Transient Eruption of Verrucous Keratoses During Encorafenib Therapy: Adverse Event or Paraneoplastic Phenomenon?

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 10/16/2024 - 14:51
Display Headline
Transient Eruption of Verrucous Keratoses During Encorafenib Therapy: Adverse Event or Paraneoplastic Phenomenon?

To the Editor:

Mutations of the BRAF protein kinase gene are implicated in a variety of malignancies.1BRAF mutations in malignancies cause the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway to become constitutively active, which results in unchecked cellular proliferation,2,3 making the BRAF mutation an attractive target for inhibition with pharmacologic agents to potentially halt cancer growth.4 Vemurafenib—the first selective BRAF inhibitor used in clinical practice—initially was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2011. The approval of dabrafenib followed in 2013 and most recently encorafenib in 2018.5

Although targeted treatment of BRAF-mutated malignancies with BRAF inhibitors has become common, it often is associated with cutaneous adverse events (AEs), such as rash, pruritus, photosensitivity, actinic keratosis, and verrucous keratosis. Some reports demonstrate these events in up to 95% of patients undergoing BRAF inhibitor treatment.6 In several cases the eruption of verrucous keratoses is among the most common cutaneous AEs seen among patients receiving BRAF inhibitor treatment.5-7

In general, lesions can appear days to months after therapy is initiated and may resolve after switching to dual therapy with a MEK inhibitor or with complete cessation of BRAF inhibitor therapy.5,7,8 One case of spontaneous resolution of vemurafenib-associated panniculitis during ongoing BRAF inhibitor therapy has been reported9; however, spontaneous resolution of cutaneous AEs is uncommon. Herein, we describe verrucous keratoses in a patient undergoing treatment with encorafenib that resolved spontaneously despite ongoing BRAF inhibitor therapy.

A 61-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with pain in the right lower quadrant. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a large ovarian mass. Subsequent bloodwork revealed elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels. The patient underwent a hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, right hemicolectomy with ileotransverse side-to-side anastomosis, right pelvic lymph node reduction, and complete cytoreduction. Histopathology revealed an adenocarcinoma of the cecum with tumor invasion into the visceral peritoneum and metastases to the left ovary, fallopian tube, and omentum. A BRAF V600E mutation was detected.

Two months after the initial presentation, the patient started her first cycle of chemotherapy with a combination of folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin. She completed 11 cycles of this regimen, then was switched to capecitabine and oxaliplatin for an additional 2 cycles due to insurance concerns. At the end of treatment, there was no evidence of disease on CT, thus the patient was followed with observation. However, she presented 10 months later to the emergency department with abdominal pain, and CT revealed new lesions in the liver that were concerning for potential metastases. She started oral encorafenib 300 mg/d and intravenous cetuximab 500 mg weekly; after 1 week, encorafenib was reduced to 150 mg/d due to nausea and loss of appetite. Within 2 weeks of starting treatment, the patient reported the relatively abrupt appearance of more than 50 small papules across the shoulders and back (Figure 1A). She was referred to dermatology, and shave biopsies of 2 lesions—one from the left anterior thigh, the other from the right posterior shoulder—revealed verrucous keratosis pathology (Figure 2). At this time, encorafenib was increased again to 300 mg/d as the patient had been tolerating the reduced dose. She continued to report the appearance of new lesions for the next 3 months, after which the lesions were stable for approximately 2 months. By 2.5 months after initiation of therapy, the patient had ­undergone CT demonstrating resolution of the liver lesions. At 5 months of therapy, the patient reported a stable to slightly reduced number of skin lesions but had begun to experience worsening joint pain, and the dosage of encorafenib was reduced to 225 mg/d. At 7 months of therapy, the dosage was further reduced to 150 mg/d due to persistent arthralgia. A follow-up examination at 10 months of therapy showed improvement in the number and size of the verrucous keratoses, and near resolution was seen by 14 months after the initial onset of the lesions (Figure 1B). At 20 months after initial onset, only 1 remaining verrucous keratosis was identified on physical examination and biopsy. The patient had continued a regimen of encorafenib 150 mg/d and weekly intravenous 500 mg cetuximab up to this point. Over the entire time period that the patient was seen, up to 12 lesions located in high-friction areas had become irritated and were treated with cryotherapy, but this contributed only minorly to the patient’s overall presentation.

FIGURE 1. A, The patient presented with more than 50 verrucous keratoses across the back and shoulders within 2 weeks of initiating encorafenib for treatment of adenocarcinoma. B, Notable improvement was seen in the number and size of the lesions 14 months after the initial onset, despite ongoing encorafenib treatment.

FIGURE 2. A and B, Histopathology revealed hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, and papillomatosis—all features of verrucous keratoses (H&E, original magnifications ×20 and ×40).

Verrucous keratosis is a known cutaneous AE of BRAF inhibitor treatment with vemurafenib and dabrafenib, with fewer cases attributed to encorafenib.5,6 Within the oncologic setting, the eruption of verrucous papules as a paraneoplastic phenomenon is heavily debated in the literature and is known as the Leser-Trélat sign. This phenomenon is commonly associated with adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract, as seen in our patient.10 Based on Curth’s postulates—the criteria used to evaluate the relationship between an internal malignancy and a cutaneous disorder—this was unlikely in our patient. The criteria, which do not all need to be met to suggest a paraneoplastic phenomenon, include concurrent onset of the malignancy and the dermatosis, parallel course, association of a specific dermatosis with a specific malignancy, statistical significance of the association, and the presence of a genetic basis for the association.11 Several features favored a drug-related cutaneous eruption vs a paraneoplastic phenomenon: (1) the malignancy was identified months before the cutaneous eruptions manifested; (2) the cutaneous lesions appeared once treatment had already been initiated; and (3) the cutaneous lesions persisted long after the malignancy was no longer identifiable on CT. Indeed, eruption of the papules temporally coincided closely with the initiation of BRAF inhibitor therapy, arguing for correlation.

As a suspected BRAF inhibitor–associated cutaneous AE, the eruption of verrucous keratoses in our patient is remarkable for its spontaneous resolution despite ongoing therapy. It is speculated that keratinocytic proliferation while on BRAF inhibitor therapy may be caused by a paradoxical increase in signaling through CRAF, another Raf isoform that plays a role in the induction of terminal differentiation of keratinocytes, with a subsequent increase in MAPK signaling.12-14 Self-resolution of this cycle despite continuing BRAF inhibitor therapy suggests the possible involvement of balancing and/or alternative mechanistic pathways that may be related to the immune system. Although verrucous keratoses are considered benign proliferations and do not necessarily require any specific treatment or reduction in BRAF inhibitor dosage, they may be treated with cryotherapy, electrocautery, shave removal, or excision,15 which often is done if the lesions become inflamed and cause pain. Additionally, some patients may feel distress from the appearance of the lesions and desire treatment for this reason. Understanding that verrucous keratoses can be a transient cutaneous AE rather than a persistent one may be useful to clinicians as they manage AEs during BRAF inhibitor therapy.

References
  1. Pakneshan S, Salajegheh A, Smith RA, Lam AK. Clinicopathological relevance of BRAF mutations in human cancer. Pathology. 2013;45:346-356. doi:10.1097/PAT.0b013e328360b61d
  2. Dhomen N, Marais R. BRAF signaling and targeted therapies in melanoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2009;23:529-545. doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2009.04.001
  3. Long GV, Menzies AM, Nagrial AM, et al. Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1239-1246. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.32.4327
  4. Ji Z, Flaherty KT, Tsao H. Targeting the RAS pathway in melanoma. Trends Mol Med. 2012;18:27-35. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2011.08.001
  5. Gouda MA, Subbiah V. Precision oncology for BRAF-mutant cancers with BRAF and MEK inhibitors: from melanoma to tissue-agnostic therapy. ESMO Open. 2023;8:100788. doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.100788
  6. Gençler B, Gönül M. Cutaneous side effects of BRAF inhibitors in advanced melanoma: review of the literature. Dermatol Res Pract. 2016;2016:5361569. doi:10.1155/2016/5361569.
  7. Chu EY, Wanat KA, Miller CJ, et al. Diverse cutaneous side effects associated with BRAF inhibitor therapy: a clinicopathologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:1265-1272. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.04.008
  8. Naqash AR, File DM, Ziemer CM, et al. Cutaneous adverse reactions in B-RAF positive metastatic melanoma following sequential treatment with B-RAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade or vice versa. a single-institutional case-series. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:4. doi:10.1186/s40425-018-0475-y
  9. Maldonado-Seral C, Berros-Fombella JP, Vivanco-Allende B, et al. Vemurafenib-associated neutrophilic panniculitis: an emergent adverse effect of variable severity. Dermatol Online J. 2013;19:16. doi:10.5070/d370x41670
  10. Mirali S, Mufti A, Lansang RP, et al. Eruptive seborrheic keratoses are associated with a co-occurring malignancy in the majority of reported cases: a systematic review. J Cutan Med Surg. 2022;26:57-62. doi:10.1177/12034754211035124
  11. Thiers BH, Sahn RE, Callen JP. Cutaneous manifestations of internal malignancy. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:73-98. doi:10.3322/caac.20005
  12. Hatzivassiliou G, Song K, Yen I, et al. RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. Nature. 2010;464:431-435. doi:10.1038/nature08833
  13. Heidorn SJ, Milagre C, Whittaker S, et al. Kinase-dead BRAF and oncogenic RAS cooperate to drive tumor progression through CRAF. Cell. 2010;140:209-221. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.040
  14. Poulikakos PI, Zhang C, Bollag G, et al. RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signaling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Nature. 2010;464:427-430. doi:10.1038/nature08902
  15. Hayat MA. Brain Metastases from Primary Tumors, Volume 3: Epidemiology, Biology, and Therapy of Melanoma and Other Cancers. Academic Press; 2016.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Alex A. Marti is from the Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City. Drs. Willis and Liu are from the Department of Dermatology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City.

The authors have no relevant financial disclosures to report.

Correspondence: Alex A. Marti, BA, 375 Newton Rd, Iowa City, IA 52242 (alex-marti@uiowa.edu).

Cutis. 2024 September;114(3):E17-E19. doi:10.12788/cutis.1108

Issue
Cutis - 114(3)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E17-E19
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Alex A. Marti is from the Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City. Drs. Willis and Liu are from the Department of Dermatology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City.

The authors have no relevant financial disclosures to report.

Correspondence: Alex A. Marti, BA, 375 Newton Rd, Iowa City, IA 52242 (alex-marti@uiowa.edu).

Cutis. 2024 September;114(3):E17-E19. doi:10.12788/cutis.1108

Author and Disclosure Information

Alex A. Marti is from the Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City. Drs. Willis and Liu are from the Department of Dermatology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City.

The authors have no relevant financial disclosures to report.

Correspondence: Alex A. Marti, BA, 375 Newton Rd, Iowa City, IA 52242 (alex-marti@uiowa.edu).

