Lymphoma & Plasma Cell Disorders

The Food and Drug Administration has expanded the indications for denosumab (Xgeva), previously indicated for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors, to include patients with multiple myeloma, according to a press release from Amgen, the manufacturer of Xgeva.

lfranki@frontlinemedcom.com

The Food and Drug Administration has expanded the indications for denosumab (Xgeva), previously indicated for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors, to include patients with multiple myeloma, according to a press release from Amgen, the manufacturer of Xgeva.

lfranki@frontlinemedcom.com

The Food and Drug Administration has expanded the indications for denosumab (Xgeva), previously indicated for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors, to include patients with multiple myeloma, according to a press release from Amgen, the manufacturer of Xgeva.

lfranki@frontlinemedcom.com

High-dose therapy with melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant (HDT/ASCT) is still the best option for multiple myeloma even after almost 2 decades with newer and highly effective induction agents, according to a recent systematic review and two meta-analyses.

Given the “unprecedented efficacy” of “modern induction therapy with immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors (also called ‘novel agents’),” investigators “have sought to reevaluate the role of HDT/ASCT,” wrote Binod Dhakal, MD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin, and his colleagues. The report is in JAMA Oncology.

To solve the issue, they analyzed five randomized controlled trials conducted since 2000 and concluded that HDT/ASCT is still the preferred treatment approach.

Despite a lack of demonstrable overall survival benefit, there is a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit, low treatment-related mortality, and potential high minimal residual disease-negative rates conferred by HDT/ASCT in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma, the researchers noted.

The combined odds for complete response were 1.27 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.65, P = .07) with HDT/ASCT, compared with standard-dose therapy (SDT). The combined hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.41-0.7, P less than .001) and 0.76 for overall survival (95% CI, 0.42-1.36, P = .20) in favor of HDT.

PFS was best with tandem HDT/ASCT (HR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.37-0.65) followed by single HDT/ASCT with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone consolidation (HR, 0.53, 95% CI, 0.37-0.76) and single HDT/ASCT alone (HR, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.53-0.87), compared with SDT. However, none of the HDT/ASCT approaches had a significant impact on overall survival.

Meanwhile, treatment-related mortality with HDT/ASCT was minimal, at less than 1%.

“The achievement of high [minimal residual disease] rates with HDT/ASCT may render this approach the ideal platform for testing novel approaches (e.g., immunotherapy) aiming at disease eradication and cures,” the researchers wrote.

The researchers reported relationships with a number of companies, including Takeda, Celgene, and Amgen, that make novel induction agents.

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Dhakal B et al. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 4. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4600.

High-dose therapy with melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant (HDT/ASCT) is still the best option for multiple myeloma even after almost 2 decades with newer and highly effective induction agents, according to a recent systematic review and two meta-analyses.

Given the “unprecedented efficacy” of “modern induction therapy with immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors (also called ‘novel agents’),” investigators “have sought to reevaluate the role of HDT/ASCT,” wrote Binod Dhakal, MD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin, and his colleagues. The report is in JAMA Oncology.

To solve the issue, they analyzed five randomized controlled trials conducted since 2000 and concluded that HDT/ASCT is still the preferred treatment approach.

Despite a lack of demonstrable overall survival benefit, there is a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit, low treatment-related mortality, and potential high minimal residual disease-negative rates conferred by HDT/ASCT in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma, the researchers noted.

The combined odds for complete response were 1.27 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.65, P = .07) with HDT/ASCT, compared with standard-dose therapy (SDT). The combined hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.41-0.7, P less than .001) and 0.76 for overall survival (95% CI, 0.42-1.36, P = .20) in favor of HDT.

PFS was best with tandem HDT/ASCT (HR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.37-0.65) followed by single HDT/ASCT with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone consolidation (HR, 0.53, 95% CI, 0.37-0.76) and single HDT/ASCT alone (HR, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.53-0.87), compared with SDT. However, none of the HDT/ASCT approaches had a significant impact on overall survival.

Meanwhile, treatment-related mortality with HDT/ASCT was minimal, at less than 1%.

“The achievement of high [minimal residual disease] rates with HDT/ASCT may render this approach the ideal platform for testing novel approaches (e.g., immunotherapy) aiming at disease eradication and cures,” the researchers wrote.

The researchers reported relationships with a number of companies, including Takeda, Celgene, and Amgen, that make novel induction agents.

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Dhakal B et al. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 4. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4600.

High-dose therapy with melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant (HDT/ASCT) is still the best option for multiple myeloma even after almost 2 decades with newer and highly effective induction agents, according to a recent systematic review and two meta-analyses.

Given the “unprecedented efficacy” of “modern induction therapy with immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors (also called ‘novel agents’),” investigators “have sought to reevaluate the role of HDT/ASCT,” wrote Binod Dhakal, MD, of the Medical College of Wisconsin, and his colleagues. The report is in JAMA Oncology.

To solve the issue, they analyzed five randomized controlled trials conducted since 2000 and concluded that HDT/ASCT is still the preferred treatment approach.

Despite a lack of demonstrable overall survival benefit, there is a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit, low treatment-related mortality, and potential high minimal residual disease-negative rates conferred by HDT/ASCT in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma, the researchers noted.

The combined odds for complete response were 1.27 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.65, P = .07) with HDT/ASCT, compared with standard-dose therapy (SDT). The combined hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.41-0.7, P less than .001) and 0.76 for overall survival (95% CI, 0.42-1.36, P = .20) in favor of HDT.

PFS was best with tandem HDT/ASCT (HR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.37-0.65) followed by single HDT/ASCT with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone consolidation (HR, 0.53, 95% CI, 0.37-0.76) and single HDT/ASCT alone (HR, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.53-0.87), compared with SDT. However, none of the HDT/ASCT approaches had a significant impact on overall survival.

Meanwhile, treatment-related mortality with HDT/ASCT was minimal, at less than 1%.

“The achievement of high [minimal residual disease] rates with HDT/ASCT may render this approach the ideal platform for testing novel approaches (e.g., immunotherapy) aiming at disease eradication and cures,” the researchers wrote.

The researchers reported relationships with a number of companies, including Takeda, Celgene, and Amgen, that make novel induction agents.

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Dhakal B et al. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 4. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4600.

ATLANTA – Closely monitoring for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and starting anticytokine therapy early can prevent life-threatening organ toxicities in recipients of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, according to Daniel W. Lee III, MD.

There’s no evidence that early anticytokine therapy impairs antitumor response, he noted. “If you wait to give anticytokine therapy until a patient is intubated, it’s too late,” Dr. Lee said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. “If you wait until a patient has been hypotensive for days, it’s probably too late. If you intervene earlier, you can avoid intubation.”

ATLANTA – Closely monitoring for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and starting anticytokine therapy early can prevent life-threatening organ toxicities in recipients of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, according to Daniel W. Lee III, MD.

There’s no evidence that early anticytokine therapy impairs antitumor response, he noted. “If you wait to give anticytokine therapy until a patient is intubated, it’s too late,” Dr. Lee said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. “If you wait until a patient has been hypotensive for days, it’s probably too late. If you intervene earlier, you can avoid intubation.”

ATLANTA – Closely monitoring for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and starting anticytokine therapy early can prevent life-threatening organ toxicities in recipients of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, according to Daniel W. Lee III, MD.

There’s no evidence that early anticytokine therapy impairs antitumor response, he noted. “If you wait to give anticytokine therapy until a patient is intubated, it’s too late,” Dr. Lee said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. “If you wait until a patient has been hypotensive for days, it’s probably too late. If you intervene earlier, you can avoid intubation.”

© Todd Buchanan 2017

ATLANTA—A population-based study indicates that, compared to other cancer survivors, patients who survive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have an increased risk of autoimmune and infectious diseases.

For example, investigators found the risk of being diagnosed with impaired humoral immunity was 16.2 times higher in female DLBCL survivors than in breast cancer survivors, 14.8 times higher in male DLBCL survivors than in prostate cancer survivors, and 12.5 times higher in all DLBCL survivors than in survivors of head and neck cancer.

“Most of the treatments that we give for lymphoma have profound effects on the immune system, either directly or indirectly, including many of the T-cell-directed therapies,” said Tanaya Shree, MD, PhD, of Stanford University Medical Center in California.

“There have been studies on many of the effects suffered by lymphoma survivors, but very little is known about their immune health.”

Dr Shree and her colleagues undertook this study to determine how the immune system fares in lymphoma survivors. The investigators limited their analysis to survivors of DLBCL.

Dr Shree presented the findings at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 198*).

Study design

Investigators pulled data from the California Cancer Registry for patients with DLBCL as their first primary cancer diagnosed between 1991 and 2012. Patients had to be 18 or older at diagnosis and have survived more than a year after diagnosis.

