AVAHO

SAN DIEGO – In the phase 3 Alliance A041202 trial of older patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), ibrutinib showed superior progression-free survival (PFS). Results of the trial were reported by Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, of the Ohio State University in Columbus during a press briefing at the recently concluded American Society of Hematology 2018 meeting. The briefing was based on an abstract from the meeting.

“There was no difference in progression-free survival between ibrutinib and ibrutinib plus rituximab,” said Dr. Woyach. “We undertook this study to determine the most effective therapy for older patients with CLL.” She noted that the findings justify the use of ibrutinib as a standard-of-care treatment for CLL patients aged 65 years and older.

Median age of patients in the study was 71 years and 67% of the patient were men, a profile that is similar, to those of patients with CLL seen at the US Department of Veterans Affairs. 

The 2-year PFS was 74% in 183 patients randomized to receive standard chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine and rituximab (BR), compared with 87% in 182 patients randomized to receive ibrutinib alone (hazard ratio, 0.39 vs. BR), and 88% in 182 patients who received ibrutinib and rituximab (IR; HR, 0.38 vs. BR). Median PFS in this study was 43 months in the BR arm, and was not reached in either of the ibrutinib-containing arms, she said. No significant differences in overall survival (OS) were seen among the treatment arms, which may have been because of short follow-up and the fact that patients in the BR arm were allowed to cross over to ibrutinib if they progressed on treatment.

The results suggest that the additional of rituximab provided little benefit to the patients though it does add to both the costs and the chair time in an infusion center, according to former Association of VA Hematology/Oncology Mary Thomas, MS, CNS, AOCN.  

“I think this really does indicate that ibrutinib as front-line therapy, which many clinicians have been doing, is a very reasonable practice,” said David P. Steensma, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, who moderated the press briefing.

Dr. Woyach added, however, that while ibrutinib represents a major therapeutic advance, its cost and its toxicities in older patients are a concern that warrant close monitoring and development of strategies to reduce the need for long-term continuous treatment.

Thomas agreed noting that health care providers needs to be aware of the risk of  atrial fib and bleeding when using ibrutinib and to ensure that patient will be able to adhere to daily dosing.

Additional phase 3 studies set to open soon will compare ibrutinib in combination with venetoclax and obinutuzumab with standard ibrutinib.

Dr. Woyach and Ms. Thomas reported having no disclosures. Dr. Steensma reported receiving research funding from, and/or serving as a consultant, board member, or adviser for Takeda Pharmaceutical, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Onconova Therapeutics, Novartis, Kura Oncology, Janssen, H3 Biosciences, Celgene, Amphivena Therapeutics, and Acceleron Pharma.

SAN DIEGO – In the phase 3 Alliance A041202 trial of older patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), ibrutinib showed superior progression-free survival (PFS). Results of the trial were reported by Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, of the Ohio State University in Columbus during a press briefing at the recently concluded American Society of Hematology 2018 meeting. The briefing was based on an abstract from the meeting.

“There was no difference in progression-free survival between ibrutinib and ibrutinib plus rituximab,” said Dr. Woyach. “We undertook this study to determine the most effective therapy for older patients with CLL.” She noted that the findings justify the use of ibrutinib as a standard-of-care treatment for CLL patients aged 65 years and older.

Median age of patients in the study was 71 years and 67% of the patient were men, a profile that is similar, to those of patients with CLL seen at the US Department of Veterans Affairs. 

The 2-year PFS was 74% in 183 patients randomized to receive standard chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine and rituximab (BR), compared with 87% in 182 patients randomized to receive ibrutinib alone (hazard ratio, 0.39 vs. BR), and 88% in 182 patients who received ibrutinib and rituximab (IR; HR, 0.38 vs. BR). Median PFS in this study was 43 months in the BR arm, and was not reached in either of the ibrutinib-containing arms, she said. No significant differences in overall survival (OS) were seen among the treatment arms, which may have been because of short follow-up and the fact that patients in the BR arm were allowed to cross over to ibrutinib if they progressed on treatment.

The results suggest that the additional of rituximab provided little benefit to the patients though it does add to both the costs and the chair time in an infusion center, according to former Association of VA Hematology/Oncology Mary Thomas, MS, CNS, AOCN.  

“I think this really does indicate that ibrutinib as front-line therapy, which many clinicians have been doing, is a very reasonable practice,” said David P. Steensma, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, who moderated the press briefing.

Dr. Woyach added, however, that while ibrutinib represents a major therapeutic advance, its cost and its toxicities in older patients are a concern that warrant close monitoring and development of strategies to reduce the need for long-term continuous treatment.

Thomas agreed noting that health care providers needs to be aware of the risk of  atrial fib and bleeding when using ibrutinib and to ensure that patient will be able to adhere to daily dosing.

Additional phase 3 studies set to open soon will compare ibrutinib in combination with venetoclax and obinutuzumab with standard ibrutinib.

Dr. Woyach and Ms. Thomas reported having no disclosures. Dr. Steensma reported receiving research funding from, and/or serving as a consultant, board member, or adviser for Takeda Pharmaceutical, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Onconova Therapeutics, Novartis, Kura Oncology, Janssen, H3 Biosciences, Celgene, Amphivena Therapeutics, and Acceleron Pharma.

SAN DIEGO – In the phase 3 Alliance A041202 trial of older patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), ibrutinib showed superior progression-free survival (PFS). Results of the trial were reported by Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, of the Ohio State University in Columbus during a press briefing at the recently concluded American Society of Hematology 2018 meeting. The briefing was based on an abstract from the meeting.

“There was no difference in progression-free survival between ibrutinib and ibrutinib plus rituximab,” said Dr. Woyach. “We undertook this study to determine the most effective therapy for older patients with CLL.” She noted that the findings justify the use of ibrutinib as a standard-of-care treatment for CLL patients aged 65 years and older.

Median age of patients in the study was 71 years and 67% of the patient were men, a profile that is similar, to those of patients with CLL seen at the US Department of Veterans Affairs. 

The 2-year PFS was 74% in 183 patients randomized to receive standard chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine and rituximab (BR), compared with 87% in 182 patients randomized to receive ibrutinib alone (hazard ratio, 0.39 vs. BR), and 88% in 182 patients who received ibrutinib and rituximab (IR; HR, 0.38 vs. BR). Median PFS in this study was 43 months in the BR arm, and was not reached in either of the ibrutinib-containing arms, she said. No significant differences in overall survival (OS) were seen among the treatment arms, which may have been because of short follow-up and the fact that patients in the BR arm were allowed to cross over to ibrutinib if they progressed on treatment.

The results suggest that the additional of rituximab provided little benefit to the patients though it does add to both the costs and the chair time in an infusion center, according to former Association of VA Hematology/Oncology Mary Thomas, MS, CNS, AOCN.  

“I think this really does indicate that ibrutinib as front-line therapy, which many clinicians have been doing, is a very reasonable practice,” said David P. Steensma, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, who moderated the press briefing.

Dr. Woyach added, however, that while ibrutinib represents a major therapeutic advance, its cost and its toxicities in older patients are a concern that warrant close monitoring and development of strategies to reduce the need for long-term continuous treatment.

Thomas agreed noting that health care providers needs to be aware of the risk of  atrial fib and bleeding when using ibrutinib and to ensure that patient will be able to adhere to daily dosing.

Additional phase 3 studies set to open soon will compare ibrutinib in combination with venetoclax and obinutuzumab with standard ibrutinib.

Dr. Woyach and Ms. Thomas reported having no disclosures. Dr. Steensma reported receiving research funding from, and/or serving as a consultant, board member, or adviser for Takeda Pharmaceutical, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Onconova Therapeutics, Novartis, Kura Oncology, Janssen, H3 Biosciences, Celgene, Amphivena Therapeutics, and Acceleron Pharma.

SAN DIEGO – It was banner year for new hematology drug approvals, according to R. Angelo de Claro, MD, of the Food and Drug Administration.

So far in 2018 there have been 32 new malignant hematology and nonmalignant hematology drug approvals by the FDA, including 12 first-time approvals, 5 new biosimilars, and 15 new indications for previously approved drugs, Dr. de Claro, clinical team leader in the FDA’s division of hematology products in Silver Spring, Md., said during an overview of the approvals at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

These include six new approvals for first-line treatment, and eight for pediatric indications, he said.

Highlights were discussed at two ASH-FDA joint symposia at the meeting, including one focused on the malignant hematology approvals, and another on the nonmalignant hematology approvals. In a video interview, Dr. de Claro provides some additional insight into their importance and about what might lie ahead.

