User login
CASE 1 › Lola A is a 28-year-old woman with a history of muscular aches and joint pain throughout her body, fatigue, and mental fogginess. She has been seen by a rheumatologist and has been given a diagnosis of fibromyalgia, but just moved to your town and is establishing care. She is feeling desperate because her pain has worsened and the medication previously prescribed (gabapentin 300 mg tid) is no longer working. She asks to try oxycodone.
CASE 2 › Matt P is a 59-year-old truck driver with severe hip osteoarthritis (OA). His orthopedist recommended against hip replacement at this time because of his young age and a heart condition that makes him high risk. His pain makes sitting for long periods very difficult. He presents to you for help because he is worried he will be unable to continue working.
CASE 3 › Keith B is a 56-year-old construction worker who has been suffering from bouts of back pain for many years. The pain has become more debilitating over time; currently, it is constant, and Mr. B can hardly make it through his work day. He has been getting hydrocodone/acetaminophen from urgent care centers and emergency rooms, but he isn’t sure it is helping and is coming to you to assume his pain management.
Chronic pain (defined as pain >3 months in duration), is a complex, heterogeneous condition affecting an estimated 116 million US adults.1 Much of the management of chronic pain occurs in primary care settings, placing family physicians (FPs) on the front lines of 2 epidemics: that of chronic pain itself and that of the abuse and misuse of opioid pain medications.
In an effort to improve communication about the risks and benefits of opioid therapy and the safety and effectiveness of pain treatments in general, many professional organizations, health care institutions, and recently the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,2 have published guidelines on the use of opioids for non-malignant chronic pain. With these guidelines in mind—and in light of the latest evidence—we propose the paradigm that follows for the treatment of chronic pain. A critical aspect of this paradigm is determining the pathophysiology underlying a patient’s pain in order to develop a well-rounded, multimodal, evidence-based treatment plan. Detailed here is the application of this approach to the treatment of 3 common chronic pain diagnoses: fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, and low back pain.
Look to the central and peripheral nervous system
Acute pain begins with activation of peripheral nociceptors at the site of injury. This causes depolarization up the spinal cord and through the brain stem to higher cortical centers where the pain is perceived and localized. Descending neural pathways transport both excitatory and inhibitory information from the brain to the periphery via the spinal cord, which either increases or decreases the perception of pain.3
When damage/injury doesn’t correlate with the perception of pain
Until recently, it was assumed that chronic pain worked much the same way as acute pain and was caused by ongoing nociceptive input in the periphery, but research has shown us that the central nervous system can play a large role in the modulation of nociception. This new understanding comes from the lack of evidence pointing to any pain state in which the degree of nociceptive input correlates with the degree of pain experienced.
For most patients with chronic pain, regardless of their diagnosis, there is some degree of alteration in the processing of nociceptive signals by the central nervous system contributing to the experience of pain.4 This alteration is thought to be the result of peripheral nociceptive signaling persisting past the point of tissue healing, leading to a hypersensitivity of nerve fibers; the fibers then continue to respond to low, or even absent, sensory stimuli.
Central sensitization is the term used when this hypersensitivity develops in the superficial, deep, and ventral cord nerves. When this happens, pain is often accompanied by other systemic symptoms such as fatigue and slowed cognitive processing, often in the setting of little to no actual stimulation of the peripheral nociceptors.3 (For more on this, see “A new paradigm for pain?” J Fam Pract. 2016;65:598-605 or go to http://www.mdedge.com/jfponline/article/111257/pain/new-paradigm-pain.)
TABLE 14 lists the possible mechanisms of pain, which can be broken down into 4 categories: peripheral nociceptive (inflammatory or mechanical), peripheral neuropathic (underlying damage to a peripheral nerve), central (referring to when the central nervous system is the primary entity involved in maintaining the pain), or any combination of the 3.
As pain becomes chronic, multiple mechanisms overlap
It is important to remember that for any single pain diagnosis, there is likely to be—at least initially—a principle underlying mechanism generating the pain. But as the pain becomes chronic, an overlap of multiple mechanisms develops, with central sensitization often playing a more dominant role than peripheral stimulation (regardless of the diagnosis).
For example, in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), peripheral nociceptive input (in the form of inflammation) is likely the initial mechanism at work, but as time goes on, central processing becomes more involved. The patient may then begin to experience pain that is disproportional to what is generally expected with RA and may develop other somatic symptoms. The diagnosis then becomes pain primarily related to RA with central sensitization, and both need to be addressed in a treatment plan. In rheumatic conditions, comorbid fibromyalgia (indicative of central sensitization) is thought to occur in 15% to 30% of patients.5
FPs can utilize the underlying mechanisms to cut across diagnostic labels and tailor treatments to those that are most likely to be effective. For a patient with more prominent peripheral involvement, a procedural intervention such as injections or surgery alone may suffice, whereas a broader approach including psychotherapy, medications, exercise, and other lifestyle interventions may be necessary for a patient with pain caused predominantly by central sensitization.
Addressing both peripheral and central components is essential. One prospective, observational cohort study of more than 600 patients scheduled for unilateral total knee or total hip arthroplasty found that those patients with a higher degree of centralization of pain (as measured by widespread pain index and modified fibromyalgia screening scales6) were less likely to report improvement in the affected body part and in overall body pain following the surgery.7
There is a high degree of overlap among many of the chronic pain syndromes (fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, interstitial cystitis, chronic headaches) that have been found to have a central sensitization component.8 Providers of primary care are aptly positioned to recognize central sensitization as the underlying pathology and target treatment effectively.
Tailor the treatment plan to the underlying mechanisms of pain
As with any chronic condition, a thorough work-up (complete with history, physical exam, and diagnostic testing, as appropriate) is indicated. In the setting of chronic pain, it’s important to identify both the primary mechanism, as well as secondary factors that may be contributing to the patient’s pain, before developing your treatment plan. These secondary factors may include co-occurring affect disorders,9 a history of trauma,10 poor sleep,11 and tobacco use,12 among others. A history of trauma, for example, co-exists with many pain syndromes. For these patients, central sensitization is responsible for much of their pain. As a result, traditional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may not be the best option because of its focus on accepting pain as a chronic diagnosis; more trauma-focused treatments such as those dealing in emotional awareness and understanding of the central nervous system’s role in chronic pain need to be considered.13
3 common conditions. Below we present evidence-based treatment approaches for 3 conditions that are typically associated with each of the major mechanisms of chronic pain generation: fibromyalgia (a central sensitization cause), OA (a peripheral nociceptive cause), and low back pain (a mixed pain state).
Fibromyalgia: A case of central sensitization
Fibromyalgia is a hallmark diagnosis for those patients in whom central sensitization is the dominant cause of pain. These patients usually present with widespread, diffuse pain, as well as somatic symptoms such as fatigue, memory difficulties, and poor sleep quality.8 When explaining the pain mechanism (ie, central sensitization) to patients, it may be useful to use the analogy of a volume control dial that is stuck in the “high” position and can’t be turned down.
Genes, the environment, and neurotransmitters play a role. The origin of the pain amplification process is believed to be multifactorial.
- Genetic factors are thought to contribute to a predisposition for amplification. To date, 5 sets of genes have been implicated in increased sensitivity to pain leading to increased risk of the development of chronic pain during a patient’s lifetime.14-19
- Environmental factors (eg, early life trauma, physical trauma especially to the trunk, certain infections such as Lyme disease and Epstein-Barr virus, and emotional stress) may trigger or exacerbate symptoms.8 Of note: Only about 5% to 10% of people who experience these triggers actually develop a chronic pain state, while the rest regain their baseline health.4 This raises the question of whether there is a point during an acute pain episode in which one can intervene and prevent the acute pain from becoming chronic in those at higher risk.4
- Imbalances of neurotransmitters (high glutamate;20 low norepinephrine, serotonin,21 and gamma-aminobutyric acid [GABA]22) play a role in central amplification. These substances not only affect sensory transmission, but also control levels of alertness, sleep, mood, and memory.
The diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia were modified in 2011 to remove the tender point examination and to add in somatic symptoms.6 These criteria can be useful in the clinical setting in identifying not only fibromyalgia itself but also the degree of “fibromyalgianess” a patient has, which is an indicator of how large a role the centralization process plays in the maintenance of chronic pain.23,24
Treatment: Multimodal and patient empowering. Evidence-based treatment options for fibromyalgia, as well as other conditions for which there is a high degree of centralized pain, can be found in TABLE 2.25-36 Multimodal treatment, with an emphasis on patient knowledge and empowerment, is generally thought to be the most beneficial.25,37 Treatment should almost always include CBT and exercise/activity therapies,26,29 which have high degrees of efficacy with few adverse effects.
In terms of medication, centrally-acting agents (tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs], and alpha 2 delta ligands) are the most effective. There is little to no data showing benefit from anti-inflammatories or opioids in the setting of fibromyalgia. There is some data to suggest that combination therapy, for example with an SNRI (milnacipran) and an alpha 2 delta ligand (pregabalin), may provide more benefit than treating with pregabalin alone.38
Complementary and alternative therapies (eg, yoga, chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage) are being studied more, and while evidence is only preliminary in terms of efficacy, there is increasing emphasis being placed on the need for patients with chronic pain to shift their treatment expectations to greater acceptance of pain and the need for ongoing self-care.28 (For more advice on managing fibromyalgia, see the related videos at http://bit.ly/2lPEt0f and http://bit.ly/2lmjEcn.)
Osteoarthritis: An example of peripheral nociceptive pain
OA is a condition long thought to be characterized by damage to the cartilage and bone; however, as with many other pain diagnoses, there is frequently little correlation between damage seen on radiographs and the amount of pain that patients experience.