“Importantly, we counted only diagnoses [of autoimmune and infectious diseases] that first appeared between 1 and 10 years after cancer diagnosis,” Dr Shree explained. “So any diagnosis we saw that had also been seen prior to cancer diagnosis or even up to 1 year post-cancer diagnosis, we considered to be pre-existing and were excluded from the analysis in order to really focus on new incident cases during survivorship.”

Investigators used the same criteria for the comparator cohorts.

The survivor data was linked to statewide discharge databases, and investigators performed the incidence analysis based on ICD-9 codes.

Investigators used Poisson regression analysis to obtain incident ratios and adjusted the models for age, race, and year of diagnosis.

They graphed the incident rate ratios for all the diagnoses that were significantly different between the DLBCL cohort and the comparator cohorts.

“[W]e considered a P value of less than 0.0005 to be significant,” Dr Shree clarified.

Survivor characteristics

The cohorts comprised 802,255 survivors of DLBCL (n=21,690), breast cancer (n=337,591), prostate cancer (n=325,533), melanoma (n=73,196), and head and neck cancer (n=44,245).

“At least 75% of patients in each cohort were aged 40 to 79,” Dr Shree noted, “with a good representation of elderly patients.”

The median follow-up time was 6.1 years for DLBCL patients and ranged from 5.7 years for head and neck cancer survivors to 8.3 years for prostate cancer survivors.

About three-quarters of patients in each cohort had hospitalization data within 1 to 10 years from cancer diagnosis.

DLBCL vs breast cancer

“Interestingly, we found some familiar names amongst the top-scoring diagnoses,” Dr Shree said.

Deficiency of humoral immunity (16.2-fold), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (9.9-fold), Sicca syndrome (6.9-fold), and immune thrombocytopenia (3.1-fold) were higher in female DLBCL survivors than breast cancer survivors.

“All of these have known associations with lymphoma,” Dr Shree said. “But we also found, surprisingly, increased rates of fungal [6.0-fold] and viral pneumonia [3.3-fold], and many other codes associated with respiratory infections. We also found a 3-fold increased rate of meningitis.”

“The only diagnosis statistically more common amongst breast cancer patients was cervicitis and endocervicitis, and this likely relates to the fact that many of these patients are undergoing hormone therapy.”

DLBCL vs prostate cancer

“We saw some of the same diagnoses come up as top-scoring hits, including viral [4.5-fold] and fungal pneumonia [8.2-fold], and meningitis [3.9-fold], and, in this case, Staphylococcal meningitis [8.6-fold],” Dr Shree said.

Deficiency of humoral immunity (14.8-fold), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (8.9-fold), Sicca syndrome (8.6-fold), and immune thrombocytopenia (4.8-fold) were also higher in the male DLBCL survivors than in prostate cancer survivors.

“No diagnoses were statistically more common in the prostate cancer survivors [than in male DLBCL survivors],” Dr Shree noted.

DLBCL vs head and neck cancer

“Again, the top 4 hits were the same 4 diagnoses we have been seeing repeatedly,” Dr Shree said.

Deficiency of humoral immunity (12.5-fold), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (9.3-fold), Sicca syndrome (5.5-fold), and immune thrombocytopenia (4.5-fold) were increased for DLBCL survivors compared to survivors of head and neck cancer.

DLBCL survivors also had an increased risk of respiratory infections, especially viral (4.4-fold) and fungal pneumonias (4.0-fold), meningitis (3.0-fold), and chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis (2.8-fold), also known as Hashimoto’s thyroiditis.

On the other hand, bacterial pneumonias and skin infections were more common in the head and neck cancer survivors than in DLBCL survivors.

DLBCL vs melanoma

“Interestingly, we did not see an increased risk for immune thrombocytopenias [in DLBCL survivors] compared to melanoma survivors in this comparison, which we had in all the other comparisons,” Dr Shree noted.

“But we did see [an increased risk for] the other diagnoses that we had been tracking, including, again, fungal pneumonia [6.9-fold], viral pneumonia [4.7-fold], and miscellaneous viral infections [2.6-fold].”

The only diagnosis that was statistically more common among melanoma survivors than DLBCL survivors was vitiligo.

Risks persist over time

The investigators assessed whether the elevated risks were static over the 1- to 10-year analysis period.

They took the top diagnoses—humoral deficiency, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, Sicca syndrome, and immune thrombocytopenia—and reviewed them for all cohorts to determine the rate of new cases.

“[F]or 3 out of these 4 diagnoses [humoral deficiency, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and Sicca syndrome], increased incident rates are highest in the first 1 to 3 years after diagnosis in the lymphoma patients,” Dr Shree said.

“But even at 5 to 10 years out, these patients continue to have increased incidence of these diagnoses compared to the other cohorts, suggesting that these risks really do remain elevated over some time.”

The investigators repeated the analysis using broader categories of diagnoses with each category encompassing many ICD-9 codes.

“[I]n 12 out of 18 broad categories that we looked at, we can still find statistically significant differences in the incident rates for these diagnoses, and they were all increased in the lymphoma patients compared to the other cohorts,” Dr Shree explained.

“[T]hese increases were seen across multiple comparisons, suggesting that this phenomenon seems to be really lymphoma-specific and not specific to any of the individual comparisons we had chosen to perform.”

The findings, she said, have a lot of implications.

“We are particularly interested in which features of patients’ treatment contribute most to these elevated risks,” Dr Shree said. “And, of course, we want to know what to be able to tell our patients and how to follow them during survivorship.”

The investigators are currently validating their findings with further analysis of the Stanford lymphoma survivors cohort of approximately 3500 patients.

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

© Todd Buchanan 2017

ATLANTA—A population-based study indicates that, compared to other cancer survivors, patients who survive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have an increased risk of autoimmune and infectious diseases.

For example, investigators found the risk of being diagnosed with impaired humoral immunity was 16.2 times higher in female DLBCL survivors than in breast cancer survivors, 14.8 times higher in male DLBCL survivors than in prostate cancer survivors, and 12.5 times higher in all DLBCL survivors than in survivors of head and neck cancer.

“Most of the treatments that we give for lymphoma have profound effects on the immune system, either directly or indirectly, including many of the T-cell-directed therapies,” said Tanaya Shree, MD, PhD, of Stanford University Medical Center in California.

“There have been studies on many of the effects suffered by lymphoma survivors, but very little is known about their immune health.”

Dr Shree and her colleagues undertook this study to determine how the immune system fares in lymphoma survivors. The investigators limited their analysis to survivors of DLBCL.

Dr Shree presented the findings at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 198*).

Study design

Investigators pulled data from the California Cancer Registry for patients with DLBCL as their first primary cancer diagnosed between 1991 and 2012. Patients had to be 18 or older at diagnosis and have survived more than a year after diagnosis.

“Importantly, we counted only diagnoses [of autoimmune and infectious diseases] that first appeared between 1 and 10 years after cancer diagnosis,” Dr Shree explained. “So any diagnosis we saw that had also been seen prior to cancer diagnosis or even up to 1 year post-cancer diagnosis, we considered to be pre-existing and were excluded from the analysis in order to really focus on new incident cases during survivorship.”

Investigators used the same criteria for the comparator cohorts.

The survivor data was linked to statewide discharge databases, and investigators performed the incidence analysis based on ICD-9 codes.

Investigators used Poisson regression analysis to obtain incident ratios and adjusted the models for age, race, and year of diagnosis.

They graphed the incident rate ratios for all the diagnoses that were significantly different between the DLBCL cohort and the comparator cohorts.

“[W]e considered a P value of less than 0.0005 to be significant,” Dr Shree clarified.

Survivor characteristics

The cohorts comprised 802,255 survivors of DLBCL (n=21,690), breast cancer (n=337,591), prostate cancer (n=325,533), melanoma (n=73,196), and head and neck cancer (n=44,245).

“At least 75% of patients in each cohort were aged 40 to 79,” Dr Shree noted, “with a good representation of elderly patients.”

The median follow-up time was 6.1 years for DLBCL patients and ranged from 5.7 years for head and neck cancer survivors to 8.3 years for prostate cancer survivors.

About three-quarters of patients in each cohort had hospitalization data within 1 to 10 years from cancer diagnosis.

DLBCL vs breast cancer

“Interestingly, we found some familiar names amongst the top-scoring diagnoses,” Dr Shree said.

Deficiency of humoral immunity (16.2-fold), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (9.9-fold), Sicca syndrome (6.9-fold), and immune thrombocytopenia (3.1-fold) were higher in female DLBCL survivors than breast cancer survivors.

“All of these have known associations with lymphoma,” Dr Shree said. “But we also found, surprisingly, increased rates of fungal [6.0-fold] and viral pneumonia [3.3-fold], and many other codes associated with respiratory infections. We also found a 3-fold increased rate of meningitis.”

“The only diagnosis statistically more common amongst breast cancer patients was cervicitis and endocervicitis, and this likely relates to the fact that many of these patients are undergoing hormone therapy.”

