Neurology

Is the relationship between A-fib and sleep apnea more than a coincidence stemming from the number of shared associated comorbidities? Significantly, the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been shown to decrease the recurrence of A-fib after pharmacologic or electrical conversion and after interventional pulmonary vein interruption.¹ This suggests that at least in some cases, sleep apnea plays an active role in initiating and possibly also maintaining A-fib. The immediate culprit mediators that come to mind are hypoxia and hypercapnea; both are at least partially ameliorated by the successful use of CPAP, and both are reasonable physiologic candidates for induction of A-fib. Hypoxia is supported by clinical observation, and hypercapnea by experimental modeling.²

It is easy for clinicians to conceptualize the organ effects of hypoxia and hypercapnea. We are accustomed to seeing clinical ramifications of these in the emergency department and intensive care unit, particularly those affecting the brain and heart, organs critically dependent on transmembrane ion flow. We may recall from biochemistry classes the effects of hypoxia on intracellular metabolism and the implications on energy stores, mitochondrial function, and ion translocation. Recent work on the cellular effects of hypoxia, including research that resulted in a Nobel prize, has drawn major attention to patterned cellular responses to intermittent and persistent hypoxia. This includes recognition of epigenetic changes resulting in localized cardiac remodeling and fibrosis,³ factors that clearly affect the expression of arrhythmias, including A-fib.

But the interrelationship between A-fib and sleep apnea may be even more convoluted and intriguing. It now seems that most things cardiac are associated with inflammation in some guise, and the A-fib connection with sleep apnea may not be an exception. Almost 20 years ago, it was recognized that A-fib is associated with an elevation in circulating C-reactive protein (CRP),⁴ a biomarker of “inflammation,” although not necessarily an active participant. Recent reviews of this connection have been published,⁵ and successful anti-inflammatory approaches to preventing A-fib using colchicine have been described.⁶ So how does this tie in with sleep apnea?

A number of papers have now demonstrated that sleep apnea is also associated with an elevation in CRP,⁷ perhaps due to increases in tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha in response to the intermittent hypoxia of sleep apnea. TNF can drive the inflammatory response through increased expression of genes regulated by nuclear factor kappa-B.⁸ While it certainly warrants consideration that the elevated biomarkers of inflammation in patients with sleep apnea actually reflect the presence of the frequent comorbidities, including visceral obesity, treating sleep apnea with CPAP (comparable to what I noted above in patients with A-fib) has been shown to reduce circulating CRP levels.⁹

As our understanding of the biologic underpinnings of A-fib and sleep apnea continue to grow, the practical clinical implications of the relationship between them, as described by Ayache et al, may achieve greater clarity. The two conditions commonly coexist, and treating the sleep apnea results in better rhythm-directed outcomes in the A-fib.

Stay tuned, there is certainly more to learn about this.

Is the relationship between A-fib and sleep apnea more than a coincidence stemming from the number of shared associated comorbidities? Significantly, the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been shown to decrease the recurrence of A-fib after pharmacologic or electrical conversion and after interventional pulmonary vein interruption.¹ This suggests that at least in some cases, sleep apnea plays an active role in initiating and possibly also maintaining A-fib. The immediate culprit mediators that come to mind are hypoxia and hypercapnea; both are at least partially ameliorated by the successful use of CPAP, and both are reasonable physiologic candidates for induction of A-fib. Hypoxia is supported by clinical observation, and hypercapnea by experimental modeling.²

It is easy for clinicians to conceptualize the organ effects of hypoxia and hypercapnea. We are accustomed to seeing clinical ramifications of these in the emergency department and intensive care unit, particularly those affecting the brain and heart, organs critically dependent on transmembrane ion flow. We may recall from biochemistry classes the effects of hypoxia on intracellular metabolism and the implications on energy stores, mitochondrial function, and ion translocation. Recent work on the cellular effects of hypoxia, including research that resulted in a Nobel prize, has drawn major attention to patterned cellular responses to intermittent and persistent hypoxia. This includes recognition of epigenetic changes resulting in localized cardiac remodeling and fibrosis,³ factors that clearly affect the expression of arrhythmias, including A-fib.

But the interrelationship between A-fib and sleep apnea may be even more convoluted and intriguing. It now seems that most things cardiac are associated with inflammation in some guise, and the A-fib connection with sleep apnea may not be an exception. Almost 20 years ago, it was recognized that A-fib is associated with an elevation in circulating C-reactive protein (CRP),⁴ a biomarker of “inflammation,” although not necessarily an active participant. Recent reviews of this connection have been published,⁵ and successful anti-inflammatory approaches to preventing A-fib using colchicine have been described.⁶ So how does this tie in with sleep apnea?

A number of papers have now demonstrated that sleep apnea is also associated with an elevation in CRP,⁷ perhaps due to increases in tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha in response to the intermittent hypoxia of sleep apnea. TNF can drive the inflammatory response through increased expression of genes regulated by nuclear factor kappa-B.⁸ While it certainly warrants consideration that the elevated biomarkers of inflammation in patients with sleep apnea actually reflect the presence of the frequent comorbidities, including visceral obesity, treating sleep apnea with CPAP (comparable to what I noted above in patients with A-fib) has been shown to reduce circulating CRP levels.⁹

As our understanding of the biologic underpinnings of A-fib and sleep apnea continue to grow, the practical clinical implications of the relationship between them, as described by Ayache et al, may achieve greater clarity. The two conditions commonly coexist, and treating the sleep apnea results in better rhythm-directed outcomes in the A-fib.

Stay tuned, there is certainly more to learn about this.

Is the relationship between A-fib and sleep apnea more than a coincidence stemming from the number of shared associated comorbidities? Significantly, the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been shown to decrease the recurrence of A-fib after pharmacologic or electrical conversion and after interventional pulmonary vein interruption.¹ This suggests that at least in some cases, sleep apnea plays an active role in initiating and possibly also maintaining A-fib. The immediate culprit mediators that come to mind are hypoxia and hypercapnea; both are at least partially ameliorated by the successful use of CPAP, and both are reasonable physiologic candidates for induction of A-fib. Hypoxia is supported by clinical observation, and hypercapnea by experimental modeling.²

It is easy for clinicians to conceptualize the organ effects of hypoxia and hypercapnea. We are accustomed to seeing clinical ramifications of these in the emergency department and intensive care unit, particularly those affecting the brain and heart, organs critically dependent on transmembrane ion flow. We may recall from biochemistry classes the effects of hypoxia on intracellular metabolism and the implications on energy stores, mitochondrial function, and ion translocation. Recent work on the cellular effects of hypoxia, including research that resulted in a Nobel prize, has drawn major attention to patterned cellular responses to intermittent and persistent hypoxia. This includes recognition of epigenetic changes resulting in localized cardiac remodeling and fibrosis,³ factors that clearly affect the expression of arrhythmias, including A-fib.

But the interrelationship between A-fib and sleep apnea may be even more convoluted and intriguing. It now seems that most things cardiac are associated with inflammation in some guise, and the A-fib connection with sleep apnea may not be an exception. Almost 20 years ago, it was recognized that A-fib is associated with an elevation in circulating C-reactive protein (CRP),⁴ a biomarker of “inflammation,” although not necessarily an active participant. Recent reviews of this connection have been published,⁵ and successful anti-inflammatory approaches to preventing A-fib using colchicine have been described.⁶ So how does this tie in with sleep apnea?

A number of papers have now demonstrated that sleep apnea is also associated with an elevation in CRP,⁷ perhaps due to increases in tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha in response to the intermittent hypoxia of sleep apnea. TNF can drive the inflammatory response through increased expression of genes regulated by nuclear factor kappa-B.⁸ While it certainly warrants consideration that the elevated biomarkers of inflammation in patients with sleep apnea actually reflect the presence of the frequent comorbidities, including visceral obesity, treating sleep apnea with CPAP (comparable to what I noted above in patients with A-fib) has been shown to reduce circulating CRP levels.⁹

As our understanding of the biologic underpinnings of A-fib and sleep apnea continue to grow, the practical clinical implications of the relationship between them, as described by Ayache et al, may achieve greater clarity. The two conditions commonly coexist, and treating the sleep apnea results in better rhythm-directed outcomes in the A-fib.

Stay tuned, there is certainly more to learn about this.

Yes. The prevalence of sleep apnea is exceedingly high in patients with atrial fibrillation—50% to 80% compared with 30% to 60% in respective control groups.^1–3 Conversely, atrial fibrillation is more prevalent in those with sleep-disordered breathing than in those without (4.8% vs 0.9%).⁴

Sleep-disordered breathing comprises obstructive sleep apnea and central sleep apnea. Obstructive sleep apnea, characterized by repetitive upper-airway obstruction during sleep, is accompanied by intermittent hypoxia, rises in carbon dioxide, autonomic nervous system fluctuations, and intrathoracic pressure alterations.⁵ Central sleep apnea may be neurally mediated and, in the setting of cardiac disease, is characterized by alterations in chemosensitivity and chemoresponsiveness, leading to a state of high loop gain—ie, a hypersensitive ventilatory control system leading to ventilatory drive oscillations.⁶

Both obstructive and central sleep apnea have been associated with atrial fibrillation. Experimental data implicate obstructive sleep apnea as a trigger of atrial arrhythmogenesis,^7,8 and epidemiologic studies support an association between central sleep apnea, Cheyne-Stokes respiration, and incident atrial fibrillation.⁹

HOW SLEEP APNEA COULD LEAD TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

In experiments in animals, intermittent upper-airway obstruction led to forced inspiration, substantial negative intrathoracic pressure, subsequent left atrial distention, and increased susceptibility to atrial fibrillation.¹⁰ The autonomic nervous system may be a mediator of apnea-induced atrial fibrillation, as apnea-induced atrial fibrillation is suppressed with autonomic blockade.¹⁰

Emerging data also support the hypothesis that intermittent hypoxia⁷ and resolution of hypercapnia,⁸ as observed in obstructive sleep apnea, exert atrial electrophysiologic changes that increase vulnerability to atrial arrhythmogenesis.

In a case-crossover study,¹¹ the odds of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation occurring after a respiratory disturbance were 17.9 times higher than after normal breathing (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2–144.2), though the absolute rate of overall arrhythmia events (including both atrial fibrillation and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia) associated with respiratory disturbances was low (1 excess arrhythmia event per 40,000 respiratory disturbances).

EFFECT OF SLEEP APNEA ON ATRIAL FIBRILLATION MANAGEMENT

Sleep apnea also seems to affect the efficacy of a rhythm-control strategy for atrial fibrillation. For example, patients with obstructive sleep apnea have a higher risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation after cardioversion (82% vs 42% in controls)¹² and up to a 25% greater risk of recurrence after catheter ablation compared with those without obstructive sleep apnea (risk ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.08–1.45).¹³

Several observational studies showed a higher rate of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation in obstructive sleep apnea patients who do not use continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) than in those who do.^14–17 CPAP therapy appears to exert beneficial effects on cardiac structural remodeling;  cardiac magnetic resonance imaging shows that patients with sleep apnea who received less than 4 hours of CPAP per night had larger left atrial dimensions and increased left ventricular mass compared with those who received more than 4 hours of CPAP at night.¹⁷ However, a need remains for high-quality, large randomized controlled trials to eliminate potential unmeasured biases due to differences that may exist between CPAP users and non-users, such as general adherence to medical therapy and healthcare interventions.

An additional consideration is that the overall utility and value of obtaining a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea strictly as it pertains to atrial fibrillation management is affected by whether a rhythm- or rate-control strategy is pursued. In other words, if a patient is deemed to be in permanent atrial fibrillation and a rhythm-control strategy is therefore not pursued, the potential effect of untreated obstructive sleep apnea on atrial fibrillation recurrence could be less important. In this case, however, the other beneficial cardiovascular and systemic effects of diagnosing and treating underlying obstructive sleep apnea would remain.

 

 

POPULATION STUDIES

Epidemiologic and clinic-based studies have supported an association between sleep apnea (mostly central, but also obstructive) and atrial fibrillation.^4,18

Community-based studies such as the Sleep Heart Health Study⁴ and the Outcomes of Sleep Disorders in Older Men Study (MrOS Sleep),¹⁸ involving thousands of participants, have found the strongest cross-sectional associations of both obstructive and central sleep apnea with nocturnal atrial fibrillation. The findings included a 2 to 5 times higher odds of nocturnal atrial fibrillation, particularly in those with a moderate to severe degree of sleep-disordered breathing—even after adjusting for confounding influences (eg, obesity) and self-reported cardiac disease such as heart failure.

