Lymphoma & Plasma Cell Disorders

Genome sequencing

Photo courtesy of NIGMS

Patients with Sézary syndrome (SS) may have a more complex array of genetic mutations than we thought, according to a paper published in Nature Communications.

Investigators uncovered a genomic landscape that, they believe, can be used to design personalized treatment regimens for SS patients.

In particular, the team found mutations in the JAK/STAT pathway and discovered that JAK-mutated SS cells are sensitive to JAK inhibitors.

To conduct this research, the investigators sequenced SS patient samples using 3 different approaches. They performed whole-genome sequencing (n=6), whole-exome sequencing (n=66), and array comparative genomic hybridization-based copy-number analysis (n=80).

“We basically found chromosomal chaos in all of our samples,” said study author Kojo Elenitoba-Johnson, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

“We did not expect the degree of genetic complexity that we found in our study.”

The investigators identified previously unknown, recurrent, loss-of-function mutations that target genes regulating epigenetic pathways.

One of these targets is ARID1A, and the team found that loss-of-function mutations and/or deletions in ARID1A occurred in more than 40% of the SS genome studied.

The investigators also identified gain-of-function mutations in PLCG1, JAK1, JAK3, STAT3, and STAT5B.

And in preliminary drug-mutation matching studies, JAK1-mutated SS cells were sensitive to JAK inhibitors.

“With knowledge like this, we can design clinical trials using JAK inhibitors for SS patients based on their JAK mutations,” Dr Elenitoba-Johnson said. “But this is just the start. These results highlight the genetic vulnerabilities that we can use in designing precision medicine therapies.”

Now, the investigators want to develop a molecular taxonomy for mutations in SS patients. Using the sequencing technology they used in this study, the team hopes to pinpoint the exact mistakes in each patient’s SS-related genes.

From this, the investigators hope to identify distinct subsets of the disease and stratify patients for precision therapy based on their mutations and the inhibitors available for those mutations.

Genome sequencing

Photo courtesy of NIGMS

Patients with Sézary syndrome (SS) may have a more complex array of genetic mutations than we thought, according to a paper published in Nature Communications.

Investigators uncovered a genomic landscape that, they believe, can be used to design personalized treatment regimens for SS patients.

In particular, the team found mutations in the JAK/STAT pathway and discovered that JAK-mutated SS cells are sensitive to JAK inhibitors.

To conduct this research, the investigators sequenced SS patient samples using 3 different approaches. They performed whole-genome sequencing (n=6), whole-exome sequencing (n=66), and array comparative genomic hybridization-based copy-number analysis (n=80).

“We basically found chromosomal chaos in all of our samples,” said study author Kojo Elenitoba-Johnson, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

“We did not expect the degree of genetic complexity that we found in our study.”

The investigators identified previously unknown, recurrent, loss-of-function mutations that target genes regulating epigenetic pathways.

One of these targets is ARID1A, and the team found that loss-of-function mutations and/or deletions in ARID1A occurred in more than 40% of the SS genome studied.

The investigators also identified gain-of-function mutations in PLCG1, JAK1, JAK3, STAT3, and STAT5B.

And in preliminary drug-mutation matching studies, JAK1-mutated SS cells were sensitive to JAK inhibitors.

“With knowledge like this, we can design clinical trials using JAK inhibitors for SS patients based on their JAK mutations,” Dr Elenitoba-Johnson said. “But this is just the start. These results highlight the genetic vulnerabilities that we can use in designing precision medicine therapies.”

Now, the investigators want to develop a molecular taxonomy for mutations in SS patients. Using the sequencing technology they used in this study, the team hopes to pinpoint the exact mistakes in each patient’s SS-related genes.

From this, the investigators hope to identify distinct subsets of the disease and stratify patients for precision therapy based on their mutations and the inhibitors available for those mutations.

Genome sequencing

Photo courtesy of NIGMS

Patients with Sézary syndrome (SS) may have a more complex array of genetic mutations than we thought, according to a paper published in Nature Communications.

Investigators uncovered a genomic landscape that, they believe, can be used to design personalized treatment regimens for SS patients.

In particular, the team found mutations in the JAK/STAT pathway and discovered that JAK-mutated SS cells are sensitive to JAK inhibitors.

To conduct this research, the investigators sequenced SS patient samples using 3 different approaches. They performed whole-genome sequencing (n=6), whole-exome sequencing (n=66), and array comparative genomic hybridization-based copy-number analysis (n=80).

“We basically found chromosomal chaos in all of our samples,” said study author Kojo Elenitoba-Johnson, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

“We did not expect the degree of genetic complexity that we found in our study.”

The investigators identified previously unknown, recurrent, loss-of-function mutations that target genes regulating epigenetic pathways.

One of these targets is ARID1A, and the team found that loss-of-function mutations and/or deletions in ARID1A occurred in more than 40% of the SS genome studied.

The investigators also identified gain-of-function mutations in PLCG1, JAK1, JAK3, STAT3, and STAT5B.

And in preliminary drug-mutation matching studies, JAK1-mutated SS cells were sensitive to JAK inhibitors.

“With knowledge like this, we can design clinical trials using JAK inhibitors for SS patients based on their JAK mutations,” Dr Elenitoba-Johnson said. “But this is just the start. These results highlight the genetic vulnerabilities that we can use in designing precision medicine therapies.”

Now, the investigators want to develop a molecular taxonomy for mutations in SS patients. Using the sequencing technology they used in this study, the team hopes to pinpoint the exact mistakes in each patient’s SS-related genes.

From this, the investigators hope to identify distinct subsets of the disease and stratify patients for precision therapy based on their mutations and the inhibitors available for those mutations.

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib produced a high degree of complete cytogenetic responses when used in first-line treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. But the drug’s toxicities, especially its propensity for causing thromboembolic events, mitigate against its upfront use, investigators say.

In a small phase II study, 90% of evaluable patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) had a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) after 3 months, and 94% had a CCyR after 6 months, but that efficacy came at the cost of significant adverse events requiring dose reductions, treatment interruptions, and early termination of the trial for safety reasons at the recommendation of the Food and Drug Administration, reported Dr. Preetesh Jain of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Tex., and colleagues.

“[O]ur study shows that ponatinib is a very potent TKI with high clinical activity in the first-line treatment of patients with chronic-phase CML. However, at the doses currently used in other settings, the safety profile might not be appropriate for treatment of this patient population who have other treatment options with high efficacy,” the investigators wrote (Lancet Haematol. 2015;2[9]:e376-e383).

Ponatinib (Iclusig) is a third-generation TKI with action against malignancies with mutations in the ABL kinase domain that make the cancers resistant to first- and second-generation TKIs such as imatinib (Gleevec), dasatinib (Sprycel), and nilotinib (Tasigna).

Ponatinib is approved in the United States for treatment of adult patients with CML positive for the T3151 mutation in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase, or T3151-positive Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL). It is also approved for treatment of adults with chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase CML or Ph+ALL for whom no other TKI is indicated.

The drug labeling carries a boxed warning about increased risk for vascular occlusion, heart failure, and hepatotoxicity. The warning notes that “[a]rterial and venous thrombosis and occlusions have occurred in at least 27% of Iclusig-treated patients, including fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, stenosis of large arterial vessels of the brain, severe peripheral vascular disease, and the need for urgent revascularization procedures.”

In a single-arm, open label trial, the investigators enrolled 51 patients with recently diagnosed CML in chronic phase, starting them on doses of oral ponatinib 45 mg daily. The protocol was later amended to a starting dose of 30 mg daily because of the high frequency of dose reductions required among patients started at 45 mg. Following a warning from the FDA about vascular complications with the drug, patients were started on daily low-dose aspirin (81 mg), and all drug doses were reduced to either 30 mg or 15 mg daily.

One of the patients discontinued therapy prior to assessment because of the FDA warning, leaving 50 for assessment at 6 months.

Of 46 patients evaluable for the primary outcome of CCyR by 6 months, 43 (94%) achieved it. Major molecular responses, defined as a BCR-ABL to ABL transcript ratio of 0.1% or lower, occurred in 40 of 50 patients (80%) evaluable for this secondary endpoint, and deep molecular response (MR4.5), defined as a ratio less than 0.0032% or lower, occurred in 28 of 50 (55%).

Cardiovascular events, primarily hypertension, occurred in 25 patients (49%), 15 (29%) had grade 3-4 myelosuppression, and 5 patients (10%) developed cerebrovascular or vaso-occlusive disease.

In all, 43 patients (85%) needed treatment interruptions at some time and 45 (88%) needed dose reductions. The study was terminated in June 2014, a little more than a year after recruitment began.

The study was sponsored by MD Anderson Cancer Center with partial support from Ariad Pharmaceuticals. Coauthors Hagop Kantarjian, Elias Jabbour, and Jorge Cortes report receiving grants, research support, or serving as consultants to Ariad.

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib produced a high degree of complete cytogenetic responses when used in first-line treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. But the drug’s toxicities, especially its propensity for causing thromboembolic events, mitigate against its upfront use, investigators say.

In a small phase II study, 90% of evaluable patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) had a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) after 3 months, and 94% had a CCyR after 6 months, but that efficacy came at the cost of significant adverse events requiring dose reductions, treatment interruptions, and early termination of the trial for safety reasons at the recommendation of the Food and Drug Administration, reported Dr. Preetesh Jain of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Tex., and colleagues.

“[O]ur study shows that ponatinib is a very potent TKI with high clinical activity in the first-line treatment of patients with chronic-phase CML. However, at the doses currently used in other settings, the safety profile might not be appropriate for treatment of this patient population who have other treatment options with high efficacy,” the investigators wrote (Lancet Haematol. 2015;2[9]:e376-e383).

Ponatinib (Iclusig) is a third-generation TKI with action against malignancies with mutations in the ABL kinase domain that make the cancers resistant to first- and second-generation TKIs such as imatinib (Gleevec), dasatinib (Sprycel), and nilotinib (Tasigna).

Ponatinib is approved in the United States for treatment of adult patients with CML positive for the T3151 mutation in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase, or T3151-positive Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL). It is also approved for treatment of adults with chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase CML or Ph+ALL for whom no other TKI is indicated.

The drug labeling carries a boxed warning about increased risk for vascular occlusion, heart failure, and hepatotoxicity. The warning notes that “[a]rterial and venous thrombosis and occlusions have occurred in at least 27% of Iclusig-treated patients, including fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, stenosis of large arterial vessels of the brain, severe peripheral vascular disease, and the need for urgent revascularization procedures.”

In a single-arm, open label trial, the investigators enrolled 51 patients with recently diagnosed CML in chronic phase, starting them on doses of oral ponatinib 45 mg daily. The protocol was later amended to a starting dose of 30 mg daily because of the high frequency of dose reductions required among patients started at 45 mg. Following a warning from the FDA about vascular complications with the drug, patients were started on daily low-dose aspirin (81 mg), and all drug doses were reduced to either 30 mg or 15 mg daily.

One of the patients discontinued therapy prior to assessment because of the FDA warning, leaving 50 for assessment at 6 months.

Of 46 patients evaluable for the primary outcome of CCyR by 6 months, 43 (94%) achieved it. Major molecular responses, defined as a BCR-ABL to ABL transcript ratio of 0.1% or lower, occurred in 40 of 50 patients (80%) evaluable for this secondary endpoint, and deep molecular response (MR4.5), defined as a ratio less than 0.0032% or lower, occurred in 28 of 50 (55%).

