Myelodysplastic Syndrome

stem cell graft

LISBON—Phase 1 results suggest a programmed cellular therapy is safe for use in patients with hematologic malignancies.

The therapy, ProTmune, is being developed as a next-generation allogeneic graft intended to reduce the incidence and severity of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Three of 7 patients who received ProTmune in this trial did develop acute GVHD, and 2 patients died.

However, the remaining 5 patients were still alive and disease-free at last follow-up.

There were no serious adverse events (AEs) attributed to ProTmune. The most common AEs were nausea, vomiting, and chest pain.

These results were presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the EBMT (abstract A401*).

The trial, known as PROTECT, is sponsored by Fate Therapeutics, the company developing ProTmune.

The phase 1 portion of PROTECT enrolled 7 adults with hematologic malignancies—1 with myelodysplastic syndrome, 3 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 3 with acute myeloid leukemia.

Patients were set to undergo matched, unrelated donor HSCT and received ProTmune as the graft. ProTmune is manufactured by modulating a mobilized peripheral blood graft with 2 small molecules, FT1050 and FT4145.

The patients ranged in age from 34 to 69, and most (n=5) were female. For conditioning, patients received fludarabine/busulfan (n=1), busulfan/cyclophosphamide (n=1), fludarabine/melphalan (n=3), or cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation (n=2).

Results

The data cut-off was February 26, 2018. The median time on study was 228 days (range, 151 to 353).

None of the patients had graft failure. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 18 days (range, 14 to 22).

Three patients had acute GVHD at day 100 after HSCT. Two patients had grade 2 skin GVHD, and 1 had grade 3 GVHD in the skin and gut.

All 3 patients responded to steroid treatment. GVHD resolved in 5 days for the patient with grade 3 GVHD. For the grade 2 patients, GVHD resolved in 7 days and 8 days, respectively.

None of the patients relapsed, but 2 died—1 of pulmonary edema and 1 of atrial fibrillation.

AEs related to ProTmune included grade 1 vomiting (n=2), grade 2 nausea (n=2), and grade 2 chest pain (n=1).

Phase 2

The phase 2 portion of PROTECT is ongoing. This is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of ProTmune in up to 60 adults with hematologic malignancies undergoing matched, unrelated donor HSCT following myeloablative conditioning.

Patients are being randomized, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive either ProTmune or a conventional, mobilized peripheral blood cell graft from a matched, unrelated donor.

The primary efficacy endpoint is the cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD by day 100 post-HSCT. Rates of chronic GVHD, cancer relapse, disease-free survival, and overall survival are also being assessed.

*Some data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

stem cell graft

LISBON—Phase 1 results suggest a programmed cellular therapy is safe for use in patients with hematologic malignancies.

The therapy, ProTmune, is being developed as a next-generation allogeneic graft intended to reduce the incidence and severity of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Three of 7 patients who received ProTmune in this trial did develop acute GVHD, and 2 patients died.

However, the remaining 5 patients were still alive and disease-free at last follow-up.

There were no serious adverse events (AEs) attributed to ProTmune. The most common AEs were nausea, vomiting, and chest pain.

These results were presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the EBMT (abstract A401*).

The trial, known as PROTECT, is sponsored by Fate Therapeutics, the company developing ProTmune.

The phase 1 portion of PROTECT enrolled 7 adults with hematologic malignancies—1 with myelodysplastic syndrome, 3 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 3 with acute myeloid leukemia.

Patients were set to undergo matched, unrelated donor HSCT and received ProTmune as the graft. ProTmune is manufactured by modulating a mobilized peripheral blood graft with 2 small molecules, FT1050 and FT4145.

The patients ranged in age from 34 to 69, and most (n=5) were female. For conditioning, patients received fludarabine/busulfan (n=1), busulfan/cyclophosphamide (n=1), fludarabine/melphalan (n=3), or cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation (n=2).

Results

The data cut-off was February 26, 2018. The median time on study was 228 days (range, 151 to 353).

None of the patients had graft failure. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 18 days (range, 14 to 22).

Three patients had acute GVHD at day 100 after HSCT. Two patients had grade 2 skin GVHD, and 1 had grade 3 GVHD in the skin and gut.

All 3 patients responded to steroid treatment. GVHD resolved in 5 days for the patient with grade 3 GVHD. For the grade 2 patients, GVHD resolved in 7 days and 8 days, respectively.

None of the patients relapsed, but 2 died—1 of pulmonary edema and 1 of atrial fibrillation.

AEs related to ProTmune included grade 1 vomiting (n=2), grade 2 nausea (n=2), and grade 2 chest pain (n=1).

Phase 2

The phase 2 portion of PROTECT is ongoing. This is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of ProTmune in up to 60 adults with hematologic malignancies undergoing matched, unrelated donor HSCT following myeloablative conditioning.

Patients are being randomized, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive either ProTmune or a conventional, mobilized peripheral blood cell graft from a matched, unrelated donor.

The primary efficacy endpoint is the cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD by day 100 post-HSCT. Rates of chronic GVHD, cancer relapse, disease-free survival, and overall survival are also being assessed.

*Some data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

stem cell graft

LISBON—Phase 1 results suggest a programmed cellular therapy is safe for use in patients with hematologic malignancies.

The therapy, ProTmune, is being developed as a next-generation allogeneic graft intended to reduce the incidence and severity of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Three of 7 patients who received ProTmune in this trial did develop acute GVHD, and 2 patients died.

However, the remaining 5 patients were still alive and disease-free at last follow-up.

There were no serious adverse events (AEs) attributed to ProTmune. The most common AEs were nausea, vomiting, and chest pain.

These results were presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the EBMT (abstract A401*).

The trial, known as PROTECT, is sponsored by Fate Therapeutics, the company developing ProTmune.

The phase 1 portion of PROTECT enrolled 7 adults with hematologic malignancies—1 with myelodysplastic syndrome, 3 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 3 with acute myeloid leukemia.

Patients were set to undergo matched, unrelated donor HSCT and received ProTmune as the graft. ProTmune is manufactured by modulating a mobilized peripheral blood graft with 2 small molecules, FT1050 and FT4145.

The patients ranged in age from 34 to 69, and most (n=5) were female. For conditioning, patients received fludarabine/busulfan (n=1), busulfan/cyclophosphamide (n=1), fludarabine/melphalan (n=3), or cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation (n=2).

Results

The data cut-off was February 26, 2018. The median time on study was 228 days (range, 151 to 353).

None of the patients had graft failure. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 18 days (range, 14 to 22).

Three patients had acute GVHD at day 100 after HSCT. Two patients had grade 2 skin GVHD, and 1 had grade 3 GVHD in the skin and gut.

All 3 patients responded to steroid treatment. GVHD resolved in 5 days for the patient with grade 3 GVHD. For the grade 2 patients, GVHD resolved in 7 days and 8 days, respectively.

None of the patients relapsed, but 2 died—1 of pulmonary edema and 1 of atrial fibrillation.

AEs related to ProTmune included grade 1 vomiting (n=2), grade 2 nausea (n=2), and grade 2 chest pain (n=1).

Phase 2

The phase 2 portion of PROTECT is ongoing. This is a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of ProTmune in up to 60 adults with hematologic malignancies undergoing matched, unrelated donor HSCT following myeloablative conditioning.

Patients are being randomized, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive either ProTmune or a conventional, mobilized peripheral blood cell graft from a matched, unrelated donor.

The primary efficacy endpoint is the cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD by day 100 post-HSCT. Rates of chronic GVHD, cancer relapse, disease-free survival, and overall survival are also being assessed.

*Some data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Parinda A. Mehta, MD

SALT LAKE CITY—A “risk-adjusted” approach leads to “excellent” survival in patients with Fanconi anemia (FA) undergoing alternative donor hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), according to a speaker at the 2018 BMT Tandem Meetings.

All FA patients who received personalized doses of busulfan in place of total body irradiation (TBI) were alive and disease-free after undergoing HSCT for bone marrow failure or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

None of the patients developed graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), and the most common toxicity was viral infection.

Parinda A. Mehta, MD, of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Ohio, presented these results at this year’s BMT Tandem Meetings as abstract 109.*

“We all know that inherent chemotherapy and radiation sensitivity makes transplant for patients with Fanconi anemia quite challenging,” Dr Mehta began. “In our recently published, prospective, multi-institutional study, we showed excellent outcomes of alternative donor transplant in patients with Fanconi anemia without using radiation.”

“In that study,** TBI was replaced by pharmacokinetically adjusted busulfan. It proved that, yes, we can do alternative donor transplant successfully without radiation by showing an overall survival of 80% for a total of 45 patients. We were quite ecstatic to see these numbers.”

The study also showed that younger patients fared better with this regimen, and younger patients did best with the lowest dose of busulfan tested (0.6 mg/kg vs 0.8 to 1.0 mg/kg). In addition, patients who underwent HSCT for bone marrow failure had better outcomes than patients who had MDS.

This led Dr Mehta and her colleagues to hypothesize that adjusting busulfan dosing based on a patient’s age and disease status at HSCT could minimize toxicity and improve outcomes.

Patients

The researchers tested their theory in 22 FA patients. They had a median age of 7 (range, 4-27), and most (n=13) were female.

Twelve patients had pancytopenia, 6 had severe single-lineage cytopenia, 3 had low-grade MDS, and 1 patient had acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Eighteen patients had a history of transfusions, and 3 had a history of androgen use.

Treatment

The preparative regimen consisted of 4 doses of busulfan (every 12 hours on day -7 to -6), followed by cyclophosphamide at 10 mg/kg/day (on day -5 to -2), fludarabine at 35 mg/m²/day (on day -5 to -2), and rabbit antithymocyte globulin at 2.5 mg/kg/day (on day -5 to -2).

Busulfan doses were adjusted according to age and disease status.

Children (age 18 and younger) with bone marrow failure received busulfan at 0.6 to 0.8 mg/kg. Children with MDS/AML received busulfan at 0.8 to 1.0 mg/kg. Adults (19 and older) received the lowest dose of busulfan—0.4 mg/kg—regardless of disease status.