DLBCL vs prostate cancer

“We saw some of the same diagnoses come up as top-scoring hits, including viral [4.5-fold] and fungal pneumonia [8.2-fold], and meningitis [3.9-fold], and, in this case, Staphylococcal meningitis [8.6-fold],” Dr Shree said.

Deficiency of humoral immunity (14.8-fold), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (8.9-fold), Sicca syndrome (8.6-fold), and immune thrombocytopenia (4.8-fold) were also higher in the male DLBCL survivors than in prostate cancer survivors.

“No diagnoses were statistically more common in the prostate cancer survivors [than in male DLBCL survivors],” Dr Shree noted.

DLBCL vs head and neck cancer

“Again, the top 4 hits were the same 4 diagnoses we have been seeing repeatedly,” Dr Shree said.

Deficiency of humoral immunity (12.5-fold), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (9.3-fold), Sicca syndrome (5.5-fold), and immune thrombocytopenia (4.5-fold) were increased for DLBCL survivors compared to survivors of head and neck cancer.

DLBCL survivors also had an increased risk of respiratory infections, especially viral (4.4-fold) and fungal pneumonias (4.0-fold), meningitis (3.0-fold), and chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis (2.8-fold), also known as Hashimoto’s thyroiditis.

On the other hand, bacterial pneumonias and skin infections were more common in the head and neck cancer survivors than in DLBCL survivors.

DLBCL vs melanoma

“Interestingly, we did not see an increased risk for immune thrombocytopenias [in DLBCL survivors] compared to melanoma survivors in this comparison, which we had in all the other comparisons,” Dr Shree noted.

“But we did see [an increased risk for] the other diagnoses that we had been tracking, including, again, fungal pneumonia [6.9-fold], viral pneumonia [4.7-fold], and miscellaneous viral infections [2.6-fold].”

The only diagnosis that was statistically more common among melanoma survivors than DLBCL survivors was vitiligo.

Risks persist over time

The investigators assessed whether the elevated risks were static over the 1- to 10-year analysis period.

They took the top diagnoses—humoral deficiency, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, Sicca syndrome, and immune thrombocytopenia—and reviewed them for all cohorts to determine the rate of new cases.

“[F]or 3 out of these 4 diagnoses [humoral deficiency, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and Sicca syndrome], increased incident rates are highest in the first 1 to 3 years after diagnosis in the lymphoma patients,” Dr Shree said.

“But even at 5 to 10 years out, these patients continue to have increased incidence of these diagnoses compared to the other cohorts, suggesting that these risks really do remain elevated over some time.”

The investigators repeated the analysis using broader categories of diagnoses with each category encompassing many ICD-9 codes.

“[I]n 12 out of 18 broad categories that we looked at, we can still find statistically significant differences in the incident rates for these diagnoses, and they were all increased in the lymphoma patients compared to the other cohorts,” Dr Shree explained.

“[T]hese increases were seen across multiple comparisons, suggesting that this phenomenon seems to be really lymphoma-specific and not specific to any of the individual comparisons we had chosen to perform.”

The findings, she said, have a lot of implications.

“We are particularly interested in which features of patients’ treatment contribute most to these elevated risks,” Dr Shree said. “And, of course, we want to know what to be able to tell our patients and how to follow them during survivorship.”

The investigators are currently validating their findings with further analysis of the Stanford lymphoma survivors cohort of approximately 3500 patients.

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

© Todd Buchanan 2017

ATLANTA—A population-based study indicates that, compared to other cancer survivors, patients who survive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have an increased risk of autoimmune and infectious diseases.

For example, investigators found the risk of being diagnosed with impaired humoral immunity was 16.2 times higher in female DLBCL survivors than in breast cancer survivors, 14.8 times higher in male DLBCL survivors than in prostate cancer survivors, and 12.5 times higher in all DLBCL survivors than in survivors of head and neck cancer.

“Most of the treatments that we give for lymphoma have profound effects on the immune system, either directly or indirectly, including many of the T-cell-directed therapies,” said Tanaya Shree, MD, PhD, of Stanford University Medical Center in California.

“There have been studies on many of the effects suffered by lymphoma survivors, but very little is known about their immune health.”

Dr Shree and her colleagues undertook this study to determine how the immune system fares in lymphoma survivors. The investigators limited their analysis to survivors of DLBCL.

Dr Shree presented the findings at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 198*).

Study design

Investigators pulled data from the California Cancer Registry for patients with DLBCL as their first primary cancer diagnosed between 1991 and 2012. Patients had to be 18 or older at diagnosis and have survived more than a year after diagnosis.

“Importantly, we counted only diagnoses [of autoimmune and infectious diseases] that first appeared between 1 and 10 years after cancer diagnosis,” Dr Shree explained. “So any diagnosis we saw that had also been seen prior to cancer diagnosis or even up to 1 year post-cancer diagnosis, we considered to be pre-existing and were excluded from the analysis in order to really focus on new incident cases during survivorship.”

Investigators used the same criteria for the comparator cohorts.

The survivor data was linked to statewide discharge databases, and investigators performed the incidence analysis based on ICD-9 codes.

Investigators used Poisson regression analysis to obtain incident ratios and adjusted the models for age, race, and year of diagnosis.

They graphed the incident rate ratios for all the diagnoses that were significantly different between the DLBCL cohort and the comparator cohorts.

“[W]e considered a P value of less than 0.0005 to be significant,” Dr Shree clarified.

Survivor characteristics

The cohorts comprised 802,255 survivors of DLBCL (n=21,690), breast cancer (n=337,591), prostate cancer (n=325,533), melanoma (n=73,196), and head and neck cancer (n=44,245).

“At least 75% of patients in each cohort were aged 40 to 79,” Dr Shree noted, “with a good representation of elderly patients.”

The median follow-up time was 6.1 years for DLBCL patients and ranged from 5.7 years for head and neck cancer survivors to 8.3 years for prostate cancer survivors.

About three-quarters of patients in each cohort had hospitalization data within 1 to 10 years from cancer diagnosis.

DLBCL vs breast cancer

“Interestingly, we found some familiar names amongst the top-scoring diagnoses,” Dr Shree said.

Deficiency of humoral immunity (16.2-fold), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (9.9-fold), Sicca syndrome (6.9-fold), and immune thrombocytopenia (3.1-fold) were higher in female DLBCL survivors than breast cancer survivors.

“All of these have known associations with lymphoma,” Dr Shree said. “But we also found, surprisingly, increased rates of fungal [6.0-fold] and viral pneumonia [3.3-fold], and many other codes associated with respiratory infections. We also found a 3-fold increased rate of meningitis.”

“The only diagnosis statistically more common amongst breast cancer patients was cervicitis and endocervicitis, and this likely relates to the fact that many of these patients are undergoing hormone therapy.”

DLBCL vs prostate cancer

“We saw some of the same diagnoses come up as top-scoring hits, including viral [4.5-fold] and fungal pneumonia [8.2-fold], and meningitis [3.9-fold], and, in this case, Staphylococcal meningitis [8.6-fold],” Dr Shree said.

Deficiency of humoral immunity (14.8-fold), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (8.9-fold), Sicca syndrome (8.6-fold), and immune thrombocytopenia (4.8-fold) were also higher in the male DLBCL survivors than in prostate cancer survivors.

“No diagnoses were statistically more common in the prostate cancer survivors [than in male DLBCL survivors],” Dr Shree noted.

DLBCL vs head and neck cancer

“Again, the top 4 hits were the same 4 diagnoses we have been seeing repeatedly,” Dr Shree said.

Deficiency of humoral immunity (12.5-fold), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (9.3-fold), Sicca syndrome (5.5-fold), and immune thrombocytopenia (4.5-fold) were increased for DLBCL survivors compared to survivors of head and neck cancer.

DLBCL survivors also had an increased risk of respiratory infections, especially viral (4.4-fold) and fungal pneumonias (4.0-fold), meningitis (3.0-fold), and chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis (2.8-fold), also known as Hashimoto’s thyroiditis.

On the other hand, bacterial pneumonias and skin infections were more common in the head and neck cancer survivors than in DLBCL survivors.

DLBCL vs melanoma

“Interestingly, we did not see an increased risk for immune thrombocytopenias [in DLBCL survivors] compared to melanoma survivors in this comparison, which we had in all the other comparisons,” Dr Shree noted.

“But we did see [an increased risk for] the other diagnoses that we had been tracking, including, again, fungal pneumonia [6.9-fold], viral pneumonia [4.7-fold], and miscellaneous viral infections [2.6-fold].”

The only diagnosis that was statistically more common among melanoma survivors than DLBCL survivors was vitiligo.

Risks persist over time

The investigators assessed whether the elevated risks were static over the 1- to 10-year analysis period.

They took the top diagnoses—humoral deficiency, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, Sicca syndrome, and immune thrombocytopenia—and reviewed them for all cohorts to determine the rate of new cases.

