Multiple Sclerosis Hub

VANCOUVER—Pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) presents unique concerns, making appropriate treatment especially important, according to an overview presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Child Neurology Society. Currently, disease-modifying therapies with FDA approval in adult MS have not been approved for the treatment of pediatric MS. In addition, brain growth and cognition are adversely affected in pediatric MS. Furthermore, children with MS tend to become disabled at a younger age, compared with adults.

Diagnosis and Initiation of Therapy

Neurologists should be prepared to engage with children and their families to ensure the most efficacious treatment. “Whenever you are having that conversation or you are considering starting the disease-modifying therapy, you need to balance the need to treat the disease with the idea that you are going to be starting a therapy for a lifetime,” said Dr. Lotze.

Disease-modifying therapies target the inflammatory aspects of pediatric-onset MS and should be initiated in children with a confirmed diagnosis, said Dr. Lotze. Children with clinically isolated syndrome who appear to be at high risk for MS and children with positive oligoclonal bands or elevated IgG index may also need to begin a disease-modifying therapy. Distinguishing between MS, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), and neuromyelitis optica (NMO) poses challenges, especially in children under age 10. Certain interferons can exacerbate NMO and may be harmful in children with ADEM or multiphasic ADEM.

Setting Goals

Neurologists are encouraged to counsel patients about the purpose and side effects of treatment, as well as to establish reasonable expectations for treatment. Additionally, children and families should be aware that another attack may occur during treatment and should be informed about what to do if it does.

No therapy is 100% efficacious in pediatric or adult MS, said Dr. Lotze. Research suggests that 50% of adults have no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) at two years of the disease. After seven years, however, 7% of these adults meet NEDA criteria. As a result, minimal disease progression (defined as less than one attack per year, fewer than three new lesions on a yearly MRI, and no progression in disability) may be a more attainable goal. “We would like to see a drug in a single individual or patient that is effective in achieving NEDA. If that is not possible … you might find that ultimately what you can go for is minimal disease progression,” said Dr. Lotze. He added that there appears to be no clear difference in terms of long-term outcome between children with MS who achieve NEDA and those who achieve minimal disease progression.

First-Line Therapies and Follow-Up Appointments

First-line agents for pediatric MS are the injectable drugs known as platform therapies. The International Pediatric MS Society Group (IPMSSG) recommends that all patients start first-line therapy (ie, interferon β or glatiramer acetate) soon after diagnosis.

Positive results from phase IV observational studies suggest that interferon β and glatiramer acetate are safe and efficacious treatments in pediatric MS. When studied in populations ranging in age from 12 to 17, these therapies decreased relapse rate, stabilized disability, and reduced accrual of new lesions. However, injectable treatments are associated with flu-like symptoms and injection-site reactions. Neurologists should start pediatric patients on interferon β with 25% to 50% of full dosing and titrate to a full adult dosing over four to six weeks. When initiating glatiramer acetate, neurologists should start children with a full adult dosing, 20 mg subcutaneous daily or 40 mg subcutaneous three times per week.

Follow-up appointments should occur every three to six months to assess adherence and determine efficacy of treatment. Neurologists are advised to ask patients whether they are comfortable with taking shots. Patients with needle anxiety, a common problem in pediatric MS, may need assistance from a child psychologist or child life specialist. Asking patients how often the patient or family forgets to take the disease-modifying therapy is also necessary, said Dr. Lotze. In addition, the transition from pediatric to adult care should be addressed in follow-up discussions. Teens must understand that certain disease-modifying therapies are contraindicated for pregnant patients. They also should be aware of how alcohol and other drugs interact with treatment.

Treatment Failure

Research indicates that approximately 30% of patients with pediatric-onset MS will not respond to the first-line therapies, and numerous variables may explain why. Age and disease duration can influence treatment efficacy, as can the number of relapses and the level of disease activity before treatment initiation. Patients who are nonadherent because of side effects and who continue to struggle with needle anxiety may experience treatment failure. The IPMSSG defines treatment failure as adherence to treatment for at least six months with no reduction in relapse rate or in new MRI T2 or contrast-enhancing lesions, or with two or more relapses within a 12-month period.

Second-Line Therapies

Trials of several oral agents are currently under way. The IPMSSG, however, urges neurologists to use extreme caution when considering nonplatform therapies for pediatric patients.

Fingolimod is a second-line drug for pediatric MS that blocks the egress of lymphocytes from the lymph nodes. A small percentage of patients taking this oral agent may develop bradycardia. Monitoring is required for the first six hours of treatment to ensure that the patient has no side effects. Some adverse effects associated with the drug include: first dose bradycardia, macular edema, and herpetic infections.

Dimethyl fumarate is an Nrf2 antioxidant pathway modulator that is associated with adverse effects such as flushing and gastrointestinal upset, said Dr. Lotze. Low-dose aspirin may help with flushing, and a proton pump inhibitor can help to manage the gastrointestinal upset. This treatment requires patients to undergo monitoring for blood count and liver function, as does fingolimod.

Teriflunomide, a pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor, is a Pregnancy Category X drug because it increases the risk of birth defects. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody, is gaining popularity for treating MS. Studies suggest that ocrelizumab may be well tolerated in pediatric MS. Natlizumamb, cladribine, and alemtuzumab are typically used to treat more aggressive forms of MS.

Neurologists rarely prescribe cyclophosphamide or mitoxantrone in pediatric MS. Cyclophosphamide has no formal FDA approval for adult MS or pediatric-onset MS and is associated with increased risks of bladder cancer, secondary leukemia, and infertility. Mitoxantrone is FDA-approved for adults with aggressive relapsing-remitting MS and secondary progressive MS. It is associated with increased cancer risk, however, and is highly cardiotoxic.

“After you have initiated a second-line agent, you need to continue to monitor aspects of disease control, including relapse rate, disability, MRI changes, and other adverse events. If you continue to see breakthrough disease, then you may need to consider … changing to another agent or moving to a more aggressive therapy such as rituximab or natalizumab,” said Dr. Lotze.

—Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

Chitnis T, Ghezzi A, Bajer-Korneck B, et al. Pediatric multiple sclerosis: Escalation and emerging treatments. Neurology. 2016;87(9 Suppl 2):S10 3-S109.

Jancic J, Nikolic B, Ivancevic N, et al. Multiple sclerosis in pediatrics: Current concepts and treatment options. Neurol Ther. 2016:5(2):131-143.

VANCOUVER—Pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) presents unique concerns, making appropriate treatment especially important, according to an overview presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Child Neurology Society. Currently, disease-modifying therapies with FDA approval in adult MS have not been approved for the treatment of pediatric MS. In addition, brain growth and cognition are adversely affected in pediatric MS. Furthermore, children with MS tend to become disabled at a younger age, compared with adults.

Diagnosis and Initiation of Therapy

Neurologists should be prepared to engage with children and their families to ensure the most efficacious treatment. “Whenever you are having that conversation or you are considering starting the disease-modifying therapy, you need to balance the need to treat the disease with the idea that you are going to be starting a therapy for a lifetime,” said Dr. Lotze.

Disease-modifying therapies target the inflammatory aspects of pediatric-onset MS and should be initiated in children with a confirmed diagnosis, said Dr. Lotze. Children with clinically isolated syndrome who appear to be at high risk for MS and children with positive oligoclonal bands or elevated IgG index may also need to begin a disease-modifying therapy. Distinguishing between MS, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), and neuromyelitis optica (NMO) poses challenges, especially in children under age 10. Certain interferons can exacerbate NMO and may be harmful in children with ADEM or multiphasic ADEM.

Setting Goals

Neurologists are encouraged to counsel patients about the purpose and side effects of treatment, as well as to establish reasonable expectations for treatment. Additionally, children and families should be aware that another attack may occur during treatment and should be informed about what to do if it does.

No therapy is 100% efficacious in pediatric or adult MS, said Dr. Lotze. Research suggests that 50% of adults have no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) at two years of the disease. After seven years, however, 7% of these adults meet NEDA criteria. As a result, minimal disease progression (defined as less than one attack per year, fewer than three new lesions on a yearly MRI, and no progression in disability) may be a more attainable goal. “We would like to see a drug in a single individual or patient that is effective in achieving NEDA. If that is not possible … you might find that ultimately what you can go for is minimal disease progression,” said Dr. Lotze. He added that there appears to be no clear difference in terms of long-term outcome between children with MS who achieve NEDA and those who achieve minimal disease progression.

First-Line Therapies and Follow-Up Appointments

First-line agents for pediatric MS are the injectable drugs known as platform therapies. The International Pediatric MS Society Group (IPMSSG) recommends that all patients start first-line therapy (ie, interferon β or glatiramer acetate) soon after diagnosis.

Positive results from phase IV observational studies suggest that interferon β and glatiramer acetate are safe and efficacious treatments in pediatric MS. When studied in populations ranging in age from 12 to 17, these therapies decreased relapse rate, stabilized disability, and reduced accrual of new lesions. However, injectable treatments are associated with flu-like symptoms and injection-site reactions. Neurologists should start pediatric patients on interferon β with 25% to 50% of full dosing and titrate to a full adult dosing over four to six weeks. When initiating glatiramer acetate, neurologists should start children with a full adult dosing, 20 mg subcutaneous daily or 40 mg subcutaneous three times per week.

Follow-up appointments should occur every three to six months to assess adherence and determine efficacy of treatment. Neurologists are advised to ask patients whether they are comfortable with taking shots. Patients with needle anxiety, a common problem in pediatric MS, may need assistance from a child psychologist or child life specialist. Asking patients how often the patient or family forgets to take the disease-modifying therapy is also necessary, said Dr. Lotze. In addition, the transition from pediatric to adult care should be addressed in follow-up discussions. Teens must understand that certain disease-modifying therapies are contraindicated for pregnant patients. They also should be aware of how alcohol and other drugs interact with treatment.

Treatment Failure

Research indicates that approximately 30% of patients with pediatric-onset MS will not respond to the first-line therapies, and numerous variables may explain why. Age and disease duration can influence treatment efficacy, as can the number of relapses and the level of disease activity before treatment initiation. Patients who are nonadherent because of side effects and who continue to struggle with needle anxiety may experience treatment failure. The IPMSSG defines treatment failure as adherence to treatment for at least six months with no reduction in relapse rate or in new MRI T2 or contrast-enhancing lesions, or with two or more relapses within a 12-month period.

Second-Line Therapies

Trials of several oral agents are currently under way. The IPMSSG, however, urges neurologists to use extreme caution when considering nonplatform therapies for pediatric patients.

Fingolimod is a second-line drug for pediatric MS that blocks the egress of lymphocytes from the lymph nodes. A small percentage of patients taking this oral agent may develop bradycardia. Monitoring is required for the first six hours of treatment to ensure that the patient has no side effects. Some adverse effects associated with the drug include: first dose bradycardia, macular edema, and herpetic infections.

Dimethyl fumarate is an Nrf2 antioxidant pathway modulator that is associated with adverse effects such as flushing and gastrointestinal upset, said Dr. Lotze. Low-dose aspirin may help with flushing, and a proton pump inhibitor can help to manage the gastrointestinal upset. This treatment requires patients to undergo monitoring for blood count and liver function, as does fingolimod.

