User login
Should monkeypox be considered an STD? Experts debate
As the number of monkeypox cases keeps growing, a discussion has opened on whether it should be considered a sexually transmitted disease like herpes, gonorrhea, or HIV.
Monkeypox is almost always spread through skin-to-skin contact and, in the West, many of the cases have occurred among men who have sex with men.
But health experts say that doesn’t make it an STD – at least not in “the classic sense.”
“Monkeypox is not a sexually transmitted disease in the classic sense (by which it’s spread in the semen or vaginal fluids), but it is spread by close physical contact with lesions,” infectious diseases expert Robert L. Murphy, MD, of Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, said in a news release.
He said the current monkeypox outbreak was more like a meningitis outbreak among gay men a few years ago.
Rowland Kao, PhD, a professor of veterinary epidemiology and data science at the University of Edinburgh, said that an “STD is one where intimate, sexual contact is critical to the transmission – where sexual acts are central to the transmission,” Newsweek reported.
“Some infections are transmitted by any type of close contact, of which sexual activity is one. Monkeypox is one of those –
But calling monkeypox an STD could deter measures to limit its spread, another expert told Newsweek.
“My uneasiness about labeling it as an STD is that for most STDs, wearing a condom or avoiding penetration or direct oral-anal/oral-genital contact is a good way of preventing transmission,” said Paul Hunter, MD, a professor of health protection at the University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.
“But for monkeypox, even just naked cuddling is a big risk. So labeling it an STD could actually work against control if people felt they just had to wear a condom.”
Denise Dewald, MD, a pediatric specialist at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, said monkeypox is not an STD – but it could become an entrenched virus.
“Monkeypox will become established in the pediatric and general population and will transmit through daycares and schools,” she tweeted. “It is not an STD. It is like MRSA. This isn’t rocket science.”
One thing is certain: More and more people are getting monkeypox. It’s been endemic in Western and Central Africa for years, and cases in Europe and North America were identified in May.
Globally, more than 14,000 cases have been identified, World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on July 20, according to the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy. Five people in Africa have died. In the United Kingdom, more than 2,100 cases have been identified.
In the United States, more than 2,500 confirmed monkeypox cases have been detected, with cases reported from every state except Alaska, Maine, Montana, Mississippi, Vermont, and Wyoming, the CDC said on July 21.
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
As the number of monkeypox cases keeps growing, a discussion has opened on whether it should be considered a sexually transmitted disease like herpes, gonorrhea, or HIV.
Monkeypox is almost always spread through skin-to-skin contact and, in the West, many of the cases have occurred among men who have sex with men.
But health experts say that doesn’t make it an STD – at least not in “the classic sense.”
“Monkeypox is not a sexually transmitted disease in the classic sense (by which it’s spread in the semen or vaginal fluids), but it is spread by close physical contact with lesions,” infectious diseases expert Robert L. Murphy, MD, of Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, said in a news release.
He said the current monkeypox outbreak was more like a meningitis outbreak among gay men a few years ago.
Rowland Kao, PhD, a professor of veterinary epidemiology and data science at the University of Edinburgh, said that an “STD is one where intimate, sexual contact is critical to the transmission – where sexual acts are central to the transmission,” Newsweek reported.
“Some infections are transmitted by any type of close contact, of which sexual activity is one. Monkeypox is one of those –
But calling monkeypox an STD could deter measures to limit its spread, another expert told Newsweek.
“My uneasiness about labeling it as an STD is that for most STDs, wearing a condom or avoiding penetration or direct oral-anal/oral-genital contact is a good way of preventing transmission,” said Paul Hunter, MD, a professor of health protection at the University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.
“But for monkeypox, even just naked cuddling is a big risk. So labeling it an STD could actually work against control if people felt they just had to wear a condom.”
Denise Dewald, MD, a pediatric specialist at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, said monkeypox is not an STD – but it could become an entrenched virus.
“Monkeypox will become established in the pediatric and general population and will transmit through daycares and schools,” she tweeted. “It is not an STD. It is like MRSA. This isn’t rocket science.”
One thing is certain: More and more people are getting monkeypox. It’s been endemic in Western and Central Africa for years, and cases in Europe and North America were identified in May.
Globally, more than 14,000 cases have been identified, World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on July 20, according to the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy. Five people in Africa have died. In the United Kingdom, more than 2,100 cases have been identified.
In the United States, more than 2,500 confirmed monkeypox cases have been detected, with cases reported from every state except Alaska, Maine, Montana, Mississippi, Vermont, and Wyoming, the CDC said on July 21.
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
As the number of monkeypox cases keeps growing, a discussion has opened on whether it should be considered a sexually transmitted disease like herpes, gonorrhea, or HIV.
Monkeypox is almost always spread through skin-to-skin contact and, in the West, many of the cases have occurred among men who have sex with men.
But health experts say that doesn’t make it an STD – at least not in “the classic sense.”
“Monkeypox is not a sexually transmitted disease in the classic sense (by which it’s spread in the semen or vaginal fluids), but it is spread by close physical contact with lesions,” infectious diseases expert Robert L. Murphy, MD, of Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, said in a news release.
He said the current monkeypox outbreak was more like a meningitis outbreak among gay men a few years ago.
Rowland Kao, PhD, a professor of veterinary epidemiology and data science at the University of Edinburgh, said that an “STD is one where intimate, sexual contact is critical to the transmission – where sexual acts are central to the transmission,” Newsweek reported.
“Some infections are transmitted by any type of close contact, of which sexual activity is one. Monkeypox is one of those –
But calling monkeypox an STD could deter measures to limit its spread, another expert told Newsweek.
“My uneasiness about labeling it as an STD is that for most STDs, wearing a condom or avoiding penetration or direct oral-anal/oral-genital contact is a good way of preventing transmission,” said Paul Hunter, MD, a professor of health protection at the University of East Anglia, Norwich, England.
“But for monkeypox, even just naked cuddling is a big risk. So labeling it an STD could actually work against control if people felt they just had to wear a condom.”
Denise Dewald, MD, a pediatric specialist at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, said monkeypox is not an STD – but it could become an entrenched virus.
“Monkeypox will become established in the pediatric and general population and will transmit through daycares and schools,” she tweeted. “It is not an STD. It is like MRSA. This isn’t rocket science.”
One thing is certain: More and more people are getting monkeypox. It’s been endemic in Western and Central Africa for years, and cases in Europe and North America were identified in May.
Globally, more than 14,000 cases have been identified, World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on July 20, according to the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy. Five people in Africa have died. In the United Kingdom, more than 2,100 cases have been identified.
In the United States, more than 2,500 confirmed monkeypox cases have been detected, with cases reported from every state except Alaska, Maine, Montana, Mississippi, Vermont, and Wyoming, the CDC said on July 21.
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
Moms’ cooing swapped with morphine for newborns in withdrawal
Four years ago, Atrium Health, in Charlotte, N.C., embarked on a dramatic change in how it cares for newborns exposed to opioids in the womb.
Until then, most of the 700 or so babies who underwent opioid withdrawal each year in the hospital system spent their first weeks in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), isolated from their parents and treated with regular doses of morphine to ease their symptoms.
Now, most babies stay in the hospital for just a few days under a new approach called Eat, Sleep, Console. These young patients stay in private rooms where they can bond with their parents and volunteer caregivers. The usual course of treatment is no longer extended therapy with opioid replacements. Instead, mothers are encouraged to stay overnight and are taught how to sooth their babies with swaddling, rocking, and cooing.
As a result, the average length of stay for newborns with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) has dropped from 12 days to 6. Use of morphine has fallen by 79%, from 2.25 to 0.45 mg/kg per stay, according to results of a quality improvement pilot project at one of Atrium’s community hospitals.
Similar outcomes from other hospitals around the country have led to widespread uptake of Eat, Sleep, Console since its advent in 2017. That year, according to federal data, seven newborns were diagnosed with NAS for every 1,000 births.
Advocates say the family-centric model helps parents feel less stigmatized and more confident in their ability to care for their babies, who can have symptoms such as irritability and difficulty feeding for months.
The approach “really empowers families to do what they do best, which is take care of each other,” Douglas Dodds, MD, a pediatrician who led the effort at Atrium, told this news organization.
Questioning the old protocols
Numerous state perinatal collaboratives, hospital associations, and health systems say the program is the new standard of care for infants with NAS and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS).
Twenty-six hospitals have adopted Eat, Sleep, Console as part of a clinical trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and a program called Advancing Clinical Trials in Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome (ACT NOW). Researchers are comparing the approach to previous care protocols in regard to 12 outcomes, including time to medical readiness for discharge, frequency of opioid replacement therapy, and safety problems, such as seizures during treatment.
The transition has been swift. Less than a decade ago, most hospitals used the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System, which was developed in the 1970s to assess babies whose mothers had used heroin during pregnancy.
The Finnegan score entails monitoring babies every 3 hours for 21 symptoms, including high-pitched crying, sneezing, gastrointestinal problems, and yawning. If a baby scores an 8 or more three times in a row, most protocols using the traditional Finnegan approach recommend that providers move infants to an NICU, where they receive morphine or methadone. Once opioid replacement therapy is started, the protocols require a gradual weaning that lasts 3-4 weeks.
As the opioid epidemic grew and NICUs around the country began to fill with babies experiencing NAS or NOW, some clinicians began to question the Finnegan-driven approach.
“You have these miserable babies who are going through this really tough experience, and our first move is to separate them from their moms,” said Matthew Grossman, MD, a pediatric hospitalist at Yale New Haven Children’s Hospital, New Haven, Conn., who created Eat, Sleep, Console.
Dr. Grossman, associate professor and vice chair for quality in the department of pediatrics at Yale University, said he noticed that when mothers stayed overnight with their babies, the infants tended to have fewer withdrawal symptoms. Indeed, previous studies had demonstrated the benefits of breastfeeding and allowing mothers and babies to share a room.
“If you think of mom as a medicine, then you can’t put the baby in a unit where the mom can’t be there,” Dr. Grossman told this news organization. “It would be like taking a kid with pneumonia and putting him in a unit that doesn’t have antibiotics.”
Despite its prominence, the Finnegan score has never been validated for guiding the treatment of NAS. In addition, Finnegan scores can be inconsistent, and the assessment requires disturbing an infant to check signs such as its startle reflex, which, as Dr. Grossman and his fellow researchers pointed out, flies in the face of American Academy of Pediatrics’ recommendations to prioritize swaddling and minimize stimulation for infants with NAS.
By contrast, Eat, Sleep, Console offers a simplified assessment. Interventions are called for if a baby eats less than an ounce of food at a time/does not breastfeed, sleeps less than an hour at a stretch, or takes more than 10 minutes to be consoled. After nonpharmacologic interventions have been tried, doses of medication are used as needed. Babies who are doing well can be discharged in as few as 4 days.
Quashing bias against parents with substance abuse disorder
Even with the promise of shorter stays and better care, switching to nonpharmacologic care presents hurdles for hospitals. Among these is a lack of physical space for mothers to room with their babies in a quiet environment.
“In many community hospitals, the only place for infants to go is a neonatal intensive care unit, outside of the newborn nursery,” said Stephen Patrick, MD, MPH, associate professor and director of the Center for Child Health Policy at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn., who researches stigma associated with opioid use during pregnancy.
Administrators at SSM St. Mary’s Hospital in St. Louis initially balked at providing private rooms for mothers and their babies with NAS and NOWS, according to Kimberly Spence, MD, a neonatologist at SSM Health. She said the initial plan was to put the babies in a busy, brightly lit nursery.
But resistance waned as the hospital convinced health plans to pay for private rooms for the 5-7 days it typically takes a baby to go through withdrawal, said Dr. Spence, associate professor of pediatrics at Saint Louis University.
“We were able to provide enough data that this is evidence-based medicine and babies do better with their moms, and that ethically, this is the right thing to do, to reduce transfers to an NICU,” she said.
In addition, news stories about the family-centric approach and shorter stays for infants, along with SSM’s launch of an outpatient clinic to treat pregnant women with opioid use disorder, helped the system to attract more patients and increase its market share, said Dr. Spence.
Another challenge was getting physicians and nurses to set aside any judgments of parents with substance abuse disorder, according to Dr. Grossman and others.
“A lot of faculty and staff on the medical team didn’t feel like we should trust moms with their babies’ medical care” at SSM, Dr. Spence said.
Some hospitals conduct anti-bias training to teach providers that substance abuse is a disease that deserves proper medical treatment and not the moral failing of a patient. Such education may involve explaining that babies’ outcomes are improved when women undergo treatment with methadone or buprenorphine during pregnancy, even though use of those medications does pose a risk of NAS.
Creating a system that supports parents with substance abuse disorders may help to change perceptions. At Atrium Health, some staff members now enjoy working with these families because they can make a profound impact, Dr. Dodds said. He said they’ve learned that families suffering from substance abuse disorder “are not that different than any other family.”
Dr. Dodds, Dr. Patrick, Dr. Spence, and Dr. Grossman reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Four years ago, Atrium Health, in Charlotte, N.C., embarked on a dramatic change in how it cares for newborns exposed to opioids in the womb.
Until then, most of the 700 or so babies who underwent opioid withdrawal each year in the hospital system spent their first weeks in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), isolated from their parents and treated with regular doses of morphine to ease their symptoms.
Now, most babies stay in the hospital for just a few days under a new approach called Eat, Sleep, Console. These young patients stay in private rooms where they can bond with their parents and volunteer caregivers. The usual course of treatment is no longer extended therapy with opioid replacements. Instead, mothers are encouraged to stay overnight and are taught how to sooth their babies with swaddling, rocking, and cooing.
As a result, the average length of stay for newborns with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) has dropped from 12 days to 6. Use of morphine has fallen by 79%, from 2.25 to 0.45 mg/kg per stay, according to results of a quality improvement pilot project at one of Atrium’s community hospitals.
Similar outcomes from other hospitals around the country have led to widespread uptake of Eat, Sleep, Console since its advent in 2017. That year, according to federal data, seven newborns were diagnosed with NAS for every 1,000 births.
Advocates say the family-centric model helps parents feel less stigmatized and more confident in their ability to care for their babies, who can have symptoms such as irritability and difficulty feeding for months.
The approach “really empowers families to do what they do best, which is take care of each other,” Douglas Dodds, MD, a pediatrician who led the effort at Atrium, told this news organization.
Questioning the old protocols
Numerous state perinatal collaboratives, hospital associations, and health systems say the program is the new standard of care for infants with NAS and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS).
Twenty-six hospitals have adopted Eat, Sleep, Console as part of a clinical trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and a program called Advancing Clinical Trials in Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome (ACT NOW). Researchers are comparing the approach to previous care protocols in regard to 12 outcomes, including time to medical readiness for discharge, frequency of opioid replacement therapy, and safety problems, such as seizures during treatment.
The transition has been swift. Less than a decade ago, most hospitals used the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System, which was developed in the 1970s to assess babies whose mothers had used heroin during pregnancy.
The Finnegan score entails monitoring babies every 3 hours for 21 symptoms, including high-pitched crying, sneezing, gastrointestinal problems, and yawning. If a baby scores an 8 or more three times in a row, most protocols using the traditional Finnegan approach recommend that providers move infants to an NICU, where they receive morphine or methadone. Once opioid replacement therapy is started, the protocols require a gradual weaning that lasts 3-4 weeks.
As the opioid epidemic grew and NICUs around the country began to fill with babies experiencing NAS or NOW, some clinicians began to question the Finnegan-driven approach.
“You have these miserable babies who are going through this really tough experience, and our first move is to separate them from their moms,” said Matthew Grossman, MD, a pediatric hospitalist at Yale New Haven Children’s Hospital, New Haven, Conn., who created Eat, Sleep, Console.
Dr. Grossman, associate professor and vice chair for quality in the department of pediatrics at Yale University, said he noticed that when mothers stayed overnight with their babies, the infants tended to have fewer withdrawal symptoms. Indeed, previous studies had demonstrated the benefits of breastfeeding and allowing mothers and babies to share a room.
“If you think of mom as a medicine, then you can’t put the baby in a unit where the mom can’t be there,” Dr. Grossman told this news organization. “It would be like taking a kid with pneumonia and putting him in a unit that doesn’t have antibiotics.”
Despite its prominence, the Finnegan score has never been validated for guiding the treatment of NAS. In addition, Finnegan scores can be inconsistent, and the assessment requires disturbing an infant to check signs such as its startle reflex, which, as Dr. Grossman and his fellow researchers pointed out, flies in the face of American Academy of Pediatrics’ recommendations to prioritize swaddling and minimize stimulation for infants with NAS.
By contrast, Eat, Sleep, Console offers a simplified assessment. Interventions are called for if a baby eats less than an ounce of food at a time/does not breastfeed, sleeps less than an hour at a stretch, or takes more than 10 minutes to be consoled. After nonpharmacologic interventions have been tried, doses of medication are used as needed. Babies who are doing well can be discharged in as few as 4 days.
Quashing bias against parents with substance abuse disorder
Even with the promise of shorter stays and better care, switching to nonpharmacologic care presents hurdles for hospitals. Among these is a lack of physical space for mothers to room with their babies in a quiet environment.
“In many community hospitals, the only place for infants to go is a neonatal intensive care unit, outside of the newborn nursery,” said Stephen Patrick, MD, MPH, associate professor and director of the Center for Child Health Policy at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn., who researches stigma associated with opioid use during pregnancy.
Administrators at SSM St. Mary’s Hospital in St. Louis initially balked at providing private rooms for mothers and their babies with NAS and NOWS, according to Kimberly Spence, MD, a neonatologist at SSM Health. She said the initial plan was to put the babies in a busy, brightly lit nursery.
But resistance waned as the hospital convinced health plans to pay for private rooms for the 5-7 days it typically takes a baby to go through withdrawal, said Dr. Spence, associate professor of pediatrics at Saint Louis University.
“We were able to provide enough data that this is evidence-based medicine and babies do better with their moms, and that ethically, this is the right thing to do, to reduce transfers to an NICU,” she said.
In addition, news stories about the family-centric approach and shorter stays for infants, along with SSM’s launch of an outpatient clinic to treat pregnant women with opioid use disorder, helped the system to attract more patients and increase its market share, said Dr. Spence.
Another challenge was getting physicians and nurses to set aside any judgments of parents with substance abuse disorder, according to Dr. Grossman and others.
“A lot of faculty and staff on the medical team didn’t feel like we should trust moms with their babies’ medical care” at SSM, Dr. Spence said.
Some hospitals conduct anti-bias training to teach providers that substance abuse is a disease that deserves proper medical treatment and not the moral failing of a patient. Such education may involve explaining that babies’ outcomes are improved when women undergo treatment with methadone or buprenorphine during pregnancy, even though use of those medications does pose a risk of NAS.
Creating a system that supports parents with substance abuse disorders may help to change perceptions. At Atrium Health, some staff members now enjoy working with these families because they can make a profound impact, Dr. Dodds said. He said they’ve learned that families suffering from substance abuse disorder “are not that different than any other family.”
Dr. Dodds, Dr. Patrick, Dr. Spence, and Dr. Grossman reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Four years ago, Atrium Health, in Charlotte, N.C., embarked on a dramatic change in how it cares for newborns exposed to opioids in the womb.
Until then, most of the 700 or so babies who underwent opioid withdrawal each year in the hospital system spent their first weeks in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), isolated from their parents and treated with regular doses of morphine to ease their symptoms.
Now, most babies stay in the hospital for just a few days under a new approach called Eat, Sleep, Console. These young patients stay in private rooms where they can bond with their parents and volunteer caregivers. The usual course of treatment is no longer extended therapy with opioid replacements. Instead, mothers are encouraged to stay overnight and are taught how to sooth their babies with swaddling, rocking, and cooing.
As a result, the average length of stay for newborns with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) has dropped from 12 days to 6. Use of morphine has fallen by 79%, from 2.25 to 0.45 mg/kg per stay, according to results of a quality improvement pilot project at one of Atrium’s community hospitals.
Similar outcomes from other hospitals around the country have led to widespread uptake of Eat, Sleep, Console since its advent in 2017. That year, according to federal data, seven newborns were diagnosed with NAS for every 1,000 births.
Advocates say the family-centric model helps parents feel less stigmatized and more confident in their ability to care for their babies, who can have symptoms such as irritability and difficulty feeding for months.
The approach “really empowers families to do what they do best, which is take care of each other,” Douglas Dodds, MD, a pediatrician who led the effort at Atrium, told this news organization.
Questioning the old protocols
Numerous state perinatal collaboratives, hospital associations, and health systems say the program is the new standard of care for infants with NAS and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS).
Twenty-six hospitals have adopted Eat, Sleep, Console as part of a clinical trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health and a program called Advancing Clinical Trials in Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome (ACT NOW). Researchers are comparing the approach to previous care protocols in regard to 12 outcomes, including time to medical readiness for discharge, frequency of opioid replacement therapy, and safety problems, such as seizures during treatment.
The transition has been swift. Less than a decade ago, most hospitals used the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System, which was developed in the 1970s to assess babies whose mothers had used heroin during pregnancy.
The Finnegan score entails monitoring babies every 3 hours for 21 symptoms, including high-pitched crying, sneezing, gastrointestinal problems, and yawning. If a baby scores an 8 or more three times in a row, most protocols using the traditional Finnegan approach recommend that providers move infants to an NICU, where they receive morphine or methadone. Once opioid replacement therapy is started, the protocols require a gradual weaning that lasts 3-4 weeks.
As the opioid epidemic grew and NICUs around the country began to fill with babies experiencing NAS or NOW, some clinicians began to question the Finnegan-driven approach.
“You have these miserable babies who are going through this really tough experience, and our first move is to separate them from their moms,” said Matthew Grossman, MD, a pediatric hospitalist at Yale New Haven Children’s Hospital, New Haven, Conn., who created Eat, Sleep, Console.
Dr. Grossman, associate professor and vice chair for quality in the department of pediatrics at Yale University, said he noticed that when mothers stayed overnight with their babies, the infants tended to have fewer withdrawal symptoms. Indeed, previous studies had demonstrated the benefits of breastfeeding and allowing mothers and babies to share a room.
“If you think of mom as a medicine, then you can’t put the baby in a unit where the mom can’t be there,” Dr. Grossman told this news organization. “It would be like taking a kid with pneumonia and putting him in a unit that doesn’t have antibiotics.”
Despite its prominence, the Finnegan score has never been validated for guiding the treatment of NAS. In addition, Finnegan scores can be inconsistent, and the assessment requires disturbing an infant to check signs such as its startle reflex, which, as Dr. Grossman and his fellow researchers pointed out, flies in the face of American Academy of Pediatrics’ recommendations to prioritize swaddling and minimize stimulation for infants with NAS.
