Dermatology

The FP recognized the lesion as a linear epidermal nevus.

Epidermal nevi (EN) are congenital hamartomas of ectodermal origin that are uncommon (occurring in < 1% of newborns and children), sporadic, and usually present at birth, although they can appear in early childhood. EN are associated with disorders of the eye, nervous system, and musculoskeletal system in 10% to 30% of patients.

EN are linear, round or oblong, well circumscribed, elevated, and flat topped. EN are often yellow-tan to dark brown in color, with a surface that is uniformly velvety or warty. They most commonly occur on the head and neck, although they can occur on the trunk and proximal extremities.

The FP determined that the patient had no neurological, musculoskeletal, or vision problems that could be associated with a linear epidermal nevus syndrome and reassured the patient and his mother that the nevus was not dangerous and did not need to be removed.

‌

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M. Epidermal nevus and nevus sebaceous. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine, 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:958-962.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.

The FP recognized the lesion as a linear epidermal nevus.

Epidermal nevi (EN) are congenital hamartomas of ectodermal origin that are uncommon (occurring in < 1% of newborns and children), sporadic, and usually present at birth, although they can appear in early childhood. EN are associated with disorders of the eye, nervous system, and musculoskeletal system in 10% to 30% of patients.

EN are linear, round or oblong, well circumscribed, elevated, and flat topped. EN are often yellow-tan to dark brown in color, with a surface that is uniformly velvety or warty. They most commonly occur on the head and neck, although they can occur on the trunk and proximal extremities.

The FP determined that the patient had no neurological, musculoskeletal, or vision problems that could be associated with a linear epidermal nevus syndrome and reassured the patient and his mother that the nevus was not dangerous and did not need to be removed.

‌

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M. Epidermal nevus and nevus sebaceous. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine, 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:958-962.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.

The FP recognized the lesion as a linear epidermal nevus.

Epidermal nevi (EN) are congenital hamartomas of ectodermal origin that are uncommon (occurring in < 1% of newborns and children), sporadic, and usually present at birth, although they can appear in early childhood. EN are associated with disorders of the eye, nervous system, and musculoskeletal system in 10% to 30% of patients.

EN are linear, round or oblong, well circumscribed, elevated, and flat topped. EN are often yellow-tan to dark brown in color, with a surface that is uniformly velvety or warty. They most commonly occur on the head and neck, although they can occur on the trunk and proximal extremities.

The FP determined that the patient had no neurological, musculoskeletal, or vision problems that could be associated with a linear epidermal nevus syndrome and reassured the patient and his mother that the nevus was not dangerous and did not need to be removed.

‌

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M. Epidermal nevus and nevus sebaceous. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine, 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:958-962.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.

ORLANDO – Dermatologists should not give up on antimalarials if hydroxychloroquine does not work for a patient with cutaneous lupus erythematosus, according to Anthony Fernandez, MD, PhD, director of medical and inpatient dermatology at the Cleveland Clinic.

A switch to chloroquine, or adding quinacrine, might do the trick, saving at least some patients from having to move on to immunosuppressive therapy, Dr. Fernandez said at the International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

ORLANDO – Dermatologists should not give up on antimalarials if hydroxychloroquine does not work for a patient with cutaneous lupus erythematosus, according to Anthony Fernandez, MD, PhD, director of medical and inpatient dermatology at the Cleveland Clinic.

A switch to chloroquine, or adding quinacrine, might do the trick, saving at least some patients from having to move on to immunosuppressive therapy, Dr. Fernandez said at the International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

ORLANDO – Dermatologists should not give up on antimalarials if hydroxychloroquine does not work for a patient with cutaneous lupus erythematosus, according to Anthony Fernandez, MD, PhD, director of medical and inpatient dermatology at the Cleveland Clinic.

A switch to chloroquine, or adding quinacrine, might do the trick, saving at least some patients from having to move on to immunosuppressive therapy, Dr. Fernandez said at the International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

aotto@frontlinemedcom.com

ORLANDO – QuantiFERON-TB Gold test results are much more likely to be indeterminate in patients with autoimmune skin diseases who are taking hydroxychloroquine, according to investigators from the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Among 46 patients with lupus, dermatomyositis, or blistering diseases who had been on hydroxychloroquine within a year of testing, QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G) – the go-to TB test in many places – yielded indeterminate results in 37%. Meanwhile, just 9.6% of tests were indeterminate among 73 patients with those diseases who had not been on hydroxychloroquine (P less than .001). The findings could not be explained by concomitant use of prednisone and other immunosuppressives; there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. “This was shocking to us. We need to come up with a better screening test in this patient population,” said lead investigator Rebecca Gaffney, a research fellow at the University of Pennsylvania, and a medical student at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.*

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

*This article was updated on June 13. 2018.

aotto@mdedge.com

ORLANDO – QuantiFERON-TB Gold test results are much more likely to be indeterminate in patients with autoimmune skin diseases who are taking hydroxychloroquine, according to investigators from the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Among 46 patients with lupus, dermatomyositis, or blistering diseases who had been on hydroxychloroquine within a year of testing, QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G) – the go-to TB test in many places – yielded indeterminate results in 37%. Meanwhile, just 9.6% of tests were indeterminate among 73 patients with those diseases who had not been on hydroxychloroquine (P less than .001). The findings could not be explained by concomitant use of prednisone and other immunosuppressives; there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. “This was shocking to us. We need to come up with a better screening test in this patient population,” said lead investigator Rebecca Gaffney, a research fellow at the University of Pennsylvania, and a medical student at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.*

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

*This article was updated on June 13. 2018.

aotto@mdedge.com

ORLANDO – QuantiFERON-TB Gold test results are much more likely to be indeterminate in patients with autoimmune skin diseases who are taking hydroxychloroquine, according to investigators from the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Among 46 patients with lupus, dermatomyositis, or blistering diseases who had been on hydroxychloroquine within a year of testing, QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G) – the go-to TB test in many places – yielded indeterminate results in 37%. Meanwhile, just 9.6% of tests were indeterminate among 73 patients with those diseases who had not been on hydroxychloroquine (P less than .001). The findings could not be explained by concomitant use of prednisone and other immunosuppressives; there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. “This was shocking to us. We need to come up with a better screening test in this patient population,” said lead investigator Rebecca Gaffney, a research fellow at the University of Pennsylvania, and a medical student at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.*

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

*This article was updated on June 13. 2018.

aotto@mdedge.com

ORLANDO – There was a median 1-year delay between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis of classic dermatomyositis, and a 17-month delay before diagnosis of amyopathic dermatomyositis, based on a review of 232 dermatomyositis patients seen at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Just 103 (44.4%) patients were diagnosed with dermatomyositis (DM) right out of the gate. Among the other 129, 48 (37.2%) were diagnosed with lupus, 38 (29.5%) with undifferentiated connective tissue disease, 10 (7.8%) went undiagnosed, and 33 (25.5%) were diagnosed with rosacea, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, lichen planus, and a number of other conditions. By the time the DM diagnosis was finally confirmed, almost every patient had Gottron’s papules or sign.

Misdiagnosis of dermatomyositis (DM) is nothing new, but the study brings home just how common the problem is, even at a major academic medical institution.

One of the take homes is that clinicians should never forget about the possibility of DM even when patients are diagnosed with other autoimmune diseases, and remain vigilant for erythema on the lateral thighs or nasolabial fold, Gottron’s papules, and other diagnostic giveaways, the researchers said.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

“We saw that there was a much higher rate of misdiagnosis in patients who didn’t have any muscle disease. We have to raise awareness that amyopathic dermatomyositis is a very prevalent condition,” Dr. Patel said at the International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

“There might be some level of subclinical muscle activity where, if you did an MRI, you might see inflammation, but the patient doesn’t report any symptoms. There are also patients that don’t have any muscle findings on MRI, or elevated muscle enzymes, but still have the skin findings,” he said.

Perhaps the markedly increased risk of cancer in DM, especially within a year or 2 of symptom onset, is the strongest argument for earlier diagnosis. “There’s also a risk of interstitial lung disease, so making sure that you’re getting pulmonary function tests and age-appropriate malignancy screening in a timely fashion is very important,” Dr. Patel said.

Also, although many of the initial treatments for DM – sun protection and topical steroids and calcineurin inhibitors, for instance – are the same as for cutaneous lupus, medications like mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate are used more readily. The sooner DM is recognized for what it is, the sooner patients can get relief, he said.

Almost all the patients were white women. The majority were 40-80 years old.

There was no industry funding for the work, and Dr. Patel didn’t have any disclosures.

aotto@mdedge.com

SOURCE: da Silva DM et al. Presented at the 2018 International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

ORLANDO – There was a median 1-year delay between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis of classic dermatomyositis, and a 17-month delay before diagnosis of amyopathic dermatomyositis, based on a review of 232 dermatomyositis patients seen at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Just 103 (44.4%) patients were diagnosed with dermatomyositis (DM) right out of the gate. Among the other 129, 48 (37.2%) were diagnosed with lupus, 38 (29.5%) with undifferentiated connective tissue disease, 10 (7.8%) went undiagnosed, and 33 (25.5%) were diagnosed with rosacea, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, lichen planus, and a number of other conditions. By the time the DM diagnosis was finally confirmed, almost every patient had Gottron’s papules or sign.

Misdiagnosis of dermatomyositis (DM) is nothing new, but the study brings home just how common the problem is, even at a major academic medical institution.

One of the take homes is that clinicians should never forget about the possibility of DM even when patients are diagnosed with other autoimmune diseases, and remain vigilant for erythema on the lateral thighs or nasolabial fold, Gottron’s papules, and other diagnostic giveaways, the researchers said.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

“We saw that there was a much higher rate of misdiagnosis in patients who didn’t have any muscle disease. We have to raise awareness that amyopathic dermatomyositis is a very prevalent condition,” Dr. Patel said at the International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

“There might be some level of subclinical muscle activity where, if you did an MRI, you might see inflammation, but the patient doesn’t report any symptoms. There are also patients that don’t have any muscle findings on MRI, or elevated muscle enzymes, but still have the skin findings,” he said.

Perhaps the markedly increased risk of cancer in DM, especially within a year or 2 of symptom onset, is the strongest argument for earlier diagnosis. “There’s also a risk of interstitial lung disease, so making sure that you’re getting pulmonary function tests and age-appropriate malignancy screening in a timely fashion is very important,” Dr. Patel said.

Also, although many of the initial treatments for DM – sun protection and topical steroids and calcineurin inhibitors, for instance – are the same as for cutaneous lupus, medications like mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate are used more readily. The sooner DM is recognized for what it is, the sooner patients can get relief, he said.

Almost all the patients were white women. The majority were 40-80 years old.

There was no industry funding for the work, and Dr. Patel didn’t have any disclosures.

aotto@mdedge.com

SOURCE: da Silva DM et al. Presented at the 2018 International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

ORLANDO – There was a median 1-year delay between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis of classic dermatomyositis, and a 17-month delay before diagnosis of amyopathic dermatomyositis, based on a review of 232 dermatomyositis patients seen at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Just 103 (44.4%) patients were diagnosed with dermatomyositis (DM) right out of the gate. Among the other 129, 48 (37.2%) were diagnosed with lupus, 38 (29.5%) with undifferentiated connective tissue disease, 10 (7.8%) went undiagnosed, and 33 (25.5%) were diagnosed with rosacea, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, lichen planus, and a number of other conditions. By the time the DM diagnosis was finally confirmed, almost every patient had Gottron’s papules or sign.

Misdiagnosis of dermatomyositis (DM) is nothing new, but the study brings home just how common the problem is, even at a major academic medical institution.

