Photo Challenge

The Diagnosis: Superficial Acral Fibromyxoma

A shave biopsy revealed an uninvolved grenz zone and mildly cellular spindle cell dermal proliferation in a collagenous and myxoid background (Figure 1). Spindle cells were seen in a myxoid background among dense coarse collagen (Figure 2A). Spindle cells also were seen in a myxoid background with mast cells and capillary network (Figure 2B). Histopathologic examination of the biopsy specimen revealed spindle cells that were diffusely positive for CD34 (Figure 3); focally positive for epithelial membrane antigen; and negative for melanocytic markers, smooth muscle markers, and cytokeratin. A diagnosis of superficial acral fibromyxoma (SAFM) was made based on clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical findings.

Superficial acral fibromyxomas, also known as digital fibromyxomas, are soft, slow-growing tumors that have a predilection for subungual or periungual regions of the hands and feet. Superficial acral fibromyxomas most frequently occur on the hallux and rarely occur on the ankle or leg. They can present as nodular, dome-shaped, polyploid, or verrucous masses. They can be soft to firm, gelatinous or solid, off-white to gray-white and can have fasciculate cut surfaces. Superficial acral fibromyxomas can be either painful or painless and present with a deformed nail in 9% of cases. Superficial acral fibromyxoma is a superficial lesion with frequent infiltration of the dermal collagen and subcutaneous tissue and may even erode or infiltrate into the underlying bone in rare cases.^1-4 Although SAFMs are rare tumors, documented cases of SAFM have been reported at an increasing rate since the first published report by Fetsch et al² in 2001.

Patients often delay seeking medical treatment and present with a solitary mass that has been slowly growing for months to years. In a study of 124 patients, Hollmann et al1 found that symptoms exist for a mean of 35 months and present with a small mass with a mean tumor size of 1.7 cm before biopsy or excision. Although the age range is broad, SAFM mostly affects middle-aged adults (median age, 49 years).¹ Hollmann et al1 also reported a male predominance (1.3:1 ratio), and preexisting local trauma is reported in 25% of cases.^2-4

The differential for SAFM should include dermatofibroma, keloid, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, acquired digital fibrokeratoma, infantile digital fibromatosis, neurolemmoma, sclerosing perineurioma, superficial angiomyxoma, low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, and acral myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma.^1-4

Superficial acral fibromyxomas are composed of CD34⁺ spindle or stellate-shaped cells that are embedded in a myxoid and/or dense hyalinized collagenous stroma in a random or loosely fascicular growth pattern. The spindle or stellate-shaped cells in SAFMs also have been found to be focally positive for epithelial membrane antigen and CD99. Lesions have accentuated microvasculature and increased mast cells.^5-8

Conservative management is reasonable, but patients presenting with persistent pain and/or local deformity should be definitively treated with complete excision and follow-up. Hollmann et al¹ found that 24% of tumors recurred locally upon incomplete excision after a mean interval of 27 months. All recurrent tumors had positive margins at excision or initial biopsy.¹ To date, no reports of tumors metastasizing have been documented.^1-4

The Diagnosis: Superficial Acral Fibromyxoma

A shave biopsy revealed an uninvolved grenz zone and mildly cellular spindle cell dermal proliferation in a collagenous and myxoid background (Figure 1). Spindle cells were seen in a myxoid background among dense coarse collagen (Figure 2A). Spindle cells also were seen in a myxoid background with mast cells and capillary network (Figure 2B). Histopathologic examination of the biopsy specimen revealed spindle cells that were diffusely positive for CD34 (Figure 3); focally positive for epithelial membrane antigen; and negative for melanocytic markers, smooth muscle markers, and cytokeratin. A diagnosis of superficial acral fibromyxoma (SAFM) was made based on clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical findings.

Superficial acral fibromyxomas, also known as digital fibromyxomas, are soft, slow-growing tumors that have a predilection for subungual or periungual regions of the hands and feet. Superficial acral fibromyxomas most frequently occur on the hallux and rarely occur on the ankle or leg. They can present as nodular, dome-shaped, polyploid, or verrucous masses. They can be soft to firm, gelatinous or solid, off-white to gray-white and can have fasciculate cut surfaces. Superficial acral fibromyxomas can be either painful or painless and present with a deformed nail in 9% of cases. Superficial acral fibromyxoma is a superficial lesion with frequent infiltration of the dermal collagen and subcutaneous tissue and may even erode or infiltrate into the underlying bone in rare cases.^1-4 Although SAFMs are rare tumors, documented cases of SAFM have been reported at an increasing rate since the first published report by Fetsch et al² in 2001.

Patients often delay seeking medical treatment and present with a solitary mass that has been slowly growing for months to years. In a study of 124 patients, Hollmann et al1 found that symptoms exist for a mean of 35 months and present with a small mass with a mean tumor size of 1.7 cm before biopsy or excision. Although the age range is broad, SAFM mostly affects middle-aged adults (median age, 49 years).¹ Hollmann et al1 also reported a male predominance (1.3:1 ratio), and preexisting local trauma is reported in 25% of cases.^2-4

The differential for SAFM should include dermatofibroma, keloid, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, acquired digital fibrokeratoma, infantile digital fibromatosis, neurolemmoma, sclerosing perineurioma, superficial angiomyxoma, low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, and acral myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma.^1-4

Superficial acral fibromyxomas are composed of CD34⁺ spindle or stellate-shaped cells that are embedded in a myxoid and/or dense hyalinized collagenous stroma in a random or loosely fascicular growth pattern. The spindle or stellate-shaped cells in SAFMs also have been found to be focally positive for epithelial membrane antigen and CD99. Lesions have accentuated microvasculature and increased mast cells.^5-8

Conservative management is reasonable, but patients presenting with persistent pain and/or local deformity should be definitively treated with complete excision and follow-up. Hollmann et al¹ found that 24% of tumors recurred locally upon incomplete excision after a mean interval of 27 months. All recurrent tumors had positive margins at excision or initial biopsy.¹ To date, no reports of tumors metastasizing have been documented.^1-4

The Diagnosis: Superficial Acral Fibromyxoma

A shave biopsy revealed an uninvolved grenz zone and mildly cellular spindle cell dermal proliferation in a collagenous and myxoid background (Figure 1). Spindle cells were seen in a myxoid background among dense coarse collagen (Figure 2A). Spindle cells also were seen in a myxoid background with mast cells and capillary network (Figure 2B). Histopathologic examination of the biopsy specimen revealed spindle cells that were diffusely positive for CD34 (Figure 3); focally positive for epithelial membrane antigen; and negative for melanocytic markers, smooth muscle markers, and cytokeratin. A diagnosis of superficial acral fibromyxoma (SAFM) was made based on clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical findings.

Superficial acral fibromyxomas, also known as digital fibromyxomas, are soft, slow-growing tumors that have a predilection for subungual or periungual regions of the hands and feet. Superficial acral fibromyxomas most frequently occur on the hallux and rarely occur on the ankle or leg. They can present as nodular, dome-shaped, polyploid, or verrucous masses. They can be soft to firm, gelatinous or solid, off-white to gray-white and can have fasciculate cut surfaces. Superficial acral fibromyxomas can be either painful or painless and present with a deformed nail in 9% of cases. Superficial acral fibromyxoma is a superficial lesion with frequent infiltration of the dermal collagen and subcutaneous tissue and may even erode or infiltrate into the underlying bone in rare cases.^1-4 Although SAFMs are rare tumors, documented cases of SAFM have been reported at an increasing rate since the first published report by Fetsch et al² in 2001.

Patients often delay seeking medical treatment and present with a solitary mass that has been slowly growing for months to years. In a study of 124 patients, Hollmann et al1 found that symptoms exist for a mean of 35 months and present with a small mass with a mean tumor size of 1.7 cm before biopsy or excision. Although the age range is broad, SAFM mostly affects middle-aged adults (median age, 49 years).¹ Hollmann et al1 also reported a male predominance (1.3:1 ratio), and preexisting local trauma is reported in 25% of cases.^2-4

The differential for SAFM should include dermatofibroma, keloid, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, acquired digital fibrokeratoma, infantile digital fibromatosis, neurolemmoma, sclerosing perineurioma, superficial angiomyxoma, low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, and acral myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma.^1-4

Superficial acral fibromyxomas are composed of CD34⁺ spindle or stellate-shaped cells that are embedded in a myxoid and/or dense hyalinized collagenous stroma in a random or loosely fascicular growth pattern. The spindle or stellate-shaped cells in SAFMs also have been found to be focally positive for epithelial membrane antigen and CD99. Lesions have accentuated microvasculature and increased mast cells.^5-8

Conservative management is reasonable, but patients presenting with persistent pain and/or local deformity should be definitively treated with complete excision and follow-up. Hollmann et al¹ found that 24% of tumors recurred locally upon incomplete excision after a mean interval of 27 months. All recurrent tumors had positive margins at excision or initial biopsy.¹ To date, no reports of tumors metastasizing have been documented.^1-4

The Diagnosis: Corticosteroid-Induced Hypopigmentation

This patient received several intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide once monthly for treatment of the keloid scar on the left ear at an outside institution. There was improvement in the size of the keloid over time. On physical examination during the most recent visit there was a prominent streak of hypopigmentation and atrophy near the corticosteroid injection site with extension to the postauricular region. There also was telangiectasia noted within the area of hypopigmentation. Intralesional triamcinolone injections were discontinued and the patient was advised to return for monitoring.

Intra-articular and intralesional corticosteroid injections frequently are used by clinicians. Cutaneous complications associated with these injections include atrophy, pigmentary changes, hypersensitivity reactions, flushing, cellulitis, and necrotizing fasciitis. Tendon rupture also has been reported.¹

There are several case reports in the literature describing hypopigmentation and/or subcutaneous atrophy after intralesional or intra-articular corticosteroid injections. A variety of underlying conditions were treated including alopecia areata, keloids, rheumatoid arthritis, de Quervain tendonitis, and psoriasis.^2-6 The lesions typically are described as linear rays of atrophy and hypopigmentation at or near the injection site, with some cases noting extension along lymph channels and proximal veins.^4,6 There usually is no associated pruritus or pain.³ This phenomenon can be seen after single or multiple injections.^4,6

Extension of hypopigmentation from the site of injection has been postulated to be due to venous or lymphatic uptake.^2,4-6 The mechanism of hypopigmentation is not known. Biopsy of a previously described case showed intact melanocytes along the dermoepidermal junction.² Biopsy from another case revealed a decrease in melanin staining, which suggests a decrease in number or activity of melanocytes.⁴ It was proposed that hypopigmentation was secondary to loss of melanocyte function instead of loss of melanocytes.² Spontaneous improvement or resolution of the hypopigmentation were noted in some cases ranging from 1 month to 1 year after initial presentation, but the hypopigmentation also can be persistent.^3-6

Hypopigmented sarcoidosis and hypopigmented mycosis fungoides, both often present on dark-skinned individuals, are included in the differential diagnosis. Hypopigmented sarcoidosis presents with hypopigmented macules or patches, some with central papules, and hypopigmented mycosis fungoides presents with hypopigmented patches or plaques with fine scale and onset often in childhood or adolescence.^7,8 Morphea can present with an initial inflammatory stage that develops into a sclerotic firm plaque or nodule with hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation.⁹ Vitiligo usually presents with depigmented macules or patches and depigmented hair within the lesion.¹⁰

The Diagnosis: Corticosteroid-Induced Hypopigmentation

This patient received several intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide once monthly for treatment of the keloid scar on the left ear at an outside institution. There was improvement in the size of the keloid over time. On physical examination during the most recent visit there was a prominent streak of hypopigmentation and atrophy near the corticosteroid injection site with extension to the postauricular region. There also was telangiectasia noted within the area of hypopigmentation. Intralesional triamcinolone injections were discontinued and the patient was advised to return for monitoring.

