LayerRx Mapping ID
245
Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin

Rosai-Dorfman Disease

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Rosai-Dorfman Disease

Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD), also known as sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy, is a rare benign histioproliferative disorder of unknown etiology.1 Clinically, it is most frequently characterized by massive painless cervical lymphadenopathy with other systemic manifestations, including fever, night sweats, and weight loss. Accompanying laboratory findings include leukocytosis with neutrophilia, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia. Extranodal involvement has been noted in more than 40% of cases, and cutaneous lesions represent the most common form of extranodal disease.2 Cutaneous RDD is a distinct and rare entity limited to the skin without lymphadenopathy or other extracutaneous involvement.3 Patients with cutaneous RDD typically present with papules and plaques that can grow to form nodules with satellite lesions that resolve into fibrotic plaques before spontaneous regression.4

Histologic examination of cutaneous lesions of RDD reveals a dense nodular dermal and often subcutaneous infiltrate of characteristic large polygonal histiocytes termed Rosai-Dorfman cells, which feature abundant pale to eosinophilic cytoplasm, indistinct borders, and large vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli (Figure 1).4,5 Some multinucleate forms may be seen. These Rosai-Dorfman cells display positive staining for CD68 and S-100, and negative staining for CD1a on immunohistochemistry. Lymphocytes and plasma cells often are admixed with the Rosai-Dorfman cells, and neutrophils and eosinophils also may be present in the infiltrate.4 The histologic hallmark of RDD is emperipolesis, a phenomenon whereby inflammatory cells such as lymphocytes and plasma cells reside intact within the cytoplasm of histiocytes (Figure 2).5

Figure 1. Sheets of large polygonal histiocytes with admixed lymphocytes and plasma cells seen in Rosai-Dorfman disease (H&E, original magnification ×200).
     
Figure 2. Emperipolesis (histiocyte-engulfing lymphocytes) demonstrated in Rosai-Dorfman disease (H&E, original magnification ×600).

The histologic differential diagnosis of cutaneous lesions of RDD includes other histiocytic and xanthomatous diseases, including eruptive xanthoma, juvenile xanthogranuloma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, and solitary reticulohistiocytoma, which should not display emperipolesis. Eruptive xanthomas display collections of foamy histiocytes in the dermis and typically contain extracellular lipid. They may contain infiltrates of lymphocytes (Figure 3). Juvenile xanthogranuloma also features a dense infiltrate of histiocytes in the papillary and reticular dermis but distinctly shows Touton giant cells and lipidization of histiocytes (Figure 4). Both eruptive xanthomas and juvenile xanthogranulomas typically stain negatively for S-100. Langerhans cell histiocytosis is histologically characterized by a dermal infiltrate of Langerhans cells that have their own distinctive morphologic features. They are uniformly ovoid with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. Their nuclei are smaller than those of Rosai-Dorfman cells and have a kidney bean shape with inconspicuous nucleoli (Figure 5). Epidermotropism of these cells can be observed. Immunohistochemically, Langerhans cell histiocytosis typically is S-100 positive, CD1a positive, and langerin positive. Reticulohistiocytoma features histiocytes that have a characteristic dusty rose or ground glass cytoplasm with two-toned darker and lighter areas (Figure 6). Reticulohistiocytoma cells stain positively for CD68 but typically stain negatively for both CD1a and S-100.

Figure 3. Lipid-laden macrophages with foamy cytoplasm and extracellular lipid seen in eruptive xanthoma (H&E, original magnification ×400).
     
Figure 4. Touton giant cell (wreath of nuclei surrounded by foamy cytoplasm) featured in juvenile xanthogranuloma (H&E, original magnification ×600).
Figure 5. Dermal infiltrate of ovoid Langerhans cells with reniform nuclei in Langerhans cell histiocytosis (H&E, original magnification ×600).
      
Figure 6. Histiocytes with dusty rose–colored cytoplasm and admixed lymphocytes in a reticulohistiocytoma (H&E, original magnification ×400).
References

1. Rosai J, Dorfman RF. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. a newly recognized benign clinicopathological entity. Arch Pathol. 1969;87:63-70.

2. Foucar E, Rosai J, Dorfman RF. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): a review of the entity. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1990;7:19-73.

3. Brenn T, Calonje E, Granter SR, et al. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease is a distinct clinical entity. Am J Dermatopathol. 2002;24:385-391.

4. Wang KH, Chen WY, Lie HN, et al. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease: clinicopathological profiles, spectrum and evolution of 21 lesions in six patients. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154:277-286.

5. Chu P, LeBoit PE. Histologic features of cutaneous sinus histiocytosis (Rosai-Dorfman disease): study of cases both with and without systemic involvement. J Cutan Pathol. 1992;19:201-206.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Alyssa Miceli, DO; Nathan Cleaver, DO; Amy Spizuoco, DO

Dr. Miceli is from the College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury. Drs. Cleaver and Spizuoco are from Ackerman Academy of Dermatopathology, New York, New York.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Amy Spizuoco, DO, Ackerman Academy of Dermatopathology, 145 E 32nd Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10016
(alspiz@yahoo.com).

Issue
Cutis - 96(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
16, 39-40
Legacy Keywords
Rosai-Dorfman disease, sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy, emperipolesis, histioproliferative disorder, dermatopathology, histology, pathology
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Alyssa Miceli, DO; Nathan Cleaver, DO; Amy Spizuoco, DO

Dr. Miceli is from the College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury. Drs. Cleaver and Spizuoco are from Ackerman Academy of Dermatopathology, New York, New York.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Amy Spizuoco, DO, Ackerman Academy of Dermatopathology, 145 E 32nd Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10016
(alspiz@yahoo.com).

Author and Disclosure Information

Alyssa Miceli, DO; Nathan Cleaver, DO; Amy Spizuoco, DO

Dr. Miceli is from the College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury. Drs. Cleaver and Spizuoco are from Ackerman Academy of Dermatopathology, New York, New York.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Amy Spizuoco, DO, Ackerman Academy of Dermatopathology, 145 E 32nd Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10016
(alspiz@yahoo.com).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD), also known as sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy, is a rare benign histioproliferative disorder of unknown etiology.1 Clinically, it is most frequently characterized by massive painless cervical lymphadenopathy with other systemic manifestations, including fever, night sweats, and weight loss. Accompanying laboratory findings include leukocytosis with neutrophilia, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia. Extranodal involvement has been noted in more than 40% of cases, and cutaneous lesions represent the most common form of extranodal disease.2 Cutaneous RDD is a distinct and rare entity limited to the skin without lymphadenopathy or other extracutaneous involvement.3 Patients with cutaneous RDD typically present with papules and plaques that can grow to form nodules with satellite lesions that resolve into fibrotic plaques before spontaneous regression.4

Histologic examination of cutaneous lesions of RDD reveals a dense nodular dermal and often subcutaneous infiltrate of characteristic large polygonal histiocytes termed Rosai-Dorfman cells, which feature abundant pale to eosinophilic cytoplasm, indistinct borders, and large vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli (Figure 1).4,5 Some multinucleate forms may be seen. These Rosai-Dorfman cells display positive staining for CD68 and S-100, and negative staining for CD1a on immunohistochemistry. Lymphocytes and plasma cells often are admixed with the Rosai-Dorfman cells, and neutrophils and eosinophils also may be present in the infiltrate.4 The histologic hallmark of RDD is emperipolesis, a phenomenon whereby inflammatory cells such as lymphocytes and plasma cells reside intact within the cytoplasm of histiocytes (Figure 2).5

Figure 1. Sheets of large polygonal histiocytes with admixed lymphocytes and plasma cells seen in Rosai-Dorfman disease (H&E, original magnification ×200).
     
Figure 2. Emperipolesis (histiocyte-engulfing lymphocytes) demonstrated in Rosai-Dorfman disease (H&E, original magnification ×600).

The histologic differential diagnosis of cutaneous lesions of RDD includes other histiocytic and xanthomatous diseases, including eruptive xanthoma, juvenile xanthogranuloma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, and solitary reticulohistiocytoma, which should not display emperipolesis. Eruptive xanthomas display collections of foamy histiocytes in the dermis and typically contain extracellular lipid. They may contain infiltrates of lymphocytes (Figure 3). Juvenile xanthogranuloma also features a dense infiltrate of histiocytes in the papillary and reticular dermis but distinctly shows Touton giant cells and lipidization of histiocytes (Figure 4). Both eruptive xanthomas and juvenile xanthogranulomas typically stain negatively for S-100. Langerhans cell histiocytosis is histologically characterized by a dermal infiltrate of Langerhans cells that have their own distinctive morphologic features. They are uniformly ovoid with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. Their nuclei are smaller than those of Rosai-Dorfman cells and have a kidney bean shape with inconspicuous nucleoli (Figure 5). Epidermotropism of these cells can be observed. Immunohistochemically, Langerhans cell histiocytosis typically is S-100 positive, CD1a positive, and langerin positive. Reticulohistiocytoma features histiocytes that have a characteristic dusty rose or ground glass cytoplasm with two-toned darker and lighter areas (Figure 6). Reticulohistiocytoma cells stain positively for CD68 but typically stain negatively for both CD1a and S-100.

Figure 3. Lipid-laden macrophages with foamy cytoplasm and extracellular lipid seen in eruptive xanthoma (H&E, original magnification ×400).
     
Figure 4. Touton giant cell (wreath of nuclei surrounded by foamy cytoplasm) featured in juvenile xanthogranuloma (H&E, original magnification ×600).
Figure 5. Dermal infiltrate of ovoid Langerhans cells with reniform nuclei in Langerhans cell histiocytosis (H&E, original magnification ×600).
      
Figure 6. Histiocytes with dusty rose–colored cytoplasm and admixed lymphocytes in a reticulohistiocytoma (H&E, original magnification ×400).

Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD), also known as sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy, is a rare benign histioproliferative disorder of unknown etiology.1 Clinically, it is most frequently characterized by massive painless cervical lymphadenopathy with other systemic manifestations, including fever, night sweats, and weight loss. Accompanying laboratory findings include leukocytosis with neutrophilia, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia. Extranodal involvement has been noted in more than 40% of cases, and cutaneous lesions represent the most common form of extranodal disease.2 Cutaneous RDD is a distinct and rare entity limited to the skin without lymphadenopathy or other extracutaneous involvement.3 Patients with cutaneous RDD typically present with papules and plaques that can grow to form nodules with satellite lesions that resolve into fibrotic plaques before spontaneous regression.4

Histologic examination of cutaneous lesions of RDD reveals a dense nodular dermal and often subcutaneous infiltrate of characteristic large polygonal histiocytes termed Rosai-Dorfman cells, which feature abundant pale to eosinophilic cytoplasm, indistinct borders, and large vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli (Figure 1).4,5 Some multinucleate forms may be seen. These Rosai-Dorfman cells display positive staining for CD68 and S-100, and negative staining for CD1a on immunohistochemistry. Lymphocytes and plasma cells often are admixed with the Rosai-Dorfman cells, and neutrophils and eosinophils also may be present in the infiltrate.4 The histologic hallmark of RDD is emperipolesis, a phenomenon whereby inflammatory cells such as lymphocytes and plasma cells reside intact within the cytoplasm of histiocytes (Figure 2).5

Figure 1. Sheets of large polygonal histiocytes with admixed lymphocytes and plasma cells seen in Rosai-Dorfman disease (H&E, original magnification ×200).
     
Figure 2. Emperipolesis (histiocyte-engulfing lymphocytes) demonstrated in Rosai-Dorfman disease (H&E, original magnification ×600).

The histologic differential diagnosis of cutaneous lesions of RDD includes other histiocytic and xanthomatous diseases, including eruptive xanthoma, juvenile xanthogranuloma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, and solitary reticulohistiocytoma, which should not display emperipolesis. Eruptive xanthomas display collections of foamy histiocytes in the dermis and typically contain extracellular lipid. They may contain infiltrates of lymphocytes (Figure 3). Juvenile xanthogranuloma also features a dense infiltrate of histiocytes in the papillary and reticular dermis but distinctly shows Touton giant cells and lipidization of histiocytes (Figure 4). Both eruptive xanthomas and juvenile xanthogranulomas typically stain negatively for S-100. Langerhans cell histiocytosis is histologically characterized by a dermal infiltrate of Langerhans cells that have their own distinctive morphologic features. They are uniformly ovoid with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. Their nuclei are smaller than those of Rosai-Dorfman cells and have a kidney bean shape with inconspicuous nucleoli (Figure 5). Epidermotropism of these cells can be observed. Immunohistochemically, Langerhans cell histiocytosis typically is S-100 positive, CD1a positive, and langerin positive. Reticulohistiocytoma features histiocytes that have a characteristic dusty rose or ground glass cytoplasm with two-toned darker and lighter areas (Figure 6). Reticulohistiocytoma cells stain positively for CD68 but typically stain negatively for both CD1a and S-100.

Figure 3. Lipid-laden macrophages with foamy cytoplasm and extracellular lipid seen in eruptive xanthoma (H&E, original magnification ×400).
     
Figure 4. Touton giant cell (wreath of nuclei surrounded by foamy cytoplasm) featured in juvenile xanthogranuloma (H&E, original magnification ×600).
Figure 5. Dermal infiltrate of ovoid Langerhans cells with reniform nuclei in Langerhans cell histiocytosis (H&E, original magnification ×600).
      
Figure 6. Histiocytes with dusty rose–colored cytoplasm and admixed lymphocytes in a reticulohistiocytoma (H&E, original magnification ×400).
References

1. Rosai J, Dorfman RF. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. a newly recognized benign clinicopathological entity. Arch Pathol. 1969;87:63-70.

2. Foucar E, Rosai J, Dorfman RF. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): a review of the entity. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1990;7:19-73.

3. Brenn T, Calonje E, Granter SR, et al. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease is a distinct clinical entity. Am J Dermatopathol. 2002;24:385-391.

4. Wang KH, Chen WY, Lie HN, et al. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease: clinicopathological profiles, spectrum and evolution of 21 lesions in six patients. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154:277-286.

5. Chu P, LeBoit PE. Histologic features of cutaneous sinus histiocytosis (Rosai-Dorfman disease): study of cases both with and without systemic involvement. J Cutan Pathol. 1992;19:201-206.

References

1. Rosai J, Dorfman RF. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. a newly recognized benign clinicopathological entity. Arch Pathol. 1969;87:63-70.

2. Foucar E, Rosai J, Dorfman RF. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): a review of the entity. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1990;7:19-73.

3. Brenn T, Calonje E, Granter SR, et al. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease is a distinct clinical entity. Am J Dermatopathol. 2002;24:385-391.

4. Wang KH, Chen WY, Lie HN, et al. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease: clinicopathological profiles, spectrum and evolution of 21 lesions in six patients. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154:277-286.

5. Chu P, LeBoit PE. Histologic features of cutaneous sinus histiocytosis (Rosai-Dorfman disease): study of cases both with and without systemic involvement. J Cutan Pathol. 1992;19:201-206.

Issue
Cutis - 96(1)
Issue
Cutis - 96(1)
Page Number
16, 39-40
Page Number
16, 39-40
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Rosai-Dorfman Disease
Display Headline
Rosai-Dorfman Disease
Legacy Keywords
Rosai-Dorfman disease, sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy, emperipolesis, histioproliferative disorder, dermatopathology, histology, pathology
Legacy Keywords
Rosai-Dorfman disease, sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy, emperipolesis, histioproliferative disorder, dermatopathology, histology, pathology
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Causes a Lichenoid Drug Eruption

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Causes a Lichenoid Drug Eruption

To the Editor:

Numerous drugs have been implicated as possible causes of lichenoid drug eruptions (LDEs). We describe a case of an LDE secondary to placement of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS).

A 28-year-old woman presented with an extensive pruritic rash of 2 months’ duration. She reported that it began on the wrists; progressed inward to involve the trunk; and then became generalized over the trunk, back, wrists, and legs. A levonorgestrel-releasing IUS had been placed 6 weeks prior to the onset of the rash. She was otherwise healthy and took loratadine and pseudoephedrine on occasion for environmental allergies. On examination there were violaceous, lichenified, flat-topped, polygonal papules scattered over the arms, legs, and trunk (Figure 1). Some papules demonstrated a Köbner phenomenon. No Wickham striae or mucosal involvement was noted. Rapid plasma reagin and hepatitis panel were negative. The patient was treated empirically with fluocinonide ointment 0.05% twice daily.

Figure 1. Violaceous, lichenified, flat-topped, polygonal papules on the back of a 28-year-old woman associated with use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Figure 2. Classic lichenoid reaction pattern including irregular acanthosis lying above a dense bandlike infiltrate of lymphocytes with liquefaction degeneration of the basal layer, rare Civatte bodies in the epidermis, and melanophages in the dermis (A and B)(H&E, original magnifications ×100 and ×200).

A shave biopsy was taken at the initial visit prior to steroid treatment. Histology revealed a classic lichenoid reaction pattern (Figure 2) and irregular acanthosis lying above the dense bandlike infiltrate of lymphocytes with liquefaction degeneration of the basal layer, rare Civatte bodies in the epidermis, and melanophages in the dermis.

At 5-week follow-up, the patient showed some improvement but not complete control of the lesions with topical steroids. Because the patient was on no other regular medications, we recommended a 3-month trial removal of the IUS. The patient decided to have the IUS removed and noted complete clearance of the skin lesions within 1 month. Challenge with oral or intradermal levonorgestrel was not conducted after clearance of the rash, which is a weakness in this report. Accordingly, the possibility that this patient’s condition was caused by idiopathic lichen planus, which may resolve spontaneously, cannot be ruled out. However, because the patient noted substantial improvement following removal of the device and remained symptom free 2 years after removal, we concluded that the cutaneous lesions were secondary to an LDE in response to the IUS.

It should be noted that as-needed use of pseudoephedrine and loratadine continued during this 2-year follow-up period and again the patient experienced no return of symptoms, which is particularly important because both of these agents have been associated with drug eruption patterns akin to lichenoid tissue reaction/interface dermatitis patterns. Pseudoephedrine is particularly notorious for causing nonpigmenting fixed drug eruptions such as those that heal without hyperpigmentation, while antihistamines such as loratadine have been associated with lichenoid and subacute lupus erythematosus–pattern drug reactions.1,2

Lichenoid drug reactions fall into the category of lymphocyte-rich lichenoid tissue reaction/interface dermatitis skin disorders.3 There are currently 202 different drugs reported to cause lichen planus or lichenoid eruptions as collected in Litt’s Drug Eruption & Reaction Database.4 Some of the more common causes of an LDE include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, antimalarials, calcium channel blockers, gold salts, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.3,4 Lichenoid eruptions typically are attributed to oral hormonal contraceptives only.5,6 An eruption in response to intrauterine levonorgestrel treatment is rare. One case report of a lichenoid eruption in response to a copper IUS was hypothesized to be due to presence of nickel salts as a manufacturing contaminant; however, the manufacturer denied the presence of the contaminant.7

The manufacturer’s information for health care professionals prescribing levonorgestrel-releasing IUS describes rashes as an adverse reaction present in less than 5% of individuals.8 Levonorgestrel-releasing IUS consists of a polyethylene frame compounded with barium sulfate, 52 mg of levonorgestrel, silicone (polydimethylsiloxane), and a monofilament brown polyethylene removal thread. The device initially releases 20 μg levonorgestrel daily, with a stable levonorgestrel plasma level of 150 to 200 pg/mL reached after the first few weeks following insertion of the device.8 Levonorgestrel is an agonist at the progesterone and androgen receptors.9 In clinical trials, levonorgestrel was implicated as the cause of increased acne, hair loss, and hirsutism as cutaneous side effects from use of levonorgestrel implants.10 However, to our knowledge, none of the other components of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS have previously been reported to cause lichen planus or LDE.

The levonorgestrel-releasing IUS has been implicated as the cause of biopsy-proven Sweet disease,11 exacerbation of preexisting seborrheic dermatitis,12 rosacea,13 and autoimmune progesterone dermatitis.14 The skin findings in these cases resolved after removal of the IUS and appropriate treatment.

 

 

Identification of the causative drug can be difficult in LDE, as timing of the eruption can vary. The latent period has been reported to range from a few months to 1 to 2 years.15 Additionally, the clinical picture is often complicated in patients with a history of different drug dosages or multiple medications. When present, the histologic features of parakeratosis and eosinophils can be clues that a lichen planus–like eruption is drug related rather than idiopathic. However, the absence of these features does not rule out a medication or environmental trigger. In this case, the time-event relationship likely indicates that the eruption was related to the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS and not triggered by other medications or not idiopathic in nature. Lichenoid drug eruptions can resolve within a few weeks or up to 2 years after drug cessation and can occasionally be complicated by partial or complete resolution and recurrence even when the drug has not been discontinued.16,17 Lichenoid drug eruptions or idiopathic lichen planus generally are treated with topical immunomodulators or corticosteroids.3

Based on the time-event relationship, morphology, distribution, and histopathologic findings, we conclude that our patient developed LDE in response to the placement of a levonorgestrel-releasing IUS. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of LDE occurring as a rare adverse effect of these devices.

References

1. Shelley WB, Shelley ED. Nonpigmenting fixed drug eruption as a distinctive reaction pattern: examples caused by sensitivity to pseudoephedrine hydrochloride and tetrahydrozoline. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:403-407.

2. Crowson AN, Magro CM. Lichenoid and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus-like dermatitis associated with antihistamine therapy. J Cutan Pathol. 1999;26:95-99.

3. Sontheimer RD. Lichenoid tissue reaction/interface dermatitis: clinical and histological perspectives [published online ahead of print February 26, 2009]. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:1088-1099.

4. Litt’s Drug Eruption & Reaction Database. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. http://www.drugeruptiondata.com/searchresults/index/reaction_type/id/1/char/L. Accessed June 11, 2015.

5. Coskey RJ. Eruptions due to oral contraceptives. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:333-334.

6.  Thomas P, Dalle E, Revillon B, et al. Cutaneous effects in hormonal contraception [in French]. NPN Med. 1985;5:19-24.

7.  Lombardi P, Campolmi P, Sertoli A. Lichenoid dermatitis caused by nickel salts? Contact Dermatitis. 1983;9:520-521.

8. Mirena [package insert]. Whippany, NJ: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc; 2014.

9. Lemus AE, Vilchis F, Damsky R, et al. Mechanism of action of levonorgestrel: in vitro metabolism and specific interactions with steroid receptors in target organs. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1992;41:881-890.

10. Brache V, Faundes A, Alvarex F, et al. Nonmenstrual adverse events during use of implantable contraceptives for women: data from clinical trials. Contraception. 2002;65:63-74.

11. Hamill M, Bowling J, Vega-Lopez F. Sweet’s syndrome and a Mirena intrauterine system. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2004;30:115-116.

12. Karri K, Mowbray D, Adams S, et al. Severe seborrhoeic dermatitis: side-effect of the Mirena intra-uterine system. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2006;11:53-54.

13. Choudry K, Humphreys F, Menage J. Rosacea in association with the progesterone-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2001;26:102.

14. Pereira A, Coker A. Hypersensitivity to Mirena—a rare complication. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23:81.

15. Halevy S, Shai A. Lichenoid drug eruptions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;29(2, pt 1):249-255.

16. Seehafer JR, Rogers RS 3rd, Fleming CR, et al. Lichen planus-like lesions caused by penicillamine in primary biliary cirrhosis. Arch Dermatol. 1981;117:140-142.

17. Anderson TE. Lichen planus following quinidine therapy. Br J Dermatol. 1967;79:500.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Jennifer A. Jones MD, PhD; Marshall J. Shuler, MD; Barrett J. Zlotoff, MD

Dr. Jones is from the Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance. Drs. Shuler and Zlotoff are from the Department of Dermatology, University of New Mexico Health Science Center, Albuquerque. Dr. Shuler currently is from the University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Barrett J. Zlotoff, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of New Mexico Health Science Center, 1021 Medical Arts Ave NE, Albuquerque, NM 87102 (bzlotoff@salud.unm.edu).

Issue
Cutis - 96(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E13–E15
Legacy Keywords
Levonorgestrel, Intrauterine, Lichenoid Drug Eruption, LDEs, IUS,
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Jennifer A. Jones MD, PhD; Marshall J. Shuler, MD; Barrett J. Zlotoff, MD

Dr. Jones is from the Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance. Drs. Shuler and Zlotoff are from the Department of Dermatology, University of New Mexico Health Science Center, Albuquerque. Dr. Shuler currently is from the University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Barrett J. Zlotoff, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of New Mexico Health Science Center, 1021 Medical Arts Ave NE, Albuquerque, NM 87102 (bzlotoff@salud.unm.edu).

Author and Disclosure Information

Jennifer A. Jones MD, PhD; Marshall J. Shuler, MD; Barrett J. Zlotoff, MD

Dr. Jones is from the Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance. Drs. Shuler and Zlotoff are from the Department of Dermatology, University of New Mexico Health Science Center, Albuquerque. Dr. Shuler currently is from the University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Barrett J. Zlotoff, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of New Mexico Health Science Center, 1021 Medical Arts Ave NE, Albuquerque, NM 87102 (bzlotoff@salud.unm.edu).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

To the Editor:

Numerous drugs have been implicated as possible causes of lichenoid drug eruptions (LDEs). We describe a case of an LDE secondary to placement of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS).

A 28-year-old woman presented with an extensive pruritic rash of 2 months’ duration. She reported that it began on the wrists; progressed inward to involve the trunk; and then became generalized over the trunk, back, wrists, and legs. A levonorgestrel-releasing IUS had been placed 6 weeks prior to the onset of the rash. She was otherwise healthy and took loratadine and pseudoephedrine on occasion for environmental allergies. On examination there were violaceous, lichenified, flat-topped, polygonal papules scattered over the arms, legs, and trunk (Figure 1). Some papules demonstrated a Köbner phenomenon. No Wickham striae or mucosal involvement was noted. Rapid plasma reagin and hepatitis panel were negative. The patient was treated empirically with fluocinonide ointment 0.05% twice daily.

Figure 1. Violaceous, lichenified, flat-topped, polygonal papules on the back of a 28-year-old woman associated with use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Figure 2. Classic lichenoid reaction pattern including irregular acanthosis lying above a dense bandlike infiltrate of lymphocytes with liquefaction degeneration of the basal layer, rare Civatte bodies in the epidermis, and melanophages in the dermis (A and B)(H&E, original magnifications ×100 and ×200).

A shave biopsy was taken at the initial visit prior to steroid treatment. Histology revealed a classic lichenoid reaction pattern (Figure 2) and irregular acanthosis lying above the dense bandlike infiltrate of lymphocytes with liquefaction degeneration of the basal layer, rare Civatte bodies in the epidermis, and melanophages in the dermis.

At 5-week follow-up, the patient showed some improvement but not complete control of the lesions with topical steroids. Because the patient was on no other regular medications, we recommended a 3-month trial removal of the IUS. The patient decided to have the IUS removed and noted complete clearance of the skin lesions within 1 month. Challenge with oral or intradermal levonorgestrel was not conducted after clearance of the rash, which is a weakness in this report. Accordingly, the possibility that this patient’s condition was caused by idiopathic lichen planus, which may resolve spontaneously, cannot be ruled out. However, because the patient noted substantial improvement following removal of the device and remained symptom free 2 years after removal, we concluded that the cutaneous lesions were secondary to an LDE in response to the IUS.

