Legislative Agenda

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Legislative Agenda

Eric Siegal, MD, SFHM, is not an SHM newbie. Since becoming a member in 1999, he has served on the awards and annual meeting committees, and he is the current chair of the Public Policy Committee. So when he learned he was elected to a three-year term as SHM’s newest board member, he says, he was excited about the opportunity to continue to work with “old friends.”

Dr. Siegal is a Critical Care Fellow at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, and previously served as regional medical director for Brentwood, Tenn.-based Cogent Healthcare. TH eWire caught up with him just as he finished attending his first board meeting at HM10.

What unique perspective do you bring to the board?

I think I have a pretty varied experience. I ran both community and academic hospitalist programs. And I obviously have the policy bent, which, with all that is going with healthcare policy reform, I think it will be important to have someone on the board who has a fair degree of fluency with that. Although I will also say that two other board members come from the policy committee, so I’m by no means alone.

What kind of issues do you look forward to getting involved in?

The two areas that interest me most are healthcare policy and how hospitalists are going to interface with the critical-care environment. We know there is a large percentage, if not a majority, of hospitalists practicing critical-care medicine, some of whom may be appropriately trained to do so and others who are not. I think there are opportunities to figure out how hospitalists can and should participate in the critical care of patients. Hopefully, we can pair up with critical-care societies to figure out how we’re going to address the massive and growing shortage of critical-care physicians in the U.S.

Where do you see SHM in 10 years?

I would like to see us recognized as part of the solution to making healthcare better. We have worked very hard up to now to demonstrate to legislators, insurers, and people in the quality world that SHM [that] although we do advocate for members, we also advocate for healthcare reform. I think, unfortunately, that many professional societies start and end primarily with what is in the best financial interest of their membership. We have gone to great lengths not to be that: to be seen as an organization that is part of the solution to healthcare, not part of the problem. … I would hope that in 10 years that would not only be widely accepted throughout the healthcare community, but that when Congress or [the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services] looks around and thinks about who are the people who they can work with to make things better, hospital medicine is at the top of the list.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Sections

Eric Siegal, MD, SFHM, is not an SHM newbie. Since becoming a member in 1999, he has served on the awards and annual meeting committees, and he is the current chair of the Public Policy Committee. So when he learned he was elected to a three-year term as SHM’s newest board member, he says, he was excited about the opportunity to continue to work with “old friends.”

Dr. Siegal is a Critical Care Fellow at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, and previously served as regional medical director for Brentwood, Tenn.-based Cogent Healthcare. TH eWire caught up with him just as he finished attending his first board meeting at HM10.

What unique perspective do you bring to the board?

I think I have a pretty varied experience. I ran both community and academic hospitalist programs. And I obviously have the policy bent, which, with all that is going with healthcare policy reform, I think it will be important to have someone on the board who has a fair degree of fluency with that. Although I will also say that two other board members come from the policy committee, so I’m by no means alone.

What kind of issues do you look forward to getting involved in?

The two areas that interest me most are healthcare policy and how hospitalists are going to interface with the critical-care environment. We know there is a large percentage, if not a majority, of hospitalists practicing critical-care medicine, some of whom may be appropriately trained to do so and others who are not. I think there are opportunities to figure out how hospitalists can and should participate in the critical care of patients. Hopefully, we can pair up with critical-care societies to figure out how we’re going to address the massive and growing shortage of critical-care physicians in the U.S.

Where do you see SHM in 10 years?

I would like to see us recognized as part of the solution to making healthcare better. We have worked very hard up to now to demonstrate to legislators, insurers, and people in the quality world that SHM [that] although we do advocate for members, we also advocate for healthcare reform. I think, unfortunately, that many professional societies start and end primarily with what is in the best financial interest of their membership. We have gone to great lengths not to be that: to be seen as an organization that is part of the solution to healthcare, not part of the problem. … I would hope that in 10 years that would not only be widely accepted throughout the healthcare community, but that when Congress or [the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services] looks around and thinks about who are the people who they can work with to make things better, hospital medicine is at the top of the list.

Eric Siegal, MD, SFHM, is not an SHM newbie. Since becoming a member in 1999, he has served on the awards and annual meeting committees, and he is the current chair of the Public Policy Committee. So when he learned he was elected to a three-year term as SHM’s newest board member, he says, he was excited about the opportunity to continue to work with “old friends.”

Dr. Siegal is a Critical Care Fellow at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, and previously served as regional medical director for Brentwood, Tenn.-based Cogent Healthcare. TH eWire caught up with him just as he finished attending his first board meeting at HM10.

What unique perspective do you bring to the board?

I think I have a pretty varied experience. I ran both community and academic hospitalist programs. And I obviously have the policy bent, which, with all that is going with healthcare policy reform, I think it will be important to have someone on the board who has a fair degree of fluency with that. Although I will also say that two other board members come from the policy committee, so I’m by no means alone.

What kind of issues do you look forward to getting involved in?

The two areas that interest me most are healthcare policy and how hospitalists are going to interface with the critical-care environment. We know there is a large percentage, if not a majority, of hospitalists practicing critical-care medicine, some of whom may be appropriately trained to do so and others who are not. I think there are opportunities to figure out how hospitalists can and should participate in the critical care of patients. Hopefully, we can pair up with critical-care societies to figure out how we’re going to address the massive and growing shortage of critical-care physicians in the U.S.

Where do you see SHM in 10 years?

I would like to see us recognized as part of the solution to making healthcare better. We have worked very hard up to now to demonstrate to legislators, insurers, and people in the quality world that SHM [that] although we do advocate for members, we also advocate for healthcare reform. I think, unfortunately, that many professional societies start and end primarily with what is in the best financial interest of their membership. We have gone to great lengths not to be that: to be seen as an organization that is part of the solution to healthcare, not part of the problem. … I would hope that in 10 years that would not only be widely accepted throughout the healthcare community, but that when Congress or [the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services] looks around and thinks about who are the people who they can work with to make things better, hospital medicine is at the top of the list.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Legislative Agenda
Display Headline
Legislative Agenda
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

In the Literature: Research You Need to Know

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
In the Literature: Research You Need to Know

Clinical question: What is the rate of symptomatic upper-extremity DVT (UEDVT), and what are the predictors of UEDVT development in a cohort of hospitalized patients with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs)?

Background: PICCs are used in hospitalized patients and increase VTE risk. Investigators in this study sought to determine the incidence of VTE associated with PICCs in a cohort of hospitalized patients.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: University-affiliated community hospital in Memphis, Tenn.

Synopsis: Over a three-month period, 954 PICCs were placed in 777 patients. Ninety percent of the patients were placed due to poor venous access. Thirty-eight (4.89%) developed at least one VTE, giving a rate of 5.10 VTEs per 1,000 PICC-days; 27 (3.47%) developed UEDVT, giving a rate of 3.65 UEDVTs per 1,000 PICC-days; eight (1.03%) had PE. Patients with VTE had a significantly longer LOS (26 days vs. 15.8 days), and average PICC-days were significantly longer in patients with VTE (13 days vs. 9 days).

In multivariate analysis, the strongest predictors of PICC-associated VTE were previous history of VTE (OR 10.83, 95% CI, 4.89-23.95), PICC tip in noncentral location (OR 2.61, 95% CI, 1.28-5.35), and duration of stay in 10-day increments (OR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.07-1.37).

This study likely underestimates the rate of VTE because symptomatic VTE specifically was assessed. This study and other studies indicate that VTE occurrence in patients with PICC lines is significant; more judicious use of PICC lines is needed and minimizing the length of time PICC lines are in place is important.

Bottom line: In hospitalized patients with PICC lines, previous history of VTE, noncentral location of the PICC tip, and duration of placement are significant predictors of VTE.