“I think what’s exciting is that you have drug development occurring in more common conditions such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, as well as in rare conditions, including hairy cell leukemia – and the first-ever approval in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis,” he said. “It’s been very busy at the FDA; stay tuned ... the year’s not done yet. There could be more coming and we certainly anticipate more applications in the future.”

Dr. de Claro is an FDA employee. He reported having no other relevant disclosures.

sworcester@mdedge.com

SAN DIEGO – It was banner year for new hematology drug approvals, according to R. Angelo de Claro, MD, of the Food and Drug Administration.

So far in 2018 there have been 32 new malignant hematology and nonmalignant hematology drug approvals by the FDA, including 12 first-time approvals, 5 new biosimilars, and 15 new indications for previously approved drugs, Dr. de Claro, clinical team leader in the FDA’s division of hematology products in Silver Spring, Md., said during an overview of the approvals at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

These include six new approvals for first-line treatment, and eight for pediatric indications, he said.

Highlights were discussed at two ASH-FDA joint symposia at the meeting, including one focused on the malignant hematology approvals, and another on the nonmalignant hematology approvals. In a video interview, Dr. de Claro provides some additional insight into their importance and about what might lie ahead.

“I think what’s exciting is that you have drug development occurring in more common conditions such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, as well as in rare conditions, including hairy cell leukemia – and the first-ever approval in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis,” he said. “It’s been very busy at the FDA; stay tuned ... the year’s not done yet. There could be more coming and we certainly anticipate more applications in the future.”

Dr. de Claro is an FDA employee. He reported having no other relevant disclosures.

sworcester@mdedge.com

SAN DIEGO – It was banner year for new hematology drug approvals, according to R. Angelo de Claro, MD, of the Food and Drug Administration.

So far in 2018 there have been 32 new malignant hematology and nonmalignant hematology drug approvals by the FDA, including 12 first-time approvals, 5 new biosimilars, and 15 new indications for previously approved drugs, Dr. de Claro, clinical team leader in the FDA’s division of hematology products in Silver Spring, Md., said during an overview of the approvals at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

These include six new approvals for first-line treatment, and eight for pediatric indications, he said.

Highlights were discussed at two ASH-FDA joint symposia at the meeting, including one focused on the malignant hematology approvals, and another on the nonmalignant hematology approvals. In a video interview, Dr. de Claro provides some additional insight into their importance and about what might lie ahead.

“I think what’s exciting is that you have drug development occurring in more common conditions such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, as well as in rare conditions, including hairy cell leukemia – and the first-ever approval in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis,” he said. “It’s been very busy at the FDA; stay tuned ... the year’s not done yet. There could be more coming and we certainly anticipate more applications in the future.”

Dr. de Claro is an FDA employee. He reported having no other relevant disclosures.

sworcester@mdedge.com

SAN DIEGO – Therapeutic expression of factor IX remains stable with no late toxicities occurring at up to 8.6 years after a single infusion of a novel gene therapy in patients with severe hemophilia B, according to interim follow-up data from a phase 1/2 dose-escalation study.

The therapy – a self-complementary adeno-associated virus vector containing a codon-optimized factor IX gene, under control of a synthetic liver specific promoter and pseudotyped with serotype 8 capsid (scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco) – was previously shown to result in a dose-dependent increase in plasma factor IX levels in all 10 patients enrolled in the study, and an earlier update showed stable factor IX activity for at least 3 years, Ulrike M. Reiss, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

However, declining factor IX expression over time remains a concern, because AAV-mediated transgene expression is mediated mainly by episomally retained viral genomes, which may be lost with natural turnover of hepatocytes, noted Dr. Reiss, director of the clinical hematology division and the Hemophilia Treatment Center at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis.

At the “halfway mark,” with a median follow-up of 6.7 years in 10 patients aged 18-64 years who were treated with doses of either 2 x 10¹¹, 6 x 10¹¹, or 2 x 10¹² vector genomes per kg (in 2, 2, and 6 patients, respectively), “factor IX expression has been persistent and stable in all participants after vector infusion,” she said.

“Factor IX expression was vector-dose dependent, achieving average levels of 1.9%-2.3% at the lower doses, and 5.1% at the high vector dose. All patients converted from having severe hemophilia to mild-moderate hemophilia,” she added.

The single significant adverse event observed during annual follow-up evaluations in the patients was a vector-related, immune-mediated liver inflammation occurring within 2-3 months of infusion in four of the six high-dose participants.

“There was complete resolution in all cases after a short course of corticosteroids over 8-12 weeks, including the taper. There were no late sequelae or any recurrence of transaminitis over time,” Dr. Reiss said. “We did not observe any new factor IX inhibitor or any late toxicity in any of these participants.”

Additionally, a comparison of average data across 3 years prior to gene therapy with the average data at 6.7 years after gene therapy showed that the annualized bleed rate decreased by 82% in the 10 participants and factor IX use decreased by 66%. In the high-dose group, the bleed rate decreased from 21 bleeds to 2 bleeds per year, and vector consumption was markedly reduced to a mean of 500 IU/kg per year from a mean of more than 2800 IU/kg per year. “Only one of the six patients in the high-dose group currently continues on prophylaxis treatment, whereas three in the low- and mid-dose groups are currently on prophylaxis,” she said. “In all [patients], the interval between prophylactic infusions has lengthened.”

Of note, Dr. Reiss and her colleagues explored the ability of using a modified, empty capsid-reduced vector preparation of the gene therapy to prevent the transaminitis seen in the 2-3 months after infusion. A new clinical preparation of scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco was manufactured with most of the empty particles removed by cesium chloride density centrifugation, but this approach provided no benefit in that regard.

“This further supports the observation that the anticapsid immune response is vector-dose dependent,” she said.

Additionally, the pattern of humoral response to AAV8 capsid was consistent with the primary immune response in participants.

“High IgG antibody titers have persisted for over 6 years; this finding is important because it will preclude these patients from any retreatment with the same vector or even potentially alternative AAV vectors of other serotypes with cross-reactive antigenicity,” she said.

Dr. Reiss reported having no relevant disclosures

sworcester@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Reiss UM et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 491.

SAN DIEGO – Therapeutic expression of factor IX remains stable with no late toxicities occurring at up to 8.6 years after a single infusion of a novel gene therapy in patients with severe hemophilia B, according to interim follow-up data from a phase 1/2 dose-escalation study.

The therapy – a self-complementary adeno-associated virus vector containing a codon-optimized factor IX gene, under control of a synthetic liver specific promoter and pseudotyped with serotype 8 capsid (scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco) – was previously shown to result in a dose-dependent increase in plasma factor IX levels in all 10 patients enrolled in the study, and an earlier update showed stable factor IX activity for at least 3 years, Ulrike M. Reiss, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

However, declining factor IX expression over time remains a concern, because AAV-mediated transgene expression is mediated mainly by episomally retained viral genomes, which may be lost with natural turnover of hepatocytes, noted Dr. Reiss, director of the clinical hematology division and the Hemophilia Treatment Center at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis.

At the “halfway mark,” with a median follow-up of 6.7 years in 10 patients aged 18-64 years who were treated with doses of either 2 x 10¹¹, 6 x 10¹¹, or 2 x 10¹² vector genomes per kg (in 2, 2, and 6 patients, respectively), “factor IX expression has been persistent and stable in all participants after vector infusion,” she said.

“Factor IX expression was vector-dose dependent, achieving average levels of 1.9%-2.3% at the lower doses, and 5.1% at the high vector dose. All patients converted from having severe hemophilia to mild-moderate hemophilia,” she added.

The single significant adverse event observed during annual follow-up evaluations in the patients was a vector-related, immune-mediated liver inflammation occurring within 2-3 months of infusion in four of the six high-dose participants.

“There was complete resolution in all cases after a short course of corticosteroids over 8-12 weeks, including the taper. There were no late sequelae or any recurrence of transaminitis over time,” Dr. Reiss said. “We did not observe any new factor IX inhibitor or any late toxicity in any of these participants.”

Additionally, a comparison of average data across 3 years prior to gene therapy with the average data at 6.7 years after gene therapy showed that the annualized bleed rate decreased by 82% in the 10 participants and factor IX use decreased by 66%. In the high-dose group, the bleed rate decreased from 21 bleeds to 2 bleeds per year, and vector consumption was markedly reduced to a mean of 500 IU/kg per year from a mean of more than 2800 IU/kg per year. “Only one of the six patients in the high-dose group currently continues on prophylaxis treatment, whereas three in the low- and mid-dose groups are currently on prophylaxis,” she said. “In all [patients], the interval between prophylactic infusions has lengthened.”