In MrOS Sleep, in an older male cohort, both obstructive and central sleep apnea were associated with nocturnal atrial fibrillation, though central sleep apnea and Cheyne-Stokes respirations had a stronger magnitude of association.¹⁸

Further insights can be drawn specifically from patients with heart failure. Sin et al,¹⁹ in a 1999 study, found that in 450 patients with systolic heart failure (85% men), the prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing was 25% to 33% (depending on the apnea-hypopnea index cutoff used) for central sleep apnea, and similarly 27% to 38% for obstructive sleep apnea. The prevalence of atrial fibrillation in this group was 10% in women and 15% in men. Atrial fibrillation was reported as a significant risk factor for central sleep apnea, but not for obstructive sleep apnea (for which only male sex and increasing body mass index were significant risk factors). Directionality was not clearly reported in this retrospective study in terms of timing of sleep studies and other assessments: ie, the report did not clearly state which came first, the atrial fibrillation or the sleep apnea. Therefore, the possibility that central sleep apnea is a predictor of atrial fibrillation cannot be excluded.  

Yumino et al,²⁰ in a study published in 2009, evaluated 218 patients with heart failure (with a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤ 45%) and reported a prevalence of moderate to severe sleep apnea of 21% for central sleep apnea and 26% for obstructive sleep apnea. In multivariate analysis, atrial fibrillation was independently associated with central sleep apnea but not obstructive sleep apnea.

In recent cohort studies, central sleep apnea was associated with 2 to 3 times higher odds of developing atrial fibrillation, while obstructive sleep apnea was not a predictor of incident atrial fibrillation.^9,21

Although most available studies associate sleep apnea with atrial fibrillation, findings of a case-control study²² did not support a difference in the prevalence of sleep apnea syndrome (defined as apnea index ≥ 5 and apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15, and the presence of sleep symptoms) in patients with lone atrial fibrillation (no evident cardiovascular disease) compared with controls matched for age, sex, and cardiovascular morbidity.

But observational studies are limited by the potential for residual unmeasured confounding factors and lack of objective cardiac structural data, such as left ventricular ejection fraction and atrial enlargement. Moreover, there can be significant differences in sleep apnea definitions among studies, thus limiting the ability to reach a definitive conclusion about the relationship between sleep apnea and atrial fibrillation.

SCREENING AND DIAGNOSIS

The 2014 joint guidelines of the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and Heart Rhythm Society for the management of atrial fibrillation state that a sleep study may be useful if sleep apnea is suspected.²³ The 2019 focused update of the 2014 guidelines²⁴ state that for overweight and obese patients with atrial fibrillation, weight loss combined with risk-factor modification is recommended (class I recommendation, level of evidence B-R, ie, data derived from 1 or more randomized trials or meta-analysis of such studies). Risk-factor modification in this case includes assessment and treatment of underlying sleep apnea, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, glucose intolerance, and alcohol and tobacco use.

Laboratory polysomnography has long been considered the gold standard for sleep apnea diagnosis. In one study,¹³ obstructive sleep apnea was a greater predictor of atrial fibrillation when diagnosed by polysomnography (risk ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.16–1.68) compared with identification by screening using the Berlin questionnaire (risk ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.91–1.27). However, a laboratory sleep study is associated with increased patient burden and limited availability.

Home sleep apnea testing is being increasingly used in the diagnostic evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea and may be a less costly, more available alternative. However, since a home sleep apnea test is less sensitive than polysomnography in detecting obstructive sleep apnea, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine guidelines²⁸ state that if a single home sleep apnea test is negative or inconclusive, polysomnography should be done if there is clinical suspicion of sleep apnea. Moreover, current guidelines from this group recommend that patients with significant cardiorespiratory disease should be tested with polysomnography rather than home sleep apnea testing.²²

Further study is needed to determine the optimal screening method for sleep apnea in patients with atrial fibrillation and to clarify the role of home sleep apnea testing. While keeping in mind the limitations of a screening questionnaire in this population, as a general approach it is reasonable to use a screening questionnaire for sleep apnea. And if the screen is positive, further evaluation with a sleep study is merited, whether by laboratory polysomnography, a home sleep apnea test, or referral to a sleep specialist.

MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE MAY BE IDEAL

Overall, given the high prevalence of sleep apnea in patients with atrial fibrillation, the deleterious effects of sleep apnea in general, the influence of sleep apnea on atrial fibrillation, and the cardiovascular and other beneficial effects of adequate treatment of sleep apnea, patients with atrial fibrillation should be assessed for sleep apnea.

While the optimal strategy in evaluating for sleep apnea in these patients needs to be further defined, a multidisciplinary approach to care involving a primary care provider, cardiologist, and sleep specialist may be ideal.

Yes. The prevalence of sleep apnea is exceedingly high in patients with atrial fibrillation—50% to 80% compared with 30% to 60% in respective control groups.^1–3 Conversely, atrial fibrillation is more prevalent in those with sleep-disordered breathing than in those without (4.8% vs 0.9%).⁴

Sleep-disordered breathing comprises obstructive sleep apnea and central sleep apnea. Obstructive sleep apnea, characterized by repetitive upper-airway obstruction during sleep, is accompanied by intermittent hypoxia, rises in carbon dioxide, autonomic nervous system fluctuations, and intrathoracic pressure alterations.⁵ Central sleep apnea may be neurally mediated and, in the setting of cardiac disease, is characterized by alterations in chemosensitivity and chemoresponsiveness, leading to a state of high loop gain—ie, a hypersensitive ventilatory control system leading to ventilatory drive oscillations.⁶

Both obstructive and central sleep apnea have been associated with atrial fibrillation. Experimental data implicate obstructive sleep apnea as a trigger of atrial arrhythmogenesis,^7,8 and epidemiologic studies support an association between central sleep apnea, Cheyne-Stokes respiration, and incident atrial fibrillation.⁹

HOW SLEEP APNEA COULD LEAD TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

In experiments in animals, intermittent upper-airway obstruction led to forced inspiration, substantial negative intrathoracic pressure, subsequent left atrial distention, and increased susceptibility to atrial fibrillation.¹⁰ The autonomic nervous system may be a mediator of apnea-induced atrial fibrillation, as apnea-induced atrial fibrillation is suppressed with autonomic blockade.¹⁰

Emerging data also support the hypothesis that intermittent hypoxia⁷ and resolution of hypercapnia,⁸ as observed in obstructive sleep apnea, exert atrial electrophysiologic changes that increase vulnerability to atrial arrhythmogenesis.

In a case-crossover study,¹¹ the odds of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation occurring after a respiratory disturbance were 17.9 times higher than after normal breathing (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2–144.2), though the absolute rate of overall arrhythmia events (including both atrial fibrillation and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia) associated with respiratory disturbances was low (1 excess arrhythmia event per 40,000 respiratory disturbances).

EFFECT OF SLEEP APNEA ON ATRIAL FIBRILLATION MANAGEMENT

Sleep apnea also seems to affect the efficacy of a rhythm-control strategy for atrial fibrillation. For example, patients with obstructive sleep apnea have a higher risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation after cardioversion (82% vs 42% in controls)¹² and up to a 25% greater risk of recurrence after catheter ablation compared with those without obstructive sleep apnea (risk ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.08–1.45).¹³

Several observational studies showed a higher rate of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation in obstructive sleep apnea patients who do not use continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) than in those who do.^14–17 CPAP therapy appears to exert beneficial effects on cardiac structural remodeling;  cardiac magnetic resonance imaging shows that patients with sleep apnea who received less than 4 hours of CPAP per night had larger left atrial dimensions and increased left ventricular mass compared with those who received more than 4 hours of CPAP at night.¹⁷ However, a need remains for high-quality, large randomized controlled trials to eliminate potential unmeasured biases due to differences that may exist between CPAP users and non-users, such as general adherence to medical therapy and healthcare interventions.

An additional consideration is that the overall utility and value of obtaining a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea strictly as it pertains to atrial fibrillation management is affected by whether a rhythm- or rate-control strategy is pursued. In other words, if a patient is deemed to be in permanent atrial fibrillation and a rhythm-control strategy is therefore not pursued, the potential effect of untreated obstructive sleep apnea on atrial fibrillation recurrence could be less important. In this case, however, the other beneficial cardiovascular and systemic effects of diagnosing and treating underlying obstructive sleep apnea would remain.

 

 

POPULATION STUDIES

Epidemiologic and clinic-based studies have supported an association between sleep apnea (mostly central, but also obstructive) and atrial fibrillation.^4,18

Community-based studies such as the Sleep Heart Health Study⁴ and the Outcomes of Sleep Disorders in Older Men Study (MrOS Sleep),¹⁸ involving thousands of participants, have found the strongest cross-sectional associations of both obstructive and central sleep apnea with nocturnal atrial fibrillation. The findings included a 2 to 5 times higher odds of nocturnal atrial fibrillation, particularly in those with a moderate to severe degree of sleep-disordered breathing—even after adjusting for confounding influences (eg, obesity) and self-reported cardiac disease such as heart failure.

In MrOS Sleep, in an older male cohort, both obstructive and central sleep apnea were associated with nocturnal atrial fibrillation, though central sleep apnea and Cheyne-Stokes respirations had a stronger magnitude of association.¹⁸

Further insights can be drawn specifically from patients with heart failure. Sin et al,¹⁹ in a 1999 study, found that in 450 patients with systolic heart failure (85% men), the prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing was 25% to 33% (depending on the apnea-hypopnea index cutoff used) for central sleep apnea, and similarly 27% to 38% for obstructive sleep apnea. The prevalence of atrial fibrillation in this group was 10% in women and 15% in men. Atrial fibrillation was reported as a significant risk factor for central sleep apnea, but not for obstructive sleep apnea (for which only male sex and increasing body mass index were significant risk factors). Directionality was not clearly reported in this retrospective study in terms of timing of sleep studies and other assessments: ie, the report did not clearly state which came first, the atrial fibrillation or the sleep apnea. Therefore, the possibility that central sleep apnea is a predictor of atrial fibrillation cannot be excluded.  

Yumino et al,²⁰ in a study published in 2009, evaluated 218 patients with heart failure (with a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤ 45%) and reported a prevalence of moderate to severe sleep apnea of 21% for central sleep apnea and 26% for obstructive sleep apnea. In multivariate analysis, atrial fibrillation was independently associated with central sleep apnea but not obstructive sleep apnea.

In recent cohort studies, central sleep apnea was associated with 2 to 3 times higher odds of developing atrial fibrillation, while obstructive sleep apnea was not a predictor of incident atrial fibrillation.^9,21

Although most available studies associate sleep apnea with atrial fibrillation, findings of a case-control study²² did not support a difference in the prevalence of sleep apnea syndrome (defined as apnea index ≥ 5 and apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15, and the presence of sleep symptoms) in patients with lone atrial fibrillation (no evident cardiovascular disease) compared with controls matched for age, sex, and cardiovascular morbidity.

But observational studies are limited by the potential for residual unmeasured confounding factors and lack of objective cardiac structural data, such as left ventricular ejection fraction and atrial enlargement. Moreover, there can be significant differences in sleep apnea definitions among studies, thus limiting the ability to reach a definitive conclusion about the relationship between sleep apnea and atrial fibrillation.

SCREENING AND DIAGNOSIS

The 2014 joint guidelines of the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and Heart Rhythm Society for the management of atrial fibrillation state that a sleep study may be useful if sleep apnea is suspected.²³ The 2019 focused update of the 2014 guidelines²⁴ state that for overweight and obese patients with atrial fibrillation, weight loss combined with risk-factor modification is recommended (class I recommendation, level of evidence B-R, ie, data derived from 1 or more randomized trials or meta-analysis of such studies). Risk-factor modification in this case includes assessment and treatment of underlying sleep apnea, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, glucose intolerance, and alcohol and tobacco use.

Laboratory polysomnography has long been considered the gold standard for sleep apnea diagnosis. In one study,¹³ obstructive sleep apnea was a greater predictor of atrial fibrillation when diagnosed by polysomnography (risk ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.16–1.68) compared with identification by screening using the Berlin questionnaire (risk ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.91–1.27). However, a laboratory sleep study is associated with increased patient burden and limited availability.

Home sleep apnea testing is being increasingly used in the diagnostic evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea and may be a less costly, more available alternative. However, since a home sleep apnea test is less sensitive than polysomnography in detecting obstructive sleep apnea, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine guidelines²⁸ state that if a single home sleep apnea test is negative or inconclusive, polysomnography should be done if there is clinical suspicion of sleep apnea. Moreover, current guidelines from this group recommend that patients with significant cardiorespiratory disease should be tested with polysomnography rather than home sleep apnea testing.²²

Further study is needed to determine the optimal screening method for sleep apnea in patients with atrial fibrillation and to clarify the role of home sleep apnea testing. While keeping in mind the limitations of a screening questionnaire in this population, as a general approach it is reasonable to use a screening questionnaire for sleep apnea. And if the screen is positive, further evaluation with a sleep study is merited, whether by laboratory polysomnography, a home sleep apnea test, or referral to a sleep specialist.

MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE MAY BE IDEAL

Overall, given the high prevalence of sleep apnea in patients with atrial fibrillation, the deleterious effects of sleep apnea in general, the influence of sleep apnea on atrial fibrillation, and the cardiovascular and other beneficial effects of adequate treatment of sleep apnea, patients with atrial fibrillation should be assessed for sleep apnea.