One of the take homes is that clinicians should never forget about the possibility of DM even when patients are diagnosed with other autoimmune diseases, and remain vigilant for erythema on the lateral thighs or nasolabial fold, Gottron’s papules, and other diagnostic giveaways, the researchers said.

M. Alexander Otto/MDedge News

“We saw that there was a much higher rate of misdiagnosis in patients who didn’t have any muscle disease. We have to raise awareness that amyopathic dermatomyositis is a very prevalent condition,” Dr. Patel said at the International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

“There might be some level of subclinical muscle activity where, if you did an MRI, you might see inflammation, but the patient doesn’t report any symptoms. There are also patients that don’t have any muscle findings on MRI, or elevated muscle enzymes, but still have the skin findings,” he said.

Perhaps the markedly increased risk of cancer in DM, especially within a year or 2 of symptom onset, is the strongest argument for earlier diagnosis. “There’s also a risk of interstitial lung disease, so making sure that you’re getting pulmonary function tests and age-appropriate malignancy screening in a timely fashion is very important,” Dr. Patel said.

Also, although many of the initial treatments for DM – sun protection and topical steroids and calcineurin inhibitors, for instance – are the same as for cutaneous lupus, medications like mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate are used more readily. The sooner DM is recognized for what it is, the sooner patients can get relief, he said.

Almost all the patients were white women. The majority were 40-80 years old.

There was no industry funding for the work, and Dr. Patel didn’t have any disclosures.

aotto@mdedge.com

SOURCE: da Silva DM et al. Presented at the 2018 International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

More than a third of American adults use complementary and alternative medicine.¹ Unfortunately, the public’s enthusiasm for herbal products is not always consistent with the scientific evidence supporting their use. In part one of this series, we discussed the studies that have been done on capsaicin, butterbur, green tea, and peppermint. In this installment, we outline the research on 5 additional remedies: turmeric/curcumin, which may be of benefit in ulcerative colitis; chamomile, which appears to offer relief to patients with anxiety; rosemary, which may help treat alopecia; as well as coffee and cocoa, which may have some cardiovascular benefits (TABLE).

Turmeric/curcumin

Overview

Turmeric (Curcuma longa), a relative of ginger, has been used for 4000 years to treat a variety of conditions.^2,3 Curcumin is the yellow pigment isolated from the rhizomes of Curcuma longa, commonly known as turmeric.³ Turmeric powder contains 5% curcumin, which is the main biologically active compound. Although it grows in many tropical locations, most turmeric is grown in India, where it is used as a main ingredient in curry. The roots and bulbs of turmeric that are used in medicine are generally boiled and dried, which results in a yellow powder.

Turmeric has been used in both Ayurvedic and Chinese medicine for its anti-inflammatory properties, in the treatment of digestive and liver problems, to fight infections, and to help heal skin diseases and wounds.^3-7

Functional GI disorders. A recent review noted that curcumin has been shown in several preclinical studies and uncontrolled clinical trials to have effects on gut inflammation, gut permeability, and the brain-gut axis, especially in functional GI disorders.⁷ A double-blind, placebo-controlled study from 1989 found that turmeric reduced symptoms of bloating and gas in subjects suffering from undifferentiated dyspepsia.⁸

Ulcerative colitis (UC). A 2012 Cochrane review noted that curcumin appears to be a safe and effective therapy for maintenance of remission in quiescent UC when given as adjunctive therapy along with mesalamine or sulfasalazine.⁹ In a 2015 randomized controlled trial (RCT), the addition of curcumin to mesalamine therapy was superior to the combination of placebo and mesalamine in inducing clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with mild-to-moderate active UC, producing no apparent adverse effects.¹⁰

Osteoarthritis (OA). Because of turmeric’s ability to reduce inflammation, it may help relieve OA pain.³ Clinical evidence is scant for the anti-arthritic efficacy of turmeric dietary supplements, although animal studies indicate that turmeric prevents inflammation through regulation of NF-kappaB-regulated genes that regulate the immune and inflammatory response.⁶ Inflammatory cell influx, joint levels of prostaglandin E2, and periarticular osteoclast formation were also inhibited by turmeric extract treatment.⁶

A 2013 review of turmeric for OA concluded that observational studies and in vitro results are promising for the use of curcumin for OA, but well-designed clinical studies were lacking and are needed to support the efficacy of curcumin in OA patients.¹¹ How­ever, in a 2014 randomized trial of 367 patients, turmeric appeared to be similar in efficacy to ibuprofen for the treatment of pain and disability in adults with knee OA.¹² The curcumin (turmeric) group also had fewer adverse effects.¹²

Cancer. There has been a great deal of research on turmeric’s anti-cancer properties, but clinical evidence is lacking. In vitro evidence, animal studies, and small clinical trials suggest that curcumin may help prevent or treat several types of cancers, but the overall evidence is poor. Nonetheless, curcumin and turmeric have been or are currently being evaluated for the treatment or prevention of prostate, liver, breast, skin, gynecologic, hematologic, pulmonary, thymic, bone, brain, and colon cancer.^13-18

Oral submucous fibrosis. A small randomized trial found improvement in oral function with curcumin lozenges, when compared to placebo, indicating that turmeric may hold promise as a treatment of oral submucous fibrosis.¹⁹

Uveitis. A small pilot study of 32 patients suggested that oral curcumin may be as effective as corticosteroids for uveitis.²⁰

Heart disease. Curcumin may have a cardiovascular protective role, as it has been shown to reduce atherosclerosis, but a reduction in myocardial infarction or stroke has not been documented.²¹

Alzheimer’s dementia. Animal studies have shown a reduction in amyloid plaque formation with curcumin.²²

Adverse effects (and precautions)

Turmeric in food is considered safe. A variety of animal and human studies have also indicated that curcumin is safe and well tolerated, even at very high doses.¹³ However, taking large amounts of turmeric for long periods of time could cause stomach upset and gastric ulcers. In addition, patients with gallstones or bile obstruction should use it with caution due to increased bile production.⁷

Because turmeric may lower blood sugar levels, patients with diabetes should monitor for hypoglycemia when using turmeric in combination with diabetic medications. Similarly, those with bleeding disorders taking blood thinners should use turmeric and curcumin with caution, because it can inhibit platelet aggregation.²³

Although it is safe to eat foods with turmeric during pregnancy, pregnant and breastfeeding women should not take turmeric supplements, as the safety of large doses in pregnancy is unknown.

The bottom line

Turmeric/curcumin has anti-inflammatory properties and may be useful as an adjunct for ulcerative colitis and to improve the symptoms of OA. It may also have anti-carcinogenic properties, although definitive data are lacking. Those with a history of gastrointestinal conditions such as gastric ulcer, patients taking blood thinners, and patients with diabetes who are prone to low blood sugar levels should use turmeric/curcumin with caution.

 

 

Chamomile

Overview

Chamomile, a member of the Asteraceae/Compositae family, is one of the oldest herbal medicines. It has been used for hay fever, inflammation, muscle spasms, menstrual disorders, insomnia, ulcers, wounds, gastrointestinal disorders, rheumatic pain, and hemorrhoids. Essential oils of chamomile are used extensively in cosmetics and aromatherapy. Many different preparations have been developed, the most popular being herbal tea.²⁴

A controlled clinical trial of chamomile extract suggested that it may have modest anxiolytic activity in patients with mild to moderate generalized anxiety disorder.

Individuals with a hypersensitivity to plants of the Asteraceae (Compositae) family such as ragweed (Ambrosia spp.), marigold flower (Calendula officinalis), and chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum spp.) may show a similar reaction to chamomile.²⁵

Anxiety. A controlled clinical trial of chamomile extract for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) suggested that it may have modest anxiolytic activity in patients with mild to moderate GAD.²⁶ Another randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial found oral chamomile extract was efficacious and well-tolerated in patients experiencing mild to moderate GAD and may provide an alternative therapeutic anxiolytic for patients with mild GAD.²⁵ In addition to its anxiolytic activity, chamomile may also provide clinically meaningful antidepressant activity.²⁶

Insomnia. Chamomile may have some impact on sleep diary measures (total sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, sleep quality, and number of awakenings) relative to placebo in adults with chronic primary insomnia, according to a small randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial involving 34 patients.²⁷ However, a systematic review found no statistically significant difference between any herbal medicine (including chamomile) and placebo, for clinical efficacy in patients with insomnia. A similar, or smaller, number of adverse events per person were reported with chamomile compared with placebo, suggesting safe use.²⁸

Infantile colic. A small prospective double-blind study on the use of chamomile-containing tea on infantile colic showed statistically significant symptom improvement in tea-treated infants. The study did note, however, that prolonged ingestion of herbal teas may lead to decreased milk intake.^29,30

Adverse effects

As noted earlier, a systematic review found that the number of adverse events per person reported with chamomile was comparable to the number associated with placebo, suggesting that it is safe.²⁸

The bottom line

Chamomile appears to be safe with minimal adverse effects and may be effective for the treatment of anxiety, insomnia, and infantile colic.

Rosemary

Overview

Rosemary, officially known as Rosmarinus officinalis, is a medicinal evergreen plant native to the Mediterranean area that appears to increase microcapillary perfusion.³¹

Topical rosemary oil may be useful in the treatment of alopecia, with minimal adverse effects.

Alopecia. A randomized double-blind controlled trial found that essential oils including rosemary oil (as well as thyme, lavender, and cedarwood) massaged into the scalp improved hair growth in almost half of patients with alopecia areata after 7 months.³² Another randomized trial comparing rosemary oil to minoxidil 2% for androgenetic alopecia showed a significant increase in hair count at the 6-month endpoint compared with the baseline, but no significant difference was found between the study groups regarding hair count either at Month 3 or Month 6 (P >.05). ³¹

Adverse effects

In the randomized trial described above comparing rosemary oil to minoxidil 2%, adverse effects appeared to be rare for topical rosemary oil. Scalp itching was more frequent in the minoxidil group.³¹

The bottom line

Topical rosemary oil may be useful in the treatment of alopecia with minimal adverse effects.

 

 

Coffee/caffeine

Overview

Coffee is one of the most widely used botanicals with approximately 3.5 billion cups of coffee consumed per day worldwide. It is a popular beverage because of its unique aromatic taste and its use as a central nervous system stimulant. The coffee tree (genus coffea) is found throughout Latin America, Africa, and eastern Asia. Two of the most common commercially grown species are Coffea arabica (Arabicas) and Coffea canephora (Robusta). Processing and roasting methods may differ and produce variations in flavor and aroma. The degree of roasting also affects the caffeine content.

Coffee consumption leads to increased alertness and can boost mental performance. Based on the literature and US Food and Drug Administration recommendations, four 8-oz cups of coffee (about 400 mg of caffeine) daily is an acceptable average amount of caffeine. More than 500 mg/d is considered excessive use of coffee.^33,34

Overall mortality. A 2008 study showed that regular coffee was not associated with increased or decreased mortality in both men and women.³⁵ However, more recent studies show an inverse relationship between mortality and coffee consumption.

Specifically, a 2014 meta-analysis found an inverse relationship between coffee and mortality.³⁶ A large prospective cohort study from 2015 that included 79,234 women and 76,704 men found that drinking coffee was inversely associated with overall mortality.³⁷ In this cohort study, an inverse association were observed for deaths from heart disease, respiratory disease, diabetes, and self-harm.³⁷ While mechanisms were not analyzed, coffee may reduce mortality risk by affecting inflammation, lung function, insulin sensitivity, and depression.