Of note, Dr. Reiss and her colleagues explored the ability of using a modified, empty capsid-reduced vector preparation of the gene therapy to prevent the transaminitis seen in the 2-3 months after infusion. A new clinical preparation of scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco was manufactured with most of the empty particles removed by cesium chloride density centrifugation, but this approach provided no benefit in that regard.

“This further supports the observation that the anticapsid immune response is vector-dose dependent,” she said.

Additionally, the pattern of humoral response to AAV8 capsid was consistent with the primary immune response in participants.

“High IgG antibody titers have persisted for over 6 years; this finding is important because it will preclude these patients from any retreatment with the same vector or even potentially alternative AAV vectors of other serotypes with cross-reactive antigenicity,” she said.

Dr. Reiss reported having no relevant disclosures

sworcester@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Reiss UM et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 491.

SAN DIEGO – Therapeutic expression of factor IX remains stable with no late toxicities occurring at up to 8.6 years after a single infusion of a novel gene therapy in patients with severe hemophilia B, according to interim follow-up data from a phase 1/2 dose-escalation study.

The therapy – a self-complementary adeno-associated virus vector containing a codon-optimized factor IX gene, under control of a synthetic liver specific promoter and pseudotyped with serotype 8 capsid (scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco) – was previously shown to result in a dose-dependent increase in plasma factor IX levels in all 10 patients enrolled in the study, and an earlier update showed stable factor IX activity for at least 3 years, Ulrike M. Reiss, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

However, declining factor IX expression over time remains a concern, because AAV-mediated transgene expression is mediated mainly by episomally retained viral genomes, which may be lost with natural turnover of hepatocytes, noted Dr. Reiss, director of the clinical hematology division and the Hemophilia Treatment Center at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis.

At the “halfway mark,” with a median follow-up of 6.7 years in 10 patients aged 18-64 years who were treated with doses of either 2 x 10¹¹, 6 x 10¹¹, or 2 x 10¹² vector genomes per kg (in 2, 2, and 6 patients, respectively), “factor IX expression has been persistent and stable in all participants after vector infusion,” she said.

“Factor IX expression was vector-dose dependent, achieving average levels of 1.9%-2.3% at the lower doses, and 5.1% at the high vector dose. All patients converted from having severe hemophilia to mild-moderate hemophilia,” she added.

The single significant adverse event observed during annual follow-up evaluations in the patients was a vector-related, immune-mediated liver inflammation occurring within 2-3 months of infusion in four of the six high-dose participants.

“There was complete resolution in all cases after a short course of corticosteroids over 8-12 weeks, including the taper. There were no late sequelae or any recurrence of transaminitis over time,” Dr. Reiss said. “We did not observe any new factor IX inhibitor or any late toxicity in any of these participants.”

Additionally, a comparison of average data across 3 years prior to gene therapy with the average data at 6.7 years after gene therapy showed that the annualized bleed rate decreased by 82% in the 10 participants and factor IX use decreased by 66%. In the high-dose group, the bleed rate decreased from 21 bleeds to 2 bleeds per year, and vector consumption was markedly reduced to a mean of 500 IU/kg per year from a mean of more than 2800 IU/kg per year. “Only one of the six patients in the high-dose group currently continues on prophylaxis treatment, whereas three in the low- and mid-dose groups are currently on prophylaxis,” she said. “In all [patients], the interval between prophylactic infusions has lengthened.”

Of note, Dr. Reiss and her colleagues explored the ability of using a modified, empty capsid-reduced vector preparation of the gene therapy to prevent the transaminitis seen in the 2-3 months after infusion. A new clinical preparation of scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco was manufactured with most of the empty particles removed by cesium chloride density centrifugation, but this approach provided no benefit in that regard.

“This further supports the observation that the anticapsid immune response is vector-dose dependent,” she said.

Additionally, the pattern of humoral response to AAV8 capsid was consistent with the primary immune response in participants.

“High IgG antibody titers have persisted for over 6 years; this finding is important because it will preclude these patients from any retreatment with the same vector or even potentially alternative AAV vectors of other serotypes with cross-reactive antigenicity,” she said.

Dr. Reiss reported having no relevant disclosures

sworcester@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Reiss UM et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 491.

SAN DIEGO – In patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) bearing IDH1 or IDH2 mutations, combinations of either ivosidenib (Tibsovo, for IDH1) or enasidenib (Idhifa, for IDH2) with standard induction and consolidation regimens are safe and well tolerated and are associated with encouraging remission rates, results of a phase 1 trial indicate.

In the open-label, phase 1 trial, ivosidenib plus chemotherapy was associated with elimination of minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry in 88% of treated patients and with IDH1-mutation clearance in 41% of patients.

Enasidenib plus chemotherapy was associated with elimination of MRD in 45% of patients and with IDH2-mutation clearance in 25% of patients, said Eytan M. Stein, MD, from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

“The overall survival rates are robust, with greater than 75% 1-year survival in both ivosidenib- and enasidenib-treated patients,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Both ivosidenib and enasidenib are approved in the United States for treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory AML bearing either IDH1 or IDH2 mutations, respectively. In this trial, the investigators explored the therapeutic potential of the IDH inhibitors in patients with previously untreated disease.

Dr. Stein and his colleagues investigated combining each of the agents with standard induction therapy with either daunorubicin 60 mg/m² per day or idarubicin 12 mg/m² per day for 3 days, plus cytarabine 200 mg/m² per day for 7 days. Patients with IDH1 mutations received ivosidenib 500 mg once daily, and those with IDH2 mutations received enasidenib 100 mg once daily.

After induction, patients with a complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete recovery of hematologic counts (CRi), or CR with incomplete recovery of platelets (CRp) could receive up to four cycles of consolidation therapy while continuing the IDH inhibitor. Patients who completed consolidation or were ineligible for consolidation could continue on maintenance therapy with their assigned drug until the end of the study.

The drugs were discontinued in patients who went on to hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

The most frequent co-occurring baseline mutations were DNMT3A, NPM1, and NRAS for patients with IDH1 mutations, and DNMT3A, SRSF2, and ASXL1 for patients with IDH2 mutations.

A total of 60 patients were assigned to ivosidenib and chemotherapy and 93 were assigned to enasidenib/chemotherapy. The median patient age was about 63 years in each arm.

All patients in each arm received a least one induction dose and about 48% in each arm received at least some consolidation dosing. In all, 18% of patients in the ivosidenib arm and 19% in the enasidenib arm went on to maintenance.

Treatment discontinuations occurred in 55% of patients in the ivosidenib group and 84% in the enasidenib group. The primary reason for discontinuation included HSCT, adverse events, progressive disease, and death (one and four patients in the respective arms).

Adverse events of interest, regardless of attribution, included the IDH differentiation syndrome in two patients on ivosidenib and one on enasidenib, leukocytosis, QT interval prolongation, and increased blood bilirubin.

The 30-day and 60-day mortality rates were 5% and 8% in the ivosidenib arm and 5% and 9% in the enasidenib arm, respectively.

Best overall response rates (CR+CRi+CRp) among all patients were 80% in the ivosidenib arm and 72% in the enasidenib arm. In each trial arm, the response rates were higher among patients with de novo AML, compared with secondary AML.

Of 12 ivosidenib-treated patients who had IDH1-mutation clearance, 10 had clearance at the end of induction therapy, and 2 achieved clearance during or after consolidation. Of 15 ivosidenib-treated patients who became MRD negative, 12 had achieved it by the end of induction, and 3 became MRD negative during consolidation.

In the enasidenib arm, 15 patients had IDH2 mutation clearance (11 after induction, 4 during consolidation) and 9 became MRD negative (7 after induction and 2 during or after consolidation).

The probability of surviving to 1 year after the start of induction among ivosidenib-treated patients was 79%; the median overall survival had not been reached and was not estimable at the time of data cutoff. The probability of surviving to 1 year among patients in the enasidenib arm was 75%. In this group, too, median overall survival had not been reached.

The clinical benefit of adding either IDH inhibitor to induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy for patients with newly diagnosed AML with IDH mutations will be further evaluated in a randomized, phase 3 trial, Dr. Stein said.

