LayerRx Mapping ID
508
Slot System
Featured Buckets
Featured Buckets Admin
Medscape Lead Concept
56

Resolution of Tinea Pedis With Imiquimod Cream 5% in a Patient With Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Resolution of Tinea Pedis With Imiquimod Cream 5% in a Patient With Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Stashower ME

Issue
Cutis - 78(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
66-69
Author and Disclosure Information

Stashower ME

Author and Disclosure Information

Stashower ME

Article PDF
Article PDF

Issue
Cutis - 78(1)
Issue
Cutis - 78(1)
Page Number
66-69
Page Number
66-69
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Resolution of Tinea Pedis With Imiquimod Cream 5% in a Patient With Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma
Display Headline
Resolution of Tinea Pedis With Imiquimod Cream 5% in a Patient With Nodular Basal Cell Carcinoma
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Hereditary Basaloid Follicular Hamartoma Syndrome

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Hereditary Basaloid Follicular Hamartoma Syndrome

Basaloid follicular hamartoma (BFH) is a benign adnexal tumor consisting of basaloid cells with follicular differentiation. BFH can occur as a solitary lesion, multiple lesions, or an autosomal dominant inherited syndrome—BFH syndrome (BFHS).1 In patients with BFHS, adnexal tumors predominantly occur on the head, neck, and torso. The syndrome often has coexisting hypotrichosis, hypohidrosis, and palmar/plantar pitting.1 A familial presentation of BFHS with palmar pitting is discussed with a review of BFHS, including the differential diagnosis of palmar pitting. 


Case Report
A 67-year-old white woman presented to dermatology with a 20-year history of several lesions on her face that started as flesh-colored papules and progressively darkened. Most lesions were 3 to 6 mm and located symmetrically around the nose, mouth, chin, and eyes. The woman presented with her 39-year-old daughter, who had a 2-year history of similar lesions around her eyes, none in a perioral distribution. The women reported that when the mother's lesions first appeared, they had the same appearance as the daughter's lesions. The persistent lesions were otherwise asymptomatic. Review of systems for both the mother and daughter were negative for other cutaneous lesions and for systemic symptoms such as fever; weight loss; and cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary symptoms. The mother's medical history was significant for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, and hypercholesterolemia. The daughter's medical history was significant only for diabetes mellitus. Results of a physical examination of the mother revealed hundreds of soft flesh-colored to hyperpigmented papules, most less than 6 mm in diameter. The papules coalesced in the perioral distribution (Figure 1). Results of a physical examination of the daughter revealed similar symmetric distribution of small (most 1–2 mm but all <6 mm in diameter) flesh-colored papules in bilateral nasolabial and periorbital areas. Symmetric palmar pitting was present in both women (Figure 2). The patients had no other clinical manifestations such as frontoparietal bossing, high arched palates, jaw cysts, short fourth metacarpals, ocular hypertelorism, or narrow sloping shoulders to suggest nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (NBCS). Histopathology results of both the mother and daughter revealed adnexal proliferation with follicular differentiation consistent with BFH (Figures 3–5).

Comment

BFH is a rare benign adnexal tumor that exhibits protean clinical manifestations. Despite the polymorphic clinical presentations, lesions exhibit similar histologic appearance, with only small variations.1,2 Lesions exist in both solitary and multiple forms.1-4 Multiple forms generally exhibit autosomal dominant inheritance, while solitary forms usually are not inherited.3 The solitary noninherited forms are more common than the multiple autosomal dominant inherited forms.3,5

Most reported solitary cases of BFH are in women, aged 20 to 88 years (median, 66 years; mean, 63 years).3 Patients with multiple familial disease may exhibit associated systemic diseases, though systemic disease is less likely in patients with solitary lesions.2,3 Systemic diseases that may be associated with BFHS include hypertension, cardiovascular disease, renal disease, obesity, carpal tunnel syndrome, and cancer of the breast and stomach.6 Generalized lesions also have been associated with cystic fibrosis,7 systemic lupus erythematosus,8 and myasthenia gravis.9

BFHS lesions have a predilection for the face and scalp but also have been reported on the neck, axillae, shoulders, and pubic regions.4 Wheeler et al6 examined 18 members in one family and found that dominantly-inherited generalized BFHS exhibits variability of disease. The patients exhibited lesions that ranged from hundreds of pigmented papules with associated hypotrichosis and palmar/ plantar pitting to minimal facial papules and a few milia involving only the face.6 Most papules are 1 to 2 mm.3 In mild forms, the lesions may go unnoticed or may be mistaken as normal.6 Lesions also may be present at birth or may develop in early childhood.6,10-12

Findings on physical examination most commonly associated with BFHS include milialike papules, comedonal-like papules, hypotrichosis, hypohidrosis, and palmar/plantar pitting (Table).6 Less common associated findings include atopic dermatitis, keratosis pilaris, lichen striatus, acrochordons, acanthosis nigricans—like changes, dermatosis papulosa nigra, acne vulgaris, café au lait spots, punctate palmar keratosis, and steatocystoma multiplex.6

The differential diagnoses of multiple facial papules include angiofibromas (tuberous sclerosis), multiple trichilemmomas (Cowden disease), multiple trichoepitheliomas, multiple syringomas, steatocystoma multiplex, seborrheic keratosis, melanocytic nevi, sebaceous hyperplasia, and NBCS or Gorlin syndrome.3 NBCS is believed to be caused by a lack of human homoloque patched (PTCH) tumor suppressor gene function, whereas BFHS is reported to be caused by a decrease in PTCH function.13 Girardi et al10 suggested that familial BFHS possibly is a forme fruste of NBCS (ie, since both entities involve the PTCH gene protein product or some member of its pathway).

Histologically, branching cords and thin strands of undifferentiated and anastomosing basaloid proliferations, which are surrounded by a loosely fibroblastic stroma, identify BFH.1 This histologic pattern may be found in a wide spectrum of clinically nevoid presentations, and individual lesions may be indistinguishable from infundibulocystic basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Occasional peripheral pallisading, papillary mesenchymal bodies, and connections to the epidermis also have been described.1

 

 

BFH is categorized within the spectrum of basaloid epithelial neoplasms associated with dysregulation of the PTCH signaling pathway.13 However, in general, BFH lesions show less mitotic figures and necrosis when compared with BCC.6,13 Immunohistochemistry results show CD34+ stromal cells in peritumoral distribution, resembling trichoepithelioma and distinguishing the condition from BCC, which lacks CD34 expression.14 Additional factors that distinguish BFH from BCC include BFH’s low proliferative index (ie, low Ki-67) and lack of bcl-2 expression.13,14

BFHS is a rare entity. It is a mainly histologic diagnosis with varied clinical presentations.6 Prognosis is good and treatment usually is cosmetic with shave, curette, or scissor methods most frequently reported.3 Because of the benign nature of this follicular tumor, observation without treatment is an option. It is important to be able to recognize this disease to avoid overaggressive surgical management and to closely monitor for any new tumors that may develop in these lesions.1 Monitoring and close follow-up of these lesions is necessary because some believe that familial BFHS is possibly a forme fruste of NBCS. Any indications of malignant changes in these lesions (eg, nonhealing and bleeding lesions, biopsy suggestive of BCC or other skin cancer) warrant surgical therapy. If lesions do not indicate malignant change, however, they may be removed for cosmetic reasons, but aggressive surgery, such as Mohs micrographic surgery, may put the patient at risk for unnecessary infection and increased morbidity.1

References

  1. Nelson BR, Johnson TM, Waldinger T, et al. Basaloid follicular hamartoma: a histologic diagnosis with diverse clinical presentations. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:915-917.
  2. Mehregan AH, Baker S. Basaloid follicular hamartoma: three cases with localized and systematized unilateral lesions. J Cutan Pathol. 1985;12:55-65.
  3. Brownstein MH. Basaloid follicular hamartoma: solitary and multiple types. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27: 237-240.
  4. Walsh N, Ackerman AB. Basaloid follicular hamartoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;29:125-127.
  5. Ricks M, Elston DM, Sartori CR. Multiple basaloid follicular hamartomas associated with acrochordons, seborrheic keratoses, and chondrosarcoma. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146:1068-1070.
  6. Wheeler CE, Carroll MA, Groben PA, et al. Autosomal dominantly inherited generalized basaloid follicular hamartoma syndrome: report of a new disease in a North Carolina family. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:189-206.
  7. Mascaro JM, Ferrando J, Bombi JA, et al. Congenital generalized follicular hamartoma associated with alopecia and cystic fibrosis in three siblings. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:454-458.
  8. Morton S, Stevens A, Powell RJ. Basaloid follicular hamartoma, total body hair loss and SLE. Lupus. 1998;7:207-209.
  9. Weltfriend S, David M, Ginzburg A, et al. Generalized hair follicle hamartoma: the third case report in association with myasthenia gravis. Am J Dermatopathol. 1987;9:428-432.
  10. Girardi M, Federman GL, McNiff JM. Familial multiple basaloid follicular hamartomas: a report of two affected sisters. Pediatr Dermatol. 1999;16:281-284.
  11. Metry D, Guill C. Generalized basaloid follicular hamartoma syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45:644-645.
  12. Keough GC, Pierson JC, McCollough ML. A congenital pink plaque. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:381-382, 384-385.
  13. Jih DM, Shapiro M, James WD, et al. Familial basaloid follicular hamartoma: lesional characterization and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2003;25:130-137.
  14. Naeyaert JM, Pauwels C, Geerts ML, et al. CD-34 and Ki-67 staining patterns of basaloid follicular hamartoma are different from those in fibroepithelioma of Pinkus and other variants of basal cell carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28:538-541.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Lee, Lourduraj, Palko, Jukic, and English report no conflict of interest. The authors report no discussion of off-label use. Dr. Lee is a dermatology resident, Dr. Lourduraj was a dermatopathology fellow, Dr. Jukic is Assistant Professor of Dermatology and Pathology, and Dr. English is Associate Professor of Dermatology and Director of the Dermatology Residency Program, all at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania. Dr. Palko is Laboratory Director, Georgia Dermatopathology, Hinesville.

Peggy Lin Lee, MD; Leena T. Lourduraj, MD; Michael J. Palko III, MD; Drazen M. Jukic, MD; Joseph C. English III, MD

Issue
Cutis - 78(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
42-46
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Lee, Lourduraj, Palko, Jukic, and English report no conflict of interest. The authors report no discussion of off-label use. Dr. Lee is a dermatology resident, Dr. Lourduraj was a dermatopathology fellow, Dr. Jukic is Assistant Professor of Dermatology and Pathology, and Dr. English is Associate Professor of Dermatology and Director of the Dermatology Residency Program, all at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania. Dr. Palko is Laboratory Director, Georgia Dermatopathology, Hinesville.

Peggy Lin Lee, MD; Leena T. Lourduraj, MD; Michael J. Palko III, MD; Drazen M. Jukic, MD; Joseph C. English III, MD

Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Lee, Lourduraj, Palko, Jukic, and English report no conflict of interest. The authors report no discussion of off-label use. Dr. Lee is a dermatology resident, Dr. Lourduraj was a dermatopathology fellow, Dr. Jukic is Assistant Professor of Dermatology and Pathology, and Dr. English is Associate Professor of Dermatology and Director of the Dermatology Residency Program, all at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania. Dr. Palko is Laboratory Director, Georgia Dermatopathology, Hinesville.

Peggy Lin Lee, MD; Leena T. Lourduraj, MD; Michael J. Palko III, MD; Drazen M. Jukic, MD; Joseph C. English III, MD

Article PDF
Article PDF

Basaloid follicular hamartoma (BFH) is a benign adnexal tumor consisting of basaloid cells with follicular differentiation. BFH can occur as a solitary lesion, multiple lesions, or an autosomal dominant inherited syndrome—BFH syndrome (BFHS).1 In patients with BFHS, adnexal tumors predominantly occur on the head, neck, and torso. The syndrome often has coexisting hypotrichosis, hypohidrosis, and palmar/plantar pitting.1 A familial presentation of BFHS with palmar pitting is discussed with a review of BFHS, including the differential diagnosis of palmar pitting. 


Case Report
A 67-year-old white woman presented to dermatology with a 20-year history of several lesions on her face that started as flesh-colored papules and progressively darkened. Most lesions were 3 to 6 mm and located symmetrically around the nose, mouth, chin, and eyes. The woman presented with her 39-year-old daughter, who had a 2-year history of similar lesions around her eyes, none in a perioral distribution. The women reported that when the mother's lesions first appeared, they had the same appearance as the daughter's lesions. The persistent lesions were otherwise asymptomatic. Review of systems for both the mother and daughter were negative for other cutaneous lesions and for systemic symptoms such as fever; weight loss; and cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary symptoms. The mother's medical history was significant for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, and hypercholesterolemia. The daughter's medical history was significant only for diabetes mellitus. Results of a physical examination of the mother revealed hundreds of soft flesh-colored to hyperpigmented papules, most less than 6 mm in diameter. The papules coalesced in the perioral distribution (Figure 1). Results of a physical examination of the daughter revealed similar symmetric distribution of small (most 1–2 mm but all <6 mm in diameter) flesh-colored papules in bilateral nasolabial and periorbital areas. Symmetric palmar pitting was present in both women (Figure 2). The patients had no other clinical manifestations such as frontoparietal bossing, high arched palates, jaw cysts, short fourth metacarpals, ocular hypertelorism, or narrow sloping shoulders to suggest nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (NBCS). Histopathology results of both the mother and daughter revealed adnexal proliferation with follicular differentiation consistent with BFH (Figures 3–5).

Comment

BFH is a rare benign adnexal tumor that exhibits protean clinical manifestations. Despite the polymorphic clinical presentations, lesions exhibit similar histologic appearance, with only small variations.1,2 Lesions exist in both solitary and multiple forms.1-4 Multiple forms generally exhibit autosomal dominant inheritance, while solitary forms usually are not inherited.3 The solitary noninherited forms are more common than the multiple autosomal dominant inherited forms.3,5

Most reported solitary cases of BFH are in women, aged 20 to 88 years (median, 66 years; mean, 63 years).3 Patients with multiple familial disease may exhibit associated systemic diseases, though systemic disease is less likely in patients with solitary lesions.2,3 Systemic diseases that may be associated with BFHS include hypertension, cardiovascular disease, renal disease, obesity, carpal tunnel syndrome, and cancer of the breast and stomach.6 Generalized lesions also have been associated with cystic fibrosis,7 systemic lupus erythematosus,8 and myasthenia gravis.9

BFHS lesions have a predilection for the face and scalp but also have been reported on the neck, axillae, shoulders, and pubic regions.4 Wheeler et al6 examined 18 members in one family and found that dominantly-inherited generalized BFHS exhibits variability of disease. The patients exhibited lesions that ranged from hundreds of pigmented papules with associated hypotrichosis and palmar/ plantar pitting to minimal facial papules and a few milia involving only the face.6 Most papules are 1 to 2 mm.3 In mild forms, the lesions may go unnoticed or may be mistaken as normal.6 Lesions also may be present at birth or may develop in early childhood.6,10-12

Findings on physical examination most commonly associated with BFHS include milialike papules, comedonal-like papules, hypotrichosis, hypohidrosis, and palmar/plantar pitting (Table).6 Less common associated findings include atopic dermatitis, keratosis pilaris, lichen striatus, acrochordons, acanthosis nigricans—like changes, dermatosis papulosa nigra, acne vulgaris, café au lait spots, punctate palmar keratosis, and steatocystoma multiplex.6

The differential diagnoses of multiple facial papules include angiofibromas (tuberous sclerosis), multiple trichilemmomas (Cowden disease), multiple trichoepitheliomas, multiple syringomas, steatocystoma multiplex, seborrheic keratosis, melanocytic nevi, sebaceous hyperplasia, and NBCS or Gorlin syndrome.3 NBCS is believed to be caused by a lack of human homoloque patched (PTCH) tumor suppressor gene function, whereas BFHS is reported to be caused by a decrease in PTCH function.13 Girardi et al10 suggested that familial BFHS possibly is a forme fruste of NBCS (ie, since both entities involve the PTCH gene protein product or some member of its pathway).