Cardiovascular events, primarily hypertension, occurred in 25 patients (49%), 15 (29%) had grade 3-4 myelosuppression, and 5 patients (10%) developed cerebrovascular or vaso-occlusive disease.

In all, 43 patients (85%) needed treatment interruptions at some time and 45 (88%) needed dose reductions. The study was terminated in June 2014, a little more than a year after recruitment began.

The study was sponsored by MD Anderson Cancer Center with partial support from Ariad Pharmaceuticals. Coauthors Hagop Kantarjian, Elias Jabbour, and Jorge Cortes report receiving grants, research support, or serving as consultants to Ariad.

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib produced a high degree of complete cytogenetic responses when used in first-line treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. But the drug’s toxicities, especially its propensity for causing thromboembolic events, mitigate against its upfront use, investigators say.

In a small phase II study, 90% of evaluable patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) had a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) after 3 months, and 94% had a CCyR after 6 months, but that efficacy came at the cost of significant adverse events requiring dose reductions, treatment interruptions, and early termination of the trial for safety reasons at the recommendation of the Food and Drug Administration, reported Dr. Preetesh Jain of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Tex., and colleagues.

“[O]ur study shows that ponatinib is a very potent TKI with high clinical activity in the first-line treatment of patients with chronic-phase CML. However, at the doses currently used in other settings, the safety profile might not be appropriate for treatment of this patient population who have other treatment options with high efficacy,” the investigators wrote (Lancet Haematol. 2015;2[9]:e376-e383).

Ponatinib (Iclusig) is a third-generation TKI with action against malignancies with mutations in the ABL kinase domain that make the cancers resistant to first- and second-generation TKIs such as imatinib (Gleevec), dasatinib (Sprycel), and nilotinib (Tasigna).

Ponatinib is approved in the United States for treatment of adult patients with CML positive for the T3151 mutation in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase, or T3151-positive Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL). It is also approved for treatment of adults with chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase CML or Ph+ALL for whom no other TKI is indicated.

The drug labeling carries a boxed warning about increased risk for vascular occlusion, heart failure, and hepatotoxicity. The warning notes that “[a]rterial and venous thrombosis and occlusions have occurred in at least 27% of Iclusig-treated patients, including fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, stenosis of large arterial vessels of the brain, severe peripheral vascular disease, and the need for urgent revascularization procedures.”

In a single-arm, open label trial, the investigators enrolled 51 patients with recently diagnosed CML in chronic phase, starting them on doses of oral ponatinib 45 mg daily. The protocol was later amended to a starting dose of 30 mg daily because of the high frequency of dose reductions required among patients started at 45 mg. Following a warning from the FDA about vascular complications with the drug, patients were started on daily low-dose aspirin (81 mg), and all drug doses were reduced to either 30 mg or 15 mg daily.

One of the patients discontinued therapy prior to assessment because of the FDA warning, leaving 50 for assessment at 6 months.

Of 46 patients evaluable for the primary outcome of CCyR by 6 months, 43 (94%) achieved it. Major molecular responses, defined as a BCR-ABL to ABL transcript ratio of 0.1% or lower, occurred in 40 of 50 patients (80%) evaluable for this secondary endpoint, and deep molecular response (MR4.5), defined as a ratio less than 0.0032% or lower, occurred in 28 of 50 (55%).

Cardiovascular events, primarily hypertension, occurred in 25 patients (49%), 15 (29%) had grade 3-4 myelosuppression, and 5 patients (10%) developed cerebrovascular or vaso-occlusive disease.

In all, 43 patients (85%) needed treatment interruptions at some time and 45 (88%) needed dose reductions. The study was terminated in June 2014, a little more than a year after recruitment began.

The study was sponsored by MD Anderson Cancer Center with partial support from Ariad Pharmaceuticals. Coauthors Hagop Kantarjian, Elias Jabbour, and Jorge Cortes report receiving grants, research support, or serving as consultants to Ariad.

An EBV-infected cell (green/red)

among uninfected cells (blue)

Image by Benjamin

Chaigne-Delalande

NEW YORK—Type 2 Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) tumors, such as Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas, are challenging to treat with virus-specific T (VST) cells, according to researchers.

These lymphomas express a more restricted array of EBV antigens that are not particularly immunogenic.

Nevertheless, researchers are devising an approach using peptide mixtures to activate EBV VSTs for use in these patients.

Helen Heslop, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, described this work at the inaugural CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Immunotherapy of Cancer Conference. She also described the researchers’ efforts to create off-the-shelf VSTs.

Dr Heslop explained that, in addition to the more restricted array of EBV antigens, EBV-associated tumors often produce inhibitory cytokines that can impede the activity of T cells.

So the researchers devised a strategy to expand these low-frequency clones by stimulating responding T cells with dendritic cells genetically modified with an ADV viral vector to overexpress LMP1 and LMP2. After multiple stimulations, they obtained an autologous product from the patient.

The team then tested the cytotoxic T cells in 21 patients with relapsed disease and in 29 patients as adjuvant therapy after stem cell transplant (n=14) or chemotherapy (n=15).

In the adjuvant arm, all patients but 1 remain in remission up to 5 years later.

In the relapsed arm, 11 had a complete response (CR), 2 had a partial response (PR), and 8 had progressive disease within 2 to 8 weeks.

“Importantly, there was no toxicity,” Dr Heslop said. “[A]ll were heavily pretreated with multiple lines of therapy for lymphoma, so I think the response rate is encouraging.”

An alternative approach: Pepmix-activated EBV VSTs

Although the antitumor effects of the above approach were encouraging, “we had a very complex manufacturing methodology that we didn’t think was sufficiently scaleable and robust for clinical studies,” Dr Heslop said.

“We also thought there would be potential regulatory issues with live EBV virus and the adenoviral vector,” she added.

And the researchers were concerned about the competition from the EBV/Ad-LMP dominant antigens.

So they devised an alternative approach using peptide mixture (pepmix)-activated EBVSTs.

This approach used autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells as the antigen-presenting cells for the first stimulation.

The researchers pulsed them with overlapping peptides derived from 4 EBV antigens expressed in the tumors (EBV-LMP1, LMP2, EBNA1, and BARF1). They then expanded and opsonized the cells with IL-7 and IL-15.

For the second stimulation, the team used the T cells pulsed with the peptides and a K562 line pulsed with co-stimulatory molecules. And this process took 23 days, as opposed to the 2-3 months with the previous product.

The researchers have treated 9 patients with these EBVSTs as adjuvant therapy after autologous stem cell transplant. All patients remain in remission.

They also treated 6 patients with active disease. Two are in CR, 2 are in PR, and 2 have progressed.

This trial is ongoing, but the researchers believe that targeting the more challenging type 2 latency tumors with autologous cells can overcome T-cell anergy by using IL-7 and IL-15.

“Obviously, we need more numbers to know what the range of response is,” Dr Heslop said, although, at this early stage, it appears pepmix-activated T cells can produce antitumor responses.

An EBV-infected cell (green/red)

among uninfected cells (blue)

Image by Benjamin

Chaigne-Delalande

NEW YORK—Type 2 Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) tumors, such as Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas, are challenging to treat with virus-specific T (VST) cells, according to researchers.

These lymphomas express a more restricted array of EBV antigens that are not particularly immunogenic.

Nevertheless, researchers are devising an approach using peptide mixtures to activate EBV VSTs for use in these patients.

Helen Heslop, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, described this work at the inaugural CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Immunotherapy of Cancer Conference. She also described the researchers’ efforts to create off-the-shelf VSTs.

Dr Heslop explained that, in addition to the more restricted array of EBV antigens, EBV-associated tumors often produce inhibitory cytokines that can impede the activity of T cells.

So the researchers devised a strategy to expand these low-frequency clones by stimulating responding T cells with dendritic cells genetically modified with an ADV viral vector to overexpress LMP1 and LMP2. After multiple stimulations, they obtained an autologous product from the patient.

The team then tested the cytotoxic T cells in 21 patients with relapsed disease and in 29 patients as adjuvant therapy after stem cell transplant (n=14) or chemotherapy (n=15).

In the adjuvant arm, all patients but 1 remain in remission up to 5 years later.

In the relapsed arm, 11 had a complete response (CR), 2 had a partial response (PR), and 8 had progressive disease within 2 to 8 weeks.

“Importantly, there was no toxicity,” Dr Heslop said. “[A]ll were heavily pretreated with multiple lines of therapy for lymphoma, so I think the response rate is encouraging.”

An alternative approach: Pepmix-activated EBV VSTs

Although the antitumor effects of the above approach were encouraging, “we had a very complex manufacturing methodology that we didn’t think was sufficiently scaleable and robust for clinical studies,” Dr Heslop said.

“We also thought there would be potential regulatory issues with live EBV virus and the adenoviral vector,” she added.

And the researchers were concerned about the competition from the EBV/Ad-LMP dominant antigens.

So they devised an alternative approach using peptide mixture (pepmix)-activated EBVSTs.

This approach used autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells as the antigen-presenting cells for the first stimulation.

The researchers pulsed them with overlapping peptides derived from 4 EBV antigens expressed in the tumors (EBV-LMP1, LMP2, EBNA1, and BARF1). They then expanded and opsonized the cells with IL-7 and IL-15.

For the second stimulation, the team used the T cells pulsed with the peptides and a K562 line pulsed with co-stimulatory molecules. And this process took 23 days, as opposed to the 2-3 months with the previous product.

The researchers have treated 9 patients with these EBVSTs as adjuvant therapy after autologous stem cell transplant. All patients remain in remission.

They also treated 6 patients with active disease. Two are in CR, 2 are in PR, and 2 have progressed.

This trial is ongoing, but the researchers believe that targeting the more challenging type 2 latency tumors with autologous cells can overcome T-cell anergy by using IL-7 and IL-15.

“Obviously, we need more numbers to know what the range of response is,” Dr Heslop said, although, at this early stage, it appears pepmix-activated T cells can produce antitumor responses.

An EBV-infected cell (green/red)

among uninfected cells (blue)

Image by Benjamin

Chaigne-Delalande

NEW YORK—Type 2 Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) tumors, such as Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas, are challenging to treat with virus-specific T (VST) cells, according to researchers.

These lymphomas express a more restricted array of EBV antigens that are not particularly immunogenic.

Nevertheless, researchers are devising an approach using peptide mixtures to activate EBV VSTs for use in these patients.

Helen Heslop, MD, of Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, described this work at the inaugural CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Immunotherapy of Cancer Conference. She also described the researchers’ efforts to create off-the-shelf VSTs.

Dr Heslop explained that, in addition to the more restricted array of EBV antigens, EBV-associated tumors often produce inhibitory cytokines that can impede the activity of T cells.

So the researchers devised a strategy to expand these low-frequency clones by stimulating responding T cells with dendritic cells genetically modified with an ADV viral vector to overexpress LMP1 and LMP2. After multiple stimulations, they obtained an autologous product from the patient.

The team then tested the cytotoxic T cells in 21 patients with relapsed disease and in 29 patients as adjuvant therapy after stem cell transplant (n=14) or chemotherapy (n=15).

In the adjuvant arm, all patients but 1 remain in remission up to 5 years later.

In the relapsed arm, 11 had a complete response (CR), 2 had a partial response (PR), and 8 had progressive disease within 2 to 8 weeks.

“Importantly, there was no toxicity,” Dr Heslop said. “[A]ll were heavily pretreated with multiple lines of therapy for lymphoma, so I think the response rate is encouraging.”