Teriflunomide, a pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor, is a Pregnancy Category X drug because it increases the risk of birth defects. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody, is gaining popularity for treating MS. Studies suggest that ocrelizumab may be well tolerated in pediatric MS. Natlizumamb, cladribine, and alemtuzumab are typically used to treat more aggressive forms of MS.

Neurologists rarely prescribe cyclophosphamide or mitoxantrone in pediatric MS. Cyclophosphamide has no formal FDA approval for adult MS or pediatric-onset MS and is associated with increased risks of bladder cancer, secondary leukemia, and infertility. Mitoxantrone is FDA-approved for adults with aggressive relapsing-remitting MS and secondary progressive MS. It is associated with increased cancer risk, however, and is highly cardiotoxic.

“After you have initiated a second-line agent, you need to continue to monitor aspects of disease control, including relapse rate, disability, MRI changes, and other adverse events. If you continue to see breakthrough disease, then you may need to consider … changing to another agent or moving to a more aggressive therapy such as rituximab or natalizumab,” said Dr. Lotze.

—Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

Chitnis T, Ghezzi A, Bajer-Korneck B, et al. Pediatric multiple sclerosis: Escalation and emerging treatments. Neurology. 2016;87(9 Suppl 2):S10 3-S109.

Jancic J, Nikolic B, Ivancevic N, et al. Multiple sclerosis in pediatrics: Current concepts and treatment options. Neurol Ther. 2016:5(2):131-143.

VANCOUVER—Pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) presents unique concerns, making appropriate treatment especially important, according to an overview presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Child Neurology Society. Currently, disease-modifying therapies with FDA approval in adult MS have not been approved for the treatment of pediatric MS. In addition, brain growth and cognition are adversely affected in pediatric MS. Furthermore, children with MS tend to become disabled at a younger age, compared with adults.

Diagnosis and Initiation of Therapy

Neurologists should be prepared to engage with children and their families to ensure the most efficacious treatment. “Whenever you are having that conversation or you are considering starting the disease-modifying therapy, you need to balance the need to treat the disease with the idea that you are going to be starting a therapy for a lifetime,” said Dr. Lotze.

Disease-modifying therapies target the inflammatory aspects of pediatric-onset MS and should be initiated in children with a confirmed diagnosis, said Dr. Lotze. Children with clinically isolated syndrome who appear to be at high risk for MS and children with positive oligoclonal bands or elevated IgG index may also need to begin a disease-modifying therapy. Distinguishing between MS, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), and neuromyelitis optica (NMO) poses challenges, especially in children under age 10. Certain interferons can exacerbate NMO and may be harmful in children with ADEM or multiphasic ADEM.

Setting Goals

Neurologists are encouraged to counsel patients about the purpose and side effects of treatment, as well as to establish reasonable expectations for treatment. Additionally, children and families should be aware that another attack may occur during treatment and should be informed about what to do if it does.

No therapy is 100% efficacious in pediatric or adult MS, said Dr. Lotze. Research suggests that 50% of adults have no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) at two years of the disease. After seven years, however, 7% of these adults meet NEDA criteria. As a result, minimal disease progression (defined as less than one attack per year, fewer than three new lesions on a yearly MRI, and no progression in disability) may be a more attainable goal. “We would like to see a drug in a single individual or patient that is effective in achieving NEDA. If that is not possible … you might find that ultimately what you can go for is minimal disease progression,” said Dr. Lotze. He added that there appears to be no clear difference in terms of long-term outcome between children with MS who achieve NEDA and those who achieve minimal disease progression.

First-Line Therapies and Follow-Up Appointments

First-line agents for pediatric MS are the injectable drugs known as platform therapies. The International Pediatric MS Society Group (IPMSSG) recommends that all patients start first-line therapy (ie, interferon β or glatiramer acetate) soon after diagnosis.

Positive results from phase IV observational studies suggest that interferon β and glatiramer acetate are safe and efficacious treatments in pediatric MS. When studied in populations ranging in age from 12 to 17, these therapies decreased relapse rate, stabilized disability, and reduced accrual of new lesions. However, injectable treatments are associated with flu-like symptoms and injection-site reactions. Neurologists should start pediatric patients on interferon β with 25% to 50% of full dosing and titrate to a full adult dosing over four to six weeks. When initiating glatiramer acetate, neurologists should start children with a full adult dosing, 20 mg subcutaneous daily or 40 mg subcutaneous three times per week.

Follow-up appointments should occur every three to six months to assess adherence and determine efficacy of treatment. Neurologists are advised to ask patients whether they are comfortable with taking shots. Patients with needle anxiety, a common problem in pediatric MS, may need assistance from a child psychologist or child life specialist. Asking patients how often the patient or family forgets to take the disease-modifying therapy is also necessary, said Dr. Lotze. In addition, the transition from pediatric to adult care should be addressed in follow-up discussions. Teens must understand that certain disease-modifying therapies are contraindicated for pregnant patients. They also should be aware of how alcohol and other drugs interact with treatment.

Treatment Failure

Research indicates that approximately 30% of patients with pediatric-onset MS will not respond to the first-line therapies, and numerous variables may explain why. Age and disease duration can influence treatment efficacy, as can the number of relapses and the level of disease activity before treatment initiation. Patients who are nonadherent because of side effects and who continue to struggle with needle anxiety may experience treatment failure. The IPMSSG defines treatment failure as adherence to treatment for at least six months with no reduction in relapse rate or in new MRI T2 or contrast-enhancing lesions, or with two or more relapses within a 12-month period.

Second-Line Therapies

Trials of several oral agents are currently under way. The IPMSSG, however, urges neurologists to use extreme caution when considering nonplatform therapies for pediatric patients.

Fingolimod is a second-line drug for pediatric MS that blocks the egress of lymphocytes from the lymph nodes. A small percentage of patients taking this oral agent may develop bradycardia. Monitoring is required for the first six hours of treatment to ensure that the patient has no side effects. Some adverse effects associated with the drug include: first dose bradycardia, macular edema, and herpetic infections.

Dimethyl fumarate is an Nrf2 antioxidant pathway modulator that is associated with adverse effects such as flushing and gastrointestinal upset, said Dr. Lotze. Low-dose aspirin may help with flushing, and a proton pump inhibitor can help to manage the gastrointestinal upset. This treatment requires patients to undergo monitoring for blood count and liver function, as does fingolimod.

Teriflunomide, a pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor, is a Pregnancy Category X drug because it increases the risk of birth defects. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody, is gaining popularity for treating MS. Studies suggest that ocrelizumab may be well tolerated in pediatric MS. Natlizumamb, cladribine, and alemtuzumab are typically used to treat more aggressive forms of MS.

Neurologists rarely prescribe cyclophosphamide or mitoxantrone in pediatric MS. Cyclophosphamide has no formal FDA approval for adult MS or pediatric-onset MS and is associated with increased risks of bladder cancer, secondary leukemia, and infertility. Mitoxantrone is FDA-approved for adults with aggressive relapsing-remitting MS and secondary progressive MS. It is associated with increased cancer risk, however, and is highly cardiotoxic.

“After you have initiated a second-line agent, you need to continue to monitor aspects of disease control, including relapse rate, disability, MRI changes, and other adverse events. If you continue to see breakthrough disease, then you may need to consider … changing to another agent or moving to a more aggressive therapy such as rituximab or natalizumab,” said Dr. Lotze.

—Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

Chitnis T, Ghezzi A, Bajer-Korneck B, et al. Pediatric multiple sclerosis: Escalation and emerging treatments. Neurology. 2016;87(9 Suppl 2):S10 3-S109.

Jancic J, Nikolic B, Ivancevic N, et al. Multiple sclerosis in pediatrics: Current concepts and treatment options. Neurol Ther. 2016:5(2):131-143.

Nine patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis had significant and unexpected disease activity within 12 months of switching from fingolimod to alemtuzumab, according to a report from six European neuroscience centers. The report was published January 10 in Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation.

The centers treated 174 patients with alemtuzumab (Lemtrada); 36 had been on fingolimod (Gilenya) beforehand. “Therefore, these nine patients ... represent 25% of the fingolimod-alemtuzumab cohort,” said Mark Willis, MBBCh, Clinical Research Fellow at Cardiff University, Wales, and colleagues.

The researchers speculated that prolonged sequestration of autoreactive lymphocytes following fingolimod withdrawal allowed “these cells to be concealed from the usual biological effect of alemtuzumab. Subsequent lymphocyte egress then provoke[d] disease reactivation ... This may have important implications for sequential drug selection and washout periods in a subset of patients who switch from fingolimod or drugs with similar biological mechanisms,” they said.

The nine patients were on fingolimod for between five and 33 months, but it was not effective. As a result, they were started on alemtuzumab following a median fingolimod washout period of six weeks. Eight patients had at least one clinical relapse within 12 months of the first alemtuzumab infusion cycle; the median time to relapse following alemtuzumab induction was 4.5 months. All nine patients had radiologic evidence of new disease activity.

Five patients had lymphocyte counts below normal when started on alemtuzumab. It has “been suggested that patients continue on an alternative [disease-modifying treatment] after fingolimod discontinuation, preferably until peripheral lymphocyte counts have normalized.” However, “there is currently no consensus as to which subsequent therapeutic agent is optimal,” the investigators said.

All nine patients went on to the second planned infusion of alemtuzumab; eight were relapse free during a mean follow-up of six months after the second treatment cycle. Of seven patients who had further imaging, four were radiologically stable, three had new T2 lesions, and one had a new gadolinium-enhancing lesion.

—M. Alexander Otto

Suggested Reading

Willis M, Pearson O, Illes Z, et al. An observational study of alemtuzumab following fingolimod for multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2017;4(2):e320.

Nine patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis had significant and unexpected disease activity within 12 months of switching from fingolimod to alemtuzumab, according to a report from six European neuroscience centers. The report was published January 10 in Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation.

The centers treated 174 patients with alemtuzumab (Lemtrada); 36 had been on fingolimod (Gilenya) beforehand. “Therefore, these nine patients ... represent 25% of the fingolimod-alemtuzumab cohort,” said Mark Willis, MBBCh, Clinical Research Fellow at Cardiff University, Wales, and colleagues.

The researchers speculated that prolonged sequestration of autoreactive lymphocytes following fingolimod withdrawal allowed “these cells to be concealed from the usual biological effect of alemtuzumab. Subsequent lymphocyte egress then provoke[d] disease reactivation ... This may have important implications for sequential drug selection and washout periods in a subset of patients who switch from fingolimod or drugs with similar biological mechanisms,” they said.

The nine patients were on fingolimod for between five and 33 months, but it was not effective. As a result, they were started on alemtuzumab following a median fingolimod washout period of six weeks. Eight patients had at least one clinical relapse within 12 months of the first alemtuzumab infusion cycle; the median time to relapse following alemtuzumab induction was 4.5 months. All nine patients had radiologic evidence of new disease activity.

Five patients had lymphocyte counts below normal when started on alemtuzumab. It has “been suggested that patients continue on an alternative [disease-modifying treatment] after fingolimod discontinuation, preferably until peripheral lymphocyte counts have normalized.” However, “there is currently no consensus as to which subsequent therapeutic agent is optimal,” the investigators said.

All nine patients went on to the second planned infusion of alemtuzumab; eight were relapse free during a mean follow-up of six months after the second treatment cycle. Of seven patients who had further imaging, four were radiologically stable, three had new T2 lesions, and one had a new gadolinium-enhancing lesion.

