Multiple Sclerosis Hub

Theme
medstat_ms
Top Sections
Conference Coverage
Clinical Topics & News
ms
Main menu
Multiple Sclerosis Hub Main Menu
Unpublish
Altmetric
DSM Affiliated
Display in offset block
Enable Disqus
Display Author and Disclosure Link
Publication Type
News
Slot System
Top 25
Disable Sticky Ads
Disable Ad Block Mitigation
Featured Buckets Admin
Show Ads on this Publication's Homepage
Consolidated Pub
Show Article Page Numbers on TOC
Use larger logo size
Off
publication_blueconic_enabled
Off
Show More Destinations Menu
Disable Adhesion on Publication
Off
Restore Menu Label on Mobile Navigation
Disable Facebook Pixel from Publication
Exclude this publication from publication selection on articles and quiz
Challenge Center
Disable Inline Native ads

Meningeal B-Cell Infiltrates May Cause Cortical Injury in Progressive MS

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/16/2019 - 15:45
Display Headline
Meningeal B-Cell Infiltrates May Cause Cortical Injury in Progressive MS

NEW ORLEANS—Meningeal B-cell infiltrates may be the main source of inflammatory or cytotoxic molecules that are released into the CSF to cause cortical tissue injury in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), according to a study described at the ACTRIMS 2016 Forum. The proinflammatory CSF profile of patients with high levels of gray matter damage significantly differs from that of patients with low levels of gray matter damage, thus suggesting that measuring levels of meningeal B-cell infiltrates may be a useful approach for patient stratification at disease onset.

Gray matter damage is the best correlate of the accumulation of physical and cognitive deficits and one of the main substrates of disability progression in MS, according to the researchers. New advanced imaging techniques enable a more accurate estimation of the load of gray matter demyelination and brain atrophy, thus suggesting that increased levels of gray matter pathology play a crucial role in more rapid progressive outcome. Investigators have proposed meningeal B-cell infiltrates as the main source of the intrathecal inflammatory or cytotoxic milieu in the CSF that may mediate and exacerbate the gradient of tissue injury in the adjacent gray matter.

Roberta Magliozzi, PhD, of the University of Verona in Italy, and colleagues undertook a study to identify specific biomarkers and imaging tools to predict and monitor gray matter pathology and its association with MS progression. The investigators performed advanced MRI imaging of gray matter damage and an extensive protein analysis of CSF for 70 patients with MS and 12 controls. Dr. Magliozzi’s group also analyzed molecular expression in paired meningeal and CSF samples from 20 postmortem cases of secondary progressive MS and 10 control cases to verify whether inflammatory mediators expressed by the meningeal infiltrates are released into the CSF.

The researchers observed that a pronounced proinflammatory CSF profile, including overexpression of CXCL13, CXCL12, CCL19, CCL21, IL6, IL10, APRIL, BAFF, TNF, TNFR1, LIGHT, IFN-γ, gray matter-CSF, and MMP2, was strictly associated with increased gray matter pathology and disease progression in patients with MS. The proinflammatory CSF profile suggested lymphoid-neogenesis, B-cell and plasmablast or plasma-cell involvement, and a TNF-mediated inflammatory response. A pattern of increased regulatory molecules, including IFNα, IFNβ, IFNλ, CCL22, and CCL25, was associated with a lower level of gray matter pathology. Consistent with this finding, the investigators detected increased expression of CXCL13, CXCL9, TNF, IFNγ, LTα, LTβ, IL10, IL16, and IL12p40 in the meninges and CSF samples of postmortem cases of secondary progressive MS with a higher level of meningeal inflammation and gray matter demyelination.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(4)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
14
Legacy Keywords
Neurology Reviews, Meningeal, B-Cell, Infiltrates, Cortical Injury, MS, Roberta Magliozzi
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

NEW ORLEANS—Meningeal B-cell infiltrates may be the main source of inflammatory or cytotoxic molecules that are released into the CSF to cause cortical tissue injury in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), according to a study described at the ACTRIMS 2016 Forum. The proinflammatory CSF profile of patients with high levels of gray matter damage significantly differs from that of patients with low levels of gray matter damage, thus suggesting that measuring levels of meningeal B-cell infiltrates may be a useful approach for patient stratification at disease onset.

Gray matter damage is the best correlate of the accumulation of physical and cognitive deficits and one of the main substrates of disability progression in MS, according to the researchers. New advanced imaging techniques enable a more accurate estimation of the load of gray matter demyelination and brain atrophy, thus suggesting that increased levels of gray matter pathology play a crucial role in more rapid progressive outcome. Investigators have proposed meningeal B-cell infiltrates as the main source of the intrathecal inflammatory or cytotoxic milieu in the CSF that may mediate and exacerbate the gradient of tissue injury in the adjacent gray matter.

Roberta Magliozzi, PhD, of the University of Verona in Italy, and colleagues undertook a study to identify specific biomarkers and imaging tools to predict and monitor gray matter pathology and its association with MS progression. The investigators performed advanced MRI imaging of gray matter damage and an extensive protein analysis of CSF for 70 patients with MS and 12 controls. Dr. Magliozzi’s group also analyzed molecular expression in paired meningeal and CSF samples from 20 postmortem cases of secondary progressive MS and 10 control cases to verify whether inflammatory mediators expressed by the meningeal infiltrates are released into the CSF.

The researchers observed that a pronounced proinflammatory CSF profile, including overexpression of CXCL13, CXCL12, CCL19, CCL21, IL6, IL10, APRIL, BAFF, TNF, TNFR1, LIGHT, IFN-γ, gray matter-CSF, and MMP2, was strictly associated with increased gray matter pathology and disease progression in patients with MS. The proinflammatory CSF profile suggested lymphoid-neogenesis, B-cell and plasmablast or plasma-cell involvement, and a TNF-mediated inflammatory response. A pattern of increased regulatory molecules, including IFNα, IFNβ, IFNλ, CCL22, and CCL25, was associated with a lower level of gray matter pathology. Consistent with this finding, the investigators detected increased expression of CXCL13, CXCL9, TNF, IFNγ, LTα, LTβ, IL10, IL16, and IL12p40 in the meninges and CSF samples of postmortem cases of secondary progressive MS with a higher level of meningeal inflammation and gray matter demyelination.

NEW ORLEANS—Meningeal B-cell infiltrates may be the main source of inflammatory or cytotoxic molecules that are released into the CSF to cause cortical tissue injury in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), according to a study described at the ACTRIMS 2016 Forum. The proinflammatory CSF profile of patients with high levels of gray matter damage significantly differs from that of patients with low levels of gray matter damage, thus suggesting that measuring levels of meningeal B-cell infiltrates may be a useful approach for patient stratification at disease onset.

Gray matter damage is the best correlate of the accumulation of physical and cognitive deficits and one of the main substrates of disability progression in MS, according to the researchers. New advanced imaging techniques enable a more accurate estimation of the load of gray matter demyelination and brain atrophy, thus suggesting that increased levels of gray matter pathology play a crucial role in more rapid progressive outcome. Investigators have proposed meningeal B-cell infiltrates as the main source of the intrathecal inflammatory or cytotoxic milieu in the CSF that may mediate and exacerbate the gradient of tissue injury in the adjacent gray matter.

Roberta Magliozzi, PhD, of the University of Verona in Italy, and colleagues undertook a study to identify specific biomarkers and imaging tools to predict and monitor gray matter pathology and its association with MS progression. The investigators performed advanced MRI imaging of gray matter damage and an extensive protein analysis of CSF for 70 patients with MS and 12 controls. Dr. Magliozzi’s group also analyzed molecular expression in paired meningeal and CSF samples from 20 postmortem cases of secondary progressive MS and 10 control cases to verify whether inflammatory mediators expressed by the meningeal infiltrates are released into the CSF.

The researchers observed that a pronounced proinflammatory CSF profile, including overexpression of CXCL13, CXCL12, CCL19, CCL21, IL6, IL10, APRIL, BAFF, TNF, TNFR1, LIGHT, IFN-γ, gray matter-CSF, and MMP2, was strictly associated with increased gray matter pathology and disease progression in patients with MS. The proinflammatory CSF profile suggested lymphoid-neogenesis, B-cell and plasmablast or plasma-cell involvement, and a TNF-mediated inflammatory response. A pattern of increased regulatory molecules, including IFNα, IFNβ, IFNλ, CCL22, and CCL25, was associated with a lower level of gray matter pathology. Consistent with this finding, the investigators detected increased expression of CXCL13, CXCL9, TNF, IFNγ, LTα, LTβ, IL10, IL16, and IL12p40 in the meninges and CSF samples of postmortem cases of secondary progressive MS with a higher level of meningeal inflammation and gray matter demyelination.

References

References

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(4)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(4)
Page Number
14
Page Number
14
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Meningeal B-Cell Infiltrates May Cause Cortical Injury in Progressive MS
Display Headline
Meningeal B-Cell Infiltrates May Cause Cortical Injury in Progressive MS
Legacy Keywords
Neurology Reviews, Meningeal, B-Cell, Infiltrates, Cortical Injury, MS, Roberta Magliozzi
Legacy Keywords
Neurology Reviews, Meningeal, B-Cell, Infiltrates, Cortical Injury, MS, Roberta Magliozzi
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Gender identity disorders in males associated with MS

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 15:42
Display Headline
Gender identity disorders in males associated with MS

An association between gender identity disorders (GIDs) and subsequent multiple sclerosis (MS) in males was found in an analysis of linked English Hospital Episode Statistics and mortality data from January 1999 to March 2012.

The findings “suggest that low testosterone levels and/or feminising gonadal hormones might influence MS risk in some men and highlight a need for further work to explore any potential role for gonadal hormones in management and/or prevention strategies,” wrote Dr. Julia Pakpoor of the Unit of Health-Care Epidemiology, Nuffield Department of Population Health, at University of Oxford (England).

She and her colleagues used the patient data to construct male and female cohorts (1,157 patients and 2,390 patients, respectively) of patients with GIDs. A patient was included in one of the two GID cohorts if he or she had an episode of care or hospital admission in which a GID or sexual transformation procedure was coded in any diagnostic position.

For males with GIDs transitioning to females, the most studied treatment regimen involves using feminizing hormones and anti-androgens, which reduce testosterone secretion or neutralize testosterone activity, the researchers noted.

They also used the database to construct male and female cohorts (4.6 million patients and 3.4 million patients, respectively) to serve as two control groups. For patients to be included in the control groups, they needed to have been first admitted to a hospital for a minor condition and to never have been admitted to a hospital for MS. Patients who had been admitted to a hospital for MS either before or at the same time they were admitted for GIDs were excluded from the GID cohorts. A patient stopped being followed upon diagnosis with MS.

“Our study design cannot give insights into mechanisms that might explain the association [between males with GIDs and MS]. However, there is evidence suggesting an association between gonadal hormones and MS, including animal models suggesting anti-inflammatory and/or neuroprotective actions of testosterone, studies indicating a high prevalence of hypogonadism in male MS patients, and improved cognitive function and slowed brain atrophy in a small pilot trial of testosterone,” the researchers noted.

The adjusted rate ratio of MS following GID in males was 6.63 (P = .0002), compared with 1.44 in females (P = .58). The adjusted rate ratios were based on 4 observed cases and 0.6 expected cases of MS in males and 5 observed cases and 3.5 expected cases of MS in females.

The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Read the study in Multiple Sclerosis Journal (doi: 10.1177/1352458515627205).

klennon@frontlinemedcom.com

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

An association between gender identity disorders (GIDs) and subsequent multiple sclerosis (MS) in males was found in an analysis of linked English Hospital Episode Statistics and mortality data from January 1999 to March 2012.

The findings “suggest that low testosterone levels and/or feminising gonadal hormones might influence MS risk in some men and highlight a need for further work to explore any potential role for gonadal hormones in management and/or prevention strategies,” wrote Dr. Julia Pakpoor of the Unit of Health-Care Epidemiology, Nuffield Department of Population Health, at University of Oxford (England).

She and her colleagues used the patient data to construct male and female cohorts (1,157 patients and 2,390 patients, respectively) of patients with GIDs. A patient was included in one of the two GID cohorts if he or she had an episode of care or hospital admission in which a GID or sexual transformation procedure was coded in any diagnostic position.

For males with GIDs transitioning to females, the most studied treatment regimen involves using feminizing hormones and anti-androgens, which reduce testosterone secretion or neutralize testosterone activity, the researchers noted.

They also used the database to construct male and female cohorts (4.6 million patients and 3.4 million patients, respectively) to serve as two control groups. For patients to be included in the control groups, they needed to have been first admitted to a hospital for a minor condition and to never have been admitted to a hospital for MS. Patients who had been admitted to a hospital for MS either before or at the same time they were admitted for GIDs were excluded from the GID cohorts. A patient stopped being followed upon diagnosis with MS.

“Our study design cannot give insights into mechanisms that might explain the association [between males with GIDs and MS]. However, there is evidence suggesting an association between gonadal hormones and MS, including animal models suggesting anti-inflammatory and/or neuroprotective actions of testosterone, studies indicating a high prevalence of hypogonadism in male MS patients, and improved cognitive function and slowed brain atrophy in a small pilot trial of testosterone,” the researchers noted.

The adjusted rate ratio of MS following GID in males was 6.63 (P = .0002), compared with 1.44 in females (P = .58). The adjusted rate ratios were based on 4 observed cases and 0.6 expected cases of MS in males and 5 observed cases and 3.5 expected cases of MS in females.

The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Read the study in Multiple Sclerosis Journal (doi: 10.1177/1352458515627205).

klennon@frontlinemedcom.com

An association between gender identity disorders (GIDs) and subsequent multiple sclerosis (MS) in males was found in an analysis of linked English Hospital Episode Statistics and mortality data from January 1999 to March 2012.

The findings “suggest that low testosterone levels and/or feminising gonadal hormones might influence MS risk in some men and highlight a need for further work to explore any potential role for gonadal hormones in management and/or prevention strategies,” wrote Dr. Julia Pakpoor of the Unit of Health-Care Epidemiology, Nuffield Department of Population Health, at University of Oxford (England).

She and her colleagues used the patient data to construct male and female cohorts (1,157 patients and 2,390 patients, respectively) of patients with GIDs. A patient was included in one of the two GID cohorts if he or she had an episode of care or hospital admission in which a GID or sexual transformation procedure was coded in any diagnostic position.

For males with GIDs transitioning to females, the most studied treatment regimen involves using feminizing hormones and anti-androgens, which reduce testosterone secretion or neutralize testosterone activity, the researchers noted.

They also used the database to construct male and female cohorts (4.6 million patients and 3.4 million patients, respectively) to serve as two control groups. For patients to be included in the control groups, they needed to have been first admitted to a hospital for a minor condition and to never have been admitted to a hospital for MS. Patients who had been admitted to a hospital for MS either before or at the same time they were admitted for GIDs were excluded from the GID cohorts. A patient stopped being followed upon diagnosis with MS.

