Article Type
Changed
Display Headline

A Solitary Axillary Subcutaneous Mass

THE DIAGNOSIS: Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman Disease

The clinical differential diagnosis in our patient included a broad array of soft-tissue neoplasms ranging from benign entities to sarcomas. Histology was notable for a dense, dermal-based, lymphohistiocytic infiltrate with alternating hypocellular and hypercellular areas imparting a marbled appearance on low-power view (Figure, A). Further immunohistochemical staining revealed large, S100-positive histiocytes containing intact inflammatory cells (emperipolesis), which confirmed a diagnosis of cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD)(Figure, B). Our patient elected to undergo surgical removal of the mass, and he will be monitored for recurrence.

CT117004012_e-Fig_AB
FIGURE. A, A punch biopsy from the lesion in the right axilla demonstrated a dense, dermal inflammatory infiltrate with alternating hypocellular and hypercellular zones (H&E, original magnification ×200 and ×300. B, High-power view showed large pale histiocytes containing intact lymphocytes and plasma cells within the cytoplasm (H&E, original magnification ×400

Rosai-Dorfman disease is a non–Langerhans cell histiocytosis that most commonly affects the lymph nodes but can affect other organs including the skin. Rosai-Dorfman disease initially was documented in the medical literature in 1969 by Rosai and Dorfman1 as benign sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. Classic RDD usually manifests with painless cervical lymphadenopathy in children or young adults along with fever, leukocytosis, anemia, polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia, and elevated inflammatory markers.2,3 Extranodal involvement has been reported in up to 43% of cases, with common sites including the skin, central nervous system, and gastrointestinal tract.3,4

Cutaneous RDD is a distinct, less common clinical entity that is limited to the skin and shows no nodal involvement or systemic symptoms such as fever, night sweats, or weight loss.5 Cutaneous RDD classically manifests with localized indurated papules and plaques, but it can manifest with tumorlike lesions in the subcutaneous tissues.6 Cutaneous RDD is very rare, with fewer than 200 known case reports in the literature as of 2014; in comparison to classic forms of RDD, cutaneous RDD has a female predominance.7,8 There are few reports of isolated cutaneous disease manifesting as soft-tissue masses, and our case represents a rare case of cutaneous RDD manifesting as a solitary soft-tissue mass in the axilla.9-11 Diagnosis of cutaneous RDD is challenging due to its variable clinical manifestations and nonspecific imaging findings, requiring clinicopathologic correlation.

Imaging of subcutaneous RDD lesions typically shows well-defined, irregularly shaped masses with homogenous enhancement on computed tomography/ magnetic resonance imaging. Additional imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography is recommended to examine for organ involvement, as RDD lesions have avid uptake.12,13 Imaging may help differentiate RDD lesions from malignant neoplasms prior to biopsy. Additional workup includes baseline laboratory testing with inflammatory markers and a complete blood count for evaluation of laboratory abnormalities seen in classic RDD, including leukocytosis, anemia, or systemic inflammation.12 Following imaging and laboratory testing, definitive diagnosis of RDD necessitates histopathologic examination.

Although cutaneous RDD is clinically distinct from its classic RDD counterpart, the conditions share the same characteristic histologic features.5 Histology is notable for a dense mixed inflammatory infiltrate comprised of large pale histiocytes exhibiting emperipolesis, lymphocytes, plasma cells, and occasional eosinophils and neutrophils. Histiocytes stain positive for CD68, CD163, and S100 and are negative for Langerhans cell markers CD1a and CD207.6

The etiology of RDD remains poorly understood. Classic RDD has been associated with both sporadic and familial forms, with somatic mutations identified in the mitogen-activated protein kinase/KRAS pathway in up to one-third of cases, and less frequently in the BRAF gene.14,15 Germline mutations in familial cases of RDD have been identified in the SLC29A3 gene; mutations in this gene are associated with a spectrum of syndromes with histiocytosis and lymphadenopathy.14,15 In contrast, molecular drivers have yet to be identified in cutaneous RDD lesions, and the current predominant hypothesis is that cutaneous RDD has a reactive or immunologic pathophysiology. Autoimmune diseases, infections, and lymphomas have been reported to co-occur with both classic and cutaneous RDD.15 While subclinical viral infections such as Epstein-Barr virus and human herpesvirus 6 have been identified in RDD cases, studies have failed to prove their role as pathogenic drivers of the disease.14,16,17 Commonly reported comorbidities include systemic lupus erythematous, diabetes, hemolytic anemia, acute/chronic uveitis (though it is controversial whether these cases represent orbital involvement in systemic RDD), and Crohn disease.7,8,18,19 Immunohistochemical findings have supported that cells within RDD are activated monocytes responding to T-cell cytokine signaling following an infectious or immunologic insult.20,21