“At the first sight, this will look counterintuitive . . . ,” Dr Mehta said. “However, based on our previous experience, in general and also from results of our previous study, this was specifically designed to avoid upfront TRM [transplant-related mortality] for these adult patients.”

All 22 patients received CD34-selected, T-cell-depleted peripheral blood stem cells from unrelated donors. Eleven patients received a fully matched graft (10/10), 8 patients had a 9/10 match, and 3 had an 8/10 match.

The median number of CD34+ cells/kg was 23.9 x 10⁶ (range, 4.9-76.6), and the median number of CD3 cells/kg was 1 x 10⁴ (range, 0.003-3.1).

T-cell depletion was the only GVHD prophylaxis used.

Patients with MDS/AML could receive azacitidine at day 42 after HSCT, an option intended to prevent relapse in these patients.

Toxicity

There were no cases of acute or chronic GVHD.

Toxicities included infections (n=24), oral mucositis (n=14), hyperbilirubinemia (n=2), pulmonary hemorrhage (n=1), and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (n=1).

There were 20 viral infections, 4 bacterial infections, and no fungal infections. Viral infections included BK virus (n=7), cytomegalovirus (n=6), Epstein-Barr virus (n=6), and adenovirus (n=1).

Dr Mehta noted that viral infections are “not unexpected in a T-cell-depleted graft setting.”

“Because we know this complication [can occur], and we worry about our patients, one of the things that, in recent years, we have done is, we manufacture viral-specific CTLs [cytotoxic T lymphocytes] for all of these patients ahead of time whenever possible,” she said.

“To give you an example, 19 out of these 20 patients’ viral infections—or rather, viremias—are completely under control with the use of either antivirals or donor-specific CTLs, including a third-party CTL in one of the patients.”

Response and survival

All 22 patients engrafted. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 9 days (range, 8-10), and the median time to platelet engraftment was 16 days (range, 11-40).

Twenty-one of the 22 patients (95%) were alive and disease-free at last follow-up. The median follow-up was 21 months (range, 6-44).

The single AML patient achieved remission but died of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) on day 202 after HSCT. Dr Mehta said this was due to partial loss of follow-up and noncompliance with medical recommendations during PTLD treatment.

The AML patient also had “significant upfront toxicity” but “recovered very nicely,” according to Dr Mehta. He had severe mucositis, herpetic stomatitis, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome that responded to defibrotide.

“Overall, we are quite excited to see 95% overall survival for this cohort and conclude that the current risk-adjusted approach leads to excellent overall survival and disease-free survival in patients undergoing alternative donor transplant either for marrow failure or MDS/AML,” Dr Mehta said.

“Enrollment is ongoing, and we hope to see continued success in patients with MDS/AML as well as in adult patients.”

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

**Mehta PA et al. Radiation-free, alternative donor HCT for Fanconi anemia patients: results from a prospective multi-institutional study. Blood 2017; doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-09-743112.

Parinda A. Mehta, MD

SALT LAKE CITY—A “risk-adjusted” approach leads to “excellent” survival in patients with Fanconi anemia (FA) undergoing alternative donor hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), according to a speaker at the 2018 BMT Tandem Meetings.

All FA patients who received personalized doses of busulfan in place of total body irradiation (TBI) were alive and disease-free after undergoing HSCT for bone marrow failure or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

None of the patients developed graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), and the most common toxicity was viral infection.

Parinda A. Mehta, MD, of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Ohio, presented these results at this year’s BMT Tandem Meetings as abstract 109.*

“We all know that inherent chemotherapy and radiation sensitivity makes transplant for patients with Fanconi anemia quite challenging,” Dr Mehta began. “In our recently published, prospective, multi-institutional study, we showed excellent outcomes of alternative donor transplant in patients with Fanconi anemia without using radiation.”

“In that study,** TBI was replaced by pharmacokinetically adjusted busulfan. It proved that, yes, we can do alternative donor transplant successfully without radiation by showing an overall survival of 80% for a total of 45 patients. We were quite ecstatic to see these numbers.”

The study also showed that younger patients fared better with this regimen, and younger patients did best with the lowest dose of busulfan tested (0.6 mg/kg vs 0.8 to 1.0 mg/kg). In addition, patients who underwent HSCT for bone marrow failure had better outcomes than patients who had MDS.

This led Dr Mehta and her colleagues to hypothesize that adjusting busulfan dosing based on a patient’s age and disease status at HSCT could minimize toxicity and improve outcomes.

Patients

The researchers tested their theory in 22 FA patients. They had a median age of 7 (range, 4-27), and most (n=13) were female.

Twelve patients had pancytopenia, 6 had severe single-lineage cytopenia, 3 had low-grade MDS, and 1 patient had acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Eighteen patients had a history of transfusions, and 3 had a history of androgen use.

Treatment

The preparative regimen consisted of 4 doses of busulfan (every 12 hours on day -7 to -6), followed by cyclophosphamide at 10 mg/kg/day (on day -5 to -2), fludarabine at 35 mg/m²/day (on day -5 to -2), and rabbit antithymocyte globulin at 2.5 mg/kg/day (on day -5 to -2).

Busulfan doses were adjusted according to age and disease status.

Children (age 18 and younger) with bone marrow failure received busulfan at 0.6 to 0.8 mg/kg. Children with MDS/AML received busulfan at 0.8 to 1.0 mg/kg. Adults (19 and older) received the lowest dose of busulfan—0.4 mg/kg—regardless of disease status.

“At the first sight, this will look counterintuitive . . . ,” Dr Mehta said. “However, based on our previous experience, in general and also from results of our previous study, this was specifically designed to avoid upfront TRM [transplant-related mortality] for these adult patients.”

All 22 patients received CD34-selected, T-cell-depleted peripheral blood stem cells from unrelated donors. Eleven patients received a fully matched graft (10/10), 8 patients had a 9/10 match, and 3 had an 8/10 match.

The median number of CD34+ cells/kg was 23.9 x 10⁶ (range, 4.9-76.6), and the median number of CD3 cells/kg was 1 x 10⁴ (range, 0.003-3.1).

T-cell depletion was the only GVHD prophylaxis used.

Patients with MDS/AML could receive azacitidine at day 42 after HSCT, an option intended to prevent relapse in these patients.

Toxicity

There were no cases of acute or chronic GVHD.

Toxicities included infections (n=24), oral mucositis (n=14), hyperbilirubinemia (n=2), pulmonary hemorrhage (n=1), and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (n=1).

There were 20 viral infections, 4 bacterial infections, and no fungal infections. Viral infections included BK virus (n=7), cytomegalovirus (n=6), Epstein-Barr virus (n=6), and adenovirus (n=1).

Dr Mehta noted that viral infections are “not unexpected in a T-cell-depleted graft setting.”

“Because we know this complication [can occur], and we worry about our patients, one of the things that, in recent years, we have done is, we manufacture viral-specific CTLs [cytotoxic T lymphocytes] for all of these patients ahead of time whenever possible,” she said.

“To give you an example, 19 out of these 20 patients’ viral infections—or rather, viremias—are completely under control with the use of either antivirals or donor-specific CTLs, including a third-party CTL in one of the patients.”

Response and survival

All 22 patients engrafted. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 9 days (range, 8-10), and the median time to platelet engraftment was 16 days (range, 11-40).

Twenty-one of the 22 patients (95%) were alive and disease-free at last follow-up. The median follow-up was 21 months (range, 6-44).

The single AML patient achieved remission but died of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) on day 202 after HSCT. Dr Mehta said this was due to partial loss of follow-up and noncompliance with medical recommendations during PTLD treatment.

The AML patient also had “significant upfront toxicity” but “recovered very nicely,” according to Dr Mehta. He had severe mucositis, herpetic stomatitis, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome that responded to defibrotide.

“Overall, we are quite excited to see 95% overall survival for this cohort and conclude that the current risk-adjusted approach leads to excellent overall survival and disease-free survival in patients undergoing alternative donor transplant either for marrow failure or MDS/AML,” Dr Mehta said.

“Enrollment is ongoing, and we hope to see continued success in patients with MDS/AML as well as in adult patients.”

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

**Mehta PA et al. Radiation-free, alternative donor HCT for Fanconi anemia patients: results from a prospective multi-institutional study. Blood 2017; doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-09-743112.

Parinda A. Mehta, MD

SALT LAKE CITY—A “risk-adjusted” approach leads to “excellent” survival in patients with Fanconi anemia (FA) undergoing alternative donor hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), according to a speaker at the 2018 BMT Tandem Meetings.

All FA patients who received personalized doses of busulfan in place of total body irradiation (TBI) were alive and disease-free after undergoing HSCT for bone marrow failure or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

None of the patients developed graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), and the most common toxicity was viral infection.

Parinda A. Mehta, MD, of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Ohio, presented these results at this year’s BMT Tandem Meetings as abstract 109.*

“We all know that inherent chemotherapy and radiation sensitivity makes transplant for patients with Fanconi anemia quite challenging,” Dr Mehta began. “In our recently published, prospective, multi-institutional study, we showed excellent outcomes of alternative donor transplant in patients with Fanconi anemia without using radiation.”

“In that study,** TBI was replaced by pharmacokinetically adjusted busulfan. It proved that, yes, we can do alternative donor transplant successfully without radiation by showing an overall survival of 80% for a total of 45 patients. We were quite ecstatic to see these numbers.”

The study also showed that younger patients fared better with this regimen, and younger patients did best with the lowest dose of busulfan tested (0.6 mg/kg vs 0.8 to 1.0 mg/kg). In addition, patients who underwent HSCT for bone marrow failure had better outcomes than patients who had MDS.

This led Dr Mehta and her colleagues to hypothesize that adjusting busulfan dosing based on a patient’s age and disease status at HSCT could minimize toxicity and improve outcomes.

Patients

The researchers tested their theory in 22 FA patients. They had a median age of 7 (range, 4-27), and most (n=13) were female.