“[F]or 3 out of these 4 diagnoses [humoral deficiency, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and Sicca syndrome], increased incident rates are highest in the first 1 to 3 years after diagnosis in the lymphoma patients,” Dr Shree said.

“But even at 5 to 10 years out, these patients continue to have increased incidence of these diagnoses compared to the other cohorts, suggesting that these risks really do remain elevated over some time.”

The investigators repeated the analysis using broader categories of diagnoses with each category encompassing many ICD-9 codes.

“[I]n 12 out of 18 broad categories that we looked at, we can still find statistically significant differences in the incident rates for these diagnoses, and they were all increased in the lymphoma patients compared to the other cohorts,” Dr Shree explained.

“[T]hese increases were seen across multiple comparisons, suggesting that this phenomenon seems to be really lymphoma-specific and not specific to any of the individual comparisons we had chosen to perform.”

The findings, she said, have a lot of implications.

“We are particularly interested in which features of patients’ treatment contribute most to these elevated risks,” Dr Shree said. “And, of course, we want to know what to be able to tell our patients and how to follow them during survivorship.”

The investigators are currently validating their findings with further analysis of the Stanford lymphoma survivors cohort of approximately 3500 patients.

*Data in the abstract differ from the presentation.

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental biologics license application (sBLA) for brentuximab vedotin (ADCETRIS).

With this sBLA, Seattle Genetics, Inc., is seeking approval for brentuximab vedotin in combination with chemotherapy for frontline treatment of patients with advanced classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

The FDA expects to make a decision on the sBLA by May 1, 2018.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The priority review for this sBLA is based on positive results from the phase 3 ECHELON-1 trial.

The FDA previously granted brentuximab vedotin breakthrough therapy designation based on ECHELON-1 results.

Breakthrough therapy designation is intended to expedite the development and review of promising drug candidates for serious or life-threatening conditions. It is based upon clinical evidence of substantial improvement over existing therapies in one or more clinically significant endpoints.

ECHELON-1

Result from ECHELON-1 were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and simultaneously published in NEJM.

In this trial, researchers compared brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) to doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) as frontline treatment for 1334 patients with advanced HL.

The study’s primary endpoint was modified progression-free survival (PFS), which was defined as time to progression, death, or evidence of non-complete response after completion of frontline therapy followed by subsequent anticancer therapy.

According to an independent review facility, A+AVD provided a significant improvement in modified PFS compared to ABVD. The hazard ratio was 0.77 (P=0.035), which corresponds to a 23% reduction in the risk of progression, death, or the need for additional anticancer therapy.

The 2-year modified PFS rate was 82.1% in the A+AVD arm and 77.2% in the ABVD arm.

There was no significant difference between the treatment arms when it came to response rates or overall survival.

The objective response rate was 86% in the A+AVD arm and 83% in the ABVD arm (P=0.12). The complete response rate was 73% and 70%, respectively (P=0.22).

The interim 2-year overall survival rate was 97% in the A+AVD arm and 95% in the ABVD arm (hazard ratio=0.72; P=0.19).

The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 99% in the A+AVD arm and 98% in the ABVD arm. The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 83% and 66%, respectively, and the incidence of serious AEs was 43% and 27%, respectively.

Neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with A+AVD, while pulmonary toxicity was more common with ABVD.

About brentuximab vedotin

Brentuximab vedotin is already FDA-approved to treat adults with:

• Classical HL who have failed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) or, in those who are not auto-HSCT candidates, have failed at least 2 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens.
• Classical HL at high risk of relapse or progression as post-auto-HSCT consolidation.
• Primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) or CD30-expressing mycosis fungoides who have received prior systemic therapy.
• Systemic ALCL who have failed at least 1 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen. (The drug has accelerated approval for this indication, based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.)
  

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental biologics license application (sBLA) for brentuximab vedotin (ADCETRIS).

With this sBLA, Seattle Genetics, Inc., is seeking approval for brentuximab vedotin in combination with chemotherapy for frontline treatment of patients with advanced classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

The FDA expects to make a decision on the sBLA by May 1, 2018.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The priority review for this sBLA is based on positive results from the phase 3 ECHELON-1 trial.

The FDA previously granted brentuximab vedotin breakthrough therapy designation based on ECHELON-1 results.

Breakthrough therapy designation is intended to expedite the development and review of promising drug candidates for serious or life-threatening conditions. It is based upon clinical evidence of substantial improvement over existing therapies in one or more clinically significant endpoints.

ECHELON-1

Result from ECHELON-1 were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and simultaneously published in NEJM.

In this trial, researchers compared brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) to doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) as frontline treatment for 1334 patients with advanced HL.

The study’s primary endpoint was modified progression-free survival (PFS), which was defined as time to progression, death, or evidence of non-complete response after completion of frontline therapy followed by subsequent anticancer therapy.

According to an independent review facility, A+AVD provided a significant improvement in modified PFS compared to ABVD. The hazard ratio was 0.77 (P=0.035), which corresponds to a 23% reduction in the risk of progression, death, or the need for additional anticancer therapy.

The 2-year modified PFS rate was 82.1% in the A+AVD arm and 77.2% in the ABVD arm.

There was no significant difference between the treatment arms when it came to response rates or overall survival.

The objective response rate was 86% in the A+AVD arm and 83% in the ABVD arm (P=0.12). The complete response rate was 73% and 70%, respectively (P=0.22).

The interim 2-year overall survival rate was 97% in the A+AVD arm and 95% in the ABVD arm (hazard ratio=0.72; P=0.19).

The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 99% in the A+AVD arm and 98% in the ABVD arm. The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 83% and 66%, respectively, and the incidence of serious AEs was 43% and 27%, respectively.

Neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with A+AVD, while pulmonary toxicity was more common with ABVD.

About brentuximab vedotin

Brentuximab vedotin is already FDA-approved to treat adults with:

• Classical HL who have failed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) or, in those who are not auto-HSCT candidates, have failed at least 2 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens.
• Classical HL at high risk of relapse or progression as post-auto-HSCT consolidation.
• Primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) or CD30-expressing mycosis fungoides who have received prior systemic therapy.
• Systemic ALCL who have failed at least 1 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen. (The drug has accelerated approval for this indication, based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.)
  

Photo from Business Wire

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental biologics license application (sBLA) for brentuximab vedotin (ADCETRIS).

With this sBLA, Seattle Genetics, Inc., is seeking approval for brentuximab vedotin in combination with chemotherapy for frontline treatment of patients with advanced classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

The FDA expects to make a decision on the sBLA by May 1, 2018.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The priority review for this sBLA is based on positive results from the phase 3 ECHELON-1 trial.

The FDA previously granted brentuximab vedotin breakthrough therapy designation based on ECHELON-1 results.

Breakthrough therapy designation is intended to expedite the development and review of promising drug candidates for serious or life-threatening conditions. It is based upon clinical evidence of substantial improvement over existing therapies in one or more clinically significant endpoints.

ECHELON-1

Result from ECHELON-1 were presented at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting and simultaneously published in NEJM.

In this trial, researchers compared brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) to doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) as frontline treatment for 1334 patients with advanced HL.

The study’s primary endpoint was modified progression-free survival (PFS), which was defined as time to progression, death, or evidence of non-complete response after completion of frontline therapy followed by subsequent anticancer therapy.

According to an independent review facility, A+AVD provided a significant improvement in modified PFS compared to ABVD. The hazard ratio was 0.77 (P=0.035), which corresponds to a 23% reduction in the risk of progression, death, or the need for additional anticancer therapy.

The 2-year modified PFS rate was 82.1% in the A+AVD arm and 77.2% in the ABVD arm.

There was no significant difference between the treatment arms when it came to response rates or overall survival.

The objective response rate was 86% in the A+AVD arm and 83% in the ABVD arm (P=0.12). The complete response rate was 73% and 70%, respectively (P=0.22).

The interim 2-year overall survival rate was 97% in the A+AVD arm and 95% in the ABVD arm (hazard ratio=0.72; P=0.19).

The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 99% in the A+AVD arm and 98% in the ABVD arm. The incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 83% and 66%, respectively, and the incidence of serious AEs was 43% and 27%, respectively.

Neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with A+AVD, while pulmonary toxicity was more common with ABVD.

About brentuximab vedotin

Brentuximab vedotin is already FDA-approved to treat adults with:

• Classical HL who have failed autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HSCT) or, in those who are not auto-HSCT candidates, have failed at least 2 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens.
• Classical HL at high risk of relapse or progression as post-auto-HSCT consolidation.
• Primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) or CD30-expressing mycosis fungoides who have received prior systemic therapy.
• Systemic ALCL who have failed at least 1 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen. (The drug has accelerated approval for this indication, based on overall response rate. Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description of clinical benefit in confirmatory trials.)
  