An alternative approach: Pepmix-activated EBV VSTs

Although the antitumor effects of the above approach were encouraging, “we had a very complex manufacturing methodology that we didn’t think was sufficiently scaleable and robust for clinical studies,” Dr Heslop said.

“We also thought there would be potential regulatory issues with live EBV virus and the adenoviral vector,” she added.

And the researchers were concerned about the competition from the EBV/Ad-LMP dominant antigens.

So they devised an alternative approach using peptide mixture (pepmix)-activated EBVSTs.

This approach used autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells as the antigen-presenting cells for the first stimulation.

The researchers pulsed them with overlapping peptides derived from 4 EBV antigens expressed in the tumors (EBV-LMP1, LMP2, EBNA1, and BARF1). They then expanded and opsonized the cells with IL-7 and IL-15.

For the second stimulation, the team used the T cells pulsed with the peptides and a K562 line pulsed with co-stimulatory molecules. And this process took 23 days, as opposed to the 2-3 months with the previous product.

The researchers have treated 9 patients with these EBVSTs as adjuvant therapy after autologous stem cell transplant. All patients remain in remission.

They also treated 6 patients with active disease. Two are in CR, 2 are in PR, and 2 have progressed.

This trial is ongoing, but the researchers believe that targeting the more challenging type 2 latency tumors with autologous cells can overcome T-cell anergy by using IL-7 and IL-15.

“Obviously, we need more numbers to know what the range of response is,” Dr Heslop said, although, at this early stage, it appears pepmix-activated T cells can produce antitumor responses.

A population-based comparison of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in first complete remission indicated that routine imaging surveillance did not improve outcomes, researchers reported.

Overall survival was similar for Danish and Swedish populations who received similar follow-up care, except that routine imaging surveillance is the standard of care in Denmark, but not in Sweden. The 3-year overall survival for Danish and Swedish patients was 92% and 91%, respectively.

Outcomes grouped by international prognostic index (IPI) also showed no significant differences between populations (J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 5, doi:10.1200/jco.2015.62.0229.).

“An imaging-based follow-up strategy does not improve postremission [overall survival] for DLBCL,” wrote Dr. Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly, of Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, and colleagues.

They observed that aside from using IPI as risk stratification, the study “also points to baseline [lactate dehyrogenase] as a single discriminator of patients with high versus low risk of progression,” (Hazard ratio, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.78-5.48; P less than .01).

The retrospective study examined records of patients with DLBCL from Sweden (n=696) and Denmark (n=525) who achieved first complete remission after first-line therapy with R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) and CHOP-like regimens from 2007 to 2012. The proportion of patients with IPI greater than two were similar for both groups, though more Danish patients received radiotherapy compared with their Swedish counterparts (35% v. 9%).

Standard follow-up care after first complete remission is similar in Denmark and Sweden and typically includes symptom assessment, clinical examination, and blood tests at 3- to 4-month intervals for 2 years, and 6-month intervals in the third year. After 3 years, Swedish patients are seen annually for 2 years and then follow-up is ended for most patients. In Denmark, 6-month checks are continued until 5 years and then follow-up is usually ended. However, in Denmark guidelines support routine computerized tomography (CT) scans of the neck, abdomen, and thorax every 6 months for 2 years, which is not encouraged by guidelines in Sweden.

Early relapse detection aims to improve survival, and although low disease burden is associated with durable survival in patients treated for relapsed DLBCL, most studies show similar outcomes for imaging versus non-imaging detection. Additionally, previous retrospective studies that have reported survival differences based on relapse detection method are prone to lead-time bias, according to the researchers.

Given that a majority of patients with recurrent DLBCL experience symptoms before relapse, that elevated lactate dehyrogenase or abnormal physical examination may raise suspicion, and that exposure to ionizing radiation from medical imaging can lead to radiation-induced cancers, “routine imaging for DLBCL in first [complete remission] is not recommended,” the authors wrote.

The research was supported in part by the North Denmark Region. Dr. El-Galaly and coauthors reported having no financial disclosures.

A population-based comparison of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in first complete remission indicated that routine imaging surveillance did not improve outcomes, researchers reported.

Overall survival was similar for Danish and Swedish populations who received similar follow-up care, except that routine imaging surveillance is the standard of care in Denmark, but not in Sweden. The 3-year overall survival for Danish and Swedish patients was 92% and 91%, respectively.

Outcomes grouped by international prognostic index (IPI) also showed no significant differences between populations (J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 5, doi:10.1200/jco.2015.62.0229.).

“An imaging-based follow-up strategy does not improve postremission [overall survival] for DLBCL,” wrote Dr. Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly, of Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, and colleagues.

They observed that aside from using IPI as risk stratification, the study “also points to baseline [lactate dehyrogenase] as a single discriminator of patients with high versus low risk of progression,” (Hazard ratio, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.78-5.48; P less than .01).

The retrospective study examined records of patients with DLBCL from Sweden (n=696) and Denmark (n=525) who achieved first complete remission after first-line therapy with R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) and CHOP-like regimens from 2007 to 2012. The proportion of patients with IPI greater than two were similar for both groups, though more Danish patients received radiotherapy compared with their Swedish counterparts (35% v. 9%).

Standard follow-up care after first complete remission is similar in Denmark and Sweden and typically includes symptom assessment, clinical examination, and blood tests at 3- to 4-month intervals for 2 years, and 6-month intervals in the third year. After 3 years, Swedish patients are seen annually for 2 years and then follow-up is ended for most patients. In Denmark, 6-month checks are continued until 5 years and then follow-up is usually ended. However, in Denmark guidelines support routine computerized tomography (CT) scans of the neck, abdomen, and thorax every 6 months for 2 years, which is not encouraged by guidelines in Sweden.

Early relapse detection aims to improve survival, and although low disease burden is associated with durable survival in patients treated for relapsed DLBCL, most studies show similar outcomes for imaging versus non-imaging detection. Additionally, previous retrospective studies that have reported survival differences based on relapse detection method are prone to lead-time bias, according to the researchers.

Given that a majority of patients with recurrent DLBCL experience symptoms before relapse, that elevated lactate dehyrogenase or abnormal physical examination may raise suspicion, and that exposure to ionizing radiation from medical imaging can lead to radiation-induced cancers, “routine imaging for DLBCL in first [complete remission] is not recommended,” the authors wrote.

The research was supported in part by the North Denmark Region. Dr. El-Galaly and coauthors reported having no financial disclosures.

A population-based comparison of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in first complete remission indicated that routine imaging surveillance did not improve outcomes, researchers reported.

Overall survival was similar for Danish and Swedish populations who received similar follow-up care, except that routine imaging surveillance is the standard of care in Denmark, but not in Sweden. The 3-year overall survival for Danish and Swedish patients was 92% and 91%, respectively.

Outcomes grouped by international prognostic index (IPI) also showed no significant differences between populations (J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 5, doi:10.1200/jco.2015.62.0229.).

“An imaging-based follow-up strategy does not improve postremission [overall survival] for DLBCL,” wrote Dr. Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly, of Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, and colleagues.

They observed that aside from using IPI as risk stratification, the study “also points to baseline [lactate dehyrogenase] as a single discriminator of patients with high versus low risk of progression,” (Hazard ratio, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.78-5.48; P less than .01).

The retrospective study examined records of patients with DLBCL from Sweden (n=696) and Denmark (n=525) who achieved first complete remission after first-line therapy with R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) and CHOP-like regimens from 2007 to 2012. The proportion of patients with IPI greater than two were similar for both groups, though more Danish patients received radiotherapy compared with their Swedish counterparts (35% v. 9%).

Standard follow-up care after first complete remission is similar in Denmark and Sweden and typically includes symptom assessment, clinical examination, and blood tests at 3- to 4-month intervals for 2 years, and 6-month intervals in the third year. After 3 years, Swedish patients are seen annually for 2 years and then follow-up is ended for most patients. In Denmark, 6-month checks are continued until 5 years and then follow-up is usually ended. However, in Denmark guidelines support routine computerized tomography (CT) scans of the neck, abdomen, and thorax every 6 months for 2 years, which is not encouraged by guidelines in Sweden.

Early relapse detection aims to improve survival, and although low disease burden is associated with durable survival in patients treated for relapsed DLBCL, most studies show similar outcomes for imaging versus non-imaging detection. Additionally, previous retrospective studies that have reported survival differences based on relapse detection method are prone to lead-time bias, according to the researchers.

Given that a majority of patients with recurrent DLBCL experience symptoms before relapse, that elevated lactate dehyrogenase or abnormal physical examination may raise suspicion, and that exposure to ionizing radiation from medical imaging can lead to radiation-induced cancers, “routine imaging for DLBCL in first [complete remission] is not recommended,” the authors wrote.

The research was supported in part by the North Denmark Region. Dr. El-Galaly and coauthors reported having no financial disclosures.

Crowded street

Photo by Pavel Novak

VIENNA—Living in overcrowded conditions may affect a young person’s risk of developing certain subtypes of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), according to researchers.

They studied more than 600 children and young adults with HL in England and found that patients who lived in areas with more overcrowded households had a lower incidence of nodular sclerosis (NS) HL but a higher incidence of the not-otherwise-specified (NOS) subtype of HL.

“Our findings related to the NS subtype may suggest that the recurrent infections to which children living in overcrowded conditions are likely to have been exposed stimulate their immune systems and, hence, protect them against developing this type of cancer later in their childhood and early adult life,” said Richard McNally, PhD, of Newcastle University in the UK.

“Those who have a genetic susceptibility to HL and have been less exposed to infection through not living in such overcrowded conditions may have less developed immune systems as a result and are therefore at greater risk of developing this subtype.”

Dr McNally and his colleagues added that it’s more difficult to interpret the findings in the NOS group because this subtype of HL is very heterogeneous. The team said the role of chance cannot be ruled out.

They presented this research at the 2015 European Cancer Congress (abstract 1414).

Dr McNally and his colleagues wanted to gain a better understanding of factors that cause HL, so they analyzed a cohort of young HL patients in Northern England, looking at factors such as sex, age, and socio-economic deprivation.

The researchers evaluated 621 cases of HL recorded in the Northern Region Young Persons’ Malignant Disease Registry. Patients were ages 0 to 24 at diagnosis and were diagnosed between 1968 and 2003.

There were 5 different subtypes of HL in this group:

• 247 cases of the NS type
• 143 NOS
• 105 of mixed cellularity
• 58 lymphocyte-rich cases
• 68 “others.”

Age and sex

Overall, more males than females had HL, but the male-female ratio varied by both age group and subtype. The age-standardized rate (ASR) of HL for males was 18.15 per million persons per year, and the ASR for females was 10.52 per million persons per year.

For the NS subtype, there were 130 males and 117 females, but this was reversed at ages 20 to 24, with 72 females and 55 males. The ASR for NS HL at 20 to 24 was 14.26 for males and 18.79 for females.

“That this change takes place after puberty seems to suggest that estrogens may be responsible in some way,” Dr McNally said. “There are a lot of genes directly regulated by sex hormones, and they are obvious suspects. Alternatively, epigenetic changes . . .  influencing key genes, induced by sex hormones, may be responsible.”

Overcrowding

The researchers calculated socio-economic deprivation using the 4 components of the Townsend deprivation score: household overcrowding, non-home ownership, unemployment, and households with no car.

They observed a lower incidence of NS HL among those patients living in areas with more overcrowded households. The relative risk of NS HL was 0.88 for a 1% increase in household overcrowding (P<0.001).

For the NOS subtype, the reverse was seen. A 1% increase in household overcrowding was associated with an increased incidence of NOS HL—a relative risk of 1.17.