While the optimal strategy in evaluating for sleep apnea in these patients needs to be further defined, a multidisciplinary approach to care involving a primary care provider, cardiologist, and sleep specialist may be ideal.

Yes. The prevalence of sleep apnea is exceedingly high in patients with atrial fibrillation—50% to 80% compared with 30% to 60% in respective control groups.^1–3 Conversely, atrial fibrillation is more prevalent in those with sleep-disordered breathing than in those without (4.8% vs 0.9%).⁴

Sleep-disordered breathing comprises obstructive sleep apnea and central sleep apnea. Obstructive sleep apnea, characterized by repetitive upper-airway obstruction during sleep, is accompanied by intermittent hypoxia, rises in carbon dioxide, autonomic nervous system fluctuations, and intrathoracic pressure alterations.⁵ Central sleep apnea may be neurally mediated and, in the setting of cardiac disease, is characterized by alterations in chemosensitivity and chemoresponsiveness, leading to a state of high loop gain—ie, a hypersensitive ventilatory control system leading to ventilatory drive oscillations.⁶

Both obstructive and central sleep apnea have been associated with atrial fibrillation. Experimental data implicate obstructive sleep apnea as a trigger of atrial arrhythmogenesis,^7,8 and epidemiologic studies support an association between central sleep apnea, Cheyne-Stokes respiration, and incident atrial fibrillation.⁹

HOW SLEEP APNEA COULD LEAD TO ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

In experiments in animals, intermittent upper-airway obstruction led to forced inspiration, substantial negative intrathoracic pressure, subsequent left atrial distention, and increased susceptibility to atrial fibrillation.¹⁰ The autonomic nervous system may be a mediator of apnea-induced atrial fibrillation, as apnea-induced atrial fibrillation is suppressed with autonomic blockade.¹⁰

Emerging data also support the hypothesis that intermittent hypoxia⁷ and resolution of hypercapnia,⁸ as observed in obstructive sleep apnea, exert atrial electrophysiologic changes that increase vulnerability to atrial arrhythmogenesis.

In a case-crossover study,¹¹ the odds of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation occurring after a respiratory disturbance were 17.9 times higher than after normal breathing (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2–144.2), though the absolute rate of overall arrhythmia events (including both atrial fibrillation and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia) associated with respiratory disturbances was low (1 excess arrhythmia event per 40,000 respiratory disturbances).

EFFECT OF SLEEP APNEA ON ATRIAL FIBRILLATION MANAGEMENT

Sleep apnea also seems to affect the efficacy of a rhythm-control strategy for atrial fibrillation. For example, patients with obstructive sleep apnea have a higher risk of recurrent atrial fibrillation after cardioversion (82% vs 42% in controls)¹² and up to a 25% greater risk of recurrence after catheter ablation compared with those without obstructive sleep apnea (risk ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.08–1.45).¹³

Several observational studies showed a higher rate of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation in obstructive sleep apnea patients who do not use continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) than in those who do.^14–17 CPAP therapy appears to exert beneficial effects on cardiac structural remodeling;  cardiac magnetic resonance imaging shows that patients with sleep apnea who received less than 4 hours of CPAP per night had larger left atrial dimensions and increased left ventricular mass compared with those who received more than 4 hours of CPAP at night.¹⁷ However, a need remains for high-quality, large randomized controlled trials to eliminate potential unmeasured biases due to differences that may exist between CPAP users and non-users, such as general adherence to medical therapy and healthcare interventions.

An additional consideration is that the overall utility and value of obtaining a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea strictly as it pertains to atrial fibrillation management is affected by whether a rhythm- or rate-control strategy is pursued. In other words, if a patient is deemed to be in permanent atrial fibrillation and a rhythm-control strategy is therefore not pursued, the potential effect of untreated obstructive sleep apnea on atrial fibrillation recurrence could be less important. In this case, however, the other beneficial cardiovascular and systemic effects of diagnosing and treating underlying obstructive sleep apnea would remain.

 

 

POPULATION STUDIES

Epidemiologic and clinic-based studies have supported an association between sleep apnea (mostly central, but also obstructive) and atrial fibrillation.^4,18

Community-based studies such as the Sleep Heart Health Study⁴ and the Outcomes of Sleep Disorders in Older Men Study (MrOS Sleep),¹⁸ involving thousands of participants, have found the strongest cross-sectional associations of both obstructive and central sleep apnea with nocturnal atrial fibrillation. The findings included a 2 to 5 times higher odds of nocturnal atrial fibrillation, particularly in those with a moderate to severe degree of sleep-disordered breathing—even after adjusting for confounding influences (eg, obesity) and self-reported cardiac disease such as heart failure.

In MrOS Sleep, in an older male cohort, both obstructive and central sleep apnea were associated with nocturnal atrial fibrillation, though central sleep apnea and Cheyne-Stokes respirations had a stronger magnitude of association.¹⁸

Further insights can be drawn specifically from patients with heart failure. Sin et al,¹⁹ in a 1999 study, found that in 450 patients with systolic heart failure (85% men), the prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing was 25% to 33% (depending on the apnea-hypopnea index cutoff used) for central sleep apnea, and similarly 27% to 38% for obstructive sleep apnea. The prevalence of atrial fibrillation in this group was 10% in women and 15% in men. Atrial fibrillation was reported as a significant risk factor for central sleep apnea, but not for obstructive sleep apnea (for which only male sex and increasing body mass index were significant risk factors). Directionality was not clearly reported in this retrospective study in terms of timing of sleep studies and other assessments: ie, the report did not clearly state which came first, the atrial fibrillation or the sleep apnea. Therefore, the possibility that central sleep apnea is a predictor of atrial fibrillation cannot be excluded.  

Yumino et al,²⁰ in a study published in 2009, evaluated 218 patients with heart failure (with a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤ 45%) and reported a prevalence of moderate to severe sleep apnea of 21% for central sleep apnea and 26% for obstructive sleep apnea. In multivariate analysis, atrial fibrillation was independently associated with central sleep apnea but not obstructive sleep apnea.

In recent cohort studies, central sleep apnea was associated with 2 to 3 times higher odds of developing atrial fibrillation, while obstructive sleep apnea was not a predictor of incident atrial fibrillation.^9,21

Although most available studies associate sleep apnea with atrial fibrillation, findings of a case-control study²² did not support a difference in the prevalence of sleep apnea syndrome (defined as apnea index ≥ 5 and apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15, and the presence of sleep symptoms) in patients with lone atrial fibrillation (no evident cardiovascular disease) compared with controls matched for age, sex, and cardiovascular morbidity.

But observational studies are limited by the potential for residual unmeasured confounding factors and lack of objective cardiac structural data, such as left ventricular ejection fraction and atrial enlargement. Moreover, there can be significant differences in sleep apnea definitions among studies, thus limiting the ability to reach a definitive conclusion about the relationship between sleep apnea and atrial fibrillation.

SCREENING AND DIAGNOSIS

The 2014 joint guidelines of the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and Heart Rhythm Society for the management of atrial fibrillation state that a sleep study may be useful if sleep apnea is suspected.²³ The 2019 focused update of the 2014 guidelines²⁴ state that for overweight and obese patients with atrial fibrillation, weight loss combined with risk-factor modification is recommended (class I recommendation, level of evidence B-R, ie, data derived from 1 or more randomized trials or meta-analysis of such studies). Risk-factor modification in this case includes assessment and treatment of underlying sleep apnea, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, glucose intolerance, and alcohol and tobacco use.

Laboratory polysomnography has long been considered the gold standard for sleep apnea diagnosis. In one study,¹³ obstructive sleep apnea was a greater predictor of atrial fibrillation when diagnosed by polysomnography (risk ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.16–1.68) compared with identification by screening using the Berlin questionnaire (risk ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.91–1.27). However, a laboratory sleep study is associated with increased patient burden and limited availability.

Home sleep apnea testing is being increasingly used in the diagnostic evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea and may be a less costly, more available alternative. However, since a home sleep apnea test is less sensitive than polysomnography in detecting obstructive sleep apnea, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine guidelines²⁸ state that if a single home sleep apnea test is negative or inconclusive, polysomnography should be done if there is clinical suspicion of sleep apnea. Moreover, current guidelines from this group recommend that patients with significant cardiorespiratory disease should be tested with polysomnography rather than home sleep apnea testing.²²

Further study is needed to determine the optimal screening method for sleep apnea in patients with atrial fibrillation and to clarify the role of home sleep apnea testing. While keeping in mind the limitations of a screening questionnaire in this population, as a general approach it is reasonable to use a screening questionnaire for sleep apnea. And if the screen is positive, further evaluation with a sleep study is merited, whether by laboratory polysomnography, a home sleep apnea test, or referral to a sleep specialist.

MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE MAY BE IDEAL

Overall, given the high prevalence of sleep apnea in patients with atrial fibrillation, the deleterious effects of sleep apnea in general, the influence of sleep apnea on atrial fibrillation, and the cardiovascular and other beneficial effects of adequate treatment of sleep apnea, patients with atrial fibrillation should be assessed for sleep apnea.

While the optimal strategy in evaluating for sleep apnea in these patients needs to be further defined, a multidisciplinary approach to care involving a primary care provider, cardiologist, and sleep specialist may be ideal.

Traumatic microbleeds (TMBs) may indicate vascular injury and predict worse outcomes after even minor brain injury, according to a study at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

The study involved 439 adults with head injuries treated in the emergency department. The participants had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans within 48 hours of the injury and again during 4 subsequent visits. They also completed behavioral and outcome questionnaires.

Microbleeds appear as small dark lesions on MRI scans but are usually too small to be seen on computer tomography (CT) scans. Sometimes they appear as dots (punctate), sometimes they are linear. In previous studies, researchers examined TMBs in the acute phase of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke and found linear-appearing TMBs only in patients with TBI, suggesting that at least linear TMBs are consistent with trauma and might be the result of injured vessels. They conjectured that TMBs seen on MRI might be a form of traumatic vascular injury distinct from primary injury to the axons.

In this study, one-third of the patients had TMBs. More than half (58%) of the participants with severe head injury showed microbleeds, as did 27% of patients with mild injuries. In most patients with microbleeds, they appeared as linear streaks or dotted lesions. The study also revealed that the frontal lobes were the region most likely to show microbleeds.

The researchers controlled for variables known to predict poor outcome, such as trauma level and trauma-related injury on CT. Even so, microbleeds significantly predicted worse outcome. Patients with both punctate and linear TMBs were twice as likely to have disability (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended ≤6) on follow-up.

One participant’s family donated his brain for further analysis after he died. Imaging with a more powerful MRI scanner and a detailed histologic analysis allowed the researchers to better understand the pathology.

The researchers found that what appeared as a punctate TMB on MRI corresponded to iron-laden macrophages in the perivascular space surrounding a vascular tree that extended over centimeters. That was surprising, the researchers say. They expected to see iron within the parenchyma, but they also found iron inside macrophages outside of the parenchyma between the vessel and neuropil, tracking alongside vessels.

The researchers say that finding signified that the extent of injury was more extensive than indicated on MRI and had consequences to cellular function over a larger area of brain. In fact, they suggest, punctate and linear TMBs may not be distinct entities: The difference in shape may be “an issue of resolution.”

The researchers conclude that TMBs could be biomarkers for vascular injury. They also note that the leakage of blood from damaged blood vessels can trigger an inflammatory response. The damage to vessels, the disruption of normal pathways of blood flow, and the influx of inflammatory cells could result in secondary injury to the brain tissue due to ischemia.

Thus, TMBs may also be useful biomarkers for identifying which patients are candidates for treatments that reduce ischemic damage or improve microvascular cerebral blood flow.

Traumatic microbleeds (TMBs) may indicate vascular injury and predict worse outcomes after even minor brain injury, according to a study at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

The study involved 439 adults with head injuries treated in the emergency department. The participants had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans within 48 hours of the injury and again during 4 subsequent visits. They also completed behavioral and outcome questionnaires.

Microbleeds appear as small dark lesions on MRI scans but are usually too small to be seen on computer tomography (CT) scans. Sometimes they appear as dots (punctate), sometimes they are linear. In previous studies, researchers examined TMBs in the acute phase of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke and found linear-appearing TMBs only in patients with TBI, suggesting that at least linear TMBs are consistent with trauma and might be the result of injured vessels. They conjectured that TMBs seen on MRI might be a form of traumatic vascular injury distinct from primary injury to the axons.

In this study, one-third of the patients had TMBs. More than half (58%) of the participants with severe head injury showed microbleeds, as did 27% of patients with mild injuries. In most patients with microbleeds, they appeared as linear streaks or dotted lesions. The study also revealed that the frontal lobes were the region most likely to show microbleeds.

The researchers controlled for variables known to predict poor outcome, such as trauma level and trauma-related injury on CT. Even so, microbleeds significantly predicted worse outcome. Patients with both punctate and linear TMBs were twice as likely to have disability (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended ≤6) on follow-up.