One study analyzed data on almost 7000 patients from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I) and found that between 30% and 50% of OA patients with moderate to severe radiographic changes were asymptomatic, and 10% of those with moderate to severe pain had normal radiographs or only mild changes.39 Research is showing that many factors may contribute to this discrepancy, including the typical “wear and tear” of the disease, subacute levels of inflammation that can lead to peripheral sensitization,40 and, in some patients, a centralized pain component. The patients with more centralized pain often have pain that is disproportionate to radiographic evidence, as well as more somatic symptoms such as fatigue, sleep disturbance, and memory issues.41
Treatment should be multimodal and include interventions targeted at halting the progression of damage as well as palliation of pain. All treatment plans for OA should also include exercise, weight reduction, and self-management, in addition to pharmacologic interventions, to reduce both the micro-inflammation and the centralized pain component (when present). Intra-articular injections of various types have been studied with some having more efficacy in pain reduction and functional improvement than others.42-45 See TABLE 342-61 for a summary of evidence-based treatment options.
Low back pain—a mixed pain state
Low back pain (LBP) has been recognized as a mixed pain state for quite some time. While some patients may experience purely nociceptive and/or neuropathic pain, most cases are nonspecific with patients experiencing varying degrees of nociceptive (myofascial low back pain), neuropathic (lumbar radiculopathy), and central sensitization pain.62,63 Evidence for centralized pain is demonstrated in studies showing hyperalgesia,64 augmented central pain processing,65 involvement of the emotional brain,66 and delayed recovery influenced by poor coping strategies.67
When developing a treatment plan for a patient with chronic low back pain, remember that the pain derives from a complex combination of pathophysiologic contributors. Identifying where a patient lies on the pain centralization spectrum can help you tailor treatment.
In one study of 548 patients presenting to a tertiary pain clinic with primary spine pain diagnoses, 42% met diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia.68 Compared to criteria-negative patients, these patients tended to be younger, unemployed, and receiving compensation; they had greater pain intensity, pain interference, and used stronger words to describe their neuropathic pain; they also had higher levels of depression/anxiety and a lower level of physical function.
Because low back pain is a condition with high prevalence and associated disability, many clinical boards have created guidelines for management. These guidelines tend to vary in the strength of evidence used, and the extent to which they are followed in clinical practice remains largely unknown. Recommendations frequently discourage the use of ultrasound/electrotherapy, but many encourage short-term use of medications (see “How effective are opioids for chronic low back pain?” J Fam Pract. 2015;64:584-584), supervised exercise therapy, CBT, and multidisciplinary treatment.
Guidelines tend to differ most widely with regard to recommendations for spinal manipulation and specific drug therapies.69 The classes of drugs that may be most useful when centralized pain is present include the SNRIs and the alpha 2 delta calcium channel ligands.4 See TABLE 470-89 for a summary of evidence-based treatment options.
CASE 1 › Ms. A is started on amitriptyline 25 mg at bedtime, which improves her fatigue and cognitive symptoms. During monthly office visits, her FP educates her about the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia and uses motivational interviewing to get her slowly moving and increasing her activity level. She is weaned off the gabapentin previously prescribed, as her symptoms stabilize and improve.
CASE 2 › Mr. P is sent for a steroid injection, which decreases his pain temporarily. During this time, he begins physical therapy; slowly, with increased movement, his function improves. A trial of duloxetine provides pain relief; that combined with intermittent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has allowed Mr. P to maintain his function and his job.
CASE 3 › Because Mr. B was only taking the narcotics intermittently and wasn’t certain they were helping, CBT was sufficient to wean Mr. B off the medication without any worsening of his pain in the process. By participating in physical therapy, he has learned how to perform certain tasks at his job without pain or injury. He uses NSAIDs as needed for pain.
CORRESPONDENCE
Jill Schneiderhan, MD, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Dr., Lobby H, Suite 2300, Ann Arbor, MI 48105; jillsch@med.umich.edu.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Drs. Daniel Clauw (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) and Martha Rumschlag (Providence Family Medicine Residency Program, Southfield, Mich), for their valuable contributions to this article.
1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education. Relieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011.
2. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain—United States, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65:1-49.
3. Aronoff GM. What do we know about the pathophysiology of chronic pain? Implications for treatment considerations. Med Clin North Am. 2016;100:31-42.
4. Clauw DJ. Diagnosing and treating chronic musculoskeletal pain based on the underlying mechanism(s). Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29:6-19.
5. Clauw DJ, Katz P. The overlap between fibromyalgia and inflammatory rheumatic disease: when and why does it occur? J Clin Rheumatol. 1995;1:335-342.
6. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, et al. Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1113-1122.
7. Brummett CM, Urquhart AG, Hassett AL, et al. Characteristics of fibromyalgia independently predict poorer long-term analgesic outcomes following total knee and hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:1386-1394.
8. Ablin K, Clauw DJ. From fibrositis to functional somatic syndromes to a bell-shaped curve of pain and sensory sensitivity: evolution of a clinical construct. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009;35:233-251.
9. Giesecke T, Gracely RH, Williams DA, et al. The relationship between depression, clinical pain, and experimental pain in a chronic pain cohort. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1577-1584.
10. Tesarz J, Eich W, Treede RD, et al. Altered pressure pain thresholds and increased wind-up in adult chronic back pain patients with a history of childhood maltreatment: a quantitative sensory testing study. Pain. 2016;157:1799-1809.
11. Finan PH, Goodin BR, Smith MT. The association of sleep and pain: an update and a path forward. J Pain. 2013;14:1539-1552.
12. Shi Y, Weingarten TN, Mantilla CB, et al. Smoking and pain: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:977-992.
13. Burger AJ, Lumley MA, Carty JN, et al. The effects of a novel psychological attribution and emotional awareness and expression therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a preliminary, uncontrolled trial. J Psychosom Res. 2016;81:1-8.
14. Zubieta JK, Heitzeg MM, Smith YR, et al. COMT val158met genotype affects mu-opioid neurotransmitter responses to a pain stressor. Science. 2003;299:1240-1243.
15. van Meurs JB, Uitterlinden AG, Stolk L, et al. A functional polymorphism in the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene is associated with osteoarthritis-related pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:628-629.
16. McLean SA, Diatchenko L, Lee YM, et al. Catechol O-methyltransferase haplotype predicts immediate musculoskeletal neck pain and psychological symptoms after motor vehicle collision. J Pain. 2011;12:101-107.
17. Costigan M, Belfer I, Griffin RS, et al. Multiple chronic pain states are associated with a common amino acid-changing allele in KCNS1. Brain. 2010;133:2519-2527.
18. Tegeder I, Costigan M, Griffin RS, et al. GTP cyclohydrolase and tetrahydrobiopterin regulate pain sensitivity and persistence. Nat Med. 2006;12:1269-1277.
19. Amaya F, Wang H, Costigan M, et al. The voltage-gated sodium channel Na(v)1.9 is an effector of peripheral inflammatory pain hypersensitivity. J Neurosci. 2006;26:12852-12860.
20. Harris RE, Napadow V, Huggins JP, et al. Pregabalin rectifies abberrant brain chemistry, connectivity, and functional responses in chronic pain patients. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:1453-1464.
21. Russell IJ, Vaeroy H, Javors M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biogenic amine metabolites in fibromyalgia/fibrositis syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:550-556.
22. Foerster BR, Petrou M, Edden RAE, et al. Reduced insular gamma-aminobutyric acid in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:579-583.
23. Clauw DJ. Fibromyalgia: a clinical review. JAMA. 2014;311:1547-1555.
26. Hauser W, Klose P, Langhorst J, et al. Efficacy of different types of aerobic exercise in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:R79.
27. Porter NS, Jason LA, Boulton A, et al. Alternative medical interventions used in the treatment and management of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16:235-249.
28. Eaves ER, Sherman KJ, Ritenbaugh C, et al. A qualitative study of changes in expectations over time among patients with chronic low back pain seeking four CAM therapies. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:12.
29. Bernardy K, Fuber N, Kollner V, et al. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapies in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:1991-2005.
30. Arnold LM, Keck PE Jr, Welge JA. Antidepressant treatment of fibromyalgia. A meta-analysis and review. Psychosomatics. 2000;41:104-113.
31. Moldofsky H, Harris HW, Archambault WT, et al. Effects of bedtime very low dose cyclobenzaprine on symptoms and sleep physiology in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:2653-2663.
32. Arnold LM. Duloxetine and other antidepressants in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia. Pain Med. 2007;Sep 8 Suppl 2:S63-S74.
33. Häuser W, Bernardy K, Uceyler N, et al. Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with gabapentin and pregabalin—a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain. 2009;145:69-81.
34. Gaskell H, Moore RA, Derry S, et al. Oxycodone for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;Jun 23:CD010692.
35. MacLean AJ, Schwartz TL. Tramadol for the treatment of fibromyalgia. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015;15:469-475.
36. Younger J, Noor N, McCue R, et al. Low-dose naltrexone for the treatment of fibromyalgia: findings of a small, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced, crossover trial assessing daily pain levels. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:529-538.
37. Camerini L, Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Differential effects of health knowledge and health empowerment over patients’ self-management and health outcomes: a cross-sectional evaluation. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89:337-344.
38. Mease PJ, Farmer MV, Palmer RH, et al. Milnacipran combined with pregabalin in fibromyalgia: a randomized, open-label study evaluating the safety and efficacy of adding milnacipran in patients with incomplete response to pregabalin. Ther Adv Musculoskeletal Dis. 2013;5:113-126.