Overcrowding seemed to have no effect on the incidence of mixed-cellularity HL or lymphocyte-rich HL.

“We knew already that recurrent infections may protect against childhood leukemia, and now it looks as we can add Hodgkin lymphoma and, particularly its NS subtype, to the list,” Dr McNally said. “In order to further investigate the factors involved, prospective studies should investigate the hormonal changes and recurrent infections and their direct link to the risk of lymphoma, but such studies are difficult to do in rare diseases.”

“A practical follow-up would be case-control studies examining biological markers related to exposure to a multitude of infectious agents, and indeed to hormonal status itself, while genetic studies are another possibility.”

Crowded street

Photo by Pavel Novak

VIENNA—Living in overcrowded conditions may affect a young person’s risk of developing certain subtypes of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), according to researchers.

They studied more than 600 children and young adults with HL in England and found that patients who lived in areas with more overcrowded households had a lower incidence of nodular sclerosis (NS) HL but a higher incidence of the not-otherwise-specified (NOS) subtype of HL.

“Our findings related to the NS subtype may suggest that the recurrent infections to which children living in overcrowded conditions are likely to have been exposed stimulate their immune systems and, hence, protect them against developing this type of cancer later in their childhood and early adult life,” said Richard McNally, PhD, of Newcastle University in the UK.

“Those who have a genetic susceptibility to HL and have been less exposed to infection through not living in such overcrowded conditions may have less developed immune systems as a result and are therefore at greater risk of developing this subtype.”

Dr McNally and his colleagues added that it’s more difficult to interpret the findings in the NOS group because this subtype of HL is very heterogeneous. The team said the role of chance cannot be ruled out.

They presented this research at the 2015 European Cancer Congress (abstract 1414).

Dr McNally and his colleagues wanted to gain a better understanding of factors that cause HL, so they analyzed a cohort of young HL patients in Northern England, looking at factors such as sex, age, and socio-economic deprivation.

The researchers evaluated 621 cases of HL recorded in the Northern Region Young Persons’ Malignant Disease Registry. Patients were ages 0 to 24 at diagnosis and were diagnosed between 1968 and 2003.

There were 5 different subtypes of HL in this group:

• 247 cases of the NS type
• 143 NOS
• 105 of mixed cellularity
• 58 lymphocyte-rich cases
• 68 “others.”

Age and sex

Overall, more males than females had HL, but the male-female ratio varied by both age group and subtype. The age-standardized rate (ASR) of HL for males was 18.15 per million persons per year, and the ASR for females was 10.52 per million persons per year.

For the NS subtype, there were 130 males and 117 females, but this was reversed at ages 20 to 24, with 72 females and 55 males. The ASR for NS HL at 20 to 24 was 14.26 for males and 18.79 for females.

“That this change takes place after puberty seems to suggest that estrogens may be responsible in some way,” Dr McNally said. “There are a lot of genes directly regulated by sex hormones, and they are obvious suspects. Alternatively, epigenetic changes . . .  influencing key genes, induced by sex hormones, may be responsible.”

Overcrowding

The researchers calculated socio-economic deprivation using the 4 components of the Townsend deprivation score: household overcrowding, non-home ownership, unemployment, and households with no car.

They observed a lower incidence of NS HL among those patients living in areas with more overcrowded households. The relative risk of NS HL was 0.88 for a 1% increase in household overcrowding (P<0.001).

For the NOS subtype, the reverse was seen. A 1% increase in household overcrowding was associated with an increased incidence of NOS HL—a relative risk of 1.17.

Overcrowding seemed to have no effect on the incidence of mixed-cellularity HL or lymphocyte-rich HL.

“We knew already that recurrent infections may protect against childhood leukemia, and now it looks as we can add Hodgkin lymphoma and, particularly its NS subtype, to the list,” Dr McNally said. “In order to further investigate the factors involved, prospective studies should investigate the hormonal changes and recurrent infections and their direct link to the risk of lymphoma, but such studies are difficult to do in rare diseases.”

“A practical follow-up would be case-control studies examining biological markers related to exposure to a multitude of infectious agents, and indeed to hormonal status itself, while genetic studies are another possibility.”

Crowded street

Photo by Pavel Novak

VIENNA—Living in overcrowded conditions may affect a young person’s risk of developing certain subtypes of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), according to researchers.

They studied more than 600 children and young adults with HL in England and found that patients who lived in areas with more overcrowded households had a lower incidence of nodular sclerosis (NS) HL but a higher incidence of the not-otherwise-specified (NOS) subtype of HL.

“Our findings related to the NS subtype may suggest that the recurrent infections to which children living in overcrowded conditions are likely to have been exposed stimulate their immune systems and, hence, protect them against developing this type of cancer later in their childhood and early adult life,” said Richard McNally, PhD, of Newcastle University in the UK.

“Those who have a genetic susceptibility to HL and have been less exposed to infection through not living in such overcrowded conditions may have less developed immune systems as a result and are therefore at greater risk of developing this subtype.”

Dr McNally and his colleagues added that it’s more difficult to interpret the findings in the NOS group because this subtype of HL is very heterogeneous. The team said the role of chance cannot be ruled out.

They presented this research at the 2015 European Cancer Congress (abstract 1414).

Dr McNally and his colleagues wanted to gain a better understanding of factors that cause HL, so they analyzed a cohort of young HL patients in Northern England, looking at factors such as sex, age, and socio-economic deprivation.

The researchers evaluated 621 cases of HL recorded in the Northern Region Young Persons’ Malignant Disease Registry. Patients were ages 0 to 24 at diagnosis and were diagnosed between 1968 and 2003.

There were 5 different subtypes of HL in this group:

• 247 cases of the NS type
• 143 NOS
• 105 of mixed cellularity
• 58 lymphocyte-rich cases
• 68 “others.”

Age and sex

Overall, more males than females had HL, but the male-female ratio varied by both age group and subtype. The age-standardized rate (ASR) of HL for males was 18.15 per million persons per year, and the ASR for females was 10.52 per million persons per year.

For the NS subtype, there were 130 males and 117 females, but this was reversed at ages 20 to 24, with 72 females and 55 males. The ASR for NS HL at 20 to 24 was 14.26 for males and 18.79 for females.

“That this change takes place after puberty seems to suggest that estrogens may be responsible in some way,” Dr McNally said. “There are a lot of genes directly regulated by sex hormones, and they are obvious suspects. Alternatively, epigenetic changes . . .  influencing key genes, induced by sex hormones, may be responsible.”

Overcrowding

The researchers calculated socio-economic deprivation using the 4 components of the Townsend deprivation score: household overcrowding, non-home ownership, unemployment, and households with no car.

They observed a lower incidence of NS HL among those patients living in areas with more overcrowded households. The relative risk of NS HL was 0.88 for a 1% increase in household overcrowding (P<0.001).

For the NOS subtype, the reverse was seen. A 1% increase in household overcrowding was associated with an increased incidence of NOS HL—a relative risk of 1.17.

Overcrowding seemed to have no effect on the incidence of mixed-cellularity HL or lymphocyte-rich HL.

“We knew already that recurrent infections may protect against childhood leukemia, and now it looks as we can add Hodgkin lymphoma and, particularly its NS subtype, to the list,” Dr McNally said. “In order to further investigate the factors involved, prospective studies should investigate the hormonal changes and recurrent infections and their direct link to the risk of lymphoma, but such studies are difficult to do in rare diseases.”

“A practical follow-up would be case-control studies examining biological markers related to exposure to a multitude of infectious agents, and indeed to hormonal status itself, while genetic studies are another possibility.”

Radiation therapist preparing

woman for radiotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

VIENNA—Millions of people throughout the world are dying from potentially treatable cancers because of a chronic underinvestment in radiotherapy resources, according to a new report.

The report suggests that expanding access to radiotherapy services will require a sizeable investment upfront, but that investment could bring economic benefits of up to $365 billion in developing countries over the next 20 years.

The report was published in The Lancet Oncology and presented at the 2015 European Cancer Congress.

The report estimates that 204 million fractions of radiotherapy will be needed to treat the 12 million cancer patients worldwide who could benefit from treatment in 2035.

But the cost per fraction is highly cost-effective and low compared to the price of many new cancer drugs, according to the report’s authors.

They estimate that full access to radiotherapy could be achieved for all patients in need in low-and middle income countries (LMIC) by 2035 for $97 billion, with potential health benefits of 27 million life-years saved and economic benefits ranging from $278 billion to $365 billion over the next 20 years.

“There is a widespread misconception that the costs of providing radiotherapy put it beyond the reach of all but the richest countries, [but] nothing could be further from the truth,” said Rifat Atun, MBBS, of Harvard University in Boston, Massachusetts.

“Our work . . .  clearly shows that not only can this essential service be deployed safely and high quality treatment delivered in low- and middle-income countries, but that scale-up of radiotherapy capacity is a feasible and highly cost-effective investment.”

The report provides details on access to radiotherapy services across the world, on a country-by-country basis. The authors calculated the costs and benefits of meeting the worldwide shortfall in resources and bridging the gap in access to effective treatment.

Estimates suggest that, at present, about 40% to 60% of cancer patients worldwide have access to radiotherapy. Even in high-income countries like Canada, Australia, and the UK, numbers of radiotherapy facilities, equipment, and trained staff are inadequate.

Access is worst in low-income countries, where as many as 9 out of 10 people cannot access radiotherapy. The problem of access is especially acute in Africa. In most African countries, radiotherapy is virtually non-existent. Forty countries have no radiotherapy facilities at all.

“The time has come to agree and implement immediate actions to tackle the global shortfall in radiotherapy services and the crisis of access to this highly effective treatment,” Dr Atun said.

With that in mind, he and his colleagues called for the following 6 targets to be met.

By 2020:

• 80% of countries to have comprehensive cancer plans that include radiotherapy.
• Each LMIC to create 1 new center for treatment and training.
• 80% of LMICs to include radiotherapy services in their universal health coverage plans.

By 2025:

• A 25% increase in radiotherapy treatment capacity.
• LMICs to train 7500 radiation oncologists, 20,000 radiotherapy radiographers, and 6000 medical physicists.
• $46 billion of upfront investment to be raised to establish radiotherapy infrastructure and training in LMICs (with help from international banks and the private sector).

“The evidence outlined in the [report] reinforces the case for investing in radiotherapy as an essential component of cancer control,” said Mary Gospodarowicz, MD, co-chair of the UICC Global Task Force on Radiotherapy for Cancer Control.

“The building of radiotherapy capacity will require large initial investment. However, the treatment is more cost-effective than chemotherapy and surgery for treating cancer, and the health and economic benefits will be realized in just 10 to 15 years.”

Radiation therapist preparing

woman for radiotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

VIENNA—Millions of people throughout the world are dying from potentially treatable cancers because of a chronic underinvestment in radiotherapy resources, according to a new report.

The report suggests that expanding access to radiotherapy services will require a sizeable investment upfront, but that investment could bring economic benefits of up to $365 billion in developing countries over the next 20 years.

The report was published in The Lancet Oncology and presented at the 2015 European Cancer Congress.

The report estimates that 204 million fractions of radiotherapy will be needed to treat the 12 million cancer patients worldwide who could benefit from treatment in 2035.

But the cost per fraction is highly cost-effective and low compared to the price of many new cancer drugs, according to the report’s authors.

They estimate that full access to radiotherapy could be achieved for all patients in need in low-and middle income countries (LMIC) by 2035 for $97 billion, with potential health benefits of 27 million life-years saved and economic benefits ranging from $278 billion to $365 billion over the next 20 years.