It should be noted that as-needed use of pseudoephedrine and loratadine continued during this 2-year follow-up period and again the patient experienced no return of symptoms, which is particularly important because both of these agents have been associated with drug eruption patterns akin to lichenoid tissue reaction/interface dermatitis patterns. Pseudoephedrine is particularly notorious for causing nonpigmenting fixed drug eruptions such as those that heal without hyperpigmentation, while antihistamines such as loratadine have been associated with lichenoid and subacute lupus erythematosus–pattern drug reactions.1,2

Lichenoid drug reactions fall into the category of lymphocyte-rich lichenoid tissue reaction/interface dermatitis skin disorders.3 There are currently 202 different drugs reported to cause lichen planus or lichenoid eruptions as collected in Litt’s Drug Eruption & Reaction Database.4 Some of the more common causes of an LDE include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, antimalarials, calcium channel blockers, gold salts, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.3,4 Lichenoid eruptions typically are attributed to oral hormonal contraceptives only.5,6 An eruption in response to intrauterine levonorgestrel treatment is rare. One case report of a lichenoid eruption in response to a copper IUS was hypothesized to be due to presence of nickel salts as a manufacturing contaminant; however, the manufacturer denied the presence of the contaminant.7

The manufacturer’s information for health care professionals prescribing levonorgestrel-releasing IUS describes rashes as an adverse reaction present in less than 5% of individuals.8 Levonorgestrel-releasing IUS consists of a polyethylene frame compounded with barium sulfate, 52 mg of levonorgestrel, silicone (polydimethylsiloxane), and a monofilament brown polyethylene removal thread. The device initially releases 20 μg levonorgestrel daily, with a stable levonorgestrel plasma level of 150 to 200 pg/mL reached after the first few weeks following insertion of the device.8 Levonorgestrel is an agonist at the progesterone and androgen receptors.9 In clinical trials, levonorgestrel was implicated as the cause of increased acne, hair loss, and hirsutism as cutaneous side effects from use of levonorgestrel implants.10 However, to our knowledge, none of the other components of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS have previously been reported to cause lichen planus or LDE.

The levonorgestrel-releasing IUS has been implicated as the cause of biopsy-proven Sweet disease,11 exacerbation of preexisting seborrheic dermatitis,12 rosacea,13 and autoimmune progesterone dermatitis.14 The skin findings in these cases resolved after removal of the IUS and appropriate treatment.

 

 

Identification of the causative drug can be difficult in LDE, as timing of the eruption can vary. The latent period has been reported to range from a few months to 1 to 2 years.15 Additionally, the clinical picture is often complicated in patients with a history of different drug dosages or multiple medications. When present, the histologic features of parakeratosis and eosinophils can be clues that a lichen planus–like eruption is drug related rather than idiopathic. However, the absence of these features does not rule out a medication or environmental trigger. In this case, the time-event relationship likely indicates that the eruption was related to the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS and not triggered by other medications or not idiopathic in nature. Lichenoid drug eruptions can resolve within a few weeks or up to 2 years after drug cessation and can occasionally be complicated by partial or complete resolution and recurrence even when the drug has not been discontinued.16,17 Lichenoid drug eruptions or idiopathic lichen planus generally are treated with topical immunomodulators or corticosteroids.3

Based on the time-event relationship, morphology, distribution, and histopathologic findings, we conclude that our patient developed LDE in response to the placement of a levonorgestrel-releasing IUS. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of LDE occurring as a rare adverse effect of these devices.

To the Editor:

Numerous drugs have been implicated as possible causes of lichenoid drug eruptions (LDEs). We describe a case of an LDE secondary to placement of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS).

A 28-year-old woman presented with an extensive pruritic rash of 2 months’ duration. She reported that it began on the wrists; progressed inward to involve the trunk; and then became generalized over the trunk, back, wrists, and legs. A levonorgestrel-releasing IUS had been placed 6 weeks prior to the onset of the rash. She was otherwise healthy and took loratadine and pseudoephedrine on occasion for environmental allergies. On examination there were violaceous, lichenified, flat-topped, polygonal papules scattered over the arms, legs, and trunk (Figure 1). Some papules demonstrated a Köbner phenomenon. No Wickham striae or mucosal involvement was noted. Rapid plasma reagin and hepatitis panel were negative. The patient was treated empirically with fluocinonide ointment 0.05% twice daily.

Figure 1. Violaceous, lichenified, flat-topped, polygonal papules on the back of a 28-year-old woman associated with use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Figure 2. Classic lichenoid reaction pattern including irregular acanthosis lying above a dense bandlike infiltrate of lymphocytes with liquefaction degeneration of the basal layer, rare Civatte bodies in the epidermis, and melanophages in the dermis (A and B)(H&E, original magnifications ×100 and ×200).

A shave biopsy was taken at the initial visit prior to steroid treatment. Histology revealed a classic lichenoid reaction pattern (Figure 2) and irregular acanthosis lying above the dense bandlike infiltrate of lymphocytes with liquefaction degeneration of the basal layer, rare Civatte bodies in the epidermis, and melanophages in the dermis.

At 5-week follow-up, the patient showed some improvement but not complete control of the lesions with topical steroids. Because the patient was on no other regular medications, we recommended a 3-month trial removal of the IUS. The patient decided to have the IUS removed and noted complete clearance of the skin lesions within 1 month. Challenge with oral or intradermal levonorgestrel was not conducted after clearance of the rash, which is a weakness in this report. Accordingly, the possibility that this patient’s condition was caused by idiopathic lichen planus, which may resolve spontaneously, cannot be ruled out. However, because the patient noted substantial improvement following removal of the device and remained symptom free 2 years after removal, we concluded that the cutaneous lesions were secondary to an LDE in response to the IUS.

It should be noted that as-needed use of pseudoephedrine and loratadine continued during this 2-year follow-up period and again the patient experienced no return of symptoms, which is particularly important because both of these agents have been associated with drug eruption patterns akin to lichenoid tissue reaction/interface dermatitis patterns. Pseudoephedrine is particularly notorious for causing nonpigmenting fixed drug eruptions such as those that heal without hyperpigmentation, while antihistamines such as loratadine have been associated with lichenoid and subacute lupus erythematosus–pattern drug reactions.1,2

Lichenoid drug reactions fall into the category of lymphocyte-rich lichenoid tissue reaction/interface dermatitis skin disorders.3 There are currently 202 different drugs reported to cause lichen planus or lichenoid eruptions as collected in Litt’s Drug Eruption & Reaction Database.4 Some of the more common causes of an LDE include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, antimalarials, calcium channel blockers, gold salts, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.3,4 Lichenoid eruptions typically are attributed to oral hormonal contraceptives only.5,6 An eruption in response to intrauterine levonorgestrel treatment is rare. One case report of a lichenoid eruption in response to a copper IUS was hypothesized to be due to presence of nickel salts as a manufacturing contaminant; however, the manufacturer denied the presence of the contaminant.7

The manufacturer’s information for health care professionals prescribing levonorgestrel-releasing IUS describes rashes as an adverse reaction present in less than 5% of individuals.8 Levonorgestrel-releasing IUS consists of a polyethylene frame compounded with barium sulfate, 52 mg of levonorgestrel, silicone (polydimethylsiloxane), and a monofilament brown polyethylene removal thread. The device initially releases 20 μg levonorgestrel daily, with a stable levonorgestrel plasma level of 150 to 200 pg/mL reached after the first few weeks following insertion of the device.8 Levonorgestrel is an agonist at the progesterone and androgen receptors.9 In clinical trials, levonorgestrel was implicated as the cause of increased acne, hair loss, and hirsutism as cutaneous side effects from use of levonorgestrel implants.10 However, to our knowledge, none of the other components of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS have previously been reported to cause lichen planus or LDE.

The levonorgestrel-releasing IUS has been implicated as the cause of biopsy-proven Sweet disease,11 exacerbation of preexisting seborrheic dermatitis,12 rosacea,13 and autoimmune progesterone dermatitis.14 The skin findings in these cases resolved after removal of the IUS and appropriate treatment.

 

 

Identification of the causative drug can be difficult in LDE, as timing of the eruption can vary. The latent period has been reported to range from a few months to 1 to 2 years.15 Additionally, the clinical picture is often complicated in patients with a history of different drug dosages or multiple medications. When present, the histologic features of parakeratosis and eosinophils can be clues that a lichen planus–like eruption is drug related rather than idiopathic. However, the absence of these features does not rule out a medication or environmental trigger. In this case, the time-event relationship likely indicates that the eruption was related to the levonorgestrel-releasing IUS and not triggered by other medications or not idiopathic in nature. Lichenoid drug eruptions can resolve within a few weeks or up to 2 years after drug cessation and can occasionally be complicated by partial or complete resolution and recurrence even when the drug has not been discontinued.16,17 Lichenoid drug eruptions or idiopathic lichen planus generally are treated with topical immunomodulators or corticosteroids.3

Based on the time-event relationship, morphology, distribution, and histopathologic findings, we conclude that our patient developed LDE in response to the placement of a levonorgestrel-releasing IUS. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of LDE occurring as a rare adverse effect of these devices.

References

1. Shelley WB, Shelley ED. Nonpigmenting fixed drug eruption as a distinctive reaction pattern: examples caused by sensitivity to pseudoephedrine hydrochloride and tetrahydrozoline. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:403-407.

2. Crowson AN, Magro CM. Lichenoid and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus-like dermatitis associated with antihistamine therapy. J Cutan Pathol. 1999;26:95-99.

3. Sontheimer RD. Lichenoid tissue reaction/interface dermatitis: clinical and histological perspectives [published online ahead of print February 26, 2009]. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:1088-1099.

4. Litt’s Drug Eruption & Reaction Database. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. http://www.drugeruptiondata.com/searchresults/index/reaction_type/id/1/char/L. Accessed June 11, 2015.

5. Coskey RJ. Eruptions due to oral contraceptives. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:333-334.

6.  Thomas P, Dalle E, Revillon B, et al. Cutaneous effects in hormonal contraception [in French]. NPN Med. 1985;5:19-24.

7.  Lombardi P, Campolmi P, Sertoli A. Lichenoid dermatitis caused by nickel salts? Contact Dermatitis. 1983;9:520-521.

8. Mirena [package insert]. Whippany, NJ: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc; 2014.

9. Lemus AE, Vilchis F, Damsky R, et al. Mechanism of action of levonorgestrel: in vitro metabolism and specific interactions with steroid receptors in target organs. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1992;41:881-890.

10. Brache V, Faundes A, Alvarex F, et al. Nonmenstrual adverse events during use of implantable contraceptives for women: data from clinical trials. Contraception. 2002;65:63-74.

11. Hamill M, Bowling J, Vega-Lopez F. Sweet’s syndrome and a Mirena intrauterine system. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2004;30:115-116.

12. Karri K, Mowbray D, Adams S, et al. Severe seborrhoeic dermatitis: side-effect of the Mirena intra-uterine system. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2006;11:53-54.

13. Choudry K, Humphreys F, Menage J. Rosacea in association with the progesterone-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2001;26:102.

14. Pereira A, Coker A. Hypersensitivity to Mirena—a rare complication. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23:81.

15. Halevy S, Shai A. Lichenoid drug eruptions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;29(2, pt 1):249-255.

16. Seehafer JR, Rogers RS 3rd, Fleming CR, et al. Lichen planus-like lesions caused by penicillamine in primary biliary cirrhosis. Arch Dermatol. 1981;117:140-142.

17. Anderson TE. Lichen planus following quinidine therapy. Br J Dermatol. 1967;79:500.

References

1. Shelley WB, Shelley ED. Nonpigmenting fixed drug eruption as a distinctive reaction pattern: examples caused by sensitivity to pseudoephedrine hydrochloride and tetrahydrozoline. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:403-407.

2. Crowson AN, Magro CM. Lichenoid and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus-like dermatitis associated with antihistamine therapy. J Cutan Pathol. 1999;26:95-99.

3. Sontheimer RD. Lichenoid tissue reaction/interface dermatitis: clinical and histological perspectives [published online ahead of print February 26, 2009]. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:1088-1099.

4. Litt’s Drug Eruption & Reaction Database. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. http://www.drugeruptiondata.com/searchresults/index/reaction_type/id/1/char/L. Accessed June 11, 2015.

5. Coskey RJ. Eruptions due to oral contraceptives. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:333-334.

6.  Thomas P, Dalle E, Revillon B, et al. Cutaneous effects in hormonal contraception [in French]. NPN Med. 1985;5:19-24.

7.  Lombardi P, Campolmi P, Sertoli A. Lichenoid dermatitis caused by nickel salts? Contact Dermatitis. 1983;9:520-521.

8. Mirena [package insert]. Whippany, NJ: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc; 2014.

9. Lemus AE, Vilchis F, Damsky R, et al. Mechanism of action of levonorgestrel: in vitro metabolism and specific interactions with steroid receptors in target organs. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1992;41:881-890.

10. Brache V, Faundes A, Alvarex F, et al. Nonmenstrual adverse events during use of implantable contraceptives for women: data from clinical trials. Contraception. 2002;65:63-74.

11. Hamill M, Bowling J, Vega-Lopez F. Sweet’s syndrome and a Mirena intrauterine system. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2004;30:115-116.

12. Karri K, Mowbray D, Adams S, et al. Severe seborrhoeic dermatitis: side-effect of the Mirena intra-uterine system. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2006;11:53-54.

13. Choudry K, Humphreys F, Menage J. Rosacea in association with the progesterone-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2001;26:102.

14. Pereira A, Coker A. Hypersensitivity to Mirena—a rare complication. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23:81.

15. Halevy S, Shai A. Lichenoid drug eruptions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;29(2, pt 1):249-255.

16. Seehafer JR, Rogers RS 3rd, Fleming CR, et al. Lichen planus-like lesions caused by penicillamine in primary biliary cirrhosis. Arch Dermatol. 1981;117:140-142.

17. Anderson TE. Lichen planus following quinidine therapy. Br J Dermatol. 1967;79:500.

Issue
Cutis - 96(1)
Issue
Cutis - 96(1)
Page Number
E13–E15
Page Number
E13–E15
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Causes a Lichenoid Drug Eruption
Display Headline
Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Causes a Lichenoid Drug Eruption
Legacy Keywords
Levonorgestrel, Intrauterine, Lichenoid Drug Eruption, LDEs, IUS,
Legacy Keywords
Levonorgestrel, Intrauterine, Lichenoid Drug Eruption, LDEs, IUS,
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Cystic Nodule on the Palm

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Cystic Nodule on the Palm

The Diagnosis: Nodular Hidradenoma

Nodular hidradenomas (NHs) are rare benign cutaneous adnexal neoplasms first described in 1949 as clear cell papillary carcinomas.1 Since then, various terms have been used to describe this entity, such as eccrine acrospiroma, solid-cystic hidradenoma, and clear cell hidradenoma.2 Review of the literature revealed a female predominance (2:1 ratio) and a mean age at presentation of 37.2 years.3,4 Nodular hidradenoma presents as an asymptomatic, solitary, mobile, firm nodule with intact overlying skin. Rarely, multiple nodules may occur.3 Some tumors display ulceration and serous fluid leakage.5 They occur most commonly on the scalp, face, and upper extremities with an average size of 2 cm.3 Rapid growth of the tumor may signal a malignant change.6

Histopathology reveals a lobulated, circumscribed, symmetrical tumor with dermal nests of epithelial cells that are polygonal with eosinophilic cytoplasm forming ductlike spaces (Figure). However, clear cell changes and squamous differentiation may be prominent features. Cystic spaces may result from tumor cell degeneration. Most tumors are encased by collagenous fibrous tissue and rarely have epidermal attachments.3

   

Anastomosing aggregates of squamous cells forming ductlike spaces were viewed on low-power magnification (A)(H&E, original magnification ×10). On higher power there were ductlike spaces and eosinophilic hyalinized stroma entrapped by the bland-appearing squamous proliferation (B)(H&E, original magnification ×20).

Nodular hidradenoma traditionally has been considered to be of eccrine origin, but more recent literature indicates that the majority of NHs are of apocrine origin. Histologically, apocrine tumors display eosinophilic secretion, mucinous epithelium, squamous or sebaceous differentiation, and decapitation secretion, whereas eccrine tumors are identified by their lack of specific features.3

Nodular hidradenoma may recur after excision. Malignant transformation is rare. In one review, 6.7% (6/89) of NHs were malignant, characterized by abnormal mitoses, nuclear atypia, and necrosis.4 Malignant NH or nodular hidradenocarcinoma behaves aggressively with up to an 86% local recurrence and 60% rate of metastasis within 2 years.6 Survival time is inversely proportional to the size of the tumor and is generally poor, with a 5-year disease-free survival of less than 30%.6,7

Treatment of NH is achieved through primary excision or Mohs micrographic surgery; however, treatment of nodular hidradenocarcinoma is controversial and typically begins with wide local excision but may involve lymph node dissection if necessary. Use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for metastases warrants more clinical studies, as it is a rare occurrence.6 Our patient planned to undergo a total excision of the benign nodule once she healed from the biopsy; however, she was lost to follow-up, as she moved out of state.

References

1. Lui Y. The histogenesis of clear cell papillary carcinoma of the skin. Am J Pathol. 1949;25:93-103.

2. Obaidat NA, Khaled OA, Ghazarian D. Skin adnexal neoplasms–part 2: an approach to tumours of cutaneous sweat glands. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60:145-159.

3. Nandeesh BN, Rajalakshmi T. A study of histopathologic spectrum of nodular hidradenoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 2012;34:461-470.

4. Hernández-Pérez E, Cestoni-Parducci R. Nodular hidradenoma and hidradenocarcinoma: a 10-year review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;12:15-20.

5. Sirinoglu H, Celebiler O. Benign nodular hidradenoma of the face. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:750-751.

6. Souvatzidis P, Sbano P, Mandato F, et al. Malignant nodular hidradenoma of the skin: report of seven cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22:549-554.

7. Ko CJ, Cochran AJ, Eng W, et al. Hidradenocarcinoma: a histological and immunohistochemical study. J Cutan Pathol. 2006;33:726-730.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Asha R. Patel, MD; Zena Zoghbi, MD; Sameera Husain, MD; Marc E. Grossman, MD

From Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York. Drs. Patel, Zoghbi, and Grossman are from the Department of Dermatology, and Dr. Husain is from the Department of Dermatopathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Asha R. Patel, MD, Columbia University, Department of Dermatology, 161 Ft Washington Ave, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10032.

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E1-E3
Legacy Keywords
eccrine tumors
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Asha R. Patel, MD; Zena Zoghbi, MD; Sameera Husain, MD; Marc E. Grossman, MD

From Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York. Drs. Patel, Zoghbi, and Grossman are from the Department of Dermatology, and Dr. Husain is from the Department of Dermatopathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Asha R. Patel, MD, Columbia University, Department of Dermatology, 161 Ft Washington Ave, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10032.

Author and Disclosure Information

Asha R. Patel, MD; Zena Zoghbi, MD; Sameera Husain, MD; Marc E. Grossman, MD

From Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York. Drs. Patel, Zoghbi, and Grossman are from the Department of Dermatology, and Dr. Husain is from the Department of Dermatopathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Asha R. Patel, MD, Columbia University, Department of Dermatology, 161 Ft Washington Ave, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10032.

Article PDF
Article PDF

The Diagnosis: Nodular Hidradenoma

Nodular hidradenomas (NHs) are rare benign cutaneous adnexal neoplasms first described in 1949 as clear cell papillary carcinomas.1 Since then, various terms have been used to describe this entity, such as eccrine acrospiroma, solid-cystic hidradenoma, and clear cell hidradenoma.2 Review of the literature revealed a female predominance (2:1 ratio) and a mean age at presentation of 37.2 years.3,4 Nodular hidradenoma presents as an asymptomatic, solitary, mobile, firm nodule with intact overlying skin. Rarely, multiple nodules may occur.3 Some tumors display ulceration and serous fluid leakage.5 They occur most commonly on the scalp, face, and upper extremities with an average size of 2 cm.3 Rapid growth of the tumor may signal a malignant change.6

Histopathology reveals a lobulated, circumscribed, symmetrical tumor with dermal nests of epithelial cells that are polygonal with eosinophilic cytoplasm forming ductlike spaces (Figure). However, clear cell changes and squamous differentiation may be prominent features. Cystic spaces may result from tumor cell degeneration. Most tumors are encased by collagenous fibrous tissue and rarely have epidermal attachments.3

   

Anastomosing aggregates of squamous cells forming ductlike spaces were viewed on low-power magnification (A)(H&E, original magnification ×10). On higher power there were ductlike spaces and eosinophilic hyalinized stroma entrapped by the bland-appearing squamous proliferation (B)(H&E, original magnification ×20).

Nodular hidradenoma traditionally has been considered to be of eccrine origin, but more recent literature indicates that the majority of NHs are of apocrine origin. Histologically, apocrine tumors display eosinophilic secretion, mucinous epithelium, squamous or sebaceous differentiation, and decapitation secretion, whereas eccrine tumors are identified by their lack of specific features.3

Nodular hidradenoma may recur after excision. Malignant transformation is rare. In one review, 6.7% (6/89) of NHs were malignant, characterized by abnormal mitoses, nuclear atypia, and necrosis.4 Malignant NH or nodular hidradenocarcinoma behaves aggressively with up to an 86% local recurrence and 60% rate of metastasis within 2 years.6 Survival time is inversely proportional to the size of the tumor and is generally poor, with a 5-year disease-free survival of less than 30%.6,7

Treatment of NH is achieved through primary excision or Mohs micrographic surgery; however, treatment of nodular hidradenocarcinoma is controversial and typically begins with wide local excision but may involve lymph node dissection if necessary. Use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for metastases warrants more clinical studies, as it is a rare occurrence.6 Our patient planned to undergo a total excision of the benign nodule once she healed from the biopsy; however, she was lost to follow-up, as she moved out of state.

The Diagnosis: Nodular Hidradenoma

Nodular hidradenomas (NHs) are rare benign cutaneous adnexal neoplasms first described in 1949 as clear cell papillary carcinomas.1 Since then, various terms have been used to describe this entity, such as eccrine acrospiroma, solid-cystic hidradenoma, and clear cell hidradenoma.2 Review of the literature revealed a female predominance (2:1 ratio) and a mean age at presentation of 37.2 years.3,4 Nodular hidradenoma presents as an asymptomatic, solitary, mobile, firm nodule with intact overlying skin. Rarely, multiple nodules may occur.3 Some tumors display ulceration and serous fluid leakage.5 They occur most commonly on the scalp, face, and upper extremities with an average size of 2 cm.3 Rapid growth of the tumor may signal a malignant change.6

Histopathology reveals a lobulated, circumscribed, symmetrical tumor with dermal nests of epithelial cells that are polygonal with eosinophilic cytoplasm forming ductlike spaces (Figure). However, clear cell changes and squamous differentiation may be prominent features. Cystic spaces may result from tumor cell degeneration. Most tumors are encased by collagenous fibrous tissue and rarely have epidermal attachments.3

   

Anastomosing aggregates of squamous cells forming ductlike spaces were viewed on low-power magnification (A)(H&E, original magnification ×10). On higher power there were ductlike spaces and eosinophilic hyalinized stroma entrapped by the bland-appearing squamous proliferation (B)(H&E, original magnification ×20).

Nodular hidradenoma traditionally has been considered to be of eccrine origin, but more recent literature indicates that the majority of NHs are of apocrine origin. Histologically, apocrine tumors display eosinophilic secretion, mucinous epithelium, squamous or sebaceous differentiation, and decapitation secretion, whereas eccrine tumors are identified by their lack of specific features.3

Nodular hidradenoma may recur after excision. Malignant transformation is rare. In one review, 6.7% (6/89) of NHs were malignant, characterized by abnormal mitoses, nuclear atypia, and necrosis.4 Malignant NH or nodular hidradenocarcinoma behaves aggressively with up to an 86% local recurrence and 60% rate of metastasis within 2 years.6 Survival time is inversely proportional to the size of the tumor and is generally poor, with a 5-year disease-free survival of less than 30%.6,7

Treatment of NH is achieved through primary excision or Mohs micrographic surgery; however, treatment of nodular hidradenocarcinoma is controversial and typically begins with wide local excision but may involve lymph node dissection if necessary. Use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for metastases warrants more clinical studies, as it is a rare occurrence.6 Our patient planned to undergo a total excision of the benign nodule once she healed from the biopsy; however, she was lost to follow-up, as she moved out of state.

References

1. Lui Y. The histogenesis of clear cell papillary carcinoma of the skin. Am J Pathol. 1949;25:93-103.

2. Obaidat NA, Khaled OA, Ghazarian D. Skin adnexal neoplasms–part 2: an approach to tumours of cutaneous sweat glands. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60:145-159.

3. Nandeesh BN, Rajalakshmi T. A study of histopathologic spectrum of nodular hidradenoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 2012;34:461-470.

4. Hernández-Pérez E, Cestoni-Parducci R. Nodular hidradenoma and hidradenocarcinoma: a 10-year review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;12:15-20.

5. Sirinoglu H, Celebiler O. Benign nodular hidradenoma of the face. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:750-751.

6. Souvatzidis P, Sbano P, Mandato F, et al. Malignant nodular hidradenoma of the skin: report of seven cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22:549-554.

7. Ko CJ, Cochran AJ, Eng W, et al. Hidradenocarcinoma: a histological and immunohistochemical study. J Cutan Pathol. 2006;33:726-730.

References

1. Lui Y. The histogenesis of clear cell papillary carcinoma of the skin. Am J Pathol. 1949;25:93-103.

2. Obaidat NA, Khaled OA, Ghazarian D. Skin adnexal neoplasms–part 2: an approach to tumours of cutaneous sweat glands. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60:145-159.

3. Nandeesh BN, Rajalakshmi T. A study of histopathologic spectrum of nodular hidradenoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 2012;34:461-470.

4. Hernández-Pérez E, Cestoni-Parducci R. Nodular hidradenoma and hidradenocarcinoma: a 10-year review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;12:15-20.

5. Sirinoglu H, Celebiler O. Benign nodular hidradenoma of the face. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:750-751.

6. Souvatzidis P, Sbano P, Mandato F, et al. Malignant nodular hidradenoma of the skin: report of seven cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22:549-554.

7. Ko CJ, Cochran AJ, Eng W, et al. Hidradenocarcinoma: a histological and immunohistochemical study. J Cutan Pathol. 2006;33:726-730.

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Page Number
E1-E3
Page Number
E1-E3
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Cystic Nodule on the Palm
Display Headline
Cystic Nodule on the Palm
Legacy Keywords
eccrine tumors
Legacy Keywords
eccrine tumors
Sections
Questionnaire Body

A 73-year-old woman with a history of multiple strokes with residual left-sided motor deficits and resultant left-hand contracture, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and a remote history of treated colon cancer and breast cancer presented with hypertensive urgency and neck pain. Upon admission, the nursing staff found an “unusual growth” on the patient’s left hand. Dermatology was consulted and a 2×1.5×1.5-cm multilobulated, malodorous, slightly tender, nonfluctuant, gelatinous, mobile, cystic nodule overlying the fourth metacarpal palmar head was examined. The patient reported the lesion was present for more than a year. Imaging was pursued, but radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging could not be performed adequately due to the patient’s severe contracture. Given the extensive differential diagnoses, an orthopedic hand surgeon performed a large incisional biopsy to obtain tissue diagnosis.
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Non–HIV-Related Kaposi Sarcoma in 2 Hispanic Patients Arising in the Setting of Chronic Venous Insufficiency

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Non–HIV-Related Kaposi Sarcoma in 2 Hispanic Patients Arising in the Setting of Chronic Venous Insufficiency

Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is a vascular neoplasm associated with human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) infection that is conventionally divided into 4 clinical variants: classic, African, transplant associated, and AIDS related. In the United States, classic KS predominantly is observed in elderly white men of Ashkenazi Jewish or Mediterranean descent.1

The clinical and histological changes seen in KS can be confused with those from chronic venous insufficiency. Both conditions tend to present with purple-colored patches, plaques, or nodules on the lower extremities. Histologically, both KS and chronic venous insufficiency are characterized by blood vessel and endothelial cell proliferation in the papillary dermis, red blood cell extravasation, and hemosiderin deposition.2 Nevertheless, KS can be diagnosed based on the presence of neoplastic spindle-shaped cells and positive immunostaining for HHV-8 antigen.3

We describe the cases of 2 elderly Hispanic patients in the United States with no history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), immunosuppression, or travel to the Mediterranean region who presented with erythematous to violaceous papules, plaques, and nodules on the distal lower extremities in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency. We review the relationship between KS and chronic venous insufficiency and suggest that these presentations may represent a distinct clinical variant of KS.

