Eric W. Rudnick, MD

To the Editor:

An otherwise healthy 26-year-old man presented to our outpatient clinic with a 15- to 20-mm, shiny, friable-appearing, red umbilical nodule with clear malodorous discharge (Figure 1). The lesion developed 2 weeks prior and gradually increased in size and discomfort. The patient reported mild associated abdominal pain. He had no fever, changes in urination or bowel movements, or prior history of umbilical growths or drainage. The abdomen was tender to palpation.

Differential diagnoses included pyogenic granuloma, umbilical hernia, epidermoid cyst or abscess, and malignancy (low suspicion). A biopsy was not performed due to concern for bleeding or communication with the bowel. A complete blood cell count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and urinalysis were unremarkable except for mild leukocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein. Ultrasonography revealed a 1.4×1.3-cm inflammatory umbilical mass with no communication with the bowel. The patient was referred to the emergency department (ED) for further evaluation. Computed tomography (CT) revealed periumbilical inflammation and an associated 1-cm calcification that appeared to be connected to a potential tract from the bladder, suggestive of a urachal remnant calcification (Figure 2). The patient was diagnosed with a persistent urachal remnant, discharged home with ciprofloxacin, and scheduled for a follow-up with urology.

The patient returned to the ED 3 days later with painful umbilical bleeding (Figure 3). While there, the patient extracted a 1-cm stone from the lesion, consistent with the calcification visualized on CT scan. Computed tomographic virtual cystoscopy showed no connection between the bladder and umbilicus. He was diagnosed with an umbilical-urachal sinus. Complete surgical excision was recommended and performed by urology without complication.

We report an unusual presentation of a symptomatic urachal remnant in an adult. During embryogenesis, the urachus connects the umbilicus to the developing bladder and normally involutes during development. Incomplete regression can cause rare pathological urachal anomalies. The clinical presentation is nonspecific and differs between children and adults, with most cases presenting during infancy or childhood.¹ Pediatric urachal abnormalities often present with umbilical drainage, abdominal pain, a palpable mass, an abnormal appearance of the umbilicus, or urinary tract infections.^2,3 In adults, the most common symptoms include hematuria, pain, or dysuria. Alternatively, they may be asympomatic³ or present with periumbilical dermatitis⁴ or abscess. Rodrigues and Gandhi⁵ reported another case of a symptomatic calculus formed within a urachal remnant. Calcifications in urachal remnants are rare and usually are reported as incidental radiologic findings.

Overall, visible umbilical masses occur infrequently. In addition to urachal anomalies, the differential diagnosis includes several benign and malignant pathologies. Benign causes include epidermoid cysts, foreign body granulomas, pyogenic granulomas, abscesses, hamartomas, nevi, hemangiomas, dermatofibromas, neurofibromas, lipomas, granular cell tumors, desmoid tumors, keloid scars, omphaliths, hernias, or omphalomesenteric duct remnants.⁶ Primary malignancies (eg, skin cancers, urachal adenocarcinoma, mesenchymal tumors) or metastasis (ie, Sister Mary Joseph nodule) also can present as umbilical nodules.

The wide range of clinical presentations of urachal anomalies combined with the rarity make diagnosis difficult. Thus, it is essential to have a high index of suspicion and awareness of how they can present. Ultrasonography and CT scan are useful tools in making the diagnosis. Urachal anomalies are prone to infection or can be associated with malignancy; therefore, timely and correct diagnosis is critical. Although surgical removal is the primary treatment for urachal anomalies, it may not be the primary treatment of the other entities included in the differential diagnosis of umbilical nodules. For example, the Sister Mary Joseph nodule can be associated with various primary malignancies, which should be treated accordingly.

To the Editor:

An otherwise healthy 26-year-old man presented to our outpatient clinic with a 15- to 20-mm, shiny, friable-appearing, red umbilical nodule with clear malodorous discharge (Figure 1). The lesion developed 2 weeks prior and gradually increased in size and discomfort. The patient reported mild associated abdominal pain. He had no fever, changes in urination or bowel movements, or prior history of umbilical growths or drainage. The abdomen was tender to palpation.

Differential diagnoses included pyogenic granuloma, umbilical hernia, epidermoid cyst or abscess, and malignancy (low suspicion). A biopsy was not performed due to concern for bleeding or communication with the bowel. A complete blood cell count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and urinalysis were unremarkable except for mild leukocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein. Ultrasonography revealed a 1.4×1.3-cm inflammatory umbilical mass with no communication with the bowel. The patient was referred to the emergency department (ED) for further evaluation. Computed tomography (CT) revealed periumbilical inflammation and an associated 1-cm calcification that appeared to be connected to a potential tract from the bladder, suggestive of a urachal remnant calcification (Figure 2). The patient was diagnosed with a persistent urachal remnant, discharged home with ciprofloxacin, and scheduled for a follow-up with urology.

The patient returned to the ED 3 days later with painful umbilical bleeding (Figure 3). While there, the patient extracted a 1-cm stone from the lesion, consistent with the calcification visualized on CT scan. Computed tomographic virtual cystoscopy showed no connection between the bladder and umbilicus. He was diagnosed with an umbilical-urachal sinus. Complete surgical excision was recommended and performed by urology without complication.

We report an unusual presentation of a symptomatic urachal remnant in an adult. During embryogenesis, the urachus connects the umbilicus to the developing bladder and normally involutes during development. Incomplete regression can cause rare pathological urachal anomalies. The clinical presentation is nonspecific and differs between children and adults, with most cases presenting during infancy or childhood.¹ Pediatric urachal abnormalities often present with umbilical drainage, abdominal pain, a palpable mass, an abnormal appearance of the umbilicus, or urinary tract infections.^2,3 In adults, the most common symptoms include hematuria, pain, or dysuria. Alternatively, they may be asympomatic³ or present with periumbilical dermatitis⁴ or abscess. Rodrigues and Gandhi⁵ reported another case of a symptomatic calculus formed within a urachal remnant. Calcifications in urachal remnants are rare and usually are reported as incidental radiologic findings.