“There is a widespread misconception that the costs of providing radiotherapy put it beyond the reach of all but the richest countries, [but] nothing could be further from the truth,” said Rifat Atun, MBBS, of Harvard University in Boston, Massachusetts.

“Our work . . .  clearly shows that not only can this essential service be deployed safely and high quality treatment delivered in low- and middle-income countries, but that scale-up of radiotherapy capacity is a feasible and highly cost-effective investment.”

The report provides details on access to radiotherapy services across the world, on a country-by-country basis. The authors calculated the costs and benefits of meeting the worldwide shortfall in resources and bridging the gap in access to effective treatment.

Estimates suggest that, at present, about 40% to 60% of cancer patients worldwide have access to radiotherapy. Even in high-income countries like Canada, Australia, and the UK, numbers of radiotherapy facilities, equipment, and trained staff are inadequate.

Access is worst in low-income countries, where as many as 9 out of 10 people cannot access radiotherapy. The problem of access is especially acute in Africa. In most African countries, radiotherapy is virtually non-existent. Forty countries have no radiotherapy facilities at all.

“The time has come to agree and implement immediate actions to tackle the global shortfall in radiotherapy services and the crisis of access to this highly effective treatment,” Dr Atun said.

With that in mind, he and his colleagues called for the following 6 targets to be met.

By 2020:

• 80% of countries to have comprehensive cancer plans that include radiotherapy.
• Each LMIC to create 1 new center for treatment and training.
• 80% of LMICs to include radiotherapy services in their universal health coverage plans.

By 2025:

• A 25% increase in radiotherapy treatment capacity.
• LMICs to train 7500 radiation oncologists, 20,000 radiotherapy radiographers, and 6000 medical physicists.
• $46 billion of upfront investment to be raised to establish radiotherapy infrastructure and training in LMICs (with help from international banks and the private sector).

“The evidence outlined in the [report] reinforces the case for investing in radiotherapy as an essential component of cancer control,” said Mary Gospodarowicz, MD, co-chair of the UICC Global Task Force on Radiotherapy for Cancer Control.

“The building of radiotherapy capacity will require large initial investment. However, the treatment is more cost-effective than chemotherapy and surgery for treating cancer, and the health and economic benefits will be realized in just 10 to 15 years.”

Radiation therapist preparing

woman for radiotherapy

Photo by Rhoda Baer

VIENNA—Millions of people throughout the world are dying from potentially treatable cancers because of a chronic underinvestment in radiotherapy resources, according to a new report.

The report suggests that expanding access to radiotherapy services will require a sizeable investment upfront, but that investment could bring economic benefits of up to $365 billion in developing countries over the next 20 years.

The report was published in The Lancet Oncology and presented at the 2015 European Cancer Congress.

The report estimates that 204 million fractions of radiotherapy will be needed to treat the 12 million cancer patients worldwide who could benefit from treatment in 2035.

But the cost per fraction is highly cost-effective and low compared to the price of many new cancer drugs, according to the report’s authors.

They estimate that full access to radiotherapy could be achieved for all patients in need in low-and middle income countries (LMIC) by 2035 for $97 billion, with potential health benefits of 27 million life-years saved and economic benefits ranging from $278 billion to $365 billion over the next 20 years.

“There is a widespread misconception that the costs of providing radiotherapy put it beyond the reach of all but the richest countries, [but] nothing could be further from the truth,” said Rifat Atun, MBBS, of Harvard University in Boston, Massachusetts.

“Our work . . .  clearly shows that not only can this essential service be deployed safely and high quality treatment delivered in low- and middle-income countries, but that scale-up of radiotherapy capacity is a feasible and highly cost-effective investment.”

The report provides details on access to radiotherapy services across the world, on a country-by-country basis. The authors calculated the costs and benefits of meeting the worldwide shortfall in resources and bridging the gap in access to effective treatment.

Estimates suggest that, at present, about 40% to 60% of cancer patients worldwide have access to radiotherapy. Even in high-income countries like Canada, Australia, and the UK, numbers of radiotherapy facilities, equipment, and trained staff are inadequate.

Access is worst in low-income countries, where as many as 9 out of 10 people cannot access radiotherapy. The problem of access is especially acute in Africa. In most African countries, radiotherapy is virtually non-existent. Forty countries have no radiotherapy facilities at all.

“The time has come to agree and implement immediate actions to tackle the global shortfall in radiotherapy services and the crisis of access to this highly effective treatment,” Dr Atun said.

With that in mind, he and his colleagues called for the following 6 targets to be met.

By 2020:

• 80% of countries to have comprehensive cancer plans that include radiotherapy.
• Each LMIC to create 1 new center for treatment and training.
• 80% of LMICs to include radiotherapy services in their universal health coverage plans.

By 2025:

• A 25% increase in radiotherapy treatment capacity.
• LMICs to train 7500 radiation oncologists, 20,000 radiotherapy radiographers, and 6000 medical physicists.
• $46 billion of upfront investment to be raised to establish radiotherapy infrastructure and training in LMICs (with help from international banks and the private sector).

“The evidence outlined in the [report] reinforces the case for investing in radiotherapy as an essential component of cancer control,” said Mary Gospodarowicz, MD, co-chair of the UICC Global Task Force on Radiotherapy for Cancer Control.

“The building of radiotherapy capacity will require large initial investment. However, the treatment is more cost-effective than chemotherapy and surgery for treating cancer, and the health and economic benefits will be realized in just 10 to 15 years.”

CHICAGO – Despite exciting new advances in the understanding of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, particularly with respect to prognostic features that predict risk for relapse, a watch-and-wait approach remains appropriate for asymptomatic disease pending outcomes data for newer approaches, according to Dr. John G. Gribben.

“When the disease is diagnosed, if it is asymptomatic, the correct approach – of course – is to continue to watch and wait,” Dr. Gribben of Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, said at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on Hematologic Malignancies.

Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated no advantage of early treatment vs. watch and wait, he said, adding that all of the trials published to date have used treatment of all-comers, and have used chlorambucil (CLB) as the treatment.

“There has been a whole variety of more modern trials that have used select prognostic features to identify subgroups of people who are at higher risk of relapse, who then go on to receive earlier treatment with either FCR [fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab], or more recently, ibrutinib,” he said.

These treatments are interesting, and the trials have demonstrated that prognostic features can identify patients who will progress more rapidly, but none have reported, he explained.

“In the absence of any published trial, I continue to ‘watch and wait’ patients, and there are no high-risk features which will make me alter that approach. Even the highest-risk features of complex karyotype and p53 abnormalities are not indications to treat patients until they become symptomatic,” he said.

It is striking how white counts vary widely in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, he noted.

“I don’t personally have any particular white count which is the number at which I’ll treat a patient. I don’t treat white counts, I treat patients,” he said.

When patients become symptomatic, the treatment of choice is now immunochemotherapies, irrespective of performance status, he said.

“Within the past year we have seen approval of obinutuzumab and ofatumumab for treatment of previously untreated CLL, as well as ibrutinib and idelalisib plus rituximab for treatment of both previously untreated CLL and those with 17p deletions for relapsed/refractory disease, as well as for up-front treatment,” he said, adding that these new agents greatly increase the available options for treating CLL.

Dr. Gribben said he considers these questions when it comes to treating CLL:

• Does the patient require treatment, or is watching and waiting appropriate?

• What is the goal of therapy? This is determined through conversation with the patient and the patient’s family regarding the side-effect profile they are willing to tolerate vs. the potential longer duration of response.

• What comorbidities are present to determine “fitness” for specific immunochemotherapy? Specifically, is the patient fit for an FCR-type approach, or is an alternative more appropriate?

• Is there a 17p deletion or P53 mutation that would make chemotherapy a less attractive option, and use of novel agents a more attractive option?

His approach, based on the answers to these questions, is as follows:

• In Rai stage 0-II patients with inactive disease, fitness and 17p deletion or p53 mutation status is irrelevant; no therapy is given.

• For active disease or Rai III-IV disease, a “go-go” patient, (or patient in good physical condition) is treated based on the presence or absence of 17p deletion or p53 mutation status. Those without 17p deletions or p53 mutations can be treated with FCR (his preference), or fludarabine-rituximab (FR). Bendamustine-rituximab (BR) is also an attractive option in certain cases, he said.

• For patients with active disease or Rai stage III-IV disease who do have a 17p deletion, his treatment of choice is either ibrutinib or idelalisib plus rituximab, depending on the patient.

• In “slow-go” patients (those with poorer physical condition) treatment is again based on mutational analysis. Those without mutation receive either FR, BR, or CLB plus obinutuzumab. These are very good options, and represent a spectrum to choose from based on the patient’s core abilities and ability to withstand particular types of treatments, he said.

“If they do have a 17p deletion, these patients are just as eligible for ibrutinib or idelalisib plus rituximab as the younger patients,” he noted.

His choices are based largely on the findings from the CLL8 trial (Lancet 2010 Oct;376[9747]:1164-74) which demonstrated an overall survival advantage with chemoimmunotherapy for front-line therapy vs. chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio, 0.68).

Over time, the advantage has become even more pronounced, according to follow-up data.

Starting with something “gentle” and saving the best treatment for later in the event of relapse was recently considered a reasonable approach, but in the wake of the CLL8 findings, this is no longer an acceptable plan, Dr. Gribben said.

“That’s why for my choice, FCR remains the treatment of choice for those patients who are fit enough to tolerate this type of approach,” he said.

In those with 17p deletions or P53 mutations, the CLL8 trial showed poor outcomes with FCR.

“This is a group of patients whom I believe chemoimmunotherapy would no longer be the treatment of choice,” he said, adding that newer findings suggest outcomes in these patients are better with novel agents.

He also noted that patients with 11q abnormalities, which were previously associated with a poor prognosis, were found in CLL8 to respond well to chemoimmunotherapy when used front line.

While there are special considerations in the elderly, and different strategies in relapsed and refractory disease, the future of CLL treatment is promising. The benefit of adding rituximab to combination chemotherapy is well established, the benefit of novel agents is also now established, and the future likely involves combining targeted therapies with each other and with immunochemotherapies, and combining targeted therapies across different pathways.

“And of course the hope is that we’re going to use the biology of the disease to decide what specific therapy is ideal for that patient. Better understanding of biology and genetics is facilitating rational development of new treatments,” he said, adding that whenever possible, patients should be treated within clinical trials.

Dr. Gribben has received research funding from the NIH, Cancer Research UK, MRC, and Wellcome Trust. He has received honoraria from Roche/Genentech, Celgene, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Gilead, Mundipharma, Infinity, TG Therapeutics, and Ascerta, and he has a patent or receives royalties from Celgene. He also has been the principal investigator on a clinical trial for Roche, Takeda, Pharmacyclics, Gilead, and Infinity.

sworcester@frontlinemedcom.com

CHICAGO – Despite exciting new advances in the understanding of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, particularly with respect to prognostic features that predict risk for relapse, a watch-and-wait approach remains appropriate for asymptomatic disease pending outcomes data for newer approaches, according to Dr. John G. Gribben.

“When the disease is diagnosed, if it is asymptomatic, the correct approach – of course – is to continue to watch and wait,” Dr. Gribben of Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, said at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on Hematologic Malignancies.

Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated no advantage of early treatment vs. watch and wait, he said, adding that all of the trials published to date have used treatment of all-comers, and have used chlorambucil (CLB) as the treatment.

“There has been a whole variety of more modern trials that have used select prognostic features to identify subgroups of people who are at higher risk of relapse, who then go on to receive earlier treatment with either FCR [fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab], or more recently, ibrutinib,” he said.