Twelve patients had pancytopenia, 6 had severe single-lineage cytopenia, 3 had low-grade MDS, and 1 patient had acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Eighteen patients had a history of transfusions, and 3 had a history of androgen use.

Treatment

The preparative regimen consisted of 4 doses of busulfan (every 12 hours on day -7 to -6), followed by cyclophosphamide at 10 mg/kg/day (on day -5 to -2), fludarabine at 35 mg/m²/day (on day -5 to -2), and rabbit antithymocyte globulin at 2.5 mg/kg/day (on day -5 to -2).

Busulfan doses were adjusted according to age and disease status.

Children (age 18 and younger) with bone marrow failure received busulfan at 0.6 to 0.8 mg/kg. Children with MDS/AML received busulfan at 0.8 to 1.0 mg/kg. Adults (19 and older) received the lowest dose of busulfan—0.4 mg/kg—regardless of disease status.

“At the first sight, this will look counterintuitive . . . ,” Dr Mehta said. “However, based on our previous experience, in general and also from results of our previous study, this was specifically designed to avoid upfront TRM [transplant-related mortality] for these adult patients.”

All 22 patients received CD34-selected, T-cell-depleted peripheral blood stem cells from unrelated donors. Eleven patients received a fully matched graft (10/10), 8 patients had a 9/10 match, and 3 had an 8/10 match.

The median number of CD34+ cells/kg was 23.9 x 10⁶ (range, 4.9-76.6), and the median number of CD3 cells/kg was 1 x 10⁴ (range, 0.003-3.1).

T-cell depletion was the only GVHD prophylaxis used.

Patients with MDS/AML could receive azacitidine at day 42 after HSCT, an option intended to prevent relapse in these patients.

Toxicity

There were no cases of acute or chronic GVHD.

Toxicities included infections (n=24), oral mucositis (n=14), hyperbilirubinemia (n=2), pulmonary hemorrhage (n=1), and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (n=1).

There were 20 viral infections, 4 bacterial infections, and no fungal infections. Viral infections included BK virus (n=7), cytomegalovirus (n=6), Epstein-Barr virus (n=6), and adenovirus (n=1).

Dr Mehta noted that viral infections are “not unexpected in a T-cell-depleted graft setting.”

“Because we know this complication [can occur], and we worry about our patients, one of the things that, in recent years, we have done is, we manufacture viral-specific CTLs [cytotoxic T lymphocytes] for all of these patients ahead of time whenever possible,” she said.

“To give you an example, 19 out of these 20 patients’ viral infections—or rather, viremias—are completely under control with the use of either antivirals or donor-specific CTLs, including a third-party CTL in one of the patients.”

Response and survival

All 22 patients engrafted. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 9 days (range, 8-10), and the median time to platelet engraftment was 16 days (range, 11-40).

Twenty-one of the 22 patients (95%) were alive and disease-free at last follow-up. The median follow-up was 21 months (range, 6-44).

The single AML patient achieved remission but died of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) on day 202 after HSCT. Dr Mehta said this was due to partial loss of follow-up and noncompliance with medical recommendations during PTLD treatment.

The AML patient also had “significant upfront toxicity” but “recovered very nicely,” according to Dr Mehta. He had severe mucositis, herpetic stomatitis, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome that responded to defibrotide.

“Overall, we are quite excited to see 95% overall survival for this cohort and conclude that the current risk-adjusted approach leads to excellent overall survival and disease-free survival in patients undergoing alternative donor transplant either for marrow failure or MDS/AML,” Dr Mehta said.

“Enrollment is ongoing, and we hope to see continued success in patients with MDS/AML as well as in adult patients.”

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

**Mehta PA et al. Radiation-free, alternative donor HCT for Fanconi anemia patients: results from a prospective multi-institutional study. Blood 2017; doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-09-743112.

Mitchell Horwitz, MD

SALT LAKE CITY—The expanded umbilical cord blood (UCB) product NiCord can be used as a stand-alone graft, according to research presented at the 2018 BMT Tandem Meetings.

Researchers found that a single NiCord unit provided “robust” engraftment in a phase 1/2 study of patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies.

NiCord recipients had quicker neutrophil and platelet engraftment than matched control subjects who received standard myeloablative UCB transplant (single or double).

Mitchell Horwitz, MD, of the Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, presented these results at the meeting as abstract 49.* The research was sponsored by Gamida Cell, the company developing NiCord.

“[NiCord] is an ex vivo expanded cell product that’s derived from an entire unit of umbilical cord blood,” Dr Horwitz explained. “It’s manufactured starting with a CD133-positive selection, which is the progenitor cell population that’s cultured, and a T-cell containing CD133-negative fraction that is provided also at the time of transplant.”

“The culture system contains nicotinamide—that’s the active ingredient in the culture. And that’s supplemented with cytokines—thrombopoietin, IL-6, FLT-3 ligand, and stem cell factor. The culture is 21 days.”

Previous research showed that double UCB transplant including a NiCord unit could provide benefits over standard double UCB transplant. This led Dr Horwitz and his colleagues to wonder if NiCord could be used as a stand-alone graft.

So the team evaluated the safety and efficacy of NiCord alone in 36 adolescents/adults with high-risk hematologic malignancies.

Patients had acute myelogenous leukemia (n=17), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=9), myelodysplastic syndrome (n=7), chronic myelogenous leukemia (n=2), and Hodgkin lymphoma (n=1).

Most patients had intermediate (n=15) or high-risk (n=13) disease. They had a median age of 44 (range, 13-63) and a median weight of 75 kg (range, 41-125).

Treatment

For conditioning, 19 patients received thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine. Fifteen patients received total body irradiation and fludarabine with or without cyclophosphamide or thiotepa. And 2 patients received clofarabine, fludarabine, and busulfan.

Most patients had a 4/6 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match (n=26), 8 had a 5/6 HLA match, and 2 had a 6/6 HLA match.

The median total nucleated cell dose was 2.4 x 10⁷/kg prior to expansion of the UCB unit and 3.7 x 10⁷/kg after expansion. The median CD34+ cell dose was 0.2 x 10⁶/kg and 6.3 x 10⁶/kg, respectively.

“CD34 cells were expanded 33-fold in the 3-week culture system,” Dr Horwitz noted. “That translated to a median CD34 dose of 6.3 x 10⁶/kg, a dose comparable to what would be obtained from an adult donor graft.”

Engraftment

There was 1 case of primary graft failure and 2 cases of secondary graft failure. One case of secondary graft failure was associated with an HHV-6 infection, and the other was due to a lethal adenovirus infection.

Of those patients who engrafted, 97% achieved full donor chimerism, and 3% had mixed chimerism.

Dr Horwitz and his colleagues compared engraftment results in the NiCord recipients to results in a cohort of patients from the CIBMTR registry who underwent UCB transplants from 2010 to 2013. They had similar characteristics as the NiCord patients—age, conditioning regimen, disease status, etc.

In total, there were 148 CIBMTR registry patients, 20% of whom received a single UCB unit.

The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11.5 days (range, 6-26) with NiCord and 21 days in the CIBMTR matched control cohort (P<0.001). The cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment was 94.4% and 89.7%, respectively.

The median time to platelet engraftment was 34 days (range, 25-96) with NiCord and 46 days in the CIBMTR controls (P<0.001). The cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment was 80.6% and 67.1%, respectively.

“There’s a median 10-day reduction in neutrophil recovery [and] 12-day reduction in time to platelet recovery [with NiCord],” Dr Horwitz noted. “There is evidence of robust and durable engraftment with a NiCord unit, with one patient now over 7 years from his first transplant on the pilot trial.”

Relapse, survival, and GVHD

Dr Horwitz reported other outcomes in the NiCord recipients without making comparisons to the CIBMTR matched controls.

The estimated 2-year rate of non-relapse mortality in NiCord recipients was 23.8%, and the estimated 2-year incidence of relapse was 33.2%.

The estimated disease-free survival was 49.1% at 1 year and 43.0% at 2 years. The estimated overall survival was 51.2% at 1 year and 2 years.

At 100 days, the rate of grade 2-4 acute GVHD was 44.0%, and the rate of grade 3-4 acute GVHD was 11.1%.

The estimated 1-year rate of mild to severe chronic GVHD was 40.5%, and the estimated 2-year rate of moderate to severe chronic GVHD was 9.8%.

Dr Horwitz said these “promising results” have led to the launch of a phase 3 registration trial in which researchers are comparing NiCord to standard single or double UCB transplant. The trial is open for accrual.

*Information in the abstract differs from the presentation.

Mitchell Horwitz, MD

SALT LAKE CITY—The expanded umbilical cord blood (UCB) product NiCord can be used as a stand-alone graft, according to research presented at the 2018 BMT Tandem Meetings.

Researchers found that a single NiCord unit provided “robust” engraftment in a phase 1/2 study of patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies.

NiCord recipients had quicker neutrophil and platelet engraftment than matched control subjects who received standard myeloablative UCB transplant (single or double).

Mitchell Horwitz, MD, of the Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, presented these results at the meeting as abstract 49.* The research was sponsored by Gamida Cell, the company developing NiCord.

“[NiCord] is an ex vivo expanded cell product that’s derived from an entire unit of umbilical cord blood,” Dr Horwitz explained. “It’s manufactured starting with a CD133-positive selection, which is the progenitor cell population that’s cultured, and a T-cell containing CD133-negative fraction that is provided also at the time of transplant.”

“The culture system contains nicotinamide—that’s the active ingredient in the culture. And that’s supplemented with cytokines—thrombopoietin, IL-6, FLT-3 ligand, and stem cell factor. The culture is 21 days.”

Previous research showed that double UCB transplant including a NiCord unit could provide benefits over standard double UCB transplant. This led Dr Horwitz and his colleagues to wonder if NiCord could be used as a stand-alone graft.

So the team evaluated the safety and efficacy of NiCord alone in 36 adolescents/adults with high-risk hematologic malignancies.

Patients had acute myelogenous leukemia (n=17), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=9), myelodysplastic syndrome (n=7), chronic myelogenous leukemia (n=2), and Hodgkin lymphoma (n=1).