Intra-articular and intralesional corticosteroid injections frequently are used by clinicians. Cutaneous complications associated with these injections include atrophy, pigmentary changes, hypersensitivity reactions, flushing, cellulitis, and necrotizing fasciitis. Tendon rupture also has been reported.¹

There are several case reports in the literature describing hypopigmentation and/or subcutaneous atrophy after intralesional or intra-articular corticosteroid injections. A variety of underlying conditions were treated including alopecia areata, keloids, rheumatoid arthritis, de Quervain tendonitis, and psoriasis.^2-6 The lesions typically are described as linear rays of atrophy and hypopigmentation at or near the injection site, with some cases noting extension along lymph channels and proximal veins.^4,6 There usually is no associated pruritus or pain.³ This phenomenon can be seen after single or multiple injections.^4,6

Extension of hypopigmentation from the site of injection has been postulated to be due to venous or lymphatic uptake.^2,4-6 The mechanism of hypopigmentation is not known. Biopsy of a previously described case showed intact melanocytes along the dermoepidermal junction.² Biopsy from another case revealed a decrease in melanin staining, which suggests a decrease in number or activity of melanocytes.⁴ It was proposed that hypopigmentation was secondary to loss of melanocyte function instead of loss of melanocytes.² Spontaneous improvement or resolution of the hypopigmentation were noted in some cases ranging from 1 month to 1 year after initial presentation, but the hypopigmentation also can be persistent.^3-6

Hypopigmented sarcoidosis and hypopigmented mycosis fungoides, both often present on dark-skinned individuals, are included in the differential diagnosis. Hypopigmented sarcoidosis presents with hypopigmented macules or patches, some with central papules, and hypopigmented mycosis fungoides presents with hypopigmented patches or plaques with fine scale and onset often in childhood or adolescence.^7,8 Morphea can present with an initial inflammatory stage that develops into a sclerotic firm plaque or nodule with hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation.⁹ Vitiligo usually presents with depigmented macules or patches and depigmented hair within the lesion.¹⁰

The Diagnosis: Corticosteroid-Induced Hypopigmentation

This patient received several intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide once monthly for treatment of the keloid scar on the left ear at an outside institution. There was improvement in the size of the keloid over time. On physical examination during the most recent visit there was a prominent streak of hypopigmentation and atrophy near the corticosteroid injection site with extension to the postauricular region. There also was telangiectasia noted within the area of hypopigmentation. Intralesional triamcinolone injections were discontinued and the patient was advised to return for monitoring.

Intra-articular and intralesional corticosteroid injections frequently are used by clinicians. Cutaneous complications associated with these injections include atrophy, pigmentary changes, hypersensitivity reactions, flushing, cellulitis, and necrotizing fasciitis. Tendon rupture also has been reported.¹

There are several case reports in the literature describing hypopigmentation and/or subcutaneous atrophy after intralesional or intra-articular corticosteroid injections. A variety of underlying conditions were treated including alopecia areata, keloids, rheumatoid arthritis, de Quervain tendonitis, and psoriasis.^2-6 The lesions typically are described as linear rays of atrophy and hypopigmentation at or near the injection site, with some cases noting extension along lymph channels and proximal veins.^4,6 There usually is no associated pruritus or pain.³ This phenomenon can be seen after single or multiple injections.^4,6

Extension of hypopigmentation from the site of injection has been postulated to be due to venous or lymphatic uptake.^2,4-6 The mechanism of hypopigmentation is not known. Biopsy of a previously described case showed intact melanocytes along the dermoepidermal junction.² Biopsy from another case revealed a decrease in melanin staining, which suggests a decrease in number or activity of melanocytes.⁴ It was proposed that hypopigmentation was secondary to loss of melanocyte function instead of loss of melanocytes.² Spontaneous improvement or resolution of the hypopigmentation were noted in some cases ranging from 1 month to 1 year after initial presentation, but the hypopigmentation also can be persistent.^3-6

Hypopigmented sarcoidosis and hypopigmented mycosis fungoides, both often present on dark-skinned individuals, are included in the differential diagnosis. Hypopigmented sarcoidosis presents with hypopigmented macules or patches, some with central papules, and hypopigmented mycosis fungoides presents with hypopigmented patches or plaques with fine scale and onset often in childhood or adolescence.^7,8 Morphea can present with an initial inflammatory stage that develops into a sclerotic firm plaque or nodule with hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation.⁹ Vitiligo usually presents with depigmented macules or patches and depigmented hair within the lesion.¹⁰

The Diagnosis: Primary Syphilitic Chancre of the Nipple

Because laboratory investigation was negative, a primary syphilitic chancre was suspected based on clinical findings, which was confirmed by a positive rapid plasma reagin with a titer of 1:32 and a positive Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay. Results were negative for human immunodeficiency virus. On further inquiry, the patient acknowledged that the right areola had been traumatized during sexual activity with his regular male partner 1 month prior. In the last year he reported having had 5 different male partners. He was treated with a single dose of 2.4 million IU of intramuscular benzathine penicillin. Screening for other sexually transmitted infections revealed concomitant gonococcal infection of the pharynx and chlamydia proctitis, both of which were subsequently treated. On follow-up 2 weeks after presentation the ulcer had resolved, and he currently is undergoing serial rapid plasma reagin titer monitoring.

Primary syphilitic chancres can occur at any mucocutaneous site of inoculation, most frequently on the genitalia.¹ Classically, after an incubation period of 9 to 90 days, a painless indurated ulcer forms² and heals spontaneously after 3 to 6 weeks if left untreated.³ Chancres at extragenital sites are uncommon, occurring in approximately 2% of patients with primary syphilis.¹ Of them, common sites include the lips and mouth (40%-70%),⁴ with areolar involvement rarely being reported. A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms nipple and chancre revealed 9 case reports in the English-language literature, with the first 2 cases being reported by Lee et al⁵ in 2006. The characteristics of these cases and our patient are summarized in the Table.^5-12

Oral contact or traumatization of the nipple by the patient's sexual partner was reported in all but one of these cases^5-10,12; trauma was unknown in one case.¹¹ Our patient reported a similar history of trauma to the nipple. It is known that transmission of syphilis can take place via kissing or oral contact, and it has been asserted that oral syphilitic lesions are highly infectious.¹³ Syphilis also can be transmitted by an already infected sexual partner sustaining minor trauma at the oral mucosa, allowing Treponema pallidum from the bloodstream to be inoculated onto the nipple. Another explanation for transmission could be the Koebner phenomenon, whereby trauma at the nipple of an already infected patient could lead to the formation of a chancre.^6,8

The differential diagnosis includes erosive adenomatosis of the nipple, nipple eczema, Paget disease of the breast, and ulcerated basal cell carcinoma. Erosive adenomatosis of the nipple is a benign tumor of unilateral involvement that presents as an asymptomatic eroded/ulcerated papule. Clinically, it is similar to Paget disease of the breast. Eczema of the nipple usually is associated with pruritus and epidermal changes such as scaling.^7,8 Paget disease of the breast arises from the extension of breast ductal carcinoma in situ onto the skin overlying the nipple. It can present as a unilateral nipple plaque with ulceration and bloody discharge. The diagnoses of erosive adenomatosis and Paget disease are confirmed with histologic examination. Basal cell carcinoma is the most common nonmelanoma skin cancer and can present as an ulcerated plaque, often with rolled borders, pearly edges, and overlying telangiectasia. It is known to be locally invasive. A punch biopsy and histopathologic examination would confirm the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma.¹⁴

Extragenital chancres, especially those occurring at unusual sites, are uncommon. Therefore, a high index of suspicion is required to diagnose and initiate appropriate treatment for these patients.

The Diagnosis: Primary Syphilitic Chancre of the Nipple

Because laboratory investigation was negative, a primary syphilitic chancre was suspected based on clinical findings, which was confirmed by a positive rapid plasma reagin with a titer of 1:32 and a positive Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay. Results were negative for human immunodeficiency virus. On further inquiry, the patient acknowledged that the right areola had been traumatized during sexual activity with his regular male partner 1 month prior. In the last year he reported having had 5 different male partners. He was treated with a single dose of 2.4 million IU of intramuscular benzathine penicillin. Screening for other sexually transmitted infections revealed concomitant gonococcal infection of the pharynx and chlamydia proctitis, both of which were subsequently treated. On follow-up 2 weeks after presentation the ulcer had resolved, and he currently is undergoing serial rapid plasma reagin titer monitoring.

Primary syphilitic chancres can occur at any mucocutaneous site of inoculation, most frequently on the genitalia.¹ Classically, after an incubation period of 9 to 90 days, a painless indurated ulcer forms² and heals spontaneously after 3 to 6 weeks if left untreated.³ Chancres at extragenital sites are uncommon, occurring in approximately 2% of patients with primary syphilis.¹ Of them, common sites include the lips and mouth (40%-70%),⁴ with areolar involvement rarely being reported. A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms nipple and chancre revealed 9 case reports in the English-language literature, with the first 2 cases being reported by Lee et al⁵ in 2006. The characteristics of these cases and our patient are summarized in the Table.^5-12

Oral contact or traumatization of the nipple by the patient's sexual partner was reported in all but one of these cases^5-10,12; trauma was unknown in one case.¹¹ Our patient reported a similar history of trauma to the nipple. It is known that transmission of syphilis can take place via kissing or oral contact, and it has been asserted that oral syphilitic lesions are highly infectious.¹³ Syphilis also can be transmitted by an already infected sexual partner sustaining minor trauma at the oral mucosa, allowing Treponema pallidum from the bloodstream to be inoculated onto the nipple. Another explanation for transmission could be the Koebner phenomenon, whereby trauma at the nipple of an already infected patient could lead to the formation of a chancre.^6,8

The differential diagnosis includes erosive adenomatosis of the nipple, nipple eczema, Paget disease of the breast, and ulcerated basal cell carcinoma. Erosive adenomatosis of the nipple is a benign tumor of unilateral involvement that presents as an asymptomatic eroded/ulcerated papule. Clinically, it is similar to Paget disease of the breast. Eczema of the nipple usually is associated with pruritus and epidermal changes such as scaling.^7,8 Paget disease of the breast arises from the extension of breast ductal carcinoma in situ onto the skin overlying the nipple. It can present as a unilateral nipple plaque with ulceration and bloody discharge. The diagnoses of erosive adenomatosis and Paget disease are confirmed with histologic examination. Basal cell carcinoma is the most common nonmelanoma skin cancer and can present as an ulcerated plaque, often with rolled borders, pearly edges, and overlying telangiectasia. It is known to be locally invasive. A punch biopsy and histopathologic examination would confirm the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma.¹⁴

Extragenital chancres, especially those occurring at unusual sites, are uncommon. Therefore, a high index of suspicion is required to diagnose and initiate appropriate treatment for these patients.

The Diagnosis: Primary Syphilitic Chancre of the Nipple

Because laboratory investigation was negative, a primary syphilitic chancre was suspected based on clinical findings, which was confirmed by a positive rapid plasma reagin with a titer of 1:32 and a positive Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay. Results were negative for human immunodeficiency virus. On further inquiry, the patient acknowledged that the right areola had been traumatized during sexual activity with his regular male partner 1 month prior. In the last year he reported having had 5 different male partners. He was treated with a single dose of 2.4 million IU of intramuscular benzathine penicillin. Screening for other sexually transmitted infections revealed concomitant gonococcal infection of the pharynx and chlamydia proctitis, both of which were subsequently treated. On follow-up 2 weeks after presentation the ulcer had resolved, and he currently is undergoing serial rapid plasma reagin titer monitoring.

Primary syphilitic chancres can occur at any mucocutaneous site of inoculation, most frequently on the genitalia.¹ Classically, after an incubation period of 9 to 90 days, a painless indurated ulcer forms² and heals spontaneously after 3 to 6 weeks if left untreated.³ Chancres at extragenital sites are uncommon, occurring in approximately 2% of patients with primary syphilis.¹ Of them, common sites include the lips and mouth (40%-70%),⁴ with areolar involvement rarely being reported. A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms nipple and chancre revealed 9 case reports in the English-language literature, with the first 2 cases being reported by Lee et al⁵ in 2006. The characteristics of these cases and our patient are summarized in the Table.^5-12

Oral contact or traumatization of the nipple by the patient's sexual partner was reported in all but one of these cases^5-10,12; trauma was unknown in one case.¹¹ Our patient reported a similar history of trauma to the nipple. It is known that transmission of syphilis can take place via kissing or oral contact, and it has been asserted that oral syphilitic lesions are highly infectious.¹³ Syphilis also can be transmitted by an already infected sexual partner sustaining minor trauma at the oral mucosa, allowing Treponema pallidum from the bloodstream to be inoculated onto the nipple. Another explanation for transmission could be the Koebner phenomenon, whereby trauma at the nipple of an already infected patient could lead to the formation of a chancre.^6,8

The differential diagnosis includes erosive adenomatosis of the nipple, nipple eczema, Paget disease of the breast, and ulcerated basal cell carcinoma. Erosive adenomatosis of the nipple is a benign tumor of unilateral involvement that presents as an asymptomatic eroded/ulcerated papule. Clinically, it is similar to Paget disease of the breast. Eczema of the nipple usually is associated with pruritus and epidermal changes such as scaling.^7,8 Paget disease of the breast arises from the extension of breast ductal carcinoma in situ onto the skin overlying the nipple. It can present as a unilateral nipple plaque with ulceration and bloody discharge. The diagnoses of erosive adenomatosis and Paget disease are confirmed with histologic examination. Basal cell carcinoma is the most common nonmelanoma skin cancer and can present as an ulcerated plaque, often with rolled borders, pearly edges, and overlying telangiectasia. It is known to be locally invasive. A punch biopsy and histopathologic examination would confirm the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma.¹⁴

Extragenital chancres, especially those occurring at unusual sites, are uncommon. Therefore, a high index of suspicion is required to diagnose and initiate appropriate treatment for these patients.