ATLANTA – Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111), an investigational BTK inhibitor, was well tolerated and active as a single agent in patients with indolent and aggressive forms of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, according to data presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Response rates ranged from 31% to 88% depending on the lymphoma subtype. Overall, approximately 10% of patients discontinued the drug because of adverse events, reported Constantine S. Tam, MBBS, MD, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre & St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne.

“There was encouraging activity against all the spectrum of indolent and aggressive NHL subtypes … and durable responses were observed across a variety of histologies,” Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib is a second-generation BTK inhibitor that, based on biochemical assays, has higher selectivity against BTK than ibrutinib, Dr. Tam said.

He presented results of an open-label, multicenter, phase 1b study of daily or twice-daily zanubrutinib in patients with B-cell malignancies, most of them relapsed or refractory to prior therapies. The lymphoma subtypes he presented included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL).

For 34 patients with indolent lymphomas (FL and MZL), the most frequent adverse events were petechiae/purpura/contusion and upper respiratory tract infection. Eleven grade 3-5 adverse events were reported, including neutropenia, infection, nausea, urinary tract infection, and abdominal pain.

Atrial fibrillation was observed in two patients in the aggressive NHL cohort, for an overall AF rate of approximately 2%, Dr. Tam said.

For 65 patients with aggressive lymphomas (DLBCL and MCL), the most frequent adverse events were petechiae/purpura/contusion and diarrhea; 27 grade 3-5 adverse events were reported, including neutropenia, pneumonia, and anemia.

The highest overall response rate reported was for MCL, at 88% (28 of 32 patients) followed by MZL at 78% (7 of 9 patients), FL at 41% (7 of 17 patients), and DLBCL 31% (8 of 26 patients).

The recommended phase 2 dose for zanubrutinib is either 320 mg/day once daily or a split dose of 160 mg twice daily, Dr. Tam said.

Based on this experience, investigators started a registration trial of zanubrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab for FL, and additional trials are planned, according to Dr. Tam.

There are also registration trials in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia based on other data suggesting activity of zanubrutinib in those disease types, he added.

Zanubrutinib is a product of BeiGene. Dr. Tam reported disclosures related to Roche, Janssen Cilag, Abbvie, Celgene, Pharmacyclics, Onyx, and Amgen.

SOURCE: Tam C et al, ASH 2017, Abstract 152

ATLANTA – Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111), an investigational BTK inhibitor, was well tolerated and active as a single agent in patients with indolent and aggressive forms of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, according to data presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Response rates ranged from 31% to 88% depending on the lymphoma subtype. Overall, approximately 10% of patients discontinued the drug because of adverse events, reported Constantine S. Tam, MBBS, MD, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre & St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne.

“There was encouraging activity against all the spectrum of indolent and aggressive NHL subtypes … and durable responses were observed across a variety of histologies,” Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib is a second-generation BTK inhibitor that, based on biochemical assays, has higher selectivity against BTK than ibrutinib, Dr. Tam said.

He presented results of an open-label, multicenter, phase 1b study of daily or twice-daily zanubrutinib in patients with B-cell malignancies, most of them relapsed or refractory to prior therapies. The lymphoma subtypes he presented included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL).

For 34 patients with indolent lymphomas (FL and MZL), the most frequent adverse events were petechiae/purpura/contusion and upper respiratory tract infection. Eleven grade 3-5 adverse events were reported, including neutropenia, infection, nausea, urinary tract infection, and abdominal pain.

Atrial fibrillation was observed in two patients in the aggressive NHL cohort, for an overall AF rate of approximately 2%, Dr. Tam said.

For 65 patients with aggressive lymphomas (DLBCL and MCL), the most frequent adverse events were petechiae/purpura/contusion and diarrhea; 27 grade 3-5 adverse events were reported, including neutropenia, pneumonia, and anemia.

The highest overall response rate reported was for MCL, at 88% (28 of 32 patients) followed by MZL at 78% (7 of 9 patients), FL at 41% (7 of 17 patients), and DLBCL 31% (8 of 26 patients).

The recommended phase 2 dose for zanubrutinib is either 320 mg/day once daily or a split dose of 160 mg twice daily, Dr. Tam said.

Based on this experience, investigators started a registration trial of zanubrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab for FL, and additional trials are planned, according to Dr. Tam.

There are also registration trials in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia based on other data suggesting activity of zanubrutinib in those disease types, he added.

Zanubrutinib is a product of BeiGene. Dr. Tam reported disclosures related to Roche, Janssen Cilag, Abbvie, Celgene, Pharmacyclics, Onyx, and Amgen.

SOURCE: Tam C et al, ASH 2017, Abstract 152

ATLANTA – Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111), an investigational BTK inhibitor, was well tolerated and active as a single agent in patients with indolent and aggressive forms of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, according to data presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Response rates ranged from 31% to 88% depending on the lymphoma subtype. Overall, approximately 10% of patients discontinued the drug because of adverse events, reported Constantine S. Tam, MBBS, MD, of Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre & St. Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne.

“There was encouraging activity against all the spectrum of indolent and aggressive NHL subtypes … and durable responses were observed across a variety of histologies,” Dr. Tam said.

Zanubrutinib is a second-generation BTK inhibitor that, based on biochemical assays, has higher selectivity against BTK than ibrutinib, Dr. Tam said.

He presented results of an open-label, multicenter, phase 1b study of daily or twice-daily zanubrutinib in patients with B-cell malignancies, most of them relapsed or refractory to prior therapies. The lymphoma subtypes he presented included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL).

For 34 patients with indolent lymphomas (FL and MZL), the most frequent adverse events were petechiae/purpura/contusion and upper respiratory tract infection. Eleven grade 3-5 adverse events were reported, including neutropenia, infection, nausea, urinary tract infection, and abdominal pain.

Atrial fibrillation was observed in two patients in the aggressive NHL cohort, for an overall AF rate of approximately 2%, Dr. Tam said.

For 65 patients with aggressive lymphomas (DLBCL and MCL), the most frequent adverse events were petechiae/purpura/contusion and diarrhea; 27 grade 3-5 adverse events were reported, including neutropenia, pneumonia, and anemia.

The highest overall response rate reported was for MCL, at 88% (28 of 32 patients) followed by MZL at 78% (7 of 9 patients), FL at 41% (7 of 17 patients), and DLBCL 31% (8 of 26 patients).

The recommended phase 2 dose for zanubrutinib is either 320 mg/day once daily or a split dose of 160 mg twice daily, Dr. Tam said.

Based on this experience, investigators started a registration trial of zanubrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab for FL, and additional trials are planned, according to Dr. Tam.

There are also registration trials in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia based on other data suggesting activity of zanubrutinib in those disease types, he added.

Zanubrutinib is a product of BeiGene. Dr. Tam reported disclosures related to Roche, Janssen Cilag, Abbvie, Celgene, Pharmacyclics, Onyx, and Amgen.

SOURCE: Tam C et al, ASH 2017, Abstract 152

ATLANTA – In patients with previously treated immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis, daratumumab monotherapy produced deep, rapid hematologic responses, based on initial results from a phase 2 trial.

So far, the response rate is about twice the rate seen with daratumumab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, Murielle Roussel, MD, of IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. “We observed deep and rapid clonal responses, even after the first infusion.”

Amy Karon/Frontline Medical News

SOURCES: Sanchorawala V et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 507; Roussel M et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 508.

ATLANTA – In patients with previously treated immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis, daratumumab monotherapy produced deep, rapid hematologic responses, based on initial results from a phase 2 trial.

So far, the response rate is about twice the rate seen with daratumumab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, Murielle Roussel, MD, of IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. “We observed deep and rapid clonal responses, even after the first infusion.”

Amy Karon/Frontline Medical News

SOURCES: Sanchorawala V et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 507; Roussel M et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 508.

ATLANTA – In patients with previously treated immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis, daratumumab monotherapy produced deep, rapid hematologic responses, based on initial results from a phase 2 trial.

So far, the response rate is about twice the rate seen with daratumumab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, Murielle Roussel, MD, of IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France, said at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. “We observed deep and rapid clonal responses, even after the first infusion.”

Amy Karon/Frontline Medical News

SOURCES: Sanchorawala V et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 507; Roussel M et al. ASH 2017 Abstract 508.

© Phil McCarten 2017

ATLANTA—The chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; KTE-C19) is showing consistent, ongoing responses more than a year after infusion.

An updated analysis of the phase 1/2 ZUMA-1 trial showed that 42% of patients who received axi-cel maintained an objective response at a median follow-up of 15.4 months.

Forty percent of patients have maintained a complete response (CR).

This compares with a 44% objective response rate and a 39% CR rate in the primary analysis of phase 2 ZUMA-1 data, when the median follow-up was 8.7 months.

Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, reported the long-term results from ZUMA-1 at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 578). The findings were published simultaneously in NEJM.