Most patients had intermediate (n=15) or high-risk (n=13) disease. They had a median age of 44 (range, 13-63) and a median weight of 75 kg (range, 41-125).

Treatment

For conditioning, 19 patients received thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine. Fifteen patients received total body irradiation and fludarabine with or without cyclophosphamide or thiotepa. And 2 patients received clofarabine, fludarabine, and busulfan.

Most patients had a 4/6 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match (n=26), 8 had a 5/6 HLA match, and 2 had a 6/6 HLA match.

The median total nucleated cell dose was 2.4 x 10⁷/kg prior to expansion of the UCB unit and 3.7 x 10⁷/kg after expansion. The median CD34+ cell dose was 0.2 x 10⁶/kg and 6.3 x 10⁶/kg, respectively.

“CD34 cells were expanded 33-fold in the 3-week culture system,” Dr Horwitz noted. “That translated to a median CD34 dose of 6.3 x 10⁶/kg, a dose comparable to what would be obtained from an adult donor graft.”

Engraftment

There was 1 case of primary graft failure and 2 cases of secondary graft failure. One case of secondary graft failure was associated with an HHV-6 infection, and the other was due to a lethal adenovirus infection.

Of those patients who engrafted, 97% achieved full donor chimerism, and 3% had mixed chimerism.

Dr Horwitz and his colleagues compared engraftment results in the NiCord recipients to results in a cohort of patients from the CIBMTR registry who underwent UCB transplants from 2010 to 2013. They had similar characteristics as the NiCord patients—age, conditioning regimen, disease status, etc.

In total, there were 148 CIBMTR registry patients, 20% of whom received a single UCB unit.

The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11.5 days (range, 6-26) with NiCord and 21 days in the CIBMTR matched control cohort (P<0.001). The cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment was 94.4% and 89.7%, respectively.

The median time to platelet engraftment was 34 days (range, 25-96) with NiCord and 46 days in the CIBMTR controls (P<0.001). The cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment was 80.6% and 67.1%, respectively.

“There’s a median 10-day reduction in neutrophil recovery [and] 12-day reduction in time to platelet recovery [with NiCord],” Dr Horwitz noted. “There is evidence of robust and durable engraftment with a NiCord unit, with one patient now over 7 years from his first transplant on the pilot trial.”

Relapse, survival, and GVHD

Dr Horwitz reported other outcomes in the NiCord recipients without making comparisons to the CIBMTR matched controls.

The estimated 2-year rate of non-relapse mortality in NiCord recipients was 23.8%, and the estimated 2-year incidence of relapse was 33.2%.

The estimated disease-free survival was 49.1% at 1 year and 43.0% at 2 years. The estimated overall survival was 51.2% at 1 year and 2 years.

At 100 days, the rate of grade 2-4 acute GVHD was 44.0%, and the rate of grade 3-4 acute GVHD was 11.1%.

The estimated 1-year rate of mild to severe chronic GVHD was 40.5%, and the estimated 2-year rate of moderate to severe chronic GVHD was 9.8%.

Dr Horwitz said these “promising results” have led to the launch of a phase 3 registration trial in which researchers are comparing NiCord to standard single or double UCB transplant. The trial is open for accrual.

*Information in the abstract differs from the presentation.

Mitchell Horwitz, MD

SALT LAKE CITY—The expanded umbilical cord blood (UCB) product NiCord can be used as a stand-alone graft, according to research presented at the 2018 BMT Tandem Meetings.

Researchers found that a single NiCord unit provided “robust” engraftment in a phase 1/2 study of patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies.

NiCord recipients had quicker neutrophil and platelet engraftment than matched control subjects who received standard myeloablative UCB transplant (single or double).

Mitchell Horwitz, MD, of the Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, presented these results at the meeting as abstract 49.* The research was sponsored by Gamida Cell, the company developing NiCord.

“[NiCord] is an ex vivo expanded cell product that’s derived from an entire unit of umbilical cord blood,” Dr Horwitz explained. “It’s manufactured starting with a CD133-positive selection, which is the progenitor cell population that’s cultured, and a T-cell containing CD133-negative fraction that is provided also at the time of transplant.”

“The culture system contains nicotinamide—that’s the active ingredient in the culture. And that’s supplemented with cytokines—thrombopoietin, IL-6, FLT-3 ligand, and stem cell factor. The culture is 21 days.”

Previous research showed that double UCB transplant including a NiCord unit could provide benefits over standard double UCB transplant. This led Dr Horwitz and his colleagues to wonder if NiCord could be used as a stand-alone graft.

So the team evaluated the safety and efficacy of NiCord alone in 36 adolescents/adults with high-risk hematologic malignancies.

Patients had acute myelogenous leukemia (n=17), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=9), myelodysplastic syndrome (n=7), chronic myelogenous leukemia (n=2), and Hodgkin lymphoma (n=1).

Most patients had intermediate (n=15) or high-risk (n=13) disease. They had a median age of 44 (range, 13-63) and a median weight of 75 kg (range, 41-125).

Treatment

For conditioning, 19 patients received thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine. Fifteen patients received total body irradiation and fludarabine with or without cyclophosphamide or thiotepa. And 2 patients received clofarabine, fludarabine, and busulfan.

Most patients had a 4/6 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match (n=26), 8 had a 5/6 HLA match, and 2 had a 6/6 HLA match.

The median total nucleated cell dose was 2.4 x 10⁷/kg prior to expansion of the UCB unit and 3.7 x 10⁷/kg after expansion. The median CD34+ cell dose was 0.2 x 10⁶/kg and 6.3 x 10⁶/kg, respectively.

“CD34 cells were expanded 33-fold in the 3-week culture system,” Dr Horwitz noted. “That translated to a median CD34 dose of 6.3 x 10⁶/kg, a dose comparable to what would be obtained from an adult donor graft.”

Engraftment

There was 1 case of primary graft failure and 2 cases of secondary graft failure. One case of secondary graft failure was associated with an HHV-6 infection, and the other was due to a lethal adenovirus infection.

Of those patients who engrafted, 97% achieved full donor chimerism, and 3% had mixed chimerism.

Dr Horwitz and his colleagues compared engraftment results in the NiCord recipients to results in a cohort of patients from the CIBMTR registry who underwent UCB transplants from 2010 to 2013. They had similar characteristics as the NiCord patients—age, conditioning regimen, disease status, etc.

In total, there were 148 CIBMTR registry patients, 20% of whom received a single UCB unit.

The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11.5 days (range, 6-26) with NiCord and 21 days in the CIBMTR matched control cohort (P<0.001). The cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment was 94.4% and 89.7%, respectively.

The median time to platelet engraftment was 34 days (range, 25-96) with NiCord and 46 days in the CIBMTR controls (P<0.001). The cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment was 80.6% and 67.1%, respectively.

“There’s a median 10-day reduction in neutrophil recovery [and] 12-day reduction in time to platelet recovery [with NiCord],” Dr Horwitz noted. “There is evidence of robust and durable engraftment with a NiCord unit, with one patient now over 7 years from his first transplant on the pilot trial.”

Relapse, survival, and GVHD

Dr Horwitz reported other outcomes in the NiCord recipients without making comparisons to the CIBMTR matched controls.

The estimated 2-year rate of non-relapse mortality in NiCord recipients was 23.8%, and the estimated 2-year incidence of relapse was 33.2%.

The estimated disease-free survival was 49.1% at 1 year and 43.0% at 2 years. The estimated overall survival was 51.2% at 1 year and 2 years.

At 100 days, the rate of grade 2-4 acute GVHD was 44.0%, and the rate of grade 3-4 acute GVHD was 11.1%.

The estimated 1-year rate of mild to severe chronic GVHD was 40.5%, and the estimated 2-year rate of moderate to severe chronic GVHD was 9.8%.

Dr Horwitz said these “promising results” have led to the launch of a phase 3 registration trial in which researchers are comparing NiCord to standard single or double UCB transplant. The trial is open for accrual.

*Information in the abstract differs from the presentation.

SALT LAKE CITY – The use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is safe and may improve posttransplant survival in patients with myelofibrosis, according to findings from an ongoing prospective phase 2 study.

The 1-year overall survival rate among the 28 initial patients in the single-center study of JAK inhibitor therapy followed by myeloablative or reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was 93%. The 2-year survival rate was 89%, compared with 54% in a closely matched historical cohort of intermediate-2–risk patients who did not receive pre-HCT JAK inhibitor therapy, Rachel B. Salit, MD, reported at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

sworcester@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Salit R et al. BMT Tandem Meetings, Abstract 17.

SALT LAKE CITY – The use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is safe and may improve posttransplant survival in patients with myelofibrosis, according to findings from an ongoing prospective phase 2 study.

The 1-year overall survival rate among the 28 initial patients in the single-center study of JAK inhibitor therapy followed by myeloablative or reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was 93%. The 2-year survival rate was 89%, compared with 54% in a closely matched historical cohort of intermediate-2–risk patients who did not receive pre-HCT JAK inhibitor therapy, Rachel B. Salit, MD, reported at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

sworcester@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Salit R et al. BMT Tandem Meetings, Abstract 17.

SALT LAKE CITY – The use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is safe and may improve posttransplant survival in patients with myelofibrosis, according to findings from an ongoing prospective phase 2 study.

The 1-year overall survival rate among the 28 initial patients in the single-center study of JAK inhibitor therapy followed by myeloablative or reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was 93%. The 2-year survival rate was 89%, compared with 54% in a closely matched historical cohort of intermediate-2–risk patients who did not receive pre-HCT JAK inhibitor therapy, Rachel B. Salit, MD, reported at the combined annual meetings of the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

sworcester@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Salit R et al. BMT Tandem Meetings, Abstract 17.

Image by Joshua Stokes

Results of a phase 1/2 trial suggest treatment with haploidentical natural killer (NK) cells can be effective against relapsed/refractory myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

NK-cell therapy elicited responses in 6 of the 16 patients studied and provided a bridge to transplant for 5 patients.