Case Reports

Patient 1

 

Figure 1. Well-demarcated, violaceous, indurated plaques on the dorsal aspects of the feet.

An 83-year-old Hispanic woman with a history of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and chronic venous insufficiency presented with a chronic painful violaceous eruption on the lower legs of 3 years’ duration. The patient reported that the erythematous patches, which she described as bruiselike, originally developed 3 years prior after starting warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation. At that time, a biopsy indicated findings of pigmented purpuric dermatosis and negative immunostaining for HHV-8. Her condition had worsened over the last 6 months with the development of tender eroded plaques on the dorsal aspects of the feet (Figure 1) and purple-brown patches and plaques on the legs. Prior treatment with topical corticosteroids and a short course of prednisone was unsuccessful. Of note, the patient had no history of immunosuppression or HIV and was not of Mediterranean or African descent.

Punch biopsies from the left dorsal foot and left lower leg revealed dermal fibrosis, a proliferation of small blood vessels with plump endothelial cells, and foci of spindled endothelial cells with narrow slitlike spaces containing erythrocytes (Figure 2). There also were extravasated erythrocytes and a sparse inflammatory cell infiltrate comprised of lymphocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils, and plasma cells. Perls Prussian blue stain highlighted numerous siderophages scattered in the dermis. Based on these findings, immunostaining for HHV-8 was performed and highlighted reactivity of the spindled cells (Figure 3). The patient was diagnosed with KS in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency.

 

Figure 2. Dermal fibrosis, proliferation of small blood vessels, and spindled endothelial cells with narrow slitlike spaces were observed (H&E, original magnification ×100).

 

Figure 3. Spindled cells reactive to human herpesvirus 8 immunostaining (original magnification ×100).

Patient 2

A 67-year-old Hispanic man with a history of diabetes mellitus presented with 10 asymptomatic purple papules and hyperkeratotic and hyperpigmented plaques on the distal aspect of the legs of 1 year’s duration in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency (Figure 4). The patient had no history of immunosuppression or HIV and was not of Mediterranean or African descent. An excisional biopsy from the left fourth toe revealed a cellular dermal vascular proliferation associated with numerous small slitlike vessels and scattered dilated blood vessels with prominent hemorrhage and surrounding dermal fibrosis (Figure 5). The lesion was markedly cellular with nuclear atypia. Many cells showed enlarged oval- to spindle-shaped hyperchromatic nuclei, some with prominent nucleoli and scant amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm. Although the differential diagnosis included an unusual cellular pyogenic granuloma with atypia in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency, the degree of cellularity and presence of spindled cells associated with slitlike vessels were more consistent with a pyogenic granulomalike variant of KS. This variant is rare but has previously been reported.4 Many of the tumor nucleoli stained strongly for HHV-8, which is a diagnostic finding of KS (Figure 6). The patient subsequently was diagnosed with KS.

Comment

These 2 cases represent unusual clinical presentations of KS in Hispanic patients with no known risk factors for KS. In patient 1, an initial skin biopsy prompted HHV-8 testing due to suspicion for KS. At that time, HHV-8 was negative, perhaps because of technical deficiencies in the staining protocol; alternatively, the patient may have subsequently developed KS. Both patients had known chronic venous insufficiency. However, biopsies revealed spindle-shaped cells forming clefts and positivity for HHV-8. We propose that these cases may represent an additional clinical variant of KS, chronic venous insufficiency–associated KS.

 

 

 

Figure 4. Purple papules and hyperkeratotic hyperpigmented plaques on the medial aspect of the right leg.

If similar presentations of KS are identified, studies will need to be done to uncover the specific risk factors involved. Human herpesvirus 8 is not sufficient for the development of KS on its own, as oncogenesis of KS requires immunodeficiency or an additional environmental factor such as diabetes mellitus.5 Through impaired microvascular circulation and the release of hypoxia-inducible factor 1a, diabetes can promote KS-herpesvirus replication. Therefore, the risk for KS is increased in individuals with diabetes regardless of a negative history of immunodeficiency, which may have been the case in patient 2.

Our cases suggest that chronic venous insufficiency may be another factor that predisposes immunocompetent individuals to KS. Chronic venous insufficiency can cause hypoxia, promoting the release of cytokines and angiogenic factors responsible for the formation of vascular tumors such as KS.6 Once present, KS can worsen preexisting stasis dermatitis by compressing the external lymphatics and exacerbating lymphedema.7 Stasis dermatitis and KS may be part of a self-perpetuating cycle that involves obstruction due to secondary lymphadenopathy, the development of lymphedema, and the release of cytokines and growth factors that lead to further vascular proliferation.8

 

Figure 5. A cellular dermal vascular proliferation associated with slitlike vessels, dermal fibrosis, and marked cellularity with nuclear atypia (H&E, original magnification ×200).
  
Figure 6. Spindled cells reactive to human herpesvirus 8 immunostain (original magnification ×400).

In summary, we present 2 cases of non–HIV-related KS that may represent an additional clinical variant of KS that mimics and/or arises in chronic venous insufficiency and appears as papules and plaques in elderly patients who are Hispanic, immunocompetent, and HIV negative. We suggest including KS in the differential diagnosis for chronic venous insufficiency, especially in cases with an unusual clinical appearance or course. In these cases, skin biopsy with HHV-8 testing may be warranted.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge William Putnam, BFA, New York, New York, for his assistance with the figures.

References

 

1. Hiatt KM, Nelson AM, Lichy JH, et al. Classic Kaposi sarcoma in the United States over the last two decades: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 438 non-HIV-related Kaposi Sarcoma patients with comparison to HIV-related Kaposi Sarcoma [published online ahead of print March 28, 2008]. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:572-582.

2. Weaver J, Billings SD. Initial presentation of stasis dermatitis mimicking solitary lesions: a previously unrecognized clinical scenario. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:1028-1032.

3. Bulat V, Lugovic´ L, Šitum M, et al. Acroangiodermatitis (pseudo-Kaposi sarcoma) as part of chronic venous insufficiency. Acta Clin Croat. 2007;46:273-277.

4. Urquhart JL, Uzieblo A, Kohler S. Detection of HHV-8 in pyogenic granuloma-like Kaposi sarcoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 2006;28:317-321.

5. Anderson LA, Lauria C, Romano N, et al. Risk factors for classical Kaposi sarcoma in a population-based case-control study in Sicily. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:3435-3443.

6. Lunardi-Iskandar Y, Bryant JL, Zeman RA, et al. Tumorigenesis and metastasis of neoplastic Kaposi’s sarcoma cell line in immunodeficient mice blocked by a human pregnancy hormone. Nature. 1995;375:64-68.

7. Allen PJ, Gillespie DL, Redfield RR, et al. Lower extremity lymphedema caused by acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related Kaposi’s sarcoma: case report and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg. 1995;22:178-181.

8. Ramdial PK, Chetty R, Singh B, et al. Lymphedematous HIV-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma. J Cutan Pathol. 2006;33:474-481.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Syril Keena T. Que, MD; Taylor DeFelice, MD, MPH; Farah R. Abdulla, MD; David Cassarino, MD; Rishi R. Patel, MD

Dr. Que was from and Drs. DeFelice and Patel are from the New York University School of Medicine, New York. Drs. DeFelice and Patel are from the Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology. Dr. Que currently is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut, Farmington. Drs. Abdulla and Cassarino are from Kaiser Permanente Fontana Medical Center, California. Dr. Abdulla is from the Department of Dermatology and Dr. Cassarino is from the Department of Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Rishi R. Patel, MD, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, 530 1st Ave, Ste 7J, New York, NY 10016 (rishi.patel@nyumc.org).

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E30-E33
Legacy Keywords
Kaposi sarcoma, chronic venous insufficiency, stasis dermatitis, human herpesvirus-8, HHV-8
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Syril Keena T. Que, MD; Taylor DeFelice, MD, MPH; Farah R. Abdulla, MD; David Cassarino, MD; Rishi R. Patel, MD

Dr. Que was from and Drs. DeFelice and Patel are from the New York University School of Medicine, New York. Drs. DeFelice and Patel are from the Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology. Dr. Que currently is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut, Farmington. Drs. Abdulla and Cassarino are from Kaiser Permanente Fontana Medical Center, California. Dr. Abdulla is from the Department of Dermatology and Dr. Cassarino is from the Department of Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Rishi R. Patel, MD, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, 530 1st Ave, Ste 7J, New York, NY 10016 (rishi.patel@nyumc.org).

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Syril Keena T. Que, MD; Taylor DeFelice, MD, MPH; Farah R. Abdulla, MD; David Cassarino, MD; Rishi R. Patel, MD

Dr. Que was from and Drs. DeFelice and Patel are from the New York University School of Medicine, New York. Drs. DeFelice and Patel are from the Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology. Dr. Que currently is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut, Farmington. Drs. Abdulla and Cassarino are from Kaiser Permanente Fontana Medical Center, California. Dr. Abdulla is from the Department of Dermatology and Dr. Cassarino is from the Department of Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Rishi R. Patel, MD, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, 530 1st Ave, Ste 7J, New York, NY 10016 (rishi.patel@nyumc.org).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is a vascular neoplasm associated with human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) infection that is conventionally divided into 4 clinical variants: classic, African, transplant associated, and AIDS related. In the United States, classic KS predominantly is observed in elderly white men of Ashkenazi Jewish or Mediterranean descent.1

The clinical and histological changes seen in KS can be confused with those from chronic venous insufficiency. Both conditions tend to present with purple-colored patches, plaques, or nodules on the lower extremities. Histologically, both KS and chronic venous insufficiency are characterized by blood vessel and endothelial cell proliferation in the papillary dermis, red blood cell extravasation, and hemosiderin deposition.2 Nevertheless, KS can be diagnosed based on the presence of neoplastic spindle-shaped cells and positive immunostaining for HHV-8 antigen.3

We describe the cases of 2 elderly Hispanic patients in the United States with no history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), immunosuppression, or travel to the Mediterranean region who presented with erythematous to violaceous papules, plaques, and nodules on the distal lower extremities in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency. We review the relationship between KS and chronic venous insufficiency and suggest that these presentations may represent a distinct clinical variant of KS.

Case Reports

Patient 1

 

Figure 1. Well-demarcated, violaceous, indurated plaques on the dorsal aspects of the feet.

An 83-year-old Hispanic woman with a history of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and chronic venous insufficiency presented with a chronic painful violaceous eruption on the lower legs of 3 years’ duration. The patient reported that the erythematous patches, which she described as bruiselike, originally developed 3 years prior after starting warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation. At that time, a biopsy indicated findings of pigmented purpuric dermatosis and negative immunostaining for HHV-8. Her condition had worsened over the last 6 months with the development of tender eroded plaques on the dorsal aspects of the feet (Figure 1) and purple-brown patches and plaques on the legs. Prior treatment with topical corticosteroids and a short course of prednisone was unsuccessful. Of note, the patient had no history of immunosuppression or HIV and was not of Mediterranean or African descent.

Punch biopsies from the left dorsal foot and left lower leg revealed dermal fibrosis, a proliferation of small blood vessels with plump endothelial cells, and foci of spindled endothelial cells with narrow slitlike spaces containing erythrocytes (Figure 2). There also were extravasated erythrocytes and a sparse inflammatory cell infiltrate comprised of lymphocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils, and plasma cells. Perls Prussian blue stain highlighted numerous siderophages scattered in the dermis. Based on these findings, immunostaining for HHV-8 was performed and highlighted reactivity of the spindled cells (Figure 3). The patient was diagnosed with KS in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency.

 

Figure 2. Dermal fibrosis, proliferation of small blood vessels, and spindled endothelial cells with narrow slitlike spaces were observed (H&E, original magnification ×100).

 

Figure 3. Spindled cells reactive to human herpesvirus 8 immunostaining (original magnification ×100).

Patient 2

A 67-year-old Hispanic man with a history of diabetes mellitus presented with 10 asymptomatic purple papules and hyperkeratotic and hyperpigmented plaques on the distal aspect of the legs of 1 year’s duration in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency (Figure 4). The patient had no history of immunosuppression or HIV and was not of Mediterranean or African descent. An excisional biopsy from the left fourth toe revealed a cellular dermal vascular proliferation associated with numerous small slitlike vessels and scattered dilated blood vessels with prominent hemorrhage and surrounding dermal fibrosis (Figure 5). The lesion was markedly cellular with nuclear atypia. Many cells showed enlarged oval- to spindle-shaped hyperchromatic nuclei, some with prominent nucleoli and scant amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm. Although the differential diagnosis included an unusual cellular pyogenic granuloma with atypia in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency, the degree of cellularity and presence of spindled cells associated with slitlike vessels were more consistent with a pyogenic granulomalike variant of KS. This variant is rare but has previously been reported.4 Many of the tumor nucleoli stained strongly for HHV-8, which is a diagnostic finding of KS (Figure 6). The patient subsequently was diagnosed with KS.

Comment

These 2 cases represent unusual clinical presentations of KS in Hispanic patients with no known risk factors for KS. In patient 1, an initial skin biopsy prompted HHV-8 testing due to suspicion for KS. At that time, HHV-8 was negative, perhaps because of technical deficiencies in the staining protocol; alternatively, the patient may have subsequently developed KS. Both patients had known chronic venous insufficiency. However, biopsies revealed spindle-shaped cells forming clefts and positivity for HHV-8. We propose that these cases may represent an additional clinical variant of KS, chronic venous insufficiency–associated KS.

 

 

 

Figure 4. Purple papules and hyperkeratotic hyperpigmented plaques on the medial aspect of the right leg.

If similar presentations of KS are identified, studies will need to be done to uncover the specific risk factors involved. Human herpesvirus 8 is not sufficient for the development of KS on its own, as oncogenesis of KS requires immunodeficiency or an additional environmental factor such as diabetes mellitus.5 Through impaired microvascular circulation and the release of hypoxia-inducible factor 1a, diabetes can promote KS-herpesvirus replication. Therefore, the risk for KS is increased in individuals with diabetes regardless of a negative history of immunodeficiency, which may have been the case in patient 2.

Our cases suggest that chronic venous insufficiency may be another factor that predisposes immunocompetent individuals to KS. Chronic venous insufficiency can cause hypoxia, promoting the release of cytokines and angiogenic factors responsible for the formation of vascular tumors such as KS.6 Once present, KS can worsen preexisting stasis dermatitis by compressing the external lymphatics and exacerbating lymphedema.7 Stasis dermatitis and KS may be part of a self-perpetuating cycle that involves obstruction due to secondary lymphadenopathy, the development of lymphedema, and the release of cytokines and growth factors that lead to further vascular proliferation.8

 

Figure 5. A cellular dermal vascular proliferation associated with slitlike vessels, dermal fibrosis, and marked cellularity with nuclear atypia (H&E, original magnification ×200).
  
Figure 6. Spindled cells reactive to human herpesvirus 8 immunostain (original magnification ×400).

In summary, we present 2 cases of non–HIV-related KS that may represent an additional clinical variant of KS that mimics and/or arises in chronic venous insufficiency and appears as papules and plaques in elderly patients who are Hispanic, immunocompetent, and HIV negative. We suggest including KS in the differential diagnosis for chronic venous insufficiency, especially in cases with an unusual clinical appearance or course. In these cases, skin biopsy with HHV-8 testing may be warranted.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge William Putnam, BFA, New York, New York, for his assistance with the figures.

Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is a vascular neoplasm associated with human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) infection that is conventionally divided into 4 clinical variants: classic, African, transplant associated, and AIDS related. In the United States, classic KS predominantly is observed in elderly white men of Ashkenazi Jewish or Mediterranean descent.1

The clinical and histological changes seen in KS can be confused with those from chronic venous insufficiency. Both conditions tend to present with purple-colored patches, plaques, or nodules on the lower extremities. Histologically, both KS and chronic venous insufficiency are characterized by blood vessel and endothelial cell proliferation in the papillary dermis, red blood cell extravasation, and hemosiderin deposition.2 Nevertheless, KS can be diagnosed based on the presence of neoplastic spindle-shaped cells and positive immunostaining for HHV-8 antigen.3

We describe the cases of 2 elderly Hispanic patients in the United States with no history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), immunosuppression, or travel to the Mediterranean region who presented with erythematous to violaceous papules, plaques, and nodules on the distal lower extremities in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency. We review the relationship between KS and chronic venous insufficiency and suggest that these presentations may represent a distinct clinical variant of KS.

Case Reports

Patient 1

 

Figure 1. Well-demarcated, violaceous, indurated plaques on the dorsal aspects of the feet.

An 83-year-old Hispanic woman with a history of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and chronic venous insufficiency presented with a chronic painful violaceous eruption on the lower legs of 3 years’ duration. The patient reported that the erythematous patches, which she described as bruiselike, originally developed 3 years prior after starting warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation. At that time, a biopsy indicated findings of pigmented purpuric dermatosis and negative immunostaining for HHV-8. Her condition had worsened over the last 6 months with the development of tender eroded plaques on the dorsal aspects of the feet (Figure 1) and purple-brown patches and plaques on the legs. Prior treatment with topical corticosteroids and a short course of prednisone was unsuccessful. Of note, the patient had no history of immunosuppression or HIV and was not of Mediterranean or African descent.

Punch biopsies from the left dorsal foot and left lower leg revealed dermal fibrosis, a proliferation of small blood vessels with plump endothelial cells, and foci of spindled endothelial cells with narrow slitlike spaces containing erythrocytes (Figure 2). There also were extravasated erythrocytes and a sparse inflammatory cell infiltrate comprised of lymphocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils, and plasma cells. Perls Prussian blue stain highlighted numerous siderophages scattered in the dermis. Based on these findings, immunostaining for HHV-8 was performed and highlighted reactivity of the spindled cells (Figure 3). The patient was diagnosed with KS in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency.

 

Figure 2. Dermal fibrosis, proliferation of small blood vessels, and spindled endothelial cells with narrow slitlike spaces were observed (H&E, original magnification ×100).

 

Figure 3. Spindled cells reactive to human herpesvirus 8 immunostaining (original magnification ×100).

Patient 2

A 67-year-old Hispanic man with a history of diabetes mellitus presented with 10 asymptomatic purple papules and hyperkeratotic and hyperpigmented plaques on the distal aspect of the legs of 1 year’s duration in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency (Figure 4). The patient had no history of immunosuppression or HIV and was not of Mediterranean or African descent. An excisional biopsy from the left fourth toe revealed a cellular dermal vascular proliferation associated with numerous small slitlike vessels and scattered dilated blood vessels with prominent hemorrhage and surrounding dermal fibrosis (Figure 5). The lesion was markedly cellular with nuclear atypia. Many cells showed enlarged oval- to spindle-shaped hyperchromatic nuclei, some with prominent nucleoli and scant amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm. Although the differential diagnosis included an unusual cellular pyogenic granuloma with atypia in the setting of chronic venous insufficiency, the degree of cellularity and presence of spindled cells associated with slitlike vessels were more consistent with a pyogenic granulomalike variant of KS. This variant is rare but has previously been reported.4 Many of the tumor nucleoli stained strongly for HHV-8, which is a diagnostic finding of KS (Figure 6). The patient subsequently was diagnosed with KS.

Comment

These 2 cases represent unusual clinical presentations of KS in Hispanic patients with no known risk factors for KS. In patient 1, an initial skin biopsy prompted HHV-8 testing due to suspicion for KS. At that time, HHV-8 was negative, perhaps because of technical deficiencies in the staining protocol; alternatively, the patient may have subsequently developed KS. Both patients had known chronic venous insufficiency. However, biopsies revealed spindle-shaped cells forming clefts and positivity for HHV-8. We propose that these cases may represent an additional clinical variant of KS, chronic venous insufficiency–associated KS.

 

 

 

Figure 4. Purple papules and hyperkeratotic hyperpigmented plaques on the medial aspect of the right leg.

If similar presentations of KS are identified, studies will need to be done to uncover the specific risk factors involved. Human herpesvirus 8 is not sufficient for the development of KS on its own, as oncogenesis of KS requires immunodeficiency or an additional environmental factor such as diabetes mellitus.5 Through impaired microvascular circulation and the release of hypoxia-inducible factor 1a, diabetes can promote KS-herpesvirus replication. Therefore, the risk for KS is increased in individuals with diabetes regardless of a negative history of immunodeficiency, which may have been the case in patient 2.

Our cases suggest that chronic venous insufficiency may be another factor that predisposes immunocompetent individuals to KS. Chronic venous insufficiency can cause hypoxia, promoting the release of cytokines and angiogenic factors responsible for the formation of vascular tumors such as KS.6 Once present, KS can worsen preexisting stasis dermatitis by compressing the external lymphatics and exacerbating lymphedema.7 Stasis dermatitis and KS may be part of a self-perpetuating cycle that involves obstruction due to secondary lymphadenopathy, the development of lymphedema, and the release of cytokines and growth factors that lead to further vascular proliferation.8

 

Figure 5. A cellular dermal vascular proliferation associated with slitlike vessels, dermal fibrosis, and marked cellularity with nuclear atypia (H&E, original magnification ×200).
  
Figure 6. Spindled cells reactive to human herpesvirus 8 immunostain (original magnification ×400).

In summary, we present 2 cases of non–HIV-related KS that may represent an additional clinical variant of KS that mimics and/or arises in chronic venous insufficiency and appears as papules and plaques in elderly patients who are Hispanic, immunocompetent, and HIV negative. We suggest including KS in the differential diagnosis for chronic venous insufficiency, especially in cases with an unusual clinical appearance or course. In these cases, skin biopsy with HHV-8 testing may be warranted.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge William Putnam, BFA, New York, New York, for his assistance with the figures.

References

 

1. Hiatt KM, Nelson AM, Lichy JH, et al. Classic Kaposi sarcoma in the United States over the last two decades: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 438 non-HIV-related Kaposi Sarcoma patients with comparison to HIV-related Kaposi Sarcoma [published online ahead of print March 28, 2008]. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:572-582.

2. Weaver J, Billings SD. Initial presentation of stasis dermatitis mimicking solitary lesions: a previously unrecognized clinical scenario. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:1028-1032.

3. Bulat V, Lugovic´ L, Šitum M, et al. Acroangiodermatitis (pseudo-Kaposi sarcoma) as part of chronic venous insufficiency. Acta Clin Croat. 2007;46:273-277.

4. Urquhart JL, Uzieblo A, Kohler S. Detection of HHV-8 in pyogenic granuloma-like Kaposi sarcoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 2006;28:317-321.

5. Anderson LA, Lauria C, Romano N, et al. Risk factors for classical Kaposi sarcoma in a population-based case-control study in Sicily. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:3435-3443.

6. Lunardi-Iskandar Y, Bryant JL, Zeman RA, et al. Tumorigenesis and metastasis of neoplastic Kaposi’s sarcoma cell line in immunodeficient mice blocked by a human pregnancy hormone. Nature. 1995;375:64-68.

7. Allen PJ, Gillespie DL, Redfield RR, et al. Lower extremity lymphedema caused by acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related Kaposi’s sarcoma: case report and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg. 1995;22:178-181.

8. Ramdial PK, Chetty R, Singh B, et al. Lymphedematous HIV-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma. J Cutan Pathol. 2006;33:474-481.

References

 

1. Hiatt KM, Nelson AM, Lichy JH, et al. Classic Kaposi sarcoma in the United States over the last two decades: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 438 non-HIV-related Kaposi Sarcoma patients with comparison to HIV-related Kaposi Sarcoma [published online ahead of print March 28, 2008]. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:572-582.

2. Weaver J, Billings SD. Initial presentation of stasis dermatitis mimicking solitary lesions: a previously unrecognized clinical scenario. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61:1028-1032.

3. Bulat V, Lugovic´ L, Šitum M, et al. Acroangiodermatitis (pseudo-Kaposi sarcoma) as part of chronic venous insufficiency. Acta Clin Croat. 2007;46:273-277.

4. Urquhart JL, Uzieblo A, Kohler S. Detection of HHV-8 in pyogenic granuloma-like Kaposi sarcoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 2006;28:317-321.

5. Anderson LA, Lauria C, Romano N, et al. Risk factors for classical Kaposi sarcoma in a population-based case-control study in Sicily. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:3435-3443.

6. Lunardi-Iskandar Y, Bryant JL, Zeman RA, et al. Tumorigenesis and metastasis of neoplastic Kaposi’s sarcoma cell line in immunodeficient mice blocked by a human pregnancy hormone. Nature. 1995;375:64-68.

7. Allen PJ, Gillespie DL, Redfield RR, et al. Lower extremity lymphedema caused by acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related Kaposi’s sarcoma: case report and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg. 1995;22:178-181.

8. Ramdial PK, Chetty R, Singh B, et al. Lymphedematous HIV-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma. J Cutan Pathol. 2006;33:474-481.

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Page Number
E30-E33
Page Number
E30-E33
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Non–HIV-Related Kaposi Sarcoma in 2 Hispanic Patients Arising in the Setting of Chronic Venous Insufficiency
Display Headline
Non–HIV-Related Kaposi Sarcoma in 2 Hispanic Patients Arising in the Setting of Chronic Venous Insufficiency
Legacy Keywords
Kaposi sarcoma, chronic venous insufficiency, stasis dermatitis, human herpesvirus-8, HHV-8
Legacy Keywords
Kaposi sarcoma, chronic venous insufficiency, stasis dermatitis, human herpesvirus-8, HHV-8
Sections
Inside the Article

  Practice Points

 

  • ­The 4 clinical variants of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) are classic, African, transplant associated, and AIDS related.
  • ­Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) staining can be used to confirm the presence of KS.
  • ­A subset of patients with chronic venous insufficiency with no other risk factors for KS have been found to have violaceous plaques that test positive for HHV-8.
  • ­Chronic venous insufficiency may be a predisposing factor to KS in immunocompetent individuals and may constitute an additional clinical variant of KS.
Disallow All Ads
Article PDF Media

Firm Plaques and Nodules Over the Body

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Firm Plaques and Nodules Over the Body

The Diagnosis: Pancreatic Panniculitis

The biopsy specimen revealed necrosis of the panniculus with “ghost” cells (Figure). Calcification was encountered. Changes of vasculitis were not identified and fungal organisms were not noted. The histopathologic findings supported a diagnosis of pancreatic panniculitis.

Punch biopsy revealed necrosis of the panniculus with “ghost” cells, and calcification was encountered (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Pancreatic panniculitis has been associated with pancreatitis, pancreatic carcinoma, pancreatic pseudocysts, congenital abnormalities of the pancreas, and drug-induced pancreatitis.1 Skin lesions may herald a diagnosis of pancreatic disease in an outpatient and should prompt thorough clinical evaluation when encountered in an outpatient setting. Our patient first developed tender nodules on the left shin 2 to 3 weeks prior to presentation. She reported that her initial nodules were flesh colored but then became erythematous and tender over 1 week’s time. The patient’s history was remarkable for ovarian cancer. She had been hospitalized 2 weeks prior to presentation for abdominal pain and ascites. Imaging studies revealed a cystic lesion in the head of the pancreas. The pancreas was traumatized during a peritoneal tap. Her nodules developed shortly thereafter and were distributed on the arms, legs, back, and abdomen.

Pancreatic tumors or inflammation are thought to trigger pancreatic panniculitis by releasing enzymes. Pancreatic enzymes such as lipase are thought to play a role in the development of pancreatic panniculitis by entering the vascular system and leading to fat necrosis.2,3 Biopsy reveals necrosis of adipocytes in the center of fat lobules.4 Ghost cells result from hydrolytic activity of enzymes on the fat cells followed by calcium deposition. A report indicates that fungal infection or gout also can cause changes that mimic pancreatic panniculitis.5

Other entities in the differential diagnosis can be excluded by biopsy. Polyarteritis nodosa is a vasculitis. Although panniculitis may be seen in polyarteritis as a secondary phenomenon, lesions are centered around blood vessels and often eventuate in ulceration.6 Subcutaneous fungal infection typically reveals organisms on periodic acid–Schiff stain.7 Pyoderma gangrenosum is associated with ulceration and a neutrophilic infiltrate that is often centered around a central pilosebaceous unit in developing lesions.8 Erythema nodosum is a panniculitis in which septal inflammation predominates.9 These differential diagnoses of pancreatic panniculitis are summarized in the Table.