39. Hannan MT, Felson DT, Pincus T. Analysis of the discordance between radiographic changes and knee pain in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:1513-1517.
40. Daghestani HN, Kraus VB. Inflammatory biomarkers in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23:1890-1896.
41. Fingleton C, Smart K, Moloney N, et al. Pain sensitization in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23:1043-1056.
42. Strand V, McIntyre LF, Beach WR, et al. Safety and efficacy of US-approved viscosupplements for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, saline-controlled trials. J Pain Res. 2015;8:217-228.
43. Jüni P, Hari R, Rutjes AW, et al. Intra-articular corticosteroid for knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD005328.
44. Meheux CJ, McCulloch PC, Lintner DM, et al. Efficacy of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:495-505.
45. Wu T, Song HX, Dong Y, et al. Intra-articular injections of botulinum toxin a for refractory joint pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2016.
46. Jordan JL, Holden MA, Mason EE, et al. Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:CD005956.
48. Fransen M, McConnell S, Hernandez-Molina G, et al. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD007912.
49. Bartels EM, Juhl CB, Christensen R, et al. Aquatic exercise for the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3:CD005523.
50. da Costa BR, Reichenbach S, Keller N, et al. Effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of pain in knee and hip osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:2093-2105.
51. Myers J, Wielage RC, Han B, et al. The efficacy of duloxetine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids in osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:76.
52. Berthelot JM, Darrieutort-Lafitte C, Le Goff B, et al. Strong opioids for noncancer pain due to musculoskeletal diseases: not more effective than acetaminophen or NSAIDs. Joint Bone Spine. 2015;82:397-401.
53. Clegg DO, Reda DJ, Harris CL, et al. Glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and the two in combination for painful knee osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:795-808.
54. Wandel S, Jüni P, Tendal B, et al. Effects of glucosamine, chondroitin, or placebo in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;341:c4675.
55. Sawitzke AD, Shi H, Finco MF, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of glucosamine, chondroitin sulphate, their combination, celecoxib or placebo taken to treat osteoarthritis of the knee: 2-year results from GAIT. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1459-1464.
56. Wu D, Huang Y, Gu Y, et al. Efficacies of different preparations of glucosamine for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67:585-594.
57. Kahan A, Uebelhart D, De Vathaire F, et al. Long-term effects of chondroitins 4 and 6 sulfate on knee osteoarthritis: the study on osteoarthritis progression prevention, a two-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:524-533.
58. Perkins K, Sahy W, Beckett RD. Efficacy of curcuma for treatment of osteoarthritis. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2017;22:156-165.
59. Clinton CM, O’Brien S, Law J, et al. Whole-foods, plant-based diet alleviates the symptoms of osteoarthritis. Arthritis. 2015;2015:708152.
60. Manyanga T, Froese M, Zarychanski R, et al. Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:312.
61. Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Maschino AC, et al. Acupuncture for chronic pain: individual patient data meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:1444-1453.
62. Nijs J, Apeldoorn A, Hallegraeff H, et al. Low back pain: guidelines for the clinical classification of predominant neuropathic, nociceptive, or central sensitization pain. Pain Physician. 2015;18:E333-E346.
63. Fishbain DA, Cole B, Lewis JE, et al. What is the evidence that neuropathic pain is present in chronic low back pain and soft tissue syndromes? An evidence-based structured review. Pain Med. 2014;15:4-15.
64. Hübscher M, Moloney N, Rebbeck T, et al. Contributions of mood, pain catastrophizing, and cold hyperalgesia in acute and chronic low back pain: a comparison with pain-free controls. Clin J Pain. 2014;30:886-893.
65. Giesecke T, Gracely RH, Grant MA, et al. Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:613-623.
66. Baliki MN, Chialvo DR, Geha PY, et al. Chronic pain and the emotional brain: specific brain activity associated with spontaneous fluctuations of intensity of chronic back pain. J Neurosci. 2006;26:12165-12173.
68. Brummett CM, Goesling J, Tsodikov A, et al. Prevalence of the fibromyalgia phenotype in patients with spine pain presenting to a tertiary care pain clinic and the potential treatment implications. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:3285-3292.
69. Koes BW, van Tulder M, Lin CW, et al. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:2075-2094.
70. Oliveira VC, Ferreira PH, Maher CG, et al. Effectiveness of self-management of low back pain: systematic review with meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:1739-1748.
71. Engers A, Jellema P, Wensing M, et al. Individual patient education for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD004057.
72. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, et al. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:CD000335.
73. French SD, Cameron M, Walker BF, et al. Superficial heat or cold for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:CD004750.
74. Franke H, Franke JD, Fryer G. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2014;15:286.
75. Franke H, Fryer G, Ostelo RW, et al. Muscle energy technique for non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD009852.
76. Oliphant D. Safety of spinal manipulation in the treatment of lumbar disk herniations: a systematic review and risk assessment. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004:197-210.
77. Furlan AD, Giraldo M, Baskwill A, et al. Massage for low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD001929.
78. Khadilkar A, Odebiyi DO, Brosseau L, et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD003008.
79. Ebadi S, Henschke N, Nakhostin Ansari N, et al. Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD009169.
80. Furlan AD, van Tulder MW, Cherkin DC, et al. Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:CD001351.
81. Chou R, Huffman LH. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:492-504.
82. Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Erro J, et al. Comparing yoga, exercise, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:849-856.
83. Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Balderson BH, et al. Effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction vs cognitive behavioral therapy or usual care on back pain and functional limitations in adults with chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315:1240-1249.
84. Staal JB, de Bie R, de Vet HC, et al. Injection therapy for subacute and chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD001824.
85. Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, et al. Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine. 2009;34:1094-1109.
86. Felson D. Paracetamol is ineffective for spinal pain and knee and hip osteoarthritis. Evid Based Med. 2015;20:205.
87. Machado GC, Maher CG, Ferreira PH, et al. Efficacy and safety of paracetamol for spinal pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials. BMJ. 2015;350:h1225.
88. Enthoven WT, Roelofs PD, Deyo RA, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:CD012087.
89. White AP, Arnold PM, Norvell DC, et al. Pharmacologic management of chronic low back pain: synthesis of the evidence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:S131-S143.
CASE 1 › Lola A is a 28-year-old woman with a history of muscular aches and joint pain throughout her body, fatigue, and mental fogginess. She has been seen by a rheumatologist and has been given a diagnosis of fibromyalgia, but just moved to your town and is establishing care. She is feeling desperate because her pain has worsened and the medication previously prescribed (gabapentin 300 mg tid) is no longer working. She asks to try oxycodone.
CASE 2 › Matt P is a 59-year-old truck driver with severe hip osteoarthritis (OA). His orthopedist recommended against hip replacement at this time because of his young age and a heart condition that makes him high risk. His pain makes sitting for long periods very difficult. He presents to you for help because he is worried he will be unable to continue working.
CASE 3 › Keith B is a 56-year-old construction worker who has been suffering from bouts of back pain for many years. The pain has become more debilitating over time; currently, it is constant, and Mr. B can hardly make it through his work day. He has been getting hydrocodone/acetaminophen from urgent care centers and emergency rooms, but he isn’t sure it is helping and is coming to you to assume his pain management.
Chronic pain (defined as pain >3 months in duration), is a complex, heterogeneous condition affecting an estimated 116 million US adults.1 Much of the management of chronic pain occurs in primary care settings, placing family physicians (FPs) on the front lines of 2 epidemics: that of chronic pain itself and that of the abuse and misuse of opioid pain medications.
In an effort to improve communication about the risks and benefits of opioid therapy and the safety and effectiveness of pain treatments in general, many professional organizations, health care institutions, and recently the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,2 have published guidelines on the use of opioids for non-malignant chronic pain. With these guidelines in mind—and in light of the latest evidence—we propose the paradigm that follows for the treatment of chronic pain. A critical aspect of this paradigm is determining the pathophysiology underlying a patient’s pain in order to develop a well-rounded, multimodal, evidence-based treatment plan. Detailed here is the application of this approach to the treatment of 3 common chronic pain diagnoses: fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, and low back pain.
Look to the central and peripheral nervous system
Acute pain begins with activation of peripheral nociceptors at the site of injury. This causes depolarization up the spinal cord and through the brain stem to higher cortical centers where the pain is perceived and localized. Descending neural pathways transport both excitatory and inhibitory information from the brain to the periphery via the spinal cord, which either increases or decreases the perception of pain.3
When damage/injury doesn’t correlate with the perception of pain
Until recently, it was assumed that chronic pain worked much the same way as acute pain and was caused by ongoing nociceptive input in the periphery, but research has shown us that the central nervous system can play a large role in the modulation of nociception. This new understanding comes from the lack of evidence pointing to any pain state in which the degree of nociceptive input correlates with the degree of pain experienced.
For most patients with chronic pain, regardless of their diagnosis, there is some degree of alteration in the processing of nociceptive signals by the central nervous system contributing to the experience of pain.4 This alteration is thought to be the result of peripheral nociceptive signaling persisting past the point of tissue healing, leading to a hypersensitivity of nerve fibers; the fibers then continue to respond to low, or even absent, sensory stimuli.
Central sensitization is the term used when this hypersensitivity develops in the superficial, deep, and ventral cord nerves. When this happens, pain is often accompanied by other systemic symptoms such as fatigue and slowed cognitive processing, often in the setting of little to no actual stimulation of the peripheral nociceptors.3 (For more on this, see “A new paradigm for pain?” J Fam Pract. 2016;65:598-605 or go to http://www.mdedge.com/jfponline/article/111257/pain/new-paradigm-pain.)