Three responders were still alive at more than 3 years of follow-up.

There were 4 grade 3 adverse events (AEs) and 2 grade 5 AEs considered possibly or probably related to NK-cell therapy.

Investigators reported these results in Clinical Cancer Research.

The trial enrolled 16 patients. Eight had MDS/AML, 3 had de novo AML, and 5 had high-risk MDS, including refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) type 1 progressing toward type 2, RAEB-2, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia type 2.

The patients’ median age was 64 (range, 40-70), and they had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-6). Six patients had received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

For this study, all patients received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total lymphoid irradiation prior to receiving haploidentical NK cells.

The median follow-up was 8 months for all patients and 28 months for responders.

Efficacy

Six patients responded to treatment. One patient with de novo AML had a complete response (CR). Two high-risk MDS patients had a marrow CR (mCR), as did 2 MDS/AML patients. One MDS/AML patient had a partial response (PR).

Two patients had stable disease (SD)—1 with MDS and 1 with MDS/AML. One patient with de novo AML had a morphologic leukemia-free state after NK-cell therapy.

Five patients proceeded to HSCT—3 in mCR, 1 in PR, and 1 with SD.

Three patients were still alive at last follow-up—1 with MDS who achieved an mCR and went on to HSCT, 1 with MDS/AML who achieved an mCR and went on to HSCT, and 1 with MDS/AML who achieved an mCR and went on to receive chemotherapy and donor lymphocyte infusion.

One survivor has more than 5 years of follow-up (the MDS patient), and the other 2 have more than 3 years of follow-up.

“Our study shows that patients with MDS, AML, and MDS/AML can be treated with NK cell-based immunotherapy and that the therapy can be highly efficacious,” said study author Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren, MD, PhD, of Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden.

Safety

The most common AEs of any grade considered possibly or probably related to NK-cell therapy were chills (n=13) and nausea (n=4).

Two patients had cytokine release syndrome (CRS) likely associated with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH).

Each of the following potentially related AEs were reported once: headache, vomiting, encephalitis infection, sinus tachycardia, bone pain, pain in extremity, and maculopapular rash.

There were 4 grade 3 AEs—CRS/HLH (n=1), chills (n=1), and nausea (n=2)—but no grade 4 AEs.

There were 2 grade 5 AEs—CRS/HLH and encephalitis infection. These occurred in a single patient who died with HLH, human herpes virus-6 encephalitis, and AML relapse.

Two investigators involved in this study serve on the scientific advisory board of Fate Therapeutics. Dr Ljunggren serves on the scientific advisory board of CellProtect, Nordic Pharmaceuticals, and HOPE Bio-Sciences. He is also on the board of directors of Vycellix and is a collaborator with Fate Therapeutics.

Image by Joshua Stokes

Results of a phase 1/2 trial suggest treatment with haploidentical natural killer (NK) cells can be effective against relapsed/refractory myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

NK-cell therapy elicited responses in 6 of the 16 patients studied and provided a bridge to transplant for 5 patients.

Three responders were still alive at more than 3 years of follow-up.

There were 4 grade 3 adverse events (AEs) and 2 grade 5 AEs considered possibly or probably related to NK-cell therapy.

Investigators reported these results in Clinical Cancer Research.

The trial enrolled 16 patients. Eight had MDS/AML, 3 had de novo AML, and 5 had high-risk MDS, including refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) type 1 progressing toward type 2, RAEB-2, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia type 2.

The patients’ median age was 64 (range, 40-70), and they had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-6). Six patients had received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

For this study, all patients received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total lymphoid irradiation prior to receiving haploidentical NK cells.

The median follow-up was 8 months for all patients and 28 months for responders.

Efficacy

Six patients responded to treatment. One patient with de novo AML had a complete response (CR). Two high-risk MDS patients had a marrow CR (mCR), as did 2 MDS/AML patients. One MDS/AML patient had a partial response (PR).

Two patients had stable disease (SD)—1 with MDS and 1 with MDS/AML. One patient with de novo AML had a morphologic leukemia-free state after NK-cell therapy.

Five patients proceeded to HSCT—3 in mCR, 1 in PR, and 1 with SD.

Three patients were still alive at last follow-up—1 with MDS who achieved an mCR and went on to HSCT, 1 with MDS/AML who achieved an mCR and went on to HSCT, and 1 with MDS/AML who achieved an mCR and went on to receive chemotherapy and donor lymphocyte infusion.

One survivor has more than 5 years of follow-up (the MDS patient), and the other 2 have more than 3 years of follow-up.

“Our study shows that patients with MDS, AML, and MDS/AML can be treated with NK cell-based immunotherapy and that the therapy can be highly efficacious,” said study author Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren, MD, PhD, of Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden.

Safety

The most common AEs of any grade considered possibly or probably related to NK-cell therapy were chills (n=13) and nausea (n=4).

Two patients had cytokine release syndrome (CRS) likely associated with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH).

Each of the following potentially related AEs were reported once: headache, vomiting, encephalitis infection, sinus tachycardia, bone pain, pain in extremity, and maculopapular rash.

There were 4 grade 3 AEs—CRS/HLH (n=1), chills (n=1), and nausea (n=2)—but no grade 4 AEs.

There were 2 grade 5 AEs—CRS/HLH and encephalitis infection. These occurred in a single patient who died with HLH, human herpes virus-6 encephalitis, and AML relapse.

Two investigators involved in this study serve on the scientific advisory board of Fate Therapeutics. Dr Ljunggren serves on the scientific advisory board of CellProtect, Nordic Pharmaceuticals, and HOPE Bio-Sciences. He is also on the board of directors of Vycellix and is a collaborator with Fate Therapeutics.

Image by Joshua Stokes

Results of a phase 1/2 trial suggest treatment with haploidentical natural killer (NK) cells can be effective against relapsed/refractory myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

NK-cell therapy elicited responses in 6 of the 16 patients studied and provided a bridge to transplant for 5 patients.

Three responders were still alive at more than 3 years of follow-up.

There were 4 grade 3 adverse events (AEs) and 2 grade 5 AEs considered possibly or probably related to NK-cell therapy.

Investigators reported these results in Clinical Cancer Research.

The trial enrolled 16 patients. Eight had MDS/AML, 3 had de novo AML, and 5 had high-risk MDS, including refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) type 1 progressing toward type 2, RAEB-2, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia type 2.

The patients’ median age was 64 (range, 40-70), and they had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range, 1-6). Six patients had received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

For this study, all patients received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total lymphoid irradiation prior to receiving haploidentical NK cells.

The median follow-up was 8 months for all patients and 28 months for responders.

Efficacy

Six patients responded to treatment. One patient with de novo AML had a complete response (CR). Two high-risk MDS patients had a marrow CR (mCR), as did 2 MDS/AML patients. One MDS/AML patient had a partial response (PR).

Two patients had stable disease (SD)—1 with MDS and 1 with MDS/AML. One patient with de novo AML had a morphologic leukemia-free state after NK-cell therapy.

Five patients proceeded to HSCT—3 in mCR, 1 in PR, and 1 with SD.

Three patients were still alive at last follow-up—1 with MDS who achieved an mCR and went on to HSCT, 1 with MDS/AML who achieved an mCR and went on to HSCT, and 1 with MDS/AML who achieved an mCR and went on to receive chemotherapy and donor lymphocyte infusion.

One survivor has more than 5 years of follow-up (the MDS patient), and the other 2 have more than 3 years of follow-up.

“Our study shows that patients with MDS, AML, and MDS/AML can be treated with NK cell-based immunotherapy and that the therapy can be highly efficacious,” said study author Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren, MD, PhD, of Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden.

Safety

The most common AEs of any grade considered possibly or probably related to NK-cell therapy were chills (n=13) and nausea (n=4).

Two patients had cytokine release syndrome (CRS) likely associated with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH).

Each of the following potentially related AEs were reported once: headache, vomiting, encephalitis infection, sinus tachycardia, bone pain, pain in extremity, and maculopapular rash.

There were 4 grade 3 AEs—CRS/HLH (n=1), chills (n=1), and nausea (n=2)—but no grade 4 AEs.

There were 2 grade 5 AEs—CRS/HLH and encephalitis infection. These occurred in a single patient who died with HLH, human herpes virus-6 encephalitis, and AML relapse.

Two investigators involved in this study serve on the scientific advisory board of Fate Therapeutics. Dr Ljunggren serves on the scientific advisory board of CellProtect, Nordic Pharmaceuticals, and HOPE Bio-Sciences. He is also on the board of directors of Vycellix and is a collaborator with Fate Therapeutics.

Photo by Bill Branson

Azacitidine for injection (Vidaza®) is now available in China.

The nucleoside metabolic inhibitor was approved in China to treat patients with intermediate-2/high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20% to 30% bone marrow blasts, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML).

Azacitidine for injection is marketed in China by BeiGene Ltd. under an exclusive license from Celgene Corporation.

“Vidaza is the only approved hypomethylating agent shown to prolong survival for patients with MDS and the first new treatment for MDS patients approved in China since 2009,” said John V. Oyler, founder, chief executive officer, and chairman of BeiGene.

“We are excited to announce that the first prescription was made in January 2018. From now on, Chinese patients can benefit from Vidaza in hospitals around China.”

Azacitidine was evaluated in a global phase 3 trial of patients with intermediate-2- and high-risk MDS, CMML, or AML (AZA-001). Results from this trial were published in The Lancet Oncology in 2009.

Patients were randomized to receive azacitidine plus best supportive care (BSC, n=179) or conventional care regimens plus BSC (105 to BSC alone, 49 to low-dose cytarabine, and 25 to chemotherapy with cytarabine and anthracycline).

Azacitidine was given subcutaneously at a dose of 75 mg/m² daily for 7 consecutive days every 28 days until disease progression, relapse after response, or unacceptable toxicity.

The median overall survival was 24.5 months with azacitidine, compared to 15 months for patients treated with conventional care regimens.