By contrast, Eat, Sleep, Console offers a simplified assessment. Interventions are called for if a baby eats less than an ounce of food at a time/does not breastfeed, sleeps less than an hour at a stretch, or takes more than 10 minutes to be consoled. After nonpharmacologic interventions have been tried, doses of medication are used as needed. Babies who are doing well can be discharged in as few as 4 days.
Quashing bias against parents with substance abuse disorder
Even with the promise of shorter stays and better care, switching to nonpharmacologic care presents hurdles for hospitals. Among these is a lack of physical space for mothers to room with their babies in a quiet environment.
“In many community hospitals, the only place for infants to go is a neonatal intensive care unit, outside of the newborn nursery,” said Stephen Patrick, MD, MPH, associate professor and director of the Center for Child Health Policy at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn., who researches stigma associated with opioid use during pregnancy.
Administrators at SSM St. Mary’s Hospital in St. Louis initially balked at providing private rooms for mothers and their babies with NAS and NOWS, according to Kimberly Spence, MD, a neonatologist at SSM Health. She said the initial plan was to put the babies in a busy, brightly lit nursery.
But resistance waned as the hospital convinced health plans to pay for private rooms for the 5-7 days it typically takes a baby to go through withdrawal, said Dr. Spence, associate professor of pediatrics at Saint Louis University.
“We were able to provide enough data that this is evidence-based medicine and babies do better with their moms, and that ethically, this is the right thing to do, to reduce transfers to an NICU,” she said.
In addition, news stories about the family-centric approach and shorter stays for infants, along with SSM’s launch of an outpatient clinic to treat pregnant women with opioid use disorder, helped the system to attract more patients and increase its market share, said Dr. Spence.
Another challenge was getting physicians and nurses to set aside any judgments of parents with substance abuse disorder, according to Dr. Grossman and others.
“A lot of faculty and staff on the medical team didn’t feel like we should trust moms with their babies’ medical care” at SSM, Dr. Spence said.
Some hospitals conduct anti-bias training to teach providers that substance abuse is a disease that deserves proper medical treatment and not the moral failing of a patient. Such education may involve explaining that babies’ outcomes are improved when women undergo treatment with methadone or buprenorphine during pregnancy, even though use of those medications does pose a risk of NAS.
Creating a system that supports parents with substance abuse disorders may help to change perceptions. At Atrium Health, some staff members now enjoy working with these families because they can make a profound impact, Dr. Dodds said. He said they’ve learned that families suffering from substance abuse disorder “are not that different than any other family.”
Dr. Dodds, Dr. Patrick, Dr. Spence, and Dr. Grossman reported no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
One thing is certain, says survey: Doctors hate taxes
For the Medscape Physicians and Taxes Report 2022, physicians shared information about their tax debt as well as how they feel about the U.S. tax code, audits, and the prospects for the future.
Even though it may not always seem that way to physicians, their family tax bills – around $75,406 on average – are in line with the other top 10% of U.S. taxpayers, according to an examination of IRS data by the Tax Foundation. However, when it comes to local taxes, the Tax Foundation found that physicians pay more than average. (Forty-three states collect tax on individual incomes.)
The average physician’s family pays a 35% marginal tax rate, compared with the top marginal tax rate in the United States of 37%. (The marginal tax rate is the highest amount of tax charged on each additional dollar after the IRS bracket rates are applied to your income.)
According to Alexis Gallati, founder of Cerebral Tax Advisors, a Knoxville, Tenn.–based firm that caters to medical professionals, doctors also should pay attention to their effective tax rate, or the percentage of income they pay in taxes. It takes into account differing tax rates on ordinary income, capital gains, and other income sources, she says. “It gives a better 30,000-foot view of your tax situation.”
Some high-income families are required to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), though in 2019 that applied to only one-tenth of U.S. households. The AMT is designed to make sure that high earners with many options for exemptions and deductions still contribute a minimum amount of tax. Only 13% of physicians surveyed said they paid the AMT, though 29% were unsure.
Filing taxes as painful as paying them
According to a 2021 Gallup poll, 50% of Americans think they pay too much tax. (About 44% think their tax bill is about right, and a kindhearted 4% think they pay too little.) Doctors are outliers on this one, with 75% saying they pay too much in taxes.
When asked what they would do to fix the tax system, the physicians in the Medscape survey had a wide array of proposed solutions, from “drop the corporate tax rate to nearly nothing to stimulate the economy” to “everyone should pay equitably. There are too many loopholes for the very wealthy.”
Some of the complaints were less about tax rates than the process of filing. One respondent said: “I would love for this system to not be our personal responsibility. Why should it be my duty to pay someone every year to do my taxes?”
About 48% of physicians prepare their own taxes (about the same percentage as the rest of the population), with most of those filing electronically, primarily because it saves time and the software is easy to use. Intuit TurboTax was the most popular online software, with 22% of respondents saying they currently used this product.
Of those who did pay someone to prepare their taxes, the complexity of their taxes cost them; the average respondent paid about three times the average rate for the service. In the long run, the cost might have been recouped.
Navjeet Chahal, managing partner and CEO of Chahal and Associates, a San Francisco–area firm specializing in working with physicians, points out that tax advisors don’t just fill out the forms; they proactively advise physicians about how they can limit their taxes. And indeed, most respondents feel that they got their money’s worth, with 70% saying their tax preparers charged a fair fee.
Though the physicians surveyed tended to think they pay too much tax, and several mentioned particular gripes with the system, the complexity of the tax code didn’t seem to be a big issue. While 82% of Americans polled in 2021 by Pew Research said they were bothered “a lot” or “some” by the complexity of the tax system, 68% of physicians agreed or slightly agreed that the U.S. tax system “makes sense.”
Gimme a break
Physicians are the beneficiaries of several types of tax breaks. Contributing to a pretax 401(k) account was the most common exemption, with 60% of physicians surveyed using this plan. Other tax breaks cited by respondents were: contributing to charity (54%), home mortgage interest (46%), and writing off business expenses (39%).
About one in five physicians has experienced an audit, but that risk has declined significantly in recent years, thanks to tighter IRS budgets. Overall, only about 1 in 167 U.S. taxpayers were audited in 2020, according to the IRS. Even for taxpayers reporting $5 million or more in income, the audit rate is only about 0.25%, the Government Accountability Office says.
The odds of a physician being summoned to a meeting with an auditor probably won’t increase for a few years, Mr. Gallati said. But the good news for doctors is bad news for lower-income Americans. “The IRS is woefully understaffed and underfunded, with the result that the agency is going for lower-hanging fruit and auditing more people in lower income brackets,” she said in an interview.
While one respondent described his experience with the IRS as “the audit from hell,” others thought it not so bad, with 72% saying the auditors treated them fairly. One respondent described the audit as “boring, short, and successful for me. The IRS owed me money.”
When it comes to taxes, physician respondents, on the whole, did not seem to be optimistic about the future. About 61% expect an increase in their tax rate because of Biden administration policies. One respondent veered into hyperbole with the comment: “I believe taxes will increase for physicians until they have no more money!”
Mr. Chahal doesn’t see it that way. He pointed out that recent attempts to raise taxes completely failed. “I personally don’t see that happening unless there’s a significant shift in the House and the Senate.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
For the Medscape Physicians and Taxes Report 2022, physicians shared information about their tax debt as well as how they feel about the U.S. tax code, audits, and the prospects for the future.
Even though it may not always seem that way to physicians, their family tax bills – around $75,406 on average – are in line with the other top 10% of U.S. taxpayers, according to an examination of IRS data by the Tax Foundation. However, when it comes to local taxes, the Tax Foundation found that physicians pay more than average. (Forty-three states collect tax on individual incomes.)
The average physician’s family pays a 35% marginal tax rate, compared with the top marginal tax rate in the United States of 37%. (The marginal tax rate is the highest amount of tax charged on each additional dollar after the IRS bracket rates are applied to your income.)
According to Alexis Gallati, founder of Cerebral Tax Advisors, a Knoxville, Tenn.–based firm that caters to medical professionals, doctors also should pay attention to their effective tax rate, or the percentage of income they pay in taxes. It takes into account differing tax rates on ordinary income, capital gains, and other income sources, she says. “It gives a better 30,000-foot view of your tax situation.”
Some high-income families are required to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), though in 2019 that applied to only one-tenth of U.S. households. The AMT is designed to make sure that high earners with many options for exemptions and deductions still contribute a minimum amount of tax. Only 13% of physicians surveyed said they paid the AMT, though 29% were unsure.
Filing taxes as painful as paying them
According to a 2021 Gallup poll, 50% of Americans think they pay too much tax. (About 44% think their tax bill is about right, and a kindhearted 4% think they pay too little.) Doctors are outliers on this one, with 75% saying they pay too much in taxes.
When asked what they would do to fix the tax system, the physicians in the Medscape survey had a wide array of proposed solutions, from “drop the corporate tax rate to nearly nothing to stimulate the economy” to “everyone should pay equitably. There are too many loopholes for the very wealthy.”
Some of the complaints were less about tax rates than the process of filing. One respondent said: “I would love for this system to not be our personal responsibility. Why should it be my duty to pay someone every year to do my taxes?”
About 48% of physicians prepare their own taxes (about the same percentage as the rest of the population), with most of those filing electronically, primarily because it saves time and the software is easy to use. Intuit TurboTax was the most popular online software, with 22% of respondents saying they currently used this product.
Of those who did pay someone to prepare their taxes, the complexity of their taxes cost them; the average respondent paid about three times the average rate for the service. In the long run, the cost might have been recouped.
Navjeet Chahal, managing partner and CEO of Chahal and Associates, a San Francisco–area firm specializing in working with physicians, points out that tax advisors don’t just fill out the forms; they proactively advise physicians about how they can limit their taxes. And indeed, most respondents feel that they got their money’s worth, with 70% saying their tax preparers charged a fair fee.
Though the physicians surveyed tended to think they pay too much tax, and several mentioned particular gripes with the system, the complexity of the tax code didn’t seem to be a big issue. While 82% of Americans polled in 2021 by Pew Research said they were bothered “a lot” or “some” by the complexity of the tax system, 68% of physicians agreed or slightly agreed that the U.S. tax system “makes sense.”
Gimme a break
Physicians are the beneficiaries of several types of tax breaks. Contributing to a pretax 401(k) account was the most common exemption, with 60% of physicians surveyed using this plan. Other tax breaks cited by respondents were: contributing to charity (54%), home mortgage interest (46%), and writing off business expenses (39%).
About one in five physicians has experienced an audit, but that risk has declined significantly in recent years, thanks to tighter IRS budgets. Overall, only about 1 in 167 U.S. taxpayers were audited in 2020, according to the IRS. Even for taxpayers reporting $5 million or more in income, the audit rate is only about 0.25%, the Government Accountability Office says.
The odds of a physician being summoned to a meeting with an auditor probably won’t increase for a few years, Mr. Gallati said. But the good news for doctors is bad news for lower-income Americans. “The IRS is woefully understaffed and underfunded, with the result that the agency is going for lower-hanging fruit and auditing more people in lower income brackets,” she said in an interview.
While one respondent described his experience with the IRS as “the audit from hell,” others thought it not so bad, with 72% saying the auditors treated them fairly. One respondent described the audit as “boring, short, and successful for me. The IRS owed me money.”
When it comes to taxes, physician respondents, on the whole, did not seem to be optimistic about the future. About 61% expect an increase in their tax rate because of Biden administration policies. One respondent veered into hyperbole with the comment: “I believe taxes will increase for physicians until they have no more money!”
Mr. Chahal doesn’t see it that way. He pointed out that recent attempts to raise taxes completely failed. “I personally don’t see that happening unless there’s a significant shift in the House and the Senate.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
For the Medscape Physicians and Taxes Report 2022, physicians shared information about their tax debt as well as how they feel about the U.S. tax code, audits, and the prospects for the future.
Even though it may not always seem that way to physicians, their family tax bills – around $75,406 on average – are in line with the other top 10% of U.S. taxpayers, according to an examination of IRS data by the Tax Foundation. However, when it comes to local taxes, the Tax Foundation found that physicians pay more than average. (Forty-three states collect tax on individual incomes.)
The average physician’s family pays a 35% marginal tax rate, compared with the top marginal tax rate in the United States of 37%. (The marginal tax rate is the highest amount of tax charged on each additional dollar after the IRS bracket rates are applied to your income.)
According to Alexis Gallati, founder of Cerebral Tax Advisors, a Knoxville, Tenn.–based firm that caters to medical professionals, doctors also should pay attention to their effective tax rate, or the percentage of income they pay in taxes. It takes into account differing tax rates on ordinary income, capital gains, and other income sources, she says. “It gives a better 30,000-foot view of your tax situation.”
Some high-income families are required to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), though in 2019 that applied to only one-tenth of U.S. households. The AMT is designed to make sure that high earners with many options for exemptions and deductions still contribute a minimum amount of tax. Only 13% of physicians surveyed said they paid the AMT, though 29% were unsure.
Filing taxes as painful as paying them
According to a 2021 Gallup poll, 50% of Americans think they pay too much tax. (About 44% think their tax bill is about right, and a kindhearted 4% think they pay too little.) Doctors are outliers on this one, with 75% saying they pay too much in taxes.
When asked what they would do to fix the tax system, the physicians in the Medscape survey had a wide array of proposed solutions, from “drop the corporate tax rate to nearly nothing to stimulate the economy” to “everyone should pay equitably. There are too many loopholes for the very wealthy.”
Some of the complaints were less about tax rates than the process of filing. One respondent said: “I would love for this system to not be our personal responsibility. Why should it be my duty to pay someone every year to do my taxes?”
About 48% of physicians prepare their own taxes (about the same percentage as the rest of the population), with most of those filing electronically, primarily because it saves time and the software is easy to use. Intuit TurboTax was the most popular online software, with 22% of respondents saying they currently used this product.
Of those who did pay someone to prepare their taxes, the complexity of their taxes cost them; the average respondent paid about three times the average rate for the service. In the long run, the cost might have been recouped.
Navjeet Chahal, managing partner and CEO of Chahal and Associates, a San Francisco–area firm specializing in working with physicians, points out that tax advisors don’t just fill out the forms; they proactively advise physicians about how they can limit their taxes. And indeed, most respondents feel that they got their money’s worth, with 70% saying their tax preparers charged a fair fee.
Though the physicians surveyed tended to think they pay too much tax, and several mentioned particular gripes with the system, the complexity of the tax code didn’t seem to be a big issue. While 82% of Americans polled in 2021 by Pew Research said they were bothered “a lot” or “some” by the complexity of the tax system, 68% of physicians agreed or slightly agreed that the U.S. tax system “makes sense.”
Gimme a break
Physicians are the beneficiaries of several types of tax breaks. Contributing to a pretax 401(k) account was the most common exemption, with 60% of physicians surveyed using this plan. Other tax breaks cited by respondents were: contributing to charity (54%), home mortgage interest (46%), and writing off business expenses (39%).
About one in five physicians has experienced an audit, but that risk has declined significantly in recent years, thanks to tighter IRS budgets. Overall, only about 1 in 167 U.S. taxpayers were audited in 2020, according to the IRS. Even for taxpayers reporting $5 million or more in income, the audit rate is only about 0.25%, the Government Accountability Office says.
The odds of a physician being summoned to a meeting with an auditor probably won’t increase for a few years, Mr. Gallati said. But the good news for doctors is bad news for lower-income Americans. “The IRS is woefully understaffed and underfunded, with the result that the agency is going for lower-hanging fruit and auditing more people in lower income brackets,” she said in an interview.
While one respondent described his experience with the IRS as “the audit from hell,” others thought it not so bad, with 72% saying the auditors treated them fairly. One respondent described the audit as “boring, short, and successful for me. The IRS owed me money.”
When it comes to taxes, physician respondents, on the whole, did not seem to be optimistic about the future. About 61% expect an increase in their tax rate because of Biden administration policies. One respondent veered into hyperbole with the comment: “I believe taxes will increase for physicians until they have no more money!”
Mr. Chahal doesn’t see it that way. He pointed out that recent attempts to raise taxes completely failed. “I personally don’t see that happening unless there’s a significant shift in the House and the Senate.”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Anxiety in COPD: Consequential, but often overlooked
Anand S. Iyer, MD, MSPH, frequently hears his patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) express fear and hopelessness and describe panic and other symptoms of anxiety. He sees anxiety affect the course of COPD, worsening symptoms and outcomes.
“I had questions about what we are doing [to help patients], so I began looking into the role of palliative care to help patients assess and manage these complex emotional and psychological symptoms,” said Dr. Iyer, assistant professor in the division of pulmonology, allergy, and critical care medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
His research is now focused on the integration of palliative care principles in COPD care. For Dr. Iyer and others engaged in research and/or patient care, finding ways of identifying and managing anxiety in patients with COPD – and other chronic lung diseases – is a calling of growing urgency.
More has been published about anxiety in patients with COPD than in other pulmonary conditions – and . Prevalence rates vary from about 1 in 4, to 1 in 2 or higher, depending on the instruments used and whether clinical DSM-based diagnoses are made, Dr. Iyer said.
A 2013 systematic review of 10 studies that utilized clinical interviews based on DSM criteria, for instance, found a prevalence of clinical anxiety of 10%-55% among inpatients and 13%-46% among outpatients with COPD. The results were similar, investigators said, to studies using self-report screening tools (Respiratory Care 2013;58[5]:858-66).
In the 16 years since an ACCP workshop panel on anxiety and depression in COPD reported higher prevalence rates than for other chronic diseases and detailed a host of problems and research needs (CHEST. 2008;134;43S-56), investigators have more fully documented links to COPD outcomes, showing, for instance, that anxiety predicts exacerbations, hospitalizations, poorer adherence to therapies, poorer quality of life and higher mortality.
Dr. Iyer and other experts say anxiety is still too often a neglected comorbidity. “It’s still underdiagnosed and therefore undertreated,” said Nick Hanania, MD, MS, professor of medicine and director of the Airways Clinical Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.
The literature on optimal approaches for management remains limited, and the role of pharmacotherapy for anxiety (and depression) in the context of COPD has not been well investigated. But there have been some advances: Screening tools have been further studied, questionnaires specific to COPD have been developed, and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) have both been shown to be effective in decreasing anxiety.
Researchers and academic clinicians are talking, meanwhile, about how to have to important conversations about anxiety with patients who have COPD and other chronic lung conditions, and how improve care in the face of significant health system challenges.
Understanding anxiety in COPD
Anxiety is often intertwined with dyspnea in a bidirectional and complex relationship, but anxiety in COPD is not always acute or limited to times of acute exacerbations.
“There’s not only the acute experience of shortness of breath or a lung change episode, but there’s an anticipation that can occur, psychologically and socially,” said Lauren Garvin, PhD, of the department of psychiatry at the University of Iowa, Iowa City. Patients worry, “what if I’m short of breath in a particular situation? What if my devices fail when I’m out somewhere?”
Patients are often living “in a state of heightened surveillance of the body,” she noted, which can be exhausting and can impact functioning.
It’s also important to appreciate that anxiety is “a continuum of experience,” said Karin Hoth, PhD, associate professor of psychiatry at the medical school, whose research includes projects focusing on psychological adjustment in COPD.
“Research historically categorizes anxiety as ‘have or don’t have.’ But there’s a continuum of experience that we’re moving toward understanding and recognizing in research,” she said. “Anxiety is part of a patient’s whole experience, no matter where one falls on the continuum.”
Female sex, current smoking, greater airflow restrictions – and in some studies, younger age – have all been associated with a greater risk of anxiety in COPD. (It may well be that women receive more attention, leaving men with higher rates of undiagnosed anxiety, Dr. Hoth said.)
Dr. Iyer stresses the complex relationship between smoking – the No. 1 cause of COPD – and anxiety. Smoking has been associated in multiple studies with an increased risk of anxiety (Brain and Behavior. 2013;3[3]:302-26), he said. (A study led by Dr. Iyer found a similar frequency of anxiety symptoms in smokers with and without COPD [Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2019;118:18-26].)
Some patients with COPD and anxiety may smoke in order to ease their anxiety, he said, making management of anxiety an important part of the smoking cessation desired for COPD improvement.
COPD medications such as bronchodilators may cause transient symptoms of anxiety, but these are rare and short-lived, Dr. Iyer said.
Screening tools and conversations
“It’s not just us not thinking about anxiety that’s the problem, it’s also patients thinking that it’s just the disease [causing their anxiety symptoms],” said Dr. Hanania, a member of the 2006 ACCP panel and an author of numerous papers on COPD and anxiety and depression. “There’s quite a bit of overlap between COPD symptoms and anxiety and depression symptoms, and unless you use structured questionnaires, you may not pick it up,” he said.
Screening tools include the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale, the PHQ-9 for depression and anxiety, and the longer Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Dr. Iyer noted, has been well validated for use in ambulatory settings.
Validated screening tools specific to anxiety in COPD are also now an option. Abebaw M. Yohannes, PhD, MSc, FCCP, professor in the department of physical therapy at Azuza Pacific University in Orange, Calif., and the author of numerous studies on COPD and anxiety, developed one of these tools – the 10-item Anxiety Inventory for Respiratory Disease (AIR) scale – out of concern that other surveys contain overlapping somatic symptoms (Chest. 2013;144[5]:1587-96).
“We removed the physical symptoms [of anxiety] that often manifest in patients with COPD,” he said.
Dr. Iyer said screening tools can effectively “highlight which person might be dealing with high levels of anxiety symptoms that might meet a threshold of clinical significance and require collaborative or interprofessional management,” including with psychologists and psychiatrists.
They can also open the door to conversation with patients. “I’ll often bluntly ask, do you feel anxious? Do you feel scared, or hopeless about what the future holds for you?,” he said. “Anxiety about the future plays a big role, and helping patients navigate the illness and understand early how it might look … can ease the level of anxiety.”
Asking patients about their experiences in managing their symptoms and about their psychological and emotional well-being can help to normalize anxiety – and it can be therapeutic, said Dr. Hoth and Dr. Garvin. Asking “how it’s going with the things that really matter in [their] life” is often a good question, they said.
Patients “won’t be offended if you ask,” said Dr. Hoth. “They view their mood and [whole] well-being as part of their medical condition.”
Time is a challenge, she said, but “conversation can be done little by little, as part of a philosophy of engaging the patient around their whole functioning, even if there’s not [a need or] a route to refer just then.”
Such early and integrated conversation borrows from the palliative care model. “Palliative care is a specialty, but it can also be an approach to care,” Dr. Iyer said. He is leading a National Institutes of Health–funded study on nurse-coach–led early palliative care for older adults with COPD and wants to see training opportunities for pulmonologists to learn basic palliative care skills that would equip them to better guide management of mild-moderate anxiety and other complex symptoms.