One participant’s family donated his brain for further analysis after he died. Imaging with a more powerful MRI scanner and a detailed histologic analysis allowed the researchers to better understand the pathology.

The researchers found that what appeared as a punctate TMB on MRI corresponded to iron-laden macrophages in the perivascular space surrounding a vascular tree that extended over centimeters. That was surprising, the researchers say. They expected to see iron within the parenchyma, but they also found iron inside macrophages outside of the parenchyma between the vessel and neuropil, tracking alongside vessels.

The researchers say that finding signified that the extent of injury was more extensive than indicated on MRI and had consequences to cellular function over a larger area of brain. In fact, they suggest, punctate and linear TMBs may not be distinct entities: The difference in shape may be “an issue of resolution.”

The researchers conclude that TMBs could be biomarkers for vascular injury. They also note that the leakage of blood from damaged blood vessels can trigger an inflammatory response. The damage to vessels, the disruption of normal pathways of blood flow, and the influx of inflammatory cells could result in secondary injury to the brain tissue due to ischemia.

Thus, TMBs may also be useful biomarkers for identifying which patients are candidates for treatments that reduce ischemic damage or improve microvascular cerebral blood flow.

Traumatic microbleeds (TMBs) may indicate vascular injury and predict worse outcomes after even minor brain injury, according to a study at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

The study involved 439 adults with head injuries treated in the emergency department. The participants had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans within 48 hours of the injury and again during 4 subsequent visits. They also completed behavioral and outcome questionnaires.

Microbleeds appear as small dark lesions on MRI scans but are usually too small to be seen on computer tomography (CT) scans. Sometimes they appear as dots (punctate), sometimes they are linear. In previous studies, researchers examined TMBs in the acute phase of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke and found linear-appearing TMBs only in patients with TBI, suggesting that at least linear TMBs are consistent with trauma and might be the result of injured vessels. They conjectured that TMBs seen on MRI might be a form of traumatic vascular injury distinct from primary injury to the axons.

In this study, one-third of the patients had TMBs. More than half (58%) of the participants with severe head injury showed microbleeds, as did 27% of patients with mild injuries. In most patients with microbleeds, they appeared as linear streaks or dotted lesions. The study also revealed that the frontal lobes were the region most likely to show microbleeds.

The researchers controlled for variables known to predict poor outcome, such as trauma level and trauma-related injury on CT. Even so, microbleeds significantly predicted worse outcome. Patients with both punctate and linear TMBs were twice as likely to have disability (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended ≤6) on follow-up.

One participant’s family donated his brain for further analysis after he died. Imaging with a more powerful MRI scanner and a detailed histologic analysis allowed the researchers to better understand the pathology.

The researchers found that what appeared as a punctate TMB on MRI corresponded to iron-laden macrophages in the perivascular space surrounding a vascular tree that extended over centimeters. That was surprising, the researchers say. They expected to see iron within the parenchyma, but they also found iron inside macrophages outside of the parenchyma between the vessel and neuropil, tracking alongside vessels.

The researchers say that finding signified that the extent of injury was more extensive than indicated on MRI and had consequences to cellular function over a larger area of brain. In fact, they suggest, punctate and linear TMBs may not be distinct entities: The difference in shape may be “an issue of resolution.”

The researchers conclude that TMBs could be biomarkers for vascular injury. They also note that the leakage of blood from damaged blood vessels can trigger an inflammatory response. The damage to vessels, the disruption of normal pathways of blood flow, and the influx of inflammatory cells could result in secondary injury to the brain tissue due to ischemia.

Thus, TMBs may also be useful biomarkers for identifying which patients are candidates for treatments that reduce ischemic damage or improve microvascular cerebral blood flow.

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – Selecting pharmacologic treatment for migraines remains a challenge despite numerous studies investigating efficacy, cost-benefit analyses, and outcomes.

“There’s very little consistency in study design, making it difficult to make real-world comparisons,” said Carly Rodriguez, PharmD, FAMP, pharmacy director at Moda Health. Dr. Rodriguez presented data on the efficacy and pharmacoeconomic factors of migraine therapy at the annual meeting of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.

The paucity of translatable evidence makes comparing and evaluating newer migraine therapies – such as botulinum toxins and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors – particularly difficult.

These two injectable drug classes are not first-line treatments for migraine; they are currently reserved for patients who are refractory to at least one prophylactic treatment, but they offer important alternatives and additions to therapy.

“OnabotulinumtoxinA makes a good case because it costs less than a single ER visit, but there’s not enough supporting data,” Dr. Rodriguez said. According to a report from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) that evaluated the clinical efficacy and economic impact associated with onabotulinumtoxinA, administering the drug saved $157/headache day averted for 20 baseline headaches per month and $223/headache day avoided for 15 baseline headaches per month.

OnabotulinumtoxinA administration showed a moderate yet significant health benefit in preventing chronic migraines by reducing the number of headache days patients experienced by more than 50%. No benefit for episodic migraines was observed.

Several single- and multicenter studies found that onabotulinumtoxinA produced positive outcomes such as a decreased number of visits to urgent care centers, a lower average number of migraines patients experienced, and improved quality of life.

An ICER report investigating CGRP inhibitors found that the cost of anti-CGRP therapy may not produce viable clinical benefits.

Both botulinum toxins and CGRP inhibitors require prior authorization, and their injectable dosage forms restrict the settings in which they are administered and dispensed. Because botulinum toxins must be administered by a health care professional, the vast majority of these drugs are restricted to medical settings, with brand-to-generic substitution often varying among health plans. For this reason, botulinum toxins rarely appear on formularies. Several health plans consider botulinum toxins interchangeable and may give prescribers options to select the botulinum toxin product of their choice.

According to Dr. Rodriguez, there is some variability as to whether CGRP therapies are available in community pharmacy settings or are restricted to specialty pharmacies. Additionally, some plans consider all CGRP inhibitors to be interchangeable, while others take a more conservative approach.

Overall, generic drugs continue to dominate migraine drug therapy, with triptans leading the way. Generics that are heavily prescribed include beta-blockers, antidepressants, and antiepileptics.

More than 37 million people living in the United States suffer from migraines – approximately 8% of the overall population. Women are four times as likely to have migraines than men.

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – Selecting pharmacologic treatment for migraines remains a challenge despite numerous studies investigating efficacy, cost-benefit analyses, and outcomes.

“There’s very little consistency in study design, making it difficult to make real-world comparisons,” said Carly Rodriguez, PharmD, FAMP, pharmacy director at Moda Health. Dr. Rodriguez presented data on the efficacy and pharmacoeconomic factors of migraine therapy at the annual meeting of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.

The paucity of translatable evidence makes comparing and evaluating newer migraine therapies – such as botulinum toxins and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors – particularly difficult.

These two injectable drug classes are not first-line treatments for migraine; they are currently reserved for patients who are refractory to at least one prophylactic treatment, but they offer important alternatives and additions to therapy.

“OnabotulinumtoxinA makes a good case because it costs less than a single ER visit, but there’s not enough supporting data,” Dr. Rodriguez said. According to a report from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) that evaluated the clinical efficacy and economic impact associated with onabotulinumtoxinA, administering the drug saved $157/headache day averted for 20 baseline headaches per month and $223/headache day avoided for 15 baseline headaches per month.

OnabotulinumtoxinA administration showed a moderate yet significant health benefit in preventing chronic migraines by reducing the number of headache days patients experienced by more than 50%. No benefit for episodic migraines was observed.

Several single- and multicenter studies found that onabotulinumtoxinA produced positive outcomes such as a decreased number of visits to urgent care centers, a lower average number of migraines patients experienced, and improved quality of life.

An ICER report investigating CGRP inhibitors found that the cost of anti-CGRP therapy may not produce viable clinical benefits.

Both botulinum toxins and CGRP inhibitors require prior authorization, and their injectable dosage forms restrict the settings in which they are administered and dispensed. Because botulinum toxins must be administered by a health care professional, the vast majority of these drugs are restricted to medical settings, with brand-to-generic substitution often varying among health plans. For this reason, botulinum toxins rarely appear on formularies. Several health plans consider botulinum toxins interchangeable and may give prescribers options to select the botulinum toxin product of their choice.

According to Dr. Rodriguez, there is some variability as to whether CGRP therapies are available in community pharmacy settings or are restricted to specialty pharmacies. Additionally, some plans consider all CGRP inhibitors to be interchangeable, while others take a more conservative approach.

Overall, generic drugs continue to dominate migraine drug therapy, with triptans leading the way. Generics that are heavily prescribed include beta-blockers, antidepressants, and antiepileptics.

More than 37 million people living in the United States suffer from migraines – approximately 8% of the overall population. Women are four times as likely to have migraines than men.

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – Selecting pharmacologic treatment for migraines remains a challenge despite numerous studies investigating efficacy, cost-benefit analyses, and outcomes.

“There’s very little consistency in study design, making it difficult to make real-world comparisons,” said Carly Rodriguez, PharmD, FAMP, pharmacy director at Moda Health. Dr. Rodriguez presented data on the efficacy and pharmacoeconomic factors of migraine therapy at the annual meeting of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.

The paucity of translatable evidence makes comparing and evaluating newer migraine therapies – such as botulinum toxins and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors – particularly difficult.

These two injectable drug classes are not first-line treatments for migraine; they are currently reserved for patients who are refractory to at least one prophylactic treatment, but they offer important alternatives and additions to therapy.

“OnabotulinumtoxinA makes a good case because it costs less than a single ER visit, but there’s not enough supporting data,” Dr. Rodriguez said. According to a report from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) that evaluated the clinical efficacy and economic impact associated with onabotulinumtoxinA, administering the drug saved $157/headache day averted for 20 baseline headaches per month and $223/headache day avoided for 15 baseline headaches per month.

OnabotulinumtoxinA administration showed a moderate yet significant health benefit in preventing chronic migraines by reducing the number of headache days patients experienced by more than 50%. No benefit for episodic migraines was observed.

Several single- and multicenter studies found that onabotulinumtoxinA produced positive outcomes such as a decreased number of visits to urgent care centers, a lower average number of migraines patients experienced, and improved quality of life.

An ICER report investigating CGRP inhibitors found that the cost of anti-CGRP therapy may not produce viable clinical benefits.

Both botulinum toxins and CGRP inhibitors require prior authorization, and their injectable dosage forms restrict the settings in which they are administered and dispensed. Because botulinum toxins must be administered by a health care professional, the vast majority of these drugs are restricted to medical settings, with brand-to-generic substitution often varying among health plans. For this reason, botulinum toxins rarely appear on formularies. Several health plans consider botulinum toxins interchangeable and may give prescribers options to select the botulinum toxin product of their choice.

According to Dr. Rodriguez, there is some variability as to whether CGRP therapies are available in community pharmacy settings or are restricted to specialty pharmacies. Additionally, some plans consider all CGRP inhibitors to be interchangeable, while others take a more conservative approach.

Overall, generic drugs continue to dominate migraine drug therapy, with triptans leading the way. Generics that are heavily prescribed include beta-blockers, antidepressants, and antiepileptics.

More than 37 million people living in the United States suffer from migraines – approximately 8% of the overall population. Women are four times as likely to have migraines than men.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved diroximel fumarate (Vumerity) for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) in adults, including clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting disease, and active secondary progressive disease, according to an Oct. 30 announcement from its developers, Biogen and Alkermes.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/ Creative Commons License

The approval is based on pharmacokinetic studies that established the bioequivalence of diroximel fumarate and dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera), and it relied in part on the safety and efficacy data for dimethyl fumarate, which was approved in 2013. Diroximel fumarate rapidly converts to monomethyl fumarate, the same active metabolite as dimethyl fumarate.

Diroximel fumarate may be better tolerated than dimethyl fumarate. A trial found that the newer drug has significantly better gastrointestinal tolerability, the developers of the drug announced in July. In addition, the drug application for diroximel fumarate included interim data from EVOLVE-MS-1, an ongoing, open-label, 2-year safety study evaluating diroximel fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Researchers found a 6.3% rate of treatment discontinuation attributable to adverse events. Less than 1% of patients discontinued treatment because of gastrointestinal adverse events.

Serious side effects of diroximel fumarate may include allergic reaction, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, decreases in white blood cell count, and liver problems. Flushing and stomach problems are the most common side effects, which may decrease over time.

Biogen plans to make diroximel fumarate available in the United States in the near future, the company said. Prescribing information is available online.

jremaly@mdedge.com

The Food and Drug Administration has approved diroximel fumarate (Vumerity) for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) in adults, including clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting disease, and active secondary progressive disease, according to an Oct. 30 announcement from its developers, Biogen and Alkermes.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/ Creative Commons License

The approval is based on pharmacokinetic studies that established the bioequivalence of diroximel fumarate and dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera), and it relied in part on the safety and efficacy data for dimethyl fumarate, which was approved in 2013. Diroximel fumarate rapidly converts to monomethyl fumarate, the same active metabolite as dimethyl fumarate.

