Dermatology

Patients who use indoor tanning beds are more likely to develop a second primary melanoma, and do it more quickly, than those who avoid indoor tanning, according to a retrospective study involving 434 melanoma patients.

rfranki@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Li Y et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(6):1101-8.

Patients who use indoor tanning beds are more likely to develop a second primary melanoma, and do it more quickly, than those who avoid indoor tanning, according to a retrospective study involving 434 melanoma patients.

rfranki@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Li Y et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(6):1101-8.

Patients who use indoor tanning beds are more likely to develop a second primary melanoma, and do it more quickly, than those who avoid indoor tanning, according to a retrospective study involving 434 melanoma patients.

rfranki@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Li Y et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(6):1101-8.

Antiepileptic drugs were found to be linked with almost ninefold increased odds for two adverse skin reactions, Steven‐Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, compared with non-AED medication classes in an analysis of adverse-event data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

Researchers at the University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy in Kingston, who performed the retrospective study, also found that six drugs within the antiepileptic drug (AED) class had a reporting odds ratio estimate of more than 20, compared with other non-AEDs.

“Although several antiepileptic drugs have been associated with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), the class effect and impact of other AEDs are not well described,” Eric P. Borrelli, PharmD, and his colleagues reported in Epilepsia.

The investigators examined rates of SJS and TEN for several AEDs using adverse event data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System between July 2014 and December 2017. The study investigators examined 198 adverse reaction reports related to AEDs, which was greater than any other drug class.

Overall, AEDs as a group had a reporting odds ratio risk estimate of 8.7 (95% confidence interval, 7.5-10.2), compared with non-AEDs. Similarly, the proportional reporting ratio was found to be 8.7 (95% CI, 7.5-10.2) in the AED group.

Within the class, the medications with the highest risk were zonisamide, rufinamide, and clorazepate, which had about 70-, 60-, and 56-fold higher odds for SJS and TEN, compared with all other medications. Other high-risk AEDs in the group included lamotrigine (reporting odds ratio, 53.0), carbamazepine (reporting OR, 24.5), and phenytoin (reporting OR, 26.3).

“Greater than 90% of SJS [and] TEN reactions associated with AEDs occur within the first 2 months of treatment initiation, although some AEDs have been associated with such reactions during long‐term use,” the researchers wrote.

The authors acknowledged that measures of prevalence and incidence could not be determined from these data since the number of patients taking AEDs is unknown.

“Increased awareness of this risk among both prescribers and patients, particularly variations in risk among different AEDs, along with education on early recognition of SJS [and] TEN signs [and] symptoms, may help mitigate the number and severity of these adverse events,” the researchers concluded.

The study was partially funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs. One coauthor reported receiving research funding from Pfizer, Merck (Cubist), and The Medicines Company.

SOURCE: Borrelli EP et al. Epilepsia. 2018 Nov 5. doi: 10.1111/epi.14591.

Antiepileptic drugs were found to be linked with almost ninefold increased odds for two adverse skin reactions, Steven‐Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, compared with non-AED medication classes in an analysis of adverse-event data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

Researchers at the University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy in Kingston, who performed the retrospective study, also found that six drugs within the antiepileptic drug (AED) class had a reporting odds ratio estimate of more than 20, compared with other non-AEDs.

“Although several antiepileptic drugs have been associated with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), the class effect and impact of other AEDs are not well described,” Eric P. Borrelli, PharmD, and his colleagues reported in Epilepsia.

The investigators examined rates of SJS and TEN for several AEDs using adverse event data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System between July 2014 and December 2017. The study investigators examined 198 adverse reaction reports related to AEDs, which was greater than any other drug class.

Overall, AEDs as a group had a reporting odds ratio risk estimate of 8.7 (95% confidence interval, 7.5-10.2), compared with non-AEDs. Similarly, the proportional reporting ratio was found to be 8.7 (95% CI, 7.5-10.2) in the AED group.

Within the class, the medications with the highest risk were zonisamide, rufinamide, and clorazepate, which had about 70-, 60-, and 56-fold higher odds for SJS and TEN, compared with all other medications. Other high-risk AEDs in the group included lamotrigine (reporting odds ratio, 53.0), carbamazepine (reporting OR, 24.5), and phenytoin (reporting OR, 26.3).

“Greater than 90% of SJS [and] TEN reactions associated with AEDs occur within the first 2 months of treatment initiation, although some AEDs have been associated with such reactions during long‐term use,” the researchers wrote.

The authors acknowledged that measures of prevalence and incidence could not be determined from these data since the number of patients taking AEDs is unknown.