Consensus guidelines on treatment for cutaneous RDD recommend either observation for asymptomatic disease or surgical excision for unifocal lesions with consideration of systemic therapy for refractory cutaneous disease.22,23 Most patients with cutaneous RDD have self-limited disease, but long-term follow-up is recommended following surgical excision to monitor for recurrence, especially if there is a residual positive margin.24 Radiation therapy also may have to be utilized for residual or recurrent disease that becomes symptomatic; however, further studies are needed to determine its efficacy in limiting recurrence.4,12,25 Systemic treatment options include immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agents such as corticosteroids, methotrexate, and rituximab.5 There currently are no guidelines on length of follow-up, but surveillance is recommended initially at 4 months, followed by 6- to 12-month intervals.22

References
  1. Rosai J, Dorfman RF. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. a newly recognized benign clinicopathological entity. Arch Pathol. 1969;87:63-70.
  2. Foucar E, Rosai J, Dorfman R. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1990;7:19-73.
  3. Stefanato CM, Ellerin PS, Bhawan J. Cutaneous sinus histiocytosis (Rosai-Dorfman disease) presenting clinically as vasculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:775-778.
  4. Dalia S, Sagatys E, Sokol L, et al. Rosai-Dorfman Disease: tumor biology, clinical features, pathology, and treatment. Cancer Control. 2014;21:322-327.
  5. Bruce-Brand C, Schneider JW, Schubert P. Rosai-Dorfman disease: an overview. J Clin Pathol. 2020;73:697.
  6. Bolognia J, Jorizzo J, Schaffer J. Dermatology. 3rd ed. ed. Elsevier Saunders 2012.
  7. Salva KA, Stenstrom M, Breadon JY, et al. Possible association of cutaneous rosai-dorfman disease and chronic crohn disease: a case series report. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150:177-181.
  8. Brenn T, Calonje E, Granter SR, et al. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease is a distinct clinical entity. Am J Dermatopathol. 2002; 24:385-391.
  9. Betini N, Munger AM, Rottmann D, et al. Rare presentation of Rosai- Dorfman disease in soft tissue: diagnostic findings and surgical treatment. Case Rep Surg. 2022;2022:8440836.
  10. Cravero JC, Ibrahim S. Recurrent soft tissue rosai dorfman disease of right medial thigh lipoma with lymph node involvement. Fed Pract. 2024;41(suppl 2):S20-S23
  11. Tenny SO, McGinness M, Zhang D, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease presenting as a breast mass and enlarged axillary lymph node mimicking malignancy: a case report and review of the literature. Breast J. 2011;17:516-520.
  12. Goyal G, Ravindran A, Young JR, et al. Clinicopathological features, treatment approaches, and outcomes in Rosai-Dorfman disease. Haematologica. 2020;105:348-357.
  13. Li H, Li D, Xia J, et al. Radiological features of Rosai-Dorfman disease: case series and review of the literature. Clin Radiol. 2022;77:E799-E805.
  14. Elbaz Younes I, Sokol L, Zhang L. Rosai-Dorfman disease between proliferation and neoplasia. Cancers. 2022;14:5271.
  15. Ravindran A, Rech KL. How I diagnose Rosai-Dorfman disease. Am J Clin Pathol. 2023;160:1-10.
  16. Kutlubay Z, Bairamov O, Sevim A, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease: a case report with nodal and cutaneous involvement and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2014;36:353-357.
  17. Luppi M, Barozzi P, Garber R, et al. Expression of human herpesvirus 6 antigens in benign and malignant lymphoproliferative diseases. Am J Pathol. 1998;153:815-823.
  18. Wang KH, Chen WY, Liu HN, et al. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease: clinicopathological profiles, spectrum and evolution of 21 lesions in six patients. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154:277-286.
  19. Vaiselbuh SR, Bryceson YT, Allen CE, et al. Updates on histiocytic disorders. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61:1329-1335.
  20. Ravindran A, Goyal G, Go RS, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease displays a unique monocyte-macrophage phenotype characterized by expression of OCT2. Am J Surg Pathol. 2021;45:35-44.
  21. Hoogewerf CJ, van Baar ME, Middelkoop E, et al. Impact of facial burns: relationship between depressive symptoms, self-esteem and scar severity. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014;36:271-276.
  22. Abla O, Jacobsen E, Picarsic J, et al. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and clinical management of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease. Blood. 2018;131:2877-2890.
  23. Al-Khateeb THH. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease of the face: a comprehensive literature review and case report. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2016;74:528-540.
  24. Cheng SP, Jeng KS, Liu CL. Subcutaneous Rosai–Dorfman disease: is surgical excision justified? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005; 19:747-750.
  25. Garcia RA, DiCarlo EF. Rosai-Dorfman disease of bone and soft tissue. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021;146:40-46.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