Overall, visible umbilical masses occur infrequently. In addition to urachal anomalies, the differential diagnosis includes several benign and malignant pathologies. Benign causes include epidermoid cysts, foreign body granulomas, pyogenic granulomas, abscesses, hamartomas, nevi, hemangiomas, dermatofibromas, neurofibromas, lipomas, granular cell tumors, desmoid tumors, keloid scars, omphaliths, hernias, or omphalomesenteric duct remnants.⁶ Primary malignancies (eg, skin cancers, urachal adenocarcinoma, mesenchymal tumors) or metastasis (ie, Sister Mary Joseph nodule) also can present as umbilical nodules.

The wide range of clinical presentations of urachal anomalies combined with the rarity make diagnosis difficult. Thus, it is essential to have a high index of suspicion and awareness of how they can present. Ultrasonography and CT scan are useful tools in making the diagnosis. Urachal anomalies are prone to infection or can be associated with malignancy; therefore, timely and correct diagnosis is critical. Although surgical removal is the primary treatment for urachal anomalies, it may not be the primary treatment of the other entities included in the differential diagnosis of umbilical nodules. For example, the Sister Mary Joseph nodule can be associated with various primary malignancies, which should be treated accordingly.

To the Editor:

An otherwise healthy 26-year-old man presented to our outpatient clinic with a 15- to 20-mm, shiny, friable-appearing, red umbilical nodule with clear malodorous discharge (Figure 1). The lesion developed 2 weeks prior and gradually increased in size and discomfort. The patient reported mild associated abdominal pain. He had no fever, changes in urination or bowel movements, or prior history of umbilical growths or drainage. The abdomen was tender to palpation.

Differential diagnoses included pyogenic granuloma, umbilical hernia, epidermoid cyst or abscess, and malignancy (low suspicion). A biopsy was not performed due to concern for bleeding or communication with the bowel. A complete blood cell count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and urinalysis were unremarkable except for mild leukocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein. Ultrasonography revealed a 1.4×1.3-cm inflammatory umbilical mass with no communication with the bowel. The patient was referred to the emergency department (ED) for further evaluation. Computed tomography (CT) revealed periumbilical inflammation and an associated 1-cm calcification that appeared to be connected to a potential tract from the bladder, suggestive of a urachal remnant calcification (Figure 2). The patient was diagnosed with a persistent urachal remnant, discharged home with ciprofloxacin, and scheduled for a follow-up with urology.

The patient returned to the ED 3 days later with painful umbilical bleeding (Figure 3). While there, the patient extracted a 1-cm stone from the lesion, consistent with the calcification visualized on CT scan. Computed tomographic virtual cystoscopy showed no connection between the bladder and umbilicus. He was diagnosed with an umbilical-urachal sinus. Complete surgical excision was recommended and performed by urology without complication.

We report an unusual presentation of a symptomatic urachal remnant in an adult. During embryogenesis, the urachus connects the umbilicus to the developing bladder and normally involutes during development. Incomplete regression can cause rare pathological urachal anomalies. The clinical presentation is nonspecific and differs between children and adults, with most cases presenting during infancy or childhood.¹ Pediatric urachal abnormalities often present with umbilical drainage, abdominal pain, a palpable mass, an abnormal appearance of the umbilicus, or urinary tract infections.^2,3 In adults, the most common symptoms include hematuria, pain, or dysuria. Alternatively, they may be asympomatic³ or present with periumbilical dermatitis⁴ or abscess. Rodrigues and Gandhi⁵ reported another case of a symptomatic calculus formed within a urachal remnant. Calcifications in urachal remnants are rare and usually are reported as incidental radiologic findings.

Overall, visible umbilical masses occur infrequently. In addition to urachal anomalies, the differential diagnosis includes several benign and malignant pathologies. Benign causes include epidermoid cysts, foreign body granulomas, pyogenic granulomas, abscesses, hamartomas, nevi, hemangiomas, dermatofibromas, neurofibromas, lipomas, granular cell tumors, desmoid tumors, keloid scars, omphaliths, hernias, or omphalomesenteric duct remnants.⁶ Primary malignancies (eg, skin cancers, urachal adenocarcinoma, mesenchymal tumors) or metastasis (ie, Sister Mary Joseph nodule) also can present as umbilical nodules.

The wide range of clinical presentations of urachal anomalies combined with the rarity make diagnosis difficult. Thus, it is essential to have a high index of suspicion and awareness of how they can present. Ultrasonography and CT scan are useful tools in making the diagnosis. Urachal anomalies are prone to infection or can be associated with malignancy; therefore, timely and correct diagnosis is critical. Although surgical removal is the primary treatment for urachal anomalies, it may not be the primary treatment of the other entities included in the differential diagnosis of umbilical nodules. For example, the Sister Mary Joseph nodule can be associated with various primary malignancies, which should be treated accordingly.

The Diagnosis: Cystic Panfolliculoma 

Panfolliculoma is a rare tumor of follicular origin.¹ Clinical examination can reveal a papule, nodule, or tumor that typically is mistaken for an epidermal inclusion cyst, trichoepithelioma, or basal cell carcinoma (BCC).² As with other benign follicular neoplasms, it often exhibits a protracted growth pattern.^3,4 Most cases reported in the literature have been shown to occur in the head or neck region. One hypothesis is that separation into the various components of the hair follicle occurs at a higher frequency in areas with a higher hair density such as the face and scalp.⁴ The lesion typically presents in patients aged 20 to 70 years, as in our patient, with cases equally distributed among males and females.^4,5 Neill et al1 reported a rare case of cystic panfolliculoma occurring on the right forearm of a 64-year-old woman. 

As its name suggests, panfolliculoma is exceptional in that it displays features of all segments of the hair follicle, including the infundibulum, isthmus, stem, and bulb.⁶ Although not necessary for diagnosis, immunohistochemical staining can be utilized to identify each hair follicle component on histopathologic examination. Panfolliculoma stains positive for 34βE12 and cytokeratin 5/6, highlighting infundibular and isthmus keratinocytes and the outer root sheath, respectively. Additionally, Ber-EP4 labels germinative cells, while CD34 highlights contiguous fibrotic stroma and trichilemmal areas.^3,4 

In our patient, histopathology revealed a cystic structure that was lined by an infundibular epithelium with a prominent granular layer. Solid collections of basaloid germinative cells that demonstrated peripheral palisading were observed (quiz image [top]). Cells with trichohyalin granules, indicative of inner root sheath differentiation, were encased by matrical cells (quiz image [bottom]).  