Cutis. 2024 September;114(3):E17-E19. doi:10.12788/cutis.1108

Article PDF
Article PDF

To the Editor:

Mutations of the BRAF protein kinase gene are implicated in a variety of malignancies.1BRAF mutations in malignancies cause the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway to become constitutively active, which results in unchecked cellular proliferation,2,3 making the BRAF mutation an attractive target for inhibition with pharmacologic agents to potentially halt cancer growth.4 Vemurafenib—the first selective BRAF inhibitor used in clinical practice—initially was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2011. The approval of dabrafenib followed in 2013 and most recently encorafenib in 2018.5

Although targeted treatment of BRAF-mutated malignancies with BRAF inhibitors has become common, it often is associated with cutaneous adverse events (AEs), such as rash, pruritus, photosensitivity, actinic keratosis, and verrucous keratosis. Some reports demonstrate these events in up to 95% of patients undergoing BRAF inhibitor treatment.6 In several cases the eruption of verrucous keratoses is among the most common cutaneous AEs seen among patients receiving BRAF inhibitor treatment.5-7

In general, lesions can appear days to months after therapy is initiated and may resolve after switching to dual therapy with a MEK inhibitor or with complete cessation of BRAF inhibitor therapy.5,7,8 One case of spontaneous resolution of vemurafenib-associated panniculitis during ongoing BRAF inhibitor therapy has been reported9; however, spontaneous resolution of cutaneous AEs is uncommon. Herein, we describe verrucous keratoses in a patient undergoing treatment with encorafenib that resolved spontaneously despite ongoing BRAF inhibitor therapy.

A 61-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with pain in the right lower quadrant. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a large ovarian mass. Subsequent bloodwork revealed elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels. The patient underwent a hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, right hemicolectomy with ileotransverse side-to-side anastomosis, right pelvic lymph node reduction, and complete cytoreduction. Histopathology revealed an adenocarcinoma of the cecum with tumor invasion into the visceral peritoneum and metastases to the left ovary, fallopian tube, and omentum. A BRAF V600E mutation was detected.

Two months after the initial presentation, the patient started her first cycle of chemotherapy with a combination of folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin. She completed 11 cycles of this regimen, then was switched to capecitabine and oxaliplatin for an additional 2 cycles due to insurance concerns. At the end of treatment, there was no evidence of disease on CT, thus the patient was followed with observation. However, she presented 10 months later to the emergency department with abdominal pain, and CT revealed new lesions in the liver that were concerning for potential metastases. She started oral encorafenib 300 mg/d and intravenous cetuximab 500 mg weekly; after 1 week, encorafenib was reduced to 150 mg/d due to nausea and loss of appetite. Within 2 weeks of starting treatment, the patient reported the relatively abrupt appearance of more than 50 small papules across the shoulders and back (Figure 1A). She was referred to dermatology, and shave biopsies of 2 lesions—one from the left anterior thigh, the other from the right posterior shoulder—revealed verrucous keratosis pathology (Figure 2). At this time, encorafenib was increased again to 300 mg/d as the patient had been tolerating the reduced dose. She continued to report the appearance of new lesions for the next 3 months, after which the lesions were stable for approximately 2 months. By 2.5 months after initiation of therapy, the patient had ­undergone CT demonstrating resolution of the liver lesions. At 5 months of therapy, the patient reported a stable to slightly reduced number of skin lesions but had begun to experience worsening joint pain, and the dosage of encorafenib was reduced to 225 mg/d. At 7 months of therapy, the dosage was further reduced to 150 mg/d due to persistent arthralgia. A follow-up examination at 10 months of therapy showed improvement in the number and size of the verrucous keratoses, and near resolution was seen by 14 months after the initial onset of the lesions (Figure 1B). At 20 months after initial onset, only 1 remaining verrucous keratosis was identified on physical examination and biopsy. The patient had continued a regimen of encorafenib 150 mg/d and weekly intravenous 500 mg cetuximab up to this point. Over the entire time period that the patient was seen, up to 12 lesions located in high-friction areas had become irritated and were treated with cryotherapy, but this contributed only minorly to the patient’s overall presentation.

FIGURE 1. A, The patient presented with more than 50 verrucous keratoses across the back and shoulders within 2 weeks of initiating encorafenib for treatment of adenocarcinoma. B, Notable improvement was seen in the number and size of the lesions 14 months after the initial onset, despite ongoing encorafenib treatment.

FIGURE 2. A and B, Histopathology revealed hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, and papillomatosis—all features of verrucous keratoses (H&E, original magnifications ×20 and ×40).

Verrucous keratosis is a known cutaneous AE of BRAF inhibitor treatment with vemurafenib and dabrafenib, with fewer cases attributed to encorafenib.5,6 Within the oncologic setting, the eruption of verrucous papules as a paraneoplastic phenomenon is heavily debated in the literature and is known as the Leser-Trélat sign. This phenomenon is commonly associated with adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract, as seen in our patient.10 Based on Curth’s postulates—the criteria used to evaluate the relationship between an internal malignancy and a cutaneous disorder—this was unlikely in our patient. The criteria, which do not all need to be met to suggest a paraneoplastic phenomenon, include concurrent onset of the malignancy and the dermatosis, parallel course, association of a specific dermatosis with a specific malignancy, statistical significance of the association, and the presence of a genetic basis for the association.11 Several features favored a drug-related cutaneous eruption vs a paraneoplastic phenomenon: (1) the malignancy was identified months before the cutaneous eruptions manifested; (2) the cutaneous lesions appeared once treatment had already been initiated; and (3) the cutaneous lesions persisted long after the malignancy was no longer identifiable on CT. Indeed, eruption of the papules temporally coincided closely with the initiation of BRAF inhibitor therapy, arguing for correlation.

As a suspected BRAF inhibitor–associated cutaneous AE, the eruption of verrucous keratoses in our patient is remarkable for its spontaneous resolution despite ongoing therapy. It is speculated that keratinocytic proliferation while on BRAF inhibitor therapy may be caused by a paradoxical increase in signaling through CRAF, another Raf isoform that plays a role in the induction of terminal differentiation of keratinocytes, with a subsequent increase in MAPK signaling.12-14 Self-resolution of this cycle despite continuing BRAF inhibitor therapy suggests the possible involvement of balancing and/or alternative mechanistic pathways that may be related to the immune system. Although verrucous keratoses are considered benign proliferations and do not necessarily require any specific treatment or reduction in BRAF inhibitor dosage, they may be treated with cryotherapy, electrocautery, shave removal, or excision,15 which often is done if the lesions become inflamed and cause pain. Additionally, some patients may feel distress from the appearance of the lesions and desire treatment for this reason. Understanding that verrucous keratoses can be a transient cutaneous AE rather than a persistent one may be useful to clinicians as they manage AEs during BRAF inhibitor therapy.

To the Editor:

Mutations of the BRAF protein kinase gene are implicated in a variety of malignancies.1BRAF mutations in malignancies cause the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway to become constitutively active, which results in unchecked cellular proliferation,2,3 making the BRAF mutation an attractive target for inhibition with pharmacologic agents to potentially halt cancer growth.4 Vemurafenib—the first selective BRAF inhibitor used in clinical practice—initially was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2011. The approval of dabrafenib followed in 2013 and most recently encorafenib in 2018.5

Although targeted treatment of BRAF-mutated malignancies with BRAF inhibitors has become common, it often is associated with cutaneous adverse events (AEs), such as rash, pruritus, photosensitivity, actinic keratosis, and verrucous keratosis. Some reports demonstrate these events in up to 95% of patients undergoing BRAF inhibitor treatment.6 In several cases the eruption of verrucous keratoses is among the most common cutaneous AEs seen among patients receiving BRAF inhibitor treatment.5-7

In general, lesions can appear days to months after therapy is initiated and may resolve after switching to dual therapy with a MEK inhibitor or with complete cessation of BRAF inhibitor therapy.5,7,8 One case of spontaneous resolution of vemurafenib-associated panniculitis during ongoing BRAF inhibitor therapy has been reported9; however, spontaneous resolution of cutaneous AEs is uncommon. Herein, we describe verrucous keratoses in a patient undergoing treatment with encorafenib that resolved spontaneously despite ongoing BRAF inhibitor therapy.

A 61-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with pain in the right lower quadrant. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a large ovarian mass. Subsequent bloodwork revealed elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels. The patient underwent a hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, right hemicolectomy with ileotransverse side-to-side anastomosis, right pelvic lymph node reduction, and complete cytoreduction. Histopathology revealed an adenocarcinoma of the cecum with tumor invasion into the visceral peritoneum and metastases to the left ovary, fallopian tube, and omentum. A BRAF V600E mutation was detected.

Two months after the initial presentation, the patient started her first cycle of chemotherapy with a combination of folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin. She completed 11 cycles of this regimen, then was switched to capecitabine and oxaliplatin for an additional 2 cycles due to insurance concerns. At the end of treatment, there was no evidence of disease on CT, thus the patient was followed with observation. However, she presented 10 months later to the emergency department with abdominal pain, and CT revealed new lesions in the liver that were concerning for potential metastases. She started oral encorafenib 300 mg/d and intravenous cetuximab 500 mg weekly; after 1 week, encorafenib was reduced to 150 mg/d due to nausea and loss of appetite. Within 2 weeks of starting treatment, the patient reported the relatively abrupt appearance of more than 50 small papules across the shoulders and back (Figure 1A). She was referred to dermatology, and shave biopsies of 2 lesions—one from the left anterior thigh, the other from the right posterior shoulder—revealed verrucous keratosis pathology (Figure 2). At this time, encorafenib was increased again to 300 mg/d as the patient had been tolerating the reduced dose. She continued to report the appearance of new lesions for the next 3 months, after which the lesions were stable for approximately 2 months. By 2.5 months after initiation of therapy, the patient had ­undergone CT demonstrating resolution of the liver lesions. At 5 months of therapy, the patient reported a stable to slightly reduced number of skin lesions but had begun to experience worsening joint pain, and the dosage of encorafenib was reduced to 225 mg/d. At 7 months of therapy, the dosage was further reduced to 150 mg/d due to persistent arthralgia. A follow-up examination at 10 months of therapy showed improvement in the number and size of the verrucous keratoses, and near resolution was seen by 14 months after the initial onset of the lesions (Figure 1B). At 20 months after initial onset, only 1 remaining verrucous keratosis was identified on physical examination and biopsy. The patient had continued a regimen of encorafenib 150 mg/d and weekly intravenous 500 mg cetuximab up to this point. Over the entire time period that the patient was seen, up to 12 lesions located in high-friction areas had become irritated and were treated with cryotherapy, but this contributed only minorly to the patient’s overall presentation.

FIGURE 1. A, The patient presented with more than 50 verrucous keratoses across the back and shoulders within 2 weeks of initiating encorafenib for treatment of adenocarcinoma. B, Notable improvement was seen in the number and size of the lesions 14 months after the initial onset, despite ongoing encorafenib treatment.

FIGURE 2. A and B, Histopathology revealed hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, and papillomatosis—all features of verrucous keratoses (H&E, original magnifications ×20 and ×40).