 

Citation: Lobo BL, Vaidean G, Broyles J, Reaves AB, Shorr RI. Risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with peripherally inserted central catheters. J Hosp Med. 2009;4(7):417-422.

Reviewed for TH eWire by Sameer Badlani, MD, Stacy S. Banerjee, MD, Alan J. Jung, MD, Elizabeth Marlow, MD, MPP, Valerie G. Press, MD, MPH, Milda R. Saunders, MD, MPH, Nilam J. Soni, MD, Srilaxmi Tumuluri, MD, Section of Hospital Medicine, University of Chicago

For more reviews of HM-related literature, visit our Web site.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Sections

Clinical question: What is the rate of symptomatic upper-extremity DVT (UEDVT), and what are the predictors of UEDVT development in a cohort of hospitalized patients with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs)?

Background: PICCs are used in hospitalized patients and increase VTE risk. Investigators in this study sought to determine the incidence of VTE associated with PICCs in a cohort of hospitalized patients.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: University-affiliated community hospital in Memphis, Tenn.

Synopsis: Over a three-month period, 954 PICCs were placed in 777 patients. Ninety percent of the patients were placed due to poor venous access. Thirty-eight (4.89%) developed at least one VTE, giving a rate of 5.10 VTEs per 1,000 PICC-days; 27 (3.47%) developed UEDVT, giving a rate of 3.65 UEDVTs per 1,000 PICC-days; eight (1.03%) had PE. Patients with VTE had a significantly longer LOS (26 days vs. 15.8 days), and average PICC-days were significantly longer in patients with VTE (13 days vs. 9 days).

In multivariate analysis, the strongest predictors of PICC-associated VTE were previous history of VTE (OR 10.83, 95% CI, 4.89-23.95), PICC tip in noncentral location (OR 2.61, 95% CI, 1.28-5.35), and duration of stay in 10-day increments (OR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.07-1.37).

This study likely underestimates the rate of VTE because symptomatic VTE specifically was assessed. This study and other studies indicate that VTE occurrence in patients with PICC lines is significant; more judicious use of PICC lines is needed and minimizing the length of time PICC lines are in place is important.

Bottom line: In hospitalized patients with PICC lines, previous history of VTE, noncentral location of the PICC tip, and duration of placement are significant predictors of VTE.

 

Citation: Lobo BL, Vaidean G, Broyles J, Reaves AB, Shorr RI. Risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with peripherally inserted central catheters. J Hosp Med. 2009;4(7):417-422.

Reviewed for TH eWire by Sameer Badlani, MD, Stacy S. Banerjee, MD, Alan J. Jung, MD, Elizabeth Marlow, MD, MPP, Valerie G. Press, MD, MPH, Milda R. Saunders, MD, MPH, Nilam J. Soni, MD, Srilaxmi Tumuluri, MD, Section of Hospital Medicine, University of Chicago

For more reviews of HM-related literature, visit our Web site.

Clinical question: What is the rate of symptomatic upper-extremity DVT (UEDVT), and what are the predictors of UEDVT development in a cohort of hospitalized patients with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs)?

Background: PICCs are used in hospitalized patients and increase VTE risk. Investigators in this study sought to determine the incidence of VTE associated with PICCs in a cohort of hospitalized patients.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: University-affiliated community hospital in Memphis, Tenn.

Synopsis: Over a three-month period, 954 PICCs were placed in 777 patients. Ninety percent of the patients were placed due to poor venous access. Thirty-eight (4.89%) developed at least one VTE, giving a rate of 5.10 VTEs per 1,000 PICC-days; 27 (3.47%) developed UEDVT, giving a rate of 3.65 UEDVTs per 1,000 PICC-days; eight (1.03%) had PE. Patients with VTE had a significantly longer LOS (26 days vs. 15.8 days), and average PICC-days were significantly longer in patients with VTE (13 days vs. 9 days).

In multivariate analysis, the strongest predictors of PICC-associated VTE were previous history of VTE (OR 10.83, 95% CI, 4.89-23.95), PICC tip in noncentral location (OR 2.61, 95% CI, 1.28-5.35), and duration of stay in 10-day increments (OR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.07-1.37).

This study likely underestimates the rate of VTE because symptomatic VTE specifically was assessed. This study and other studies indicate that VTE occurrence in patients with PICC lines is significant; more judicious use of PICC lines is needed and minimizing the length of time PICC lines are in place is important.

Bottom line: In hospitalized patients with PICC lines, previous history of VTE, noncentral location of the PICC tip, and duration of placement are significant predictors of VTE.

 

Citation: Lobo BL, Vaidean G, Broyles J, Reaves AB, Shorr RI. Risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with peripherally inserted central catheters. J Hosp Med. 2009;4(7):417-422.

Reviewed for TH eWire by Sameer Badlani, MD, Stacy S. Banerjee, MD, Alan J. Jung, MD, Elizabeth Marlow, MD, MPP, Valerie G. Press, MD, MPH, Milda R. Saunders, MD, MPH, Nilam J. Soni, MD, Srilaxmi Tumuluri, MD, Section of Hospital Medicine, University of Chicago

For more reviews of HM-related literature, visit our Web site.

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
In the Literature: Research You Need to Know
Display Headline
In the Literature: Research You Need to Know
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

SHM President: 'Take Charge of QI'

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
SHM President: 'Take Charge of QI'

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — The HM movement over the past two decades has matured into a defined specialty, but must now take charge of quality improvement (QI) in hospital settings if it hopes to “go to that next level,” the new SHM president declared at the annual meeting this morning.

“We’re at a stage as an organization that we need to continue to do the quality education efforts, but we need to start rising to that next level, which is the quality execution and solutions,” said President Jeffrey Wiese, MD, FACP, SFHM, associate professor of medicine at Tulane University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans.

Dr. Wiese said that within five years he expects SHM to have crafted an interactive database listing all HM-led QI projects. He envisions the information as a resource for hospitalists looking to lead projects, as well as a “grand menu of potential practice improvement modules” to satisfy the new Focused Practice in Hospital Medicine Maintenance of Certification through the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM).

“We have great heterogeneity in the society,” Dr. Wiese said after his address. “Some people are quality experts because they received great training from SHM, Intermountain Health, IHI, but then there are many members that are interested and really want to be that quality expert, but are to the left on the continuum, still learning how to do it."

The new president capped a morning of speechifying from outgoing President Scott Flanders, MD, SFHM, director of the hospitalist division, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, and SHM CEO Larry Wellikson, MD, SFHM. Both reveled in HM’s growth, but agreed that to sustain that momentum more of the estimated 30,000 hospitalists in the U.S. need to get more involved in promoting and pushing the practice.

“We really need to engage everybody," Dr. Flanders said. "We need all 60,000 hands on deck.”

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Sections

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — The HM movement over the past two decades has matured into a defined specialty, but must now take charge of quality improvement (QI) in hospital settings if it hopes to “go to that next level,” the new SHM president declared at the annual meeting this morning.

“We’re at a stage as an organization that we need to continue to do the quality education efforts, but we need to start rising to that next level, which is the quality execution and solutions,” said President Jeffrey Wiese, MD, FACP, SFHM, associate professor of medicine at Tulane University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans.

Dr. Wiese said that within five years he expects SHM to have crafted an interactive database listing all HM-led QI projects. He envisions the information as a resource for hospitalists looking to lead projects, as well as a “grand menu of potential practice improvement modules” to satisfy the new Focused Practice in Hospital Medicine Maintenance of Certification through the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM).

“We have great heterogeneity in the society,” Dr. Wiese said after his address. “Some people are quality experts because they received great training from SHM, Intermountain Health, IHI, but then there are many members that are interested and really want to be that quality expert, but are to the left on the continuum, still learning how to do it."