The study was funded by Agios Pharmaceuticals and Celgene. Dr. Stein reported consulting with those companies and others.

SOURCE: Stein EM et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 560.

SAN DIEGO – In patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) bearing IDH1 or IDH2 mutations, combinations of either ivosidenib (Tibsovo, for IDH1) or enasidenib (Idhifa, for IDH2) with standard induction and consolidation regimens are safe and well tolerated and are associated with encouraging remission rates, results of a phase 1 trial indicate.

In the open-label, phase 1 trial, ivosidenib plus chemotherapy was associated with elimination of minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry in 88% of treated patients and with IDH1-mutation clearance in 41% of patients.

Enasidenib plus chemotherapy was associated with elimination of MRD in 45% of patients and with IDH2-mutation clearance in 25% of patients, said Eytan M. Stein, MD, from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

“The overall survival rates are robust, with greater than 75% 1-year survival in both ivosidenib- and enasidenib-treated patients,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Both ivosidenib and enasidenib are approved in the United States for treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory AML bearing either IDH1 or IDH2 mutations, respectively. In this trial, the investigators explored the therapeutic potential of the IDH inhibitors in patients with previously untreated disease.

Dr. Stein and his colleagues investigated combining each of the agents with standard induction therapy with either daunorubicin 60 mg/m² per day or idarubicin 12 mg/m² per day for 3 days, plus cytarabine 200 mg/m² per day for 7 days. Patients with IDH1 mutations received ivosidenib 500 mg once daily, and those with IDH2 mutations received enasidenib 100 mg once daily.

After induction, patients with a complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete recovery of hematologic counts (CRi), or CR with incomplete recovery of platelets (CRp) could receive up to four cycles of consolidation therapy while continuing the IDH inhibitor. Patients who completed consolidation or were ineligible for consolidation could continue on maintenance therapy with their assigned drug until the end of the study.

The drugs were discontinued in patients who went on to hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

The most frequent co-occurring baseline mutations were DNMT3A, NPM1, and NRAS for patients with IDH1 mutations, and DNMT3A, SRSF2, and ASXL1 for patients with IDH2 mutations.

A total of 60 patients were assigned to ivosidenib and chemotherapy and 93 were assigned to enasidenib/chemotherapy. The median patient age was about 63 years in each arm.

All patients in each arm received a least one induction dose and about 48% in each arm received at least some consolidation dosing. In all, 18% of patients in the ivosidenib arm and 19% in the enasidenib arm went on to maintenance.

Treatment discontinuations occurred in 55% of patients in the ivosidenib group and 84% in the enasidenib group. The primary reason for discontinuation included HSCT, adverse events, progressive disease, and death (one and four patients in the respective arms).

Adverse events of interest, regardless of attribution, included the IDH differentiation syndrome in two patients on ivosidenib and one on enasidenib, leukocytosis, QT interval prolongation, and increased blood bilirubin.

The 30-day and 60-day mortality rates were 5% and 8% in the ivosidenib arm and 5% and 9% in the enasidenib arm, respectively.

Best overall response rates (CR+CRi+CRp) among all patients were 80% in the ivosidenib arm and 72% in the enasidenib arm. In each trial arm, the response rates were higher among patients with de novo AML, compared with secondary AML.

Of 12 ivosidenib-treated patients who had IDH1-mutation clearance, 10 had clearance at the end of induction therapy, and 2 achieved clearance during or after consolidation. Of 15 ivosidenib-treated patients who became MRD negative, 12 had achieved it by the end of induction, and 3 became MRD negative during consolidation.

In the enasidenib arm, 15 patients had IDH2 mutation clearance (11 after induction, 4 during consolidation) and 9 became MRD negative (7 after induction and 2 during or after consolidation).

The probability of surviving to 1 year after the start of induction among ivosidenib-treated patients was 79%; the median overall survival had not been reached and was not estimable at the time of data cutoff. The probability of surviving to 1 year among patients in the enasidenib arm was 75%. In this group, too, median overall survival had not been reached.

The clinical benefit of adding either IDH inhibitor to induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy for patients with newly diagnosed AML with IDH mutations will be further evaluated in a randomized, phase 3 trial, Dr. Stein said.

The study was funded by Agios Pharmaceuticals and Celgene. Dr. Stein reported consulting with those companies and others.

SOURCE: Stein EM et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 560.

SAN DIEGO – In patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) bearing IDH1 or IDH2 mutations, combinations of either ivosidenib (Tibsovo, for IDH1) or enasidenib (Idhifa, for IDH2) with standard induction and consolidation regimens are safe and well tolerated and are associated with encouraging remission rates, results of a phase 1 trial indicate.

In the open-label, phase 1 trial, ivosidenib plus chemotherapy was associated with elimination of minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry in 88% of treated patients and with IDH1-mutation clearance in 41% of patients.

Enasidenib plus chemotherapy was associated with elimination of MRD in 45% of patients and with IDH2-mutation clearance in 25% of patients, said Eytan M. Stein, MD, from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

“The overall survival rates are robust, with greater than 75% 1-year survival in both ivosidenib- and enasidenib-treated patients,” he said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Both ivosidenib and enasidenib are approved in the United States for treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory AML bearing either IDH1 or IDH2 mutations, respectively. In this trial, the investigators explored the therapeutic potential of the IDH inhibitors in patients with previously untreated disease.

Dr. Stein and his colleagues investigated combining each of the agents with standard induction therapy with either daunorubicin 60 mg/m² per day or idarubicin 12 mg/m² per day for 3 days, plus cytarabine 200 mg/m² per day for 7 days. Patients with IDH1 mutations received ivosidenib 500 mg once daily, and those with IDH2 mutations received enasidenib 100 mg once daily.

After induction, patients with a complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete recovery of hematologic counts (CRi), or CR with incomplete recovery of platelets (CRp) could receive up to four cycles of consolidation therapy while continuing the IDH inhibitor. Patients who completed consolidation or were ineligible for consolidation could continue on maintenance therapy with their assigned drug until the end of the study.

The drugs were discontinued in patients who went on to hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

The most frequent co-occurring baseline mutations were DNMT3A, NPM1, and NRAS for patients with IDH1 mutations, and DNMT3A, SRSF2, and ASXL1 for patients with IDH2 mutations.

A total of 60 patients were assigned to ivosidenib and chemotherapy and 93 were assigned to enasidenib/chemotherapy. The median patient age was about 63 years in each arm.

All patients in each arm received a least one induction dose and about 48% in each arm received at least some consolidation dosing. In all, 18% of patients in the ivosidenib arm and 19% in the enasidenib arm went on to maintenance.

Treatment discontinuations occurred in 55% of patients in the ivosidenib group and 84% in the enasidenib group. The primary reason for discontinuation included HSCT, adverse events, progressive disease, and death (one and four patients in the respective arms).

Adverse events of interest, regardless of attribution, included the IDH differentiation syndrome in two patients on ivosidenib and one on enasidenib, leukocytosis, QT interval prolongation, and increased blood bilirubin.

The 30-day and 60-day mortality rates were 5% and 8% in the ivosidenib arm and 5% and 9% in the enasidenib arm, respectively.

Best overall response rates (CR+CRi+CRp) among all patients were 80% in the ivosidenib arm and 72% in the enasidenib arm. In each trial arm, the response rates were higher among patients with de novo AML, compared with secondary AML.

Of 12 ivosidenib-treated patients who had IDH1-mutation clearance, 10 had clearance at the end of induction therapy, and 2 achieved clearance during or after consolidation. Of 15 ivosidenib-treated patients who became MRD negative, 12 had achieved it by the end of induction, and 3 became MRD negative during consolidation.

In the enasidenib arm, 15 patients had IDH2 mutation clearance (11 after induction, 4 during consolidation) and 9 became MRD negative (7 after induction and 2 during or after consolidation).

The probability of surviving to 1 year after the start of induction among ivosidenib-treated patients was 79%; the median overall survival had not been reached and was not estimable at the time of data cutoff. The probability of surviving to 1 year among patients in the enasidenib arm was 75%. In this group, too, median overall survival had not been reached.

The clinical benefit of adding either IDH inhibitor to induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy for patients with newly diagnosed AML with IDH mutations will be further evaluated in a randomized, phase 3 trial, Dr. Stein said.

The study was funded by Agios Pharmaceuticals and Celgene. Dr. Stein reported consulting with those companies and others.

SOURCE: Stein EM et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 560.