Cardiovascular disease. Coffee consumption may modestly reduce the risk of stroke, according to a prospective cohort study of 83,076 women from the Nurses’ Health Study who were followed for 24 years.³⁸ Reduced cardiovascular mortality was also found in a large prospective cohort study, as noted in the mortality discussion above.³⁷ A 2014 meta-analysis concluded that coffee consumption is inversely associated with cardiovascular mortality. Drinking 3 or 4 cups a day appears to be the amount that may decrease one’s risk of death when compared to those who do not drink coffee at all.³⁶

Liver disease. Friedrich et al performed a study involving 379 patients with end stage liver disease, and found that coffee consumption delayed the progression of disease in patients with both alcoholic liver disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis.³⁹ Coffee consumption also increased long-term survival after liver transplantation.³⁹ However, the study found that coffee did not have any effect on patients with chronic viral hepatitis.

In a 2016 meta-analysis, caffeinated coffee consumption reduced hepatic fibrosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, although caffeine consumption did not reduce the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.⁴⁰ Another meta-analysis, including 16 studies, also found caffeine reduced the risk for hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis.⁴¹

Depression. Based on 2 different systematic reviews and meta-analyses from 2016, coffee consumption appears to have a significant protective effect, decreasing the risk of developing depression.^40,42

Alzheimer’s disease/dementia. Coffee, tea, and caffeine consumption show promise in reducing the risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Individuals who consume one to 2 cups of coffee per day had a decreased incidence of mild cognitive impairment compared to non-drinkers.⁴³ A 2015 Japanese study also found an inverse association between coffee consumption and dementia among women, nonsmokers, and those who do not drink alcohol.⁴⁴ Most recently, a 2016 study, the Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study, looked at incident dementia rates in women >65 years of age with high vs low caffeine intake. Women with higher caffeine intake were less likely to develop dementia or any cognitive impairment compared with those consuming <64 mg/day.⁴⁵

Type 2 diabetes. A 2009 prospective cohort study, which included 40,011 participants followed for more than 10 years, found that drinking at least 3 cups of coffee or tea was associated with a lowered risk of type 2 diabetes.⁴⁶ A 2009 systematic review of 20 cohort studies showed that high intakes of coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and tea are associated with a reduced risk of diabetes.⁴⁷

A meta-analysis of 12 studies involving 832,956 participants found an inverse relationship between cutaneous melanoma and coffee consumption.

Melanoma. A meta-analysis of 12 studies involving 832,956 participants demon­strated an inverse relationship between cutaneous melanoma and coffee consumption.⁴⁷ The risk of melanoma decreased by 3% and 4% for one cup/day of total coffee and caffeinated coffee consumption, respectively. Furthermore, a 2016 meta-analysis found that caffeinated coffee may have greater chemopreventive effects against melanoma than decaffeinated coffee.⁴⁸

Adverse effects

Despite the many potential benefits of coffee, caffeine is a potent drug that should be used with caution.⁴⁹ People with underlying heart problems should avoid caffeine due to concern that it may cause palpitations from tachycardia. It may worsen anxiety problems or depression. Coffee may increase the production of stomach acids, which can worsen acid reflux or stomach ulcers.

Regular coffee intake is associated with a lower risk of mortality, reduced CV events, and a reduction in liver disease progression.

Caffeine is a potent diuretic and may decrease absorption of calcium and cause OA. Caffeine may cause dependence and withdrawal symptoms. Some of the symptoms of withdrawal include drowsiness, headaches, irritability, nausea, and vomiting. It may disrupt sleeping patterns by causing jitters and sleeplessness.⁴⁹ Additionally, large amounts of caffeine may cause overdose and death.

The bottom line

Regular coffee intake is associated with a lower risk of mortality, reduced cardiovascular events, and a reduction in liver disease progression. Coffee may also have some utility for improving cognitive function and reducing the risk of type 2 diabetes. Caffeinated coffee should be limited to no more than 32 oz per day, due to the risk of insomnia, palpitations, anxiety, and gastritis.

 

 

Chocolate/cocoa

Overview

Few natural products have been claimed to successfully treat as many disorders as chocolate. The modern concept of chocolate as food has overshadowed its traditional medicinal use, although recent trials have looked at evidence for some of its traditional uses. Chocolate is processed from the pod of the cacao plant. The earliest evidence for its medical use is in Mayan civilizations, and for most of its approximately 4000-year history, chocolate was consumed as a bitter drink referred to as the “drink of the Gods.” The traditional drink was mixed with water, vanilla, honey, chili peppers, and other spices. Important components in chocolate include flavonoids (antioxidants), cocoa butter, caffeine, theobromine, and phenylethylamine.  

Chocolate has stimulating, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, and cardioprotective effects, and improves the bioavailability of nitric oxide, which can improve blood pressure and platelet function.⁵⁰ Epicatechin (an antioxidant) in cocoa is primarily responsible for its favorable impact on vascular endothelium via its effect on both acute and chronic upregulation of nitric oxide production. Other cardiovascular effects are mediated by the anti-inflammatory effects of cocoa polyphenols, and modulated through the activity of NF-kappaB.⁵¹

Multiple studies have shown that chocolate is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular risk.

Dark chocolate appears to have the greatest benefit, as milk binds to antioxidants in chocolate, making them unavailable. Therefore, milk chocolate is not a good antioxidant source. There is no specific amount of chocolate that is known to be ideal, but an average of one to 2 ounces per day is often used in studies.

Cardiovascular effects. Chocolate does contain saturated fat, but a comparative, double-blind study found that short-term use of cocoa powder lowered plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, oxidized LDL, and apo B concentrations, and the plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration increased, relative to baseline in the low-, middle-, and high-cocoa groups.⁵² A small randomized crossover trial without clinical outcomes indicated that chocolate may increase HDL cholesterol without increasing weight.⁵³

A meta-analysis of short-term (2-12 weeks) treatment with dark chocolate/cocoa products showed reductions in LDL and total cholesterol, but no changes in HDL or triglycerides.⁵⁴ Another meta-analysis of RCTs, however, showed no short-term effect of cocoa/chocolate on lipid concentrations.⁵⁵ A randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study of 62 patients with diabetes and hypertension showed that high polyphenol chocolate improved triglyceride levels.⁵⁶

Chocolate intake was associated with a lower risk of cognitive decline, with the greatest benefit noted in those who averaged more than one chocolate bar per week.

Multiple studies have shown that chocolate is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular risk.^57-59 A best case scenario analysis using a Markov model to predict the long-term effectiveness and cost effectiveness of daily dark chocolate consumption in a population with metabolic syndrome at high risk of cardiovascular disease concluded that daily consumption of dark chocolate can reduce cardiovascular events by 85 per 10,000 population treated over 10 years. The study concluded that $42 could be cost effectively spent per person per year on prevention strategies using dark chocolate.⁵⁹

In addition, a meta-analysis of 7 observational studies showed that high levels of chocolate consumption (any type) were associated with a 29% reduction in stroke compared with the lowest levels of chocolate intake.⁵⁷ Results of a similar meta-analysis from Neurology in 2012 also suggested that moderate chocolate consumption (any type) may lower the risk of stroke.⁶⁰

That said, 2 systematic reviews specifically relating to the risk of coronary heart disease and chocolate intake were inconclusive.^61-62

Blood pressure (BP). An RCT published in JAMA indicates that inclusion of small amounts of polyphenol-rich dark chocolate as part of a usual diet efficiently reduced BP and improved the formation of vasodilative nitric oxide.⁶³ A meta-analysis of 10 RCTs also showed mean BP change in the active cocoa treatment arms across all trials was -4.5 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI), -5.9 to -3.2; P<.001) for systolic BP and -2.5 mm Hg (95% CI, -3.9 to -1.2; P<.001) for diastolic BP.⁶⁴

A Cochrane Review meta-analysis of 20 studies revealed a statistically significant BP-reducing effect of flavanol-rich cocoa products compared with control in short-term trials of 2 to 18 weeks' duration.⁶⁵ Because studies have shown improvement in BP with chocolate intake, investigations into a role of chocolate in the prevention of preeclampsia have been undertaken. In some studies, chocolate intake was associated with reduced odds of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension.^66,67

Diabetes. Chocolate may exert significant vascular protection because of its antioxidant properties and possible increase of nitric oxide bioavailability, which can influence glucose uptake. A small trial comparing the effects of either dark or white chocolate bars (which do not contain the polyphenols) showed improved BP and glucose and insulin responses to an oral glucose tolerance test in healthy subjects on dark chocolate, but not white chocolate.⁶⁸ A comparison of chocolate consumption and risk of diabetes in the Physicians’ Health Study showed an inverse relationship between chocolate intake with incident disease, but this association appeared only to apply in younger and normal-body weight men after controlling for comprehensive lifestyles, including total energy consumption.⁶⁹

Fatigue. The effect of chocolate on a person’s energy level has been noted for centuries.⁷⁰ A small randomized trial showed improved energy levels in those treated with higher chocolate intakes. In a double-blind, randomized, clinical pilot crossover study, high cocoa liquor/polyphenol rich chocolate, reduced fatigue in subjects with chronic fatigue syndrome.⁷¹

Anxiety. A small randomized trial showed chocolate decreased anxiety in high-anxiety trait subjects and improved the anxiety level and the energy levels of low-anxiety trait participants.⁷²

Eye effects. The literature presents conflicting evidence regarding the effect of flavonoids on patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. However, a meta-analysis showed that flavonoids have a promising role in improving visual function in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension, and appear to play a part in both improving and slowing the progression of visual field loss.⁷³

Cognitive decline. Chocolate intake (any type) was associated with a lower risk of cognitive decline (RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.92) with the greatest benefit noted in those who averaged more than one chocolate bar or one tablespoon of cocoa powder per week. This protective effect was observed only among subjects with an average daily consumption of caffeine <75  mg (69% of the participants; RR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.82).⁷⁴

The bottom line

Chocolate with high cocoa content (dark chocolate) appears to be safe and beneficial as part of a healthy diet and lifestyle that includes exercise and stress reduction to decrease cardiovascular risk and may improve energy levels.

CORRESPONDENCE
Michael Malone, MD, Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033; malm0001@hotmail.com.

More than a third of American adults use complementary and alternative medicine.¹ Unfortunately, the public’s enthusiasm for herbal products is not always consistent with the scientific evidence supporting their use. In part one of this series, we discussed the studies that have been done on capsaicin, butterbur, green tea, and peppermint. In this installment, we outline the research on 5 additional remedies: turmeric/curcumin, which may be of benefit in ulcerative colitis; chamomile, which appears to offer relief to patients with anxiety; rosemary, which may help treat alopecia; as well as coffee and cocoa, which may have some cardiovascular benefits (TABLE).

Turmeric/curcumin

Overview

Turmeric (Curcuma longa), a relative of ginger, has been used for 4000 years to treat a variety of conditions.^2,3 Curcumin is the yellow pigment isolated from the rhizomes of Curcuma longa, commonly known as turmeric.³ Turmeric powder contains 5% curcumin, which is the main biologically active compound. Although it grows in many tropical locations, most turmeric is grown in India, where it is used as a main ingredient in curry. The roots and bulbs of turmeric that are used in medicine are generally boiled and dried, which results in a yellow powder.

