Which patients with a parapneumonic effusion need a chest tube?

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 08/01/2018 - 07:25
Display Headline
Which patients with a parapneumonic effusion need a chest tube?

Hospitalized patients with pneumonia who develop a complicated parapneumonic effusion or empyema need to undergo chest tube placement.

WHAT IS PARAPNEUMONIC EFFUSION?

Parapneumonic effusion is a pleural effusion that forms concurrently with bacterial or viral pneumonia. Up to 40% of patients hospitalized with pneumonia develop a parapneumonic effusion.1 The effusion progresses through a continuum of 3 stages: uncomplicated, complicated, and empyema.

Uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion is an exudative effusion without bacteria or pus that is caused by movement of fluid and neutrophils into the pleural space. Pneumonia itself causes an increase in interstitial fluid and capillary leakage. The effusion becomes complicated as a result of bacteria invading the pleural space, causing a further increase in neutrophils in the pleural fluid. Empyema is defined as the presence of frank pus in the pleural space.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, pneumonia accounts for 674,000 emergency department visits each year; of the patients hospitalized, up to 40% develop a parapneumonic effusion.2 The only study done on rates of death associated with parapneumonic effusion showed that, compared with patients with no effusion, the risk of death was 3.7 times higher with a unilateral effusion and 6.5 times higher with bilateral effusions.3

INITIAL EVALUATION

The initial evaluation of suspected parapneumonic effusion should include chest radiography with lateral or decubitus views, followed by thoracentesis if indicated. If thoracentesis is performed, the fluid should be tested as follows:

  • Gram stain
  • Appropriate cultures based on clinical scenario (eg, aerobic, anaerobic, fungal)
  • Total protein in pleural fluid and serum
  • Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in pleural fluid and serum
  • Glucose
  • pH.

CLASSIFICATION OF EFFUSIONS

When pleural fluid is obtained, the total protein and LDH levels are used to categorize the effusion as either transudative or exudative based on the Light criteria.4 An effusion is confirmed as exudative when 1 of the following 3 criteria is met:

  • The ratio of pleural fluid protein to serum protein is greater than 0.5
  • The ratio of pleural fluid LDH to serum LDH is greater than 0.6
  • The pleural fluid LDH is greater than two-thirds the upper limit of normal for the serum LDH.

Parapneumonic effusion: Categories, management, and prognosis
Once an effusion is characterized as exudative, the American College of Chest Physicians consensus guidelines are used for further classification and prognostication.5 The guidelines estimate the risk of poor outcome by dividing the effusions based on their characteristics: the anatomy of the effusion, the bacteriology of the fluid, and the chemistry of the pleural fluid (Table 1). Based on these guidelines, effusions are divided into 4 categories. Category 1 and 2 effusions are considered uncomplicated, category 3 is considered complicated, and category 4 is empyema. The outcomes of interest are prolonged hospitalization, prolonged systemic toxicity, increased ventilator impairment, increased morbidity rate, and increased mortality rate.5

Category 1 effusions are defined as free- flowing fluid with a thickness of less than 10 mm on any imaging modality. Thoracentesis for pleural fluid analysis is not required. The prognosis is very good.

Category 2 effusions are defined as free- flowing fluid with a thickness greater than 10 mm and less than 50% of the hemithorax. Thoracentesis is typically done because of the size of the effusion, but Gram stain and culture of the pleural fluid are usually negative, and the pH is at least 7.2. The prognosis is good.

Category 3 effusions are considered complicated because the anatomy of the pleural space becomes altered or because bacteria have invaded the pleural space. The effusion is larger than 50% of the hemithorax or is loculated, or the parietal pleura is thickened. Since the bacteria have invaded the pleural space, Gram stain or culture of pleural fluid may be positive, the pleural fluid pH may be less than 7.2, or the glucose level of the fluid may be less than 60 mg/dL. The prognosis for category 3 is poor.

Category 4 effusions are defined as empyema. The only characteristic that separates this from category 3 is frank pus in the pleural space. The prognosis is very poor.

 

 

TO PLACE A CHEST TUBE OR NOT

For category 1 or 2 effusions, treatment with antibiotics alone is typically enough. Category 3 effusions usually do not respond to antibiotics alone and may require complete drainage of the fluid with or without a chest tube depending on whether loculations are present, as loculations are difficult to drain with a chest tube. Category 4 effusions require both antibiotics and chest tube placement.