Historically, panfolliculomas characteristically have been known to reside in the dermis, with only focal connection to the epidermis, if at all present. Nevertheless, Harris et al⁷ detailed 2 cases that displayed predominant epidermal involvement, defined by the term epidermal panfolliculoma. In a study performed by Shan and Guo,² an additional 9 cases (19 panfolliculomas) were found to have similar findings, for which the term superficial panfolliculoma was suggested. In cases that display a primary epidermal component, common mimickers include tumor of the follicular infundibulum and the reactive process of follicular induction.⁷ 

Cystic panfolliculoma is a rare subtype further characterized as a lesion with distinctive features of a panfolliculoma that arises from a cyst wall composed of the follicular infundibulum.^2,6 The origin of cystic panfolliculoma has not been fully elucidated. It has been hypothesized that the formation of such lesions may arise due to epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. One explanation is that basal cells with stem cell capability may progress into hair follicle structures after communication with underlying dermal cells during invagination of the epidermis, while the epithelial cells not in close proximity to dermal cells maintain stem cell capability.⁸ 

The histologic differential diagnosis of cystic panfolliculoma includes dilated pore of Winer, epidermal inclusion cyst, pilar cyst, trichofolliculoma, folliculosebaceous cystic hamartoma, cystic trichoblastoma, and BCC.⁵ Panfolliculoma can mimic both trichoblastoma and trichoepithelioma on a low-power field; however, the latter follicular tumors lack differentiation to the infundibulum, isthmus, outer root sheath, or hair shaft, as in a panfolliculoma.⁴ Trichoblastoma is composed of germinative hair follicle cells, with differentiation limited to the hair germ and papilla (Figure 1).⁹ Panfolliculoma additionally differs from trichoblastoma by having a more prevalent epithelial factor compared to a more pronounced stromal factor in trichoblastoma.¹ The cystic subtype of trichoblastoma differs from cystic panfolliculoma in that the cyst wall develops from the infundibulum only and has germinative cells protruding outwards from the cyst wall.  

Although BCCs may arise in cystic structures, panfolliculomas can be discerned from this entity by their sharp demarcation, lack of peritumoral clefting, and presence of cytokeratin 20-positive Merkel cells.⁵ Unlike panfolliculoma, the tumor islands in BCC commonly display peripheral palisading of nuclei with a surrounding fibromyxoid stroma (Figure 2). Additionally, BCCs can exhibit crowding of nuclei, atypia, and mitoses.⁶ 

Folliculosebaceous cystic hamartomas and cystic panfolliculomas both contain a cystic structure with differentiation of the cyst wall to the hair follicle. However, folliculosebaceous cystic hamartomas are dilated infundibulocystic configurations that contain sebaceous glands emanating from the cyst wall (Figure 3). Kimura et al¹⁰ described defining features of the mesenchymal component of this follicular tumor, including an increase in fibroplasia, vascularity, and adipose tissue. In addition, the epithelial aspect exhibits clefting among the stroma and uninvolved dermis.⁶

Dilated pore of Winer consists of a cystic opening with connection to the epidermis. The cyst wall resembles the follicular infundibulum, and the cavity is filled with lamellar orthokeratosis (Figure 4).^5,11 Epidermal inclusion cysts also contain a cyst wall that resembles the infundibular epithelium, without differentiation to all segments of the hair follicle. They are lined by a stratified squamous epithelium, retain a granular layer, and contain lamellar keratin within the cyst cavity.^5,12 

In summary, panfolliculoma is a rare benign neoplasm that demonstrates differentiation to each component of the hair follicle structure. Our case demonstrates a unique subtype showcasing cystic changes that infrequently has been described in the literature. 

The Diagnosis: Cystic Panfolliculoma 

Panfolliculoma is a rare tumor of follicular origin.¹ Clinical examination can reveal a papule, nodule, or tumor that typically is mistaken for an epidermal inclusion cyst, trichoepithelioma, or basal cell carcinoma (BCC).² As with other benign follicular neoplasms, it often exhibits a protracted growth pattern.^3,4 Most cases reported in the literature have been shown to occur in the head or neck region. One hypothesis is that separation into the various components of the hair follicle occurs at a higher frequency in areas with a higher hair density such as the face and scalp.⁴ The lesion typically presents in patients aged 20 to 70 years, as in our patient, with cases equally distributed among males and females.^4,5 Neill et al1 reported a rare case of cystic panfolliculoma occurring on the right forearm of a 64-year-old woman. 

As its name suggests, panfolliculoma is exceptional in that it displays features of all segments of the hair follicle, including the infundibulum, isthmus, stem, and bulb.⁶ Although not necessary for diagnosis, immunohistochemical staining can be utilized to identify each hair follicle component on histopathologic examination. Panfolliculoma stains positive for 34βE12 and cytokeratin 5/6, highlighting infundibular and isthmus keratinocytes and the outer root sheath, respectively. Additionally, Ber-EP4 labels germinative cells, while CD34 highlights contiguous fibrotic stroma and trichilemmal areas.^3,4 

In our patient, histopathology revealed a cystic structure that was lined by an infundibular epithelium with a prominent granular layer. Solid collections of basaloid germinative cells that demonstrated peripheral palisading were observed (quiz image [top]). Cells with trichohyalin granules, indicative of inner root sheath differentiation, were encased by matrical cells (quiz image [bottom]).  