Histologically, branching cords and thin strands of undifferentiated and anastomosing basaloid proliferations, which are surrounded by a loosely fibroblastic stroma, identify BFH.1 This histologic pattern may be found in a wide spectrum of clinically nevoid presentations, and individual lesions may be indistinguishable from infundibulocystic basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Occasional peripheral pallisading, papillary mesenchymal bodies, and connections to the epidermis also have been described.1

 

 

BFH is categorized within the spectrum of basaloid epithelial neoplasms associated with dysregulation of the PTCH signaling pathway.13 However, in general, BFH lesions show less mitotic figures and necrosis when compared with BCC.6,13 Immunohistochemistry results show CD34+ stromal cells in peritumoral distribution, resembling trichoepithelioma and distinguishing the condition from BCC, which lacks CD34 expression.14 Additional factors that distinguish BFH from BCC include BFH’s low proliferative index (ie, low Ki-67) and lack of bcl-2 expression.13,14

BFHS is a rare entity. It is a mainly histologic diagnosis with varied clinical presentations.6 Prognosis is good and treatment usually is cosmetic with shave, curette, or scissor methods most frequently reported.3 Because of the benign nature of this follicular tumor, observation without treatment is an option. It is important to be able to recognize this disease to avoid overaggressive surgical management and to closely monitor for any new tumors that may develop in these lesions.1 Monitoring and close follow-up of these lesions is necessary because some believe that familial BFHS is possibly a forme fruste of NBCS. Any indications of malignant changes in these lesions (eg, nonhealing and bleeding lesions, biopsy suggestive of BCC or other skin cancer) warrant surgical therapy. If lesions do not indicate malignant change, however, they may be removed for cosmetic reasons, but aggressive surgery, such as Mohs micrographic surgery, may put the patient at risk for unnecessary infection and increased morbidity.1

Basaloid follicular hamartoma (BFH) is a benign adnexal tumor consisting of basaloid cells with follicular differentiation. BFH can occur as a solitary lesion, multiple lesions, or an autosomal dominant inherited syndrome—BFH syndrome (BFHS).1 In patients with BFHS, adnexal tumors predominantly occur on the head, neck, and torso. The syndrome often has coexisting hypotrichosis, hypohidrosis, and palmar/plantar pitting.1 A familial presentation of BFHS with palmar pitting is discussed with a review of BFHS, including the differential diagnosis of palmar pitting. 


Case Report
A 67-year-old white woman presented to dermatology with a 20-year history of several lesions on her face that started as flesh-colored papules and progressively darkened. Most lesions were 3 to 6 mm and located symmetrically around the nose, mouth, chin, and eyes. The woman presented with her 39-year-old daughter, who had a 2-year history of similar lesions around her eyes, none in a perioral distribution. The women reported that when the mother's lesions first appeared, they had the same appearance as the daughter's lesions. The persistent lesions were otherwise asymptomatic. Review of systems for both the mother and daughter were negative for other cutaneous lesions and for systemic symptoms such as fever; weight loss; and cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary symptoms. The mother's medical history was significant for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, and hypercholesterolemia. The daughter's medical history was significant only for diabetes mellitus. Results of a physical examination of the mother revealed hundreds of soft flesh-colored to hyperpigmented papules, most less than 6 mm in diameter. The papules coalesced in the perioral distribution (Figure 1). Results of a physical examination of the daughter revealed similar symmetric distribution of small (most 1–2 mm but all <6 mm in diameter) flesh-colored papules in bilateral nasolabial and periorbital areas. Symmetric palmar pitting was present in both women (Figure 2). The patients had no other clinical manifestations such as frontoparietal bossing, high arched palates, jaw cysts, short fourth metacarpals, ocular hypertelorism, or narrow sloping shoulders to suggest nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (NBCS). Histopathology results of both the mother and daughter revealed adnexal proliferation with follicular differentiation consistent with BFH (Figures 3–5).

Comment

BFH is a rare benign adnexal tumor that exhibits protean clinical manifestations. Despite the polymorphic clinical presentations, lesions exhibit similar histologic appearance, with only small variations.1,2 Lesions exist in both solitary and multiple forms.1-4 Multiple forms generally exhibit autosomal dominant inheritance, while solitary forms usually are not inherited.3 The solitary noninherited forms are more common than the multiple autosomal dominant inherited forms.3,5

Most reported solitary cases of BFH are in women, aged 20 to 88 years (median, 66 years; mean, 63 years).3 Patients with multiple familial disease may exhibit associated systemic diseases, though systemic disease is less likely in patients with solitary lesions.2,3 Systemic diseases that may be associated with BFHS include hypertension, cardiovascular disease, renal disease, obesity, carpal tunnel syndrome, and cancer of the breast and stomach.6 Generalized lesions also have been associated with cystic fibrosis,7 systemic lupus erythematosus,8 and myasthenia gravis.9

BFHS lesions have a predilection for the face and scalp but also have been reported on the neck, axillae, shoulders, and pubic regions.4 Wheeler et al6 examined 18 members in one family and found that dominantly-inherited generalized BFHS exhibits variability of disease. The patients exhibited lesions that ranged from hundreds of pigmented papules with associated hypotrichosis and palmar/ plantar pitting to minimal facial papules and a few milia involving only the face.6 Most papules are 1 to 2 mm.3 In mild forms, the lesions may go unnoticed or may be mistaken as normal.6 Lesions also may be present at birth or may develop in early childhood.6,10-12

Findings on physical examination most commonly associated with BFHS include milialike papules, comedonal-like papules, hypotrichosis, hypohidrosis, and palmar/plantar pitting (Table).6 Less common associated findings include atopic dermatitis, keratosis pilaris, lichen striatus, acrochordons, acanthosis nigricans—like changes, dermatosis papulosa nigra, acne vulgaris, café au lait spots, punctate palmar keratosis, and steatocystoma multiplex.6

The differential diagnoses of multiple facial papules include angiofibromas (tuberous sclerosis), multiple trichilemmomas (Cowden disease), multiple trichoepitheliomas, multiple syringomas, steatocystoma multiplex, seborrheic keratosis, melanocytic nevi, sebaceous hyperplasia, and NBCS or Gorlin syndrome.3 NBCS is believed to be caused by a lack of human homoloque patched (PTCH) tumor suppressor gene function, whereas BFHS is reported to be caused by a decrease in PTCH function.13 Girardi et al10 suggested that familial BFHS possibly is a forme fruste of NBCS (ie, since both entities involve the PTCH gene protein product or some member of its pathway).

Histologically, branching cords and thin strands of undifferentiated and anastomosing basaloid proliferations, which are surrounded by a loosely fibroblastic stroma, identify BFH.1 This histologic pattern may be found in a wide spectrum of clinically nevoid presentations, and individual lesions may be indistinguishable from infundibulocystic basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Occasional peripheral pallisading, papillary mesenchymal bodies, and connections to the epidermis also have been described.1

 

 

BFH is categorized within the spectrum of basaloid epithelial neoplasms associated with dysregulation of the PTCH signaling pathway.13 However, in general, BFH lesions show less mitotic figures and necrosis when compared with BCC.6,13 Immunohistochemistry results show CD34+ stromal cells in peritumoral distribution, resembling trichoepithelioma and distinguishing the condition from BCC, which lacks CD34 expression.14 Additional factors that distinguish BFH from BCC include BFH’s low proliferative index (ie, low Ki-67) and lack of bcl-2 expression.13,14

BFHS is a rare entity. It is a mainly histologic diagnosis with varied clinical presentations.6 Prognosis is good and treatment usually is cosmetic with shave, curette, or scissor methods most frequently reported.3 Because of the benign nature of this follicular tumor, observation without treatment is an option. It is important to be able to recognize this disease to avoid overaggressive surgical management and to closely monitor for any new tumors that may develop in these lesions.1 Monitoring and close follow-up of these lesions is necessary because some believe that familial BFHS is possibly a forme fruste of NBCS. Any indications of malignant changes in these lesions (eg, nonhealing and bleeding lesions, biopsy suggestive of BCC or other skin cancer) warrant surgical therapy. If lesions do not indicate malignant change, however, they may be removed for cosmetic reasons, but aggressive surgery, such as Mohs micrographic surgery, may put the patient at risk for unnecessary infection and increased morbidity.1

References

  1. Nelson BR, Johnson TM, Waldinger T, et al. Basaloid follicular hamartoma: a histologic diagnosis with diverse clinical presentations. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:915-917.
  2. Mehregan AH, Baker S. Basaloid follicular hamartoma: three cases with localized and systematized unilateral lesions. J Cutan Pathol. 1985;12:55-65.
  3. Brownstein MH. Basaloid follicular hamartoma: solitary and multiple types. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27: 237-240.
  4. Walsh N, Ackerman AB. Basaloid follicular hamartoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;29:125-127.
  5. Ricks M, Elston DM, Sartori CR. Multiple basaloid follicular hamartomas associated with acrochordons, seborrheic keratoses, and chondrosarcoma. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146:1068-1070.
  6. Wheeler CE, Carroll MA, Groben PA, et al. Autosomal dominantly inherited generalized basaloid follicular hamartoma syndrome: report of a new disease in a North Carolina family. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:189-206.
  7. Mascaro JM, Ferrando J, Bombi JA, et al. Congenital generalized follicular hamartoma associated with alopecia and cystic fibrosis in three siblings. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:454-458.
  8. Morton S, Stevens A, Powell RJ. Basaloid follicular hamartoma, total body hair loss and SLE. Lupus. 1998;7:207-209.
  9. Weltfriend S, David M, Ginzburg A, et al. Generalized hair follicle hamartoma: the third case report in association with myasthenia gravis. Am J Dermatopathol. 1987;9:428-432.
  10. Girardi M, Federman GL, McNiff JM. Familial multiple basaloid follicular hamartomas: a report of two affected sisters. Pediatr Dermatol. 1999;16:281-284.
  11. Metry D, Guill C. Generalized basaloid follicular hamartoma syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45:644-645.
  12. Keough GC, Pierson JC, McCollough ML. A congenital pink plaque. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:381-382, 384-385.
  13. Jih DM, Shapiro M, James WD, et al. Familial basaloid follicular hamartoma: lesional characterization and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2003;25:130-137.
  14. Naeyaert JM, Pauwels C, Geerts ML, et al. CD-34 and Ki-67 staining patterns of basaloid follicular hamartoma are different from those in fibroepithelioma of Pinkus and other variants of basal cell carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28:538-541.
References

  1. Nelson BR, Johnson TM, Waldinger T, et al. Basaloid follicular hamartoma: a histologic diagnosis with diverse clinical presentations. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:915-917.
  2. Mehregan AH, Baker S. Basaloid follicular hamartoma: three cases with localized and systematized unilateral lesions. J Cutan Pathol. 1985;12:55-65.
  3. Brownstein MH. Basaloid follicular hamartoma: solitary and multiple types. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27: 237-240.
  4. Walsh N, Ackerman AB. Basaloid follicular hamartoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;29:125-127.
  5. Ricks M, Elston DM, Sartori CR. Multiple basaloid follicular hamartomas associated with acrochordons, seborrheic keratoses, and chondrosarcoma. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146:1068-1070.
  6. Wheeler CE, Carroll MA, Groben PA, et al. Autosomal dominantly inherited generalized basaloid follicular hamartoma syndrome: report of a new disease in a North Carolina family. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:189-206.
  7. Mascaro JM, Ferrando J, Bombi JA, et al. Congenital generalized follicular hamartoma associated with alopecia and cystic fibrosis in three siblings. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:454-458.
  8. Morton S, Stevens A, Powell RJ. Basaloid follicular hamartoma, total body hair loss and SLE. Lupus. 1998;7:207-209.
  9. Weltfriend S, David M, Ginzburg A, et al. Generalized hair follicle hamartoma: the third case report in association with myasthenia gravis. Am J Dermatopathol. 1987;9:428-432.
  10. Girardi M, Federman GL, McNiff JM. Familial multiple basaloid follicular hamartomas: a report of two affected sisters. Pediatr Dermatol. 1999;16:281-284.
  11. Metry D, Guill C. Generalized basaloid follicular hamartoma syndrome. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45:644-645.
  12. Keough GC, Pierson JC, McCollough ML. A congenital pink plaque. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133:381-382, 384-385.
  13. Jih DM, Shapiro M, James WD, et al. Familial basaloid follicular hamartoma: lesional characterization and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2003;25:130-137.
  14. Naeyaert JM, Pauwels C, Geerts ML, et al. CD-34 and Ki-67 staining patterns of basaloid follicular hamartoma are different from those in fibroepithelioma of Pinkus and other variants of basal cell carcinoma. J Cutan Pathol. 2001;28:538-541.
Issue
Cutis - 78(1)
Issue
Cutis - 78(1)
Page Number
42-46
Page Number
42-46
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Hereditary Basaloid Follicular Hamartoma Syndrome
Display Headline
Hereditary Basaloid Follicular Hamartoma Syndrome
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Malignant Acanthosis Nigricans and Tripe Palms Associated With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Malignant Acanthosis Nigricans and Tripe Palms Associated With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

McGinness J, Greer K

Issue
Cutis - 78(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
37-40
Author and Disclosure Information

McGinness J, Greer K

Author and Disclosure Information

McGinness J, Greer K

Article PDF
Article PDF

Issue
Cutis - 78(1)
Issue
Cutis - 78(1)
Page Number
37-40
Page Number
37-40
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Malignant Acanthosis Nigricans and Tripe Palms Associated With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Display Headline
Malignant Acanthosis Nigricans and Tripe Palms Associated With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

What Is Your Diagnosis? Cowden Disease (Multiple Hamartoma Syndrome)

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
What Is Your Diagnosis? Cowden Disease (Multiple Hamartoma Syndrome)

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Elston DM

Issue
Cutis - 78(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
28-52
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Elston DM

Author and Disclosure Information

Elston DM

Article PDF
Article PDF

Issue
Cutis - 78(1)
Issue
Cutis - 78(1)
Page Number
28-52
Page Number
28-52
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
What Is Your Diagnosis? Cowden Disease (Multiple Hamartoma Syndrome)
Display Headline
What Is Your Diagnosis? Cowden Disease (Multiple Hamartoma Syndrome)
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Bednar Tumor: Treatment With Mohs Micrographic Surgery

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Bednar Tumor: Treatment With Mohs Micrographic Surgery

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Campbell RM, Regan L, Dufresne RG Jr, Muglia J, Robinson-Bostom L

Issue
Cutis - 77(6)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
422-424
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Campbell RM, Regan L, Dufresne RG Jr, Muglia J, Robinson-Bostom L

Author and Disclosure Information

Campbell RM, Regan L, Dufresne RG Jr, Muglia J, Robinson-Bostom L

Article PDF
Article PDF

Issue
Cutis - 77(6)
Issue
Cutis - 77(6)
Page Number
422-424
Page Number
422-424
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Bednar Tumor: Treatment With Mohs Micrographic Surgery
Display Headline
Bednar Tumor: Treatment With Mohs Micrographic Surgery
Sections
Article Source

Citation Override
Originally published in Cosmetic Dermatology
PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Case Report

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Case Report

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Kato Y, Kushikata Y, Kawana S

Issue
Cutis - 77(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
305-309
Author and Disclosure Information

Kato Y, Kushikata Y, Kawana S

Author and Disclosure Information

Kato Y, Kushikata Y, Kawana S

Article PDF
Article PDF

Issue
Cutis - 77(5)
Issue
Cutis - 77(5)
Page Number
305-309
Page Number
305-309
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Case Report
Display Headline
Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Case Report
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a well-known tumor of the salivary glands and oral cavity that accounts for 10% to 15% of all head and neck tumors worldwide.1 In contrast, primary cutaneous ACC is a rare tumor, with less than 50 cases reported to date.2-10 We report an additional case of primary cutaneous ACC and describe the clinical presentation, histologic findings, and subsequent treatment. A brief review of the literature also is provided. 