—M. Alexander Otto

Suggested Reading

Willis M, Pearson O, Illes Z, et al. An observational study of alemtuzumab following fingolimod for multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2017;4(2):e320.

Nine patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis had significant and unexpected disease activity within 12 months of switching from fingolimod to alemtuzumab, according to a report from six European neuroscience centers. The report was published January 10 in Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation.

The centers treated 174 patients with alemtuzumab (Lemtrada); 36 had been on fingolimod (Gilenya) beforehand. “Therefore, these nine patients ... represent 25% of the fingolimod-alemtuzumab cohort,” said Mark Willis, MBBCh, Clinical Research Fellow at Cardiff University, Wales, and colleagues.

The researchers speculated that prolonged sequestration of autoreactive lymphocytes following fingolimod withdrawal allowed “these cells to be concealed from the usual biological effect of alemtuzumab. Subsequent lymphocyte egress then provoke[d] disease reactivation ... This may have important implications for sequential drug selection and washout periods in a subset of patients who switch from fingolimod or drugs with similar biological mechanisms,” they said.

The nine patients were on fingolimod for between five and 33 months, but it was not effective. As a result, they were started on alemtuzumab following a median fingolimod washout period of six weeks. Eight patients had at least one clinical relapse within 12 months of the first alemtuzumab infusion cycle; the median time to relapse following alemtuzumab induction was 4.5 months. All nine patients had radiologic evidence of new disease activity.

Five patients had lymphocyte counts below normal when started on alemtuzumab. It has “been suggested that patients continue on an alternative [disease-modifying treatment] after fingolimod discontinuation, preferably until peripheral lymphocyte counts have normalized.” However, “there is currently no consensus as to which subsequent therapeutic agent is optimal,” the investigators said.

All nine patients went on to the second planned infusion of alemtuzumab; eight were relapse free during a mean follow-up of six months after the second treatment cycle. Of seven patients who had further imaging, four were radiologically stable, three had new T2 lesions, and one had a new gadolinium-enhancing lesion.

—M. Alexander Otto

Suggested Reading

Willis M, Pearson O, Illes Z, et al. An observational study of alemtuzumab following fingolimod for multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2017;4(2):e320.

“Our results further point to a possible sequence of events leading to MS, in which changes in vibration sensitivity may precede the appearance of demyelinating lesions in the brain,” said the researchers.

Evaluating First-Degree Relatives

Dr. Xia and colleagues conducted the Genes and Environment in MS (GEMS) project, the first prospective study of populations at risk for MS and the first detailed cross-sectional examination of higher-risk and lower-risk family members of patients with MS. The study involved 100 neurologically asymptomatic adults (ages 18 to 50) who were first-degree relatives of patients with MS and participated in the GEMS project from August 2012 to July 2015.

Forty-one of the participants were high-risk patients who scored in the top 10% of a Genetic and Environmental Risk Score (GERS), and 59 participants were low-risk and scored in the bottom 10% of the GERS. The GERS included genetic risk factors (ie, HLA alleles and several MS-associated non-HLA genetic variants) and environmental factors, such as smoking status, BMI, history of infectious mononucleosis and migraine, and vitamin D levels.

Since 40 of the 41 high-risk individuals were female, and 25 of the 59 low-risk individuals were female, the investigators limited the study to the 65 female participants to avoid “attributing any potential difference primarily to the role of sex,” the researchers said.

Testing Neurologic Function

To help identify early signs of MS, the investigators used brain MRI, optical coherence tomography, and other measures of neurologic function, including the Expanded Disability Status Scale, Timed 25-Foot Walk, Nine-Hole Peg Test, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Timed Up and Go, and high-contrast and low-contrast visual acuity.

Overall, women at high risk showed more subclinical signs of MS than women at low risk, based on an omnibus test that globally assessed the burden of neurologic dysfunction by comparing the overall differences between the two groups. Impaired vibration perception yielded a stronger result; of 47 women (27 at high risk and 20 at low risk) tested in this manner, women at high risk showed significantly reduced vibration perception in the distal lower extremities.

One patient in the high-risk group converted to clinically definite MS during the study. Four of the women at high risk had T2-weighted hyperintense lesions that met the 2010 McDonald MRI criteria for dissemination in space, compared with one woman at low risk. Two women at high risk and one at low risk met the 2016 proposed consensus MRI criteria for MS diagnosis. In addition, radiologic isolated syndrome occurred in one woman from each group. Also, there was a single focus of leptomeningeal enhancement in three women at high risk and one woman at low risk.

Some limitations of this study include the small size, the lack of male participants, the cross-sectional design, and the fact that the vibration sensitivity thresholds were in the normal range for individuals at high risk and low risk. Researchers “plan to confirm the finding of change in vibration sensitivity with a follow-up study.” They added that the “study highlights the importantneed to develop and test more sensitive measures, particularly with biometric devices, to detect subtle subclinical changes early in the disease process.”

Identifying High-Risk Individuals

“The GEMS study represents the most ambitious effort yet to identify presymptomatic individuals who are at increased risk for MS, and it is a valuable first step toward targeted screening,” said Fredrik Piehl, MD, PhD, Professor of Neuroimmunology at Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, in an accompanying editorial. “Even if we cannot yet intervene therapeutically using currently available disease-modifying treatments in presymptomatic stages of MS, the ability to better define high-risk individuals is likely to make active surveillance programs more cost effective. It also provides important information to counsel individuals about lifestyle changes, such as quitting smoking. The GERS also can likely be further refined with more up-to-date data on the interaction between specific genetic and environmental factors,” he added. Dr. Piehl disclosed research support, travel grants, and other relationships with Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis, Merck, Roche, Serono, and Teva.

—Heidi Splete

Suggested Reading

Xia Z, Steele SU, Bakshi A, et al. Assessment of early evidence of multiple sclerosis in a prospective study of asymptomatic high-risk family members. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Jan 17 [Epub ahead of print].

Piehl F. Multiple sclerosis-a tuning fork still required. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Jan 17 [Epub ahead of print].

“Our results further point to a possible sequence of events leading to MS, in which changes in vibration sensitivity may precede the appearance of demyelinating lesions in the brain,” said the researchers.

Evaluating First-Degree Relatives

Dr. Xia and colleagues conducted the Genes and Environment in MS (GEMS) project, the first prospective study of populations at risk for MS and the first detailed cross-sectional examination of higher-risk and lower-risk family members of patients with MS. The study involved 100 neurologically asymptomatic adults (ages 18 to 50) who were first-degree relatives of patients with MS and participated in the GEMS project from August 2012 to July 2015.

Forty-one of the participants were high-risk patients who scored in the top 10% of a Genetic and Environmental Risk Score (GERS), and 59 participants were low-risk and scored in the bottom 10% of the GERS. The GERS included genetic risk factors (ie, HLA alleles and several MS-associated non-HLA genetic variants) and environmental factors, such as smoking status, BMI, history of infectious mononucleosis and migraine, and vitamin D levels.

Since 40 of the 41 high-risk individuals were female, and 25 of the 59 low-risk individuals were female, the investigators limited the study to the 65 female participants to avoid “attributing any potential difference primarily to the role of sex,” the researchers said.

Testing Neurologic Function

To help identify early signs of MS, the investigators used brain MRI, optical coherence tomography, and other measures of neurologic function, including the Expanded Disability Status Scale, Timed 25-Foot Walk, Nine-Hole Peg Test, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Timed Up and Go, and high-contrast and low-contrast visual acuity.

Overall, women at high risk showed more subclinical signs of MS than women at low risk, based on an omnibus test that globally assessed the burden of neurologic dysfunction by comparing the overall differences between the two groups. Impaired vibration perception yielded a stronger result; of 47 women (27 at high risk and 20 at low risk) tested in this manner, women at high risk showed significantly reduced vibration perception in the distal lower extremities.

One patient in the high-risk group converted to clinically definite MS during the study. Four of the women at high risk had T2-weighted hyperintense lesions that met the 2010 McDonald MRI criteria for dissemination in space, compared with one woman at low risk. Two women at high risk and one at low risk met the 2016 proposed consensus MRI criteria for MS diagnosis. In addition, radiologic isolated syndrome occurred in one woman from each group. Also, there was a single focus of leptomeningeal enhancement in three women at high risk and one woman at low risk.

Some limitations of this study include the small size, the lack of male participants, the cross-sectional design, and the fact that the vibration sensitivity thresholds were in the normal range for individuals at high risk and low risk. Researchers “plan to confirm the finding of change in vibration sensitivity with a follow-up study.” They added that the “study highlights the importantneed to develop and test more sensitive measures, particularly with biometric devices, to detect subtle subclinical changes early in the disease process.”

Identifying High-Risk Individuals

“The GEMS study represents the most ambitious effort yet to identify presymptomatic individuals who are at increased risk for MS, and it is a valuable first step toward targeted screening,” said Fredrik Piehl, MD, PhD, Professor of Neuroimmunology at Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, in an accompanying editorial. “Even if we cannot yet intervene therapeutically using currently available disease-modifying treatments in presymptomatic stages of MS, the ability to better define high-risk individuals is likely to make active surveillance programs more cost effective. It also provides important information to counsel individuals about lifestyle changes, such as quitting smoking. The GERS also can likely be further refined with more up-to-date data on the interaction between specific genetic and environmental factors,” he added. Dr. Piehl disclosed research support, travel grants, and other relationships with Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis, Merck, Roche, Serono, and Teva.

—Heidi Splete

Suggested Reading

Xia Z, Steele SU, Bakshi A, et al. Assessment of early evidence of multiple sclerosis in a prospective study of asymptomatic high-risk family members. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Jan 17 [Epub ahead of print].

Piehl F. Multiple sclerosis-a tuning fork still required. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Jan 17 [Epub ahead of print].

“Our results further point to a possible sequence of events leading to MS, in which changes in vibration sensitivity may precede the appearance of demyelinating lesions in the brain,” said the researchers.

Evaluating First-Degree Relatives

Dr. Xia and colleagues conducted the Genes and Environment in MS (GEMS) project, the first prospective study of populations at risk for MS and the first detailed cross-sectional examination of higher-risk and lower-risk family members of patients with MS. The study involved 100 neurologically asymptomatic adults (ages 18 to 50) who were first-degree relatives of patients with MS and participated in the GEMS project from August 2012 to July 2015.

Forty-one of the participants were high-risk patients who scored in the top 10% of a Genetic and Environmental Risk Score (GERS), and 59 participants were low-risk and scored in the bottom 10% of the GERS. The GERS included genetic risk factors (ie, HLA alleles and several MS-associated non-HLA genetic variants) and environmental factors, such as smoking status, BMI, history of infectious mononucleosis and migraine, and vitamin D levels.

Since 40 of the 41 high-risk individuals were female, and 25 of the 59 low-risk individuals were female, the investigators limited the study to the 65 female participants to avoid “attributing any potential difference primarily to the role of sex,” the researchers said.

Testing Neurologic Function

To help identify early signs of MS, the investigators used brain MRI, optical coherence tomography, and other measures of neurologic function, including the Expanded Disability Status Scale, Timed 25-Foot Walk, Nine-Hole Peg Test, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Timed Up and Go, and high-contrast and low-contrast visual acuity.

Overall, women at high risk showed more subclinical signs of MS than women at low risk, based on an omnibus test that globally assessed the burden of neurologic dysfunction by comparing the overall differences between the two groups. Impaired vibration perception yielded a stronger result; of 47 women (27 at high risk and 20 at low risk) tested in this manner, women at high risk showed significantly reduced vibration perception in the distal lower extremities.