The authors have no relevant financial disclosures to report.

Correspondence: Mica C.G. Williams, BA, 15 York St, LMP 5040, New Haven, CT 06510 (mica.williams@yale.edu).

Cutis. 2026 April;117(4):E12-E14. doi:10.12788/cutis.1383

Issue
Cutis - 117(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E12-E14
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

The authors have no relevant financial disclosures to report.

Correspondence: Mica C.G. Williams, BA, 15 York St, LMP 5040, New Haven, CT 06510 (mica.williams@yale.edu).

Cutis. 2026 April;117(4):E12-E14. doi:10.12788/cutis.1383

Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

The authors have no relevant financial disclosures to report.

Correspondence: Mica C.G. Williams, BA, 15 York St, LMP 5040, New Haven, CT 06510 (mica.williams@yale.edu).

Cutis. 2026 April;117(4):E12-E14. doi:10.12788/cutis.1383

Article PDF
Article PDF

THE DIAGNOSIS: Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman Disease

The clinical differential diagnosis in our patient included a broad array of soft-tissue neoplasms ranging from benign entities to sarcomas. Histology was notable for a dense, dermal-based, lymphohistiocytic infiltrate with alternating hypocellular and hypercellular areas imparting a marbled appearance on low-power view (Figure, A). Further immunohistochemical staining revealed large, S100-positive histiocytes containing intact inflammatory cells (emperipolesis), which confirmed a diagnosis of cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD)(Figure, B). Our patient elected to undergo surgical removal of the mass, and he will be monitored for recurrence.

CT117004012_e-Fig_AB
FIGURE. A, A punch biopsy from the lesion in the right axilla demonstrated a dense, dermal inflammatory infiltrate with alternating hypocellular and hypercellular zones (H&E, original magnification ×200 and ×300. B, High-power view showed large pale histiocytes containing intact lymphocytes and plasma cells within the cytoplasm (H&E, original magnification ×400

Rosai-Dorfman disease is a non–Langerhans cell histiocytosis that most commonly affects the lymph nodes but can affect other organs including the skin. Rosai-Dorfman disease initially was documented in the medical literature in 1969 by Rosai and Dorfman1 as benign sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. Classic RDD usually manifests with painless cervical lymphadenopathy in children or young adults along with fever, leukocytosis, anemia, polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia, and elevated inflammatory markers.2,3 Extranodal involvement has been reported in up to 43% of cases, with common sites including the skin, central nervous system, and gastrointestinal tract.3,4

Cutaneous RDD is a distinct, less common clinical entity that is limited to the skin and shows no nodal involvement or systemic symptoms such as fever, night sweats, or weight loss.5 Cutaneous RDD classically manifests with localized indurated papules and plaques, but it can manifest with tumorlike lesions in the subcutaneous tissues.6 Cutaneous RDD is very rare, with fewer than 200 known case reports in the literature as of 2014; in comparison to classic forms of RDD, cutaneous RDD has a female predominance.7,8 There are few reports of isolated cutaneous disease manifesting as soft-tissue masses, and our case represents a rare case of cutaneous RDD manifesting as a solitary soft-tissue mass in the axilla.9-11 Diagnosis of cutaneous RDD is challenging due to its variable clinical manifestations and nonspecific imaging findings, requiring clinicopathologic correlation.

Imaging of subcutaneous RDD lesions typically shows well-defined, irregularly shaped masses with homogenous enhancement on computed tomography/ magnetic resonance imaging. Additional imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography is recommended to examine for organ involvement, as RDD lesions have avid uptake.12,13 Imaging may help differentiate RDD lesions from malignant neoplasms prior to biopsy. Additional workup includes baseline laboratory testing with inflammatory markers and a complete blood count for evaluation of laboratory abnormalities seen in classic RDD, including leukocytosis, anemia, or systemic inflammation.12 Following imaging and laboratory testing, definitive diagnosis of RDD necessitates histopathologic examination.