Case Report
A 57-year-old white woman presented to her dermatologist with a one-year history of an enlarging flesh-colored nodule on the left side of the scalp. The patient's medical history was significant only for bradycardia and hypertension. The results of a biopsy of a tumor specimen revealed a large neoplasm composed of epithelial cells that filled the entire dermis (Figure). There was no connection between the tumor and the epidermis. The tumor cells were arranged in multiple lobules that varied in size and shape and that were separated by fibrous stroma. Some of the lobules showed cystic change and others showed ductal differentiation, imparting an overall cribriform appearance to the tumor. The tumor cells were small and basophilic in nature. Perineural invasion was not present. The findings were characteristic of ACC.

The patient underwent Mohs micrographic surgery for excision of the tumor. Clearance was achieved in 3 stages. The final defect measured 3.0x3.5 cm, extended through the periosteum, and primarily was closed. To rule out an extracutaneous primary site, computed tomography scans were obtained of the head, neck, chest, and abdomen. The scan results were unremarkable. The patient had no symptomatology of her head or neck. Results of an examination by an otolaryngologist revealed no abnormalities of the minor salivary glands, parotid glands, submandibular glands, tongue, oropharyngeal and nasal cavities, or ears. The patient then underwent 33 local radiation treatments to the scalp (total radiation dose of 5940 cGy) to decrease the possibility of recurrence. At 28 months postsurgery, she had no signs of recurrence. 


Comment

ACC accounts for about 10% to 15% of head and neck tumors and most frequently occurs in the major and minor salivary glands; other sites that may be involved include the tracheobronchial tree, esophagus, lacrimal gland, ear canal, breast, uterine cervix, Bartholin glands, prostate, mucosal glands of the upper respiratory tract, and skin.1,4,11 ACC of the head and neck usually is a slow-growing tumor. Local recurrences are frequent; and metastasis, which occurs in 21% to 54% of cases, tends to involve the lung, liver, bone, and brain.12-14 Cutaneous metastasis from ACC of the head and neck is rare.15,16 Primary cutaneous ACC is a rare tumor that was first reported by Boggio in 1975.2 Primary cutaneous ACC most commonly involves the scalp and presents as a slow-growing nondescript nodule. The local recurrence rate after excision is approximately 50%.3,17 Nodal metastasis from primary cutaneous ACC is rare.3,4 To our knowledge, 5 cases of visceral metastasis from primary cutaneous ACC have been reported.7,8 Histologically, the tumor is composed of epithelial cells arranged into multiple lobules, many of which show cystic change and therefore impart a cribriform appearance to the tumor. There is no connection between the tumor lobules and the epidermis. The tumor displays an infiltrating pattern that fills the entire dermis and that frequently invades the subcutaneous tissue. Perineural invasion is seen in approximately one half of cases; vascular invasion occurs less commonly.8,18,19 Basophilic mucinous material is present within the cystic lobules, and the stroma between the lobules is fibrous. The epithelial cells are small and basophilic with scant cytoplasm. Mitotic figures are rare. In addition to the cribriform areas, tubular foci sometimes are found.15,18 The main tumor that histologically may mimic primary cutaneous ACC is adenoid basal cell carcinoma. Both tumors are composed of small epithelial cells with minimal cytoplasm that are arranged into multiple cystic lobules, giving rise to an adenoid or cribriform appearance; additionally, both tumors contain abundant mucin. Adenoid basal cell carcinoma differs from primary cutaneous ACC in several ways: the tumor lobules may connect with the epidermis; perineural invasion is rare; peripheral palisading and retraction artifact may be present; and the stroma may be more cellular.5,19 Immunohistochemical staining may be useful in distinguishing tumors that are difficult to differentiate based on the results of histologic evaluations (Table).17,19

The cell of origin for primary cutaneous ACC is not known. Many authors believe that primary cutaneous ACC arises from the eccrine gland or duct; however, primary cutaneous ACC also occurs in the ear canal, which does not contain eccrine glands. Furthermore, ACC can arise in a variety of different organs. Therefore, ACC likely has a different cell of origin in different locations in the body, all of which give rise to tumors with a similar histologic appearance.5,8 Treatment recommendations for primary cutaneous ACC consist of either wide local excision or Mohs micrographic surgery.7-9,17,18 The high rate of perineural spread accounts for the large recurrence rate after local excision with minimal margins or without micrographic control. One group has used Mohs micrographic surgery using a toluidine blue stain (instead of the usual hematoxylin-eosin stain), which metachromatically stains the abundant mucin found within the tumor and may help to better delineate the tumor's margins.10 Some patients have had adjuvant local radiation therapy to decrease recurrence rates,7 but some clinicians find radiation to be ineffective.18,19 Visceral metastases from primary cutaneous ACC either have been treated with chemotherapy or have been monitored radiographically.7,8 In summary, primary cutaneous ACC is a rare tumor and is much less common than ACC arising in other sites. Therefore, a diagnosis of primary cutaneous ACC should be considered only after an extracutaneous origin has been ruled out. Because ACC most frequently arises from the salivary glands (and less commonly from other locations in the head and neck or elsewhere in the body), a complete physical examination of the head and neck region, preferably by an otolaryngologist, should be performed. Additional imaging studies may be useful. Because the risk of local recurrence is high, the authors recommend Mohs micrographic surgery for treatment of this tumor. Additionally, adjuvant radiation treatment may be helpful.

References

  1. Khan AJ, DiGiovanna MP, Ross DA, et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma: a retrospective clinical review. Int J Cancer. 2001;96:149-158.
  2. Boggio R. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the scalp. Arch Dermatol. 1975;111:793-794.
  3. Weekly M, Lydiatt DD, Lydiatt WM, et al. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes. Head Neck. 2000;22:84-86.
  4. Chu SS, Chang YL, Lou PJ. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma with regional lymph node metastasis. J Laryngol Otol. 2001;115:673-675.
  5. Seab JA, Graham JH. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:113-118.
  6. Marback EF, Costa AL, Nossa LMB, et al. Eyelid skin adenoid cystic carcinoma: a clinicopathological study of one case simulating sebaceous gland carcinoma. Br J Opthalmol. 2003;87:118-125.
  7. Pappo O, Gez E, Craciun I, et al. Growth rate analysis of lung metastases appearing 18 years after resection of cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. case report and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992;116:76-79.
  8. Chang SE, Ahn SJ, Choi JH, et al. Primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of skin with lung metastasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40:640-642.
  9. Irvine AD, Kenny B, Walsh MY, et al. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1996;21:249-250.
  10. Chesser RS, Bertler DE, Fitzpatrick JE, et al. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery toluidine blue technique. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992;18:175-176.
  11. Perzin KH, Gullane P, Conley J. Adenoid cystic carcinoma involving the external auditory canal: a clinicopathologic study of 16 cases. Cancer. 1982;50:2873-2883.
  12. Fordice J, Kershaw C, El-Naggar A, et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck: predictors of morbidity and mortality. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:149-152.
  13. van der Wal JE, Becking AG, Snow GB, et al. Distant metastases of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands and the value of diagnostic examinations during follow-up. Head Neck. 2002;24:779-783.
  14. Spiro RH. Distant metastasis in adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary gland origin. Am J Surg. 1997;174:495-498.
  15. Chang CH, Liao YL, Hong HS. Cutaneous metastasis from adenoid cystic carcinoma of the parotid gland. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:775-779.
  16. Nakamura M, Miyachi Y. Cutaneous metastasis from an adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lacrimal gland. Br J Dermatol. 1999;141:373-374.
  17. van der Kwast TH, Vuzevski VD, Ramaekers F, et al. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma: case report, immunohistochemistry, and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol. 1988;118:567-577.
  18. Cooper PH, Adelson GL, Holthaus WH. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120:774-777.
  19. Wick MR, Swanson, PE. Primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the skin. a clinical, histological, and immunocytochemical comparison with adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary glands and adenoid basal cell carcinoma. Am J Derma
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Fueston, Gloster, and Mutasim report no conflict of interest. The authors report no discussion of off-label use. From the Department of Dermatology, University of Cincinnati, Ohio. At the time this article was written, Dr. Fueston was a resident. Dr. Gloster is Associate Professor of Dermatology and Director of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology. Dr. Mutasim is Professor and Chairman, Department of Dermatology, and Professor, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

John C. Fueston, MD; Hugh M. Gloster, MD; Diya F. Mutasim, MD

Issue
Cutis - 77(3)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
157-160
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Fueston, Gloster, and Mutasim report no conflict of interest. The authors report no discussion of off-label use. From the Department of Dermatology, University of Cincinnati, Ohio. At the time this article was written, Dr. Fueston was a resident. Dr. Gloster is Associate Professor of Dermatology and Director of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology. Dr. Mutasim is Professor and Chairman, Department of Dermatology, and Professor, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

John C. Fueston, MD; Hugh M. Gloster, MD; Diya F. Mutasim, MD

Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Fueston, Gloster, and Mutasim report no conflict of interest. The authors report no discussion of off-label use. From the Department of Dermatology, University of Cincinnati, Ohio. At the time this article was written, Dr. Fueston was a resident. Dr. Gloster is Associate Professor of Dermatology and Director of Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Cutaneous Oncology. Dr. Mutasim is Professor and Chairman, Department of Dermatology, and Professor, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

John C. Fueston, MD; Hugh M. Gloster, MD; Diya F. Mutasim, MD

Article PDF
Article PDF

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a well-known tumor of the salivary glands and oral cavity that accounts for 10% to 15% of all head and neck tumors worldwide.1 In contrast, primary cutaneous ACC is a rare tumor, with less than 50 cases reported to date.2-10 We report an additional case of primary cutaneous ACC and describe the clinical presentation, histologic findings, and subsequent treatment. A brief review of the literature also is provided. 


Case Report
A 57-year-old white woman presented to her dermatologist with a one-year history of an enlarging flesh-colored nodule on the left side of the scalp. The patient's medical history was significant only for bradycardia and hypertension. The results of a biopsy of a tumor specimen revealed a large neoplasm composed of epithelial cells that filled the entire dermis (Figure). There was no connection between the tumor and the epidermis. The tumor cells were arranged in multiple lobules that varied in size and shape and that were separated by fibrous stroma. Some of the lobules showed cystic change and others showed ductal differentiation, imparting an overall cribriform appearance to the tumor. The tumor cells were small and basophilic in nature. Perineural invasion was not present. The findings were characteristic of ACC.

The patient underwent Mohs micrographic surgery for excision of the tumor. Clearance was achieved in 3 stages. The final defect measured 3.0x3.5 cm, extended through the periosteum, and primarily was closed. To rule out an extracutaneous primary site, computed tomography scans were obtained of the head, neck, chest, and abdomen. The scan results were unremarkable. The patient had no symptomatology of her head or neck. Results of an examination by an otolaryngologist revealed no abnormalities of the minor salivary glands, parotid glands, submandibular glands, tongue, oropharyngeal and nasal cavities, or ears. The patient then underwent 33 local radiation treatments to the scalp (total radiation dose of 5940 cGy) to decrease the possibility of recurrence. At 28 months postsurgery, she had no signs of recurrence. 


Comment

ACC accounts for about 10% to 15% of head and neck tumors and most frequently occurs in the major and minor salivary glands; other sites that may be involved include the tracheobronchial tree, esophagus, lacrimal gland, ear canal, breast, uterine cervix, Bartholin glands, prostate, mucosal glands of the upper respiratory tract, and skin.1,4,11 ACC of the head and neck usually is a slow-growing tumor. Local recurrences are frequent; and metastasis, which occurs in 21% to 54% of cases, tends to involve the lung, liver, bone, and brain.12-14 Cutaneous metastasis from ACC of the head and neck is rare.15,16 Primary cutaneous ACC is a rare tumor that was first reported by Boggio in 1975.2 Primary cutaneous ACC most commonly involves the scalp and presents as a slow-growing nondescript nodule. The local recurrence rate after excision is approximately 50%.3,17 Nodal metastasis from primary cutaneous ACC is rare.3,4 To our knowledge, 5 cases of visceral metastasis from primary cutaneous ACC have been reported.7,8 Histologically, the tumor is composed of epithelial cells arranged into multiple lobules, many of which show cystic change and therefore impart a cribriform appearance to the tumor. There is no connection between the tumor lobules and the epidermis. The tumor displays an infiltrating pattern that fills the entire dermis and that frequently invades the subcutaneous tissue. Perineural invasion is seen in approximately one half of cases; vascular invasion occurs less commonly.8,18,19 Basophilic mucinous material is present within the cystic lobules, and the stroma between the lobules is fibrous. The epithelial cells are small and basophilic with scant cytoplasm. Mitotic figures are rare. In addition to the cribriform areas, tubular foci sometimes are found.15,18 The main tumor that histologically may mimic primary cutaneous ACC is adenoid basal cell carcinoma. Both tumors are composed of small epithelial cells with minimal cytoplasm that are arranged into multiple cystic lobules, giving rise to an adenoid or cribriform appearance; additionally, both tumors contain abundant mucin. Adenoid basal cell carcinoma differs from primary cutaneous ACC in several ways: the tumor lobules may connect with the epidermis; perineural invasion is rare; peripheral palisading and retraction artifact may be present; and the stroma may be more cellular.5,19 Immunohistochemical staining may be useful in distinguishing tumors that are difficult to differentiate based on the results of histologic evaluations (Table).17,19

The cell of origin for primary cutaneous ACC is not known. Many authors believe that primary cutaneous ACC arises from the eccrine gland or duct; however, primary cutaneous ACC also occurs in the ear canal, which does not contain eccrine glands. Furthermore, ACC can arise in a variety of different organs. Therefore, ACC likely has a different cell of origin in different locations in the body, all of which give rise to tumors with a similar histologic appearance.5,8 Treatment recommendations for primary cutaneous ACC consist of either wide local excision or Mohs micrographic surgery.7-9,17,18 The high rate of perineural spread accounts for the large recurrence rate after local excision with minimal margins or without micrographic control. One group has used Mohs micrographic surgery using a toluidine blue stain (instead of the usual hematoxylin-eosin stain), which metachromatically stains the abundant mucin found within the tumor and may help to better delineate the tumor's margins.10 Some patients have had adjuvant local radiation therapy to decrease recurrence rates,7 but some clinicians find radiation to be ineffective.18,19 Visceral metastases from primary cutaneous ACC either have been treated with chemotherapy or have been monitored radiographically.7,8 In summary, primary cutaneous ACC is a rare tumor and is much less common than ACC arising in other sites. Therefore, a diagnosis of primary cutaneous ACC should be considered only after an extracutaneous origin has been ruled out. Because ACC most frequently arises from the salivary glands (and less commonly from other locations in the head and neck or elsewhere in the body), a complete physical examination of the head and neck region, preferably by an otolaryngologist, should be performed. Additional imaging studies may be useful. Because the risk of local recurrence is high, the authors recommend Mohs micrographic surgery for treatment of this tumor. Additionally, adjuvant radiation treatment may be helpful.

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a well-known tumor of the salivary glands and oral cavity that accounts for 10% to 15% of all head and neck tumors worldwide.1 In contrast, primary cutaneous ACC is a rare tumor, with less than 50 cases reported to date.2-10 We report an additional case of primary cutaneous ACC and describe the clinical presentation, histologic findings, and subsequent treatment. A brief review of the literature also is provided. 