Verrucous keratosis is a known cutaneous AE of BRAF inhibitor treatment with vemurafenib and dabrafenib, with fewer cases attributed to encorafenib.5,6 Within the oncologic setting, the eruption of verrucous papules as a paraneoplastic phenomenon is heavily debated in the literature and is known as the Leser-Trélat sign. This phenomenon is commonly associated with adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract, as seen in our patient.10 Based on Curth’s postulates—the criteria used to evaluate the relationship between an internal malignancy and a cutaneous disorder—this was unlikely in our patient. The criteria, which do not all need to be met to suggest a paraneoplastic phenomenon, include concurrent onset of the malignancy and the dermatosis, parallel course, association of a specific dermatosis with a specific malignancy, statistical significance of the association, and the presence of a genetic basis for the association.11 Several features favored a drug-related cutaneous eruption vs a paraneoplastic phenomenon: (1) the malignancy was identified months before the cutaneous eruptions manifested; (2) the cutaneous lesions appeared once treatment had already been initiated; and (3) the cutaneous lesions persisted long after the malignancy was no longer identifiable on CT. Indeed, eruption of the papules temporally coincided closely with the initiation of BRAF inhibitor therapy, arguing for correlation.

As a suspected BRAF inhibitor–associated cutaneous AE, the eruption of verrucous keratoses in our patient is remarkable for its spontaneous resolution despite ongoing therapy. It is speculated that keratinocytic proliferation while on BRAF inhibitor therapy may be caused by a paradoxical increase in signaling through CRAF, another Raf isoform that plays a role in the induction of terminal differentiation of keratinocytes, with a subsequent increase in MAPK signaling.12-14 Self-resolution of this cycle despite continuing BRAF inhibitor therapy suggests the possible involvement of balancing and/or alternative mechanistic pathways that may be related to the immune system. Although verrucous keratoses are considered benign proliferations and do not necessarily require any specific treatment or reduction in BRAF inhibitor dosage, they may be treated with cryotherapy, electrocautery, shave removal, or excision,15 which often is done if the lesions become inflamed and cause pain. Additionally, some patients may feel distress from the appearance of the lesions and desire treatment for this reason. Understanding that verrucous keratoses can be a transient cutaneous AE rather than a persistent one may be useful to clinicians as they manage AEs during BRAF inhibitor therapy.

References
  1. Pakneshan S, Salajegheh A, Smith RA, Lam AK. Clinicopathological relevance of BRAF mutations in human cancer. Pathology. 2013;45:346-356. doi:10.1097/PAT.0b013e328360b61d
  2. Dhomen N, Marais R. BRAF signaling and targeted therapies in melanoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2009;23:529-545. doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2009.04.001
  3. Long GV, Menzies AM, Nagrial AM, et al. Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1239-1246. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.32.4327
  4. Ji Z, Flaherty KT, Tsao H. Targeting the RAS pathway in melanoma. Trends Mol Med. 2012;18:27-35. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2011.08.001
  5. Gouda MA, Subbiah V. Precision oncology for BRAF-mutant cancers with BRAF and MEK inhibitors: from melanoma to tissue-agnostic therapy. ESMO Open. 2023;8:100788. doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.100788
  6. Gençler B, Gönül M. Cutaneous side effects of BRAF inhibitors in advanced melanoma: review of the literature. Dermatol Res Pract. 2016;2016:5361569. doi:10.1155/2016/5361569.
  7. Chu EY, Wanat KA, Miller CJ, et al. Diverse cutaneous side effects associated with BRAF inhibitor therapy: a clinicopathologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:1265-1272. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.04.008
  8. Naqash AR, File DM, Ziemer CM, et al. Cutaneous adverse reactions in B-RAF positive metastatic melanoma following sequential treatment with B-RAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade or vice versa. a single-institutional case-series. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:4. doi:10.1186/s40425-018-0475-y
  9. Maldonado-Seral C, Berros-Fombella JP, Vivanco-Allende B, et al. Vemurafenib-associated neutrophilic panniculitis: an emergent adverse effect of variable severity. Dermatol Online J. 2013;19:16. doi:10.5070/d370x41670
  10. Mirali S, Mufti A, Lansang RP, et al. Eruptive seborrheic keratoses are associated with a co-occurring malignancy in the majority of reported cases: a systematic review. J Cutan Med Surg. 2022;26:57-62. doi:10.1177/12034754211035124
  11. Thiers BH, Sahn RE, Callen JP. Cutaneous manifestations of internal malignancy. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:73-98. doi:10.3322/caac.20005
  12. Hatzivassiliou G, Song K, Yen I, et al. RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. Nature. 2010;464:431-435. doi:10.1038/nature08833
  13. Heidorn SJ, Milagre C, Whittaker S, et al. Kinase-dead BRAF and oncogenic RAS cooperate to drive tumor progression through CRAF. Cell. 2010;140:209-221. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.040
  14. Poulikakos PI, Zhang C, Bollag G, et al. RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signaling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Nature. 2010;464:427-430. doi:10.1038/nature08902
  15. Hayat MA. Brain Metastases from Primary Tumors, Volume 3: Epidemiology, Biology, and Therapy of Melanoma and Other Cancers. Academic Press; 2016.
References
  1. Pakneshan S, Salajegheh A, Smith RA, Lam AK. Clinicopathological relevance of BRAF mutations in human cancer. Pathology. 2013;45:346-356. doi:10.1097/PAT.0b013e328360b61d
  2. Dhomen N, Marais R. BRAF signaling and targeted therapies in melanoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2009;23:529-545. doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2009.04.001
  3. Long GV, Menzies AM, Nagrial AM, et al. Prognostic and clinicopathologic associations of oncogenic BRAF in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1239-1246. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.32.4327
  4. Ji Z, Flaherty KT, Tsao H. Targeting the RAS pathway in melanoma. Trends Mol Med. 2012;18:27-35. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2011.08.001
  5. Gouda MA, Subbiah V. Precision oncology for BRAF-mutant cancers with BRAF and MEK inhibitors: from melanoma to tissue-agnostic therapy. ESMO Open. 2023;8:100788. doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.100788
  6. Gençler B, Gönül M. Cutaneous side effects of BRAF inhibitors in advanced melanoma: review of the literature. Dermatol Res Pract. 2016;2016:5361569. doi:10.1155/2016/5361569.
  7. Chu EY, Wanat KA, Miller CJ, et al. Diverse cutaneous side effects associated with BRAF inhibitor therapy: a clinicopathologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:1265-1272. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.04.008
  8. Naqash AR, File DM, Ziemer CM, et al. Cutaneous adverse reactions in B-RAF positive metastatic melanoma following sequential treatment with B-RAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade or vice versa. a single-institutional case-series. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:4. doi:10.1186/s40425-018-0475-y
  9. Maldonado-Seral C, Berros-Fombella JP, Vivanco-Allende B, et al. Vemurafenib-associated neutrophilic panniculitis: an emergent adverse effect of variable severity. Dermatol Online J. 2013;19:16. doi:10.5070/d370x41670
  10. Mirali S, Mufti A, Lansang RP, et al. Eruptive seborrheic keratoses are associated with a co-occurring malignancy in the majority of reported cases: a systematic review. J Cutan Med Surg. 2022;26:57-62. doi:10.1177/12034754211035124
  11. Thiers BH, Sahn RE, Callen JP. Cutaneous manifestations of internal malignancy. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:73-98. doi:10.3322/caac.20005
  12. Hatzivassiliou G, Song K, Yen I, et al. RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. Nature. 2010;464:431-435. doi:10.1038/nature08833
  13. Heidorn SJ, Milagre C, Whittaker S, et al. Kinase-dead BRAF and oncogenic RAS cooperate to drive tumor progression through CRAF. Cell. 2010;140:209-221. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.040
  14. Poulikakos PI, Zhang C, Bollag G, et al. RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signaling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Nature. 2010;464:427-430. doi:10.1038/nature08902
  15. Hayat MA. Brain Metastases from Primary Tumors, Volume 3: Epidemiology, Biology, and Therapy of Melanoma and Other Cancers. Academic Press; 2016.
Issue
Cutis - 114(3)
Issue
Cutis - 114(3)
Page Number
E17-E19
Page Number
E17-E19
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Transient Eruption of Verrucous Keratoses During Encorafenib Therapy: Adverse Event or Paraneoplastic Phenomenon?
Display Headline
Transient Eruption of Verrucous Keratoses During Encorafenib Therapy: Adverse Event or Paraneoplastic Phenomenon?
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Verrucous keratoses are common cutaneous adverse events (AEs) associated with BRAF inhibitor therapy.
  • Verrucous papules may be a paraneoplastic phenomenon and can be differentiated from a treatment-related AE based on the timing and progression in relation to tumor burden.
  • Although treatment of particularly bothersome lesions with cryotherapy may be warranted, verrucous papules secondary to BRAF inhibitor therapy may resolve spontaneously.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Article PDF Media

Persistent Chlorotrichosis With Chronic Sun Exposure

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 02/26/2020 - 11:34
Display Headline
Persistent Chlorotrichosis With Chronic Sun Exposure

 

To the Editor:

Chlorotrichosis, or green hair discoloration, is a dermatologic condition secondary to copper deposition on the hair. It most often is seen among swimmers who have prolonged exposure to chlorinated pools. The classic patient has predisposing chemical, heat, or mechanical damage to the hair shaft and usually lighter-colored hair.1-3 We present a case of chlorotrichosis in a young brunette patient who did not have predisposing factors except for chronic sun exposure.

A 13-year-old healthy adolescent girl with brown hair presented with persistent green hair for 2 years (Figure 1A). She had first noted hair discoloration after swimming in a neighbor’s chlorinated outdoor pool during summertime but experienced year-round persistence even without swimming. She denied any history of typical risk factors for hair damage, including exposure to hair dye or bleach, styling products, heat, or mechanical damage from excessive brushing. Her sister had blonde hair with a history of similar activities and exposures, and although she did style her hair with heat, she did not develop hair discoloration. The patient lived in a newer home, and prior tap water testing did not show elevated levels of copper. She admitted to strictly wearing her hair down at all times, including during strenuous activity and swimming. Excessive teasing at school prompted her mother to seek advice from hair salons. Bleaching test strips of hair reportedly caused paradoxical intensification of green, and the patient declined recommendations for red hair dye. The patient also tried Internet-based suggestions such as topically applying crushed aspirin, lemon juice, tea tree oil, and clarifying shampoos, which all failed to result in notable improvement.

Figure 1. A, Patient with green hair (chlorotrichosis) before treatment. B, Patient’s hair after 2 treatments with penicillamine shampoo.


Physical examination revealed a sun-exposed distribution of ashy green hair that was worse at the distal hair ends and completely spared the roots. Trichoscopy of discolored hair (Figure 2A) revealed diffuse cuticle thinning, whereas unaffected hair appeared normal (Figure 2B). Because the patient reported slight improvement with tea tree oil, treatment was initiated with twice-weekly hot vegetable oil treatments applied for 20 minutes, which ultimately proved unsuccessful. Penicillamine shampoo (250-mg capsule of penicillamine into 5-mL purified water and 5-mL pH-balanced clear shampoo) was then recommended. At 3-month follow-up, the patient exhibited notable improvement of the hair discoloration, with only mild persistence at the distal ends of sun-damaged hair, visible only under fluorescent lighting (Figure 1B). Our recommendations thereafter were focused on prevention (Table).

Figure 2. A, Trichoscopy of chlorotrichosis-affected hair demonstrated diffuse cuticle thinning (original magnification ×4). B, Trichoscopy of unaffected hair showed a thicker healthier cuticle (original magnification ×4).