SAN DIEGO – Lower-than-usual doses of rituximab may be sufficient in patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), results of a recent pilot safety and efficacy study suggest.

Patients receiving just 100 mg/week for 4 weeks had rates of relapse and exacerbation that were favorable, compared with historical controls, according to investigator Jeffrey I. Zwicker, MD, of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, both in Boston. He presented the findings at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

However, the low-dose treatment was not without side effects, according to Dr. Zwicker, who described one case of acute respiratory failure out of the 19 patients enrolled in the ART (Adjuvant Rituximab in TTP) study.

“The likely benefit is cost savings, rather than less toxicity,” Dr. Zwicker said of the low-dose rituximab regimen.

Out of 19 patients enrolled in ART, 18 were eligible to receive the study treatment, which included low-dose rituximab plus standard plasma exchange and corticosteroids.

Following this initial therapy, all patients had a response, defined as a platelet count 150,000/mcL or greater for 2 consecutive days, with a median time to response of 5 days.

There were two exacerbations (12%) at 30 days after stopping plasma exchange and no cases of refractory TTP, which compared favorably to historical controls, Dr. Zwicker said.

The rate of relapse at 2 years was 28%, which again compared favorably with a historical control data repository in which the rate of relapse at 2 years was 51%.

One patient in the study suffered a case of acute respiratory failure requiring intubation during the third rituximab infusion and was ultimately placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

“The patient did survive, but this is just a reminder that there are potential side effects, even with lower doses of rituximab,” Dr. Zwicker said.

A few other serious adverse events – including central line infection and bacteremia in one patient – were more likely related to the plasma exchange, he added.

These results with low-dose rituximab are consistent with findings that rituximab 375 mg/m² for four doses reduces the incidence of exacerbation and refractory disease and prevents or delays relapses, according to Dr. Zwicker and his coinvestigators, including J. Evan Sadler, MD, PhD, of Washington University, St. Louis, who initiated the study.

The typical TTP regimen of rituximab 375 mg/m² for four weekly doses is borrowed from protocols for B-cell lymphomas; however, the B-cell mass in nonmalignant disease is likely to be much less than in lymphoproliferative disorders, Dr. Zwicker told attendees.

“The benefit, principally, of lower-dose rituximab is saving of thousands upon thousands of dollars,” Dr. Zwicker said.

This is not the only data set to suggest a potential role for lower-dose rituximab, he added, noting that a recently published retrospective analysis showed “fairly similar” treatment-free survival rates for standard rituximab and a reduced-dose regimen. There also are case series in other autoimmune cytopenias, namely idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and pure red cell aplasia, that provide evidence in support of low-dose rituximab, he added.

Dr. Zwicker reported research funding with Incyte and Quercegen, and consultancy with Parexel. Dr. Sadler reported consultancy with Ablynx.

SOURCE: Zwicker JI et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 374.

SAN DIEGO – Lower-than-usual doses of rituximab may be sufficient in patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), results of a recent pilot safety and efficacy study suggest.

Patients receiving just 100 mg/week for 4 weeks had rates of relapse and exacerbation that were favorable, compared with historical controls, according to investigator Jeffrey I. Zwicker, MD, of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, both in Boston. He presented the findings at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

However, the low-dose treatment was not without side effects, according to Dr. Zwicker, who described one case of acute respiratory failure out of the 19 patients enrolled in the ART (Adjuvant Rituximab in TTP) study.

“The likely benefit is cost savings, rather than less toxicity,” Dr. Zwicker said of the low-dose rituximab regimen.

Out of 19 patients enrolled in ART, 18 were eligible to receive the study treatment, which included low-dose rituximab plus standard plasma exchange and corticosteroids.

Following this initial therapy, all patients had a response, defined as a platelet count 150,000/mcL or greater for 2 consecutive days, with a median time to response of 5 days.

There were two exacerbations (12%) at 30 days after stopping plasma exchange and no cases of refractory TTP, which compared favorably to historical controls, Dr. Zwicker said.

The rate of relapse at 2 years was 28%, which again compared favorably with a historical control data repository in which the rate of relapse at 2 years was 51%.

One patient in the study suffered a case of acute respiratory failure requiring intubation during the third rituximab infusion and was ultimately placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

“The patient did survive, but this is just a reminder that there are potential side effects, even with lower doses of rituximab,” Dr. Zwicker said.

A few other serious adverse events – including central line infection and bacteremia in one patient – were more likely related to the plasma exchange, he added.

These results with low-dose rituximab are consistent with findings that rituximab 375 mg/m² for four doses reduces the incidence of exacerbation and refractory disease and prevents or delays relapses, according to Dr. Zwicker and his coinvestigators, including J. Evan Sadler, MD, PhD, of Washington University, St. Louis, who initiated the study.

The typical TTP regimen of rituximab 375 mg/m² for four weekly doses is borrowed from protocols for B-cell lymphomas; however, the B-cell mass in nonmalignant disease is likely to be much less than in lymphoproliferative disorders, Dr. Zwicker told attendees.

“The benefit, principally, of lower-dose rituximab is saving of thousands upon thousands of dollars,” Dr. Zwicker said.

This is not the only data set to suggest a potential role for lower-dose rituximab, he added, noting that a recently published retrospective analysis showed “fairly similar” treatment-free survival rates for standard rituximab and a reduced-dose regimen. There also are case series in other autoimmune cytopenias, namely idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and pure red cell aplasia, that provide evidence in support of low-dose rituximab, he added.

Dr. Zwicker reported research funding with Incyte and Quercegen, and consultancy with Parexel. Dr. Sadler reported consultancy with Ablynx.

SOURCE: Zwicker JI et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 374.

SAN DIEGO – Lower-than-usual doses of rituximab may be sufficient in patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), results of a recent pilot safety and efficacy study suggest.

Patients receiving just 100 mg/week for 4 weeks had rates of relapse and exacerbation that were favorable, compared with historical controls, according to investigator Jeffrey I. Zwicker, MD, of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, both in Boston. He presented the findings at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

However, the low-dose treatment was not without side effects, according to Dr. Zwicker, who described one case of acute respiratory failure out of the 19 patients enrolled in the ART (Adjuvant Rituximab in TTP) study.

“The likely benefit is cost savings, rather than less toxicity,” Dr. Zwicker said of the low-dose rituximab regimen.

Out of 19 patients enrolled in ART, 18 were eligible to receive the study treatment, which included low-dose rituximab plus standard plasma exchange and corticosteroids.

Following this initial therapy, all patients had a response, defined as a platelet count 150,000/mcL or greater for 2 consecutive days, with a median time to response of 5 days.

There were two exacerbations (12%) at 30 days after stopping plasma exchange and no cases of refractory TTP, which compared favorably to historical controls, Dr. Zwicker said.

The rate of relapse at 2 years was 28%, which again compared favorably with a historical control data repository in which the rate of relapse at 2 years was 51%.

One patient in the study suffered a case of acute respiratory failure requiring intubation during the third rituximab infusion and was ultimately placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

“The patient did survive, but this is just a reminder that there are potential side effects, even with lower doses of rituximab,” Dr. Zwicker said.

A few other serious adverse events – including central line infection and bacteremia in one patient – were more likely related to the plasma exchange, he added.

These results with low-dose rituximab are consistent with findings that rituximab 375 mg/m² for four doses reduces the incidence of exacerbation and refractory disease and prevents or delays relapses, according to Dr. Zwicker and his coinvestigators, including J. Evan Sadler, MD, PhD, of Washington University, St. Louis, who initiated the study.

The typical TTP regimen of rituximab 375 mg/m² for four weekly doses is borrowed from protocols for B-cell lymphomas; however, the B-cell mass in nonmalignant disease is likely to be much less than in lymphoproliferative disorders, Dr. Zwicker told attendees.

“The benefit, principally, of lower-dose rituximab is saving of thousands upon thousands of dollars,” Dr. Zwicker said.

This is not the only data set to suggest a potential role for lower-dose rituximab, he added, noting that a recently published retrospective analysis showed “fairly similar” treatment-free survival rates for standard rituximab and a reduced-dose regimen. There also are case series in other autoimmune cytopenias, namely idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and pure red cell aplasia, that provide evidence in support of low-dose rituximab, he added.

Dr. Zwicker reported research funding with Incyte and Quercegen, and consultancy with Parexel. Dr. Sadler reported consultancy with Ablynx.

SOURCE: Zwicker JI et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 374.