Case Report
A 57-year-old white woman presented to her dermatologist with a one-year history of an enlarging flesh-colored nodule on the left side of the scalp. The patient's medical history was significant only for bradycardia and hypertension. The results of a biopsy of a tumor specimen revealed a large neoplasm composed of epithelial cells that filled the entire dermis (Figure). There was no connection between the tumor and the epidermis. The tumor cells were arranged in multiple lobules that varied in size and shape and that were separated by fibrous stroma. Some of the lobules showed cystic change and others showed ductal differentiation, imparting an overall cribriform appearance to the tumor. The tumor cells were small and basophilic in nature. Perineural invasion was not present. The findings were characteristic of ACC.

The patient underwent Mohs micrographic surgery for excision of the tumor. Clearance was achieved in 3 stages. The final defect measured 3.0x3.5 cm, extended through the periosteum, and primarily was closed. To rule out an extracutaneous primary site, computed tomography scans were obtained of the head, neck, chest, and abdomen. The scan results were unremarkable. The patient had no symptomatology of her head or neck. Results of an examination by an otolaryngologist revealed no abnormalities of the minor salivary glands, parotid glands, submandibular glands, tongue, oropharyngeal and nasal cavities, or ears. The patient then underwent 33 local radiation treatments to the scalp (total radiation dose of 5940 cGy) to decrease the possibility of recurrence. At 28 months postsurgery, she had no signs of recurrence. 


Comment

ACC accounts for about 10% to 15% of head and neck tumors and most frequently occurs in the major and minor salivary glands; other sites that may be involved include the tracheobronchial tree, esophagus, lacrimal gland, ear canal, breast, uterine cervix, Bartholin glands, prostate, mucosal glands of the upper respiratory tract, and skin.1,4,11 ACC of the head and neck usually is a slow-growing tumor. Local recurrences are frequent; and metastasis, which occurs in 21% to 54% of cases, tends to involve the lung, liver, bone, and brain.12-14 Cutaneous metastasis from ACC of the head and neck is rare.15,16 Primary cutaneous ACC is a rare tumor that was first reported by Boggio in 1975.2 Primary cutaneous ACC most commonly involves the scalp and presents as a slow-growing nondescript nodule. The local recurrence rate after excision is approximately 50%.3,17 Nodal metastasis from primary cutaneous ACC is rare.3,4 To our knowledge, 5 cases of visceral metastasis from primary cutaneous ACC have been reported.7,8 Histologically, the tumor is composed of epithelial cells arranged into multiple lobules, many of which show cystic change and therefore impart a cribriform appearance to the tumor. There is no connection between the tumor lobules and the epidermis. The tumor displays an infiltrating pattern that fills the entire dermis and that frequently invades the subcutaneous tissue. Perineural invasion is seen in approximately one half of cases; vascular invasion occurs less commonly.8,18,19 Basophilic mucinous material is present within the cystic lobules, and the stroma between the lobules is fibrous. The epithelial cells are small and basophilic with scant cytoplasm. Mitotic figures are rare. In addition to the cribriform areas, tubular foci sometimes are found.15,18 The main tumor that histologically may mimic primary cutaneous ACC is adenoid basal cell carcinoma. Both tumors are composed of small epithelial cells with minimal cytoplasm that are arranged into multiple cystic lobules, giving rise to an adenoid or cribriform appearance; additionally, both tumors contain abundant mucin. Adenoid basal cell carcinoma differs from primary cutaneous ACC in several ways: the tumor lobules may connect with the epidermis; perineural invasion is rare; peripheral palisading and retraction artifact may be present; and the stroma may be more cellular.5,19 Immunohistochemical staining may be useful in distinguishing tumors that are difficult to differentiate based on the results of histologic evaluations (Table).17,19

The cell of origin for primary cutaneous ACC is not known. Many authors believe that primary cutaneous ACC arises from the eccrine gland or duct; however, primary cutaneous ACC also occurs in the ear canal, which does not contain eccrine glands. Furthermore, ACC can arise in a variety of different organs. Therefore, ACC likely has a different cell of origin in different locations in the body, all of which give rise to tumors with a similar histologic appearance.5,8 Treatment recommendations for primary cutaneous ACC consist of either wide local excision or Mohs micrographic surgery.7-9,17,18 The high rate of perineural spread accounts for the large recurrence rate after local excision with minimal margins or without micrographic control. One group has used Mohs micrographic surgery using a toluidine blue stain (instead of the usual hematoxylin-eosin stain), which metachromatically stains the abundant mucin found within the tumor and may help to better delineate the tumor's margins.10 Some patients have had adjuvant local radiation therapy to decrease recurrence rates,7 but some clinicians find radiation to be ineffective.18,19 Visceral metastases from primary cutaneous ACC either have been treated with chemotherapy or have been monitored radiographically.7,8 In summary, primary cutaneous ACC is a rare tumor and is much less common than ACC arising in other sites. Therefore, a diagnosis of primary cutaneous ACC should be considered only after an extracutaneous origin has been ruled out. Because ACC most frequently arises from the salivary glands (and less commonly from other locations in the head and neck or elsewhere in the body), a complete physical examination of the head and neck region, preferably by an otolaryngologist, should be performed. Additional imaging studies may be useful. Because the risk of local recurrence is high, the authors recommend Mohs micrographic surgery for treatment of this tumor. Additionally, adjuvant radiation treatment may be helpful.

References

  1. Khan AJ, DiGiovanna MP, Ross DA, et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma: a retrospective clinical review. Int J Cancer. 2001;96:149-158.
  2. Boggio R. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the scalp. Arch Dermatol. 1975;111:793-794.
  3. Weekly M, Lydiatt DD, Lydiatt WM, et al. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes. Head Neck. 2000;22:84-86.
  4. Chu SS, Chang YL, Lou PJ. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma with regional lymph node metastasis. J Laryngol Otol. 2001;115:673-675.
  5. Seab JA, Graham JH. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:113-118.
  6. Marback EF, Costa AL, Nossa LMB, et al. Eyelid skin adenoid cystic carcinoma: a clinicopathological study of one case simulating sebaceous gland carcinoma. Br J Opthalmol. 2003;87:118-125.
  7. Pappo O, Gez E, Craciun I, et al. Growth rate analysis of lung metastases appearing 18 years after resection of cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. case report and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992;116:76-79.
  8. Chang SE, Ahn SJ, Choi JH, et al. Primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of skin with lung metastasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40:640-642.
  9. Irvine AD, Kenny B, Walsh MY, et al. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1996;21:249-250.
  10. Chesser RS, Bertler DE, Fitzpatrick JE, et al. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery toluidine blue technique. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992;18:175-176.
  11. Perzin KH, Gullane P, Conley J. Adenoid cystic carcinoma involving the external auditory canal: a clinicopathologic study of 16 cases. Cancer. 1982;50:2873-2883.
  12. Fordice J, Kershaw C, El-Naggar A, et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck: predictors of morbidity and mortality. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:149-152.
  13. van der Wal JE, Becking AG, Snow GB, et al. Distant metastases of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands and the value of diagnostic examinations during follow-up. Head Neck. 2002;24:779-783.
  14. Spiro RH. Distant metastasis in adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary gland origin. Am J Surg. 1997;174:495-498.
  15. Chang CH, Liao YL, Hong HS. Cutaneous metastasis from adenoid cystic carcinoma of the parotid gland. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:775-779.
  16. Nakamura M, Miyachi Y. Cutaneous metastasis from an adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lacrimal gland. Br J Dermatol. 1999;141:373-374.
  17. van der Kwast TH, Vuzevski VD, Ramaekers F, et al. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma: case report, immunohistochemistry, and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol. 1988;118:567-577.
  18. Cooper PH, Adelson GL, Holthaus WH. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120:774-777.
  19. Wick MR, Swanson, PE. Primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the skin. a clinical, histological, and immunocytochemical comparison with adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary glands and adenoid basal cell carcinoma. Am J Derma
References

  1. Khan AJ, DiGiovanna MP, Ross DA, et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma: a retrospective clinical review. Int J Cancer. 2001;96:149-158.
  2. Boggio R. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the scalp. Arch Dermatol. 1975;111:793-794.
  3. Weekly M, Lydiatt DD, Lydiatt WM, et al. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes. Head Neck. 2000;22:84-86.
  4. Chu SS, Chang YL, Lou PJ. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma with regional lymph node metastasis. J Laryngol Otol. 2001;115:673-675.
  5. Seab JA, Graham JH. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:113-118.
  6. Marback EF, Costa AL, Nossa LMB, et al. Eyelid skin adenoid cystic carcinoma: a clinicopathological study of one case simulating sebaceous gland carcinoma. Br J Opthalmol. 2003;87:118-125.
  7. Pappo O, Gez E, Craciun I, et al. Growth rate analysis of lung metastases appearing 18 years after resection of cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. case report and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992;116:76-79.
  8. Chang SE, Ahn SJ, Choi JH, et al. Primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of skin with lung metastasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40:640-642.
  9. Irvine AD, Kenny B, Walsh MY, et al. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1996;21:249-250.
  10. Chesser RS, Bertler DE, Fitzpatrick JE, et al. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery toluidine blue technique. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992;18:175-176.
  11. Perzin KH, Gullane P, Conley J. Adenoid cystic carcinoma involving the external auditory canal: a clinicopathologic study of 16 cases. Cancer. 1982;50:2873-2883.
  12. Fordice J, Kershaw C, El-Naggar A, et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the head and neck: predictors of morbidity and mortality. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:149-152.
  13. van der Wal JE, Becking AG, Snow GB, et al. Distant metastases of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands and the value of diagnostic examinations during follow-up. Head Neck. 2002;24:779-783.
  14. Spiro RH. Distant metastasis in adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary gland origin. Am J Surg. 1997;174:495-498.
  15. Chang CH, Liao YL, Hong HS. Cutaneous metastasis from adenoid cystic carcinoma of the parotid gland. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:775-779.
  16. Nakamura M, Miyachi Y. Cutaneous metastasis from an adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lacrimal gland. Br J Dermatol. 1999;141:373-374.
  17. van der Kwast TH, Vuzevski VD, Ramaekers F, et al. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma: case report, immunohistochemistry, and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol. 1988;118:567-577.
  18. Cooper PH, Adelson GL, Holthaus WH. Primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120:774-777.
  19. Wick MR, Swanson, PE. Primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the skin. a clinical, histological, and immunocytochemical comparison with adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary glands and adenoid basal cell carcinoma. Am J Derma
Issue
Cutis - 77(3)
Issue
Cutis - 77(3)
Page Number
157-160
Page Number
157-160
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Display Headline
Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Syringomatous Carcinoma in a Young Patient Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Syringomatous Carcinoma in a Young Patient Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery

Syringomatous carcinoma (SC), considered by some to be a variant of microcystic adnexal carcinoma (MAC),1 is a rare malignant neoplasm of sweat gland origin. SC encompasses a range of neoplasms with different degrees of differentiation, and its nomenclature has varied over the years. SC also has been referred to as syringoid eccrine carcinoma,2 basal cell tumor with eccrine differentiation,3 malignant syringoma,4 and sclerosing sweat duct carcinoma.5 Its diagnosis has been a dilemma in a number of reported cases, probably due to the combination of its rarity and thus limited clinical and histopathologic information, microscopic similarities to other benign and malignant neoplasms, and characteristic histologic features that may only be apparent in surgical excisions containing deeper tissue. We report a case of SC that masqueraded as an epidermoid cyst in an unusually young patient.


Case Report
A 23-year-old Asian man, who was otherwise healthy, presented with an asymptomatic slowly enlarging nodule of one year's duration on the right medial eyebrow. Prior treatment with intralesional steroid injections resulted in minimal improvement. The patient had no personal or family history of skin cancers. Physical examination results demonstrated a well-demarcated, mobile, nontender subcutaneous nodule measuring 7 mm in diameter. The clinical presentation favored a diagnosis of an epidermal inclusion cyst, and the patient underwent surgical excision of the lesion. Results of the histopathologic examination revealed a neoplasm in the dermis consisting of bands and nests of pale staining basaloid cells extending between the collagen fibers (Figure 1). There were focal areas of ductal differentiation, scattered individual necrotic cells, moderate dermal fibrosis, and chronic inflammation with numerous eo-sinophils. Moderate nuclear atypia also was present (Figure 2). Perineural involvement was not seen. Results of immunohistochemical analysis revealed positive staining for high—and low—molecular-weight cytokeratins, as well as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)(Figure 3). There was scattered positivity with S-100 protein in occasional cells lining lumina and in dendritic cells (Figure 4). The histopathologic findings supported the diagnosis of SC. Because the neoplasm extended to the surgical margins of the specimen, repeat surgical excision with continuous microscopic control under the Mohs micrographic technique was performed to prevent local recurrence and spare normal tissue. At the 18-month follow-up visit, no local recurrence was seen.


Comment SC is a rare, malignant sweat gland neoplasm that usually occurs in the fourth and fifth decades of life.4-8 SC typically presents as a slow-growing, solitary, painless nodule or indurated plaque on the head or neck region.6-8 It has been frequently found on the upper and lower lips; however, it also has been reported to occur on the finger and breast.9,10 Predisposing factors for the development of SC are unclear11 but may include previous radiation to the face and history of receiving an organ transplant with immunosuppressive drug therapy.12-17 Histopathologically, SC is characterized by asymmetric and deep dermal invasion of tumor cells, perineural involvement, ductal formation, keratin-filled cysts, multiple nests of basaloid or squamous cells, and desmoplasia of the surrounding dermal stroma (Table 1).5,6 Some authors consider SC to be closely related to MAC but generally describe SC as more basaloid with larger tubules and a more sclerotic stroma than MAC.18-26 If histologic examination of SC is limited to the superficial dermis, SC demonstrates similarities to other neoplasms, including syringomas, trichoadenomas, trichoepitheliomas, basal cell carcinomas, or squamous cell carcinomas. In the reported cases in which SC was initially misdiagnosed as another benign or malignant neoplasm, many misdiagnoses were due to either a benign clinical appearance of the lesion or biopsy specimens that were too superficial to contain the deeper characteristic histologic features of SC.8,9,11,27-30

Immunohistochemical studies can facilitate the diagnosis of SC and differentiate it from other neoplasms. SC stains positively for CEA, S-100 protein, epithelial membrane antigen, cyto-keratin, and gross cystic disease fluid protein 15,31 all of which aid in the confirmation of a sweat gland neoplasm (Table 2).8,32,33,39 Positivity for CEA in the ductal lining cells and the luminal contents of tumor ducts confirms sweat gland differentiation.25,33,34 This ductal immunoreactivity to CEA appears to be one of the most reliable findings to differentiate SC and MAC from other adnexal tumors, especially desmoplastic trichoepithelioma, which may be one of the more challenging histo-pathologic differential diagnoses.35 In addition, epithelial membrane antigen positivity can be found in the areas showing glandular features.35 This can assist in distinguishing SC from a desmoplastic trichoepithelioma or sclerosing type basal cell carcinoma, both of which demonstrate negativity to epithelial membrane antigen.35 S-100 protein positivity in dendritic cells, as well as in some cords and ducts in SC, further verifies dendritic differentiation toward sweat gland structures and is useful as an adjunct in the confirmation of glandular differentiation.25,33,34,36

 

 

Without proper and timely diagnosis and management, SC can cause severe patient morbidity. Although SC rarely metastasizes and can have an indolent course, it can be locally de-structive and lead to potentially disfiguring outcomes.5-7 SC can invade deeply and infiltrate into the dermis, subcutaneous fat tissue, muscle, perichondrium, periosteum, and galea.8 Goto et al9 reported a case of an SC that was initially misdiagnosed as a basal cell carcinoma of the left middle finger. The deeper, characteristic features of SC were not recognized until after the affected finger required amputation due to erosion of the bone. Hoppenreijs et al11 described an aggressive case of an SC arising at a site of previously irradiated squamous cell carcinoma of the lower eyelid. Extensive involvement of the SC in the orbit led to the recommendation of an orbital exenter-ation; however, it was not performed because of the poor clinical condition of the patient. Treatments for SC have included wide local excision and Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). SC treatment with wide local excision often resulted in incomplete excision of the neoplasm despite having taken an adequate margin around the clinically assessable tumor.5 Cases of SC treated with wide local excision had a recurrence rate of 47%.5 The positive surgical margins following wide local excision may be due to the deep infiltration of SC, which frequently exceeds the clinically predicted size of the tumor.5 Due to the close relationship of MAC and SC, we feel that MMS treatment of SC will reduce recurrences as it has for MAC. Currently, there is strong support for the treatment of MAC with MMS as a gold standard to ensure complete clearance of the neoplasm and to reduce the local recurrence rate.12,13,17,21,22,37,38 In a study of MAC by Chiller et al,37 the authors demonstrated a median 4-fold increase in defect size when they compared the clinically estimated pretreatment size of the lesion with the MMS-determined posttreatment size of the lesion. The authors therefore suggest that, similar to the MMS-treated lesions, the lesions completely treated with wide local excision also would produce a defect size that is at least 4 times greater than the predicted pretreatment size of the lesion. Because wide local excision relies on predicted margins of the lesion, which the authors have shown can be greatly underestimated, Chiller et al37 argue that the use of MMS, which does not rely on predicted margins, is a reasonable first-line therapeutic modality for effectively treating patients with MAC. Furthermore, MMS allows for the examination of the entire peripheral and deep margins of the lesion, which is critical when considering the deep infiltrative nature of MAC. The reported local recurrence rate of MAC treated with MMS is 0% to 5%,12,13,21,26,38 which is much lower than the reported local recurrence rate following treatment with wide local excision. This reduced recurrence rate found in MAC cases treated with MMS is probably due to the ability to confirm complete removal of the neoplasm with MMS. 