The source of exogenous copper in chlorotrichosis commonly is tap water flowing through copper pipes or swimming pools rich in chlorine and copper-containing algaecides.2,4,8 The acidity of tap water is thought to cause the release of copper from the pipes.2,5 Such acidity could result from the effects of acid rain on water reservoirs or from water additives such as fluoride2 or those used in decalcification systems.5 Additionally, the attachment of electrical grounds to copper piping can cause copper to solubilize through an electric current, increasing water levels of copper.3 Although low pH facilitates copper solubility, high pH within the hair facilitates copper precipitation, which is quickly followed by adhesion to anionic molecules within hair shafts. Therefore, it is postulated that chlorotrichosis may persist in insufficiently rinsed hair with residual alkaline shampoo.6

Beyond pH flux in the induction of chlorotrichosis, other environmental agents have been suspected to play a role. A case report of green hair in a black patient following use of selenium sulfide 2.5% shampoo identified hair damage from tinea capitis infection as predisposing to chlorotrichosis.9 Other reports have cited tar shampoo and industrial exposure to cobalt, nickel, brass, mercury, or chromium as causative factors.2,3,6,7 Interestingly, green hair discoloration also has been observed in the metabolic disorder phenylketonuria.1



Few individuals exposed to elevated levels of copper will develop chlorotrichosis, which emphasizes the critical role of predisposing hair damage in its pathogenesis. With violation of the hair cuticle, chlorine can crystallize and copper can adhere to the hair shaft.10 Bleaching and waving of the hair also appear to alter the composition of keratin by increasing the number of cysteic acid and similar anionic sulfonate groups, which can bind copper.8

Although not harmful, chlorotrichosis may be aesthetically undesirable and lead to considerable social ostracism. Without intrinsic hair defects or obvious differences in predisposing factors, the question was raised as to why our patient, as a brunette, experienced dramatic hair discoloration while her blonde sister was entirely unaffected. We postulated that our patient’s persistent green hair may have been due to her unique predisposition to extensive sun-induced and mechanical hair damage because of her unwavering tendency to wear her hair down at all times. A variety of treatments of variable reported efficacy have been proposed (Table); fortunately, if treatments fail, the discoloration resolves with hair growth.



This case is unique in that it presented in a brunette patient with seemingly minimal hair damage with an unaffected blonde-haired sibling and with persistence over years. Furthermore, it lends credence to the use of penicillamine shampoo in treating chlorotrichosis, even in particularly difficult cases in which other treatments have failed.

References
  1. Holmes LB, Goldsmith LA. The man with green hair [letter]. N Engl J Med. 1974;291:1037.
  2. Lampe RM, Henderson AL, Hansen GH. Green hair. JAMA. 1977;237:2092.
  3. Nordlund JJ, Hartley C, Fister J. On the cause of green hair. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:1700.
  4. Goldschmidt H. Green hair. Arch Dermatol. 1979;115:1288.
  5. Hinz T, Klingmuller K, Bieber T, et al. The mystery of green hair. Eur J Dermatol. 2009;19:409-410.
  6. Mascaro JM Jr, Ferrando J, Fontarnau R, et al. Green hair. Cutis. 1995;56:37-40.
  7. Bhat GR, Lukenbach ER, Kennedy RR, et al. The green hair problem: a preliminary investigation. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1979;30:1-8.
  8. Blanc D, Zultak M, Rochefort A, et al. Green hair: clinical, chemical and epidemiologic study. apropos of a case. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1988;115:807-812.
  9. Fitzgerald EA, Purcell SM, Goldman HM. Green hair discoloration due to selenium sulfide. Int J Dermatol. 1997;36:238-239.
  10. Fair NB, Gupta BS. The chlorine-hair interaction. II. effect of chlorination at varied pH levels on hair properties. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1987;38:371-384.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Connor is from Columbia Skin Clinic, South Carolina. Dr. Vidal is from the Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Dr. Liu is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Cody J. Connor, MD, 3600 Forest Dr, Ste 400, Columbia, SC 29204 (codyjconnor@gmail.com).

Issue
Cutis - 105(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E25-E27
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Connor is from Columbia Skin Clinic, South Carolina. Dr. Vidal is from the Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Dr. Liu is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Cody J. Connor, MD, 3600 Forest Dr, Ste 400, Columbia, SC 29204 (codyjconnor@gmail.com).

Author and Disclosure Information

Dr. Connor is from Columbia Skin Clinic, South Carolina. Dr. Vidal is from the Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Dr. Liu is from the Department of Dermatology, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Cody J. Connor, MD, 3600 Forest Dr, Ste 400, Columbia, SC 29204 (codyjconnor@gmail.com).

Article PDF
Article PDF

 

To the Editor:

Chlorotrichosis, or green hair discoloration, is a dermatologic condition secondary to copper deposition on the hair. It most often is seen among swimmers who have prolonged exposure to chlorinated pools. The classic patient has predisposing chemical, heat, or mechanical damage to the hair shaft and usually lighter-colored hair.1-3 We present a case of chlorotrichosis in a young brunette patient who did not have predisposing factors except for chronic sun exposure.

A 13-year-old healthy adolescent girl with brown hair presented with persistent green hair for 2 years (Figure 1A). She had first noted hair discoloration after swimming in a neighbor’s chlorinated outdoor pool during summertime but experienced year-round persistence even without swimming. She denied any history of typical risk factors for hair damage, including exposure to hair dye or bleach, styling products, heat, or mechanical damage from excessive brushing. Her sister had blonde hair with a history of similar activities and exposures, and although she did style her hair with heat, she did not develop hair discoloration. The patient lived in a newer home, and prior tap water testing did not show elevated levels of copper. She admitted to strictly wearing her hair down at all times, including during strenuous activity and swimming. Excessive teasing at school prompted her mother to seek advice from hair salons. Bleaching test strips of hair reportedly caused paradoxical intensification of green, and the patient declined recommendations for red hair dye. The patient also tried Internet-based suggestions such as topically applying crushed aspirin, lemon juice, tea tree oil, and clarifying shampoos, which all failed to result in notable improvement.

Figure 1. A, Patient with green hair (chlorotrichosis) before treatment. B, Patient’s hair after 2 treatments with penicillamine shampoo.


Physical examination revealed a sun-exposed distribution of ashy green hair that was worse at the distal hair ends and completely spared the roots. Trichoscopy of discolored hair (Figure 2A) revealed diffuse cuticle thinning, whereas unaffected hair appeared normal (Figure 2B). Because the patient reported slight improvement with tea tree oil, treatment was initiated with twice-weekly hot vegetable oil treatments applied for 20 minutes, which ultimately proved unsuccessful. Penicillamine shampoo (250-mg capsule of penicillamine into 5-mL purified water and 5-mL pH-balanced clear shampoo) was then recommended. At 3-month follow-up, the patient exhibited notable improvement of the hair discoloration, with only mild persistence at the distal ends of sun-damaged hair, visible only under fluorescent lighting (Figure 1B). Our recommendations thereafter were focused on prevention (Table).

Figure 2. A, Trichoscopy of chlorotrichosis-affected hair demonstrated diffuse cuticle thinning (original magnification ×4). B, Trichoscopy of unaffected hair showed a thicker healthier cuticle (original magnification ×4).


The source of exogenous copper in chlorotrichosis commonly is tap water flowing through copper pipes or swimming pools rich in chlorine and copper-containing algaecides.2,4,8 The acidity of tap water is thought to cause the release of copper from the pipes.2,5 Such acidity could result from the effects of acid rain on water reservoirs or from water additives such as fluoride2 or those used in decalcification systems.5 Additionally, the attachment of electrical grounds to copper piping can cause copper to solubilize through an electric current, increasing water levels of copper.3 Although low pH facilitates copper solubility, high pH within the hair facilitates copper precipitation, which is quickly followed by adhesion to anionic molecules within hair shafts. Therefore, it is postulated that chlorotrichosis may persist in insufficiently rinsed hair with residual alkaline shampoo.6

Beyond pH flux in the induction of chlorotrichosis, other environmental agents have been suspected to play a role. A case report of green hair in a black patient following use of selenium sulfide 2.5% shampoo identified hair damage from tinea capitis infection as predisposing to chlorotrichosis.9 Other reports have cited tar shampoo and industrial exposure to cobalt, nickel, brass, mercury, or chromium as causative factors.2,3,6,7 Interestingly, green hair discoloration also has been observed in the metabolic disorder phenylketonuria.1



Few individuals exposed to elevated levels of copper will develop chlorotrichosis, which emphasizes the critical role of predisposing hair damage in its pathogenesis. With violation of the hair cuticle, chlorine can crystallize and copper can adhere to the hair shaft.10 Bleaching and waving of the hair also appear to alter the composition of keratin by increasing the number of cysteic acid and similar anionic sulfonate groups, which can bind copper.8

Although not harmful, chlorotrichosis may be aesthetically undesirable and lead to considerable social ostracism. Without intrinsic hair defects or obvious differences in predisposing factors, the question was raised as to why our patient, as a brunette, experienced dramatic hair discoloration while her blonde sister was entirely unaffected. We postulated that our patient’s persistent green hair may have been due to her unique predisposition to extensive sun-induced and mechanical hair damage because of her unwavering tendency to wear her hair down at all times. A variety of treatments of variable reported efficacy have been proposed (Table); fortunately, if treatments fail, the discoloration resolves with hair growth.



This case is unique in that it presented in a brunette patient with seemingly minimal hair damage with an unaffected blonde-haired sibling and with persistence over years. Furthermore, it lends credence to the use of penicillamine shampoo in treating chlorotrichosis, even in particularly difficult cases in which other treatments have failed.

 

To the Editor:

Chlorotrichosis, or green hair discoloration, is a dermatologic condition secondary to copper deposition on the hair. It most often is seen among swimmers who have prolonged exposure to chlorinated pools. The classic patient has predisposing chemical, heat, or mechanical damage to the hair shaft and usually lighter-colored hair.1-3 We present a case of chlorotrichosis in a young brunette patient who did not have predisposing factors except for chronic sun exposure.

A 13-year-old healthy adolescent girl with brown hair presented with persistent green hair for 2 years (Figure 1A). She had first noted hair discoloration after swimming in a neighbor’s chlorinated outdoor pool during summertime but experienced year-round persistence even without swimming. She denied any history of typical risk factors for hair damage, including exposure to hair dye or bleach, styling products, heat, or mechanical damage from excessive brushing. Her sister had blonde hair with a history of similar activities and exposures, and although she did style her hair with heat, she did not develop hair discoloration. The patient lived in a newer home, and prior tap water testing did not show elevated levels of copper. She admitted to strictly wearing her hair down at all times, including during strenuous activity and swimming. Excessive teasing at school prompted her mother to seek advice from hair salons. Bleaching test strips of hair reportedly caused paradoxical intensification of green, and the patient declined recommendations for red hair dye. The patient also tried Internet-based suggestions such as topically applying crushed aspirin, lemon juice, tea tree oil, and clarifying shampoos, which all failed to result in notable improvement.

Figure 1. A, Patient with green hair (chlorotrichosis) before treatment. B, Patient’s hair after 2 treatments with penicillamine shampoo.