“Our study design cannot give insights into mechanisms that might explain the association [between males with GIDs and MS]. However, there is evidence suggesting an association between gonadal hormones and MS, including animal models suggesting anti-inflammatory and/or neuroprotective actions of testosterone, studies indicating a high prevalence of hypogonadism in male MS patients, and improved cognitive function and slowed brain atrophy in a small pilot trial of testosterone,” the researchers noted.

The adjusted rate ratio of MS following GID in males was 6.63 (P = .0002), compared with 1.44 in females (P = .58). The adjusted rate ratios were based on 4 observed cases and 0.6 expected cases of MS in males and 5 observed cases and 3.5 expected cases of MS in females.

The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Read the study in Multiple Sclerosis Journal (doi: 10.1177/1352458515627205).

klennon@frontlinemedcom.com

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Gender identity disorders in males associated with MS
Display Headline
Gender identity disorders in males associated with MS
Article Source

FROM MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Phenytoin trial in optic neuritis hints at neuroprotection

Interpret neuroprotection results with caution
Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/16/2019 - 15:45
Display Headline
Phenytoin trial in optic neuritis hints at neuroprotection

Patients with acute demyelinating optic neuritis who received the anticonvulsant drug phenytoin lost 30% less of their retinal nerve fiber layer than did placebo-treated patients in a randomized, phase II study.

“The results of this clinical trial support the concept of neuroprotection using phenytoin to inhibit voltage-gated sodium channels in patients with acute optic neuritis,” wrote Dr. Rhian Raftopoulos of the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, and coauthors (Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00004-1).

Courtesy National Eye Institute

The study in 86 individuals with acute optic neuritis randomized 29 participants to receive 4 mg/kg per day of oral phenytoin, 13 to 6 mg/kg per day of oral phenytoin, and 44 to placebo for 3 months; all were randomized within 14 days of vision loss. One-third of the patients had previously been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis or were diagnosed at presentation, and 74% had at least one brain lesion on MRI.

Treatment with phenytoin resulted in a decline of mean retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in the affected eye from 130.62 mcm at baseline to 81.46 mcm at 6 months, compared with a decline from 125.20 mcm to 74.29 mcm in the placebo group, representing an adjusted mean difference of 7.15 mcm that reached statistical significance.

The researchers also noted a significant 34% reduction in macular volume loss in the treatment arm, compared with placebo, representing an adjusted mean difference of 0.20 mm3. However, the treatment had no significant effect on low-contrast visual acuity and visual evoked potentials.

The most common adverse event in the treatment arm was maculopapular rash, which was judged as severe in one patient treated with phenytoin.

The study was supported by the U.S. National Multiple Sclerosis Society, the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Novartis, the U.K. National Institute for Health Research, and the NIHR UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Centre. Several authors declared personal fees, trial funding, grants, and consultancies for pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis.

References

Body

The absence of regular, early outcome assessments around 1-2 months after initiation of treatment makes it hard to interpret the results because they would have helped to rule out a primarily anti-inflammatory effect of the treatment by tracking retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) swelling and possible optic nerve inflammation, especially given that there was higher baseline RNFL thickness and worse low-contrast visual acuity in the patients who received phenytoin. If the true RNFL thickness at baseline in the affected eye of patients in the phenytoin group was higher than those in the placebo group, it could have accounted for the findings even though the investigators made a prespecified adjustment for it.

Although the results of this study are a major advancement and undeniably encouraging, future studies need to include more frequent OCT sampling, as well as more detailed OCT-segmentation-derived retinal measures such as ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer thickness, which do not swell during acute optic neuritis, mitigating the need for statistical corrections involving the unaffected eye.

Dr. Shiv Saidha and Dr. Peter A. Calabresi are from the division of neuroimmunology and neurological infections at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. These comments were taken from an accompanying editorial (Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00024-7). Dr. Saidha declared receiving funding support, consulting fees, grant support, speaking honoraria, and advisory board positions with the pharmaceutical industry, including companies that market MS drugs. Dr. Calabresi declared consultancies, research funding, and advisory board positions with the pharmaceutical industry, including companies that market MS drugs.

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Body

The absence of regular, early outcome assessments around 1-2 months after initiation of treatment makes it hard to interpret the results because they would have helped to rule out a primarily anti-inflammatory effect of the treatment by tracking retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) swelling and possible optic nerve inflammation, especially given that there was higher baseline RNFL thickness and worse low-contrast visual acuity in the patients who received phenytoin. If the true RNFL thickness at baseline in the affected eye of patients in the phenytoin group was higher than those in the placebo group, it could have accounted for the findings even though the investigators made a prespecified adjustment for it.

Although the results of this study are a major advancement and undeniably encouraging, future studies need to include more frequent OCT sampling, as well as more detailed OCT-segmentation-derived retinal measures such as ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer thickness, which do not swell during acute optic neuritis, mitigating the need for statistical corrections involving the unaffected eye.

Dr. Shiv Saidha and Dr. Peter A. Calabresi are from the division of neuroimmunology and neurological infections at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. These comments were taken from an accompanying editorial (Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00024-7). Dr. Saidha declared receiving funding support, consulting fees, grant support, speaking honoraria, and advisory board positions with the pharmaceutical industry, including companies that market MS drugs. Dr. Calabresi declared consultancies, research funding, and advisory board positions with the pharmaceutical industry, including companies that market MS drugs.

Body

The absence of regular, early outcome assessments around 1-2 months after initiation of treatment makes it hard to interpret the results because they would have helped to rule out a primarily anti-inflammatory effect of the treatment by tracking retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) swelling and possible optic nerve inflammation, especially given that there was higher baseline RNFL thickness and worse low-contrast visual acuity in the patients who received phenytoin. If the true RNFL thickness at baseline in the affected eye of patients in the phenytoin group was higher than those in the placebo group, it could have accounted for the findings even though the investigators made a prespecified adjustment for it.

Although the results of this study are a major advancement and undeniably encouraging, future studies need to include more frequent OCT sampling, as well as more detailed OCT-segmentation-derived retinal measures such as ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer thickness, which do not swell during acute optic neuritis, mitigating the need for statistical corrections involving the unaffected eye.

Dr. Shiv Saidha and Dr. Peter A. Calabresi are from the division of neuroimmunology and neurological infections at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. These comments were taken from an accompanying editorial (Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00024-7). Dr. Saidha declared receiving funding support, consulting fees, grant support, speaking honoraria, and advisory board positions with the pharmaceutical industry, including companies that market MS drugs. Dr. Calabresi declared consultancies, research funding, and advisory board positions with the pharmaceutical industry, including companies that market MS drugs.

Title
Interpret neuroprotection results with caution
Interpret neuroprotection results with caution

Patients with acute demyelinating optic neuritis who received the anticonvulsant drug phenytoin lost 30% less of their retinal nerve fiber layer than did placebo-treated patients in a randomized, phase II study.

“The results of this clinical trial support the concept of neuroprotection using phenytoin to inhibit voltage-gated sodium channels in patients with acute optic neuritis,” wrote Dr. Rhian Raftopoulos of the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, and coauthors (Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00004-1).

Courtesy National Eye Institute

The study in 86 individuals with acute optic neuritis randomized 29 participants to receive 4 mg/kg per day of oral phenytoin, 13 to 6 mg/kg per day of oral phenytoin, and 44 to placebo for 3 months; all were randomized within 14 days of vision loss. One-third of the patients had previously been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis or were diagnosed at presentation, and 74% had at least one brain lesion on MRI.

Treatment with phenytoin resulted in a decline of mean retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in the affected eye from 130.62 mcm at baseline to 81.46 mcm at 6 months, compared with a decline from 125.20 mcm to 74.29 mcm in the placebo group, representing an adjusted mean difference of 7.15 mcm that reached statistical significance.

The researchers also noted a significant 34% reduction in macular volume loss in the treatment arm, compared with placebo, representing an adjusted mean difference of 0.20 mm3. However, the treatment had no significant effect on low-contrast visual acuity and visual evoked potentials.

The most common adverse event in the treatment arm was maculopapular rash, which was judged as severe in one patient treated with phenytoin.

The study was supported by the U.S. National Multiple Sclerosis Society, the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Novartis, the U.K. National Institute for Health Research, and the NIHR UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Centre. Several authors declared personal fees, trial funding, grants, and consultancies for pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis.

Patients with acute demyelinating optic neuritis who received the anticonvulsant drug phenytoin lost 30% less of their retinal nerve fiber layer than did placebo-treated patients in a randomized, phase II study.

“The results of this clinical trial support the concept of neuroprotection using phenytoin to inhibit voltage-gated sodium channels in patients with acute optic neuritis,” wrote Dr. Rhian Raftopoulos of the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, and coauthors (Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00004-1).

Courtesy National Eye Institute

The study in 86 individuals with acute optic neuritis randomized 29 participants to receive 4 mg/kg per day of oral phenytoin, 13 to 6 mg/kg per day of oral phenytoin, and 44 to placebo for 3 months; all were randomized within 14 days of vision loss. One-third of the patients had previously been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis or were diagnosed at presentation, and 74% had at least one brain lesion on MRI.

Treatment with phenytoin resulted in a decline of mean retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in the affected eye from 130.62 mcm at baseline to 81.46 mcm at 6 months, compared with a decline from 125.20 mcm to 74.29 mcm in the placebo group, representing an adjusted mean difference of 7.15 mcm that reached statistical significance.

The researchers also noted a significant 34% reduction in macular volume loss in the treatment arm, compared with placebo, representing an adjusted mean difference of 0.20 mm3. However, the treatment had no significant effect on low-contrast visual acuity and visual evoked potentials.

The most common adverse event in the treatment arm was maculopapular rash, which was judged as severe in one patient treated with phenytoin.

The study was supported by the U.S. National Multiple Sclerosis Society, the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Novartis, the U.K. National Institute for Health Research, and the NIHR UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Centre. Several authors declared personal fees, trial funding, grants, and consultancies for pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Phenytoin trial in optic neuritis hints at neuroprotection
Display Headline
Phenytoin trial in optic neuritis hints at neuroprotection
Article Source

FROM LANCET NEUROLOGY

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Phenytoin treatment is associated with a reduction in retinal nerve fiber layer loss in individuals with demyelinating optic neuritis.

Major finding: Treatment with phenytoin was associated with a 30% reduction in the extent of retinal nerve fiber layer loss, compared with placebo.

Data source: Randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial in 86 individuals with acute demyelinating optic neuritis.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the U.S. National Multiple Sclerosis Society, the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Novartis, the U.K. National Institute for Health Research, and the NIHR UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Centre. Several authors declared personal fees, trial funding, grants, and consultancies for pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis.

Three lesions needed for MRI diagnosis of MS

A step forward for MS diagnosis
Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 15:39
Display Headline
Three lesions needed for MRI diagnosis of MS

A European expert group has proposed several revisions to the 2010 McDonald criteria for the use of MRI in diagnosing multiple sclerosis.

The MAGNIMS collaborative research network argued that new data on the application of MRI, as well as improvements in MRI technology, demanded changes to the multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostic criteria.

The first proposed recommendation is that three or more focal lesions, rather than a single lesion, should be present to diagnose the involvement of the periventricular region and to show disease dissemination in space (Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422[15]00393-2).

HUNG KUO CHUN/Thinkstock

“A single lesion was deemed not sufficiently specific to determine whether involvement of the periventricular region is due to a demyelinating inflammatory event, and the use of one periventricular lesion for assessing dissemination in space has never been formally validated,” wrote Dr. Massimo Filippi of Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, and his coauthors.

They also pointed out that incidental periventricular lesions can be found in up to 30% of patients with migraine, and in individuals with other neurologic disorders.

In addition, the group recommended that optic nerve lesions be added to the criteria for dissemination in space.

“Clinical documentation of optic nerve atrophy or pallor, neurophysiological confirmation of optic nerve dysfunction (slowed conduction), or imaging features of clinically silent optic nerve inflammation (MRI lesions or retinal nerve fiber layer thinning) support dissemination in space and, in patients without concurrent visual symptoms, dissemination in time.”

According to the new recommendations, disease dissemination in space can be shown by the involvement of at least two areas from a list of five possibilities: three or more periventricular lesions, one or more infratentorial lesions, one or more spinal cord lesions, one or more optic nerve lesions, or one or more cortical or juxtacortical lesions.

However, the group did not propose any significant changes to the criteria for dissemination in time, other than saying that the presence of nonenhancing black holes should not be considered as a potential alternative criterion to show dissemination in time in adult patients.

The committee also backed the existing recommendations that children aged 11 years or older with nonacute disseminated encephalomyelitis–like presentation should be diagnosed with the same criteria as adults, for dissemination in time and space.

“Several studies have confirmed that the 2010 McDonald criteria perform better than or similar to previously proposed pediatric MS criteria for diagnosis of children with nonacute disseminated encephalomyelitis presentations and pediatric patients older than 11 years, and the consensus group therefore recommend caution when using these criteria in children younger than 11 years,” they wrote.

Other recommendations include that there be no distinction required between symptomatic and asymptomatic MRI lesions for diagnosing dissemination in time or space; that the whole spinal cord be imaged to define dissemination in space, particularly in patients who do not fulfill the brain MRI criteria; and that the same criteria for dissemination in space be used for both primary progressive MS and relapse-onset MS, with cerebrospinal fluid results considered for clinically uncertain cases of primary progressive MS.

The expenses of the workshop where the recommendations were formulated were supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Novartis. The authors of the paper declared grants, consultancies, speaking fees, travel support, and honoraria from numerous pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis.

References

Body

Dr. Robert J. Fox

Including the initial symptomatic lesion in the lesion count to satisfy criteria for dissemination in space and time might be the most useful contribution of the revised criteria to clinical practice.

In addition, the broad applicability of the MRI criteria were affirmed in primary progressive multiple sclerosis, relapse-onset multiple sclerosis, children aged 11 years or older without an acute disseminated encephalomyelitis presentation, and patients with multiple sclerosis in Asia and Latin America.

Dr. Robert J. Fox is from the Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research at the Cleveland Clinic. These comments were taken from an accompanying editorial (Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422[16]00023-5). Dr. Fox declared personal consulting fees from Actelion, Biogen, Genentech, Mallinckrodt, MedDay, Novartis, Teva, and XenoPort; advisory committee roles for Biogen and Novartis; and research grant funding from Novartis.

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Body

Dr. Robert J. Fox

Including the initial symptomatic lesion in the lesion count to satisfy criteria for dissemination in space and time might be the most useful contribution of the revised criteria to clinical practice.

In addition, the broad applicability of the MRI criteria were affirmed in primary progressive multiple sclerosis, relapse-onset multiple sclerosis, children aged 11 years or older without an acute disseminated encephalomyelitis presentation, and patients with multiple sclerosis in Asia and Latin America.