Turmeric has been used in both Ayurvedic and Chinese medicine for its anti-inflammatory properties, in the treatment of digestive and liver problems, to fight infections, and to help heal skin diseases and wounds.^3-7

Functional GI disorders. A recent review noted that curcumin has been shown in several preclinical studies and uncontrolled clinical trials to have effects on gut inflammation, gut permeability, and the brain-gut axis, especially in functional GI disorders.⁷ A double-blind, placebo-controlled study from 1989 found that turmeric reduced symptoms of bloating and gas in subjects suffering from undifferentiated dyspepsia.⁸

Ulcerative colitis (UC). A 2012 Cochrane review noted that curcumin appears to be a safe and effective therapy for maintenance of remission in quiescent UC when given as adjunctive therapy along with mesalamine or sulfasalazine.⁹ In a 2015 randomized controlled trial (RCT), the addition of curcumin to mesalamine therapy was superior to the combination of placebo and mesalamine in inducing clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with mild-to-moderate active UC, producing no apparent adverse effects.¹⁰

Osteoarthritis (OA). Because of turmeric’s ability to reduce inflammation, it may help relieve OA pain.³ Clinical evidence is scant for the anti-arthritic efficacy of turmeric dietary supplements, although animal studies indicate that turmeric prevents inflammation through regulation of NF-kappaB-regulated genes that regulate the immune and inflammatory response.⁶ Inflammatory cell influx, joint levels of prostaglandin E2, and periarticular osteoclast formation were also inhibited by turmeric extract treatment.⁶

A 2013 review of turmeric for OA concluded that observational studies and in vitro results are promising for the use of curcumin for OA, but well-designed clinical studies were lacking and are needed to support the efficacy of curcumin in OA patients.¹¹ How­ever, in a 2014 randomized trial of 367 patients, turmeric appeared to be similar in efficacy to ibuprofen for the treatment of pain and disability in adults with knee OA.¹² The curcumin (turmeric) group also had fewer adverse effects.¹²

Cancer. There has been a great deal of research on turmeric’s anti-cancer properties, but clinical evidence is lacking. In vitro evidence, animal studies, and small clinical trials suggest that curcumin may help prevent or treat several types of cancers, but the overall evidence is poor. Nonetheless, curcumin and turmeric have been or are currently being evaluated for the treatment or prevention of prostate, liver, breast, skin, gynecologic, hematologic, pulmonary, thymic, bone, brain, and colon cancer.^13-18

Oral submucous fibrosis. A small randomized trial found improvement in oral function with curcumin lozenges, when compared to placebo, indicating that turmeric may hold promise as a treatment of oral submucous fibrosis.¹⁹

Uveitis. A small pilot study of 32 patients suggested that oral curcumin may be as effective as corticosteroids for uveitis.²⁰

Heart disease. Curcumin may have a cardiovascular protective role, as it has been shown to reduce atherosclerosis, but a reduction in myocardial infarction or stroke has not been documented.²¹

Alzheimer’s dementia. Animal studies have shown a reduction in amyloid plaque formation with curcumin.²²

Adverse effects (and precautions)

Turmeric in food is considered safe. A variety of animal and human studies have also indicated that curcumin is safe and well tolerated, even at very high doses.¹³ However, taking large amounts of turmeric for long periods of time could cause stomach upset and gastric ulcers. In addition, patients with gallstones or bile obstruction should use it with caution due to increased bile production.⁷

Because turmeric may lower blood sugar levels, patients with diabetes should monitor for hypoglycemia when using turmeric in combination with diabetic medications. Similarly, those with bleeding disorders taking blood thinners should use turmeric and curcumin with caution, because it can inhibit platelet aggregation.²³

Although it is safe to eat foods with turmeric during pregnancy, pregnant and breastfeeding women should not take turmeric supplements, as the safety of large doses in pregnancy is unknown.

The bottom line

Turmeric/curcumin has anti-inflammatory properties and may be useful as an adjunct for ulcerative colitis and to improve the symptoms of OA. It may also have anti-carcinogenic properties, although definitive data are lacking. Those with a history of gastrointestinal conditions such as gastric ulcer, patients taking blood thinners, and patients with diabetes who are prone to low blood sugar levels should use turmeric/curcumin with caution.

 

 

Chamomile

Overview

Chamomile, a member of the Asteraceae/Compositae family, is one of the oldest herbal medicines. It has been used for hay fever, inflammation, muscle spasms, menstrual disorders, insomnia, ulcers, wounds, gastrointestinal disorders, rheumatic pain, and hemorrhoids. Essential oils of chamomile are used extensively in cosmetics and aromatherapy. Many different preparations have been developed, the most popular being herbal tea.²⁴

A controlled clinical trial of chamomile extract suggested that it may have modest anxiolytic activity in patients with mild to moderate generalized anxiety disorder.

Individuals with a hypersensitivity to plants of the Asteraceae (Compositae) family such as ragweed (Ambrosia spp.), marigold flower (Calendula officinalis), and chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum spp.) may show a similar reaction to chamomile.²⁵

Anxiety. A controlled clinical trial of chamomile extract for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) suggested that it may have modest anxiolytic activity in patients with mild to moderate GAD.²⁶ Another randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial found oral chamomile extract was efficacious and well-tolerated in patients experiencing mild to moderate GAD and may provide an alternative therapeutic anxiolytic for patients with mild GAD.²⁵ In addition to its anxiolytic activity, chamomile may also provide clinically meaningful antidepressant activity.²⁶

Insomnia. Chamomile may have some impact on sleep diary measures (total sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, sleep quality, and number of awakenings) relative to placebo in adults with chronic primary insomnia, according to a small randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial involving 34 patients.²⁷ However, a systematic review found no statistically significant difference between any herbal medicine (including chamomile) and placebo, for clinical efficacy in patients with insomnia. A similar, or smaller, number of adverse events per person were reported with chamomile compared with placebo, suggesting safe use.²⁸

Infantile colic. A small prospective double-blind study on the use of chamomile-containing tea on infantile colic showed statistically significant symptom improvement in tea-treated infants. The study did note, however, that prolonged ingestion of herbal teas may lead to decreased milk intake.^29,30

Adverse effects

As noted earlier, a systematic review found that the number of adverse events per person reported with chamomile was comparable to the number associated with placebo, suggesting that it is safe.²⁸

The bottom line

Chamomile appears to be safe with minimal adverse effects and may be effective for the treatment of anxiety, insomnia, and infantile colic.

Rosemary

Overview

Rosemary, officially known as Rosmarinus officinalis, is a medicinal evergreen plant native to the Mediterranean area that appears to increase microcapillary perfusion.³¹

Topical rosemary oil may be useful in the treatment of alopecia, with minimal adverse effects.

Alopecia. A randomized double-blind controlled trial found that essential oils including rosemary oil (as well as thyme, lavender, and cedarwood) massaged into the scalp improved hair growth in almost half of patients with alopecia areata after 7 months.³² Another randomized trial comparing rosemary oil to minoxidil 2% for androgenetic alopecia showed a significant increase in hair count at the 6-month endpoint compared with the baseline, but no significant difference was found between the study groups regarding hair count either at Month 3 or Month 6 (P >.05). ³¹

Adverse effects

In the randomized trial described above comparing rosemary oil to minoxidil 2%, adverse effects appeared to be rare for topical rosemary oil. Scalp itching was more frequent in the minoxidil group.³¹

The bottom line

Topical rosemary oil may be useful in the treatment of alopecia with minimal adverse effects.

 

 

Coffee/caffeine

Overview

Coffee is one of the most widely used botanicals with approximately 3.5 billion cups of coffee consumed per day worldwide. It is a popular beverage because of its unique aromatic taste and its use as a central nervous system stimulant. The coffee tree (genus coffea) is found throughout Latin America, Africa, and eastern Asia. Two of the most common commercially grown species are Coffea arabica (Arabicas) and Coffea canephora (Robusta). Processing and roasting methods may differ and produce variations in flavor and aroma. The degree of roasting also affects the caffeine content.

Coffee consumption leads to increased alertness and can boost mental performance. Based on the literature and US Food and Drug Administration recommendations, four 8-oz cups of coffee (about 400 mg of caffeine) daily is an acceptable average amount of caffeine. More than 500 mg/d is considered excessive use of coffee.^33,34

Overall mortality. A 2008 study showed that regular coffee was not associated with increased or decreased mortality in both men and women.³⁵ However, more recent studies show an inverse relationship between mortality and coffee consumption.

Specifically, a 2014 meta-analysis found an inverse relationship between coffee and mortality.³⁶ A large prospective cohort study from 2015 that included 79,234 women and 76,704 men found that drinking coffee was inversely associated with overall mortality.³⁷ In this cohort study, an inverse association were observed for deaths from heart disease, respiratory disease, diabetes, and self-harm.³⁷ While mechanisms were not analyzed, coffee may reduce mortality risk by affecting inflammation, lung function, insulin sensitivity, and depression.

Cardiovascular disease. Coffee consumption may modestly reduce the risk of stroke, according to a prospective cohort study of 83,076 women from the Nurses’ Health Study who were followed for 24 years.³⁸ Reduced cardiovascular mortality was also found in a large prospective cohort study, as noted in the mortality discussion above.³⁷ A 2014 meta-analysis concluded that coffee consumption is inversely associated with cardiovascular mortality. Drinking 3 or 4 cups a day appears to be the amount that may decrease one’s risk of death when compared to those who do not drink coffee at all.³⁶

Liver disease. Friedrich et al performed a study involving 379 patients with end stage liver disease, and found that coffee consumption delayed the progression of disease in patients with both alcoholic liver disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis.³⁹ Coffee consumption also increased long-term survival after liver transplantation.³⁹ However, the study found that coffee did not have any effect on patients with chronic viral hepatitis.

In a 2016 meta-analysis, caffeinated coffee consumption reduced hepatic fibrosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, although caffeine consumption did not reduce the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.⁴⁰ Another meta-analysis, including 16 studies, also found caffeine reduced the risk for hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis.⁴¹

Depression. Based on 2 different systematic reviews and meta-analyses from 2016, coffee consumption appears to have a significant protective effect, decreasing the risk of developing depression.^40,42

Alzheimer’s disease/dementia. Coffee, tea, and caffeine consumption show promise in reducing the risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Individuals who consume one to 2 cups of coffee per day had a decreased incidence of mild cognitive impairment compared to non-drinkers.⁴³ A 2015 Japanese study also found an inverse association between coffee consumption and dementia among women, nonsmokers, and those who do not drink alcohol.⁴⁴ Most recently, a 2016 study, the Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study, looked at incident dementia rates in women >65 years of age with high vs low caffeine intake. Women with higher caffeine intake were less likely to develop dementia or any cognitive impairment compared with those consuming <64 mg/day.⁴⁵

Type 2 diabetes. A 2009 prospective cohort study, which included 40,011 participants followed for more than 10 years, found that drinking at least 3 cups of coffee or tea was associated with a lowered risk of type 2 diabetes.⁴⁶ A 2009 systematic review of 20 cohort studies showed that high intakes of coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and tea are associated with a reduced risk of diabetes.⁴⁷

A meta-analysis of 12 studies involving 832,956 participants found an inverse relationship between cutaneous melanoma and coffee consumption.

Melanoma. A meta-analysis of 12 studies involving 832,956 participants demon­strated an inverse relationship between cutaneous melanoma and coffee consumption.⁴⁷ The risk of melanoma decreased by 3% and 4% for one cup/day of total coffee and caffeinated coffee consumption, respectively. Furthermore, a 2016 meta-analysis found that caffeinated coffee may have greater chemopreventive effects against melanoma than decaffeinated coffee.⁴⁸

Adverse effects

Despite the many potential benefits of coffee, caffeine is a potent drug that should be used with caution.⁴⁹ People with underlying heart problems should avoid caffeine due to concern that it may cause palpitations from tachycardia. It may worsen anxiety problems or depression. Coffee may increase the production of stomach acids, which can worsen acid reflux or stomach ulcers.

Regular coffee intake is associated with a lower risk of mortality, reduced CV events, and a reduction in liver disease progression.

Caffeine is a potent diuretic and may decrease absorption of calcium and cause OA. Caffeine may cause dependence and withdrawal symptoms. Some of the symptoms of withdrawal include drowsiness, headaches, irritability, nausea, and vomiting. It may disrupt sleeping patterns by causing jitters and sleeplessness.⁴⁹ Additionally, large amounts of caffeine may cause overdose and death.