Pulmonary rehabilitation
For many patients with COPD who have anxiety and/or depressive symptoms, referral for nonpharmacologic therapies such as psychotherapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is “one of the best things you can do,” Dr. Iyer said.
“If patients haven’t done pulmonary rehabilitation, get them in. And if they have done it before, get them back into it again,” he emphasized. “Accredited programs give a holistic approach to improving your strength, your breathlessness, your mindset and understanding of your breathlessness, and your own levels of security.”
Studies addressing the impact of PR and CBT on anxiety have been mostly small and observational but have yielded encouraging findings. A 2017 review reported that PR and CBT were effective in the treatment of anxiety and dyspnea, in the short term, in the majority of 47 studies (JAMA. 2017;18[12]:1096.e1-1096.e17). And a 2019 systematic review and meta-analysis focused on PR reported that, across 11 studies comprising 734 patients, PR conferred significant benefits for anxiety and depression compared with usual care (CHEST. 2019;156[1]:80-91).
Dr. Yohannes, Dr. Hanania, and colleagues recently reported on 734 patients with clinically stable COPD who completed a community-based 8-week PR program of 2 hours a week: 1 hour of exercise and 1 hour of education, the latter of which covered anxiety, panic management, and relaxation.
Patients who had severe dyspnea and comorbid anxiety and depression prior to PR – one-third of the group compared with 20% having anxiety alone and 5% having depression alone – had the most significant improvements in dyspnea scores and anxiety and depression scores (Respir Med. Apr 9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106850.)
The problem is, pulmonary rehabilitation is under-reimbursed and not widely accessible. It’s logistically challenging for patients to attend therapy 2-3 times a week. And according to a recently published study by Dr. Yohannes, Dr. Hanania, and colleagues, patients with more anxiety and dyspnea may be at higher risk of dropping out (Respir Med. 2022 Jan 20. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.10674). Moreover, Dr. Iyer said, there is a shortage of programs that are accredited.
Telehealth may help on some of these fronts. The efficacy of real-time video PR for COPD is being investigated in a randomized NIH trial (now in the recruitment phase) led by pulmonologist Surya P. Bhatt, MD, also at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Researchers also need to investigate issues of sustainability – to learn what “works best in the long run,” Dr. Iyer said.
Dr. Yohannes and Dr. Hanania are encouraged by a recent finding that patients with COPD who completed 8 weeks of PR maintained improvements in anxiety and quality-of-life scores at 2 years. (Improvements in dyspnea and other outcomes did not persist.) (CHEST. 2021;159[3]:967-74). Prospective studies contrasting maintenance programs with no maintenance following PR, are needed, they wrote.
Understanding psychological interventions
Dr. Hoth and Dr. Garvin advise their pulmonologist colleagues to feel as confident as possible in describing for patients what CBT and other psychological therapies entail.
“A person [with COPD] who is experiencing something on the continuum of anxiety might be really turning inward and [assessing] unwanted internal experiences” and accompanying thoughts, sensations, emotional impacts and behaviors, Dr. Garvin said.
Among the goals, she said, are to “make shifts around those internal experiences that might invoke some more tolerance or that might shift their relationship with the experiences, or even with the diagnosis itself and all the uncertainties it carries.”
Psychological therapies can involve social support, or “breath and grounding work,” she said. “There are lots of different approaches from different providers.”
Dr. Yohannes advocates incorporating principles of CBT into PR. “In the absence of one-on-one or group [stand-alone] CBT … the principles are worth incorporating as part of the education piece [of PR],” he said. “CBT helps patients to refocus their attention. … and gives them self-confidence to engage in exercise and to function a bit more in their daily activities.”
None of those interviewed for this story reported having any relevant conflicts of interest.
Anand S. Iyer, MD, MSPH, frequently hears his patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) express fear and hopelessness and describe panic and other symptoms of anxiety. He sees anxiety affect the course of COPD, worsening symptoms and outcomes.
“I had questions about what we are doing [to help patients], so I began looking into the role of palliative care to help patients assess and manage these complex emotional and psychological symptoms,” said Dr. Iyer, assistant professor in the division of pulmonology, allergy, and critical care medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
His research is now focused on the integration of palliative care principles in COPD care. For Dr. Iyer and others engaged in research and/or patient care, finding ways of identifying and managing anxiety in patients with COPD – and other chronic lung diseases – is a calling of growing urgency.
More has been published about anxiety in patients with COPD than in other pulmonary conditions – and . Prevalence rates vary from about 1 in 4, to 1 in 2 or higher, depending on the instruments used and whether clinical DSM-based diagnoses are made, Dr. Iyer said.
A 2013 systematic review of 10 studies that utilized clinical interviews based on DSM criteria, for instance, found a prevalence of clinical anxiety of 10%-55% among inpatients and 13%-46% among outpatients with COPD. The results were similar, investigators said, to studies using self-report screening tools (Respiratory Care 2013;58[5]:858-66).
In the 16 years since an ACCP workshop panel on anxiety and depression in COPD reported higher prevalence rates than for other chronic diseases and detailed a host of problems and research needs (CHEST. 2008;134;43S-56), investigators have more fully documented links to COPD outcomes, showing, for instance, that anxiety predicts exacerbations, hospitalizations, poorer adherence to therapies, poorer quality of life and higher mortality.
Dr. Iyer and other experts say anxiety is still too often a neglected comorbidity. “It’s still underdiagnosed and therefore undertreated,” said Nick Hanania, MD, MS, professor of medicine and director of the Airways Clinical Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.
The literature on optimal approaches for management remains limited, and the role of pharmacotherapy for anxiety (and depression) in the context of COPD has not been well investigated. But there have been some advances: Screening tools have been further studied, questionnaires specific to COPD have been developed, and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) have both been shown to be effective in decreasing anxiety.
Researchers and academic clinicians are talking, meanwhile, about how to have to important conversations about anxiety with patients who have COPD and other chronic lung conditions, and how improve care in the face of significant health system challenges.
Understanding anxiety in COPD
Anxiety is often intertwined with dyspnea in a bidirectional and complex relationship, but anxiety in COPD is not always acute or limited to times of acute exacerbations.
“There’s not only the acute experience of shortness of breath or a lung change episode, but there’s an anticipation that can occur, psychologically and socially,” said Lauren Garvin, PhD, of the department of psychiatry at the University of Iowa, Iowa City. Patients worry, “what if I’m short of breath in a particular situation? What if my devices fail when I’m out somewhere?”
Patients are often living “in a state of heightened surveillance of the body,” she noted, which can be exhausting and can impact functioning.
It’s also important to appreciate that anxiety is “a continuum of experience,” said Karin Hoth, PhD, associate professor of psychiatry at the medical school, whose research includes projects focusing on psychological adjustment in COPD.
“Research historically categorizes anxiety as ‘have or don’t have.’ But there’s a continuum of experience that we’re moving toward understanding and recognizing in research,” she said. “Anxiety is part of a patient’s whole experience, no matter where one falls on the continuum.”
Female sex, current smoking, greater airflow restrictions – and in some studies, younger age – have all been associated with a greater risk of anxiety in COPD. (It may well be that women receive more attention, leaving men with higher rates of undiagnosed anxiety, Dr. Hoth said.)
Dr. Iyer stresses the complex relationship between smoking – the No. 1 cause of COPD – and anxiety. Smoking has been associated in multiple studies with an increased risk of anxiety (Brain and Behavior. 2013;3[3]:302-26), he said. (A study led by Dr. Iyer found a similar frequency of anxiety symptoms in smokers with and without COPD [Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2019;118:18-26].)
Some patients with COPD and anxiety may smoke in order to ease their anxiety, he said, making management of anxiety an important part of the smoking cessation desired for COPD improvement.
COPD medications such as bronchodilators may cause transient symptoms of anxiety, but these are rare and short-lived, Dr. Iyer said.
Screening tools and conversations
“It’s not just us not thinking about anxiety that’s the problem, it’s also patients thinking that it’s just the disease [causing their anxiety symptoms],” said Dr. Hanania, a member of the 2006 ACCP panel and an author of numerous papers on COPD and anxiety and depression. “There’s quite a bit of overlap between COPD symptoms and anxiety and depression symptoms, and unless you use structured questionnaires, you may not pick it up,” he said.
Screening tools include the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale, the PHQ-9 for depression and anxiety, and the longer Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Dr. Iyer noted, has been well validated for use in ambulatory settings.
Validated screening tools specific to anxiety in COPD are also now an option. Abebaw M. Yohannes, PhD, MSc, FCCP, professor in the department of physical therapy at Azuza Pacific University in Orange, Calif., and the author of numerous studies on COPD and anxiety, developed one of these tools – the 10-item Anxiety Inventory for Respiratory Disease (AIR) scale – out of concern that other surveys contain overlapping somatic symptoms (Chest. 2013;144[5]:1587-96).
“We removed the physical symptoms [of anxiety] that often manifest in patients with COPD,” he said.
Dr. Iyer said screening tools can effectively “highlight which person might be dealing with high levels of anxiety symptoms that might meet a threshold of clinical significance and require collaborative or interprofessional management,” including with psychologists and psychiatrists.
They can also open the door to conversation with patients. “I’ll often bluntly ask, do you feel anxious? Do you feel scared, or hopeless about what the future holds for you?,” he said. “Anxiety about the future plays a big role, and helping patients navigate the illness and understand early how it might look … can ease the level of anxiety.”
Asking patients about their experiences in managing their symptoms and about their psychological and emotional well-being can help to normalize anxiety – and it can be therapeutic, said Dr. Hoth and Dr. Garvin. Asking “how it’s going with the things that really matter in [their] life” is often a good question, they said.
Patients “won’t be offended if you ask,” said Dr. Hoth. “They view their mood and [whole] well-being as part of their medical condition.”
Time is a challenge, she said, but “conversation can be done little by little, as part of a philosophy of engaging the patient around their whole functioning, even if there’s not [a need or] a route to refer just then.”
Such early and integrated conversation borrows from the palliative care model. “Palliative care is a specialty, but it can also be an approach to care,” Dr. Iyer said. He is leading a National Institutes of Health–funded study on nurse-coach–led early palliative care for older adults with COPD and wants to see training opportunities for pulmonologists to learn basic palliative care skills that would equip them to better guide management of mild-moderate anxiety and other complex symptoms.
Pulmonary rehabilitation
For many patients with COPD who have anxiety and/or depressive symptoms, referral for nonpharmacologic therapies such as psychotherapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is “one of the best things you can do,” Dr. Iyer said.
“If patients haven’t done pulmonary rehabilitation, get them in. And if they have done it before, get them back into it again,” he emphasized. “Accredited programs give a holistic approach to improving your strength, your breathlessness, your mindset and understanding of your breathlessness, and your own levels of security.”
Studies addressing the impact of PR and CBT on anxiety have been mostly small and observational but have yielded encouraging findings. A 2017 review reported that PR and CBT were effective in the treatment of anxiety and dyspnea, in the short term, in the majority of 47 studies (JAMA. 2017;18[12]:1096.e1-1096.e17). And a 2019 systematic review and meta-analysis focused on PR reported that, across 11 studies comprising 734 patients, PR conferred significant benefits for anxiety and depression compared with usual care (CHEST. 2019;156[1]:80-91).
Dr. Yohannes, Dr. Hanania, and colleagues recently reported on 734 patients with clinically stable COPD who completed a community-based 8-week PR program of 2 hours a week: 1 hour of exercise and 1 hour of education, the latter of which covered anxiety, panic management, and relaxation.
Patients who had severe dyspnea and comorbid anxiety and depression prior to PR – one-third of the group compared with 20% having anxiety alone and 5% having depression alone – had the most significant improvements in dyspnea scores and anxiety and depression scores (Respir Med. Apr 9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106850.)
The problem is, pulmonary rehabilitation is under-reimbursed and not widely accessible. It’s logistically challenging for patients to attend therapy 2-3 times a week. And according to a recently published study by Dr. Yohannes, Dr. Hanania, and colleagues, patients with more anxiety and dyspnea may be at higher risk of dropping out (Respir Med. 2022 Jan 20. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.10674). Moreover, Dr. Iyer said, there is a shortage of programs that are accredited.
Telehealth may help on some of these fronts. The efficacy of real-time video PR for COPD is being investigated in a randomized NIH trial (now in the recruitment phase) led by pulmonologist Surya P. Bhatt, MD, also at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Researchers also need to investigate issues of sustainability – to learn what “works best in the long run,” Dr. Iyer said.
Dr. Yohannes and Dr. Hanania are encouraged by a recent finding that patients with COPD who completed 8 weeks of PR maintained improvements in anxiety and quality-of-life scores at 2 years. (Improvements in dyspnea and other outcomes did not persist.) (CHEST. 2021;159[3]:967-74). Prospective studies contrasting maintenance programs with no maintenance following PR, are needed, they wrote.
Understanding psychological interventions
Dr. Hoth and Dr. Garvin advise their pulmonologist colleagues to feel as confident as possible in describing for patients what CBT and other psychological therapies entail.
“A person [with COPD] who is experiencing something on the continuum of anxiety might be really turning inward and [assessing] unwanted internal experiences” and accompanying thoughts, sensations, emotional impacts and behaviors, Dr. Garvin said.
Among the goals, she said, are to “make shifts around those internal experiences that might invoke some more tolerance or that might shift their relationship with the experiences, or even with the diagnosis itself and all the uncertainties it carries.”
Psychological therapies can involve social support, or “breath and grounding work,” she said. “There are lots of different approaches from different providers.”
Dr. Yohannes advocates incorporating principles of CBT into PR. “In the absence of one-on-one or group [stand-alone] CBT … the principles are worth incorporating as part of the education piece [of PR],” he said. “CBT helps patients to refocus their attention. … and gives them self-confidence to engage in exercise and to function a bit more in their daily activities.”
None of those interviewed for this story reported having any relevant conflicts of interest.
Anand S. Iyer, MD, MSPH, frequently hears his patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) express fear and hopelessness and describe panic and other symptoms of anxiety. He sees anxiety affect the course of COPD, worsening symptoms and outcomes.
“I had questions about what we are doing [to help patients], so I began looking into the role of palliative care to help patients assess and manage these complex emotional and psychological symptoms,” said Dr. Iyer, assistant professor in the division of pulmonology, allergy, and critical care medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
His research is now focused on the integration of palliative care principles in COPD care. For Dr. Iyer and others engaged in research and/or patient care, finding ways of identifying and managing anxiety in patients with COPD – and other chronic lung diseases – is a calling of growing urgency.
More has been published about anxiety in patients with COPD than in other pulmonary conditions – and . Prevalence rates vary from about 1 in 4, to 1 in 2 or higher, depending on the instruments used and whether clinical DSM-based diagnoses are made, Dr. Iyer said.
A 2013 systematic review of 10 studies that utilized clinical interviews based on DSM criteria, for instance, found a prevalence of clinical anxiety of 10%-55% among inpatients and 13%-46% among outpatients with COPD. The results were similar, investigators said, to studies using self-report screening tools (Respiratory Care 2013;58[5]:858-66).
In the 16 years since an ACCP workshop panel on anxiety and depression in COPD reported higher prevalence rates than for other chronic diseases and detailed a host of problems and research needs (CHEST. 2008;134;43S-56), investigators have more fully documented links to COPD outcomes, showing, for instance, that anxiety predicts exacerbations, hospitalizations, poorer adherence to therapies, poorer quality of life and higher mortality.
Dr. Iyer and other experts say anxiety is still too often a neglected comorbidity. “It’s still underdiagnosed and therefore undertreated,” said Nick Hanania, MD, MS, professor of medicine and director of the Airways Clinical Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.
The literature on optimal approaches for management remains limited, and the role of pharmacotherapy for anxiety (and depression) in the context of COPD has not been well investigated. But there have been some advances: Screening tools have been further studied, questionnaires specific to COPD have been developed, and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) have both been shown to be effective in decreasing anxiety.
Researchers and academic clinicians are talking, meanwhile, about how to have to important conversations about anxiety with patients who have COPD and other chronic lung conditions, and how improve care in the face of significant health system challenges.
Understanding anxiety in COPD
Anxiety is often intertwined with dyspnea in a bidirectional and complex relationship, but anxiety in COPD is not always acute or limited to times of acute exacerbations.
“There’s not only the acute experience of shortness of breath or a lung change episode, but there’s an anticipation that can occur, psychologically and socially,” said Lauren Garvin, PhD, of the department of psychiatry at the University of Iowa, Iowa City. Patients worry, “what if I’m short of breath in a particular situation? What if my devices fail when I’m out somewhere?”
Patients are often living “in a state of heightened surveillance of the body,” she noted, which can be exhausting and can impact functioning.
It’s also important to appreciate that anxiety is “a continuum of experience,” said Karin Hoth, PhD, associate professor of psychiatry at the medical school, whose research includes projects focusing on psychological adjustment in COPD.
“Research historically categorizes anxiety as ‘have or don’t have.’ But there’s a continuum of experience that we’re moving toward understanding and recognizing in research,” she said. “Anxiety is part of a patient’s whole experience, no matter where one falls on the continuum.”
Female sex, current smoking, greater airflow restrictions – and in some studies, younger age – have all been associated with a greater risk of anxiety in COPD. (It may well be that women receive more attention, leaving men with higher rates of undiagnosed anxiety, Dr. Hoth said.)
Dr. Iyer stresses the complex relationship between smoking – the No. 1 cause of COPD – and anxiety. Smoking has been associated in multiple studies with an increased risk of anxiety (Brain and Behavior. 2013;3[3]:302-26), he said. (A study led by Dr. Iyer found a similar frequency of anxiety symptoms in smokers with and without COPD [Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2019;118:18-26].)
Some patients with COPD and anxiety may smoke in order to ease their anxiety, he said, making management of anxiety an important part of the smoking cessation desired for COPD improvement.
COPD medications such as bronchodilators may cause transient symptoms of anxiety, but these are rare and short-lived, Dr. Iyer said.
Screening tools and conversations
“It’s not just us not thinking about anxiety that’s the problem, it’s also patients thinking that it’s just the disease [causing their anxiety symptoms],” said Dr. Hanania, a member of the 2006 ACCP panel and an author of numerous papers on COPD and anxiety and depression. “There’s quite a bit of overlap between COPD symptoms and anxiety and depression symptoms, and unless you use structured questionnaires, you may not pick it up,” he said.
Screening tools include the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale, the PHQ-9 for depression and anxiety, and the longer Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Dr. Iyer noted, has been well validated for use in ambulatory settings.
Validated screening tools specific to anxiety in COPD are also now an option. Abebaw M. Yohannes, PhD, MSc, FCCP, professor in the department of physical therapy at Azuza Pacific University in Orange, Calif., and the author of numerous studies on COPD and anxiety, developed one of these tools – the 10-item Anxiety Inventory for Respiratory Disease (AIR) scale – out of concern that other surveys contain overlapping somatic symptoms (Chest. 2013;144[5]:1587-96).
“We removed the physical symptoms [of anxiety] that often manifest in patients with COPD,” he said.
Dr. Iyer said screening tools can effectively “highlight which person might be dealing with high levels of anxiety symptoms that might meet a threshold of clinical significance and require collaborative or interprofessional management,” including with psychologists and psychiatrists.
They can also open the door to conversation with patients. “I’ll often bluntly ask, do you feel anxious? Do you feel scared, or hopeless about what the future holds for you?,” he said. “Anxiety about the future plays a big role, and helping patients navigate the illness and understand early how it might look … can ease the level of anxiety.”
Asking patients about their experiences in managing their symptoms and about their psychological and emotional well-being can help to normalize anxiety – and it can be therapeutic, said Dr. Hoth and Dr. Garvin. Asking “how it’s going with the things that really matter in [their] life” is often a good question, they said.
Patients “won’t be offended if you ask,” said Dr. Hoth. “They view their mood and [whole] well-being as part of their medical condition.”
Time is a challenge, she said, but “conversation can be done little by little, as part of a philosophy of engaging the patient around their whole functioning, even if there’s not [a need or] a route to refer just then.”
Such early and integrated conversation borrows from the palliative care model. “Palliative care is a specialty, but it can also be an approach to care,” Dr. Iyer said. He is leading a National Institutes of Health–funded study on nurse-coach–led early palliative care for older adults with COPD and wants to see training opportunities for pulmonologists to learn basic palliative care skills that would equip them to better guide management of mild-moderate anxiety and other complex symptoms.
Pulmonary rehabilitation
For many patients with COPD who have anxiety and/or depressive symptoms, referral for nonpharmacologic therapies such as psychotherapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is “one of the best things you can do,” Dr. Iyer said.
“If patients haven’t done pulmonary rehabilitation, get them in. And if they have done it before, get them back into it again,” he emphasized. “Accredited programs give a holistic approach to improving your strength, your breathlessness, your mindset and understanding of your breathlessness, and your own levels of security.”
Studies addressing the impact of PR and CBT on anxiety have been mostly small and observational but have yielded encouraging findings. A 2017 review reported that PR and CBT were effective in the treatment of anxiety and dyspnea, in the short term, in the majority of 47 studies (JAMA. 2017;18[12]:1096.e1-1096.e17). And a 2019 systematic review and meta-analysis focused on PR reported that, across 11 studies comprising 734 patients, PR conferred significant benefits for anxiety and depression compared with usual care (CHEST. 2019;156[1]:80-91).
Dr. Yohannes, Dr. Hanania, and colleagues recently reported on 734 patients with clinically stable COPD who completed a community-based 8-week PR program of 2 hours a week: 1 hour of exercise and 1 hour of education, the latter of which covered anxiety, panic management, and relaxation.
Patients who had severe dyspnea and comorbid anxiety and depression prior to PR – one-third of the group compared with 20% having anxiety alone and 5% having depression alone – had the most significant improvements in dyspnea scores and anxiety and depression scores (Respir Med. Apr 9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106850.)
The problem is, pulmonary rehabilitation is under-reimbursed and not widely accessible. It’s logistically challenging for patients to attend therapy 2-3 times a week. And according to a recently published study by Dr. Yohannes, Dr. Hanania, and colleagues, patients with more anxiety and dyspnea may be at higher risk of dropping out (Respir Med. 2022 Jan 20. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.10674). Moreover, Dr. Iyer said, there is a shortage of programs that are accredited.
Telehealth may help on some of these fronts. The efficacy of real-time video PR for COPD is being investigated in a randomized NIH trial (now in the recruitment phase) led by pulmonologist Surya P. Bhatt, MD, also at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Researchers also need to investigate issues of sustainability – to learn what “works best in the long run,” Dr. Iyer said.