TABLE 14 lists the possible mechanisms of pain, which can be broken down into 4 categories: peripheral nociceptive (inflammatory or mechanical), peripheral neuropathic (underlying damage to a peripheral nerve), central (referring to when the central nervous system is the primary entity involved in maintaining the pain), or any combination of the 3.
As pain becomes chronic, multiple mechanisms overlap
It is important to remember that for any single pain diagnosis, there is likely to be—at least initially—a principle underlying mechanism generating the pain. But as the pain becomes chronic, an overlap of multiple mechanisms develops, with central sensitization often playing a more dominant role than peripheral stimulation (regardless of the diagnosis).
For example, in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), peripheral nociceptive input (in the form of inflammation) is likely the initial mechanism at work, but as time goes on, central processing becomes more involved. The patient may then begin to experience pain that is disproportional to what is generally expected with RA and may develop other somatic symptoms. The diagnosis then becomes pain primarily related to RA with central sensitization, and both need to be addressed in a treatment plan. In rheumatic conditions, comorbid fibromyalgia (indicative of central sensitization) is thought to occur in 15% to 30% of patients.5
FPs can utilize the underlying mechanisms to cut across diagnostic labels and tailor treatments to those that are most likely to be effective. For a patient with more prominent peripheral involvement, a procedural intervention such as injections or surgery alone may suffice, whereas a broader approach including psychotherapy, medications, exercise, and other lifestyle interventions may be necessary for a patient with pain caused predominantly by central sensitization.
Addressing both peripheral and central components is essential. One prospective, observational cohort study of more than 600 patients scheduled for unilateral total knee or total hip arthroplasty found that those patients with a higher degree of centralization of pain (as measured by widespread pain index and modified fibromyalgia screening scales6) were less likely to report improvement in the affected body part and in overall body pain following the surgery.7
There is a high degree of overlap among many of the chronic pain syndromes (fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, interstitial cystitis, chronic headaches) that have been found to have a central sensitization component.8 Providers of primary care are aptly positioned to recognize central sensitization as the underlying pathology and target treatment effectively.
Tailor the treatment plan to the underlying mechanisms of pain
As with any chronic condition, a thorough work-up (complete with history, physical exam, and diagnostic testing, as appropriate) is indicated. In the setting of chronic pain, it’s important to identify both the primary mechanism, as well as secondary factors that may be contributing to the patient’s pain, before developing your treatment plan. These secondary factors may include co-occurring affect disorders,9 a history of trauma,10 poor sleep,11 and tobacco use,12 among others. A history of trauma, for example, co-exists with many pain syndromes. For these patients, central sensitization is responsible for much of their pain. As a result, traditional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may not be the best option because of its focus on accepting pain as a chronic diagnosis; more trauma-focused treatments such as those dealing in emotional awareness and understanding of the central nervous system’s role in chronic pain need to be considered.13
3 common conditions. Below we present evidence-based treatment approaches for 3 conditions that are typically associated with each of the major mechanisms of chronic pain generation: fibromyalgia (a central sensitization cause), OA (a peripheral nociceptive cause), and low back pain (a mixed pain state).
Fibromyalgia: A case of central sensitization
Fibromyalgia is a hallmark diagnosis for those patients in whom central sensitization is the dominant cause of pain. These patients usually present with widespread, diffuse pain, as well as somatic symptoms such as fatigue, memory difficulties, and poor sleep quality.8 When explaining the pain mechanism (ie, central sensitization) to patients, it may be useful to use the analogy of a volume control dial that is stuck in the “high” position and can’t be turned down.
Genes, the environment, and neurotransmitters play a role. The origin of the pain amplification process is believed to be multifactorial.
- Genetic factors are thought to contribute to a predisposition for amplification. To date, 5 sets of genes have been implicated in increased sensitivity to pain leading to increased risk of the development of chronic pain during a patient’s lifetime.14-19
- Environmental factors (eg, early life trauma, physical trauma especially to the trunk, certain infections such as Lyme disease and Epstein-Barr virus, and emotional stress) may trigger or exacerbate symptoms.8 Of note: Only about 5% to 10% of people who experience these triggers actually develop a chronic pain state, while the rest regain their baseline health.4 This raises the question of whether there is a point during an acute pain episode in which one can intervene and prevent the acute pain from becoming chronic in those at higher risk.4
- Imbalances of neurotransmitters (high glutamate;20 low norepinephrine, serotonin,21 and gamma-aminobutyric acid [GABA]22) play a role in central amplification. These substances not only affect sensory transmission, but also control levels of alertness, sleep, mood, and memory.
The diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia were modified in 2011 to remove the tender point examination and to add in somatic symptoms.6 These criteria can be useful in the clinical setting in identifying not only fibromyalgia itself but also the degree of “fibromyalgianess” a patient has, which is an indicator of how large a role the centralization process plays in the maintenance of chronic pain.23,24
Treatment: Multimodal and patient empowering. Evidence-based treatment options for fibromyalgia, as well as other conditions for which there is a high degree of centralized pain, can be found in TABLE 2.25-36 Multimodal treatment, with an emphasis on patient knowledge and empowerment, is generally thought to be the most beneficial.25,37 Treatment should almost always include CBT and exercise/activity therapies,26,29 which have high degrees of efficacy with few adverse effects.
In terms of medication, centrally-acting agents (tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs], and alpha 2 delta ligands) are the most effective. There is little to no data showing benefit from anti-inflammatories or opioids in the setting of fibromyalgia. There is some data to suggest that combination therapy, for example with an SNRI (milnacipran) and an alpha 2 delta ligand (pregabalin), may provide more benefit than treating with pregabalin alone.38
Complementary and alternative therapies (eg, yoga, chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage) are being studied more, and while evidence is only preliminary in terms of efficacy, there is increasing emphasis being placed on the need for patients with chronic pain to shift their treatment expectations to greater acceptance of pain and the need for ongoing self-care.28 (For more advice on managing fibromyalgia, see the related videos at http://bit.ly/2lPEt0f and http://bit.ly/2lmjEcn.)
Osteoarthritis: An example of peripheral nociceptive pain
OA is a condition long thought to be characterized by damage to the cartilage and bone; however, as with many other pain diagnoses, there is frequently little correlation between damage seen on radiographs and the amount of pain that patients experience.
One study analyzed data on almost 7000 patients from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I) and found that between 30% and 50% of OA patients with moderate to severe radiographic changes were asymptomatic, and 10% of those with moderate to severe pain had normal radiographs or only mild changes.39 Research is showing that many factors may contribute to this discrepancy, including the typical “wear and tear” of the disease, subacute levels of inflammation that can lead to peripheral sensitization,40 and, in some patients, a centralized pain component. The patients with more centralized pain often have pain that is disproportionate to radiographic evidence, as well as more somatic symptoms such as fatigue, sleep disturbance, and memory issues.41
Treatment should be multimodal and include interventions targeted at halting the progression of damage as well as palliation of pain. All treatment plans for OA should also include exercise, weight reduction, and self-management, in addition to pharmacologic interventions, to reduce both the micro-inflammation and the centralized pain component (when present). Intra-articular injections of various types have been studied with some having more efficacy in pain reduction and functional improvement than others.42-45 See TABLE 342-61 for a summary of evidence-based treatment options.
Low back pain—a mixed pain state
Low back pain (LBP) has been recognized as a mixed pain state for quite some time. While some patients may experience purely nociceptive and/or neuropathic pain, most cases are nonspecific with patients experiencing varying degrees of nociceptive (myofascial low back pain), neuropathic (lumbar radiculopathy), and central sensitization pain.62,63 Evidence for centralized pain is demonstrated in studies showing hyperalgesia,64 augmented central pain processing,65 involvement of the emotional brain,66 and delayed recovery influenced by poor coping strategies.67
When developing a treatment plan for a patient with chronic low back pain, remember that the pain derives from a complex combination of pathophysiologic contributors. Identifying where a patient lies on the pain centralization spectrum can help you tailor treatment.
In one study of 548 patients presenting to a tertiary pain clinic with primary spine pain diagnoses, 42% met diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia.68 Compared to criteria-negative patients, these patients tended to be younger, unemployed, and receiving compensation; they had greater pain intensity, pain interference, and used stronger words to describe their neuropathic pain; they also had higher levels of depression/anxiety and a lower level of physical function.
Because low back pain is a condition with high prevalence and associated disability, many clinical boards have created guidelines for management. These guidelines tend to vary in the strength of evidence used, and the extent to which they are followed in clinical practice remains largely unknown. Recommendations frequently discourage the use of ultrasound/electrotherapy, but many encourage short-term use of medications (see “How effective are opioids for chronic low back pain?” J Fam Pract. 2015;64:584-584), supervised exercise therapy, CBT, and multidisciplinary treatment.
Guidelines tend to differ most widely with regard to recommendations for spinal manipulation and specific drug therapies.69 The classes of drugs that may be most useful when centralized pain is present include the SNRIs and the alpha 2 delta calcium channel ligands.4 See TABLE 470-89 for a summary of evidence-based treatment options.
CASE 1 › Ms. A is started on amitriptyline 25 mg at bedtime, which improves her fatigue and cognitive symptoms. During monthly office visits, her FP educates her about the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia and uses motivational interviewing to get her slowly moving and increasing her activity level. She is weaned off the gabapentin previously prescribed, as her symptoms stabilize and improve.
CASE 2 › Mr. P is sent for a steroid injection, which decreases his pain temporarily. During this time, he begins physical therapy; slowly, with increased movement, his function improves. A trial of duloxetine provides pain relief; that combined with intermittent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has allowed Mr. P to maintain his function and his job.