One patient in the high-risk group converted to clinically definite MS during the study. Four of the women at high risk had T2-weighted hyperintense lesions that met the 2010 McDonald MRI criteria for dissemination in space, compared with one woman at low risk. Two women at high risk and one at low risk met the 2016 proposed consensus MRI criteria for MS diagnosis. In addition, radiologic isolated syndrome occurred in one woman from each group. Also, there was a single focus of leptomeningeal enhancement in three women at high risk and one woman at low risk.

Some limitations of this study include the small size, the lack of male participants, the cross-sectional design, and the fact that the vibration sensitivity thresholds were in the normal range for individuals at high risk and low risk. Researchers “plan to confirm the finding of change in vibration sensitivity with a follow-up study.” They added that the “study highlights the importantneed to develop and test more sensitive measures, particularly with biometric devices, to detect subtle subclinical changes early in the disease process.”

Identifying High-Risk Individuals

“The GEMS study represents the most ambitious effort yet to identify presymptomatic individuals who are at increased risk for MS, and it is a valuable first step toward targeted screening,” said Fredrik Piehl, MD, PhD, Professor of Neuroimmunology at Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, in an accompanying editorial. “Even if we cannot yet intervene therapeutically using currently available disease-modifying treatments in presymptomatic stages of MS, the ability to better define high-risk individuals is likely to make active surveillance programs more cost effective. It also provides important information to counsel individuals about lifestyle changes, such as quitting smoking. The GERS also can likely be further refined with more up-to-date data on the interaction between specific genetic and environmental factors,” he added. Dr. Piehl disclosed research support, travel grants, and other relationships with Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis, Merck, Roche, Serono, and Teva.

—Heidi Splete

Suggested Reading

Xia Z, Steele SU, Bakshi A, et al. Assessment of early evidence of multiple sclerosis in a prospective study of asymptomatic high-risk family members. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Jan 17 [Epub ahead of print].

Piehl F. Multiple sclerosis-a tuning fork still required. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Jan 17 [Epub ahead of print].

Compared with the natural history of the disease, disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) significantly reduce the risks of long-term disability worsening and evolution to secondary progressive MS (SPMS), according to research published in the October issue of Annals of Neurology. The data also suggest that patients who have no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) for two years are no more likely to have long-term stability than patients who do not reach this end point.

“These observations challenge the concept that NEDA represents remission. Although NEDA may be a useful measure for assessing relative therapeutic efficacy, many patients who meet NEDA criteria over two years go on to develop clinically significant disability,” said Bruce A. C. Cree, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Neurology at the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine. “Worsening in patients who meet the two-year NEDA end point could result from active spinal cord disease not captured with brain MRI, progressive axonal or neuronal degeneration, or an escape from a true but transient remission state.

Researchers had anticipated that between 36% and 50% of patients with relapsing MS (RMS) would develop SPMS, but 11.3% of the cohort transitioned to SPMS during the course of the study. Evolution of sustained disability was also slower than expected, said Dr. Cree.

Examining Long-Term Effects of Treatment

Natural history studies from the pretreatment era suggest that between one-third and one-half of patients with MS experience substantial worsening of neurologic disability approximately 15 years after disease onset. Disease-modifying therapies in MS have been studied during the past two decades and are associated with improvement in the short term. Their effect on long-term outcomes is unknown, however. Furthermore, little is known about the relationship between short-term MRI measurements and long-term disability in MS.

As a result, Dr. Cree and colleagues conducted a prospective study to characterize the accrual of long-term disability in a cohort of actively treated patients with MS. Additionally, they sought to assess whether clinical and MRI data used in clinical trials have long-term prognostic value.

Eligible participants had all clinical subtypes of MS and were first evaluated at the MS Center at the University of California, San Francisco between July 2004 and September 2005. Patients were excluded if they were unable to tolerate MRI scans, had poor venous access, or if they had other significant medical illnesses that might interfere with goals of the study. Investigators followed participants annually for five years. In addition, patients underwent re-evaluation at extended time points for as long as 10 years after baseline.

Researchers defined disability progression as a clinically significant worsening in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), the timed 25-foot walk, the nine-hole peg test, and the paced serial auditory addition test.

Two Tiers of Therapy

Participants were treated with FDA-approved therapies or off-label therapies. Researchers defined two treatment tiers and categorized therapies based on their relative perceived effectiveness using data from clinical trials.

The first tier of treatment, platform therapy, included interferon (IFN) beta, glatiramer acetate, and off-label therapies such as glucocorticoids, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil. The second tier of treatment, high-potency therapy, included natalizumab, rituximab, mitoxantrone, and cyclophosphamide.

NEDA and Long-Term Disability

Of 517 actively managed patients with MS enrolled in the study, 366 had RMS, 48 had SPMS, 21 had primary progressive MS (PPMS), and 82 had clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). After 10 years of follow-up, neurologic disability was stable or improved, compared with baseline, in 41% of patients. Serum vitamin D levels were inversely associated with short-term MS disease activity, but were not associated with long-term disability. At a median time of 16.8 years after disease onset, 10.7% of patients reached an EDSS score of greater than or equal to 6, and 18.1% of patients evolved from RMS to SPMS.

The investigators concluded that evolution to SPMS in this study was significantly lower than expected, based on natural history studies. They also noted that short-term increases in EDSS did not necessarily predict future accumulation of long-term disability in patients with RMS. In addition, subjects with NEDA by clinical and MRI criteria during the first two years had long-term outcomes that were no different from those of the cohort as a whole.

“Treating to target with two-year NEDA as the goal may not result in protection against long-term disability,” said Dr. Cree. “Long-term studies are urgently needed to determine if high-intensity therapy, initiated at the time of diagnosis or used in patients with seemingly inactive disease, is superior to the escalation approach employed in this cohort.”

—Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

University of California, San Francisco MS-EPIC Team, Cree BA, Gourraud PA, et al. Long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis disability in the treatment era. Ann Neurol. 2016;80(4):499-510.

Compared with the natural history of the disease, disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) significantly reduce the risks of long-term disability worsening and evolution to secondary progressive MS (SPMS), according to research published in the October issue of Annals of Neurology. The data also suggest that patients who have no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) for two years are no more likely to have long-term stability than patients who do not reach this end point.

“These observations challenge the concept that NEDA represents remission. Although NEDA may be a useful measure for assessing relative therapeutic efficacy, many patients who meet NEDA criteria over two years go on to develop clinically significant disability,” said Bruce A. C. Cree, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Neurology at the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine. “Worsening in patients who meet the two-year NEDA end point could result from active spinal cord disease not captured with brain MRI, progressive axonal or neuronal degeneration, or an escape from a true but transient remission state.

Researchers had anticipated that between 36% and 50% of patients with relapsing MS (RMS) would develop SPMS, but 11.3% of the cohort transitioned to SPMS during the course of the study. Evolution of sustained disability was also slower than expected, said Dr. Cree.

Examining Long-Term Effects of Treatment

Natural history studies from the pretreatment era suggest that between one-third and one-half of patients with MS experience substantial worsening of neurologic disability approximately 15 years after disease onset. Disease-modifying therapies in MS have been studied during the past two decades and are associated with improvement in the short term. Their effect on long-term outcomes is unknown, however. Furthermore, little is known about the relationship between short-term MRI measurements and long-term disability in MS.

As a result, Dr. Cree and colleagues conducted a prospective study to characterize the accrual of long-term disability in a cohort of actively treated patients with MS. Additionally, they sought to assess whether clinical and MRI data used in clinical trials have long-term prognostic value.

Eligible participants had all clinical subtypes of MS and were first evaluated at the MS Center at the University of California, San Francisco between July 2004 and September 2005. Patients were excluded if they were unable to tolerate MRI scans, had poor venous access, or if they had other significant medical illnesses that might interfere with goals of the study. Investigators followed participants annually for five years. In addition, patients underwent re-evaluation at extended time points for as long as 10 years after baseline.

Researchers defined disability progression as a clinically significant worsening in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), the timed 25-foot walk, the nine-hole peg test, and the paced serial auditory addition test.

Two Tiers of Therapy

Participants were treated with FDA-approved therapies or off-label therapies. Researchers defined two treatment tiers and categorized therapies based on their relative perceived effectiveness using data from clinical trials.

The first tier of treatment, platform therapy, included interferon (IFN) beta, glatiramer acetate, and off-label therapies such as glucocorticoids, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil. The second tier of treatment, high-potency therapy, included natalizumab, rituximab, mitoxantrone, and cyclophosphamide.

NEDA and Long-Term Disability

Of 517 actively managed patients with MS enrolled in the study, 366 had RMS, 48 had SPMS, 21 had primary progressive MS (PPMS), and 82 had clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). After 10 years of follow-up, neurologic disability was stable or improved, compared with baseline, in 41% of patients. Serum vitamin D levels were inversely associated with short-term MS disease activity, but were not associated with long-term disability. At a median time of 16.8 years after disease onset, 10.7% of patients reached an EDSS score of greater than or equal to 6, and 18.1% of patients evolved from RMS to SPMS.

The investigators concluded that evolution to SPMS in this study was significantly lower than expected, based on natural history studies. They also noted that short-term increases in EDSS did not necessarily predict future accumulation of long-term disability in patients with RMS. In addition, subjects with NEDA by clinical and MRI criteria during the first two years had long-term outcomes that were no different from those of the cohort as a whole.

“Treating to target with two-year NEDA as the goal may not result in protection against long-term disability,” said Dr. Cree. “Long-term studies are urgently needed to determine if high-intensity therapy, initiated at the time of diagnosis or used in patients with seemingly inactive disease, is superior to the escalation approach employed in this cohort.”

—Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

University of California, San Francisco MS-EPIC Team, Cree BA, Gourraud PA, et al. Long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis disability in the treatment era. Ann Neurol. 2016;80(4):499-510.

Compared with the natural history of the disease, disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) significantly reduce the risks of long-term disability worsening and evolution to secondary progressive MS (SPMS), according to research published in the October issue of Annals of Neurology. The data also suggest that patients who have no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) for two years are no more likely to have long-term stability than patients who do not reach this end point.

“These observations challenge the concept that NEDA represents remission. Although NEDA may be a useful measure for assessing relative therapeutic efficacy, many patients who meet NEDA criteria over two years go on to develop clinically significant disability,” said Bruce A. C. Cree, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Neurology at the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine. “Worsening in patients who meet the two-year NEDA end point could result from active spinal cord disease not captured with brain MRI, progressive axonal or neuronal degeneration, or an escape from a true but transient remission state.

Researchers had anticipated that between 36% and 50% of patients with relapsing MS (RMS) would develop SPMS, but 11.3% of the cohort transitioned to SPMS during the course of the study. Evolution of sustained disability was also slower than expected, said Dr. Cree.

Examining Long-Term Effects of Treatment

Natural history studies from the pretreatment era suggest that between one-third and one-half of patients with MS experience substantial worsening of neurologic disability approximately 15 years after disease onset. Disease-modifying therapies in MS have been studied during the past two decades and are associated with improvement in the short term. Their effect on long-term outcomes is unknown, however. Furthermore, little is known about the relationship between short-term MRI measurements and long-term disability in MS.