Diroximel fumarate may be better tolerated than dimethyl fumarate. A trial found that the newer drug has significantly better gastrointestinal tolerability, the developers of the drug announced in July. In addition, the drug application for diroximel fumarate included interim data from EVOLVE-MS-1, an ongoing, open-label, 2-year safety study evaluating diroximel fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Researchers found a 6.3% rate of treatment discontinuation attributable to adverse events. Less than 1% of patients discontinued treatment because of gastrointestinal adverse events.

Serious side effects of diroximel fumarate may include allergic reaction, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, decreases in white blood cell count, and liver problems. Flushing and stomach problems are the most common side effects, which may decrease over time.

Biogen plans to make diroximel fumarate available in the United States in the near future, the company said. Prescribing information is available online.

jremaly@mdedge.com

The Food and Drug Administration has approved diroximel fumarate (Vumerity) for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) in adults, including clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting disease, and active secondary progressive disease, according to an Oct. 30 announcement from its developers, Biogen and Alkermes.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/ Creative Commons License

The approval is based on pharmacokinetic studies that established the bioequivalence of diroximel fumarate and dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera), and it relied in part on the safety and efficacy data for dimethyl fumarate, which was approved in 2013. Diroximel fumarate rapidly converts to monomethyl fumarate, the same active metabolite as dimethyl fumarate.

Diroximel fumarate may be better tolerated than dimethyl fumarate. A trial found that the newer drug has significantly better gastrointestinal tolerability, the developers of the drug announced in July. In addition, the drug application for diroximel fumarate included interim data from EVOLVE-MS-1, an ongoing, open-label, 2-year safety study evaluating diroximel fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Researchers found a 6.3% rate of treatment discontinuation attributable to adverse events. Less than 1% of patients discontinued treatment because of gastrointestinal adverse events.

Serious side effects of diroximel fumarate may include allergic reaction, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, decreases in white blood cell count, and liver problems. Flushing and stomach problems are the most common side effects, which may decrease over time.

Biogen plans to make diroximel fumarate available in the United States in the near future, the company said. Prescribing information is available online.

jremaly@mdedge.com

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – The net prices of drugs are increasing four times faster than the rate of inflation, despite being offset 43% from list prices.

Kenishirotie/Thinkstock

List prices increased by 232% from 2007 to 2018 (12% per year) and net prices increased 133% during that same time period. For Medicaid, the gross-to-net discount increased from 40% in 2007 to 68% in 2018. For all other payers, the increase was 22%-50% during that same period, Inmaculada Hernandez, PharmD, and colleagues reported at annual meeting of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.

The investigators also found a wide variation on discounts across therapeutic classes. For example, list price for drugs in the multiple sclerosis category increased 407% over the study period while net price increased 221%. Insulins came in second in terms of gross price increases (337%) but saw only net prices increases by 83% due to increasing discounts, according to Dr. Hernandez, assistant professor of pharmacy and therapeutics at the University of Pittsburgh.

List prices for noninsulin diabetes treatments tripled during the observation period, but net prices went up only 24%. List price increases were lowest in the antineoplastic class, averaging 135%, though there were only 34% in rebates to offset the list price, resulting in an average net price increase of 89%.

Research was based on pricing data supplied by investment firm SSR Health for branded products and U.S. sales reported by publicly traded companies. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute sponsored the study.

gtwachtman@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Hernandez I et a. AMCP Nexus, poster U2.

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – The net prices of drugs are increasing four times faster than the rate of inflation, despite being offset 43% from list prices.

Kenishirotie/Thinkstock

List prices increased by 232% from 2007 to 2018 (12% per year) and net prices increased 133% during that same time period. For Medicaid, the gross-to-net discount increased from 40% in 2007 to 68% in 2018. For all other payers, the increase was 22%-50% during that same period, Inmaculada Hernandez, PharmD, and colleagues reported at annual meeting of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.

The investigators also found a wide variation on discounts across therapeutic classes. For example, list price for drugs in the multiple sclerosis category increased 407% over the study period while net price increased 221%. Insulins came in second in terms of gross price increases (337%) but saw only net prices increases by 83% due to increasing discounts, according to Dr. Hernandez, assistant professor of pharmacy and therapeutics at the University of Pittsburgh.

List prices for noninsulin diabetes treatments tripled during the observation period, but net prices went up only 24%. List price increases were lowest in the antineoplastic class, averaging 135%, though there were only 34% in rebates to offset the list price, resulting in an average net price increase of 89%.

Research was based on pricing data supplied by investment firm SSR Health for branded products and U.S. sales reported by publicly traded companies. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute sponsored the study.

gtwachtman@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Hernandez I et a. AMCP Nexus, poster U2.

NATIONAL HARBOR, MD. – The net prices of drugs are increasing four times faster than the rate of inflation, despite being offset 43% from list prices.

Kenishirotie/Thinkstock

List prices increased by 232% from 2007 to 2018 (12% per year) and net prices increased 133% during that same time period. For Medicaid, the gross-to-net discount increased from 40% in 2007 to 68% in 2018. For all other payers, the increase was 22%-50% during that same period, Inmaculada Hernandez, PharmD, and colleagues reported at annual meeting of the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.

The investigators also found a wide variation on discounts across therapeutic classes. For example, list price for drugs in the multiple sclerosis category increased 407% over the study period while net price increased 221%. Insulins came in second in terms of gross price increases (337%) but saw only net prices increases by 83% due to increasing discounts, according to Dr. Hernandez, assistant professor of pharmacy and therapeutics at the University of Pittsburgh.

List prices for noninsulin diabetes treatments tripled during the observation period, but net prices went up only 24%. List price increases were lowest in the antineoplastic class, averaging 135%, though there were only 34% in rebates to offset the list price, resulting in an average net price increase of 89%.

Research was based on pricing data supplied by investment firm SSR Health for branded products and U.S. sales reported by publicly traded companies. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute sponsored the study.

gtwachtman@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Hernandez I et a. AMCP Nexus, poster U2.

AUSTIN, TEX. – Patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) who receive intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) appear to have an increased risk of thromboembolic events if it is administered with a central venous access device (CVAD) when compared against those without a CVAD, according to a recent study.

Although CVADs can reliably deliver IVIg, they also represent an established risk factor for thromboembolic events, Ami Patel, PhD, a senior epidemiologist at CSL Behring, and colleagues noted on their poster at the annual meeting of the American Association for Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine.

The results suggest a need for physicians to be vigilant about patients’ potential risk factors for thromboembolic events, Dr. Patel said in an interview. Further research is planned, however, because the current study did not control for other risk factors or explore other possible confounding, she said.

Dr. Patel and her associates analyzed U.S. claims data (IBM/Truven MarketScan) from 2006 to 2018 and included all patients with a CIDP diagnosis claim and a postdiagnosis code for IVIg. A code for CVAD up to 2 months before CIDP diagnosis without removal before IVIg treatment ended determined those with CVAD exposure, and thromboembolic events included any codes related to arterial, venous, or vascular prostheses.

The researchers then compared patients in a case-control fashion, matching each one with a CVAD to five patients of similar demographics without a CVAD. Characteristics used for matching included medical insurance type, prescription data availability, sex, age, geographic region, and years enrolled in the database.

Among 7,447 patients with at least one IVIg claim, 11.8% (n = 882) had CVAD exposure and 88.2% (n = 6,565) did not. Of those without a CVAD, 3,642 patients were matched to patients with CVAD. A quarter (25.4%) of patients with a CVAD had a thromboembolic event, compared with 11.2% of matched patients without CVADs (P less than .0001).

In the year leading up to IVIg therapy, 16.9% of those with a CVAD and 10.9% of matched patients without one had a previous thromboembolic event (P less than .0001). Patients with a CVAD also had significantly higher rates of hypertension (51.9% vs. 45.0% with placebo; P less than .001) and anticoagulation therapy (7.0% vs. 5.2% with placebo; P less than .05). Differences between the groups were not significant for diabetes (26.9% vs. 24.2%) and hyperlipidemia (19.1% vs. 17.8%).

Occlusion and stenosis of the carotid artery was the most common arterial thromboembolic outcome, occurring in 5.3% of those with a CVAD and in 2.8% of those without a CVAD. The most common venous thromboembolic event was acute venous embolism and thrombosis of lower-extremity deep vessels, which occurred in 7% of those with a CVAD and in 1.8% of those without.

The researchers also compared inpatient admissions and emergency department visits among those with and without a CVAD; both rates were higher in patients with a CVAD. Visits to the emergency department occurred at a rate of 0.14 events per month for those with a CVAD (2.01 distinct months with a claim) and 0.09 events per month for those without a CVAD (0.65 distinct months with a claim). Patients with a CVAD had 1.44 months with an inpatient admissions claim, in comparison with 0.41 months among matched patients without a CVAD. Inpatient admission frequency per month was 0.14 for those with a CVAD and 0.08 for those without.

The research was funded by CSL Behring. Dr. Patel and two of the other five authors are employees of CSL Behring.

SOURCE: Patel A et al. AANEM 2019, Abstract 94.

AUSTIN, TEX. – Patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) who receive intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) appear to have an increased risk of thromboembolic events if it is administered with a central venous access device (CVAD) when compared against those without a CVAD, according to a recent study.

Although CVADs can reliably deliver IVIg, they also represent an established risk factor for thromboembolic events, Ami Patel, PhD, a senior epidemiologist at CSL Behring, and colleagues noted on their poster at the annual meeting of the American Association for Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine.

The results suggest a need for physicians to be vigilant about patients’ potential risk factors for thromboembolic events, Dr. Patel said in an interview. Further research is planned, however, because the current study did not control for other risk factors or explore other possible confounding, she said.

Dr. Patel and her associates analyzed U.S. claims data (IBM/Truven MarketScan) from 2006 to 2018 and included all patients with a CIDP diagnosis claim and a postdiagnosis code for IVIg. A code for CVAD up to 2 months before CIDP diagnosis without removal before IVIg treatment ended determined those with CVAD exposure, and thromboembolic events included any codes related to arterial, venous, or vascular prostheses.

The researchers then compared patients in a case-control fashion, matching each one with a CVAD to five patients of similar demographics without a CVAD. Characteristics used for matching included medical insurance type, prescription data availability, sex, age, geographic region, and years enrolled in the database.

Among 7,447 patients with at least one IVIg claim, 11.8% (n = 882) had CVAD exposure and 88.2% (n = 6,565) did not. Of those without a CVAD, 3,642 patients were matched to patients with CVAD. A quarter (25.4%) of patients with a CVAD had a thromboembolic event, compared with 11.2% of matched patients without CVADs (P less than .0001).

In the year leading up to IVIg therapy, 16.9% of those with a CVAD and 10.9% of matched patients without one had a previous thromboembolic event (P less than .0001). Patients with a CVAD also had significantly higher rates of hypertension (51.9% vs. 45.0% with placebo; P less than .001) and anticoagulation therapy (7.0% vs. 5.2% with placebo; P less than .05). Differences between the groups were not significant for diabetes (26.9% vs. 24.2%) and hyperlipidemia (19.1% vs. 17.8%).

Occlusion and stenosis of the carotid artery was the most common arterial thromboembolic outcome, occurring in 5.3% of those with a CVAD and in 2.8% of those without a CVAD. The most common venous thromboembolic event was acute venous embolism and thrombosis of lower-extremity deep vessels, which occurred in 7% of those with a CVAD and in 1.8% of those without.

The researchers also compared inpatient admissions and emergency department visits among those with and without a CVAD; both rates were higher in patients with a CVAD. Visits to the emergency department occurred at a rate of 0.14 events per month for those with a CVAD (2.01 distinct months with a claim) and 0.09 events per month for those without a CVAD (0.65 distinct months with a claim). Patients with a CVAD had 1.44 months with an inpatient admissions claim, in comparison with 0.41 months among matched patients without a CVAD. Inpatient admission frequency per month was 0.14 for those with a CVAD and 0.08 for those without.

The research was funded by CSL Behring. Dr. Patel and two of the other five authors are employees of CSL Behring.

SOURCE: Patel A et al. AANEM 2019, Abstract 94.

AUSTIN, TEX. – Patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) who receive intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) appear to have an increased risk of thromboembolic events if it is administered with a central venous access device (CVAD) when compared against those without a CVAD, according to a recent study.

Although CVADs can reliably deliver IVIg, they also represent an established risk factor for thromboembolic events, Ami Patel, PhD, a senior epidemiologist at CSL Behring, and colleagues noted on their poster at the annual meeting of the American Association for Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine.

The results suggest a need for physicians to be vigilant about patients’ potential risk factors for thromboembolic events, Dr. Patel said in an interview. Further research is planned, however, because the current study did not control for other risk factors or explore other possible confounding, she said.

Dr. Patel and her associates analyzed U.S. claims data (IBM/Truven MarketScan) from 2006 to 2018 and included all patients with a CIDP diagnosis claim and a postdiagnosis code for IVIg. A code for CVAD up to 2 months before CIDP diagnosis without removal before IVIg treatment ended determined those with CVAD exposure, and thromboembolic events included any codes related to arterial, venous, or vascular prostheses.