The Diagnosis: Circumscribed Palmar Hypokeratosis

Circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis is a rare, benign, acquired dermatosis that was first described by Pérez et al¹ in 2002 and is characterized by annular plaques with an atrophic center and hyperkeratotic edges. Classically, the lesions present on the thenar and hypothenar eminences of the palms.² The condition predominantly affects women (4:1 ratio), with a mean age of onset of 65 years.³

Although the pathogenesis of circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis is unknown, local trauma generally is considered to be the causative factor. Other hypotheses include human papillomaviruses 4 and 6 infection and primary abnormal keratinization in the epidermis.³ Immunohistochemical studies have demonstrated increased expression of keratin 16 and Ki-67 in cutaneous lesions, which is postulated to be responsible for keratinocyte fragility associated with epidermal hyperproliferation. Other reported cases have shown diminished keratin 9, keratin 2e, and connexin 26 expression, which normally are abundant in the acral epidermis. Abnormal expression of antigens associated with epidermal proliferation and differentiation also have been reported,³ suggesting that there is an altered regulation of the cutaneous desquamation process.

Histologically, circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis is characterized by an abrupt reduction in the stratum corneum (Figure), forming a step between the lesion and the perilesional normal skin.^2,3 The clinical appearance of erythema is due to visualization of dermal blood circulation in the area of corneal thinning and is not a result of vasodilation. The dermis is uninvolved, and inflammation is absent. The differential diagnosis includes psoriasis, Bowen disease, porokeratosis, and dermatophytosis.³

Circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis is a chronic condition, and there are no known reports of development of malignancy. Treatment is not required but may include cryotherapy; topical therapy with corticosteroids, retinoids, urea, and calcipotriene; and photodynamic therapy. Circumscribed hypokeratosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of palmar lesions.

The Diagnosis: Circumscribed Palmar Hypokeratosis

Circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis is a rare, benign, acquired dermatosis that was first described by Pérez et al¹ in 2002 and is characterized by annular plaques with an atrophic center and hyperkeratotic edges. Classically, the lesions present on the thenar and hypothenar eminences of the palms.² The condition predominantly affects women (4:1 ratio), with a mean age of onset of 65 years.³

Although the pathogenesis of circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis is unknown, local trauma generally is considered to be the causative factor. Other hypotheses include human papillomaviruses 4 and 6 infection and primary abnormal keratinization in the epidermis.³ Immunohistochemical studies have demonstrated increased expression of keratin 16 and Ki-67 in cutaneous lesions, which is postulated to be responsible for keratinocyte fragility associated with epidermal hyperproliferation. Other reported cases have shown diminished keratin 9, keratin 2e, and connexin 26 expression, which normally are abundant in the acral epidermis. Abnormal expression of antigens associated with epidermal proliferation and differentiation also have been reported,³ suggesting that there is an altered regulation of the cutaneous desquamation process.

Histologically, circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis is characterized by an abrupt reduction in the stratum corneum (Figure), forming a step between the lesion and the perilesional normal skin.^2,3 The clinical appearance of erythema is due to visualization of dermal blood circulation in the area of corneal thinning and is not a result of vasodilation. The dermis is uninvolved, and inflammation is absent. The differential diagnosis includes psoriasis, Bowen disease, porokeratosis, and dermatophytosis.³

Circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis is a chronic condition, and there are no known reports of development of malignancy. Treatment is not required but may include cryotherapy; topical therapy with corticosteroids, retinoids, urea, and calcipotriene; and photodynamic therapy. Circumscribed hypokeratosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of palmar lesions.

The Diagnosis: Circumscribed Palmar Hypokeratosis

Circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis is a rare, benign, acquired dermatosis that was first described by Pérez et al¹ in 2002 and is characterized by annular plaques with an atrophic center and hyperkeratotic edges. Classically, the lesions present on the thenar and hypothenar eminences of the palms.² The condition predominantly affects women (4:1 ratio), with a mean age of onset of 65 years.³

Although the pathogenesis of circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis is unknown, local trauma generally is considered to be the causative factor. Other hypotheses include human papillomaviruses 4 and 6 infection and primary abnormal keratinization in the epidermis.³ Immunohistochemical studies have demonstrated increased expression of keratin 16 and Ki-67 in cutaneous lesions, which is postulated to be responsible for keratinocyte fragility associated with epidermal hyperproliferation. Other reported cases have shown diminished keratin 9, keratin 2e, and connexin 26 expression, which normally are abundant in the acral epidermis. Abnormal expression of antigens associated with epidermal proliferation and differentiation also have been reported,³ suggesting that there is an altered regulation of the cutaneous desquamation process.

Histologically, circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis is characterized by an abrupt reduction in the stratum corneum (Figure), forming a step between the lesion and the perilesional normal skin.^2,3 The clinical appearance of erythema is due to visualization of dermal blood circulation in the area of corneal thinning and is not a result of vasodilation. The dermis is uninvolved, and inflammation is absent. The differential diagnosis includes psoriasis, Bowen disease, porokeratosis, and dermatophytosis.³

Circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis is a chronic condition, and there are no known reports of development of malignancy. Treatment is not required but may include cryotherapy; topical therapy with corticosteroids, retinoids, urea, and calcipotriene; and photodynamic therapy. Circumscribed hypokeratosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of palmar lesions.

The Diagnosis: Cutaneous Crohn Disease

A punch biopsy of the vulvar skin revealed epidermal hyperplasia with moderate spongiosis and exocytosis of lymphocytes and neutrophils in the epidermis. A brisk mixed inflammatory infiltrate of epithelioid histiocytes, multinucleate foreign body-type giant cells, lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils in a granulomatous pattern also were present in the dermis (Figure). Periodic acid-Schiff and acid-fast bacillus stains were negative. Given the history of Crohn disease (CD) and the characteristic dermal noncaseating granulomas on histology, the patient was diagnosed with cutaneous CD.

Although the patient was offered a topical corticosteroid, she deferred topical therapy. Given the lack of response to adalimumab, the gastroenterology department switched the patient to a treatment of infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks. Azathioprine was discontinued and the patient was switched to intramuscular methotrexate 25 mg/mL weekly. Slow reepithelialization of the vulvar and perianal erosions occurred on this regimen.

Although CD has numerous cutaneous features, cutaneous CD, also known as metastatic CD, is the rarest cutaneous manifestation of CD.¹ This disease process is characterized by noncaseating granulomatous cutaneous lesions that are not contiguous with the affected gastrointestinal tract.² The pathogenesis of cutaneous CD is unknown. Young adults tend to be more predisposed to developing cutaneous CD, likely due to the age distribution of CD.³

Cutaneous CD commonly presents in patients with a well-established history of gastrointestinal CD but occasionally can be the presenting sign of CD.¹ The most common sites of involvement are the legs, vulva, penis, trunk, face, and intertriginous areas. Cutaneous CD findings can be divided into 2 subgroups: genital and nongenital lesions. Genital findings involve ulceration, erythema, edema, and fissuring of the vulva, labia, clitoris, scrotum, penis, and perineum. Nongenital cutaneous manifestations include ulcers; erythematous papules, plaques, and nodules; abscesslike lesions; and lichenoid papules.^4,5 The severity of cutaneous lesions does not correlate to the severity of gastrointestinal disease; however, colon involvement is more common in patients with cutaneous CD.⁶

Histologically, cutaneous CD presents as noncaseating granulomatous inflammation in the papillary and reticular dermis. These granulomas consist of epithelioid histiocytes and multinucleated giant cells with a lymphocytic infiltrate.⁵

Given the rarity of cutaneous CD, treatment approach is based on anecdotal evidence from case reports and case series. For a single lesion or localized disease, topical superpotent or intralesional steroids are recommended for initial therapy.³ Oral metronidazole also is an effective treatment and can be combined with topical or intralesional steroids.⁷ For disseminated disease, systemic corticosteroids have shown efficacy.³ Other reported treatment options include oral corticosteroids, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, infliximab, and adalimumab. If monotherapy fails, combination therapy may be needed. Surgical debridement may be attempted if medical therapy fails but is complicated by wound dehiscence and disease recurrence.³

Although genital ulcers can be a presentation of Behçet disease and genital herpes infection, genital nodules and plaques are not typical for these 2 diseases. Also, the patient did not have oral ulcers, which is a common feature of Behçet disease. Genital sarcoidosis is extremely rare, and cutaneous CD was more likely given the patient's medical history. Finally, Jacquet dermatitis is more common in children, and patients with this condition typically have history of fecal and urinary incontinence.

The Diagnosis: Cutaneous Crohn Disease

A punch biopsy of the vulvar skin revealed epidermal hyperplasia with moderate spongiosis and exocytosis of lymphocytes and neutrophils in the epidermis. A brisk mixed inflammatory infiltrate of epithelioid histiocytes, multinucleate foreign body-type giant cells, lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils in a granulomatous pattern also were present in the dermis (Figure). Periodic acid-Schiff and acid-fast bacillus stains were negative. Given the history of Crohn disease (CD) and the characteristic dermal noncaseating granulomas on histology, the patient was diagnosed with cutaneous CD.

Although the patient was offered a topical corticosteroid, she deferred topical therapy. Given the lack of response to adalimumab, the gastroenterology department switched the patient to a treatment of infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks. Azathioprine was discontinued and the patient was switched to intramuscular methotrexate 25 mg/mL weekly. Slow reepithelialization of the vulvar and perianal erosions occurred on this regimen.

Although CD has numerous cutaneous features, cutaneous CD, also known as metastatic CD, is the rarest cutaneous manifestation of CD.¹ This disease process is characterized by noncaseating granulomatous cutaneous lesions that are not contiguous with the affected gastrointestinal tract.² The pathogenesis of cutaneous CD is unknown. Young adults tend to be more predisposed to developing cutaneous CD, likely due to the age distribution of CD.³

Cutaneous CD commonly presents in patients with a well-established history of gastrointestinal CD but occasionally can be the presenting sign of CD.¹ The most common sites of involvement are the legs, vulva, penis, trunk, face, and intertriginous areas. Cutaneous CD findings can be divided into 2 subgroups: genital and nongenital lesions. Genital findings involve ulceration, erythema, edema, and fissuring of the vulva, labia, clitoris, scrotum, penis, and perineum. Nongenital cutaneous manifestations include ulcers; erythematous papules, plaques, and nodules; abscesslike lesions; and lichenoid papules.^4,5 The severity of cutaneous lesions does not correlate to the severity of gastrointestinal disease; however, colon involvement is more common in patients with cutaneous CD.⁶

Histologically, cutaneous CD presents as noncaseating granulomatous inflammation in the papillary and reticular dermis. These granulomas consist of epithelioid histiocytes and multinucleated giant cells with a lymphocytic infiltrate.⁵

Given the rarity of cutaneous CD, treatment approach is based on anecdotal evidence from case reports and case series. For a single lesion or localized disease, topical superpotent or intralesional steroids are recommended for initial therapy.³ Oral metronidazole also is an effective treatment and can be combined with topical or intralesional steroids.⁷ For disseminated disease, systemic corticosteroids have shown efficacy.³ Other reported treatment options include oral corticosteroids, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, infliximab, and adalimumab. If monotherapy fails, combination therapy may be needed. Surgical debridement may be attempted if medical therapy fails but is complicated by wound dehiscence and disease recurrence.³

Although genital ulcers can be a presentation of Behçet disease and genital herpes infection, genital nodules and plaques are not typical for these 2 diseases. Also, the patient did not have oral ulcers, which is a common feature of Behçet disease. Genital sarcoidosis is extremely rare, and cutaneous CD was more likely given the patient's medical history. Finally, Jacquet dermatitis is more common in children, and patients with this condition typically have history of fecal and urinary incontinence.

The Diagnosis: Cutaneous Crohn Disease

A punch biopsy of the vulvar skin revealed epidermal hyperplasia with moderate spongiosis and exocytosis of lymphocytes and neutrophils in the epidermis. A brisk mixed inflammatory infiltrate of epithelioid histiocytes, multinucleate foreign body-type giant cells, lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils in a granulomatous pattern also were present in the dermis (Figure). Periodic acid-Schiff and acid-fast bacillus stains were negative. Given the history of Crohn disease (CD) and the characteristic dermal noncaseating granulomas on histology, the patient was diagnosed with cutaneous CD.