WHAT TYPE OF CHEST TUBE?

Studies have shown that small-bore chest tubes (< 20 F) are as efficacious as larger tubes (≥ 20 F) for the treatment of complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema.6,7 Studies have also shown that the size of the tube makes no difference in the time needed to drain the effusion, the length of hospital stay, or the complication rate.8,9 Based on these studies, a small-bore chest tube should be placed first when clinically appropriate. When a chest tube is placed for empyema, computed tomography should be performed within 24 hours to confirm proper tube placement.

ADVANCED THERAPIES FOR EMPYEMA

Empyema treatment fails when antibiotic coverage is inadequate or when a loculation is not drained appropriately. Options if treatment fails include instillation of fibrinolytics into the pleural space, video-assisted thora­scopic surgery, and decortication.

The role of fibrinolytics has not been well-established, but fibrinolytics should be considered in loculated effusions or empyema, or if drainage of the effusion slows.10 Video-assisted thora­scopic surgery is reserved for effusions that are incompletely drained with a chest tube with or without fibrinolytics; studies have shown shorter hospital length of stay and higher treatment efficacy when this is performed earlier for loculated effusions.11 Decortication is reserved for symptomatic patients who have a thickened pleura more than 6 months after the initial infection.12 Timing for each of these procedures is not clearly defined and so must be individualized.

TAKE-AWAY POINTS

  • Parapneumonic effusion occurs concurrently with pneumonia and with a high frequency.1
  • Effusions are associated with an increased risk of death.3
  • Categorizing the effusion helps guide treatment.
  • Chest tubes should be placed for some cases of complicated effusion and for all cases of empyema.
  • A small-bore chest tube (< 20 F) should be tried first.
References
  1. Light RW. Parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006; 3(1):75–80. doi:10.1513/pats.200510-113JH
  2. US Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Health Statistics. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2013 emergency department summary tables. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/2013_ed_web_tables.pdf.
  3. Hasley PB, Albaum MN, Li YH, et al. Do pulmonary radiographic findings at presentation predict mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia? Arch Intern Med 1996; 156(19):2206–2212. doi:10.1001/archinte.1996.00440180068008
  4. Light RW, Macgregor MI, Luchsinger PC, Ball WC. Pleural effusions: the diagnostic separation of transudates and exudates. Ann Intern Med 1972; 77(4):507–513. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-77-4-507
  5. Colice GL, Curtis A, Deslauriers J, et al. Medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions: an evidence-based guideline. Chest 2000; 118(4):1158–1171. doi:10.1378/CHEST.118.4.1158
  6. Ali I, Unruh H. Management of empyema thoracis. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 50(3):355–359. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(90)90474-K
  7. Ashbaugh DG. Empyema thoracis. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality. Chest 1991; 99(5):1162–1165. doi:10.1378/CHEST.99.5.1162
  8. Cooke DT, David EA. Large-bore and small-bore chest tubes: types, function, and placement. Thorac Surg Clin 2013; 23(1):17–24. doi:10.1016/j.thorsurg.2012.10.006
  9. Halifax RJ, Psallidas I, Rahman NM. Chest drain size: the debate continues. Curr Pulmonol Rep 2017; 6(1):26–29. doi:10.1007/s13665-017-0162-3
  10. Maskell NA, Davies CW, Nunn AJ, et al; First Multicenter Intrapleural Sepsis Trial (MIST1) Group. UK controlled trial of intrapleural streptokinase for pleural infection. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(9):865–874. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa042473
  11. Wait MA, Sharma S, Hohn J, Dal Nogare A. A randomized trial of empyema therapy. Chest 1997; 111(6):1548–1551. doi:10.1378/chest.111.6.1548
  12. Rzyman W, Skokowski J, Romanowicz G, Lass P, Dziadziuszko R. Decortication in chronic pleural empyema—effect on lung function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21(3):502–507. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)01167-8
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Scott A. Helgeson, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Brett T. Hiroto, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Scott J. Billings, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Courtney L. Scott, DO
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Michele D. Lewis, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Address: Michele D. Lewis, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224; Lewis.Michele@mayo.edu

Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(8)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
609-611
Legacy Keywords
pneumonia, parapneumonic effusion, pleural effusion, chest tube, exudate, empyemia, Scot Helgeson, Brett Hiroto, Scott Billings, Courtney Scott, Michele Lewis
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Scott A. Helgeson, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Brett T. Hiroto, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Scott J. Billings, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Courtney L. Scott, DO
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Michele D. Lewis, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Address: Michele D. Lewis, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224; Lewis.Michele@mayo.edu

Author and Disclosure Information

Scott A. Helgeson, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Brett T. Hiroto, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Scott J. Billings, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Courtney L. Scott, DO
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Michele D. Lewis, MD
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Address: Michele D. Lewis, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224; Lewis.Michele@mayo.edu

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

Hospitalized patients with pneumonia who develop a complicated parapneumonic effusion or empyema need to undergo chest tube placement.