The researchers then compared patients in a case-control fashion, matching each one with a CVAD to five patients of similar demographics without a CVAD. Characteristics used for matching included medical insurance type, prescription data availability, sex, age, geographic region, and years enrolled in the database.

Among 7,447 patients with at least one IVIg claim, 11.8% (n = 882) had CVAD exposure and 88.2% (n = 6,565) did not. Of those without a CVAD, 3,642 patients were matched to patients with CVAD. A quarter (25.4%) of patients with a CVAD had a thromboembolic event, compared with 11.2% of matched patients without CVADs (P less than .0001).

In the year leading up to IVIg therapy, 16.9% of those with a CVAD and 10.9% of matched patients without one had a previous thromboembolic event (P less than .0001). Patients with a CVAD also had significantly higher rates of hypertension (51.9% vs. 45.0% with placebo; P less than .001) and anticoagulation therapy (7.0% vs. 5.2% with placebo; P less than .05). Differences between the groups were not significant for diabetes (26.9% vs. 24.2%) and hyperlipidemia (19.1% vs. 17.8%).

Occlusion and stenosis of the carotid artery was the most common arterial thromboembolic outcome, occurring in 5.3% of those with a CVAD and in 2.8% of those without a CVAD. The most common venous thromboembolic event was acute venous embolism and thrombosis of lower-extremity deep vessels, which occurred in 7% of those with a CVAD and in 1.8% of those without.

The researchers also compared inpatient admissions and emergency department visits among those with and without a CVAD; both rates were higher in patients with a CVAD. Visits to the emergency department occurred at a rate of 0.14 events per month for those with a CVAD (2.01 distinct months with a claim) and 0.09 events per month for those without a CVAD (0.65 distinct months with a claim). Patients with a CVAD had 1.44 months with an inpatient admissions claim, in comparison with 0.41 months among matched patients without a CVAD. Inpatient admission frequency per month was 0.14 for those with a CVAD and 0.08 for those without.

The research was funded by CSL Behring. Dr. Patel and two of the other five authors are employees of CSL Behring.

SOURCE: Patel A et al. AANEM 2019, Abstract 94.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. – Treatment of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) with an investigational nuclear factor–kappa B (NF-kB) inhibitor may slow disease progression as assessed by MRI and functional measures, according to an analysis of phase 2 trial data presented at the annual meeting of the Child Neurology Society.

Jake Remaly/MDedge News

The NF-kB pathway is “fundamental to the pathogenesis and biology of DMD,” said Richard Finkel, MD, chief of neurology at Nemours Children’s Health System in Orlando and principal investigator for the phase 2 study, known as MoveDMD.

A lack of dystrophin, combined with the mechanical stress of muscle contraction, activates the NF-kB pathway and inhibits muscle regeneration. “It is known that there is inflammation and fibrosis and release of cytokines early in life” in patients with DMD, Dr. Finkel said.

Independent of mutation

Edasalonexent is an NF-kB inhibitor that is being developed by Catabasis as a therapy for patients with DMD regardless of the genetic mutation that is causing the disease. It may be used as monotherapy or with other dystrophin-targeted treatments, Dr. Finkel said.

In a mouse model of DMD, an analog of the drug reduced muscle inflammation and increased the force of diaphragm muscle. To assess edasalonexent’s safety, pharmacokinetics, and effects on functional measures and MRI in patients with DMD, Dr. Finkel and colleagues conducted the MoveDMD trial. Investigators enrolled boys aged 4 years to younger than 8 years who were not receiving treatment with corticosteroids.

Researchers first examined drug safety and pharmacokinetics in 17 boys who received the treatment for 1 week. The investigators then followed 16 of these patients off treatment for as long as 6 months. This off-treatment period was followed by a phase 2, placebo-controlled period, during which the 16 patients and another 15 patients received edasalonexent 67 mg/kg/day, edasalonexent 100 mg/kg/day, or placebo for 12 weeks. Patients subsequently entered an open-label extension study.

Dr. Finkel presented a comparison of outcomes during the off-treatment period with outcomes during the open-label extension. “We used these boys as their own internal control, if you wish,” he said.

Creatine kinase levels decreased soon after treatment, as did other markers of muscle disease. The drug “seems to have an early and sustained biomarker response,” Dr. Finkel said.

Annualized rate of change on lower leg muscle MRI-T2 decreased. “There is a relative reduction and stabilization from week 12 all the way out through the open-label extension to 72 weeks,” he said. “It suggests that there is an early and sustained response in stabilization of the MRI as a biomarker.”

Timed function tests

A comparison of the annualized rates of change on timed function tests – including the 10-meter walk/run, time-to-stand, and four-stair-climb, and the North Star Ambulatory Assessment – during the off-treatment and on-treatment periods indicated slowing of disease progression with treatment. “Shortly after starting on drug ... there was a relative stabilization in each of these measures,” Dr. Finkel said.

In addition, the researchers observed an early signal of possible cardiac benefit. Mean heart rate at baseline was 99 bpm. On treatment, it decreased to 92 bpm. “Boys with DMD die typically of cardiomyopathy, so it is important to try to address the cardiac status,” he said.

The drug was safe and well tolerated. Most participants experienced mild gastrointestinal issues, which typically were transient. One serious adverse event during the trial occurred in a patient receiving placebo. Patients tended to have a stable body mass index during treatment, Dr. Finkel said.

During the open-label extension, patients had “clinically meaningful slowing of disease progression on edasalonexent,” relative to the off-treatment period, Dr. Finkel said. Investigators plan to further study edasalonexent for the treatment of DMD in a phase 3 trial. The phase 3 study, PolarisDMD, recently completed enrollment at 40 sites. Results could be available in about a year, Dr. Finkel said.

The study was sponsored by Catabasis. Dr. Finkel disclosed consulting work and grants or research support from Catabasis and other companies.

jremaly@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Finkel R et al. CNS 2019. Abstract PL1-3.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. – Treatment of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) with an investigational nuclear factor–kappa B (NF-kB) inhibitor may slow disease progression as assessed by MRI and functional measures, according to an analysis of phase 2 trial data presented at the annual meeting of the Child Neurology Society.

Jake Remaly/MDedge News

The NF-kB pathway is “fundamental to the pathogenesis and biology of DMD,” said Richard Finkel, MD, chief of neurology at Nemours Children’s Health System in Orlando and principal investigator for the phase 2 study, known as MoveDMD.

A lack of dystrophin, combined with the mechanical stress of muscle contraction, activates the NF-kB pathway and inhibits muscle regeneration. “It is known that there is inflammation and fibrosis and release of cytokines early in life” in patients with DMD, Dr. Finkel said.

Independent of mutation

Edasalonexent is an NF-kB inhibitor that is being developed by Catabasis as a therapy for patients with DMD regardless of the genetic mutation that is causing the disease. It may be used as monotherapy or with other dystrophin-targeted treatments, Dr. Finkel said.

In a mouse model of DMD, an analog of the drug reduced muscle inflammation and increased the force of diaphragm muscle. To assess edasalonexent’s safety, pharmacokinetics, and effects on functional measures and MRI in patients with DMD, Dr. Finkel and colleagues conducted the MoveDMD trial. Investigators enrolled boys aged 4 years to younger than 8 years who were not receiving treatment with corticosteroids.

Researchers first examined drug safety and pharmacokinetics in 17 boys who received the treatment for 1 week. The investigators then followed 16 of these patients off treatment for as long as 6 months. This off-treatment period was followed by a phase 2, placebo-controlled period, during which the 16 patients and another 15 patients received edasalonexent 67 mg/kg/day, edasalonexent 100 mg/kg/day, or placebo for 12 weeks. Patients subsequently entered an open-label extension study.

Dr. Finkel presented a comparison of outcomes during the off-treatment period with outcomes during the open-label extension. “We used these boys as their own internal control, if you wish,” he said.

Creatine kinase levels decreased soon after treatment, as did other markers of muscle disease. The drug “seems to have an early and sustained biomarker response,” Dr. Finkel said.

Annualized rate of change on lower leg muscle MRI-T2 decreased. “There is a relative reduction and stabilization from week 12 all the way out through the open-label extension to 72 weeks,” he said. “It suggests that there is an early and sustained response in stabilization of the MRI as a biomarker.”

Timed function tests

A comparison of the annualized rates of change on timed function tests – including the 10-meter walk/run, time-to-stand, and four-stair-climb, and the North Star Ambulatory Assessment – during the off-treatment and on-treatment periods indicated slowing of disease progression with treatment. “Shortly after starting on drug ... there was a relative stabilization in each of these measures,” Dr. Finkel said.

In addition, the researchers observed an early signal of possible cardiac benefit. Mean heart rate at baseline was 99 bpm. On treatment, it decreased to 92 bpm. “Boys with DMD die typically of cardiomyopathy, so it is important to try to address the cardiac status,” he said.

The drug was safe and well tolerated. Most participants experienced mild gastrointestinal issues, which typically were transient. One serious adverse event during the trial occurred in a patient receiving placebo. Patients tended to have a stable body mass index during treatment, Dr. Finkel said.

During the open-label extension, patients had “clinically meaningful slowing of disease progression on edasalonexent,” relative to the off-treatment period, Dr. Finkel said. Investigators plan to further study edasalonexent for the treatment of DMD in a phase 3 trial. The phase 3 study, PolarisDMD, recently completed enrollment at 40 sites. Results could be available in about a year, Dr. Finkel said.

The study was sponsored by Catabasis. Dr. Finkel disclosed consulting work and grants or research support from Catabasis and other companies.

jremaly@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Finkel R et al. CNS 2019. Abstract PL1-3.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. – Treatment of boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) with an investigational nuclear factor–kappa B (NF-kB) inhibitor may slow disease progression as assessed by MRI and functional measures, according to an analysis of phase 2 trial data presented at the annual meeting of the Child Neurology Society.

Jake Remaly/MDedge News

The NF-kB pathway is “fundamental to the pathogenesis and biology of DMD,” said Richard Finkel, MD, chief of neurology at Nemours Children’s Health System in Orlando and principal investigator for the phase 2 study, known as MoveDMD.

A lack of dystrophin, combined with the mechanical stress of muscle contraction, activates the NF-kB pathway and inhibits muscle regeneration. “It is known that there is inflammation and fibrosis and release of cytokines early in life” in patients with DMD, Dr. Finkel said.

Independent of mutation

Edasalonexent is an NF-kB inhibitor that is being developed by Catabasis as a therapy for patients with DMD regardless of the genetic mutation that is causing the disease. It may be used as monotherapy or with other dystrophin-targeted treatments, Dr. Finkel said.

In a mouse model of DMD, an analog of the drug reduced muscle inflammation and increased the force of diaphragm muscle. To assess edasalonexent’s safety, pharmacokinetics, and effects on functional measures and MRI in patients with DMD, Dr. Finkel and colleagues conducted the MoveDMD trial. Investigators enrolled boys aged 4 years to younger than 8 years who were not receiving treatment with corticosteroids.

Researchers first examined drug safety and pharmacokinetics in 17 boys who received the treatment for 1 week. The investigators then followed 16 of these patients off treatment for as long as 6 months. This off-treatment period was followed by a phase 2, placebo-controlled period, during which the 16 patients and another 15 patients received edasalonexent 67 mg/kg/day, edasalonexent 100 mg/kg/day, or placebo for 12 weeks. Patients subsequently entered an open-label extension study.

Dr. Finkel presented a comparison of outcomes during the off-treatment period with outcomes during the open-label extension. “We used these boys as their own internal control, if you wish,” he said.

Creatine kinase levels decreased soon after treatment, as did other markers of muscle disease. The drug “seems to have an early and sustained biomarker response,” Dr. Finkel said.

Annualized rate of change on lower leg muscle MRI-T2 decreased. “There is a relative reduction and stabilization from week 12 all the way out through the open-label extension to 72 weeks,” he said. “It suggests that there is an early and sustained response in stabilization of the MRI as a biomarker.”

Timed function tests

A comparison of the annualized rates of change on timed function tests – including the 10-meter walk/run, time-to-stand, and four-stair-climb, and the North Star Ambulatory Assessment – during the off-treatment and on-treatment periods indicated slowing of disease progression with treatment. “Shortly after starting on drug ... there was a relative stabilization in each of these measures,” Dr. Finkel said.

In addition, the researchers observed an early signal of possible cardiac benefit. Mean heart rate at baseline was 99 bpm. On treatment, it decreased to 92 bpm. “Boys with DMD die typically of cardiomyopathy, so it is important to try to address the cardiac status,” he said.

The drug was safe and well tolerated. Most participants experienced mild gastrointestinal issues, which typically were transient. One serious adverse event during the trial occurred in a patient receiving placebo. Patients tended to have a stable body mass index during treatment, Dr. Finkel said.