Pancreatic panniculitis can be associated with acute arthritis and inflammation of periarticular fat.10 Treatment of pancreatic panniculitis is usually focused on the underlying pancreatic disease.11,12 Our patient benefited from analgesic therapy and her lesions improved on follow-up. Clinicians encountering a patient with new tender nodules should be prompted to perform a biopsy. When histopathologic evaluation reveals ghosted adipocytes, pancreatic panniculitis should be suspected and clinical evaluation undertaken.

References

1. Garcia-Romero D, Vanaclocha F. Pancreatic panniculitis. Dermatol Clin. 2008;26:465-470.

2. Berman B, Conteas C, Smith B, et al. Fatal pancreatitis presenting with subcutaneous fat necrosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:359-364.

3. Dhawan SS, Jimenez-Acosta F, Poppiti RJ Jr, et al. Subcutaneous fat necrosis associated with pancreatitis: histochemical and electron microscopic findings. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;85:1025-1028.

4. Cannon JR, Pitha JV, Everett MA. Subcutaneous fat necrosis in pancreatitis. J Cutan Pathol. 1979;6:501-506.

5. Requena L, Sitthinamsuwan P, Santonja C, et al. Cutaneous and mucosal mucormycosis mimicking pancreatic panniculitis and gouty panniculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66:975-984.

6. Grattan CEH. Polyarteritis nodosa. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 1. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:405-407.

7. Millett CR, Halpern AV, Heymann WR. Subcutaneous mycoses. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 2. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:1266-1273.

8. Moschella SL, Davis MDP. Pyoderma gangrenosum. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 1. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:427-431.

9. Patterson JW. Erythema nodosum. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 2. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:1641-1645.

10. Patterson JW. Pancreatic panniculitis. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 2. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:1649-1650.

11. Requena L, Sanchez Yus E. Panniculitis. part II. mostly lobular panniculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45:325-361.

12. Dahl PR, Su WP, Cullimore KC, et al. Pancreatic panniculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33:413-417.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dylan Conroy, BS; Thomas N. Helm, MD

Mr. Conroy was from Canisius College, Buffalo, New York, and currently is from Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. Dr. Helm is from Buffalo Medical Group.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Thomas N. Helm, MD, Buffalo Medical Group, Department of Dermatopathology, 6225 Sheridan Dr, Ste 208, Bldg B, Williamsville, NY 14221 (thelm@buffalomedicalgroup.com).

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E21-E23
Legacy Keywords
pancreatic panniculitis, erythematous nodules, metastatic ovarian cancer, erythema nodosum, subcutaneous fungal infection, pyoderma gangrenosum, peritoneal tap, pancreas
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dylan Conroy, BS; Thomas N. Helm, MD

Mr. Conroy was from Canisius College, Buffalo, New York, and currently is from Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. Dr. Helm is from Buffalo Medical Group.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Thomas N. Helm, MD, Buffalo Medical Group, Department of Dermatopathology, 6225 Sheridan Dr, Ste 208, Bldg B, Williamsville, NY 14221 (thelm@buffalomedicalgroup.com).

Author and Disclosure Information

Dylan Conroy, BS; Thomas N. Helm, MD

Mr. Conroy was from Canisius College, Buffalo, New York, and currently is from Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. Dr. Helm is from Buffalo Medical Group.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Thomas N. Helm, MD, Buffalo Medical Group, Department of Dermatopathology, 6225 Sheridan Dr, Ste 208, Bldg B, Williamsville, NY 14221 (thelm@buffalomedicalgroup.com).

Article PDF
Article PDF

The Diagnosis: Pancreatic Panniculitis

The biopsy specimen revealed necrosis of the panniculus with “ghost” cells (Figure). Calcification was encountered. Changes of vasculitis were not identified and fungal organisms were not noted. The histopathologic findings supported a diagnosis of pancreatic panniculitis.

Punch biopsy revealed necrosis of the panniculus with “ghost” cells, and calcification was encountered (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Pancreatic panniculitis has been associated with pancreatitis, pancreatic carcinoma, pancreatic pseudocysts, congenital abnormalities of the pancreas, and drug-induced pancreatitis.1 Skin lesions may herald a diagnosis of pancreatic disease in an outpatient and should prompt thorough clinical evaluation when encountered in an outpatient setting. Our patient first developed tender nodules on the left shin 2 to 3 weeks prior to presentation. She reported that her initial nodules were flesh colored but then became erythematous and tender over 1 week’s time. The patient’s history was remarkable for ovarian cancer. She had been hospitalized 2 weeks prior to presentation for abdominal pain and ascites. Imaging studies revealed a cystic lesion in the head of the pancreas. The pancreas was traumatized during a peritoneal tap. Her nodules developed shortly thereafter and were distributed on the arms, legs, back, and abdomen.

Pancreatic tumors or inflammation are thought to trigger pancreatic panniculitis by releasing enzymes. Pancreatic enzymes such as lipase are thought to play a role in the development of pancreatic panniculitis by entering the vascular system and leading to fat necrosis.2,3 Biopsy reveals necrosis of adipocytes in the center of fat lobules.4 Ghost cells result from hydrolytic activity of enzymes on the fat cells followed by calcium deposition. A report indicates that fungal infection or gout also can cause changes that mimic pancreatic panniculitis.5

Other entities in the differential diagnosis can be excluded by biopsy. Polyarteritis nodosa is a vasculitis. Although panniculitis may be seen in polyarteritis as a secondary phenomenon, lesions are centered around blood vessels and often eventuate in ulceration.6 Subcutaneous fungal infection typically reveals organisms on periodic acid–Schiff stain.7 Pyoderma gangrenosum is associated with ulceration and a neutrophilic infiltrate that is often centered around a central pilosebaceous unit in developing lesions.8 Erythema nodosum is a panniculitis in which septal inflammation predominates.9 These differential diagnoses of pancreatic panniculitis are summarized in the Table.

Pancreatic panniculitis can be associated with acute arthritis and inflammation of periarticular fat.10 Treatment of pancreatic panniculitis is usually focused on the underlying pancreatic disease.11,12 Our patient benefited from analgesic therapy and her lesions improved on follow-up. Clinicians encountering a patient with new tender nodules should be prompted to perform a biopsy. When histopathologic evaluation reveals ghosted adipocytes, pancreatic panniculitis should be suspected and clinical evaluation undertaken.

The Diagnosis: Pancreatic Panniculitis

The biopsy specimen revealed necrosis of the panniculus with “ghost” cells (Figure). Calcification was encountered. Changes of vasculitis were not identified and fungal organisms were not noted. The histopathologic findings supported a diagnosis of pancreatic panniculitis.

Punch biopsy revealed necrosis of the panniculus with “ghost” cells, and calcification was encountered (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Pancreatic panniculitis has been associated with pancreatitis, pancreatic carcinoma, pancreatic pseudocysts, congenital abnormalities of the pancreas, and drug-induced pancreatitis.1 Skin lesions may herald a diagnosis of pancreatic disease in an outpatient and should prompt thorough clinical evaluation when encountered in an outpatient setting. Our patient first developed tender nodules on the left shin 2 to 3 weeks prior to presentation. She reported that her initial nodules were flesh colored but then became erythematous and tender over 1 week’s time. The patient’s history was remarkable for ovarian cancer. She had been hospitalized 2 weeks prior to presentation for abdominal pain and ascites. Imaging studies revealed a cystic lesion in the head of the pancreas. The pancreas was traumatized during a peritoneal tap. Her nodules developed shortly thereafter and were distributed on the arms, legs, back, and abdomen.

Pancreatic tumors or inflammation are thought to trigger pancreatic panniculitis by releasing enzymes. Pancreatic enzymes such as lipase are thought to play a role in the development of pancreatic panniculitis by entering the vascular system and leading to fat necrosis.2,3 Biopsy reveals necrosis of adipocytes in the center of fat lobules.4 Ghost cells result from hydrolytic activity of enzymes on the fat cells followed by calcium deposition. A report indicates that fungal infection or gout also can cause changes that mimic pancreatic panniculitis.5

Other entities in the differential diagnosis can be excluded by biopsy. Polyarteritis nodosa is a vasculitis. Although panniculitis may be seen in polyarteritis as a secondary phenomenon, lesions are centered around blood vessels and often eventuate in ulceration.6 Subcutaneous fungal infection typically reveals organisms on periodic acid–Schiff stain.7 Pyoderma gangrenosum is associated with ulceration and a neutrophilic infiltrate that is often centered around a central pilosebaceous unit in developing lesions.8 Erythema nodosum is a panniculitis in which septal inflammation predominates.9 These differential diagnoses of pancreatic panniculitis are summarized in the Table.

Pancreatic panniculitis can be associated with acute arthritis and inflammation of periarticular fat.10 Treatment of pancreatic panniculitis is usually focused on the underlying pancreatic disease.11,12 Our patient benefited from analgesic therapy and her lesions improved on follow-up. Clinicians encountering a patient with new tender nodules should be prompted to perform a biopsy. When histopathologic evaluation reveals ghosted adipocytes, pancreatic panniculitis should be suspected and clinical evaluation undertaken.

References

1. Garcia-Romero D, Vanaclocha F. Pancreatic panniculitis. Dermatol Clin. 2008;26:465-470.

2. Berman B, Conteas C, Smith B, et al. Fatal pancreatitis presenting with subcutaneous fat necrosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:359-364.

3. Dhawan SS, Jimenez-Acosta F, Poppiti RJ Jr, et al. Subcutaneous fat necrosis associated with pancreatitis: histochemical and electron microscopic findings. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;85:1025-1028.

4. Cannon JR, Pitha JV, Everett MA. Subcutaneous fat necrosis in pancreatitis. J Cutan Pathol. 1979;6:501-506.

5. Requena L, Sitthinamsuwan P, Santonja C, et al. Cutaneous and mucosal mucormycosis mimicking pancreatic panniculitis and gouty panniculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66:975-984.

6. Grattan CEH. Polyarteritis nodosa. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 1. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:405-407.

7. Millett CR, Halpern AV, Heymann WR. Subcutaneous mycoses. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 2. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:1266-1273.

8. Moschella SL, Davis MDP. Pyoderma gangrenosum. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 1. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:427-431.

9. Patterson JW. Erythema nodosum. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 2. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:1641-1645.

10. Patterson JW. Pancreatic panniculitis. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 2. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:1649-1650.

11. Requena L, Sanchez Yus E. Panniculitis. part II. mostly lobular panniculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45:325-361.

12. Dahl PR, Su WP, Cullimore KC, et al. Pancreatic panniculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33:413-417.

References

1. Garcia-Romero D, Vanaclocha F. Pancreatic panniculitis. Dermatol Clin. 2008;26:465-470.

2. Berman B, Conteas C, Smith B, et al. Fatal pancreatitis presenting with subcutaneous fat necrosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:359-364.

3. Dhawan SS, Jimenez-Acosta F, Poppiti RJ Jr, et al. Subcutaneous fat necrosis associated with pancreatitis: histochemical and electron microscopic findings. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;85:1025-1028.

4. Cannon JR, Pitha JV, Everett MA. Subcutaneous fat necrosis in pancreatitis. J Cutan Pathol. 1979;6:501-506.

5. Requena L, Sitthinamsuwan P, Santonja C, et al. Cutaneous and mucosal mucormycosis mimicking pancreatic panniculitis and gouty panniculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66:975-984.

6. Grattan CEH. Polyarteritis nodosa. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 1. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:405-407.

7. Millett CR, Halpern AV, Heymann WR. Subcutaneous mycoses. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 2. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:1266-1273.

8. Moschella SL, Davis MDP. Pyoderma gangrenosum. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 1. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:427-431.

9. Patterson JW. Erythema nodosum. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 2. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:1641-1645.

10. Patterson JW. Pancreatic panniculitis. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. Vol 2. 3rd ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:1649-1650.

11. Requena L, Sanchez Yus E. Panniculitis. part II. mostly lobular panniculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45:325-361.

12. Dahl PR, Su WP, Cullimore KC, et al. Pancreatic panniculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33:413-417.

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Page Number
E21-E23
Page Number
E21-E23
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Firm Plaques and Nodules Over the Body
Display Headline
Firm Plaques and Nodules Over the Body
Legacy Keywords
pancreatic panniculitis, erythematous nodules, metastatic ovarian cancer, erythema nodosum, subcutaneous fungal infection, pyoderma gangrenosum, peritoneal tap, pancreas
Legacy Keywords
pancreatic panniculitis, erythematous nodules, metastatic ovarian cancer, erythema nodosum, subcutaneous fungal infection, pyoderma gangrenosum, peritoneal tap, pancreas
Sections
Questionnaire Body

A 52-year-old woman presented with painful erythematous nodules of 2 weeks’ duration that began as a single lesion on the left shin and spread rapidly to involve the trunk, arms, and legs. A punch biopsy was performed. Pertinent history included a recent hospitalization for drainage of malignant ascites secondary to metastatic ovarian cancer. The lesions did not drain and were not pruritic. The patient did not have a history of fever, night sweats, nausea, headache, neurologic change, muscle aching, or recent weight loss.
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Imiquimod-Induced Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus–like Changes

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Imiquimod-Induced Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus–like Changes

Drug-induced lupus accounts for up to 10% of lupus erythematosus cases. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) is a distinct clinical variant of lupus erythematosus that typically presents as annular, often scaly, erythematous plaques in photodistributed areas. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus has been reported in association with multiple systemic medications including docetaxel, terbinafine, leuprolide acetate, etanercept, and efalizumab1-5; however, the induction of SCLE by topical agents has not been widely reported. We report a case of local induction of lesions that clinically and histologically resembled SCLE in a 50-year-old woman following treatment with topical imiquimod.

Case Report

A 50-year-old woman presented with an adverse inflammatory reaction on the right side of the upper chest secondary to application of topical imiquimod. Prior to the current presentation the patient was diagnosed with a biopsy-proven superficial basal cell carcinoma (BCC) on the sun-exposed area of the upper right breast, and topical imiquimod therapy was initiated. Several days after starting treatment, the patient began applying imiquimod on areas of clinically normal skin on the upper chest as advised by her dermatologist. After 7 to 10 days of application the patient reported intense erythema, pain, and crusting in the treated area on the right side of the upper chest. She also experienced systemic symptoms including fatigue, arthralgia, malaise, and fever.

Clinical examination revealed erythematous to violaceous annular and polycyclic plaques on the upper chest (Figure 1). Erythema and scaling were noted at the site of the superficial BCC. A biopsy showed a superficial and mid-dermal perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate with overlying vacuolar interface dermatitis and scattered necrotic keratinocytes (Figures 2A and 2B). There was slightly increased dermal edema and mucin. Anti-CD123 immunohistochemical staining revealed nodular aggregates of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) accompanying lymphocytes around dermal vessels and adnexa (Figure 2C). The patient’s family history was remarkable for SCLE in her daughter. Antinuclear antibody, anti-Ro (Sjögren syndrome antigen A), and anti-La (Sjögren syndrome antigen B) were negative. On follow-up examination 1 month after discontinuation of imiquimod, the patient’s skin lesions had completely cleared. Two years later, the patient continued to be free of skin lesions.

 


Figure 1. Annular plaques on the upper chest with overlying
scale and focal central clearing. 


 

Figure 2. Vacuolar interface dermatitis with a perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate (A)(H&E, original magnification ×40). Scattered necrotic keratinocytes were evident (B)(H&E, original magnification ×400). Anti-CD123 immunohistochemical staining revealed nodular aggregates of plasmacytoid dendritic cells with accompanying lymphocytes centered around dermal vessels and adnexa (C)(original magnification ×200).

Comment

Imiquimod is a topical immunomodulator used for the treatment of genital warts and cutaneous malignancies. It exerts its effect via induction of proinflammatory cytokines (eg, IFN-a, tumor necrosis factor a [TNF-α]) through activation of toll-like receptor (TLR) 7, an intracytoplasmic receptor that is found on several cell types including pDCs and B cells. When the cell surface receptor is bound by activating ligands (eg, single-stranded RNA, imiquimod), downstream signaling is initiated, resulting in the production of large amounts of IFN-a and TNF-α.6,7 Both IFN-a and TNF-α are upregulated in patient serum and lesional skin in SCLE.8,9 Additionally, pDCs have been shown to accumulate in lesions of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) in a distinct dermal pattern, as demonstrated by CD123 staining.9,10 This pattern is identical to the one seen in our case. Although pDCs also are present in cutaneous dermatomyositis lesions, the pattern is distinct from CLE.10 These findings indicate that IFN-a produced by pDCs may play an integral role in the pathogenesis of CLE. Several observations implicating TLR signaling in the pathogenesis of lupus have been described. In a lupus-prone mouse model of lupus erythematosus, transgenic overexpression of TLR-7 resulted in increased severity of clinical disease and accelerated mortality. Antimalarials improve lupus erythematosus via blockade of TLR-7 and TLR-9 signaling.11

Imiquimod, which acts as an inducer of IFN-α expression through TLR-7 signaling, may have been an inciting factor in the development of SCLE-like lesions in this genetically predisposed patient. Histopathology of cutaneous malignancies treated with topical imiquimod typically does not show lupuslike features.12 It is possible that a subset of predisposed patients have increased numbers of pDCs primed in their skin or that they exhibit a more robust TLR-7 reaction to imiquimod, resulting in abundant IFN-a production. Other autoimmune diseases, such as pemphigus foliaceus and vitiligo, also have been reported to occur locally after the application of imiquimod,13,14 which suggests that a localized autoimmune reaction can be induced by activation of TLR-7; however, a case of chronic discoid lupus erythematosus of the scalp improving after treatment with imiquimod has been reported.15

 

 

The use of imiquimod in patients with a personal or family history of lupus erythematosus or those with a personal history of an autoimmune blistering disorder should be undertaken with caution until more is known.

References

 

1. Chen M, Crowson AN, Woofter M, et al. Docetaxel (taxotere) induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: report of 4 cases. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:818-820.

2. Farhi D, Viguier M, Cosnes A, et al. Terbinafine-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Dermatology. 2006;212:59-65.

3. Wiechert A, Tüting T, Bieber T, et al. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus in a leuprorelin-treated patient with prostate carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:231-233.

4. Bleumink GS, ter Borg EJ, Ramselaar CG, et al. Etanercept-induced subcutaneous lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001;40:1317-1319.

5. Bentley DD, Graves JE, Smith DI, et al. Efalizumab-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54(suppl 5):S242-S243.

6. Marshak-Rothstein A. Toll-like receptors in systemic autoimmune disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:823-835.

7. Hurwitz DJ, Pincus L, Kupper TS. Imiquimod: a topically applied link between innate and acquired immunity. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:1347-1350.

8. Zampieri S, Alaibac M, Iaccarino L, et al. Tumour necrosis factor alpha is expressed in refractory skin lesions from patients with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:545-548.

9. Farkas L, Beiske K, Lund-Johansen F, et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (natural interferon-alpha/beta-producing cells) accumulate in cutaneous lupus erythematosus lesions. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:237-243.

10. McNiff JM, Kaplan DH. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells are present in cutaneous dermatomyositis lesions in a pattern distinct from lupus erythematosus. J Cutan Pathol. 2008;35:452-456.

11. Pisitkun P, Deane JA, Difilippantonio MJ, et al. Autoreactive B cell responses to RNA-related antigens due to TLR7 gene duplication. Science. 2006;312:1669-1672.

12. Wolf IH, Kodama K, Cerroni L, et al. Nature of inflammatory infiltrate in superficial cutaneous malignancies during topical imiquimod treatment. Am J Dermatopathol. 2007;29:237-241.

13. Lin R, Ladd DJ Jr, Powell DJ, et al. Localized pemphigus foliaceus induced by topical imiquimod treatment. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:889-890.

14. Brown T, Zirvi M, Cotsarelis G, et al. Vitiligo-like hypopigmentation associated with imiquimod treatment of genital warts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52:715-716.

15. Gersden R, Wenzel J, Uerlich M, et al. Successful treatment of chronic discoid lupus erythematosus of the scalp with imiquimod. Dermatology. 2002;205:416-418.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Sheilagh M. Maguiness, MD; Terry T. Farsani, MD; Daniel C. Zedek, MD; Timothy G. Berger, MD

Dr. Maguiness is from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Dr. Farsani is from the Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Mountain View, California. Drs. Zedek and Berger are from the University of California, San Francisco.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Terry T. Farsani, MD, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, 701 E El Camino Real, Mountain View, CA 94306 (tfarsani@gmail.com).

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
349-351
Legacy Keywords
imiquimod, cutaneous lupus, toll-like receptor, autoimmune disease, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, drug-induced lupus
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Sheilagh M. Maguiness, MD; Terry T. Farsani, MD; Daniel C. Zedek, MD; Timothy G. Berger, MD

Dr. Maguiness is from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Dr. Farsani is from the Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Mountain View, California. Drs. Zedek and Berger are from the University of California, San Francisco.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Terry T. Farsani, MD, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, 701 E El Camino Real, Mountain View, CA 94306 (tfarsani@gmail.com).

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Sheilagh M. Maguiness, MD; Terry T. Farsani, MD; Daniel C. Zedek, MD; Timothy G. Berger, MD

Dr. Maguiness is from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Dr. Farsani is from the Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Mountain View, California. Drs. Zedek and Berger are from the University of California, San Francisco.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Terry T. Farsani, MD, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, 701 E El Camino Real, Mountain View, CA 94306 (tfarsani@gmail.com).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Drug-induced lupus accounts for up to 10% of lupus erythematosus cases. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) is a distinct clinical variant of lupus erythematosus that typically presents as annular, often scaly, erythematous plaques in photodistributed areas. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus has been reported in association with multiple systemic medications including docetaxel, terbinafine, leuprolide acetate, etanercept, and efalizumab1-5; however, the induction of SCLE by topical agents has not been widely reported. We report a case of local induction of lesions that clinically and histologically resembled SCLE in a 50-year-old woman following treatment with topical imiquimod.

Case Report

A 50-year-old woman presented with an adverse inflammatory reaction on the right side of the upper chest secondary to application of topical imiquimod. Prior to the current presentation the patient was diagnosed with a biopsy-proven superficial basal cell carcinoma (BCC) on the sun-exposed area of the upper right breast, and topical imiquimod therapy was initiated. Several days after starting treatment, the patient began applying imiquimod on areas of clinically normal skin on the upper chest as advised by her dermatologist. After 7 to 10 days of application the patient reported intense erythema, pain, and crusting in the treated area on the right side of the upper chest. She also experienced systemic symptoms including fatigue, arthralgia, malaise, and fever.

Clinical examination revealed erythematous to violaceous annular and polycyclic plaques on the upper chest (Figure 1). Erythema and scaling were noted at the site of the superficial BCC. A biopsy showed a superficial and mid-dermal perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate with overlying vacuolar interface dermatitis and scattered necrotic keratinocytes (Figures 2A and 2B). There was slightly increased dermal edema and mucin. Anti-CD123 immunohistochemical staining revealed nodular aggregates of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) accompanying lymphocytes around dermal vessels and adnexa (Figure 2C). The patient’s family history was remarkable for SCLE in her daughter. Antinuclear antibody, anti-Ro (Sjögren syndrome antigen A), and anti-La (Sjögren syndrome antigen B) were negative. On follow-up examination 1 month after discontinuation of imiquimod, the patient’s skin lesions had completely cleared. Two years later, the patient continued to be free of skin lesions.

 


Figure 1. Annular plaques on the upper chest with overlying
scale and focal central clearing. 


 

Figure 2. Vacuolar interface dermatitis with a perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate (A)(H&E, original magnification ×40). Scattered necrotic keratinocytes were evident (B)(H&E, original magnification ×400). Anti-CD123 immunohistochemical staining revealed nodular aggregates of plasmacytoid dendritic cells with accompanying lymphocytes centered around dermal vessels and adnexa (C)(original magnification ×200).

Comment

Imiquimod is a topical immunomodulator used for the treatment of genital warts and cutaneous malignancies. It exerts its effect via induction of proinflammatory cytokines (eg, IFN-a, tumor necrosis factor a [TNF-α]) through activation of toll-like receptor (TLR) 7, an intracytoplasmic receptor that is found on several cell types including pDCs and B cells. When the cell surface receptor is bound by activating ligands (eg, single-stranded RNA, imiquimod), downstream signaling is initiated, resulting in the production of large amounts of IFN-a and TNF-α.6,7 Both IFN-a and TNF-α are upregulated in patient serum and lesional skin in SCLE.8,9 Additionally, pDCs have been shown to accumulate in lesions of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) in a distinct dermal pattern, as demonstrated by CD123 staining.9,10 This pattern is identical to the one seen in our case. Although pDCs also are present in cutaneous dermatomyositis lesions, the pattern is distinct from CLE.10 These findings indicate that IFN-a produced by pDCs may play an integral role in the pathogenesis of CLE. Several observations implicating TLR signaling in the pathogenesis of lupus have been described. In a lupus-prone mouse model of lupus erythematosus, transgenic overexpression of TLR-7 resulted in increased severity of clinical disease and accelerated mortality. Antimalarials improve lupus erythematosus via blockade of TLR-7 and TLR-9 signaling.11

Imiquimod, which acts as an inducer of IFN-α expression through TLR-7 signaling, may have been an inciting factor in the development of SCLE-like lesions in this genetically predisposed patient. Histopathology of cutaneous malignancies treated with topical imiquimod typically does not show lupuslike features.12 It is possible that a subset of predisposed patients have increased numbers of pDCs primed in their skin or that they exhibit a more robust TLR-7 reaction to imiquimod, resulting in abundant IFN-a production. Other autoimmune diseases, such as pemphigus foliaceus and vitiligo, also have been reported to occur locally after the application of imiquimod,13,14 which suggests that a localized autoimmune reaction can be induced by activation of TLR-7; however, a case of chronic discoid lupus erythematosus of the scalp improving after treatment with imiquimod has been reported.15

 

 

The use of imiquimod in patients with a personal or family history of lupus erythematosus or those with a personal history of an autoimmune blistering disorder should be undertaken with caution until more is known.

Drug-induced lupus accounts for up to 10% of lupus erythematosus cases. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) is a distinct clinical variant of lupus erythematosus that typically presents as annular, often scaly, erythematous plaques in photodistributed areas. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus has been reported in association with multiple systemic medications including docetaxel, terbinafine, leuprolide acetate, etanercept, and efalizumab1-5; however, the induction of SCLE by topical agents has not been widely reported. We report a case of local induction of lesions that clinically and histologically resembled SCLE in a 50-year-old woman following treatment with topical imiquimod.

Case Report

A 50-year-old woman presented with an adverse inflammatory reaction on the right side of the upper chest secondary to application of topical imiquimod. Prior to the current presentation the patient was diagnosed with a biopsy-proven superficial basal cell carcinoma (BCC) on the sun-exposed area of the upper right breast, and topical imiquimod therapy was initiated. Several days after starting treatment, the patient began applying imiquimod on areas of clinically normal skin on the upper chest as advised by her dermatologist. After 7 to 10 days of application the patient reported intense erythema, pain, and crusting in the treated area on the right side of the upper chest. She also experienced systemic symptoms including fatigue, arthralgia, malaise, and fever.