Conclusion To our knowledge, this case report describes the occurrence of SC, a rare sweat gland neoplasm, in the youngest reported patient and is only the second reported case of SC treated with MMS. Adequate sampling of tissue with an excisional biopsy allowed for appropriate evaluation with histologic and immunohistochemical studies to arrive at the diagnosis that could easily have been missed with a superficial biopsy. In our patient, histopathologic evaluation showed typical nests of basaloid cells, ductal differentiation, and ductal fibrosis seen in SC. However, perineural involvement that is particularly characteristic of SC was not present. This may portend a better prognosis for our patient whose tumor was completely excised after one stage of MMS and has not shown evidence of recurrence at the 18-month follow-up visit. MMS allowed for evaluation of the entire surgical margin and decreased risk of local recurrence resulting from an incomplete excision. In addition, it also allowed for sparing of normal tissue in a cosmetically sensitive area where SC commonly occurs. In summary, this case highlights the importance of including SC in the differential diagnosis of an enlarging cystic lesion in a younger patient and its successful treatment with MMS. 

References

  1. Weedon D. Tumors of cutaneous appendages. In: Weedon D, ed. Skin Pathology. 2nd ed. London, England: Churchill Livingstone; 2002:897.
  2. Sanchez Yus E, Requena Caballero L, Garcia Salazar I, et al. Clear cell syringoid eccrine carcinoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 1987;9:225-231.
  3. Freeman RG, Winkelmann RK. Basal cell tumor with eccrine differentiation (eccrine epithelioma). Arch Dermatol. 1969;100:234-242.
  4. Glatt HJ, Proia AD, Tsoy EA, et al. Malignant syringoma of the eyelid. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:987-990.
  5. Cooper PH, Mills SE, Leonard DD, et al. Sclerosing sweat duct (syringomatous) carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985;9:422-433.
  6. Mehregan AH, Hashimoto K, Rahbari H. Eccrine adenocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1983;119:104-114.
  7. Wick MR, Goellner JR, Wolfe JT III, et al. Adnexal carcinomas of the skin, I: eccrine carcinomas. Cancer. 1985;56:1147-1162.
  8. Abenoza P, Ackerman AB. Syringomatous carcinomas. In: Abenoza P, Ackerman AB, eds. Neoplasms with Eccrine Differentiation. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1990:371-412.
  9. Goto M, Sonoda T, Shibuya H, et al. Digital syringomatous carcinoma mimicking basal cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144:438-439.
  10. Urso C. Syringomatous breast carcinoma and correlated lesions. Pathologica. 1996;88:196-199.
  11. Hoppenreijs VP, Reuser TT, Mooy CM, et al. Syringomatous carcinoma of the eyelid and orbit: a clinical and histopathological challenge. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:668-672.
  12. Snow S, Madjar DD, Hardy S, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: report of 13 cases and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27:401-408.
  13. Friedman PM, Friedman RH, Jiang SB, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: collaborative series review and update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41:225-231.
  14. Antley CA, Carney M, Smoller BR. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma arising in the setting of previous radiation therapy. J Cutan Pathol. 1999;26:48-50.
  15. Borenstein A, Seidman DS, Trau H, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma following radiotherapy in childhood. Am J Med Sci. 1991;301:259-261.
  16. Fleischmann HE, Roth RJ, Wood C, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma treated by microscopically controlled excision. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1984;10:873-875.
  17. Schwarze HP, Loche F, Lamant L, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma induced by multiple radiation therapy. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39:369-372.
  18. Cooper PH, Mills SE. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984;10:908-914.
  19. Hamm JC, Argenta LC, Swanson NA. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: an unpredictable aggressive neoplasm. Ann Plast Surg. 1987;19:173-180.
  20. Birkby CS, Argenyi ZB, Whitaker DC. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma with mandibular invasion and bone marrow replacement. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1989;15:308-312.
  21. Leibovitch I, Huilgol SC, Selva D, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52:295-300.
  22. Gardner ES, Goldb
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Hu and Drs. Ko, Soriano, and Chiu report no conflict of interest. The authors report no discussion of off-label use. Ms. Hu is a medical student; Dr. Soriano is Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine, Division of Dermatology; and Dr. Chiu is Clinical Instructor, Division of Dermatology, all at David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles. Dr. Ko is Assistant Professor, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Jenny C. Hu, BS; Christine J. Ko, MD; Teresa T. Soriano, MD; Melvin W. Chiu, MD

Issue
Cutis - 77(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
19-24
Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Hu and Drs. Ko, Soriano, and Chiu report no conflict of interest. The authors report no discussion of off-label use. Ms. Hu is a medical student; Dr. Soriano is Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine, Division of Dermatology; and Dr. Chiu is Clinical Instructor, Division of Dermatology, all at David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles. Dr. Ko is Assistant Professor, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Jenny C. Hu, BS; Christine J. Ko, MD; Teresa T. Soriano, MD; Melvin W. Chiu, MD

Author and Disclosure Information

Ms. Hu and Drs. Ko, Soriano, and Chiu report no conflict of interest. The authors report no discussion of off-label use. Ms. Hu is a medical student; Dr. Soriano is Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine, Division of Dermatology; and Dr. Chiu is Clinical Instructor, Division of Dermatology, all at David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles. Dr. Ko is Assistant Professor, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Jenny C. Hu, BS; Christine J. Ko, MD; Teresa T. Soriano, MD; Melvin W. Chiu, MD

Article PDF
Article PDF

Syringomatous carcinoma (SC), considered by some to be a variant of microcystic adnexal carcinoma (MAC),1 is a rare malignant neoplasm of sweat gland origin. SC encompasses a range of neoplasms with different degrees of differentiation, and its nomenclature has varied over the years. SC also has been referred to as syringoid eccrine carcinoma,2 basal cell tumor with eccrine differentiation,3 malignant syringoma,4 and sclerosing sweat duct carcinoma.5 Its diagnosis has been a dilemma in a number of reported cases, probably due to the combination of its rarity and thus limited clinical and histopathologic information, microscopic similarities to other benign and malignant neoplasms, and characteristic histologic features that may only be apparent in surgical excisions containing deeper tissue. We report a case of SC that masqueraded as an epidermoid cyst in an unusually young patient.


Case Report
A 23-year-old Asian man, who was otherwise healthy, presented with an asymptomatic slowly enlarging nodule of one year's duration on the right medial eyebrow. Prior treatment with intralesional steroid injections resulted in minimal improvement. The patient had no personal or family history of skin cancers. Physical examination results demonstrated a well-demarcated, mobile, nontender subcutaneous nodule measuring 7 mm in diameter. The clinical presentation favored a diagnosis of an epidermal inclusion cyst, and the patient underwent surgical excision of the lesion. Results of the histopathologic examination revealed a neoplasm in the dermis consisting of bands and nests of pale staining basaloid cells extending between the collagen fibers (Figure 1). There were focal areas of ductal differentiation, scattered individual necrotic cells, moderate dermal fibrosis, and chronic inflammation with numerous eo-sinophils. Moderate nuclear atypia also was present (Figure 2). Perineural involvement was not seen. Results of immunohistochemical analysis revealed positive staining for high—and low—molecular-weight cytokeratins, as well as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)(Figure 3). There was scattered positivity with S-100 protein in occasional cells lining lumina and in dendritic cells (Figure 4). The histopathologic findings supported the diagnosis of SC. Because the neoplasm extended to the surgical margins of the specimen, repeat surgical excision with continuous microscopic control under the Mohs micrographic technique was performed to prevent local recurrence and spare normal tissue. At the 18-month follow-up visit, no local recurrence was seen.


Comment SC is a rare, malignant sweat gland neoplasm that usually occurs in the fourth and fifth decades of life.4-8 SC typically presents as a slow-growing, solitary, painless nodule or indurated plaque on the head or neck region.6-8 It has been frequently found on the upper and lower lips; however, it also has been reported to occur on the finger and breast.9,10 Predisposing factors for the development of SC are unclear11 but may include previous radiation to the face and history of receiving an organ transplant with immunosuppressive drug therapy.12-17 Histopathologically, SC is characterized by asymmetric and deep dermal invasion of tumor cells, perineural involvement, ductal formation, keratin-filled cysts, multiple nests of basaloid or squamous cells, and desmoplasia of the surrounding dermal stroma (Table 1).5,6 Some authors consider SC to be closely related to MAC but generally describe SC as more basaloid with larger tubules and a more sclerotic stroma than MAC.18-26 If histologic examination of SC is limited to the superficial dermis, SC demonstrates similarities to other neoplasms, including syringomas, trichoadenomas, trichoepitheliomas, basal cell carcinomas, or squamous cell carcinomas. In the reported cases in which SC was initially misdiagnosed as another benign or malignant neoplasm, many misdiagnoses were due to either a benign clinical appearance of the lesion or biopsy specimens that were too superficial to contain the deeper characteristic histologic features of SC.8,9,11,27-30

Immunohistochemical studies can facilitate the diagnosis of SC and differentiate it from other neoplasms. SC stains positively for CEA, S-100 protein, epithelial membrane antigen, cyto-keratin, and gross cystic disease fluid protein 15,31 all of which aid in the confirmation of a sweat gland neoplasm (Table 2).8,32,33,39 Positivity for CEA in the ductal lining cells and the luminal contents of tumor ducts confirms sweat gland differentiation.25,33,34 This ductal immunoreactivity to CEA appears to be one of the most reliable findings to differentiate SC and MAC from other adnexal tumors, especially desmoplastic trichoepithelioma, which may be one of the more challenging histo-pathologic differential diagnoses.35 In addition, epithelial membrane antigen positivity can be found in the areas showing glandular features.35 This can assist in distinguishing SC from a desmoplastic trichoepithelioma or sclerosing type basal cell carcinoma, both of which demonstrate negativity to epithelial membrane antigen.35 S-100 protein positivity in dendritic cells, as well as in some cords and ducts in SC, further verifies dendritic differentiation toward sweat gland structures and is useful as an adjunct in the confirmation of glandular differentiation.25,33,34,36

 

 

Without proper and timely diagnosis and management, SC can cause severe patient morbidity. Although SC rarely metastasizes and can have an indolent course, it can be locally de-structive and lead to potentially disfiguring outcomes.5-7 SC can invade deeply and infiltrate into the dermis, subcutaneous fat tissue, muscle, perichondrium, periosteum, and galea.8 Goto et al9 reported a case of an SC that was initially misdiagnosed as a basal cell carcinoma of the left middle finger. The deeper, characteristic features of SC were not recognized until after the affected finger required amputation due to erosion of the bone. Hoppenreijs et al11 described an aggressive case of an SC arising at a site of previously irradiated squamous cell carcinoma of the lower eyelid. Extensive involvement of the SC in the orbit led to the recommendation of an orbital exenter-ation; however, it was not performed because of the poor clinical condition of the patient. Treatments for SC have included wide local excision and Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). SC treatment with wide local excision often resulted in incomplete excision of the neoplasm despite having taken an adequate margin around the clinically assessable tumor.5 Cases of SC treated with wide local excision had a recurrence rate of 47%.5 The positive surgical margins following wide local excision may be due to the deep infiltration of SC, which frequently exceeds the clinically predicted size of the tumor.5 Due to the close relationship of MAC and SC, we feel that MMS treatment of SC will reduce recurrences as it has for MAC. Currently, there is strong support for the treatment of MAC with MMS as a gold standard to ensure complete clearance of the neoplasm and to reduce the local recurrence rate.12,13,17,21,22,37,38 In a study of MAC by Chiller et al,37 the authors demonstrated a median 4-fold increase in defect size when they compared the clinically estimated pretreatment size of the lesion with the MMS-determined posttreatment size of the lesion. The authors therefore suggest that, similar to the MMS-treated lesions, the lesions completely treated with wide local excision also would produce a defect size that is at least 4 times greater than the predicted pretreatment size of the lesion. Because wide local excision relies on predicted margins of the lesion, which the authors have shown can be greatly underestimated, Chiller et al37 argue that the use of MMS, which does not rely on predicted margins, is a reasonable first-line therapeutic modality for effectively treating patients with MAC. Furthermore, MMS allows for the examination of the entire peripheral and deep margins of the lesion, which is critical when considering the deep infiltrative nature of MAC. The reported local recurrence rate of MAC treated with MMS is 0% to 5%,12,13,21,26,38 which is much lower than the reported local recurrence rate following treatment with wide local excision. This reduced recurrence rate found in MAC cases treated with MMS is probably due to the ability to confirm complete removal of the neoplasm with MMS. 


Conclusion To our knowledge, this case report describes the occurrence of SC, a rare sweat gland neoplasm, in the youngest reported patient and is only the second reported case of SC treated with MMS. Adequate sampling of tissue with an excisional biopsy allowed for appropriate evaluation with histologic and immunohistochemical studies to arrive at the diagnosis that could easily have been missed with a superficial biopsy. In our patient, histopathologic evaluation showed typical nests of basaloid cells, ductal differentiation, and ductal fibrosis seen in SC. However, perineural involvement that is particularly characteristic of SC was not present. This may portend a better prognosis for our patient whose tumor was completely excised after one stage of MMS and has not shown evidence of recurrence at the 18-month follow-up visit. MMS allowed for evaluation of the entire surgical margin and decreased risk of local recurrence resulting from an incomplete excision. In addition, it also allowed for sparing of normal tissue in a cosmetically sensitive area where SC commonly occurs. In summary, this case highlights the importance of including SC in the differential diagnosis of an enlarging cystic lesion in a younger patient and its successful treatment with MMS. 

Syringomatous carcinoma (SC), considered by some to be a variant of microcystic adnexal carcinoma (MAC),1 is a rare malignant neoplasm of sweat gland origin. SC encompasses a range of neoplasms with different degrees of differentiation, and its nomenclature has varied over the years. SC also has been referred to as syringoid eccrine carcinoma,2 basal cell tumor with eccrine differentiation,3 malignant syringoma,4 and sclerosing sweat duct carcinoma.5 Its diagnosis has been a dilemma in a number of reported cases, probably due to the combination of its rarity and thus limited clinical and histopathologic information, microscopic similarities to other benign and malignant neoplasms, and characteristic histologic features that may only be apparent in surgical excisions containing deeper tissue. We report a case of SC that masqueraded as an epidermoid cyst in an unusually young patient.