Physical examination revealed a sun-exposed distribution of ashy green hair that was worse at the distal hair ends and completely spared the roots. Trichoscopy of discolored hair (Figure 2A) revealed diffuse cuticle thinning, whereas unaffected hair appeared normal (Figure 2B). Because the patient reported slight improvement with tea tree oil, treatment was initiated with twice-weekly hot vegetable oil treatments applied for 20 minutes, which ultimately proved unsuccessful. Penicillamine shampoo (250-mg capsule of penicillamine into 5-mL purified water and 5-mL pH-balanced clear shampoo) was then recommended. At 3-month follow-up, the patient exhibited notable improvement of the hair discoloration, with only mild persistence at the distal ends of sun-damaged hair, visible only under fluorescent lighting (Figure 1B). Our recommendations thereafter were focused on prevention (Table).

Figure 2. A, Trichoscopy of chlorotrichosis-affected hair demonstrated diffuse cuticle thinning (original magnification ×4). B, Trichoscopy of unaffected hair showed a thicker healthier cuticle (original magnification ×4).


The source of exogenous copper in chlorotrichosis commonly is tap water flowing through copper pipes or swimming pools rich in chlorine and copper-containing algaecides.2,4,8 The acidity of tap water is thought to cause the release of copper from the pipes.2,5 Such acidity could result from the effects of acid rain on water reservoirs or from water additives such as fluoride2 or those used in decalcification systems.5 Additionally, the attachment of electrical grounds to copper piping can cause copper to solubilize through an electric current, increasing water levels of copper.3 Although low pH facilitates copper solubility, high pH within the hair facilitates copper precipitation, which is quickly followed by adhesion to anionic molecules within hair shafts. Therefore, it is postulated that chlorotrichosis may persist in insufficiently rinsed hair with residual alkaline shampoo.6

Beyond pH flux in the induction of chlorotrichosis, other environmental agents have been suspected to play a role. A case report of green hair in a black patient following use of selenium sulfide 2.5% shampoo identified hair damage from tinea capitis infection as predisposing to chlorotrichosis.9 Other reports have cited tar shampoo and industrial exposure to cobalt, nickel, brass, mercury, or chromium as causative factors.2,3,6,7 Interestingly, green hair discoloration also has been observed in the metabolic disorder phenylketonuria.1



Few individuals exposed to elevated levels of copper will develop chlorotrichosis, which emphasizes the critical role of predisposing hair damage in its pathogenesis. With violation of the hair cuticle, chlorine can crystallize and copper can adhere to the hair shaft.10 Bleaching and waving of the hair also appear to alter the composition of keratin by increasing the number of cysteic acid and similar anionic sulfonate groups, which can bind copper.8

Although not harmful, chlorotrichosis may be aesthetically undesirable and lead to considerable social ostracism. Without intrinsic hair defects or obvious differences in predisposing factors, the question was raised as to why our patient, as a brunette, experienced dramatic hair discoloration while her blonde sister was entirely unaffected. We postulated that our patient’s persistent green hair may have been due to her unique predisposition to extensive sun-induced and mechanical hair damage because of her unwavering tendency to wear her hair down at all times. A variety of treatments of variable reported efficacy have been proposed (Table); fortunately, if treatments fail, the discoloration resolves with hair growth.



This case is unique in that it presented in a brunette patient with seemingly minimal hair damage with an unaffected blonde-haired sibling and with persistence over years. Furthermore, it lends credence to the use of penicillamine shampoo in treating chlorotrichosis, even in particularly difficult cases in which other treatments have failed.

References
  1. Holmes LB, Goldsmith LA. The man with green hair [letter]. N Engl J Med. 1974;291:1037.
  2. Lampe RM, Henderson AL, Hansen GH. Green hair. JAMA. 1977;237:2092.
  3. Nordlund JJ, Hartley C, Fister J. On the cause of green hair. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:1700.
  4. Goldschmidt H. Green hair. Arch Dermatol. 1979;115:1288.
  5. Hinz T, Klingmuller K, Bieber T, et al. The mystery of green hair. Eur J Dermatol. 2009;19:409-410.
  6. Mascaro JM Jr, Ferrando J, Fontarnau R, et al. Green hair. Cutis. 1995;56:37-40.
  7. Bhat GR, Lukenbach ER, Kennedy RR, et al. The green hair problem: a preliminary investigation. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1979;30:1-8.
  8. Blanc D, Zultak M, Rochefort A, et al. Green hair: clinical, chemical and epidemiologic study. apropos of a case. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1988;115:807-812.
  9. Fitzgerald EA, Purcell SM, Goldman HM. Green hair discoloration due to selenium sulfide. Int J Dermatol. 1997;36:238-239.
  10. Fair NB, Gupta BS. The chlorine-hair interaction. II. effect of chlorination at varied pH levels on hair properties. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1987;38:371-384.
References
  1. Holmes LB, Goldsmith LA. The man with green hair [letter]. N Engl J Med. 1974;291:1037.
  2. Lampe RM, Henderson AL, Hansen GH. Green hair. JAMA. 1977;237:2092.
  3. Nordlund JJ, Hartley C, Fister J. On the cause of green hair. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:1700.
  4. Goldschmidt H. Green hair. Arch Dermatol. 1979;115:1288.
  5. Hinz T, Klingmuller K, Bieber T, et al. The mystery of green hair. Eur J Dermatol. 2009;19:409-410.
  6. Mascaro JM Jr, Ferrando J, Fontarnau R, et al. Green hair. Cutis. 1995;56:37-40.
  7. Bhat GR, Lukenbach ER, Kennedy RR, et al. The green hair problem: a preliminary investigation. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1979;30:1-8.
  8. Blanc D, Zultak M, Rochefort A, et al. Green hair: clinical, chemical and epidemiologic study. apropos of a case. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1988;115:807-812.
  9. Fitzgerald EA, Purcell SM, Goldman HM. Green hair discoloration due to selenium sulfide. Int J Dermatol. 1997;36:238-239.
  10. Fair NB, Gupta BS. The chlorine-hair interaction. II. effect of chlorination at varied pH levels on hair properties. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1987;38:371-384.
Issue
Cutis - 105(2)
Issue
Cutis - 105(2)
Page Number
E25-E27
Page Number
E25-E27
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Persistent Chlorotrichosis With Chronic Sun Exposure
Display Headline
Persistent Chlorotrichosis With Chronic Sun Exposure
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Chlorotrichosis is the deposition of copper onto hair, which causes a green discoloration and most commonly occurs in blonde patients with excessive exposure to chlorinated water.
  • Hair cuticle damage from hair care practices, such as use of heat or chemicals, can predispose patients to the development of chlorotrichosis.
  • Although a number of treatments have been proposed, the use of penicillamine shampoo seems to be particularly effective and works via chelation of the adherent copper molecules.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media

Multiple Facial Papules

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 11/27/2019 - 11:08

The Diagnosis: Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome 

Histopathologic examination revealed a collection of bland spindle cells with perifollicular fibrosis consistent with a fibrofolliculoma, confirming the diagnosis of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome (Figure). Cosmetic treatment with ablative therapy was offered, but the patient declined.  

Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. A and B, Histopathology revealed a collection of bland spindle cells with perifollicular fibrosis consistent with a fibrofolliculoma (H&E, original magnifications ×100 and ×200).

Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome is an autosomal-dominant genodermatosis caused by a loss-of-function mutation in the folliculin gene, FLCN, on chromosome arm 17p11.2.1 Cutaneous findings include benign follicular hamartomas, such as fibrofolliculomas and trichodiscomas. Angiofibromas, perifollicular fibromas, oral papillomas, and acrochordons also can be present.1 Cutaneous lesions usually appear on the head and neck in the third decade of life.  

Patients with Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome are at an increased risk for pneumothorax and renal cancer, specifically hybrid oncocytic-chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.2 In a study of 89 patients with a FLCN mutation, 90% (80/89) of patients had cutaneous lesions, 84% (34/89) had pulmonary cysts, and 34% (30/89) had kidney tumors. Affected individuals were at a higher risk for pneumothorax and kidney tumors if there was a family history of these tumors.2  

Proposed diagnostic criteria include any 1 of the following: 2 or more skin lesions clinically consistent with fibrofolliculomas and 1 histologically confirmed fibrofolliculoma; multiple bilateral pulmonary cysts in the basilar lung with or without pneumothorax before 40 years of age; bilateral multifocal chromophobe renal carcinomas or hybrid oncocytic tumors; combination of cutaneous, pulmonary, or renal manifestation in the patient and family; or a FLCN mutation.3  

Current recommendations for the workup of a patient with Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome include referral to genetic counseling for the patient and family, a baseline computed tomography of the chest to evaluate for pulmonary cysts, and gadolinium-enhanced abdominal magnetic resonance imaging starting at 20 years of age and repeated every 3 to 4 years to screen for renal tumors.1 Pulmonary function tests can be considered if the patient is symptomatic or has a high cyst burden. Patients should be advised against smoking and scuba diving. 

The differential diagnosis of multiple facial papules includes Cowden syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, Brooke-Spiegler syndrome, and Muir-Torre syndrome. Cowden syndrome is caused by a mutation in the protein tyrosine phosphatase gene, PTEN.4 The characteristic cutaneous findings on the face are trichilemmomas, which appear as flesh-colored papules that may have a verrucous surface.  

Tuberous sclerosis is caused by mutations in hamartin (TSC1) or tuberin (TSC2). Angiofibromas are most commonly found on the face and appear as flesh-colored to red-brown papules. Fibrous plaques, periungual fibromas, gingival fibromas, hypopigmented macules, and connective tissue nevi also are found in tuberous sclerosis.5  

Brooke-Spiegler syndrome is caused by a mutation in the CYLD lysine 63 deubiquitinase gene, CYLD. Trichoepitheliomas, cylindromas, and spiradenomas are caused by the CYLD mutation and appear on the head and neck. Trichoepitheliomas are flesh-colored to pink papules found on the face, often concentrated in the nasolabial folds.6 Cylindromas and spiradenomas are flesh-colored to pink papules or nodules most commonly found on the scalp.6  

Muir-Torre syndrome is caused by a mutation in DNA mismatch repair genes MSH2 and/or MLH1.7 Sebaceous neoplasms, including sebaceous adenomas, sebaceomas, and less frequently sebaceous carcinomas, are characteristic cutaneous findings and appear as pink to yellow papules commonly found on the head and neck.  

Careful history taking, physical examination, and histopathologic analysis are important in recognizing the features of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Accurate and timely diagnosis is essential for the appropriate care of patients and their families, given the syndrome's systemic implications.  

References
  1. Gupta N, Sunwoo BY, Kotloff RM. Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Clin Chest Med. 2016;37:475-486. 
  2. Toro JR, Wei MH, Glenn GM, et al. BHD mutations, clinical and molecular genetic investigations of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome: a new series of 50 families and a review of published reports. J Med Genet. 2008;45:321-331. 
  3. Schmidt LS, Linehan WM. Molecular genetics and clinical features of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12:558-569. 
  4. Marsh D, Kum JB, Lunetta KL, et al. PTEN mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlations in Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome suggest a single entity with Cowden syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:1461-1472. 
  5. Wataya-Kaneda M, Uemura M, Fujita K, et al. Tuberous sclerosis complex: recent advances in manifestations and therapy. Int J Urol. 2017;24:681-691. 
  6. Kazakov DV. Brooke-Spiegler syndrome and phenotypic variants: an update. Head Neck Pathol. 2016;10:125-130. 
  7. Mahalingam M. MSH6, Past and present and Muir-Torre syndrome--connecting the dots. Am J Dermatopathol. 2017;39:239-249.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

From the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City. Dr. Holt is from the Department of Dermatology, and Dr. Liu is from the Departments of Dermatology and Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Melia Hernandez Holt, MD, 200 Hawkins Dr, 30000 PFP, Iowa City, IA 52242 (melia-holt@uiowa.edu).