Historically, panfolliculomas characteristically have been known to reside in the dermis, with only focal connection to the epidermis, if at all present. Nevertheless, Harris et al⁷ detailed 2 cases that displayed predominant epidermal involvement, defined by the term epidermal panfolliculoma. In a study performed by Shan and Guo,² an additional 9 cases (19 panfolliculomas) were found to have similar findings, for which the term superficial panfolliculoma was suggested. In cases that display a primary epidermal component, common mimickers include tumor of the follicular infundibulum and the reactive process of follicular induction.⁷ 

Cystic panfolliculoma is a rare subtype further characterized as a lesion with distinctive features of a panfolliculoma that arises from a cyst wall composed of the follicular infundibulum.^2,6 The origin of cystic panfolliculoma has not been fully elucidated. It has been hypothesized that the formation of such lesions may arise due to epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. One explanation is that basal cells with stem cell capability may progress into hair follicle structures after communication with underlying dermal cells during invagination of the epidermis, while the epithelial cells not in close proximity to dermal cells maintain stem cell capability.⁸ 

The histologic differential diagnosis of cystic panfolliculoma includes dilated pore of Winer, epidermal inclusion cyst, pilar cyst, trichofolliculoma, folliculosebaceous cystic hamartoma, cystic trichoblastoma, and BCC.⁵ Panfolliculoma can mimic both trichoblastoma and trichoepithelioma on a low-power field; however, the latter follicular tumors lack differentiation to the infundibulum, isthmus, outer root sheath, or hair shaft, as in a panfolliculoma.⁴ Trichoblastoma is composed of germinative hair follicle cells, with differentiation limited to the hair germ and papilla (Figure 1).⁹ Panfolliculoma additionally differs from trichoblastoma by having a more prevalent epithelial factor compared to a more pronounced stromal factor in trichoblastoma.¹ The cystic subtype of trichoblastoma differs from cystic panfolliculoma in that the cyst wall develops from the infundibulum only and has germinative cells protruding outwards from the cyst wall.  

Although BCCs may arise in cystic structures, panfolliculomas can be discerned from this entity by their sharp demarcation, lack of peritumoral clefting, and presence of cytokeratin 20-positive Merkel cells.⁵ Unlike panfolliculoma, the tumor islands in BCC commonly display peripheral palisading of nuclei with a surrounding fibromyxoid stroma (Figure 2). Additionally, BCCs can exhibit crowding of nuclei, atypia, and mitoses.⁶ 

Folliculosebaceous cystic hamartomas and cystic panfolliculomas both contain a cystic structure with differentiation of the cyst wall to the hair follicle. However, folliculosebaceous cystic hamartomas are dilated infundibulocystic configurations that contain sebaceous glands emanating from the cyst wall (Figure 3). Kimura et al¹⁰ described defining features of the mesenchymal component of this follicular tumor, including an increase in fibroplasia, vascularity, and adipose tissue. In addition, the epithelial aspect exhibits clefting among the stroma and uninvolved dermis.⁶

Dilated pore of Winer consists of a cystic opening with connection to the epidermis. The cyst wall resembles the follicular infundibulum, and the cavity is filled with lamellar orthokeratosis (Figure 4).^5,11 Epidermal inclusion cysts also contain a cyst wall that resembles the infundibular epithelium, without differentiation to all segments of the hair follicle. They are lined by a stratified squamous epithelium, retain a granular layer, and contain lamellar keratin within the cyst cavity.^5,12 

In summary, panfolliculoma is a rare benign neoplasm that demonstrates differentiation to each component of the hair follicle structure. Our case demonstrates a unique subtype showcasing cystic changes that infrequently has been described in the literature. 

The Diagnosis: Cystic Panfolliculoma 

Panfolliculoma is a rare tumor of follicular origin.¹ Clinical examination can reveal a papule, nodule, or tumor that typically is mistaken for an epidermal inclusion cyst, trichoepithelioma, or basal cell carcinoma (BCC).² As with other benign follicular neoplasms, it often exhibits a protracted growth pattern.^3,4 Most cases reported in the literature have been shown to occur in the head or neck region. One hypothesis is that separation into the various components of the hair follicle occurs at a higher frequency in areas with a higher hair density such as the face and scalp.⁴ The lesion typically presents in patients aged 20 to 70 years, as in our patient, with cases equally distributed among males and females.^4,5 Neill et al1 reported a rare case of cystic panfolliculoma occurring on the right forearm of a 64-year-old woman. 

As its name suggests, panfolliculoma is exceptional in that it displays features of all segments of the hair follicle, including the infundibulum, isthmus, stem, and bulb.⁶ Although not necessary for diagnosis, immunohistochemical staining can be utilized to identify each hair follicle component on histopathologic examination. Panfolliculoma stains positive for 34βE12 and cytokeratin 5/6, highlighting infundibular and isthmus keratinocytes and the outer root sheath, respectively. Additionally, Ber-EP4 labels germinative cells, while CD34 highlights contiguous fibrotic stroma and trichilemmal areas.^3,4 

In our patient, histopathology revealed a cystic structure that was lined by an infundibular epithelium with a prominent granular layer. Solid collections of basaloid germinative cells that demonstrated peripheral palisading were observed (quiz image [top]). Cells with trichohyalin granules, indicative of inner root sheath differentiation, were encased by matrical cells (quiz image [bottom]).  

Historically, panfolliculomas characteristically have been known to reside in the dermis, with only focal connection to the epidermis, if at all present. Nevertheless, Harris et al⁷ detailed 2 cases that displayed predominant epidermal involvement, defined by the term epidermal panfolliculoma. In a study performed by Shan and Guo,² an additional 9 cases (19 panfolliculomas) were found to have similar findings, for which the term superficial panfolliculoma was suggested. In cases that display a primary epidermal component, common mimickers include tumor of the follicular infundibulum and the reactive process of follicular induction.⁷ 

Cystic panfolliculoma is a rare subtype further characterized as a lesion with distinctive features of a panfolliculoma that arises from a cyst wall composed of the follicular infundibulum.^2,6 The origin of cystic panfolliculoma has not been fully elucidated. It has been hypothesized that the formation of such lesions may arise due to epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. One explanation is that basal cells with stem cell capability may progress into hair follicle structures after communication with underlying dermal cells during invagination of the epidermis, while the epithelial cells not in close proximity to dermal cells maintain stem cell capability.⁸ 

The histologic differential diagnosis of cystic panfolliculoma includes dilated pore of Winer, epidermal inclusion cyst, pilar cyst, trichofolliculoma, folliculosebaceous cystic hamartoma, cystic trichoblastoma, and BCC.⁵ Panfolliculoma can mimic both trichoblastoma and trichoepithelioma on a low-power field; however, the latter follicular tumors lack differentiation to the infundibulum, isthmus, outer root sheath, or hair shaft, as in a panfolliculoma.⁴ Trichoblastoma is composed of germinative hair follicle cells, with differentiation limited to the hair germ and papilla (Figure 1).⁹ Panfolliculoma additionally differs from trichoblastoma by having a more prevalent epithelial factor compared to a more pronounced stromal factor in trichoblastoma.¹ The cystic subtype of trichoblastoma differs from cystic panfolliculoma in that the cyst wall develops from the infundibulum only and has germinative cells protruding outwards from the cyst wall.  