SAN DIEGO – A newly developed personalized model that “harnesses the power of artificial intelligence” to predict overall survival and transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes outperforms both the original and revised International Prognostic Scoring Systems (IPSS, IPSS-R), according to Aziz Nazha, MD.

The machine learning model, which was built using clinical and genomic data derived from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients diagnosed according to 2008 World Health Organization criteria, incorporates information beyond that included in the IPSS and IPSS-R, and provides patient-specific survival probabilities at different time points, Dr. Nazha of Cleveland Clinic reported during a press briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The model was developed in a combined training cohort of 1,471 patients from the Cleveland Clinic and Munich Leukemia Laboratory and was validated in a separate cohort of 831 patients from the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Fla.

The concordance index – a measure for comparing the accuracy of the various models – was 0.80 for overall survival (OS), and 0.78 for AML transformation vs. 0.66 and 0.73, respectively, for IPSS, and 0.67 and 0.73, respectively, for IPSS-R, Dr. Nazha said. The new “geno-clinical” model also outperformed mutations-only analysis, mutations plus cytogenetics analysis, and mutations plus cytogenetics plus age analyses for both OS and AML transformation.

Adding mutational variant allelic frequency did not significantly improve prediction accuracy, he noted.

Dr. Nazha and his colleagues are developing a web application tool that can be used to run the trained model to calculate patient-specific, time-specific OS and AML transformation probabilities. He discussed the new model and its implications for personalized prognosis and treatment in this video interview.

Improved risk assessment helps patients understand their disease and “establish expectations about their journey with their disease,” and it is also extremely important for treating physicians, he said.

“All of our consensus guidelines and treatment recommendations are based on risk,” he explained, noting that the approach varies greatly for higher- and lower-risk patients.

This model represents a potential new focus on “personalized prediction” in addition to the increasing focus on personalized treatment and takes into account the heterogeneous outcomes seen in patients with MDS, he said.

Dr. Nazha reported consultancy for Karyopharma and Tolero, and data-monitoring committee membership for MEI.

sworcester@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Nazha A et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 793.

SAN DIEGO – A newly developed personalized model that “harnesses the power of artificial intelligence” to predict overall survival and transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes outperforms both the original and revised International Prognostic Scoring Systems (IPSS, IPSS-R), according to Aziz Nazha, MD.

The machine learning model, which was built using clinical and genomic data derived from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients diagnosed according to 2008 World Health Organization criteria, incorporates information beyond that included in the IPSS and IPSS-R, and provides patient-specific survival probabilities at different time points, Dr. Nazha of Cleveland Clinic reported during a press briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The model was developed in a combined training cohort of 1,471 patients from the Cleveland Clinic and Munich Leukemia Laboratory and was validated in a separate cohort of 831 patients from the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Fla.

The concordance index – a measure for comparing the accuracy of the various models – was 0.80 for overall survival (OS), and 0.78 for AML transformation vs. 0.66 and 0.73, respectively, for IPSS, and 0.67 and 0.73, respectively, for IPSS-R, Dr. Nazha said. The new “geno-clinical” model also outperformed mutations-only analysis, mutations plus cytogenetics analysis, and mutations plus cytogenetics plus age analyses for both OS and AML transformation.

Adding mutational variant allelic frequency did not significantly improve prediction accuracy, he noted.

Dr. Nazha and his colleagues are developing a web application tool that can be used to run the trained model to calculate patient-specific, time-specific OS and AML transformation probabilities. He discussed the new model and its implications for personalized prognosis and treatment in this video interview.

Improved risk assessment helps patients understand their disease and “establish expectations about their journey with their disease,” and it is also extremely important for treating physicians, he said.

“All of our consensus guidelines and treatment recommendations are based on risk,” he explained, noting that the approach varies greatly for higher- and lower-risk patients.

This model represents a potential new focus on “personalized prediction” in addition to the increasing focus on personalized treatment and takes into account the heterogeneous outcomes seen in patients with MDS, he said.

Dr. Nazha reported consultancy for Karyopharma and Tolero, and data-monitoring committee membership for MEI.

sworcester@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Nazha A et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 793.

SAN DIEGO – A newly developed personalized model that “harnesses the power of artificial intelligence” to predict overall survival and transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes outperforms both the original and revised International Prognostic Scoring Systems (IPSS, IPSS-R), according to Aziz Nazha, MD.

The machine learning model, which was built using clinical and genomic data derived from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients diagnosed according to 2008 World Health Organization criteria, incorporates information beyond that included in the IPSS and IPSS-R, and provides patient-specific survival probabilities at different time points, Dr. Nazha of Cleveland Clinic reported during a press briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The model was developed in a combined training cohort of 1,471 patients from the Cleveland Clinic and Munich Leukemia Laboratory and was validated in a separate cohort of 831 patients from the Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Fla.

The concordance index – a measure for comparing the accuracy of the various models – was 0.80 for overall survival (OS), and 0.78 for AML transformation vs. 0.66 and 0.73, respectively, for IPSS, and 0.67 and 0.73, respectively, for IPSS-R, Dr. Nazha said. The new “geno-clinical” model also outperformed mutations-only analysis, mutations plus cytogenetics analysis, and mutations plus cytogenetics plus age analyses for both OS and AML transformation.

Adding mutational variant allelic frequency did not significantly improve prediction accuracy, he noted.

Dr. Nazha and his colleagues are developing a web application tool that can be used to run the trained model to calculate patient-specific, time-specific OS and AML transformation probabilities. He discussed the new model and its implications for personalized prognosis and treatment in this video interview.

Improved risk assessment helps patients understand their disease and “establish expectations about their journey with their disease,” and it is also extremely important for treating physicians, he said.

“All of our consensus guidelines and treatment recommendations are based on risk,” he explained, noting that the approach varies greatly for higher- and lower-risk patients.

This model represents a potential new focus on “personalized prediction” in addition to the increasing focus on personalized treatment and takes into account the heterogeneous outcomes seen in patients with MDS, he said.

Dr. Nazha reported consultancy for Karyopharma and Tolero, and data-monitoring committee membership for MEI.

sworcester@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Nazha A et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 793.

SAN DIEGO – Ixazomib improved progression-free survival following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, according to results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Andrew Bowser/MDedge News

Treatment with the oral proteasome inhibitor for 24 months was well tolerated, had a low discontinuation rate, and improved progression-free survival by 39% versus placebo, according to Meletios A. Dimopoulos, MD, of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.

These findings suggest ixazomib (Ninlaro) represents a “new treatment option for maintenance after transplantation,” Dr. Dimopoulos said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The trial, known as TOURMALINE-MM3, is the first-ever randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a proteasome inhibitor used as maintenance after ASCT, according to Dr. Dimopoulos. Lenalidomide is approved in that setting, but 29% of patients who start the treatment discontinue because of treatment-related adverse events.

“Proteasome inhibitors have a different mechanism of action and may provide an alternative to lenalidomide,” Dr. Dimopoulos said at an oral abstract session. Ixazomib has a manageable toxicity profile and “convenient” weekly oral dosing, making it “well suited” for maintenance.

When asked by an attendee whether ixazomib would become “the standard of care” for younger patients with myeloma in this setting, Dr. Dimopoulos replied the results show that ixazomib “is an option for patients, especially for those where a physician may believe that a proteasome inhibitor may be indicated.”

However, when pressed by an attendee to comment on how ixazomib compares with lenalidomide for maintenance, Dr. Dimopoulos remarked that current maintenance studies are moving in the direction of combining therapies.

“I think that instead of saying, ‘is ixazomib better than lenalidomide?’ or vice versa, it is better to see how one may combine those drugs in subsets of patients, or even combine these drugs with other agents,” he said.

The TOURMALINE-MM3 study included 656 patients randomized posttransplantation to receive weekly ixazomib or placebo for up to 2 years.

The median progression-free survival was 26.5 months for ixazomib versus 21.3 months for placebo (P = .002; hazard ratio, 0.720; 95% confidence interval, 0.582-0.890). Median overall survival had not been reached in either ixazomib or placebo arms as of this report, with a median follow-up of 31 months.

The discontinuation rate was 7% for ixazomib versus 5% for placebo, according to the investigator. Moreover, ixazomib was associated with “low toxicity” and no difference in the rates of new primary malignancies, at 3% in both arms.

A manuscript describing results of the TOURMALINE-MM3 study is in press in the Lancet, with an expected online publication date of Dec. 10, Dr. Dimopoulos told attendees. Other studies are ongoing to evaluate ixazomib combinations and treatment to progression in this setting.