“Increased awareness of this risk among both prescribers and patients, particularly variations in risk among different AEDs, along with education on early recognition of SJS [and] TEN signs [and] symptoms, may help mitigate the number and severity of these adverse events,” the researchers concluded.

The study was partially funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs. One coauthor reported receiving research funding from Pfizer, Merck (Cubist), and The Medicines Company.

SOURCE: Borrelli EP et al. Epilepsia. 2018 Nov 5. doi: 10.1111/epi.14591.

Antiepileptic drugs were found to be linked with almost ninefold increased odds for two adverse skin reactions, Steven‐Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, compared with non-AED medication classes in an analysis of adverse-event data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

Researchers at the University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy in Kingston, who performed the retrospective study, also found that six drugs within the antiepileptic drug (AED) class had a reporting odds ratio estimate of more than 20, compared with other non-AEDs.

“Although several antiepileptic drugs have been associated with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), the class effect and impact of other AEDs are not well described,” Eric P. Borrelli, PharmD, and his colleagues reported in Epilepsia.

The investigators examined rates of SJS and TEN for several AEDs using adverse event data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System between July 2014 and December 2017. The study investigators examined 198 adverse reaction reports related to AEDs, which was greater than any other drug class.

Overall, AEDs as a group had a reporting odds ratio risk estimate of 8.7 (95% confidence interval, 7.5-10.2), compared with non-AEDs. Similarly, the proportional reporting ratio was found to be 8.7 (95% CI, 7.5-10.2) in the AED group.

Within the class, the medications with the highest risk were zonisamide, rufinamide, and clorazepate, which had about 70-, 60-, and 56-fold higher odds for SJS and TEN, compared with all other medications. Other high-risk AEDs in the group included lamotrigine (reporting odds ratio, 53.0), carbamazepine (reporting OR, 24.5), and phenytoin (reporting OR, 26.3).

“Greater than 90% of SJS [and] TEN reactions associated with AEDs occur within the first 2 months of treatment initiation, although some AEDs have been associated with such reactions during long‐term use,” the researchers wrote.

The authors acknowledged that measures of prevalence and incidence could not be determined from these data since the number of patients taking AEDs is unknown.

“Increased awareness of this risk among both prescribers and patients, particularly variations in risk among different AEDs, along with education on early recognition of SJS [and] TEN signs [and] symptoms, may help mitigate the number and severity of these adverse events,” the researchers concluded.

The study was partially funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs. One coauthor reported receiving research funding from Pfizer, Merck (Cubist), and The Medicines Company.

SOURCE: Borrelli EP et al. Epilepsia. 2018 Nov 5. doi: 10.1111/epi.14591.

Figure 1

While the differential diagnosis for these lesions (FIGURE 1A) included basal cell carcinoma, the FP had reason to suspect that these papules were actually sebaceous hyperplasia.

The FP saw a pattern of crown-like vessels and popcorn-like structures (FIGURE 1B) when he examined the patient with his dermatoscope. None of the vessels crossed the midline, and the popcorn-like structures were hyperplastic sebaceous glands. The FP photographed the largest lesion with a dermatoscope attached to his smart phone and showed the reassuring pattern to the anxious patient. He explained to her why this was not skin cancer and how hyperplasia of sebaceous glands is often normal for aging facial skin. He also offered her treatment if she thought that the lesions were cosmetically unappealing.

The patient said that she would be grateful to have the largest lesion treated because it did bother her when she looked in the mirror. The FP treated this lesion using electrosurgery with a blunt tipped electrode, on a setting of 2.1, without anesthesia. He warned the patient before he applied the activated electrode to the skin, and the patient tolerated the procedure well. The sebaceous glands melted easily with the current. The result appeared gray and was expected to heal with minimal to no scarring. At a future visit, the patient said that she was happy with the result and asked if additional lesions could be treated with the same electrosurgical approach.

‌

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Karnes J, Usatine R. Basal cell carcinoma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:989-998.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.

Figure 1

While the differential diagnosis for these lesions (FIGURE 1A) included basal cell carcinoma, the FP had reason to suspect that these papules were actually sebaceous hyperplasia.

The FP saw a pattern of crown-like vessels and popcorn-like structures (FIGURE 1B) when he examined the patient with his dermatoscope. None of the vessels crossed the midline, and the popcorn-like structures were hyperplastic sebaceous glands. The FP photographed the largest lesion with a dermatoscope attached to his smart phone and showed the reassuring pattern to the anxious patient. He explained to her why this was not skin cancer and how hyperplasia of sebaceous glands is often normal for aging facial skin. He also offered her treatment if she thought that the lesions were cosmetically unappealing.