The new president capped a morning of speechifying from outgoing President Scott Flanders, MD, SFHM, director of the hospitalist division, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, and SHM CEO Larry Wellikson, MD, SFHM. Both reveled in HM’s growth, but agreed that to sustain that momentum more of the estimated 30,000 hospitalists in the U.S. need to get more involved in promoting and pushing the practice.

“We really need to engage everybody," Dr. Flanders said. "We need all 60,000 hands on deck.”

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — The HM movement over the past two decades has matured into a defined specialty, but must now take charge of quality improvement (QI) in hospital settings if it hopes to “go to that next level,” the new SHM president declared at the annual meeting this morning.

“We’re at a stage as an organization that we need to continue to do the quality education efforts, but we need to start rising to that next level, which is the quality execution and solutions,” said President Jeffrey Wiese, MD, FACP, SFHM, associate professor of medicine at Tulane University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans.

Dr. Wiese said that within five years he expects SHM to have crafted an interactive database listing all HM-led QI projects. He envisions the information as a resource for hospitalists looking to lead projects, as well as a “grand menu of potential practice improvement modules” to satisfy the new Focused Practice in Hospital Medicine Maintenance of Certification through the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM).

“We have great heterogeneity in the society,” Dr. Wiese said after his address. “Some people are quality experts because they received great training from SHM, Intermountain Health, IHI, but then there are many members that are interested and really want to be that quality expert, but are to the left on the continuum, still learning how to do it."

The new president capped a morning of speechifying from outgoing President Scott Flanders, MD, SFHM, director of the hospitalist division, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, and SHM CEO Larry Wellikson, MD, SFHM. Both reveled in HM’s growth, but agreed that to sustain that momentum more of the estimated 30,000 hospitalists in the U.S. need to get more involved in promoting and pushing the practice.

“We really need to engage everybody," Dr. Flanders said. "We need all 60,000 hands on deck.”

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
SHM President: 'Take Charge of QI'
Display Headline
SHM President: 'Take Charge of QI'
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

Researchers Earn First SHM Junior Faculty Development Awards

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Researchers Earn First SHM Junior Faculty Development Awards

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — Kirsten Kangelaris, MD, and Evan Fieldston, MD, MBA, MSHP, were presented $50,000 Junior Faculty Development Awards this morning at HM10. The first-year awards are part of SHM’s commitment to helping the “generation of new knowledge,” said Scott Flanders, SHM’s outgoing president.

Dr. Kangelaris, a fellow in internal medicine at the University of California at San Francisco, focuses her research on continued clinical and biologic genetic risk-prediction algorithms that will improve the triage and early-management strategies for hospitalized patients with inflammatory illness.

Dr. Fieldston, an assistant professor in pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, plans to use his award to examine the association between dynamic aspects of workload, workforce, and quality of care at children’s hospitals.

SHM also handed out its annual Awards of Excellence and announced winners from the Research, Innovation, and Clinical Vignette (PDF) competition. Judges scored more than 400 posters; some of the winning project teams included medical students.

“I am particularly proud to see that we had medical students as award winners,” said Flanders, chief of the hospital medicine division at the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor. “That gives me great hope for the future of HM.”

 

Awards of Excellence

  • Clinical Excellence: Jennifer Myers (pictured), MD, FHM, patient safety officer at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania;
  • Excellence in Research: Margaret Fang, MD, MPH, FHM, assistant professor of medicine at the University of California at San Francisco;
  • Outstanding Service in Hospital Medicine: Mitchell Wilson, MD, SFHM, corporate medical director for Eagle Hospital Physicians;
  • Excellence in Teaching: Amir Jaffer, associate professor of medicine, chief of the hospital medicine division in the Department of Medicine at the University of Miami (Fla.); and
  • Excellence in Teamwork in Quality Improvement: Emory Healthcare’s VTE Prevention Team.

Research, Innovation, and Clinical Vignettes winners

  • Research: Will Southern, MD, MS, and Julia Arnsten, MD, MPH, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, N.Y.: “Increased Mortality and Readmission Among Patients Discharged against Medical Advice.”
  • Innovation Poster: Aaron Farberg, BS, Andrew Lin, BS, Latoya Kuhn, MPH, Scott Flanders, MD, SFHM, Christopher Kim, MD, MBA, University of Michigan Medical School, “Dear Doctor: A Tool to Facilitate Patient-Centered Care and Enhance Communication.”
  • Adult Vignette: Jennie Wei, MD, and Patrick Kneeland, MD, University of California at San Francisco, “A Case of Skin Ulcers and Neutropenia: Definitely Not a Helminth Problem.”
  • Pediatric Vignette: Harry Hoar, MD, Baystate Children’s Hospitalist, Springfield, Mass., “A Teen with Varices: An Uncommon Presentation of a Familiar Disease.”
  •  

     

 

 

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Sections

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — Kirsten Kangelaris, MD, and Evan Fieldston, MD, MBA, MSHP, were presented $50,000 Junior Faculty Development Awards this morning at HM10. The first-year awards are part of SHM’s commitment to helping the “generation of new knowledge,” said Scott Flanders, SHM’s outgoing president.

Dr. Kangelaris, a fellow in internal medicine at the University of California at San Francisco, focuses her research on continued clinical and biologic genetic risk-prediction algorithms that will improve the triage and early-management strategies for hospitalized patients with inflammatory illness.

Dr. Fieldston, an assistant professor in pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, plans to use his award to examine the association between dynamic aspects of workload, workforce, and quality of care at children’s hospitals.

SHM also handed out its annual Awards of Excellence and announced winners from the Research, Innovation, and Clinical Vignette (PDF) competition. Judges scored more than 400 posters; some of the winning project teams included medical students.

“I am particularly proud to see that we had medical students as award winners,” said Flanders, chief of the hospital medicine division at the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor. “That gives me great hope for the future of HM.”

 

Awards of Excellence

  • Clinical Excellence: Jennifer Myers (pictured), MD, FHM, patient safety officer at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania;
  • Excellence in Research: Margaret Fang, MD, MPH, FHM, assistant professor of medicine at the University of California at San Francisco;
  • Outstanding Service in Hospital Medicine: Mitchell Wilson, MD, SFHM, corporate medical director for Eagle Hospital Physicians;
  • Excellence in Teaching: Amir Jaffer, associate professor of medicine, chief of the hospital medicine division in the Department of Medicine at the University of Miami (Fla.); and
  • Excellence in Teamwork in Quality Improvement: Emory Healthcare’s VTE Prevention Team.

Research, Innovation, and Clinical Vignettes winners

  • Research: Will Southern, MD, MS, and Julia Arnsten, MD, MPH, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, N.Y.: “Increased Mortality and Readmission Among Patients Discharged against Medical Advice.”
  • Innovation Poster: Aaron Farberg, BS, Andrew Lin, BS, Latoya Kuhn, MPH, Scott Flanders, MD, SFHM, Christopher Kim, MD, MBA, University of Michigan Medical School, “Dear Doctor: A Tool to Facilitate Patient-Centered Care and Enhance Communication.”
  • Adult Vignette: Jennie Wei, MD, and Patrick Kneeland, MD, University of California at San Francisco, “A Case of Skin Ulcers and Neutropenia: Definitely Not a Helminth Problem.”
  • Pediatric Vignette: Harry Hoar, MD, Baystate Children’s Hospitalist, Springfield, Mass., “A Teen with Varices: An Uncommon Presentation of a Familiar Disease.”
  •  

     

 

 

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — Kirsten Kangelaris, MD, and Evan Fieldston, MD, MBA, MSHP, were presented $50,000 Junior Faculty Development Awards this morning at HM10. The first-year awards are part of SHM’s commitment to helping the “generation of new knowledge,” said Scott Flanders, SHM’s outgoing president.

Dr. Kangelaris, a fellow in internal medicine at the University of California at San Francisco, focuses her research on continued clinical and biologic genetic risk-prediction algorithms that will improve the triage and early-management strategies for hospitalized patients with inflammatory illness.