Dr. Robert J. Fox is from the Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research at the Cleveland Clinic. These comments were taken from an accompanying editorial (Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422[16]00023-5). Dr. Fox declared personal consulting fees from Actelion, Biogen, Genentech, Mallinckrodt, MedDay, Novartis, Teva, and XenoPort; advisory committee roles for Biogen and Novartis; and research grant funding from Novartis.

Body

Dr. Robert J. Fox

Including the initial symptomatic lesion in the lesion count to satisfy criteria for dissemination in space and time might be the most useful contribution of the revised criteria to clinical practice.

In addition, the broad applicability of the MRI criteria were affirmed in primary progressive multiple sclerosis, relapse-onset multiple sclerosis, children aged 11 years or older without an acute disseminated encephalomyelitis presentation, and patients with multiple sclerosis in Asia and Latin America.

Dr. Robert J. Fox is from the Mellen Center for MS Treatment and Research at the Cleveland Clinic. These comments were taken from an accompanying editorial (Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422[16]00023-5). Dr. Fox declared personal consulting fees from Actelion, Biogen, Genentech, Mallinckrodt, MedDay, Novartis, Teva, and XenoPort; advisory committee roles for Biogen and Novartis; and research grant funding from Novartis.

Title
A step forward for MS diagnosis
A step forward for MS diagnosis

A European expert group has proposed several revisions to the 2010 McDonald criteria for the use of MRI in diagnosing multiple sclerosis.

The MAGNIMS collaborative research network argued that new data on the application of MRI, as well as improvements in MRI technology, demanded changes to the multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostic criteria.

The first proposed recommendation is that three or more focal lesions, rather than a single lesion, should be present to diagnose the involvement of the periventricular region and to show disease dissemination in space (Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422[15]00393-2).

HUNG KUO CHUN/Thinkstock

“A single lesion was deemed not sufficiently specific to determine whether involvement of the periventricular region is due to a demyelinating inflammatory event, and the use of one periventricular lesion for assessing dissemination in space has never been formally validated,” wrote Dr. Massimo Filippi of Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, and his coauthors.

They also pointed out that incidental periventricular lesions can be found in up to 30% of patients with migraine, and in individuals with other neurologic disorders.

In addition, the group recommended that optic nerve lesions be added to the criteria for dissemination in space.

“Clinical documentation of optic nerve atrophy or pallor, neurophysiological confirmation of optic nerve dysfunction (slowed conduction), or imaging features of clinically silent optic nerve inflammation (MRI lesions or retinal nerve fiber layer thinning) support dissemination in space and, in patients without concurrent visual symptoms, dissemination in time.”

According to the new recommendations, disease dissemination in space can be shown by the involvement of at least two areas from a list of five possibilities: three or more periventricular lesions, one or more infratentorial lesions, one or more spinal cord lesions, one or more optic nerve lesions, or one or more cortical or juxtacortical lesions.

However, the group did not propose any significant changes to the criteria for dissemination in time, other than saying that the presence of nonenhancing black holes should not be considered as a potential alternative criterion to show dissemination in time in adult patients.

The committee also backed the existing recommendations that children aged 11 years or older with nonacute disseminated encephalomyelitis–like presentation should be diagnosed with the same criteria as adults, for dissemination in time and space.

“Several studies have confirmed that the 2010 McDonald criteria perform better than or similar to previously proposed pediatric MS criteria for diagnosis of children with nonacute disseminated encephalomyelitis presentations and pediatric patients older than 11 years, and the consensus group therefore recommend caution when using these criteria in children younger than 11 years,” they wrote.

Other recommendations include that there be no distinction required between symptomatic and asymptomatic MRI lesions for diagnosing dissemination in time or space; that the whole spinal cord be imaged to define dissemination in space, particularly in patients who do not fulfill the brain MRI criteria; and that the same criteria for dissemination in space be used for both primary progressive MS and relapse-onset MS, with cerebrospinal fluid results considered for clinically uncertain cases of primary progressive MS.

The expenses of the workshop where the recommendations were formulated were supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Novartis. The authors of the paper declared grants, consultancies, speaking fees, travel support, and honoraria from numerous pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis.

A European expert group has proposed several revisions to the 2010 McDonald criteria for the use of MRI in diagnosing multiple sclerosis.

The MAGNIMS collaborative research network argued that new data on the application of MRI, as well as improvements in MRI technology, demanded changes to the multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostic criteria.

The first proposed recommendation is that three or more focal lesions, rather than a single lesion, should be present to diagnose the involvement of the periventricular region and to show disease dissemination in space (Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan 25. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422[15]00393-2).

HUNG KUO CHUN/Thinkstock

“A single lesion was deemed not sufficiently specific to determine whether involvement of the periventricular region is due to a demyelinating inflammatory event, and the use of one periventricular lesion for assessing dissemination in space has never been formally validated,” wrote Dr. Massimo Filippi of Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, and his coauthors.

They also pointed out that incidental periventricular lesions can be found in up to 30% of patients with migraine, and in individuals with other neurologic disorders.

In addition, the group recommended that optic nerve lesions be added to the criteria for dissemination in space.

“Clinical documentation of optic nerve atrophy or pallor, neurophysiological confirmation of optic nerve dysfunction (slowed conduction), or imaging features of clinically silent optic nerve inflammation (MRI lesions or retinal nerve fiber layer thinning) support dissemination in space and, in patients without concurrent visual symptoms, dissemination in time.”

According to the new recommendations, disease dissemination in space can be shown by the involvement of at least two areas from a list of five possibilities: three or more periventricular lesions, one or more infratentorial lesions, one or more spinal cord lesions, one or more optic nerve lesions, or one or more cortical or juxtacortical lesions.

However, the group did not propose any significant changes to the criteria for dissemination in time, other than saying that the presence of nonenhancing black holes should not be considered as a potential alternative criterion to show dissemination in time in adult patients.

The committee also backed the existing recommendations that children aged 11 years or older with nonacute disseminated encephalomyelitis–like presentation should be diagnosed with the same criteria as adults, for dissemination in time and space.

“Several studies have confirmed that the 2010 McDonald criteria perform better than or similar to previously proposed pediatric MS criteria for diagnosis of children with nonacute disseminated encephalomyelitis presentations and pediatric patients older than 11 years, and the consensus group therefore recommend caution when using these criteria in children younger than 11 years,” they wrote.

Other recommendations include that there be no distinction required between symptomatic and asymptomatic MRI lesions for diagnosing dissemination in time or space; that the whole spinal cord be imaged to define dissemination in space, particularly in patients who do not fulfill the brain MRI criteria; and that the same criteria for dissemination in space be used for both primary progressive MS and relapse-onset MS, with cerebrospinal fluid results considered for clinically uncertain cases of primary progressive MS.

The expenses of the workshop where the recommendations were formulated were supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Novartis. The authors of the paper declared grants, consultancies, speaking fees, travel support, and honoraria from numerous pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Three lesions needed for MRI diagnosis of MS
Display Headline
Three lesions needed for MRI diagnosis of MS
Article Source

FROM LANCET NEUROLOGY

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Molecular Biomarkers May Predict Conversion to MS

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/16/2019 - 15:45
Display Headline
Molecular Biomarkers May Predict Conversion to MS

BARCELONA—CSF levels of chitinase 3-like-1 protein and of the light subunit of neurofilaments predict conversion to multiple sclerosis (MS) and the development of neurologic disability in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), according to an overview presented at the 31st Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). Ongoing research will indicate whether combinations of CSF biomarkers provide more accurate prognoses than individual biomarkers do.

Clinical manifestations, disease course, radiologic findings, histopathologic characteristics of lesions, and response to treatment vary greatly among patients with MS. The heterogeneity of the disease creates a need for reliable biomarkers that may improve diagnosis, stratification, prediction of disease course, identification of new therapies, and development of personalized therapy, said Manuel Comabella, MD, Head of the Laboratory of the Clinical Neuroimmunology Unit at the MS Center of Catalonia in Barcelona.

Neurofilament Proteins

Previous studies indicate that CSF oligoclonal bands and the 14-3-3 protein individually predict conversion from CIS to MS. Newer research indicates that the levels of neurofilament proteins in CSF can help neurologists quantify axonal damage. Neurofilaments comprise heavy, medium, and light subunits, and neurofilaments’ axonal diameter is influenced by the degree to which they are phosphorylated. Pathologic processes that cause axonal damage release the neurofilament proteins into the CSF, where they can be detected.

Teunissen et al observed that CSF levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments were significantly higher in patients with CIS who converted to clinically definite MS, compared with patients with CIS who did not convert. More recently, Modvig and colleagues found that levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments predicted long-term disability, as measured by the MS severity scale and the nine-hole peg test, in patients with optic neuritis after more than three years of follow-up.

Levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments also may predict disease progression in patients with MS. Investigators found that conversion from relapsing-remitting MS to secondary progressive MS was more likely among patients with high levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments, compared with patients with intermediate or undetectable levels. Also, case reviews indicate that common MS therapies such as natalizumab or fingolimod modify CSF levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments, “which suggests that they can be used as a biomarker to monitor the response to therapies and … the neuroprotective effects of treatments,” said Dr. Comabella.

Chitinase 3-Like-1 Protein

Investigators also have examined chitinase 3-like-1 protein as a potential biomarker. The protein results from strong proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β. Serum and plasma levels of the protein usually are elevated in people with disorders characterized by chronic inflammation.

Dr. Comabella and colleagues conducted a study to identify CSF biomarkers associated with conversion from CIS to MS. The investigators classified patients into two groups. One group included patients with CIS who had a normal MRI and were positive for IgG oligoclonal bands at baseline, and who converted to clinically definite MS during follow-up. The other group included patients with CIS who had a normal MRI at baseline and after five years of follow-up, were negative for IgG oligoclonal bands, and did not convert to MS during follow-up.

The investigators applied a mass-spectrometry-based proteomic approach to identify proteins that were present in different quantities in the CSF of patients who converted to MS, compared with those who did not. They found that CSF levels of chitinase 3-like-1 protein were significantly higher in patients who converted to MS, compared with those who did not. CSF levels of the protein also correlated with MRI abnormalities at baseline and with disability progression during follow-up. In addition, high levels of chitinase 3-like-1 protein were associated with a shorter time to MS.

These results prompted Dr. Comabella’s group to begin a study evaluating chitinase 3-like-1 protein as a prognostic biomarker for conversion to MS. The investigators examined more than 800 CSF samples from patients with CIS. They used multivariable Cox regression models to investigate the association between CSF chitinase 3-like-1 protein levels and the time to MS, based on Poser or 2005 McDonald criteria, and also based on the time to reach an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3.

CSF levels of chitinase 3-like-1 protein were a risk factor for conversion to MS, independent of other predictors such as IgG oligoclonal bands and MRI. Chitinase 3-like-1 protein levels were the only significant independent risk factor associated with the development of neurologic disability, with a hazard ratio of approximately 4. “A chitinase level of 170 ng/mL was the best cutoff that allowed us to classify protein levels into high and low, and 44% of the patients had protein levels above this cutoff,” said Dr. Comabella. Levels higher than 170 ng/mL were associated with a shorter time to MS and with faster development of disability.

 

 

Dr. Comabella’s results are consistent with those of other recent investigations of the protein. Using a similar proteomic approach, Hinsinger et al identified chitinase 3-like-1 protein as one of the best predictors of conversion to MS. They identified 189 ng/ml as the cutoff that best classified protein levels as high or low. Levels above the cutoff were associated with shorter time to MS, based on the 2005 McDonald criteria. Also, Modvig’s study of patients with optic neuritis found that chitinase 3-like-1 protein, MRI, and age together were the best predictor of clinically definite MS. The protein also predicted long-term cognitive impairment in that study.

Do Biomarker Combinations Improve Predictions?

Combinations of biomarkers may improve prognostic predictions for patients with CIS, compared with individual biomarkers, said Dr. Comabella. He and his colleagues are investigating the predictive value of the combination of chitinase 3-like-1 protein, dipeptidase, and semaphorin 7A. Data suggest that this combination is better at distinguishing between patients with CIS who convert to MS and those who do not, compared with each biomarker considered individually.

Dr. Comabella’s group also is investigating the potential neurotoxic effect of chitinase 3-like-1 protein. They are adding the protein to primary cultures of neurons at the concentrations above and below the cutoff of 170 ng/ml. Preliminary data suggest that the protein is neurotoxic.

Erik Greb

References

Suggested Reading
Comabella M, Fernández M, Martin R, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid chitinase 3-like 1 levels are associated with conversion to multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2010;133(Pt 4):1082-1093.
Hinsinger G, Galéotti N, Nabholz N, et al. Chitinase 3-like proteins as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2015;21(10):1251-1261.
Modvig S, Degn M, Roed H, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of chitinase 3-like 1 and neurofilament light chain predict multiple sclerosis development and disability after optic neuritis. Mult Scler. 2015;21(14):1761-1770.

Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(2)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
28
Legacy Keywords
neurofilament protein, chitinase 3-like-1, CIS, Erik Greb, Neurology Reviews, Manuel Comabella
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

BARCELONA—CSF levels of chitinase 3-like-1 protein and of the light subunit of neurofilaments predict conversion to multiple sclerosis (MS) and the development of neurologic disability in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), according to an overview presented at the 31st Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). Ongoing research will indicate whether combinations of CSF biomarkers provide more accurate prognoses than individual biomarkers do.

Clinical manifestations, disease course, radiologic findings, histopathologic characteristics of lesions, and response to treatment vary greatly among patients with MS. The heterogeneity of the disease creates a need for reliable biomarkers that may improve diagnosis, stratification, prediction of disease course, identification of new therapies, and development of personalized therapy, said Manuel Comabella, MD, Head of the Laboratory of the Clinical Neuroimmunology Unit at the MS Center of Catalonia in Barcelona.

Neurofilament Proteins

Previous studies indicate that CSF oligoclonal bands and the 14-3-3 protein individually predict conversion from CIS to MS. Newer research indicates that the levels of neurofilament proteins in CSF can help neurologists quantify axonal damage. Neurofilaments comprise heavy, medium, and light subunits, and neurofilaments’ axonal diameter is influenced by the degree to which they are phosphorylated. Pathologic processes that cause axonal damage release the neurofilament proteins into the CSF, where they can be detected.

Teunissen et al observed that CSF levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments were significantly higher in patients with CIS who converted to clinically definite MS, compared with patients with CIS who did not convert. More recently, Modvig and colleagues found that levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments predicted long-term disability, as measured by the MS severity scale and the nine-hole peg test, in patients with optic neuritis after more than three years of follow-up.

Levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments also may predict disease progression in patients with MS. Investigators found that conversion from relapsing-remitting MS to secondary progressive MS was more likely among patients with high levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments, compared with patients with intermediate or undetectable levels. Also, case reviews indicate that common MS therapies such as natalizumab or fingolimod modify CSF levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments, “which suggests that they can be used as a biomarker to monitor the response to therapies and … the neuroprotective effects of treatments,” said Dr. Comabella.

Chitinase 3-Like-1 Protein

Investigators also have examined chitinase 3-like-1 protein as a potential biomarker. The protein results from strong proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β. Serum and plasma levels of the protein usually are elevated in people with disorders characterized by chronic inflammation.

Dr. Comabella and colleagues conducted a study to identify CSF biomarkers associated with conversion from CIS to MS. The investigators classified patients into two groups. One group included patients with CIS who had a normal MRI and were positive for IgG oligoclonal bands at baseline, and who converted to clinically definite MS during follow-up. The other group included patients with CIS who had a normal MRI at baseline and after five years of follow-up, were negative for IgG oligoclonal bands, and did not convert to MS during follow-up.

The investigators applied a mass-spectrometry-based proteomic approach to identify proteins that were present in different quantities in the CSF of patients who converted to MS, compared with those who did not. They found that CSF levels of chitinase 3-like-1 protein were significantly higher in patients who converted to MS, compared with those who did not. CSF levels of the protein also correlated with MRI abnormalities at baseline and with disability progression during follow-up. In addition, high levels of chitinase 3-like-1 protein were associated with a shorter time to MS.

These results prompted Dr. Comabella’s group to begin a study evaluating chitinase 3-like-1 protein as a prognostic biomarker for conversion to MS. The investigators examined more than 800 CSF samples from patients with CIS. They used multivariable Cox regression models to investigate the association between CSF chitinase 3-like-1 protein levels and the time to MS, based on Poser or 2005 McDonald criteria, and also based on the time to reach an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3.

CSF levels of chitinase 3-like-1 protein were a risk factor for conversion to MS, independent of other predictors such as IgG oligoclonal bands and MRI. Chitinase 3-like-1 protein levels were the only significant independent risk factor associated with the development of neurologic disability, with a hazard ratio of approximately 4. “A chitinase level of 170 ng/mL was the best cutoff that allowed us to classify protein levels into high and low, and 44% of the patients had protein levels above this cutoff,” said Dr. Comabella. Levels higher than 170 ng/mL were associated with a shorter time to MS and with faster development of disability.

 

 

Dr. Comabella’s results are consistent with those of other recent investigations of the protein. Using a similar proteomic approach, Hinsinger et al identified chitinase 3-like-1 protein as one of the best predictors of conversion to MS. They identified 189 ng/ml as the cutoff that best classified protein levels as high or low. Levels above the cutoff were associated with shorter time to MS, based on the 2005 McDonald criteria. Also, Modvig’s study of patients with optic neuritis found that chitinase 3-like-1 protein, MRI, and age together were the best predictor of clinically definite MS. The protein also predicted long-term cognitive impairment in that study.

Do Biomarker Combinations Improve Predictions?

Combinations of biomarkers may improve prognostic predictions for patients with CIS, compared with individual biomarkers, said Dr. Comabella. He and his colleagues are investigating the predictive value of the combination of chitinase 3-like-1 protein, dipeptidase, and semaphorin 7A. Data suggest that this combination is better at distinguishing between patients with CIS who convert to MS and those who do not, compared with each biomarker considered individually.

Dr. Comabella’s group also is investigating the potential neurotoxic effect of chitinase 3-like-1 protein. They are adding the protein to primary cultures of neurons at the concentrations above and below the cutoff of 170 ng/ml. Preliminary data suggest that the protein is neurotoxic.

Erik Greb

BARCELONA—CSF levels of chitinase 3-like-1 protein and of the light subunit of neurofilaments predict conversion to multiple sclerosis (MS) and the development of neurologic disability in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), according to an overview presented at the 31st Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). Ongoing research will indicate whether combinations of CSF biomarkers provide more accurate prognoses than individual biomarkers do.

Clinical manifestations, disease course, radiologic findings, histopathologic characteristics of lesions, and response to treatment vary greatly among patients with MS. The heterogeneity of the disease creates a need for reliable biomarkers that may improve diagnosis, stratification, prediction of disease course, identification of new therapies, and development of personalized therapy, said Manuel Comabella, MD, Head of the Laboratory of the Clinical Neuroimmunology Unit at the MS Center of Catalonia in Barcelona.

Neurofilament Proteins

Previous studies indicate that CSF oligoclonal bands and the 14-3-3 protein individually predict conversion from CIS to MS. Newer research indicates that the levels of neurofilament proteins in CSF can help neurologists quantify axonal damage. Neurofilaments comprise heavy, medium, and light subunits, and neurofilaments’ axonal diameter is influenced by the degree to which they are phosphorylated. Pathologic processes that cause axonal damage release the neurofilament proteins into the CSF, where they can be detected.

Teunissen et al observed that CSF levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments were significantly higher in patients with CIS who converted to clinically definite MS, compared with patients with CIS who did not convert. More recently, Modvig and colleagues found that levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments predicted long-term disability, as measured by the MS severity scale and the nine-hole peg test, in patients with optic neuritis after more than three years of follow-up.

Levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments also may predict disease progression in patients with MS. Investigators found that conversion from relapsing-remitting MS to secondary progressive MS was more likely among patients with high levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments, compared with patients with intermediate or undetectable levels. Also, case reviews indicate that common MS therapies such as natalizumab or fingolimod modify CSF levels of the light subunit of the neurofilaments, “which suggests that they can be used as a biomarker to monitor the response to therapies and … the neuroprotective effects of treatments,” said Dr. Comabella.

Chitinase 3-Like-1 Protein

Investigators also have examined chitinase 3-like-1 protein as a potential biomarker. The protein results from strong proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β. Serum and plasma levels of the protein usually are elevated in people with disorders characterized by chronic inflammation.

Dr. Comabella and colleagues conducted a study to identify CSF biomarkers associated with conversion from CIS to MS. The investigators classified patients into two groups. One group included patients with CIS who had a normal MRI and were positive for IgG oligoclonal bands at baseline, and who converted to clinically definite MS during follow-up. The other group included patients with CIS who had a normal MRI at baseline and after five years of follow-up, were negative for IgG oligoclonal bands, and did not convert to MS during follow-up.

The investigators applied a mass-spectrometry-based proteomic approach to identify proteins that were present in different quantities in the CSF of patients who converted to MS, compared with those who did not. They found that CSF levels of chitinase 3-like-1 protein were significantly higher in patients who converted to MS, compared with those who did not. CSF levels of the protein also correlated with MRI abnormalities at baseline and with disability progression during follow-up. In addition, high levels of chitinase 3-like-1 protein were associated with a shorter time to MS.

These results prompted Dr. Comabella’s group to begin a study evaluating chitinase 3-like-1 protein as a prognostic biomarker for conversion to MS. The investigators examined more than 800 CSF samples from patients with CIS. They used multivariable Cox regression models to investigate the association between CSF chitinase 3-like-1 protein levels and the time to MS, based on Poser or 2005 McDonald criteria, and also based on the time to reach an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3.

CSF levels of chitinase 3-like-1 protein were a risk factor for conversion to MS, independent of other predictors such as IgG oligoclonal bands and MRI. Chitinase 3-like-1 protein levels were the only significant independent risk factor associated with the development of neurologic disability, with a hazard ratio of approximately 4. “A chitinase level of 170 ng/mL was the best cutoff that allowed us to classify protein levels into high and low, and 44% of the patients had protein levels above this cutoff,” said Dr. Comabella. Levels higher than 170 ng/mL were associated with a shorter time to MS and with faster development of disability.

 

 

Dr. Comabella’s results are consistent with those of other recent investigations of the protein. Using a similar proteomic approach, Hinsinger et al identified chitinase 3-like-1 protein as one of the best predictors of conversion to MS. They identified 189 ng/ml as the cutoff that best classified protein levels as high or low. Levels above the cutoff were associated with shorter time to MS, based on the 2005 McDonald criteria. Also, Modvig’s study of patients with optic neuritis found that chitinase 3-like-1 protein, MRI, and age together were the best predictor of clinically definite MS. The protein also predicted long-term cognitive impairment in that study.

Do Biomarker Combinations Improve Predictions?

Combinations of biomarkers may improve prognostic predictions for patients with CIS, compared with individual biomarkers, said Dr. Comabella. He and his colleagues are investigating the predictive value of the combination of chitinase 3-like-1 protein, dipeptidase, and semaphorin 7A. Data suggest that this combination is better at distinguishing between patients with CIS who convert to MS and those who do not, compared with each biomarker considered individually.

Dr. Comabella’s group also is investigating the potential neurotoxic effect of chitinase 3-like-1 protein. They are adding the protein to primary cultures of neurons at the concentrations above and below the cutoff of 170 ng/ml. Preliminary data suggest that the protein is neurotoxic.

Erik Greb

References

Suggested Reading
Comabella M, Fernández M, Martin R, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid chitinase 3-like 1 levels are associated with conversion to multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2010;133(Pt 4):1082-1093.
Hinsinger G, Galéotti N, Nabholz N, et al. Chitinase 3-like proteins as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2015;21(10):1251-1261.
Modvig S, Degn M, Roed H, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of chitinase 3-like 1 and neurofilament light chain predict multiple sclerosis development and disability after optic neuritis. Mult Scler. 2015;21(14):1761-1770.

References

Suggested Reading
Comabella M, Fernández M, Martin R, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid chitinase 3-like 1 levels are associated with conversion to multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2010;133(Pt 4):1082-1093.
Hinsinger G, Galéotti N, Nabholz N, et al. Chitinase 3-like proteins as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2015;21(10):1251-1261.
Modvig S, Degn M, Roed H, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid levels of chitinase 3-like 1 and neurofilament light chain predict multiple sclerosis development and disability after optic neuritis. Mult Scler. 2015;21(14):1761-1770.

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(2)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(2)
Page Number
28
Page Number
28
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Molecular Biomarkers May Predict Conversion to MS
Display Headline
Molecular Biomarkers May Predict Conversion to MS
Legacy Keywords
neurofilament protein, chitinase 3-like-1, CIS, Erik Greb, Neurology Reviews, Manuel Comabella
Legacy Keywords
neurofilament protein, chitinase 3-like-1, CIS, Erik Greb, Neurology Reviews, Manuel Comabella
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Study confirms value of watching JCV serology during natalizumab treatment

More reasons to watch for JCV index changes
Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 15:38
Display Headline
Study confirms value of watching JCV serology during natalizumab treatment

New analyses of multiple sclerosis patients taking natalizumab reemphasize the need to monitor John Cunningham virus (JCV) seroconversion and the level of anti-JCV antibody titers via JCV index values, according to a study of a pair of German and French cohorts.

Longitudinal data available for 525 German patients and 711 French patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) revealed seroconversion rates of 8.5%-10.3% per year, seroprevalence increases of 5%-6% during 15-24 months of follow-up, and increases in JCV index values of 0.091 units (12.9%) per year, which “clearly support the facilitation [of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)] by treatment with natalizumab [Tysabri]” and are “at least 8 to 10 times as much as would be expected by age,” reported Nicholas Schwab, Ph.D., of the University of Münster (Germany) and his colleagues (Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016;3:e195. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000195).

Of the longitudinally followed German patients, 186 (35.4%) were initially seropositive and 43 (12.7%) became seropositive during a mean follow-up duration of 14.8 months, or 10.3% per year. The group of 711 longitudinally followed French patients included 468 (65.8%) who were initially JCV positive. A total of 20 (8.2%) patients who were initially JCV negative seroconverted in the first year, and another 21 (8.6%) did so in the second year, for an overall rate of 8.5% per year.

A total of 525 patients had changes in the level of anti-JCV antibodies in serum (and therefore had changes in JCV index value) during the observation period. Patients with a JCV index value less than 0.4 (very low PML risk) declined from 65.1% to 61.3%, and those with values 0.4-0.9 (low risk) declined from 8.0% to 7.8%. The proportion grew from 4.6% to 5.9% for values 0.9-1.5 (medium risk) and from 22.3% to 25.0% for values greater than 1.5 (high risk). In addition to reflecting the patients’ change in serostatus, the change in PML risk levels “suggested that patients who changed serostatus directly presented with high anti-JCV antibody titers afterward, as the groups of low and medium risk did not grow substantially over time,” the researchers wrote.

A group of 201 patients who were followed over time after becoming seropositive had a mean JCV index value that rose significantly from 2.046 to 2.158 and was not attributable to aging. Rises in JCV index values of more than 30% over the course of 14.8 months occurred in 17% of the patients, compared with stable values in 80% and decreases of more than 30% in 3%. Altogether, the index value of all 201 patients rose by a mean of 0.091 units (12.9%) per year.

“Because as yet there are no studies on the influence of other treatments on JCV index values ... we cannot be certain that it was the treatment with natalizumab that led to the rising index values in our study,” the investigators wrote, although they noted that a recent study of more than 7,000 control patients with MS showed that the duration of non–natalizumab MS treatment did not influence JCV seroprevalence after adjustment for age, sex, and country of origin.

Also, even though the mean index value for JCV-positive patients was greater than 2, putting them in the highest PML risk category, the investigators noted that very few of these patients will ultimately develop PML, so “JCV serology should not be the only PML risk biomarker used in the stratification of patients treated with natalizumab.”

The study was funded by various German and French institutional and governmental grants. Many authors reported financial ties to companies marketing MS drugs, including Biogen, the manufacturer of natalizumab.

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com

References

Body

Dr. Schwab and his colleagues’ study showing high rates of seroconversion, rising seroprevalence, and increasing John Cunningham virus (JCV) index values add to growing evidence for the need to monitor JCV index values and seroconversion to determine patients’ risk for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy while taking natalizumab.

Their data extend earlier paired, longitudinal studies of natalizumab-treated patients with similar high rates of seroconversion (8%-27% per year) and rises in titers.

However, the higher replication rate of JCV implicated by rising anti-JCV titers does not mean that PML is imminent; the risk of PML in JCV-positive natalizumab-treated patients without prior immunosuppressant therapy is 1 in 1,000 per year, whereas the risk of an MS attack in untreated patients is 1 in 2 per year.

It will be important to combine JCV index with other predictive markers for PML in the future, including potential blood markers involving L-selectin expression on T cells, human leukocyte antigen subtypes, viral DNA content in circulating B cells, and numbers of cytolytic T cells, interleukin-10–positive T cells, or anti-JCV effector memory T cells.

Dr. Adil Javed and Dr. Anthony T. Reder are with the University of Chicago. This commentary summarized their editorial accompanying the study by Dr. Schwab and his colleagues (Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016;3:e199. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000199). The authors disclosed financial ties to many companies that market drugs for MS, including Biogen, which manufactures natalizumab.