Although BCCs may arise in cystic structures, panfolliculomas can be discerned from this entity by their sharp demarcation, lack of peritumoral clefting, and presence of cytokeratin 20-positive Merkel cells.⁵ Unlike panfolliculoma, the tumor islands in BCC commonly display peripheral palisading of nuclei with a surrounding fibromyxoid stroma (Figure 2). Additionally, BCCs can exhibit crowding of nuclei, atypia, and mitoses.⁶ 

Folliculosebaceous cystic hamartomas and cystic panfolliculomas both contain a cystic structure with differentiation of the cyst wall to the hair follicle. However, folliculosebaceous cystic hamartomas are dilated infundibulocystic configurations that contain sebaceous glands emanating from the cyst wall (Figure 3). Kimura et al¹⁰ described defining features of the mesenchymal component of this follicular tumor, including an increase in fibroplasia, vascularity, and adipose tissue. In addition, the epithelial aspect exhibits clefting among the stroma and uninvolved dermis.⁶

Dilated pore of Winer consists of a cystic opening with connection to the epidermis. The cyst wall resembles the follicular infundibulum, and the cavity is filled with lamellar orthokeratosis (Figure 4).^5,11 Epidermal inclusion cysts also contain a cyst wall that resembles the infundibular epithelium, without differentiation to all segments of the hair follicle. They are lined by a stratified squamous epithelium, retain a granular layer, and contain lamellar keratin within the cyst cavity.^5,12 

In summary, panfolliculoma is a rare benign neoplasm that demonstrates differentiation to each component of the hair follicle structure. Our case demonstrates a unique subtype showcasing cystic changes that infrequently has been described in the literature. 

To the Editor:

A 56-year-old white woman with a history of melanoma and hypertension presented for evaluation of progressive hair loss of more than 1 year’s duration with associated pruritis. Scalp examination revealed diffuse erythema and scarring alopecia of the bilateral parietal and temporal regions. Physical examination also revealed nonscarring alopecia of the bilateral axillae, with associated thinning of the pubic hair, eyebrows, and eyelashes, as well as keratosis pilaris on the upper arms. Biopsy of the parietal scalp revealed mild scarring alopecia with isthmic fibroplasia consistent with early lichen planopilaris (LPP)(Figure). These histologic features combined with the patient’s clinical presentation were consistent with a diagnosis of Graham-Little-Piccardi-Lassueur syndrome (GLPL).

Graham-Little-Piccardi-Lassueur syndrome was first described by Piccardi in 1913.A second case was then described by Graham-Little in 1915 in a patient referred by Lassueur, resulting in the name it bears today.^1,2 The condition presents most commonly in middle-aged white women and is characterized by a triad of cicatricial alopecia of the scalp, nonscarring alopecia of the axillae and/or groin, and a rough follicular eruption on the body and/or scalp. Symptoms may not be present simultaneously. In GLPL, scarring alopecia of the scalp often precedes follicular eruptions of the trunk, arms, and legs by as much as years,² and the inverse also has been reported.¹ The inflammatory lesions of the scalp eventually resolve spontaneously, but the hair loss is by definition irreversible.

This rare condition is considered one of the 3 clinical variants of LPP. Other variants include classic LPP, also known as follicular lichen planus, and frontal fibrosing alopecia.³ More recently, fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution has gained some popularity as a fourth variant of LPP.⁴ All variants of LPP, including GLPL, result in a scarring alopecia. The classic scalp finding is an erythematous to violaceous, perifollicular, hyperkeratotic scale at the base of the terminal hairs. The population of inflamed follicles spreads outward, leaving behind a round to oval, central, atrophic scar that often is devoid of follicles. Few hairs may persist within zones of alopecia at presentation; however, these hairs are affected by inflammation and also will likely shed. A hair pull test will be positive at the margins during active disease, consisting of mostly anagen hairs on trichogram examination.^1,5 Patients may develop only a single foci of hair loss, but much more commonly, a patchy multifocal alopecia is noted.⁶ Sites often will coalesce. Onset of scalp alopecia may be insidious or fulminant.

The nonscarring alopecia of the axillae and groin may be described as subtle thinning to complete hair loss with no signs of atrophy or inflammation. Although not commonly reported, a case of nonscarring alopecia located on the shoulders has been seen.⁷

The follicular eruption that can be present on the trunk, arms, or legs in GLPL is most often but not limited to keratosis pilaris, as was seen in our patient. One reported case also described lichen spinulosus as a potential variant.⁸ Lichen planopilaris is separate from lichen planus (LP) because of its selective follicular involvement vs the nonselective mucocutaneous distribution of LP. The 2 processes also are histologically distinct; however, estimations have shown that more than 50% of patients with GLPL experience at least 1 episode of mucosal or cutaneous LP in their lifetime.⁹ Rarely, coexistence of GLPL and LP lesions has been described. One reported case of GLPL and concomitant hypertrophic LP could represent a severe form of the disease.⁹ Additionally, lichen planus pigmentosus, an uncommon variant of LP characterized by hyperpigmented brown macules in sun-exposed areas and flexural folds, was identified in a case report of an Asian woman with GLPL.¹⁰

As a general rule, the variants of LPP most commonly are seen in postmenopausal women aged 40 to 60 years; however, rare cases in a child and a teenager have been reported.¹¹ The GLPL variant of LPP is reported up to 4 times more frequently in females.⁵ Pruritus and pain are inconsistent findings, and there are no systemic signs of illness. A case of androgen insensitivity syndrome associated with GLPL suggested a potential influence of hormones in LPP.¹² Stress, vitamin A deficiency, and autoimmunity also have been proposed as triggers of GLPL.¹³ Furthermore, familial GLPL was described in a mother and daughter, though the association was uncertain.¹⁴ Our patient had no relevant family history.