Dr. Fieldston, an assistant professor in pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, plans to use his award to examine the association between dynamic aspects of workload, workforce, and quality of care at children’s hospitals.

SHM also handed out its annual Awards of Excellence and announced winners from the Research, Innovation, and Clinical Vignette (PDF) competition. Judges scored more than 400 posters; some of the winning project teams included medical students.

“I am particularly proud to see that we had medical students as award winners,” said Flanders, chief of the hospital medicine division at the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor. “That gives me great hope for the future of HM.”

 

Awards of Excellence

  • Clinical Excellence: Jennifer Myers (pictured), MD, FHM, patient safety officer at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania;
  • Excellence in Research: Margaret Fang, MD, MPH, FHM, assistant professor of medicine at the University of California at San Francisco;
  • Outstanding Service in Hospital Medicine: Mitchell Wilson, MD, SFHM, corporate medical director for Eagle Hospital Physicians;
  • Excellence in Teaching: Amir Jaffer, associate professor of medicine, chief of the hospital medicine division in the Department of Medicine at the University of Miami (Fla.); and
  • Excellence in Teamwork in Quality Improvement: Emory Healthcare’s VTE Prevention Team.

Research, Innovation, and Clinical Vignettes winners

  • Research: Will Southern, MD, MS, and Julia Arnsten, MD, MPH, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, N.Y.: “Increased Mortality and Readmission Among Patients Discharged against Medical Advice.”
  • Innovation Poster: Aaron Farberg, BS, Andrew Lin, BS, Latoya Kuhn, MPH, Scott Flanders, MD, SFHM, Christopher Kim, MD, MBA, University of Michigan Medical School, “Dear Doctor: A Tool to Facilitate Patient-Centered Care and Enhance Communication.”
  • Adult Vignette: Jennie Wei, MD, and Patrick Kneeland, MD, University of California at San Francisco, “A Case of Skin Ulcers and Neutropenia: Definitely Not a Helminth Problem.”
  • Pediatric Vignette: Harry Hoar, MD, Baystate Children’s Hospitalist, Springfield, Mass., “A Teen with Varices: An Uncommon Presentation of a Familiar Disease.”
  •  

     

 

 

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Researchers Earn First SHM Junior Faculty Development Awards
Display Headline
Researchers Earn First SHM Junior Faculty Development Awards
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

Health Reform Heading HM's Way

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Health Reform Heading HM's Way

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. – Hospitalists are poised to take the reins of implementing the landmark healthcare reform package signed into law two weeks ago.

“It creates challenges for us; it creates great opportunities for us,” Ron Greeno, MD, FCCP, SFHM, chief medical officer of Brentwood, Tenn.-based Cogent Healthcare, and a member of SHM’s Public Policy Committee, said during a panel discussion this morning at HM10. “Saddle up, because we’re going to be asked to do a lot of things.”

Just what the most meaningful healthcare legislation since Medicare was passed in 1965 will mean for hospitalists is murky. Eric Siegal, MD, SFHM, chair of SHM’s Public Policy Committee, noted that a skeptic can look at bundling payments as a negative influence on HM compensation, while a supporter might argue that a revised revenue methodology could streamline operations, align interests and eventually be a boon to the bottom line.

Either way, outgoing SHM President Scott Flanders, MD, SFHM, director of the hospitalist division at the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor, wants all hospitalists to be prepared for inevitable discussions of how to improve quality of care and reduce costs.

“The timing couldn’t be more fortuitous,” Dr. Flanders said, referring to the fact the annual meeting is being held just miles from the Capitol. “We are about to experience some sea changes in healthcare in the United States.”

Leslie Norwalk, former acting administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), noted that much of the reform would hinge on pay incentives and the ability to properly fund programs that encourage new ideas, particularly the proposed Council on Technology and Innovation. Without proper funding, many elements of the health reform legislation could go by the wayside, said Norwalk, now a lawyer in Washington.

“You get what you pay for,” she added. “If you stop paying for readmission—at least avoidable readmission…then I imagine that this trend would change.”

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Sections

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. – Hospitalists are poised to take the reins of implementing the landmark healthcare reform package signed into law two weeks ago.

“It creates challenges for us; it creates great opportunities for us,” Ron Greeno, MD, FCCP, SFHM, chief medical officer of Brentwood, Tenn.-based Cogent Healthcare, and a member of SHM’s Public Policy Committee, said during a panel discussion this morning at HM10. “Saddle up, because we’re going to be asked to do a lot of things.”

Just what the most meaningful healthcare legislation since Medicare was passed in 1965 will mean for hospitalists is murky. Eric Siegal, MD, SFHM, chair of SHM’s Public Policy Committee, noted that a skeptic can look at bundling payments as a negative influence on HM compensation, while a supporter might argue that a revised revenue methodology could streamline operations, align interests and eventually be a boon to the bottom line.

Either way, outgoing SHM President Scott Flanders, MD, SFHM, director of the hospitalist division at the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor, wants all hospitalists to be prepared for inevitable discussions of how to improve quality of care and reduce costs.

“The timing couldn’t be more fortuitous,” Dr. Flanders said, referring to the fact the annual meeting is being held just miles from the Capitol. “We are about to experience some sea changes in healthcare in the United States.”

Leslie Norwalk, former acting administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), noted that much of the reform would hinge on pay incentives and the ability to properly fund programs that encourage new ideas, particularly the proposed Council on Technology and Innovation. Without proper funding, many elements of the health reform legislation could go by the wayside, said Norwalk, now a lawyer in Washington.

“You get what you pay for,” she added. “If you stop paying for readmission—at least avoidable readmission…then I imagine that this trend would change.”

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. – Hospitalists are poised to take the reins of implementing the landmark healthcare reform package signed into law two weeks ago.

“It creates challenges for us; it creates great opportunities for us,” Ron Greeno, MD, FCCP, SFHM, chief medical officer of Brentwood, Tenn.-based Cogent Healthcare, and a member of SHM’s Public Policy Committee, said during a panel discussion this morning at HM10. “Saddle up, because we’re going to be asked to do a lot of things.”

Just what the most meaningful healthcare legislation since Medicare was passed in 1965 will mean for hospitalists is murky. Eric Siegal, MD, SFHM, chair of SHM’s Public Policy Committee, noted that a skeptic can look at bundling payments as a negative influence on HM compensation, while a supporter might argue that a revised revenue methodology could streamline operations, align interests and eventually be a boon to the bottom line.

Either way, outgoing SHM President Scott Flanders, MD, SFHM, director of the hospitalist division at the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor, wants all hospitalists to be prepared for inevitable discussions of how to improve quality of care and reduce costs.

“The timing couldn’t be more fortuitous,” Dr. Flanders said, referring to the fact the annual meeting is being held just miles from the Capitol. “We are about to experience some sea changes in healthcare in the United States.”

Leslie Norwalk, former acting administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), noted that much of the reform would hinge on pay incentives and the ability to properly fund programs that encourage new ideas, particularly the proposed Council on Technology and Innovation. Without proper funding, many elements of the health reform legislation could go by the wayside, said Norwalk, now a lawyer in Washington.

“You get what you pay for,” she added. “If you stop paying for readmission—at least avoidable readmission…then I imagine that this trend would change.”

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
Health Reform Heading HM's Way
Display Headline
Health Reform Heading HM's Way
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

First, Do No Harm

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
First, Do No Harm

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — Paul Levy doesn’t take well to the idea that things just happen in a hospital, whether it’s a central-line infection, a patient fall, or an accommodation for excellence.

Levy, president and CEO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, insists that improvement be a central tenet of his institution—and the only way to improve things is to monitor them first to establish a baseline.

Many of the roughly 2,500 hospitalists gathered for HM10 here might have expected Levy to talk about the recently passed healthcare reform package. Surprisingly, he instead told them to “ignore the healthcare reform bill" during this morning’s keynote address.