CASE 3 › Because Mr. B was only taking the narcotics intermittently and wasn’t certain they were helping, CBT was sufficient to wean Mr. B off the medication without any worsening of his pain in the process. By participating in physical therapy, he has learned how to perform certain tasks at his job without pain or injury. He uses NSAIDs as needed for pain.
CORRESPONDENCE
Jill Schneiderhan, MD, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Dr., Lobby H, Suite 2300, Ann Arbor, MI 48105; jillsch@med.umich.edu.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Drs. Daniel Clauw (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) and Martha Rumschlag (Providence Family Medicine Residency Program, Southfield, Mich), for their valuable contributions to this article.
CASE 1 › Lola A is a 28-year-old woman with a history of muscular aches and joint pain throughout her body, fatigue, and mental fogginess. She has been seen by a rheumatologist and has been given a diagnosis of fibromyalgia, but just moved to your town and is establishing care. She is feeling desperate because her pain has worsened and the medication previously prescribed (gabapentin 300 mg tid) is no longer working. She asks to try oxycodone.
CASE 2 › Matt P is a 59-year-old truck driver with severe hip osteoarthritis (OA). His orthopedist recommended against hip replacement at this time because of his young age and a heart condition that makes him high risk. His pain makes sitting for long periods very difficult. He presents to you for help because he is worried he will be unable to continue working.
CASE 3 › Keith B is a 56-year-old construction worker who has been suffering from bouts of back pain for many years. The pain has become more debilitating over time; currently, it is constant, and Mr. B can hardly make it through his work day. He has been getting hydrocodone/acetaminophen from urgent care centers and emergency rooms, but he isn’t sure it is helping and is coming to you to assume his pain management.
Chronic pain (defined as pain >3 months in duration), is a complex, heterogeneous condition affecting an estimated 116 million US adults.1 Much of the management of chronic pain occurs in primary care settings, placing family physicians (FPs) on the front lines of 2 epidemics: that of chronic pain itself and that of the abuse and misuse of opioid pain medications.
In an effort to improve communication about the risks and benefits of opioid therapy and the safety and effectiveness of pain treatments in general, many professional organizations, health care institutions, and recently the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,2 have published guidelines on the use of opioids for non-malignant chronic pain. With these guidelines in mind—and in light of the latest evidence—we propose the paradigm that follows for the treatment of chronic pain. A critical aspect of this paradigm is determining the pathophysiology underlying a patient’s pain in order to develop a well-rounded, multimodal, evidence-based treatment plan. Detailed here is the application of this approach to the treatment of 3 common chronic pain diagnoses: fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, and low back pain.
Look to the central and peripheral nervous system
Acute pain begins with activation of peripheral nociceptors at the site of injury. This causes depolarization up the spinal cord and through the brain stem to higher cortical centers where the pain is perceived and localized. Descending neural pathways transport both excitatory and inhibitory information from the brain to the periphery via the spinal cord, which either increases or decreases the perception of pain.3
When damage/injury doesn’t correlate with the perception of pain
Until recently, it was assumed that chronic pain worked much the same way as acute pain and was caused by ongoing nociceptive input in the periphery, but research has shown us that the central nervous system can play a large role in the modulation of nociception. This new understanding comes from the lack of evidence pointing to any pain state in which the degree of nociceptive input correlates with the degree of pain experienced.
For most patients with chronic pain, regardless of their diagnosis, there is some degree of alteration in the processing of nociceptive signals by the central nervous system contributing to the experience of pain.4 This alteration is thought to be the result of peripheral nociceptive signaling persisting past the point of tissue healing, leading to a hypersensitivity of nerve fibers; the fibers then continue to respond to low, or even absent, sensory stimuli.
Central sensitization is the term used when this hypersensitivity develops in the superficial, deep, and ventral cord nerves. When this happens, pain is often accompanied by other systemic symptoms such as fatigue and slowed cognitive processing, often in the setting of little to no actual stimulation of the peripheral nociceptors.3 (For more on this, see “A new paradigm for pain?” J Fam Pract. 2016;65:598-605 or go to http://www.mdedge.com/jfponline/article/111257/pain/new-paradigm-pain.)
TABLE 14 lists the possible mechanisms of pain, which can be broken down into 4 categories: peripheral nociceptive (inflammatory or mechanical), peripheral neuropathic (underlying damage to a peripheral nerve), central (referring to when the central nervous system is the primary entity involved in maintaining the pain), or any combination of the 3.
As pain becomes chronic, multiple mechanisms overlap
It is important to remember that for any single pain diagnosis, there is likely to be—at least initially—a principle underlying mechanism generating the pain. But as the pain becomes chronic, an overlap of multiple mechanisms develops, with central sensitization often playing a more dominant role than peripheral stimulation (regardless of the diagnosis).
For example, in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), peripheral nociceptive input (in the form of inflammation) is likely the initial mechanism at work, but as time goes on, central processing becomes more involved. The patient may then begin to experience pain that is disproportional to what is generally expected with RA and may develop other somatic symptoms. The diagnosis then becomes pain primarily related to RA with central sensitization, and both need to be addressed in a treatment plan. In rheumatic conditions, comorbid fibromyalgia (indicative of central sensitization) is thought to occur in 15% to 30% of patients.5
FPs can utilize the underlying mechanisms to cut across diagnostic labels and tailor treatments to those that are most likely to be effective. For a patient with more prominent peripheral involvement, a procedural intervention such as injections or surgery alone may suffice, whereas a broader approach including psychotherapy, medications, exercise, and other lifestyle interventions may be necessary for a patient with pain caused predominantly by central sensitization.
Addressing both peripheral and central components is essential. One prospective, observational cohort study of more than 600 patients scheduled for unilateral total knee or total hip arthroplasty found that those patients with a higher degree of centralization of pain (as measured by widespread pain index and modified fibromyalgia screening scales6) were less likely to report improvement in the affected body part and in overall body pain following the surgery.7
There is a high degree of overlap among many of the chronic pain syndromes (fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, interstitial cystitis, chronic headaches) that have been found to have a central sensitization component.8 Providers of primary care are aptly positioned to recognize central sensitization as the underlying pathology and target treatment effectively.
Tailor the treatment plan to the underlying mechanisms of pain
As with any chronic condition, a thorough work-up (complete with history, physical exam, and diagnostic testing, as appropriate) is indicated. In the setting of chronic pain, it’s important to identify both the primary mechanism, as well as secondary factors that may be contributing to the patient’s pain, before developing your treatment plan. These secondary factors may include co-occurring affect disorders,9 a history of trauma,10 poor sleep,11 and tobacco use,12 among others. A history of trauma, for example, co-exists with many pain syndromes. For these patients, central sensitization is responsible for much of their pain. As a result, traditional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may not be the best option because of its focus on accepting pain as a chronic diagnosis; more trauma-focused treatments such as those dealing in emotional awareness and understanding of the central nervous system’s role in chronic pain need to be considered.13
3 common conditions. Below we present evidence-based treatment approaches for 3 conditions that are typically associated with each of the major mechanisms of chronic pain generation: fibromyalgia (a central sensitization cause), OA (a peripheral nociceptive cause), and low back pain (a mixed pain state).
Fibromyalgia: A case of central sensitization
Fibromyalgia is a hallmark diagnosis for those patients in whom central sensitization is the dominant cause of pain. These patients usually present with widespread, diffuse pain, as well as somatic symptoms such as fatigue, memory difficulties, and poor sleep quality.8 When explaining the pain mechanism (ie, central sensitization) to patients, it may be useful to use the analogy of a volume control dial that is stuck in the “high” position and can’t be turned down.
Genes, the environment, and neurotransmitters play a role. The origin of the pain amplification process is believed to be multifactorial.
- Genetic factors are thought to contribute to a predisposition for amplification. To date, 5 sets of genes have been implicated in increased sensitivity to pain leading to increased risk of the development of chronic pain during a patient’s lifetime.14-19
- Environmental factors (eg, early life trauma, physical trauma especially to the trunk, certain infections such as Lyme disease and Epstein-Barr virus, and emotional stress) may trigger or exacerbate symptoms.8 Of note: Only about 5% to 10% of people who experience these triggers actually develop a chronic pain state, while the rest regain their baseline health.4 This raises the question of whether there is a point during an acute pain episode in which one can intervene and prevent the acute pain from becoming chronic in those at higher risk.4
- Imbalances of neurotransmitters (high glutamate;20 low norepinephrine, serotonin,21 and gamma-aminobutyric acid [GABA]22) play a role in central amplification. These substances not only affect sensory transmission, but also control levels of alertness, sleep, mood, and memory.
The diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia were modified in 2011 to remove the tender point examination and to add in somatic symptoms.6 These criteria can be useful in the clinical setting in identifying not only fibromyalgia itself but also the degree of “fibromyalgianess” a patient has, which is an indicator of how large a role the centralization process plays in the maintenance of chronic pain.23,24
Treatment: Multimodal and patient empowering. Evidence-based treatment options for fibromyalgia, as well as other conditions for which there is a high degree of centralized pain, can be found in TABLE 2.25-36 Multimodal treatment, with an emphasis on patient knowledge and empowerment, is generally thought to be the most beneficial.25,37 Treatment should almost always include CBT and exercise/activity therapies,26,29 which have high degrees of efficacy with few adverse effects.