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Body

Dr. Schwab and his colleagues’ study showing high rates of seroconversion, rising seroprevalence, and increasing John Cunningham virus (JCV) index values add to growing evidence for the need to monitor JCV index values and seroconversion to determine patients’ risk for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy while taking natalizumab.

Their data extend earlier paired, longitudinal studies of natalizumab-treated patients with similar high rates of seroconversion (8%-27% per year) and rises in titers.

However, the higher replication rate of JCV implicated by rising anti-JCV titers does not mean that PML is imminent; the risk of PML in JCV-positive natalizumab-treated patients without prior immunosuppressant therapy is 1 in 1,000 per year, whereas the risk of an MS attack in untreated patients is 1 in 2 per year.

It will be important to combine JCV index with other predictive markers for PML in the future, including potential blood markers involving L-selectin expression on T cells, human leukocyte antigen subtypes, viral DNA content in circulating B cells, and numbers of cytolytic T cells, interleukin-10–positive T cells, or anti-JCV effector memory T cells.

Dr. Adil Javed and Dr. Anthony T. Reder are with the University of Chicago. This commentary summarized their editorial accompanying the study by Dr. Schwab and his colleagues (Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016;3:e199. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000199). The authors disclosed financial ties to many companies that market drugs for MS, including Biogen, which manufactures natalizumab.

Body

Dr. Schwab and his colleagues’ study showing high rates of seroconversion, rising seroprevalence, and increasing John Cunningham virus (JCV) index values add to growing evidence for the need to monitor JCV index values and seroconversion to determine patients’ risk for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy while taking natalizumab.

Their data extend earlier paired, longitudinal studies of natalizumab-treated patients with similar high rates of seroconversion (8%-27% per year) and rises in titers.

However, the higher replication rate of JCV implicated by rising anti-JCV titers does not mean that PML is imminent; the risk of PML in JCV-positive natalizumab-treated patients without prior immunosuppressant therapy is 1 in 1,000 per year, whereas the risk of an MS attack in untreated patients is 1 in 2 per year.

It will be important to combine JCV index with other predictive markers for PML in the future, including potential blood markers involving L-selectin expression on T cells, human leukocyte antigen subtypes, viral DNA content in circulating B cells, and numbers of cytolytic T cells, interleukin-10–positive T cells, or anti-JCV effector memory T cells.

Dr. Adil Javed and Dr. Anthony T. Reder are with the University of Chicago. This commentary summarized their editorial accompanying the study by Dr. Schwab and his colleagues (Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016;3:e199. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000199). The authors disclosed financial ties to many companies that market drugs for MS, including Biogen, which manufactures natalizumab.

Title
More reasons to watch for JCV index changes
More reasons to watch for JCV index changes

New analyses of multiple sclerosis patients taking natalizumab reemphasize the need to monitor John Cunningham virus (JCV) seroconversion and the level of anti-JCV antibody titers via JCV index values, according to a study of a pair of German and French cohorts.

Longitudinal data available for 525 German patients and 711 French patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) revealed seroconversion rates of 8.5%-10.3% per year, seroprevalence increases of 5%-6% during 15-24 months of follow-up, and increases in JCV index values of 0.091 units (12.9%) per year, which “clearly support the facilitation [of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)] by treatment with natalizumab [Tysabri]” and are “at least 8 to 10 times as much as would be expected by age,” reported Nicholas Schwab, Ph.D., of the University of Münster (Germany) and his colleagues (Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016;3:e195. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000195).

Of the longitudinally followed German patients, 186 (35.4%) were initially seropositive and 43 (12.7%) became seropositive during a mean follow-up duration of 14.8 months, or 10.3% per year. The group of 711 longitudinally followed French patients included 468 (65.8%) who were initially JCV positive. A total of 20 (8.2%) patients who were initially JCV negative seroconverted in the first year, and another 21 (8.6%) did so in the second year, for an overall rate of 8.5% per year.

A total of 525 patients had changes in the level of anti-JCV antibodies in serum (and therefore had changes in JCV index value) during the observation period. Patients with a JCV index value less than 0.4 (very low PML risk) declined from 65.1% to 61.3%, and those with values 0.4-0.9 (low risk) declined from 8.0% to 7.8%. The proportion grew from 4.6% to 5.9% for values 0.9-1.5 (medium risk) and from 22.3% to 25.0% for values greater than 1.5 (high risk). In addition to reflecting the patients’ change in serostatus, the change in PML risk levels “suggested that patients who changed serostatus directly presented with high anti-JCV antibody titers afterward, as the groups of low and medium risk did not grow substantially over time,” the researchers wrote.

A group of 201 patients who were followed over time after becoming seropositive had a mean JCV index value that rose significantly from 2.046 to 2.158 and was not attributable to aging. Rises in JCV index values of more than 30% over the course of 14.8 months occurred in 17% of the patients, compared with stable values in 80% and decreases of more than 30% in 3%. Altogether, the index value of all 201 patients rose by a mean of 0.091 units (12.9%) per year.

“Because as yet there are no studies on the influence of other treatments on JCV index values ... we cannot be certain that it was the treatment with natalizumab that led to the rising index values in our study,” the investigators wrote, although they noted that a recent study of more than 7,000 control patients with MS showed that the duration of non–natalizumab MS treatment did not influence JCV seroprevalence after adjustment for age, sex, and country of origin.

Also, even though the mean index value for JCV-positive patients was greater than 2, putting them in the highest PML risk category, the investigators noted that very few of these patients will ultimately develop PML, so “JCV serology should not be the only PML risk biomarker used in the stratification of patients treated with natalizumab.”

The study was funded by various German and French institutional and governmental grants. Many authors reported financial ties to companies marketing MS drugs, including Biogen, the manufacturer of natalizumab.

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com

New analyses of multiple sclerosis patients taking natalizumab reemphasize the need to monitor John Cunningham virus (JCV) seroconversion and the level of anti-JCV antibody titers via JCV index values, according to a study of a pair of German and French cohorts.

Longitudinal data available for 525 German patients and 711 French patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) revealed seroconversion rates of 8.5%-10.3% per year, seroprevalence increases of 5%-6% during 15-24 months of follow-up, and increases in JCV index values of 0.091 units (12.9%) per year, which “clearly support the facilitation [of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)] by treatment with natalizumab [Tysabri]” and are “at least 8 to 10 times as much as would be expected by age,” reported Nicholas Schwab, Ph.D., of the University of Münster (Germany) and his colleagues (Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016;3:e195. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000195).

Of the longitudinally followed German patients, 186 (35.4%) were initially seropositive and 43 (12.7%) became seropositive during a mean follow-up duration of 14.8 months, or 10.3% per year. The group of 711 longitudinally followed French patients included 468 (65.8%) who were initially JCV positive. A total of 20 (8.2%) patients who were initially JCV negative seroconverted in the first year, and another 21 (8.6%) did so in the second year, for an overall rate of 8.5% per year.

A total of 525 patients had changes in the level of anti-JCV antibodies in serum (and therefore had changes in JCV index value) during the observation period. Patients with a JCV index value less than 0.4 (very low PML risk) declined from 65.1% to 61.3%, and those with values 0.4-0.9 (low risk) declined from 8.0% to 7.8%. The proportion grew from 4.6% to 5.9% for values 0.9-1.5 (medium risk) and from 22.3% to 25.0% for values greater than 1.5 (high risk). In addition to reflecting the patients’ change in serostatus, the change in PML risk levels “suggested that patients who changed serostatus directly presented with high anti-JCV antibody titers afterward, as the groups of low and medium risk did not grow substantially over time,” the researchers wrote.

A group of 201 patients who were followed over time after becoming seropositive had a mean JCV index value that rose significantly from 2.046 to 2.158 and was not attributable to aging. Rises in JCV index values of more than 30% over the course of 14.8 months occurred in 17% of the patients, compared with stable values in 80% and decreases of more than 30% in 3%. Altogether, the index value of all 201 patients rose by a mean of 0.091 units (12.9%) per year.

“Because as yet there are no studies on the influence of other treatments on JCV index values ... we cannot be certain that it was the treatment with natalizumab that led to the rising index values in our study,” the investigators wrote, although they noted that a recent study of more than 7,000 control patients with MS showed that the duration of non–natalizumab MS treatment did not influence JCV seroprevalence after adjustment for age, sex, and country of origin.

Also, even though the mean index value for JCV-positive patients was greater than 2, putting them in the highest PML risk category, the investigators noted that very few of these patients will ultimately develop PML, so “JCV serology should not be the only PML risk biomarker used in the stratification of patients treated with natalizumab.”

The study was funded by various German and French institutional and governmental grants. Many authors reported financial ties to companies marketing MS drugs, including Biogen, the manufacturer of natalizumab.

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Study confirms value of watching JCV serology during natalizumab treatment
Display Headline
Study confirms value of watching JCV serology during natalizumab treatment
Article Source

FROM NEUROLOGY: NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Keep watch over patients’ anti-JCV seroconversion and JCV index values during treatment with natalizumab to help determine risk for PML.

Major finding: Longitudinal data revealed seroconversion rates of 8.5%-10.3% per year, seroprevalence increases of 5%-6% during 15-24 months of follow-up, and increases in JCV index values of 0.091 units (12.9%) per year.

Data source: Two prospective, longitudinal cohorts of MS patients

Disclosures: The study was funded by various German and French institutional and governmental grants. Many authors reported financial ties to companies marketing MS drugs, including Biogen, the manufacturer of natalizumab.

Fludarabine added to interferon hints at benefits for breakthrough MS

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/16/2019 - 15:45
Display Headline
Fludarabine added to interferon hints at benefits for breakthrough MS

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients who experienced breakthrough disease despite treatment with interferon beta-1a required less acute corticosteroids during relapses and had better responses on several MRI outcomes with the addition of fludarabine, compared with monthly methylprednisolone, in a small, prospective, randomized, open-label study.

Investigators led by Dr. Steven J. Greenberg of AbbVie, North Chicago, chose to test fludarabine in the proof-of-concept, pilot study because of its immunosuppressive properties and effectiveness in treating disorders involving immune dysregulation, most notably lymphoproliferative disorders and hematologic malignancies.

©solitude72/iStockphoto

Fludarabine is a purine nucleoside analog prodrug that upon phosphorylation is toxic to dividing and quiescent lymphocytes and monocytes, according to the researchers, and exerts its effects through DNA synthesis interference and apoptosis. Methylprednisolone was used as an add-on comparator because of its common use in multiple sclerosis.

In addition to weekly intramuscular interferon beta-1a (Avonex), all 18 patients in the study initially received IV methylprednisolone 1 g once daily for 3 consecutive days, and then 1 week later were randomized to receive fludarabine 25 mg/m2 IV once daily for 5 consecutive days per 4-week cycle for 3 consecutive cycles or methylprednisolone 1 g IV 1 day per 4-week cycle for 3 consecutive cycles (Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016 Jan 21. doi: 10.1177/1756285615626049).

Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred with similar frequency in each group over 12 months of follow-up, with infection being the most common AE (three with fludarabine and two with methylprednisolone). Grade 3 or grade 2 leukopenia that had not normalized within 28 days after treatment occurred in three fludarabine patients and one methylprednisolone patient, and took significantly longer resolve for those taking fludarabine (3.75 months vs. 0.17 months).

Over 12 months of follow-up, fludarabine-treated patients experienced numerically, but not significantly, fewer mean relapses (0.5 vs. 0.8) and longer median time to relapse (10.5 months vs. 8.5 months). However, fludarabine led to significantly fewer mean cycles of corticosteroids (0.5 vs. 0.8).

Expanded Disability Status Scale scores declined from baseline to 12 months by a mean of –0.2 in the fludarabine group but increased in the methylprednisolone group by 0.5. Both groups achieved slight improvements in MS Functional Composite scores.

Fludarabine-treated patients had significant declines from baseline to 12 months in gadolinium-positive lesion volume (–98.3%) and number (–93.3%), but no significant differences were recorded in either group for changes in FLAIR lesion volume, T1-hypointense lesion volume or number, or brain parenchymal fraction.

Two outlier patients in the fludarabine group who had 21 and 17 gadolinium-positive lesions, respectively, at baseline were examined in separate analyses and results for the fludarabine group were analyzed both with and without them. None of the results appreciably changed when they were included or excluded, except for gadolinium-positive lesion volume and number, which were not significantly changed without the two patients. The two outlier patients had 100% mean reductions in gadolinium-positive lesion number and volume and a 19.4% mean reduction in FLAIR lesion volume.

The investigators cautioned that “the long-term safety of repetitive use has not been established by this study, which is a critical consideration for a chronic disease like MS. We emphasize that our results should be considered preliminary and would await confirmation in a larger-scale trial.”

This study was supported in part by an investigator-initiated study grant provided by Biogen. Berlex Laboratories provided fludarabine. Dr. Greenberg is an employee of AbbVie, and two coauthors reported financial ties to companies marketing MS drugs.

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
multiple sclerosis, fludaradine, corticosteriods
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients who experienced breakthrough disease despite treatment with interferon beta-1a required less acute corticosteroids during relapses and had better responses on several MRI outcomes with the addition of fludarabine, compared with monthly methylprednisolone, in a small, prospective, randomized, open-label study.

Investigators led by Dr. Steven J. Greenberg of AbbVie, North Chicago, chose to test fludarabine in the proof-of-concept, pilot study because of its immunosuppressive properties and effectiveness in treating disorders involving immune dysregulation, most notably lymphoproliferative disorders and hematologic malignancies.

©solitude72/iStockphoto

Fludarabine is a purine nucleoside analog prodrug that upon phosphorylation is toxic to dividing and quiescent lymphocytes and monocytes, according to the researchers, and exerts its effects through DNA synthesis interference and apoptosis. Methylprednisolone was used as an add-on comparator because of its common use in multiple sclerosis.

In addition to weekly intramuscular interferon beta-1a (Avonex), all 18 patients in the study initially received IV methylprednisolone 1 g once daily for 3 consecutive days, and then 1 week later were randomized to receive fludarabine 25 mg/m2 IV once daily for 5 consecutive days per 4-week cycle for 3 consecutive cycles or methylprednisolone 1 g IV 1 day per 4-week cycle for 3 consecutive cycles (Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016 Jan 21. doi: 10.1177/1756285615626049).

Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred with similar frequency in each group over 12 months of follow-up, with infection being the most common AE (three with fludarabine and two with methylprednisolone). Grade 3 or grade 2 leukopenia that had not normalized within 28 days after treatment occurred in three fludarabine patients and one methylprednisolone patient, and took significantly longer resolve for those taking fludarabine (3.75 months vs. 0.17 months).

Over 12 months of follow-up, fludarabine-treated patients experienced numerically, but not significantly, fewer mean relapses (0.5 vs. 0.8) and longer median time to relapse (10.5 months vs. 8.5 months). However, fludarabine led to significantly fewer mean cycles of corticosteroids (0.5 vs. 0.8).