Issue
Cutis - 104(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E17-E19
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

From the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City. Dr. Holt is from the Department of Dermatology, and Dr. Liu is from the Departments of Dermatology and Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Melia Hernandez Holt, MD, 200 Hawkins Dr, 30000 PFP, Iowa City, IA 52242 (melia-holt@uiowa.edu).

Author and Disclosure Information

From the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City. Dr. Holt is from the Department of Dermatology, and Dr. Liu is from the Departments of Dermatology and Pathology.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Melia Hernandez Holt, MD, 200 Hawkins Dr, 30000 PFP, Iowa City, IA 52242 (melia-holt@uiowa.edu).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

The Diagnosis: Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome 

Histopathologic examination revealed a collection of bland spindle cells with perifollicular fibrosis consistent with a fibrofolliculoma, confirming the diagnosis of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome (Figure). Cosmetic treatment with ablative therapy was offered, but the patient declined.  

Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. A and B, Histopathology revealed a collection of bland spindle cells with perifollicular fibrosis consistent with a fibrofolliculoma (H&E, original magnifications ×100 and ×200).

Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome is an autosomal-dominant genodermatosis caused by a loss-of-function mutation in the folliculin gene, FLCN, on chromosome arm 17p11.2.1 Cutaneous findings include benign follicular hamartomas, such as fibrofolliculomas and trichodiscomas. Angiofibromas, perifollicular fibromas, oral papillomas, and acrochordons also can be present.1 Cutaneous lesions usually appear on the head and neck in the third decade of life.  

Patients with Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome are at an increased risk for pneumothorax and renal cancer, specifically hybrid oncocytic-chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.2 In a study of 89 patients with a FLCN mutation, 90% (80/89) of patients had cutaneous lesions, 84% (34/89) had pulmonary cysts, and 34% (30/89) had kidney tumors. Affected individuals were at a higher risk for pneumothorax and kidney tumors if there was a family history of these tumors.2  

Proposed diagnostic criteria include any 1 of the following: 2 or more skin lesions clinically consistent with fibrofolliculomas and 1 histologically confirmed fibrofolliculoma; multiple bilateral pulmonary cysts in the basilar lung with or without pneumothorax before 40 years of age; bilateral multifocal chromophobe renal carcinomas or hybrid oncocytic tumors; combination of cutaneous, pulmonary, or renal manifestation in the patient and family; or a FLCN mutation.3  

Current recommendations for the workup of a patient with Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome include referral to genetic counseling for the patient and family, a baseline computed tomography of the chest to evaluate for pulmonary cysts, and gadolinium-enhanced abdominal magnetic resonance imaging starting at 20 years of age and repeated every 3 to 4 years to screen for renal tumors.1 Pulmonary function tests can be considered if the patient is symptomatic or has a high cyst burden. Patients should be advised against smoking and scuba diving. 

The differential diagnosis of multiple facial papules includes Cowden syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, Brooke-Spiegler syndrome, and Muir-Torre syndrome. Cowden syndrome is caused by a mutation in the protein tyrosine phosphatase gene, PTEN.4 The characteristic cutaneous findings on the face are trichilemmomas, which appear as flesh-colored papules that may have a verrucous surface.  

Tuberous sclerosis is caused by mutations in hamartin (TSC1) or tuberin (TSC2). Angiofibromas are most commonly found on the face and appear as flesh-colored to red-brown papules. Fibrous plaques, periungual fibromas, gingival fibromas, hypopigmented macules, and connective tissue nevi also are found in tuberous sclerosis.5  

Brooke-Spiegler syndrome is caused by a mutation in the CYLD lysine 63 deubiquitinase gene, CYLD. Trichoepitheliomas, cylindromas, and spiradenomas are caused by the CYLD mutation and appear on the head and neck. Trichoepitheliomas are flesh-colored to pink papules found on the face, often concentrated in the nasolabial folds.6 Cylindromas and spiradenomas are flesh-colored to pink papules or nodules most commonly found on the scalp.6  

Muir-Torre syndrome is caused by a mutation in DNA mismatch repair genes MSH2 and/or MLH1.7 Sebaceous neoplasms, including sebaceous adenomas, sebaceomas, and less frequently sebaceous carcinomas, are characteristic cutaneous findings and appear as pink to yellow papules commonly found on the head and neck.  

Careful history taking, physical examination, and histopathologic analysis are important in recognizing the features of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Accurate and timely diagnosis is essential for the appropriate care of patients and their families, given the syndrome's systemic implications.  

The Diagnosis: Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome 

Histopathologic examination revealed a collection of bland spindle cells with perifollicular fibrosis consistent with a fibrofolliculoma, confirming the diagnosis of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome (Figure). Cosmetic treatment with ablative therapy was offered, but the patient declined.  

Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. A and B, Histopathology revealed a collection of bland spindle cells with perifollicular fibrosis consistent with a fibrofolliculoma (H&E, original magnifications ×100 and ×200).

Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome is an autosomal-dominant genodermatosis caused by a loss-of-function mutation in the folliculin gene, FLCN, on chromosome arm 17p11.2.1 Cutaneous findings include benign follicular hamartomas, such as fibrofolliculomas and trichodiscomas. Angiofibromas, perifollicular fibromas, oral papillomas, and acrochordons also can be present.1 Cutaneous lesions usually appear on the head and neck in the third decade of life.  

Patients with Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome are at an increased risk for pneumothorax and renal cancer, specifically hybrid oncocytic-chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.2 In a study of 89 patients with a FLCN mutation, 90% (80/89) of patients had cutaneous lesions, 84% (34/89) had pulmonary cysts, and 34% (30/89) had kidney tumors. Affected individuals were at a higher risk for pneumothorax and kidney tumors if there was a family history of these tumors.2  

Proposed diagnostic criteria include any 1 of the following: 2 or more skin lesions clinically consistent with fibrofolliculomas and 1 histologically confirmed fibrofolliculoma; multiple bilateral pulmonary cysts in the basilar lung with or without pneumothorax before 40 years of age; bilateral multifocal chromophobe renal carcinomas or hybrid oncocytic tumors; combination of cutaneous, pulmonary, or renal manifestation in the patient and family; or a FLCN mutation.3  

Current recommendations for the workup of a patient with Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome include referral to genetic counseling for the patient and family, a baseline computed tomography of the chest to evaluate for pulmonary cysts, and gadolinium-enhanced abdominal magnetic resonance imaging starting at 20 years of age and repeated every 3 to 4 years to screen for renal tumors.1 Pulmonary function tests can be considered if the patient is symptomatic or has a high cyst burden. Patients should be advised against smoking and scuba diving. 

The differential diagnosis of multiple facial papules includes Cowden syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, Brooke-Spiegler syndrome, and Muir-Torre syndrome. Cowden syndrome is caused by a mutation in the protein tyrosine phosphatase gene, PTEN.4 The characteristic cutaneous findings on the face are trichilemmomas, which appear as flesh-colored papules that may have a verrucous surface.  

Tuberous sclerosis is caused by mutations in hamartin (TSC1) or tuberin (TSC2). Angiofibromas are most commonly found on the face and appear as flesh-colored to red-brown papules. Fibrous plaques, periungual fibromas, gingival fibromas, hypopigmented macules, and connective tissue nevi also are found in tuberous sclerosis.5  

Brooke-Spiegler syndrome is caused by a mutation in the CYLD lysine 63 deubiquitinase gene, CYLD. Trichoepitheliomas, cylindromas, and spiradenomas are caused by the CYLD mutation and appear on the head and neck. Trichoepitheliomas are flesh-colored to pink papules found on the face, often concentrated in the nasolabial folds.6 Cylindromas and spiradenomas are flesh-colored to pink papules or nodules most commonly found on the scalp.6  

Muir-Torre syndrome is caused by a mutation in DNA mismatch repair genes MSH2 and/or MLH1.7 Sebaceous neoplasms, including sebaceous adenomas, sebaceomas, and less frequently sebaceous carcinomas, are characteristic cutaneous findings and appear as pink to yellow papules commonly found on the head and neck.  

Careful history taking, physical examination, and histopathologic analysis are important in recognizing the features of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Accurate and timely diagnosis is essential for the appropriate care of patients and their families, given the syndrome's systemic implications.  

References
  1. Gupta N, Sunwoo BY, Kotloff RM. Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Clin Chest Med. 2016;37:475-486. 
  2. Toro JR, Wei MH, Glenn GM, et al. BHD mutations, clinical and molecular genetic investigations of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome: a new series of 50 families and a review of published reports. J Med Genet. 2008;45:321-331. 
  3. Schmidt LS, Linehan WM. Molecular genetics and clinical features of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12:558-569. 
  4. Marsh D, Kum JB, Lunetta KL, et al. PTEN mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlations in Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome suggest a single entity with Cowden syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:1461-1472. 
  5. Wataya-Kaneda M, Uemura M, Fujita K, et al. Tuberous sclerosis complex: recent advances in manifestations and therapy. Int J Urol. 2017;24:681-691. 
  6. Kazakov DV. Brooke-Spiegler syndrome and phenotypic variants: an update. Head Neck Pathol. 2016;10:125-130. 
  7. Mahalingam M. MSH6, Past and present and Muir-Torre syndrome--connecting the dots. Am J Dermatopathol. 2017;39:239-249.
References
  1. Gupta N, Sunwoo BY, Kotloff RM. Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Clin Chest Med. 2016;37:475-486. 
  2. Toro JR, Wei MH, Glenn GM, et al. BHD mutations, clinical and molecular genetic investigations of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome: a new series of 50 families and a review of published reports. J Med Genet. 2008;45:321-331. 
  3. Schmidt LS, Linehan WM. Molecular genetics and clinical features of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12:558-569. 
  4. Marsh D, Kum JB, Lunetta KL, et al. PTEN mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlations in Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome suggest a single entity with Cowden syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:1461-1472. 
  5. Wataya-Kaneda M, Uemura M, Fujita K, et al. Tuberous sclerosis complex: recent advances in manifestations and therapy. Int J Urol. 2017;24:681-691. 
  6. Kazakov DV. Brooke-Spiegler syndrome and phenotypic variants: an update. Head Neck Pathol. 2016;10:125-130. 
  7. Mahalingam M. MSH6, Past and present and Muir-Torre syndrome--connecting the dots. Am J Dermatopathol. 2017;39:239-249.
Issue
Cutis - 104(5)
Issue
Cutis - 104(5)
Page Number
E17-E19
Page Number
E17-E19
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Questionnaire Body

A 50-year-old man presented with facial papules on the cheeks that had appeared approximately 1.5 years prior and gradually spread over the face and neck. They were occasionally pruritic but otherwise were asymptomatic. His mother and brother reportedly had similar clinical findings. Family history was notable for a maternal uncle who had died in his 30s of an unknown type of renal cancer. Physical examination revealed innumerable white-gray papules that measured 1 to 5 mm and were scattered across the face and neck. Punch biopsies were obtained. Computed tomography of the chest showed multiple bibasilar pulmonary cysts. Magnetic resonance imaging was negative for renal tumors.