The bottom line

Regular coffee intake is associated with a lower risk of mortality, reduced cardiovascular events, and a reduction in liver disease progression. Coffee may also have some utility for improving cognitive function and reducing the risk of type 2 diabetes. Caffeinated coffee should be limited to no more than 32 oz per day, due to the risk of insomnia, palpitations, anxiety, and gastritis.

 

 

Chocolate/cocoa

Overview

Few natural products have been claimed to successfully treat as many disorders as chocolate. The modern concept of chocolate as food has overshadowed its traditional medicinal use, although recent trials have looked at evidence for some of its traditional uses. Chocolate is processed from the pod of the cacao plant. The earliest evidence for its medical use is in Mayan civilizations, and for most of its approximately 4000-year history, chocolate was consumed as a bitter drink referred to as the “drink of the Gods.” The traditional drink was mixed with water, vanilla, honey, chili peppers, and other spices. Important components in chocolate include flavonoids (antioxidants), cocoa butter, caffeine, theobromine, and phenylethylamine.  

Chocolate has stimulating, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, and cardioprotective effects, and improves the bioavailability of nitric oxide, which can improve blood pressure and platelet function.⁵⁰ Epicatechin (an antioxidant) in cocoa is primarily responsible for its favorable impact on vascular endothelium via its effect on both acute and chronic upregulation of nitric oxide production. Other cardiovascular effects are mediated by the anti-inflammatory effects of cocoa polyphenols, and modulated through the activity of NF-kappaB.⁵¹

Multiple studies have shown that chocolate is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular risk.

Dark chocolate appears to have the greatest benefit, as milk binds to antioxidants in chocolate, making them unavailable. Therefore, milk chocolate is not a good antioxidant source. There is no specific amount of chocolate that is known to be ideal, but an average of one to 2 ounces per day is often used in studies.

Cardiovascular effects. Chocolate does contain saturated fat, but a comparative, double-blind study found that short-term use of cocoa powder lowered plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, oxidized LDL, and apo B concentrations, and the plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration increased, relative to baseline in the low-, middle-, and high-cocoa groups.⁵² A small randomized crossover trial without clinical outcomes indicated that chocolate may increase HDL cholesterol without increasing weight.⁵³

A meta-analysis of short-term (2-12 weeks) treatment with dark chocolate/cocoa products showed reductions in LDL and total cholesterol, but no changes in HDL or triglycerides.⁵⁴ Another meta-analysis of RCTs, however, showed no short-term effect of cocoa/chocolate on lipid concentrations.⁵⁵ A randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study of 62 patients with diabetes and hypertension showed that high polyphenol chocolate improved triglyceride levels.⁵⁶

Chocolate intake was associated with a lower risk of cognitive decline, with the greatest benefit noted in those who averaged more than one chocolate bar per week.

Multiple studies have shown that chocolate is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular risk.^57-59 A best case scenario analysis using a Markov model to predict the long-term effectiveness and cost effectiveness of daily dark chocolate consumption in a population with metabolic syndrome at high risk of cardiovascular disease concluded that daily consumption of dark chocolate can reduce cardiovascular events by 85 per 10,000 population treated over 10 years. The study concluded that $42 could be cost effectively spent per person per year on prevention strategies using dark chocolate.⁵⁹

In addition, a meta-analysis of 7 observational studies showed that high levels of chocolate consumption (any type) were associated with a 29% reduction in stroke compared with the lowest levels of chocolate intake.⁵⁷ Results of a similar meta-analysis from Neurology in 2012 also suggested that moderate chocolate consumption (any type) may lower the risk of stroke.⁶⁰

That said, 2 systematic reviews specifically relating to the risk of coronary heart disease and chocolate intake were inconclusive.^61-62

Blood pressure (BP). An RCT published in JAMA indicates that inclusion of small amounts of polyphenol-rich dark chocolate as part of a usual diet efficiently reduced BP and improved the formation of vasodilative nitric oxide.⁶³ A meta-analysis of 10 RCTs also showed mean BP change in the active cocoa treatment arms across all trials was -4.5 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI), -5.9 to -3.2; P<.001) for systolic BP and -2.5 mm Hg (95% CI, -3.9 to -1.2; P<.001) for diastolic BP.⁶⁴

A Cochrane Review meta-analysis of 20 studies revealed a statistically significant BP-reducing effect of flavanol-rich cocoa products compared with control in short-term trials of 2 to 18 weeks' duration.⁶⁵ Because studies have shown improvement in BP with chocolate intake, investigations into a role of chocolate in the prevention of preeclampsia have been undertaken. In some studies, chocolate intake was associated with reduced odds of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension.^66,67

Diabetes. Chocolate may exert significant vascular protection because of its antioxidant properties and possible increase of nitric oxide bioavailability, which can influence glucose uptake. A small trial comparing the effects of either dark or white chocolate bars (which do not contain the polyphenols) showed improved BP and glucose and insulin responses to an oral glucose tolerance test in healthy subjects on dark chocolate, but not white chocolate.⁶⁸ A comparison of chocolate consumption and risk of diabetes in the Physicians’ Health Study showed an inverse relationship between chocolate intake with incident disease, but this association appeared only to apply in younger and normal-body weight men after controlling for comprehensive lifestyles, including total energy consumption.⁶⁹

Fatigue. The effect of chocolate on a person’s energy level has been noted for centuries.⁷⁰ A small randomized trial showed improved energy levels in those treated with higher chocolate intakes. In a double-blind, randomized, clinical pilot crossover study, high cocoa liquor/polyphenol rich chocolate, reduced fatigue in subjects with chronic fatigue syndrome.⁷¹

Anxiety. A small randomized trial showed chocolate decreased anxiety in high-anxiety trait subjects and improved the anxiety level and the energy levels of low-anxiety trait participants.⁷²

Eye effects. The literature presents conflicting evidence regarding the effect of flavonoids on patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. However, a meta-analysis showed that flavonoids have a promising role in improving visual function in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension, and appear to play a part in both improving and slowing the progression of visual field loss.⁷³

Cognitive decline. Chocolate intake (any type) was associated with a lower risk of cognitive decline (RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.92) with the greatest benefit noted in those who averaged more than one chocolate bar or one tablespoon of cocoa powder per week. This protective effect was observed only among subjects with an average daily consumption of caffeine <75  mg (69% of the participants; RR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.82).⁷⁴

The bottom line

Chocolate with high cocoa content (dark chocolate) appears to be safe and beneficial as part of a healthy diet and lifestyle that includes exercise and stress reduction to decrease cardiovascular risk and may improve energy levels.

CORRESPONDENCE
Michael Malone, MD, Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033; malm0001@hotmail.com.

More than a third of American adults use complementary and alternative medicine.¹ Unfortunately, the public’s enthusiasm for herbal products is not always consistent with the scientific evidence supporting their use. In part one of this series, we discussed the studies that have been done on capsaicin, butterbur, green tea, and peppermint. In this installment, we outline the research on 5 additional remedies: turmeric/curcumin, which may be of benefit in ulcerative colitis; chamomile, which appears to offer relief to patients with anxiety; rosemary, which may help treat alopecia; as well as coffee and cocoa, which may have some cardiovascular benefits (TABLE).

Turmeric/curcumin

Overview

Turmeric (Curcuma longa), a relative of ginger, has been used for 4000 years to treat a variety of conditions.^2,3 Curcumin is the yellow pigment isolated from the rhizomes of Curcuma longa, commonly known as turmeric.³ Turmeric powder contains 5% curcumin, which is the main biologically active compound. Although it grows in many tropical locations, most turmeric is grown in India, where it is used as a main ingredient in curry. The roots and bulbs of turmeric that are used in medicine are generally boiled and dried, which results in a yellow powder.

Turmeric has been used in both Ayurvedic and Chinese medicine for its anti-inflammatory properties, in the treatment of digestive and liver problems, to fight infections, and to help heal skin diseases and wounds.^3-7

Functional GI disorders. A recent review noted that curcumin has been shown in several preclinical studies and uncontrolled clinical trials to have effects on gut inflammation, gut permeability, and the brain-gut axis, especially in functional GI disorders.⁷ A double-blind, placebo-controlled study from 1989 found that turmeric reduced symptoms of bloating and gas in subjects suffering from undifferentiated dyspepsia.⁸

Ulcerative colitis (UC). A 2012 Cochrane review noted that curcumin appears to be a safe and effective therapy for maintenance of remission in quiescent UC when given as adjunctive therapy along with mesalamine or sulfasalazine.⁹ In a 2015 randomized controlled trial (RCT), the addition of curcumin to mesalamine therapy was superior to the combination of placebo and mesalamine in inducing clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with mild-to-moderate active UC, producing no apparent adverse effects.¹⁰

Osteoarthritis (OA). Because of turmeric’s ability to reduce inflammation, it may help relieve OA pain.³ Clinical evidence is scant for the anti-arthritic efficacy of turmeric dietary supplements, although animal studies indicate that turmeric prevents inflammation through regulation of NF-kappaB-regulated genes that regulate the immune and inflammatory response.⁶ Inflammatory cell influx, joint levels of prostaglandin E2, and periarticular osteoclast formation were also inhibited by turmeric extract treatment.⁶

A 2013 review of turmeric for OA concluded that observational studies and in vitro results are promising for the use of curcumin for OA, but well-designed clinical studies were lacking and are needed to support the efficacy of curcumin in OA patients.¹¹ How­ever, in a 2014 randomized trial of 367 patients, turmeric appeared to be similar in efficacy to ibuprofen for the treatment of pain and disability in adults with knee OA.¹² The curcumin (turmeric) group also had fewer adverse effects.¹²

Cancer. There has been a great deal of research on turmeric’s anti-cancer properties, but clinical evidence is lacking. In vitro evidence, animal studies, and small clinical trials suggest that curcumin may help prevent or treat several types of cancers, but the overall evidence is poor. Nonetheless, curcumin and turmeric have been or are currently being evaluated for the treatment or prevention of prostate, liver, breast, skin, gynecologic, hematologic, pulmonary, thymic, bone, brain, and colon cancer.^13-18

Oral submucous fibrosis. A small randomized trial found improvement in oral function with curcumin lozenges, when compared to placebo, indicating that turmeric may hold promise as a treatment of oral submucous fibrosis.¹⁹

Uveitis. A small pilot study of 32 patients suggested that oral curcumin may be as effective as corticosteroids for uveitis.²⁰

Heart disease. Curcumin may have a cardiovascular protective role, as it has been shown to reduce atherosclerosis, but a reduction in myocardial infarction or stroke has not been documented.²¹

Alzheimer’s dementia. Animal studies have shown a reduction in amyloid plaque formation with curcumin.²²

Adverse effects (and precautions)

Turmeric in food is considered safe. A variety of animal and human studies have also indicated that curcumin is safe and well tolerated, even at very high doses.¹³ However, taking large amounts of turmeric for long periods of time could cause stomach upset and gastric ulcers. In addition, patients with gallstones or bile obstruction should use it with caution due to increased bile production.⁷

Because turmeric may lower blood sugar levels, patients with diabetes should monitor for hypoglycemia when using turmeric in combination with diabetic medications. Similarly, those with bleeding disorders taking blood thinners should use turmeric and curcumin with caution, because it can inhibit platelet aggregation.²³

Although it is safe to eat foods with turmeric during pregnancy, pregnant and breastfeeding women should not take turmeric supplements, as the safety of large doses in pregnancy is unknown.