Although cutaneous RDD is clinically distinct from its classic RDD counterpart, the conditions share the same characteristic histologic features.5 Histology is notable for a dense mixed inflammatory infiltrate comprised of large pale histiocytes exhibiting emperipolesis, lymphocytes, plasma cells, and occasional eosinophils and neutrophils. Histiocytes stain positive for CD68, CD163, and S100 and are negative for Langerhans cell markers CD1a and CD207.6

The etiology of RDD remains poorly understood. Classic RDD has been associated with both sporadic and familial forms, with somatic mutations identified in the mitogen-activated protein kinase/KRAS pathway in up to one-third of cases, and less frequently in the BRAF gene.14,15 Germline mutations in familial cases of RDD have been identified in the SLC29A3 gene; mutations in this gene are associated with a spectrum of syndromes with histiocytosis and lymphadenopathy.14,15 In contrast, molecular drivers have yet to be identified in cutaneous RDD lesions, and the current predominant hypothesis is that cutaneous RDD has a reactive or immunologic pathophysiology. Autoimmune diseases, infections, and lymphomas have been reported to co-occur with both classic and cutaneous RDD.15 While subclinical viral infections such as Epstein-Barr virus and human herpesvirus 6 have been identified in RDD cases, studies have failed to prove their role as pathogenic drivers of the disease.14,16,17 Commonly reported comorbidities include systemic lupus erythematous, diabetes, hemolytic anemia, acute/chronic uveitis (though it is controversial whether these cases represent orbital involvement in systemic RDD), and Crohn disease.7,8,18,19 Immunohistochemical findings have supported that cells within RDD are activated monocytes responding to T-cell cytokine signaling following an infectious or immunologic insult.20,21

Consensus guidelines on treatment for cutaneous RDD recommend either observation for asymptomatic disease or surgical excision for unifocal lesions with consideration of systemic therapy for refractory cutaneous disease.22,23 Most patients with cutaneous RDD have self-limited disease, but long-term follow-up is recommended following surgical excision to monitor for recurrence, especially if there is a residual positive margin.24 Radiation therapy also may have to be utilized for residual or recurrent disease that becomes symptomatic; however, further studies are needed to determine its efficacy in limiting recurrence.4,12,25 Systemic treatment options include immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agents such as corticosteroids, methotrexate, and rituximab.5 There currently are no guidelines on length of follow-up, but surveillance is recommended initially at 4 months, followed by 6- to 12-month intervals.22

THE DIAGNOSIS: Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman Disease

The clinical differential diagnosis in our patient included a broad array of soft-tissue neoplasms ranging from benign entities to sarcomas. Histology was notable for a dense, dermal-based, lymphohistiocytic infiltrate with alternating hypocellular and hypercellular areas imparting a marbled appearance on low-power view (Figure, A). Further immunohistochemical staining revealed large, S100-positive histiocytes containing intact inflammatory cells (emperipolesis), which confirmed a diagnosis of cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD)(Figure, B). Our patient elected to undergo surgical removal of the mass, and he will be monitored for recurrence.

CT117004012_e-Fig_AB
FIGURE. A, A punch biopsy from the lesion in the right axilla demonstrated a dense, dermal inflammatory infiltrate with alternating hypocellular and hypercellular zones (H&E, original magnification ×200 and ×300. B, High-power view showed large pale histiocytes containing intact lymphocytes and plasma cells within the cytoplasm (H&E, original magnification ×400

Rosai-Dorfman disease is a non–Langerhans cell histiocytosis that most commonly affects the lymph nodes but can affect other organs including the skin. Rosai-Dorfman disease initially was documented in the medical literature in 1969 by Rosai and Dorfman1 as benign sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. Classic RDD usually manifests with painless cervical lymphadenopathy in children or young adults along with fever, leukocytosis, anemia, polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia, and elevated inflammatory markers.2,3 Extranodal involvement has been reported in up to 43% of cases, with common sites including the skin, central nervous system, and gastrointestinal tract.3,4

Cutaneous RDD is a distinct, less common clinical entity that is limited to the skin and shows no nodal involvement or systemic symptoms such as fever, night sweats, or weight loss.5 Cutaneous RDD classically manifests with localized indurated papules and plaques, but it can manifest with tumorlike lesions in the subcutaneous tissues.6 Cutaneous RDD is very rare, with fewer than 200 known case reports in the literature as of 2014; in comparison to classic forms of RDD, cutaneous RDD has a female predominance.7,8 There are few reports of isolated cutaneous disease manifesting as soft-tissue masses, and our case represents a rare case of cutaneous RDD manifesting as a solitary soft-tissue mass in the axilla.9-11 Diagnosis of cutaneous RDD is challenging due to its variable clinical manifestations and nonspecific imaging findings, requiring clinicopathologic correlation.