WHAT IS PARAPNEUMONIC EFFUSION?

Parapneumonic effusion is a pleural effusion that forms concurrently with bacterial or viral pneumonia. Up to 40% of patients hospitalized with pneumonia develop a parapneumonic effusion.1 The effusion progresses through a continuum of 3 stages: uncomplicated, complicated, and empyema.

Uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion is an exudative effusion without bacteria or pus that is caused by movement of fluid and neutrophils into the pleural space. Pneumonia itself causes an increase in interstitial fluid and capillary leakage. The effusion becomes complicated as a result of bacteria invading the pleural space, causing a further increase in neutrophils in the pleural fluid. Empyema is defined as the presence of frank pus in the pleural space.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, pneumonia accounts for 674,000 emergency department visits each year; of the patients hospitalized, up to 40% develop a parapneumonic effusion.2 The only study done on rates of death associated with parapneumonic effusion showed that, compared with patients with no effusion, the risk of death was 3.7 times higher with a unilateral effusion and 6.5 times higher with bilateral effusions.3

INITIAL EVALUATION

The initial evaluation of suspected parapneumonic effusion should include chest radiography with lateral or decubitus views, followed by thoracentesis if indicated. If thoracentesis is performed, the fluid should be tested as follows:

  • Gram stain
  • Appropriate cultures based on clinical scenario (eg, aerobic, anaerobic, fungal)
  • Total protein in pleural fluid and serum
  • Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in pleural fluid and serum
  • Glucose
  • pH.

CLASSIFICATION OF EFFUSIONS

When pleural fluid is obtained, the total protein and LDH levels are used to categorize the effusion as either transudative or exudative based on the Light criteria.4 An effusion is confirmed as exudative when 1 of the following 3 criteria is met:

  • The ratio of pleural fluid protein to serum protein is greater than 0.5
  • The ratio of pleural fluid LDH to serum LDH is greater than 0.6
  • The pleural fluid LDH is greater than two-thirds the upper limit of normal for the serum LDH.

Parapneumonic effusion: Categories, management, and prognosis
Once an effusion is characterized as exudative, the American College of Chest Physicians consensus guidelines are used for further classification and prognostication.5 The guidelines estimate the risk of poor outcome by dividing the effusions based on their characteristics: the anatomy of the effusion, the bacteriology of the fluid, and the chemistry of the pleural fluid (Table 1). Based on these guidelines, effusions are divided into 4 categories. Category 1 and 2 effusions are considered uncomplicated, category 3 is considered complicated, and category 4 is empyema. The outcomes of interest are prolonged hospitalization, prolonged systemic toxicity, increased ventilator impairment, increased morbidity rate, and increased mortality rate.5

Category 1 effusions are defined as free- flowing fluid with a thickness of less than 10 mm on any imaging modality. Thoracentesis for pleural fluid analysis is not required. The prognosis is very good.

Category 2 effusions are defined as free- flowing fluid with a thickness greater than 10 mm and less than 50% of the hemithorax. Thoracentesis is typically done because of the size of the effusion, but Gram stain and culture of the pleural fluid are usually negative, and the pH is at least 7.2. The prognosis is good.

Category 3 effusions are considered complicated because the anatomy of the pleural space becomes altered or because bacteria have invaded the pleural space. The effusion is larger than 50% of the hemithorax or is loculated, or the parietal pleura is thickened. Since the bacteria have invaded the pleural space, Gram stain or culture of pleural fluid may be positive, the pleural fluid pH may be less than 7.2, or the glucose level of the fluid may be less than 60 mg/dL. The prognosis for category 3 is poor.

Category 4 effusions are defined as empyema. The only characteristic that separates this from category 3 is frank pus in the pleural space. The prognosis is very poor.