There was a higher hematologic response rate in the azacitidine arm than the conventional care arm—29% and 12%, respectively.

In the azacitidine group, 45% of patients who were dependent on red blood cell transfusions at baseline became transfusion independent, compared with 11% in the conventional care group.

Forty-six percent of patients in the azacitidine arm and 63% in the conventional care arm died.

Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity (in the azacitidine and conventional care arms, respectively) included neutropenia (91% and 76%), thrombocytopenia (85% and 80%), and anemia (57% and 68%).

Photo by Bill Branson

Azacitidine for injection (Vidaza®) is now available in China.

The nucleoside metabolic inhibitor was approved in China to treat patients with intermediate-2/high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20% to 30% bone marrow blasts, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML).

Azacitidine for injection is marketed in China by BeiGene Ltd. under an exclusive license from Celgene Corporation.

“Vidaza is the only approved hypomethylating agent shown to prolong survival for patients with MDS and the first new treatment for MDS patients approved in China since 2009,” said John V. Oyler, founder, chief executive officer, and chairman of BeiGene.

“We are excited to announce that the first prescription was made in January 2018. From now on, Chinese patients can benefit from Vidaza in hospitals around China.”

Azacitidine was evaluated in a global phase 3 trial of patients with intermediate-2- and high-risk MDS, CMML, or AML (AZA-001). Results from this trial were published in The Lancet Oncology in 2009.

Patients were randomized to receive azacitidine plus best supportive care (BSC, n=179) or conventional care regimens plus BSC (105 to BSC alone, 49 to low-dose cytarabine, and 25 to chemotherapy with cytarabine and anthracycline).

Azacitidine was given subcutaneously at a dose of 75 mg/m² daily for 7 consecutive days every 28 days until disease progression, relapse after response, or unacceptable toxicity.

The median overall survival was 24.5 months with azacitidine, compared to 15 months for patients treated with conventional care regimens.

There was a higher hematologic response rate in the azacitidine arm than the conventional care arm—29% and 12%, respectively.

In the azacitidine group, 45% of patients who were dependent on red blood cell transfusions at baseline became transfusion independent, compared with 11% in the conventional care group.

Forty-six percent of patients in the azacitidine arm and 63% in the conventional care arm died.

Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity (in the azacitidine and conventional care arms, respectively) included neutropenia (91% and 76%), thrombocytopenia (85% and 80%), and anemia (57% and 68%).

Photo by Bill Branson

Azacitidine for injection (Vidaza®) is now available in China.

The nucleoside metabolic inhibitor was approved in China to treat patients with intermediate-2/high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20% to 30% bone marrow blasts, and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML).

Azacitidine for injection is marketed in China by BeiGene Ltd. under an exclusive license from Celgene Corporation.

“Vidaza is the only approved hypomethylating agent shown to prolong survival for patients with MDS and the first new treatment for MDS patients approved in China since 2009,” said John V. Oyler, founder, chief executive officer, and chairman of BeiGene.

“We are excited to announce that the first prescription was made in January 2018. From now on, Chinese patients can benefit from Vidaza in hospitals around China.”

Azacitidine was evaluated in a global phase 3 trial of patients with intermediate-2- and high-risk MDS, CMML, or AML (AZA-001). Results from this trial were published in The Lancet Oncology in 2009.

Patients were randomized to receive azacitidine plus best supportive care (BSC, n=179) or conventional care regimens plus BSC (105 to BSC alone, 49 to low-dose cytarabine, and 25 to chemotherapy with cytarabine and anthracycline).

Azacitidine was given subcutaneously at a dose of 75 mg/m² daily for 7 consecutive days every 28 days until disease progression, relapse after response, or unacceptable toxicity.

The median overall survival was 24.5 months with azacitidine, compared to 15 months for patients treated with conventional care regimens.

There was a higher hematologic response rate in the azacitidine arm than the conventional care arm—29% and 12%, respectively.

In the azacitidine group, 45% of patients who were dependent on red blood cell transfusions at baseline became transfusion independent, compared with 11% in the conventional care group.

Forty-six percent of patients in the azacitidine arm and 63% in the conventional care arm died.

Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity (in the azacitidine and conventional care arms, respectively) included neutropenia (91% and 76%), thrombocytopenia (85% and 80%), and anemia (57% and 68%).

A novel agent holds promise as a treatment option for anemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who are not helped by erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), according to results from a phase 2 trial.

Sotatercept (ACE-011) is a first-in-class novel recombinant fusion protein, and was found to be effective and well tolerated, increasing hemoglobin concentrations and decreasing the transfusion burden in this patient population.

Nearly half (29, 47%) of 62 patients with a high transfusion burden achieved hematologic improvement–erythroid (HI-E), which for them was a reduction in red blood cell transfusion from baseline of 4 U or more for at least 56 days. Additionally, 7 of 12 patients (58%) with a low transfusion burden also achieved HI-E, defined as an increase in hemoglobin of 1.5 g/dL or more that was sustained for at least 56 days without a transfusion.

“Taken together, these findings provide proof of principle that the recombinant protein sotatercept can restore ineffective erythropoiesis in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, with an acceptable safety profile,” Rami Komrokji, MD, of Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, and his colleagues, wrote in the Lancet Haematology.

There are few effective treatment options available for patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have anemia, especially after they fail primary or secondary treatment with ESAs, or for those who are not likely to benefit from ESA therapy.

In this phase 2 trial, the researchers sought to establish a safe and effective dose of sotatercept in a cohort of 74 patients. Of this group, 7 received 0.1 mg/kg sotatercept, 6 got 0.3 mg/kg, 21 received 0.5 mg/kg, 35 got 1.0 mg/kg, and 5 patients received doses up to 2.0 mg/kg. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was the proportion of patients who achieved HI-E.

All of the patients were pretreated, having received prior therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes, including ESAs, hypomethylating agents (azacitidine or decitabine), lenalidomide, and other agents including corticosteroids and immunomodulators.

Within this cohort, 36 patients (49%; 95% confidence intervaI, 38-60) achieved HI-E while 20 patients (27%; 95% CI, 18-38) achieved independence from transfusion for at least 56 days.

Fatigue (26%) and peripheral edema (24%) were the most common adverse events reported, while grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 34% of patients. Of these, 4 patients had grade 3-4 TEAEs that were probably related to the treatment. The most common grade 3-4 TEAEs were lipase increase and anemia, and each was reported in three patients. Additionally, 17 patients (23%) experienced at least one serious TEAE, including a death from a treatment-emergent subdural hematoma (which caused the patient to fall).

The study was funded by the Celgene. Dr. Komrokji reported financial relationships with Celgene and Novartis. Other study authors reported relationships with various pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Komrokji R et al. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Jan 10. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30002-4.

A novel agent holds promise as a treatment option for anemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who are not helped by erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), according to results from a phase 2 trial.

Sotatercept (ACE-011) is a first-in-class novel recombinant fusion protein, and was found to be effective and well tolerated, increasing hemoglobin concentrations and decreasing the transfusion burden in this patient population.

Nearly half (29, 47%) of 62 patients with a high transfusion burden achieved hematologic improvement–erythroid (HI-E), which for them was a reduction in red blood cell transfusion from baseline of 4 U or more for at least 56 days. Additionally, 7 of 12 patients (58%) with a low transfusion burden also achieved HI-E, defined as an increase in hemoglobin of 1.5 g/dL or more that was sustained for at least 56 days without a transfusion.

“Taken together, these findings provide proof of principle that the recombinant protein sotatercept can restore ineffective erythropoiesis in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, with an acceptable safety profile,” Rami Komrokji, MD, of Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, and his colleagues, wrote in the Lancet Haematology.

There are few effective treatment options available for patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have anemia, especially after they fail primary or secondary treatment with ESAs, or for those who are not likely to benefit from ESA therapy.

In this phase 2 trial, the researchers sought to establish a safe and effective dose of sotatercept in a cohort of 74 patients. Of this group, 7 received 0.1 mg/kg sotatercept, 6 got 0.3 mg/kg, 21 received 0.5 mg/kg, 35 got 1.0 mg/kg, and 5 patients received doses up to 2.0 mg/kg. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was the proportion of patients who achieved HI-E.

All of the patients were pretreated, having received prior therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes, including ESAs, hypomethylating agents (azacitidine or decitabine), lenalidomide, and other agents including corticosteroids and immunomodulators.

Within this cohort, 36 patients (49%; 95% confidence intervaI, 38-60) achieved HI-E while 20 patients (27%; 95% CI, 18-38) achieved independence from transfusion for at least 56 days.

Fatigue (26%) and peripheral edema (24%) were the most common adverse events reported, while grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 34% of patients. Of these, 4 patients had grade 3-4 TEAEs that were probably related to the treatment. The most common grade 3-4 TEAEs were lipase increase and anemia, and each was reported in three patients. Additionally, 17 patients (23%) experienced at least one serious TEAE, including a death from a treatment-emergent subdural hematoma (which caused the patient to fall).

The study was funded by the Celgene. Dr. Komrokji reported financial relationships with Celgene and Novartis. Other study authors reported relationships with various pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Komrokji R et al. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Jan 10. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30002-4.

A novel agent holds promise as a treatment option for anemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who are not helped by erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), according to results from a phase 2 trial.

Sotatercept (ACE-011) is a first-in-class novel recombinant fusion protein, and was found to be effective and well tolerated, increasing hemoglobin concentrations and decreasing the transfusion burden in this patient population.

Nearly half (29, 47%) of 62 patients with a high transfusion burden achieved hematologic improvement–erythroid (HI-E), which for them was a reduction in red blood cell transfusion from baseline of 4 U or more for at least 56 days. Additionally, 7 of 12 patients (58%) with a low transfusion burden also achieved HI-E, defined as an increase in hemoglobin of 1.5 g/dL or more that was sustained for at least 56 days without a transfusion.

“Taken together, these findings provide proof of principle that the recombinant protein sotatercept can restore ineffective erythropoiesis in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, with an acceptable safety profile,” Rami Komrokji, MD, of Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, and his colleagues, wrote in the Lancet Haematology.