Although the patient was offered a topical corticosteroid, she deferred topical therapy. Given the lack of response to adalimumab, the gastroenterology department switched the patient to a treatment of infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks. Azathioprine was discontinued and the patient was switched to intramuscular methotrexate 25 mg/mL weekly. Slow reepithelialization of the vulvar and perianal erosions occurred on this regimen.

Although CD has numerous cutaneous features, cutaneous CD, also known as metastatic CD, is the rarest cutaneous manifestation of CD.¹ This disease process is characterized by noncaseating granulomatous cutaneous lesions that are not contiguous with the affected gastrointestinal tract.² The pathogenesis of cutaneous CD is unknown. Young adults tend to be more predisposed to developing cutaneous CD, likely due to the age distribution of CD.³

Cutaneous CD commonly presents in patients with a well-established history of gastrointestinal CD but occasionally can be the presenting sign of CD.¹ The most common sites of involvement are the legs, vulva, penis, trunk, face, and intertriginous areas. Cutaneous CD findings can be divided into 2 subgroups: genital and nongenital lesions. Genital findings involve ulceration, erythema, edema, and fissuring of the vulva, labia, clitoris, scrotum, penis, and perineum. Nongenital cutaneous manifestations include ulcers; erythematous papules, plaques, and nodules; abscesslike lesions; and lichenoid papules.^4,5 The severity of cutaneous lesions does not correlate to the severity of gastrointestinal disease; however, colon involvement is more common in patients with cutaneous CD.⁶

Histologically, cutaneous CD presents as noncaseating granulomatous inflammation in the papillary and reticular dermis. These granulomas consist of epithelioid histiocytes and multinucleated giant cells with a lymphocytic infiltrate.⁵

Given the rarity of cutaneous CD, treatment approach is based on anecdotal evidence from case reports and case series. For a single lesion or localized disease, topical superpotent or intralesional steroids are recommended for initial therapy.³ Oral metronidazole also is an effective treatment and can be combined with topical or intralesional steroids.⁷ For disseminated disease, systemic corticosteroids have shown efficacy.³ Other reported treatment options include oral corticosteroids, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, infliximab, and adalimumab. If monotherapy fails, combination therapy may be needed. Surgical debridement may be attempted if medical therapy fails but is complicated by wound dehiscence and disease recurrence.³

Although genital ulcers can be a presentation of Behçet disease and genital herpes infection, genital nodules and plaques are not typical for these 2 diseases. Also, the patient did not have oral ulcers, which is a common feature of Behçet disease. Genital sarcoidosis is extremely rare, and cutaneous CD was more likely given the patient's medical history. Finally, Jacquet dermatitis is more common in children, and patients with this condition typically have history of fecal and urinary incontinence.

The Diagnosis: Annular Psoriasis

Because the patient's history was nonconcordant with the clinical appearance, a 4-mm punch biopsy was performed from a lesion on the left hip. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections demonstrated mild irregular acanthosis of the epidermis with discrete mounds of parakeratin (Figure 1A). Higher power revealed numerous neutrophils entrapped within focal scale crusts (Figure 1B). Periodic acid-Schiff stain for fungus demonstrated no hyphal elements or yeast forms in the stratum corneum. These histopathology findings were consistent with the diagnosis of annular psoriasis.

The manifestation of psoriasis may take many forms, ranging from classic plaques to pustular eruptions--either annular or generalized--and erythroderma. Primarily annular plaque-type psoriasis without pustules, however, remains an uncommon finding.¹ Psoriatic plaques may become annular or arcuate with central clearing from partial treatment with topical medications, though our patient reported annular plaques prior to any treatment. His presentation was notably different than annular pustular psoriasis in that there were no pustules in the leading edge, and there was no trailing scale, which is typical of annular pustular psoriasis.

Topical triamcinolone prescribed at the initial presentation to the dermatology department helped with pruritus, but due to the large body surface area involved, methotrexate later was initiated. After a 10-mg test dose of methotrexate and titration to 15 mg weekly, dramatic improvement in the rash was noted after 8 weeks. As the rash resolved, only faint hyperpigmented patches remained (Figure 2).

Erythema gyratum repens is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome that presents with annular scaly plaques with concentric circles with a wood grain-like appearance. The borders can advance up to 1 cm daily and show nonspecific findings on histopathology.² Due to the observation that approximately 80% of cases of erythema gyratum repens were associated with an underlying malignancy, most often of the lung,³ this diagnosis was entertained given our patient's clinical presentation.

Erythema annulare centrifugum (EAC) historically has been divided into 2 forms: superficial and deep.⁴ Both present with slowly expanding, annular, pink plaques. Superficial EAC demonstrates parakeratosis and trailing scale and has not been proven to be associated with other systemic diseases, while deep EAC has infiltrated borders without scale, and many cases of EAC may represent annular forms of tumid lupus.⁴ Inflammatory cells may cuff vessels tightly, resulting in so-called coat sleeve infiltrate in superficial EAC. Along with trailing scale, this finding suggests the diagnosis. It has been argued that EAC is not an entity on its own and should prompt evaluation for lupus erythematosus, dermatitis, hypersensitivity to tinea pedis, and Lyme disease in appropriate circumstances.⁵

Tinea corporis always should be considered when evaluating annular scaly plaques with central clearing. Diagnosis and treatment are straightforward when hyphae are found on microscopy of skin scrapings or seen on periodic acid-Schiff stains of formalin-fixed tissue. Tinea imbricata presents with an interesting morphology and appears more ornate or cerebriform than tinea corporis caused by Trichophyton rubrum. It is caused by infection with Trichophyton circumscriptum and occurs in certain regions in the South Pacific, Southeast Asia, and Central and South America, making the diagnosis within the United States unlikely for a patient who has not traveled to these areas.⁶

Erythema chronicum migrans is diagnostic of Lyme disease infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, and solitary lesions occur surrounding the site of a tick bite in the majority of patients. Only 20% of patients will develop multiple lesions consistent with erythema chronicum migrans due to multiple tick bites, spirochetemia, or lymphatic spread.⁷ Up to one-third of patients are unaware that they were bitten by a tick. In endemic areas, this diagnosis must be entertained in any patient presenting with an annular rash, as treatment may prevent notable morbidity.

The Diagnosis: Annular Psoriasis

Because the patient's history was nonconcordant with the clinical appearance, a 4-mm punch biopsy was performed from a lesion on the left hip. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections demonstrated mild irregular acanthosis of the epidermis with discrete mounds of parakeratin (Figure 1A). Higher power revealed numerous neutrophils entrapped within focal scale crusts (Figure 1B). Periodic acid-Schiff stain for fungus demonstrated no hyphal elements or yeast forms in the stratum corneum. These histopathology findings were consistent with the diagnosis of annular psoriasis.

The manifestation of psoriasis may take many forms, ranging from classic plaques to pustular eruptions--either annular or generalized--and erythroderma. Primarily annular plaque-type psoriasis without pustules, however, remains an uncommon finding.¹ Psoriatic plaques may become annular or arcuate with central clearing from partial treatment with topical medications, though our patient reported annular plaques prior to any treatment. His presentation was notably different than annular pustular psoriasis in that there were no pustules in the leading edge, and there was no trailing scale, which is typical of annular pustular psoriasis.

Topical triamcinolone prescribed at the initial presentation to the dermatology department helped with pruritus, but due to the large body surface area involved, methotrexate later was initiated. After a 10-mg test dose of methotrexate and titration to 15 mg weekly, dramatic improvement in the rash was noted after 8 weeks. As the rash resolved, only faint hyperpigmented patches remained (Figure 2).

Erythema gyratum repens is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome that presents with annular scaly plaques with concentric circles with a wood grain-like appearance. The borders can advance up to 1 cm daily and show nonspecific findings on histopathology.² Due to the observation that approximately 80% of cases of erythema gyratum repens were associated with an underlying malignancy, most often of the lung,³ this diagnosis was entertained given our patient's clinical presentation.

Erythema annulare centrifugum (EAC) historically has been divided into 2 forms: superficial and deep.⁴ Both present with slowly expanding, annular, pink plaques. Superficial EAC demonstrates parakeratosis and trailing scale and has not been proven to be associated with other systemic diseases, while deep EAC has infiltrated borders without scale, and many cases of EAC may represent annular forms of tumid lupus.⁴ Inflammatory cells may cuff vessels tightly, resulting in so-called coat sleeve infiltrate in superficial EAC. Along with trailing scale, this finding suggests the diagnosis. It has been argued that EAC is not an entity on its own and should prompt evaluation for lupus erythematosus, dermatitis, hypersensitivity to tinea pedis, and Lyme disease in appropriate circumstances.⁵

Tinea corporis always should be considered when evaluating annular scaly plaques with central clearing. Diagnosis and treatment are straightforward when hyphae are found on microscopy of skin scrapings or seen on periodic acid-Schiff stains of formalin-fixed tissue. Tinea imbricata presents with an interesting morphology and appears more ornate or cerebriform than tinea corporis caused by Trichophyton rubrum. It is caused by infection with Trichophyton circumscriptum and occurs in certain regions in the South Pacific, Southeast Asia, and Central and South America, making the diagnosis within the United States unlikely for a patient who has not traveled to these areas.⁶

Erythema chronicum migrans is diagnostic of Lyme disease infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, and solitary lesions occur surrounding the site of a tick bite in the majority of patients. Only 20% of patients will develop multiple lesions consistent with erythema chronicum migrans due to multiple tick bites, spirochetemia, or lymphatic spread.⁷ Up to one-third of patients are unaware that they were bitten by a tick. In endemic areas, this diagnosis must be entertained in any patient presenting with an annular rash, as treatment may prevent notable morbidity.

The Diagnosis: Annular Psoriasis

Because the patient's history was nonconcordant with the clinical appearance, a 4-mm punch biopsy was performed from a lesion on the left hip. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections demonstrated mild irregular acanthosis of the epidermis with discrete mounds of parakeratin (Figure 1A). Higher power revealed numerous neutrophils entrapped within focal scale crusts (Figure 1B). Periodic acid-Schiff stain for fungus demonstrated no hyphal elements or yeast forms in the stratum corneum. These histopathology findings were consistent with the diagnosis of annular psoriasis.

The manifestation of psoriasis may take many forms, ranging from classic plaques to pustular eruptions--either annular or generalized--and erythroderma. Primarily annular plaque-type psoriasis without pustules, however, remains an uncommon finding.¹ Psoriatic plaques may become annular or arcuate with central clearing from partial treatment with topical medications, though our patient reported annular plaques prior to any treatment. His presentation was notably different than annular pustular psoriasis in that there were no pustules in the leading edge, and there was no trailing scale, which is typical of annular pustular psoriasis.

Topical triamcinolone prescribed at the initial presentation to the dermatology department helped with pruritus, but due to the large body surface area involved, methotrexate later was initiated. After a 10-mg test dose of methotrexate and titration to 15 mg weekly, dramatic improvement in the rash was noted after 8 weeks. As the rash resolved, only faint hyperpigmented patches remained (Figure 2).

Erythema gyratum repens is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome that presents with annular scaly plaques with concentric circles with a wood grain-like appearance. The borders can advance up to 1 cm daily and show nonspecific findings on histopathology.² Due to the observation that approximately 80% of cases of erythema gyratum repens were associated with an underlying malignancy, most often of the lung,³ this diagnosis was entertained given our patient's clinical presentation.

Erythema annulare centrifugum (EAC) historically has been divided into 2 forms: superficial and deep.⁴ Both present with slowly expanding, annular, pink plaques. Superficial EAC demonstrates parakeratosis and trailing scale and has not been proven to be associated with other systemic diseases, while deep EAC has infiltrated borders without scale, and many cases of EAC may represent annular forms of tumid lupus.⁴ Inflammatory cells may cuff vessels tightly, resulting in so-called coat sleeve infiltrate in superficial EAC. Along with trailing scale, this finding suggests the diagnosis. It has been argued that EAC is not an entity on its own and should prompt evaluation for lupus erythematosus, dermatitis, hypersensitivity to tinea pedis, and Lyme disease in appropriate circumstances.⁵

Tinea corporis always should be considered when evaluating annular scaly plaques with central clearing. Diagnosis and treatment are straightforward when hyphae are found on microscopy of skin scrapings or seen on periodic acid-Schiff stains of formalin-fixed tissue. Tinea imbricata presents with an interesting morphology and appears more ornate or cerebriform than tinea corporis caused by Trichophyton rubrum. It is caused by infection with Trichophyton circumscriptum and occurs in certain regions in the South Pacific, Southeast Asia, and Central and South America, making the diagnosis within the United States unlikely for a patient who has not traveled to these areas.⁶

Erythema chronicum migrans is diagnostic of Lyme disease infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, and solitary lesions occur surrounding the site of a tick bite in the majority of patients. Only 20% of patients will develop multiple lesions consistent with erythema chronicum migrans due to multiple tick bites, spirochetemia, or lymphatic spread.⁷ Up to one-third of patients are unaware that they were bitten by a tick. In endemic areas, this diagnosis must be entertained in any patient presenting with an annular rash, as treatment may prevent notable morbidity.