In terms of medication, centrally-acting agents (tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs], and alpha 2 delta ligands) are the most effective. There is little to no data showing benefit from anti-inflammatories or opioids in the setting of fibromyalgia. There is some data to suggest that combination therapy, for example with an SNRI (milnacipran) and an alpha 2 delta ligand (pregabalin), may provide more benefit than treating with pregabalin alone.38
Complementary and alternative therapies (eg, yoga, chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage) are being studied more, and while evidence is only preliminary in terms of efficacy, there is increasing emphasis being placed on the need for patients with chronic pain to shift their treatment expectations to greater acceptance of pain and the need for ongoing self-care.28 (For more advice on managing fibromyalgia, see the related videos at http://bit.ly/2lPEt0f and http://bit.ly/2lmjEcn.)
Osteoarthritis: An example of peripheral nociceptive pain
OA is a condition long thought to be characterized by damage to the cartilage and bone; however, as with many other pain diagnoses, there is frequently little correlation between damage seen on radiographs and the amount of pain that patients experience.
One study analyzed data on almost 7000 patients from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I) and found that between 30% and 50% of OA patients with moderate to severe radiographic changes were asymptomatic, and 10% of those with moderate to severe pain had normal radiographs or only mild changes.39 Research is showing that many factors may contribute to this discrepancy, including the typical “wear and tear” of the disease, subacute levels of inflammation that can lead to peripheral sensitization,40 and, in some patients, a centralized pain component. The patients with more centralized pain often have pain that is disproportionate to radiographic evidence, as well as more somatic symptoms such as fatigue, sleep disturbance, and memory issues.41
Treatment should be multimodal and include interventions targeted at halting the progression of damage as well as palliation of pain. All treatment plans for OA should also include exercise, weight reduction, and self-management, in addition to pharmacologic interventions, to reduce both the micro-inflammation and the centralized pain component (when present). Intra-articular injections of various types have been studied with some having more efficacy in pain reduction and functional improvement than others.42-45 See TABLE 342-61 for a summary of evidence-based treatment options.
Low back pain—a mixed pain state
Low back pain (LBP) has been recognized as a mixed pain state for quite some time. While some patients may experience purely nociceptive and/or neuropathic pain, most cases are nonspecific with patients experiencing varying degrees of nociceptive (myofascial low back pain), neuropathic (lumbar radiculopathy), and central sensitization pain.62,63 Evidence for centralized pain is demonstrated in studies showing hyperalgesia,64 augmented central pain processing,65 involvement of the emotional brain,66 and delayed recovery influenced by poor coping strategies.67
When developing a treatment plan for a patient with chronic low back pain, remember that the pain derives from a complex combination of pathophysiologic contributors. Identifying where a patient lies on the pain centralization spectrum can help you tailor treatment.
In one study of 548 patients presenting to a tertiary pain clinic with primary spine pain diagnoses, 42% met diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia.68 Compared to criteria-negative patients, these patients tended to be younger, unemployed, and receiving compensation; they had greater pain intensity, pain interference, and used stronger words to describe their neuropathic pain; they also had higher levels of depression/anxiety and a lower level of physical function.
Because low back pain is a condition with high prevalence and associated disability, many clinical boards have created guidelines for management. These guidelines tend to vary in the strength of evidence used, and the extent to which they are followed in clinical practice remains largely unknown. Recommendations frequently discourage the use of ultrasound/electrotherapy, but many encourage short-term use of medications (see “How effective are opioids for chronic low back pain?” J Fam Pract. 2015;64:584-584), supervised exercise therapy, CBT, and multidisciplinary treatment.
Guidelines tend to differ most widely with regard to recommendations for spinal manipulation and specific drug therapies.69 The classes of drugs that may be most useful when centralized pain is present include the SNRIs and the alpha 2 delta calcium channel ligands.4 See TABLE 470-89 for a summary of evidence-based treatment options.
CASE 1 › Ms. A is started on amitriptyline 25 mg at bedtime, which improves her fatigue and cognitive symptoms. During monthly office visits, her FP educates her about the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia and uses motivational interviewing to get her slowly moving and increasing her activity level. She is weaned off the gabapentin previously prescribed, as her symptoms stabilize and improve.
CASE 2 › Mr. P is sent for a steroid injection, which decreases his pain temporarily. During this time, he begins physical therapy; slowly, with increased movement, his function improves. A trial of duloxetine provides pain relief; that combined with intermittent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has allowed Mr. P to maintain his function and his job.
CASE 3 › Because Mr. B was only taking the narcotics intermittently and wasn’t certain they were helping, CBT was sufficient to wean Mr. B off the medication without any worsening of his pain in the process. By participating in physical therapy, he has learned how to perform certain tasks at his job without pain or injury. He uses NSAIDs as needed for pain.
CORRESPONDENCE
Jill Schneiderhan, MD, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Dr., Lobby H, Suite 2300, Ann Arbor, MI 48105; jillsch@med.umich.edu.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Drs. Daniel Clauw (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) and Martha Rumschlag (Providence Family Medicine Residency Program, Southfield, Mich), for their valuable contributions to this article.
1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education. Relieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011.
2. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain—United States, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65:1-49.
3. Aronoff GM. What do we know about the pathophysiology of chronic pain? Implications for treatment considerations. Med Clin North Am. 2016;100:31-42.
4. Clauw DJ. Diagnosing and treating chronic musculoskeletal pain based on the underlying mechanism(s). Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29:6-19.
5. Clauw DJ, Katz P. The overlap between fibromyalgia and inflammatory rheumatic disease: when and why does it occur? J Clin Rheumatol. 1995;1:335-342.
6. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, et al. Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1113-1122.
7. Brummett CM, Urquhart AG, Hassett AL, et al. Characteristics of fibromyalgia independently predict poorer long-term analgesic outcomes following total knee and hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:1386-1394.
8. Ablin K, Clauw DJ. From fibrositis to functional somatic syndromes to a bell-shaped curve of pain and sensory sensitivity: evolution of a clinical construct. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009;35:233-251.
9. Giesecke T, Gracely RH, Williams DA, et al. The relationship between depression, clinical pain, and experimental pain in a chronic pain cohort. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1577-1584.
10. Tesarz J, Eich W, Treede RD, et al. Altered pressure pain thresholds and increased wind-up in adult chronic back pain patients with a history of childhood maltreatment: a quantitative sensory testing study. Pain. 2016;157:1799-1809.
11. Finan PH, Goodin BR, Smith MT. The association of sleep and pain: an update and a path forward. J Pain. 2013;14:1539-1552.
12. Shi Y, Weingarten TN, Mantilla CB, et al. Smoking and pain: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:977-992.
13. Burger AJ, Lumley MA, Carty JN, et al. The effects of a novel psychological attribution and emotional awareness and expression therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a preliminary, uncontrolled trial. J Psychosom Res. 2016;81:1-8.
14. Zubieta JK, Heitzeg MM, Smith YR, et al. COMT val158met genotype affects mu-opioid neurotransmitter responses to a pain stressor. Science. 2003;299:1240-1243.
15. van Meurs JB, Uitterlinden AG, Stolk L, et al. A functional polymorphism in the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene is associated with osteoarthritis-related pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:628-629.
16. McLean SA, Diatchenko L, Lee YM, et al. Catechol O-methyltransferase haplotype predicts immediate musculoskeletal neck pain and psychological symptoms after motor vehicle collision. J Pain. 2011;12:101-107.
17. Costigan M, Belfer I, Griffin RS, et al. Multiple chronic pain states are associated with a common amino acid-changing allele in KCNS1. Brain. 2010;133:2519-2527.
18. Tegeder I, Costigan M, Griffin RS, et al. GTP cyclohydrolase and tetrahydrobiopterin regulate pain sensitivity and persistence. Nat Med. 2006;12:1269-1277.
19. Amaya F, Wang H, Costigan M, et al. The voltage-gated sodium channel Na(v)1.9 is an effector of peripheral inflammatory pain hypersensitivity. J Neurosci. 2006;26:12852-12860.
20. Harris RE, Napadow V, Huggins JP, et al. Pregabalin rectifies abberrant brain chemistry, connectivity, and functional responses in chronic pain patients. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:1453-1464.
21. Russell IJ, Vaeroy H, Javors M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biogenic amine metabolites in fibromyalgia/fibrositis syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:550-556.
22. Foerster BR, Petrou M, Edden RAE, et al. Reduced insular gamma-aminobutyric acid in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:579-583.
23. Clauw DJ. Fibromyalgia: a clinical review. JAMA. 2014;311:1547-1555.
26. Hauser W, Klose P, Langhorst J, et al. Efficacy of different types of aerobic exercise in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:R79.
27. Porter NS, Jason LA, Boulton A, et al. Alternative medical interventions used in the treatment and management of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16:235-249.
28. Eaves ER, Sherman KJ, Ritenbaugh C, et al. A qualitative study of changes in expectations over time among patients with chronic low back pain seeking four CAM therapies. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:12.
29. Bernardy K, Fuber N, Kollner V, et al. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapies in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:1991-2005.
30. Arnold LM, Keck PE Jr, Welge JA. Antidepressant treatment of fibromyalgia. A meta-analysis and review. Psychosomatics. 2000;41:104-113.
31. Moldofsky H, Harris HW, Archambault WT, et al. Effects of bedtime very low dose cyclobenzaprine on symptoms and sleep physiology in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:2653-2663.
32. Arnold LM. Duloxetine and other antidepressants in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia. Pain Med. 2007;Sep 8 Suppl 2:S63-S74.
33. Häuser W, Bernardy K, Uceyler N, et al. Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with gabapentin and pregabalin—a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain. 2009;145:69-81.
34. Gaskell H, Moore RA, Derry S, et al. Oxycodone for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;Jun 23:CD010692.