Case Report
A 23-year-old Asian man, who was otherwise healthy, presented with an asymptomatic slowly enlarging nodule of one year's duration on the right medial eyebrow. Prior treatment with intralesional steroid injections resulted in minimal improvement. The patient had no personal or family history of skin cancers. Physical examination results demonstrated a well-demarcated, mobile, nontender subcutaneous nodule measuring 7 mm in diameter. The clinical presentation favored a diagnosis of an epidermal inclusion cyst, and the patient underwent surgical excision of the lesion. Results of the histopathologic examination revealed a neoplasm in the dermis consisting of bands and nests of pale staining basaloid cells extending between the collagen fibers (Figure 1). There were focal areas of ductal differentiation, scattered individual necrotic cells, moderate dermal fibrosis, and chronic inflammation with numerous eo-sinophils. Moderate nuclear atypia also was present (Figure 2). Perineural involvement was not seen. Results of immunohistochemical analysis revealed positive staining for high—and low—molecular-weight cytokeratins, as well as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)(Figure 3). There was scattered positivity with S-100 protein in occasional cells lining lumina and in dendritic cells (Figure 4). The histopathologic findings supported the diagnosis of SC. Because the neoplasm extended to the surgical margins of the specimen, repeat surgical excision with continuous microscopic control under the Mohs micrographic technique was performed to prevent local recurrence and spare normal tissue. At the 18-month follow-up visit, no local recurrence was seen.


Comment SC is a rare, malignant sweat gland neoplasm that usually occurs in the fourth and fifth decades of life.4-8 SC typically presents as a slow-growing, solitary, painless nodule or indurated plaque on the head or neck region.6-8 It has been frequently found on the upper and lower lips; however, it also has been reported to occur on the finger and breast.9,10 Predisposing factors for the development of SC are unclear11 but may include previous radiation to the face and history of receiving an organ transplant with immunosuppressive drug therapy.12-17 Histopathologically, SC is characterized by asymmetric and deep dermal invasion of tumor cells, perineural involvement, ductal formation, keratin-filled cysts, multiple nests of basaloid or squamous cells, and desmoplasia of the surrounding dermal stroma (Table 1).5,6 Some authors consider SC to be closely related to MAC but generally describe SC as more basaloid with larger tubules and a more sclerotic stroma than MAC.18-26 If histologic examination of SC is limited to the superficial dermis, SC demonstrates similarities to other neoplasms, including syringomas, trichoadenomas, trichoepitheliomas, basal cell carcinomas, or squamous cell carcinomas. In the reported cases in which SC was initially misdiagnosed as another benign or malignant neoplasm, many misdiagnoses were due to either a benign clinical appearance of the lesion or biopsy specimens that were too superficial to contain the deeper characteristic histologic features of SC.8,9,11,27-30

Immunohistochemical studies can facilitate the diagnosis of SC and differentiate it from other neoplasms. SC stains positively for CEA, S-100 protein, epithelial membrane antigen, cyto-keratin, and gross cystic disease fluid protein 15,31 all of which aid in the confirmation of a sweat gland neoplasm (Table 2).8,32,33,39 Positivity for CEA in the ductal lining cells and the luminal contents of tumor ducts confirms sweat gland differentiation.25,33,34 This ductal immunoreactivity to CEA appears to be one of the most reliable findings to differentiate SC and MAC from other adnexal tumors, especially desmoplastic trichoepithelioma, which may be one of the more challenging histo-pathologic differential diagnoses.35 In addition, epithelial membrane antigen positivity can be found in the areas showing glandular features.35 This can assist in distinguishing SC from a desmoplastic trichoepithelioma or sclerosing type basal cell carcinoma, both of which demonstrate negativity to epithelial membrane antigen.35 S-100 protein positivity in dendritic cells, as well as in some cords and ducts in SC, further verifies dendritic differentiation toward sweat gland structures and is useful as an adjunct in the confirmation of glandular differentiation.25,33,34,36

 

 

Without proper and timely diagnosis and management, SC can cause severe patient morbidity. Although SC rarely metastasizes and can have an indolent course, it can be locally de-structive and lead to potentially disfiguring outcomes.5-7 SC can invade deeply and infiltrate into the dermis, subcutaneous fat tissue, muscle, perichondrium, periosteum, and galea.8 Goto et al9 reported a case of an SC that was initially misdiagnosed as a basal cell carcinoma of the left middle finger. The deeper, characteristic features of SC were not recognized until after the affected finger required amputation due to erosion of the bone. Hoppenreijs et al11 described an aggressive case of an SC arising at a site of previously irradiated squamous cell carcinoma of the lower eyelid. Extensive involvement of the SC in the orbit led to the recommendation of an orbital exenter-ation; however, it was not performed because of the poor clinical condition of the patient. Treatments for SC have included wide local excision and Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). SC treatment with wide local excision often resulted in incomplete excision of the neoplasm despite having taken an adequate margin around the clinically assessable tumor.5 Cases of SC treated with wide local excision had a recurrence rate of 47%.5 The positive surgical margins following wide local excision may be due to the deep infiltration of SC, which frequently exceeds the clinically predicted size of the tumor.5 Due to the close relationship of MAC and SC, we feel that MMS treatment of SC will reduce recurrences as it has for MAC. Currently, there is strong support for the treatment of MAC with MMS as a gold standard to ensure complete clearance of the neoplasm and to reduce the local recurrence rate.12,13,17,21,22,37,38 In a study of MAC by Chiller et al,37 the authors demonstrated a median 4-fold increase in defect size when they compared the clinically estimated pretreatment size of the lesion with the MMS-determined posttreatment size of the lesion. The authors therefore suggest that, similar to the MMS-treated lesions, the lesions completely treated with wide local excision also would produce a defect size that is at least 4 times greater than the predicted pretreatment size of the lesion. Because wide local excision relies on predicted margins of the lesion, which the authors have shown can be greatly underestimated, Chiller et al37 argue that the use of MMS, which does not rely on predicted margins, is a reasonable first-line therapeutic modality for effectively treating patients with MAC. Furthermore, MMS allows for the examination of the entire peripheral and deep margins of the lesion, which is critical when considering the deep infiltrative nature of MAC. The reported local recurrence rate of MAC treated with MMS is 0% to 5%,12,13,21,26,38 which is much lower than the reported local recurrence rate following treatment with wide local excision. This reduced recurrence rate found in MAC cases treated with MMS is probably due to the ability to confirm complete removal of the neoplasm with MMS. 


Conclusion To our knowledge, this case report describes the occurrence of SC, a rare sweat gland neoplasm, in the youngest reported patient and is only the second reported case of SC treated with MMS. Adequate sampling of tissue with an excisional biopsy allowed for appropriate evaluation with histologic and immunohistochemical studies to arrive at the diagnosis that could easily have been missed with a superficial biopsy. In our patient, histopathologic evaluation showed typical nests of basaloid cells, ductal differentiation, and ductal fibrosis seen in SC. However, perineural involvement that is particularly characteristic of SC was not present. This may portend a better prognosis for our patient whose tumor was completely excised after one stage of MMS and has not shown evidence of recurrence at the 18-month follow-up visit. MMS allowed for evaluation of the entire surgical margin and decreased risk of local recurrence resulting from an incomplete excision. In addition, it also allowed for sparing of normal tissue in a cosmetically sensitive area where SC commonly occurs. In summary, this case highlights the importance of including SC in the differential diagnosis of an enlarging cystic lesion in a younger patient and its successful treatment with MMS. 

References

  1. Weedon D. Tumors of cutaneous appendages. In: Weedon D, ed. Skin Pathology. 2nd ed. London, England: Churchill Livingstone; 2002:897.
  2. Sanchez Yus E, Requena Caballero L, Garcia Salazar I, et al. Clear cell syringoid eccrine carcinoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 1987;9:225-231.
  3. Freeman RG, Winkelmann RK. Basal cell tumor with eccrine differentiation (eccrine epithelioma). Arch Dermatol. 1969;100:234-242.
  4. Glatt HJ, Proia AD, Tsoy EA, et al. Malignant syringoma of the eyelid. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:987-990.
  5. Cooper PH, Mills SE, Leonard DD, et al. Sclerosing sweat duct (syringomatous) carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985;9:422-433.
  6. Mehregan AH, Hashimoto K, Rahbari H. Eccrine adenocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1983;119:104-114.
  7. Wick MR, Goellner JR, Wolfe JT III, et al. Adnexal carcinomas of the skin, I: eccrine carcinomas. Cancer. 1985;56:1147-1162.
  8. Abenoza P, Ackerman AB. Syringomatous carcinomas. In: Abenoza P, Ackerman AB, eds. Neoplasms with Eccrine Differentiation. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1990:371-412.
  9. Goto M, Sonoda T, Shibuya H, et al. Digital syringomatous carcinoma mimicking basal cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144:438-439.
  10. Urso C. Syringomatous breast carcinoma and correlated lesions. Pathologica. 1996;88:196-199.
  11. Hoppenreijs VP, Reuser TT, Mooy CM, et al. Syringomatous carcinoma of the eyelid and orbit: a clinical and histopathological challenge. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:668-672.
  12. Snow S, Madjar DD, Hardy S, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: report of 13 cases and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27:401-408.
  13. Friedman PM, Friedman RH, Jiang SB, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: collaborative series review and update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41:225-231.
  14. Antley CA, Carney M, Smoller BR. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma arising in the setting of previous radiation therapy. J Cutan Pathol. 1999;26:48-50.
  15. Borenstein A, Seidman DS, Trau H, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma following radiotherapy in childhood. Am J Med Sci. 1991;301:259-261.
  16. Fleischmann HE, Roth RJ, Wood C, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma treated by microscopically controlled excision. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1984;10:873-875.
  17. Schwarze HP, Loche F, Lamant L, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma induced by multiple radiation therapy. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39:369-372.
  18. Cooper PH, Mills SE. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984;10:908-914.
  19. Hamm JC, Argenta LC, Swanson NA. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: an unpredictable aggressive neoplasm. Ann Plast Surg. 1987;19:173-180.
  20. Birkby CS, Argenyi ZB, Whitaker DC. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma with mandibular invasion and bone marrow replacement. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1989;15:308-312.
  21. Leibovitch I, Huilgol SC, Selva D, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52:295-300.
  22. Gardner ES, Goldb
References

  1. Weedon D. Tumors of cutaneous appendages. In: Weedon D, ed. Skin Pathology. 2nd ed. London, England: Churchill Livingstone; 2002:897.
  2. Sanchez Yus E, Requena Caballero L, Garcia Salazar I, et al. Clear cell syringoid eccrine carcinoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 1987;9:225-231.
  3. Freeman RG, Winkelmann RK. Basal cell tumor with eccrine differentiation (eccrine epithelioma). Arch Dermatol. 1969;100:234-242.
  4. Glatt HJ, Proia AD, Tsoy EA, et al. Malignant syringoma of the eyelid. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:987-990.
  5. Cooper PH, Mills SE, Leonard DD, et al. Sclerosing sweat duct (syringomatous) carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985;9:422-433.
  6. Mehregan AH, Hashimoto K, Rahbari H. Eccrine adenocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1983;119:104-114.
  7. Wick MR, Goellner JR, Wolfe JT III, et al. Adnexal carcinomas of the skin, I: eccrine carcinomas. Cancer. 1985;56:1147-1162.
  8. Abenoza P, Ackerman AB. Syringomatous carcinomas. In: Abenoza P, Ackerman AB, eds. Neoplasms with Eccrine Differentiation. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1990:371-412.
  9. Goto M, Sonoda T, Shibuya H, et al. Digital syringomatous carcinoma mimicking basal cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144:438-439.
  10. Urso C. Syringomatous breast carcinoma and correlated lesions. Pathologica. 1996;88:196-199.
  11. Hoppenreijs VP, Reuser TT, Mooy CM, et al. Syringomatous carcinoma of the eyelid and orbit: a clinical and histopathological challenge. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:668-672.
  12. Snow S, Madjar DD, Hardy S, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: report of 13 cases and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27:401-408.
  13. Friedman PM, Friedman RH, Jiang SB, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: collaborative series review and update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41:225-231.
  14. Antley CA, Carney M, Smoller BR. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma arising in the setting of previous radiation therapy. J Cutan Pathol. 1999;26:48-50.
  15. Borenstein A, Seidman DS, Trau H, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma following radiotherapy in childhood. Am J Med Sci. 1991;301:259-261.
  16. Fleischmann HE, Roth RJ, Wood C, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma treated by microscopically controlled excision. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1984;10:873-875.
  17. Schwarze HP, Loche F, Lamant L, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma induced by multiple radiation therapy. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39:369-372.
  18. Cooper PH, Mills SE. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984;10:908-914.
  19. Hamm JC, Argenta LC, Swanson NA. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: an unpredictable aggressive neoplasm. Ann Plast Surg. 1987;19:173-180.
  20. Birkby CS, Argenyi ZB, Whitaker DC. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma with mandibular invasion and bone marrow replacement. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1989;15:308-312.
  21. Leibovitch I, Huilgol SC, Selva D, et al. Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52:295-300.
  22. Gardner ES, Goldb
Issue
Cutis - 77(1)
Issue
Cutis - 77(1)
Page Number
19-24
Page Number
19-24
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Syringomatous Carcinoma in a Young Patient Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery
Display Headline
Syringomatous Carcinoma in a Young Patient Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

Angiosarcoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Angiosarcoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Angiosarcoma is an aggressive neoplasm that predominantly affects elderly patients. Most cases appear on the scalp and face de novo; however, trauma, longstanding lymphedema, and irradiation are predisposing factors. Management includes a multidisciplinary team and may involve a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy tailored to the patient’s age and associated comorbidities.

Bruiselike patches on the face and scalp of elderly patients should raise the index of suspicion for angiosarcoma. A biopsy of the lesion and a workup for other organ involvement should be considered. We present the case of an elderly patient with an angiosarcoma and discuss the management and follow-up along with a brief review of the current literature. 


Case Report
In February 2002, an 80-year-old white man presented with approximately a 3-month history of a growing raised area on the nose (Figure). The patient first noticed a sudden onset of redness on the right side of his nose in December 2001. The redness gradually darkened over the next 3 months.

Examination revealed a 30-X20-mm purplish red plaque on the right side of the patient's nose. Results of a 4-mm punch biopsy showed an angiosarcoma. The patient was referred to an ear, nose, and throat physician with a special interest in oncology. He also was evaluated by an oncologist. Results of the patient's physical examination were unremarkable except for the skin lesion on his nose. Results of a complete blood count, x-ray, and computed tomography of the chest, as well as an abdominal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of the head and neck, were unremarkable for masses, lymphadenopathy, or other significant findings. In March 2002, the patient underwent excision of the tumor followed by skin grafting. Six weeks after the operation, the patient was started on external beam radiation therapy. He was treated with 98 Gy over 49 days (2.0 Gy daily). Results of follow-up physical examinations by the multidisciplinary team did not reveal any signs or symptoms of tumor recurrence. On the patient's last follow-up visit in April 2005, he showed no evidence of recurrence of the lesion or metastasis. No follow-up photographs were taken. 