Clinical examination revealed erythematous to violaceous annular and polycyclic plaques on the upper chest (Figure 1). Erythema and scaling were noted at the site of the superficial BCC. A biopsy showed a superficial and mid-dermal perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate with overlying vacuolar interface dermatitis and scattered necrotic keratinocytes (Figures 2A and 2B). There was slightly increased dermal edema and mucin. Anti-CD123 immunohistochemical staining revealed nodular aggregates of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) accompanying lymphocytes around dermal vessels and adnexa (Figure 2C). The patient’s family history was remarkable for SCLE in her daughter. Antinuclear antibody, anti-Ro (Sjögren syndrome antigen A), and anti-La (Sjögren syndrome antigen B) were negative. On follow-up examination 1 month after discontinuation of imiquimod, the patient’s skin lesions had completely cleared. Two years later, the patient continued to be free of skin lesions.

 


Figure 1. Annular plaques on the upper chest with overlying
scale and focal central clearing. 


 

Figure 2. Vacuolar interface dermatitis with a perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate (A)(H&E, original magnification ×40). Scattered necrotic keratinocytes were evident (B)(H&E, original magnification ×400). Anti-CD123 immunohistochemical staining revealed nodular aggregates of plasmacytoid dendritic cells with accompanying lymphocytes centered around dermal vessels and adnexa (C)(original magnification ×200).

Comment

Imiquimod is a topical immunomodulator used for the treatment of genital warts and cutaneous malignancies. It exerts its effect via induction of proinflammatory cytokines (eg, IFN-a, tumor necrosis factor a [TNF-α]) through activation of toll-like receptor (TLR) 7, an intracytoplasmic receptor that is found on several cell types including pDCs and B cells. When the cell surface receptor is bound by activating ligands (eg, single-stranded RNA, imiquimod), downstream signaling is initiated, resulting in the production of large amounts of IFN-a and TNF-α.6,7 Both IFN-a and TNF-α are upregulated in patient serum and lesional skin in SCLE.8,9 Additionally, pDCs have been shown to accumulate in lesions of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) in a distinct dermal pattern, as demonstrated by CD123 staining.9,10 This pattern is identical to the one seen in our case. Although pDCs also are present in cutaneous dermatomyositis lesions, the pattern is distinct from CLE.10 These findings indicate that IFN-a produced by pDCs may play an integral role in the pathogenesis of CLE. Several observations implicating TLR signaling in the pathogenesis of lupus have been described. In a lupus-prone mouse model of lupus erythematosus, transgenic overexpression of TLR-7 resulted in increased severity of clinical disease and accelerated mortality. Antimalarials improve lupus erythematosus via blockade of TLR-7 and TLR-9 signaling.11

Imiquimod, which acts as an inducer of IFN-α expression through TLR-7 signaling, may have been an inciting factor in the development of SCLE-like lesions in this genetically predisposed patient. Histopathology of cutaneous malignancies treated with topical imiquimod typically does not show lupuslike features.12 It is possible that a subset of predisposed patients have increased numbers of pDCs primed in their skin or that they exhibit a more robust TLR-7 reaction to imiquimod, resulting in abundant IFN-a production. Other autoimmune diseases, such as pemphigus foliaceus and vitiligo, also have been reported to occur locally after the application of imiquimod,13,14 which suggests that a localized autoimmune reaction can be induced by activation of TLR-7; however, a case of chronic discoid lupus erythematosus of the scalp improving after treatment with imiquimod has been reported.15

 

 

The use of imiquimod in patients with a personal or family history of lupus erythematosus or those with a personal history of an autoimmune blistering disorder should be undertaken with caution until more is known.

References

 

1. Chen M, Crowson AN, Woofter M, et al. Docetaxel (taxotere) induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: report of 4 cases. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:818-820.

2. Farhi D, Viguier M, Cosnes A, et al. Terbinafine-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Dermatology. 2006;212:59-65.

3. Wiechert A, Tüting T, Bieber T, et al. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus in a leuprorelin-treated patient with prostate carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:231-233.

4. Bleumink GS, ter Borg EJ, Ramselaar CG, et al. Etanercept-induced subcutaneous lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001;40:1317-1319.

5. Bentley DD, Graves JE, Smith DI, et al. Efalizumab-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54(suppl 5):S242-S243.

6. Marshak-Rothstein A. Toll-like receptors in systemic autoimmune disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:823-835.

7. Hurwitz DJ, Pincus L, Kupper TS. Imiquimod: a topically applied link between innate and acquired immunity. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:1347-1350.

8. Zampieri S, Alaibac M, Iaccarino L, et al. Tumour necrosis factor alpha is expressed in refractory skin lesions from patients with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:545-548.

9. Farkas L, Beiske K, Lund-Johansen F, et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (natural interferon-alpha/beta-producing cells) accumulate in cutaneous lupus erythematosus lesions. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:237-243.

10. McNiff JM, Kaplan DH. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells are present in cutaneous dermatomyositis lesions in a pattern distinct from lupus erythematosus. J Cutan Pathol. 2008;35:452-456.

11. Pisitkun P, Deane JA, Difilippantonio MJ, et al. Autoreactive B cell responses to RNA-related antigens due to TLR7 gene duplication. Science. 2006;312:1669-1672.

12. Wolf IH, Kodama K, Cerroni L, et al. Nature of inflammatory infiltrate in superficial cutaneous malignancies during topical imiquimod treatment. Am J Dermatopathol. 2007;29:237-241.

13. Lin R, Ladd DJ Jr, Powell DJ, et al. Localized pemphigus foliaceus induced by topical imiquimod treatment. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:889-890.

14. Brown T, Zirvi M, Cotsarelis G, et al. Vitiligo-like hypopigmentation associated with imiquimod treatment of genital warts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52:715-716.

15. Gersden R, Wenzel J, Uerlich M, et al. Successful treatment of chronic discoid lupus erythematosus of the scalp with imiquimod. Dermatology. 2002;205:416-418.

References

 

1. Chen M, Crowson AN, Woofter M, et al. Docetaxel (taxotere) induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: report of 4 cases. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:818-820.

2. Farhi D, Viguier M, Cosnes A, et al. Terbinafine-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Dermatology. 2006;212:59-65.

3. Wiechert A, Tüting T, Bieber T, et al. Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus in a leuprorelin-treated patient with prostate carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:231-233.

4. Bleumink GS, ter Borg EJ, Ramselaar CG, et al. Etanercept-induced subcutaneous lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001;40:1317-1319.

5. Bentley DD, Graves JE, Smith DI, et al. Efalizumab-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54(suppl 5):S242-S243.

6. Marshak-Rothstein A. Toll-like receptors in systemic autoimmune disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:823-835.

7. Hurwitz DJ, Pincus L, Kupper TS. Imiquimod: a topically applied link between innate and acquired immunity. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:1347-1350.

8. Zampieri S, Alaibac M, Iaccarino L, et al. Tumour necrosis factor alpha is expressed in refractory skin lesions from patients with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:545-548.

9. Farkas L, Beiske K, Lund-Johansen F, et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (natural interferon-alpha/beta-producing cells) accumulate in cutaneous lupus erythematosus lesions. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:237-243.

10. McNiff JM, Kaplan DH. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells are present in cutaneous dermatomyositis lesions in a pattern distinct from lupus erythematosus. J Cutan Pathol. 2008;35:452-456.

11. Pisitkun P, Deane JA, Difilippantonio MJ, et al. Autoreactive B cell responses to RNA-related antigens due to TLR7 gene duplication. Science. 2006;312:1669-1672.

12. Wolf IH, Kodama K, Cerroni L, et al. Nature of inflammatory infiltrate in superficial cutaneous malignancies during topical imiquimod treatment. Am J Dermatopathol. 2007;29:237-241.

13. Lin R, Ladd DJ Jr, Powell DJ, et al. Localized pemphigus foliaceus induced by topical imiquimod treatment. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:889-890.

14. Brown T, Zirvi M, Cotsarelis G, et al. Vitiligo-like hypopigmentation associated with imiquimod treatment of genital warts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52:715-716.

15. Gersden R, Wenzel J, Uerlich M, et al. Successful treatment of chronic discoid lupus erythematosus of the scalp with imiquimod. Dermatology. 2002;205:416-418.

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Page Number
349-351
Page Number
349-351
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Imiquimod-Induced Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus–like Changes
Display Headline
Imiquimod-Induced Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus–like Changes
Legacy Keywords
imiquimod, cutaneous lupus, toll-like receptor, autoimmune disease, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, drug-induced lupus
Legacy Keywords
imiquimod, cutaneous lupus, toll-like receptor, autoimmune disease, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, drug-induced lupus
Sections
Inside the Article

   Practice Points

 

  • ­Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus has been reported in association with multiple systemic medications; however, association of this disorder with topical agents has not been widely reported.
  • ­The use of topical imiquimod in patients with a personal or family history of lupus erythematosus should be undertaken with caution until more is known.
Disallow All Ads
Article PDF Media

Rare Angioinvasive Fungal Infection in Association With Leukemia Cutis

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Rare Angioinvasive Fungal Infection in Association With Leukemia Cutis

Leukemia cutis (LC) is characterized by the infiltration of malignant neoplastic leukocytes or their precursors into the skin, most often in conjunction with systemic leukemia.1 Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is the second most common cause of LC and the most common form of leukemia among adults.1 Patients with leukemia often are in a relative or absolute immunocompromised state, which may be secondary to neutropenia, chemotherapy regimens, or immunosuppressive regimens following stem cell transplant (SCT). Thus, when evaluating cutaneous lesions consistent with LC in immunocompromised patients, there must be a high index of suspicion for concomitant opportunistic infections.

We report the case of a 52-year-old man with primary refractory AML following allogeneic SCT with relapse who presented with an LC lesion below the knee with concomitant invasive fungal infection despite being on prophylactic oral antifungal therapy.

Case Report

A 52-year-old man with primary refractory AML (M1) of 1 year’s duration presented for evaluation of a slowly progressing reddish purple nodule on the right knee of 2 to 4 months’ duration. The patient had undergone a matched unrelated donor allogeneic SCT 6 months following diagnosis of AML with subsequent disease progression despite reduction of posttransplant graft-versus-host disease prophylactic immune suppression and a cycle of clofarabine. The patient was hospitalized 2 months after the SCT for neutropenic fever and was found to have vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia, Clostridium difficile colitis, and possible fungal pneumonia. He was treated with voriconazole 200 mg twice daily, which he continued following discharge for antifungal prophylaxis. At the time of discharge, the patient reported that he noticed an asymptomatic “purple papule” on the right knee but did not seek further workup.

Two months later, the patient presented with a fever (temperature, 38.6°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count, 130 cells/mL [increased from 53 cells/mL 1 week prior to admission]). Due to his history of immunosuppression and neutropenia, the patient was placed on a broad-spectrum antibiotic regimen of cefepime, daptomycin, and linezolid on admission. Later, vancomycin and gentamicin were added and voriconazole was switched to caspofungin. The patient also received granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for neutropenia. During the current hospitalization, blood cultures demonstrated vancomycin-resistant enterococcemia, and computed tomography of the chest revealed findings consistent with multilobar pneumonia.

 

Figure 1. A large round, reddish purple, centrally ulcerated plaque with dark hemorrhagic crust and a surrounding patch of erythema inferior to the knee on the right lateral lower leg.

Dermatology was consulted to evaluate the purple nodule on the right knee, which had slowly progressed since his last admission. Physical examination revealed a violaceous, 1.5×1.5-cm nodule with central necrosis covered by black eschar with surrounding erythema (Figure 1). Biopsy specimens for routine histology and a tissue culture were obtained. Histopathologic examination revealed a dense diffuse infiltrate of large hyperchromatic mononuclear cells extending through the dermis, which was consistent with the patient’s known AML (Figure 2). Acid-fast bacillus staining was negative for mycobacterial organisms. Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stain demonstrated an overwhelming number of septate fungal hyphae with acute-angle branching, concerning for Aspergillus species (Figure 3). Of note, an Aspergillus serum antigen test was performed at this time and was negative. On repeat review of the routine histologic sections, angioinvasion by hyphae was detected amidst the dense lymphocytic infiltrate (Figure 4).

Given the patient’s immunocompromised state, the presence of angioinvasive fungi on the skin biopsy, and unresolved pneumonia, the patient was restarted on voriconazole for treatment of likely Aspergillus infection. He was continued on chemotherapy for the primary refractory AML and received a donor lymphocyte infusion prior to discharge. After the patient was discharged, the tissue culture grew Paecilomyces, a rare fungal species. The patient died 1 week after discharge.

 

Figure 2. A punch biopsy specimen demonstrated a dense interstitial infiltrate of hyperchromatic cells extending through the dermis (A)(H&E, original magnification ×200). Higher-power view of monomorphic cells exhibited elevated nuclear-cytoplasmic ratios (B)(H&E, original magnification ×600).

   

Figure 3. Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stain revealed numerous fungal hyphae (A)(original magnification ×200). Higher-power magnification showed septate fungal hyphae (B)(original magnification ×600).

 

Figure 4. Leukemia cutis and numerous fungal hyphae demonstrated angioinvasion (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Comment

Leukemia cutis is an extramedullary manifestation of leukemia that appears in 10% to 15% of patients with AML.2 The frequency of LC differs widely for the various types of AML, with the majority of cases occurring in the acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4) or acute monocytic leukemia (M5) subtypes.3,4 One large study of AML patients (N=381) demonstrated an incidence of LC in 28.6% of patients with the M4 subtype and 42.9% of those with the M5 subtype, with an incidence of only 7.1% of patients with the M1 subtype.3 It occurs less frequently in chronic myeloproliferative diseases.2,4

 

 

Leukemia cutis has a wide range of cutaneous manifestations and may present with solitary or multiple papular, nodular, or plaquelike lesions that are red-brown, blue, violaceous, or hemorrhagic.4 Leukemia cutis occurs most commonly on the legs, followed by the arms, back, chest, scalp, and face.2,4 Leukemia cutis may be hard to distinguish clinically from other conditions such as cutaneous metastases of visceral malignancies, lymphoma, drug eruptions, and opportunistic infections. Leukemia cutis ulcers often measure only a few centimeters in diameter with a firmly adherent purulent or hemorrhagic crust and may occur in unusual locations. These lesions usually are treatment resistant and their persistence may help to lead to diagnosis.4

Microscopically, most LC lesions show a perivascular or periadnexal pattern of involvement or a dense diffuse, interstitial, or nodular atypical lymphocytic infiltrate involving the dermis and subcutis with sparing of the upper papillary dermis.2 The cytologic appearance of M1 and M2 subtypes of AML are characterized by medium-sized to large mononuclear cells with a light cytoplasm and large basophilic cell nuclei. The M4 and M5 subtypes of AML generally are dominated by medium-sized, round or oval-shaped mononuclear cells that may have eosinophilic cytoplasm and segmented or kidney-shaped basophilic nuclei.4 Immunophenotyping is crucial for diagnosis. In myeloid disorders, there is positive staining with markers of myeloid lineage such as myeloperoxidase, lysozyme, CD34, CD15, CD68, CD43, and CD117.5

In our patient, there was an ulcerated dense diffuse dermal infiltrate of large atypical lymphocytes consistent with LC and positive immunostaining consistent with LC associated with AML. Additionally, septate hyphae with acute-angle branching also were noted in the dermal blood vessels on hematoxylin and eosin and fungal staining, demonstrating concomitant fungal infection. Angioinvasion of organisms demonstrated on skin biopsy and persistent pneumonia noted on chest imaging suggested a disseminated infectious process.       

Invasive fungal infections are an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised individuals, including those with hematologic malignancies and hematologic SCTs. Despite an increasing number of antifungal therapies, outcomes are frequently suboptimal with mortality rates often greater than 50% depending on the pathogen and disease.6 Thus, there must be a high index of suspicion of infection even when a separate histopathologic diagnosis is available, such as the finding of leukemic infiltrates in this patient’s biopsy specimen. A similar case of LC has been reported with concomitant fungal infection involving Fusarium and Enterococcus.7 Patients with leukemic cells may develop leukemic infiltrates in response to cutaneous infection, and a high index of suspicion for 2 related but distinct processes is necessary.

Paecilomyces species are an emerging cause of opportunistic and usually severe human infections.8-11 The Paecilomyces species are saprophytic filamentous fungi that are found worldwide in soil as well as contaminants in the air and water.12Paecilomyces infection is generally associated with the use of immunosuppressive therapies, implants, or ocular surgery. Among species in this genus, Paecilomyces lilacinus and Paecilomyces variotii are of clinical importance. Most species have high susceptibility to the newer azoles such as voriconazole.6

Conclusion

Despite continued treatment with voriconazole, our patient still developed a rare fungal infection arising in a lesion of LC. He had signs of infection, including an elevated white blood cell count, fever, and malaise, which are nonspecific clinical findings that could have been attributed to known relapse of systemic leukemia or to known enterococcemia. Even in patients on antifungal prophylaxis and with other possible causes of leukocytosis, this case illustrates that there must be a high index of suspicion for angioinvasive fungal infection.

References

 

1. Aquilera SB, Zarraga M, Rosen L. Leukemia cutis in a patient with acute myelogenous leukemia: a case report and review of the literature. Cutis. 2010;85:31-36.

2. Cho-Vega JH, Medeiros J, Prieto VG, et al. Leukemia cutis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;129:130.

3. Agis H, Weltermann A, Fonatsch C, et al. A comparative study on demographic, hematological, and cytogenetic findings and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia with and without leukemia cutis. Ann Hematol. 2002;81:90-95.

4. Wagner G, Fenchel K, Back W, et al. Leukemia cutis—epidemiology, clinical presentation, and differential diagnoses. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012;10:27-36.

5. Hejmadi RK, Thompson D, Shah F, et al. Cutaneous presentation of aleukemic monoblastic leukemia cutis: a case report and review of literature with focus on immunohistochemistry. J Cutan Pathol. 2008;35(suppl 1):46.

6. Kontoyiannis DP. Invasive mycoses: strategies for effective management. Am J Med. 2012;125(suppl 1):25-38.

7. Feramisco JD, Hsiao JL, Fox LP, et al. Angioinvasive Fusarium and concomitant Enterococcus infection arising in association with leukemia cutis. J Cutan Pathol. 2011;38:926-929.

8. Antachopoulos C, Walsh TJ, Roilides E. Fungal infections in primary immunodeficiencies. Eur J Pediatr. 2007;166:1099-1117.

9. Carey J, D’Amico R, Sutton DA, et al. Paecilomyces lilacinus vaginitis in an immuno-competent patient. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:1155-1158.

10. Castro LG, Salebian A, Sotto MN. Hyalohyphomycosis by Paecilomyces lilacinus in a renal transplant patient and a review of human Paecilomyces species infections. J Med Vet Mycol. 1990;28:15-26.

11. Pastor FJ, Guarro J. Clinical manifestations, treatment and outcome of Paecilomyces lilacinus infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12:948-960.

12. Castelli MV, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Cuesta I, et al. Susceptibility testing and molecular classification of Paecilomyces spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:2926-2928.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Yunyoung C. Chang, MD; Campbell Stewart, MD; Emily Y. Chu, MD, PhD; Misha Rosenbach, MD

From the Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Misha Rosenbach, MD, 3600 Spruce St, 2nd Floor, Maloney Building, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (Misha.Rosenbach@uphs.upenn.edu).

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
332-335
Legacy Keywords
leukemia cutis, acute myelogenous leukemia, angioinvasive fungal infection, paecilomyces
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Yunyoung C. Chang, MD; Campbell Stewart, MD; Emily Y. Chu, MD, PhD; Misha Rosenbach, MD

From the Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Misha Rosenbach, MD, 3600 Spruce St, 2nd Floor, Maloney Building, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (Misha.Rosenbach@uphs.upenn.edu).

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Yunyoung C. Chang, MD; Campbell Stewart, MD; Emily Y. Chu, MD, PhD; Misha Rosenbach, MD

From the Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Misha Rosenbach, MD, 3600 Spruce St, 2nd Floor, Maloney Building, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (Misha.Rosenbach@uphs.upenn.edu).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Leukemia cutis (LC) is characterized by the infiltration of malignant neoplastic leukocytes or their precursors into the skin, most often in conjunction with systemic leukemia.1 Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is the second most common cause of LC and the most common form of leukemia among adults.1 Patients with leukemia often are in a relative or absolute immunocompromised state, which may be secondary to neutropenia, chemotherapy regimens, or immunosuppressive regimens following stem cell transplant (SCT). Thus, when evaluating cutaneous lesions consistent with LC in immunocompromised patients, there must be a high index of suspicion for concomitant opportunistic infections.

We report the case of a 52-year-old man with primary refractory AML following allogeneic SCT with relapse who presented with an LC lesion below the knee with concomitant invasive fungal infection despite being on prophylactic oral antifungal therapy.

Case Report

A 52-year-old man with primary refractory AML (M1) of 1 year’s duration presented for evaluation of a slowly progressing reddish purple nodule on the right knee of 2 to 4 months’ duration. The patient had undergone a matched unrelated donor allogeneic SCT 6 months following diagnosis of AML with subsequent disease progression despite reduction of posttransplant graft-versus-host disease prophylactic immune suppression and a cycle of clofarabine. The patient was hospitalized 2 months after the SCT for neutropenic fever and was found to have vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia, Clostridium difficile colitis, and possible fungal pneumonia. He was treated with voriconazole 200 mg twice daily, which he continued following discharge for antifungal prophylaxis. At the time of discharge, the patient reported that he noticed an asymptomatic “purple papule” on the right knee but did not seek further workup.

Two months later, the patient presented with a fever (temperature, 38.6°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count, 130 cells/mL [increased from 53 cells/mL 1 week prior to admission]). Due to his history of immunosuppression and neutropenia, the patient was placed on a broad-spectrum antibiotic regimen of cefepime, daptomycin, and linezolid on admission. Later, vancomycin and gentamicin were added and voriconazole was switched to caspofungin. The patient also received granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for neutropenia. During the current hospitalization, blood cultures demonstrated vancomycin-resistant enterococcemia, and computed tomography of the chest revealed findings consistent with multilobar pneumonia.

 

Figure 1. A large round, reddish purple, centrally ulcerated plaque with dark hemorrhagic crust and a surrounding patch of erythema inferior to the knee on the right lateral lower leg.

Dermatology was consulted to evaluate the purple nodule on the right knee, which had slowly progressed since his last admission. Physical examination revealed a violaceous, 1.5×1.5-cm nodule with central necrosis covered by black eschar with surrounding erythema (Figure 1). Biopsy specimens for routine histology and a tissue culture were obtained. Histopathologic examination revealed a dense diffuse infiltrate of large hyperchromatic mononuclear cells extending through the dermis, which was consistent with the patient’s known AML (Figure 2). Acid-fast bacillus staining was negative for mycobacterial organisms. Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stain demonstrated an overwhelming number of septate fungal hyphae with acute-angle branching, concerning for Aspergillus species (Figure 3). Of note, an Aspergillus serum antigen test was performed at this time and was negative. On repeat review of the routine histologic sections, angioinvasion by hyphae was detected amidst the dense lymphocytic infiltrate (Figure 4).

Given the patient’s immunocompromised state, the presence of angioinvasive fungi on the skin biopsy, and unresolved pneumonia, the patient was restarted on voriconazole for treatment of likely Aspergillus infection. He was continued on chemotherapy for the primary refractory AML and received a donor lymphocyte infusion prior to discharge. After the patient was discharged, the tissue culture grew Paecilomyces, a rare fungal species. The patient died 1 week after discharge.

 

Figure 2. A punch biopsy specimen demonstrated a dense interstitial infiltrate of hyperchromatic cells extending through the dermis (A)(H&E, original magnification ×200). Higher-power view of monomorphic cells exhibited elevated nuclear-cytoplasmic ratios (B)(H&E, original magnification ×600).

   

Figure 3. Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stain revealed numerous fungal hyphae (A)(original magnification ×200). Higher-power magnification showed septate fungal hyphae (B)(original magnification ×600).

 

Figure 4. Leukemia cutis and numerous fungal hyphae demonstrated angioinvasion (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Comment

Leukemia cutis is an extramedullary manifestation of leukemia that appears in 10% to 15% of patients with AML.2 The frequency of LC differs widely for the various types of AML, with the majority of cases occurring in the acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4) or acute monocytic leukemia (M5) subtypes.3,4 One large study of AML patients (N=381) demonstrated an incidence of LC in 28.6% of patients with the M4 subtype and 42.9% of those with the M5 subtype, with an incidence of only 7.1% of patients with the M1 subtype.3 It occurs less frequently in chronic myeloproliferative diseases.2,4

 

 

Leukemia cutis has a wide range of cutaneous manifestations and may present with solitary or multiple papular, nodular, or plaquelike lesions that are red-brown, blue, violaceous, or hemorrhagic.4 Leukemia cutis occurs most commonly on the legs, followed by the arms, back, chest, scalp, and face.2,4 Leukemia cutis may be hard to distinguish clinically from other conditions such as cutaneous metastases of visceral malignancies, lymphoma, drug eruptions, and opportunistic infections. Leukemia cutis ulcers often measure only a few centimeters in diameter with a firmly adherent purulent or hemorrhagic crust and may occur in unusual locations. These lesions usually are treatment resistant and their persistence may help to lead to diagnosis.4

Microscopically, most LC lesions show a perivascular or periadnexal pattern of involvement or a dense diffuse, interstitial, or nodular atypical lymphocytic infiltrate involving the dermis and subcutis with sparing of the upper papillary dermis.2 The cytologic appearance of M1 and M2 subtypes of AML are characterized by medium-sized to large mononuclear cells with a light cytoplasm and large basophilic cell nuclei. The M4 and M5 subtypes of AML generally are dominated by medium-sized, round or oval-shaped mononuclear cells that may have eosinophilic cytoplasm and segmented or kidney-shaped basophilic nuclei.4 Immunophenotyping is crucial for diagnosis. In myeloid disorders, there is positive staining with markers of myeloid lineage such as myeloperoxidase, lysozyme, CD34, CD15, CD68, CD43, and CD117.5

In our patient, there was an ulcerated dense diffuse dermal infiltrate of large atypical lymphocytes consistent with LC and positive immunostaining consistent with LC associated with AML. Additionally, septate hyphae with acute-angle branching also were noted in the dermal blood vessels on hematoxylin and eosin and fungal staining, demonstrating concomitant fungal infection. Angioinvasion of organisms demonstrated on skin biopsy and persistent pneumonia noted on chest imaging suggested a disseminated infectious process.       

Invasive fungal infections are an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised individuals, including those with hematologic malignancies and hematologic SCTs. Despite an increasing number of antifungal therapies, outcomes are frequently suboptimal with mortality rates often greater than 50% depending on the pathogen and disease.6 Thus, there must be a high index of suspicion of infection even when a separate histopathologic diagnosis is available, such as the finding of leukemic infiltrates in this patient’s biopsy specimen. A similar case of LC has been reported with concomitant fungal infection involving Fusarium and Enterococcus.7 Patients with leukemic cells may develop leukemic infiltrates in response to cutaneous infection, and a high index of suspicion for 2 related but distinct processes is necessary.

Paecilomyces species are an emerging cause of opportunistic and usually severe human infections.8-11 The Paecilomyces species are saprophytic filamentous fungi that are found worldwide in soil as well as contaminants in the air and water.12Paecilomyces infection is generally associated with the use of immunosuppressive therapies, implants, or ocular surgery. Among species in this genus, Paecilomyces lilacinus and Paecilomyces variotii are of clinical importance. Most species have high susceptibility to the newer azoles such as voriconazole.6

Conclusion

Despite continued treatment with voriconazole, our patient still developed a rare fungal infection arising in a lesion of LC. He had signs of infection, including an elevated white blood cell count, fever, and malaise, which are nonspecific clinical findings that could have been attributed to known relapse of systemic leukemia or to known enterococcemia. Even in patients on antifungal prophylaxis and with other possible causes of leukocytosis, this case illustrates that there must be a high index of suspicion for angioinvasive fungal infection.

Leukemia cutis (LC) is characterized by the infiltration of malignant neoplastic leukocytes or their precursors into the skin, most often in conjunction with systemic leukemia.1 Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is the second most common cause of LC and the most common form of leukemia among adults.1 Patients with leukemia often are in a relative or absolute immunocompromised state, which may be secondary to neutropenia, chemotherapy regimens, or immunosuppressive regimens following stem cell transplant (SCT). Thus, when evaluating cutaneous lesions consistent with LC in immunocompromised patients, there must be a high index of suspicion for concomitant opportunistic infections.