 

 

TO PLACE A CHEST TUBE OR NOT

For category 1 or 2 effusions, treatment with antibiotics alone is typically enough. Category 3 effusions usually do not respond to antibiotics alone and may require complete drainage of the fluid with or without a chest tube depending on whether loculations are present, as loculations are difficult to drain with a chest tube. Category 4 effusions require both antibiotics and chest tube placement.

WHAT TYPE OF CHEST TUBE?

Studies have shown that small-bore chest tubes (< 20 F) are as efficacious as larger tubes (≥ 20 F) for the treatment of complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema.6,7 Studies have also shown that the size of the tube makes no difference in the time needed to drain the effusion, the length of hospital stay, or the complication rate.8,9 Based on these studies, a small-bore chest tube should be placed first when clinically appropriate. When a chest tube is placed for empyema, computed tomography should be performed within 24 hours to confirm proper tube placement.

ADVANCED THERAPIES FOR EMPYEMA

Empyema treatment fails when antibiotic coverage is inadequate or when a loculation is not drained appropriately. Options if treatment fails include instillation of fibrinolytics into the pleural space, video-assisted thora­scopic surgery, and decortication.

The role of fibrinolytics has not been well-established, but fibrinolytics should be considered in loculated effusions or empyema, or if drainage of the effusion slows.10 Video-assisted thora­scopic surgery is reserved for effusions that are incompletely drained with a chest tube with or without fibrinolytics; studies have shown shorter hospital length of stay and higher treatment efficacy when this is performed earlier for loculated effusions.11 Decortication is reserved for symptomatic patients who have a thickened pleura more than 6 months after the initial infection.12 Timing for each of these procedures is not clearly defined and so must be individualized.

TAKE-AWAY POINTS

  • Parapneumonic effusion occurs concurrently with pneumonia and with a high frequency.1
  • Effusions are associated with an increased risk of death.3
  • Categorizing the effusion helps guide treatment.
  • Chest tubes should be placed for some cases of complicated effusion and for all cases of empyema.
  • A small-bore chest tube (< 20 F) should be tried first.

Hospitalized patients with pneumonia who develop a complicated parapneumonic effusion or empyema need to undergo chest tube placement.

WHAT IS PARAPNEUMONIC EFFUSION?

Parapneumonic effusion is a pleural effusion that forms concurrently with bacterial or viral pneumonia. Up to 40% of patients hospitalized with pneumonia develop a parapneumonic effusion.1 The effusion progresses through a continuum of 3 stages: uncomplicated, complicated, and empyema.

Uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion is an exudative effusion without bacteria or pus that is caused by movement of fluid and neutrophils into the pleural space. Pneumonia itself causes an increase in interstitial fluid and capillary leakage. The effusion becomes complicated as a result of bacteria invading the pleural space, causing a further increase in neutrophils in the pleural fluid. Empyema is defined as the presence of frank pus in the pleural space.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, pneumonia accounts for 674,000 emergency department visits each year; of the patients hospitalized, up to 40% develop a parapneumonic effusion.2 The only study done on rates of death associated with parapneumonic effusion showed that, compared with patients with no effusion, the risk of death was 3.7 times higher with a unilateral effusion and 6.5 times higher with bilateral effusions.3

INITIAL EVALUATION

The initial evaluation of suspected parapneumonic effusion should include chest radiography with lateral or decubitus views, followed by thoracentesis if indicated. If thoracentesis is performed, the fluid should be tested as follows:

  • Gram stain
  • Appropriate cultures based on clinical scenario (eg, aerobic, anaerobic, fungal)
  • Total protein in pleural fluid and serum
  • Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in pleural fluid and serum
  • Glucose
  • pH.

CLASSIFICATION OF EFFUSIONS

When pleural fluid is obtained, the total protein and LDH levels are used to categorize the effusion as either transudative or exudative based on the Light criteria.4 An effusion is confirmed as exudative when 1 of the following 3 criteria is met:

  • The ratio of pleural fluid protein to serum protein is greater than 0.5
  • The ratio of pleural fluid LDH to serum LDH is greater than 0.6
  • The pleural fluid LDH is greater than two-thirds the upper limit of normal for the serum LDH.