Dr. Yohannes and Dr. Hanania are encouraged by a recent finding that patients with COPD who completed 8 weeks of PR maintained improvements in anxiety and quality-of-life scores at 2 years. (Improvements in dyspnea and other outcomes did not persist.) (CHEST. 2021;159[3]:967-74). Prospective studies contrasting maintenance programs with no maintenance following PR, are needed, they wrote.
Understanding psychological interventions
Dr. Hoth and Dr. Garvin advise their pulmonologist colleagues to feel as confident as possible in describing for patients what CBT and other psychological therapies entail.
“A person [with COPD] who is experiencing something on the continuum of anxiety might be really turning inward and [assessing] unwanted internal experiences” and accompanying thoughts, sensations, emotional impacts and behaviors, Dr. Garvin said.
Among the goals, she said, are to “make shifts around those internal experiences that might invoke some more tolerance or that might shift their relationship with the experiences, or even with the diagnosis itself and all the uncertainties it carries.”
Psychological therapies can involve social support, or “breath and grounding work,” she said. “There are lots of different approaches from different providers.”
Dr. Yohannes advocates incorporating principles of CBT into PR. “In the absence of one-on-one or group [stand-alone] CBT … the principles are worth incorporating as part of the education piece [of PR],” he said. “CBT helps patients to refocus their attention. … and gives them self-confidence to engage in exercise and to function a bit more in their daily activities.”
None of those interviewed for this story reported having any relevant conflicts of interest.
Pig heart transplants and the ethical challenges that lie ahead
The long-struggling field of cardiac xenotransplantation has had a very good year.
In January, the University of Maryland made history by keeping a 57-year-old man deemed too sick for a human heart transplant alive for 2 months with a genetically engineered pig heart. On July 12, New York University surgeons reported that heart function was “completely normal with excellent contractility” in two brain-dead patients with pig hearts beating in their chests for 72 hours.
The NYU team approached the project with a decedent model in mind and, after discussions with their IRB equivalent, settled on a 72-hour window because that’s the time they typically keep people ventilated when trying to place their organs, explained Robert A. Montgomery, MD, DPhil, director of the NYU Langone Transplant Institute.
“There’s no real ethical argument for that,” he said in an interview. The consideration is what the family is willing to do when trying to balance doing “something very altruistic and good versus having closure.”
Some families have religious beliefs that burial or interment has to occur very rapidly, whereas others, including one of the family donors, were willing to have the research go on much longer, Dr. Montgomery said. Indeed, the next protocol is being written to consider maintaining the bodies for 2-4 weeks.
“People do vary and you have to kind of accommodate that variation,” he said. “For some people, this isn’t going to be what they’re going to want and that’s why you have to go through the consent process.”
Informed authorization
Arthur L. Caplan, PhD, director of medical ethics at the NYU Langone Medical Center, said the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act recognizes an individual’s right to be an organ donor for transplant and research, but it “mentions nothing about maintaining you in a dead state artificially for research purposes.”
“It’s a major shift in what people are thinking about doing when they die or their relatives die,” he said.
Because organ donation is controlled at the state, not federal, level, the possibility of donating organs for xenotransplantation, like medical aid in dying, will vary between states, observed Dr. Caplan. The best way to ensure that patients whose organs are found to be unsuitable for transplantation have the option is to change state laws.
He noted that cases are already springing up where people are requesting postmortem sperm or egg donations without direct consents from the person who died. “So we have this new area opening up of handling the use of the dead body and we need to bring the law into sync with the possibilities that are out there.”
In terms of informed authorization (informed consent is reserved for the living), Dr. Caplan said there should be written evidence the person wanted to be a donor and, while not required by law, all survivors should give their permission and understand what’s going to be done in terms of the experiment, such as the use of animal parts, when the body will be returned, and the possibility of zoonotic viral infection.
“They have to fully accept that the person is dead and we’re just maintaining them artificially,” he said. “There’s no maintaining anyone who’s alive. That’s a source of a lot of confusion.”
Special committees also need to be appointed with voices from people in organ procurement, law, theology, and patient groups to monitor practice to ensure people who have given permission understood the process, that families have their questions answered independent of the research team, and that clear limits are set on how long experiments will last.
As to what those limits should be: “I think in terms of a week or 2,” Dr. Caplan said. “Obviously we could maintain bodies longer and people have. But I think, culturally in our society, going much past that starts to perhaps stress emotionally, psychologically, family and friends about getting closure.”
“I’m not as comfortable when people say things like, ‘How about 2 months?’ ” he said. “That’s a long time to sort of accept the fact that somebody has died but you can’t complete all the things that go along with the death.”
Dr. Caplan is also uncomfortable with the use of one-off emergency authorizations, as used for Maryland resident David Bennett Sr., who was rejected for standard heart transplantation and required mechanical circulatory support to stay alive.
“It’s too premature, I believe, even to try and rescue someone,” he said. “We need to learn more from the deceased models.”
A better model
Dr. Montgomery noted that primates are very imperfect models for predicting what’s going to happen in humans, and that in order to do xenotransplantation in living humans, there are only two pathways – the one-off emergency authorization or a clinical phase 1 trial.
The decedent model, he said, “will make human trials safer because it’s an intermediate step. You don’t have a living human’s life on the line when you’re trying to do iterative changes and improve the procedure.”
The team, for example, omitted a perfusion pump that was used in the Maryland case and would likely have made its way into phase 1 trials based on baboon data that suggested it was important to have the heart on the pump for hours before it was transplanted, he said. “We didn’t do any of that. We just did it like we would do a regular heart transplant and it started right up, immediately, and started to work.”
The researchers did not release details on the immunosuppression regimen, but noted that, unlike Maryland, they also did not use the experimental anti-CD40 antibody to tamp down the recipients’ immune system.
Although Mr. Bennett’s autopsy did not show any conventional sign of graft rejection, the transplanted pig heart was infected with porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) and Mr. Bennett showed traces of DNA from PCMV in his circulation.
Nailing down safety
Dr. Montgomery said he wouldn’t rule out xenotransplantation in a living human, but that the safety issues need to be nailed down. “I think that the tests used on the pig that was the donor for the Bennett case were not sensitive enough for latent virus, and that’s how it slipped through. So there was a bit of going back to the drawing board, really looking at each of the tests, and being sure we had the sensitivity to pick up a latent virus.”
He noted that United Therapeutics, which funded the research and provided the engineered pigs through its subsidiary Revivicor, has created and validated a more sensitive polymerase chain reaction test that covers some 35 different pathogens, microbes, and parasites. NYU has also developed its own platform to repeat the testing and for monitoring after the transplant. “The ones that we’re currently using would have picked up the virus.”
Stuart Russell, MD, a professor of medicine who specializes in advanced HF at Duke University, Durham, N.C., said “the biggest thing from my perspective is those two amazing families that were willing let this happen. ... If 20 years from now, this is what we’re doing, it’s related to these families being this generous at a really tough time in their lives.”
Dr. Russell said he awaits publication of the data on what the pathology of the heart looks like, but that the experiments “help to give us a lot of reassurance that we don’t need to worry about hyperacute rejection,” which by definition is going to happen in the first 24-48 hours.
That said, longer-term data is essential to potential safety issues. Notably, among the 10 genetic modifications made to the pigs, four were porcine gene knockouts, including a growth hormone receptor knockout to prevent abnormal organ growth inside the recipient’s chest. As a result, the organs seem to be small for the age of the pig and just don’t grow that well, admitted Dr. Montgomery, who said they are currently analyzing this with echocardiography.
Dr. Russell said this may create a sizing issue, but also “if you have a heart that’s more stressed in the pig, from the point of being a donor, maybe it’s not as good a heart as if it was growing normally. But that kind of stuff, I think, is going to take more than two cases and longer-term data to sort out.”
Sharon Hunt, MD, professor emerita, Stanford (Calif.) University Medical Center, and past president of the International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation, said it’s not the technical aspects, but the biology of xenotransplantation that’s really daunting.
“It’s not the physical act of doing it, like they needed a bigger heart or a smaller heart. Those are technical problems but they’ll manage them,” she said. “The big problem is biological – and the bottom line is we don’t really know. We may have overcome hyperacute rejection, which is great, but the rest remains to be seen.”
Dr. Hunt, who worked with heart transplantation pioneer Norman Shumway, MD, and spent decades caring for patients after transplantation, said most families will consent to 24 or 48 hours or even a week of experimentation on a brain-dead loved one, but what the transplant community wants to know is whether this is workable for many months.
“So the fact that the xenotransplant works for 72 hours, yeah, that’s groovy. But, you know, the answer is kind of ‘so what,’ ” she said. “I’d like to see this go for months, like they were trying to do in the human in Maryland.”
For phase 1 trials, even longer-term survival with or without rejection or with rejection that’s treatable is needed, Dr. Hunt suggested.
“We haven’t seen that yet. The Maryland people were very valiant but they lost the cause,” she said. “There’s just so much more to do before we have a viable model to start anything like a phase 1 trial. I’d love it if that happens in my lifetime, but I’m not sure it’s going to.”
Dr. Russell and Dr. Hunt reported no relevant financial relationships. Dr. Caplan reported serving as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant, or trustee for Johnson & Johnson’s Panel for Compassionate Drug Use (unpaid position) and is a contributing author and adviser for Medscape.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
The long-struggling field of cardiac xenotransplantation has had a very good year.
In January, the University of Maryland made history by keeping a 57-year-old man deemed too sick for a human heart transplant alive for 2 months with a genetically engineered pig heart. On July 12, New York University surgeons reported that heart function was “completely normal with excellent contractility” in two brain-dead patients with pig hearts beating in their chests for 72 hours.
The NYU team approached the project with a decedent model in mind and, after discussions with their IRB equivalent, settled on a 72-hour window because that’s the time they typically keep people ventilated when trying to place their organs, explained Robert A. Montgomery, MD, DPhil, director of the NYU Langone Transplant Institute.
“There’s no real ethical argument for that,” he said in an interview. The consideration is what the family is willing to do when trying to balance doing “something very altruistic and good versus having closure.”
Some families have religious beliefs that burial or interment has to occur very rapidly, whereas others, including one of the family donors, were willing to have the research go on much longer, Dr. Montgomery said. Indeed, the next protocol is being written to consider maintaining the bodies for 2-4 weeks.
“People do vary and you have to kind of accommodate that variation,” he said. “For some people, this isn’t going to be what they’re going to want and that’s why you have to go through the consent process.”
Informed authorization
Arthur L. Caplan, PhD, director of medical ethics at the NYU Langone Medical Center, said the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act recognizes an individual’s right to be an organ donor for transplant and research, but it “mentions nothing about maintaining you in a dead state artificially for research purposes.”
“It’s a major shift in what people are thinking about doing when they die or their relatives die,” he said.
Because organ donation is controlled at the state, not federal, level, the possibility of donating organs for xenotransplantation, like medical aid in dying, will vary between states, observed Dr. Caplan. The best way to ensure that patients whose organs are found to be unsuitable for transplantation have the option is to change state laws.
He noted that cases are already springing up where people are requesting postmortem sperm or egg donations without direct consents from the person who died. “So we have this new area opening up of handling the use of the dead body and we need to bring the law into sync with the possibilities that are out there.”
In terms of informed authorization (informed consent is reserved for the living), Dr. Caplan said there should be written evidence the person wanted to be a donor and, while not required by law, all survivors should give their permission and understand what’s going to be done in terms of the experiment, such as the use of animal parts, when the body will be returned, and the possibility of zoonotic viral infection.
“They have to fully accept that the person is dead and we’re just maintaining them artificially,” he said. “There’s no maintaining anyone who’s alive. That’s a source of a lot of confusion.”
Special committees also need to be appointed with voices from people in organ procurement, law, theology, and patient groups to monitor practice to ensure people who have given permission understood the process, that families have their questions answered independent of the research team, and that clear limits are set on how long experiments will last.
As to what those limits should be: “I think in terms of a week or 2,” Dr. Caplan said. “Obviously we could maintain bodies longer and people have. But I think, culturally in our society, going much past that starts to perhaps stress emotionally, psychologically, family and friends about getting closure.”
“I’m not as comfortable when people say things like, ‘How about 2 months?’ ” he said. “That’s a long time to sort of accept the fact that somebody has died but you can’t complete all the things that go along with the death.”
Dr. Caplan is also uncomfortable with the use of one-off emergency authorizations, as used for Maryland resident David Bennett Sr., who was rejected for standard heart transplantation and required mechanical circulatory support to stay alive.
“It’s too premature, I believe, even to try and rescue someone,” he said. “We need to learn more from the deceased models.”
A better model
Dr. Montgomery noted that primates are very imperfect models for predicting what’s going to happen in humans, and that in order to do xenotransplantation in living humans, there are only two pathways – the one-off emergency authorization or a clinical phase 1 trial.
The decedent model, he said, “will make human trials safer because it’s an intermediate step. You don’t have a living human’s life on the line when you’re trying to do iterative changes and improve the procedure.”
The team, for example, omitted a perfusion pump that was used in the Maryland case and would likely have made its way into phase 1 trials based on baboon data that suggested it was important to have the heart on the pump for hours before it was transplanted, he said. “We didn’t do any of that. We just did it like we would do a regular heart transplant and it started right up, immediately, and started to work.”
The researchers did not release details on the immunosuppression regimen, but noted that, unlike Maryland, they also did not use the experimental anti-CD40 antibody to tamp down the recipients’ immune system.
Although Mr. Bennett’s autopsy did not show any conventional sign of graft rejection, the transplanted pig heart was infected with porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) and Mr. Bennett showed traces of DNA from PCMV in his circulation.
Nailing down safety
Dr. Montgomery said he wouldn’t rule out xenotransplantation in a living human, but that the safety issues need to be nailed down. “I think that the tests used on the pig that was the donor for the Bennett case were not sensitive enough for latent virus, and that’s how it slipped through. So there was a bit of going back to the drawing board, really looking at each of the tests, and being sure we had the sensitivity to pick up a latent virus.”
He noted that United Therapeutics, which funded the research and provided the engineered pigs through its subsidiary Revivicor, has created and validated a more sensitive polymerase chain reaction test that covers some 35 different pathogens, microbes, and parasites. NYU has also developed its own platform to repeat the testing and for monitoring after the transplant. “The ones that we’re currently using would have picked up the virus.”
Stuart Russell, MD, a professor of medicine who specializes in advanced HF at Duke University, Durham, N.C., said “the biggest thing from my perspective is those two amazing families that were willing let this happen. ... If 20 years from now, this is what we’re doing, it’s related to these families being this generous at a really tough time in their lives.”
Dr. Russell said he awaits publication of the data on what the pathology of the heart looks like, but that the experiments “help to give us a lot of reassurance that we don’t need to worry about hyperacute rejection,” which by definition is going to happen in the first 24-48 hours.
That said, longer-term data is essential to potential safety issues. Notably, among the 10 genetic modifications made to the pigs, four were porcine gene knockouts, including a growth hormone receptor knockout to prevent abnormal organ growth inside the recipient’s chest. As a result, the organs seem to be small for the age of the pig and just don’t grow that well, admitted Dr. Montgomery, who said they are currently analyzing this with echocardiography.
Dr. Russell said this may create a sizing issue, but also “if you have a heart that’s more stressed in the pig, from the point of being a donor, maybe it’s not as good a heart as if it was growing normally. But that kind of stuff, I think, is going to take more than two cases and longer-term data to sort out.”
Sharon Hunt, MD, professor emerita, Stanford (Calif.) University Medical Center, and past president of the International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation, said it’s not the technical aspects, but the biology of xenotransplantation that’s really daunting.
“It’s not the physical act of doing it, like they needed a bigger heart or a smaller heart. Those are technical problems but they’ll manage them,” she said. “The big problem is biological – and the bottom line is we don’t really know. We may have overcome hyperacute rejection, which is great, but the rest remains to be seen.”
Dr. Hunt, who worked with heart transplantation pioneer Norman Shumway, MD, and spent decades caring for patients after transplantation, said most families will consent to 24 or 48 hours or even a week of experimentation on a brain-dead loved one, but what the transplant community wants to know is whether this is workable for many months.
“So the fact that the xenotransplant works for 72 hours, yeah, that’s groovy. But, you know, the answer is kind of ‘so what,’ ” she said. “I’d like to see this go for months, like they were trying to do in the human in Maryland.”
For phase 1 trials, even longer-term survival with or without rejection or with rejection that’s treatable is needed, Dr. Hunt suggested.
“We haven’t seen that yet. The Maryland people were very valiant but they lost the cause,” she said. “There’s just so much more to do before we have a viable model to start anything like a phase 1 trial. I’d love it if that happens in my lifetime, but I’m not sure it’s going to.”
Dr. Russell and Dr. Hunt reported no relevant financial relationships. Dr. Caplan reported serving as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant, or trustee for Johnson & Johnson’s Panel for Compassionate Drug Use (unpaid position) and is a contributing author and adviser for Medscape.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
The long-struggling field of cardiac xenotransplantation has had a very good year.
In January, the University of Maryland made history by keeping a 57-year-old man deemed too sick for a human heart transplant alive for 2 months with a genetically engineered pig heart. On July 12, New York University surgeons reported that heart function was “completely normal with excellent contractility” in two brain-dead patients with pig hearts beating in their chests for 72 hours.
The NYU team approached the project with a decedent model in mind and, after discussions with their IRB equivalent, settled on a 72-hour window because that’s the time they typically keep people ventilated when trying to place their organs, explained Robert A. Montgomery, MD, DPhil, director of the NYU Langone Transplant Institute.
“There’s no real ethical argument for that,” he said in an interview. The consideration is what the family is willing to do when trying to balance doing “something very altruistic and good versus having closure.”
Some families have religious beliefs that burial or interment has to occur very rapidly, whereas others, including one of the family donors, were willing to have the research go on much longer, Dr. Montgomery said. Indeed, the next protocol is being written to consider maintaining the bodies for 2-4 weeks.
“People do vary and you have to kind of accommodate that variation,” he said. “For some people, this isn’t going to be what they’re going to want and that’s why you have to go through the consent process.”
Informed authorization
Arthur L. Caplan, PhD, director of medical ethics at the NYU Langone Medical Center, said the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act recognizes an individual’s right to be an organ donor for transplant and research, but it “mentions nothing about maintaining you in a dead state artificially for research purposes.”
“It’s a major shift in what people are thinking about doing when they die or their relatives die,” he said.
Because organ donation is controlled at the state, not federal, level, the possibility of donating organs for xenotransplantation, like medical aid in dying, will vary between states, observed Dr. Caplan. The best way to ensure that patients whose organs are found to be unsuitable for transplantation have the option is to change state laws.
He noted that cases are already springing up where people are requesting postmortem sperm or egg donations without direct consents from the person who died. “So we have this new area opening up of handling the use of the dead body and we need to bring the law into sync with the possibilities that are out there.”
In terms of informed authorization (informed consent is reserved for the living), Dr. Caplan said there should be written evidence the person wanted to be a donor and, while not required by law, all survivors should give their permission and understand what’s going to be done in terms of the experiment, such as the use of animal parts, when the body will be returned, and the possibility of zoonotic viral infection.
“They have to fully accept that the person is dead and we’re just maintaining them artificially,” he said. “There’s no maintaining anyone who’s alive. That’s a source of a lot of confusion.”
Special committees also need to be appointed with voices from people in organ procurement, law, theology, and patient groups to monitor practice to ensure people who have given permission understood the process, that families have their questions answered independent of the research team, and that clear limits are set on how long experiments will last.
As to what those limits should be: “I think in terms of a week or 2,” Dr. Caplan said. “Obviously we could maintain bodies longer and people have. But I think, culturally in our society, going much past that starts to perhaps stress emotionally, psychologically, family and friends about getting closure.”
“I’m not as comfortable when people say things like, ‘How about 2 months?’ ” he said. “That’s a long time to sort of accept the fact that somebody has died but you can’t complete all the things that go along with the death.”
Dr. Caplan is also uncomfortable with the use of one-off emergency authorizations, as used for Maryland resident David Bennett Sr., who was rejected for standard heart transplantation and required mechanical circulatory support to stay alive.
“It’s too premature, I believe, even to try and rescue someone,” he said. “We need to learn more from the deceased models.”
A better model
Dr. Montgomery noted that primates are very imperfect models for predicting what’s going to happen in humans, and that in order to do xenotransplantation in living humans, there are only two pathways – the one-off emergency authorization or a clinical phase 1 trial.
The decedent model, he said, “will make human trials safer because it’s an intermediate step. You don’t have a living human’s life on the line when you’re trying to do iterative changes and improve the procedure.”
The team, for example, omitted a perfusion pump that was used in the Maryland case and would likely have made its way into phase 1 trials based on baboon data that suggested it was important to have the heart on the pump for hours before it was transplanted, he said. “We didn’t do any of that. We just did it like we would do a regular heart transplant and it started right up, immediately, and started to work.”
The researchers did not release details on the immunosuppression regimen, but noted that, unlike Maryland, they also did not use the experimental anti-CD40 antibody to tamp down the recipients’ immune system.
Although Mr. Bennett’s autopsy did not show any conventional sign of graft rejection, the transplanted pig heart was infected with porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) and Mr. Bennett showed traces of DNA from PCMV in his circulation.
Nailing down safety
Dr. Montgomery said he wouldn’t rule out xenotransplantation in a living human, but that the safety issues need to be nailed down. “I think that the tests used on the pig that was the donor for the Bennett case were not sensitive enough for latent virus, and that’s how it slipped through. So there was a bit of going back to the drawing board, really looking at each of the tests, and being sure we had the sensitivity to pick up a latent virus.”
He noted that United Therapeutics, which funded the research and provided the engineered pigs through its subsidiary Revivicor, has created and validated a more sensitive polymerase chain reaction test that covers some 35 different pathogens, microbes, and parasites. NYU has also developed its own platform to repeat the testing and for monitoring after the transplant. “The ones that we’re currently using would have picked up the virus.”
Stuart Russell, MD, a professor of medicine who specializes in advanced HF at Duke University, Durham, N.C., said “the biggest thing from my perspective is those two amazing families that were willing let this happen. ... If 20 years from now, this is what we’re doing, it’s related to these families being this generous at a really tough time in their lives.”
Dr. Russell said he awaits publication of the data on what the pathology of the heart looks like, but that the experiments “help to give us a lot of reassurance that we don’t need to worry about hyperacute rejection,” which by definition is going to happen in the first 24-48 hours.
That said, longer-term data is essential to potential safety issues. Notably, among the 10 genetic modifications made to the pigs, four were porcine gene knockouts, including a growth hormone receptor knockout to prevent abnormal organ growth inside the recipient’s chest. As a result, the organs seem to be small for the age of the pig and just don’t grow that well, admitted Dr. Montgomery, who said they are currently analyzing this with echocardiography.