There are few effective treatment options available for patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have anemia, especially after they fail primary or secondary treatment with ESAs, or for those who are not likely to benefit from ESA therapy.

In this phase 2 trial, the researchers sought to establish a safe and effective dose of sotatercept in a cohort of 74 patients. Of this group, 7 received 0.1 mg/kg sotatercept, 6 got 0.3 mg/kg, 21 received 0.5 mg/kg, 35 got 1.0 mg/kg, and 5 patients received doses up to 2.0 mg/kg. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was the proportion of patients who achieved HI-E.

All of the patients were pretreated, having received prior therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes, including ESAs, hypomethylating agents (azacitidine or decitabine), lenalidomide, and other agents including corticosteroids and immunomodulators.

Within this cohort, 36 patients (49%; 95% confidence intervaI, 38-60) achieved HI-E while 20 patients (27%; 95% CI, 18-38) achieved independence from transfusion for at least 56 days.

Fatigue (26%) and peripheral edema (24%) were the most common adverse events reported, while grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 34% of patients. Of these, 4 patients had grade 3-4 TEAEs that were probably related to the treatment. The most common grade 3-4 TEAEs were lipase increase and anemia, and each was reported in three patients. Additionally, 17 patients (23%) experienced at least one serious TEAE, including a death from a treatment-emergent subdural hematoma (which caused the patient to fall).

The study was funded by the Celgene. Dr. Komrokji reported financial relationships with Celgene and Novartis. Other study authors reported relationships with various pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: Komrokji R et al. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Jan 10. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30002-4.

ATLANTA – Minimal residual disease-guided treatment with azacitidine is an effective strategy for preventing or delaying hematological relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are at high risk for relapse, according to findings from the open-label, interventional RELAZA2 trial.

Of 205 patients screened between 2011 and 2015 at 11 centers in Germany, 53 became minimal residual disease (MRD) positive while remaining in hematological remission. All 53 started azacitidine-based preemptive treatment, and 6 months after the initiation of the MRD-guided therapy, 31 (58%) were still in complete remission, while 22 (42%) relapsed after a median of three treatment cycles, Uwe Platzbecker, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Of those still in complete remission, 21 patients responded with a decline of MRD below a predefined threshold, and 10 achieved stabilization in the absence of relapse, said Dr. Platzbecker of the University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany.

The overall response rate was greater in those who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (71% vs. 48%), he noted.

“After 6 months, 24 patients continued to receive a median of nine subsequent azacitidine cycles. Seven patients completed 24 months of treatment according to protocol. Eventually, hematologic relapse occurred in eight of those patients (33%) but was delayed until a median of 397 days after initial MRD detection,” he said in an interview, adding that, overall, 26 of the 53 patients in the study (49%) experienced hematologic relapse, which was delayed until a median of 422 days after initial MRD detection.

Study subjects were adults with a median age of 59 years with measurable MRD suggestive of imminent relapse but who were still in CR. Most (48) had AML, and 5 had MDS. They were treated preemptively with six cycles of 75 mg/m² of azacitidine given subcutaneously on days 1-7 of each 1-month cycle. Those who continued treatment beyond the initial 6 months were treated with risk-adapted azacitidine-based therapy for up to 18 additional months.

Treatment was well tolerated. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in three patients, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 45 patients. Infections and pneumonia, which occurred in four and three patients, respectively, were the main serious side effects during the first 6 cycles.

“With a median follow-up of 13 months after the start of MRD-guided preemptive treatment, the actual overall and progression free survival rate was 76% and 42%, respectively,” Dr. Platzbecker said.

Chemotherapy frequently results in complete remission in patients with MDS or AML, but a substantial proportion of patients relapse even after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, he said, noting that treatment options in these patients are limited.

In the prospective RELAZA 1 trial, short-term preemptive azacitidine therapy was associated with sustained responses. RELAZA2 was designed to assess the ability of early nonintensive azacitidine treatment, directed by MRD monitoring after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and chemotherapy, prior to avert relapse.

The findings suggest that this approach is effective in patients at higher risk of relapse, but the success of treatment seems to be context dependent, Dr. Platzbecker said, explaining that this finding emphasizes the potential immunomodulatory role of hypomethylating agents.

“The study supports the prognostic importance of MRD in AML and may serve as a platform for future studies in combining hypomethylating agents and novel targeted therapies,” he concluded.

The RELAZA2 trial is sponsored by Technische Universität Dresden. Dr. Platzbecker reported serving as a consultant for, and receiving honoraria and research funding from Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, and Acceleron.

sworcester@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Platzbecker U et al. ASH 2017 Abstract #565.

ATLANTA – Minimal residual disease-guided treatment with azacitidine is an effective strategy for preventing or delaying hematological relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are at high risk for relapse, according to findings from the open-label, interventional RELAZA2 trial.

Of 205 patients screened between 2011 and 2015 at 11 centers in Germany, 53 became minimal residual disease (MRD) positive while remaining in hematological remission. All 53 started azacitidine-based preemptive treatment, and 6 months after the initiation of the MRD-guided therapy, 31 (58%) were still in complete remission, while 22 (42%) relapsed after a median of three treatment cycles, Uwe Platzbecker, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Of those still in complete remission, 21 patients responded with a decline of MRD below a predefined threshold, and 10 achieved stabilization in the absence of relapse, said Dr. Platzbecker of the University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany.

The overall response rate was greater in those who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (71% vs. 48%), he noted.

“After 6 months, 24 patients continued to receive a median of nine subsequent azacitidine cycles. Seven patients completed 24 months of treatment according to protocol. Eventually, hematologic relapse occurred in eight of those patients (33%) but was delayed until a median of 397 days after initial MRD detection,” he said in an interview, adding that, overall, 26 of the 53 patients in the study (49%) experienced hematologic relapse, which was delayed until a median of 422 days after initial MRD detection.

Study subjects were adults with a median age of 59 years with measurable MRD suggestive of imminent relapse but who were still in CR. Most (48) had AML, and 5 had MDS. They were treated preemptively with six cycles of 75 mg/m² of azacitidine given subcutaneously on days 1-7 of each 1-month cycle. Those who continued treatment beyond the initial 6 months were treated with risk-adapted azacitidine-based therapy for up to 18 additional months.

Treatment was well tolerated. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in three patients, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 45 patients. Infections and pneumonia, which occurred in four and three patients, respectively, were the main serious side effects during the first 6 cycles.

“With a median follow-up of 13 months after the start of MRD-guided preemptive treatment, the actual overall and progression free survival rate was 76% and 42%, respectively,” Dr. Platzbecker said.

Chemotherapy frequently results in complete remission in patients with MDS or AML, but a substantial proportion of patients relapse even after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, he said, noting that treatment options in these patients are limited.

In the prospective RELAZA 1 trial, short-term preemptive azacitidine therapy was associated with sustained responses. RELAZA2 was designed to assess the ability of early nonintensive azacitidine treatment, directed by MRD monitoring after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and chemotherapy, prior to avert relapse.

The findings suggest that this approach is effective in patients at higher risk of relapse, but the success of treatment seems to be context dependent, Dr. Platzbecker said, explaining that this finding emphasizes the potential immunomodulatory role of hypomethylating agents.

“The study supports the prognostic importance of MRD in AML and may serve as a platform for future studies in combining hypomethylating agents and novel targeted therapies,” he concluded.

The RELAZA2 trial is sponsored by Technische Universität Dresden. Dr. Platzbecker reported serving as a consultant for, and receiving honoraria and research funding from Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, and Acceleron.

sworcester@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Platzbecker U et al. ASH 2017 Abstract #565.

ATLANTA – Minimal residual disease-guided treatment with azacitidine is an effective strategy for preventing or delaying hematological relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are at high risk for relapse, according to findings from the open-label, interventional RELAZA2 trial.

Of 205 patients screened between 2011 and 2015 at 11 centers in Germany, 53 became minimal residual disease (MRD) positive while remaining in hematological remission. All 53 started azacitidine-based preemptive treatment, and 6 months after the initiation of the MRD-guided therapy, 31 (58%) were still in complete remission, while 22 (42%) relapsed after a median of three treatment cycles, Uwe Platzbecker, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Of those still in complete remission, 21 patients responded with a decline of MRD below a predefined threshold, and 10 achieved stabilization in the absence of relapse, said Dr. Platzbecker of the University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany.

The overall response rate was greater in those who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (71% vs. 48%), he noted.

“After 6 months, 24 patients continued to receive a median of nine subsequent azacitidine cycles. Seven patients completed 24 months of treatment according to protocol. Eventually, hematologic relapse occurred in eight of those patients (33%) but was delayed until a median of 397 days after initial MRD detection,” he said in an interview, adding that, overall, 26 of the 53 patients in the study (49%) experienced hematologic relapse, which was delayed until a median of 422 days after initial MRD detection.

Study subjects were adults with a median age of 59 years with measurable MRD suggestive of imminent relapse but who were still in CR. Most (48) had AML, and 5 had MDS. They were treated preemptively with six cycles of 75 mg/m² of azacitidine given subcutaneously on days 1-7 of each 1-month cycle. Those who continued treatment beyond the initial 6 months were treated with risk-adapted azacitidine-based therapy for up to 18 additional months.

Treatment was well tolerated. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in three patients, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 45 patients. Infections and pneumonia, which occurred in four and three patients, respectively, were the main serious side effects during the first 6 cycles.

“With a median follow-up of 13 months after the start of MRD-guided preemptive treatment, the actual overall and progression free survival rate was 76% and 42%, respectively,” Dr. Platzbecker said.

Chemotherapy frequently results in complete remission in patients with MDS or AML, but a substantial proportion of patients relapse even after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, he said, noting that treatment options in these patients are limited.

In the prospective RELAZA 1 trial, short-term preemptive azacitidine therapy was associated with sustained responses. RELAZA2 was designed to assess the ability of early nonintensive azacitidine treatment, directed by MRD monitoring after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and chemotherapy, prior to avert relapse.