These treatments are interesting, and the trials have demonstrated that prognostic features can identify patients who will progress more rapidly, but none have reported, he explained.

“In the absence of any published trial, I continue to ‘watch and wait’ patients, and there are no high-risk features which will make me alter that approach. Even the highest-risk features of complex karyotype and p53 abnormalities are not indications to treat patients until they become symptomatic,” he said.

It is striking how white counts vary widely in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, he noted.

“I don’t personally have any particular white count which is the number at which I’ll treat a patient. I don’t treat white counts, I treat patients,” he said.

When patients become symptomatic, the treatment of choice is now immunochemotherapies, irrespective of performance status, he said.

“Within the past year we have seen approval of obinutuzumab and ofatumumab for treatment of previously untreated CLL, as well as ibrutinib and idelalisib plus rituximab for treatment of both previously untreated CLL and those with 17p deletions for relapsed/refractory disease, as well as for up-front treatment,” he said, adding that these new agents greatly increase the available options for treating CLL.

Dr. Gribben said he considers these questions when it comes to treating CLL:

• Does the patient require treatment, or is watching and waiting appropriate?

• What is the goal of therapy? This is determined through conversation with the patient and the patient’s family regarding the side-effect profile they are willing to tolerate vs. the potential longer duration of response.

• What comorbidities are present to determine “fitness” for specific immunochemotherapy? Specifically, is the patient fit for an FCR-type approach, or is an alternative more appropriate?

• Is there a 17p deletion or P53 mutation that would make chemotherapy a less attractive option, and use of novel agents a more attractive option?

His approach, based on the answers to these questions, is as follows:

• In Rai stage 0-II patients with inactive disease, fitness and 17p deletion or p53 mutation status is irrelevant; no therapy is given.

• For active disease or Rai III-IV disease, a “go-go” patient, (or patient in good physical condition) is treated based on the presence or absence of 17p deletion or p53 mutation status. Those without 17p deletions or p53 mutations can be treated with FCR (his preference), or fludarabine-rituximab (FR). Bendamustine-rituximab (BR) is also an attractive option in certain cases, he said.

• For patients with active disease or Rai stage III-IV disease who do have a 17p deletion, his treatment of choice is either ibrutinib or idelalisib plus rituximab, depending on the patient.

• In “slow-go” patients (those with poorer physical condition) treatment is again based on mutational analysis. Those without mutation receive either FR, BR, or CLB plus obinutuzumab. These are very good options, and represent a spectrum to choose from based on the patient’s core abilities and ability to withstand particular types of treatments, he said.

“If they do have a 17p deletion, these patients are just as eligible for ibrutinib or idelalisib plus rituximab as the younger patients,” he noted.

His choices are based largely on the findings from the CLL8 trial (Lancet 2010 Oct;376[9747]:1164-74) which demonstrated an overall survival advantage with chemoimmunotherapy for front-line therapy vs. chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio, 0.68).

Over time, the advantage has become even more pronounced, according to follow-up data.

Starting with something “gentle” and saving the best treatment for later in the event of relapse was recently considered a reasonable approach, but in the wake of the CLL8 findings, this is no longer an acceptable plan, Dr. Gribben said.

“That’s why for my choice, FCR remains the treatment of choice for those patients who are fit enough to tolerate this type of approach,” he said.

In those with 17p deletions or P53 mutations, the CLL8 trial showed poor outcomes with FCR.

“This is a group of patients whom I believe chemoimmunotherapy would no longer be the treatment of choice,” he said, adding that newer findings suggest outcomes in these patients are better with novel agents.

He also noted that patients with 11q abnormalities, which were previously associated with a poor prognosis, were found in CLL8 to respond well to chemoimmunotherapy when used front line.

While there are special considerations in the elderly, and different strategies in relapsed and refractory disease, the future of CLL treatment is promising. The benefit of adding rituximab to combination chemotherapy is well established, the benefit of novel agents is also now established, and the future likely involves combining targeted therapies with each other and with immunochemotherapies, and combining targeted therapies across different pathways.

“And of course the hope is that we’re going to use the biology of the disease to decide what specific therapy is ideal for that patient. Better understanding of biology and genetics is facilitating rational development of new treatments,” he said, adding that whenever possible, patients should be treated within clinical trials.

Dr. Gribben has received research funding from the NIH, Cancer Research UK, MRC, and Wellcome Trust. He has received honoraria from Roche/Genentech, Celgene, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Gilead, Mundipharma, Infinity, TG Therapeutics, and Ascerta, and he has a patent or receives royalties from Celgene. He also has been the principal investigator on a clinical trial for Roche, Takeda, Pharmacyclics, Gilead, and Infinity.

sworcester@frontlinemedcom.com

CHICAGO – Despite exciting new advances in the understanding of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, particularly with respect to prognostic features that predict risk for relapse, a watch-and-wait approach remains appropriate for asymptomatic disease pending outcomes data for newer approaches, according to Dr. John G. Gribben.

“When the disease is diagnosed, if it is asymptomatic, the correct approach – of course – is to continue to watch and wait,” Dr. Gribben of Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, said at the American Society of Hematology Meeting on Hematologic Malignancies.

Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated no advantage of early treatment vs. watch and wait, he said, adding that all of the trials published to date have used treatment of all-comers, and have used chlorambucil (CLB) as the treatment.

“There has been a whole variety of more modern trials that have used select prognostic features to identify subgroups of people who are at higher risk of relapse, who then go on to receive earlier treatment with either FCR [fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab], or more recently, ibrutinib,” he said.

These treatments are interesting, and the trials have demonstrated that prognostic features can identify patients who will progress more rapidly, but none have reported, he explained.

“In the absence of any published trial, I continue to ‘watch and wait’ patients, and there are no high-risk features which will make me alter that approach. Even the highest-risk features of complex karyotype and p53 abnormalities are not indications to treat patients until they become symptomatic,” he said.

It is striking how white counts vary widely in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, he noted.

“I don’t personally have any particular white count which is the number at which I’ll treat a patient. I don’t treat white counts, I treat patients,” he said.

When patients become symptomatic, the treatment of choice is now immunochemotherapies, irrespective of performance status, he said.

“Within the past year we have seen approval of obinutuzumab and ofatumumab for treatment of previously untreated CLL, as well as ibrutinib and idelalisib plus rituximab for treatment of both previously untreated CLL and those with 17p deletions for relapsed/refractory disease, as well as for up-front treatment,” he said, adding that these new agents greatly increase the available options for treating CLL.

Dr. Gribben said he considers these questions when it comes to treating CLL:

• Does the patient require treatment, or is watching and waiting appropriate?

• What is the goal of therapy? This is determined through conversation with the patient and the patient’s family regarding the side-effect profile they are willing to tolerate vs. the potential longer duration of response.

• What comorbidities are present to determine “fitness” for specific immunochemotherapy? Specifically, is the patient fit for an FCR-type approach, or is an alternative more appropriate?

• Is there a 17p deletion or P53 mutation that would make chemotherapy a less attractive option, and use of novel agents a more attractive option?

His approach, based on the answers to these questions, is as follows:

• In Rai stage 0-II patients with inactive disease, fitness and 17p deletion or p53 mutation status is irrelevant; no therapy is given.

• For active disease or Rai III-IV disease, a “go-go” patient, (or patient in good physical condition) is treated based on the presence or absence of 17p deletion or p53 mutation status. Those without 17p deletions or p53 mutations can be treated with FCR (his preference), or fludarabine-rituximab (FR). Bendamustine-rituximab (BR) is also an attractive option in certain cases, he said.

• For patients with active disease or Rai stage III-IV disease who do have a 17p deletion, his treatment of choice is either ibrutinib or idelalisib plus rituximab, depending on the patient.

• In “slow-go” patients (those with poorer physical condition) treatment is again based on mutational analysis. Those without mutation receive either FR, BR, or CLB plus obinutuzumab. These are very good options, and represent a spectrum to choose from based on the patient’s core abilities and ability to withstand particular types of treatments, he said.

“If they do have a 17p deletion, these patients are just as eligible for ibrutinib or idelalisib plus rituximab as the younger patients,” he noted.

His choices are based largely on the findings from the CLL8 trial (Lancet 2010 Oct;376[9747]:1164-74) which demonstrated an overall survival advantage with chemoimmunotherapy for front-line therapy vs. chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio, 0.68).

Over time, the advantage has become even more pronounced, according to follow-up data.

Starting with something “gentle” and saving the best treatment for later in the event of relapse was recently considered a reasonable approach, but in the wake of the CLL8 findings, this is no longer an acceptable plan, Dr. Gribben said.

“That’s why for my choice, FCR remains the treatment of choice for those patients who are fit enough to tolerate this type of approach,” he said.

In those with 17p deletions or P53 mutations, the CLL8 trial showed poor outcomes with FCR.

“This is a group of patients whom I believe chemoimmunotherapy would no longer be the treatment of choice,” he said, adding that newer findings suggest outcomes in these patients are better with novel agents.

He also noted that patients with 11q abnormalities, which were previously associated with a poor prognosis, were found in CLL8 to respond well to chemoimmunotherapy when used front line.

While there are special considerations in the elderly, and different strategies in relapsed and refractory disease, the future of CLL treatment is promising. The benefit of adding rituximab to combination chemotherapy is well established, the benefit of novel agents is also now established, and the future likely involves combining targeted therapies with each other and with immunochemotherapies, and combining targeted therapies across different pathways.

“And of course the hope is that we’re going to use the biology of the disease to decide what specific therapy is ideal for that patient. Better understanding of biology and genetics is facilitating rational development of new treatments,” he said, adding that whenever possible, patients should be treated within clinical trials.

Dr. Gribben has received research funding from the NIH, Cancer Research UK, MRC, and Wellcome Trust. He has received honoraria from Roche/Genentech, Celgene, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Gilead, Mundipharma, Infinity, TG Therapeutics, and Ascerta, and he has a patent or receives royalties from Celgene. He also has been the principal investigator on a clinical trial for Roche, Takeda, Pharmacyclics, Gilead, and Infinity.

sworcester@frontlinemedcom.com

Laurence Cooper, MD, PhD

Photo courtesy of MDACC

NEW YORK—Researchers have used a nonviral approach to create chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and tested these cells in safety trials.

Patients with advanced lymphoma or leukemia were infused with the nonvirally modified CD19-directed CAR T cells after autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Eighty-six percent of autologous HSCT recipients were alive 24 months after infusion, and 53% of allogeneic HSCT recipients were alive with a median follow-up of 6.5 months.

“Gratifyingly, the patients have not demonstrated any acute or late toxicity to these CAR T-cell infusions,” said Laurence Cooper, MD, PhD, formerly of MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) in Houston, Texas, and now with Ziopharm Oncology.

Dr Cooper presented these results at the inaugural CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference.

Some of the technology he described was conducted at MDACC. Dr Cooper is currently a visiting scientist there and will continue to supervise the development of this technology.

Dr Cooper said the appeal of this nonviral approach, which is a modified Sleeping Beauty approach, “is it essentially avoids the complexity of making a virus, a lentivirus or a retrovirus, it can be done at quite low cost, and really allows for a nimbleness to this system.”

Using a simple blood draw of 200 cc of peripheral blood—the process does not require apheresis—the T cells can be expanded on a feeder cell layer and genetically reprogrammed.

Sleeping Beauty system

The researchers reprogrammed the T cells using a 2-plasmid Sleeping Beauty system, which is a transposon/transposase system.