The Diagnosis: Wells Syndrome

A punch biopsy taken from the perimeter of the lesion demonstrated mild spongiosis overlying a dense nodular to diffuse infiltrate of lymphocytes, neutrophils, and numerous eosinophils, some involving underlying fat lobules (Figure, A and B). In some areas, eosinophilic degeneration of collagen bundles surrounded by a rim of histiocytes, "flame features," were observed (Figure C). The clinical and histological features were consistent with Wells syndrome (WS), also known as eosinophilic cellulitis. Given the localized mild nature of the disease, the patient was started on a midpotency topical corticosteroid.

Wells syndrome is a rare inflammatory condition characterized by clinical polymorphism, suggestive histologic findings, and a recurrent course.^1,2 This condition is especially rare in children.^3,4 Caputo et al1 described 7 variants in their case series of 19 patients: classic plaque-type variant (the most common clinical presentation in children); annular granuloma-like (the most common clinical presentation in adults); urticarialike; bullous; papulonodular; papulovesicular; and fixed drug eruption-like. Wells syndrome is thought to result from excess production of IL-5 in response to a hypersensitivity reaction to an exogenous or endogenous circulating antigen.^3,4 Increased levels of IL-5 enhance eosinophil accumulation in the skin, degranulation, and subsequent tissue destruction.^3,4 Reported triggers include insect bites, viral and bacterial infections, drug eruptions, recent vaccination, and paraphenylenediamine in henna tattoos.^3-7 Additionally, WS has been reported in the setting of gastrointestinal pathologies, such as celiac disease and ulcerative colitis, and with asthma exacerbations.^8,9 However, in half of pediatric cases, no trigger can be identified.⁷

Clinically, WS presents with pruritic, mildly tender plaques.⁷ Lesions may be localized or diffuse and range from mild annular or circinate plaques with infiltrated borders to cellulitic-appearing lesions that are occasionally associated with bullae.^5,6 Patients often report prodromal symptoms of burning and pruritus.^5,6 Lesions rapidly progress over 2 to 3 days, pass through a blue grayish discoloration phase, and gradually resolve over 2 to 8 weeks.^5,6,10 Although patients generally heal without scarring, WS lesions have been described to resolve with atrophy and hyperpigmentation resembling morphea.^5-7 Additionally, patients typically experience a relapsing remitting course over months to years with eventual spontaneous resolution.^1,5 Patients also may experience systemic symptoms including fever, lymphadenopathy, and arthralgia, though they do not develop more widespread systemic manifestations.^2,3,7

Diagnosis of WS is based on clinicopathologic correlation. Histopathology of WS lesions demonstrates 3 phases. The acute phase demonstrates edema of the superficial and mid dermis with a dense dermal eosinophilic infiltrate.^1,6,10 The subacute granulomatous phase demonstrates flame figures in the dermis.^1,2,6,7,10 Flame figures consist of palisading groups of eosinophils and histiocytes around a core of degenerating basophilic collagen bundles associated with major basic protein.^1,2,6,7,10 Finally, in the resolution phase, eosinophils gradually disappear while histiocytes and giant cells persist, forming microgranulomas.^1,2,10 Notably, no vasculitis is observed and direct immunofluorescence is negative.^3,7 Although flame figures are suggestive of WS, they are not pathognomonic and are observed in other conditions including Churg-Strauss syndrome, parasitic and fungal infections, herpes gestationis, bullous pemphigoid, and follicular mucinosis.^2,5

Wells syndrome is a self-resolving and benign condition.^1,10 Physicians are recommended to gather a complete history including review of medications and vaccinations; a history of insect bites, infections, and asthma; laboratory workup consisting of a complete blood cell count with differential and stool samples for ova and parasites; and a skin biopsy if the diagnosis is unclear.⁷ Identification and treatment of underlying causes often results in resolution.⁶ Systemic corticosteroids frequently are used in both adult and pediatric patients, though practitioners should consider alternative treatments when recurrences occur to avoid steroid side effects.^3,6 Midpotency topical corticosteroids present a safe alternative to systemic corticosteroids in the pediatric population, especially in cases of localized WS without systemic symptoms.³ Other medications reported in the literature include cyclosporine, dapsone, antimalarial medications, and azathioprine.⁶ Despite appropriate therapy, patients and physicians should anticipate recurrence over months to years.^1,6

The Diagnosis: Wells Syndrome

A punch biopsy taken from the perimeter of the lesion demonstrated mild spongiosis overlying a dense nodular to diffuse infiltrate of lymphocytes, neutrophils, and numerous eosinophils, some involving underlying fat lobules (Figure, A and B). In some areas, eosinophilic degeneration of collagen bundles surrounded by a rim of histiocytes, "flame features," were observed (Figure C). The clinical and histological features were consistent with Wells syndrome (WS), also known as eosinophilic cellulitis. Given the localized mild nature of the disease, the patient was started on a midpotency topical corticosteroid.

Wells syndrome is a rare inflammatory condition characterized by clinical polymorphism, suggestive histologic findings, and a recurrent course.^1,2 This condition is especially rare in children.^3,4 Caputo et al1 described 7 variants in their case series of 19 patients: classic plaque-type variant (the most common clinical presentation in children); annular granuloma-like (the most common clinical presentation in adults); urticarialike; bullous; papulonodular; papulovesicular; and fixed drug eruption-like. Wells syndrome is thought to result from excess production of IL-5 in response to a hypersensitivity reaction to an exogenous or endogenous circulating antigen.^3,4 Increased levels of IL-5 enhance eosinophil accumulation in the skin, degranulation, and subsequent tissue destruction.^3,4 Reported triggers include insect bites, viral and bacterial infections, drug eruptions, recent vaccination, and paraphenylenediamine in henna tattoos.^3-7 Additionally, WS has been reported in the setting of gastrointestinal pathologies, such as celiac disease and ulcerative colitis, and with asthma exacerbations.^8,9 However, in half of pediatric cases, no trigger can be identified.⁷

Clinically, WS presents with pruritic, mildly tender plaques.⁷ Lesions may be localized or diffuse and range from mild annular or circinate plaques with infiltrated borders to cellulitic-appearing lesions that are occasionally associated with bullae.^5,6 Patients often report prodromal symptoms of burning and pruritus.^5,6 Lesions rapidly progress over 2 to 3 days, pass through a blue grayish discoloration phase, and gradually resolve over 2 to 8 weeks.^5,6,10 Although patients generally heal without scarring, WS lesions have been described to resolve with atrophy and hyperpigmentation resembling morphea.^5-7 Additionally, patients typically experience a relapsing remitting course over months to years with eventual spontaneous resolution.^1,5 Patients also may experience systemic symptoms including fever, lymphadenopathy, and arthralgia, though they do not develop more widespread systemic manifestations.^2,3,7

Diagnosis of WS is based on clinicopathologic correlation. Histopathology of WS lesions demonstrates 3 phases. The acute phase demonstrates edema of the superficial and mid dermis with a dense dermal eosinophilic infiltrate.^1,6,10 The subacute granulomatous phase demonstrates flame figures in the dermis.^1,2,6,7,10 Flame figures consist of palisading groups of eosinophils and histiocytes around a core of degenerating basophilic collagen bundles associated with major basic protein.^1,2,6,7,10 Finally, in the resolution phase, eosinophils gradually disappear while histiocytes and giant cells persist, forming microgranulomas.^1,2,10 Notably, no vasculitis is observed and direct immunofluorescence is negative.^3,7 Although flame figures are suggestive of WS, they are not pathognomonic and are observed in other conditions including Churg-Strauss syndrome, parasitic and fungal infections, herpes gestationis, bullous pemphigoid, and follicular mucinosis.^2,5

Wells syndrome is a self-resolving and benign condition.^1,10 Physicians are recommended to gather a complete history including review of medications and vaccinations; a history of insect bites, infections, and asthma; laboratory workup consisting of a complete blood cell count with differential and stool samples for ova and parasites; and a skin biopsy if the diagnosis is unclear.⁷ Identification and treatment of underlying causes often results in resolution.⁶ Systemic corticosteroids frequently are used in both adult and pediatric patients, though practitioners should consider alternative treatments when recurrences occur to avoid steroid side effects.^3,6 Midpotency topical corticosteroids present a safe alternative to systemic corticosteroids in the pediatric population, especially in cases of localized WS without systemic symptoms.³ Other medications reported in the literature include cyclosporine, dapsone, antimalarial medications, and azathioprine.⁶ Despite appropriate therapy, patients and physicians should anticipate recurrence over months to years.^1,6

The Diagnosis: Wells Syndrome

A punch biopsy taken from the perimeter of the lesion demonstrated mild spongiosis overlying a dense nodular to diffuse infiltrate of lymphocytes, neutrophils, and numerous eosinophils, some involving underlying fat lobules (Figure, A and B). In some areas, eosinophilic degeneration of collagen bundles surrounded by a rim of histiocytes, "flame features," were observed (Figure C). The clinical and histological features were consistent with Wells syndrome (WS), also known as eosinophilic cellulitis. Given the localized mild nature of the disease, the patient was started on a midpotency topical corticosteroid.

Wells syndrome is a rare inflammatory condition characterized by clinical polymorphism, suggestive histologic findings, and a recurrent course.^1,2 This condition is especially rare in children.^3,4 Caputo et al1 described 7 variants in their case series of 19 patients: classic plaque-type variant (the most common clinical presentation in children); annular granuloma-like (the most common clinical presentation in adults); urticarialike; bullous; papulonodular; papulovesicular; and fixed drug eruption-like. Wells syndrome is thought to result from excess production of IL-5 in response to a hypersensitivity reaction to an exogenous or endogenous circulating antigen.^3,4 Increased levels of IL-5 enhance eosinophil accumulation in the skin, degranulation, and subsequent tissue destruction.^3,4 Reported triggers include insect bites, viral and bacterial infections, drug eruptions, recent vaccination, and paraphenylenediamine in henna tattoos.^3-7 Additionally, WS has been reported in the setting of gastrointestinal pathologies, such as celiac disease and ulcerative colitis, and with asthma exacerbations.^8,9 However, in half of pediatric cases, no trigger can be identified.⁷

Clinically, WS presents with pruritic, mildly tender plaques.⁷ Lesions may be localized or diffuse and range from mild annular or circinate plaques with infiltrated borders to cellulitic-appearing lesions that are occasionally associated with bullae.^5,6 Patients often report prodromal symptoms of burning and pruritus.^5,6 Lesions rapidly progress over 2 to 3 days, pass through a blue grayish discoloration phase, and gradually resolve over 2 to 8 weeks.^5,6,10 Although patients generally heal without scarring, WS lesions have been described to resolve with atrophy and hyperpigmentation resembling morphea.^5-7 Additionally, patients typically experience a relapsing remitting course over months to years with eventual spontaneous resolution.^1,5 Patients also may experience systemic symptoms including fever, lymphadenopathy, and arthralgia, though they do not develop more widespread systemic manifestations.^2,3,7

Diagnosis of WS is based on clinicopathologic correlation. Histopathology of WS lesions demonstrates 3 phases. The acute phase demonstrates edema of the superficial and mid dermis with a dense dermal eosinophilic infiltrate.^1,6,10 The subacute granulomatous phase demonstrates flame figures in the dermis.^1,2,6,7,10 Flame figures consist of palisading groups of eosinophils and histiocytes around a core of degenerating basophilic collagen bundles associated with major basic protein.^1,2,6,7,10 Finally, in the resolution phase, eosinophils gradually disappear while histiocytes and giant cells persist, forming microgranulomas.^1,2,10 Notably, no vasculitis is observed and direct immunofluorescence is negative.^3,7 Although flame figures are suggestive of WS, they are not pathognomonic and are observed in other conditions including Churg-Strauss syndrome, parasitic and fungal infections, herpes gestationis, bullous pemphigoid, and follicular mucinosis.^2,5

Wells syndrome is a self-resolving and benign condition.^1,10 Physicians are recommended to gather a complete history including review of medications and vaccinations; a history of insect bites, infections, and asthma; laboratory workup consisting of a complete blood cell count with differential and stool samples for ova and parasites; and a skin biopsy if the diagnosis is unclear.⁷ Identification and treatment of underlying causes often results in resolution.⁶ Systemic corticosteroids frequently are used in both adult and pediatric patients, though practitioners should consider alternative treatments when recurrences occur to avoid steroid side effects.^3,6 Midpotency topical corticosteroids present a safe alternative to systemic corticosteroids in the pediatric population, especially in cases of localized WS without systemic symptoms.³ Other medications reported in the literature include cyclosporine, dapsone, antimalarial medications, and azathioprine.⁶ Despite appropriate therapy, patients and physicians should anticipate recurrence over months to years.^1,6

The Diagnosis: Cutaneous Collagenous Vasculopathy

Histopathologic examination revealed ectatic blood vessels lined with unremarkable endothelial cells and thickened, hyalinized vessel walls scattered within the papillary dermis (Figure 1). The epidermis was unremarkable. There was minimal associated inflammation and no extravasation of erythrocytes. The hyalinized material was weakly positive on periodic acid-Schiff staining (Figure 2) and negative on Congo red staining, which supported of a diagnosis of cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy (CCV).