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Mon, 11/25/2019 - 10:00
Un-Gate On Date
Mon, 11/25/2019 - 10:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Mon, 11/25/2019 - 10:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Article PDF Media

Pruritic Papules on the Scalp and Arms

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 01/10/2019 - 13:34
Display Headline
Pruritic Papules on the Scalp and Arms

Folliculotropic Mycosis Fungoides

Folliculotropic mycosis fungoides (FMF) is a variant of mycosis fungoides (MF) that occurs mostly in adults with a male predilection. The disease clinically favors the head and neck. Patients commonly present with pruritic papules that often are grouped, alopecia, and frequent secondary bacterial infections. Less commonly patients present with acneiform lesions and mucinorrhea. Patients often experience more pruritus in FMF than in classic MF, which can provide a good means of assessing disease activity. Disease-specific 5-year survival is approximately 70% to 80%, which is worse than classic plaque-stage MF and similar to tumor-stage MF.1

Treatment of FMF differs from classic MF in that the lesions are less responsive to skin-targeted therapies due to the perifollicular nature of dermal infiltrates. Superficial skin lesions can be treated with psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) therapy. Other options include PUVA in combination with interferon alfa or retinoids and local radiotherapy for solitary thick tumors; however, in patients who have more infiltrative skin lesions or had PUVA therapy that failed, total skin electron beam therapy may be required.2

On histologic examination, there typically is perivascular and periadnexal localization of dermal infiltrates with varied involvement of the follicular epithelium and damage to hair follicles by atypical small, medium, and large hyperchromatic lymphocytes with cerebriform nuclei. Mucinous degeneration of the follicular epithelium can be seen, as highlighted on Alcian blue staining, and a mixed infiltrate of eosinophils and plasma cells often is present (quiz image and Figure 1). Frequent sparing of the epidermis is noteworthy.2-4 In most cases, the neoplastic T lymphocytes are characterized by a CD3+CD4+CD8-immunophenotype as is seen in classic MF. Sometimes an admixture of CD30+ blast cells is seen.1

Figure 1. Follicular and perivascular dermal infiltrates in folliculotropic mycosis fungoides (H&E, original magnification ×4).

Histologic differential considerations for FMF include eosinophilic pustular folliculitis (EPF), primary follicular mucinosis, lupus erythematosus, and pityrosporum folliculitis.

Eosinophilic pustular folliculitis has several clinical subtypes, such as classic Ofuji disease and immunosuppression-associated EPF secondary to human immunodeficiency virus. Histologically, EPF is characterized by spongiosis of the hair follicle epithelium with exocytosis of a mixed infiltrate of lymphocytes and eosinophils extending from the sebaceous gland and its duct to the infundibulum with formation of hallmark eosinophilic pustules (Figure 2). Infiltration of neutrophils in inflamed lesions generally is seen. Eosinophilic pustular folliculitis is an important differential for FMF, as follicular mucinosis has been observed in lesions of EPF.5 Both EPF and FMF can exhibit eosinophils and lymphocytes in the upper dermis, spongiosis of the hair follicle epithelium, and mucinous degeneration of follicles,6 though lymphocytic atypia and relatively fewer eosinophils are suggestive of the latter.

Photograph courtesy of Brian Swick, MD (Iowa City, Iowa).
Figure 2. Eosinophilic pustular folliculitis with spongiosis of the hair follicle epithelium and exocytosis of a mixed infiltrate of lymphocytes and eosinophils (H&E, original magnification ×20).

 

 

Primary follicular mucinosis (PFM) tends to occur as a solitary lesion in younger female patients in contrast to the multiple lesions that typically appear in older male patients with FMF. Histologically, PFM usually manifests as large, cystic, mucin-filled spaces and polyclonal perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate without notable cellular atypia or epidermotropism (Figure 3). Because follicular mucinosis is a common feature of FMF, its distinction from PFM can be challenging and often is aided by the absence of cellular atypia and relatively mild lymphocytic infiltrate in the latter.7

Photograph courtesy of Brian Swick, MD (Iowa City, Iowa).
Figure 3. Follicular mucinosis with mucin-filled cystic spaces (H&E, original magnification ×4).

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus with its characteristic folliculocentric lymphocytic infiltration and associated dermal mucin also qualifies as a potential differential possibility for FMF; however, the perivascular and periadnexal pattern of lymphocytic infiltration as well as the localization of mucin to the reticular dermal interstitium8,9 are key histopathologic distinctions (Figure 4). Furthermore, although the histologic presentation of lupus erythematosus can be variable, it also classically shows interface dermatitis, basement membrane thickening, and follicular plugging.

Photograph courtesy of Brian Swick, MD (Iowa City, Iowa).
Figure 4. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus with interface dermatitis as well as a perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate with follicular plugging (H&E, original magnification ×4).

Pityrosporum folliculitis is the most common cause of fungal folliculitis and is caused by the Malassezia species. On histology, there typically is an unremarkable epithelium with plugged follicles and suppurative folliculitis. Serial sections of the biopsy specimen often are required to identify dilated, follicle-containing, budding yeast cells (Figure 5). Organisms are located predominantly within the infundibulum and orifice of follicular lumen, are positive for periodic acid-Schiff, and are diastase resistant.10

Photograph courtesy of Brian Swick, MD (Iowa City, Iowa).
Figure 5. Pityrosporum folliculitis with budding yeast forms (H&E, original magnification ×40).

References
  1. Willemze R, Jaffe ES, Burg G, et al. WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas. Blood. 2005;105:3768-3785.
  2. van Doorn R, Scheffer E, Willemze R. Follicular mycosis fungoides, a distinct disease entity with or without associated follicular mucinosis. a clinicopathologic and follow-up study of 51 patients. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:191-198.
  3. DeBloom J 2nd, Severson J, Gaspari A, et al. Follicular mycosis fungoides: a case report and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28:318-324.
  4. Flaig MJ, Cerroni L, Schuhmann K, et al. Follicular mycosis fungoides: a histopathologic analysis of nine cases. J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28:525-530.
  5. Fujiyama T, Tokura Y. Clinical and histopathological differential diagnosis of eosinophilic pustular folliculitis. J Dermatol. 2013;40:419-423.
  6. Lee JY, Tsai YM, Sheu HM. Ofuji's disease with follicular mucinosis and its differential diagnosis from alopecia mucinosa. J Cutan Pathol. 2003;30:307-313.
  7. Rongioletti F, De Lucchi S, Meyes D, et al. Follicular mucinosis: a clinicopathologic, histochemical, immunohistochemical and molecular study comparing the primary benign form and the mycosis fungoides-associated follicular mucinosis. J Cutan Pathol. 2010;37:15-19.
  8. Vincent JG, Chan MP. Specificity of dermal mucin in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus: comparison with other dermatitides and normal skin. J Cutan Pathol. 2015;42:722-729.
  9. Yell JA, Mbuagbaw J, Burge SM. Cutaneous manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Br J Dermatol. 1996;135:355-362.
  10. Durdu M, Ilkit M. First step in the differential diagnosis of folliculitis: cytology. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2013;39:9-25.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Chitgopeker, Landherr, and Liu are from the Department of Dermatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic, Iowa City. Dr. Liu also is from the Department of Pathology. Dr. Lehrer is from Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Pooja Chitgopeker, MBChB, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic, Department of Dermatology, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242 (pooja-chitgopeker@uiowa.edu).

Issue
Cutis - 98(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
228,249-250
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Chitgopeker, Landherr, and Liu are from the Department of Dermatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic, Iowa City. Dr. Liu also is from the Department of Pathology. Dr. Lehrer is from Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Pooja Chitgopeker, MBChB, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic, Department of Dermatology, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242 (pooja-chitgopeker@uiowa.edu).

Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Chitgopeker, Landherr, and Liu are from the Department of Dermatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic, Iowa City. Dr. Liu also is from the Department of Pathology. Dr. Lehrer is from Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Pooja Chitgopeker, MBChB, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic, Department of Dermatology, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242 (pooja-chitgopeker@uiowa.edu).

Article PDF
Article PDF

Folliculotropic Mycosis Fungoides

Folliculotropic mycosis fungoides (FMF) is a variant of mycosis fungoides (MF) that occurs mostly in adults with a male predilection. The disease clinically favors the head and neck. Patients commonly present with pruritic papules that often are grouped, alopecia, and frequent secondary bacterial infections. Less commonly patients present with acneiform lesions and mucinorrhea. Patients often experience more pruritus in FMF than in classic MF, which can provide a good means of assessing disease activity. Disease-specific 5-year survival is approximately 70% to 80%, which is worse than classic plaque-stage MF and similar to tumor-stage MF.1

Treatment of FMF differs from classic MF in that the lesions are less responsive to skin-targeted therapies due to the perifollicular nature of dermal infiltrates. Superficial skin lesions can be treated with psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) therapy. Other options include PUVA in combination with interferon alfa or retinoids and local radiotherapy for solitary thick tumors; however, in patients who have more infiltrative skin lesions or had PUVA therapy that failed, total skin electron beam therapy may be required.2

On histologic examination, there typically is perivascular and periadnexal localization of dermal infiltrates with varied involvement of the follicular epithelium and damage to hair follicles by atypical small, medium, and large hyperchromatic lymphocytes with cerebriform nuclei. Mucinous degeneration of the follicular epithelium can be seen, as highlighted on Alcian blue staining, and a mixed infiltrate of eosinophils and plasma cells often is present (quiz image and Figure 1). Frequent sparing of the epidermis is noteworthy.2-4 In most cases, the neoplastic T lymphocytes are characterized by a CD3+CD4+CD8-immunophenotype as is seen in classic MF. Sometimes an admixture of CD30+ blast cells is seen.1

Figure 1. Follicular and perivascular dermal infiltrates in folliculotropic mycosis fungoides (H&E, original magnification ×4).

Histologic differential considerations for FMF include eosinophilic pustular folliculitis (EPF), primary follicular mucinosis, lupus erythematosus, and pityrosporum folliculitis.

Eosinophilic pustular folliculitis has several clinical subtypes, such as classic Ofuji disease and immunosuppression-associated EPF secondary to human immunodeficiency virus. Histologically, EPF is characterized by spongiosis of the hair follicle epithelium with exocytosis of a mixed infiltrate of lymphocytes and eosinophils extending from the sebaceous gland and its duct to the infundibulum with formation of hallmark eosinophilic pustules (Figure 2). Infiltration of neutrophils in inflamed lesions generally is seen. Eosinophilic pustular folliculitis is an important differential for FMF, as follicular mucinosis has been observed in lesions of EPF.5 Both EPF and FMF can exhibit eosinophils and lymphocytes in the upper dermis, spongiosis of the hair follicle epithelium, and mucinous degeneration of follicles,6 though lymphocytic atypia and relatively fewer eosinophils are suggestive of the latter.