TOURMALINE-MM3 is sponsored by Takeda (Millennium), the maker of ixazomib. Dr. Dimopoulos reported honoraria and consultancy with Janssen, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Celgene.

SOURCE: Dimopoulos MA et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 301.

SAN DIEGO – Ixazomib improved progression-free survival following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, according to results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Andrew Bowser/MDedge News

Treatment with the oral proteasome inhibitor for 24 months was well tolerated, had a low discontinuation rate, and improved progression-free survival by 39% versus placebo, according to Meletios A. Dimopoulos, MD, of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.

These findings suggest ixazomib (Ninlaro) represents a “new treatment option for maintenance after transplantation,” Dr. Dimopoulos said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The trial, known as TOURMALINE-MM3, is the first-ever randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a proteasome inhibitor used as maintenance after ASCT, according to Dr. Dimopoulos. Lenalidomide is approved in that setting, but 29% of patients who start the treatment discontinue because of treatment-related adverse events.

“Proteasome inhibitors have a different mechanism of action and may provide an alternative to lenalidomide,” Dr. Dimopoulos said at an oral abstract session. Ixazomib has a manageable toxicity profile and “convenient” weekly oral dosing, making it “well suited” for maintenance.

When asked by an attendee whether ixazomib would become “the standard of care” for younger patients with myeloma in this setting, Dr. Dimopoulos replied the results show that ixazomib “is an option for patients, especially for those where a physician may believe that a proteasome inhibitor may be indicated.”

However, when pressed by an attendee to comment on how ixazomib compares with lenalidomide for maintenance, Dr. Dimopoulos remarked that current maintenance studies are moving in the direction of combining therapies.

“I think that instead of saying, ‘is ixazomib better than lenalidomide?’ or vice versa, it is better to see how one may combine those drugs in subsets of patients, or even combine these drugs with other agents,” he said.

The TOURMALINE-MM3 study included 656 patients randomized posttransplantation to receive weekly ixazomib or placebo for up to 2 years.

The median progression-free survival was 26.5 months for ixazomib versus 21.3 months for placebo (P = .002; hazard ratio, 0.720; 95% confidence interval, 0.582-0.890). Median overall survival had not been reached in either ixazomib or placebo arms as of this report, with a median follow-up of 31 months.

The discontinuation rate was 7% for ixazomib versus 5% for placebo, according to the investigator. Moreover, ixazomib was associated with “low toxicity” and no difference in the rates of new primary malignancies, at 3% in both arms.

A manuscript describing results of the TOURMALINE-MM3 study is in press in the Lancet, with an expected online publication date of Dec. 10, Dr. Dimopoulos told attendees. Other studies are ongoing to evaluate ixazomib combinations and treatment to progression in this setting.

TOURMALINE-MM3 is sponsored by Takeda (Millennium), the maker of ixazomib. Dr. Dimopoulos reported honoraria and consultancy with Janssen, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Celgene.

SOURCE: Dimopoulos MA et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 301.

SAN DIEGO – Ixazomib improved progression-free survival following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, according to results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Andrew Bowser/MDedge News

Treatment with the oral proteasome inhibitor for 24 months was well tolerated, had a low discontinuation rate, and improved progression-free survival by 39% versus placebo, according to Meletios A. Dimopoulos, MD, of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.

These findings suggest ixazomib (Ninlaro) represents a “new treatment option for maintenance after transplantation,” Dr. Dimopoulos said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The trial, known as TOURMALINE-MM3, is the first-ever randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a proteasome inhibitor used as maintenance after ASCT, according to Dr. Dimopoulos. Lenalidomide is approved in that setting, but 29% of patients who start the treatment discontinue because of treatment-related adverse events.

“Proteasome inhibitors have a different mechanism of action and may provide an alternative to lenalidomide,” Dr. Dimopoulos said at an oral abstract session. Ixazomib has a manageable toxicity profile and “convenient” weekly oral dosing, making it “well suited” for maintenance.

When asked by an attendee whether ixazomib would become “the standard of care” for younger patients with myeloma in this setting, Dr. Dimopoulos replied the results show that ixazomib “is an option for patients, especially for those where a physician may believe that a proteasome inhibitor may be indicated.”

However, when pressed by an attendee to comment on how ixazomib compares with lenalidomide for maintenance, Dr. Dimopoulos remarked that current maintenance studies are moving in the direction of combining therapies.

“I think that instead of saying, ‘is ixazomib better than lenalidomide?’ or vice versa, it is better to see how one may combine those drugs in subsets of patients, or even combine these drugs with other agents,” he said.

The TOURMALINE-MM3 study included 656 patients randomized posttransplantation to receive weekly ixazomib or placebo for up to 2 years.

The median progression-free survival was 26.5 months for ixazomib versus 21.3 months for placebo (P = .002; hazard ratio, 0.720; 95% confidence interval, 0.582-0.890). Median overall survival had not been reached in either ixazomib or placebo arms as of this report, with a median follow-up of 31 months.

The discontinuation rate was 7% for ixazomib versus 5% for placebo, according to the investigator. Moreover, ixazomib was associated with “low toxicity” and no difference in the rates of new primary malignancies, at 3% in both arms.

A manuscript describing results of the TOURMALINE-MM3 study is in press in the Lancet, with an expected online publication date of Dec. 10, Dr. Dimopoulos told attendees. Other studies are ongoing to evaluate ixazomib combinations and treatment to progression in this setting.

TOURMALINE-MM3 is sponsored by Takeda (Millennium), the maker of ixazomib. Dr. Dimopoulos reported honoraria and consultancy with Janssen, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Celgene.

SOURCE: Dimopoulos MA et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 301.

SAN DIEGO – Two-thirds of adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who had early responses to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy with tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) remain in remission with no evidence of minimal residual disease, according to an updated analysis of the JULIET trial.

In the single-arm, open-label trial, the overall response rate after 19 months of follow-up was 54%, including 40% complete remissions and 14% partial remissions. The median duration of response had not been reached at the time of data cutoff, and the median overall survival had not been reached for patients with a complete remission. Overall survival in this heavily pretreated population as a whole (all patients who received CAR T-cell infusions) was 11.1 months.

Adverse events were similar to those previously reported and were manageable, according to investigator Richard Thomas Maziarz, MD, from the Oregon Health & Science Knight Cancer Institute in Portland.

In this video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Dr. Maziarz discusses the promising results using CAR T cells in this difficult to treat population.

SAN DIEGO – Two-thirds of adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who had early responses to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy with tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) remain in remission with no evidence of minimal residual disease, according to an updated analysis of the JULIET trial.

In the single-arm, open-label trial, the overall response rate after 19 months of follow-up was 54%, including 40% complete remissions and 14% partial remissions. The median duration of response had not been reached at the time of data cutoff, and the median overall survival had not been reached for patients with a complete remission. Overall survival in this heavily pretreated population as a whole (all patients who received CAR T-cell infusions) was 11.1 months.

Adverse events were similar to those previously reported and were manageable, according to investigator Richard Thomas Maziarz, MD, from the Oregon Health & Science Knight Cancer Institute in Portland.

In this video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Dr. Maziarz discusses the promising results using CAR T cells in this difficult to treat population.

SAN DIEGO – Two-thirds of adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who had early responses to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy with tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) remain in remission with no evidence of minimal residual disease, according to an updated analysis of the JULIET trial.

In the single-arm, open-label trial, the overall response rate after 19 months of follow-up was 54%, including 40% complete remissions and 14% partial remissions. The median duration of response had not been reached at the time of data cutoff, and the median overall survival had not been reached for patients with a complete remission. Overall survival in this heavily pretreated population as a whole (all patients who received CAR T-cell infusions) was 11.1 months.

Adverse events were similar to those previously reported and were manageable, according to investigator Richard Thomas Maziarz, MD, from the Oregon Health & Science Knight Cancer Institute in Portland.

In this video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Dr. Maziarz discusses the promising results using CAR T cells in this difficult to treat population.

SAN DIEGO – Investigators demonstrated the feasibility of delivering genomic results in 7 days in a population of older, newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The Beat AML Master Trial is an ongoing umbrella study that harnesses cytogenetic information and next generation sequencing to match patients with targeted therapies across a number of substudies or outside of the trial’s multicenter network.

The researchers chose AML for this precision-medicine study because of its rapid onset and lethal nature, its heterogeneity, and the availability of more-targeted therapies, said Amy Burd, PhD, of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, which is sponsoring the study.