The patient previously had been given a suspected diagnosis of generalized essential telangiectasia by an outside dermatologist several years prior to the current presentation, as CCV had yet to be recognized as its own entity and therefore few cases had been described in the literature. She had a known history of obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, which are associated with the condition. Multiple specialists concluded that the disease was too extensive for laser treatment. A review of PubMed articles indexed for MEDLINE yielded no established treatment options.

Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy is a rare acquired microangiopathy involving the small vessels of the skin. Its clinical presentation is indistinguishable from that of generalized essential telangiectasia (GET). Patients generally present with asymptomatic, widespread, blanching, symmetric telangiectasias that classically begin on the legs and steadily progress upward with classic sparing of the face (Figure 3). Whereas GET has been reported to involve the oral and conjunctival mucosa, mucosal involvement is not typically observed in CCV and is considered to be a distinguishing factor between the 2 conditions.^1,2 However, our patient reported oral symptoms, and oral erosions were seen on multiple physical examinations; therefore, ours is a rare case of mucosal involvement in conjunction with CCV. Given this finding, it is possible that more cases of CCV with mucosal involvement may exist but have been clinically misdiagnosed as GET.

First described by Salama and Rosenthal³ in 2000, CCV remains a rarely reported entity, with approximately 33 reported cases in the worldwide literature.^2,4-7 The condition typically arises in adults with an equal predilection for males and females.² The true incidence of CCV is unknown and likely is underreported given its close similarities to GET, which often is diagnosed clinically. The unique histopathologic finding of superficial ectatic vascular spaces with eosinophilic hyalinized vessel walls in CCV is key to distinguishing these similar entities, and even this finding can be subtle and is easily overlooked. Inflammation is sparse to absent. Deposited material is positive on periodic acid-Schiff and cytokeratin IV staining (representing reduplicated basement membrane-type collagen) and is diastase resistant. Smooth muscle actin staining is diminished or absent. Ultrastructural examination reveals reduplicated, laminated basement membrane; Luse bodies (abnormally long, widely spaced collagen fibers); and a decrease in or loss of pericytes. Of note, Luse bodies are nonspecific and their absence does not exclude a diagnosis of CCV.¹

The etiology of CCV is unclear, and multiple pathogenetic mechanisms have been proposed. Ultimately, this entity is thought to arise from repeated endothelial cell damage, although the trigger for the endothelial cell injury is not completely understood. Diabetes mellitus sometimes is associated with microangiopathy and may be a confounding but not causative factor in some cases.¹ Some investigators believe CCV is caused by a genetic defect that alters collagen production in the small vessels of the skin.⁵ Others have hypothesized that it is a secondary manifestation of an underlying disease or is associated with a medication; however, no disease or drug has been convincingly implicated in CCV.⁸

Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy is limited to the skin, with no known reports of systemic involvement in the literature.⁷ There are no recommended laboratory studies to aid in diagnosis.¹ It is critical to exclude hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), as these patients can have life-threatening systemic involvement. Patients with CCV generally have no history of a bleeding diathesis, patients with HHT classically report recurrent epistaxis and gastrointestinal bleeding.⁷ A family history of HHT also is helpful for diagnosis, as the condition is autosomal dominant.¹ Neither HHT or telangiectasia macularis eruptiva perstans, which also can be included in the differential diagnosis, demonstrate vessel wall hyalinization. 

Treatment options for CCV are limited. Basso et al⁶ reported notable improvement in a patient with CCV treated with a combined 595-nm pulsed dye laser and 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser and optimized pulsed light. In one patient, treatment with a 585-nm pulsed dye laser produced a blanching response, suggesting that this may be a potential treatment option.⁷ Treatment with sclerotherapy has been ineffective.²

It is critical for both dermatologists and dermatopathologists to recognize and report this newly described entity, as the unique finding of vessel wall hyalinization in CCV may be indicative of a certain pathogenetic mechanism and effective treatment avenue that has yet to be established due to the relatively few number of reports that currently exist in the literature.

The Diagnosis: Cutaneous Collagenous Vasculopathy

Histopathologic examination revealed ectatic blood vessels lined with unremarkable endothelial cells and thickened, hyalinized vessel walls scattered within the papillary dermis (Figure 1). The epidermis was unremarkable. There was minimal associated inflammation and no extravasation of erythrocytes. The hyalinized material was weakly positive on periodic acid-Schiff staining (Figure 2) and negative on Congo red staining, which supported of a diagnosis of cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy (CCV).

The patient previously had been given a suspected diagnosis of generalized essential telangiectasia by an outside dermatologist several years prior to the current presentation, as CCV had yet to be recognized as its own entity and therefore few cases had been described in the literature. She had a known history of obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, which are associated with the condition. Multiple specialists concluded that the disease was too extensive for laser treatment. A review of PubMed articles indexed for MEDLINE yielded no established treatment options.

Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy is a rare acquired microangiopathy involving the small vessels of the skin. Its clinical presentation is indistinguishable from that of generalized essential telangiectasia (GET). Patients generally present with asymptomatic, widespread, blanching, symmetric telangiectasias that classically begin on the legs and steadily progress upward with classic sparing of the face (Figure 3). Whereas GET has been reported to involve the oral and conjunctival mucosa, mucosal involvement is not typically observed in CCV and is considered to be a distinguishing factor between the 2 conditions.^1,2 However, our patient reported oral symptoms, and oral erosions were seen on multiple physical examinations; therefore, ours is a rare case of mucosal involvement in conjunction with CCV. Given this finding, it is possible that more cases of CCV with mucosal involvement may exist but have been clinically misdiagnosed as GET.

First described by Salama and Rosenthal³ in 2000, CCV remains a rarely reported entity, with approximately 33 reported cases in the worldwide literature.^2,4-7 The condition typically arises in adults with an equal predilection for males and females.² The true incidence of CCV is unknown and likely is underreported given its close similarities to GET, which often is diagnosed clinically. The unique histopathologic finding of superficial ectatic vascular spaces with eosinophilic hyalinized vessel walls in CCV is key to distinguishing these similar entities, and even this finding can be subtle and is easily overlooked. Inflammation is sparse to absent. Deposited material is positive on periodic acid-Schiff and cytokeratin IV staining (representing reduplicated basement membrane-type collagen) and is diastase resistant. Smooth muscle actin staining is diminished or absent. Ultrastructural examination reveals reduplicated, laminated basement membrane; Luse bodies (abnormally long, widely spaced collagen fibers); and a decrease in or loss of pericytes. Of note, Luse bodies are nonspecific and their absence does not exclude a diagnosis of CCV.¹

The etiology of CCV is unclear, and multiple pathogenetic mechanisms have been proposed. Ultimately, this entity is thought to arise from repeated endothelial cell damage, although the trigger for the endothelial cell injury is not completely understood. Diabetes mellitus sometimes is associated with microangiopathy and may be a confounding but not causative factor in some cases.¹ Some investigators believe CCV is caused by a genetic defect that alters collagen production in the small vessels of the skin.⁵ Others have hypothesized that it is a secondary manifestation of an underlying disease or is associated with a medication; however, no disease or drug has been convincingly implicated in CCV.⁸

Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy is limited to the skin, with no known reports of systemic involvement in the literature.⁷ There are no recommended laboratory studies to aid in diagnosis.¹ It is critical to exclude hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), as these patients can have life-threatening systemic involvement. Patients with CCV generally have no history of a bleeding diathesis, patients with HHT classically report recurrent epistaxis and gastrointestinal bleeding.⁷ A family history of HHT also is helpful for diagnosis, as the condition is autosomal dominant.¹ Neither HHT or telangiectasia macularis eruptiva perstans, which also can be included in the differential diagnosis, demonstrate vessel wall hyalinization. 

Treatment options for CCV are limited. Basso et al⁶ reported notable improvement in a patient with CCV treated with a combined 595-nm pulsed dye laser and 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser and optimized pulsed light. In one patient, treatment with a 585-nm pulsed dye laser produced a blanching response, suggesting that this may be a potential treatment option.⁷ Treatment with sclerotherapy has been ineffective.²

It is critical for both dermatologists and dermatopathologists to recognize and report this newly described entity, as the unique finding of vessel wall hyalinization in CCV may be indicative of a certain pathogenetic mechanism and effective treatment avenue that has yet to be established due to the relatively few number of reports that currently exist in the literature.

The Diagnosis: Cutaneous Collagenous Vasculopathy

Histopathologic examination revealed ectatic blood vessels lined with unremarkable endothelial cells and thickened, hyalinized vessel walls scattered within the papillary dermis (Figure 1). The epidermis was unremarkable. There was minimal associated inflammation and no extravasation of erythrocytes. The hyalinized material was weakly positive on periodic acid-Schiff staining (Figure 2) and negative on Congo red staining, which supported of a diagnosis of cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy (CCV).

The patient previously had been given a suspected diagnosis of generalized essential telangiectasia by an outside dermatologist several years prior to the current presentation, as CCV had yet to be recognized as its own entity and therefore few cases had been described in the literature. She had a known history of obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, which are associated with the condition. Multiple specialists concluded that the disease was too extensive for laser treatment. A review of PubMed articles indexed for MEDLINE yielded no established treatment options.

Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy is a rare acquired microangiopathy involving the small vessels of the skin. Its clinical presentation is indistinguishable from that of generalized essential telangiectasia (GET). Patients generally present with asymptomatic, widespread, blanching, symmetric telangiectasias that classically begin on the legs and steadily progress upward with classic sparing of the face (Figure 3). Whereas GET has been reported to involve the oral and conjunctival mucosa, mucosal involvement is not typically observed in CCV and is considered to be a distinguishing factor between the 2 conditions.^1,2 However, our patient reported oral symptoms, and oral erosions were seen on multiple physical examinations; therefore, ours is a rare case of mucosal involvement in conjunction with CCV. Given this finding, it is possible that more cases of CCV with mucosal involvement may exist but have been clinically misdiagnosed as GET.

First described by Salama and Rosenthal³ in 2000, CCV remains a rarely reported entity, with approximately 33 reported cases in the worldwide literature.^2,4-7 The condition typically arises in adults with an equal predilection for males and females.² The true incidence of CCV is unknown and likely is underreported given its close similarities to GET, which often is diagnosed clinically. The unique histopathologic finding of superficial ectatic vascular spaces with eosinophilic hyalinized vessel walls in CCV is key to distinguishing these similar entities, and even this finding can be subtle and is easily overlooked. Inflammation is sparse to absent. Deposited material is positive on periodic acid-Schiff and cytokeratin IV staining (representing reduplicated basement membrane-type collagen) and is diastase resistant. Smooth muscle actin staining is diminished or absent. Ultrastructural examination reveals reduplicated, laminated basement membrane; Luse bodies (abnormally long, widely spaced collagen fibers); and a decrease in or loss of pericytes. Of note, Luse bodies are nonspecific and their absence does not exclude a diagnosis of CCV.¹

The etiology of CCV is unclear, and multiple pathogenetic mechanisms have been proposed. Ultimately, this entity is thought to arise from repeated endothelial cell damage, although the trigger for the endothelial cell injury is not completely understood. Diabetes mellitus sometimes is associated with microangiopathy and may be a confounding but not causative factor in some cases.¹ Some investigators believe CCV is caused by a genetic defect that alters collagen production in the small vessels of the skin.⁵ Others have hypothesized that it is a secondary manifestation of an underlying disease or is associated with a medication; however, no disease or drug has been convincingly implicated in CCV.⁸

Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy is limited to the skin, with no known reports of systemic involvement in the literature.⁷ There are no recommended laboratory studies to aid in diagnosis.¹ It is critical to exclude hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), as these patients can have life-threatening systemic involvement. Patients with CCV generally have no history of a bleeding diathesis, patients with HHT classically report recurrent epistaxis and gastrointestinal bleeding.⁷ A family history of HHT also is helpful for diagnosis, as the condition is autosomal dominant.¹ Neither HHT or telangiectasia macularis eruptiva perstans, which also can be included in the differential diagnosis, demonstrate vessel wall hyalinization. 