Workups to reveal the etiology of GLPL have been inconclusive. Reports of laboratory testing including complete blood cell count, basic metabolic panel, liver function tests, testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone levels, and chest radiograph have been normal.² Additional workup for viral triggers also has been negative.¹⁵ A case series of 29 patients with LPP and its variants, including GLPL, revealed positive antinuclear antibodies in 10% of patients and a thyroid disorder in 24% of patients, with Hashimoto thyroiditis being the most prevalent in 7% of cases.¹⁶ There may be a strong association between the comorbidities of thyroid dysfunction and GLPL, as documented in other studies.^10,17 A case-control study by Mesinkovska et al¹⁷ revealed a considerable increase in the prevalence of thyroid gland disease among patients with LPP vs controls. Human leukocyte antigen DR1 was found in a familial case of GLPL,⁴ and a case of GLPL following hepatitis B vaccination also has been described.¹⁸

Graham-Little-Piccardi-Lassueur syndrome most likely is a T-cell mediated autoimmune condition associated with one or multiple unknown keratinocyte antigens. Autoantibodies to the inner centromere protein were identified in a case that was positive on direct immunofluorescence, which may provide more insight into the disease pathophysiology.¹³ Interestingly, a study comparing the concentrations of inflammatory cells in LPP and traction alopecia found an elevation in the ratio of Langerhans cells to T lymphocytes within the follicular inflammatory infiltrate of LPP.¹⁹

Because the number of patients with GLPL is so few, therapy should mirror advances being made in treatments for other variants of LPP. More recent studies of LPP treatment with hydroxychloroquine showed opposing results, though the safety profile of this agent makes it an enticing treatment option.^22,23 Tetracyclines showed improvement in 4 of 15 (26.7%) patients in a retrospective study by Spencer et al.²⁴ Another retrospective study showed promising results with the potent 5-alpha reductase inhibitor dutasteride with 7 of 10 (70%) postmenopausal patients reporting stabilization over a mean duration of 28 months with no reported side effects.²⁵ Antimalarial medications also have been implemented as adjunct therapies with mixed results.⁵ A case of a 26-year-old man with GLPL from South India showed systemic disease improvement following treatment with pulsed systemic steroids, isotretinoin, and anxiolytics.⁷ Chloroquine phosphate at a daily dose of 150 mg for 3 to 9 months yielded a transient response in one postmenopausal patient with frontal fibrosing alopecia.⁶ Stabilization of hair loss was achieved with a combination of hydroxychloroquine and doxycycline in a woman with GLPL who was previously unresponsive to tacrolimus ointment.¹⁰ Thalidomide showed early promise in an isolated report claiming successful treatment of LPP,²⁶ but there is contradictory evidence, as thalidomide showed no benefit in a series of 4 patients with LPP.²⁷

Peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ), a transcription factor that regulates genes, is downregulated in LPP.²⁸ Deletion of PPAR-γ within follicular stem cells in mice results in a phenotype similar to cicatricial alopecia. Data have supported the role of PPAR-γ in maintaining the pilosebaceous unit. A case report of pioglitazone (PPAR-γ agonist) therapy used at 15 mg daily for 8 months was successful in treating a patient with LPP.²⁸ Further investigation must be conducted to evaluate these treatments since early attenuation of the disease process is crucial to the reduction of permanent hair loss.

Advances in the early recognition and successful treatment of GLPL are dependent on continued research in all variants of LPP. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to establish standard of care. Further studies should target the association of GLPL and other autoimmune phenomena. Moreover, research into the etiology will provide direction in understanding disease progression and outcome.

To the Editor:

A 56-year-old white woman with a history of melanoma and hypertension presented for evaluation of progressive hair loss of more than 1 year’s duration with associated pruritis. Scalp examination revealed diffuse erythema and scarring alopecia of the bilateral parietal and temporal regions. Physical examination also revealed nonscarring alopecia of the bilateral axillae, with associated thinning of the pubic hair, eyebrows, and eyelashes, as well as keratosis pilaris on the upper arms. Biopsy of the parietal scalp revealed mild scarring alopecia with isthmic fibroplasia consistent with early lichen planopilaris (LPP)(Figure). These histologic features combined with the patient’s clinical presentation were consistent with a diagnosis of Graham-Little-Piccardi-Lassueur syndrome (GLPL).

Graham-Little-Piccardi-Lassueur syndrome was first described by Piccardi in 1913.A second case was then described by Graham-Little in 1915 in a patient referred by Lassueur, resulting in the name it bears today.^1,2 The condition presents most commonly in middle-aged white women and is characterized by a triad of cicatricial alopecia of the scalp, nonscarring alopecia of the axillae and/or groin, and a rough follicular eruption on the body and/or scalp. Symptoms may not be present simultaneously. In GLPL, scarring alopecia of the scalp often precedes follicular eruptions of the trunk, arms, and legs by as much as years,² and the inverse also has been reported.¹ The inflammatory lesions of the scalp eventually resolve spontaneously, but the hair loss is by definition irreversible.

This rare condition is considered one of the 3 clinical variants of LPP. Other variants include classic LPP, also known as follicular lichen planus, and frontal fibrosing alopecia.³ More recently, fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution has gained some popularity as a fourth variant of LPP.⁴ All variants of LPP, including GLPL, result in a scarring alopecia. The classic scalp finding is an erythematous to violaceous, perifollicular, hyperkeratotic scale at the base of the terminal hairs. The population of inflamed follicles spreads outward, leaving behind a round to oval, central, atrophic scar that often is devoid of follicles. Few hairs may persist within zones of alopecia at presentation; however, these hairs are affected by inflammation and also will likely shed. A hair pull test will be positive at the margins during active disease, consisting of mostly anagen hairs on trichogram examination.^1,5 Patients may develop only a single foci of hair loss, but much more commonly, a patchy multifocal alopecia is noted.⁶ Sites often will coalesce. Onset of scalp alopecia may be insidious or fulminant.