Imaging of subcutaneous RDD lesions typically shows well-defined, irregularly shaped masses with homogenous enhancement on computed tomography/ magnetic resonance imaging. Additional imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography is recommended to examine for organ involvement, as RDD lesions have avid uptake.12,13 Imaging may help differentiate RDD lesions from malignant neoplasms prior to biopsy. Additional workup includes baseline laboratory testing with inflammatory markers and a complete blood count for evaluation of laboratory abnormalities seen in classic RDD, including leukocytosis, anemia, or systemic inflammation.12 Following imaging and laboratory testing, definitive diagnosis of RDD necessitates histopathologic examination.

Although cutaneous RDD is clinically distinct from its classic RDD counterpart, the conditions share the same characteristic histologic features.5 Histology is notable for a dense mixed inflammatory infiltrate comprised of large pale histiocytes exhibiting emperipolesis, lymphocytes, plasma cells, and occasional eosinophils and neutrophils. Histiocytes stain positive for CD68, CD163, and S100 and are negative for Langerhans cell markers CD1a and CD207.6

The etiology of RDD remains poorly understood. Classic RDD has been associated with both sporadic and familial forms, with somatic mutations identified in the mitogen-activated protein kinase/KRAS pathway in up to one-third of cases, and less frequently in the BRAF gene.14,15 Germline mutations in familial cases of RDD have been identified in the SLC29A3 gene; mutations in this gene are associated with a spectrum of syndromes with histiocytosis and lymphadenopathy.14,15 In contrast, molecular drivers have yet to be identified in cutaneous RDD lesions, and the current predominant hypothesis is that cutaneous RDD has a reactive or immunologic pathophysiology. Autoimmune diseases, infections, and lymphomas have been reported to co-occur with both classic and cutaneous RDD.15 While subclinical viral infections such as Epstein-Barr virus and human herpesvirus 6 have been identified in RDD cases, studies have failed to prove their role as pathogenic drivers of the disease.14,16,17 Commonly reported comorbidities include systemic lupus erythematous, diabetes, hemolytic anemia, acute/chronic uveitis (though it is controversial whether these cases represent orbital involvement in systemic RDD), and Crohn disease.7,8,18,19 Immunohistochemical findings have supported that cells within RDD are activated monocytes responding to T-cell cytokine signaling following an infectious or immunologic insult.20,21

Consensus guidelines on treatment for cutaneous RDD recommend either observation for asymptomatic disease or surgical excision for unifocal lesions with consideration of systemic therapy for refractory cutaneous disease.22,23 Most patients with cutaneous RDD have self-limited disease, but long-term follow-up is recommended following surgical excision to monitor for recurrence, especially if there is a residual positive margin.24 Radiation therapy also may have to be utilized for residual or recurrent disease that becomes symptomatic; however, further studies are needed to determine its efficacy in limiting recurrence.4,12,25 Systemic treatment options include immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agents such as corticosteroids, methotrexate, and rituximab.5 There currently are no guidelines on length of follow-up, but surveillance is recommended initially at 4 months, followed by 6- to 12-month intervals.22