Comment

Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the face and scalp is a distinct entity among the angiosarcomas. It was first described in detail by Jones1 in 1964 as malignant angioendothelioma of the skin.2 This aggressive vascular neoplasm predominantly affects elderly patients (average age, 70 years).3 Men are affected twice as frequently as women. Men also tend to develop the disease at an earlier age. The tumor is localized mostly to the upper half of the face and the scalp.3 Predisposing factors in the onset of angiosarcoma include trauma, longstanding lymphedema, and irradiation of benign vascular lesions; however, most cases present with no obvious etiology.4 The clinical presentation of angiosarcoma is variable. Ill-defined bruiselike areas or facial edema with minimal erythema are the initial signs. Progressively more indurated plaques appear with nodular or ulcerated components. The neoplasm spreads quickly, centrifugally, and transdermally.5,6 Multifocality also is possible. The original clinical size of the tumor rarely correlates to the degree of microscopic tissue invasion.7 Unusual presentations have included yellowish plaques over the upper eyelids that resemble xanthelasma and cause ptosis,8 rosacealike lesions,9 and lesions presenting with scarring alopecia.10 Angiosarcoma presenting with intermittent angioedema of the face that comes and goes is another uncommon manifestation.11 Rhinophymalike features also should be considered as an unusual clinical manifestation of cutaneous angiosarcoma.12 Diagnosis often is delayed by the variable presentation and the benign appearance of the lesion, which simulates a bruise or a hemangioma. Retrospective studies show that clinical diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcomas often is difficult.13 Other lesions that may need to be differentiated from angiosarcoma on the face include hemangiomas, Kaposi sarcomas, malignant melanomas, metastases, and vascular venous malformations. A summary of the characteristic features is included in the Table.

Pathologically, 2 main patterns of angiomas are recognized: angiomatous and solid.9 The angiomatous pattern is characterized by irregular, anastomosing vascular channels that dissect through the collagen. The vessels are lined by endothelial cells with features that range from normal-appearing endothelial cells to pleomorphic, hyperchromatic cells that exhibit multi-layering. Papillary processes may be present within the lumen. Numerous normal or abnormal mitotic figures are present as well. A dense mononuclear cell infiltrate is present and correlates with a better prognosis. In the solid form of angiosarcoma, tumor cells may be spindle or polygonal shaped. Vascular architecture may not be identified in the poorly differentiated areas. Reticulin staining highlights the vascular channels.9 Possible immunohistochemical markers for angiosarcoma include ulex europaeus 1 lectin (sensitive marker; used in conjunction with epithelial membrane antigen and cytokeratin to exclude epithelial tumor); factor VIII antigen (highly specific; low detection sensitivity); CD34 cells (highly sensitive; stains dermal dendrocytes, sweat gland basement membrane, and hematopoietic progenitor cells); and CD31 cells (highly sensitive; good specificity).7,19 Several differential diagnoses should be considered on pathology.20 Unlike benign vascular lesions, the well-differentiated angiomatous areas in angiosarcoma display cytologic atypia; multilayering, papillary structures; and irregular anastomosing blood vessels. In Kaposi sarcoma, cytologic atypia is less prominent and there is no endothelial multilayering.20 The optimal treatment of cutaneous angiosarcoma has not been defined.21 Generally, radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy are advocated to treat patients with these tumors. In many patients, surgery often is not feasible because of the tumor's multifocal nature and local spread pattern.21 Therefore, the results have been poor. In a study by Mark et al,22 only 1 of 12 patients had the disease locally controlled. Holden et al23 reported 1 cure in 7 patients treated with surgery alone. The surgical aim is to resect all clinically identifiable disease.24 In areas of doubt, microscopic control of surgical margins may have a role in guiding the extent of resection. Achieving a negative margin frequently is difficult in angiosarcoma patients because of the extensive microscopic spread that is so common in this disease. Therefore, in trying to achieve a negative margin, a wound is created that almost never can be closed primarily. The reconstructive surgeon has a number of options for initial temporary coverage, as well as definitive reconstruction, including homograft skin, autologous skin graft, rotation flaps, and free flaps.24 Angiosarcomas usually respond to radiotherapy to some degree and most studies suggest that a combination of surgery and radiotherapy offers the best chance for long-term control.3,21 In 1 series of 28 angiosarcomas of the head and neck, Mark et al22 reported better survival after a median 32 months with combined surgery and radiotherapy compared with surgery alone. In cases unsuited for surgery, radiotherapy alone may be considered; however, usually only partial responses are achieved. Morrison et al21 suggested that moderate doses of radiation could control subclinical disease. Because angiosarcoma is a systemic disease, chemotherapy may be useful in its management.25 The efficacy of chemotherapy is undefined, with some studies reporting a beneficial effect and others suggesting no survival benefit. Chemotherapeutic agents used have included doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, dacarbazine, actinomycin D, methotrexate, and vincristine.25 Systemic paclitaxel therapy has been used with encouraging results in 3 patients with angiosarcoma with regression of the lesions.26 Spieth and colleagues27 reported the effectiveness of 13-cis-retinoic acid and interferon alfa-2a combination therapy in a patient with recurring cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head after radical radiation treatment. There is no optimal treatment for angiosarcoma and the search for effective systemic treatment is needed. The prognosis in angiosarcoma is poor because of its high potential for metastasis.28 The 5-year survival rate is about 12%. Prognostic factors include the size of the tumor and mitotic counts, with tumors less than 10 cm in diameter and those with low mitotic counts having a better prognosis.28


 

 

Conclusion

Angiosarcomas are rare, aggressive tumors of vascular origin. They occur most often in areas of long-term sun-exposed skin in elderly patients, patients with longstanding lymphedema, or patients who have completed radiation therapy. The prognosis is poor and radical surgery is often required. In addition, radiation or chemotherapy may be considered as therapeutic options.

References

  1. Jones EW. Malignant angioendothelioma of the skin. Br J Dermatol. 1964;76:21-39.
  2. Girard C, Johnson WC, Graham JH. Cutaneous angiosarcoma. Cancer. 1970;26:868-883.
  3. Sasaki R, Soejima T, Kishi K, et al. Angiosarcoma treated with radiotherapy: impact of tumor type and size on outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:1032-1040.
  4. Fink-Puches R, Smolle J, Beham A, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma [in German]. Hautarzt. 2000;51:479-485.
  5. Mackenzie U. Angiosarcoma of the face. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:549-550.
  6. Rich AL, Berman P. Cutaneous angiosarcoma presenting as an unusual facial bruise. Age Ageing. 2004;33:512-514.
  7. Mentzel T, Kutzner H, Wollina U. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the face: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of a case resembling rosacea clinically. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38:837-840.
  8. Bray LC, Sullivan TJ, Whitehead K. Angiosarcoma of the eyelid. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1995;23:69-72.
  9. Cannavo SP, Lentini M, Magliolo E, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the face. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2003;175:594-595.
  10. Knight TE, Robinson HM, Sina B. Angiosarcoma (angioendothelioma) of the scalp. an unusual case of scarring alopecia. Arch Dermatol. 1980;116:683-686.
  11. Tay YK, Ong BH. Cutaneous angiosarcoma presenting as recurrent angio-oedema of the face. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143:1346-1348.
  12. Aguila LI, Sanchez JL. Angiosarcoma of the face resembling rhinophyma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:530-531.
  13. Leighton SE, Levine TP. Angiosarcoma of the external ear: a case report. Am J Otol. 1991;12:54-56.
  14. Conlon JD, Drolet BA. Skin lesions in the neonate. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2004;51:863-888.
  15. Piccirillo E, Agarwal M, Rohit, et al. Management of temporal bone hemangiomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004;113:431-437.
  16. Antman K, Chang Y. Kaposi's sarcoma. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1027-1038.
  17. Balch CM. Cutaneous melanoma: prognosis and treatment results worldwide. Semin Surg Oncol. 1992;8:400-414.
  18. Abbruzzese JL, Abbruzzese MC, Lenzi R. Analysis of a diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected tumors of unknown origin. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:2094-2103.
  19. Conde-Taboada A, Florez A, De la Torre C, et al. Pseudoangiosarcomatous squamous cell carcinoma of skin arising adjacent to decubitus ulcers. Am J Dermatopathol. 2005;27:142-144.
  20. Sur RK, Nayler S, Ahmed SN, et al. Angiosarcomas—clinical profile, pathology and management. S Afr J Surg. 2000;38:13-16.
  21. Morrison WH, Byers RM, Garden AS, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head and neck. a therapeutic dilemma. Cancer. 1995;76:319-327.
  22. Mark RJ, Tran LM, Sercarz J, et al. Angiosarcoma of the head and neck. the UCLA experience 1955 through 1990. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:973-978.
  23. Holden CA, Spittle MF, Jones EW. Angiosarcoma of the face and scalp, prognosis and treatmen
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Selim, Khachemoune, and Lockshin report no conflict of interest. The authors report no discussion of off-label use. Dr. Selim is a research fellow, Endocrine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Dr. Khachemoune is Clinical Instructor, Department of Dermatology, SUNY Downstate, and an attending dermatologist, VA Hospital, Brooklyn, New York. Dr. Lockshin is a practicing physician, DermAssociates, PC, Silver Spring, Maryland.

Abdulhafez Selim, MD, PhD; Amore Khachemoune, MD, CWS; Norman A. Lockshin, MD

Issue
Cutis - 76(5)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
313-317
Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Selim, Khachemoune, and Lockshin report no conflict of interest. The authors report no discussion of off-label use. Dr. Selim is a research fellow, Endocrine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Dr. Khachemoune is Clinical Instructor, Department of Dermatology, SUNY Downstate, and an attending dermatologist, VA Hospital, Brooklyn, New York. Dr. Lockshin is a practicing physician, DermAssociates, PC, Silver Spring, Maryland.

Abdulhafez Selim, MD, PhD; Amore Khachemoune, MD, CWS; Norman A. Lockshin, MD

Author and Disclosure Information

Drs. Selim, Khachemoune, and Lockshin report no conflict of interest. The authors report no discussion of off-label use. Dr. Selim is a research fellow, Endocrine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Dr. Khachemoune is Clinical Instructor, Department of Dermatology, SUNY Downstate, and an attending dermatologist, VA Hospital, Brooklyn, New York. Dr. Lockshin is a practicing physician, DermAssociates, PC, Silver Spring, Maryland.

Abdulhafez Selim, MD, PhD; Amore Khachemoune, MD, CWS; Norman A. Lockshin, MD

Article PDF
Article PDF

Angiosarcoma is an aggressive neoplasm that predominantly affects elderly patients. Most cases appear on the scalp and face de novo; however, trauma, longstanding lymphedema, and irradiation are predisposing factors. Management includes a multidisciplinary team and may involve a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy tailored to the patient’s age and associated comorbidities.

Bruiselike patches on the face and scalp of elderly patients should raise the index of suspicion for angiosarcoma. A biopsy of the lesion and a workup for other organ involvement should be considered. We present the case of an elderly patient with an angiosarcoma and discuss the management and follow-up along with a brief review of the current literature. 


Case Report
In February 2002, an 80-year-old white man presented with approximately a 3-month history of a growing raised area on the nose (Figure). The patient first noticed a sudden onset of redness on the right side of his nose in December 2001. The redness gradually darkened over the next 3 months.

Examination revealed a 30-X20-mm purplish red plaque on the right side of the patient's nose. Results of a 4-mm punch biopsy showed an angiosarcoma. The patient was referred to an ear, nose, and throat physician with a special interest in oncology. He also was evaluated by an oncologist. Results of the patient's physical examination were unremarkable except for the skin lesion on his nose. Results of a complete blood count, x-ray, and computed tomography of the chest, as well as an abdominal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of the head and neck, were unremarkable for masses, lymphadenopathy, or other significant findings. In March 2002, the patient underwent excision of the tumor followed by skin grafting. Six weeks after the operation, the patient was started on external beam radiation therapy. He was treated with 98 Gy over 49 days (2.0 Gy daily). Results of follow-up physical examinations by the multidisciplinary team did not reveal any signs or symptoms of tumor recurrence. On the patient's last follow-up visit in April 2005, he showed no evidence of recurrence of the lesion or metastasis. No follow-up photographs were taken. 


Comment

Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the face and scalp is a distinct entity among the angiosarcomas. It was first described in detail by Jones1 in 1964 as malignant angioendothelioma of the skin.2 This aggressive vascular neoplasm predominantly affects elderly patients (average age, 70 years).3 Men are affected twice as frequently as women. Men also tend to develop the disease at an earlier age. The tumor is localized mostly to the upper half of the face and the scalp.3 Predisposing factors in the onset of angiosarcoma include trauma, longstanding lymphedema, and irradiation of benign vascular lesions; however, most cases present with no obvious etiology.4 The clinical presentation of angiosarcoma is variable. Ill-defined bruiselike areas or facial edema with minimal erythema are the initial signs. Progressively more indurated plaques appear with nodular or ulcerated components. The neoplasm spreads quickly, centrifugally, and transdermally.5,6 Multifocality also is possible. The original clinical size of the tumor rarely correlates to the degree of microscopic tissue invasion.7 Unusual presentations have included yellowish plaques over the upper eyelids that resemble xanthelasma and cause ptosis,8 rosacealike lesions,9 and lesions presenting with scarring alopecia.10 Angiosarcoma presenting with intermittent angioedema of the face that comes and goes is another uncommon manifestation.11 Rhinophymalike features also should be considered as an unusual clinical manifestation of cutaneous angiosarcoma.12 Diagnosis often is delayed by the variable presentation and the benign appearance of the lesion, which simulates a bruise or a hemangioma. Retrospective studies show that clinical diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcomas often is difficult.13 Other lesions that may need to be differentiated from angiosarcoma on the face include hemangiomas, Kaposi sarcomas, malignant melanomas, metastases, and vascular venous malformations. A summary of the characteristic features is included in the Table.

Pathologically, 2 main patterns of angiomas are recognized: angiomatous and solid.9 The angiomatous pattern is characterized by irregular, anastomosing vascular channels that dissect through the collagen. The vessels are lined by endothelial cells with features that range from normal-appearing endothelial cells to pleomorphic, hyperchromatic cells that exhibit multi-layering. Papillary processes may be present within the lumen. Numerous normal or abnormal mitotic figures are present as well. A dense mononuclear cell infiltrate is present and correlates with a better prognosis. In the solid form of angiosarcoma, tumor cells may be spindle or polygonal shaped. Vascular architecture may not be identified in the poorly differentiated areas. Reticulin staining highlights the vascular channels.9 Possible immunohistochemical markers for angiosarcoma include ulex europaeus 1 lectin (sensitive marker; used in conjunction with epithelial membrane antigen and cytokeratin to exclude epithelial tumor); factor VIII antigen (highly specific; low detection sensitivity); CD34 cells (highly sensitive; stains dermal dendrocytes, sweat gland basement membrane, and hematopoietic progenitor cells); and CD31 cells (highly sensitive; good specificity).7,19 Several differential diagnoses should be considered on pathology.20 Unlike benign vascular lesions, the well-differentiated angiomatous areas in angiosarcoma display cytologic atypia; multilayering, papillary structures; and irregular anastomosing blood vessels. In Kaposi sarcoma, cytologic atypia is less prominent and there is no endothelial multilayering.20 The optimal treatment of cutaneous angiosarcoma has not been defined.21 Generally, radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy are advocated to treat patients with these tumors. In many patients, surgery often is not feasible because of the tumor's multifocal nature and local spread pattern.21 Therefore, the results have been poor. In a study by Mark et al,22 only 1 of 12 patients had the disease locally controlled. Holden et al23 reported 1 cure in 7 patients treated with surgery alone. The surgical aim is to resect all clinically identifiable disease.24 In areas of doubt, microscopic control of surgical margins may have a role in guiding the extent of resection. Achieving a negative margin frequently is difficult in angiosarcoma patients because of the extensive microscopic spread that is so common in this disease. Therefore, in trying to achieve a negative margin, a wound is created that almost never can be closed primarily. The reconstructive surgeon has a number of options for initial temporary coverage, as well as definitive reconstruction, including homograft skin, autologous skin graft, rotation flaps, and free flaps.24 Angiosarcomas usually respond to radiotherapy to some degree and most studies suggest that a combination of surgery and radiotherapy offers the best chance for long-term control.3,21 In 1 series of 28 angiosarcomas of the head and neck, Mark et al22 reported better survival after a median 32 months with combined surgery and radiotherapy compared with surgery alone. In cases unsuited for surgery, radiotherapy alone may be considered; however, usually only partial responses are achieved. Morrison et al21 suggested that moderate doses of radiation could control subclinical disease. Because angiosarcoma is a systemic disease, chemotherapy may be useful in its management.25 The efficacy of chemotherapy is undefined, with some studies reporting a beneficial effect and others suggesting no survival benefit. Chemotherapeutic agents used have included doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, dacarbazine, actinomycin D, methotrexate, and vincristine.25 Systemic paclitaxel therapy has been used with encouraging results in 3 patients with angiosarcoma with regression of the lesions.26 Spieth and colleagues27 reported the effectiveness of 13-cis-retinoic acid and interferon alfa-2a combination therapy in a patient with recurring cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head after radical radiation treatment. There is no optimal treatment for angiosarcoma and the search for effective systemic treatment is needed. The prognosis in angiosarcoma is poor because of its high potential for metastasis.28 The 5-year survival rate is about 12%. Prognostic factors include the size of the tumor and mitotic counts, with tumors less than 10 cm in diameter and those with low mitotic counts having a better prognosis.28


 

 

Conclusion

Angiosarcomas are rare, aggressive tumors of vascular origin. They occur most often in areas of long-term sun-exposed skin in elderly patients, patients with longstanding lymphedema, or patients who have completed radiation therapy. The prognosis is poor and radical surgery is often required. In addition, radiation or chemotherapy may be considered as therapeutic options.