During the open-label extension, patients had “clinically meaningful slowing of disease progression on edasalonexent,” relative to the off-treatment period, Dr. Finkel said. Investigators plan to further study edasalonexent for the treatment of DMD in a phase 3 trial. The phase 3 study, PolarisDMD, recently completed enrollment at 40 sites. Results could be available in about a year, Dr. Finkel said.

The study was sponsored by Catabasis. Dr. Finkel disclosed consulting work and grants or research support from Catabasis and other companies.

jremaly@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Finkel R et al. CNS 2019. Abstract PL1-3.

ST. LOUIS – A blood test that seems almost as good as amyloid PET scanning, the gold standard, for detecting asymptomatic amyloid plaques in the brain could be on the market in 2-3 years, according to a report at the annual meeting of the American Neurological Association. The research was also published in Neurology (2019 Oct 22;93[17]:e1647-59).

Investigators at Washington University, St. Louis, found that, among 158 mostly cognitively normal people in their 60s and 70s, the plasma ratio of amyloid-beta 42 peptide to amyloid-beta 40 peptide identified people who were PET positive and PET negative for amyloid with an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.93) and climbed to 0.94 when combined with age and Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 status (95% CI, 0.90-0.97), “which is really quite spectacular for a blood test,” said study lead Suzanne Schindler, MD, PhD, who is affiliated with the university.

People who had a positive blood test – a ratio below .1281 – but a negative PET scan were 15 times more likely to convert to a positive scan at an average of 4 years than subjects with a negative test. “The blood test [detected] brain changes of Alzheimer’s disease before the amyloid PET scan,” Dr. Schindler said.

Amyloid-beta 42 – the number refers to how many amino acids are in the peptide chain – is much stickier and more prone to aggregate in plaques than amyloid-beta 40. The ratio of the two falls as the 42 form is sequestered preferentially into amyloid plaques while the level of amyloid-beta 40 remains more constant, she explained at the meeting.

The team concluded that the test accurately “predicts current and future brain amyloidosis” and “could be used in prevention trials to screen for individuals likely to be amyloid PET-positive and at risk for Alzheimer disease dementia.”

“We are really excited about it. I think there’s been recognition for a long time that a blood test would really be a game changer. We still have a little bit more work to do, but I don’t think it’s that far away,” Dr. Schindler said in an interview after her presentation.

The goal of Alzheimer’s research is to slow, reverse, or even prevent brain pathology before symptoms set in, at which point damage is likely irreversible. For that to happen, plaques need to be detected early.

Currently there are two ways to do that, both with difficulties: PET scans, which are expensive, expose people to radiation, and of limited availability, and spinal fluid analysis, which involves a lumbar puncture that “not many people want to undergo.” The problems slow down enrollment for prevention trials, Dr. Schindler said.

The blood test, which the Food and Drug Administration granted breakthrough status in January 2019, could offer a much easier and less expensive way to identify subjects and monitor outcomes. It could “really speed up enrollment and help us get to effective drugs faster,” she said.

Beyond that, clinicians could use it to help figure out what’s going on in older people with cognitive issues. If a drug or some other way is ever found to prevent Alzheimer’s, there’s even the possibility of screening patients for amyloidosis during routine exams. Potentially, “I think the market is huge,” she said.

The test is being developed by a company, C2N diagnostics, founded by Dr. Schindler’s colleagues at the university, and could be available commercially in 2-3 years. It involves high precision immunoprecipitation and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, so “it isn’t something your general lab is going to do. It’s probably going to be a couple centers that have this test, and everybody mails their samples in, which we do for a lot of different tests,” she said.

Several companies are working on similar assays.

Dr. Schindler said she has no financial stake in the blood test.

aotto@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Schindler S et al. Neurology. 2019 Oct 22;93(17):e1647-59.

ST. LOUIS – A blood test that seems almost as good as amyloid PET scanning, the gold standard, for detecting asymptomatic amyloid plaques in the brain could be on the market in 2-3 years, according to a report at the annual meeting of the American Neurological Association. The research was also published in Neurology (2019 Oct 22;93[17]:e1647-59).

Investigators at Washington University, St. Louis, found that, among 158 mostly cognitively normal people in their 60s and 70s, the plasma ratio of amyloid-beta 42 peptide to amyloid-beta 40 peptide identified people who were PET positive and PET negative for amyloid with an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.93) and climbed to 0.94 when combined with age and Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 status (95% CI, 0.90-0.97), “which is really quite spectacular for a blood test,” said study lead Suzanne Schindler, MD, PhD, who is affiliated with the university.

People who had a positive blood test – a ratio below .1281 – but a negative PET scan were 15 times more likely to convert to a positive scan at an average of 4 years than subjects with a negative test. “The blood test [detected] brain changes of Alzheimer’s disease before the amyloid PET scan,” Dr. Schindler said.

Amyloid-beta 42 – the number refers to how many amino acids are in the peptide chain – is much stickier and more prone to aggregate in plaques than amyloid-beta 40. The ratio of the two falls as the 42 form is sequestered preferentially into amyloid plaques while the level of amyloid-beta 40 remains more constant, she explained at the meeting.

The team concluded that the test accurately “predicts current and future brain amyloidosis” and “could be used in prevention trials to screen for individuals likely to be amyloid PET-positive and at risk for Alzheimer disease dementia.”

“We are really excited about it. I think there’s been recognition for a long time that a blood test would really be a game changer. We still have a little bit more work to do, but I don’t think it’s that far away,” Dr. Schindler said in an interview after her presentation.

The goal of Alzheimer’s research is to slow, reverse, or even prevent brain pathology before symptoms set in, at which point damage is likely irreversible. For that to happen, plaques need to be detected early.

Currently there are two ways to do that, both with difficulties: PET scans, which are expensive, expose people to radiation, and of limited availability, and spinal fluid analysis, which involves a lumbar puncture that “not many people want to undergo.” The problems slow down enrollment for prevention trials, Dr. Schindler said.

The blood test, which the Food and Drug Administration granted breakthrough status in January 2019, could offer a much easier and less expensive way to identify subjects and monitor outcomes. It could “really speed up enrollment and help us get to effective drugs faster,” she said.

Beyond that, clinicians could use it to help figure out what’s going on in older people with cognitive issues. If a drug or some other way is ever found to prevent Alzheimer’s, there’s even the possibility of screening patients for amyloidosis during routine exams. Potentially, “I think the market is huge,” she said.

The test is being developed by a company, C2N diagnostics, founded by Dr. Schindler’s colleagues at the university, and could be available commercially in 2-3 years. It involves high precision immunoprecipitation and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, so “it isn’t something your general lab is going to do. It’s probably going to be a couple centers that have this test, and everybody mails their samples in, which we do for a lot of different tests,” she said.

Several companies are working on similar assays.

Dr. Schindler said she has no financial stake in the blood test.

aotto@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Schindler S et al. Neurology. 2019 Oct 22;93(17):e1647-59.

ST. LOUIS – A blood test that seems almost as good as amyloid PET scanning, the gold standard, for detecting asymptomatic amyloid plaques in the brain could be on the market in 2-3 years, according to a report at the annual meeting of the American Neurological Association. The research was also published in Neurology (2019 Oct 22;93[17]:e1647-59).

Investigators at Washington University, St. Louis, found that, among 158 mostly cognitively normal people in their 60s and 70s, the plasma ratio of amyloid-beta 42 peptide to amyloid-beta 40 peptide identified people who were PET positive and PET negative for amyloid with an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.93) and climbed to 0.94 when combined with age and Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 status (95% CI, 0.90-0.97), “which is really quite spectacular for a blood test,” said study lead Suzanne Schindler, MD, PhD, who is affiliated with the university.

People who had a positive blood test – a ratio below .1281 – but a negative PET scan were 15 times more likely to convert to a positive scan at an average of 4 years than subjects with a negative test. “The blood test [detected] brain changes of Alzheimer’s disease before the amyloid PET scan,” Dr. Schindler said.

Amyloid-beta 42 – the number refers to how many amino acids are in the peptide chain – is much stickier and more prone to aggregate in plaques than amyloid-beta 40. The ratio of the two falls as the 42 form is sequestered preferentially into amyloid plaques while the level of amyloid-beta 40 remains more constant, she explained at the meeting.

The team concluded that the test accurately “predicts current and future brain amyloidosis” and “could be used in prevention trials to screen for individuals likely to be amyloid PET-positive and at risk for Alzheimer disease dementia.”

“We are really excited about it. I think there’s been recognition for a long time that a blood test would really be a game changer. We still have a little bit more work to do, but I don’t think it’s that far away,” Dr. Schindler said in an interview after her presentation.

The goal of Alzheimer’s research is to slow, reverse, or even prevent brain pathology before symptoms set in, at which point damage is likely irreversible. For that to happen, plaques need to be detected early.

Currently there are two ways to do that, both with difficulties: PET scans, which are expensive, expose people to radiation, and of limited availability, and spinal fluid analysis, which involves a lumbar puncture that “not many people want to undergo.” The problems slow down enrollment for prevention trials, Dr. Schindler said.

The blood test, which the Food and Drug Administration granted breakthrough status in January 2019, could offer a much easier and less expensive way to identify subjects and monitor outcomes. It could “really speed up enrollment and help us get to effective drugs faster,” she said.

Beyond that, clinicians could use it to help figure out what’s going on in older people with cognitive issues. If a drug or some other way is ever found to prevent Alzheimer’s, there’s even the possibility of screening patients for amyloidosis during routine exams. Potentially, “I think the market is huge,” she said.

The test is being developed by a company, C2N diagnostics, founded by Dr. Schindler’s colleagues at the university, and could be available commercially in 2-3 years. It involves high precision immunoprecipitation and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, so “it isn’t something your general lab is going to do. It’s probably going to be a couple centers that have this test, and everybody mails their samples in, which we do for a lot of different tests,” she said.

Several companies are working on similar assays.

Dr. Schindler said she has no financial stake in the blood test.

aotto@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Schindler S et al. Neurology. 2019 Oct 22;93(17):e1647-59.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. – Baricitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, may reduce symptoms of Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS), a compassionate use study suggests. Scores on a novel AGS scale improved, and skin and liver complications resolved in children with AGS who received treatment with baricitinib, according to results presented at the annual meeting of the Child Neurology Society.

Jake Remaly/MDedge News

AGS is caused by various heritable disorders of the innate immunity that result in excessive interferon production. AGS characteristically manifests as an early-onset encephalopathy that causes intellectual and physical disability, but patients may have a wide range of clinical phenotypes. The disease may involve the skin, liver, lungs, heart, and other organs, as well as the brain.

A multisystem disorder

“The neurologic features, while they are the most compelling for us, are really only the tip of the iceberg,” said Adeline Vanderver, MD, program director of the leukodystrophy center, and the Jacob A. Kamens Endowed Chair in Neurologic Disorders and Translational Neurotherapeutics at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. “Nearly every single organ system in the body is affected, from either direct interferon injury or from a secondary vasculopathy related to the interferonopathy.”

Dr. Vanderver presented results from the compassionate use study, which assessed whether the JAK inhibitor baricitinib (Olumiant) may decrease interferon signaling in AGS and limit the morbidity of the disease.

The phase 1, open-label trial “included compassionate use of baricitinib in AGS under the argument that these children did not have time to wait for approval of the drug,” said Dr. Vanderver. In 2018, the Food and Drug Administration approved baricitinib for moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in adults with an inadequate response to methotrexate.

The phase 1 trial in AGS included 35 patients with mutation-defined AGS and evidence of inflammatory disease that could be targeted by JAK inhibition. The trial population was 36% female. The average age of disease onset was 0.8 years, and patients’ average age at treatment was 6.1 years. The investigators assessed safety and laboratory data every 3 months and conducted clinical assessments every 6 months.

The heterogeneity of AGS phenotypes within families and across genotypes makes treatment trials in this disorder a challenge, Dr. Vanderver said. Outcome measures may have ceiling or floor effects that fail to capture the range of severity of AGS symptoms. Dr. Vanderver and colleagues developed a novel AGS scale to capture the scope of neurologic function in patients with AGS

.

When the researchers applied the AGS scale to a historical cohort of patients, most had stable scores about 6 months after disease onset. “After the first 6 months of the disease, the disease tends to be much more static, as the children have sustained significant neurologic injury,” Dr. Vanderver said.

They applied the novel AGS scale post hoc as an exploratory endpoint in the phase 1 trial. In addition, parents recorded information in a diary about skin involvement, irritability, seizures, and fever. “Over time, we see a reduction, although not always a statistically significant reduction, in symptom burden,” Dr. Vanderver said. The AGS clinical diary scores reflect “what the parents were telling us – that they felt like their children were feeling better during treatment,” she said.

Several patients had skin conditions that improved with treatment. One patient with dermatitis or eczema had the skin abnormality resolve within 3 days. A patient with full-body panniculitis began healing for the first time after about a month of treatment. Seasonal variations and dose adjustments led to fluctuations in some of the skin conditions. Nevertheless, the results suggested significant improvement in skin manifestations in patients with AGS, Dr. Vanderver said.