References
  1. Rosai J, Dorfman RF. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. a newly recognized benign clinicopathological entity. Arch Pathol. 1969;87:63-70.
  2. Foucar E, Rosai J, Dorfman R. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1990;7:19-73.
  3. Stefanato CM, Ellerin PS, Bhawan J. Cutaneous sinus histiocytosis (Rosai-Dorfman disease) presenting clinically as vasculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:775-778.
  4. Dalia S, Sagatys E, Sokol L, et al. Rosai-Dorfman Disease: tumor biology, clinical features, pathology, and treatment. Cancer Control. 2014;21:322-327.
  5. Bruce-Brand C, Schneider JW, Schubert P. Rosai-Dorfman disease: an overview. J Clin Pathol. 2020;73:697.
  6. Bolognia J, Jorizzo J, Schaffer J. Dermatology. 3rd ed. ed. Elsevier Saunders 2012.
  7. Salva KA, Stenstrom M, Breadon JY, et al. Possible association of cutaneous rosai-dorfman disease and chronic crohn disease: a case series report. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150:177-181.
  8. Brenn T, Calonje E, Granter SR, et al. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease is a distinct clinical entity. Am J Dermatopathol. 2002; 24:385-391.
  9. Betini N, Munger AM, Rottmann D, et al. Rare presentation of Rosai- Dorfman disease in soft tissue: diagnostic findings and surgical treatment. Case Rep Surg. 2022;2022:8440836.
  10. Cravero JC, Ibrahim S. Recurrent soft tissue rosai dorfman disease of right medial thigh lipoma with lymph node involvement. Fed Pract. 2024;41(suppl 2):S20-S23
  11. Tenny SO, McGinness M, Zhang D, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease presenting as a breast mass and enlarged axillary lymph node mimicking malignancy: a case report and review of the literature. Breast J. 2011;17:516-520.
  12. Goyal G, Ravindran A, Young JR, et al. Clinicopathological features, treatment approaches, and outcomes in Rosai-Dorfman disease. Haematologica. 2020;105:348-357.
  13. Li H, Li D, Xia J, et al. Radiological features of Rosai-Dorfman disease: case series and review of the literature. Clin Radiol. 2022;77:E799-E805.
  14. Elbaz Younes I, Sokol L, Zhang L. Rosai-Dorfman disease between proliferation and neoplasia. Cancers. 2022;14:5271.
  15. Ravindran A, Rech KL. How I diagnose Rosai-Dorfman disease. Am J Clin Pathol. 2023;160:1-10.
  16. Kutlubay Z, Bairamov O, Sevim A, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease: a case report with nodal and cutaneous involvement and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2014;36:353-357.
  17. Luppi M, Barozzi P, Garber R, et al. Expression of human herpesvirus 6 antigens in benign and malignant lymphoproliferative diseases. Am J Pathol. 1998;153:815-823.
  18. Wang KH, Chen WY, Liu HN, et al. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease: clinicopathological profiles, spectrum and evolution of 21 lesions in six patients. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154:277-286.
  19. Vaiselbuh SR, Bryceson YT, Allen CE, et al. Updates on histiocytic disorders. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61:1329-1335.
  20. Ravindran A, Goyal G, Go RS, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease displays a unique monocyte-macrophage phenotype characterized by expression of OCT2. Am J Surg Pathol. 2021;45:35-44.
  21. Hoogewerf CJ, van Baar ME, Middelkoop E, et al. Impact of facial burns: relationship between depressive symptoms, self-esteem and scar severity. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014;36:271-276.
  22. Abla O, Jacobsen E, Picarsic J, et al. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and clinical management of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease. Blood. 2018;131:2877-2890.
  23. Al-Khateeb THH. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease of the face: a comprehensive literature review and case report. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2016;74:528-540.
  24. Cheng SP, Jeng KS, Liu CL. Subcutaneous Rosai–Dorfman disease: is surgical excision justified? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005; 19:747-750.
  25. Garcia RA, DiCarlo EF. Rosai-Dorfman disease of bone and soft tissue. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021;146:40-46.
References
  1. Rosai J, Dorfman RF. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy. a newly recognized benign clinicopathological entity. Arch Pathol. 1969;87:63-70.
  2. Foucar E, Rosai J, Dorfman R. Sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (Rosai-Dorfman disease): review of the entity. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1990;7:19-73.
  3. Stefanato CM, Ellerin PS, Bhawan J. Cutaneous sinus histiocytosis (Rosai-Dorfman disease) presenting clinically as vasculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:775-778.
  4. Dalia S, Sagatys E, Sokol L, et al. Rosai-Dorfman Disease: tumor biology, clinical features, pathology, and treatment. Cancer Control. 2014;21:322-327.
  5. Bruce-Brand C, Schneider JW, Schubert P. Rosai-Dorfman disease: an overview. J Clin Pathol. 2020;73:697.