35. MacLean AJ, Schwartz TL. Tramadol for the treatment of fibromyalgia. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015;15:469-475.
36. Younger J, Noor N, McCue R, et al. Low-dose naltrexone for the treatment of fibromyalgia: findings of a small, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced, crossover trial assessing daily pain levels. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:529-538.
37. Camerini L, Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Differential effects of health knowledge and health empowerment over patients’ self-management and health outcomes: a cross-sectional evaluation. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89:337-344.
38. Mease PJ, Farmer MV, Palmer RH, et al. Milnacipran combined with pregabalin in fibromyalgia: a randomized, open-label study evaluating the safety and efficacy of adding milnacipran in patients with incomplete response to pregabalin. Ther Adv Musculoskeletal Dis. 2013;5:113-126.
39. Hannan MT, Felson DT, Pincus T. Analysis of the discordance between radiographic changes and knee pain in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:1513-1517.
40. Daghestani HN, Kraus VB. Inflammatory biomarkers in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23:1890-1896.
41. Fingleton C, Smart K, Moloney N, et al. Pain sensitization in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23:1043-1056.
42. Strand V, McIntyre LF, Beach WR, et al. Safety and efficacy of US-approved viscosupplements for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, saline-controlled trials. J Pain Res. 2015;8:217-228.
43. Jüni P, Hari R, Rutjes AW, et al. Intra-articular corticosteroid for knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD005328.
44. Meheux CJ, McCulloch PC, Lintner DM, et al. Efficacy of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:495-505.
45. Wu T, Song HX, Dong Y, et al. Intra-articular injections of botulinum toxin a for refractory joint pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2016.
46. Jordan JL, Holden MA, Mason EE, et al. Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:CD005956.
48. Fransen M, McConnell S, Hernandez-Molina G, et al. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD007912.
49. Bartels EM, Juhl CB, Christensen R, et al. Aquatic exercise for the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3:CD005523.
50. da Costa BR, Reichenbach S, Keller N, et al. Effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of pain in knee and hip osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:2093-2105.
51. Myers J, Wielage RC, Han B, et al. The efficacy of duloxetine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids in osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:76.
52. Berthelot JM, Darrieutort-Lafitte C, Le Goff B, et al. Strong opioids for noncancer pain due to musculoskeletal diseases: not more effective than acetaminophen or NSAIDs. Joint Bone Spine. 2015;82:397-401.
53. Clegg DO, Reda DJ, Harris CL, et al. Glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and the two in combination for painful knee osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:795-808.
54. Wandel S, Jüni P, Tendal B, et al. Effects of glucosamine, chondroitin, or placebo in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;341:c4675.
55. Sawitzke AD, Shi H, Finco MF, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of glucosamine, chondroitin sulphate, their combination, celecoxib or placebo taken to treat osteoarthritis of the knee: 2-year results from GAIT. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1459-1464.
56. Wu D, Huang Y, Gu Y, et al. Efficacies of different preparations of glucosamine for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67:585-594.
57. Kahan A, Uebelhart D, De Vathaire F, et al. Long-term effects of chondroitins 4 and 6 sulfate on knee osteoarthritis: the study on osteoarthritis progression prevention, a two-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:524-533.
58. Perkins K, Sahy W, Beckett RD. Efficacy of curcuma for treatment of osteoarthritis. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2017;22:156-165.
59. Clinton CM, O’Brien S, Law J, et al. Whole-foods, plant-based diet alleviates the symptoms of osteoarthritis. Arthritis. 2015;2015:708152.
60. Manyanga T, Froese M, Zarychanski R, et al. Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:312.
61. Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Maschino AC, et al. Acupuncture for chronic pain: individual patient data meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:1444-1453.
62. Nijs J, Apeldoorn A, Hallegraeff H, et al. Low back pain: guidelines for the clinical classification of predominant neuropathic, nociceptive, or central sensitization pain. Pain Physician. 2015;18:E333-E346.
63. Fishbain DA, Cole B, Lewis JE, et al. What is the evidence that neuropathic pain is present in chronic low back pain and soft tissue syndromes? An evidence-based structured review. Pain Med. 2014;15:4-15.
64. Hübscher M, Moloney N, Rebbeck T, et al. Contributions of mood, pain catastrophizing, and cold hyperalgesia in acute and chronic low back pain: a comparison with pain-free controls. Clin J Pain. 2014;30:886-893.
65. Giesecke T, Gracely RH, Grant MA, et al. Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:613-623.
66. Baliki MN, Chialvo DR, Geha PY, et al. Chronic pain and the emotional brain: specific brain activity associated with spontaneous fluctuations of intensity of chronic back pain. J Neurosci. 2006;26:12165-12173.
68. Brummett CM, Goesling J, Tsodikov A, et al. Prevalence of the fibromyalgia phenotype in patients with spine pain presenting to a tertiary care pain clinic and the potential treatment implications. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:3285-3292.
69. Koes BW, van Tulder M, Lin CW, et al. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:2075-2094.
70. Oliveira VC, Ferreira PH, Maher CG, et al. Effectiveness of self-management of low back pain: systematic review with meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:1739-1748.
71. Engers A, Jellema P, Wensing M, et al. Individual patient education for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD004057.
72. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, et al. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:CD000335.
73. French SD, Cameron M, Walker BF, et al. Superficial heat or cold for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:CD004750.
74. Franke H, Franke JD, Fryer G. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2014;15:286.
75. Franke H, Fryer G, Ostelo RW, et al. Muscle energy technique for non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD009852.
76. Oliphant D. Safety of spinal manipulation in the treatment of lumbar disk herniations: a systematic review and risk assessment. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004:197-210.
77. Furlan AD, Giraldo M, Baskwill A, et al. Massage for low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD001929.
78. Khadilkar A, Odebiyi DO, Brosseau L, et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD003008.
79. Ebadi S, Henschke N, Nakhostin Ansari N, et al. Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD009169.
80. Furlan AD, van Tulder MW, Cherkin DC, et al. Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:CD001351.
81. Chou R, Huffman LH. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:492-504.
82. Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Erro J, et al. Comparing yoga, exercise, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:849-856.
83. Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Balderson BH, et al. Effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction vs cognitive behavioral therapy or usual care on back pain and functional limitations in adults with chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315:1240-1249.
84. Staal JB, de Bie R, de Vet HC, et al. Injection therapy for subacute and chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD001824.
85. Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, et al. Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine. 2009;34:1094-1109.
86. Felson D. Paracetamol is ineffective for spinal pain and knee and hip osteoarthritis. Evid Based Med. 2015;20:205.
87. Machado GC, Maher CG, Ferreira PH, et al. Efficacy and safety of paracetamol for spinal pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials. BMJ. 2015;350:h1225.
88. Enthoven WT, Roelofs PD, Deyo RA, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:CD012087.
89. White AP, Arnold PM, Norvell DC, et al. Pharmacologic management of chronic low back pain: synthesis of the evidence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:S131-S143.
1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education. Relieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011.
2. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain—United States, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65:1-49.
3. Aronoff GM. What do we know about the pathophysiology of chronic pain? Implications for treatment considerations. Med Clin North Am. 2016;100:31-42.
4. Clauw DJ. Diagnosing and treating chronic musculoskeletal pain based on the underlying mechanism(s). Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29:6-19.
5. Clauw DJ, Katz P. The overlap between fibromyalgia and inflammatory rheumatic disease: when and why does it occur? J Clin Rheumatol. 1995;1:335-342.
6. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, et al. Fibromyalgia criteria and severity scales for clinical and epidemiological studies: a modification of the ACR Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1113-1122.
7. Brummett CM, Urquhart AG, Hassett AL, et al. Characteristics of fibromyalgia independently predict poorer long-term analgesic outcomes following total knee and hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:1386-1394.
8. Ablin K, Clauw DJ. From fibrositis to functional somatic syndromes to a bell-shaped curve of pain and sensory sensitivity: evolution of a clinical construct. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009;35:233-251.
9. Giesecke T, Gracely RH, Williams DA, et al. The relationship between depression, clinical pain, and experimental pain in a chronic pain cohort. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1577-1584.
10. Tesarz J, Eich W, Treede RD, et al. Altered pressure pain thresholds and increased wind-up in adult chronic back pain patients with a history of childhood maltreatment: a quantitative sensory testing study. Pain. 2016;157:1799-1809.
11. Finan PH, Goodin BR, Smith MT. The association of sleep and pain: an update and a path forward. J Pain. 2013;14:1539-1552.
12. Shi Y, Weingarten TN, Mantilla CB, et al. Smoking and pain: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:977-992.
13. Burger AJ, Lumley MA, Carty JN, et al. The effects of a novel psychological attribution and emotional awareness and expression therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a preliminary, uncontrolled trial. J Psychosom Res. 2016;81:1-8.
14. Zubieta JK, Heitzeg MM, Smith YR, et al. COMT val158met genotype affects mu-opioid neurotransmitter responses to a pain stressor. Science. 2003;299:1240-1243.
15. van Meurs JB, Uitterlinden AG, Stolk L, et al. A functional polymorphism in the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene is associated with osteoarthritis-related pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:628-629.
16. McLean SA, Diatchenko L, Lee YM, et al. Catechol O-methyltransferase haplotype predicts immediate musculoskeletal neck pain and psychological symptoms after motor vehicle collision. J Pain. 2011;12:101-107.
17. Costigan M, Belfer I, Griffin RS, et al. Multiple chronic pain states are associated with a common amino acid-changing allele in KCNS1. Brain. 2010;133:2519-2527.