The transposon DNA plasmid codes for the cargo load, which, in this case, is the CAR. At the same time, the transposase DNA plasmid is electroporated, “which is really the secret sauce of the transposition event,” Dr Cooper explained.

After electroporation, the transposon/transposase are co-cultured with K562-derived artificial antigen-presenting cells (aAPC) and expanded with the integrated transposon of K562-aAPC. In this case, CD19 is on the aAPC.

CD19 is co-expressed with other co-stimulatory molecules, CD86 and 4-1BB ligand.

In addition, the researchers added a molecule of interleukin 15 that’s sewn in frame to the Fc region of an immunoglobulin that then activates the T cell in the context of these co-stimulatory molecules.

The T cells that have stable integrants of the CAR grow out over time. And those that have transient expression of the CAR die by neglect.

“By day 14, most of the T cells have the CAR sewn into the genome and are stably expressed,” Dr Cooper said.

The CAR used for these safety trials at MDACC targets CD19 and uses mouse scFv held in frame with an immunoglobulin 4 Fc (IgG4Fc) stalk.

It’s tunneled through the T-cell membrane and has 2 costimulatory molecules, signal 1 delivered by phosphorylation of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif in CD3ζ and signal 2 by the costimulatory domain CD28.

The researchers tested the CD19 CARs in 2 clinical settings—one with T cells that were patient-derived and infused after autologous HSCT, and the second with T cells that were derived from a third party and infused after allogeneic HSCT.

Infusion after autologous HSCT

The researchers first tried the CARs in 7 non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who had an autologous HSCT. Their median age was 52 (range, 36-61).

Five patients received a starting CAR T-cell dose of 5x10⁸ cells/m², and 2 received 5x10⁹ cells/m².

Six patients (86%) remain alive and are in complete remission (CR) at a median follow-up of 24 months.

Infusion after allogeneic HSCT

The researchers expanded the investigation to a wider cohort of 19 patients who had undergone allogeneic HSCT.

Seventeen patients had advanced CD19-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 2 had non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Their median age was 35 (range, 21-56).

All patients were on graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with tacrolimus at the time of CAR infusion. A subset of these allogeneic transplant patients had haploidentical donors rather than matched sibling donors.

Five patients received a CAR T-cell dose of 10⁶, 6 patients received 10⁷, 5 received 5x10⁷, and 3 received 5x10⁸ cells/m² based on recipient body surface area.

Fifty-eight percent of patients (11/19) achieved a CR, and 10 remain alive a median of 6.5 months after CAR T-cell infusion.

Three patients developed GVHD, 1 with steroid-refractory acute liver disease, 1 with grade 2 acute skin disease, and 1 with chronic limited skin disease. The incidence of GVHD was lower than historical controls at MDACC, Dr Cooper said.

“[G]ratifyingly, in this clinical setting of minimal disease, patients did not have any acute or late toxicity from these infusions,” he added.

And the rate of cytomegalovirus reactivation after CAR T-cell infusion was 24%, compared with 41% for patients after transplant at MDACC without CAR T-cell infusion.

Eight patients received haploidentical HSCT followed by CAR T-cell infusion, and 75% (6/8) remain in CR.

Persistence of infused T cells

The researchers used 2 forms of PCR—qPCR and droplet PCR—to map the fate of the CARs.

“Roughly speaking, for these patients, and this is in line with the literature, in terms of those T cells that are activated through CD28 in contrast to 4-1BB, these T cells are, on average, living about 28 or so days post-infusion,” Dr Cooper noted.

He said this is similar to results observed with CARs being tested at the National Cancer Institute and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Laurence Cooper, MD, PhD

Photo courtesy of MDACC

NEW YORK—Researchers have used a nonviral approach to create chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and tested these cells in safety trials.

Patients with advanced lymphoma or leukemia were infused with the nonvirally modified CD19-directed CAR T cells after autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Eighty-six percent of autologous HSCT recipients were alive 24 months after infusion, and 53% of allogeneic HSCT recipients were alive with a median follow-up of 6.5 months.

“Gratifyingly, the patients have not demonstrated any acute or late toxicity to these CAR T-cell infusions,” said Laurence Cooper, MD, PhD, formerly of MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) in Houston, Texas, and now with Ziopharm Oncology.

Dr Cooper presented these results at the inaugural CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference.

Some of the technology he described was conducted at MDACC. Dr Cooper is currently a visiting scientist there and will continue to supervise the development of this technology.

Dr Cooper said the appeal of this nonviral approach, which is a modified Sleeping Beauty approach, “is it essentially avoids the complexity of making a virus, a lentivirus or a retrovirus, it can be done at quite low cost, and really allows for a nimbleness to this system.”

Using a simple blood draw of 200 cc of peripheral blood—the process does not require apheresis—the T cells can be expanded on a feeder cell layer and genetically reprogrammed.

Sleeping Beauty system

The researchers reprogrammed the T cells using a 2-plasmid Sleeping Beauty system, which is a transposon/transposase system.

The transposon DNA plasmid codes for the cargo load, which, in this case, is the CAR. At the same time, the transposase DNA plasmid is electroporated, “which is really the secret sauce of the transposition event,” Dr Cooper explained.

After electroporation, the transposon/transposase are co-cultured with K562-derived artificial antigen-presenting cells (aAPC) and expanded with the integrated transposon of K562-aAPC. In this case, CD19 is on the aAPC.

CD19 is co-expressed with other co-stimulatory molecules, CD86 and 4-1BB ligand.

In addition, the researchers added a molecule of interleukin 15 that’s sewn in frame to the Fc region of an immunoglobulin that then activates the T cell in the context of these co-stimulatory molecules.

The T cells that have stable integrants of the CAR grow out over time. And those that have transient expression of the CAR die by neglect.

“By day 14, most of the T cells have the CAR sewn into the genome and are stably expressed,” Dr Cooper said.

The CAR used for these safety trials at MDACC targets CD19 and uses mouse scFv held in frame with an immunoglobulin 4 Fc (IgG4Fc) stalk.

It’s tunneled through the T-cell membrane and has 2 costimulatory molecules, signal 1 delivered by phosphorylation of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif in CD3ζ and signal 2 by the costimulatory domain CD28.

The researchers tested the CD19 CARs in 2 clinical settings—one with T cells that were patient-derived and infused after autologous HSCT, and the second with T cells that were derived from a third party and infused after allogeneic HSCT.

Infusion after autologous HSCT

The researchers first tried the CARs in 7 non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who had an autologous HSCT. Their median age was 52 (range, 36-61).

Five patients received a starting CAR T-cell dose of 5x10⁸ cells/m², and 2 received 5x10⁹ cells/m².

Six patients (86%) remain alive and are in complete remission (CR) at a median follow-up of 24 months.

Infusion after allogeneic HSCT

The researchers expanded the investigation to a wider cohort of 19 patients who had undergone allogeneic HSCT.

Seventeen patients had advanced CD19-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 2 had non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Their median age was 35 (range, 21-56).

All patients were on graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with tacrolimus at the time of CAR infusion. A subset of these allogeneic transplant patients had haploidentical donors rather than matched sibling donors.

Five patients received a CAR T-cell dose of 10⁶, 6 patients received 10⁷, 5 received 5x10⁷, and 3 received 5x10⁸ cells/m² based on recipient body surface area.

Fifty-eight percent of patients (11/19) achieved a CR, and 10 remain alive a median of 6.5 months after CAR T-cell infusion.

Three patients developed GVHD, 1 with steroid-refractory acute liver disease, 1 with grade 2 acute skin disease, and 1 with chronic limited skin disease. The incidence of GVHD was lower than historical controls at MDACC, Dr Cooper said.

“[G]ratifyingly, in this clinical setting of minimal disease, patients did not have any acute or late toxicity from these infusions,” he added.

And the rate of cytomegalovirus reactivation after CAR T-cell infusion was 24%, compared with 41% for patients after transplant at MDACC without CAR T-cell infusion.

Eight patients received haploidentical HSCT followed by CAR T-cell infusion, and 75% (6/8) remain in CR.

Persistence of infused T cells

The researchers used 2 forms of PCR—qPCR and droplet PCR—to map the fate of the CARs.

“Roughly speaking, for these patients, and this is in line with the literature, in terms of those T cells that are activated through CD28 in contrast to 4-1BB, these T cells are, on average, living about 28 or so days post-infusion,” Dr Cooper noted.

He said this is similar to results observed with CARs being tested at the National Cancer Institute and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Laurence Cooper, MD, PhD

Photo courtesy of MDACC

NEW YORK—Researchers have used a nonviral approach to create chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and tested these cells in safety trials.

Patients with advanced lymphoma or leukemia were infused with the nonvirally modified CD19-directed CAR T cells after autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Eighty-six percent of autologous HSCT recipients were alive 24 months after infusion, and 53% of allogeneic HSCT recipients were alive with a median follow-up of 6.5 months.

“Gratifyingly, the patients have not demonstrated any acute or late toxicity to these CAR T-cell infusions,” said Laurence Cooper, MD, PhD, formerly of MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) in Houston, Texas, and now with Ziopharm Oncology.

Dr Cooper presented these results at the inaugural CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference.

Some of the technology he described was conducted at MDACC. Dr Cooper is currently a visiting scientist there and will continue to supervise the development of this technology.

Dr Cooper said the appeal of this nonviral approach, which is a modified Sleeping Beauty approach, “is it essentially avoids the complexity of making a virus, a lentivirus or a retrovirus, it can be done at quite low cost, and really allows for a nimbleness to this system.”

Using a simple blood draw of 200 cc of peripheral blood—the process does not require apheresis—the T cells can be expanded on a feeder cell layer and genetically reprogrammed.

Sleeping Beauty system

The researchers reprogrammed the T cells using a 2-plasmid Sleeping Beauty system, which is a transposon/transposase system.

The transposon DNA plasmid codes for the cargo load, which, in this case, is the CAR. At the same time, the transposase DNA plasmid is electroporated, “which is really the secret sauce of the transposition event,” Dr Cooper explained.

After electroporation, the transposon/transposase are co-cultured with K562-derived artificial antigen-presenting cells (aAPC) and expanded with the integrated transposon of K562-aAPC. In this case, CD19 is on the aAPC.

CD19 is co-expressed with other co-stimulatory molecules, CD86 and 4-1BB ligand.

In addition, the researchers added a molecule of interleukin 15 that’s sewn in frame to the Fc region of an immunoglobulin that then activates the T cell in the context of these co-stimulatory molecules.

The T cells that have stable integrants of the CAR grow out over time. And those that have transient expression of the CAR die by neglect.

“By day 14, most of the T cells have the CAR sewn into the genome and are stably expressed,” Dr Cooper said.

The CAR used for these safety trials at MDACC targets CD19 and uses mouse scFv held in frame with an immunoglobulin 4 Fc (IgG4Fc) stalk.

It’s tunneled through the T-cell membrane and has 2 costimulatory molecules, signal 1 delivered by phosphorylation of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif in CD3ζ and signal 2 by the costimulatory domain CD28.

The researchers tested the CD19 CARs in 2 clinical settings—one with T cells that were patient-derived and infused after autologous HSCT, and the second with T cells that were derived from a third party and infused after allogeneic HSCT.

Infusion after autologous HSCT

The researchers first tried the CARs in 7 non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who had an autologous HSCT. Their median age was 52 (range, 36-61).

Five patients received a starting CAR T-cell dose of 5x10⁸ cells/m², and 2 received 5x10⁹ cells/m².