“Ignore all the fuss about it," he said. "Focus instead on the underlying values that you each have individually, and that you have collectively, as to why you became docs in the first place.”

Levy, who is not a physician, has quickly made a name as a leading voice in quality and transparency discussions, particularly via his popular blog. This morning, he told thousands of hospitalists that while change can be difficult, “we are doing too much harm in our hospitals.” He encouraged hospitalists to take charge of quality programs and point out processes and systems that could be improved.

And while he didn’t discount the federal mandate to provide increased access to medical care, he noted that the future delivery of care will improve as a function of thoughtful analysis and dedicated work, not because of new budgeting rules.

“It won’t be because we changed the payment regime,” Levy boasted. “It will be because you did the job.”

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Sections

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — Paul Levy doesn’t take well to the idea that things just happen in a hospital, whether it’s a central-line infection, a patient fall, or an accommodation for excellence.

Levy, president and CEO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, insists that improvement be a central tenet of his institution—and the only way to improve things is to monitor them first to establish a baseline.

Many of the roughly 2,500 hospitalists gathered for HM10 here might have expected Levy to talk about the recently passed healthcare reform package. Surprisingly, he instead told them to “ignore the healthcare reform bill" during this morning’s keynote address.

“Ignore all the fuss about it," he said. "Focus instead on the underlying values that you each have individually, and that you have collectively, as to why you became docs in the first place.”

Levy, who is not a physician, has quickly made a name as a leading voice in quality and transparency discussions, particularly via his popular blog. This morning, he told thousands of hospitalists that while change can be difficult, “we are doing too much harm in our hospitals.” He encouraged hospitalists to take charge of quality programs and point out processes and systems that could be improved.

And while he didn’t discount the federal mandate to provide increased access to medical care, he noted that the future delivery of care will improve as a function of thoughtful analysis and dedicated work, not because of new budgeting rules.

“It won’t be because we changed the payment regime,” Levy boasted. “It will be because you did the job.”

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — Paul Levy doesn’t take well to the idea that things just happen in a hospital, whether it’s a central-line infection, a patient fall, or an accommodation for excellence.

Levy, president and CEO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, insists that improvement be a central tenet of his institution—and the only way to improve things is to monitor them first to establish a baseline.

Many of the roughly 2,500 hospitalists gathered for HM10 here might have expected Levy to talk about the recently passed healthcare reform package. Surprisingly, he instead told them to “ignore the healthcare reform bill" during this morning’s keynote address.

“Ignore all the fuss about it," he said. "Focus instead on the underlying values that you each have individually, and that you have collectively, as to why you became docs in the first place.”

Levy, who is not a physician, has quickly made a name as a leading voice in quality and transparency discussions, particularly via his popular blog. This morning, he told thousands of hospitalists that while change can be difficult, “we are doing too much harm in our hospitals.” He encouraged hospitalists to take charge of quality programs and point out processes and systems that could be improved.

And while he didn’t discount the federal mandate to provide increased access to medical care, he noted that the future delivery of care will improve as a function of thoughtful analysis and dedicated work, not because of new budgeting rules.

“It won’t be because we changed the payment regime,” Levy boasted. “It will be because you did the job.”

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
First, Do No Harm
Display Headline
First, Do No Harm
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

California HealthCare Foundation Adopts Project BOOST

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
California HealthCare Foundation Adopts Project BOOST

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. – The next cohort of sites for SHM’s transitional-care program will be 20 California hospitals and health centers.

The agreement to expand Project BOOST (Better Outcomes for Older Adults through Safer Transitions) was made public by society cofounder Win Whitcomb, MD, MHM, chief quality officer at Mercy Medical Center in Springfield, Mass., during an academic pre-course session Thursday at HM10 just outside Washington, D.C.

It’s the second major expansion of the program this year. In January, 15 sites in Michigan entered into a collaborative BOOST program to be comanaged by the University of Michigan and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. Although details are still pending for the California model, it will be a collaboration with the California HealthCare Foundation, an independent nonprofit focused on improving healthcare and reducing costs in the Golden State.

BOOST works by pairing mentors with hospitalists at select institutions to improve care via a discharge planning toolkit. BOOST debuted late in 2008 with six pilot sites. After the California additions, the platform will have expanded to 65 sites.

Dr. Whitcomb’s news was just one of the tidbits tossed out during the practice management pre-course, one of eight daylong courses for hospitalists. Two new pre-courses debuted this year: “Early Career Hospitalist: Skills for Success” and “Essential Neurology for the Hospitalist.”

“It’s a very good learning environment where you can sit down and focus,” said Julius Yang, MD, PhD, a hospitalist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston and the course director for the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) learning session. “It allows you to really immerse yourself in the information.”

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Sections

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. – The next cohort of sites for SHM’s transitional-care program will be 20 California hospitals and health centers.

The agreement to expand Project BOOST (Better Outcomes for Older Adults through Safer Transitions) was made public by society cofounder Win Whitcomb, MD, MHM, chief quality officer at Mercy Medical Center in Springfield, Mass., during an academic pre-course session Thursday at HM10 just outside Washington, D.C.

It’s the second major expansion of the program this year. In January, 15 sites in Michigan entered into a collaborative BOOST program to be comanaged by the University of Michigan and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. Although details are still pending for the California model, it will be a collaboration with the California HealthCare Foundation, an independent nonprofit focused on improving healthcare and reducing costs in the Golden State.

BOOST works by pairing mentors with hospitalists at select institutions to improve care via a discharge planning toolkit. BOOST debuted late in 2008 with six pilot sites. After the California additions, the platform will have expanded to 65 sites.

Dr. Whitcomb’s news was just one of the tidbits tossed out during the practice management pre-course, one of eight daylong courses for hospitalists. Two new pre-courses debuted this year: “Early Career Hospitalist: Skills for Success” and “Essential Neurology for the Hospitalist.”

“It’s a very good learning environment where you can sit down and focus,” said Julius Yang, MD, PhD, a hospitalist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston and the course director for the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) learning session. “It allows you to really immerse yourself in the information.”

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. – The next cohort of sites for SHM’s transitional-care program will be 20 California hospitals and health centers.

The agreement to expand Project BOOST (Better Outcomes for Older Adults through Safer Transitions) was made public by society cofounder Win Whitcomb, MD, MHM, chief quality officer at Mercy Medical Center in Springfield, Mass., during an academic pre-course session Thursday at HM10 just outside Washington, D.C.

It’s the second major expansion of the program this year. In January, 15 sites in Michigan entered into a collaborative BOOST program to be comanaged by the University of Michigan and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. Although details are still pending for the California model, it will be a collaboration with the California HealthCare Foundation, an independent nonprofit focused on improving healthcare and reducing costs in the Golden State.

BOOST works by pairing mentors with hospitalists at select institutions to improve care via a discharge planning toolkit. BOOST debuted late in 2008 with six pilot sites. After the California additions, the platform will have expanded to 65 sites.

Dr. Whitcomb’s news was just one of the tidbits tossed out during the practice management pre-course, one of eight daylong courses for hospitalists. Two new pre-courses debuted this year: “Early Career Hospitalist: Skills for Success” and “Essential Neurology for the Hospitalist.”

“It’s a very good learning environment where you can sit down and focus,” said Julius Yang, MD, PhD, a hospitalist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston and the course director for the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) learning session. “It allows you to really immerse yourself in the information.”