The nonscarring alopecia of the axillae and groin may be described as subtle thinning to complete hair loss with no signs of atrophy or inflammation. Although not commonly reported, a case of nonscarring alopecia located on the shoulders has been seen.⁷

The follicular eruption that can be present on the trunk, arms, or legs in GLPL is most often but not limited to keratosis pilaris, as was seen in our patient. One reported case also described lichen spinulosus as a potential variant.⁸ Lichen planopilaris is separate from lichen planus (LP) because of its selective follicular involvement vs the nonselective mucocutaneous distribution of LP. The 2 processes also are histologically distinct; however, estimations have shown that more than 50% of patients with GLPL experience at least 1 episode of mucosal or cutaneous LP in their lifetime.⁹ Rarely, coexistence of GLPL and LP lesions has been described. One reported case of GLPL and concomitant hypertrophic LP could represent a severe form of the disease.⁹ Additionally, lichen planus pigmentosus, an uncommon variant of LP characterized by hyperpigmented brown macules in sun-exposed areas and flexural folds, was identified in a case report of an Asian woman with GLPL.¹⁰

As a general rule, the variants of LPP most commonly are seen in postmenopausal women aged 40 to 60 years; however, rare cases in a child and a teenager have been reported.¹¹ The GLPL variant of LPP is reported up to 4 times more frequently in females.⁵ Pruritus and pain are inconsistent findings, and there are no systemic signs of illness. A case of androgen insensitivity syndrome associated with GLPL suggested a potential influence of hormones in LPP.¹² Stress, vitamin A deficiency, and autoimmunity also have been proposed as triggers of GLPL.¹³ Furthermore, familial GLPL was described in a mother and daughter, though the association was uncertain.¹⁴ Our patient had no relevant family history.

Workups to reveal the etiology of GLPL have been inconclusive. Reports of laboratory testing including complete blood cell count, basic metabolic panel, liver function tests, testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone levels, and chest radiograph have been normal.² Additional workup for viral triggers also has been negative.¹⁵ A case series of 29 patients with LPP and its variants, including GLPL, revealed positive antinuclear antibodies in 10% of patients and a thyroid disorder in 24% of patients, with Hashimoto thyroiditis being the most prevalent in 7% of cases.¹⁶ There may be a strong association between the comorbidities of thyroid dysfunction and GLPL, as documented in other studies.^10,17 A case-control study by Mesinkovska et al¹⁷ revealed a considerable increase in the prevalence of thyroid gland disease among patients with LPP vs controls. Human leukocyte antigen DR1 was found in a familial case of GLPL,⁴ and a case of GLPL following hepatitis B vaccination also has been described.¹⁸

Graham-Little-Piccardi-Lassueur syndrome most likely is a T-cell mediated autoimmune condition associated with one or multiple unknown keratinocyte antigens. Autoantibodies to the inner centromere protein were identified in a case that was positive on direct immunofluorescence, which may provide more insight into the disease pathophysiology.¹³ Interestingly, a study comparing the concentrations of inflammatory cells in LPP and traction alopecia found an elevation in the ratio of Langerhans cells to T lymphocytes within the follicular inflammatory infiltrate of LPP.¹⁹

Because the number of patients with GLPL is so few, therapy should mirror advances being made in treatments for other variants of LPP. More recent studies of LPP treatment with hydroxychloroquine showed opposing results, though the safety profile of this agent makes it an enticing treatment option.^22,23 Tetracyclines showed improvement in 4 of 15 (26.7%) patients in a retrospective study by Spencer et al.²⁴ Another retrospective study showed promising results with the potent 5-alpha reductase inhibitor dutasteride with 7 of 10 (70%) postmenopausal patients reporting stabilization over a mean duration of 28 months with no reported side effects.²⁵ Antimalarial medications also have been implemented as adjunct therapies with mixed results.⁵ A case of a 26-year-old man with GLPL from South India showed systemic disease improvement following treatment with pulsed systemic steroids, isotretinoin, and anxiolytics.⁷ Chloroquine phosphate at a daily dose of 150 mg for 3 to 9 months yielded a transient response in one postmenopausal patient with frontal fibrosing alopecia.⁶ Stabilization of hair loss was achieved with a combination of hydroxychloroquine and doxycycline in a woman with GLPL who was previously unresponsive to tacrolimus ointment.¹⁰ Thalidomide showed early promise in an isolated report claiming successful treatment of LPP,²⁶ but there is contradictory evidence, as thalidomide showed no benefit in a series of 4 patients with LPP.²⁷

Peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ), a transcription factor that regulates genes, is downregulated in LPP.²⁸ Deletion of PPAR-γ within follicular stem cells in mice results in a phenotype similar to cicatricial alopecia. Data have supported the role of PPAR-γ in maintaining the pilosebaceous unit. A case report of pioglitazone (PPAR-γ agonist) therapy used at 15 mg daily for 8 months was successful in treating a patient with LPP.²⁸ Further investigation must be conducted to evaluate these treatments since early attenuation of the disease process is crucial to the reduction of permanent hair loss.

Advances in the early recognition and successful treatment of GLPL are dependent on continued research in all variants of LPP. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to establish standard of care. Further studies should target the association of GLPL and other autoimmune phenomena. Moreover, research into the etiology will provide direction in understanding disease progression and outcome.

To the Editor:

A 56-year-old white woman with a history of melanoma and hypertension presented for evaluation of progressive hair loss of more than 1 year’s duration with associated pruritis. Scalp examination revealed diffuse erythema and scarring alopecia of the bilateral parietal and temporal regions. Physical examination also revealed nonscarring alopecia of the bilateral axillae, with associated thinning of the pubic hair, eyebrows, and eyelashes, as well as keratosis pilaris on the upper arms. Biopsy of the parietal scalp revealed mild scarring alopecia with isthmic fibroplasia consistent with early lichen planopilaris (LPP)(Figure). These histologic features combined with the patient’s clinical presentation were consistent with a diagnosis of Graham-Little-Piccardi-Lassueur syndrome (GLPL).

Graham-Little-Piccardi-Lassueur syndrome was first described by Piccardi in 1913.A second case was then described by Graham-Little in 1915 in a patient referred by Lassueur, resulting in the name it bears today.^1,2 The condition presents most commonly in middle-aged white women and is characterized by a triad of cicatricial alopecia of the scalp, nonscarring alopecia of the axillae and/or groin, and a rough follicular eruption on the body and/or scalp. Symptoms may not be present simultaneously. In GLPL, scarring alopecia of the scalp often precedes follicular eruptions of the trunk, arms, and legs by as much as years,² and the inverse also has been reported.¹ The inflammatory lesions of the scalp eventually resolve spontaneously, but the hair loss is by definition irreversible.