The findings suggest that this approach is effective in patients at higher risk of relapse, but the success of treatment seems to be context dependent, Dr. Platzbecker said, explaining that this finding emphasizes the potential immunomodulatory role of hypomethylating agents.

“The study supports the prognostic importance of MRD in AML and may serve as a platform for future studies in combining hypomethylating agents and novel targeted therapies,” he concluded.

The RELAZA2 trial is sponsored by Technische Universität Dresden. Dr. Platzbecker reported serving as a consultant for, and receiving honoraria and research funding from Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, and Acceleron.

sworcester@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Platzbecker U et al. ASH 2017 Abstract #565.

Micrograph showing MDS

Researchers have developed a technique that may help predict whether patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) will respond to treatment with azacytidine (AZA).

“The new method, called AZA-MS, utilizes a cutting-edge technique known as mass spectrometry to measure the different forms of AZA inside blood cells of patients—such as the AZA molecules that are incorporated into the DNA or RNA,” said Ashwin Unnikrishnan, PhD, of the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia.

With this method, Dr Unnikrishnan and his colleagues found that patients who do not respond to AZA may incorporate fewer AZA molecules in their DNA and have lower DNA demethylation than responders. However, this is not always the case.

The researchers reported these findings in Leukemia.

The team initially tested AZA-MS in AZA-treated RKO cells and found that AZA-MS could quantify the ribonucleoside (5-AZA-cR) and deoxyribonucleoside (5-AZA-CdR) forms of AZA in RNA, DNA, and the cytoplasm—all in the same sample.

The researchers also found that AZA induced dose-dependent DNA demethylation but did not have an effect on RNA methylation.

The team then used AZA-MS to analyze bone marrow samples from patients with MDS (n=4) or CMML (n=4) who were undergoing treatment with AZA. All of the patients had received at least 6 cycles of the drug.

Each patient had 3 bone marrow samples collected—one immediately before starting treatment; one on day 8 of cycle 1 (C1d8); and one on day 28 of cycle 1 (C1d28), when they had spent 20 days off the drug.

Four of the patients were complete responders, and 4 were nonresponders. In each group, 2 patients had MDS, and 2 had CMML.

At C1d8, DNA-5-AZA-CdR was significantly greater in responders than nonresponders. And, overall, responders had increased DNA demethylation compared to nonresponders.

However, the researchers also observed differences among the nonresponders. Two nonresponders had very low levels of DNA-5-AZA-CdR at C1d8 and no demethylation. The other 2 nonresponders had much higher DNA-5-AZA-CdR and DNA demethylation levels, which were comparable to levels in responders.

The researchers said they could detect AZA and DNA-5-AZA-CdR intracellularly, as well as RNA-AZA, in the nonresponders with minimal DNA-5-AZA-CdR and DNA demethylation.

The team said this suggests that neither cellular uptake nor intracellular metabolism explain the low DNA-5-AZA-CdR in these patients. Instead, the researchers believe these patients may have a greater proportion of bone marrow cells that are quiescent and not undergoing DNA replication.

The researchers also believe the nonresponders with higher DNA-5-AZA-CdR may be explained by a failure to induce an interferon response, which is necessary for a clinical response.

On the other hand, these nonresponders could have defective immune cell-mediated clearance of dysplastic cells or increased tolerance to this clearance, the researchers said.

The team also noted that, at C1d28, DNA-5-AZA-CdR levels dropped (but were still detectable) in all 8 patients, and DNA methylation had nearly returned to pretreatment levels in all patients.

Micrograph showing MDS

Researchers have developed a technique that may help predict whether patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) will respond to treatment with azacytidine (AZA).

“The new method, called AZA-MS, utilizes a cutting-edge technique known as mass spectrometry to measure the different forms of AZA inside blood cells of patients—such as the AZA molecules that are incorporated into the DNA or RNA,” said Ashwin Unnikrishnan, PhD, of the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia.

With this method, Dr Unnikrishnan and his colleagues found that patients who do not respond to AZA may incorporate fewer AZA molecules in their DNA and have lower DNA demethylation than responders. However, this is not always the case.

The researchers reported these findings in Leukemia.

The team initially tested AZA-MS in AZA-treated RKO cells and found that AZA-MS could quantify the ribonucleoside (5-AZA-cR) and deoxyribonucleoside (5-AZA-CdR) forms of AZA in RNA, DNA, and the cytoplasm—all in the same sample.

The researchers also found that AZA induced dose-dependent DNA demethylation but did not have an effect on RNA methylation.

The team then used AZA-MS to analyze bone marrow samples from patients with MDS (n=4) or CMML (n=4) who were undergoing treatment with AZA. All of the patients had received at least 6 cycles of the drug.

Each patient had 3 bone marrow samples collected—one immediately before starting treatment; one on day 8 of cycle 1 (C1d8); and one on day 28 of cycle 1 (C1d28), when they had spent 20 days off the drug.

Four of the patients were complete responders, and 4 were nonresponders. In each group, 2 patients had MDS, and 2 had CMML.

At C1d8, DNA-5-AZA-CdR was significantly greater in responders than nonresponders. And, overall, responders had increased DNA demethylation compared to nonresponders.

However, the researchers also observed differences among the nonresponders. Two nonresponders had very low levels of DNA-5-AZA-CdR at C1d8 and no demethylation. The other 2 nonresponders had much higher DNA-5-AZA-CdR and DNA demethylation levels, which were comparable to levels in responders.

The researchers said they could detect AZA and DNA-5-AZA-CdR intracellularly, as well as RNA-AZA, in the nonresponders with minimal DNA-5-AZA-CdR and DNA demethylation.

The team said this suggests that neither cellular uptake nor intracellular metabolism explain the low DNA-5-AZA-CdR in these patients. Instead, the researchers believe these patients may have a greater proportion of bone marrow cells that are quiescent and not undergoing DNA replication.

The researchers also believe the nonresponders with higher DNA-5-AZA-CdR may be explained by a failure to induce an interferon response, which is necessary for a clinical response.

On the other hand, these nonresponders could have defective immune cell-mediated clearance of dysplastic cells or increased tolerance to this clearance, the researchers said.

The team also noted that, at C1d28, DNA-5-AZA-CdR levels dropped (but were still detectable) in all 8 patients, and DNA methylation had nearly returned to pretreatment levels in all patients.

Micrograph showing MDS

Researchers have developed a technique that may help predict whether patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) will respond to treatment with azacytidine (AZA).

“The new method, called AZA-MS, utilizes a cutting-edge technique known as mass spectrometry to measure the different forms of AZA inside blood cells of patients—such as the AZA molecules that are incorporated into the DNA or RNA,” said Ashwin Unnikrishnan, PhD, of the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia.

With this method, Dr Unnikrishnan and his colleagues found that patients who do not respond to AZA may incorporate fewer AZA molecules in their DNA and have lower DNA demethylation than responders. However, this is not always the case.

The researchers reported these findings in Leukemia.

The team initially tested AZA-MS in AZA-treated RKO cells and found that AZA-MS could quantify the ribonucleoside (5-AZA-cR) and deoxyribonucleoside (5-AZA-CdR) forms of AZA in RNA, DNA, and the cytoplasm—all in the same sample.

The researchers also found that AZA induced dose-dependent DNA demethylation but did not have an effect on RNA methylation.

The team then used AZA-MS to analyze bone marrow samples from patients with MDS (n=4) or CMML (n=4) who were undergoing treatment with AZA. All of the patients had received at least 6 cycles of the drug.

Each patient had 3 bone marrow samples collected—one immediately before starting treatment; one on day 8 of cycle 1 (C1d8); and one on day 28 of cycle 1 (C1d28), when they had spent 20 days off the drug.

Four of the patients were complete responders, and 4 were nonresponders. In each group, 2 patients had MDS, and 2 had CMML.

At C1d8, DNA-5-AZA-CdR was significantly greater in responders than nonresponders. And, overall, responders had increased DNA demethylation compared to nonresponders.

However, the researchers also observed differences among the nonresponders. Two nonresponders had very low levels of DNA-5-AZA-CdR at C1d8 and no demethylation. The other 2 nonresponders had much higher DNA-5-AZA-CdR and DNA demethylation levels, which were comparable to levels in responders.

The researchers said they could detect AZA and DNA-5-AZA-CdR intracellularly, as well as RNA-AZA, in the nonresponders with minimal DNA-5-AZA-CdR and DNA demethylation.

The team said this suggests that neither cellular uptake nor intracellular metabolism explain the low DNA-5-AZA-CdR in these patients. Instead, the researchers believe these patients may have a greater proportion of bone marrow cells that are quiescent and not undergoing DNA replication.

The researchers also believe the nonresponders with higher DNA-5-AZA-CdR may be explained by a failure to induce an interferon response, which is necessary for a clinical response.

On the other hand, these nonresponders could have defective immune cell-mediated clearance of dysplastic cells or increased tolerance to this clearance, the researchers said.

The team also noted that, at C1d28, DNA-5-AZA-CdR levels dropped (but were still detectable) in all 8 patients, and DNA methylation had nearly returned to pretreatment levels in all patients.

ATLANTA – The novel Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor INCB052793 showed encouraging activity, particularly in combination with azacitidine, in certain patients with advanced myeloid malignancies in a phase 1/2 trial.

The activity was seen even in patients who previously failed treatment with hypomethylating agents, Amer M. Zeidan, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

sworcester@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Zeidan A et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 640.

ATLANTA – The novel Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor INCB052793 showed encouraging activity, particularly in combination with azacitidine, in certain patients with advanced myeloid malignancies in a phase 1/2 trial.

The activity was seen even in patients who previously failed treatment with hypomethylating agents, Amer M. Zeidan, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

sworcester@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Zeidan A et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 640.

ATLANTA – The novel Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor INCB052793 showed encouraging activity, particularly in combination with azacitidine, in certain patients with advanced myeloid malignancies in a phase 1/2 trial.

The activity was seen even in patients who previously failed treatment with hypomethylating agents, Amer M. Zeidan, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

sworcester@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Zeidan A et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 640.