We report the case of a 52-year-old man with primary refractory AML following allogeneic SCT with relapse who presented with an LC lesion below the knee with concomitant invasive fungal infection despite being on prophylactic oral antifungal therapy.

Case Report

A 52-year-old man with primary refractory AML (M1) of 1 year’s duration presented for evaluation of a slowly progressing reddish purple nodule on the right knee of 2 to 4 months’ duration. The patient had undergone a matched unrelated donor allogeneic SCT 6 months following diagnosis of AML with subsequent disease progression despite reduction of posttransplant graft-versus-host disease prophylactic immune suppression and a cycle of clofarabine. The patient was hospitalized 2 months after the SCT for neutropenic fever and was found to have vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia, Clostridium difficile colitis, and possible fungal pneumonia. He was treated with voriconazole 200 mg twice daily, which he continued following discharge for antifungal prophylaxis. At the time of discharge, the patient reported that he noticed an asymptomatic “purple papule” on the right knee but did not seek further workup.

Two months later, the patient presented with a fever (temperature, 38.6°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count, 130 cells/mL [increased from 53 cells/mL 1 week prior to admission]). Due to his history of immunosuppression and neutropenia, the patient was placed on a broad-spectrum antibiotic regimen of cefepime, daptomycin, and linezolid on admission. Later, vancomycin and gentamicin were added and voriconazole was switched to caspofungin. The patient also received granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for neutropenia. During the current hospitalization, blood cultures demonstrated vancomycin-resistant enterococcemia, and computed tomography of the chest revealed findings consistent with multilobar pneumonia.

 

Figure 1. A large round, reddish purple, centrally ulcerated plaque with dark hemorrhagic crust and a surrounding patch of erythema inferior to the knee on the right lateral lower leg.

Dermatology was consulted to evaluate the purple nodule on the right knee, which had slowly progressed since his last admission. Physical examination revealed a violaceous, 1.5×1.5-cm nodule with central necrosis covered by black eschar with surrounding erythema (Figure 1). Biopsy specimens for routine histology and a tissue culture were obtained. Histopathologic examination revealed a dense diffuse infiltrate of large hyperchromatic mononuclear cells extending through the dermis, which was consistent with the patient’s known AML (Figure 2). Acid-fast bacillus staining was negative for mycobacterial organisms. Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stain demonstrated an overwhelming number of septate fungal hyphae with acute-angle branching, concerning for Aspergillus species (Figure 3). Of note, an Aspergillus serum antigen test was performed at this time and was negative. On repeat review of the routine histologic sections, angioinvasion by hyphae was detected amidst the dense lymphocytic infiltrate (Figure 4).

Given the patient’s immunocompromised state, the presence of angioinvasive fungi on the skin biopsy, and unresolved pneumonia, the patient was restarted on voriconazole for treatment of likely Aspergillus infection. He was continued on chemotherapy for the primary refractory AML and received a donor lymphocyte infusion prior to discharge. After the patient was discharged, the tissue culture grew Paecilomyces, a rare fungal species. The patient died 1 week after discharge.

 

Figure 2. A punch biopsy specimen demonstrated a dense interstitial infiltrate of hyperchromatic cells extending through the dermis (A)(H&E, original magnification ×200). Higher-power view of monomorphic cells exhibited elevated nuclear-cytoplasmic ratios (B)(H&E, original magnification ×600).

   

Figure 3. Grocott-Gomori methenamine-silver stain revealed numerous fungal hyphae (A)(original magnification ×200). Higher-power magnification showed septate fungal hyphae (B)(original magnification ×600).

 

Figure 4. Leukemia cutis and numerous fungal hyphae demonstrated angioinvasion (H&E, original magnification ×200).

Comment

Leukemia cutis is an extramedullary manifestation of leukemia that appears in 10% to 15% of patients with AML.2 The frequency of LC differs widely for the various types of AML, with the majority of cases occurring in the acute myelomonocytic leukemia (M4) or acute monocytic leukemia (M5) subtypes.3,4 One large study of AML patients (N=381) demonstrated an incidence of LC in 28.6% of patients with the M4 subtype and 42.9% of those with the M5 subtype, with an incidence of only 7.1% of patients with the M1 subtype.3 It occurs less frequently in chronic myeloproliferative diseases.2,4

 

 

Leukemia cutis has a wide range of cutaneous manifestations and may present with solitary or multiple papular, nodular, or plaquelike lesions that are red-brown, blue, violaceous, or hemorrhagic.4 Leukemia cutis occurs most commonly on the legs, followed by the arms, back, chest, scalp, and face.2,4 Leukemia cutis may be hard to distinguish clinically from other conditions such as cutaneous metastases of visceral malignancies, lymphoma, drug eruptions, and opportunistic infections. Leukemia cutis ulcers often measure only a few centimeters in diameter with a firmly adherent purulent or hemorrhagic crust and may occur in unusual locations. These lesions usually are treatment resistant and their persistence may help to lead to diagnosis.4

Microscopically, most LC lesions show a perivascular or periadnexal pattern of involvement or a dense diffuse, interstitial, or nodular atypical lymphocytic infiltrate involving the dermis and subcutis with sparing of the upper papillary dermis.2 The cytologic appearance of M1 and M2 subtypes of AML are characterized by medium-sized to large mononuclear cells with a light cytoplasm and large basophilic cell nuclei. The M4 and M5 subtypes of AML generally are dominated by medium-sized, round or oval-shaped mononuclear cells that may have eosinophilic cytoplasm and segmented or kidney-shaped basophilic nuclei.4 Immunophenotyping is crucial for diagnosis. In myeloid disorders, there is positive staining with markers of myeloid lineage such as myeloperoxidase, lysozyme, CD34, CD15, CD68, CD43, and CD117.5

In our patient, there was an ulcerated dense diffuse dermal infiltrate of large atypical lymphocytes consistent with LC and positive immunostaining consistent with LC associated with AML. Additionally, septate hyphae with acute-angle branching also were noted in the dermal blood vessels on hematoxylin and eosin and fungal staining, demonstrating concomitant fungal infection. Angioinvasion of organisms demonstrated on skin biopsy and persistent pneumonia noted on chest imaging suggested a disseminated infectious process.       

Invasive fungal infections are an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised individuals, including those with hematologic malignancies and hematologic SCTs. Despite an increasing number of antifungal therapies, outcomes are frequently suboptimal with mortality rates often greater than 50% depending on the pathogen and disease.6 Thus, there must be a high index of suspicion of infection even when a separate histopathologic diagnosis is available, such as the finding of leukemic infiltrates in this patient’s biopsy specimen. A similar case of LC has been reported with concomitant fungal infection involving Fusarium and Enterococcus.7 Patients with leukemic cells may develop leukemic infiltrates in response to cutaneous infection, and a high index of suspicion for 2 related but distinct processes is necessary.

Paecilomyces species are an emerging cause of opportunistic and usually severe human infections.8-11 The Paecilomyces species are saprophytic filamentous fungi that are found worldwide in soil as well as contaminants in the air and water.12Paecilomyces infection is generally associated with the use of immunosuppressive therapies, implants, or ocular surgery. Among species in this genus, Paecilomyces lilacinus and Paecilomyces variotii are of clinical importance. Most species have high susceptibility to the newer azoles such as voriconazole.6

Conclusion

Despite continued treatment with voriconazole, our patient still developed a rare fungal infection arising in a lesion of LC. He had signs of infection, including an elevated white blood cell count, fever, and malaise, which are nonspecific clinical findings that could have been attributed to known relapse of systemic leukemia or to known enterococcemia. Even in patients on antifungal prophylaxis and with other possible causes of leukocytosis, this case illustrates that there must be a high index of suspicion for angioinvasive fungal infection.

References

 

1. Aquilera SB, Zarraga M, Rosen L. Leukemia cutis in a patient with acute myelogenous leukemia: a case report and review of the literature. Cutis. 2010;85:31-36.

2. Cho-Vega JH, Medeiros J, Prieto VG, et al. Leukemia cutis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;129:130.

3. Agis H, Weltermann A, Fonatsch C, et al. A comparative study on demographic, hematological, and cytogenetic findings and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia with and without leukemia cutis. Ann Hematol. 2002;81:90-95.

4. Wagner G, Fenchel K, Back W, et al. Leukemia cutis—epidemiology, clinical presentation, and differential diagnoses. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012;10:27-36.

5. Hejmadi RK, Thompson D, Shah F, et al. Cutaneous presentation of aleukemic monoblastic leukemia cutis: a case report and review of literature with focus on immunohistochemistry. J Cutan Pathol. 2008;35(suppl 1):46.

6. Kontoyiannis DP. Invasive mycoses: strategies for effective management. Am J Med. 2012;125(suppl 1):25-38.

7. Feramisco JD, Hsiao JL, Fox LP, et al. Angioinvasive Fusarium and concomitant Enterococcus infection arising in association with leukemia cutis. J Cutan Pathol. 2011;38:926-929.

8. Antachopoulos C, Walsh TJ, Roilides E. Fungal infections in primary immunodeficiencies. Eur J Pediatr. 2007;166:1099-1117.

9. Carey J, D’Amico R, Sutton DA, et al. Paecilomyces lilacinus vaginitis in an immuno-competent patient. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:1155-1158.

10. Castro LG, Salebian A, Sotto MN. Hyalohyphomycosis by Paecilomyces lilacinus in a renal transplant patient and a review of human Paecilomyces species infections. J Med Vet Mycol. 1990;28:15-26.

11. Pastor FJ, Guarro J. Clinical manifestations, treatment and outcome of Paecilomyces lilacinus infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12:948-960.

12. Castelli MV, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Cuesta I, et al. Susceptibility testing and molecular classification of Paecilomyces spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:2926-2928.

References

 

1. Aquilera SB, Zarraga M, Rosen L. Leukemia cutis in a patient with acute myelogenous leukemia: a case report and review of the literature. Cutis. 2010;85:31-36.

2. Cho-Vega JH, Medeiros J, Prieto VG, et al. Leukemia cutis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;129:130.

3. Agis H, Weltermann A, Fonatsch C, et al. A comparative study on demographic, hematological, and cytogenetic findings and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia with and without leukemia cutis. Ann Hematol. 2002;81:90-95.

4. Wagner G, Fenchel K, Back W, et al. Leukemia cutis—epidemiology, clinical presentation, and differential diagnoses. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012;10:27-36.

5. Hejmadi RK, Thompson D, Shah F, et al. Cutaneous presentation of aleukemic monoblastic leukemia cutis: a case report and review of literature with focus on immunohistochemistry. J Cutan Pathol. 2008;35(suppl 1):46.

6. Kontoyiannis DP. Invasive mycoses: strategies for effective management. Am J Med. 2012;125(suppl 1):25-38.

7. Feramisco JD, Hsiao JL, Fox LP, et al. Angioinvasive Fusarium and concomitant Enterococcus infection arising in association with leukemia cutis. J Cutan Pathol. 2011;38:926-929.

8. Antachopoulos C, Walsh TJ, Roilides E. Fungal infections in primary immunodeficiencies. Eur J Pediatr. 2007;166:1099-1117.

9. Carey J, D’Amico R, Sutton DA, et al. Paecilomyces lilacinus vaginitis in an immuno-competent patient. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:1155-1158.

10. Castro LG, Salebian A, Sotto MN. Hyalohyphomycosis by Paecilomyces lilacinus in a renal transplant patient and a review of human Paecilomyces species infections. J Med Vet Mycol. 1990;28:15-26.

11. Pastor FJ, Guarro J. Clinical manifestations, treatment and outcome of Paecilomyces lilacinus infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12:948-960.

12. Castelli MV, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, Cuesta I, et al. Susceptibility testing and molecular classification of Paecilomyces spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:2926-2928.

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Page Number
332-335
Page Number
332-335
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Rare Angioinvasive Fungal Infection in Association With Leukemia Cutis
Display Headline
Rare Angioinvasive Fungal Infection in Association With Leukemia Cutis
Legacy Keywords
leukemia cutis, acute myelogenous leukemia, angioinvasive fungal infection, paecilomyces
Legacy Keywords
leukemia cutis, acute myelogenous leukemia, angioinvasive fungal infection, paecilomyces
Sections
Inside the Article

   Practice Points

 

  • ­Immunosuppressed patients are at risk for atypical presentations of common infections as well as infection with rare pathogens.
  • ­Skin biopsy and tissue culture play an important role in identifying infectious agents in immunosuppressed patients.
  • ­Leukemic infiltrates may mask pathogens, and pathologists should strongly consider additional stains when indicated.
Disallow All Ads
Article PDF Media

Extramammary Paget Disease

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Extramammary Paget Disease

Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is an uncommon condition that usually presents in apocrine sweat gland–rich areas, most commonly the vulva followed by the perianal region. Lesions clinically present as erythematous, well-demarcated plaques that may become ulcerated, erosive, scaly, or eczematous. Extramammary Paget disease has a female predominance and usually occurs in the sixth to eighth decades of life.1 Histologically, EMPD displays intraepidermal spread of large cells with plentiful amphophilic cytoplasm and large nuclei (Figure 1). These atypical cells may be seen “spit out” whole into the stratum corneum rather than keratinizing into parakeratotic cells (Figure 2). Frequently, the cytoplasm of these tumor cells is positive on mucicarmine staining, which indicates the presence of mucin, giving the cytoplasm a bluish gray color on hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections. Typically, EMPD cells can be found alone or in nests throughout the epithelium. The basal layer of the epithelium will appear crushed but not infiltrated by these atypical cells in some areas.2 Extramammary Paget disease is epithelial membrane antigen and cytokeratin 7 positive, unlike other conditions in the differential diagnosis such as benign acral nevus, Bowen disease, mycosis fungoides, and superficial spreading melanoma in situ, with the rare exception of cytokeratin 7 positivity in Bowen disease.3

Figure 1. Intraepidermal spread of large cells with plentiful amphophilic cytoplasm in extramammary Paget disease (H&E, original magnification ×10).
     
Figure 2. Atypical cells of extramammary Paget disease “spit out” whole into the stratum corneum rather than keratinizing into parakeratotic cells (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Benign acral nevi, similar to melanoma in situ, can have melanocytes scattered above the basal layer, but they usually appear in the lower half of the epidermis without cytologic atypia.4 When present, these pagetoid cells are most often limited to the center of a well-delineated lesion. The compact thick stratum corneum characteristic of acral skin also is helpful in distinguishing a benign acral nevus from EMPD, which does not involve acral sites (Figure 3).2

Figure 3. Cytologically normal melanocytes in the lower half of the epidermis in a benign acral nevus with a thick stratum corneum that is indicative of acral skin (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Bowen disease (squamous cell carcinoma in situ) may have pagetoid spread (or buckshot scatter) through the epidermis similar to EMPD and melanoma in situ. However, in Bowen disease the malignant cells are keratinocytes that keratinize and become incorporated into the stratum corneum as parakeratotic nuclei rather than intact “spit out” cells, as seen in melanoma in situ and EMPD. Usually the pagetoid spread is only focal in Bowen disease with other areas of more characteristic full-thickness keratinocyte atypia (Figure 4).2

Figure 4. Parakeratosis and pagetoid spread of cells adjacent to areas of full-thickness epidermal keratinocyte atypia in Bowen disease (H&E, original magnification ×10).

Mycosis fungoides displays atypical lymphocytes with large dark nuclei and minimal to no cytoplasm scattered throughout the epidermis. The atypical cells have irregular nuclear contours and often a clear perinuclear space (Figure 5). These cells tend to line up along the dermoepidermal junction and form intraepidermal clusters known as Pautrier microabscesses. Papillary dermal fibroplasia also is usually present in mycosis fungoides.2

Figure 5. Atypical lymphocytes in the epidermis of mycosis fungoides display nuclei that are large, dark, and have irregular nuclear contours with perinuclear clearing (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Similar to EMPD, superficial spreading melanoma in situ shows single or nested atypical cells scattered throughout all levels of the epithelium and may be “spit out” whole into the stratum corneum rather than keratinizing into parakeratotic cells. However, in melanoma, nests of atypical melanocytes predominate and involve the basal layer (Figure 6), whereas clusters of cells in EMPD typically are located superficial to the basal layer. The cells of melanoma also lack the amphophilic mucinous cytoplasm of EMPD.1

Figure 6. Nests of atypical melanocytes predominately involving the basal layer in superficial spreading melanoma in situ (H&E, original magnification ×20).
References

1. Calonje E, Brenn T, Lazar A, et al. McKee’s Pathology of the Skin. 4th ed. London, England: Elsevier Saunders; 2011.

2. Ferringer T, Elston D, eds. Dermatopathology. 2nd ed. London, England: Elsevier; 2014.

3. Sah SP, Kelly PJ, McManus DT, et al. Diffuse CK7, CAM5.2 and BerEP4 positivity in pagetoid squamous cell carcinoma in situ (pagetoid Bowen’s disease) of the perianal region: a mimic of extramammary Paget’s disease. Histopathology. 2013;62:511-514.

4. LeBoit PE. A diagnosis for maniacs. Am J Dermatopathol. 2000;22:556-558.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Michael Zaleski, BS; Tammie Ferringer, MD

From Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Tammie Ferringer, MD, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA 17821 (tferringer@geisinger.edu).

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
308, 315-316
Legacy Keywords
Extramammary Paget Disease, EMPD, histopathology, apocrine sweat gland
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Michael Zaleski, BS; Tammie Ferringer, MD

From Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Tammie Ferringer, MD, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA 17821 (tferringer@geisinger.edu).

Author and Disclosure Information

Michael Zaleski, BS; Tammie Ferringer, MD

From Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Tammie Ferringer, MD, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N Academy Ave, Danville, PA 17821 (tferringer@geisinger.edu).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is an uncommon condition that usually presents in apocrine sweat gland–rich areas, most commonly the vulva followed by the perianal region. Lesions clinically present as erythematous, well-demarcated plaques that may become ulcerated, erosive, scaly, or eczematous. Extramammary Paget disease has a female predominance and usually occurs in the sixth to eighth decades of life.1 Histologically, EMPD displays intraepidermal spread of large cells with plentiful amphophilic cytoplasm and large nuclei (Figure 1). These atypical cells may be seen “spit out” whole into the stratum corneum rather than keratinizing into parakeratotic cells (Figure 2). Frequently, the cytoplasm of these tumor cells is positive on mucicarmine staining, which indicates the presence of mucin, giving the cytoplasm a bluish gray color on hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections. Typically, EMPD cells can be found alone or in nests throughout the epithelium. The basal layer of the epithelium will appear crushed but not infiltrated by these atypical cells in some areas.2 Extramammary Paget disease is epithelial membrane antigen and cytokeratin 7 positive, unlike other conditions in the differential diagnosis such as benign acral nevus, Bowen disease, mycosis fungoides, and superficial spreading melanoma in situ, with the rare exception of cytokeratin 7 positivity in Bowen disease.3

Figure 1. Intraepidermal spread of large cells with plentiful amphophilic cytoplasm in extramammary Paget disease (H&E, original magnification ×10).
     
Figure 2. Atypical cells of extramammary Paget disease “spit out” whole into the stratum corneum rather than keratinizing into parakeratotic cells (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Benign acral nevi, similar to melanoma in situ, can have melanocytes scattered above the basal layer, but they usually appear in the lower half of the epidermis without cytologic atypia.4 When present, these pagetoid cells are most often limited to the center of a well-delineated lesion. The compact thick stratum corneum characteristic of acral skin also is helpful in distinguishing a benign acral nevus from EMPD, which does not involve acral sites (Figure 3).2

Figure 3. Cytologically normal melanocytes in the lower half of the epidermis in a benign acral nevus with a thick stratum corneum that is indicative of acral skin (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Bowen disease (squamous cell carcinoma in situ) may have pagetoid spread (or buckshot scatter) through the epidermis similar to EMPD and melanoma in situ. However, in Bowen disease the malignant cells are keratinocytes that keratinize and become incorporated into the stratum corneum as parakeratotic nuclei rather than intact “spit out” cells, as seen in melanoma in situ and EMPD. Usually the pagetoid spread is only focal in Bowen disease with other areas of more characteristic full-thickness keratinocyte atypia (Figure 4).2

Figure 4. Parakeratosis and pagetoid spread of cells adjacent to areas of full-thickness epidermal keratinocyte atypia in Bowen disease (H&E, original magnification ×10).

Mycosis fungoides displays atypical lymphocytes with large dark nuclei and minimal to no cytoplasm scattered throughout the epidermis. The atypical cells have irregular nuclear contours and often a clear perinuclear space (Figure 5). These cells tend to line up along the dermoepidermal junction and form intraepidermal clusters known as Pautrier microabscesses. Papillary dermal fibroplasia also is usually present in mycosis fungoides.2

Figure 5. Atypical lymphocytes in the epidermis of mycosis fungoides display nuclei that are large, dark, and have irregular nuclear contours with perinuclear clearing (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Similar to EMPD, superficial spreading melanoma in situ shows single or nested atypical cells scattered throughout all levels of the epithelium and may be “spit out” whole into the stratum corneum rather than keratinizing into parakeratotic cells. However, in melanoma, nests of atypical melanocytes predominate and involve the basal layer (Figure 6), whereas clusters of cells in EMPD typically are located superficial to the basal layer. The cells of melanoma also lack the amphophilic mucinous cytoplasm of EMPD.1

Figure 6. Nests of atypical melanocytes predominately involving the basal layer in superficial spreading melanoma in situ (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is an uncommon condition that usually presents in apocrine sweat gland–rich areas, most commonly the vulva followed by the perianal region. Lesions clinically present as erythematous, well-demarcated plaques that may become ulcerated, erosive, scaly, or eczematous. Extramammary Paget disease has a female predominance and usually occurs in the sixth to eighth decades of life.1 Histologically, EMPD displays intraepidermal spread of large cells with plentiful amphophilic cytoplasm and large nuclei (Figure 1). These atypical cells may be seen “spit out” whole into the stratum corneum rather than keratinizing into parakeratotic cells (Figure 2). Frequently, the cytoplasm of these tumor cells is positive on mucicarmine staining, which indicates the presence of mucin, giving the cytoplasm a bluish gray color on hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections. Typically, EMPD cells can be found alone or in nests throughout the epithelium. The basal layer of the epithelium will appear crushed but not infiltrated by these atypical cells in some areas.2 Extramammary Paget disease is epithelial membrane antigen and cytokeratin 7 positive, unlike other conditions in the differential diagnosis such as benign acral nevus, Bowen disease, mycosis fungoides, and superficial spreading melanoma in situ, with the rare exception of cytokeratin 7 positivity in Bowen disease.3

Figure 1. Intraepidermal spread of large cells with plentiful amphophilic cytoplasm in extramammary Paget disease (H&E, original magnification ×10).
     
Figure 2. Atypical cells of extramammary Paget disease “spit out” whole into the stratum corneum rather than keratinizing into parakeratotic cells (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Benign acral nevi, similar to melanoma in situ, can have melanocytes scattered above the basal layer, but they usually appear in the lower half of the epidermis without cytologic atypia.4 When present, these pagetoid cells are most often limited to the center of a well-delineated lesion. The compact thick stratum corneum characteristic of acral skin also is helpful in distinguishing a benign acral nevus from EMPD, which does not involve acral sites (Figure 3).2

Figure 3. Cytologically normal melanocytes in the lower half of the epidermis in a benign acral nevus with a thick stratum corneum that is indicative of acral skin (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Bowen disease (squamous cell carcinoma in situ) may have pagetoid spread (or buckshot scatter) through the epidermis similar to EMPD and melanoma in situ. However, in Bowen disease the malignant cells are keratinocytes that keratinize and become incorporated into the stratum corneum as parakeratotic nuclei rather than intact “spit out” cells, as seen in melanoma in situ and EMPD. Usually the pagetoid spread is only focal in Bowen disease with other areas of more characteristic full-thickness keratinocyte atypia (Figure 4).2

Figure 4. Parakeratosis and pagetoid spread of cells adjacent to areas of full-thickness epidermal keratinocyte atypia in Bowen disease (H&E, original magnification ×10).

Mycosis fungoides displays atypical lymphocytes with large dark nuclei and minimal to no cytoplasm scattered throughout the epidermis. The atypical cells have irregular nuclear contours and often a clear perinuclear space (Figure 5). These cells tend to line up along the dermoepidermal junction and form intraepidermal clusters known as Pautrier microabscesses. Papillary dermal fibroplasia also is usually present in mycosis fungoides.2

Figure 5. Atypical lymphocytes in the epidermis of mycosis fungoides display nuclei that are large, dark, and have irregular nuclear contours with perinuclear clearing (H&E, original magnification ×20).

Similar to EMPD, superficial spreading melanoma in situ shows single or nested atypical cells scattered throughout all levels of the epithelium and may be “spit out” whole into the stratum corneum rather than keratinizing into parakeratotic cells. However, in melanoma, nests of atypical melanocytes predominate and involve the basal layer (Figure 6), whereas clusters of cells in EMPD typically are located superficial to the basal layer. The cells of melanoma also lack the amphophilic mucinous cytoplasm of EMPD.1

Figure 6. Nests of atypical melanocytes predominately involving the basal layer in superficial spreading melanoma in situ (H&E, original magnification ×20).
References

1. Calonje E, Brenn T, Lazar A, et al. McKee’s Pathology of the Skin. 4th ed. London, England: Elsevier Saunders; 2011.

2. Ferringer T, Elston D, eds. Dermatopathology. 2nd ed. London, England: Elsevier; 2014.

3. Sah SP, Kelly PJ, McManus DT, et al. Diffuse CK7, CAM5.2 and BerEP4 positivity in pagetoid squamous cell carcinoma in situ (pagetoid Bowen’s disease) of the perianal region: a mimic of extramammary Paget’s disease. Histopathology. 2013;62:511-514.

4. LeBoit PE. A diagnosis for maniacs. Am J Dermatopathol. 2000;22:556-558.

References

1. Calonje E, Brenn T, Lazar A, et al. McKee’s Pathology of the Skin. 4th ed. London, England: Elsevier Saunders; 2011.

2. Ferringer T, Elston D, eds. Dermatopathology. 2nd ed. London, England: Elsevier; 2014.

3. Sah SP, Kelly PJ, McManus DT, et al. Diffuse CK7, CAM5.2 and BerEP4 positivity in pagetoid squamous cell carcinoma in situ (pagetoid Bowen’s disease) of the perianal region: a mimic of extramammary Paget’s disease. Histopathology. 2013;62:511-514.

4. LeBoit PE. A diagnosis for maniacs. Am J Dermatopathol. 2000;22:556-558.

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Page Number
308, 315-316
Page Number
308, 315-316
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Extramammary Paget Disease
Display Headline
Extramammary Paget Disease
Legacy Keywords
Extramammary Paget Disease, EMPD, histopathology, apocrine sweat gland
Legacy Keywords
Extramammary Paget Disease, EMPD, histopathology, apocrine sweat gland
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Primary Localized Cutaneous Nodular Amyloidosis of the Thighs

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Primary Localized Cutaneous Nodular Amyloidosis of the Thighs

Case Report

Clinical Findings

A 65-year-old woman presented with multiple asymptomatic discrete nodules and atrophic plaques on the thighs of 4 years’ duration. The lesions had started as 2 small, asymptomatic, madder red plaques symmetrically located on the anterior aspect of each thigh that had gradually increased in number and size, particularly on the right thigh. Two years later, 2 new atrophic plaques appeared on the anterior aspect of each. The lesions developed slowly but never remitted and had been misdiagnosed as primary macular atrophy of skin by several outpatient clinics. The patient’s general health was good and her personal and family history was unremarkable.