As a result, Dr. Cree and colleagues conducted a prospective study to characterize the accrual of long-term disability in a cohort of actively treated patients with MS. Additionally, they sought to assess whether clinical and MRI data used in clinical trials have long-term prognostic value.

Eligible participants had all clinical subtypes of MS and were first evaluated at the MS Center at the University of California, San Francisco between July 2004 and September 2005. Patients were excluded if they were unable to tolerate MRI scans, had poor venous access, or if they had other significant medical illnesses that might interfere with goals of the study. Investigators followed participants annually for five years. In addition, patients underwent re-evaluation at extended time points for as long as 10 years after baseline.

Researchers defined disability progression as a clinically significant worsening in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), the timed 25-foot walk, the nine-hole peg test, and the paced serial auditory addition test.

Two Tiers of Therapy

Participants were treated with FDA-approved therapies or off-label therapies. Researchers defined two treatment tiers and categorized therapies based on their relative perceived effectiveness using data from clinical trials.

The first tier of treatment, platform therapy, included interferon (IFN) beta, glatiramer acetate, and off-label therapies such as glucocorticoids, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil. The second tier of treatment, high-potency therapy, included natalizumab, rituximab, mitoxantrone, and cyclophosphamide.

NEDA and Long-Term Disability

Of 517 actively managed patients with MS enrolled in the study, 366 had RMS, 48 had SPMS, 21 had primary progressive MS (PPMS), and 82 had clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). After 10 years of follow-up, neurologic disability was stable or improved, compared with baseline, in 41% of patients. Serum vitamin D levels were inversely associated with short-term MS disease activity, but were not associated with long-term disability. At a median time of 16.8 years after disease onset, 10.7% of patients reached an EDSS score of greater than or equal to 6, and 18.1% of patients evolved from RMS to SPMS.

The investigators concluded that evolution to SPMS in this study was significantly lower than expected, based on natural history studies. They also noted that short-term increases in EDSS did not necessarily predict future accumulation of long-term disability in patients with RMS. In addition, subjects with NEDA by clinical and MRI criteria during the first two years had long-term outcomes that were no different from those of the cohort as a whole.

“Treating to target with two-year NEDA as the goal may not result in protection against long-term disability,” said Dr. Cree. “Long-term studies are urgently needed to determine if high-intensity therapy, initiated at the time of diagnosis or used in patients with seemingly inactive disease, is superior to the escalation approach employed in this cohort.”

—Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

University of California, San Francisco MS-EPIC Team, Cree BA, Gourraud PA, et al. Long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis disability in the treatment era. Ann Neurol. 2016;80(4):499-510.

A new report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine shines a light on what the existing literature says about the perceived health benefits and dangers of using cannabis and cannabinoids.

“What little we know for certain about the effects of marijuana on human health — and all that we have reason to suspect — justifies serious national concern,” wrote the authors of the report, the evidence and research review of which was chaired by Marie McCormick, MD, of Harvard University in Boston. “The committee’s major recommendation called for an intensification and more comprehensive research effort into the effects of marijuana on the health of the American people.”

The authors concluded current literature shows substantial evidence stating that cannabis is effective at managing chronic pain in adults, while oral cannabinoid use is effective in mitigating nausea or vomiting induced by chemotherapy and improving patient-reported spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Additionally, cannabinoids – specifically, nabiximols – are moderately effective in the short term for improving sleep disturbances brought on by obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic pain, and multiple sclerosis.

However, there is limited evidence to support cannabis or cannabinoid use for reducing weight loss or inducing appetite in HIV/AIDS patients, improving clinician-measured spasicity or Tourette syndrome symptoms, reducing anxiety, improving symptoms brought on by post-traumatic stress, and improving outcomes in patients who have suffered traumatic brain injury or intracranial hemorrhage.

Additionally, there is no evidence to support the use of cannabis or cannabinoids in treating cancers or cancer-related anorexia, irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, epilepsy, spinal cord-related spasticity, symptoms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, and dystonia.

“Present data on drug use progression neither support nor refute the suggestion that medical availability would increase drug abuse,” the authors noted. “However, this question is beyond the issues normally considered for medical uses of drugs and should not be a factor in evaluating the therapeutic potential of marijuana or cannabinoids.”

From a mental health standpoint, suicidal thoughts were found to be more likely in individuals who frequently used cannabis or cannabinoids. Symptoms like depression and anxiety are also more likely in those who smoke marijuana and have bipolar disorder. There is also “limited evidence of a statistical association between sustained abstinence from cannabis use [and] impairments in the cognitive domains of learning, memory, and attention.”

Among the other significant findings of the report, children who live in states where marijuana has been legalized are significantly more likely to ingest cannabis or cannabinoids; so far, marijuana use in some form – either recreational or medical – has been approved in 28 states and Washington, DC. Furthermore, adolescents who use marijuana are more likely to experience difficulties in social and educational development. And individuals of any age who smoke marijuana and drive are more likely to be involved in a car accident.

Also noteworthy is the lack of evidence pointing to marijuana use causing cancer. While chronic marijuana smoking was found to be linked to bronchitis, it was not found to cause cancers that are most commonly associated with chronic smoking of tobacco.

“This report highlights that there are critical gaps in our understanding of the health effects of cannabis,” explained John H. Krystal, MD, of Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut.

A reviewer of the report, Dr. Krystal elaborated on the gaps that exist in the current literature, saying “One reason for these gaps has been regulatory and practical challenges facing those who attempted to conduct this research. For example, what supply of cannabis should they use? Where, in the typical hospital settings where research is conducted, should patients participating in research be permitted to smoke cannabis? What standards should the institutional review committees employ when evaluating studies that involve the administration of cannabis or other cannabinoids?”

Ultimately, Dr. Krystal stated, “what should be evident from this summary is that only a few of the many publicized clinical applications for cannabis are adequately supported by acceptable research standards for determining safety or efficacy.” Specifically, states that have approved cannabis use for managing PTSD symptoms are doing so based off “meager” evidence, and in some cases, are circumventing FDA regulatory processes in a way. This could not only compromise patient care, but muddy the waters for physicians who want to treat their patients safely while also following legal avenues.

“Physicians may face a tension between their roles as physicians [and] their wish to provide a legal path for access to cannabinoids for their patients,” Dr. Krystal said, adding that “the endorsement of particular cannabis prescription practices by the states, even for clinical indications where cannabis has not been shown to be safe and effective, may create pressure for physicians to engage in ineffective or unsafe cannabis prescription practices.”

Ultimately, the report underlines areas of need in terms of understanding and effectively using cannabis and cannabinoid in treating patients. Calling the report a “call to arms” for those in the health care – and, specifically, the public health – arena, Dr. Krystal added that he hopes the findings of the report will be used for educating “legislators, physicians, and consumers [about the] potential benefits and risks of cannabis and thereby help to guide both legislation, clinical practice, and perhaps recreational use.”
 

dchitnis@frontlinemedcom.com

A new report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine shines a light on what the existing literature says about the perceived health benefits and dangers of using cannabis and cannabinoids.

“What little we know for certain about the effects of marijuana on human health — and all that we have reason to suspect — justifies serious national concern,” wrote the authors of the report, the evidence and research review of which was chaired by Marie McCormick, MD, of Harvard University in Boston. “The committee’s major recommendation called for an intensification and more comprehensive research effort into the effects of marijuana on the health of the American people.”

The authors concluded current literature shows substantial evidence stating that cannabis is effective at managing chronic pain in adults, while oral cannabinoid use is effective in mitigating nausea or vomiting induced by chemotherapy and improving patient-reported spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Additionally, cannabinoids – specifically, nabiximols – are moderately effective in the short term for improving sleep disturbances brought on by obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic pain, and multiple sclerosis.

However, there is limited evidence to support cannabis or cannabinoid use for reducing weight loss or inducing appetite in HIV/AIDS patients, improving clinician-measured spasicity or Tourette syndrome symptoms, reducing anxiety, improving symptoms brought on by post-traumatic stress, and improving outcomes in patients who have suffered traumatic brain injury or intracranial hemorrhage.

Additionally, there is no evidence to support the use of cannabis or cannabinoids in treating cancers or cancer-related anorexia, irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, epilepsy, spinal cord-related spasticity, symptoms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, and dystonia.

“Present data on drug use progression neither support nor refute the suggestion that medical availability would increase drug abuse,” the authors noted. “However, this question is beyond the issues normally considered for medical uses of drugs and should not be a factor in evaluating the therapeutic potential of marijuana or cannabinoids.”

From a mental health standpoint, suicidal thoughts were found to be more likely in individuals who frequently used cannabis or cannabinoids. Symptoms like depression and anxiety are also more likely in those who smoke marijuana and have bipolar disorder. There is also “limited evidence of a statistical association between sustained abstinence from cannabis use [and] impairments in the cognitive domains of learning, memory, and attention.”

Among the other significant findings of the report, children who live in states where marijuana has been legalized are significantly more likely to ingest cannabis or cannabinoids; so far, marijuana use in some form – either recreational or medical – has been approved in 28 states and Washington, DC. Furthermore, adolescents who use marijuana are more likely to experience difficulties in social and educational development. And individuals of any age who smoke marijuana and drive are more likely to be involved in a car accident.

Also noteworthy is the lack of evidence pointing to marijuana use causing cancer. While chronic marijuana smoking was found to be linked to bronchitis, it was not found to cause cancers that are most commonly associated with chronic smoking of tobacco.

“This report highlights that there are critical gaps in our understanding of the health effects of cannabis,” explained John H. Krystal, MD, of Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut.

A reviewer of the report, Dr. Krystal elaborated on the gaps that exist in the current literature, saying “One reason for these gaps has been regulatory and practical challenges facing those who attempted to conduct this research. For example, what supply of cannabis should they use? Where, in the typical hospital settings where research is conducted, should patients participating in research be permitted to smoke cannabis? What standards should the institutional review committees employ when evaluating studies that involve the administration of cannabis or other cannabinoids?”

Ultimately, Dr. Krystal stated, “what should be evident from this summary is that only a few of the many publicized clinical applications for cannabis are adequately supported by acceptable research standards for determining safety or efficacy.” Specifically, states that have approved cannabis use for managing PTSD symptoms are doing so based off “meager” evidence, and in some cases, are circumventing FDA regulatory processes in a way. This could not only compromise patient care, but muddy the waters for physicians who want to treat their patients safely while also following legal avenues.

“Physicians may face a tension between their roles as physicians [and] their wish to provide a legal path for access to cannabinoids for their patients,” Dr. Krystal said, adding that “the endorsement of particular cannabis prescription practices by the states, even for clinical indications where cannabis has not been shown to be safe and effective, may create pressure for physicians to engage in ineffective or unsafe cannabis prescription practices.”

Ultimately, the report underlines areas of need in terms of understanding and effectively using cannabis and cannabinoid in treating patients. Calling the report a “call to arms” for those in the health care – and, specifically, the public health – arena, Dr. Krystal added that he hopes the findings of the report will be used for educating “legislators, physicians, and consumers [about the] potential benefits and risks of cannabis and thereby help to guide both legislation, clinical practice, and perhaps recreational use.”
 

dchitnis@frontlinemedcom.com

A new report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine shines a light on what the existing literature says about the perceived health benefits and dangers of using cannabis and cannabinoids.