  6. Bolognia J, Jorizzo J, Schaffer J. Dermatology. 3rd ed. ed. Elsevier Saunders 2012.
  7. Salva KA, Stenstrom M, Breadon JY, et al. Possible association of cutaneous rosai-dorfman disease and chronic crohn disease: a case series report. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150:177-181.
  8. Brenn T, Calonje E, Granter SR, et al. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease is a distinct clinical entity. Am J Dermatopathol. 2002; 24:385-391.
  9. Betini N, Munger AM, Rottmann D, et al. Rare presentation of Rosai- Dorfman disease in soft tissue: diagnostic findings and surgical treatment. Case Rep Surg. 2022;2022:8440836.
  10. Cravero JC, Ibrahim S. Recurrent soft tissue rosai dorfman disease of right medial thigh lipoma with lymph node involvement. Fed Pract. 2024;41(suppl 2):S20-S23
  11. Tenny SO, McGinness M, Zhang D, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease presenting as a breast mass and enlarged axillary lymph node mimicking malignancy: a case report and review of the literature. Breast J. 2011;17:516-520.
  12. Goyal G, Ravindran A, Young JR, et al. Clinicopathological features, treatment approaches, and outcomes in Rosai-Dorfman disease. Haematologica. 2020;105:348-357.
  13. Li H, Li D, Xia J, et al. Radiological features of Rosai-Dorfman disease: case series and review of the literature. Clin Radiol. 2022;77:E799-E805.
  14. Elbaz Younes I, Sokol L, Zhang L. Rosai-Dorfman disease between proliferation and neoplasia. Cancers. 2022;14:5271.
  15. Ravindran A, Rech KL. How I diagnose Rosai-Dorfman disease. Am J Clin Pathol. 2023;160:1-10.
  16. Kutlubay Z, Bairamov O, Sevim A, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease: a case report with nodal and cutaneous involvement and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2014;36:353-357.
  17. Luppi M, Barozzi P, Garber R, et al. Expression of human herpesvirus 6 antigens in benign and malignant lymphoproliferative diseases. Am J Pathol. 1998;153:815-823.
  18. Wang KH, Chen WY, Liu HN, et al. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease: clinicopathological profiles, spectrum and evolution of 21 lesions in six patients. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154:277-286.
  19. Vaiselbuh SR, Bryceson YT, Allen CE, et al. Updates on histiocytic disorders. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014;61:1329-1335.
  20. Ravindran A, Goyal G, Go RS, et al. Rosai-Dorfman disease displays a unique monocyte-macrophage phenotype characterized by expression of OCT2. Am J Surg Pathol. 2021;45:35-44.
  21. Hoogewerf CJ, van Baar ME, Middelkoop E, et al. Impact of facial burns: relationship between depressive symptoms, self-esteem and scar severity. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014;36:271-276.
  22. Abla O, Jacobsen E, Picarsic J, et al. Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and clinical management of Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease. Blood. 2018;131:2877-2890.
  23. Al-Khateeb THH. Cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease of the face: a comprehensive literature review and case report. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2016;74:528-540.
  24. Cheng SP, Jeng KS, Liu CL. Subcutaneous Rosai–Dorfman disease: is surgical excision justified? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2005; 19:747-750.
  25. Garcia RA, DiCarlo EF. Rosai-Dorfman disease of bone and soft tissue. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021;146:40-46.
Issue
Cutis - 117(4)
Issue
Cutis - 117(4)
Page Number
E12-E14
Page Number
E12-E14
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline

A Solitary Axillary Subcutaneous Mass

Display Headline

A Solitary Axillary Subcutaneous Mass

Sections
Questionnaire Body

A 34-year-old man presented to our dermatology clinic for evaluation of a lesion in the right axilla of 1 year’s duration that had recently increased in size. The lesion was nontender and intermittently pruritic and was associated with focal hypohidrosis. The patient denied any fevers, chills, or recent weight change. His medical history was otherwise unremarkable. His only medications were daily ashwagandha and vitamin B and C supplements. On physical examination, a firm, 6-cm, subcutaneous nodule was noted in the right axilla with central alopecia and without a clear punctum. He had no palpable cervical, postauricular, or inguinal lymphadenopathy. The left axilla was clear, and there were no other relevant skin findings. Laboratory testing including a complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and sexually transmitted infections panel was unremarkable. Ultrasonography and subsequent magnetic resonance imaging of the right axilla showed a 4.9-cm nodule located in the subcutaneous fat with minimal deep infiltration and relatively smooth margins. An incisional biopsy of the lesion was performed.

Williams-PC-0326-Quiz
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
survey writer start date