Treatment options for CCV are limited. Basso et al⁶ reported notable improvement in a patient with CCV treated with a combined 595-nm pulsed dye laser and 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser and optimized pulsed light. In one patient, treatment with a 585-nm pulsed dye laser produced a blanching response, suggesting that this may be a potential treatment option.⁷ Treatment with sclerotherapy has been ineffective.²

It is critical for both dermatologists and dermatopathologists to recognize and report this newly described entity, as the unique finding of vessel wall hyalinization in CCV may be indicative of a certain pathogenetic mechanism and effective treatment avenue that has yet to be established due to the relatively few number of reports that currently exist in the literature.

The Diagnosis: Superficial Migratory Thrombophlebitis

On initial presentation, the differential diagnosis included livedoid vasculopathy, cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa, erythema ab igne, cholesterol embolism, and livedo reticularis. Laboratory investigation included antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), antinuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, serum protein electrophoresis, and coagulation tests. Pertinent findings included transient low total complement activity but normal complement protein C2, C3, and C5 levels and negative cryoglobulins. Additional laboratory testing revealed elevated antiphosphatidylserine IgG, which remained elevated 12 weeks later.

New lesions continued to appear over the next several months as painful, erythematous, linear, pruritic nodules that resolved as hyperpigmented linear patches, which intersected to form a livedo reticularis-like pattern that covered the lower legs. Biopsy of an erythematous nodule on the right leg revealed fibrin occlusion of a medium-sized vein in the subcutaneous fat. Direct immunofluorescence was not specific. Venous duplex ultrasonography demonstrated chronic superficial thrombophlebitis and was crucial to the diagnosis. Ultimately, the patient's history, clinical presentation, laboratory results, venous studies, and histopathologic analysis were consistent with a diagnosis of superficial migratory thrombophlebitis (SMT) with resultant postinflammatory hyperpigmentation presenting in a reticular pattern that mimicked livedoid vasculopathy, livedo reticularis, or erythema ab igne.

Superficial migratory thrombophlebitis, also known as thrombophlebitis migrans, is defined as the recurrent formation of thrombi within superficial veins.¹ The presence of a thrombus in a superficial vein evokes an inflammatory response, resulting in swelling, tenderness, erythema, and warmth in the affected area. Superficial migratory thrombophlebitis has been associated with several etiologies, including pregnancy, oral contraceptive use, APS, vasculitic disorders, and malignancies (eg, pancreas, lung, breast), as well as infections such as secondary syphilis.¹

When SMT is associated with an occult malignancy, it is known as Trousseau syndrome. Common malignancies found in association with Trousseau syndrome include pancreatic, lung, and breast cancers.² A systematic review from 2008 evaluated the utility of extensive cancer screening strategies in patients with newly diagnosed, unprovoked venous thromboembolic events.³ Using a wide screening strategy that included computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis, the investigators detected a considerable number of formerly undiagnosed cancers, increasing detection rates from 49.4% to 69.7%. After the diagnosis of SMT was made in our patient, computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was performed, but the findings were unremarkable.

Because occult malignancy was excluded in our patient, the likely etiology of SMT was APS, an acquired autoimmune condition diagnosed based on the presence of a vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy failure in women as well as elevation of at least one antiphospholipid antibody laboratory marker (eg, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibody, and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibody) on 2 or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart.⁴ Other antibodies such as those directed against negatively charged phospholipids (eg, antiphosphatidylserine [which was elevated in our patient], phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidic acid) have been reported in patients with APS, although their diagnostic use is controversial.⁵ For example, the presence of antiphosphatidylserine antibodies has been considered common but not specific in patients with APS.⁴ However, a recent observational study demonstrated that antiphosphatidylserine antibodies are highly specific (87%) and useful in diagnosing clinical APS cases in the presence of other negative markers.⁶

In our patient, diagnosis of SMT with resultant postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in a reticular pattern was based on the patient's medical history, clinical examination, and histopathologic findings, as well as laboratory results and venous studies. However, it is important to note that a livedo reticularis-like pattern also is a very common finding in APS and must be included in the differential diagnosis of a reticular network on the skin.⁷ Moreover, differentiating livedo reticularis from SMT has prognostic importance since SMT may be associated with underlying malignancies while livedo reticularis may be associated with Sneddon syndrome, a disorder in which neurologic vascular events (eg, cerebrovascular accidents) are present.⁸ While this distinction is important, there are no pathognomonic histologic findings seen in livedo reticularis, and consideration of the clinical picture and additional testing is critical.^4,8

Livedo vasculopathy was excluded in our patient due to the lack of diagnostic histopathologic findings, such as fibrin deposition and thrombus formation involving the upper- and mid-dermal capillaries.⁹ Furthermore, characteristic direct immunofluorescence findings of a homogenous or granular deposition in the vessel wall consisting of immune complexes, complement, and fibrin were absent in our patient.⁹ Our patient also lacked common clinical findings found in livedo vasculopathy such as small ulcerations or atrophic, porcelain-white scars on the lower legs. Erythema ab igne also was excluded in our patient due to the absence of heat exposure and presence of fibrin occlusion in the superficial leg veins. Physiologic livedo reticularis, defined as a livedoid pattern due to physiologic changes in the skin in response to cold exposure,¹⁰ also was excluded, as our patient's cutaneous changes included an alteration in pigmentation with a brown reticular pattern and no blanching, erythematous or violaceous hue, warmth, or tenderness.

In conclusion, SMT is a disorder with multiple associations that may clinically mimic livedo reticularis and livedoid vasculopathy when postinflammatory hyperpigmentation has a lacelike or livedoid pattern. While nontraditional antibodies may be useful in diagnosis in patients suspected of having APS with otherwise negative markers, standardized assays and further studies are needed to determine the specificity and value of these antibodies, particularly when used in isolation. Our patient's elevated antiphosphatidylserine IgG may have been the cause of her hypercoagulable state causing the SMT. A livedoid pattern is a common finding in APS and also was seen in our patient with SMT, but the differentiation of the brown pigmentary change and more active erythema was critical to the appropriate clinical workup of our patient.

The Diagnosis: Superficial Migratory Thrombophlebitis

On initial presentation, the differential diagnosis included livedoid vasculopathy, cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa, erythema ab igne, cholesterol embolism, and livedo reticularis. Laboratory investigation included antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), antinuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, serum protein electrophoresis, and coagulation tests. Pertinent findings included transient low total complement activity but normal complement protein C2, C3, and C5 levels and negative cryoglobulins. Additional laboratory testing revealed elevated antiphosphatidylserine IgG, which remained elevated 12 weeks later.

New lesions continued to appear over the next several months as painful, erythematous, linear, pruritic nodules that resolved as hyperpigmented linear patches, which intersected to form a livedo reticularis-like pattern that covered the lower legs. Biopsy of an erythematous nodule on the right leg revealed fibrin occlusion of a medium-sized vein in the subcutaneous fat. Direct immunofluorescence was not specific. Venous duplex ultrasonography demonstrated chronic superficial thrombophlebitis and was crucial to the diagnosis. Ultimately, the patient's history, clinical presentation, laboratory results, venous studies, and histopathologic analysis were consistent with a diagnosis of superficial migratory thrombophlebitis (SMT) with resultant postinflammatory hyperpigmentation presenting in a reticular pattern that mimicked livedoid vasculopathy, livedo reticularis, or erythema ab igne.

Superficial migratory thrombophlebitis, also known as thrombophlebitis migrans, is defined as the recurrent formation of thrombi within superficial veins.¹ The presence of a thrombus in a superficial vein evokes an inflammatory response, resulting in swelling, tenderness, erythema, and warmth in the affected area. Superficial migratory thrombophlebitis has been associated with several etiologies, including pregnancy, oral contraceptive use, APS, vasculitic disorders, and malignancies (eg, pancreas, lung, breast), as well as infections such as secondary syphilis.¹

When SMT is associated with an occult malignancy, it is known as Trousseau syndrome. Common malignancies found in association with Trousseau syndrome include pancreatic, lung, and breast cancers.² A systematic review from 2008 evaluated the utility of extensive cancer screening strategies in patients with newly diagnosed, unprovoked venous thromboembolic events.³ Using a wide screening strategy that included computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis, the investigators detected a considerable number of formerly undiagnosed cancers, increasing detection rates from 49.4% to 69.7%. After the diagnosis of SMT was made in our patient, computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was performed, but the findings were unremarkable.

Because occult malignancy was excluded in our patient, the likely etiology of SMT was APS, an acquired autoimmune condition diagnosed based on the presence of a vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy failure in women as well as elevation of at least one antiphospholipid antibody laboratory marker (eg, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibody, and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibody) on 2 or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart.⁴ Other antibodies such as those directed against negatively charged phospholipids (eg, antiphosphatidylserine [which was elevated in our patient], phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidic acid) have been reported in patients with APS, although their diagnostic use is controversial.⁵ For example, the presence of antiphosphatidylserine antibodies has been considered common but not specific in patients with APS.⁴ However, a recent observational study demonstrated that antiphosphatidylserine antibodies are highly specific (87%) and useful in diagnosing clinical APS cases in the presence of other negative markers.⁶

In our patient, diagnosis of SMT with resultant postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in a reticular pattern was based on the patient's medical history, clinical examination, and histopathologic findings, as well as laboratory results and venous studies. However, it is important to note that a livedo reticularis-like pattern also is a very common finding in APS and must be included in the differential diagnosis of a reticular network on the skin.⁷ Moreover, differentiating livedo reticularis from SMT has prognostic importance since SMT may be associated with underlying malignancies while livedo reticularis may be associated with Sneddon syndrome, a disorder in which neurologic vascular events (eg, cerebrovascular accidents) are present.⁸ While this distinction is important, there are no pathognomonic histologic findings seen in livedo reticularis, and consideration of the clinical picture and additional testing is critical.^4,8

Livedo vasculopathy was excluded in our patient due to the lack of diagnostic histopathologic findings, such as fibrin deposition and thrombus formation involving the upper- and mid-dermal capillaries.⁹ Furthermore, characteristic direct immunofluorescence findings of a homogenous or granular deposition in the vessel wall consisting of immune complexes, complement, and fibrin were absent in our patient.⁹ Our patient also lacked common clinical findings found in livedo vasculopathy such as small ulcerations or atrophic, porcelain-white scars on the lower legs. Erythema ab igne also was excluded in our patient due to the absence of heat exposure and presence of fibrin occlusion in the superficial leg veins. Physiologic livedo reticularis, defined as a livedoid pattern due to physiologic changes in the skin in response to cold exposure,¹⁰ also was excluded, as our patient's cutaneous changes included an alteration in pigmentation with a brown reticular pattern and no blanching, erythematous or violaceous hue, warmth, or tenderness.

In conclusion, SMT is a disorder with multiple associations that may clinically mimic livedo reticularis and livedoid vasculopathy when postinflammatory hyperpigmentation has a lacelike or livedoid pattern. While nontraditional antibodies may be useful in diagnosis in patients suspected of having APS with otherwise negative markers, standardized assays and further studies are needed to determine the specificity and value of these antibodies, particularly when used in isolation. Our patient's elevated antiphosphatidylserine IgG may have been the cause of her hypercoagulable state causing the SMT. A livedoid pattern is a common finding in APS and also was seen in our patient with SMT, but the differentiation of the brown pigmentary change and more active erythema was critical to the appropriate clinical workup of our patient.

The Diagnosis: Superficial Migratory Thrombophlebitis

On initial presentation, the differential diagnosis included livedoid vasculopathy, cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa, erythema ab igne, cholesterol embolism, and livedo reticularis. Laboratory investigation included antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), antinuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, serum protein electrophoresis, and coagulation tests. Pertinent findings included transient low total complement activity but normal complement protein C2, C3, and C5 levels and negative cryoglobulins. Additional laboratory testing revealed elevated antiphosphatidylserine IgG, which remained elevated 12 weeks later.

New lesions continued to appear over the next several months as painful, erythematous, linear, pruritic nodules that resolved as hyperpigmented linear patches, which intersected to form a livedo reticularis-like pattern that covered the lower legs. Biopsy of an erythematous nodule on the right leg revealed fibrin occlusion of a medium-sized vein in the subcutaneous fat. Direct immunofluorescence was not specific. Venous duplex ultrasonography demonstrated chronic superficial thrombophlebitis and was crucial to the diagnosis. Ultimately, the patient's history, clinical presentation, laboratory results, venous studies, and histopathologic analysis were consistent with a diagnosis of superficial migratory thrombophlebitis (SMT) with resultant postinflammatory hyperpigmentation presenting in a reticular pattern that mimicked livedoid vasculopathy, livedo reticularis, or erythema ab igne.