“What little we know for certain about the effects of marijuana on human health — and all that we have reason to suspect — justifies serious national concern,” wrote the authors of the report, the evidence and research review of which was chaired by Marie McCormick, MD, of Harvard University in Boston. “The committee’s major recommendation called for an intensification and more comprehensive research effort into the effects of marijuana on the health of the American people.”

The authors concluded current literature shows substantial evidence stating that cannabis is effective at managing chronic pain in adults, while oral cannabinoid use is effective in mitigating nausea or vomiting induced by chemotherapy and improving patient-reported spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Additionally, cannabinoids – specifically, nabiximols – are moderately effective in the short term for improving sleep disturbances brought on by obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic pain, and multiple sclerosis.

However, there is limited evidence to support cannabis or cannabinoid use for reducing weight loss or inducing appetite in HIV/AIDS patients, improving clinician-measured spasicity or Tourette syndrome symptoms, reducing anxiety, improving symptoms brought on by post-traumatic stress, and improving outcomes in patients who have suffered traumatic brain injury or intracranial hemorrhage.

Additionally, there is no evidence to support the use of cannabis or cannabinoids in treating cancers or cancer-related anorexia, irritable bowel syndrome symptoms, epilepsy, spinal cord-related spasticity, symptoms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, and dystonia.

“Present data on drug use progression neither support nor refute the suggestion that medical availability would increase drug abuse,” the authors noted. “However, this question is beyond the issues normally considered for medical uses of drugs and should not be a factor in evaluating the therapeutic potential of marijuana or cannabinoids.”

From a mental health standpoint, suicidal thoughts were found to be more likely in individuals who frequently used cannabis or cannabinoids. Symptoms like depression and anxiety are also more likely in those who smoke marijuana and have bipolar disorder. There is also “limited evidence of a statistical association between sustained abstinence from cannabis use [and] impairments in the cognitive domains of learning, memory, and attention.”

Among the other significant findings of the report, children who live in states where marijuana has been legalized are significantly more likely to ingest cannabis or cannabinoids; so far, marijuana use in some form – either recreational or medical – has been approved in 28 states and Washington, DC. Furthermore, adolescents who use marijuana are more likely to experience difficulties in social and educational development. And individuals of any age who smoke marijuana and drive are more likely to be involved in a car accident.

Also noteworthy is the lack of evidence pointing to marijuana use causing cancer. While chronic marijuana smoking was found to be linked to bronchitis, it was not found to cause cancers that are most commonly associated with chronic smoking of tobacco.

“This report highlights that there are critical gaps in our understanding of the health effects of cannabis,” explained John H. Krystal, MD, of Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut.

A reviewer of the report, Dr. Krystal elaborated on the gaps that exist in the current literature, saying “One reason for these gaps has been regulatory and practical challenges facing those who attempted to conduct this research. For example, what supply of cannabis should they use? Where, in the typical hospital settings where research is conducted, should patients participating in research be permitted to smoke cannabis? What standards should the institutional review committees employ when evaluating studies that involve the administration of cannabis or other cannabinoids?”

Ultimately, Dr. Krystal stated, “what should be evident from this summary is that only a few of the many publicized clinical applications for cannabis are adequately supported by acceptable research standards for determining safety or efficacy.” Specifically, states that have approved cannabis use for managing PTSD symptoms are doing so based off “meager” evidence, and in some cases, are circumventing FDA regulatory processes in a way. This could not only compromise patient care, but muddy the waters for physicians who want to treat their patients safely while also following legal avenues.

“Physicians may face a tension between their roles as physicians [and] their wish to provide a legal path for access to cannabinoids for their patients,” Dr. Krystal said, adding that “the endorsement of particular cannabis prescription practices by the states, even for clinical indications where cannabis has not been shown to be safe and effective, may create pressure for physicians to engage in ineffective or unsafe cannabis prescription practices.”

Ultimately, the report underlines areas of need in terms of understanding and effectively using cannabis and cannabinoid in treating patients. Calling the report a “call to arms” for those in the health care – and, specifically, the public health – arena, Dr. Krystal added that he hopes the findings of the report will be used for educating “legislators, physicians, and consumers [about the] potential benefits and risks of cannabis and thereby help to guide both legislation, clinical practice, and perhaps recreational use.”
 

dchitnis@frontlinemedcom.com

Nine relapsing multiple sclerosis patients had significant and unexpected disease activity within 12 months of switching from fingolimod to alemtuzumab, according to a report from six European neuroscience centers.

The centers treated 174 patients with alemtuzumab (Lemtrada); 36 had been on fingolimod (Gilenya) beforehand. “Therefore, these nine patients ... represent 25% of the fingolimod-alemtuzumab cohort,” said investigators led by Mark Willis, MBBCh, a clinical research fellow at Cardiff University, Wales (Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2017 Jan 10. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000320).

solitude72/iStockphoto

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

Nine relapsing multiple sclerosis patients had significant and unexpected disease activity within 12 months of switching from fingolimod to alemtuzumab, according to a report from six European neuroscience centers.

The centers treated 174 patients with alemtuzumab (Lemtrada); 36 had been on fingolimod (Gilenya) beforehand. “Therefore, these nine patients ... represent 25% of the fingolimod-alemtuzumab cohort,” said investigators led by Mark Willis, MBBCh, a clinical research fellow at Cardiff University, Wales (Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2017 Jan 10. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000320).

solitude72/iStockphoto

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

Nine relapsing multiple sclerosis patients had significant and unexpected disease activity within 12 months of switching from fingolimod to alemtuzumab, according to a report from six European neuroscience centers.

The centers treated 174 patients with alemtuzumab (Lemtrada); 36 had been on fingolimod (Gilenya) beforehand. “Therefore, these nine patients ... represent 25% of the fingolimod-alemtuzumab cohort,” said investigators led by Mark Willis, MBBCh, a clinical research fellow at Cardiff University, Wales (Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2017 Jan 10. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000320).

solitude72/iStockphoto

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

Asymptomatic first-degree relatives of multiple sclerosis patients at high risk for developing the disease were significantly more likely to show subclinical signs of MS than were family members at lower risk, in the Genes and Environment in Multiple Sclerosis prospective cohort study. The findings were published online on Jan. 17 in JAMA Neurology.

The Genes and Environment in Multiple Sclerosis (GEMS) project is the first prospective study of populations at risk for MS and is the first detailed cross-sectional examination of higher-risk and lower-risk family members to date, according to investigators led by Zongqi Xia, MD, PhD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston. Although the totality of evidence put together through neuroimaging and numerous clinical tests in the study indicate that individuals with the highest risk for MS have higher risk for the disease than do those with the lowest risk, simple vibration threshold testing gave the best results, Dr. Xia and his colleagues reported.

copyright Zerbor/Thinkstock

Asymptomatic first-degree relatives of multiple sclerosis patients at high risk for developing the disease were significantly more likely to show subclinical signs of MS than were family members at lower risk, in the Genes and Environment in Multiple Sclerosis prospective cohort study. The findings were published online on Jan. 17 in JAMA Neurology.

The Genes and Environment in Multiple Sclerosis (GEMS) project is the first prospective study of populations at risk for MS and is the first detailed cross-sectional examination of higher-risk and lower-risk family members to date, according to investigators led by Zongqi Xia, MD, PhD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston. Although the totality of evidence put together through neuroimaging and numerous clinical tests in the study indicate that individuals with the highest risk for MS have higher risk for the disease than do those with the lowest risk, simple vibration threshold testing gave the best results, Dr. Xia and his colleagues reported.

copyright Zerbor/Thinkstock

Asymptomatic first-degree relatives of multiple sclerosis patients at high risk for developing the disease were significantly more likely to show subclinical signs of MS than were family members at lower risk, in the Genes and Environment in Multiple Sclerosis prospective cohort study. The findings were published online on Jan. 17 in JAMA Neurology.

The Genes and Environment in Multiple Sclerosis (GEMS) project is the first prospective study of populations at risk for MS and is the first detailed cross-sectional examination of higher-risk and lower-risk family members to date, according to investigators led by Zongqi Xia, MD, PhD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston. Although the totality of evidence put together through neuroimaging and numerous clinical tests in the study indicate that individuals with the highest risk for MS have higher risk for the disease than do those with the lowest risk, simple vibration threshold testing gave the best results, Dr. Xia and his colleagues reported.

copyright Zerbor/Thinkstock

LONDON—As a first- or second-line agent for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), rituximab demonstrates superior drug survival (ie, the proportion of patients remaining on a drug over time), compared with fingolimod and natalizumab, according to an investigation described at the 32nd Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in MS. The likelihood of relapse-free survival also is greater with rituximab than with fingolimod or natalizumab.

Rituximab Is Not Indicated for MS

Rituximab, a chimeric mouse–human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is not approved as an MS treatment, but researchers have studied it for this indication. Naismith et al found that rituximab effectively treated breakthrough disease in patients with relapsing-remitting MS.

In a retrospective, observational study, Fredrik Piehl, MD, Professor of Neuroimmunology at Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, and colleagues examined outcomes in patients with MS who switched from natalizumab to rituximab or fingolimod as part of a risk-management strategy. Compared with patients who switched to fingolimod, patients who switched to rituximab had lower risks of clinical relapses and adverse events.

These results prompted Dr. Piehl and colleagues to conduct a study to compare the baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients with relapsing-remitting MS starting rituximab, fingolimod, or natalizumab. The investigators used data from the Swedish Neuroregistry, which contains information on approximately 80% of all Swedish patients with MS. They included 4,244 patients in their final analysis and examined only the first period for each therapy and patient.

Rituximab Reduced Likelihood of Relapse

Approximately 14% of Swedish patients with relapsing-remitting MS received natalizumab, 10% received fingolimod, and 29% received rituximab. Patients who initiated therapy with natalizumab tended to be younger, have a higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and have more active disease at baseline, compared with the other participants.

Drug survival was greater among all patients who ever received rituximab, compared with all patients who ever received fingolimod or natalizumab. When the researchers examined the drugs as first-line agents, drug survival was greater with rituximab than with the other therapies. They found the same result when they analyzed the treatments as second-line agents. Among patients who switched from natalizumab, drug survival was greater in patients who initiated rituximab, compared with those who initiated fingolimod.

Relapse-free survival was most likely among patients receiving rituximab, compared with patients receiving fingolimod or natalizumab. When the researchers analyzed the drugs as first-line agents, they found that relapse-free survival was more likely with rituximab than with the other therapies, but the difference was small. The difference in relapse-free survival was greater, however, when the researchers analyzed the three drugs as second-line therapies.

“The strengths of this study are that it is nationwide and [that] it is a real-world population, including patients with various comorbidities,” said Dr. Piehl. The study results were susceptible to hidden confounding by indication, however. Another weakness of the study was its retrospective, observational design, said Dr. Piehl.

—Erik Greb

Suggested Reading

Naismith RT, Piccio L, Lyons JA, et al. Rituximab add-on therapy for breakthrough relapsing multiple sclerosis: a 52-week phase II trial. Neurology. 2010;74(23):1860-1867.

Salzer J, Svenningsson R, Alping P, et al. Rituximab in multiple sclerosis: A retrospective observational study on safety and efficacy. Neurology. 2016 Oct 19 [Epub ahead of print].

LONDON—As a first- or second-line agent for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), rituximab demonstrates superior drug survival (ie, the proportion of patients remaining on a drug over time), compared with fingolimod and natalizumab, according to an investigation described at the 32nd Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in MS. The likelihood of relapse-free survival also is greater with rituximab than with fingolimod or natalizumab.