Parapneumonic effusion: Categories, management, and prognosis
Once an effusion is characterized as exudative, the American College of Chest Physicians consensus guidelines are used for further classification and prognostication.5 The guidelines estimate the risk of poor outcome by dividing the effusions based on their characteristics: the anatomy of the effusion, the bacteriology of the fluid, and the chemistry of the pleural fluid (Table 1). Based on these guidelines, effusions are divided into 4 categories. Category 1 and 2 effusions are considered uncomplicated, category 3 is considered complicated, and category 4 is empyema. The outcomes of interest are prolonged hospitalization, prolonged systemic toxicity, increased ventilator impairment, increased morbidity rate, and increased mortality rate.5

Category 1 effusions are defined as free- flowing fluid with a thickness of less than 10 mm on any imaging modality. Thoracentesis for pleural fluid analysis is not required. The prognosis is very good.

Category 2 effusions are defined as free- flowing fluid with a thickness greater than 10 mm and less than 50% of the hemithorax. Thoracentesis is typically done because of the size of the effusion, but Gram stain and culture of the pleural fluid are usually negative, and the pH is at least 7.2. The prognosis is good.

Category 3 effusions are considered complicated because the anatomy of the pleural space becomes altered or because bacteria have invaded the pleural space. The effusion is larger than 50% of the hemithorax or is loculated, or the parietal pleura is thickened. Since the bacteria have invaded the pleural space, Gram stain or culture of pleural fluid may be positive, the pleural fluid pH may be less than 7.2, or the glucose level of the fluid may be less than 60 mg/dL. The prognosis for category 3 is poor.

Category 4 effusions are defined as empyema. The only characteristic that separates this from category 3 is frank pus in the pleural space. The prognosis is very poor.

 

 

TO PLACE A CHEST TUBE OR NOT

For category 1 or 2 effusions, treatment with antibiotics alone is typically enough. Category 3 effusions usually do not respond to antibiotics alone and may require complete drainage of the fluid with or without a chest tube depending on whether loculations are present, as loculations are difficult to drain with a chest tube. Category 4 effusions require both antibiotics and chest tube placement.

WHAT TYPE OF CHEST TUBE?

Studies have shown that small-bore chest tubes (< 20 F) are as efficacious as larger tubes (≥ 20 F) for the treatment of complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema.6,7 Studies have also shown that the size of the tube makes no difference in the time needed to drain the effusion, the length of hospital stay, or the complication rate.8,9 Based on these studies, a small-bore chest tube should be placed first when clinically appropriate. When a chest tube is placed for empyema, computed tomography should be performed within 24 hours to confirm proper tube placement.

ADVANCED THERAPIES FOR EMPYEMA

Empyema treatment fails when antibiotic coverage is inadequate or when a loculation is not drained appropriately. Options if treatment fails include instillation of fibrinolytics into the pleural space, video-assisted thora­scopic surgery, and decortication.

The role of fibrinolytics has not been well-established, but fibrinolytics should be considered in loculated effusions or empyema, or if drainage of the effusion slows.10 Video-assisted thora­scopic surgery is reserved for effusions that are incompletely drained with a chest tube with or without fibrinolytics; studies have shown shorter hospital length of stay and higher treatment efficacy when this is performed earlier for loculated effusions.11 Decortication is reserved for symptomatic patients who have a thickened pleura more than 6 months after the initial infection.12 Timing for each of these procedures is not clearly defined and so must be individualized.