Physical examination revealed multiple madder red plaques and nodules of various shapes and sizes (ie, 1–3 cm in diameter) on the anterior aspect of the right thigh. The lesions were slightly elevated with a waxy surface, firm, and painless to palpation. One similar lesion was noted on the anterior aspect of the left thigh. Two 2-cm, brown-red, atrophic plaques also were noted in a symmetrical distribution on the anterior aspect of each thigh. The plaque surfaces were slightly crinkly and shiny, and anetodermalike lesions produced a buttonhole sign identical to a neurofibroma on palpation (Figure 1).

 

Figure 1. Multiple madder red plaques, nodules, and atrophic plaques in various shapes and sizes were seen on the anterior aspect of both thighs.

Histopathologic Findings

Two biopsy specimens were taken from a nodule and an atrophic plaque on the right thigh. Microscopic examination revealed deposition of homogeneous eosinophilic material in the reticular dermis and subcutis as well as around the fine vessels (Figure 2A). There was mild cellular infiltration of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and giant cells in the dermis, especially adjacent to deposits and around the vessels (Figure 2B). The homogeneous material appeared salmon pink on Congo red staining and bright green by thioflavin T staining using a fluorescent microscope (Figures 3 and 4). These results suggested the characteristic features of cutaneous nodular amyloidosis.

 

 

Figure 2. Histopathologically, homogeneous eosinophilic material deposited in the reticular dermis and subcutis was noted (A)(H&E, original magnification ×25). Microscopic examination showed lymphocytes and plasma cells infiltrated in the dermis, especially adjacent to deposits and around the vessels (B)(H&E, original magnification ×200).

 

Figure 3. Congo red staining showed salmon pink homogeneous material (original magnification ×25).
Figure 4. Thioflavin T staining showed bright green homogeneous material (original magnification ×100).

 

Laboratory Findings

Laboratory studies showed normal results for complete blood cell count, urinalysis, liver and renal function tests, blood glucose levels, lipid panel, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Serum protein electrophoresis was normal and no Bence Jones proteins were detected. Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM levels showed no abnormalities. Electrocardiogram, chest radiography, and abdominal ultrasound were normal.

A diagnosis of primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis (PLCNA) was made based on clinical, histopathologic, and laboratory findings. Although surgical excision in stages was proposed, the patient refused treatment because the lesions were asymptomatic. There was no obvious progression of the skin lesions and no abnormal systemic findings during 2.5 years’ follow-up.

Comment

Amyloidosis is a spectrum of diseases consisting of deposition of amyloid proteins in various tissues. Clinically, amyloidosis is divided into both primary and secondary forms of systemic amyloidosis, hemodialysis-associated amyloidosis, heredofamilial amyloidosis, and cutaneous amyloidosis. Primary cutaneous amyloidosis is localized to the skin without other organ involvement and does not occur in systemic amyloidosis. Secondary cutaneous involvement in systemic amyloidosis is rare. Most cases of primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis (PLCA) are sporadic but approximately 10% of cases may be familial.1 There are 3 main forms of localized cutaneous amyloidosis: macular, lichen, and nodular amyloidosis. Nodular cutaneous amyloidosis is the rarest form of PLCA.

Nodular amyloidosis was first described by Gottron in 1950.2 Its cutaneous lesions may present as single or multiple nodules, occasionally with overlying atrophic plaques. The lesions consist of firm, smooth-surfaced, waxy or rubbery, pink to tan papules, plaques, or nodules measuring up to several centimeters. On some lesions, surface telangiectasia may be seen. Bullous-appearing and anetodermalike lesions have been reported.3 The acral region is the most common location, followed by the legs, head, trunk, arms, and genitalia, respectively.4 In some cases the lesions can spontaneously improve over time. In our patient, the lesions were composed of both multiple nodules and atrophic plaques, which is uncommon.

The pathogenesis of amyloid deposition is still unknown. Cutaneous macular and lichen amyloidosis may originate from degenerated keratinocyte intermediate filaments. Nodular amyloidosis may represent a localized plasma cell dyscrasia that can be associated with a monoclonal gammopathy or multiple myeloma.5 Some components of amyloid in some cases of PLCNA may consist of κ and λ immunoglobulin light chains, with most reported cases being of the l subtype.6 The results of one study indicated that β2-microglobulin was another major component of amyloid fibrils and that β2-microglobulin was partly subjected to the modification of advanced glycation end product in PLCNA.7

 

 

The histopathologic examination of PLCNA is characterized by large deposits of amorphous, sometimes fissured, pale, eosinophilic material in the papillary dermis, reticular dermis, and subcutaneous fat. The overlying epidermis may exhibit flattened rete ridges. Amyloid may occur within vessel walls and adnexal structures, sometimes in a ring surrounding individual fat cells. Clinically, the lesions of PLCNA may be indistinguishable from nodular deposits of amyloid occurring in primary systemic amyloidosis or myeloma-associated amyloidosis. Histopathologically, PLCNA usually has a variable infiltrate of plasma cells and lymphocytes at the periphery or within the amyloid deposits,6 but no single stain is highly sensitive and specific. Congo red–stained deposits showed salmon pink amorphous material or apple green birefringence with polarizing microscopy.8 Amyloid derived from immunoglobulin light chains, including cutaneous nodular amyloid, also stain positive for anti-human λ light chain antibody on immunohistochemistry. Additionally, amyloid can stain positively with methyl violet and crystal violet Gram stains, Picrosirius red, thioflavin T, Dylon, and periodic acid–Schiff stains.

Clinically, some PLCNA lesions can be removed via surgical excision or laser if they are cosmetically disfiguring or symptomatic. Other methods have been attempted to improve the appearance of the lesions, such as intralesional corticosteroids, cryotherapy, and dermabrasion,9 but they usually are not helpful and have a high rate of recurrence. Although PLCNA often is a benign cutaneous disorder and some cases of PLCNA could be reactive diseases rather than neoplastic ones, some patients may develop underlying systemic amyloidosis or even paraproteinemia.10 Northcutt and Vanover11 indicated that systemic amyloidosis may be expected in less than 15% of 47 patients with localized cutaneous amyloidosis during follow-up by reviewing most of the related literature. Some cases may be associated with Sjögren syndrome (SJS), CREST (calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal motility disorders, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasia) syndrome, dermatomyositis, and diabetes mellitus.12-14 Polyclonal immunoglobulin amyloid has been reported only in PLCNA with SJS, which may be due to the fact that a certain population of SJS develops polyclonal B-cell proliferation and hyperglobulinemia.12 Woollons and Black15 estimated the rate of progression of PLCNA to systemic amyloidosis to be only 7%, which is much lower than the rate in the literature by a large clinical follow-up study on PLCNA.16 However, all patients with PLCNA should have a systemic evaluation and should be advised to undergo long-term clinical follow-up to help prevent progression to systemic amyloidosis or plasma cell dyscrasia.

References

 

1. Sakuma TH, Hans-Filho G, Arita K, et al. Familial primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis in Brazil. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:695-699.

2. Rodermund OE. On amyloidosis cutis nodularis atrophicans (Gottron 1950). at the same time a contribution to the classification of amyloidosis [in German]. Arch Klin Exp Dermatol. 1967;230:153-171.

3. Chapel TA, Birmingham DJ, Malinowski YE. Nodular primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:1248-1249.

4. Criado PR, Silva CS, Vasconcellos C, et al. Extensive nodular cutaneous amyloidosis: an unusual presentation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005;19:481-483.

5. Touart DM, Sau P. Cutaneous deposition diseases. part I [published correction appears in J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39:1042]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39(2, pt 1):149-171; quiz 172-174.

6. Borrowman TA, Lutz ME, Walsh JS. Cutaneous nodular amyloidosis masquerading as a foot callus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:307-310.

7. Fujimoto N, Yajima M, Ohnishi Y, et al. Advanced glycation end product-modified beta2-microglobulin is a component of amyloid fibrils of primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;118:479-484.

8. Clement CG, Truong LD. An evaluation of Congo red fluorescence for the diagnosis of amyloidosis. Hum Pathol. 2014;45:1766-1772.

9. Lien MH, Railan D, Nelson BR. The efficacy of dermabrasion in the treatment of nodular amyloidosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36(2, pt 2):315-316.

10. Taylor SC, Baker E, Grossman ME. Nodular vulvar amyloid as a presentation of systemic amyloidosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;24:139.

11. Northcutt AD, Vanover MJ. Nodular cutaneous amyloidosis involving the vulva. case report and literature review. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:518-521.

12. Yoneyama K, Tochigi N, Oikawa A, et al. Primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis in a patient with Sjögren’s syndrome: a review of the literature. J Dermatol. 2005;32:120-123.

13. Summers EM, Kendrick CG. Primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis and CREST syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. Cutis. 2008;82:55-59.

14. Taniguchi Y, Horino T, Terada Y. Cutaneous amyloidosis associated with amyopathic dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:1088-1089.

15. Woollons A, Black MM. Nodular localized primary cutaneous amyloidosis: a long-term follow-up study. Br J Dermatol. 2001;145:105-109.

16. Brownstein MH, Helwig EB. The cutaneous amyloidoses. I. localized forms. Arch Dermatol. 1970;102:8-19.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Zhifang Zhai, PhD; Fei Hao, PhD; Zhiqiang Song, PhD; Xichuan Yang, PhD

From the Department of Dermatology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Zhifang Zhai, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038 China (zhaizf1004@163.com).

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E24-E27
Legacy Keywords
cutaneous amyloidosis, primary localized, nodular, atrophic plaque
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

 

Zhifang Zhai, PhD; Fei Hao, PhD; Zhiqiang Song, PhD; Xichuan Yang, PhD

From the Department of Dermatology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Zhifang Zhai, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038 China (zhaizf1004@163.com).

Author and Disclosure Information

 

Zhifang Zhai, PhD; Fei Hao, PhD; Zhiqiang Song, PhD; Xichuan Yang, PhD

From the Department of Dermatology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Zhifang Zhai, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038 China (zhaizf1004@163.com).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Case Report

Clinical Findings

A 65-year-old woman presented with multiple asymptomatic discrete nodules and atrophic plaques on the thighs of 4 years’ duration. The lesions had started as 2 small, asymptomatic, madder red plaques symmetrically located on the anterior aspect of each thigh that had gradually increased in number and size, particularly on the right thigh. Two years later, 2 new atrophic plaques appeared on the anterior aspect of each. The lesions developed slowly but never remitted and had been misdiagnosed as primary macular atrophy of skin by several outpatient clinics. The patient’s general health was good and her personal and family history was unremarkable.

Physical examination revealed multiple madder red plaques and nodules of various shapes and sizes (ie, 1–3 cm in diameter) on the anterior aspect of the right thigh. The lesions were slightly elevated with a waxy surface, firm, and painless to palpation. One similar lesion was noted on the anterior aspect of the left thigh. Two 2-cm, brown-red, atrophic plaques also were noted in a symmetrical distribution on the anterior aspect of each thigh. The plaque surfaces were slightly crinkly and shiny, and anetodermalike lesions produced a buttonhole sign identical to a neurofibroma on palpation (Figure 1).

 

Figure 1. Multiple madder red plaques, nodules, and atrophic plaques in various shapes and sizes were seen on the anterior aspect of both thighs.

Histopathologic Findings

Two biopsy specimens were taken from a nodule and an atrophic plaque on the right thigh. Microscopic examination revealed deposition of homogeneous eosinophilic material in the reticular dermis and subcutis as well as around the fine vessels (Figure 2A). There was mild cellular infiltration of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and giant cells in the dermis, especially adjacent to deposits and around the vessels (Figure 2B). The homogeneous material appeared salmon pink on Congo red staining and bright green by thioflavin T staining using a fluorescent microscope (Figures 3 and 4). These results suggested the characteristic features of cutaneous nodular amyloidosis.

 

 

Figure 2. Histopathologically, homogeneous eosinophilic material deposited in the reticular dermis and subcutis was noted (A)(H&E, original magnification ×25). Microscopic examination showed lymphocytes and plasma cells infiltrated in the dermis, especially adjacent to deposits and around the vessels (B)(H&E, original magnification ×200).

 

Figure 3. Congo red staining showed salmon pink homogeneous material (original magnification ×25).
Figure 4. Thioflavin T staining showed bright green homogeneous material (original magnification ×100).

 

Laboratory Findings

Laboratory studies showed normal results for complete blood cell count, urinalysis, liver and renal function tests, blood glucose levels, lipid panel, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Serum protein electrophoresis was normal and no Bence Jones proteins were detected. Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM levels showed no abnormalities. Electrocardiogram, chest radiography, and abdominal ultrasound were normal.

A diagnosis of primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis (PLCNA) was made based on clinical, histopathologic, and laboratory findings. Although surgical excision in stages was proposed, the patient refused treatment because the lesions were asymptomatic. There was no obvious progression of the skin lesions and no abnormal systemic findings during 2.5 years’ follow-up.

Comment

Amyloidosis is a spectrum of diseases consisting of deposition of amyloid proteins in various tissues. Clinically, amyloidosis is divided into both primary and secondary forms of systemic amyloidosis, hemodialysis-associated amyloidosis, heredofamilial amyloidosis, and cutaneous amyloidosis. Primary cutaneous amyloidosis is localized to the skin without other organ involvement and does not occur in systemic amyloidosis. Secondary cutaneous involvement in systemic amyloidosis is rare. Most cases of primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis (PLCA) are sporadic but approximately 10% of cases may be familial.1 There are 3 main forms of localized cutaneous amyloidosis: macular, lichen, and nodular amyloidosis. Nodular cutaneous amyloidosis is the rarest form of PLCA.

Nodular amyloidosis was first described by Gottron in 1950.2 Its cutaneous lesions may present as single or multiple nodules, occasionally with overlying atrophic plaques. The lesions consist of firm, smooth-surfaced, waxy or rubbery, pink to tan papules, plaques, or nodules measuring up to several centimeters. On some lesions, surface telangiectasia may be seen. Bullous-appearing and anetodermalike lesions have been reported.3 The acral region is the most common location, followed by the legs, head, trunk, arms, and genitalia, respectively.4 In some cases the lesions can spontaneously improve over time. In our patient, the lesions were composed of both multiple nodules and atrophic plaques, which is uncommon.

The pathogenesis of amyloid deposition is still unknown. Cutaneous macular and lichen amyloidosis may originate from degenerated keratinocyte intermediate filaments. Nodular amyloidosis may represent a localized plasma cell dyscrasia that can be associated with a monoclonal gammopathy or multiple myeloma.5 Some components of amyloid in some cases of PLCNA may consist of κ and λ immunoglobulin light chains, with most reported cases being of the l subtype.6 The results of one study indicated that β2-microglobulin was another major component of amyloid fibrils and that β2-microglobulin was partly subjected to the modification of advanced glycation end product in PLCNA.7

 

 

The histopathologic examination of PLCNA is characterized by large deposits of amorphous, sometimes fissured, pale, eosinophilic material in the papillary dermis, reticular dermis, and subcutaneous fat. The overlying epidermis may exhibit flattened rete ridges. Amyloid may occur within vessel walls and adnexal structures, sometimes in a ring surrounding individual fat cells. Clinically, the lesions of PLCNA may be indistinguishable from nodular deposits of amyloid occurring in primary systemic amyloidosis or myeloma-associated amyloidosis. Histopathologically, PLCNA usually has a variable infiltrate of plasma cells and lymphocytes at the periphery or within the amyloid deposits,6 but no single stain is highly sensitive and specific. Congo red–stained deposits showed salmon pink amorphous material or apple green birefringence with polarizing microscopy.8 Amyloid derived from immunoglobulin light chains, including cutaneous nodular amyloid, also stain positive for anti-human λ light chain antibody on immunohistochemistry. Additionally, amyloid can stain positively with methyl violet and crystal violet Gram stains, Picrosirius red, thioflavin T, Dylon, and periodic acid–Schiff stains.

Clinically, some PLCNA lesions can be removed via surgical excision or laser if they are cosmetically disfiguring or symptomatic. Other methods have been attempted to improve the appearance of the lesions, such as intralesional corticosteroids, cryotherapy, and dermabrasion,9 but they usually are not helpful and have a high rate of recurrence. Although PLCNA often is a benign cutaneous disorder and some cases of PLCNA could be reactive diseases rather than neoplastic ones, some patients may develop underlying systemic amyloidosis or even paraproteinemia.10 Northcutt and Vanover11 indicated that systemic amyloidosis may be expected in less than 15% of 47 patients with localized cutaneous amyloidosis during follow-up by reviewing most of the related literature. Some cases may be associated with Sjögren syndrome (SJS), CREST (calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal motility disorders, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasia) syndrome, dermatomyositis, and diabetes mellitus.12-14 Polyclonal immunoglobulin amyloid has been reported only in PLCNA with SJS, which may be due to the fact that a certain population of SJS develops polyclonal B-cell proliferation and hyperglobulinemia.12 Woollons and Black15 estimated the rate of progression of PLCNA to systemic amyloidosis to be only 7%, which is much lower than the rate in the literature by a large clinical follow-up study on PLCNA.16 However, all patients with PLCNA should have a systemic evaluation and should be advised to undergo long-term clinical follow-up to help prevent progression to systemic amyloidosis or plasma cell dyscrasia.

Case Report

Clinical Findings

A 65-year-old woman presented with multiple asymptomatic discrete nodules and atrophic plaques on the thighs of 4 years’ duration. The lesions had started as 2 small, asymptomatic, madder red plaques symmetrically located on the anterior aspect of each thigh that had gradually increased in number and size, particularly on the right thigh. Two years later, 2 new atrophic plaques appeared on the anterior aspect of each. The lesions developed slowly but never remitted and had been misdiagnosed as primary macular atrophy of skin by several outpatient clinics. The patient’s general health was good and her personal and family history was unremarkable.

Physical examination revealed multiple madder red plaques and nodules of various shapes and sizes (ie, 1–3 cm in diameter) on the anterior aspect of the right thigh. The lesions were slightly elevated with a waxy surface, firm, and painless to palpation. One similar lesion was noted on the anterior aspect of the left thigh. Two 2-cm, brown-red, atrophic plaques also were noted in a symmetrical distribution on the anterior aspect of each thigh. The plaque surfaces were slightly crinkly and shiny, and anetodermalike lesions produced a buttonhole sign identical to a neurofibroma on palpation (Figure 1).

 

Figure 1. Multiple madder red plaques, nodules, and atrophic plaques in various shapes and sizes were seen on the anterior aspect of both thighs.

Histopathologic Findings

Two biopsy specimens were taken from a nodule and an atrophic plaque on the right thigh. Microscopic examination revealed deposition of homogeneous eosinophilic material in the reticular dermis and subcutis as well as around the fine vessels (Figure 2A). There was mild cellular infiltration of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and giant cells in the dermis, especially adjacent to deposits and around the vessels (Figure 2B). The homogeneous material appeared salmon pink on Congo red staining and bright green by thioflavin T staining using a fluorescent microscope (Figures 3 and 4). These results suggested the characteristic features of cutaneous nodular amyloidosis.

 

 

Figure 2. Histopathologically, homogeneous eosinophilic material deposited in the reticular dermis and subcutis was noted (A)(H&E, original magnification ×25). Microscopic examination showed lymphocytes and plasma cells infiltrated in the dermis, especially adjacent to deposits and around the vessels (B)(H&E, original magnification ×200).

 

Figure 3. Congo red staining showed salmon pink homogeneous material (original magnification ×25).
Figure 4. Thioflavin T staining showed bright green homogeneous material (original magnification ×100).

 

Laboratory Findings

Laboratory studies showed normal results for complete blood cell count, urinalysis, liver and renal function tests, blood glucose levels, lipid panel, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Serum protein electrophoresis was normal and no Bence Jones proteins were detected. Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM levels showed no abnormalities. Electrocardiogram, chest radiography, and abdominal ultrasound were normal.

A diagnosis of primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis (PLCNA) was made based on clinical, histopathologic, and laboratory findings. Although surgical excision in stages was proposed, the patient refused treatment because the lesions were asymptomatic. There was no obvious progression of the skin lesions and no abnormal systemic findings during 2.5 years’ follow-up.

Comment

Amyloidosis is a spectrum of diseases consisting of deposition of amyloid proteins in various tissues. Clinically, amyloidosis is divided into both primary and secondary forms of systemic amyloidosis, hemodialysis-associated amyloidosis, heredofamilial amyloidosis, and cutaneous amyloidosis. Primary cutaneous amyloidosis is localized to the skin without other organ involvement and does not occur in systemic amyloidosis. Secondary cutaneous involvement in systemic amyloidosis is rare. Most cases of primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis (PLCA) are sporadic but approximately 10% of cases may be familial.1 There are 3 main forms of localized cutaneous amyloidosis: macular, lichen, and nodular amyloidosis. Nodular cutaneous amyloidosis is the rarest form of PLCA.

Nodular amyloidosis was first described by Gottron in 1950.2 Its cutaneous lesions may present as single or multiple nodules, occasionally with overlying atrophic plaques. The lesions consist of firm, smooth-surfaced, waxy or rubbery, pink to tan papules, plaques, or nodules measuring up to several centimeters. On some lesions, surface telangiectasia may be seen. Bullous-appearing and anetodermalike lesions have been reported.3 The acral region is the most common location, followed by the legs, head, trunk, arms, and genitalia, respectively.4 In some cases the lesions can spontaneously improve over time. In our patient, the lesions were composed of both multiple nodules and atrophic plaques, which is uncommon.

The pathogenesis of amyloid deposition is still unknown. Cutaneous macular and lichen amyloidosis may originate from degenerated keratinocyte intermediate filaments. Nodular amyloidosis may represent a localized plasma cell dyscrasia that can be associated with a monoclonal gammopathy or multiple myeloma.5 Some components of amyloid in some cases of PLCNA may consist of κ and λ immunoglobulin light chains, with most reported cases being of the l subtype.6 The results of one study indicated that β2-microglobulin was another major component of amyloid fibrils and that β2-microglobulin was partly subjected to the modification of advanced glycation end product in PLCNA.7

 

 

The histopathologic examination of PLCNA is characterized by large deposits of amorphous, sometimes fissured, pale, eosinophilic material in the papillary dermis, reticular dermis, and subcutaneous fat. The overlying epidermis may exhibit flattened rete ridges. Amyloid may occur within vessel walls and adnexal structures, sometimes in a ring surrounding individual fat cells. Clinically, the lesions of PLCNA may be indistinguishable from nodular deposits of amyloid occurring in primary systemic amyloidosis or myeloma-associated amyloidosis. Histopathologically, PLCNA usually has a variable infiltrate of plasma cells and lymphocytes at the periphery or within the amyloid deposits,6 but no single stain is highly sensitive and specific. Congo red–stained deposits showed salmon pink amorphous material or apple green birefringence with polarizing microscopy.8 Amyloid derived from immunoglobulin light chains, including cutaneous nodular amyloid, also stain positive for anti-human λ light chain antibody on immunohistochemistry. Additionally, amyloid can stain positively with methyl violet and crystal violet Gram stains, Picrosirius red, thioflavin T, Dylon, and periodic acid–Schiff stains.

Clinically, some PLCNA lesions can be removed via surgical excision or laser if they are cosmetically disfiguring or symptomatic. Other methods have been attempted to improve the appearance of the lesions, such as intralesional corticosteroids, cryotherapy, and dermabrasion,9 but they usually are not helpful and have a high rate of recurrence. Although PLCNA often is a benign cutaneous disorder and some cases of PLCNA could be reactive diseases rather than neoplastic ones, some patients may develop underlying systemic amyloidosis or even paraproteinemia.10 Northcutt and Vanover11 indicated that systemic amyloidosis may be expected in less than 15% of 47 patients with localized cutaneous amyloidosis during follow-up by reviewing most of the related literature. Some cases may be associated with Sjögren syndrome (SJS), CREST (calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal motility disorders, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasia) syndrome, dermatomyositis, and diabetes mellitus.12-14 Polyclonal immunoglobulin amyloid has been reported only in PLCNA with SJS, which may be due to the fact that a certain population of SJS develops polyclonal B-cell proliferation and hyperglobulinemia.12 Woollons and Black15 estimated the rate of progression of PLCNA to systemic amyloidosis to be only 7%, which is much lower than the rate in the literature by a large clinical follow-up study on PLCNA.16 However, all patients with PLCNA should have a systemic evaluation and should be advised to undergo long-term clinical follow-up to help prevent progression to systemic amyloidosis or plasma cell dyscrasia.

References

 

1. Sakuma TH, Hans-Filho G, Arita K, et al. Familial primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis in Brazil. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:695-699.

2. Rodermund OE. On amyloidosis cutis nodularis atrophicans (Gottron 1950). at the same time a contribution to the classification of amyloidosis [in German]. Arch Klin Exp Dermatol. 1967;230:153-171.

3. Chapel TA, Birmingham DJ, Malinowski YE. Nodular primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:1248-1249.

4. Criado PR, Silva CS, Vasconcellos C, et al. Extensive nodular cutaneous amyloidosis: an unusual presentation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005;19:481-483.

5. Touart DM, Sau P. Cutaneous deposition diseases. part I [published correction appears in J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39:1042]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39(2, pt 1):149-171; quiz 172-174.

6. Borrowman TA, Lutz ME, Walsh JS. Cutaneous nodular amyloidosis masquerading as a foot callus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:307-310.

7. Fujimoto N, Yajima M, Ohnishi Y, et al. Advanced glycation end product-modified beta2-microglobulin is a component of amyloid fibrils of primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;118:479-484.

8. Clement CG, Truong LD. An evaluation of Congo red fluorescence for the diagnosis of amyloidosis. Hum Pathol. 2014;45:1766-1772.

9. Lien MH, Railan D, Nelson BR. The efficacy of dermabrasion in the treatment of nodular amyloidosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36(2, pt 2):315-316.

10. Taylor SC, Baker E, Grossman ME. Nodular vulvar amyloid as a presentation of systemic amyloidosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;24:139.

11. Northcutt AD, Vanover MJ. Nodular cutaneous amyloidosis involving the vulva. case report and literature review. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:518-521.

12. Yoneyama K, Tochigi N, Oikawa A, et al. Primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis in a patient with Sjögren’s syndrome: a review of the literature. J Dermatol. 2005;32:120-123.

13. Summers EM, Kendrick CG. Primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis and CREST syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. Cutis. 2008;82:55-59.

14. Taniguchi Y, Horino T, Terada Y. Cutaneous amyloidosis associated with amyopathic dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:1088-1089.

15. Woollons A, Black MM. Nodular localized primary cutaneous amyloidosis: a long-term follow-up study. Br J Dermatol. 2001;145:105-109.

16. Brownstein MH, Helwig EB. The cutaneous amyloidoses. I. localized forms. Arch Dermatol. 1970;102:8-19.

References

 

1. Sakuma TH, Hans-Filho G, Arita K, et al. Familial primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis in Brazil. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:695-699.

2. Rodermund OE. On amyloidosis cutis nodularis atrophicans (Gottron 1950). at the same time a contribution to the classification of amyloidosis [in German]. Arch Klin Exp Dermatol. 1967;230:153-171.

3. Chapel TA, Birmingham DJ, Malinowski YE. Nodular primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:1248-1249.

4. Criado PR, Silva CS, Vasconcellos C, et al. Extensive nodular cutaneous amyloidosis: an unusual presentation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005;19:481-483.

5. Touart DM, Sau P. Cutaneous deposition diseases. part I [published correction appears in J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39:1042]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39(2, pt 1):149-171; quiz 172-174.

6. Borrowman TA, Lutz ME, Walsh JS. Cutaneous nodular amyloidosis masquerading as a foot callus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:307-310.

7. Fujimoto N, Yajima M, Ohnishi Y, et al. Advanced glycation end product-modified beta2-microglobulin is a component of amyloid fibrils of primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;118:479-484.

8. Clement CG, Truong LD. An evaluation of Congo red fluorescence for the diagnosis of amyloidosis. Hum Pathol. 2014;45:1766-1772.

9. Lien MH, Railan D, Nelson BR. The efficacy of dermabrasion in the treatment of nodular amyloidosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36(2, pt 2):315-316.