Superficial migratory thrombophlebitis, also known as thrombophlebitis migrans, is defined as the recurrent formation of thrombi within superficial veins.¹ The presence of a thrombus in a superficial vein evokes an inflammatory response, resulting in swelling, tenderness, erythema, and warmth in the affected area. Superficial migratory thrombophlebitis has been associated with several etiologies, including pregnancy, oral contraceptive use, APS, vasculitic disorders, and malignancies (eg, pancreas, lung, breast), as well as infections such as secondary syphilis.¹

When SMT is associated with an occult malignancy, it is known as Trousseau syndrome. Common malignancies found in association with Trousseau syndrome include pancreatic, lung, and breast cancers.² A systematic review from 2008 evaluated the utility of extensive cancer screening strategies in patients with newly diagnosed, unprovoked venous thromboembolic events.³ Using a wide screening strategy that included computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis, the investigators detected a considerable number of formerly undiagnosed cancers, increasing detection rates from 49.4% to 69.7%. After the diagnosis of SMT was made in our patient, computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was performed, but the findings were unremarkable.

Because occult malignancy was excluded in our patient, the likely etiology of SMT was APS, an acquired autoimmune condition diagnosed based on the presence of a vascular thrombosis and/or pregnancy failure in women as well as elevation of at least one antiphospholipid antibody laboratory marker (eg, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibody, and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibody) on 2 or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart.⁴ Other antibodies such as those directed against negatively charged phospholipids (eg, antiphosphatidylserine [which was elevated in our patient], phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidic acid) have been reported in patients with APS, although their diagnostic use is controversial.⁵ For example, the presence of antiphosphatidylserine antibodies has been considered common but not specific in patients with APS.⁴ However, a recent observational study demonstrated that antiphosphatidylserine antibodies are highly specific (87%) and useful in diagnosing clinical APS cases in the presence of other negative markers.⁶

In our patient, diagnosis of SMT with resultant postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in a reticular pattern was based on the patient's medical history, clinical examination, and histopathologic findings, as well as laboratory results and venous studies. However, it is important to note that a livedo reticularis-like pattern also is a very common finding in APS and must be included in the differential diagnosis of a reticular network on the skin.⁷ Moreover, differentiating livedo reticularis from SMT has prognostic importance since SMT may be associated with underlying malignancies while livedo reticularis may be associated with Sneddon syndrome, a disorder in which neurologic vascular events (eg, cerebrovascular accidents) are present.⁸ While this distinction is important, there are no pathognomonic histologic findings seen in livedo reticularis, and consideration of the clinical picture and additional testing is critical.^4,8

Livedo vasculopathy was excluded in our patient due to the lack of diagnostic histopathologic findings, such as fibrin deposition and thrombus formation involving the upper- and mid-dermal capillaries.⁹ Furthermore, characteristic direct immunofluorescence findings of a homogenous or granular deposition in the vessel wall consisting of immune complexes, complement, and fibrin were absent in our patient.⁹ Our patient also lacked common clinical findings found in livedo vasculopathy such as small ulcerations or atrophic, porcelain-white scars on the lower legs. Erythema ab igne also was excluded in our patient due to the absence of heat exposure and presence of fibrin occlusion in the superficial leg veins. Physiologic livedo reticularis, defined as a livedoid pattern due to physiologic changes in the skin in response to cold exposure,¹⁰ also was excluded, as our patient's cutaneous changes included an alteration in pigmentation with a brown reticular pattern and no blanching, erythematous or violaceous hue, warmth, or tenderness.

In conclusion, SMT is a disorder with multiple associations that may clinically mimic livedo reticularis and livedoid vasculopathy when postinflammatory hyperpigmentation has a lacelike or livedoid pattern. While nontraditional antibodies may be useful in diagnosis in patients suspected of having APS with otherwise negative markers, standardized assays and further studies are needed to determine the specificity and value of these antibodies, particularly when used in isolation. Our patient's elevated antiphosphatidylserine IgG may have been the cause of her hypercoagulable state causing the SMT. A livedoid pattern is a common finding in APS and also was seen in our patient with SMT, but the differentiation of the brown pigmentary change and more active erythema was critical to the appropriate clinical workup of our patient.

The Diagnosis: Polypoid Dermatofibroma

Histologic examination revealed a poorly demarcated lesion localized in the dermis that was composed of an admixture of fibroblastlike cells, histiocytes, siderophages, multinucleated giant cells, and hemorrhage (Figure). Based on these findings, a diagnosis of polypoid dermatofibroma (DF) was made. No further treatment was necessary because the lesion was completely excised.

Dermatofibromas, also known as benign fibrous histiocytomas, are common, benign, mesenchymal, fibrosing tumors of the skin that appear predominantly on the legs in in women, but any part of the body in either sex can be affected. Clinically, DFs show the dimple sign when laterally squeezed and can be painful spontaneously or when rubbed. Histologically, DFs are poorly demarcated lesions composed of a variable admixture of fibroblastlike cells, histiocytes (some of which may be xanthomatous or multinucleated), and blood vessels. The etiology still remains unclear. Most investigators consider DF to be a reactive process, but some think that it is a benign mesenchymal tumor.^1,2

Many subtypes of DF have been described based on their unique architectural, cellular, stromal, and clinical features.^2,3 Polypoid DF is a rare variant that comprises only 3% of reported cases4 and tends to be larger than other DF subtypes. Requena et al⁵ reported 12 cases of giant DF, another clinical subtype, that were larger than 5 cm in diameter, most of which had a polypoid appearance.

Moreover, 3 distinct variants of DF with unique histologic features tend to show polypoid morphology.^3,4 In epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma, also known as epithelioid cell histiocytoma, at least 50% of the lesion is composed of rounded or polygonal epithelioid cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and round to oval nuclei containing small eosinophilic nucleoli.⁴ A grenz zone generally is lacking and numerous small blood vessels are a constant feature of epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma. The other variant of DF that also tends to have a polypoid appearance is lipidized fibrous histiocytoma, or ankle-type fibrous histiocytoma, which usually arises below the knee, especially around the ankle, and often becomes larger than common DF.⁴ Lastly, atypical polypoid DF is a benign, polyp-shaped lesion that shows hypercellularity with striking nuclear atypism and scattered mitotic figures in addition to the ordinary histologic features of DF.³

Acquired fibrokeratomas manifest as solitary dome-shaped, flesh-colored protrusions usually located on the feet and hands. Sclerotic fibroma is a rare cutaneous neoplasm that presents as a solitary, translucent or waxy nodule or as multiple nodules when it is part of Cowden disease. Fibromas, also known as skin tags, are common cutaneous tumors that appear in intertriginous areas and frequently adopt a pedunculated morphology. Although clinically some of these lesions may resemble polypoid DF, the differential diagnosis is made by histologic examination.

Dermatofibroma is a common cutaneous tumor that follows a benign course. It can adopt multiple morphologies. Awareness of this rare variant may aid in its appropriate diagnosis and management. Dermatofibromas are benign neoplasms, and therefore they usually do not require treatment. If they become symptomatic or are bothersome to the patient, the treatment of choice is surgical removal.
 

The Diagnosis: Polypoid Dermatofibroma

Histologic examination revealed a poorly demarcated lesion localized in the dermis that was composed of an admixture of fibroblastlike cells, histiocytes, siderophages, multinucleated giant cells, and hemorrhage (Figure). Based on these findings, a diagnosis of polypoid dermatofibroma (DF) was made. No further treatment was necessary because the lesion was completely excised.

Dermatofibromas, also known as benign fibrous histiocytomas, are common, benign, mesenchymal, fibrosing tumors of the skin that appear predominantly on the legs in in women, but any part of the body in either sex can be affected. Clinically, DFs show the dimple sign when laterally squeezed and can be painful spontaneously or when rubbed. Histologically, DFs are poorly demarcated lesions composed of a variable admixture of fibroblastlike cells, histiocytes (some of which may be xanthomatous or multinucleated), and blood vessels. The etiology still remains unclear. Most investigators consider DF to be a reactive process, but some think that it is a benign mesenchymal tumor.^1,2

Many subtypes of DF have been described based on their unique architectural, cellular, stromal, and clinical features.^2,3 Polypoid DF is a rare variant that comprises only 3% of reported cases4 and tends to be larger than other DF subtypes. Requena et al⁵ reported 12 cases of giant DF, another clinical subtype, that were larger than 5 cm in diameter, most of which had a polypoid appearance.

Moreover, 3 distinct variants of DF with unique histologic features tend to show polypoid morphology.^3,4 In epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma, also known as epithelioid cell histiocytoma, at least 50% of the lesion is composed of rounded or polygonal epithelioid cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and round to oval nuclei containing small eosinophilic nucleoli.⁴ A grenz zone generally is lacking and numerous small blood vessels are a constant feature of epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma. The other variant of DF that also tends to have a polypoid appearance is lipidized fibrous histiocytoma, or ankle-type fibrous histiocytoma, which usually arises below the knee, especially around the ankle, and often becomes larger than common DF.⁴ Lastly, atypical polypoid DF is a benign, polyp-shaped lesion that shows hypercellularity with striking nuclear atypism and scattered mitotic figures in addition to the ordinary histologic features of DF.³

Acquired fibrokeratomas manifest as solitary dome-shaped, flesh-colored protrusions usually located on the feet and hands. Sclerotic fibroma is a rare cutaneous neoplasm that presents as a solitary, translucent or waxy nodule or as multiple nodules when it is part of Cowden disease. Fibromas, also known as skin tags, are common cutaneous tumors that appear in intertriginous areas and frequently adopt a pedunculated morphology. Although clinically some of these lesions may resemble polypoid DF, the differential diagnosis is made by histologic examination.

Dermatofibroma is a common cutaneous tumor that follows a benign course. It can adopt multiple morphologies. Awareness of this rare variant may aid in its appropriate diagnosis and management. Dermatofibromas are benign neoplasms, and therefore they usually do not require treatment. If they become symptomatic or are bothersome to the patient, the treatment of choice is surgical removal.
 

The Diagnosis: Polypoid Dermatofibroma

Histologic examination revealed a poorly demarcated lesion localized in the dermis that was composed of an admixture of fibroblastlike cells, histiocytes, siderophages, multinucleated giant cells, and hemorrhage (Figure). Based on these findings, a diagnosis of polypoid dermatofibroma (DF) was made. No further treatment was necessary because the lesion was completely excised.

Dermatofibromas, also known as benign fibrous histiocytomas, are common, benign, mesenchymal, fibrosing tumors of the skin that appear predominantly on the legs in in women, but any part of the body in either sex can be affected. Clinically, DFs show the dimple sign when laterally squeezed and can be painful spontaneously or when rubbed. Histologically, DFs are poorly demarcated lesions composed of a variable admixture of fibroblastlike cells, histiocytes (some of which may be xanthomatous or multinucleated), and blood vessels. The etiology still remains unclear. Most investigators consider DF to be a reactive process, but some think that it is a benign mesenchymal tumor.^1,2

Many subtypes of DF have been described based on their unique architectural, cellular, stromal, and clinical features.^2,3 Polypoid DF is a rare variant that comprises only 3% of reported cases4 and tends to be larger than other DF subtypes. Requena et al⁵ reported 12 cases of giant DF, another clinical subtype, that were larger than 5 cm in diameter, most of which had a polypoid appearance.

Moreover, 3 distinct variants of DF with unique histologic features tend to show polypoid morphology.^3,4 In epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma, also known as epithelioid cell histiocytoma, at least 50% of the lesion is composed of rounded or polygonal epithelioid cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and round to oval nuclei containing small eosinophilic nucleoli.⁴ A grenz zone generally is lacking and numerous small blood vessels are a constant feature of epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma. The other variant of DF that also tends to have a polypoid appearance is lipidized fibrous histiocytoma, or ankle-type fibrous histiocytoma, which usually arises below the knee, especially around the ankle, and often becomes larger than common DF.⁴ Lastly, atypical polypoid DF is a benign, polyp-shaped lesion that shows hypercellularity with striking nuclear atypism and scattered mitotic figures in addition to the ordinary histologic features of DF.³

Acquired fibrokeratomas manifest as solitary dome-shaped, flesh-colored protrusions usually located on the feet and hands. Sclerotic fibroma is a rare cutaneous neoplasm that presents as a solitary, translucent or waxy nodule or as multiple nodules when it is part of Cowden disease. Fibromas, also known as skin tags, are common cutaneous tumors that appear in intertriginous areas and frequently adopt a pedunculated morphology. Although clinically some of these lesions may resemble polypoid DF, the differential diagnosis is made by histologic examination.

Dermatofibroma is a common cutaneous tumor that follows a benign course. It can adopt multiple morphologies. Awareness of this rare variant may aid in its appropriate diagnosis and management. Dermatofibromas are benign neoplasms, and therefore they usually do not require treatment. If they become symptomatic or are bothersome to the patient, the treatment of choice is surgical removal.