Patients generally had stable AGS scale scores in the year before treatment, although a couple of patients who were closer to disease onset had precipitous decline in neurologic function, she said. “We had a statistically significant increase in that scale of neurologic function in our patients during the period of the study, even in patients who had sometimes had years of disease duration,” said Dr. Vanderver.

Dr. Vanderver cautioned that she does not want to overstate the changes in function. Patients with AGS may have less potential for recuperation, compared with patients with other conditions. “A child with significant disruptive CNS disease may not recuperate normal functioning,” Dr. Vanderver said, “but it can be clinically meaningful to families if children start having better head control, smile, communicate, even if they might not regain all their motor milestones.”

In addition, a small subset of patients who had potentially life threatening liver complications from the disease experienced rapid normalization and improvement of liver function. “This blockade can be important not just for neurologic function but also to maintain normal physiologic homeostasis of other organs that are affected by the interferonopathy,” Dr. Vanderver said.

Interferon signaling scores decreased in the days after starting treatment and subsequently leveled out.

Serious adverse events that occurred during the trial, such as hospitalizations, were attributable to AGS. One child died from unrecognized pulmonary hypertension, which is now known to be a complication of AGS but was not at the time.

Harnessing a side effect

The most significant and recurrent laboratory abnormality was thrombocytosis. “That is a known complication of this family of drugs that in many cases allowed us to improve previous treatment-resistant thrombocytopenia, so we kind of like that side effect in most cases, but in two cases it did ... result in dose adjustments, although we never had to stop the medication for that.”

The study offers proof of principle that AGS is treatable, Dr. Vanderver said. A phase 2 trial is enrolling patients closer to disease onset. Early treatment of AGS may remain a challenge until there is newborn screening for the disease, she said.

Dr. Vanderver receives grant and in-kind support for translational research without personal compensation from Eli Lilly, Takeda, Illumina, Biogen, Homology, and Ionis. In addition, Dr. Vanderver serves on the scientific advisory boards of the European Leukodystrophy Association and the United Leukodystrophy Foundation, as well as in an unpaid capacity for Takeda, Ionis, Biogen, and Illumina.

Eli Lilly provided support for the phase 1 study. In addition, the study received support from the AGS Association Americas Family Foundation, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute.

jremaly@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Vanderver A et al. CNS 2019. Abstract PL1-6.
 

CHARLOTTE, N.C. – Baricitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, may reduce symptoms of Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS), a compassionate use study suggests. Scores on a novel AGS scale improved, and skin and liver complications resolved in children with AGS who received treatment with baricitinib, according to results presented at the annual meeting of the Child Neurology Society.

Jake Remaly/MDedge News

AGS is caused by various heritable disorders of the innate immunity that result in excessive interferon production. AGS characteristically manifests as an early-onset encephalopathy that causes intellectual and physical disability, but patients may have a wide range of clinical phenotypes. The disease may involve the skin, liver, lungs, heart, and other organs, as well as the brain.

A multisystem disorder

“The neurologic features, while they are the most compelling for us, are really only the tip of the iceberg,” said Adeline Vanderver, MD, program director of the leukodystrophy center, and the Jacob A. Kamens Endowed Chair in Neurologic Disorders and Translational Neurotherapeutics at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. “Nearly every single organ system in the body is affected, from either direct interferon injury or from a secondary vasculopathy related to the interferonopathy.”

Dr. Vanderver presented results from the compassionate use study, which assessed whether the JAK inhibitor baricitinib (Olumiant) may decrease interferon signaling in AGS and limit the morbidity of the disease.

The phase 1, open-label trial “included compassionate use of baricitinib in AGS under the argument that these children did not have time to wait for approval of the drug,” said Dr. Vanderver. In 2018, the Food and Drug Administration approved baricitinib for moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in adults with an inadequate response to methotrexate.

The phase 1 trial in AGS included 35 patients with mutation-defined AGS and evidence of inflammatory disease that could be targeted by JAK inhibition. The trial population was 36% female. The average age of disease onset was 0.8 years, and patients’ average age at treatment was 6.1 years. The investigators assessed safety and laboratory data every 3 months and conducted clinical assessments every 6 months.

The heterogeneity of AGS phenotypes within families and across genotypes makes treatment trials in this disorder a challenge, Dr. Vanderver said. Outcome measures may have ceiling or floor effects that fail to capture the range of severity of AGS symptoms. Dr. Vanderver and colleagues developed a novel AGS scale to capture the scope of neurologic function in patients with AGS

.

When the researchers applied the AGS scale to a historical cohort of patients, most had stable scores about 6 months after disease onset. “After the first 6 months of the disease, the disease tends to be much more static, as the children have sustained significant neurologic injury,” Dr. Vanderver said.

They applied the novel AGS scale post hoc as an exploratory endpoint in the phase 1 trial. In addition, parents recorded information in a diary about skin involvement, irritability, seizures, and fever. “Over time, we see a reduction, although not always a statistically significant reduction, in symptom burden,” Dr. Vanderver said. The AGS clinical diary scores reflect “what the parents were telling us – that they felt like their children were feeling better during treatment,” she said.

Several patients had skin conditions that improved with treatment. One patient with dermatitis or eczema had the skin abnormality resolve within 3 days. A patient with full-body panniculitis began healing for the first time after about a month of treatment. Seasonal variations and dose adjustments led to fluctuations in some of the skin conditions. Nevertheless, the results suggested significant improvement in skin manifestations in patients with AGS, Dr. Vanderver said.

Patients generally had stable AGS scale scores in the year before treatment, although a couple of patients who were closer to disease onset had precipitous decline in neurologic function, she said. “We had a statistically significant increase in that scale of neurologic function in our patients during the period of the study, even in patients who had sometimes had years of disease duration,” said Dr. Vanderver.

Dr. Vanderver cautioned that she does not want to overstate the changes in function. Patients with AGS may have less potential for recuperation, compared with patients with other conditions. “A child with significant disruptive CNS disease may not recuperate normal functioning,” Dr. Vanderver said, “but it can be clinically meaningful to families if children start having better head control, smile, communicate, even if they might not regain all their motor milestones.”

In addition, a small subset of patients who had potentially life threatening liver complications from the disease experienced rapid normalization and improvement of liver function. “This blockade can be important not just for neurologic function but also to maintain normal physiologic homeostasis of other organs that are affected by the interferonopathy,” Dr. Vanderver said.

Interferon signaling scores decreased in the days after starting treatment and subsequently leveled out.

Serious adverse events that occurred during the trial, such as hospitalizations, were attributable to AGS. One child died from unrecognized pulmonary hypertension, which is now known to be a complication of AGS but was not at the time.

Harnessing a side effect

The most significant and recurrent laboratory abnormality was thrombocytosis. “That is a known complication of this family of drugs that in many cases allowed us to improve previous treatment-resistant thrombocytopenia, so we kind of like that side effect in most cases, but in two cases it did ... result in dose adjustments, although we never had to stop the medication for that.”

The study offers proof of principle that AGS is treatable, Dr. Vanderver said. A phase 2 trial is enrolling patients closer to disease onset. Early treatment of AGS may remain a challenge until there is newborn screening for the disease, she said.

Dr. Vanderver receives grant and in-kind support for translational research without personal compensation from Eli Lilly, Takeda, Illumina, Biogen, Homology, and Ionis. In addition, Dr. Vanderver serves on the scientific advisory boards of the European Leukodystrophy Association and the United Leukodystrophy Foundation, as well as in an unpaid capacity for Takeda, Ionis, Biogen, and Illumina.

Eli Lilly provided support for the phase 1 study. In addition, the study received support from the AGS Association Americas Family Foundation, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute.

jremaly@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Vanderver A et al. CNS 2019. Abstract PL1-6.
 

CHARLOTTE, N.C. – Baricitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, may reduce symptoms of Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS), a compassionate use study suggests. Scores on a novel AGS scale improved, and skin and liver complications resolved in children with AGS who received treatment with baricitinib, according to results presented at the annual meeting of the Child Neurology Society.

Jake Remaly/MDedge News

AGS is caused by various heritable disorders of the innate immunity that result in excessive interferon production. AGS characteristically manifests as an early-onset encephalopathy that causes intellectual and physical disability, but patients may have a wide range of clinical phenotypes. The disease may involve the skin, liver, lungs, heart, and other organs, as well as the brain.

A multisystem disorder

“The neurologic features, while they are the most compelling for us, are really only the tip of the iceberg,” said Adeline Vanderver, MD, program director of the leukodystrophy center, and the Jacob A. Kamens Endowed Chair in Neurologic Disorders and Translational Neurotherapeutics at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. “Nearly every single organ system in the body is affected, from either direct interferon injury or from a secondary vasculopathy related to the interferonopathy.”

Dr. Vanderver presented results from the compassionate use study, which assessed whether the JAK inhibitor baricitinib (Olumiant) may decrease interferon signaling in AGS and limit the morbidity of the disease.

The phase 1, open-label trial “included compassionate use of baricitinib in AGS under the argument that these children did not have time to wait for approval of the drug,” said Dr. Vanderver. In 2018, the Food and Drug Administration approved baricitinib for moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in adults with an inadequate response to methotrexate.

The phase 1 trial in AGS included 35 patients with mutation-defined AGS and evidence of inflammatory disease that could be targeted by JAK inhibition. The trial population was 36% female. The average age of disease onset was 0.8 years, and patients’ average age at treatment was 6.1 years. The investigators assessed safety and laboratory data every 3 months and conducted clinical assessments every 6 months.

The heterogeneity of AGS phenotypes within families and across genotypes makes treatment trials in this disorder a challenge, Dr. Vanderver said. Outcome measures may have ceiling or floor effects that fail to capture the range of severity of AGS symptoms. Dr. Vanderver and colleagues developed a novel AGS scale to capture the scope of neurologic function in patients with AGS

.

When the researchers applied the AGS scale to a historical cohort of patients, most had stable scores about 6 months after disease onset. “After the first 6 months of the disease, the disease tends to be much more static, as the children have sustained significant neurologic injury,” Dr. Vanderver said.

They applied the novel AGS scale post hoc as an exploratory endpoint in the phase 1 trial. In addition, parents recorded information in a diary about skin involvement, irritability, seizures, and fever. “Over time, we see a reduction, although not always a statistically significant reduction, in symptom burden,” Dr. Vanderver said. The AGS clinical diary scores reflect “what the parents were telling us – that they felt like their children were feeling better during treatment,” she said.

Several patients had skin conditions that improved with treatment. One patient with dermatitis or eczema had the skin abnormality resolve within 3 days. A patient with full-body panniculitis began healing for the first time after about a month of treatment. Seasonal variations and dose adjustments led to fluctuations in some of the skin conditions. Nevertheless, the results suggested significant improvement in skin manifestations in patients with AGS, Dr. Vanderver said.

Patients generally had stable AGS scale scores in the year before treatment, although a couple of patients who were closer to disease onset had precipitous decline in neurologic function, she said. “We had a statistically significant increase in that scale of neurologic function in our patients during the period of the study, even in patients who had sometimes had years of disease duration,” said Dr. Vanderver.

Dr. Vanderver cautioned that she does not want to overstate the changes in function. Patients with AGS may have less potential for recuperation, compared with patients with other conditions. “A child with significant disruptive CNS disease may not recuperate normal functioning,” Dr. Vanderver said, “but it can be clinically meaningful to families if children start having better head control, smile, communicate, even if they might not regain all their motor milestones.”

In addition, a small subset of patients who had potentially life threatening liver complications from the disease experienced rapid normalization and improvement of liver function. “This blockade can be important not just for neurologic function but also to maintain normal physiologic homeostasis of other organs that are affected by the interferonopathy,” Dr. Vanderver said.

Interferon signaling scores decreased in the days after starting treatment and subsequently leveled out.

Serious adverse events that occurred during the trial, such as hospitalizations, were attributable to AGS. One child died from unrecognized pulmonary hypertension, which is now known to be a complication of AGS but was not at the time.

Harnessing a side effect

The most significant and recurrent laboratory abnormality was thrombocytosis. “That is a known complication of this family of drugs that in many cases allowed us to improve previous treatment-resistant thrombocytopenia, so we kind of like that side effect in most cases, but in two cases it did ... result in dose adjustments, although we never had to stop the medication for that.”

The study offers proof of principle that AGS is treatable, Dr. Vanderver said. A phase 2 trial is enrolling patients closer to disease onset. Early treatment of AGS may remain a challenge until there is newborn screening for the disease, she said.

Dr. Vanderver receives grant and in-kind support for translational research without personal compensation from Eli Lilly, Takeda, Illumina, Biogen, Homology, and Ionis. In addition, Dr. Vanderver serves on the scientific advisory boards of the European Leukodystrophy Association and the United Leukodystrophy Foundation, as well as in an unpaid capacity for Takeda, Ionis, Biogen, and Illumina.

Eli Lilly provided support for the phase 1 study. In addition, the study received support from the AGS Association Americas Family Foundation, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute.

jremaly@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Vanderver A et al. CNS 2019. Abstract PL1-6.