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
California HealthCare Foundation Adopts Project BOOST
Display Headline
California HealthCare Foundation Adopts Project BOOST
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

The Pediatric Hospital Medicine Core Competencies Supplement

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
The Pediatric Hospital Medicine Core Competencies Supplement

0

Pediatric Hospital Medicine Core Competencies Table of Contents
Introductionv
Authors, Reviewers, and Editorsvii
Section 1:Common Clinical Diagnoses and Conditions 
Acute abdominal pain and the acute abdomen1
Apparent life‐threatening event2
Asthma3
Bone and joint infections5
Bronchiolitis6
Central nervous system infections8
Diabetes mellitus9
Failure to thrive11
Fever of unknown origin13
Gastroenteritis14
Kawasaki disease16
Neonatal fever17
Neonatal jaundice18
Pneumonia19
Respiratory failure21
Seizures22
Shock24
Sickle cell disease25
Skin and soft tissue infection26
Toxic ingestion28
Upper airway infections29
Urinary tract infections31
Section 2:Core Skills 
Bladder catheterization/suprapubic bladder tap34
Electrocardiogram interpretation35
Feeding tubes36
Fluids and electrolyte management37
Intravenous access and phlebotomy39
Lumbar puncture40
Non‐invasive monitoring42
Nutrition43
Oxygen delivery and airway management44
Pain management46
Pediatric advanced life support47
Procedural sedation49
Radiographic interpretation50
Section 3:Specialized Clinical Services 
Child abuse and neglect53
Hospice and palliative care54
Leading a healthcare team55
Newborn care and delivery room management57
Technology dependent children59
Transport of the critically ill child60
Section 4:Healthcare Systems: Supporting and Advancing Child Health 
Advocacy64
Business practices65
Communication67
Continuous quality improvement68
Cost‐effective care69
Education71
Ethics72
Evidence based medicine73
Health information systems75
Legal issues/risk management76
Patient safety77
Research79
Transitions of care80
Appendix Original Research 
Pediatric Hospital Medicine Core Competencies: Development and Methodology Erin R. Stucky MD, Mary C. Ottolini MD, MPH and Jennifer Maniscalco MD, MPH82
Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 5(2)
Page Number
i-iv
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF

0

Pediatric Hospital Medicine Core Competencies Table of Contents
Introductionv
Authors, Reviewers, and Editorsvii
Section 1:Common Clinical Diagnoses and Conditions 
Acute abdominal pain and the acute abdomen1
Apparent life‐threatening event2
Asthma3
Bone and joint infections5
Bronchiolitis6
Central nervous system infections8
Diabetes mellitus9
Failure to thrive11
Fever of unknown origin13
Gastroenteritis14
Kawasaki disease16
Neonatal fever17
Neonatal jaundice18
Pneumonia19
Respiratory failure21
Seizures22
Shock24
Sickle cell disease25
Skin and soft tissue infection26
Toxic ingestion28
Upper airway infections29
Urinary tract infections31
Section 2:Core Skills 
Bladder catheterization/suprapubic bladder tap34
Electrocardiogram interpretation35
Feeding tubes36
Fluids and electrolyte management37
Intravenous access and phlebotomy39
Lumbar puncture40
Non‐invasive monitoring42
Nutrition43
Oxygen delivery and airway management44
Pain management46
Pediatric advanced life support47
Procedural sedation49
Radiographic interpretation50
Section 3:Specialized Clinical Services 
Child abuse and neglect53
Hospice and palliative care54
Leading a healthcare team55
Newborn care and delivery room management57
Technology dependent children59
Transport of the critically ill child60
Section 4:Healthcare Systems: Supporting and Advancing Child Health 
Advocacy64
Business practices65
Communication67
Continuous quality improvement68
Cost‐effective care69
Education71
Ethics72
Evidence based medicine73
Health information systems75
Legal issues/risk management76
Patient safety77
Research79
Transitions of care80
Appendix Original Research 
Pediatric Hospital Medicine Core Competencies: Development and Methodology Erin R. Stucky MD, Mary C. Ottolini MD, MPH and Jennifer Maniscalco MD, MPH82

0

Pediatric Hospital Medicine Core Competencies Table of Contents
Introductionv
Authors, Reviewers, and Editorsvii
Section 1:Common Clinical Diagnoses and Conditions 
Acute abdominal pain and the acute abdomen1
Apparent life‐threatening event2
Asthma3
Bone and joint infections5
Bronchiolitis6
Central nervous system infections8
Diabetes mellitus9
Failure to thrive11
Fever of unknown origin13
Gastroenteritis14
Kawasaki disease16
Neonatal fever17
Neonatal jaundice18
Pneumonia19
Respiratory failure21
Seizures22
Shock24
Sickle cell disease25
Skin and soft tissue infection26
Toxic ingestion28
Upper airway infections29
Urinary tract infections31
Section 2:Core Skills 
Bladder catheterization/suprapubic bladder tap34
Electrocardiogram interpretation35
Feeding tubes36
Fluids and electrolyte management37
Intravenous access and phlebotomy39
Lumbar puncture40
Non‐invasive monitoring42
Nutrition43
Oxygen delivery and airway management44
Pain management46
Pediatric advanced life support47
Procedural sedation49
Radiographic interpretation50
Section 3:Specialized Clinical Services 
Child abuse and neglect53
Hospice and palliative care54
Leading a healthcare team55
Newborn care and delivery room management57
Technology dependent children59
Transport of the critically ill child60
Section 4:Healthcare Systems: Supporting and Advancing Child Health 
Advocacy64
Business practices65
Communication67
Continuous quality improvement68
Cost‐effective care69
Education71
Ethics72
Evidence based medicine73
Health information systems75
Legal issues/risk management76
Patient safety77
Research79
Transitions of care80
Appendix Original Research 
Pediatric Hospital Medicine Core Competencies: Development and Methodology Erin R. Stucky MD, Mary C. Ottolini MD, MPH and Jennifer Maniscalco MD, MPH82
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 5(2)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 5(2)
Page Number
i-iv
Page Number
i-iv
Article Type
Display Headline
The Pediatric Hospital Medicine Core Competencies Supplement
Display Headline
The Pediatric Hospital Medicine Core Competencies Supplement
Sections
Article Source

Copyright © 2010 Society of Hospital Medicine

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
Open Access (article Unlocked/Open Access)
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media

New Knowledge Paramount to HM10 Attendees

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
New Knowledge Paramount to HM10 Attendees

For an early-career hospitalist like Michele DeKorte, MD, HM10 offers a plethora of opportunities for practical knowledge and bushels of take-home points. “This is my first time, and I’m excited to be here,” Dr. DeKorte said moments after registering for HM10 at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center just outside Washington, D.C.

Dr. DeKorte, who has worked as a hospitalist at the University of California at San Diego since 2008, is one of a record 2,500 hospitalists registered for SHM’s annual meeting. She and hundreds of other hospitalists were taking part in Thursday’s lineup of pre-courses.

“I’m doing the procedures pre-course [Essential Procedures for the Hospitalist A Hands-on Experience] in the afternoon. I like procedures, so I think it will be fun,” she said, noting she will focus on the clinical track throughout the four-day event, which features more than 90 educational sessions. “It’s more interesting to me at this stage of the game. I want to have a better idea of how people are practicing HM around the country.”

Catherine Fitzgerald, DO, has worked as a hospitalist since 2005 and is attending her first annual meeting. For two years, she worked in an administrative role with CPMG at St. Joseph’s Memorial Hospital in Denver, and she plans to attend a smattering of practice-management sessions. “I also sit on our heart-failure committee at St. Joseph’s, so I have signed up for the session ‘How to Prevent Heart Failure Readmissions.’” she explained. “The meeting sessions are good reviews of things you already know, and interspersed in the discussions usually are these little pearls of new knowledge for your practice.”

In addition to aiming to improve her HM practice, Dr. Fitzgerald is excited to be in the nation’s capital with loved ones. Dr. Fitzgerald’s mother and 6-year-old son are scheduled to visit the White House.

“I’ll be at the conference all day, but that’s OK,” she said, with a hint of jealousy. “It was snowing in Denver, and we had to de-ice the plane last night. It’s 80 and sunny here, so this is beautiful.”