Angiosarcoma is an aggressive neoplasm that predominantly affects elderly patients. Most cases appear on the scalp and face de novo; however, trauma, longstanding lymphedema, and irradiation are predisposing factors. Management includes a multidisciplinary team and may involve a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy tailored to the patient’s age and associated comorbidities.

Bruiselike patches on the face and scalp of elderly patients should raise the index of suspicion for angiosarcoma. A biopsy of the lesion and a workup for other organ involvement should be considered. We present the case of an elderly patient with an angiosarcoma and discuss the management and follow-up along with a brief review of the current literature. 


Case Report
In February 2002, an 80-year-old white man presented with approximately a 3-month history of a growing raised area on the nose (Figure). The patient first noticed a sudden onset of redness on the right side of his nose in December 2001. The redness gradually darkened over the next 3 months.

Examination revealed a 30-X20-mm purplish red plaque on the right side of the patient's nose. Results of a 4-mm punch biopsy showed an angiosarcoma. The patient was referred to an ear, nose, and throat physician with a special interest in oncology. He also was evaluated by an oncologist. Results of the patient's physical examination were unremarkable except for the skin lesion on his nose. Results of a complete blood count, x-ray, and computed tomography of the chest, as well as an abdominal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of the head and neck, were unremarkable for masses, lymphadenopathy, or other significant findings. In March 2002, the patient underwent excision of the tumor followed by skin grafting. Six weeks after the operation, the patient was started on external beam radiation therapy. He was treated with 98 Gy over 49 days (2.0 Gy daily). Results of follow-up physical examinations by the multidisciplinary team did not reveal any signs or symptoms of tumor recurrence. On the patient's last follow-up visit in April 2005, he showed no evidence of recurrence of the lesion or metastasis. No follow-up photographs were taken. 


Comment

Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the face and scalp is a distinct entity among the angiosarcomas. It was first described in detail by Jones1 in 1964 as malignant angioendothelioma of the skin.2 This aggressive vascular neoplasm predominantly affects elderly patients (average age, 70 years).3 Men are affected twice as frequently as women. Men also tend to develop the disease at an earlier age. The tumor is localized mostly to the upper half of the face and the scalp.3 Predisposing factors in the onset of angiosarcoma include trauma, longstanding lymphedema, and irradiation of benign vascular lesions; however, most cases present with no obvious etiology.4 The clinical presentation of angiosarcoma is variable. Ill-defined bruiselike areas or facial edema with minimal erythema are the initial signs. Progressively more indurated plaques appear with nodular or ulcerated components. The neoplasm spreads quickly, centrifugally, and transdermally.5,6 Multifocality also is possible. The original clinical size of the tumor rarely correlates to the degree of microscopic tissue invasion.7 Unusual presentations have included yellowish plaques over the upper eyelids that resemble xanthelasma and cause ptosis,8 rosacealike lesions,9 and lesions presenting with scarring alopecia.10 Angiosarcoma presenting with intermittent angioedema of the face that comes and goes is another uncommon manifestation.11 Rhinophymalike features also should be considered as an unusual clinical manifestation of cutaneous angiosarcoma.12 Diagnosis often is delayed by the variable presentation and the benign appearance of the lesion, which simulates a bruise or a hemangioma. Retrospective studies show that clinical diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcomas often is difficult.13 Other lesions that may need to be differentiated from angiosarcoma on the face include hemangiomas, Kaposi sarcomas, malignant melanomas, metastases, and vascular venous malformations. A summary of the characteristic features is included in the Table.

Pathologically, 2 main patterns of angiomas are recognized: angiomatous and solid.9 The angiomatous pattern is characterized by irregular, anastomosing vascular channels that dissect through the collagen. The vessels are lined by endothelial cells with features that range from normal-appearing endothelial cells to pleomorphic, hyperchromatic cells that exhibit multi-layering. Papillary processes may be present within the lumen. Numerous normal or abnormal mitotic figures are present as well. A dense mononuclear cell infiltrate is present and correlates with a better prognosis. In the solid form of angiosarcoma, tumor cells may be spindle or polygonal shaped. Vascular architecture may not be identified in the poorly differentiated areas. Reticulin staining highlights the vascular channels.9 Possible immunohistochemical markers for angiosarcoma include ulex europaeus 1 lectin (sensitive marker; used in conjunction with epithelial membrane antigen and cytokeratin to exclude epithelial tumor); factor VIII antigen (highly specific; low detection sensitivity); CD34 cells (highly sensitive; stains dermal dendrocytes, sweat gland basement membrane, and hematopoietic progenitor cells); and CD31 cells (highly sensitive; good specificity).7,19 Several differential diagnoses should be considered on pathology.20 Unlike benign vascular lesions, the well-differentiated angiomatous areas in angiosarcoma display cytologic atypia; multilayering, papillary structures; and irregular anastomosing blood vessels. In Kaposi sarcoma, cytologic atypia is less prominent and there is no endothelial multilayering.20 The optimal treatment of cutaneous angiosarcoma has not been defined.21 Generally, radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy are advocated to treat patients with these tumors. In many patients, surgery often is not feasible because of the tumor's multifocal nature and local spread pattern.21 Therefore, the results have been poor. In a study by Mark et al,22 only 1 of 12 patients had the disease locally controlled. Holden et al23 reported 1 cure in 7 patients treated with surgery alone. The surgical aim is to resect all clinically identifiable disease.24 In areas of doubt, microscopic control of surgical margins may have a role in guiding the extent of resection. Achieving a negative margin frequently is difficult in angiosarcoma patients because of the extensive microscopic spread that is so common in this disease. Therefore, in trying to achieve a negative margin, a wound is created that almost never can be closed primarily. The reconstructive surgeon has a number of options for initial temporary coverage, as well as definitive reconstruction, including homograft skin, autologous skin graft, rotation flaps, and free flaps.24 Angiosarcomas usually respond to radiotherapy to some degree and most studies suggest that a combination of surgery and radiotherapy offers the best chance for long-term control.3,21 In 1 series of 28 angiosarcomas of the head and neck, Mark et al22 reported better survival after a median 32 months with combined surgery and radiotherapy compared with surgery alone. In cases unsuited for surgery, radiotherapy alone may be considered; however, usually only partial responses are achieved. Morrison et al21 suggested that moderate doses of radiation could control subclinical disease. Because angiosarcoma is a systemic disease, chemotherapy may be useful in its management.25 The efficacy of chemotherapy is undefined, with some studies reporting a beneficial effect and others suggesting no survival benefit. Chemotherapeutic agents used have included doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, dacarbazine, actinomycin D, methotrexate, and vincristine.25 Systemic paclitaxel therapy has been used with encouraging results in 3 patients with angiosarcoma with regression of the lesions.26 Spieth and colleagues27 reported the effectiveness of 13-cis-retinoic acid and interferon alfa-2a combination therapy in a patient with recurring cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head after radical radiation treatment. There is no optimal treatment for angiosarcoma and the search for effective systemic treatment is needed. The prognosis in angiosarcoma is poor because of its high potential for metastasis.28 The 5-year survival rate is about 12%. Prognostic factors include the size of the tumor and mitotic counts, with tumors less than 10 cm in diameter and those with low mitotic counts having a better prognosis.28


 

 

Conclusion

Angiosarcomas are rare, aggressive tumors of vascular origin. They occur most often in areas of long-term sun-exposed skin in elderly patients, patients with longstanding lymphedema, or patients who have completed radiation therapy. The prognosis is poor and radical surgery is often required. In addition, radiation or chemotherapy may be considered as therapeutic options.

References

  1. Jones EW. Malignant angioendothelioma of the skin. Br J Dermatol. 1964;76:21-39.
  2. Girard C, Johnson WC, Graham JH. Cutaneous angiosarcoma. Cancer. 1970;26:868-883.
  3. Sasaki R, Soejima T, Kishi K, et al. Angiosarcoma treated with radiotherapy: impact of tumor type and size on outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:1032-1040.
  4. Fink-Puches R, Smolle J, Beham A, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma [in German]. Hautarzt. 2000;51:479-485.
  5. Mackenzie U. Angiosarcoma of the face. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:549-550.
  6. Rich AL, Berman P. Cutaneous angiosarcoma presenting as an unusual facial bruise. Age Ageing. 2004;33:512-514.
  7. Mentzel T, Kutzner H, Wollina U. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the face: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of a case resembling rosacea clinically. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38:837-840.
  8. Bray LC, Sullivan TJ, Whitehead K. Angiosarcoma of the eyelid. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1995;23:69-72.
  9. Cannavo SP, Lentini M, Magliolo E, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the face. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2003;175:594-595.
  10. Knight TE, Robinson HM, Sina B. Angiosarcoma (angioendothelioma) of the scalp. an unusual case of scarring alopecia. Arch Dermatol. 1980;116:683-686.
  11. Tay YK, Ong BH. Cutaneous angiosarcoma presenting as recurrent angio-oedema of the face. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143:1346-1348.
  12. Aguila LI, Sanchez JL. Angiosarcoma of the face resembling rhinophyma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:530-531.
  13. Leighton SE, Levine TP. Angiosarcoma of the external ear: a case report. Am J Otol. 1991;12:54-56.
  14. Conlon JD, Drolet BA. Skin lesions in the neonate. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2004;51:863-888.
  15. Piccirillo E, Agarwal M, Rohit, et al. Management of temporal bone hemangiomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004;113:431-437.
  16. Antman K, Chang Y. Kaposi's sarcoma. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1027-1038.
  17. Balch CM. Cutaneous melanoma: prognosis and treatment results worldwide. Semin Surg Oncol. 1992;8:400-414.
  18. Abbruzzese JL, Abbruzzese MC, Lenzi R. Analysis of a diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected tumors of unknown origin. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:2094-2103.
  19. Conde-Taboada A, Florez A, De la Torre C, et al. Pseudoangiosarcomatous squamous cell carcinoma of skin arising adjacent to decubitus ulcers. Am J Dermatopathol. 2005;27:142-144.
  20. Sur RK, Nayler S, Ahmed SN, et al. Angiosarcomas—clinical profile, pathology and management. S Afr J Surg. 2000;38:13-16.
  21. Morrison WH, Byers RM, Garden AS, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head and neck. a therapeutic dilemma. Cancer. 1995;76:319-327.
  22. Mark RJ, Tran LM, Sercarz J, et al. Angiosarcoma of the head and neck. the UCLA experience 1955 through 1990. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:973-978.
  23. Holden CA, Spittle MF, Jones EW. Angiosarcoma of the face and scalp, prognosis and treatmen
References

  1. Jones EW. Malignant angioendothelioma of the skin. Br J Dermatol. 1964;76:21-39.
  2. Girard C, Johnson WC, Graham JH. Cutaneous angiosarcoma. Cancer. 1970;26:868-883.
  3. Sasaki R, Soejima T, Kishi K, et al. Angiosarcoma treated with radiotherapy: impact of tumor type and size on outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:1032-1040.
  4. Fink-Puches R, Smolle J, Beham A, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma [in German]. Hautarzt. 2000;51:479-485.
  5. Mackenzie U. Angiosarcoma of the face. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121:549-550.
  6. Rich AL, Berman P. Cutaneous angiosarcoma presenting as an unusual facial bruise. Age Ageing. 2004;33:512-514.
  7. Mentzel T, Kutzner H, Wollina U. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the face: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of a case resembling rosacea clinically. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38:837-840.
  8. Bray LC, Sullivan TJ, Whitehead K. Angiosarcoma of the eyelid. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1995;23:69-72.
  9. Cannavo SP, Lentini M, Magliolo E, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the face. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2003;175:594-595.
  10. Knight TE, Robinson HM, Sina B. Angiosarcoma (angioendothelioma) of the scalp. an unusual case of scarring alopecia. Arch Dermatol. 1980;116:683-686.
  11. Tay YK, Ong BH. Cutaneous angiosarcoma presenting as recurrent angio-oedema of the face. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143:1346-1348.
  12. Aguila LI, Sanchez JL. Angiosarcoma of the face resembling rhinophyma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:530-531.
  13. Leighton SE, Levine TP. Angiosarcoma of the external ear: a case report. Am J Otol. 1991;12:54-56.
  14. Conlon JD, Drolet BA. Skin lesions in the neonate. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2004;51:863-888.
  15. Piccirillo E, Agarwal M, Rohit, et al. Management of temporal bone hemangiomas. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004;113:431-437.
  16. Antman K, Chang Y. Kaposi's sarcoma. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1027-1038.
  17. Balch CM. Cutaneous melanoma: prognosis and treatment results worldwide. Semin Surg Oncol. 1992;8:400-414.
  18. Abbruzzese JL, Abbruzzese MC, Lenzi R. Analysis of a diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected tumors of unknown origin. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:2094-2103.
  19. Conde-Taboada A, Florez A, De la Torre C, et al. Pseudoangiosarcomatous squamous cell carcinoma of skin arising adjacent to decubitus ulcers. Am J Dermatopathol. 2005;27:142-144.
  20. Sur RK, Nayler S, Ahmed SN, et al. Angiosarcomas—clinical profile, pathology and management. S Afr J Surg. 2000;38:13-16.
  21. Morrison WH, Byers RM, Garden AS, et al. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head and neck. a therapeutic dilemma. Cancer. 1995;76:319-327.
  22. Mark RJ, Tran LM, Sercarz J, et al. Angiosarcoma of the head and neck. the UCLA experience 1955 through 1990. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119:973-978.
  23. Holden CA, Spittle MF, Jones EW. Angiosarcoma of the face and scalp, prognosis and treatmen
Issue
Cutis - 76(5)
Issue
Cutis - 76(5)
Page Number
313-317
Page Number
313-317
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Angiosarcoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Display Headline
Angiosarcoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media

The Use of Topical Imiquimod for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis: A Status Report

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
The Use of Topical Imiquimod for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis: A Status Report

Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

Del Rosso JQ

Issue
Cutis - 76(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
241-248
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Del Rosso JQ

Author and Disclosure Information

Del Rosso JQ

Article PDF
Article PDF

Issue
Cutis - 76(4)
Issue
Cutis - 76(4)
Page Number
241-248
Page Number
241-248
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
The Use of Topical Imiquimod for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis: A Status Report
Display Headline
The Use of Topical Imiquimod for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis: A Status Report
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Article PDF Media