Dr. Russell said this may create a sizing issue, but also “if you have a heart that’s more stressed in the pig, from the point of being a donor, maybe it’s not as good a heart as if it was growing normally. But that kind of stuff, I think, is going to take more than two cases and longer-term data to sort out.”
Sharon Hunt, MD, professor emerita, Stanford (Calif.) University Medical Center, and past president of the International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation, said it’s not the technical aspects, but the biology of xenotransplantation that’s really daunting.
“It’s not the physical act of doing it, like they needed a bigger heart or a smaller heart. Those are technical problems but they’ll manage them,” she said. “The big problem is biological – and the bottom line is we don’t really know. We may have overcome hyperacute rejection, which is great, but the rest remains to be seen.”
Dr. Hunt, who worked with heart transplantation pioneer Norman Shumway, MD, and spent decades caring for patients after transplantation, said most families will consent to 24 or 48 hours or even a week of experimentation on a brain-dead loved one, but what the transplant community wants to know is whether this is workable for many months.
“So the fact that the xenotransplant works for 72 hours, yeah, that’s groovy. But, you know, the answer is kind of ‘so what,’ ” she said. “I’d like to see this go for months, like they were trying to do in the human in Maryland.”
For phase 1 trials, even longer-term survival with or without rejection or with rejection that’s treatable is needed, Dr. Hunt suggested.
“We haven’t seen that yet. The Maryland people were very valiant but they lost the cause,” she said. “There’s just so much more to do before we have a viable model to start anything like a phase 1 trial. I’d love it if that happens in my lifetime, but I’m not sure it’s going to.”
Dr. Russell and Dr. Hunt reported no relevant financial relationships. Dr. Caplan reported serving as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant, or trustee for Johnson & Johnson’s Panel for Compassionate Drug Use (unpaid position) and is a contributing author and adviser for Medscape.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
CAR T-cell therapy turns 10 and finally earns the word ‘cure’
Ten years ago, Stephan Grupp, MD, PhD, plunged into an unexplored area of pediatric cancer treatment with a 6-year-old patient for whom every treatment available for her acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) had been exhausted.
Dr. Grupp, a pioneer in cellular immunotherapy at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, had just got the green light to launch the first phase 1 trial of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for children.
“The trial opened at the absolute last possible moment that it could have been helpful to her,” he said in an interview. “There was nothing else to do to temporize her further. ... It had to open then or never.”
The patient was Emily Whitehead, who has since become a poster girl for the dramatic results that can be achieved with these novel therapies. After that one CAR T-cell treatment back in 2012, she has been free of her leukemia and has remained in remission for more than 10 years.
Dr. Grupp said that he is, at last, starting to use the “cure” word.
“I’m not just a doctor, I’m a scientist – and one case isn’t enough to have confidence about anything,” he said. “We wanted more patients to be out longer to be able to say that thing which we have for a long time called the ‘c word.’
“CAR T-cell therapy has now been given to hundreds of patients at CHOP, and – we are unique in this – we have a couple dozen patients who are 5, 6, 7, 9 years out or more without further therapy. That feels like a cure to me,” he commented.
First patient with ALL
Emily was the first patient with ALL to receive the novel treatment, and also the first child.
There was a precedent, however. After having been “stuck” for decades, the CAR T-cell field had recently made a breakthrough, thanks to research by Dr. Grupp’s colleague Carl June, MD, and associates at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. By tweaking two key steps in the genetic modification of T cells, Dr. June’s team had successfully treated three adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), two of whom were in complete remission.
But using the treatment for a child and for a different type of leukemia was a daunting prospect. Dr. Grupp said that he was candid with Emily’s parents, Tom and Kari Whitehead, emphasizing that there are no guarantees in cancer treatment, particularly in a phase 1 trial.
But the Whiteheads had no time to waste and nowhere else to turn. Her father, Tom, recalled saying: “This is something outside the box, this is going to give her a chance.”
Dr. Grupp, who described himself as being “on the cowboy end” of oncology care, was ready to take the plunge.
Little did any of them know that the treatment would make Emily even sicker than she already was, putting her in intensive care. But thanks to a combination of several lucky breaks and a lot of brain power, she would make a breathtakingly rapid recovery.
The ‘magic formula’
CAR T-cell therapy involves harvesting a patient’s T cells and modifying them in the lab with a chimeric antigen receptor to target CD19, a protein found on the surface of ALL cancer cells.
Before the University of Pennsylvania team tweaked the process, clinical trials of the therapy yielded only modest results because the modified T cells “were very powerful in the short term but had almost no proliferative capacity” once they were infused back into the patient, Dr. Grupp explained.
“It does not matter how many cells you give to a patient, what matters is that the cells grow in the patient to the level needed to control the leukemia,” he said.
Dr. June’s team came up with what Dr. Grupp calls “the magic formula”: A bead-based manufacturing process that produced younger T-cell phenotypes with “enormous” proliferative capacity, and a lentiviral approach to the genetic modification, enabling prolonged expression of the CAR-T molecule.
“Was it rogue? Absolutely, positively not,” said Dr. Grupp, thinking back to the day he enrolled Emily in the trial. “Was it risky? Obviously ... we all dived into this pool without knowing what was under the water, so I would say, rogue, no, risky, yes. And I would say we didn’t know nearly enough about the risks.”
Cytokine storm
The gravest risk that Dr. Grupp and his team encountered was something they had not anticipated. At the time, they had no name for it.
The three adults with CLL who had received CAR T-cell therapy had experienced a mild version that the researchers referred to as “tumor lysis syndrome”.
But for Emily, on day 3 of her CAR T-cell infusion, there was a ferocious reaction storm that later came to be called cytokine release syndrome.
“The wheels just came off then,” said Mr. Whitehead. “I remember her blood pressure was 53 over 29. They took her to the ICU, induced a coma, and put her on a ventilator. It was brutal to watch. The oscillatory ventilator just pounds on you, and there was blood bubbling out around the hose in her mouth.
“I remember the third or fourth night, a doctor took me in the hallway and said, ‘There’s a one-in-a-thousand chance your daughter is alive when the sun comes up,’” Mr. Whitehead said in an interview. “And I said: ‘All right, I’ll see you at rounds tomorrow, because she’ll still be here.’ ”
“We had some vague notion of toxicity ... but it turned out not nearly enough,” said Dr. Grupp. The ICU “worked flat out” to save her life. “They had deployed everything they had to keep a human being alive and they had nothing more to add. At some point, you run out of things that you can do, and we had run out.”
On the fly
It was then that the team ran into some good luck. The first break was when they decided to look at her cytokines. “Our whole knowledge base came together in the moment, on the fly, at the exact moment when Emily was so very sick,” he recalled. “Could we get the result fast enough? The lab dropped everything to run the test.”
They ordered a broad cytokine panel that included 30 analytes. The results showed that a number of cytokines “were just unbelievably elevated,” he said. Among them was interleukin-6.
“IL-6 isn’t even made by T cells, so nobody in the world would have guessed that this would have mattered. If we’d ordered a smaller panel, it might not even have been on it. Yet this was the one cytokine we had a drug for – tocilizumab – so that was chance. And then, another chance was that the drug was at the hospital, because there are rheumatology patients who get it.
“So, we went from making the determination that IL-6 was high and figuring out there was a drug for it at 3:00 o’clock to giving the drug to her at 8:00 o’clock, and then her clinical situation turned around so quickly – I mean hours later.”
Emily woke up from a 14-day medically induced coma on her seventh birthday.
Eight days later, her bone marrow showed complete remission. “The doctors said, ‘We’ve never seen anyone this sick get better any faster,’ ” Mr. Whitehead said.
She had already been through a battery of treatments for her leukemia. “It was 22 months of failed, standard treatment, and then just 23 days after they gave her the first dose of CAR T-cells that she was cancer free,” he added.
Talking about ‘cure’
Now that Emily, 17, has remained in remission for 10 years, Dr. Grupp is finally willing to use the word “cure” – but it has taken him a long time.
Now, he says, the challenge from the bedside is to keep parents’ and patients’ expectations realistic about what they see as a miracle cure.
“It’s not a miracle. We can get patients into remission 90-plus percent of the time – but some patients do relapse – and then there are the risks [of the cytokine storm, which can be life-threatening].
“Right now, our experience is that about 12% of patients end up in the ICU, but they hardly ever end up as sick as Emily ... because now we’re giving the tocilizumab much earlier,” Dr. Grupp said.
Hearing whispers
Since their daughter’s recovery, Tom and Kari Whitehead have dedicated much of their time to spreading the word about the treatment that saved Emily’s life. Mr. Whitehead testified at the Food and Drug Administration’s advisory committee meeting in 2017 when approval was being considered for the CAR T-cell product that Emily received. The product was tisagenlecleucel-T (Novartis); at that meeting, there was a unanimous vote to recommend approval. This was the first CAR T cell to reach the market.
As cofounders of the Emily Whitehead Foundation, Emily’s parents have helped raise more than $2 million to support research in the field, and they travel around the world telling their story to “move this revolution forward.”
Despite their fierce belief in the science that saved Emily, they also acknowledge there was luck – and faith. Early in their journey, when Emily experienced relapse after her initial treatments, Mr. Whitehead drew comfort from two visions, which he calls “whispers,” that guided them through several forks in the road and through tough decisions about Emily’s treatment.
Several times the parents refused treatment that was offered to Emily, and once they had her discharged against medical advice. “I told Kari she’s definitely going to beat her cancer – I saw it. I don’t know how it’s going to happen, but we’re going to be in the bone marrow transplant hallway [at CHOP] teaching her to walk again. I know a lot of doctors don’t want to hear anything about ‘a sign,’ or what guided us, but I don’t think you have to separate faith and science, I think it takes everything to make something like this to happen.”
Enduring effect
The key to the CAR T-cell breakthrough that gave rise to Emily’s therapy was cell proliferation, and the effect is enduring, beyond all expectations, said Dr. Grupp. The modified T cells are still detectable in Emily and other patients in long-term remission.
“The fundamental question is, are the cells still working, or are the patients cured and they don’t need them?” said Dr. Grupp. “I think it’s the latter. The data that we have from several large datasets that we developed with Novartis are that, if you get to a year and your minimal residual disease testing both by flow and by next-generation sequencing is negative and you still have B-cell aplasia, the relapse risk is close to zero at that point.”
While it’s still not clear if and when that risk will ever get to zero, Emily and Dr. Grupp have successfully closed the chapter.
“Oncologists have different notions of what the word ‘cure’ means. If your attitude is you’re not cured until you’ve basically reached the end of your life and you haven’t relapsed, well, that’s an impossible bar to hit. My attitude is, if your likelihood of having a disease recurrence is lower than the other risks in your life, like getting into your car and driving to your appointment, then that’s what a functional cure looks like,” he said.
“I’m probably the doctor that still sees her the most, but honestly, the whole conversation is not about leukemia at all. She has B-cell aplasia, so we have to treat that, and then it’s about making sure there’s no long-term side effects from the totality of her treatment. Generally, for a patient who’s gotten a moderate amount of chemotherapy and CAR T, that should not interfere with fertility. Has any patient in the history of the world ever relapsed more than 5 years out from their therapy? Of course. Is that incredibly rare? Yes, it is. You can be paralyzed by that, or you can compartmentalize it.”
As for the Whiteheads, they are focused on Emily’s college applications, her new driver’s license, and her project to cowrite a film about her story with a Hollywood filmmaker.
Mr. Whitehead said the one thing he hopes clinicians take away from their story is that sometimes a parent’s instinct transcends science.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Ten years ago, Stephan Grupp, MD, PhD, plunged into an unexplored area of pediatric cancer treatment with a 6-year-old patient for whom every treatment available for her acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) had been exhausted.
Dr. Grupp, a pioneer in cellular immunotherapy at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, had just got the green light to launch the first phase 1 trial of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for children.
“The trial opened at the absolute last possible moment that it could have been helpful to her,” he said in an interview. “There was nothing else to do to temporize her further. ... It had to open then or never.”
The patient was Emily Whitehead, who has since become a poster girl for the dramatic results that can be achieved with these novel therapies. After that one CAR T-cell treatment back in 2012, she has been free of her leukemia and has remained in remission for more than 10 years.
Dr. Grupp said that he is, at last, starting to use the “cure” word.
“I’m not just a doctor, I’m a scientist – and one case isn’t enough to have confidence about anything,” he said. “We wanted more patients to be out longer to be able to say that thing which we have for a long time called the ‘c word.’
“CAR T-cell therapy has now been given to hundreds of patients at CHOP, and – we are unique in this – we have a couple dozen patients who are 5, 6, 7, 9 years out or more without further therapy. That feels like a cure to me,” he commented.
First patient with ALL
Emily was the first patient with ALL to receive the novel treatment, and also the first child.
There was a precedent, however. After having been “stuck” for decades, the CAR T-cell field had recently made a breakthrough, thanks to research by Dr. Grupp’s colleague Carl June, MD, and associates at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. By tweaking two key steps in the genetic modification of T cells, Dr. June’s team had successfully treated three adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), two of whom were in complete remission.
But using the treatment for a child and for a different type of leukemia was a daunting prospect. Dr. Grupp said that he was candid with Emily’s parents, Tom and Kari Whitehead, emphasizing that there are no guarantees in cancer treatment, particularly in a phase 1 trial.
But the Whiteheads had no time to waste and nowhere else to turn. Her father, Tom, recalled saying: “This is something outside the box, this is going to give her a chance.”
Dr. Grupp, who described himself as being “on the cowboy end” of oncology care, was ready to take the plunge.
Little did any of them know that the treatment would make Emily even sicker than she already was, putting her in intensive care. But thanks to a combination of several lucky breaks and a lot of brain power, she would make a breathtakingly rapid recovery.
The ‘magic formula’
CAR T-cell therapy involves harvesting a patient’s T cells and modifying them in the lab with a chimeric antigen receptor to target CD19, a protein found on the surface of ALL cancer cells.
Before the University of Pennsylvania team tweaked the process, clinical trials of the therapy yielded only modest results because the modified T cells “were very powerful in the short term but had almost no proliferative capacity” once they were infused back into the patient, Dr. Grupp explained.
“It does not matter how many cells you give to a patient, what matters is that the cells grow in the patient to the level needed to control the leukemia,” he said.
Dr. June’s team came up with what Dr. Grupp calls “the magic formula”: A bead-based manufacturing process that produced younger T-cell phenotypes with “enormous” proliferative capacity, and a lentiviral approach to the genetic modification, enabling prolonged expression of the CAR-T molecule.
“Was it rogue? Absolutely, positively not,” said Dr. Grupp, thinking back to the day he enrolled Emily in the trial. “Was it risky? Obviously ... we all dived into this pool without knowing what was under the water, so I would say, rogue, no, risky, yes. And I would say we didn’t know nearly enough about the risks.”
Cytokine storm
The gravest risk that Dr. Grupp and his team encountered was something they had not anticipated. At the time, they had no name for it.
The three adults with CLL who had received CAR T-cell therapy had experienced a mild version that the researchers referred to as “tumor lysis syndrome”.
But for Emily, on day 3 of her CAR T-cell infusion, there was a ferocious reaction storm that later came to be called cytokine release syndrome.
“The wheels just came off then,” said Mr. Whitehead. “I remember her blood pressure was 53 over 29. They took her to the ICU, induced a coma, and put her on a ventilator. It was brutal to watch. The oscillatory ventilator just pounds on you, and there was blood bubbling out around the hose in her mouth.
“I remember the third or fourth night, a doctor took me in the hallway and said, ‘There’s a one-in-a-thousand chance your daughter is alive when the sun comes up,’” Mr. Whitehead said in an interview. “And I said: ‘All right, I’ll see you at rounds tomorrow, because she’ll still be here.’ ”
“We had some vague notion of toxicity ... but it turned out not nearly enough,” said Dr. Grupp. The ICU “worked flat out” to save her life. “They had deployed everything they had to keep a human being alive and they had nothing more to add. At some point, you run out of things that you can do, and we had run out.”
On the fly
It was then that the team ran into some good luck. The first break was when they decided to look at her cytokines. “Our whole knowledge base came together in the moment, on the fly, at the exact moment when Emily was so very sick,” he recalled. “Could we get the result fast enough? The lab dropped everything to run the test.”
They ordered a broad cytokine panel that included 30 analytes. The results showed that a number of cytokines “were just unbelievably elevated,” he said. Among them was interleukin-6.
“IL-6 isn’t even made by T cells, so nobody in the world would have guessed that this would have mattered. If we’d ordered a smaller panel, it might not even have been on it. Yet this was the one cytokine we had a drug for – tocilizumab – so that was chance. And then, another chance was that the drug was at the hospital, because there are rheumatology patients who get it.
“So, we went from making the determination that IL-6 was high and figuring out there was a drug for it at 3:00 o’clock to giving the drug to her at 8:00 o’clock, and then her clinical situation turned around so quickly – I mean hours later.”
Emily woke up from a 14-day medically induced coma on her seventh birthday.
Eight days later, her bone marrow showed complete remission. “The doctors said, ‘We’ve never seen anyone this sick get better any faster,’ ” Mr. Whitehead said.
She had already been through a battery of treatments for her leukemia. “It was 22 months of failed, standard treatment, and then just 23 days after they gave her the first dose of CAR T-cells that she was cancer free,” he added.
Talking about ‘cure’
Now that Emily, 17, has remained in remission for 10 years, Dr. Grupp is finally willing to use the word “cure” – but it has taken him a long time.
Now, he says, the challenge from the bedside is to keep parents’ and patients’ expectations realistic about what they see as a miracle cure.
“It’s not a miracle. We can get patients into remission 90-plus percent of the time – but some patients do relapse – and then there are the risks [of the cytokine storm, which can be life-threatening].
“Right now, our experience is that about 12% of patients end up in the ICU, but they hardly ever end up as sick as Emily ... because now we’re giving the tocilizumab much earlier,” Dr. Grupp said.
Hearing whispers
Since their daughter’s recovery, Tom and Kari Whitehead have dedicated much of their time to spreading the word about the treatment that saved Emily’s life. Mr. Whitehead testified at the Food and Drug Administration’s advisory committee meeting in 2017 when approval was being considered for the CAR T-cell product that Emily received. The product was tisagenlecleucel-T (Novartis); at that meeting, there was a unanimous vote to recommend approval. This was the first CAR T cell to reach the market.
As cofounders of the Emily Whitehead Foundation, Emily’s parents have helped raise more than $2 million to support research in the field, and they travel around the world telling their story to “move this revolution forward.”
Despite their fierce belief in the science that saved Emily, they also acknowledge there was luck – and faith. Early in their journey, when Emily experienced relapse after her initial treatments, Mr. Whitehead drew comfort from two visions, which he calls “whispers,” that guided them through several forks in the road and through tough decisions about Emily’s treatment.
Several times the parents refused treatment that was offered to Emily, and once they had her discharged against medical advice. “I told Kari she’s definitely going to beat her cancer – I saw it. I don’t know how it’s going to happen, but we’re going to be in the bone marrow transplant hallway [at CHOP] teaching her to walk again. I know a lot of doctors don’t want to hear anything about ‘a sign,’ or what guided us, but I don’t think you have to separate faith and science, I think it takes everything to make something like this to happen.”
Enduring effect
The key to the CAR T-cell breakthrough that gave rise to Emily’s therapy was cell proliferation, and the effect is enduring, beyond all expectations, said Dr. Grupp. The modified T cells are still detectable in Emily and other patients in long-term remission.
“The fundamental question is, are the cells still working, or are the patients cured and they don’t need them?” said Dr. Grupp. “I think it’s the latter. The data that we have from several large datasets that we developed with Novartis are that, if you get to a year and your minimal residual disease testing both by flow and by next-generation sequencing is negative and you still have B-cell aplasia, the relapse risk is close to zero at that point.”
While it’s still not clear if and when that risk will ever get to zero, Emily and Dr. Grupp have successfully closed the chapter.
“Oncologists have different notions of what the word ‘cure’ means. If your attitude is you’re not cured until you’ve basically reached the end of your life and you haven’t relapsed, well, that’s an impossible bar to hit. My attitude is, if your likelihood of having a disease recurrence is lower than the other risks in your life, like getting into your car and driving to your appointment, then that’s what a functional cure looks like,” he said.
“I’m probably the doctor that still sees her the most, but honestly, the whole conversation is not about leukemia at all. She has B-cell aplasia, so we have to treat that, and then it’s about making sure there’s no long-term side effects from the totality of her treatment. Generally, for a patient who’s gotten a moderate amount of chemotherapy and CAR T, that should not interfere with fertility. Has any patient in the history of the world ever relapsed more than 5 years out from their therapy? Of course. Is that incredibly rare? Yes, it is. You can be paralyzed by that, or you can compartmentalize it.”
As for the Whiteheads, they are focused on Emily’s college applications, her new driver’s license, and her project to cowrite a film about her story with a Hollywood filmmaker.
Mr. Whitehead said the one thing he hopes clinicians take away from their story is that sometimes a parent’s instinct transcends science.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Ten years ago, Stephan Grupp, MD, PhD, plunged into an unexplored area of pediatric cancer treatment with a 6-year-old patient for whom every treatment available for her acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) had been exhausted.
Dr. Grupp, a pioneer in cellular immunotherapy at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, had just got the green light to launch the first phase 1 trial of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for children.
“The trial opened at the absolute last possible moment that it could have been helpful to her,” he said in an interview. “There was nothing else to do to temporize her further. ... It had to open then or never.”
The patient was Emily Whitehead, who has since become a poster girl for the dramatic results that can be achieved with these novel therapies. After that one CAR T-cell treatment back in 2012, she has been free of her leukemia and has remained in remission for more than 10 years.
Dr. Grupp said that he is, at last, starting to use the “cure” word.
“I’m not just a doctor, I’m a scientist – and one case isn’t enough to have confidence about anything,” he said. “We wanted more patients to be out longer to be able to say that thing which we have for a long time called the ‘c word.’
“CAR T-cell therapy has now been given to hundreds of patients at CHOP, and – we are unique in this – we have a couple dozen patients who are 5, 6, 7, 9 years out or more without further therapy. That feels like a cure to me,” he commented.
First patient with ALL
Emily was the first patient with ALL to receive the novel treatment, and also the first child.
There was a precedent, however. After having been “stuck” for decades, the CAR T-cell field had recently made a breakthrough, thanks to research by Dr. Grupp’s colleague Carl June, MD, and associates at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. By tweaking two key steps in the genetic modification of T cells, Dr. June’s team had successfully treated three adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), two of whom were in complete remission.