One of Dr. DeKorte’s colleagues at UCSD, Diana Childers, MD, was filling up the tank of knowledge in the “Documentation and Coding for Hospitalists” pre-course. Dr. Childers is one of the UCSD group’s billing experts, and Dr. DeKorte was looking forward to picking her brain.

“It’s still overwhelming to me,” Dr. DeKorte says. “I’m hoping she’ll pass along the nuggets, the gems of billing and coding.”

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Sections

For an early-career hospitalist like Michele DeKorte, MD, HM10 offers a plethora of opportunities for practical knowledge and bushels of take-home points. “This is my first time, and I’m excited to be here,” Dr. DeKorte said moments after registering for HM10 at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center just outside Washington, D.C.

Dr. DeKorte, who has worked as a hospitalist at the University of California at San Diego since 2008, is one of a record 2,500 hospitalists registered for SHM’s annual meeting. She and hundreds of other hospitalists were taking part in Thursday’s lineup of pre-courses.

“I’m doing the procedures pre-course [Essential Procedures for the Hospitalist A Hands-on Experience] in the afternoon. I like procedures, so I think it will be fun,” she said, noting she will focus on the clinical track throughout the four-day event, which features more than 90 educational sessions. “It’s more interesting to me at this stage of the game. I want to have a better idea of how people are practicing HM around the country.”

Catherine Fitzgerald, DO, has worked as a hospitalist since 2005 and is attending her first annual meeting. For two years, she worked in an administrative role with CPMG at St. Joseph’s Memorial Hospital in Denver, and she plans to attend a smattering of practice-management sessions. “I also sit on our heart-failure committee at St. Joseph’s, so I have signed up for the session ‘How to Prevent Heart Failure Readmissions.’” she explained. “The meeting sessions are good reviews of things you already know, and interspersed in the discussions usually are these little pearls of new knowledge for your practice.”

In addition to aiming to improve her HM practice, Dr. Fitzgerald is excited to be in the nation’s capital with loved ones. Dr. Fitzgerald’s mother and 6-year-old son are scheduled to visit the White House.

“I’ll be at the conference all day, but that’s OK,” she said, with a hint of jealousy. “It was snowing in Denver, and we had to de-ice the plane last night. It’s 80 and sunny here, so this is beautiful.”

One of Dr. DeKorte’s colleagues at UCSD, Diana Childers, MD, was filling up the tank of knowledge in the “Documentation and Coding for Hospitalists” pre-course. Dr. Childers is one of the UCSD group’s billing experts, and Dr. DeKorte was looking forward to picking her brain.

“It’s still overwhelming to me,” Dr. DeKorte says. “I’m hoping she’ll pass along the nuggets, the gems of billing and coding.”

For an early-career hospitalist like Michele DeKorte, MD, HM10 offers a plethora of opportunities for practical knowledge and bushels of take-home points. “This is my first time, and I’m excited to be here,” Dr. DeKorte said moments after registering for HM10 at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center just outside Washington, D.C.

Dr. DeKorte, who has worked as a hospitalist at the University of California at San Diego since 2008, is one of a record 2,500 hospitalists registered for SHM’s annual meeting. She and hundreds of other hospitalists were taking part in Thursday’s lineup of pre-courses.

“I’m doing the procedures pre-course [Essential Procedures for the Hospitalist A Hands-on Experience] in the afternoon. I like procedures, so I think it will be fun,” she said, noting she will focus on the clinical track throughout the four-day event, which features more than 90 educational sessions. “It’s more interesting to me at this stage of the game. I want to have a better idea of how people are practicing HM around the country.”

Catherine Fitzgerald, DO, has worked as a hospitalist since 2005 and is attending her first annual meeting. For two years, she worked in an administrative role with CPMG at St. Joseph’s Memorial Hospital in Denver, and she plans to attend a smattering of practice-management sessions. “I also sit on our heart-failure committee at St. Joseph’s, so I have signed up for the session ‘How to Prevent Heart Failure Readmissions.’” she explained. “The meeting sessions are good reviews of things you already know, and interspersed in the discussions usually are these little pearls of new knowledge for your practice.”

In addition to aiming to improve her HM practice, Dr. Fitzgerald is excited to be in the nation’s capital with loved ones. Dr. Fitzgerald’s mother and 6-year-old son are scheduled to visit the White House.

“I’ll be at the conference all day, but that’s OK,” she said, with a hint of jealousy. “It was snowing in Denver, and we had to de-ice the plane last night. It’s 80 and sunny here, so this is beautiful.”

One of Dr. DeKorte’s colleagues at UCSD, Diana Childers, MD, was filling up the tank of knowledge in the “Documentation and Coding for Hospitalists” pre-course. Dr. Childers is one of the UCSD group’s billing experts, and Dr. DeKorte was looking forward to picking her brain.

“It’s still overwhelming to me,” Dr. DeKorte says. “I’m hoping she’ll pass along the nuggets, the gems of billing and coding.”

Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Issue
The Hospitalist - 2010(04)
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Display Headline
New Knowledge Paramount to HM10 Attendees
Display Headline
New Knowledge Paramount to HM10 Attendees
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)

Evidence‐based medicine

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Evidence‐based medicine

Introduction

Evidence‐based medicine (EBM) is the judicious use of systematically evaluated clinical research applied to care of a patient or population. Evidence‐based medicine principles support use of results from rigorously validated randomized controlled trials where available, in combination with other sources of information such as other published literature, expert opinion and consensus statements. Grading research based on a hierarchy of strength of evidence is a hallmark of EBM. Clinical decisions are then made considering a combination of a patient's value system, specific clinical circumstances, and a thorough assessment of the literature regarding the clinical condition. Used correctly, application of EBM results in use of current best scientific knowledge to create best plans of care while acknowledging the specific circumstance of patients.

Knowledge

Pediatric hospitalists should be able to:

  • Define EBM and state how its use is integrated into clinical decision‐making for a patient or a population.

  • Review how EBM support quality improvement and patient safety efforts.

  • List databases and other resources commonly used to search for medical evidence.

  • Discuss the risk and benefits of accessing medical resources through publicly available search engines.

  • Discuss the benefits and limitations of commonly used scientific medical resources, considering issues such as publication bias, consensus statement methodology used, national versus international web indexed articles, and others.

  • Explain the classification systems used to grade the strength of evidence in a given published work and discuss how this can help guide clinical decision making.

  • Explain how each of the components (PICO, or patient‐intervention‐control‐outcomes) of a well composed, searchable clinical question aid in obtaining a more accurate and comprehensive list of references.

  • Distinguish between different study designs, such as retrospective, prospective, case control, and others and list the benefits and limitations of each.

  • Compare and contrast the major study types such as cost‐effectiveness, therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, harm, and systematic review.

  • Define commonly used terms such as relative and absolute risk reduction, number needed to treat (NNT), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), likelihood ratios (LR).

 

Skills

Pediatric hospitalists should be able to:

  • Demonstrate facility with internet search engines to access all potentially relevant sources of information.

  • Access on line evidence‐based medicine toolkits to assist with the assessment of healthcare literature.

  • Translate a clinical question into a searchable PICO question or search string.

  • Identify the type of clinical question being asked: therapy, diagnosis, prognosis or harm/causality.

  • Identify the most appropriate study design for a given specific question.

  • Demonstrate proficiency in performance of an EBM literature search using electronic resources such as Pub Med.

  • Critically appraise the quality of studies, using a consistent method.

  • Critically interpret study results.

  • Apply relevant results of validated studies that are of the highest quality available to care for individual patients and populations.

  • Develop a personal strategy to consistently incorporate evidence, balance of harm and benefits, and patients' values into clinical decision making to deliver the highest quality care.

 

Attitudes

Pediatric hospitalists should be able to:

  • Seek the best available evidence to support clinical decision making.