Expanded Disability Status Scale scores declined from baseline to 12 months by a mean of –0.2 in the fludarabine group but increased in the methylprednisolone group by 0.5. Both groups achieved slight improvements in MS Functional Composite scores.

Fludarabine-treated patients had significant declines from baseline to 12 months in gadolinium-positive lesion volume (–98.3%) and number (–93.3%), but no significant differences were recorded in either group for changes in FLAIR lesion volume, T1-hypointense lesion volume or number, or brain parenchymal fraction.

Two outlier patients in the fludarabine group who had 21 and 17 gadolinium-positive lesions, respectively, at baseline were examined in separate analyses and results for the fludarabine group were analyzed both with and without them. None of the results appreciably changed when they were included or excluded, except for gadolinium-positive lesion volume and number, which were not significantly changed without the two patients. The two outlier patients had 100% mean reductions in gadolinium-positive lesion number and volume and a 19.4% mean reduction in FLAIR lesion volume.

The investigators cautioned that “the long-term safety of repetitive use has not been established by this study, which is a critical consideration for a chronic disease like MS. We emphasize that our results should be considered preliminary and would await confirmation in a larger-scale trial.”

This study was supported in part by an investigator-initiated study grant provided by Biogen. Berlex Laboratories provided fludarabine. Dr. Greenberg is an employee of AbbVie, and two coauthors reported financial ties to companies marketing MS drugs.

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients who experienced breakthrough disease despite treatment with interferon beta-1a required less acute corticosteroids during relapses and had better responses on several MRI outcomes with the addition of fludarabine, compared with monthly methylprednisolone, in a small, prospective, randomized, open-label study.

Investigators led by Dr. Steven J. Greenberg of AbbVie, North Chicago, chose to test fludarabine in the proof-of-concept, pilot study because of its immunosuppressive properties and effectiveness in treating disorders involving immune dysregulation, most notably lymphoproliferative disorders and hematologic malignancies.

©solitude72/iStockphoto

Fludarabine is a purine nucleoside analog prodrug that upon phosphorylation is toxic to dividing and quiescent lymphocytes and monocytes, according to the researchers, and exerts its effects through DNA synthesis interference and apoptosis. Methylprednisolone was used as an add-on comparator because of its common use in multiple sclerosis.

In addition to weekly intramuscular interferon beta-1a (Avonex), all 18 patients in the study initially received IV methylprednisolone 1 g once daily for 3 consecutive days, and then 1 week later were randomized to receive fludarabine 25 mg/m2 IV once daily for 5 consecutive days per 4-week cycle for 3 consecutive cycles or methylprednisolone 1 g IV 1 day per 4-week cycle for 3 consecutive cycles (Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016 Jan 21. doi: 10.1177/1756285615626049).

Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred with similar frequency in each group over 12 months of follow-up, with infection being the most common AE (three with fludarabine and two with methylprednisolone). Grade 3 or grade 2 leukopenia that had not normalized within 28 days after treatment occurred in three fludarabine patients and one methylprednisolone patient, and took significantly longer resolve for those taking fludarabine (3.75 months vs. 0.17 months).

Over 12 months of follow-up, fludarabine-treated patients experienced numerically, but not significantly, fewer mean relapses (0.5 vs. 0.8) and longer median time to relapse (10.5 months vs. 8.5 months). However, fludarabine led to significantly fewer mean cycles of corticosteroids (0.5 vs. 0.8).

Expanded Disability Status Scale scores declined from baseline to 12 months by a mean of –0.2 in the fludarabine group but increased in the methylprednisolone group by 0.5. Both groups achieved slight improvements in MS Functional Composite scores.

Fludarabine-treated patients had significant declines from baseline to 12 months in gadolinium-positive lesion volume (–98.3%) and number (–93.3%), but no significant differences were recorded in either group for changes in FLAIR lesion volume, T1-hypointense lesion volume or number, or brain parenchymal fraction.

Two outlier patients in the fludarabine group who had 21 and 17 gadolinium-positive lesions, respectively, at baseline were examined in separate analyses and results for the fludarabine group were analyzed both with and without them. None of the results appreciably changed when they were included or excluded, except for gadolinium-positive lesion volume and number, which were not significantly changed without the two patients. The two outlier patients had 100% mean reductions in gadolinium-positive lesion number and volume and a 19.4% mean reduction in FLAIR lesion volume.

The investigators cautioned that “the long-term safety of repetitive use has not been established by this study, which is a critical consideration for a chronic disease like MS. We emphasize that our results should be considered preliminary and would await confirmation in a larger-scale trial.”

This study was supported in part by an investigator-initiated study grant provided by Biogen. Berlex Laboratories provided fludarabine. Dr. Greenberg is an employee of AbbVie, and two coauthors reported financial ties to companies marketing MS drugs.

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Fludarabine added to interferon hints at benefits for breakthrough MS
Display Headline
Fludarabine added to interferon hints at benefits for breakthrough MS
Legacy Keywords
multiple sclerosis, fludaradine, corticosteriods
Legacy Keywords
multiple sclerosis, fludaradine, corticosteriods
Article Source

FROM THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Preliminary evidence suggests that fludarabine added to interferon beta-1a for breakthrough disease in relapsing-remitting MS patients may be a safe and well-tolerated adjunct with some hints of ability to reduce disease activity.

Major finding: Fludarabine-treated patients had significant declines from baseline to 12 months in gadolinium-positive lesion volume (–98.3%) and number (–93.3%), but no significant differences were recorded in either group for changes in FLAIR lesion volume, T1-hypointense lesion volume or number, or brain parenchymal fraction.

Data source: A prospective, randomized, open-label study of 18 relapsing-remitting MS patients.

Disclosures: This study was supported in part by an investigator-initiated study grant provided by Biogen. Berlex Laboratories provided fludarabine. Dr. Greenberg is an employee of AbbVie, and two coauthors reported financial ties to companies marketing MS drugs.

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Presents Diagnostic and Treatment Challenges

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/16/2019 - 15:45
Display Headline
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Presents Diagnostic and Treatment Challenges

BARCELONA—Revised consensus criteria have proposed that neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) become the new unifying term to replace neuromyelitis optica, and that the condition be further stratified based on serologic testing. In kind, NMOSD treatment may differ based on the goals of either relapse prevention or prevention of acute attacks. NMOSD diagnosis and treatment were discussed at the 31st Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.

NMOSD encompasses what previously has been diagnosed as neuromyelitis optica, an inflammatory CNS syndrome distinct from multiple sclerosis (MS), which requires clinical optic neuritis and myelitis. It also includes limited forms (eg, optic neuritis or myelitis alone) and a series of associated conditions such as area postrema syndrome and certain brain syndromes known to occur with other symptoms of neuromyelitis optica, said Brian G. Weinshenker, MD, Professor of Neurology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, and a member of the international panel that developed the NMOSD consensus criteria. The criteria were published in the July 14 issue of Neurology. The criteria also include patients who are aquaporin 4 (AQP4) seronegative but have otherwise typical clinical presentations.

Brian G. Weinshenker, MD

Patients who are AQP4 antibody sero­positive should have at least one core clinical characteristic for a diagnosis of NMOSD, according to the criteria. The core clinical characteristics are optic neuritis, acute myelitis, area postrema syndrome (ie, otherwise unexplained hiccups or nausea), acute brainstem syndrome, symptomatic narcolepsy or acute diencephalic clinical syndrome with diencephalic lesions typical of NMOSD on MRI, and symptomatic cerebral syndrome.

“There are no exclusionary criteria, but our caveat is that there should be no better explanation for the symptoms,” Dr. Weinshenker noted. “Comorbidities such as lupus or Sjögren’s syndrome do not exclude NMOSD, but some syndromes or comorbidities raise red flags. These red flags are clinical and MRI features that might suggest a diagnosis of MS instead of NMOSD, as well as sarcoidosis, which can cause optic neuritis or myelitis.” Other red flags, according to the criteria, include cancer and chronic infection (eg, HIV or syphilis).

For patients who are AQP4 seronegative or those for whom serologic testing is unavailable, the criteria are similar, but more rigorous. Specifically, at least two core clinical characteristics are required, and one of them must be optic neuritis, acute myelitis with longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) lesions, or area postrema syndrome.

“There must be evidence of dissemination in space, and we require additional MRI features to be present,” said Dr. Weinshenker. “For example, in patients with intractable vomiting, we require that they also have associated dorsal medulla/area postrema lesions.” Those with myelitis must have a long spinal cord lesion and those with acute optic neuritis must have a long optic nerve lesion that takes up half or more of the length of the optic nerve or affects the optic chiasm. “Again, there should be no better explanation for the findings,” he said.

The revised criteria align “with our contemporary view of what NMOSD is and captures current expert practice,” Dr. Weinshenker said. “It should facilitate clinical research by allowing for early diagnosis in a larger pool of patients who might be eligible for clinical trials.”

However, as is true for any set of diagnostic criteria, physicians will still need to exercise individual judgment, he said. He noted that despite the high accuracy of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing, the most widely used serologic test in the United States for AQP4 antibodies, there is still about a 5% chance of false positives, particularly among patients with a low pretest probability of NMOSD. In addition, patients who are AQP4 seronegative, who make up approximately 30% of the total NMOSD population, are poorly characterized.

Among the AQP4 seropositive patients are those who have detectable serum myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies. They tend to be younger, male, and less likely to relapse than those with AQP4 antibodies “Maybe MOG syndrome will ultimately be considered separately, but currently we consider it to be a form of NMOSD, and future versions of the diagnostic criteria will probably incorporate other biomarkers,” Dr. Weinshenker said.

NMOSD therapy can be stratified into two types: treatment of acute (ie, monophasic) attack and relapse prevention, said Jacqueline Palace, BM, DM, Consultant Neurologist at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom. She noted that her classifications for treatment purposes are not based on the newly revised NMOSD diagnostic criteria, but rather are slightly broader. She pointed out that her treatment recommendations are in line with 2010 guidelines by the European Federation of Neurological Societies.

 

 

“AQP4 antibody disease is a relapsing condition when untreated,” said Dr. Palace. “On the other hand, many MOG antibody seropositive patients have monophasic phenotypes.” Other monophasic conditions include LETM or idiopathic transverse myelitis, Devic’s disease, and severe or bilateral optic neuritis.

Patients in the monophasic group may go on to develop relapsing disease (ie, relapsing NMOSD, relapsing optic neuritis, and relapsing LETM), Dr. Palace noted. Among the difficult-to-treat patients are those who have overlap between MS and antibody-negative NMOSD.

Management of an acute attack across all of these monophasic syndromes is similar because the attacks tend to present with more severe relapses than patients with MS, and some patients are left with severe residual disability, said Dr. Palace. “We treat these patients urgently with IV methylprednisolone for three to five days to try to restore function. If there is poor response or significant disability, we follow with plasma exchange.” If plasma exchange is not feasible, patients may be given IV immunoglobulin (IVIG), she suggested. “There is a small proportion of patients who develop severe paraplegia that don’t appear to respond at all to treatment, even if given urgently. In my experience, these patients are monophasic and they are antibody negative for both MOG and AQP4.”

Patients with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis can rebound if given a short course of IV methylprednisolone. Dr. Palace recommended follow-on prednisolone for two months for patients who have such monophasic MOG and AQP4 antibody disorders to prevent rebound, and for longer (ie, six to 12 months) for monophasic patients with MOG antibodies.

Preventing relapse is probably the most important aspect of managing NMOSD. “AQP4 antibody disease is a relapsing condition, and there is no progressive phase as there is in MS,” Dr. Palace said. “There is a high morbidity and mortality associated with relapse.”

In a 2012 review of AQP4 antibody-seropositive patients—many of whom were on corticosteroids or other immunosuppression—researchers found that, among 59 patients in the UK with a median follow-up of five years, 22% had permanent bilateral visual loss with visual acuity of less than 6/36 in the better eye, and nearly 30% were wheelchair-dependent.

Prednisolone cover alone or in conjunction with a steroid-sparing drug (ie, azathioprine, mycophenolate, methotrexate, or rituximab) is the recommended first-line treatment for relapse prevention. “If patients have a relapse on an adequate dose tried for three to six months, then you might consider an alternative first-line drug or other less commonly used immunosuppressive agents such as ciclosporin/tacrolimus, cyclophosphamide, or mitoxantrone. Regular plasma exchange or IVIG is also an option,” said Dr. Palace. “We note that our patients appear less likely to relapse if they are kept on a low background dose of prednisolone when on other immunosuppressants. If they have a relapse, we may increase the background prednisolone dose rather than switch treatments.”

Some MS disease-modifying drugs have been reported to exacerbate NMOSD, including beta-interferon, natalizumab, and fingolimod. In addition, there is a theoretical risk of alemtuzumab being harmful because it is known to precipitate antibody-mediated disease, Dr. Palace said.

Adriene Marshall

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
24-27
Legacy Keywords
NMOSD, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, Brian Weinshenker, Jacqueline Palace, Neurology Reviews
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Related Articles

BARCELONA—Revised consensus criteria have proposed that neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) become the new unifying term to replace neuromyelitis optica, and that the condition be further stratified based on serologic testing. In kind, NMOSD treatment may differ based on the goals of either relapse prevention or prevention of acute attacks. NMOSD diagnosis and treatment were discussed at the 31st Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.

NMOSD encompasses what previously has been diagnosed as neuromyelitis optica, an inflammatory CNS syndrome distinct from multiple sclerosis (MS), which requires clinical optic neuritis and myelitis. It also includes limited forms (eg, optic neuritis or myelitis alone) and a series of associated conditions such as area postrema syndrome and certain brain syndromes known to occur with other symptoms of neuromyelitis optica, said Brian G. Weinshenker, MD, Professor of Neurology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, and a member of the international panel that developed the NMOSD consensus criteria. The criteria were published in the July 14 issue of Neurology. The criteria also include patients who are aquaporin 4 (AQP4) seronegative but have otherwise typical clinical presentations.

Brian G. Weinshenker, MD

Patients who are AQP4 antibody sero­positive should have at least one core clinical characteristic for a diagnosis of NMOSD, according to the criteria. The core clinical characteristics are optic neuritis, acute myelitis, area postrema syndrome (ie, otherwise unexplained hiccups or nausea), acute brainstem syndrome, symptomatic narcolepsy or acute diencephalic clinical syndrome with diencephalic lesions typical of NMOSD on MRI, and symptomatic cerebral syndrome.

“There are no exclusionary criteria, but our caveat is that there should be no better explanation for the symptoms,” Dr. Weinshenker noted. “Comorbidities such as lupus or Sjögren’s syndrome do not exclude NMOSD, but some syndromes or comorbidities raise red flags. These red flags are clinical and MRI features that might suggest a diagnosis of MS instead of NMOSD, as well as sarcoidosis, which can cause optic neuritis or myelitis.” Other red flags, according to the criteria, include cancer and chronic infection (eg, HIV or syphilis).