But using the treatment for a child and for a different type of leukemia was a daunting prospect. Dr. Grupp said that he was candid with Emily’s parents, Tom and Kari Whitehead, emphasizing that there are no guarantees in cancer treatment, particularly in a phase 1 trial.
But the Whiteheads had no time to waste and nowhere else to turn. Her father, Tom, recalled saying: “This is something outside the box, this is going to give her a chance.”
Dr. Grupp, who described himself as being “on the cowboy end” of oncology care, was ready to take the plunge.
Little did any of them know that the treatment would make Emily even sicker than she already was, putting her in intensive care. But thanks to a combination of several lucky breaks and a lot of brain power, she would make a breathtakingly rapid recovery.
The ‘magic formula’
CAR T-cell therapy involves harvesting a patient’s T cells and modifying them in the lab with a chimeric antigen receptor to target CD19, a protein found on the surface of ALL cancer cells.
Before the University of Pennsylvania team tweaked the process, clinical trials of the therapy yielded only modest results because the modified T cells “were very powerful in the short term but had almost no proliferative capacity” once they were infused back into the patient, Dr. Grupp explained.
“It does not matter how many cells you give to a patient, what matters is that the cells grow in the patient to the level needed to control the leukemia,” he said.
Dr. June’s team came up with what Dr. Grupp calls “the magic formula”: A bead-based manufacturing process that produced younger T-cell phenotypes with “enormous” proliferative capacity, and a lentiviral approach to the genetic modification, enabling prolonged expression of the CAR-T molecule.
“Was it rogue? Absolutely, positively not,” said Dr. Grupp, thinking back to the day he enrolled Emily in the trial. “Was it risky? Obviously ... we all dived into this pool without knowing what was under the water, so I would say, rogue, no, risky, yes. And I would say we didn’t know nearly enough about the risks.”
Cytokine storm
The gravest risk that Dr. Grupp and his team encountered was something they had not anticipated. At the time, they had no name for it.
The three adults with CLL who had received CAR T-cell therapy had experienced a mild version that the researchers referred to as “tumor lysis syndrome”.
But for Emily, on day 3 of her CAR T-cell infusion, there was a ferocious reaction storm that later came to be called cytokine release syndrome.
“The wheels just came off then,” said Mr. Whitehead. “I remember her blood pressure was 53 over 29. They took her to the ICU, induced a coma, and put her on a ventilator. It was brutal to watch. The oscillatory ventilator just pounds on you, and there was blood bubbling out around the hose in her mouth.
“I remember the third or fourth night, a doctor took me in the hallway and said, ‘There’s a one-in-a-thousand chance your daughter is alive when the sun comes up,’” Mr. Whitehead said in an interview. “And I said: ‘All right, I’ll see you at rounds tomorrow, because she’ll still be here.’ ”
“We had some vague notion of toxicity ... but it turned out not nearly enough,” said Dr. Grupp. The ICU “worked flat out” to save her life. “They had deployed everything they had to keep a human being alive and they had nothing more to add. At some point, you run out of things that you can do, and we had run out.”
On the fly
It was then that the team ran into some good luck. The first break was when they decided to look at her cytokines. “Our whole knowledge base came together in the moment, on the fly, at the exact moment when Emily was so very sick,” he recalled. “Could we get the result fast enough? The lab dropped everything to run the test.”
They ordered a broad cytokine panel that included 30 analytes. The results showed that a number of cytokines “were just unbelievably elevated,” he said. Among them was interleukin-6.
“IL-6 isn’t even made by T cells, so nobody in the world would have guessed that this would have mattered. If we’d ordered a smaller panel, it might not even have been on it. Yet this was the one cytokine we had a drug for – tocilizumab – so that was chance. And then, another chance was that the drug was at the hospital, because there are rheumatology patients who get it.
“So, we went from making the determination that IL-6 was high and figuring out there was a drug for it at 3:00 o’clock to giving the drug to her at 8:00 o’clock, and then her clinical situation turned around so quickly – I mean hours later.”
Emily woke up from a 14-day medically induced coma on her seventh birthday.
Eight days later, her bone marrow showed complete remission. “The doctors said, ‘We’ve never seen anyone this sick get better any faster,’ ” Mr. Whitehead said.
She had already been through a battery of treatments for her leukemia. “It was 22 months of failed, standard treatment, and then just 23 days after they gave her the first dose of CAR T-cells that she was cancer free,” he added.
Talking about ‘cure’
Now that Emily, 17, has remained in remission for 10 years, Dr. Grupp is finally willing to use the word “cure” – but it has taken him a long time.
Now, he says, the challenge from the bedside is to keep parents’ and patients’ expectations realistic about what they see as a miracle cure.
“It’s not a miracle. We can get patients into remission 90-plus percent of the time – but some patients do relapse – and then there are the risks [of the cytokine storm, which can be life-threatening].
“Right now, our experience is that about 12% of patients end up in the ICU, but they hardly ever end up as sick as Emily ... because now we’re giving the tocilizumab much earlier,” Dr. Grupp said.
Hearing whispers
Since their daughter’s recovery, Tom and Kari Whitehead have dedicated much of their time to spreading the word about the treatment that saved Emily’s life. Mr. Whitehead testified at the Food and Drug Administration’s advisory committee meeting in 2017 when approval was being considered for the CAR T-cell product that Emily received. The product was tisagenlecleucel-T (Novartis); at that meeting, there was a unanimous vote to recommend approval. This was the first CAR T cell to reach the market.
As cofounders of the Emily Whitehead Foundation, Emily’s parents have helped raise more than $2 million to support research in the field, and they travel around the world telling their story to “move this revolution forward.”
Despite their fierce belief in the science that saved Emily, they also acknowledge there was luck – and faith. Early in their journey, when Emily experienced relapse after her initial treatments, Mr. Whitehead drew comfort from two visions, which he calls “whispers,” that guided them through several forks in the road and through tough decisions about Emily’s treatment.
Several times the parents refused treatment that was offered to Emily, and once they had her discharged against medical advice. “I told Kari she’s definitely going to beat her cancer – I saw it. I don’t know how it’s going to happen, but we’re going to be in the bone marrow transplant hallway [at CHOP] teaching her to walk again. I know a lot of doctors don’t want to hear anything about ‘a sign,’ or what guided us, but I don’t think you have to separate faith and science, I think it takes everything to make something like this to happen.”
Enduring effect
The key to the CAR T-cell breakthrough that gave rise to Emily’s therapy was cell proliferation, and the effect is enduring, beyond all expectations, said Dr. Grupp. The modified T cells are still detectable in Emily and other patients in long-term remission.
“The fundamental question is, are the cells still working, or are the patients cured and they don’t need them?” said Dr. Grupp. “I think it’s the latter. The data that we have from several large datasets that we developed with Novartis are that, if you get to a year and your minimal residual disease testing both by flow and by next-generation sequencing is negative and you still have B-cell aplasia, the relapse risk is close to zero at that point.”
While it’s still not clear if and when that risk will ever get to zero, Emily and Dr. Grupp have successfully closed the chapter.
“Oncologists have different notions of what the word ‘cure’ means. If your attitude is you’re not cured until you’ve basically reached the end of your life and you haven’t relapsed, well, that’s an impossible bar to hit. My attitude is, if your likelihood of having a disease recurrence is lower than the other risks in your life, like getting into your car and driving to your appointment, then that’s what a functional cure looks like,” he said.
“I’m probably the doctor that still sees her the most, but honestly, the whole conversation is not about leukemia at all. She has B-cell aplasia, so we have to treat that, and then it’s about making sure there’s no long-term side effects from the totality of her treatment. Generally, for a patient who’s gotten a moderate amount of chemotherapy and CAR T, that should not interfere with fertility. Has any patient in the history of the world ever relapsed more than 5 years out from their therapy? Of course. Is that incredibly rare? Yes, it is. You can be paralyzed by that, or you can compartmentalize it.”
As for the Whiteheads, they are focused on Emily’s college applications, her new driver’s license, and her project to cowrite a film about her story with a Hollywood filmmaker.
Mr. Whitehead said the one thing he hopes clinicians take away from their story is that sometimes a parent’s instinct transcends science.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
How short can a ‘short workout’ really be?
Some people thrive on hours-long runs and sweaty Peloton classes, but a much larger group of people lack the time, motivation, or ability for long workouts. Take, for example, those with chronic health conditions, limited mobility, prior negative fitness experiences, or the hopelessly overscheduled.
That doesn’t mean they have to forgo the physical and psychological benefits of exercise. In recent years, headlines have touted research on the benefits of a few minutes of physical activity. Not to mention the cottage fitness industry that has risen in response by promising physical transformations in X minutes a day (or less!).
What’s true? What’s too good to be true? Even when U.S. Health & Human Services physical activity guidelines recommend 150-300 minutes (2.5-5 hours) of moderate intensity movement per week?
The research says yes. While you should never expect total-body transformation, short workouts, even 10 minutes or less, really can improve your health, mental wellbeing, and fitness – if you approach them right.
Why short bursts of movement can be beneficial
Since at least 2005, researchers have been attempting to pinpoint just how short you can go and still benefit, says Edward F. Coyle, PhD, professor and director of the Human Performance Laboratory at the University of Texas, Austin.
Part of the equation is intensity. His studies show 10-minute workouts in which people cycle as hard as they can for 4 seconds, then rest for 15-30 seconds, improve fitness in young and older adults (and in the latter, also build muscle mass). Other studies have shown shorter “exercise snacks” – climbing three flights of stairs three times, with 1-4 hours in between – improved fitness over six weeks.
By turning up the intensity, Dr. Coyle says, these interval sessions temporarily deprive your muscles of both fuel and the oxygen they need to produce more, just like longer workouts. In response, your blood volume increases, your heart pumps more with each beat, and your muscle cells develop more mitochondria (tiny energy-producing factories).
That doesn’t mean less-intense physical activity isn’t beneficial, too. It is. In fact, there are several ways you can approach shorter movement sessions and really do well.
1. “Accumulate” a healthier lifestyle by moving throughout the day.
To reap the myriad benefits of physical activity – from lower blood pressure to better sleep to a longer life – health experts recommend the aforementioned 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity weekly. Moderate means your heart’s beating faster, but you can still speak.
That averages out to 20 minutes daily. However, if you’ve been inactive or have physical or logistical limitations, a full 20 minutes can seem daunting.
Fortunately, the most recent update to the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans specifically states you don’t have to log those minutes at once. Any amount of movement “counts” toward the total.
Four minutes here, 8 minutes there, another 5 minutes again later … it all adds up.
In fact, depending on what you do with the rest of your hours, small, frequent bouts of movement may be better for your health than one solid workout.
“Being very sedentary all day and just doing 30 minutes of exercise once a day is not very healthy for you,” says Anthony Wall, MS, a certified personal trainer and spokesperson for the American Council on Exercise. Emphasis on very sedentary. Long periods of sitting have their own health risks, including more heart disease and diabetes. While a single concentrated workout session is better than nothing, it may not reverse the damage done by all that sitting.
Remember: Our bodies are designed for movement. It’s okay to work up to 150 minutes gradually. Begin where you are, perhaps with a 5-minute walk around the block or easy stretches or exercises on the nearest patch of carpet. Establish consistency, then add on – it’ll feel easier as body and mind adapt.
“Data show the more you exercise, the more motivated you›ll be to exercise,” says Julia Basso, PhD, assistant professor and director of the embodied brain laboratory at Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg. When you crave movement, it’s easier to sneak it in. Eventually, all those minutes will add up to 150 a week – or more.
2. Improve mood and thinking as well as your health.
Short sessions of physical activity also benefit brain function, says Dr. Basso, a neuroscientist and dancer. Moving your body increases blood flow to the brain and modulates levels of neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine. It also stimulates the release of growth factors that, over time, help sprout new brain cells.
And movement has near-immediate perks. In a recent Japanese study, running for just 10 minutes improved participant’s moods and reaction times on a color-word matching test. Brain imaging showed increased activity in prefrontal cortex areas that control executive functions such as attention, planning, and working memory.
So if you’re feeling low, stressed, or stuck on a tough problem at work, try a 10-minute break for moderate movement. In this case, don’t go all-out – tougher workouts still benefit your brain over time, but the immediate stress response may temporarily cloud your thinking, Dr. Basso says.
Instead, level up by adding another brain-boosting element like social connection or rhythmic music. Walk with a friend, for instance, or fire up a playlist and dance.
3. Gain fitness through brief, hard bursts.
The government’s exercise guidelines acknowledge the harder you work, the faster you reap rewards. Choosing more vigorous activities – where you›re breathing so hard you can only gasp a few words – halves the minimum requirement to 75 minutes weekly.
Plus, intensity brings added fitness gains, Mr. Wall says. This includes getting better at sport-specific skills and building anaerobic endurance, or the ability to work harder for longer periods of time.
However, the short, hard approach has its challenges. It’s often tricky to replicate lab-based protocols in the real world (Dr. Coyle’s cycling experiments, for example, use specialized bikes). Warming up first can add time; stair-climbing study participants began with 10 jumping jacks, 10 air squats, and five lunges on each leg.
Finally, pushing hard is uncomfortable. Doing it daily puts you at risk of overtraining or injury, Mr. Wall says. Even Dr. Coyle himself alternates 3 days per week of 4-second training with 45-minute steady rides, where he can watch Netflix.
Longer sessions bring more pronounced improvements in health markers like blood pressure and resting heart rate, Mr. Wall says. And while any movement is better than none, mixing up everything from modality to length and intensity likely provides the biggest bounty of benefits.
Consider these physical activity ideas “ingredients,” Mr. Wall says. “We all eat vegetables, but some of us like bell peppers more than carrots and tomatoes. We all need to get our five fruits and vegetables a day – but how we mix it up, there’s a lot of variation there. Movement works the same way.”
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
Some people thrive on hours-long runs and sweaty Peloton classes, but a much larger group of people lack the time, motivation, or ability for long workouts. Take, for example, those with chronic health conditions, limited mobility, prior negative fitness experiences, or the hopelessly overscheduled.
That doesn’t mean they have to forgo the physical and psychological benefits of exercise. In recent years, headlines have touted research on the benefits of a few minutes of physical activity. Not to mention the cottage fitness industry that has risen in response by promising physical transformations in X minutes a day (or less!).
What’s true? What’s too good to be true? Even when U.S. Health & Human Services physical activity guidelines recommend 150-300 minutes (2.5-5 hours) of moderate intensity movement per week?
The research says yes. While you should never expect total-body transformation, short workouts, even 10 minutes or less, really can improve your health, mental wellbeing, and fitness – if you approach them right.
Why short bursts of movement can be beneficial
Since at least 2005, researchers have been attempting to pinpoint just how short you can go and still benefit, says Edward F. Coyle, PhD, professor and director of the Human Performance Laboratory at the University of Texas, Austin.
Part of the equation is intensity. His studies show 10-minute workouts in which people cycle as hard as they can for 4 seconds, then rest for 15-30 seconds, improve fitness in young and older adults (and in the latter, also build muscle mass). Other studies have shown shorter “exercise snacks” – climbing three flights of stairs three times, with 1-4 hours in between – improved fitness over six weeks.
By turning up the intensity, Dr. Coyle says, these interval sessions temporarily deprive your muscles of both fuel and the oxygen they need to produce more, just like longer workouts. In response, your blood volume increases, your heart pumps more with each beat, and your muscle cells develop more mitochondria (tiny energy-producing factories).
That doesn’t mean less-intense physical activity isn’t beneficial, too. It is. In fact, there are several ways you can approach shorter movement sessions and really do well.
1. “Accumulate” a healthier lifestyle by moving throughout the day.
To reap the myriad benefits of physical activity – from lower blood pressure to better sleep to a longer life – health experts recommend the aforementioned 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity weekly. Moderate means your heart’s beating faster, but you can still speak.
That averages out to 20 minutes daily. However, if you’ve been inactive or have physical or logistical limitations, a full 20 minutes can seem daunting.
Fortunately, the most recent update to the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans specifically states you don’t have to log those minutes at once. Any amount of movement “counts” toward the total.
Four minutes here, 8 minutes there, another 5 minutes again later … it all adds up.
In fact, depending on what you do with the rest of your hours, small, frequent bouts of movement may be better for your health than one solid workout.
“Being very sedentary all day and just doing 30 minutes of exercise once a day is not very healthy for you,” says Anthony Wall, MS, a certified personal trainer and spokesperson for the American Council on Exercise. Emphasis on very sedentary. Long periods of sitting have their own health risks, including more heart disease and diabetes. While a single concentrated workout session is better than nothing, it may not reverse the damage done by all that sitting.
Remember: Our bodies are designed for movement. It’s okay to work up to 150 minutes gradually. Begin where you are, perhaps with a 5-minute walk around the block or easy stretches or exercises on the nearest patch of carpet. Establish consistency, then add on – it’ll feel easier as body and mind adapt.
“Data show the more you exercise, the more motivated you›ll be to exercise,” says Julia Basso, PhD, assistant professor and director of the embodied brain laboratory at Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg. When you crave movement, it’s easier to sneak it in. Eventually, all those minutes will add up to 150 a week – or more.
2. Improve mood and thinking as well as your health.
Short sessions of physical activity also benefit brain function, says Dr. Basso, a neuroscientist and dancer. Moving your body increases blood flow to the brain and modulates levels of neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine. It also stimulates the release of growth factors that, over time, help sprout new brain cells.
And movement has near-immediate perks. In a recent Japanese study, running for just 10 minutes improved participant’s moods and reaction times on a color-word matching test. Brain imaging showed increased activity in prefrontal cortex areas that control executive functions such as attention, planning, and working memory.
So if you’re feeling low, stressed, or stuck on a tough problem at work, try a 10-minute break for moderate movement. In this case, don’t go all-out – tougher workouts still benefit your brain over time, but the immediate stress response may temporarily cloud your thinking, Dr. Basso says.
Instead, level up by adding another brain-boosting element like social connection or rhythmic music. Walk with a friend, for instance, or fire up a playlist and dance.
3. Gain fitness through brief, hard bursts.
The government’s exercise guidelines acknowledge the harder you work, the faster you reap rewards. Choosing more vigorous activities – where you›re breathing so hard you can only gasp a few words – halves the minimum requirement to 75 minutes weekly.
Plus, intensity brings added fitness gains, Mr. Wall says. This includes getting better at sport-specific skills and building anaerobic endurance, or the ability to work harder for longer periods of time.
However, the short, hard approach has its challenges. It’s often tricky to replicate lab-based protocols in the real world (Dr. Coyle’s cycling experiments, for example, use specialized bikes). Warming up first can add time; stair-climbing study participants began with 10 jumping jacks, 10 air squats, and five lunges on each leg.
Finally, pushing hard is uncomfortable. Doing it daily puts you at risk of overtraining or injury, Mr. Wall says. Even Dr. Coyle himself alternates 3 days per week of 4-second training with 45-minute steady rides, where he can watch Netflix.
Longer sessions bring more pronounced improvements in health markers like blood pressure and resting heart rate, Mr. Wall says. And while any movement is better than none, mixing up everything from modality to length and intensity likely provides the biggest bounty of benefits.
Consider these physical activity ideas “ingredients,” Mr. Wall says. “We all eat vegetables, but some of us like bell peppers more than carrots and tomatoes. We all need to get our five fruits and vegetables a day – but how we mix it up, there’s a lot of variation there. Movement works the same way.”
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
Some people thrive on hours-long runs and sweaty Peloton classes, but a much larger group of people lack the time, motivation, or ability for long workouts. Take, for example, those with chronic health conditions, limited mobility, prior negative fitness experiences, or the hopelessly overscheduled.
That doesn’t mean they have to forgo the physical and psychological benefits of exercise. In recent years, headlines have touted research on the benefits of a few minutes of physical activity. Not to mention the cottage fitness industry that has risen in response by promising physical transformations in X minutes a day (or less!).
What’s true? What’s too good to be true? Even when U.S. Health & Human Services physical activity guidelines recommend 150-300 minutes (2.5-5 hours) of moderate intensity movement per week?
The research says yes. While you should never expect total-body transformation, short workouts, even 10 minutes or less, really can improve your health, mental wellbeing, and fitness – if you approach them right.
Why short bursts of movement can be beneficial
Since at least 2005, researchers have been attempting to pinpoint just how short you can go and still benefit, says Edward F. Coyle, PhD, professor and director of the Human Performance Laboratory at the University of Texas, Austin.
Part of the equation is intensity. His studies show 10-minute workouts in which people cycle as hard as they can for 4 seconds, then rest for 15-30 seconds, improve fitness in young and older adults (and in the latter, also build muscle mass). Other studies have shown shorter “exercise snacks” – climbing three flights of stairs three times, with 1-4 hours in between – improved fitness over six weeks.
By turning up the intensity, Dr. Coyle says, these interval sessions temporarily deprive your muscles of both fuel and the oxygen they need to produce more, just like longer workouts. In response, your blood volume increases, your heart pumps more with each beat, and your muscle cells develop more mitochondria (tiny energy-producing factories).
That doesn’t mean less-intense physical activity isn’t beneficial, too. It is. In fact, there are several ways you can approach shorter movement sessions and really do well.
1. “Accumulate” a healthier lifestyle by moving throughout the day.
To reap the myriad benefits of physical activity – from lower blood pressure to better sleep to a longer life – health experts recommend the aforementioned 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity weekly. Moderate means your heart’s beating faster, but you can still speak.
That averages out to 20 minutes daily. However, if you’ve been inactive or have physical or logistical limitations, a full 20 minutes can seem daunting.
Fortunately, the most recent update to the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans specifically states you don’t have to log those minutes at once. Any amount of movement “counts” toward the total.
Four minutes here, 8 minutes there, another 5 minutes again later … it all adds up.
In fact, depending on what you do with the rest of your hours, small, frequent bouts of movement may be better for your health than one solid workout.
“Being very sedentary all day and just doing 30 minutes of exercise once a day is not very healthy for you,” says Anthony Wall, MS, a certified personal trainer and spokesperson for the American Council on Exercise. Emphasis on very sedentary. Long periods of sitting have their own health risks, including more heart disease and diabetes. While a single concentrated workout session is better than nothing, it may not reverse the damage done by all that sitting.
Remember: Our bodies are designed for movement. It’s okay to work up to 150 minutes gradually. Begin where you are, perhaps with a 5-minute walk around the block or easy stretches or exercises on the nearest patch of carpet. Establish consistency, then add on – it’ll feel easier as body and mind adapt.
“Data show the more you exercise, the more motivated you›ll be to exercise,” says Julia Basso, PhD, assistant professor and director of the embodied brain laboratory at Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg. When you crave movement, it’s easier to sneak it in. Eventually, all those minutes will add up to 150 a week – or more.