10. Taylor SC, Baker E, Grossman ME. Nodular vulvar amyloid as a presentation of systemic amyloidosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;24:139.

11. Northcutt AD, Vanover MJ. Nodular cutaneous amyloidosis involving the vulva. case report and literature review. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:518-521.

12. Yoneyama K, Tochigi N, Oikawa A, et al. Primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis in a patient with Sjögren’s syndrome: a review of the literature. J Dermatol. 2005;32:120-123.

13. Summers EM, Kendrick CG. Primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis and CREST syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. Cutis. 2008;82:55-59.

14. Taniguchi Y, Horino T, Terada Y. Cutaneous amyloidosis associated with amyopathic dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:1088-1089.

15. Woollons A, Black MM. Nodular localized primary cutaneous amyloidosis: a long-term follow-up study. Br J Dermatol. 2001;145:105-109.

16. Brownstein MH, Helwig EB. The cutaneous amyloidoses. I. localized forms. Arch Dermatol. 1970;102:8-19.

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Page Number
E24-E27
Page Number
E24-E27
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Primary Localized Cutaneous Nodular Amyloidosis of the Thighs
Display Headline
Primary Localized Cutaneous Nodular Amyloidosis of the Thighs
Legacy Keywords
cutaneous amyloidosis, primary localized, nodular, atrophic plaque
Legacy Keywords
cutaneous amyloidosis, primary localized, nodular, atrophic plaque
Sections
Inside the Article

   Practice Points

 

  • ­The cutaneous lesions of primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis (PLCNA) may present as single or multiple nodules, occasionally with overlying atrophic plaques and some with surface telangiectasia.
  • ­Primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis may represent a localized plasma cell dyscrasia that can be associated with a monoclonal gammopathy or multiple myeloma.
  • ­Although PLCNA often is a benign cutaneous disorder, some patients can develop underlying systemic amyloidosis or even paraproteinemia.
Disallow All Ads
Article PDF Media

Benign Cephalic Histiocytosis

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Benign Cephalic Histiocytosis

To the Editor:

Benign cephalic histiocytosis (BCH) falls into the group of non–Langerhans cell histiocytosis (non-LCH), which is characterized by a benign course and tendency toward spontaneous remission. Apart from BCH, the main types of non-LCH include juvenile xanthogranuloma, generalized eruptive histiocytoma, and xanthoma disseminatum.1

Benign cephalic histiocytosis is a rare form of cutaneous histiocytosis in young children. It presents as a papular eruption on the head and has not been associated with internal organ involvement.2-4 It was described in 1971 by Gianotti et al5 and was named infantile histiocytosis with intracytoplasmic worm-like bodies because electron microscopy revealed histiocytes with large cytoplasmatic inclusions composed of wormlike membranous profiles and absence of Birbeck granules. In BCH, skin lesions are located on the head including the face and sometimes on the neck. Lesions occasionally may appear on the trunk, buttocks, and thighs. Mucous membranes are not involved. The onset of disease is typical in the first year of life; however, the disease may begin within the first 3 years of life. An eruption is characterized by small, 2- to 8-mm, discrete, asymptomatic, tan to red-brown macules and papules. The lesions may persist for several months or years and subsequently flatten, becoming hyperpigmented briefly. They often completely resolve with time. Most children are otherwise healthy and developmentally normal6-9; however, diabetes insipidus has been reported in some children with BCH.10

Histologic examination of skin samples reveals the infiltrate of histiocytes, which closely approaches the epidermis, accompanied by scattered lymphocytes and a few eosinophils.1,2,11 The histiocytes express a typical macrophage marker CD68, whereas immunostaining for Langerhans cell markers such as CD1a and S-100 is negative.3,9,12,13

A 2.5-year-old boy was admitted to our dermatology department with suspected cutaneous mastocytosis (CM). Since the age of 13 months, he had developed small, 4- to 8-mm, dark pinkish macules and papules localized on the cheeks (Figure 1). Physical examination performed in our center revealed yellowish macules and flat papules limited to the cheeks. Darier sign was negative. The boy was otherwise healthy and developmentally normal. All laboratory tests were within reference range and his family history was uneventful.

Figure 1. Maculopapular eruption of benign cephalic histiocytosis on the cheeks (A and B).

Histopathologic examination of the skin sample revealed a normotypic epidermis and scattered subepidermal infiltrates in the upper dermis. The infiltrates were composed of predominating histiocytes and a few mast cells and eosinophils (Figure 2). The histiocytes were slightly pleomorphic and had abundant clear cytoplasm, vesicular nuclei, and prominent nucleoli. Mitoses were absent in these cells. The majority of cells within the infiltrate expressed CD68 and were CD1a- and S-100-. However, occasional CD1a+ cells were seen. Immunostaining for mast cell marker CD117 was negative. Cutaneous mastocytosis was excluded and non-LCH was recognized. Based on the typical location, morphology, and immunophenotype of skin lesions, BCH was diagnosed. At 24-month follow-up, spontaneous regression of skin lesions was observed.

Gianotti et al7 described BCH as a separate entity of the non-LCH group of disorders and established its diagnostic criteria: (1) onset of disease within the first 3 years of life; (2) location of skin lesions on the scalp and lack of lesions on the hands, feet, mucous membranes, and internal organ involvement; (3) spontaneous complete remission of symptoms; and (4) monomorphic infiltration of histiocytes that do not express S-100 and CD1a.

The macular and flat, papular, pink-yellow or orange lesions visible on the face of our patient are characteristic of BCH. Moreover, the cheeks are the most typical location of a BCH eruption, as noted in our patient.6,7,12 The presence of histiocytic infiltrates composed of CD68+ cells strongly support the diagnosis.3,4,9-13 In contrast to other reports, occasional CD1a+ cells of Langerhans phenotype were found in our case.3,9,11,12 The proliferation of Langerhans cells in the skin and internal organs and presence of langerin are characteristic of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH).1,4,14 The presence of a few CD1a cells in cases with clinical features compatible with non-LCH may suggest that some of these cases may represent a papular self-healing variant of LCH or may indicate that there is an overlap among the histiocytic syndromes (eg, non-LCH and LCH). Furthermore, many of benign histiocytic lesions may evolve over the course of time into the others.12,13 Differential diagnosis of BCH should include other benign forms of cutaneous histiocytosis, particularly the small nodular variant of juvenile xanthogranuloma and generalized eruptive histiocytoma (GEH). Juvenile xanthogranuloma pre-sents as disseminated, yellowish, nodular lesions and may be associated with ocular involvement, whereas GEH is characterized by rapid onset of the disease and disseminated nodular eruption.1,4

 

 

  

Figure 2. Skin section showing the upper and mid dermis infiltrated with slightly pleomorphic epithelioid histiocytic cells with clear cytoplasm and vesicular nuclei. Few accompanying lymphocytes and eosinophils were visible (H&E, original magnifications ×200 and ×400).

A close histologic relationship and presence of overlapping symptoms observed among BCH, GEH, and juvenile xanthogranuloma indicate that these entities fall into a spectrum of the same disorder. However, the presence of a uniform infiltrate of large foamy histiocytes readily distinguishes xanthomas from BCH.4 In some unusual clinical presentations of CM or in cases of the nodular form of the condition, there is a need to distinguish between non-LCH and CM, as in our patient. Darier sign, consisting of urtication and erythema appearing after mechanical irritation of the skin lesion, is pathognomonic for CM. Nevertheless, Darier sign is not sufficient to confirm CM when it is not pronounced. Therefore, histologic examination with the use of immunostaining plays a key role in the differential diagnosis of these disorders in children.15 Treatment of BCH is not recommended because of spontaneous remission of the disease.1-5

Benign cephalic histiocytosis is a rare clinical form of non-LCH. No systemic or mucosal involvement has been described. Lesions often are confused with plane warts, but a biopsy is definitive. Therapy is not effective but fortunately none is necessary.

References

1. Gianotti F, Caputo R. Histiocytic syndromes: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;13:383-404.

2. Jih DM, Salcedo SL, Jaworsky C. Benign cephalic histiocytosis: a case report and review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:908-913.

3. Dadzie O, Hopster D, Cerio R, et al. Benign cephalic histiocytosis in a British-African child. Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22:444-446.

4. Goodman WT, Barret TL. Histiocytoses. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. 3rd ed. Hong Kong, China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:1527-1546.

5. Gianotti F, Caputo R, Ermacora E. Singular infantile histiocytosis with cells with intracytoplasmic vermiform particles [in French]. Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syphiligr. 1971;78:232-233.

6. Barsky B, Lao I, Barsky S, et al. Benign cephalic histiocytosis. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120:650-655.

7. Gianotti F, Caputo R, Ermacora E, et al. Benign cephalic histiocytosis. Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:1038-1043.

8. Zelger BW, Sidoroff A, Orchard G, et al. Non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. a new unifying concept. Am J Dermatopathol. 1996;18:490-504.

9. Hasegawa S, Deguchi M, Chiba-Okada S, et al. Japanese case of benign cephalic histiocytosis. J Dermatol. 2009;36:69-71.

10. Weston WL, Travers SH, Mierau GW, et al. Benign cephalic histiocytosis with diabetes insipidus. Pediatr Dermatol. 2000;17:296-298.

11. Gianotti R, Alessi E, Caputo R. Benign cephalic histiocytosis: a distinct entity or a part of a wide spectrum of histiocytic proliferative disorders of children? a histopathological study. Am J Dermatopathol. 1993;15:315-319.

12. Rodriguez-Jurado R, Duran-McKinster C, Ruiz-Maldonado R. Benign cephalic histiocytosis progressing into juvenile xanthogranuloma: a non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis transforming under the influence of a virus? Am J Dermatopathol. 2000;22:70-74.

13. Sidwell RU, Francis N, Slater DN, et al. Is disseminated juvenile xanthogranulomatosis benign cephalic histiocytosis? Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22:40-43.

14. Favara BE, Jaffe R. The histopathology of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Br J Cancer Suppl. 1994;23:S17-S23.

15. Heide R, Beishuizen A, De Groot H, et al. Mastocytosis in children: a protocol for management. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008;25:493-500.

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Magdalena Lange, MD, PhD; Ewa Iżycka-Świeszewska, MD, PhD; Igor Michajłowski, MD, PhD; Wioletta Barańska-Rybak, MD, PhD

All from the Medical University of Gdansk, Poland. Drs. Lange, Michajłowski, and Barańska-Rybak are from the Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, and Dr. Iżycka-Świeszewska is from the Department of Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Magdalena Lange, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki St 7, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland (m.lange@gumed.edu.pl).

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E15–E17
Legacy Keywords
benign cephalic histiocytosis, non-Langerhans histiocytosis, clinical manifestation
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Magdalena Lange, MD, PhD; Ewa Iżycka-Świeszewska, MD, PhD; Igor Michajłowski, MD, PhD; Wioletta Barańska-Rybak, MD, PhD

All from the Medical University of Gdansk, Poland. Drs. Lange, Michajłowski, and Barańska-Rybak are from the Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, and Dr. Iżycka-Świeszewska is from the Department of Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Magdalena Lange, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki St 7, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland (m.lange@gumed.edu.pl).

Author and Disclosure Information

Magdalena Lange, MD, PhD; Ewa Iżycka-Świeszewska, MD, PhD; Igor Michajłowski, MD, PhD; Wioletta Barańska-Rybak, MD, PhD

All from the Medical University of Gdansk, Poland. Drs. Lange, Michajłowski, and Barańska-Rybak are from the Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, and Dr. Iżycka-Świeszewska is from the Department of Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Magdalena Lange, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki St 7, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland (m.lange@gumed.edu.pl).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

To the Editor:

Benign cephalic histiocytosis (BCH) falls into the group of non–Langerhans cell histiocytosis (non-LCH), which is characterized by a benign course and tendency toward spontaneous remission. Apart from BCH, the main types of non-LCH include juvenile xanthogranuloma, generalized eruptive histiocytoma, and xanthoma disseminatum.1

Benign cephalic histiocytosis is a rare form of cutaneous histiocytosis in young children. It presents as a papular eruption on the head and has not been associated with internal organ involvement.2-4 It was described in 1971 by Gianotti et al5 and was named infantile histiocytosis with intracytoplasmic worm-like bodies because electron microscopy revealed histiocytes with large cytoplasmatic inclusions composed of wormlike membranous profiles and absence of Birbeck granules. In BCH, skin lesions are located on the head including the face and sometimes on the neck. Lesions occasionally may appear on the trunk, buttocks, and thighs. Mucous membranes are not involved. The onset of disease is typical in the first year of life; however, the disease may begin within the first 3 years of life. An eruption is characterized by small, 2- to 8-mm, discrete, asymptomatic, tan to red-brown macules and papules. The lesions may persist for several months or years and subsequently flatten, becoming hyperpigmented briefly. They often completely resolve with time. Most children are otherwise healthy and developmentally normal6-9; however, diabetes insipidus has been reported in some children with BCH.10

Histologic examination of skin samples reveals the infiltrate of histiocytes, which closely approaches the epidermis, accompanied by scattered lymphocytes and a few eosinophils.1,2,11 The histiocytes express a typical macrophage marker CD68, whereas immunostaining for Langerhans cell markers such as CD1a and S-100 is negative.3,9,12,13

A 2.5-year-old boy was admitted to our dermatology department with suspected cutaneous mastocytosis (CM). Since the age of 13 months, he had developed small, 4- to 8-mm, dark pinkish macules and papules localized on the cheeks (Figure 1). Physical examination performed in our center revealed yellowish macules and flat papules limited to the cheeks. Darier sign was negative. The boy was otherwise healthy and developmentally normal. All laboratory tests were within reference range and his family history was uneventful.

Figure 1. Maculopapular eruption of benign cephalic histiocytosis on the cheeks (A and B).

Histopathologic examination of the skin sample revealed a normotypic epidermis and scattered subepidermal infiltrates in the upper dermis. The infiltrates were composed of predominating histiocytes and a few mast cells and eosinophils (Figure 2). The histiocytes were slightly pleomorphic and had abundant clear cytoplasm, vesicular nuclei, and prominent nucleoli. Mitoses were absent in these cells. The majority of cells within the infiltrate expressed CD68 and were CD1a- and S-100-. However, occasional CD1a+ cells were seen. Immunostaining for mast cell marker CD117 was negative. Cutaneous mastocytosis was excluded and non-LCH was recognized. Based on the typical location, morphology, and immunophenotype of skin lesions, BCH was diagnosed. At 24-month follow-up, spontaneous regression of skin lesions was observed.

Gianotti et al7 described BCH as a separate entity of the non-LCH group of disorders and established its diagnostic criteria: (1) onset of disease within the first 3 years of life; (2) location of skin lesions on the scalp and lack of lesions on the hands, feet, mucous membranes, and internal organ involvement; (3) spontaneous complete remission of symptoms; and (4) monomorphic infiltration of histiocytes that do not express S-100 and CD1a.

The macular and flat, papular, pink-yellow or orange lesions visible on the face of our patient are characteristic of BCH. Moreover, the cheeks are the most typical location of a BCH eruption, as noted in our patient.6,7,12 The presence of histiocytic infiltrates composed of CD68+ cells strongly support the diagnosis.3,4,9-13 In contrast to other reports, occasional CD1a+ cells of Langerhans phenotype were found in our case.3,9,11,12 The proliferation of Langerhans cells in the skin and internal organs and presence of langerin are characteristic of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH).1,4,14 The presence of a few CD1a cells in cases with clinical features compatible with non-LCH may suggest that some of these cases may represent a papular self-healing variant of LCH or may indicate that there is an overlap among the histiocytic syndromes (eg, non-LCH and LCH). Furthermore, many of benign histiocytic lesions may evolve over the course of time into the others.12,13 Differential diagnosis of BCH should include other benign forms of cutaneous histiocytosis, particularly the small nodular variant of juvenile xanthogranuloma and generalized eruptive histiocytoma (GEH). Juvenile xanthogranuloma pre-sents as disseminated, yellowish, nodular lesions and may be associated with ocular involvement, whereas GEH is characterized by rapid onset of the disease and disseminated nodular eruption.1,4

 

 

  

Figure 2. Skin section showing the upper and mid dermis infiltrated with slightly pleomorphic epithelioid histiocytic cells with clear cytoplasm and vesicular nuclei. Few accompanying lymphocytes and eosinophils were visible (H&E, original magnifications ×200 and ×400).

A close histologic relationship and presence of overlapping symptoms observed among BCH, GEH, and juvenile xanthogranuloma indicate that these entities fall into a spectrum of the same disorder. However, the presence of a uniform infiltrate of large foamy histiocytes readily distinguishes xanthomas from BCH.4 In some unusual clinical presentations of CM or in cases of the nodular form of the condition, there is a need to distinguish between non-LCH and CM, as in our patient. Darier sign, consisting of urtication and erythema appearing after mechanical irritation of the skin lesion, is pathognomonic for CM. Nevertheless, Darier sign is not sufficient to confirm CM when it is not pronounced. Therefore, histologic examination with the use of immunostaining plays a key role in the differential diagnosis of these disorders in children.15 Treatment of BCH is not recommended because of spontaneous remission of the disease.1-5

Benign cephalic histiocytosis is a rare clinical form of non-LCH. No systemic or mucosal involvement has been described. Lesions often are confused with plane warts, but a biopsy is definitive. Therapy is not effective but fortunately none is necessary.

To the Editor:

Benign cephalic histiocytosis (BCH) falls into the group of non–Langerhans cell histiocytosis (non-LCH), which is characterized by a benign course and tendency toward spontaneous remission. Apart from BCH, the main types of non-LCH include juvenile xanthogranuloma, generalized eruptive histiocytoma, and xanthoma disseminatum.1

Benign cephalic histiocytosis is a rare form of cutaneous histiocytosis in young children. It presents as a papular eruption on the head and has not been associated with internal organ involvement.2-4 It was described in 1971 by Gianotti et al5 and was named infantile histiocytosis with intracytoplasmic worm-like bodies because electron microscopy revealed histiocytes with large cytoplasmatic inclusions composed of wormlike membranous profiles and absence of Birbeck granules. In BCH, skin lesions are located on the head including the face and sometimes on the neck. Lesions occasionally may appear on the trunk, buttocks, and thighs. Mucous membranes are not involved. The onset of disease is typical in the first year of life; however, the disease may begin within the first 3 years of life. An eruption is characterized by small, 2- to 8-mm, discrete, asymptomatic, tan to red-brown macules and papules. The lesions may persist for several months or years and subsequently flatten, becoming hyperpigmented briefly. They often completely resolve with time. Most children are otherwise healthy and developmentally normal6-9; however, diabetes insipidus has been reported in some children with BCH.10

Histologic examination of skin samples reveals the infiltrate of histiocytes, which closely approaches the epidermis, accompanied by scattered lymphocytes and a few eosinophils.1,2,11 The histiocytes express a typical macrophage marker CD68, whereas immunostaining for Langerhans cell markers such as CD1a and S-100 is negative.3,9,12,13

A 2.5-year-old boy was admitted to our dermatology department with suspected cutaneous mastocytosis (CM). Since the age of 13 months, he had developed small, 4- to 8-mm, dark pinkish macules and papules localized on the cheeks (Figure 1). Physical examination performed in our center revealed yellowish macules and flat papules limited to the cheeks. Darier sign was negative. The boy was otherwise healthy and developmentally normal. All laboratory tests were within reference range and his family history was uneventful.

Figure 1. Maculopapular eruption of benign cephalic histiocytosis on the cheeks (A and B).

Histopathologic examination of the skin sample revealed a normotypic epidermis and scattered subepidermal infiltrates in the upper dermis. The infiltrates were composed of predominating histiocytes and a few mast cells and eosinophils (Figure 2). The histiocytes were slightly pleomorphic and had abundant clear cytoplasm, vesicular nuclei, and prominent nucleoli. Mitoses were absent in these cells. The majority of cells within the infiltrate expressed CD68 and were CD1a- and S-100-. However, occasional CD1a+ cells were seen. Immunostaining for mast cell marker CD117 was negative. Cutaneous mastocytosis was excluded and non-LCH was recognized. Based on the typical location, morphology, and immunophenotype of skin lesions, BCH was diagnosed. At 24-month follow-up, spontaneous regression of skin lesions was observed.

Gianotti et al7 described BCH as a separate entity of the non-LCH group of disorders and established its diagnostic criteria: (1) onset of disease within the first 3 years of life; (2) location of skin lesions on the scalp and lack of lesions on the hands, feet, mucous membranes, and internal organ involvement; (3) spontaneous complete remission of symptoms; and (4) monomorphic infiltration of histiocytes that do not express S-100 and CD1a.

The macular and flat, papular, pink-yellow or orange lesions visible on the face of our patient are characteristic of BCH. Moreover, the cheeks are the most typical location of a BCH eruption, as noted in our patient.6,7,12 The presence of histiocytic infiltrates composed of CD68+ cells strongly support the diagnosis.3,4,9-13 In contrast to other reports, occasional CD1a+ cells of Langerhans phenotype were found in our case.3,9,11,12 The proliferation of Langerhans cells in the skin and internal organs and presence of langerin are characteristic of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH).1,4,14 The presence of a few CD1a cells in cases with clinical features compatible with non-LCH may suggest that some of these cases may represent a papular self-healing variant of LCH or may indicate that there is an overlap among the histiocytic syndromes (eg, non-LCH and LCH). Furthermore, many of benign histiocytic lesions may evolve over the course of time into the others.12,13 Differential diagnosis of BCH should include other benign forms of cutaneous histiocytosis, particularly the small nodular variant of juvenile xanthogranuloma and generalized eruptive histiocytoma (GEH). Juvenile xanthogranuloma pre-sents as disseminated, yellowish, nodular lesions and may be associated with ocular involvement, whereas GEH is characterized by rapid onset of the disease and disseminated nodular eruption.1,4

 

 

  

Figure 2. Skin section showing the upper and mid dermis infiltrated with slightly pleomorphic epithelioid histiocytic cells with clear cytoplasm and vesicular nuclei. Few accompanying lymphocytes and eosinophils were visible (H&E, original magnifications ×200 and ×400).

A close histologic relationship and presence of overlapping symptoms observed among BCH, GEH, and juvenile xanthogranuloma indicate that these entities fall into a spectrum of the same disorder. However, the presence of a uniform infiltrate of large foamy histiocytes readily distinguishes xanthomas from BCH.4 In some unusual clinical presentations of CM or in cases of the nodular form of the condition, there is a need to distinguish between non-LCH and CM, as in our patient. Darier sign, consisting of urtication and erythema appearing after mechanical irritation of the skin lesion, is pathognomonic for CM. Nevertheless, Darier sign is not sufficient to confirm CM when it is not pronounced. Therefore, histologic examination with the use of immunostaining plays a key role in the differential diagnosis of these disorders in children.15 Treatment of BCH is not recommended because of spontaneous remission of the disease.1-5

Benign cephalic histiocytosis is a rare clinical form of non-LCH. No systemic or mucosal involvement has been described. Lesions often are confused with plane warts, but a biopsy is definitive. Therapy is not effective but fortunately none is necessary.

References

1. Gianotti F, Caputo R. Histiocytic syndromes: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;13:383-404.

2. Jih DM, Salcedo SL, Jaworsky C. Benign cephalic histiocytosis: a case report and review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:908-913.

3. Dadzie O, Hopster D, Cerio R, et al. Benign cephalic histiocytosis in a British-African child. Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22:444-446.

4. Goodman WT, Barret TL. Histiocytoses. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. 3rd ed. Hong Kong, China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:1527-1546.

5. Gianotti F, Caputo R, Ermacora E. Singular infantile histiocytosis with cells with intracytoplasmic vermiform particles [in French]. Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syphiligr. 1971;78:232-233.

6. Barsky B, Lao I, Barsky S, et al. Benign cephalic histiocytosis. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120:650-655.

7. Gianotti F, Caputo R, Ermacora E, et al. Benign cephalic histiocytosis. Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:1038-1043.

8. Zelger BW, Sidoroff A, Orchard G, et al. Non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. a new unifying concept. Am J Dermatopathol. 1996;18:490-504.

9. Hasegawa S, Deguchi M, Chiba-Okada S, et al. Japanese case of benign cephalic histiocytosis. J Dermatol. 2009;36:69-71.

10. Weston WL, Travers SH, Mierau GW, et al. Benign cephalic histiocytosis with diabetes insipidus. Pediatr Dermatol. 2000;17:296-298.

11. Gianotti R, Alessi E, Caputo R. Benign cephalic histiocytosis: a distinct entity or a part of a wide spectrum of histiocytic proliferative disorders of children? a histopathological study. Am J Dermatopathol. 1993;15:315-319.

12. Rodriguez-Jurado R, Duran-McKinster C, Ruiz-Maldonado R. Benign cephalic histiocytosis progressing into juvenile xanthogranuloma: a non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis transforming under the influence of a virus? Am J Dermatopathol. 2000;22:70-74.

13. Sidwell RU, Francis N, Slater DN, et al. Is disseminated juvenile xanthogranulomatosis benign cephalic histiocytosis? Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22:40-43.

14. Favara BE, Jaffe R. The histopathology of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Br J Cancer Suppl. 1994;23:S17-S23.

15. Heide R, Beishuizen A, De Groot H, et al. Mastocytosis in children: a protocol for management. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008;25:493-500.

References

1. Gianotti F, Caputo R. Histiocytic syndromes: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;13:383-404.

2. Jih DM, Salcedo SL, Jaworsky C. Benign cephalic histiocytosis: a case report and review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:908-913.

3. Dadzie O, Hopster D, Cerio R, et al. Benign cephalic histiocytosis in a British-African child. Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22:444-446.

4. Goodman WT, Barret TL. Histiocytoses. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Schaffer JV, eds. Dermatology. 3rd ed. Hong Kong, China: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:1527-1546.

5. Gianotti F, Caputo R, Ermacora E. Singular infantile histiocytosis with cells with intracytoplasmic vermiform particles [in French]. Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syphiligr. 1971;78:232-233.

6. Barsky B, Lao I, Barsky S, et al. Benign cephalic histiocytosis. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120:650-655.

7. Gianotti F, Caputo R, Ermacora E, et al. Benign cephalic histiocytosis. Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:1038-1043.

8. Zelger BW, Sidoroff A, Orchard G, et al. Non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. a new unifying concept. Am J Dermatopathol. 1996;18:490-504.

9. Hasegawa S, Deguchi M, Chiba-Okada S, et al. Japanese case of benign cephalic histiocytosis. J Dermatol. 2009;36:69-71.

10. Weston WL, Travers SH, Mierau GW, et al. Benign cephalic histiocytosis with diabetes insipidus. Pediatr Dermatol. 2000;17:296-298.

11. Gianotti R, Alessi E, Caputo R. Benign cephalic histiocytosis: a distinct entity or a part of a wide spectrum of histiocytic proliferative disorders of children? a histopathological study. Am J Dermatopathol. 1993;15:315-319.

12. Rodriguez-Jurado R, Duran-McKinster C, Ruiz-Maldonado R. Benign cephalic histiocytosis progressing into juvenile xanthogranuloma: a non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis transforming under the influence of a virus? Am J Dermatopathol. 2000;22:70-74.

13. Sidwell RU, Francis N, Slater DN, et al. Is disseminated juvenile xanthogranulomatosis benign cephalic histiocytosis? Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22:40-43.

14. Favara BE, Jaffe R. The histopathology of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Br J Cancer Suppl. 1994;23:S17-S23.

15. Heide R, Beishuizen A, De Groot H, et al. Mastocytosis in children: a protocol for management. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008;25:493-500.

Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Issue
Cutis - 95(6)
Page Number
E15–E17
Page Number
E15–E17
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Benign Cephalic Histiocytosis
Display Headline
Benign Cephalic Histiocytosis
Legacy Keywords
benign cephalic histiocytosis, non-Langerhans histiocytosis, clinical manifestation
Legacy Keywords
benign cephalic histiocytosis, non-Langerhans histiocytosis, clinical manifestation
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media