For patients who are AQP4 seronegative or those for whom serologic testing is unavailable, the criteria are similar, but more rigorous. Specifically, at least two core clinical characteristics are required, and one of them must be optic neuritis, acute myelitis with longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) lesions, or area postrema syndrome.

“There must be evidence of dissemination in space, and we require additional MRI features to be present,” said Dr. Weinshenker. “For example, in patients with intractable vomiting, we require that they also have associated dorsal medulla/area postrema lesions.” Those with myelitis must have a long spinal cord lesion and those with acute optic neuritis must have a long optic nerve lesion that takes up half or more of the length of the optic nerve or affects the optic chiasm. “Again, there should be no better explanation for the findings,” he said.

The revised criteria align “with our contemporary view of what NMOSD is and captures current expert practice,” Dr. Weinshenker said. “It should facilitate clinical research by allowing for early diagnosis in a larger pool of patients who might be eligible for clinical trials.”

However, as is true for any set of diagnostic criteria, physicians will still need to exercise individual judgment, he said. He noted that despite the high accuracy of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing, the most widely used serologic test in the United States for AQP4 antibodies, there is still about a 5% chance of false positives, particularly among patients with a low pretest probability of NMOSD. In addition, patients who are AQP4 seronegative, who make up approximately 30% of the total NMOSD population, are poorly characterized.

Among the AQP4 seropositive patients are those who have detectable serum myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies. They tend to be younger, male, and less likely to relapse than those with AQP4 antibodies “Maybe MOG syndrome will ultimately be considered separately, but currently we consider it to be a form of NMOSD, and future versions of the diagnostic criteria will probably incorporate other biomarkers,” Dr. Weinshenker said.

NMOSD therapy can be stratified into two types: treatment of acute (ie, monophasic) attack and relapse prevention, said Jacqueline Palace, BM, DM, Consultant Neurologist at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom. She noted that her classifications for treatment purposes are not based on the newly revised NMOSD diagnostic criteria, but rather are slightly broader. She pointed out that her treatment recommendations are in line with 2010 guidelines by the European Federation of Neurological Societies.

 

 

“AQP4 antibody disease is a relapsing condition when untreated,” said Dr. Palace. “On the other hand, many MOG antibody seropositive patients have monophasic phenotypes.” Other monophasic conditions include LETM or idiopathic transverse myelitis, Devic’s disease, and severe or bilateral optic neuritis.

Patients in the monophasic group may go on to develop relapsing disease (ie, relapsing NMOSD, relapsing optic neuritis, and relapsing LETM), Dr. Palace noted. Among the difficult-to-treat patients are those who have overlap between MS and antibody-negative NMOSD.

Management of an acute attack across all of these monophasic syndromes is similar because the attacks tend to present with more severe relapses than patients with MS, and some patients are left with severe residual disability, said Dr. Palace. “We treat these patients urgently with IV methylprednisolone for three to five days to try to restore function. If there is poor response or significant disability, we follow with plasma exchange.” If plasma exchange is not feasible, patients may be given IV immunoglobulin (IVIG), she suggested. “There is a small proportion of patients who develop severe paraplegia that don’t appear to respond at all to treatment, even if given urgently. In my experience, these patients are monophasic and they are antibody negative for both MOG and AQP4.”

Patients with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis can rebound if given a short course of IV methylprednisolone. Dr. Palace recommended follow-on prednisolone for two months for patients who have such monophasic MOG and AQP4 antibody disorders to prevent rebound, and for longer (ie, six to 12 months) for monophasic patients with MOG antibodies.

Preventing relapse is probably the most important aspect of managing NMOSD. “AQP4 antibody disease is a relapsing condition, and there is no progressive phase as there is in MS,” Dr. Palace said. “There is a high morbidity and mortality associated with relapse.”

In a 2012 review of AQP4 antibody-seropositive patients—many of whom were on corticosteroids or other immunosuppression—researchers found that, among 59 patients in the UK with a median follow-up of five years, 22% had permanent bilateral visual loss with visual acuity of less than 6/36 in the better eye, and nearly 30% were wheelchair-dependent.

Prednisolone cover alone or in conjunction with a steroid-sparing drug (ie, azathioprine, mycophenolate, methotrexate, or rituximab) is the recommended first-line treatment for relapse prevention. “If patients have a relapse on an adequate dose tried for three to six months, then you might consider an alternative first-line drug or other less commonly used immunosuppressive agents such as ciclosporin/tacrolimus, cyclophosphamide, or mitoxantrone. Regular plasma exchange or IVIG is also an option,” said Dr. Palace. “We note that our patients appear less likely to relapse if they are kept on a low background dose of prednisolone when on other immunosuppressants. If they have a relapse, we may increase the background prednisolone dose rather than switch treatments.”

Some MS disease-modifying drugs have been reported to exacerbate NMOSD, including beta-interferon, natalizumab, and fingolimod. In addition, there is a theoretical risk of alemtuzumab being harmful because it is known to precipitate antibody-mediated disease, Dr. Palace said.

Adriene Marshall

BARCELONA—Revised consensus criteria have proposed that neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) become the new unifying term to replace neuromyelitis optica, and that the condition be further stratified based on serologic testing. In kind, NMOSD treatment may differ based on the goals of either relapse prevention or prevention of acute attacks. NMOSD diagnosis and treatment were discussed at the 31st Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.

NMOSD encompasses what previously has been diagnosed as neuromyelitis optica, an inflammatory CNS syndrome distinct from multiple sclerosis (MS), which requires clinical optic neuritis and myelitis. It also includes limited forms (eg, optic neuritis or myelitis alone) and a series of associated conditions such as area postrema syndrome and certain brain syndromes known to occur with other symptoms of neuromyelitis optica, said Brian G. Weinshenker, MD, Professor of Neurology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, and a member of the international panel that developed the NMOSD consensus criteria. The criteria were published in the July 14 issue of Neurology. The criteria also include patients who are aquaporin 4 (AQP4) seronegative but have otherwise typical clinical presentations.

Brian G. Weinshenker, MD

Patients who are AQP4 antibody sero­positive should have at least one core clinical characteristic for a diagnosis of NMOSD, according to the criteria. The core clinical characteristics are optic neuritis, acute myelitis, area postrema syndrome (ie, otherwise unexplained hiccups or nausea), acute brainstem syndrome, symptomatic narcolepsy or acute diencephalic clinical syndrome with diencephalic lesions typical of NMOSD on MRI, and symptomatic cerebral syndrome.

“There are no exclusionary criteria, but our caveat is that there should be no better explanation for the symptoms,” Dr. Weinshenker noted. “Comorbidities such as lupus or Sjögren’s syndrome do not exclude NMOSD, but some syndromes or comorbidities raise red flags. These red flags are clinical and MRI features that might suggest a diagnosis of MS instead of NMOSD, as well as sarcoidosis, which can cause optic neuritis or myelitis.” Other red flags, according to the criteria, include cancer and chronic infection (eg, HIV or syphilis).

For patients who are AQP4 seronegative or those for whom serologic testing is unavailable, the criteria are similar, but more rigorous. Specifically, at least two core clinical characteristics are required, and one of them must be optic neuritis, acute myelitis with longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) lesions, or area postrema syndrome.

“There must be evidence of dissemination in space, and we require additional MRI features to be present,” said Dr. Weinshenker. “For example, in patients with intractable vomiting, we require that they also have associated dorsal medulla/area postrema lesions.” Those with myelitis must have a long spinal cord lesion and those with acute optic neuritis must have a long optic nerve lesion that takes up half or more of the length of the optic nerve or affects the optic chiasm. “Again, there should be no better explanation for the findings,” he said.

The revised criteria align “with our contemporary view of what NMOSD is and captures current expert practice,” Dr. Weinshenker said. “It should facilitate clinical research by allowing for early diagnosis in a larger pool of patients who might be eligible for clinical trials.”

However, as is true for any set of diagnostic criteria, physicians will still need to exercise individual judgment, he said. He noted that despite the high accuracy of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing, the most widely used serologic test in the United States for AQP4 antibodies, there is still about a 5% chance of false positives, particularly among patients with a low pretest probability of NMOSD. In addition, patients who are AQP4 seronegative, who make up approximately 30% of the total NMOSD population, are poorly characterized.

Among the AQP4 seropositive patients are those who have detectable serum myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies. They tend to be younger, male, and less likely to relapse than those with AQP4 antibodies “Maybe MOG syndrome will ultimately be considered separately, but currently we consider it to be a form of NMOSD, and future versions of the diagnostic criteria will probably incorporate other biomarkers,” Dr. Weinshenker said.

NMOSD therapy can be stratified into two types: treatment of acute (ie, monophasic) attack and relapse prevention, said Jacqueline Palace, BM, DM, Consultant Neurologist at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom. She noted that her classifications for treatment purposes are not based on the newly revised NMOSD diagnostic criteria, but rather are slightly broader. She pointed out that her treatment recommendations are in line with 2010 guidelines by the European Federation of Neurological Societies.

 

 

“AQP4 antibody disease is a relapsing condition when untreated,” said Dr. Palace. “On the other hand, many MOG antibody seropositive patients have monophasic phenotypes.” Other monophasic conditions include LETM or idiopathic transverse myelitis, Devic’s disease, and severe or bilateral optic neuritis.

Patients in the monophasic group may go on to develop relapsing disease (ie, relapsing NMOSD, relapsing optic neuritis, and relapsing LETM), Dr. Palace noted. Among the difficult-to-treat patients are those who have overlap between MS and antibody-negative NMOSD.

Management of an acute attack across all of these monophasic syndromes is similar because the attacks tend to present with more severe relapses than patients with MS, and some patients are left with severe residual disability, said Dr. Palace. “We treat these patients urgently with IV methylprednisolone for three to five days to try to restore function. If there is poor response or significant disability, we follow with plasma exchange.” If plasma exchange is not feasible, patients may be given IV immunoglobulin (IVIG), she suggested. “There is a small proportion of patients who develop severe paraplegia that don’t appear to respond at all to treatment, even if given urgently. In my experience, these patients are monophasic and they are antibody negative for both MOG and AQP4.”

Patients with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis can rebound if given a short course of IV methylprednisolone. Dr. Palace recommended follow-on prednisolone for two months for patients who have such monophasic MOG and AQP4 antibody disorders to prevent rebound, and for longer (ie, six to 12 months) for monophasic patients with MOG antibodies.

Preventing relapse is probably the most important aspect of managing NMOSD. “AQP4 antibody disease is a relapsing condition, and there is no progressive phase as there is in MS,” Dr. Palace said. “There is a high morbidity and mortality associated with relapse.”

In a 2012 review of AQP4 antibody-seropositive patients—many of whom were on corticosteroids or other immunosuppression—researchers found that, among 59 patients in the UK with a median follow-up of five years, 22% had permanent bilateral visual loss with visual acuity of less than 6/36 in the better eye, and nearly 30% were wheelchair-dependent.

Prednisolone cover alone or in conjunction with a steroid-sparing drug (ie, azathioprine, mycophenolate, methotrexate, or rituximab) is the recommended first-line treatment for relapse prevention. “If patients have a relapse on an adequate dose tried for three to six months, then you might consider an alternative first-line drug or other less commonly used immunosuppressive agents such as ciclosporin/tacrolimus, cyclophosphamide, or mitoxantrone. Regular plasma exchange or IVIG is also an option,” said Dr. Palace. “We note that our patients appear less likely to relapse if they are kept on a low background dose of prednisolone when on other immunosuppressants. If they have a relapse, we may increase the background prednisolone dose rather than switch treatments.”

Some MS disease-modifying drugs have been reported to exacerbate NMOSD, including beta-interferon, natalizumab, and fingolimod. In addition, there is a theoretical risk of alemtuzumab being harmful because it is known to precipitate antibody-mediated disease, Dr. Palace said.

Adriene Marshall

References

References

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(1)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(1)
Page Number
24-27
Page Number
24-27
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Presents Diagnostic and Treatment Challenges
Display Headline
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Presents Diagnostic and Treatment Challenges
Legacy Keywords
NMOSD, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, Brian Weinshenker, Jacqueline Palace, Neurology Reviews
Legacy Keywords
NMOSD, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, Brian Weinshenker, Jacqueline Palace, Neurology Reviews
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Amiselimod May Provide Benefits for Patients With Relapsing-Remitting MS

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/16/2019 - 15:45
Display Headline
Amiselimod May Provide Benefits for Patients With Relapsing-Remitting MS

BARCELONA—The investigational compound amiselimod, which also is known as MT-1303, improves MRI outcomes and reduces annualized relapse rate among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), according to data presented at the 31st Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). Results indicate that the drug is well tolerated and may reduce the loss of gray matter volume.

Ludwig Kappos, MD, Chair of Neurology at University Hospital in Basel, Switzerland, and colleagues conducted a phase II proof-of-concept study that compared three doses of amiselimod with placebo. The investigators enrolled 415 patients with relapsing-remitting MS into the study. Participants were randomized to receive placebo or 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg, or 0.4 mg of amiselimod. Each treatment group included approximately 100 people. Patients underwent MRI at baseline and at weeks four, eight, 12, 16, 20, and 24.

Ludwig Kappos, MD

The trial’s primary end point was the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions from weeks eight to 24. Secondary efficacy end points included the proportion of gadolinium-enhancing-lesion-free patients, the total number of new or enlarged T2 lesions, brain volume, gray matter volume, clinical outcomes, relapse rate, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score.

The study population had active MS and was in a relatively early stage of disease. Patients’ mean EDSS score at baseline ranged between 0.5 and 0.8. The treatment groups were well balanced in terms of demographic, clinical, and imaging variables. The proportion of patients with gadolinium enhancement at baseline, however, varied between 30% and 40% between groups. The group that received the lowest dose of amiselimod had the largest proportion of patients with gadolinium enhancement at baseline. Patients had a median number of two relapses in the previous two years. More than 90% of participants completed the study.

Amiselimod was associated with a dose-dependent reduction in the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions. Patients who received 0.4 mg of amiselimod had a 77% reduction in gadolinium-enhancing lesions. Participants who received 0.1 mg of amiselimod had an approximately 50% reduction in gadolinium-enhancing lesions. In addition, the two highest doses were associated with a 70% reduction and a 55% reduction, respectively, in the number of new and enlarged T2 lesions.

All three doses of the drug reduced patients’ annualized relapse rate. After 24 weeks of treatment, the 0.4-mg dose of amiselimod reduced the risk of relapse by 0.18. The drug also increased the likelihood of relapse freedom, compared with placebo. The study, however, was not designed to show an effect of treatment on relapses, said Dr. Kappos. Furthermore, amiselimod provided a dose-dependent reduction in gray matter volume loss. The investigators found no difference in disability between treated patients and controls, perhaps because of the study’s short duration, said Dr. Kappos.