Rituximab Is Not Indicated for MS

Rituximab, a chimeric mouse–human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is not approved as an MS treatment, but researchers have studied it for this indication. Naismith et al found that rituximab effectively treated breakthrough disease in patients with relapsing-remitting MS.

In a retrospective, observational study, Fredrik Piehl, MD, Professor of Neuroimmunology at Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, and colleagues examined outcomes in patients with MS who switched from natalizumab to rituximab or fingolimod as part of a risk-management strategy. Compared with patients who switched to fingolimod, patients who switched to rituximab had lower risks of clinical relapses and adverse events.

These results prompted Dr. Piehl and colleagues to conduct a study to compare the baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients with relapsing-remitting MS starting rituximab, fingolimod, or natalizumab. The investigators used data from the Swedish Neuroregistry, which contains information on approximately 80% of all Swedish patients with MS. They included 4,244 patients in their final analysis and examined only the first period for each therapy and patient.

Rituximab Reduced Likelihood of Relapse

Approximately 14% of Swedish patients with relapsing-remitting MS received natalizumab, 10% received fingolimod, and 29% received rituximab. Patients who initiated therapy with natalizumab tended to be younger, have a higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and have more active disease at baseline, compared with the other participants.

Drug survival was greater among all patients who ever received rituximab, compared with all patients who ever received fingolimod or natalizumab. When the researchers examined the drugs as first-line agents, drug survival was greater with rituximab than with the other therapies. They found the same result when they analyzed the treatments as second-line agents. Among patients who switched from natalizumab, drug survival was greater in patients who initiated rituximab, compared with those who initiated fingolimod.

Relapse-free survival was most likely among patients receiving rituximab, compared with patients receiving fingolimod or natalizumab. When the researchers analyzed the drugs as first-line agents, they found that relapse-free survival was more likely with rituximab than with the other therapies, but the difference was small. The difference in relapse-free survival was greater, however, when the researchers analyzed the three drugs as second-line therapies.

“The strengths of this study are that it is nationwide and [that] it is a real-world population, including patients with various comorbidities,” said Dr. Piehl. The study results were susceptible to hidden confounding by indication, however. Another weakness of the study was its retrospective, observational design, said Dr. Piehl.

—Erik Greb

Suggested Reading

Naismith RT, Piccio L, Lyons JA, et al. Rituximab add-on therapy for breakthrough relapsing multiple sclerosis: a 52-week phase II trial. Neurology. 2010;74(23):1860-1867.

Salzer J, Svenningsson R, Alping P, et al. Rituximab in multiple sclerosis: A retrospective observational study on safety and efficacy. Neurology. 2016 Oct 19 [Epub ahead of print].

LONDON—As a first- or second-line agent for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), rituximab demonstrates superior drug survival (ie, the proportion of patients remaining on a drug over time), compared with fingolimod and natalizumab, according to an investigation described at the 32nd Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in MS. The likelihood of relapse-free survival also is greater with rituximab than with fingolimod or natalizumab.

Rituximab Is Not Indicated for MS

Rituximab, a chimeric mouse–human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is not approved as an MS treatment, but researchers have studied it for this indication. Naismith et al found that rituximab effectively treated breakthrough disease in patients with relapsing-remitting MS.

In a retrospective, observational study, Fredrik Piehl, MD, Professor of Neuroimmunology at Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, and colleagues examined outcomes in patients with MS who switched from natalizumab to rituximab or fingolimod as part of a risk-management strategy. Compared with patients who switched to fingolimod, patients who switched to rituximab had lower risks of clinical relapses and adverse events.

These results prompted Dr. Piehl and colleagues to conduct a study to compare the baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients with relapsing-remitting MS starting rituximab, fingolimod, or natalizumab. The investigators used data from the Swedish Neuroregistry, which contains information on approximately 80% of all Swedish patients with MS. They included 4,244 patients in their final analysis and examined only the first period for each therapy and patient.

Rituximab Reduced Likelihood of Relapse

Approximately 14% of Swedish patients with relapsing-remitting MS received natalizumab, 10% received fingolimod, and 29% received rituximab. Patients who initiated therapy with natalizumab tended to be younger, have a higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and have more active disease at baseline, compared with the other participants.

Drug survival was greater among all patients who ever received rituximab, compared with all patients who ever received fingolimod or natalizumab. When the researchers examined the drugs as first-line agents, drug survival was greater with rituximab than with the other therapies. They found the same result when they analyzed the treatments as second-line agents. Among patients who switched from natalizumab, drug survival was greater in patients who initiated rituximab, compared with those who initiated fingolimod.

Relapse-free survival was most likely among patients receiving rituximab, compared with patients receiving fingolimod or natalizumab. When the researchers analyzed the drugs as first-line agents, they found that relapse-free survival was more likely with rituximab than with the other therapies, but the difference was small. The difference in relapse-free survival was greater, however, when the researchers analyzed the three drugs as second-line therapies.

“The strengths of this study are that it is nationwide and [that] it is a real-world population, including patients with various comorbidities,” said Dr. Piehl. The study results were susceptible to hidden confounding by indication, however. Another weakness of the study was its retrospective, observational design, said Dr. Piehl.

—Erik Greb

Suggested Reading

Naismith RT, Piccio L, Lyons JA, et al. Rituximab add-on therapy for breakthrough relapsing multiple sclerosis: a 52-week phase II trial. Neurology. 2010;74(23):1860-1867.

Salzer J, Svenningsson R, Alping P, et al. Rituximab in multiple sclerosis: A retrospective observational study on safety and efficacy. Neurology. 2016 Oct 19 [Epub ahead of print].

LONDON—Many patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) suffer from bladder dysfunction, however, few of these patients have their symptoms managed, according to an overview presented at the 32nd Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in MS.

If a patient reports bladder symptoms, most often those bladder symptoms will persist and increase, said Jalesh Panicker, MD, DM, Consultant Neurologist and Clinical Lead in Uroneurology at the University College London Institute of Neurology in Queen Square, London. Symptoms of urinary frequency, urgency, incontinence, and nocturia, which are collectively called overactive bladder syndrome, increase with increased duration of MS and tend to correlate with the neurologic disability, especially lower limb parameter weakness.

In a large survey of 3,000 patients with MS, 90% rated bladder complications as one of the top five common symptomatic problems. Seventy percent of the group reported that bladder issues had a moderate or high impact on them. Only one-third of patients surveyed reported improvement after starting disease-modifying therapies.

Bladder symptoms in MS occur, on average, six years into the illness. Lower urinary tract symptoms are present in 10% of patients at first diagnosis. To help address this issue, the Actionable eight-item questionnaire was developed to help make it easier for doctors to assess bladder problems, said Dr. Panicker.

Lesion location plays a significant role in urinary tract dysfunction. Patients with suprapontine lesions present predominantly with overactive bladder, whereas patients with spinal lesions tend to report voiding symptoms such as hesitancy and poor stream. Plaques in the cerebral cord can also alter the pattern of lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Measuring post-void residue is critical for bladder dysfunction management. Unlike in urgency and incontinence, patients tend to have difficulties expressing voiding and voiding dysfunction symptoms. A high post-void residue can cause urinary tract infections and lead to devastating effects on patients, Dr. Panicker said. Using a bladder scanner to detect high post-void residuals may help reduce urinary tract infections.

Oral Agents

The three most commonly used treatments for bladder dysfunction in patients with MS are oral agents, botulinum toxin, and neuromodulation. Oral antimuscarinics work through the muscarinic receptors of the bladder, reducing bladder sensation and intrusive pressures, inhibiting detrusor overactivity, and improving bladder capacity. Oxybutynin, for example, can cause dry mouth and dry eyes, whereas newer antimuscarinics such as tolteradine, solifenancin, or fesoteradine are less likely to cause dry eyes, dry mouth, or constipation, Dr. Panicker noted.

Anticholinergic burden refers to the cumulative effect of multiple medications with anticholinergic properties. The higher the anticholinergic burden, the greater the risk of cognitive impairment, impaired functional performance, mortality, and brain atrophy. The Anticholinergic Burden Scale (ACB) grades medications according to their anticholinergic burden—mild (ACB1), moderate (ACB2), and severe (ACB3). Total ACB score is the sum of each medication the patient is on; any ACB score over 3 is considered clinically relevant.

Beta 3 agonists are another class of oral agents used to control bladder symptoms. Beta 3 agonists inhibit intrusive muscle contractions and increase relaxation by acting on the beta 3 receptors present on the wall of the bladder. Unlike antimuscarinics, beta 3 agonists are devoid of side effects like dry mouth, dry eyes, and constipation; however, these oral agents are associated with cardiovascular side effects. Currently, there are pivotal phase III studies on the efficacy of mirabegron in the UK, however, there is limited evidence from neurologic patients and there is a need for more long-term data, Dr. Panicker said.

Botulinum Toxin

Botulinum toxin is effective for bladder management. Evidence shows that patients with MS experienced significant improvement in urinary incontinence, frequency, and urgency as early as four weeks after injections, and this beneficial effect is not lost with repeated injections. Three pivotal phase III studies have demonstrated the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA for improving incontinence. Studies suggest that onabotulinumtoxinA significantly improved incontinence at week 12. The median duration of retreatment was 42 weeks.

Neuromodulation

Stimulating the tibial nerve is beneficial in managing overactive bladder symptoms such as urinary frequency and incontinence. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is one of the few treatments that does not tend to worsen voiding dysfunction. It is also potentially a treatment for patients who are retaining urine or experiencing incomplete bladder emptying.

“With several disease-modifying therapies over the last few years, it is clear that the number of MS relapses in patients is coming down. There is evidence to suggest that the neurologic disability that accumulates is also either halted or possibly even reversed. Whether the nonmotor symptoms of MS, such as urinary tract dysfunction, also would get halted or reversed with these treatments is an area for further research,” said Dr. Panicker.

—Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

Ginsberg D, Gousse A, Keppenne V, et al. Phase 3 efficacy and tolerability study of onabotulinumtoxinA for urinary incontinence from neurogenic detrusor overactivity. J Urol. 2012;187(6):2131-2139.

Jongen PJ, Blok BF, Heesakkers JP, et al. Simplified scoring of the Actionable 8-item screening questionnaire for neurogenic bladder overactivity in multiple sclerosis: a comparative analysis of test performance at different cut-off points. BMC Urol. 2015;15:106.

Wintner A, Kim MM, Bechis SK, Kreydin El. Voiding dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Semin Neurol. 2016;36(1):34-40.

LONDON—Many patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) suffer from bladder dysfunction, however, few of these patients have their symptoms managed, according to an overview presented at the 32nd Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in MS.

If a patient reports bladder symptoms, most often those bladder symptoms will persist and increase, said Jalesh Panicker, MD, DM, Consultant Neurologist and Clinical Lead in Uroneurology at the University College London Institute of Neurology in Queen Square, London. Symptoms of urinary frequency, urgency, incontinence, and nocturia, which are collectively called overactive bladder syndrome, increase with increased duration of MS and tend to correlate with the neurologic disability, especially lower limb parameter weakness.

In a large survey of 3,000 patients with MS, 90% rated bladder complications as one of the top five common symptomatic problems. Seventy percent of the group reported that bladder issues had a moderate or high impact on them. Only one-third of patients surveyed reported improvement after starting disease-modifying therapies.