The primary phase 2 analysis was previously presented at the AACR Annual Meeting 2017.

At ASH 2017, Dr Neelapu disclosed that he has received research funding and served as a consultant for Kite Pharma, the developer of axi-cel. Kite Pharma and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program supported ZUMA-1.

Study schema and patient characteristics

Phase 1 of ZUMA-1 enrolled 7 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL).

In phase 2, 101 patients were grouped into 2 cohorts—77 with refractory DLBCL and 24 with refractory PMBCL/TFL.

A total of 108 patients were treated in phases 1 and 2 and were included in the long-term pooled analysis.

Patients received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine and, 2 days later, a fixed dose of axi-cel at 2 x 10⁶ CAR T cells/kg.

“Importantly, the product could be manufactured for 99% of enrolled patients,” Dr Neelapu said. “Moreover, 91% of the enrolled patients were dosed with axi-cel, and there were no patients lost to follow-up.”

Patients in the pooled analysis were a median age of 58 (range, 23–76), and 27 (25%) were 65 or older.

Seventy-three patients (68%) were male, 62 (57%) had an ECOG status of 1, 90 (83%) had stage III or IV disease, and 48 (44%) had an IPI score of 3 to 4.

Seventy-six patients (70%) had received 3 or more prior therapies.

Eighty patients (74%) were refractory to their second or later line of therapy, and 70 (65%) had progressive disease as their best response to their last prior therapy. Twenty-five patients (23%) had relapsed after autologous stem cell transplant.

Response

The data cutoff for the long-term analysis was August 11, 2017.

In addition to the ongoing responses mentioned above, the best objective response was 82% in both the phase 2 primary analysis and the long-term analysis for phases 1 and 2.

CR as the best objective response increased from 54% in the primary analysis to 58% at the longer follow-up.

“We did observe deepening of the responses over time,” Dr Neelapu said. “At the time of the first tumor assessment, 60 patients had either partial remission or stable disease. But 23 of those 60 eventually achieved a complete remission up to 15 months post-infusion without any additional therapy.”

The median time to conversion from partial response to CR was 64 days (range, 49–242).

“The durability of these responses was observed consistently across key covariates,” Dr Neelapu added, “including the refractory subgroups, the disease stage groups, IPI risk groups. The CD19 status at baseline did not matter, nor did the cell of origin, or the CD4/CD8 ratio of the product.”

Furthermore, the investigators observed no differences in patients who received tocilizumab or corticosteroids.

The median duration of response for all patients was 11.1 months. For those who achieved CR, the median duration of response has not yet been reached.

Three of the 7 patients (43%) in the phase 1 part of the trial had an ongoing CR at 24 months.

At the median follow-up of 15.4 months, 42% of patients were progression-free, and 56% were alive.

The median overall survival has not been reached. Investigators estimated the 18-month overall survival to be 52%.

Safety

Adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher occurred in 97% of patients, and serious AEs of grade 3 or higher occurred in 46% of patients in the updated analysis.

No new axi-cel-related AEs of cytokine release syndrome, neurologic events, or grade 5 AEs have arisen since the primary analysis.

There were four grade 5 events, 2 of which were related to axi-cel.

“All these four grade 5 events were previously reported—three in the phase 2 and one in the phase 1 trial,” Dr Neelapu said.

Most patients experienced hypogammaglobulinemia and B-cell aplasia. Eight percent of patients had IVIG support during the study.

Infections, such as pneumonia, influenza, and viral infection, were the most common new-onset treatment-emergent serious AEs occurring after 6 months in 10 patients. All were manageable and resolved prior to the data cut-off.

Persistence and resistance

“We observed long-term persistence of the CAR T cells,” Dr Neelapu said.

CAR T cells persisted in 71% of patients still responding at 1 year. And durable responses were observed in patients with and without detectable CAR T cells.

A central review committee analyzed biopsies of 21 evaluable patients at progression to try to determine the mechanism of resistance.

Fourteen of 21 (67%) biopsies were CD19-positive. Of these, 9 were PD-L1-positive, 4 were PD-L1-negative, and 1 was not evaluable.

Seven patients (33%) were CD19-negative compared to baseline. Of these, 4 were PD-L1-positive, 2 were PD-L1-negative, and 1 was not evaluable.

“This PD-L1 expression was observed in both CD19-positive relapses and CD19-negative relapses,” Dr Neelapu emphasized.

Of the 21 patients, 62% were PD-L1-positive.

Investigators hypothesize that 2 potential mechanisms could contribute to relapse: loss of CD19 and expression of PD-L1.

Axi-cel (Yescarta™) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in October for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

© Phil McCarten 2017

ATLANTA—The chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; KTE-C19) is showing consistent, ongoing responses more than a year after infusion.

An updated analysis of the phase 1/2 ZUMA-1 trial showed that 42% of patients who received axi-cel maintained an objective response at a median follow-up of 15.4 months.

Forty percent of patients have maintained a complete response (CR).

This compares with a 44% objective response rate and a 39% CR rate in the primary analysis of phase 2 ZUMA-1 data, when the median follow-up was 8.7 months.

Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, reported the long-term results from ZUMA-1 at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 578). The findings were published simultaneously in NEJM.

The primary phase 2 analysis was previously presented at the AACR Annual Meeting 2017.

At ASH 2017, Dr Neelapu disclosed that he has received research funding and served as a consultant for Kite Pharma, the developer of axi-cel. Kite Pharma and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program supported ZUMA-1.

Study schema and patient characteristics

Phase 1 of ZUMA-1 enrolled 7 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL).

In phase 2, 101 patients were grouped into 2 cohorts—77 with refractory DLBCL and 24 with refractory PMBCL/TFL.

A total of 108 patients were treated in phases 1 and 2 and were included in the long-term pooled analysis.

Patients received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine and, 2 days later, a fixed dose of axi-cel at 2 x 10⁶ CAR T cells/kg.

“Importantly, the product could be manufactured for 99% of enrolled patients,” Dr Neelapu said. “Moreover, 91% of the enrolled patients were dosed with axi-cel, and there were no patients lost to follow-up.”

Patients in the pooled analysis were a median age of 58 (range, 23–76), and 27 (25%) were 65 or older.

Seventy-three patients (68%) were male, 62 (57%) had an ECOG status of 1, 90 (83%) had stage III or IV disease, and 48 (44%) had an IPI score of 3 to 4.

Seventy-six patients (70%) had received 3 or more prior therapies.

Eighty patients (74%) were refractory to their second or later line of therapy, and 70 (65%) had progressive disease as their best response to their last prior therapy. Twenty-five patients (23%) had relapsed after autologous stem cell transplant.

Response

The data cutoff for the long-term analysis was August 11, 2017.

In addition to the ongoing responses mentioned above, the best objective response was 82% in both the phase 2 primary analysis and the long-term analysis for phases 1 and 2.

CR as the best objective response increased from 54% in the primary analysis to 58% at the longer follow-up.

“We did observe deepening of the responses over time,” Dr Neelapu said. “At the time of the first tumor assessment, 60 patients had either partial remission or stable disease. But 23 of those 60 eventually achieved a complete remission up to 15 months post-infusion without any additional therapy.”

The median time to conversion from partial response to CR was 64 days (range, 49–242).

“The durability of these responses was observed consistently across key covariates,” Dr Neelapu added, “including the refractory subgroups, the disease stage groups, IPI risk groups. The CD19 status at baseline did not matter, nor did the cell of origin, or the CD4/CD8 ratio of the product.”

Furthermore, the investigators observed no differences in patients who received tocilizumab or corticosteroids.

The median duration of response for all patients was 11.1 months. For those who achieved CR, the median duration of response has not yet been reached.

Three of the 7 patients (43%) in the phase 1 part of the trial had an ongoing CR at 24 months.

At the median follow-up of 15.4 months, 42% of patients were progression-free, and 56% were alive.

The median overall survival has not been reached. Investigators estimated the 18-month overall survival to be 52%.

Safety

Adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher occurred in 97% of patients, and serious AEs of grade 3 or higher occurred in 46% of patients in the updated analysis.

No new axi-cel-related AEs of cytokine release syndrome, neurologic events, or grade 5 AEs have arisen since the primary analysis.

There were four grade 5 events, 2 of which were related to axi-cel.

“All these four grade 5 events were previously reported—three in the phase 2 and one in the phase 1 trial,” Dr Neelapu said.

Most patients experienced hypogammaglobulinemia and B-cell aplasia. Eight percent of patients had IVIG support during the study.

Infections, such as pneumonia, influenza, and viral infection, were the most common new-onset treatment-emergent serious AEs occurring after 6 months in 10 patients. All were manageable and resolved prior to the data cut-off.

Persistence and resistance

“We observed long-term persistence of the CAR T cells,” Dr Neelapu said.

CAR T cells persisted in 71% of patients still responding at 1 year. And durable responses were observed in patients with and without detectable CAR T cells.