The investigators observed no difference in the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events between patients receiving amiselimod and those receiving placebo. Significantly, the researchers did not observe a higher rate of cardiac side effects among treated participants, said Dr. Kappos. Nor was amiselimod associated with a higher rate of infections.

Erik Greb

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
23
Legacy Keywords
amiselimod, gadolinium-enhancing lesions, annualized relapse rate, Ludwig Kappos, Erik Greb, Neurology Reviews
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

BARCELONA—The investigational compound amiselimod, which also is known as MT-1303, improves MRI outcomes and reduces annualized relapse rate among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), according to data presented at the 31st Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). Results indicate that the drug is well tolerated and may reduce the loss of gray matter volume.

Ludwig Kappos, MD, Chair of Neurology at University Hospital in Basel, Switzerland, and colleagues conducted a phase II proof-of-concept study that compared three doses of amiselimod with placebo. The investigators enrolled 415 patients with relapsing-remitting MS into the study. Participants were randomized to receive placebo or 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg, or 0.4 mg of amiselimod. Each treatment group included approximately 100 people. Patients underwent MRI at baseline and at weeks four, eight, 12, 16, 20, and 24.

Ludwig Kappos, MD

The trial’s primary end point was the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions from weeks eight to 24. Secondary efficacy end points included the proportion of gadolinium-enhancing-lesion-free patients, the total number of new or enlarged T2 lesions, brain volume, gray matter volume, clinical outcomes, relapse rate, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score.

The study population had active MS and was in a relatively early stage of disease. Patients’ mean EDSS score at baseline ranged between 0.5 and 0.8. The treatment groups were well balanced in terms of demographic, clinical, and imaging variables. The proportion of patients with gadolinium enhancement at baseline, however, varied between 30% and 40% between groups. The group that received the lowest dose of amiselimod had the largest proportion of patients with gadolinium enhancement at baseline. Patients had a median number of two relapses in the previous two years. More than 90% of participants completed the study.

Amiselimod was associated with a dose-dependent reduction in the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions. Patients who received 0.4 mg of amiselimod had a 77% reduction in gadolinium-enhancing lesions. Participants who received 0.1 mg of amiselimod had an approximately 50% reduction in gadolinium-enhancing lesions. In addition, the two highest doses were associated with a 70% reduction and a 55% reduction, respectively, in the number of new and enlarged T2 lesions.

All three doses of the drug reduced patients’ annualized relapse rate. After 24 weeks of treatment, the 0.4-mg dose of amiselimod reduced the risk of relapse by 0.18. The drug also increased the likelihood of relapse freedom, compared with placebo. The study, however, was not designed to show an effect of treatment on relapses, said Dr. Kappos. Furthermore, amiselimod provided a dose-dependent reduction in gray matter volume loss. The investigators found no difference in disability between treated patients and controls, perhaps because of the study’s short duration, said Dr. Kappos.

The investigators observed no difference in the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events between patients receiving amiselimod and those receiving placebo. Significantly, the researchers did not observe a higher rate of cardiac side effects among treated participants, said Dr. Kappos. Nor was amiselimod associated with a higher rate of infections.

Erik Greb

BARCELONA—The investigational compound amiselimod, which also is known as MT-1303, improves MRI outcomes and reduces annualized relapse rate among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), according to data presented at the 31st Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). Results indicate that the drug is well tolerated and may reduce the loss of gray matter volume.

Ludwig Kappos, MD, Chair of Neurology at University Hospital in Basel, Switzerland, and colleagues conducted a phase II proof-of-concept study that compared three doses of amiselimod with placebo. The investigators enrolled 415 patients with relapsing-remitting MS into the study. Participants were randomized to receive placebo or 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg, or 0.4 mg of amiselimod. Each treatment group included approximately 100 people. Patients underwent MRI at baseline and at weeks four, eight, 12, 16, 20, and 24.

Ludwig Kappos, MD

The trial’s primary end point was the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions from weeks eight to 24. Secondary efficacy end points included the proportion of gadolinium-enhancing-lesion-free patients, the total number of new or enlarged T2 lesions, brain volume, gray matter volume, clinical outcomes, relapse rate, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score.

The study population had active MS and was in a relatively early stage of disease. Patients’ mean EDSS score at baseline ranged between 0.5 and 0.8. The treatment groups were well balanced in terms of demographic, clinical, and imaging variables. The proportion of patients with gadolinium enhancement at baseline, however, varied between 30% and 40% between groups. The group that received the lowest dose of amiselimod had the largest proportion of patients with gadolinium enhancement at baseline. Patients had a median number of two relapses in the previous two years. More than 90% of participants completed the study.

Amiselimod was associated with a dose-dependent reduction in the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions. Patients who received 0.4 mg of amiselimod had a 77% reduction in gadolinium-enhancing lesions. Participants who received 0.1 mg of amiselimod had an approximately 50% reduction in gadolinium-enhancing lesions. In addition, the two highest doses were associated with a 70% reduction and a 55% reduction, respectively, in the number of new and enlarged T2 lesions.

All three doses of the drug reduced patients’ annualized relapse rate. After 24 weeks of treatment, the 0.4-mg dose of amiselimod reduced the risk of relapse by 0.18. The drug also increased the likelihood of relapse freedom, compared with placebo. The study, however, was not designed to show an effect of treatment on relapses, said Dr. Kappos. Furthermore, amiselimod provided a dose-dependent reduction in gray matter volume loss. The investigators found no difference in disability between treated patients and controls, perhaps because of the study’s short duration, said Dr. Kappos.

The investigators observed no difference in the rate of treatment-emergent adverse events between patients receiving amiselimod and those receiving placebo. Significantly, the researchers did not observe a higher rate of cardiac side effects among treated participants, said Dr. Kappos. Nor was amiselimod associated with a higher rate of infections.

Erik Greb

References

References

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(1)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(1)
Page Number
23
Page Number
23
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Amiselimod May Provide Benefits for Patients With Relapsing-Remitting MS
Display Headline
Amiselimod May Provide Benefits for Patients With Relapsing-Remitting MS
Legacy Keywords
amiselimod, gadolinium-enhancing lesions, annualized relapse rate, Ludwig Kappos, Erik Greb, Neurology Reviews
Legacy Keywords
amiselimod, gadolinium-enhancing lesions, annualized relapse rate, Ludwig Kappos, Erik Greb, Neurology Reviews
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Radiologically Isolated Disease Is Part of the MS Spectrum

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 16:05
Display Headline
Radiologically Isolated Disease Is Part of the MS Spectrum

The findings of a multicenter, multinational cohort study of radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) published online ahead of print November 24 in Annals of Neurology offer further evidence that the condition should be considered part of the multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment spectrum because of the rate at which patients progressed to primary progressive MS over the course of the study.

“This is the first report of the temporal course within the preprogression phase for an extremely rare group of subjects originally identified by MRI as having asymptomatic disease, who ultimately experienced progressive symptom evolution consistent with primary progressive MS that could not otherwise be explained by any other mechanism (excessive alcohol use, vitamin deficiencies, etc.),” said Orhun H. Kantarci, MD, Assistant Professor of Neurology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

Dr. Kantarci and his coinvestigators evaluated 453 patients with RIS at 22 centers in the United States, France, Italy, Spain, and Turkey. The researchers also collected data on MRI, lesions, and CSF at baseline and during follow-up for as long as 20 years in certain cohorts. Demographic and clinical data were also analyzed for each patient enrolled.

Ultimately, 128 (28%) of the 453 patients with RIS developed symptomatic MS. Of these patients, 15 (12%) evolved to primary progressive MS and the remaining 113 patients “developed a first acute clinical event related to CNS demyelination consistent with clinically isolated syndrome [CIS]/MS diagnosis.” RIS occurred at a median age of 43.3, with an age range of 20 to 66, and evolved to primary progressive MS at a mean age of 49.1. The median time to conversion was 3.5 years over a median follow-up period of 5.8 years.

Nine patients with primary progressive MS were male, and the remaining six were female. Patients with primary progressive MS were more likely to be men, compared with patients who developed CIS/MS. In addition, median age at the onset of RIS and median age at symptomatic evolution were both older by about 10 years in patients with primary progressive MS versus patients who developed CIS/MS.“The 12% prevalence of primary progressive MS in this large RIS cohort, as well as age at primary progressive MS onset, is strikingly similar to that of large clinical studies in MS,” the authors noted. “Studying RIS, therefore, provides an opportunity to better understand the onset of clinical MS and to test early intervention.”Dr. Kantarci and his associates also pointed out that, in their study, the older age of primary progressive MS onset versus CIS/MS was “clearly” independent of individual follow-up times. Therefore, they also concluded that “age dependence of progressive MS development, in the absence of previous clinical relapses despite having clear subclinically active MS, suggests that biological aging mechanisms may be a significant contributor for development of progressive MS.”

Deepak Chitnis

References

Suggested Reading
Kantarci OH, Lebrun C, Siva A, et al. Primary progressive MS evolving from radiologically isolated syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2015 Nov 24 [Epub ahead of print].

Author and Disclosure Information

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
14
Legacy Keywords
RIS, CIS, primary progressive MS, Neurology Reviews, Orhun Kantarci, Deepak Chitnis
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

The findings of a multicenter, multinational cohort study of radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) published online ahead of print November 24 in Annals of Neurology offer further evidence that the condition should be considered part of the multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment spectrum because of the rate at which patients progressed to primary progressive MS over the course of the study.

“This is the first report of the temporal course within the preprogression phase for an extremely rare group of subjects originally identified by MRI as having asymptomatic disease, who ultimately experienced progressive symptom evolution consistent with primary progressive MS that could not otherwise be explained by any other mechanism (excessive alcohol use, vitamin deficiencies, etc.),” said Orhun H. Kantarci, MD, Assistant Professor of Neurology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

Dr. Kantarci and his coinvestigators evaluated 453 patients with RIS at 22 centers in the United States, France, Italy, Spain, and Turkey. The researchers also collected data on MRI, lesions, and CSF at baseline and during follow-up for as long as 20 years in certain cohorts. Demographic and clinical data were also analyzed for each patient enrolled.

Ultimately, 128 (28%) of the 453 patients with RIS developed symptomatic MS. Of these patients, 15 (12%) evolved to primary progressive MS and the remaining 113 patients “developed a first acute clinical event related to CNS demyelination consistent with clinically isolated syndrome [CIS]/MS diagnosis.” RIS occurred at a median age of 43.3, with an age range of 20 to 66, and evolved to primary progressive MS at a mean age of 49.1. The median time to conversion was 3.5 years over a median follow-up period of 5.8 years.

Nine patients with primary progressive MS were male, and the remaining six were female. Patients with primary progressive MS were more likely to be men, compared with patients who developed CIS/MS. In addition, median age at the onset of RIS and median age at symptomatic evolution were both older by about 10 years in patients with primary progressive MS versus patients who developed CIS/MS.“The 12% prevalence of primary progressive MS in this large RIS cohort, as well as age at primary progressive MS onset, is strikingly similar to that of large clinical studies in MS,” the authors noted. “Studying RIS, therefore, provides an opportunity to better understand the onset of clinical MS and to test early intervention.”Dr. Kantarci and his associates also pointed out that, in their study, the older age of primary progressive MS onset versus CIS/MS was “clearly” independent of individual follow-up times. Therefore, they also concluded that “age dependence of progressive MS development, in the absence of previous clinical relapses despite having clear subclinically active MS, suggests that biological aging mechanisms may be a significant contributor for development of progressive MS.”

Deepak Chitnis

The findings of a multicenter, multinational cohort study of radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) published online ahead of print November 24 in Annals of Neurology offer further evidence that the condition should be considered part of the multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment spectrum because of the rate at which patients progressed to primary progressive MS over the course of the study.

“This is the first report of the temporal course within the preprogression phase for an extremely rare group of subjects originally identified by MRI as having asymptomatic disease, who ultimately experienced progressive symptom evolution consistent with primary progressive MS that could not otherwise be explained by any other mechanism (excessive alcohol use, vitamin deficiencies, etc.),” said Orhun H. Kantarci, MD, Assistant Professor of Neurology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

Dr. Kantarci and his coinvestigators evaluated 453 patients with RIS at 22 centers in the United States, France, Italy, Spain, and Turkey. The researchers also collected data on MRI, lesions, and CSF at baseline and during follow-up for as long as 20 years in certain cohorts. Demographic and clinical data were also analyzed for each patient enrolled.

Ultimately, 128 (28%) of the 453 patients with RIS developed symptomatic MS. Of these patients, 15 (12%) evolved to primary progressive MS and the remaining 113 patients “developed a first acute clinical event related to CNS demyelination consistent with clinically isolated syndrome [CIS]/MS diagnosis.” RIS occurred at a median age of 43.3, with an age range of 20 to 66, and evolved to primary progressive MS at a mean age of 49.1. The median time to conversion was 3.5 years over a median follow-up period of 5.8 years.

Nine patients with primary progressive MS were male, and the remaining six were female. Patients with primary progressive MS were more likely to be men, compared with patients who developed CIS/MS. In addition, median age at the onset of RIS and median age at symptomatic evolution were both older by about 10 years in patients with primary progressive MS versus patients who developed CIS/MS.“The 12% prevalence of primary progressive MS in this large RIS cohort, as well as age at primary progressive MS onset, is strikingly similar to that of large clinical studies in MS,” the authors noted. “Studying RIS, therefore, provides an opportunity to better understand the onset of clinical MS and to test early intervention.”Dr. Kantarci and his associates also pointed out that, in their study, the older age of primary progressive MS onset versus CIS/MS was “clearly” independent of individual follow-up times. Therefore, they also concluded that “age dependence of progressive MS development, in the absence of previous clinical relapses despite having clear subclinically active MS, suggests that biological aging mechanisms may be a significant contributor for development of progressive MS.”

Deepak Chitnis

References

Suggested Reading
Kantarci OH, Lebrun C, Siva A, et al. Primary progressive MS evolving from radiologically isolated syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2015 Nov 24 [Epub ahead of print].

References

Suggested Reading
Kantarci OH, Lebrun C, Siva A, et al. Primary progressive MS evolving from radiologically isolated syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2015 Nov 24 [Epub ahead of print].

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(1)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 24(1)
Page Number
14
Page Number
14
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Radiologically Isolated Disease Is Part of the MS Spectrum
Display Headline
Radiologically Isolated Disease Is Part of the MS Spectrum
Legacy Keywords
RIS, CIS, primary progressive MS, Neurology Reviews, Orhun Kantarci, Deepak Chitnis
Legacy Keywords
RIS, CIS, primary progressive MS, Neurology Reviews, Orhun Kantarci, Deepak Chitnis
Sections
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article