  • Acquire and maintain EBM skills through integration into daily practice and pursuit of ongoing continuing education.

  • Recognize how personal practice patterns are influenced by the integration of EBM.

  • Role model use of EBM at the beside.

 

Systems Organization and Improvement

In order to improve efficiency and quality within their organizations, pediatric hospitalists should:

  • Lead, coordinate or participate in the development and implementation cost‐effective, evidence‐based care pathways to standardize the evaluation and management of hospitalized children in the local system.

  • Engage with hospital staff, subspecialists, and others in a multidisciplinary team approach toward integrating EBM into clinical decision making processes.

  • Work with hospital administrators to acquire and maintain effective, efficient electronic resources for the performance of EBM.

 

Article PDF
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 5(2)
Page Number
98-99
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF

Introduction

Evidence‐based medicine (EBM) is the judicious use of systematically evaluated clinical research applied to care of a patient or population. Evidence‐based medicine principles support use of results from rigorously validated randomized controlled trials where available, in combination with other sources of information such as other published literature, expert opinion and consensus statements. Grading research based on a hierarchy of strength of evidence is a hallmark of EBM. Clinical decisions are then made considering a combination of a patient's value system, specific clinical circumstances, and a thorough assessment of the literature regarding the clinical condition. Used correctly, application of EBM results in use of current best scientific knowledge to create best plans of care while acknowledging the specific circumstance of patients.

Knowledge

Pediatric hospitalists should be able to:

  • Define EBM and state how its use is integrated into clinical decision‐making for a patient or a population.

  • Review how EBM support quality improvement and patient safety efforts.

  • List databases and other resources commonly used to search for medical evidence.

  • Discuss the risk and benefits of accessing medical resources through publicly available search engines.

  • Discuss the benefits and limitations of commonly used scientific medical resources, considering issues such as publication bias, consensus statement methodology used, national versus international web indexed articles, and others.

  • Explain the classification systems used to grade the strength of evidence in a given published work and discuss how this can help guide clinical decision making.

  • Explain how each of the components (PICO, or patient‐intervention‐control‐outcomes) of a well composed, searchable clinical question aid in obtaining a more accurate and comprehensive list of references.

  • Distinguish between different study designs, such as retrospective, prospective, case control, and others and list the benefits and limitations of each.

  • Compare and contrast the major study types such as cost‐effectiveness, therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, harm, and systematic review.

  • Define commonly used terms such as relative and absolute risk reduction, number needed to treat (NNT), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), likelihood ratios (LR).

 

Skills

Pediatric hospitalists should be able to:

  • Demonstrate facility with internet search engines to access all potentially relevant sources of information.

  • Access on line evidence‐based medicine toolkits to assist with the assessment of healthcare literature.

  • Translate a clinical question into a searchable PICO question or search string.

  • Identify the type of clinical question being asked: therapy, diagnosis, prognosis or harm/causality.

  • Identify the most appropriate study design for a given specific question.

  • Demonstrate proficiency in performance of an EBM literature search using electronic resources such as Pub Med.

  • Critically appraise the quality of studies, using a consistent method.

  • Critically interpret study results.

  • Apply relevant results of validated studies that are of the highest quality available to care for individual patients and populations.

  • Develop a personal strategy to consistently incorporate evidence, balance of harm and benefits, and patients' values into clinical decision making to deliver the highest quality care.

 

Attitudes

Pediatric hospitalists should be able to:

  • Seek the best available evidence to support clinical decision making.

  • Acquire and maintain EBM skills through integration into daily practice and pursuit of ongoing continuing education.

  • Recognize how personal practice patterns are influenced by the integration of EBM.

  • Role model use of EBM at the beside.

 

Systems Organization and Improvement

In order to improve efficiency and quality within their organizations, pediatric hospitalists should:

  • Lead, coordinate or participate in the development and implementation cost‐effective, evidence‐based care pathways to standardize the evaluation and management of hospitalized children in the local system.

  • Engage with hospital staff, subspecialists, and others in a multidisciplinary team approach toward integrating EBM into clinical decision making processes.

  • Work with hospital administrators to acquire and maintain effective, efficient electronic resources for the performance of EBM.

 

Introduction

Evidence‐based medicine (EBM) is the judicious use of systematically evaluated clinical research applied to care of a patient or population. Evidence‐based medicine principles support use of results from rigorously validated randomized controlled trials where available, in combination with other sources of information such as other published literature, expert opinion and consensus statements. Grading research based on a hierarchy of strength of evidence is a hallmark of EBM. Clinical decisions are then made considering a combination of a patient's value system, specific clinical circumstances, and a thorough assessment of the literature regarding the clinical condition. Used correctly, application of EBM results in use of current best scientific knowledge to create best plans of care while acknowledging the specific circumstance of patients.

Knowledge

Pediatric hospitalists should be able to:

  • Define EBM and state how its use is integrated into clinical decision‐making for a patient or a population.

  • Review how EBM support quality improvement and patient safety efforts.

  • List databases and other resources commonly used to search for medical evidence.

  • Discuss the risk and benefits of accessing medical resources through publicly available search engines.

  • Discuss the benefits and limitations of commonly used scientific medical resources, considering issues such as publication bias, consensus statement methodology used, national versus international web indexed articles, and others.

  • Explain the classification systems used to grade the strength of evidence in a given published work and discuss how this can help guide clinical decision making.

  • Explain how each of the components (PICO, or patient‐intervention‐control‐outcomes) of a well composed, searchable clinical question aid in obtaining a more accurate and comprehensive list of references.

  • Distinguish between different study designs, such as retrospective, prospective, case control, and others and list the benefits and limitations of each.

  • Compare and contrast the major study types such as cost‐effectiveness, therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, harm, and systematic review.

  • Define commonly used terms such as relative and absolute risk reduction, number needed to treat (NNT), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), likelihood ratios (LR).

 

Skills

Pediatric hospitalists should be able to:

  • Demonstrate facility with internet search engines to access all potentially relevant sources of information.

  • Access on line evidence‐based medicine toolkits to assist with the assessment of healthcare literature.

  • Translate a clinical question into a searchable PICO question or search string.

  • Identify the type of clinical question being asked: therapy, diagnosis, prognosis or harm/causality.

  • Identify the most appropriate study design for a given specific question.

  • Demonstrate proficiency in performance of an EBM literature search using electronic resources such as Pub Med.

  • Critically appraise the quality of studies, using a consistent method.

  • Critically interpret study results.

  • Apply relevant results of validated studies that are of the highest quality available to care for individual patients and populations.

  • Develop a personal strategy to consistently incorporate evidence, balance of harm and benefits, and patients' values into clinical decision making to deliver the highest quality care.

 

Attitudes

Pediatric hospitalists should be able to:

  • Seek the best available evidence to support clinical decision making.

  • Acquire and maintain EBM skills through integration into daily practice and pursuit of ongoing continuing education.

  • Recognize how personal practice patterns are influenced by the integration of EBM.

  • Role model use of EBM at the beside.

 

Systems Organization and Improvement

In order to improve efficiency and quality within their organizations, pediatric hospitalists should:

  • Lead, coordinate or participate in the development and implementation cost‐effective, evidence‐based care pathways to standardize the evaluation and management of hospitalized children in the local system.

  • Engage with hospital staff, subspecialists, and others in a multidisciplinary team approach toward integrating EBM into clinical decision making processes.

  • Work with hospital administrators to acquire and maintain effective, efficient electronic resources for the performance of EBM.

 

Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 5(2)
Issue
Journal of Hospital Medicine - 5(2)
Page Number
98-99
Page Number
98-99
Article Type
Display Headline
Evidence‐based medicine
Display Headline
Evidence‐based medicine
Sections
Article Source

Copyright © 2010 Society of Hospital Medicine

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
Open Access (article Unlocked/Open Access)
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Article PDF Media