18. Tegeder I, Costigan M, Griffin RS, et al. GTP cyclohydrolase and tetrahydrobiopterin regulate pain sensitivity and persistence. Nat Med. 2006;12:1269-1277.
19. Amaya F, Wang H, Costigan M, et al. The voltage-gated sodium channel Na(v)1.9 is an effector of peripheral inflammatory pain hypersensitivity. J Neurosci. 2006;26:12852-12860.
20. Harris RE, Napadow V, Huggins JP, et al. Pregabalin rectifies abberrant brain chemistry, connectivity, and functional responses in chronic pain patients. Anesthesiology. 2013;119:1453-1464.
21. Russell IJ, Vaeroy H, Javors M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biogenic amine metabolites in fibromyalgia/fibrositis syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:550-556.
22. Foerster BR, Petrou M, Edden RAE, et al. Reduced insular gamma-aminobutyric acid in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:579-583.
23. Clauw DJ. Fibromyalgia: a clinical review. JAMA. 2014;311:1547-1555.
26. Hauser W, Klose P, Langhorst J, et al. Efficacy of different types of aerobic exercise in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12:R79.
27. Porter NS, Jason LA, Boulton A, et al. Alternative medical interventions used in the treatment and management of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16:235-249.
28. Eaves ER, Sherman KJ, Ritenbaugh C, et al. A qualitative study of changes in expectations over time among patients with chronic low back pain seeking four CAM therapies. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:12.
29. Bernardy K, Fuber N, Kollner V, et al. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapies in fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:1991-2005.
30. Arnold LM, Keck PE Jr, Welge JA. Antidepressant treatment of fibromyalgia. A meta-analysis and review. Psychosomatics. 2000;41:104-113.
31. Moldofsky H, Harris HW, Archambault WT, et al. Effects of bedtime very low dose cyclobenzaprine on symptoms and sleep physiology in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:2653-2663.
32. Arnold LM. Duloxetine and other antidepressants in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia. Pain Med. 2007;Sep 8 Suppl 2:S63-S74.
33. Häuser W, Bernardy K, Uceyler N, et al. Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with gabapentin and pregabalin—a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain. 2009;145:69-81.
34. Gaskell H, Moore RA, Derry S, et al. Oxycodone for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;Jun 23:CD010692.
35. MacLean AJ, Schwartz TL. Tramadol for the treatment of fibromyalgia. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015;15:469-475.
36. Younger J, Noor N, McCue R, et al. Low-dose naltrexone for the treatment of fibromyalgia: findings of a small, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced, crossover trial assessing daily pain levels. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:529-538.
37. Camerini L, Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Differential effects of health knowledge and health empowerment over patients’ self-management and health outcomes: a cross-sectional evaluation. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89:337-344.
38. Mease PJ, Farmer MV, Palmer RH, et al. Milnacipran combined with pregabalin in fibromyalgia: a randomized, open-label study evaluating the safety and efficacy of adding milnacipran in patients with incomplete response to pregabalin. Ther Adv Musculoskeletal Dis. 2013;5:113-126.
39. Hannan MT, Felson DT, Pincus T. Analysis of the discordance between radiographic changes and knee pain in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:1513-1517.
40. Daghestani HN, Kraus VB. Inflammatory biomarkers in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23:1890-1896.
41. Fingleton C, Smart K, Moloney N, et al. Pain sensitization in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015;23:1043-1056.
42. Strand V, McIntyre LF, Beach WR, et al. Safety and efficacy of US-approved viscosupplements for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, saline-controlled trials. J Pain Res. 2015;8:217-228.
43. Jüni P, Hari R, Rutjes AW, et al. Intra-articular corticosteroid for knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD005328.
44. Meheux CJ, McCulloch PC, Lintner DM, et al. Efficacy of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma injections in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2016;32:495-505.
45. Wu T, Song HX, Dong Y, et al. Intra-articular injections of botulinum toxin a for refractory joint pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2016.
46. Jordan JL, Holden MA, Mason EE, et al. Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:CD005956.
48. Fransen M, McConnell S, Hernandez-Molina G, et al. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD007912.
49. Bartels EM, Juhl CB, Christensen R, et al. Aquatic exercise for the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3:CD005523.
50. da Costa BR, Reichenbach S, Keller N, et al. Effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of pain in knee and hip osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:2093-2105.
51. Myers J, Wielage RC, Han B, et al. The efficacy of duloxetine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and opioids in osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:76.
52. Berthelot JM, Darrieutort-Lafitte C, Le Goff B, et al. Strong opioids for noncancer pain due to musculoskeletal diseases: not more effective than acetaminophen or NSAIDs. Joint Bone Spine. 2015;82:397-401.
53. Clegg DO, Reda DJ, Harris CL, et al. Glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and the two in combination for painful knee osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:795-808.
54. Wandel S, Jüni P, Tendal B, et al. Effects of glucosamine, chondroitin, or placebo in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;341:c4675.
55. Sawitzke AD, Shi H, Finco MF, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of glucosamine, chondroitin sulphate, their combination, celecoxib or placebo taken to treat osteoarthritis of the knee: 2-year results from GAIT. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1459-1464.
56. Wu D, Huang Y, Gu Y, et al. Efficacies of different preparations of glucosamine for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67:585-594.
57. Kahan A, Uebelhart D, De Vathaire F, et al. Long-term effects of chondroitins 4 and 6 sulfate on knee osteoarthritis: the study on osteoarthritis progression prevention, a two-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:524-533.
58. Perkins K, Sahy W, Beckett RD. Efficacy of curcuma for treatment of osteoarthritis. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2017;22:156-165.
59. Clinton CM, O’Brien S, Law J, et al. Whole-foods, plant-based diet alleviates the symptoms of osteoarthritis. Arthritis. 2015;2015:708152.
60. Manyanga T, Froese M, Zarychanski R, et al. Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:312.
61. Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Maschino AC, et al. Acupuncture for chronic pain: individual patient data meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:1444-1453.
62. Nijs J, Apeldoorn A, Hallegraeff H, et al. Low back pain: guidelines for the clinical classification of predominant neuropathic, nociceptive, or central sensitization pain. Pain Physician. 2015;18:E333-E346.
63. Fishbain DA, Cole B, Lewis JE, et al. What is the evidence that neuropathic pain is present in chronic low back pain and soft tissue syndromes? An evidence-based structured review. Pain Med. 2014;15:4-15.
64. Hübscher M, Moloney N, Rebbeck T, et al. Contributions of mood, pain catastrophizing, and cold hyperalgesia in acute and chronic low back pain: a comparison with pain-free controls. Clin J Pain. 2014;30:886-893.
65. Giesecke T, Gracely RH, Grant MA, et al. Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:613-623.
66. Baliki MN, Chialvo DR, Geha PY, et al. Chronic pain and the emotional brain: specific brain activity associated with spontaneous fluctuations of intensity of chronic back pain. J Neurosci. 2006;26:12165-12173.
68. Brummett CM, Goesling J, Tsodikov A, et al. Prevalence of the fibromyalgia phenotype in patients with spine pain presenting to a tertiary care pain clinic and the potential treatment implications. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:3285-3292.
69. Koes BW, van Tulder M, Lin CW, et al. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:2075-2094.
70. Oliveira VC, Ferreira PH, Maher CG, et al. Effectiveness of self-management of low back pain: systematic review with meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:1739-1748.
71. Engers A, Jellema P, Wensing M, et al. Individual patient education for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD004057.
72. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, et al. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:CD000335.
73. French SD, Cameron M, Walker BF, et al. Superficial heat or cold for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:CD004750.
74. Franke H, Franke JD, Fryer G. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2014;15:286.
75. Franke H, Fryer G, Ostelo RW, et al. Muscle energy technique for non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD009852.
76. Oliphant D. Safety of spinal manipulation in the treatment of lumbar disk herniations: a systematic review and risk assessment. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004:197-210.
77. Furlan AD, Giraldo M, Baskwill A, et al. Massage for low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015:CD001929.
78. Khadilkar A, Odebiyi DO, Brosseau L, et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD003008.
79. Ebadi S, Henschke N, Nakhostin Ansari N, et al. Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD009169.
80. Furlan AD, van Tulder MW, Cherkin DC, et al. Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:CD001351.
81. Chou R, Huffman LH. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:492-504.
82. Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Erro J, et al. Comparing yoga, exercise, and a self-care book for chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:849-856.
83. Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Balderson BH, et al. Effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction vs cognitive behavioral therapy or usual care on back pain and functional limitations in adults with chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315:1240-1249.
84. Staal JB, de Bie R, de Vet HC, et al. Injection therapy for subacute and chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD001824.
85. Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, et al. Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine. 2009;34:1094-1109.
86. Felson D. Paracetamol is ineffective for spinal pain and knee and hip osteoarthritis. Evid Based Med. 2015;20:205.
87. Machado GC, Maher CG, Ferreira PH, et al. Efficacy and safety of paracetamol for spinal pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials. BMJ. 2015;350:h1225.
88. Enthoven WT, Roelofs PD, Deyo RA, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:CD012087.
89. White AP, Arnold PM, Norvell DC, et al. Pharmacologic management of chronic low back pain: synthesis of the evidence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:S131-S143.
PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS
› Recommend cognitive behavioral therapy for most patients suffering from chronic pain. A
› Recommend movement and exercise therapies for all patients with chronic pain. A
› Prescribe anti-inflammatory medications for patients with peripheral nociceptive pain and centrally-acting agents, such as tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and alpha 2 delta ligands, for patients with centralized pain. A
Strength of recommendation (SOR)
A Good-quality patient-oriented evidence
B Inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence
C Consensus, usual practice, opinion, disease-oriented evidence, case series