A central review committee analyzed biopsies of 21 evaluable patients at progression to try to determine the mechanism of resistance.

Fourteen of 21 (67%) biopsies were CD19-positive. Of these, 9 were PD-L1-positive, 4 were PD-L1-negative, and 1 was not evaluable.

Seven patients (33%) were CD19-negative compared to baseline. Of these, 4 were PD-L1-positive, 2 were PD-L1-negative, and 1 was not evaluable.

“This PD-L1 expression was observed in both CD19-positive relapses and CD19-negative relapses,” Dr Neelapu emphasized.

Of the 21 patients, 62% were PD-L1-positive.

Investigators hypothesize that 2 potential mechanisms could contribute to relapse: loss of CD19 and expression of PD-L1.

Axi-cel (Yescarta™) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in October for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

© Phil McCarten 2017

ATLANTA—The chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; KTE-C19) is showing consistent, ongoing responses more than a year after infusion.

An updated analysis of the phase 1/2 ZUMA-1 trial showed that 42% of patients who received axi-cel maintained an objective response at a median follow-up of 15.4 months.

Forty percent of patients have maintained a complete response (CR).

This compares with a 44% objective response rate and a 39% CR rate in the primary analysis of phase 2 ZUMA-1 data, when the median follow-up was 8.7 months.

Sattva S. Neelapu, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas, reported the long-term results from ZUMA-1 at the 2017 ASH Annual Meeting (abstract 578). The findings were published simultaneously in NEJM.

The primary phase 2 analysis was previously presented at the AACR Annual Meeting 2017.

At ASH 2017, Dr Neelapu disclosed that he has received research funding and served as a consultant for Kite Pharma, the developer of axi-cel. Kite Pharma and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Therapy Acceleration Program supported ZUMA-1.

Study schema and patient characteristics

Phase 1 of ZUMA-1 enrolled 7 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL).

In phase 2, 101 patients were grouped into 2 cohorts—77 with refractory DLBCL and 24 with refractory PMBCL/TFL.

A total of 108 patients were treated in phases 1 and 2 and were included in the long-term pooled analysis.

Patients received a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine and, 2 days later, a fixed dose of axi-cel at 2 x 10⁶ CAR T cells/kg.

“Importantly, the product could be manufactured for 99% of enrolled patients,” Dr Neelapu said. “Moreover, 91% of the enrolled patients were dosed with axi-cel, and there were no patients lost to follow-up.”

Patients in the pooled analysis were a median age of 58 (range, 23–76), and 27 (25%) were 65 or older.

Seventy-three patients (68%) were male, 62 (57%) had an ECOG status of 1, 90 (83%) had stage III or IV disease, and 48 (44%) had an IPI score of 3 to 4.

Seventy-six patients (70%) had received 3 or more prior therapies.

Eighty patients (74%) were refractory to their second or later line of therapy, and 70 (65%) had progressive disease as their best response to their last prior therapy. Twenty-five patients (23%) had relapsed after autologous stem cell transplant.

Response

The data cutoff for the long-term analysis was August 11, 2017.

In addition to the ongoing responses mentioned above, the best objective response was 82% in both the phase 2 primary analysis and the long-term analysis for phases 1 and 2.

CR as the best objective response increased from 54% in the primary analysis to 58% at the longer follow-up.

“We did observe deepening of the responses over time,” Dr Neelapu said. “At the time of the first tumor assessment, 60 patients had either partial remission or stable disease. But 23 of those 60 eventually achieved a complete remission up to 15 months post-infusion without any additional therapy.”

The median time to conversion from partial response to CR was 64 days (range, 49–242).

“The durability of these responses was observed consistently across key covariates,” Dr Neelapu added, “including the refractory subgroups, the disease stage groups, IPI risk groups. The CD19 status at baseline did not matter, nor did the cell of origin, or the CD4/CD8 ratio of the product.”

Furthermore, the investigators observed no differences in patients who received tocilizumab or corticosteroids.

The median duration of response for all patients was 11.1 months. For those who achieved CR, the median duration of response has not yet been reached.

Three of the 7 patients (43%) in the phase 1 part of the trial had an ongoing CR at 24 months.

At the median follow-up of 15.4 months, 42% of patients were progression-free, and 56% were alive.

The median overall survival has not been reached. Investigators estimated the 18-month overall survival to be 52%.

Safety

Adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher occurred in 97% of patients, and serious AEs of grade 3 or higher occurred in 46% of patients in the updated analysis.

No new axi-cel-related AEs of cytokine release syndrome, neurologic events, or grade 5 AEs have arisen since the primary analysis.

There were four grade 5 events, 2 of which were related to axi-cel.

“All these four grade 5 events were previously reported—three in the phase 2 and one in the phase 1 trial,” Dr Neelapu said.

Most patients experienced hypogammaglobulinemia and B-cell aplasia. Eight percent of patients had IVIG support during the study.

Infections, such as pneumonia, influenza, and viral infection, were the most common new-onset treatment-emergent serious AEs occurring after 6 months in 10 patients. All were manageable and resolved prior to the data cut-off.

Persistence and resistance

“We observed long-term persistence of the CAR T cells,” Dr Neelapu said.

CAR T cells persisted in 71% of patients still responding at 1 year. And durable responses were observed in patients with and without detectable CAR T cells.

A central review committee analyzed biopsies of 21 evaluable patients at progression to try to determine the mechanism of resistance.

Fourteen of 21 (67%) biopsies were CD19-positive. Of these, 9 were PD-L1-positive, 4 were PD-L1-negative, and 1 was not evaluable.

Seven patients (33%) were CD19-negative compared to baseline. Of these, 4 were PD-L1-positive, 2 were PD-L1-negative, and 1 was not evaluable.

“This PD-L1 expression was observed in both CD19-positive relapses and CD19-negative relapses,” Dr Neelapu emphasized.

Of the 21 patients, 62% were PD-L1-positive.

Investigators hypothesize that 2 potential mechanisms could contribute to relapse: loss of CD19 and expression of PD-L1.

Axi-cel (Yescarta™) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in October for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

Pemphigus patients may be more likely to develop chronic leukemia, multiple myeloma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, based on the findings of a retrospective study conducted at the Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.

Although the findings are preliminary, the possible associations should be considered when treating pemphigus patients, the investigators reported in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Khalaf Kridin, MD, of the Rambam Health Care Campus department of dermatology and his fellow investigators conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective, controlled study of 11,859 patients gathered from the Clait Health Services computerized database. A total of 1,985 pemphigus patients and 9,874 control patients were included. Patients were 72 years old on average, and most were female (60%) and Jewish (90%).

Dr. Kridin and his colleagues measured the prevalence of acute and chronic leukemia, Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and polycythemia vera.

The pemphigus patients, compared with the control group, had a significantly higher prevalence of chronic leukemia (0.9% vs 0.4% [P = .007]), multiple myeloma (0.8% vs 0.4% [P = .009]), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1.8% vs 1.2% [P = .040]).

In a sensitivity analysis, patients with pemphigus were twice as likely to have chronic leukemia (odds ratio = 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.6) and multiple myeloma (OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.9) and were one and a half times as likely to have non-Hodgkin lymphoma (OR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.2).

Dr. Kridin and his fellow investigators hypothesized that the risks may be related to some pemphigus treatments.

“Certain immunosuppressive treatments for pemphigus, such as azathioprine, could increase the risk of developing hematologic malignancies,” they wrote. “Controlling for immunosuppressive agents attenuated the association of pemphigus with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma, hinting that they play a role in the higher prevalence.”

Chronic immune stimulation also may be influencing a higher prevalence of hematologic cancers in pemphigus patients “by randomly introducing pro-oncogenic mutations in rapidly dividing cells,” they said.

Investigators were limited by a lack of data on patients’ immunopathological subtype, clinical features, severity of pemphigus, and precise histological type of leukemia and lymphoma.

Dr. Kridin and his fellow investigators reported no relevant financial disclosures.

ezimmerman@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Kridin K et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Dec 2. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.039.

Pemphigus patients may be more likely to develop chronic leukemia, multiple myeloma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, based on the findings of a retrospective study conducted at the Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.

Although the findings are preliminary, the possible associations should be considered when treating pemphigus patients, the investigators reported in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Khalaf Kridin, MD, of the Rambam Health Care Campus department of dermatology and his fellow investigators conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective, controlled study of 11,859 patients gathered from the Clait Health Services computerized database. A total of 1,985 pemphigus patients and 9,874 control patients were included. Patients were 72 years old on average, and most were female (60%) and Jewish (90%).

Dr. Kridin and his colleagues measured the prevalence of acute and chronic leukemia, Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and polycythemia vera.

The pemphigus patients, compared with the control group, had a significantly higher prevalence of chronic leukemia (0.9% vs 0.4% [P = .007]), multiple myeloma (0.8% vs 0.4% [P = .009]), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1.8% vs 1.2% [P = .040]).