Photograph courtesy of Brian Swick, MD (Iowa City, Iowa).
Figure 2. Eosinophilic pustular folliculitis with spongiosis of the hair follicle epithelium and exocytosis of a mixed infiltrate of lymphocytes and eosinophils (H&E, original magnification ×20).

 

 

Primary follicular mucinosis (PFM) tends to occur as a solitary lesion in younger female patients in contrast to the multiple lesions that typically appear in older male patients with FMF. Histologically, PFM usually manifests as large, cystic, mucin-filled spaces and polyclonal perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate without notable cellular atypia or epidermotropism (Figure 3). Because follicular mucinosis is a common feature of FMF, its distinction from PFM can be challenging and often is aided by the absence of cellular atypia and relatively mild lymphocytic infiltrate in the latter.7

Photograph courtesy of Brian Swick, MD (Iowa City, Iowa).
Figure 3. Follicular mucinosis with mucin-filled cystic spaces (H&E, original magnification ×4).

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus with its characteristic folliculocentric lymphocytic infiltration and associated dermal mucin also qualifies as a potential differential possibility for FMF; however, the perivascular and periadnexal pattern of lymphocytic infiltration as well as the localization of mucin to the reticular dermal interstitium8,9 are key histopathologic distinctions (Figure 4). Furthermore, although the histologic presentation of lupus erythematosus can be variable, it also classically shows interface dermatitis, basement membrane thickening, and follicular plugging.

Photograph courtesy of Brian Swick, MD (Iowa City, Iowa).
Figure 4. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus with interface dermatitis as well as a perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate with follicular plugging (H&E, original magnification ×4).

Pityrosporum folliculitis is the most common cause of fungal folliculitis and is caused by the Malassezia species. On histology, there typically is an unremarkable epithelium with plugged follicles and suppurative folliculitis. Serial sections of the biopsy specimen often are required to identify dilated, follicle-containing, budding yeast cells (Figure 5). Organisms are located predominantly within the infundibulum and orifice of follicular lumen, are positive for periodic acid-Schiff, and are diastase resistant.10

Photograph courtesy of Brian Swick, MD (Iowa City, Iowa).
Figure 5. Pityrosporum folliculitis with budding yeast forms (H&E, original magnification ×40).

Folliculotropic Mycosis Fungoides

Folliculotropic mycosis fungoides (FMF) is a variant of mycosis fungoides (MF) that occurs mostly in adults with a male predilection. The disease clinically favors the head and neck. Patients commonly present with pruritic papules that often are grouped, alopecia, and frequent secondary bacterial infections. Less commonly patients present with acneiform lesions and mucinorrhea. Patients often experience more pruritus in FMF than in classic MF, which can provide a good means of assessing disease activity. Disease-specific 5-year survival is approximately 70% to 80%, which is worse than classic plaque-stage MF and similar to tumor-stage MF.1

Treatment of FMF differs from classic MF in that the lesions are less responsive to skin-targeted therapies due to the perifollicular nature of dermal infiltrates. Superficial skin lesions can be treated with psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) therapy. Other options include PUVA in combination with interferon alfa or retinoids and local radiotherapy for solitary thick tumors; however, in patients who have more infiltrative skin lesions or had PUVA therapy that failed, total skin electron beam therapy may be required.2

On histologic examination, there typically is perivascular and periadnexal localization of dermal infiltrates with varied involvement of the follicular epithelium and damage to hair follicles by atypical small, medium, and large hyperchromatic lymphocytes with cerebriform nuclei. Mucinous degeneration of the follicular epithelium can be seen, as highlighted on Alcian blue staining, and a mixed infiltrate of eosinophils and plasma cells often is present (quiz image and Figure 1). Frequent sparing of the epidermis is noteworthy.2-4 In most cases, the neoplastic T lymphocytes are characterized by a CD3+CD4+CD8-immunophenotype as is seen in classic MF. Sometimes an admixture of CD30+ blast cells is seen.1

Figure 1. Follicular and perivascular dermal infiltrates in folliculotropic mycosis fungoides (H&E, original magnification ×4).

Histologic differential considerations for FMF include eosinophilic pustular folliculitis (EPF), primary follicular mucinosis, lupus erythematosus, and pityrosporum folliculitis.

Eosinophilic pustular folliculitis has several clinical subtypes, such as classic Ofuji disease and immunosuppression-associated EPF secondary to human immunodeficiency virus. Histologically, EPF is characterized by spongiosis of the hair follicle epithelium with exocytosis of a mixed infiltrate of lymphocytes and eosinophils extending from the sebaceous gland and its duct to the infundibulum with formation of hallmark eosinophilic pustules (Figure 2). Infiltration of neutrophils in inflamed lesions generally is seen. Eosinophilic pustular folliculitis is an important differential for FMF, as follicular mucinosis has been observed in lesions of EPF.5 Both EPF and FMF can exhibit eosinophils and lymphocytes in the upper dermis, spongiosis of the hair follicle epithelium, and mucinous degeneration of follicles,6 though lymphocytic atypia and relatively fewer eosinophils are suggestive of the latter.

Photograph courtesy of Brian Swick, MD (Iowa City, Iowa).
Figure 2. Eosinophilic pustular folliculitis with spongiosis of the hair follicle epithelium and exocytosis of a mixed infiltrate of lymphocytes and eosinophils (H&E, original magnification ×20).

 

 

Primary follicular mucinosis (PFM) tends to occur as a solitary lesion in younger female patients in contrast to the multiple lesions that typically appear in older male patients with FMF. Histologically, PFM usually manifests as large, cystic, mucin-filled spaces and polyclonal perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate without notable cellular atypia or epidermotropism (Figure 3). Because follicular mucinosis is a common feature of FMF, its distinction from PFM can be challenging and often is aided by the absence of cellular atypia and relatively mild lymphocytic infiltrate in the latter.7

Photograph courtesy of Brian Swick, MD (Iowa City, Iowa).
Figure 3. Follicular mucinosis with mucin-filled cystic spaces (H&E, original magnification ×4).

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus with its characteristic folliculocentric lymphocytic infiltration and associated dermal mucin also qualifies as a potential differential possibility for FMF; however, the perivascular and periadnexal pattern of lymphocytic infiltration as well as the localization of mucin to the reticular dermal interstitium8,9 are key histopathologic distinctions (Figure 4). Furthermore, although the histologic presentation of lupus erythematosus can be variable, it also classically shows interface dermatitis, basement membrane thickening, and follicular plugging.

Photograph courtesy of Brian Swick, MD (Iowa City, Iowa).
Figure 4. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus with interface dermatitis as well as a perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate with follicular plugging (H&E, original magnification ×4).

Pityrosporum folliculitis is the most common cause of fungal folliculitis and is caused by the Malassezia species. On histology, there typically is an unremarkable epithelium with plugged follicles and suppurative folliculitis. Serial sections of the biopsy specimen often are required to identify dilated, follicle-containing, budding yeast cells (Figure 5). Organisms are located predominantly within the infundibulum and orifice of follicular lumen, are positive for periodic acid-Schiff, and are diastase resistant.10

Photograph courtesy of Brian Swick, MD (Iowa City, Iowa).
Figure 5. Pityrosporum folliculitis with budding yeast forms (H&E, original magnification ×40).

References
  1. Willemze R, Jaffe ES, Burg G, et al. WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas. Blood. 2005;105:3768-3785.
  2. van Doorn R, Scheffer E, Willemze R. Follicular mycosis fungoides, a distinct disease entity with or without associated follicular mucinosis. a clinicopathologic and follow-up study of 51 patients. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:191-198.
  3. DeBloom J 2nd, Severson J, Gaspari A, et al. Follicular mycosis fungoides: a case report and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28:318-324.
  4. Flaig MJ, Cerroni L, Schuhmann K, et al. Follicular mycosis fungoides: a histopathologic analysis of nine cases. J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28:525-530.
  5. Fujiyama T, Tokura Y. Clinical and histopathological differential diagnosis of eosinophilic pustular folliculitis. J Dermatol. 2013;40:419-423.
  6. Lee JY, Tsai YM, Sheu HM. Ofuji's disease with follicular mucinosis and its differential diagnosis from alopecia mucinosa. J Cutan Pathol. 2003;30:307-313.
  7. Rongioletti F, De Lucchi S, Meyes D, et al. Follicular mucinosis: a clinicopathologic, histochemical, immunohistochemical and molecular study comparing the primary benign form and the mycosis fungoides-associated follicular mucinosis. J Cutan Pathol. 2010;37:15-19.
  8. Vincent JG, Chan MP. Specificity of dermal mucin in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus: comparison with other dermatitides and normal skin. J Cutan Pathol. 2015;42:722-729.
  9. Yell JA, Mbuagbaw J, Burge SM. Cutaneous manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Br J Dermatol. 1996;135:355-362.
  10. Durdu M, Ilkit M. First step in the differential diagnosis of folliculitis: cytology. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2013;39:9-25.
References
  1. Willemze R, Jaffe ES, Burg G, et al. WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas. Blood. 2005;105:3768-3785.
  2. van Doorn R, Scheffer E, Willemze R. Follicular mycosis fungoides, a distinct disease entity with or without associated follicular mucinosis. a clinicopathologic and follow-up study of 51 patients. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:191-198.
  3. DeBloom J 2nd, Severson J, Gaspari A, et al. Follicular mycosis fungoides: a case report and review of the literature. J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28:318-324.
  4. Flaig MJ, Cerroni L, Schuhmann K, et al. Follicular mycosis fungoides: a histopathologic analysis of nine cases. J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28:525-530.
  5. Fujiyama T, Tokura Y. Clinical and histopathological differential diagnosis of eosinophilic pustular folliculitis. J Dermatol. 2013;40:419-423.
  6. Lee JY, Tsai YM, Sheu HM. Ofuji's disease with follicular mucinosis and its differential diagnosis from alopecia mucinosa. J Cutan Pathol. 2003;30:307-313.
  7. Rongioletti F, De Lucchi S, Meyes D, et al. Follicular mucinosis: a clinicopathologic, histochemical, immunohistochemical and molecular study comparing the primary benign form and the mycosis fungoides-associated follicular mucinosis. J Cutan Pathol. 2010;37:15-19.
  8. Vincent JG, Chan MP. Specificity of dermal mucin in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus: comparison with other dermatitides and normal skin. J Cutan Pathol. 2015;42:722-729.
  9. Yell JA, Mbuagbaw J, Burge SM. Cutaneous manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Br J Dermatol. 1996;135:355-362.
  10. Durdu M, Ilkit M. First step in the differential diagnosis of folliculitis: cytology. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2013;39:9-25.
Issue
Cutis - 98(4)
Issue
Cutis - 98(4)
Page Number
228,249-250
Page Number
228,249-250
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Pruritic Papules on the Scalp and Arms
Display Headline
Pruritic Papules on the Scalp and Arms
Sections
Questionnaire Body

H&E, original magnification ×20.

A 60-year-old man presented with a 3-month history of itchy bumps on the scalp and arms. He also noticed some patches of hair loss in these areas. He had no history of other skin conditions and was otherwise healthy with no other medical comorbidities.    
 

Disallow All Ads
Article PDF Media