The bottom line

Turmeric/curcumin has anti-inflammatory properties and may be useful as an adjunct for ulcerative colitis and to improve the symptoms of OA. It may also have anti-carcinogenic properties, although definitive data are lacking. Those with a history of gastrointestinal conditions such as gastric ulcer, patients taking blood thinners, and patients with diabetes who are prone to low blood sugar levels should use turmeric/curcumin with caution.

 

 

Chamomile

Overview

Chamomile, a member of the Asteraceae/Compositae family, is one of the oldest herbal medicines. It has been used for hay fever, inflammation, muscle spasms, menstrual disorders, insomnia, ulcers, wounds, gastrointestinal disorders, rheumatic pain, and hemorrhoids. Essential oils of chamomile are used extensively in cosmetics and aromatherapy. Many different preparations have been developed, the most popular being herbal tea.²⁴

A controlled clinical trial of chamomile extract suggested that it may have modest anxiolytic activity in patients with mild to moderate generalized anxiety disorder.

Individuals with a hypersensitivity to plants of the Asteraceae (Compositae) family such as ragweed (Ambrosia spp.), marigold flower (Calendula officinalis), and chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum spp.) may show a similar reaction to chamomile.²⁵

Anxiety. A controlled clinical trial of chamomile extract for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) suggested that it may have modest anxiolytic activity in patients with mild to moderate GAD.²⁶ Another randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial found oral chamomile extract was efficacious and well-tolerated in patients experiencing mild to moderate GAD and may provide an alternative therapeutic anxiolytic for patients with mild GAD.²⁵ In addition to its anxiolytic activity, chamomile may also provide clinically meaningful antidepressant activity.²⁶

Insomnia. Chamomile may have some impact on sleep diary measures (total sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, sleep quality, and number of awakenings) relative to placebo in adults with chronic primary insomnia, according to a small randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial involving 34 patients.²⁷ However, a systematic review found no statistically significant difference between any herbal medicine (including chamomile) and placebo, for clinical efficacy in patients with insomnia. A similar, or smaller, number of adverse events per person were reported with chamomile compared with placebo, suggesting safe use.²⁸

Infantile colic. A small prospective double-blind study on the use of chamomile-containing tea on infantile colic showed statistically significant symptom improvement in tea-treated infants. The study did note, however, that prolonged ingestion of herbal teas may lead to decreased milk intake.^29,30

Adverse effects

As noted earlier, a systematic review found that the number of adverse events per person reported with chamomile was comparable to the number associated with placebo, suggesting that it is safe.²⁸

The bottom line

Chamomile appears to be safe with minimal adverse effects and may be effective for the treatment of anxiety, insomnia, and infantile colic.

Rosemary

Overview

Rosemary, officially known as Rosmarinus officinalis, is a medicinal evergreen plant native to the Mediterranean area that appears to increase microcapillary perfusion.³¹

Topical rosemary oil may be useful in the treatment of alopecia, with minimal adverse effects.

Alopecia. A randomized double-blind controlled trial found that essential oils including rosemary oil (as well as thyme, lavender, and cedarwood) massaged into the scalp improved hair growth in almost half of patients with alopecia areata after 7 months.³² Another randomized trial comparing rosemary oil to minoxidil 2% for androgenetic alopecia showed a significant increase in hair count at the 6-month endpoint compared with the baseline, but no significant difference was found between the study groups regarding hair count either at Month 3 or Month 6 (P >.05). ³¹

Adverse effects

In the randomized trial described above comparing rosemary oil to minoxidil 2%, adverse effects appeared to be rare for topical rosemary oil. Scalp itching was more frequent in the minoxidil group.³¹

The bottom line

Topical rosemary oil may be useful in the treatment of alopecia with minimal adverse effects.

 

 

Coffee/caffeine

Overview

Coffee is one of the most widely used botanicals with approximately 3.5 billion cups of coffee consumed per day worldwide. It is a popular beverage because of its unique aromatic taste and its use as a central nervous system stimulant. The coffee tree (genus coffea) is found throughout Latin America, Africa, and eastern Asia. Two of the most common commercially grown species are Coffea arabica (Arabicas) and Coffea canephora (Robusta). Processing and roasting methods may differ and produce variations in flavor and aroma. The degree of roasting also affects the caffeine content.

Coffee consumption leads to increased alertness and can boost mental performance. Based on the literature and US Food and Drug Administration recommendations, four 8-oz cups of coffee (about 400 mg of caffeine) daily is an acceptable average amount of caffeine. More than 500 mg/d is considered excessive use of coffee.^33,34

Overall mortality. A 2008 study showed that regular coffee was not associated with increased or decreased mortality in both men and women.³⁵ However, more recent studies show an inverse relationship between mortality and coffee consumption.

Specifically, a 2014 meta-analysis found an inverse relationship between coffee and mortality.³⁶ A large prospective cohort study from 2015 that included 79,234 women and 76,704 men found that drinking coffee was inversely associated with overall mortality.³⁷ In this cohort study, an inverse association were observed for deaths from heart disease, respiratory disease, diabetes, and self-harm.³⁷ While mechanisms were not analyzed, coffee may reduce mortality risk by affecting inflammation, lung function, insulin sensitivity, and depression.

Cardiovascular disease. Coffee consumption may modestly reduce the risk of stroke, according to a prospective cohort study of 83,076 women from the Nurses’ Health Study who were followed for 24 years.³⁸ Reduced cardiovascular mortality was also found in a large prospective cohort study, as noted in the mortality discussion above.³⁷ A 2014 meta-analysis concluded that coffee consumption is inversely associated with cardiovascular mortality. Drinking 3 or 4 cups a day appears to be the amount that may decrease one’s risk of death when compared to those who do not drink coffee at all.³⁶

Liver disease. Friedrich et al performed a study involving 379 patients with end stage liver disease, and found that coffee consumption delayed the progression of disease in patients with both alcoholic liver disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis.³⁹ Coffee consumption also increased long-term survival after liver transplantation.³⁹ However, the study found that coffee did not have any effect on patients with chronic viral hepatitis.

In a 2016 meta-analysis, caffeinated coffee consumption reduced hepatic fibrosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, although caffeine consumption did not reduce the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.⁴⁰ Another meta-analysis, including 16 studies, also found caffeine reduced the risk for hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis.⁴¹

Depression. Based on 2 different systematic reviews and meta-analyses from 2016, coffee consumption appears to have a significant protective effect, decreasing the risk of developing depression.^40,42

Alzheimer’s disease/dementia. Coffee, tea, and caffeine consumption show promise in reducing the risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Individuals who consume one to 2 cups of coffee per day had a decreased incidence of mild cognitive impairment compared to non-drinkers.⁴³ A 2015 Japanese study also found an inverse association between coffee consumption and dementia among women, nonsmokers, and those who do not drink alcohol.⁴⁴ Most recently, a 2016 study, the Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study, looked at incident dementia rates in women >65 years of age with high vs low caffeine intake. Women with higher caffeine intake were less likely to develop dementia or any cognitive impairment compared with those consuming <64 mg/day.⁴⁵

Type 2 diabetes. A 2009 prospective cohort study, which included 40,011 participants followed for more than 10 years, found that drinking at least 3 cups of coffee or tea was associated with a lowered risk of type 2 diabetes.⁴⁶ A 2009 systematic review of 20 cohort studies showed that high intakes of coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and tea are associated with a reduced risk of diabetes.⁴⁷

A meta-analysis of 12 studies involving 832,956 participants found an inverse relationship between cutaneous melanoma and coffee consumption.

Melanoma. A meta-analysis of 12 studies involving 832,956 participants demon­strated an inverse relationship between cutaneous melanoma and coffee consumption.⁴⁷ The risk of melanoma decreased by 3% and 4% for one cup/day of total coffee and caffeinated coffee consumption, respectively. Furthermore, a 2016 meta-analysis found that caffeinated coffee may have greater chemopreventive effects against melanoma than decaffeinated coffee.⁴⁸

Adverse effects

Despite the many potential benefits of coffee, caffeine is a potent drug that should be used with caution.⁴⁹ People with underlying heart problems should avoid caffeine due to concern that it may cause palpitations from tachycardia. It may worsen anxiety problems or depression. Coffee may increase the production of stomach acids, which can worsen acid reflux or stomach ulcers.

Regular coffee intake is associated with a lower risk of mortality, reduced CV events, and a reduction in liver disease progression.

Caffeine is a potent diuretic and may decrease absorption of calcium and cause OA. Caffeine may cause dependence and withdrawal symptoms. Some of the symptoms of withdrawal include drowsiness, headaches, irritability, nausea, and vomiting. It may disrupt sleeping patterns by causing jitters and sleeplessness.⁴⁹ Additionally, large amounts of caffeine may cause overdose and death.

The bottom line

Regular coffee intake is associated with a lower risk of mortality, reduced cardiovascular events, and a reduction in liver disease progression. Coffee may also have some utility for improving cognitive function and reducing the risk of type 2 diabetes. Caffeinated coffee should be limited to no more than 32 oz per day, due to the risk of insomnia, palpitations, anxiety, and gastritis.

 

 

Chocolate/cocoa

Overview

Few natural products have been claimed to successfully treat as many disorders as chocolate. The modern concept of chocolate as food has overshadowed its traditional medicinal use, although recent trials have looked at evidence for some of its traditional uses. Chocolate is processed from the pod of the cacao plant. The earliest evidence for its medical use is in Mayan civilizations, and for most of its approximately 4000-year history, chocolate was consumed as a bitter drink referred to as the “drink of the Gods.” The traditional drink was mixed with water, vanilla, honey, chili peppers, and other spices. Important components in chocolate include flavonoids (antioxidants), cocoa butter, caffeine, theobromine, and phenylethylamine.  

Chocolate has stimulating, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, and cardioprotective effects, and improves the bioavailability of nitric oxide, which can improve blood pressure and platelet function.⁵⁰ Epicatechin (an antioxidant) in cocoa is primarily responsible for its favorable impact on vascular endothelium via its effect on both acute and chronic upregulation of nitric oxide production. Other cardiovascular effects are mediated by the anti-inflammatory effects of cocoa polyphenols, and modulated through the activity of NF-kappaB.⁵¹

Multiple studies have shown that chocolate is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular risk.

Dark chocolate appears to have the greatest benefit, as milk binds to antioxidants in chocolate, making them unavailable. Therefore, milk chocolate is not a good antioxidant source. There is no specific amount of chocolate that is known to be ideal, but an average of one to 2 ounces per day is often used in studies.

Cardiovascular effects. Chocolate does contain saturated fat, but a comparative, double-blind study found that short-term use of cocoa powder lowered plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, oxidized LDL, and apo B concentrations, and the plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration increased, relative to baseline in the low-, middle-, and high-cocoa groups.⁵² A small randomized crossover trial without clinical outcomes indicated that chocolate may increase HDL cholesterol without increasing weight.⁵³

A meta-analysis of short-term (2-12 weeks) treatment with dark chocolate/cocoa products showed reductions in LDL and total cholesterol, but no changes in HDL or triglycerides.⁵⁴ Another meta-analysis of RCTs, however, showed no short-term effect of cocoa/chocolate on lipid concentrations.⁵⁵ A randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study of 62 patients with diabetes and hypertension showed that high polyphenol chocolate improved triglyceride levels.⁵⁶

Chocolate intake was associated with a lower risk of cognitive decline, with the greatest benefit noted in those who averaged more than one chocolate bar per week.