In a sensitivity analysis, patients with pemphigus were twice as likely to have chronic leukemia (odds ratio = 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.6) and multiple myeloma (OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.9) and were one and a half times as likely to have non-Hodgkin lymphoma (OR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.2).

Dr. Kridin and his fellow investigators hypothesized that the risks may be related to some pemphigus treatments.

“Certain immunosuppressive treatments for pemphigus, such as azathioprine, could increase the risk of developing hematologic malignancies,” they wrote. “Controlling for immunosuppressive agents attenuated the association of pemphigus with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma, hinting that they play a role in the higher prevalence.”

Chronic immune stimulation also may be influencing a higher prevalence of hematologic cancers in pemphigus patients “by randomly introducing pro-oncogenic mutations in rapidly dividing cells,” they said.

Investigators were limited by a lack of data on patients’ immunopathological subtype, clinical features, severity of pemphigus, and precise histological type of leukemia and lymphoma.

Dr. Kridin and his fellow investigators reported no relevant financial disclosures.

ezimmerman@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Kridin K et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Dec 2. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.039.

Pemphigus patients may be more likely to develop chronic leukemia, multiple myeloma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, based on the findings of a retrospective study conducted at the Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.

Although the findings are preliminary, the possible associations should be considered when treating pemphigus patients, the investigators reported in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

Khalaf Kridin, MD, of the Rambam Health Care Campus department of dermatology and his fellow investigators conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective, controlled study of 11,859 patients gathered from the Clait Health Services computerized database. A total of 1,985 pemphigus patients and 9,874 control patients were included. Patients were 72 years old on average, and most were female (60%) and Jewish (90%).

Dr. Kridin and his colleagues measured the prevalence of acute and chronic leukemia, Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and polycythemia vera.

The pemphigus patients, compared with the control group, had a significantly higher prevalence of chronic leukemia (0.9% vs 0.4% [P = .007]), multiple myeloma (0.8% vs 0.4% [P = .009]), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1.8% vs 1.2% [P = .040]).

In a sensitivity analysis, patients with pemphigus were twice as likely to have chronic leukemia (odds ratio = 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.6) and multiple myeloma (OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.9) and were one and a half times as likely to have non-Hodgkin lymphoma (OR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.2).

Dr. Kridin and his fellow investigators hypothesized that the risks may be related to some pemphigus treatments.

“Certain immunosuppressive treatments for pemphigus, such as azathioprine, could increase the risk of developing hematologic malignancies,” they wrote. “Controlling for immunosuppressive agents attenuated the association of pemphigus with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma, hinting that they play a role in the higher prevalence.”

Chronic immune stimulation also may be influencing a higher prevalence of hematologic cancers in pemphigus patients “by randomly introducing pro-oncogenic mutations in rapidly dividing cells,” they said.

Investigators were limited by a lack of data on patients’ immunopathological subtype, clinical features, severity of pemphigus, and precise histological type of leukemia and lymphoma.

Dr. Kridin and his fellow investigators reported no relevant financial disclosures.

ezimmerman@frontlinemedcom.com

SOURCE: Kridin K et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Dec 2. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.039.

Image from NIDCD

Researchers have gained new insight into hearing loss caused by cisplatin.

By measuring and mapping cisplatin retention in mouse and human inner ear tissues, the researchers found that cisplatin builds up in the inner ear and can remain there for years.

The team also found that a region in the inner ear called the stria vascularis could be targeted to prevent hearing loss resulting from cisplatin.

Lisa L. Cunningham, PhD, of the National Institute on Deafness and other Communications Disorders (NIDCD) in Bethesda, Maryland, and her colleagues reported these findings in Nature Communications.

The researchers noted that cisplatin can cause permanent hearing loss in 40% to 80% of treated patients. The team’s new findings help explain why.

The researchers found that, in most areas of the body, cisplatin is eliminated within days or weeks of treatment, but, in the inner ear, the drug remains much longer.

The team developed a mouse model that represents cisplatin-induced hearing loss seen in human patients.

By looking at inner ear tissue of mice after the first, second, and third cisplatin treatment, the researchers saw that cisplatin remained in the mouse inner ear much longer than in most other body tissues, and the drug builds up with each successive treatment.

The team also studied inner ear tissue donated by deceased adults who had been treated with cisplatin and found the drug is retained in the inner ear months or years after treatment.

When the researchers examined inner ear tissue from a child, they found cisplatin buildup that was even higher than that seen in adults.

Taken together, these results suggest the inner ear readily takes up cisplatin but has limited ability to remove the drug.

In mice and human tissues, the researchers saw the highest buildup of cisplatin in a part of the inner ear called the stria vascularis, which helps maintain the positive electrical charge in inner ear fluid that certain cells need to detect sound.

The team found the accumulation of cisplatin in the stria vascularis contributed to cisplatin-related hearing loss.

“Our findings suggest that if we can prevent cisplatin from entering the stria vascularis in the inner ear during treatment, we may be able to protect cancer patients from developing cisplatin-induced hearing loss,” Dr Cunningham said.

Image from NIDCD

Researchers have gained new insight into hearing loss caused by cisplatin.

By measuring and mapping cisplatin retention in mouse and human inner ear tissues, the researchers found that cisplatin builds up in the inner ear and can remain there for years.

The team also found that a region in the inner ear called the stria vascularis could be targeted to prevent hearing loss resulting from cisplatin.

Lisa L. Cunningham, PhD, of the National Institute on Deafness and other Communications Disorders (NIDCD) in Bethesda, Maryland, and her colleagues reported these findings in Nature Communications.

The researchers noted that cisplatin can cause permanent hearing loss in 40% to 80% of treated patients. The team’s new findings help explain why.

The researchers found that, in most areas of the body, cisplatin is eliminated within days or weeks of treatment, but, in the inner ear, the drug remains much longer.

The team developed a mouse model that represents cisplatin-induced hearing loss seen in human patients.

By looking at inner ear tissue of mice after the first, second, and third cisplatin treatment, the researchers saw that cisplatin remained in the mouse inner ear much longer than in most other body tissues, and the drug builds up with each successive treatment.

The team also studied inner ear tissue donated by deceased adults who had been treated with cisplatin and found the drug is retained in the inner ear months or years after treatment.

When the researchers examined inner ear tissue from a child, they found cisplatin buildup that was even higher than that seen in adults.

Taken together, these results suggest the inner ear readily takes up cisplatin but has limited ability to remove the drug.

In mice and human tissues, the researchers saw the highest buildup of cisplatin in a part of the inner ear called the stria vascularis, which helps maintain the positive electrical charge in inner ear fluid that certain cells need to detect sound.

The team found the accumulation of cisplatin in the stria vascularis contributed to cisplatin-related hearing loss.

“Our findings suggest that if we can prevent cisplatin from entering the stria vascularis in the inner ear during treatment, we may be able to protect cancer patients from developing cisplatin-induced hearing loss,” Dr Cunningham said.

Image from NIDCD

Researchers have gained new insight into hearing loss caused by cisplatin.

By measuring and mapping cisplatin retention in mouse and human inner ear tissues, the researchers found that cisplatin builds up in the inner ear and can remain there for years.

The team also found that a region in the inner ear called the stria vascularis could be targeted to prevent hearing loss resulting from cisplatin.

Lisa L. Cunningham, PhD, of the National Institute on Deafness and other Communications Disorders (NIDCD) in Bethesda, Maryland, and her colleagues reported these findings in Nature Communications.

The researchers noted that cisplatin can cause permanent hearing loss in 40% to 80% of treated patients. The team’s new findings help explain why.

The researchers found that, in most areas of the body, cisplatin is eliminated within days or weeks of treatment, but, in the inner ear, the drug remains much longer.

The team developed a mouse model that represents cisplatin-induced hearing loss seen in human patients.

By looking at inner ear tissue of mice after the first, second, and third cisplatin treatment, the researchers saw that cisplatin remained in the mouse inner ear much longer than in most other body tissues, and the drug builds up with each successive treatment.

The team also studied inner ear tissue donated by deceased adults who had been treated with cisplatin and found the drug is retained in the inner ear months or years after treatment.

When the researchers examined inner ear tissue from a child, they found cisplatin buildup that was even higher than that seen in adults.

Taken together, these results suggest the inner ear readily takes up cisplatin but has limited ability to remove the drug.

In mice and human tissues, the researchers saw the highest buildup of cisplatin in a part of the inner ear called the stria vascularis, which helps maintain the positive electrical charge in inner ear fluid that certain cells need to detect sound.

The team found the accumulation of cisplatin in the stria vascularis contributed to cisplatin-related hearing loss.

“Our findings suggest that if we can prevent cisplatin from entering the stria vascularis in the inner ear during treatment, we may be able to protect cancer patients from developing cisplatin-induced hearing loss,” Dr Cunningham said.