Of the remaining 10 patients, 8 died from systemic disease progression, and 2 died during follow-up, 1 during remission from a fungal infection and 1 from nonmalignant complications of HIV.

The investigators say that the addition of rituximab may have contributed to the favorable outcomes, and that rescheduling and limiting the amount of high-dose methotrexate delivered likely contributed to lower incidences of both severe mucositis and neutropenic fever.

Although a separate trial is evaluating a different regimen (EPOCH-R; etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab) in Burkitt lymphoma, “the modified AMC 048 version of CODOX-M/IVAC-R may better serve patients who present with CNS disease or are at high risk for CNS relapse (e.g., patients with bone marrow, testicular, or multiple extranodal sites), because it contains high-dose cytarabine and methotrexate, drugs that cross the blood-brain barrier. Consequently, AMC048 represents a reasonable treatment option in the appropriate setting, possibly irrespective of HIV status.”

The study by Dr. Ariela Noy from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York and her colleagues, is published in Blood.

For HIV-positive patients with Burkitt lymphoma, a modified intensive chemotherapy regimen produced overall and progression-free survival rates comparable with those seen in HIV-free patients with Burkitt, with manageable toxicities, reported researchers in a multicenter clinical trial.

The AIDS Malignancy Consortium (AMC) 048 study looked at the use of a modified version of the dose intensive CODOX-M/IVAC regimen, consisting of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, high-dose methotrexate/ifosfamide, etoposide, and high-dose cytarabine. Compared with the standard regimen, the investigators added rituximab, reduced and/or rescheduled cyclophosphamide and methotrexate, limited the use of vincristine, and used combination intrathecal chemotherapy to prevent central nervous system involvement.

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Ed Uthman, MD/Creative Commons License

The study included 34 HIV-positive patients (30 men and 4 women) with Burkitt, 26 of whom were also receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The patients ranged in age from 19-55 (median 42) years. Of the 34 patients, 25 had Ann Arbor stage IV disease, 2 had stage III, 1 had stage IIE, 2 had stage II, and 4 had stage I. Median age was 42 years (range, 19-55 years).

The median CD4 count was 195 cells/mL; five patients had fewer than 100 cells/mL

Progression-free survival at 1 year was 69%, and 1- and 2-year overall survival were 72% and 69%, respectively.

The modified CODOX-M/IVAC regimen was associated with a grade 3 to 4 toxicity rate of 79%, with no grade 3 or 4 mucositis reported. In contrast, virtually all patients who receive the unmodified regimen develop at least one grade 3 or greater toxicity.

In total, there were 20 hematologic, 14 infectious, and 6 metabolic toxicities. Five patients did not complete treatment because of adverse events.

There were 11 deaths, including 1 treatment-related death of a patient with encephalopathy, hepatic failure, hepatitis B, and pneumonia cited as contributing causes. Of the remaining 10 patients, 8 died from systemic disease progression, and 2 died during follow-up, 1 during remission from a fungal infection and 1 from nonmalignant complications of HIV.

The investigators say that the addition of rituximab may have contributed to the favorable outcomes, and that rescheduling and limiting the amount of high-dose methotrexate delivered likely contributed to lower incidences of both severe mucositis and neutropenic fever.

Although a separate trial is evaluating a different regimen (EPOCH-R; etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab) in Burkitt lymphoma, “the modified AMC 048 version of CODOX-M/IVAC-R may better serve patients who present with CNS disease or are at high risk for CNS relapse (e.g., patients with bone marrow, testicular, or multiple extranodal sites), because it contains high-dose cytarabine and methotrexate, drugs that cross the blood-brain barrier. Consequently, AMC048 represents a reasonable treatment option in the appropriate setting, possibly irrespective of HIV status.”

The study by Dr. Ariela Noy from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York and her colleagues, is published in Blood.