2. Improve mood and thinking as well as your health.
Short sessions of physical activity also benefit brain function, says Dr. Basso, a neuroscientist and dancer. Moving your body increases blood flow to the brain and modulates levels of neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine. It also stimulates the release of growth factors that, over time, help sprout new brain cells.
And movement has near-immediate perks. In a recent Japanese study, running for just 10 minutes improved participant’s moods and reaction times on a color-word matching test. Brain imaging showed increased activity in prefrontal cortex areas that control executive functions such as attention, planning, and working memory.
So if you’re feeling low, stressed, or stuck on a tough problem at work, try a 10-minute break for moderate movement. In this case, don’t go all-out – tougher workouts still benefit your brain over time, but the immediate stress response may temporarily cloud your thinking, Dr. Basso says.
Instead, level up by adding another brain-boosting element like social connection or rhythmic music. Walk with a friend, for instance, or fire up a playlist and dance.
3. Gain fitness through brief, hard bursts.
The government’s exercise guidelines acknowledge the harder you work, the faster you reap rewards. Choosing more vigorous activities – where you›re breathing so hard you can only gasp a few words – halves the minimum requirement to 75 minutes weekly.
Plus, intensity brings added fitness gains, Mr. Wall says. This includes getting better at sport-specific skills and building anaerobic endurance, or the ability to work harder for longer periods of time.
However, the short, hard approach has its challenges. It’s often tricky to replicate lab-based protocols in the real world (Dr. Coyle’s cycling experiments, for example, use specialized bikes). Warming up first can add time; stair-climbing study participants began with 10 jumping jacks, 10 air squats, and five lunges on each leg.
Finally, pushing hard is uncomfortable. Doing it daily puts you at risk of overtraining or injury, Mr. Wall says. Even Dr. Coyle himself alternates 3 days per week of 4-second training with 45-minute steady rides, where he can watch Netflix.
Longer sessions bring more pronounced improvements in health markers like blood pressure and resting heart rate, Mr. Wall says. And while any movement is better than none, mixing up everything from modality to length and intensity likely provides the biggest bounty of benefits.
Consider these physical activity ideas “ingredients,” Mr. Wall says. “We all eat vegetables, but some of us like bell peppers more than carrots and tomatoes. We all need to get our five fruits and vegetables a day – but how we mix it up, there’s a lot of variation there. Movement works the same way.”
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
Does your patient have long COVID? Some clues on what to look for
New Yorker Lyss Stern came down with COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic, in March 2020. She ran a 103° F fever for 5 days straight and was bedridden for several weeks. Yet symptoms such as a persistent headache and tinnitus, or ringing in her ears, lingered.
“Four months later, I still couldn’t walk four blocks without becoming winded,” says Ms. Stern, 48. Five months after her diagnosis, her doctors finally gave a name to her condition: long COVID.
Long COVID is known by many different names: long-haul COVID, postacute COVID-19, or even chronic COVID. It’s a general term used to describe the range of ongoing health problems people can have after their infection.
Another earlier report found that one in five COVID-19 survivors between the ages of 18 and 64, and one in four survivors aged at least 65, have a health condition that may be related to their previous bout with the virus.
Unfortunately, there’s no easy way to screen for long COVID.
“There’s no definite laboratory test to give us a diagnosis,” says Daniel Sterman, MD, director of the division of pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine at NYU Langone Health in New York. “We’re also still working on a definition, since there’s a whole slew of symptoms associated with the condition.”
It’s a challenge that Ms. Stern is personally acquainted with after she bounced from doctor to doctor for several months before she found her way to the Center for Post-COVID Care at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. “It was a relief to have an official diagnosis, even if it didn’t bring immediate answers,” she says.
What to look for
Many people who become infected with COVID-19 get symptoms that linger for 2-3 weeks after their infection has cleared, says Brittany Baloun, a certified nurse practitioner at the Cleveland Clinic. “It’s not unusual to feel some residual shortness of breath or heart palpitations, especially if you are exerting yourself,” she says. “The acute phase of COVID itself can last for up to 14 days. But if it’s been 30 days since you came down with the virus, and your symptoms are still there and not improving, it indicates some level of long COVID.”
More than 200 symptoms can be linked to long COVID. But perhaps the one that stands out the most is constant fatigue that interferes with daily life.
“We often hear that these patients can’t fold the laundry or take a short walk with their dog without feeling exhausted,” Ms. Baloun says.
This exhaustion may get worse after patients exercise or do something mentally taxing, a condition known as postexertional malaise.
“It can be crushing fatigue; I may clean my room for an hour and talk to a friend, and the next day feel like I can’t get out of bed,” says Allison Guy, 36, who was diagnosed with COVID in February 2021. She’s now a long-COVID advocate in Washington.
Other symptoms can be divided into different categories, which include cardiac/lung symptoms such as shortness of breath, coughing, chest pain, and heart palpitations, as well as neurologic symptoms.
One of the most common neurologic symptoms is brain fog, says Andrew Schamess, MD, a professor of internal medicine at Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, who runs its post-COVID recovery program. “Patients describe feeling ‘fuzzy’ or ‘spacey,’ and often report that they are forgetful or have memory problems,” he says. Others include:
- Headache.
- Sleep problems. One 2022 study from the Cleveland Clinic found that more than 40% of patients with long COVID reported sleep disturbances.
- Dizziness when standing.
- Pins-and-needles feelings.
- Changes in smell or taste.
- Depression or anxiety.
You could also have digestive symptoms such as diarrhea or stomach pain. Other symptoms include joint or muscle pain, rashes, or changes in menstrual cycles.
Risk of having other health conditions
People who have had COVID-19, particularly a severe case, may be more at risk of getting other health conditions, such as:
- Type 2 diabetes.
- Kidney failure.
- Pulmonary embolism, or a blood clot in the lung.
- Myocarditis, an inflamed heart.
While it’s hard to say precisely whether these conditions were caused by COVID, they are most likely linked to it, says Dr. Schamess. A March 2022 study published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, for example, found that people who had recovered from COVID-19 had a 40% higher risk of being diagnosed with type 2 diabetes over the next year.
“We don’t know for sure that infection with COVID-19 triggered someone’s diabetes – it may have been that they already had risk factors and the virus pushed them over the edge,” he says.
COVID-19 itself may also worsen conditions you already have, such as asthma, sleep apnea, or fibromyalgia. “We see patients with previously mild asthma who come in constantly coughing and wheezing, for example,” says Dr. Schamess. “They usually respond well once we start aggressive treatment.” That might include a continuous positive airway pressure, or CPAP, setup to help treat sleep apnea, or gabapentin to treat fibromyalgia symptoms.
Is it long COVID or something else?
Long COVID can cause a long list of symptoms, and they can easily mean other ailments. That’s one reason why, if your symptoms last for more than a month, it’s important to see a doctor, Ms. Baloun says. They can run a wide variety of tests to check for other conditions, such as a thyroid disorder or vitamin deficiency, that could be confused with long COVID.
They should also run blood tests such as D-dimer. This helps rule out a pulmonary embolism, which can be a complication of COVID-19 and also causes symptoms that may mimic long COVID, such as breathlessness and anxiety. They will also run tests to look for inflammation, Ms. Baloun says.
“These tests can’t provide definitive answers, but they can help provide clues as to what’s causing symptoms and whether they are related to long COVID,” she says.
What’s just as important, says Dr. Schamess, is a careful medical history. This can help pinpoint exactly when symptoms started, when they worsened, and whether anything else could have triggered them.
“I saw a patient recently who presented with symptoms of brain fog, memory loss, fatigue, headache, and sleep disturbance 5 months after she had COVID-19,” says Dr. Schamess. “After we talked, we realized that her symptoms were due to a fainting spell a couple of months earlier where she whacked her head very hard. She didn’t have long COVID – she had a concussion. But I wouldn’t have picked that up if I had just run a whole battery of tests.”
Ms. Stern agrees. “If you have long COVID, you may come across doctors who dismiss your symptoms, especially if your workups don’t show an obvious problem,” she says. “But you know your body. If it still seems like something is wrong, then you need to continue to push until you find answers.”
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
New Yorker Lyss Stern came down with COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic, in March 2020. She ran a 103° F fever for 5 days straight and was bedridden for several weeks. Yet symptoms such as a persistent headache and tinnitus, or ringing in her ears, lingered.
“Four months later, I still couldn’t walk four blocks without becoming winded,” says Ms. Stern, 48. Five months after her diagnosis, her doctors finally gave a name to her condition: long COVID.
Long COVID is known by many different names: long-haul COVID, postacute COVID-19, or even chronic COVID. It’s a general term used to describe the range of ongoing health problems people can have after their infection.
Another earlier report found that one in five COVID-19 survivors between the ages of 18 and 64, and one in four survivors aged at least 65, have a health condition that may be related to their previous bout with the virus.
Unfortunately, there’s no easy way to screen for long COVID.
“There’s no definite laboratory test to give us a diagnosis,” says Daniel Sterman, MD, director of the division of pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine at NYU Langone Health in New York. “We’re also still working on a definition, since there’s a whole slew of symptoms associated with the condition.”
It’s a challenge that Ms. Stern is personally acquainted with after she bounced from doctor to doctor for several months before she found her way to the Center for Post-COVID Care at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. “It was a relief to have an official diagnosis, even if it didn’t bring immediate answers,” she says.
What to look for
Many people who become infected with COVID-19 get symptoms that linger for 2-3 weeks after their infection has cleared, says Brittany Baloun, a certified nurse practitioner at the Cleveland Clinic. “It’s not unusual to feel some residual shortness of breath or heart palpitations, especially if you are exerting yourself,” she says. “The acute phase of COVID itself can last for up to 14 days. But if it’s been 30 days since you came down with the virus, and your symptoms are still there and not improving, it indicates some level of long COVID.”
More than 200 symptoms can be linked to long COVID. But perhaps the one that stands out the most is constant fatigue that interferes with daily life.
“We often hear that these patients can’t fold the laundry or take a short walk with their dog without feeling exhausted,” Ms. Baloun says.
This exhaustion may get worse after patients exercise or do something mentally taxing, a condition known as postexertional malaise.
“It can be crushing fatigue; I may clean my room for an hour and talk to a friend, and the next day feel like I can’t get out of bed,” says Allison Guy, 36, who was diagnosed with COVID in February 2021. She’s now a long-COVID advocate in Washington.
Other symptoms can be divided into different categories, which include cardiac/lung symptoms such as shortness of breath, coughing, chest pain, and heart palpitations, as well as neurologic symptoms.
One of the most common neurologic symptoms is brain fog, says Andrew Schamess, MD, a professor of internal medicine at Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, who runs its post-COVID recovery program. “Patients describe feeling ‘fuzzy’ or ‘spacey,’ and often report that they are forgetful or have memory problems,” he says. Others include:
- Headache.
- Sleep problems. One 2022 study from the Cleveland Clinic found that more than 40% of patients with long COVID reported sleep disturbances.
- Dizziness when standing.
- Pins-and-needles feelings.
- Changes in smell or taste.
- Depression or anxiety.
You could also have digestive symptoms such as diarrhea or stomach pain. Other symptoms include joint or muscle pain, rashes, or changes in menstrual cycles.
Risk of having other health conditions
People who have had COVID-19, particularly a severe case, may be more at risk of getting other health conditions, such as:
- Type 2 diabetes.
- Kidney failure.
- Pulmonary embolism, or a blood clot in the lung.
- Myocarditis, an inflamed heart.
While it’s hard to say precisely whether these conditions were caused by COVID, they are most likely linked to it, says Dr. Schamess. A March 2022 study published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, for example, found that people who had recovered from COVID-19 had a 40% higher risk of being diagnosed with type 2 diabetes over the next year.
“We don’t know for sure that infection with COVID-19 triggered someone’s diabetes – it may have been that they already had risk factors and the virus pushed them over the edge,” he says.
COVID-19 itself may also worsen conditions you already have, such as asthma, sleep apnea, or fibromyalgia. “We see patients with previously mild asthma who come in constantly coughing and wheezing, for example,” says Dr. Schamess. “They usually respond well once we start aggressive treatment.” That might include a continuous positive airway pressure, or CPAP, setup to help treat sleep apnea, or gabapentin to treat fibromyalgia symptoms.
Is it long COVID or something else?
Long COVID can cause a long list of symptoms, and they can easily mean other ailments. That’s one reason why, if your symptoms last for more than a month, it’s important to see a doctor, Ms. Baloun says. They can run a wide variety of tests to check for other conditions, such as a thyroid disorder or vitamin deficiency, that could be confused with long COVID.
They should also run blood tests such as D-dimer. This helps rule out a pulmonary embolism, which can be a complication of COVID-19 and also causes symptoms that may mimic long COVID, such as breathlessness and anxiety. They will also run tests to look for inflammation, Ms. Baloun says.
“These tests can’t provide definitive answers, but they can help provide clues as to what’s causing symptoms and whether they are related to long COVID,” she says.
What’s just as important, says Dr. Schamess, is a careful medical history. This can help pinpoint exactly when symptoms started, when they worsened, and whether anything else could have triggered them.
“I saw a patient recently who presented with symptoms of brain fog, memory loss, fatigue, headache, and sleep disturbance 5 months after she had COVID-19,” says Dr. Schamess. “After we talked, we realized that her symptoms were due to a fainting spell a couple of months earlier where she whacked her head very hard. She didn’t have long COVID – she had a concussion. But I wouldn’t have picked that up if I had just run a whole battery of tests.”
Ms. Stern agrees. “If you have long COVID, you may come across doctors who dismiss your symptoms, especially if your workups don’t show an obvious problem,” she says. “But you know your body. If it still seems like something is wrong, then you need to continue to push until you find answers.”
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
New Yorker Lyss Stern came down with COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic, in March 2020. She ran a 103° F fever for 5 days straight and was bedridden for several weeks. Yet symptoms such as a persistent headache and tinnitus, or ringing in her ears, lingered.
“Four months later, I still couldn’t walk four blocks without becoming winded,” says Ms. Stern, 48. Five months after her diagnosis, her doctors finally gave a name to her condition: long COVID.
Long COVID is known by many different names: long-haul COVID, postacute COVID-19, or even chronic COVID. It’s a general term used to describe the range of ongoing health problems people can have after their infection.
Another earlier report found that one in five COVID-19 survivors between the ages of 18 and 64, and one in four survivors aged at least 65, have a health condition that may be related to their previous bout with the virus.
Unfortunately, there’s no easy way to screen for long COVID.
“There’s no definite laboratory test to give us a diagnosis,” says Daniel Sterman, MD, director of the division of pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine at NYU Langone Health in New York. “We’re also still working on a definition, since there’s a whole slew of symptoms associated with the condition.”
It’s a challenge that Ms. Stern is personally acquainted with after she bounced from doctor to doctor for several months before she found her way to the Center for Post-COVID Care at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. “It was a relief to have an official diagnosis, even if it didn’t bring immediate answers,” she says.
What to look for
Many people who become infected with COVID-19 get symptoms that linger for 2-3 weeks after their infection has cleared, says Brittany Baloun, a certified nurse practitioner at the Cleveland Clinic. “It’s not unusual to feel some residual shortness of breath or heart palpitations, especially if you are exerting yourself,” she says. “The acute phase of COVID itself can last for up to 14 days. But if it’s been 30 days since you came down with the virus, and your symptoms are still there and not improving, it indicates some level of long COVID.”
More than 200 symptoms can be linked to long COVID. But perhaps the one that stands out the most is constant fatigue that interferes with daily life.
“We often hear that these patients can’t fold the laundry or take a short walk with their dog without feeling exhausted,” Ms. Baloun says.
This exhaustion may get worse after patients exercise or do something mentally taxing, a condition known as postexertional malaise.
“It can be crushing fatigue; I may clean my room for an hour and talk to a friend, and the next day feel like I can’t get out of bed,” says Allison Guy, 36, who was diagnosed with COVID in February 2021. She’s now a long-COVID advocate in Washington.
Other symptoms can be divided into different categories, which include cardiac/lung symptoms such as shortness of breath, coughing, chest pain, and heart palpitations, as well as neurologic symptoms.
One of the most common neurologic symptoms is brain fog, says Andrew Schamess, MD, a professor of internal medicine at Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, who runs its post-COVID recovery program. “Patients describe feeling ‘fuzzy’ or ‘spacey,’ and often report that they are forgetful or have memory problems,” he says. Others include:
- Headache.
- Sleep problems. One 2022 study from the Cleveland Clinic found that more than 40% of patients with long COVID reported sleep disturbances.
- Dizziness when standing.
- Pins-and-needles feelings.
- Changes in smell or taste.
- Depression or anxiety.
You could also have digestive symptoms such as diarrhea or stomach pain. Other symptoms include joint or muscle pain, rashes, or changes in menstrual cycles.
Risk of having other health conditions
People who have had COVID-19, particularly a severe case, may be more at risk of getting other health conditions, such as:
- Type 2 diabetes.
- Kidney failure.
- Pulmonary embolism, or a blood clot in the lung.
- Myocarditis, an inflamed heart.
While it’s hard to say precisely whether these conditions were caused by COVID, they are most likely linked to it, says Dr. Schamess. A March 2022 study published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, for example, found that people who had recovered from COVID-19 had a 40% higher risk of being diagnosed with type 2 diabetes over the next year.
“We don’t know for sure that infection with COVID-19 triggered someone’s diabetes – it may have been that they already had risk factors and the virus pushed them over the edge,” he says.
COVID-19 itself may also worsen conditions you already have, such as asthma, sleep apnea, or fibromyalgia. “We see patients with previously mild asthma who come in constantly coughing and wheezing, for example,” says Dr. Schamess. “They usually respond well once we start aggressive treatment.” That might include a continuous positive airway pressure, or CPAP, setup to help treat sleep apnea, or gabapentin to treat fibromyalgia symptoms.
Is it long COVID or something else?
Long COVID can cause a long list of symptoms, and they can easily mean other ailments. That’s one reason why, if your symptoms last for more than a month, it’s important to see a doctor, Ms. Baloun says. They can run a wide variety of tests to check for other conditions, such as a thyroid disorder or vitamin deficiency, that could be confused with long COVID.
They should also run blood tests such as D-dimer. This helps rule out a pulmonary embolism, which can be a complication of COVID-19 and also causes symptoms that may mimic long COVID, such as breathlessness and anxiety. They will also run tests to look for inflammation, Ms. Baloun says.
“These tests can’t provide definitive answers, but they can help provide clues as to what’s causing symptoms and whether they are related to long COVID,” she says.
What’s just as important, says Dr. Schamess, is a careful medical history. This can help pinpoint exactly when symptoms started, when they worsened, and whether anything else could have triggered them.
“I saw a patient recently who presented with symptoms of brain fog, memory loss, fatigue, headache, and sleep disturbance 5 months after she had COVID-19,” says Dr. Schamess. “After we talked, we realized that her symptoms were due to a fainting spell a couple of months earlier where she whacked her head very hard. She didn’t have long COVID – she had a concussion. But I wouldn’t have picked that up if I had just run a whole battery of tests.”
Ms. Stern agrees. “If you have long COVID, you may come across doctors who dismiss your symptoms, especially if your workups don’t show an obvious problem,” she says. “But you know your body. If it still seems like something is wrong, then you need to continue to push until you find answers.”
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
Job market for physicians, advanced practitioners rebounds after COVID-19 slump: Report
After a year of uncertainty and decline because of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a recently released report from Merritt Hawkins, the physician search division of AMN Healthcare.
The study is based on an analysis of job search and consulting assignments that the firm conducted on behalf of its health care organization clients from April 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022.
“Search engagements were down a little over 30% in 2020, but by the end of 2021, everything started spiking dramatically to the point of where we were at a 34-year high,” Michael Belkin, divisional vice president with Merritt Hawkins, told this news organization. “The pendulum has gone all the way back. People are more interested in going out and seeing their physicians.”
Demand for physicians was suppressed during the peak of the pandemic, as many hospitals curtailed elective procedures and many patients refrained from entering a medical facility. A large backlog of patients needing care subsequently developed.
This, combined with an aging population and widespread chronic medical conditions, has caused a strong surge in demand for physicians and advanced practitioners, according to the report.
In addition to the volume of searches increasing, physician starting salaries have rebounded from the COVID-19 downturn.
Average starting salaries of 14 physician specialties tracked in 2021/2022 increased, while only 3 decreased. Orthopedic surgeons were offered an average of $565,000 to start, exclusive of signing bonuses and other incentives, up from $546,000 the previous year. Urologists were offered an average of $510,000 to start, up from $497,000; gastroenterologists were offered $474,000, up from $453,000; while radiologists were offered $455,000, up from $401,000.
Similarly, a recent Medscape study based on responses from more than 13,000 U.S. physicians across 29 specialties found that income for all physician specialists increased, with otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, and dermatologists experiencing the greatest gains.
A new reality
While the job market for physicians and advanced practitioners has seemingly recovered, there are many differences between today’s working environment for clinicians and what existed during the pandemic.
First, specialists are now stepping into the spotlight, a position that primary care clinicians previously held. The majority of Merritt Hawkins’ search engagements (64%) in 2021/2022 were for physician specialists, including cardiologists, gastroenterologists, orthopedic surgeons, neurologists, oncologists, and others. Only 17% of the search engagements were for primary care physicians, down from 18% in 2020/2021 and 20% in 2019/2020.
“We’ve seen specialties bounce back faster. Of course, you’ve got the aging population; you’ve got people that want that specialized care,” Mr. Belkin said.
Advanced practitioners also are playing a more significant role in the postpandemic word. In fact, 19% of Merritt Hawkins’ search engagements were for advanced practitioners, including nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants, and certified registered nurse anesthetists, up from 18% the previous year and just 13% the year prior to that, indicating growing demand for nonphysician providers.
NPs, in fact, topped the list of most requested search engagements, underscoring a shift from traditional physician office-based primary care delivery settings toward “convenient care” settings such as urgent care centers and retail clinics that are largely staffed by NPs and other advanced practitioners.
Advanced practitioners are taking on more responsibility for primary care simply because there is a large number of these professionals ready to take on the challenge.
The health care industry was “not able to produce enough primary care physicians over the last decade. So advanced practitioners, I believe, have slowly started to work alongside those primary care physicians. In a lot of areas such as your retail space, your CVS, your Walmart, your Walgreens, your standalone urgent cares, they’ve stepped up,” Mr. Belkin said.
Advanced practitioners also are providing the convenience that consumers are increasingly demanding.
“We are a society that wants things immediately ... but it’s still a challenge to schedule an appointment with a physician. However, it’s less of a challenge to get into a retail clinic or an urgent care center or to schedule something through telehealth,” Mr. Belkin noted.