Six patients (86%) remain alive and are in complete remission (CR) at a median follow-up of 24 months.

Infusion after allogeneic HSCT

The researchers expanded the investigation to a wider cohort of 19 patients who had undergone allogeneic HSCT.

Seventeen patients had advanced CD19-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 2 had non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Their median age was 35 (range, 21-56).

All patients were on graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with tacrolimus at the time of CAR infusion. A subset of these allogeneic transplant patients had haploidentical donors rather than matched sibling donors.

Five patients received a CAR T-cell dose of 10⁶, 6 patients received 10⁷, 5 received 5x10⁷, and 3 received 5x10⁸ cells/m² based on recipient body surface area.

Fifty-eight percent of patients (11/19) achieved a CR, and 10 remain alive a median of 6.5 months after CAR T-cell infusion.

Three patients developed GVHD, 1 with steroid-refractory acute liver disease, 1 with grade 2 acute skin disease, and 1 with chronic limited skin disease. The incidence of GVHD was lower than historical controls at MDACC, Dr Cooper said.

“[G]ratifyingly, in this clinical setting of minimal disease, patients did not have any acute or late toxicity from these infusions,” he added.

And the rate of cytomegalovirus reactivation after CAR T-cell infusion was 24%, compared with 41% for patients after transplant at MDACC without CAR T-cell infusion.

Eight patients received haploidentical HSCT followed by CAR T-cell infusion, and 75% (6/8) remain in CR.

Persistence of infused T cells

The researchers used 2 forms of PCR—qPCR and droplet PCR—to map the fate of the CARs.

“Roughly speaking, for these patients, and this is in line with the literature, in terms of those T cells that are activated through CD28 in contrast to 4-1BB, these T cells are, on average, living about 28 or so days post-infusion,” Dr Cooper noted.

He said this is similar to results observed with CARs being tested at the National Cancer Institute and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Doctor and patient

Photo by Logan Tuttle

VIENNA—Despite progress made in recent years, there are “major problems” in pediatric oncology care in Europe, according to a report from the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE).

Cancer is still the first cause of death by disease in children age 1 and older in Europe, and more than 300,000 European citizens are pediatric cancer survivors.

These individuals have a higher risk of death at 5 years after diagnosis than that of the general population.

“This is a serious problem for patients, their families, and for health services, with major inequalities existing across Europe,” said SIOPE President Gilles Vassal, MD, PhD, of the Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France.

“Add to this the fact that 35% of such cancers normally occur before the child is 5 years old and that many pediatric cancers are difficult to treat, and you will understand why we thought it essential to try to tackle this problem in a practical way.”

The resulting report, “The SIOPE Strategic Plan: A European Cancer Plan for Children and Adolescents,” was recently presented at the 2015 European Cancer Congress.

Problem-solving

The report was drawn up after widespread consultation, including discussions with parents, patients, and survivors. It sets out existing problems and proposes solutions to tackle them.

Among these problems are poor access to new drugs for pediatric patients; lack of funding; disparities across Europe in access to treatment and, hence, survival; and the fact that pediatric oncology has been relatively isolated from the adult oncology community.

With the goal of fixing these problems, the report sets out a number of goals and lists the key factors that will be necessary in order to achieve them.

These include a commitment of all funding bodies to finance projects and structures of relevance to pediatric oncology; a strong partnership with patients, parents, and survivors, including better communication and dissemination of information; better collaboration with adult oncology; and transparent partnerships with industry.

Understanding biology

“One of the most important objectives focuses on increasing our knowledge of the biology of pediatric tumors,” said SIOPE President-Elect Martin Schrappe, MD, of the University of Kiel, Germany.

“Cancers in adults result from a multistep process, usually after exposure to external carcinogens such as tobacco, alcohol, and diet, and often progress over many years. Pediatric malignancies develop early in life and over a much shorter time period. This suggests that fewer and stronger events are required for them to progress. Compared with adult cancers, most of them show fewer genetic defects and have a lower genetic complexity.”

“Major progress has been made in understanding pediatric tumor biology, and this has led to the discovery of some unique cancer hallmarks. Now, we need to use modern, innovative technologies to further decipher the mechanisms of pediatric tumor development, progression, and relapse, and speed up its translation to the clinic.”

To do this effectively and fairly, according to the report, interactions need to be strengthened at several levels—between networks of basic research teams, between basic scientists and clinical researchers, and by increasing the involvement of patients and parents in the search for personalized treatments. SIOPE plans to monitor progress through research into outcomes.

Improving quality of life

Another important issue for SIOPE is improving the quality of life for survivors.

“We believe that, in 2020, there will be nearly half a million European pediatric cancer survivors, and many of them will have side effects that are severe enough to affect their daily lives,” Dr Schrappe said. “While the fact that so many survive is a cause for rejoicing, we have a duty to provide them with optimal long-term care so that the rest of their lives may be as normal as possible.”

“One way of doing this would be the creation of a ‘survivorship passport’ for each child and adolescent cured of a cancer. This would contain a history of their disease and treatment, together with relevant follow-up measures aimed at improving their quality of life and a database for storing the clinical data [that would] facilitate monitoring and research.”

Doctor and patient

Photo by Logan Tuttle

VIENNA—Despite progress made in recent years, there are “major problems” in pediatric oncology care in Europe, according to a report from the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE).

Cancer is still the first cause of death by disease in children age 1 and older in Europe, and more than 300,000 European citizens are pediatric cancer survivors.

These individuals have a higher risk of death at 5 years after diagnosis than that of the general population.

“This is a serious problem for patients, their families, and for health services, with major inequalities existing across Europe,” said SIOPE President Gilles Vassal, MD, PhD, of the Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France.

“Add to this the fact that 35% of such cancers normally occur before the child is 5 years old and that many pediatric cancers are difficult to treat, and you will understand why we thought it essential to try to tackle this problem in a practical way.”

The resulting report, “The SIOPE Strategic Plan: A European Cancer Plan for Children and Adolescents,” was recently presented at the 2015 European Cancer Congress.

Problem-solving

The report was drawn up after widespread consultation, including discussions with parents, patients, and survivors. It sets out existing problems and proposes solutions to tackle them.

Among these problems are poor access to new drugs for pediatric patients; lack of funding; disparities across Europe in access to treatment and, hence, survival; and the fact that pediatric oncology has been relatively isolated from the adult oncology community.

With the goal of fixing these problems, the report sets out a number of goals and lists the key factors that will be necessary in order to achieve them.

These include a commitment of all funding bodies to finance projects and structures of relevance to pediatric oncology; a strong partnership with patients, parents, and survivors, including better communication and dissemination of information; better collaboration with adult oncology; and transparent partnerships with industry.

Understanding biology

“One of the most important objectives focuses on increasing our knowledge of the biology of pediatric tumors,” said SIOPE President-Elect Martin Schrappe, MD, of the University of Kiel, Germany.

“Cancers in adults result from a multistep process, usually after exposure to external carcinogens such as tobacco, alcohol, and diet, and often progress over many years. Pediatric malignancies develop early in life and over a much shorter time period. This suggests that fewer and stronger events are required for them to progress. Compared with adult cancers, most of them show fewer genetic defects and have a lower genetic complexity.”

“Major progress has been made in understanding pediatric tumor biology, and this has led to the discovery of some unique cancer hallmarks. Now, we need to use modern, innovative technologies to further decipher the mechanisms of pediatric tumor development, progression, and relapse, and speed up its translation to the clinic.”

To do this effectively and fairly, according to the report, interactions need to be strengthened at several levels—between networks of basic research teams, between basic scientists and clinical researchers, and by increasing the involvement of patients and parents in the search for personalized treatments. SIOPE plans to monitor progress through research into outcomes.

Improving quality of life

Another important issue for SIOPE is improving the quality of life for survivors.

“We believe that, in 2020, there will be nearly half a million European pediatric cancer survivors, and many of them will have side effects that are severe enough to affect their daily lives,” Dr Schrappe said. “While the fact that so many survive is a cause for rejoicing, we have a duty to provide them with optimal long-term care so that the rest of their lives may be as normal as possible.”

“One way of doing this would be the creation of a ‘survivorship passport’ for each child and adolescent cured of a cancer. This would contain a history of their disease and treatment, together with relevant follow-up measures aimed at improving their quality of life and a database for storing the clinical data [that would] facilitate monitoring and research.”

Doctor and patient

Photo by Logan Tuttle

VIENNA—Despite progress made in recent years, there are “major problems” in pediatric oncology care in Europe, according to a report from the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE).

Cancer is still the first cause of death by disease in children age 1 and older in Europe, and more than 300,000 European citizens are pediatric cancer survivors.

These individuals have a higher risk of death at 5 years after diagnosis than that of the general population.

“This is a serious problem for patients, their families, and for health services, with major inequalities existing across Europe,” said SIOPE President Gilles Vassal, MD, PhD, of the Institut Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France.

“Add to this the fact that 35% of such cancers normally occur before the child is 5 years old and that many pediatric cancers are difficult to treat, and you will understand why we thought it essential to try to tackle this problem in a practical way.”

The resulting report, “The SIOPE Strategic Plan: A European Cancer Plan for Children and Adolescents,” was recently presented at the 2015 European Cancer Congress.

Problem-solving

The report was drawn up after widespread consultation, including discussions with parents, patients, and survivors. It sets out existing problems and proposes solutions to tackle them.

Among these problems are poor access to new drugs for pediatric patients; lack of funding; disparities across Europe in access to treatment and, hence, survival; and the fact that pediatric oncology has been relatively isolated from the adult oncology community.

With the goal of fixing these problems, the report sets out a number of goals and lists the key factors that will be necessary in order to achieve them.

These include a commitment of all funding bodies to finance projects and structures of relevance to pediatric oncology; a strong partnership with patients, parents, and survivors, including better communication and dissemination of information; better collaboration with adult oncology; and transparent partnerships with industry.

Understanding biology

“One of the most important objectives focuses on increasing our knowledge of the biology of pediatric tumors,” said SIOPE President-Elect Martin Schrappe, MD, of the University of Kiel, Germany.

“Cancers in adults result from a multistep process, usually after exposure to external carcinogens such as tobacco, alcohol, and diet, and often progress over many years. Pediatric malignancies develop early in life and over a much shorter time period. This suggests that fewer and stronger events are required for them to progress. Compared with adult cancers, most of them show fewer genetic defects and have a lower genetic complexity.”

“Major progress has been made in understanding pediatric tumor biology, and this has led to the discovery of some unique cancer hallmarks. Now, we need to use modern, innovative technologies to further decipher the mechanisms of pediatric tumor development, progression, and relapse, and speed up its translation to the clinic.”

To do this effectively and fairly, according to the report, interactions need to be strengthened at several levels—between networks of basic research teams, between basic scientists and clinical researchers, and by increasing the involvement of patients and parents in the search for personalized treatments. SIOPE plans to monitor progress through research into outcomes.

Improving quality of life

Another important issue for SIOPE is improving the quality of life for survivors.

“We believe that, in 2020, there will be nearly half a million European pediatric cancer survivors, and many of them will have side effects that are severe enough to affect their daily lives,” Dr Schrappe said. “While the fact that so many survive is a cause for rejoicing, we have a duty to provide them with optimal long-term care so that the rest of their lives may be as normal as possible.”

“One way of doing this would be the creation of a ‘survivorship passport’ for each child and adolescent cured of a cancer. This would contain a history of their disease and treatment, together with relevant follow-up measures aimed at improving their quality of life and a database for storing the clinical data [that would] facilitate monitoring and research.”