Multiple studies have shown that chocolate is associated with a reduction in cardiovascular risk.^57-59 A best case scenario analysis using a Markov model to predict the long-term effectiveness and cost effectiveness of daily dark chocolate consumption in a population with metabolic syndrome at high risk of cardiovascular disease concluded that daily consumption of dark chocolate can reduce cardiovascular events by 85 per 10,000 population treated over 10 years. The study concluded that $42 could be cost effectively spent per person per year on prevention strategies using dark chocolate.⁵⁹

In addition, a meta-analysis of 7 observational studies showed that high levels of chocolate consumption (any type) were associated with a 29% reduction in stroke compared with the lowest levels of chocolate intake.⁵⁷ Results of a similar meta-analysis from Neurology in 2012 also suggested that moderate chocolate consumption (any type) may lower the risk of stroke.⁶⁰

That said, 2 systematic reviews specifically relating to the risk of coronary heart disease and chocolate intake were inconclusive.^61-62

Blood pressure (BP). An RCT published in JAMA indicates that inclusion of small amounts of polyphenol-rich dark chocolate as part of a usual diet efficiently reduced BP and improved the formation of vasodilative nitric oxide.⁶³ A meta-analysis of 10 RCTs also showed mean BP change in the active cocoa treatment arms across all trials was -4.5 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI), -5.9 to -3.2; P<.001) for systolic BP and -2.5 mm Hg (95% CI, -3.9 to -1.2; P<.001) for diastolic BP.⁶⁴

A Cochrane Review meta-analysis of 20 studies revealed a statistically significant BP-reducing effect of flavanol-rich cocoa products compared with control in short-term trials of 2 to 18 weeks' duration.⁶⁵ Because studies have shown improvement in BP with chocolate intake, investigations into a role of chocolate in the prevention of preeclampsia have been undertaken. In some studies, chocolate intake was associated with reduced odds of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension.^66,67

Diabetes. Chocolate may exert significant vascular protection because of its antioxidant properties and possible increase of nitric oxide bioavailability, which can influence glucose uptake. A small trial comparing the effects of either dark or white chocolate bars (which do not contain the polyphenols) showed improved BP and glucose and insulin responses to an oral glucose tolerance test in healthy subjects on dark chocolate, but not white chocolate.⁶⁸ A comparison of chocolate consumption and risk of diabetes in the Physicians’ Health Study showed an inverse relationship between chocolate intake with incident disease, but this association appeared only to apply in younger and normal-body weight men after controlling for comprehensive lifestyles, including total energy consumption.⁶⁹

Fatigue. The effect of chocolate on a person’s energy level has been noted for centuries.⁷⁰ A small randomized trial showed improved energy levels in those treated with higher chocolate intakes. In a double-blind, randomized, clinical pilot crossover study, high cocoa liquor/polyphenol rich chocolate, reduced fatigue in subjects with chronic fatigue syndrome.⁷¹

Anxiety. A small randomized trial showed chocolate decreased anxiety in high-anxiety trait subjects and improved the anxiety level and the energy levels of low-anxiety trait participants.⁷²

Eye effects. The literature presents conflicting evidence regarding the effect of flavonoids on patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. However, a meta-analysis showed that flavonoids have a promising role in improving visual function in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension, and appear to play a part in both improving and slowing the progression of visual field loss.⁷³

Cognitive decline. Chocolate intake (any type) was associated with a lower risk of cognitive decline (RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.92) with the greatest benefit noted in those who averaged more than one chocolate bar or one tablespoon of cocoa powder per week. This protective effect was observed only among subjects with an average daily consumption of caffeine <75  mg (69% of the participants; RR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.82).⁷⁴

The bottom line

Chocolate with high cocoa content (dark chocolate) appears to be safe and beneficial as part of a healthy diet and lifestyle that includes exercise and stress reduction to decrease cardiovascular risk and may improve energy levels.

CORRESPONDENCE
Michael Malone, MD, Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033; malm0001@hotmail.com.

The patient was diagnosed with granuloma annulare on the basis of history and clinical exam. A potassium hydroxide prep of skin scrapings was performed to rule out tinea corporis, and did not show evidence of fungal elements. The patient was treated with topical betamethasone with partial improvement.

First described as a “ringed eruption of the fingers” by Thomas Colcott Fox in 1895, granuloma annulare (GA) is a relatively common, benign, and self-limited condition whose precise etiology remains unclear. It is characterized commonly by pink to violaceous aciform or annular plaques on clinical examination. In some cases of GA, annular lesions are not present, or may be formed of grouped papules.

Courtesy Dr. Catalina Matiz

Courtesy Dr. Catalina Matiz

Mr. Kusari is with the division of pediatric and adolescent dermatology, Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, and the departments of dermatology and pediatrics, University of California, San Diego. Dr. Matiz is a pediatric dermatologist at Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego. They reported having no conflicts of interest.

References

1. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1980 Sep;3(3):217-30.

2. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Sep;75(3):457-65.

3. Dermatol Online J. 2013 Dec 16;19(12):20719.

4. Acta Derm Venereol. 2008;88(5):519-20.

5. J Cutan Med Surg. 2014 Nov;18(6):413-9.

6. South Med J. 1997 Oct;90(10):1056-9.

7. Am J Dermatopathol. 2003 Apr;25(2):113-6.

8. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2013 Aug;14(4):279-90.

9. Br J Dermatol. 1994 Apr;130(4):494-7.

The patient was diagnosed with granuloma annulare on the basis of history and clinical exam. A potassium hydroxide prep of skin scrapings was performed to rule out tinea corporis, and did not show evidence of fungal elements. The patient was treated with topical betamethasone with partial improvement.

First described as a “ringed eruption of the fingers” by Thomas Colcott Fox in 1895, granuloma annulare (GA) is a relatively common, benign, and self-limited condition whose precise etiology remains unclear. It is characterized commonly by pink to violaceous aciform or annular plaques on clinical examination. In some cases of GA, annular lesions are not present, or may be formed of grouped papules.

Courtesy Dr. Catalina Matiz

Courtesy Dr. Catalina Matiz

Mr. Kusari is with the division of pediatric and adolescent dermatology, Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, and the departments of dermatology and pediatrics, University of California, San Diego. Dr. Matiz is a pediatric dermatologist at Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego. They reported having no conflicts of interest.

References

1. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1980 Sep;3(3):217-30.

2. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Sep;75(3):457-65.

3. Dermatol Online J. 2013 Dec 16;19(12):20719.

4. Acta Derm Venereol. 2008;88(5):519-20.

5. J Cutan Med Surg. 2014 Nov;18(6):413-9.

6. South Med J. 1997 Oct;90(10):1056-9.

7. Am J Dermatopathol. 2003 Apr;25(2):113-6.

8. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2013 Aug;14(4):279-90.

9. Br J Dermatol. 1994 Apr;130(4):494-7.

The patient was diagnosed with granuloma annulare on the basis of history and clinical exam. A potassium hydroxide prep of skin scrapings was performed to rule out tinea corporis, and did not show evidence of fungal elements. The patient was treated with topical betamethasone with partial improvement.

First described as a “ringed eruption of the fingers” by Thomas Colcott Fox in 1895, granuloma annulare (GA) is a relatively common, benign, and self-limited condition whose precise etiology remains unclear. It is characterized commonly by pink to violaceous aciform or annular plaques on clinical examination. In some cases of GA, annular lesions are not present, or may be formed of grouped papules.

Courtesy Dr. Catalina Matiz

Courtesy Dr. Catalina Matiz

Mr. Kusari is with the division of pediatric and adolescent dermatology, Rady Children’s Hospital, San Diego, and the departments of dermatology and pediatrics, University of California, San Diego. Dr. Matiz is a pediatric dermatologist at Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego. They reported having no conflicts of interest.

References

1. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1980 Sep;3(3):217-30.

2. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Sep;75(3):457-65.

3. Dermatol Online J. 2013 Dec 16;19(12):20719.

4. Acta Derm Venereol. 2008;88(5):519-20.

5. J Cutan Med Surg. 2014 Nov;18(6):413-9.

6. South Med J. 1997 Oct;90(10):1056-9.

7. Am J Dermatopathol. 2003 Apr;25(2):113-6.

8. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2013 Aug;14(4):279-90.

9. Br J Dermatol. 1994 Apr;130(4):494-7.

Here are 4 articles from the June issue of Clinician Reviews (individual articles are valid for one year from date of publication—expiration dates below):

1. Dermatology Practice Gaps: Missed Diagnoses

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2IhaxSm
Expires February 11, 2019

2. When to Worry About Congenital Melanocytic Nevi

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2IhMOBC
Expires March 2, 2019

3. Unscheduled Visits for Pain After Hernia Surgery Common, Costly

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2GbfWIV
Expires February 15, 2019

4. Melanoma Incidence Increased in Older Non-Hispanic Whites

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2wOkVzZ
Expires February 9, 2019

Here are 4 articles from the June issue of Clinician Reviews (individual articles are valid for one year from date of publication—expiration dates below):

1. Dermatology Practice Gaps: Missed Diagnoses

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2IhaxSm
Expires February 11, 2019

2. When to Worry About Congenital Melanocytic Nevi

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2IhMOBC
Expires March 2, 2019

3. Unscheduled Visits for Pain After Hernia Surgery Common, Costly

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2GbfWIV
Expires February 15, 2019

4. Melanoma Incidence Increased in Older Non-Hispanic Whites

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2wOkVzZ
Expires February 9, 2019

Here are 4 articles from the June issue of Clinician Reviews (individual articles are valid for one year from date of publication—expiration dates below):

1. Dermatology Practice Gaps: Missed Diagnoses

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2IhaxSm
Expires February 11, 2019

2. When to Worry About Congenital Melanocytic Nevi

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2IhMOBC
Expires March 2, 2019

3. Unscheduled Visits for Pain After Hernia Surgery Common, Costly

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2GbfWIV
Expires February 15, 2019

4. Melanoma Incidence Increased in Older Non-Hispanic Whites

To take the posttest, go to: https://bit.ly/2wOkVzZ
Expires February 9, 2019

ORLANDO – Progression from cutaneous to systemic lupus happens far more quickly than is commonly reported in the literature, according to an investigation from Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston.

Most studies have emphasized mean time to progression, which is generally said to be about 8 years. The problem is that the range is broad, anywhere from a few months to 30 or more years, so “the outliers influence the mean, and therefore, may not provide a fully accurate representation of the interval in which [most] patients progress” from discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), lead investigator Scott Elman, MD, said at the International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

“As clinicians seeing DLE patients, the primary question we are asking ourselves is how frequently we should be monitoring for signs and symptoms of systemic lupus,” he said. Relying on mean time instead of median time might give a false sense of security – and even delay checking for arthritis, nephritis, and other manifestations. There’s no current standard of practice about when monitoring should occur, but “I certainly think that closer monitoring of new patients with a diagnosis of DLE, especially in their first couple of years,” is a good idea, he noted, adding that for most patients, “it seems that if it’s going to happen, it’s going to happen sooner” rather than later. At Brigham and Women’s, newly diagnosed patients are generally brought back every 3-6 months for lab tests and a thorough review of symptoms, Dr. Elman said.

The next step is to identify risk factors for early progression. The study did not find any significant differences in lab values, medication exposures, or disease manifestations between early and late progressors, perhaps because of the small sample size. The work continues.

There was no external funding for the work. Dr. Elman had no disclosures.

aotto@mdedge.com

ORLANDO – Progression from cutaneous to systemic lupus happens far more quickly than is commonly reported in the literature, according to an investigation from Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston.