Bladder symptoms in MS occur, on average, six years into the illness. Lower urinary tract symptoms are present in 10% of patients at first diagnosis. To help address this issue, the Actionable eight-item questionnaire was developed to help make it easier for doctors to assess bladder problems, said Dr. Panicker.

Lesion location plays a significant role in urinary tract dysfunction. Patients with suprapontine lesions present predominantly with overactive bladder, whereas patients with spinal lesions tend to report voiding symptoms such as hesitancy and poor stream. Plaques in the cerebral cord can also alter the pattern of lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Measuring post-void residue is critical for bladder dysfunction management. Unlike in urgency and incontinence, patients tend to have difficulties expressing voiding and voiding dysfunction symptoms. A high post-void residue can cause urinary tract infections and lead to devastating effects on patients, Dr. Panicker said. Using a bladder scanner to detect high post-void residuals may help reduce urinary tract infections.

Oral Agents

The three most commonly used treatments for bladder dysfunction in patients with MS are oral agents, botulinum toxin, and neuromodulation. Oral antimuscarinics work through the muscarinic receptors of the bladder, reducing bladder sensation and intrusive pressures, inhibiting detrusor overactivity, and improving bladder capacity. Oxybutynin, for example, can cause dry mouth and dry eyes, whereas newer antimuscarinics such as tolteradine, solifenancin, or fesoteradine are less likely to cause dry eyes, dry mouth, or constipation, Dr. Panicker noted.

Anticholinergic burden refers to the cumulative effect of multiple medications with anticholinergic properties. The higher the anticholinergic burden, the greater the risk of cognitive impairment, impaired functional performance, mortality, and brain atrophy. The Anticholinergic Burden Scale (ACB) grades medications according to their anticholinergic burden—mild (ACB1), moderate (ACB2), and severe (ACB3). Total ACB score is the sum of each medication the patient is on; any ACB score over 3 is considered clinically relevant.

Beta 3 agonists are another class of oral agents used to control bladder symptoms. Beta 3 agonists inhibit intrusive muscle contractions and increase relaxation by acting on the beta 3 receptors present on the wall of the bladder. Unlike antimuscarinics, beta 3 agonists are devoid of side effects like dry mouth, dry eyes, and constipation; however, these oral agents are associated with cardiovascular side effects. Currently, there are pivotal phase III studies on the efficacy of mirabegron in the UK, however, there is limited evidence from neurologic patients and there is a need for more long-term data, Dr. Panicker said.

Botulinum Toxin

Botulinum toxin is effective for bladder management. Evidence shows that patients with MS experienced significant improvement in urinary incontinence, frequency, and urgency as early as four weeks after injections, and this beneficial effect is not lost with repeated injections. Three pivotal phase III studies have demonstrated the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA for improving incontinence. Studies suggest that onabotulinumtoxinA significantly improved incontinence at week 12. The median duration of retreatment was 42 weeks.

Neuromodulation

Stimulating the tibial nerve is beneficial in managing overactive bladder symptoms such as urinary frequency and incontinence. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is one of the few treatments that does not tend to worsen voiding dysfunction. It is also potentially a treatment for patients who are retaining urine or experiencing incomplete bladder emptying.

“With several disease-modifying therapies over the last few years, it is clear that the number of MS relapses in patients is coming down. There is evidence to suggest that the neurologic disability that accumulates is also either halted or possibly even reversed. Whether the nonmotor symptoms of MS, such as urinary tract dysfunction, also would get halted or reversed with these treatments is an area for further research,” said Dr. Panicker.

—Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

Ginsberg D, Gousse A, Keppenne V, et al. Phase 3 efficacy and tolerability study of onabotulinumtoxinA for urinary incontinence from neurogenic detrusor overactivity. J Urol. 2012;187(6):2131-2139.

Jongen PJ, Blok BF, Heesakkers JP, et al. Simplified scoring of the Actionable 8-item screening questionnaire for neurogenic bladder overactivity in multiple sclerosis: a comparative analysis of test performance at different cut-off points. BMC Urol. 2015;15:106.

Wintner A, Kim MM, Bechis SK, Kreydin El. Voiding dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Semin Neurol. 2016;36(1):34-40.

LONDON—Many patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) suffer from bladder dysfunction, however, few of these patients have their symptoms managed, according to an overview presented at the 32nd Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in MS.

If a patient reports bladder symptoms, most often those bladder symptoms will persist and increase, said Jalesh Panicker, MD, DM, Consultant Neurologist and Clinical Lead in Uroneurology at the University College London Institute of Neurology in Queen Square, London. Symptoms of urinary frequency, urgency, incontinence, and nocturia, which are collectively called overactive bladder syndrome, increase with increased duration of MS and tend to correlate with the neurologic disability, especially lower limb parameter weakness.

In a large survey of 3,000 patients with MS, 90% rated bladder complications as one of the top five common symptomatic problems. Seventy percent of the group reported that bladder issues had a moderate or high impact on them. Only one-third of patients surveyed reported improvement after starting disease-modifying therapies.

Bladder symptoms in MS occur, on average, six years into the illness. Lower urinary tract symptoms are present in 10% of patients at first diagnosis. To help address this issue, the Actionable eight-item questionnaire was developed to help make it easier for doctors to assess bladder problems, said Dr. Panicker.

Lesion location plays a significant role in urinary tract dysfunction. Patients with suprapontine lesions present predominantly with overactive bladder, whereas patients with spinal lesions tend to report voiding symptoms such as hesitancy and poor stream. Plaques in the cerebral cord can also alter the pattern of lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Measuring post-void residue is critical for bladder dysfunction management. Unlike in urgency and incontinence, patients tend to have difficulties expressing voiding and voiding dysfunction symptoms. A high post-void residue can cause urinary tract infections and lead to devastating effects on patients, Dr. Panicker said. Using a bladder scanner to detect high post-void residuals may help reduce urinary tract infections.

Oral Agents

The three most commonly used treatments for bladder dysfunction in patients with MS are oral agents, botulinum toxin, and neuromodulation. Oral antimuscarinics work through the muscarinic receptors of the bladder, reducing bladder sensation and intrusive pressures, inhibiting detrusor overactivity, and improving bladder capacity. Oxybutynin, for example, can cause dry mouth and dry eyes, whereas newer antimuscarinics such as tolteradine, solifenancin, or fesoteradine are less likely to cause dry eyes, dry mouth, or constipation, Dr. Panicker noted.

Anticholinergic burden refers to the cumulative effect of multiple medications with anticholinergic properties. The higher the anticholinergic burden, the greater the risk of cognitive impairment, impaired functional performance, mortality, and brain atrophy. The Anticholinergic Burden Scale (ACB) grades medications according to their anticholinergic burden—mild (ACB1), moderate (ACB2), and severe (ACB3). Total ACB score is the sum of each medication the patient is on; any ACB score over 3 is considered clinically relevant.

Beta 3 agonists are another class of oral agents used to control bladder symptoms. Beta 3 agonists inhibit intrusive muscle contractions and increase relaxation by acting on the beta 3 receptors present on the wall of the bladder. Unlike antimuscarinics, beta 3 agonists are devoid of side effects like dry mouth, dry eyes, and constipation; however, these oral agents are associated with cardiovascular side effects. Currently, there are pivotal phase III studies on the efficacy of mirabegron in the UK, however, there is limited evidence from neurologic patients and there is a need for more long-term data, Dr. Panicker said.

Botulinum Toxin

Botulinum toxin is effective for bladder management. Evidence shows that patients with MS experienced significant improvement in urinary incontinence, frequency, and urgency as early as four weeks after injections, and this beneficial effect is not lost with repeated injections. Three pivotal phase III studies have demonstrated the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA for improving incontinence. Studies suggest that onabotulinumtoxinA significantly improved incontinence at week 12. The median duration of retreatment was 42 weeks.

Neuromodulation

Stimulating the tibial nerve is beneficial in managing overactive bladder symptoms such as urinary frequency and incontinence. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is one of the few treatments that does not tend to worsen voiding dysfunction. It is also potentially a treatment for patients who are retaining urine or experiencing incomplete bladder emptying.

“With several disease-modifying therapies over the last few years, it is clear that the number of MS relapses in patients is coming down. There is evidence to suggest that the neurologic disability that accumulates is also either halted or possibly even reversed. Whether the nonmotor symptoms of MS, such as urinary tract dysfunction, also would get halted or reversed with these treatments is an area for further research,” said Dr. Panicker.

—Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

Ginsberg D, Gousse A, Keppenne V, et al. Phase 3 efficacy and tolerability study of onabotulinumtoxinA for urinary incontinence from neurogenic detrusor overactivity. J Urol. 2012;187(6):2131-2139.

Jongen PJ, Blok BF, Heesakkers JP, et al. Simplified scoring of the Actionable 8-item screening questionnaire for neurogenic bladder overactivity in multiple sclerosis: a comparative analysis of test performance at different cut-off points. BMC Urol. 2015;15:106.

Wintner A, Kim MM, Bechis SK, Kreydin El. Voiding dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Semin Neurol. 2016;36(1):34-40.

Serum concentrations of natalizumab do not appear to rise before patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis are diagnosed with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, contradicting the hypothesis that exposure to elevated concentrations of the drug is a risk factor for the disease, according to findings from a prospective, observational cohort study.

Zoé L.E. van Kempen, MD, and her colleagues at VU Medical Center Amsterdam noted that a small but increasing number of “neurologists are extending dose intervals of natalizumab [Tysabri] with the primary aim of reducing the risk of PML [progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy] by lowering the natalizumab exposure per patient,” which also potentially has the benefit of decreasing drug costs, as well as clinic or hospital visits. However, there have been no prospective studies that confirm that extending natalizumab dose intervals does not affect efficacy.

HUNG KUO CHUN/Thinkstock

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com

Serum concentrations of natalizumab do not appear to rise before patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis are diagnosed with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, contradicting the hypothesis that exposure to elevated concentrations of the drug is a risk factor for the disease, according to findings from a prospective, observational cohort study.

Zoé L.E. van Kempen, MD, and her colleagues at VU Medical Center Amsterdam noted that a small but increasing number of “neurologists are extending dose intervals of natalizumab [Tysabri] with the primary aim of reducing the risk of PML [progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy] by lowering the natalizumab exposure per patient,” which also potentially has the benefit of decreasing drug costs, as well as clinic or hospital visits. However, there have been no prospective studies that confirm that extending natalizumab dose intervals does not affect efficacy.

HUNG KUO CHUN/Thinkstock

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com

Serum concentrations of natalizumab do not appear to rise before patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis are diagnosed with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, contradicting the hypothesis that exposure to elevated concentrations of the drug is a risk factor for the disease, according to findings from a prospective, observational cohort study.

Zoé L.E. van Kempen, MD, and her colleagues at VU Medical Center Amsterdam noted that a small but increasing number of “neurologists are extending dose intervals of natalizumab [Tysabri] with the primary aim of reducing the risk of PML [progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy] by lowering the natalizumab exposure per patient,” which also potentially has the benefit of decreasing drug costs, as well as clinic or hospital visits. However, there have been no prospective studies that confirm that extending natalizumab dose intervals does not affect efficacy.

HUNG KUO CHUN/Thinkstock

jevans@frontlinemedcom.com