This rare condition is considered one of the 3 clinical variants of LPP. Other variants include classic LPP, also known as follicular lichen planus, and frontal fibrosing alopecia.³ More recently, fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution has gained some popularity as a fourth variant of LPP.⁴ All variants of LPP, including GLPL, result in a scarring alopecia. The classic scalp finding is an erythematous to violaceous, perifollicular, hyperkeratotic scale at the base of the terminal hairs. The population of inflamed follicles spreads outward, leaving behind a round to oval, central, atrophic scar that often is devoid of follicles. Few hairs may persist within zones of alopecia at presentation; however, these hairs are affected by inflammation and also will likely shed. A hair pull test will be positive at the margins during active disease, consisting of mostly anagen hairs on trichogram examination.^1,5 Patients may develop only a single foci of hair loss, but much more commonly, a patchy multifocal alopecia is noted.⁶ Sites often will coalesce. Onset of scalp alopecia may be insidious or fulminant.

The nonscarring alopecia of the axillae and groin may be described as subtle thinning to complete hair loss with no signs of atrophy or inflammation. Although not commonly reported, a case of nonscarring alopecia located on the shoulders has been seen.⁷

The follicular eruption that can be present on the trunk, arms, or legs in GLPL is most often but not limited to keratosis pilaris, as was seen in our patient. One reported case also described lichen spinulosus as a potential variant.⁸ Lichen planopilaris is separate from lichen planus (LP) because of its selective follicular involvement vs the nonselective mucocutaneous distribution of LP. The 2 processes also are histologically distinct; however, estimations have shown that more than 50% of patients with GLPL experience at least 1 episode of mucosal or cutaneous LP in their lifetime.⁹ Rarely, coexistence of GLPL and LP lesions has been described. One reported case of GLPL and concomitant hypertrophic LP could represent a severe form of the disease.⁹ Additionally, lichen planus pigmentosus, an uncommon variant of LP characterized by hyperpigmented brown macules in sun-exposed areas and flexural folds, was identified in a case report of an Asian woman with GLPL.¹⁰

As a general rule, the variants of LPP most commonly are seen in postmenopausal women aged 40 to 60 years; however, rare cases in a child and a teenager have been reported.¹¹ The GLPL variant of LPP is reported up to 4 times more frequently in females.⁵ Pruritus and pain are inconsistent findings, and there are no systemic signs of illness. A case of androgen insensitivity syndrome associated with GLPL suggested a potential influence of hormones in LPP.¹² Stress, vitamin A deficiency, and autoimmunity also have been proposed as triggers of GLPL.¹³ Furthermore, familial GLPL was described in a mother and daughter, though the association was uncertain.¹⁴ Our patient had no relevant family history.

Workups to reveal the etiology of GLPL have been inconclusive. Reports of laboratory testing including complete blood cell count, basic metabolic panel, liver function tests, testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone levels, and chest radiograph have been normal.² Additional workup for viral triggers also has been negative.¹⁵ A case series of 29 patients with LPP and its variants, including GLPL, revealed positive antinuclear antibodies in 10% of patients and a thyroid disorder in 24% of patients, with Hashimoto thyroiditis being the most prevalent in 7% of cases.¹⁶ There may be a strong association between the comorbidities of thyroid dysfunction and GLPL, as documented in other studies.^10,17 A case-control study by Mesinkovska et al¹⁷ revealed a considerable increase in the prevalence of thyroid gland disease among patients with LPP vs controls. Human leukocyte antigen DR1 was found in a familial case of GLPL,⁴ and a case of GLPL following hepatitis B vaccination also has been described.¹⁸

Graham-Little-Piccardi-Lassueur syndrome most likely is a T-cell mediated autoimmune condition associated with one or multiple unknown keratinocyte antigens. Autoantibodies to the inner centromere protein were identified in a case that was positive on direct immunofluorescence, which may provide more insight into the disease pathophysiology.¹³ Interestingly, a study comparing the concentrations of inflammatory cells in LPP and traction alopecia found an elevation in the ratio of Langerhans cells to T lymphocytes within the follicular inflammatory infiltrate of LPP.¹⁹

Because the number of patients with GLPL is so few, therapy should mirror advances being made in treatments for other variants of LPP. More recent studies of LPP treatment with hydroxychloroquine showed opposing results, though the safety profile of this agent makes it an enticing treatment option.^22,23 Tetracyclines showed improvement in 4 of 15 (26.7%) patients in a retrospective study by Spencer et al.²⁴ Another retrospective study showed promising results with the potent 5-alpha reductase inhibitor dutasteride with 7 of 10 (70%) postmenopausal patients reporting stabilization over a mean duration of 28 months with no reported side effects.²⁵ Antimalarial medications also have been implemented as adjunct therapies with mixed results.⁵ A case of a 26-year-old man with GLPL from South India showed systemic disease improvement following treatment with pulsed systemic steroids, isotretinoin, and anxiolytics.⁷ Chloroquine phosphate at a daily dose of 150 mg for 3 to 9 months yielded a transient response in one postmenopausal patient with frontal fibrosing alopecia.⁶ Stabilization of hair loss was achieved with a combination of hydroxychloroquine and doxycycline in a woman with GLPL who was previously unresponsive to tacrolimus ointment.¹⁰ Thalidomide showed early promise in an isolated report claiming successful treatment of LPP,²⁶ but there is contradictory evidence, as thalidomide showed no benefit in a series of 4 patients with LPP.²⁷

Peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ), a transcription factor that regulates genes, is downregulated in LPP.²⁸ Deletion of PPAR-γ within follicular stem cells in mice results in a phenotype similar to cicatricial alopecia. Data have supported the role of PPAR-γ in maintaining the pilosebaceous unit. A case report of pioglitazone (PPAR-γ agonist) therapy used at 15 mg daily for 8 months was successful in treating a patient with LPP.²⁸ Further investigation must be conducted to evaluate these treatments since early attenuation of the disease process is crucial to the reduction of permanent hair loss.

Advances in the early recognition and successful treatment of GLPL are dependent on continued research in all variants of LPP. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to establish standard of care. Further studies should target the association of GLPL and other autoimmune phenomena. Moreover, research into the etiology will provide direction in understanding disease progression and outcome.