Most studies have emphasized mean time to progression, which is generally said to be about 8 years. The problem is that the range is broad, anywhere from a few months to 30 or more years, so “the outliers influence the mean, and therefore, may not provide a fully accurate representation of the interval in which [most] patients progress” from discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), lead investigator Scott Elman, MD, said at the International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

“As clinicians seeing DLE patients, the primary question we are asking ourselves is how frequently we should be monitoring for signs and symptoms of systemic lupus,” he said. Relying on mean time instead of median time might give a false sense of security – and even delay checking for arthritis, nephritis, and other manifestations. There’s no current standard of practice about when monitoring should occur, but “I certainly think that closer monitoring of new patients with a diagnosis of DLE, especially in their first couple of years,” is a good idea, he noted, adding that for most patients, “it seems that if it’s going to happen, it’s going to happen sooner” rather than later. At Brigham and Women’s, newly diagnosed patients are generally brought back every 3-6 months for lab tests and a thorough review of symptoms, Dr. Elman said.

The next step is to identify risk factors for early progression. The study did not find any significant differences in lab values, medication exposures, or disease manifestations between early and late progressors, perhaps because of the small sample size. The work continues.

There was no external funding for the work. Dr. Elman had no disclosures.

aotto@mdedge.com

ORLANDO – Progression from cutaneous to systemic lupus happens far more quickly than is commonly reported in the literature, according to an investigation from Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston.

Most studies have emphasized mean time to progression, which is generally said to be about 8 years. The problem is that the range is broad, anywhere from a few months to 30 or more years, so “the outliers influence the mean, and therefore, may not provide a fully accurate representation of the interval in which [most] patients progress” from discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), lead investigator Scott Elman, MD, said at the International Conference on Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

“As clinicians seeing DLE patients, the primary question we are asking ourselves is how frequently we should be monitoring for signs and symptoms of systemic lupus,” he said. Relying on mean time instead of median time might give a false sense of security – and even delay checking for arthritis, nephritis, and other manifestations. There’s no current standard of practice about when monitoring should occur, but “I certainly think that closer monitoring of new patients with a diagnosis of DLE, especially in their first couple of years,” is a good idea, he noted, adding that for most patients, “it seems that if it’s going to happen, it’s going to happen sooner” rather than later. At Brigham and Women’s, newly diagnosed patients are generally brought back every 3-6 months for lab tests and a thorough review of symptoms, Dr. Elman said.

The next step is to identify risk factors for early progression. The study did not find any significant differences in lab values, medication exposures, or disease manifestations between early and late progressors, perhaps because of the small sample size. The work continues.

There was no external funding for the work. Dr. Elman had no disclosures.

aotto@mdedge.com

The FP recognized that this was a case of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), based on the clinical presentation. The distribution of the erythema, scale, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was highly suggestive of an ACD to nickel. In this case, the nickel in the patient’s eyeglasses and the snaps on her pants were the culprit. The plaque near the patient’s eye was actually in the shape of the metal on the inside of her glasses.

ACD is a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in which a foreign substance comes into contact with the skin and is linked to skin proteins; this forms an antigen complex, leading to sensitization. When the epidermis is re-exposed to the antigen, the sensitized T cells initiate an inflammatory cascade, leading to the skin changes seen in ACD. 

Contact dermatitis can sometimes be diagnosed clinically with a good history and physical exam. However, there are many cases in which patch testing is needed to find the offending allergens or confirm the suspicion regarding a specific allergen. The differential diagnosis includes cutaneous candidiasis, impetigo, plaque psoriasis, and seborrheic dermatitis.

Patients with ACD should avoid the allergen that is causing the reaction. In cases of nickel ACD, the patient may cover the metal tab of his or her jeans with an iron-on patch or a few coats of clear nail polish. Fortunately, some jeans manufacturers now make nickel-free metal tabs (eg, Levis’s).

Cool compresses can soothe the symptoms of acute cases of ACD. Localized acute ACD lesions respond best to mid-potency (eg, 0.1% triamcinolone) to high-potency (eg, 0.05% clobetasol) topical steroids. On areas of thinner skin, lower-potency steroids such as desonide ointment can minimize the risk of skin atrophy.

In this case, the FP recommended that the patient get glasses that were nickel free and explained how to avoid the nickel that still exists in some pants. She was also given desonide 0.05% cream to apply to the affected area for symptomatic relief.

‌

Adapted from: Usatine RP, Jacob SE. Rash on eyebrows and periumbilical region. J Fam Pract. 2017;66:45-47.

The FP recognized that this was a case of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), based on the clinical presentation. The distribution of the erythema, scale, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was highly suggestive of an ACD to nickel. In this case, the nickel in the patient’s eyeglasses and the snaps on her pants were the culprit. The plaque near the patient’s eye was actually in the shape of the metal on the inside of her glasses.

ACD is a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in which a foreign substance comes into contact with the skin and is linked to skin proteins; this forms an antigen complex, leading to sensitization. When the epidermis is re-exposed to the antigen, the sensitized T cells initiate an inflammatory cascade, leading to the skin changes seen in ACD. 

Contact dermatitis can sometimes be diagnosed clinically with a good history and physical exam. However, there are many cases in which patch testing is needed to find the offending allergens or confirm the suspicion regarding a specific allergen. The differential diagnosis includes cutaneous candidiasis, impetigo, plaque psoriasis, and seborrheic dermatitis.

Patients with ACD should avoid the allergen that is causing the reaction. In cases of nickel ACD, the patient may cover the metal tab of his or her jeans with an iron-on patch or a few coats of clear nail polish. Fortunately, some jeans manufacturers now make nickel-free metal tabs (eg, Levis’s).

Cool compresses can soothe the symptoms of acute cases of ACD. Localized acute ACD lesions respond best to mid-potency (eg, 0.1% triamcinolone) to high-potency (eg, 0.05% clobetasol) topical steroids. On areas of thinner skin, lower-potency steroids such as desonide ointment can minimize the risk of skin atrophy.

In this case, the FP recommended that the patient get glasses that were nickel free and explained how to avoid the nickel that still exists in some pants. She was also given desonide 0.05% cream to apply to the affected area for symptomatic relief.

‌

Adapted from: Usatine RP, Jacob SE. Rash on eyebrows and periumbilical region. J Fam Pract. 2017;66:45-47.

The FP recognized that this was a case of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), based on the clinical presentation. The distribution of the erythema, scale, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was highly suggestive of an ACD to nickel. In this case, the nickel in the patient’s eyeglasses and the snaps on her pants were the culprit. The plaque near the patient’s eye was actually in the shape of the metal on the inside of her glasses.

ACD is a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in which a foreign substance comes into contact with the skin and is linked to skin proteins; this forms an antigen complex, leading to sensitization. When the epidermis is re-exposed to the antigen, the sensitized T cells initiate an inflammatory cascade, leading to the skin changes seen in ACD. 

Contact dermatitis can sometimes be diagnosed clinically with a good history and physical exam. However, there are many cases in which patch testing is needed to find the offending allergens or confirm the suspicion regarding a specific allergen. The differential diagnosis includes cutaneous candidiasis, impetigo, plaque psoriasis, and seborrheic dermatitis.

Patients with ACD should avoid the allergen that is causing the reaction. In cases of nickel ACD, the patient may cover the metal tab of his or her jeans with an iron-on patch or a few coats of clear nail polish. Fortunately, some jeans manufacturers now make nickel-free metal tabs (eg, Levis’s).

Cool compresses can soothe the symptoms of acute cases of ACD. Localized acute ACD lesions respond best to mid-potency (eg, 0.1% triamcinolone) to high-potency (eg, 0.05% clobetasol) topical steroids. On areas of thinner skin, lower-potency steroids such as desonide ointment can minimize the risk of skin atrophy.

In this case, the FP recommended that the patient get glasses that were nickel free and explained how to avoid the nickel that still exists in some pants. She was also given desonide 0.05% cream to apply to the affected area for symptomatic relief.

‌

Adapted from: Usatine RP, Jacob SE. Rash on eyebrows and periumbilical region. J Fam Pract. 2017;66:45-47.

Biologic treatments were not associated with an increased risk of cancer among patients with psoriasis in the medium term, in a study that analyzed data from patient registries.

“Cumulative length of exposure to biologics was not associated with the risk of developing cancers, even after controlling for the effect of age, gender, location,” as well as for previous exposure to methotrexate, cyclosporine, and phototherapy; duration of psoriasis; and comorbidities, reported Ignacio García-Doval, MD, of the Fundación Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología, Madrid, and his associates.

Christine Langer-p?schel/Thinkstock

The pooled adjusted odds ratio of cancer per year of biologic exposure was 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.13), demonstrating no significantly increased risk of cancer per cumulative year of biologic exposure for psoriasis therapy, Dr. García-Doval and his associates reported in the study, published in the British Journal of Dermatology. This was true even when broken down within the registries for comparison, and when analyzed by type of cancers, such as squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma.

A limitation of the study was inadequate power to detect and compare risk between individual biologics, they said. Also, “as our data describe limited follow-up and latencies, it is still possible that a risk after longer periods of exposure and latencies exists.”

Most of the authors had numerous financial disclosures related to pharmaceutical companies. Psonet was supported with funds from the European Association of Venereology and Dermatology and the Italian Drug Agency. Funding for the individual registries includes support from pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: García-Doval I et al. Br J Dermatol. 2018 May 3. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16715.

Biologic treatments were not associated with an increased risk of cancer among patients with psoriasis in the medium term, in a study that analyzed data from patient registries.

“Cumulative length of exposure to biologics was not associated with the risk of developing cancers, even after controlling for the effect of age, gender, location,” as well as for previous exposure to methotrexate, cyclosporine, and phototherapy; duration of psoriasis; and comorbidities, reported Ignacio García-Doval, MD, of the Fundación Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología, Madrid, and his associates.

Christine Langer-p?schel/Thinkstock

The pooled adjusted odds ratio of cancer per year of biologic exposure was 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.13), demonstrating no significantly increased risk of cancer per cumulative year of biologic exposure for psoriasis therapy, Dr. García-Doval and his associates reported in the study, published in the British Journal of Dermatology. This was true even when broken down within the registries for comparison, and when analyzed by type of cancers, such as squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma.

A limitation of the study was inadequate power to detect and compare risk between individual biologics, they said. Also, “as our data describe limited follow-up and latencies, it is still possible that a risk after longer periods of exposure and latencies exists.”

Most of the authors had numerous financial disclosures related to pharmaceutical companies. Psonet was supported with funds from the European Association of Venereology and Dermatology and the Italian Drug Agency. Funding for the individual registries includes support from pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: García-Doval I et al. Br J Dermatol. 2018 May 3. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16715.

Biologic treatments were not associated with an increased risk of cancer among patients with psoriasis in the medium term, in a study that analyzed data from patient registries.

“Cumulative length of exposure to biologics was not associated with the risk of developing cancers, even after controlling for the effect of age, gender, location,” as well as for previous exposure to methotrexate, cyclosporine, and phototherapy; duration of psoriasis; and comorbidities, reported Ignacio García-Doval, MD, of the Fundación Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología, Madrid, and his associates.

Christine Langer-p?schel/Thinkstock

The pooled adjusted odds ratio of cancer per year of biologic exposure was 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.13), demonstrating no significantly increased risk of cancer per cumulative year of biologic exposure for psoriasis therapy, Dr. García-Doval and his associates reported in the study, published in the British Journal of Dermatology. This was true even when broken down within the registries for comparison, and when analyzed by type of cancers, such as squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma.

A limitation of the study was inadequate power to detect and compare risk between individual biologics, they said. Also, “as our data describe limited follow-up and latencies, it is still possible that a risk after longer periods of exposure and latencies exists.”

Most of the authors had numerous financial disclosures related to pharmaceutical companies. Psonet was supported with funds from the European Association of Venereology and Dermatology and the Italian Drug Agency. Funding for the individual registries includes support from pharmaceutical companies.

SOURCE: García-Doval I et al. Br J Dermatol. 2018 May 3. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16715.