More than just money
With the job market strong, the challenge for health care organizations is to create competitive recruiting packages. Sure enough, 92% of candidates were offered signing bonuses in 2021/2022 compared with just 61% in 2020/2021.
The financial incentives, however, might not be enough. In this environment, health care organizations need to go beyond simply offering competitive salaries to new recruits. For example, clinicians are seeking flexibility, as many potential hires are seeking remote positions. In fact, 18% of radiology search engagements were for teleradiologists, while 15% of its search engagements for psychiatrists were for telepsychiatrists in 2021/2022.
“Right now, quality of life is a very important factor. It’s work-life balance. It’s sensitivity to the stresses that we just experienced over the last 2.5 years,” Mr. Belkin concluded. “There’s more sensitivity around the culture of the organizations. What’s the leadership like? How did the organization handle the pandemic? How do they respond?”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
After a year of uncertainty and decline because of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a recently released report from Merritt Hawkins, the physician search division of AMN Healthcare.
The study is based on an analysis of job search and consulting assignments that the firm conducted on behalf of its health care organization clients from April 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022.
“Search engagements were down a little over 30% in 2020, but by the end of 2021, everything started spiking dramatically to the point of where we were at a 34-year high,” Michael Belkin, divisional vice president with Merritt Hawkins, told this news organization. “The pendulum has gone all the way back. People are more interested in going out and seeing their physicians.”
Demand for physicians was suppressed during the peak of the pandemic, as many hospitals curtailed elective procedures and many patients refrained from entering a medical facility. A large backlog of patients needing care subsequently developed.
This, combined with an aging population and widespread chronic medical conditions, has caused a strong surge in demand for physicians and advanced practitioners, according to the report.
In addition to the volume of searches increasing, physician starting salaries have rebounded from the COVID-19 downturn.
Average starting salaries of 14 physician specialties tracked in 2021/2022 increased, while only 3 decreased. Orthopedic surgeons were offered an average of $565,000 to start, exclusive of signing bonuses and other incentives, up from $546,000 the previous year. Urologists were offered an average of $510,000 to start, up from $497,000; gastroenterologists were offered $474,000, up from $453,000; while radiologists were offered $455,000, up from $401,000.
Similarly, a recent Medscape study based on responses from more than 13,000 U.S. physicians across 29 specialties found that income for all physician specialists increased, with otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, and dermatologists experiencing the greatest gains.
A new reality
While the job market for physicians and advanced practitioners has seemingly recovered, there are many differences between today’s working environment for clinicians and what existed during the pandemic.
First, specialists are now stepping into the spotlight, a position that primary care clinicians previously held. The majority of Merritt Hawkins’ search engagements (64%) in 2021/2022 were for physician specialists, including cardiologists, gastroenterologists, orthopedic surgeons, neurologists, oncologists, and others. Only 17% of the search engagements were for primary care physicians, down from 18% in 2020/2021 and 20% in 2019/2020.
“We’ve seen specialties bounce back faster. Of course, you’ve got the aging population; you’ve got people that want that specialized care,” Mr. Belkin said.
Advanced practitioners also are playing a more significant role in the postpandemic word. In fact, 19% of Merritt Hawkins’ search engagements were for advanced practitioners, including nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants, and certified registered nurse anesthetists, up from 18% the previous year and just 13% the year prior to that, indicating growing demand for nonphysician providers.
NPs, in fact, topped the list of most requested search engagements, underscoring a shift from traditional physician office-based primary care delivery settings toward “convenient care” settings such as urgent care centers and retail clinics that are largely staffed by NPs and other advanced practitioners.
Advanced practitioners are taking on more responsibility for primary care simply because there is a large number of these professionals ready to take on the challenge.
The health care industry was “not able to produce enough primary care physicians over the last decade. So advanced practitioners, I believe, have slowly started to work alongside those primary care physicians. In a lot of areas such as your retail space, your CVS, your Walmart, your Walgreens, your standalone urgent cares, they’ve stepped up,” Mr. Belkin said.
Advanced practitioners also are providing the convenience that consumers are increasingly demanding.
“We are a society that wants things immediately ... but it’s still a challenge to schedule an appointment with a physician. However, it’s less of a challenge to get into a retail clinic or an urgent care center or to schedule something through telehealth,” Mr. Belkin noted.
More than just money
With the job market strong, the challenge for health care organizations is to create competitive recruiting packages. Sure enough, 92% of candidates were offered signing bonuses in 2021/2022 compared with just 61% in 2020/2021.
The financial incentives, however, might not be enough. In this environment, health care organizations need to go beyond simply offering competitive salaries to new recruits. For example, clinicians are seeking flexibility, as many potential hires are seeking remote positions. In fact, 18% of radiology search engagements were for teleradiologists, while 15% of its search engagements for psychiatrists were for telepsychiatrists in 2021/2022.
“Right now, quality of life is a very important factor. It’s work-life balance. It’s sensitivity to the stresses that we just experienced over the last 2.5 years,” Mr. Belkin concluded. “There’s more sensitivity around the culture of the organizations. What’s the leadership like? How did the organization handle the pandemic? How do they respond?”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
After a year of uncertainty and decline because of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a recently released report from Merritt Hawkins, the physician search division of AMN Healthcare.
The study is based on an analysis of job search and consulting assignments that the firm conducted on behalf of its health care organization clients from April 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022.
“Search engagements were down a little over 30% in 2020, but by the end of 2021, everything started spiking dramatically to the point of where we were at a 34-year high,” Michael Belkin, divisional vice president with Merritt Hawkins, told this news organization. “The pendulum has gone all the way back. People are more interested in going out and seeing their physicians.”
Demand for physicians was suppressed during the peak of the pandemic, as many hospitals curtailed elective procedures and many patients refrained from entering a medical facility. A large backlog of patients needing care subsequently developed.
This, combined with an aging population and widespread chronic medical conditions, has caused a strong surge in demand for physicians and advanced practitioners, according to the report.
In addition to the volume of searches increasing, physician starting salaries have rebounded from the COVID-19 downturn.
Average starting salaries of 14 physician specialties tracked in 2021/2022 increased, while only 3 decreased. Orthopedic surgeons were offered an average of $565,000 to start, exclusive of signing bonuses and other incentives, up from $546,000 the previous year. Urologists were offered an average of $510,000 to start, up from $497,000; gastroenterologists were offered $474,000, up from $453,000; while radiologists were offered $455,000, up from $401,000.
Similarly, a recent Medscape study based on responses from more than 13,000 U.S. physicians across 29 specialties found that income for all physician specialists increased, with otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, and dermatologists experiencing the greatest gains.
A new reality
While the job market for physicians and advanced practitioners has seemingly recovered, there are many differences between today’s working environment for clinicians and what existed during the pandemic.
First, specialists are now stepping into the spotlight, a position that primary care clinicians previously held. The majority of Merritt Hawkins’ search engagements (64%) in 2021/2022 were for physician specialists, including cardiologists, gastroenterologists, orthopedic surgeons, neurologists, oncologists, and others. Only 17% of the search engagements were for primary care physicians, down from 18% in 2020/2021 and 20% in 2019/2020.
“We’ve seen specialties bounce back faster. Of course, you’ve got the aging population; you’ve got people that want that specialized care,” Mr. Belkin said.
Advanced practitioners also are playing a more significant role in the postpandemic word. In fact, 19% of Merritt Hawkins’ search engagements were for advanced practitioners, including nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants, and certified registered nurse anesthetists, up from 18% the previous year and just 13% the year prior to that, indicating growing demand for nonphysician providers.
NPs, in fact, topped the list of most requested search engagements, underscoring a shift from traditional physician office-based primary care delivery settings toward “convenient care” settings such as urgent care centers and retail clinics that are largely staffed by NPs and other advanced practitioners.
Advanced practitioners are taking on more responsibility for primary care simply because there is a large number of these professionals ready to take on the challenge.
The health care industry was “not able to produce enough primary care physicians over the last decade. So advanced practitioners, I believe, have slowly started to work alongside those primary care physicians. In a lot of areas such as your retail space, your CVS, your Walmart, your Walgreens, your standalone urgent cares, they’ve stepped up,” Mr. Belkin said.
Advanced practitioners also are providing the convenience that consumers are increasingly demanding.
“We are a society that wants things immediately ... but it’s still a challenge to schedule an appointment with a physician. However, it’s less of a challenge to get into a retail clinic or an urgent care center or to schedule something through telehealth,” Mr. Belkin noted.
More than just money
With the job market strong, the challenge for health care organizations is to create competitive recruiting packages. Sure enough, 92% of candidates were offered signing bonuses in 2021/2022 compared with just 61% in 2020/2021.
The financial incentives, however, might not be enough. In this environment, health care organizations need to go beyond simply offering competitive salaries to new recruits. For example, clinicians are seeking flexibility, as many potential hires are seeking remote positions. In fact, 18% of radiology search engagements were for teleradiologists, while 15% of its search engagements for psychiatrists were for telepsychiatrists in 2021/2022.
“Right now, quality of life is a very important factor. It’s work-life balance. It’s sensitivity to the stresses that we just experienced over the last 2.5 years,” Mr. Belkin concluded. “There’s more sensitivity around the culture of the organizations. What’s the leadership like? How did the organization handle the pandemic? How do they respond?”
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Charcoal could be the cure for the common high-fat diet
Charcoal won’t let high-fat diet weigh you down
Do you want to be the funniest person alive? Of course you do. It’s really simple too, just one joke can make you the greatest comedian of all time. All you have to do is go camping and cook food over a roaring campfire. When someone drops food into the fire (which they always will), get ready. Once they fish out the offending food, which is almost certainly coated in hot coals, tell them: “Ah, eat it anyway. A little texture never hurt!” Trust us, most hilarious and original gag of all time.
But before your hapless friend brushes off his hot dog and forces a laugh, consider this: Japanese researchers have found that a charcoal supplement can prevent weight gain in mice consuming a high-fat diet. Charcoal is actually quite the helpful substance, and not just for grilling. It’s been used as medicine for hundreds of years and even today is used as a treatment for drug overdose and excess gas and flatulence.
The study involved two groups of mice: One was fed a normal diet, the other a high-fat diet. After 12 weeks, the high-fat diet mice had gained weight. At that point, edible activated charcoal was added to their diet. From that point, weight gain was similar between the two groups, and the amount of bile acid, cholesterol, triglyceride, and fatty acid excreted by the high-fat mice increased by two to four times.
The researchers supported the notion that consuming an activated charcoal supplement before or while eating fatty food could prevent weight gain from said fatty food. Which works out well for the classic American barbecue, which is traditionally both high in fat and charcoal. All you have to do is buy some extra charcoal briquettes to pass around and munch on with your friends. Now that’s a party we can get behind.
There’s awake, and then there’s neurologically awake
Time to toss another urban legend onto the trash heap of history. Say goodbye to the benefits of uninterrupted sleep. It’s a fraud, a fake, a myth, a hit or myth, a swing and a myth, an old wives’ tale. You can stuff it and put it on a shelf next to Bigfoot, the Slender Man, and Twinkies.
We all thought we needed 8 hours of uninterrupted sleep every night, but guess who we forgot to tell? Our brains. They’ve been doing exactly the opposite all along, laughing at us the whole time. Smug SOBs.
To straighten out this mess, let’s bring in a scientist, Celia Kjaerby of the Center for Translational Neuromedicine at the University of Copenhagen: “You may think that sleep is a constant state that you are in, and then you wake up. But there is a lot more to sleep than meets the eye. We have learned that noradrenaline causes you to wake up more than 100 times a night. And that is during perfectly normal sleep.”
Those 100 or so sleep interruptions are so brief that we don’t even notice, but they are very important, according to a study conducted at the university. Those tiny little wake-up calls are “the essence for the part of sleep that makes us wake up rested and which enables us to remember what we learned the day before. ... The very short awakenings are created by waves of norepinephrine [and they] reset the brain so that it is ready to store memory when you dive back into sleep,” lead author Maiken Nedergaard, MD, explained.
The investigators compared the level of noradrenaline in sleeping mice with their electrical activity and found that the hormone constantly increased and decreased in a wavelike pattern. A high level meant that the animal was neurologically awake. Deeper valleys between the high points meant better sleep, and the mice with the “highest number of deep noradrenaline valleys were also the ones with the best memory,” the team said in their written statement.
Not just the best memory, they said, but “super memory.” That, of course, was enough to get the attention of Marvel Comics, so the next Disney superhero blockbuster will feature Nocturna, the queen of the night. Her power? Never forgets. Her archnemesis? The Insomniac. Her catchphrase? “Let me sleep on it.”
Words can hurt, literally
Growing up, we’re sure you heard the “sticks and stones” rhyme. Maybe you’ve even recited it once or twice to defend yourself. Well, forget it, because words can hurt and your brain knows it.
In a new study published in Frontiers in Communication, Marijn Struiksma, PhD, of Utrecht University, and colleagues incorporated the use of electroencephalography (EEG) and skin conductance on 79 women to see how words (specifically insults) actually affect the human body.
Each subject was asked to read three different types of statements: an insult, a compliment, and something factual but neutral. Half of the statements contained the subject’s name and half used somebody else’s. The participants were told that these statements were collected from three men.
Nobody interacted with each other, and the setting was completely clinical, yet the results were unmistakable. The EEG showed an effect in P2 amplitude with repetitive insults, no matter who it was about. Even though the insults weren’t real and the participants were aware of it, the brain still recognized them as hurtful, coming across as “mini slaps in the face,” Dr. Struiksma noted in a written statement.
The researchers noted that more needs to be done to better understand the long-term effects that insults can have and create a deeper understanding between words and emotion, but studying the effects of insults in a real-life setting is ethically tricky. This study is a start.
So, yeah, sticks and stones can break your bones, but words will actually hurt you.
This article was updated 7/21/22.
Charcoal won’t let high-fat diet weigh you down
Do you want to be the funniest person alive? Of course you do. It’s really simple too, just one joke can make you the greatest comedian of all time. All you have to do is go camping and cook food over a roaring campfire. When someone drops food into the fire (which they always will), get ready. Once they fish out the offending food, which is almost certainly coated in hot coals, tell them: “Ah, eat it anyway. A little texture never hurt!” Trust us, most hilarious and original gag of all time.
But before your hapless friend brushes off his hot dog and forces a laugh, consider this: Japanese researchers have found that a charcoal supplement can prevent weight gain in mice consuming a high-fat diet. Charcoal is actually quite the helpful substance, and not just for grilling. It’s been used as medicine for hundreds of years and even today is used as a treatment for drug overdose and excess gas and flatulence.
The study involved two groups of mice: One was fed a normal diet, the other a high-fat diet. After 12 weeks, the high-fat diet mice had gained weight. At that point, edible activated charcoal was added to their diet. From that point, weight gain was similar between the two groups, and the amount of bile acid, cholesterol, triglyceride, and fatty acid excreted by the high-fat mice increased by two to four times.
The researchers supported the notion that consuming an activated charcoal supplement before or while eating fatty food could prevent weight gain from said fatty food. Which works out well for the classic American barbecue, which is traditionally both high in fat and charcoal. All you have to do is buy some extra charcoal briquettes to pass around and munch on with your friends. Now that’s a party we can get behind.
There’s awake, and then there’s neurologically awake
Time to toss another urban legend onto the trash heap of history. Say goodbye to the benefits of uninterrupted sleep. It’s a fraud, a fake, a myth, a hit or myth, a swing and a myth, an old wives’ tale. You can stuff it and put it on a shelf next to Bigfoot, the Slender Man, and Twinkies.
We all thought we needed 8 hours of uninterrupted sleep every night, but guess who we forgot to tell? Our brains. They’ve been doing exactly the opposite all along, laughing at us the whole time. Smug SOBs.
To straighten out this mess, let’s bring in a scientist, Celia Kjaerby of the Center for Translational Neuromedicine at the University of Copenhagen: “You may think that sleep is a constant state that you are in, and then you wake up. But there is a lot more to sleep than meets the eye. We have learned that noradrenaline causes you to wake up more than 100 times a night. And that is during perfectly normal sleep.”
Those 100 or so sleep interruptions are so brief that we don’t even notice, but they are very important, according to a study conducted at the university. Those tiny little wake-up calls are “the essence for the part of sleep that makes us wake up rested and which enables us to remember what we learned the day before. ... The very short awakenings are created by waves of norepinephrine [and they] reset the brain so that it is ready to store memory when you dive back into sleep,” lead author Maiken Nedergaard, MD, explained.
The investigators compared the level of noradrenaline in sleeping mice with their electrical activity and found that the hormone constantly increased and decreased in a wavelike pattern. A high level meant that the animal was neurologically awake. Deeper valleys between the high points meant better sleep, and the mice with the “highest number of deep noradrenaline valleys were also the ones with the best memory,” the team said in their written statement.
Not just the best memory, they said, but “super memory.” That, of course, was enough to get the attention of Marvel Comics, so the next Disney superhero blockbuster will feature Nocturna, the queen of the night. Her power? Never forgets. Her archnemesis? The Insomniac. Her catchphrase? “Let me sleep on it.”
Words can hurt, literally
Growing up, we’re sure you heard the “sticks and stones” rhyme. Maybe you’ve even recited it once or twice to defend yourself. Well, forget it, because words can hurt and your brain knows it.
In a new study published in Frontiers in Communication, Marijn Struiksma, PhD, of Utrecht University, and colleagues incorporated the use of electroencephalography (EEG) and skin conductance on 79 women to see how words (specifically insults) actually affect the human body.
Each subject was asked to read three different types of statements: an insult, a compliment, and something factual but neutral. Half of the statements contained the subject’s name and half used somebody else’s. The participants were told that these statements were collected from three men.
Nobody interacted with each other, and the setting was completely clinical, yet the results were unmistakable. The EEG showed an effect in P2 amplitude with repetitive insults, no matter who it was about. Even though the insults weren’t real and the participants were aware of it, the brain still recognized them as hurtful, coming across as “mini slaps in the face,” Dr. Struiksma noted in a written statement.
The researchers noted that more needs to be done to better understand the long-term effects that insults can have and create a deeper understanding between words and emotion, but studying the effects of insults in a real-life setting is ethically tricky. This study is a start.
So, yeah, sticks and stones can break your bones, but words will actually hurt you.
This article was updated 7/21/22.
Charcoal won’t let high-fat diet weigh you down
Do you want to be the funniest person alive? Of course you do. It’s really simple too, just one joke can make you the greatest comedian of all time. All you have to do is go camping and cook food over a roaring campfire. When someone drops food into the fire (which they always will), get ready. Once they fish out the offending food, which is almost certainly coated in hot coals, tell them: “Ah, eat it anyway. A little texture never hurt!” Trust us, most hilarious and original gag of all time.
But before your hapless friend brushes off his hot dog and forces a laugh, consider this: Japanese researchers have found that a charcoal supplement can prevent weight gain in mice consuming a high-fat diet. Charcoal is actually quite the helpful substance, and not just for grilling. It’s been used as medicine for hundreds of years and even today is used as a treatment for drug overdose and excess gas and flatulence.
The study involved two groups of mice: One was fed a normal diet, the other a high-fat diet. After 12 weeks, the high-fat diet mice had gained weight. At that point, edible activated charcoal was added to their diet. From that point, weight gain was similar between the two groups, and the amount of bile acid, cholesterol, triglyceride, and fatty acid excreted by the high-fat mice increased by two to four times.
The researchers supported the notion that consuming an activated charcoal supplement before or while eating fatty food could prevent weight gain from said fatty food. Which works out well for the classic American barbecue, which is traditionally both high in fat and charcoal. All you have to do is buy some extra charcoal briquettes to pass around and munch on with your friends. Now that’s a party we can get behind.
There’s awake, and then there’s neurologically awake
Time to toss another urban legend onto the trash heap of history. Say goodbye to the benefits of uninterrupted sleep. It’s a fraud, a fake, a myth, a hit or myth, a swing and a myth, an old wives’ tale. You can stuff it and put it on a shelf next to Bigfoot, the Slender Man, and Twinkies.
We all thought we needed 8 hours of uninterrupted sleep every night, but guess who we forgot to tell? Our brains. They’ve been doing exactly the opposite all along, laughing at us the whole time. Smug SOBs.
To straighten out this mess, let’s bring in a scientist, Celia Kjaerby of the Center for Translational Neuromedicine at the University of Copenhagen: “You may think that sleep is a constant state that you are in, and then you wake up. But there is a lot more to sleep than meets the eye. We have learned that noradrenaline causes you to wake up more than 100 times a night. And that is during perfectly normal sleep.”
Those 100 or so sleep interruptions are so brief that we don’t even notice, but they are very important, according to a study conducted at the university. Those tiny little wake-up calls are “the essence for the part of sleep that makes us wake up rested and which enables us to remember what we learned the day before. ... The very short awakenings are created by waves of norepinephrine [and they] reset the brain so that it is ready to store memory when you dive back into sleep,” lead author Maiken Nedergaard, MD, explained.
The investigators compared the level of noradrenaline in sleeping mice with their electrical activity and found that the hormone constantly increased and decreased in a wavelike pattern. A high level meant that the animal was neurologically awake. Deeper valleys between the high points meant better sleep, and the mice with the “highest number of deep noradrenaline valleys were also the ones with the best memory,” the team said in their written statement.
Not just the best memory, they said, but “super memory.” That, of course, was enough to get the attention of Marvel Comics, so the next Disney superhero blockbuster will feature Nocturna, the queen of the night. Her power? Never forgets. Her archnemesis? The Insomniac. Her catchphrase? “Let me sleep on it.”
Words can hurt, literally
Growing up, we’re sure you heard the “sticks and stones” rhyme. Maybe you’ve even recited it once or twice to defend yourself. Well, forget it, because words can hurt and your brain knows it.
In a new study published in Frontiers in Communication, Marijn Struiksma, PhD, of Utrecht University, and colleagues incorporated the use of electroencephalography (EEG) and skin conductance on 79 women to see how words (specifically insults) actually affect the human body.
Each subject was asked to read three different types of statements: an insult, a compliment, and something factual but neutral. Half of the statements contained the subject’s name and half used somebody else’s. The participants were told that these statements were collected from three men.
Nobody interacted with each other, and the setting was completely clinical, yet the results were unmistakable. The EEG showed an effect in P2 amplitude with repetitive insults, no matter who it was about. Even though the insults weren’t real and the participants were aware of it, the brain still recognized them as hurtful, coming across as “mini slaps in the face,” Dr. Struiksma noted in a written statement.
The researchers noted that more needs to be done to better understand the long-term effects that insults can have and create a deeper understanding between words and emotion, but studying the effects of insults in a real-life setting is ethically tricky. This study is a start.
So, yeah, sticks and stones can break your bones, but words will actually hurt you.
This article was updated 7/21/22.