TAKE-AWAY POINTS

  • Parapneumonic effusion occurs concurrently with pneumonia and with a high frequency.1
  • Effusions are associated with an increased risk of death.3
  • Categorizing the effusion helps guide treatment.
  • Chest tubes should be placed for some cases of complicated effusion and for all cases of empyema.
  • A small-bore chest tube (< 20 F) should be tried first.
References
  1. Light RW. Parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006; 3(1):75–80. doi:10.1513/pats.200510-113JH
  2. US Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Health Statistics. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2013 emergency department summary tables. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/2013_ed_web_tables.pdf.
  3. Hasley PB, Albaum MN, Li YH, et al. Do pulmonary radiographic findings at presentation predict mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia? Arch Intern Med 1996; 156(19):2206–2212. doi:10.1001/archinte.1996.00440180068008
  4. Light RW, Macgregor MI, Luchsinger PC, Ball WC. Pleural effusions: the diagnostic separation of transudates and exudates. Ann Intern Med 1972; 77(4):507–513. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-77-4-507
  5. Colice GL, Curtis A, Deslauriers J, et al. Medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions: an evidence-based guideline. Chest 2000; 118(4):1158–1171. doi:10.1378/CHEST.118.4.1158
  6. Ali I, Unruh H. Management of empyema thoracis. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 50(3):355–359. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(90)90474-K
  7. Ashbaugh DG. Empyema thoracis. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality. Chest 1991; 99(5):1162–1165. doi:10.1378/CHEST.99.5.1162
  8. Cooke DT, David EA. Large-bore and small-bore chest tubes: types, function, and placement. Thorac Surg Clin 2013; 23(1):17–24. doi:10.1016/j.thorsurg.2012.10.006
  9. Halifax RJ, Psallidas I, Rahman NM. Chest drain size: the debate continues. Curr Pulmonol Rep 2017; 6(1):26–29. doi:10.1007/s13665-017-0162-3
  10. Maskell NA, Davies CW, Nunn AJ, et al; First Multicenter Intrapleural Sepsis Trial (MIST1) Group. UK controlled trial of intrapleural streptokinase for pleural infection. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(9):865–874. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa042473
  11. Wait MA, Sharma S, Hohn J, Dal Nogare A. A randomized trial of empyema therapy. Chest 1997; 111(6):1548–1551. doi:10.1378/chest.111.6.1548
  12. Rzyman W, Skokowski J, Romanowicz G, Lass P, Dziadziuszko R. Decortication in chronic pleural empyema—effect on lung function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21(3):502–507. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)01167-8
References
  1. Light RW. Parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006; 3(1):75–80. doi:10.1513/pats.200510-113JH
  2. US Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Health Statistics. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2013 emergency department summary tables. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/2013_ed_web_tables.pdf.
  3. Hasley PB, Albaum MN, Li YH, et al. Do pulmonary radiographic findings at presentation predict mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia? Arch Intern Med 1996; 156(19):2206–2212. doi:10.1001/archinte.1996.00440180068008
  4. Light RW, Macgregor MI, Luchsinger PC, Ball WC. Pleural effusions: the diagnostic separation of transudates and exudates. Ann Intern Med 1972; 77(4):507–513. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-77-4-507
  5. Colice GL, Curtis A, Deslauriers J, et al. Medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions: an evidence-based guideline. Chest 2000; 118(4):1158–1171. doi:10.1378/CHEST.118.4.1158
  6. Ali I, Unruh H. Management of empyema thoracis. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 50(3):355–359. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(90)90474-K
  7. Ashbaugh DG. Empyema thoracis. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality. Chest 1991; 99(5):1162–1165. doi:10.1378/CHEST.99.5.1162
  8. Cooke DT, David EA. Large-bore and small-bore chest tubes: types, function, and placement. Thorac Surg Clin 2013; 23(1):17–24. doi:10.1016/j.thorsurg.2012.10.006
  9. Halifax RJ, Psallidas I, Rahman NM. Chest drain size: the debate continues. Curr Pulmonol Rep 2017; 6(1):26–29. doi:10.1007/s13665-017-0162-3
  10. Maskell NA, Davies CW, Nunn AJ, et al; First Multicenter Intrapleural Sepsis Trial (MIST1) Group. UK controlled trial of intrapleural streptokinase for pleural infection. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(9):865–874. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa042473
  11. Wait MA, Sharma S, Hohn J, Dal Nogare A. A randomized trial of empyema therapy. Chest 1997; 111(6):1548–1551. doi:10.1378/chest.111.6.1548
  12. Rzyman W, Skokowski J, Romanowicz G, Lass P, Dziadziuszko R. Decortication in chronic pleural empyema—effect on lung function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21(3):502–507. doi:10.1016/S1010-7940(01)01167-8
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(8)
Issue
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine - 85(8)
Page Number
609-611
Page Number
609-611
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Which patients with a parapneumonic effusion need a chest tube?
Display Headline
Which patients with a parapneumonic effusion need a chest tube?
Legacy Keywords
pneumonia, parapneumonic effusion, pleural effusion, chest tube, exudate, empyemia, Scot Helgeson, Brett Hiroto, Scott Billings, Courtney Scott, Michele Lewis
Legacy Keywords
pneumonia, parapneumonic effusion, pleural effusion, chest tube, exudate, empyemia, Scot Helgeson, Brett Hiroto, Scott Billings, Courtney Scott, Michele Lewis
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 08:45
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 08:45
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 07/25/2018 - 08:45
Article PDF Media