Initial data from the trial showed that more than 95% of patients were assigned to treatment in 7 days or less, based on their personalized genomic information.

Overall, 285 patients had usable genomic screening data and were assigned to treatment. Of those patients, 273 were assigned to a treatment within 7 days, Dr. Burd reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The speed of delivering these results is critical, said Joseph Mikhael, MD, chief medical officer for the International Myeloma Foundation in Phoenix, who moderated a media briefing on personalized medicine.

“One of the greatest challenges we faced in the concept of personalized medicine is by the time you’ve determined what is best for that patient ... the horse is already out of the barn,” Dr. Mikhael said. “You have to have started the patient on treatment already or else their disease could have progressed quite rapidly.”

In the past, genomic results might come back a month after the patient started therapy. “It was really almost academic,” he said.

In the Beat AML study, more than half (146 patients) were treated based on their AML subtype. The remaining patients (139) were not treated: 2.5% of patients died within 7 days, 7% of patients chose an alternative treatment prior to assignment, 20% chose standard of care, 9.1% chose an alternative trial after assignment, 8.1% chose palliative care, and the remainder had a reason that was not specified.

“The treatment decisions are made for what’s best for the patient even if that means a study outside of Beat AML,” Dr. Burd said.

Currently, there are 11 substudies offering treatment to trial participants across 13 clinical sites. There has been promising efficacy in many of the treatment arms, Dr. Burd said.

In the future, the researchers are looking to expand the substudies to look into novel drug combinations for certain AML subtypes, specifically isocitrate dehydrogenase 2–mutated groups.

Dr. Burd is an employee of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. Other coinvestigators reported financial relationships with the pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Mikhael reported research funding from AbbVie, Celgene, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi.

mschneider@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Burd A et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 559.

SAN DIEGO – Investigators demonstrated the feasibility of delivering genomic results in 7 days in a population of older, newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The Beat AML Master Trial is an ongoing umbrella study that harnesses cytogenetic information and next generation sequencing to match patients with targeted therapies across a number of substudies or outside of the trial’s multicenter network.

The researchers chose AML for this precision-medicine study because of its rapid onset and lethal nature, its heterogeneity, and the availability of more-targeted therapies, said Amy Burd, PhD, of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, which is sponsoring the study.

Initial data from the trial showed that more than 95% of patients were assigned to treatment in 7 days or less, based on their personalized genomic information.

Overall, 285 patients had usable genomic screening data and were assigned to treatment. Of those patients, 273 were assigned to a treatment within 7 days, Dr. Burd reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The speed of delivering these results is critical, said Joseph Mikhael, MD, chief medical officer for the International Myeloma Foundation in Phoenix, who moderated a media briefing on personalized medicine.

“One of the greatest challenges we faced in the concept of personalized medicine is by the time you’ve determined what is best for that patient ... the horse is already out of the barn,” Dr. Mikhael said. “You have to have started the patient on treatment already or else their disease could have progressed quite rapidly.”

In the past, genomic results might come back a month after the patient started therapy. “It was really almost academic,” he said.

In the Beat AML study, more than half (146 patients) were treated based on their AML subtype. The remaining patients (139) were not treated: 2.5% of patients died within 7 days, 7% of patients chose an alternative treatment prior to assignment, 20% chose standard of care, 9.1% chose an alternative trial after assignment, 8.1% chose palliative care, and the remainder had a reason that was not specified.

“The treatment decisions are made for what’s best for the patient even if that means a study outside of Beat AML,” Dr. Burd said.

Currently, there are 11 substudies offering treatment to trial participants across 13 clinical sites. There has been promising efficacy in many of the treatment arms, Dr. Burd said.

In the future, the researchers are looking to expand the substudies to look into novel drug combinations for certain AML subtypes, specifically isocitrate dehydrogenase 2–mutated groups.

Dr. Burd is an employee of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. Other coinvestigators reported financial relationships with the pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Mikhael reported research funding from AbbVie, Celgene, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi.

mschneider@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Burd A et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 559.

SAN DIEGO – Investigators demonstrated the feasibility of delivering genomic results in 7 days in a population of older, newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

The Beat AML Master Trial is an ongoing umbrella study that harnesses cytogenetic information and next generation sequencing to match patients with targeted therapies across a number of substudies or outside of the trial’s multicenter network.

The researchers chose AML for this precision-medicine study because of its rapid onset and lethal nature, its heterogeneity, and the availability of more-targeted therapies, said Amy Burd, PhD, of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, which is sponsoring the study.

Initial data from the trial showed that more than 95% of patients were assigned to treatment in 7 days or less, based on their personalized genomic information.

Overall, 285 patients had usable genomic screening data and were assigned to treatment. Of those patients, 273 were assigned to a treatment within 7 days, Dr. Burd reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The speed of delivering these results is critical, said Joseph Mikhael, MD, chief medical officer for the International Myeloma Foundation in Phoenix, who moderated a media briefing on personalized medicine.

“One of the greatest challenges we faced in the concept of personalized medicine is by the time you’ve determined what is best for that patient ... the horse is already out of the barn,” Dr. Mikhael said. “You have to have started the patient on treatment already or else their disease could have progressed quite rapidly.”

In the past, genomic results might come back a month after the patient started therapy. “It was really almost academic,” he said.

In the Beat AML study, more than half (146 patients) were treated based on their AML subtype. The remaining patients (139) were not treated: 2.5% of patients died within 7 days, 7% of patients chose an alternative treatment prior to assignment, 20% chose standard of care, 9.1% chose an alternative trial after assignment, 8.1% chose palliative care, and the remainder had a reason that was not specified.

“The treatment decisions are made for what’s best for the patient even if that means a study outside of Beat AML,” Dr. Burd said.

Currently, there are 11 substudies offering treatment to trial participants across 13 clinical sites. There has been promising efficacy in many of the treatment arms, Dr. Burd said.

In the future, the researchers are looking to expand the substudies to look into novel drug combinations for certain AML subtypes, specifically isocitrate dehydrogenase 2–mutated groups.

Dr. Burd is an employee of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. Other coinvestigators reported financial relationships with the pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Mikhael reported research funding from AbbVie, Celgene, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi.

mschneider@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Burd A et al. ASH 2018, Abstract 559.

SAN DIEGO – Diversity of the gut microbiome, sampled either before or after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), is predictive of overall survival.

A multinational study of intestinal microbiota in the United States, Europe, and Japan showed that in all four geographic regions patients scheduled for HCT had about a 100% lower median diversity of intestinal bacteria, compared with healthy volunteers, and that enterococcal species predominated in the transplant candidates, reported Jonathan U. Peled, MD, PhD, from the bone marrow transplantation service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

The investigators also found that intestinal microbial diversity was significantly associated with overall survival following an HCT.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Dr. Peled elaborated on the study findings and described potential pre- and posttransplant interventions that could improve results and increase survival following HCT.

Dr. Peled reported current or prior relationships with Seres Therapeutics, the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, and Merck/Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

SAN DIEGO – Diversity of the gut microbiome, sampled either before or after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), is predictive of overall survival.

A multinational study of intestinal microbiota in the United States, Europe, and Japan showed that in all four geographic regions patients scheduled for HCT had about a 100% lower median diversity of intestinal bacteria, compared with healthy volunteers, and that enterococcal species predominated in the transplant candidates, reported Jonathan U. Peled, MD, PhD, from the bone marrow transplantation service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

The investigators also found that intestinal microbial diversity was significantly associated with overall survival following an HCT.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Dr. Peled elaborated on the study findings and described potential pre- and posttransplant interventions that could improve results and increase survival following HCT.

Dr. Peled reported current or prior relationships with Seres Therapeutics, the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, and Merck/Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

SAN DIEGO – Diversity of the gut microbiome, sampled either before or after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), is predictive of overall survival.

A multinational study of intestinal microbiota in the United States, Europe, and Japan showed that in all four geographic regions patients scheduled for HCT had about a 100% lower median diversity of intestinal bacteria, compared with healthy volunteers, and that enterococcal species predominated in the transplant candidates, reported Jonathan U. Peled, MD, PhD, from the bone marrow transplantation service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

The investigators also found that intestinal microbial diversity was significantly associated with overall survival following an HCT.

In a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Dr. Peled elaborated on the study findings and described potential pre- and posttransplant interventions that could improve results and increase survival following HCT.

Dr. Peled reported current or prior relationships with Seres Therapeutics, the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, and Merck/Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.