The patient said that she would be grateful to have the largest lesion treated because it did bother her when she looked in the mirror. The FP treated this lesion using electrosurgery with a blunt tipped electrode, on a setting of 2.1, without anesthesia. He warned the patient before he applied the activated electrode to the skin, and the patient tolerated the procedure well. The sebaceous glands melted easily with the current. The result appeared gray and was expected to heal with minimal to no scarring. At a future visit, the patient said that she was happy with the result and asked if additional lesions could be treated with the same electrosurgical approach.

‌

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Karnes J, Usatine R. Basal cell carcinoma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:989-998.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.

Figure 1

While the differential diagnosis for these lesions (FIGURE 1A) included basal cell carcinoma, the FP had reason to suspect that these papules were actually sebaceous hyperplasia.

The FP saw a pattern of crown-like vessels and popcorn-like structures (FIGURE 1B) when he examined the patient with his dermatoscope. None of the vessels crossed the midline, and the popcorn-like structures were hyperplastic sebaceous glands. The FP photographed the largest lesion with a dermatoscope attached to his smart phone and showed the reassuring pattern to the anxious patient. He explained to her why this was not skin cancer and how hyperplasia of sebaceous glands is often normal for aging facial skin. He also offered her treatment if she thought that the lesions were cosmetically unappealing.

The patient said that she would be grateful to have the largest lesion treated because it did bother her when she looked in the mirror. The FP treated this lesion using electrosurgery with a blunt tipped electrode, on a setting of 2.1, without anesthesia. He warned the patient before he applied the activated electrode to the skin, and the patient tolerated the procedure well. The sebaceous glands melted easily with the current. The result appeared gray and was expected to heal with minimal to no scarring. At a future visit, the patient said that she was happy with the result and asked if additional lesions could be treated with the same electrosurgical approach.

‌

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Karnes J, Usatine R. Basal cell carcinoma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:989-998.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.

CHICAGO – Oral tofacitinib demonstrated strong clinical efficacy and good safety in the first-ever formal study of a Janus kinase inhibitor in patients with active, treatment-resistant dermatomyositis, Julie J. Paik, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

Based upon the encouraging results of this small, open-label, proof-of-concept study, a larger randomized controlled trial is being planned, according to Dr. Paik, a rheumatologist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

The study included 10 dermatomyositis patients enrolled at the Johns Hopkins Myositis Clinic. All had previously failed at least two steroid-sparing drugs and/or high-dose steroids. After first going off all steroid-sparing agents and being limited to a maximum of 20 mg/day of prednisone, the participants were placed on 11 mg of open-label, extended-release tofacitinib (Xeljanz XR) once daily. Dr. Paik only reported results in 9 patients because the 10th hadn’t yet reached the 12-week mark.

The primary outcome was the rate of achievement of significant improvement at week 12 as defined using the validated International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) criteria, which require at least a 20% improvement in three of six core set measures coupled with no more than two measures worsening by 25% or more. By this standard, all nine patients met the primary endpoint. Five were rated as showing moderate improvement, and the other four demonstrated minimal improvement, based on the Total Improvement Score of the Myositis Response criteria. The median Total Improvement Score was 40, indicative of at least moderate improvement.

The mean CDASI (Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index) activity score – a key secondary endpoint – improved from 28 at baseline to 9.5 at week 12, which translates to a shift from moderate or severe disease to mild disease.

Levels of the alpha-chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10, which are expressed in muscle affected by idiopathic inflammatory myopathies such as dermatomyositis, declined strongly over the course of 12 weeks of treatment to an extent that was just shy of statistical significance.

Myositis antibody titers didn’t change in response to tofacitinib therapy. Of note, six patients were positive for antitranscriptional intermediary factor 1-gamma, and five of the six were moderate responders to JAK inhibitor therapy.

Four patients were on 20 mg/day of prednisone at baseline; three of the four were able to go off steroids altogether over the course of 12 weeks.

The treatment was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events.

Asked if she thought 11 mg/day of tofacitinib was the right dose for this population of refractory dermatomyositis patients, Dr. Paik replied, “We’re not sure we have the right dose. We had one patient who didn’t have as robust a response, and I really wonder, if we gave her a higher dose, it would have made a difference.”

Extended-release tofacitinib at 11 mg/day is the approved dose for rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. However, 20 mg/day is approved for patients with ulcerative colitis, and Dr. Paik is lobbying for inclusion of a higher-dose arm in the randomized, controlled trial.

Prior to this formal proof-of-concept study, which was funded by Pfizer, the experience with tofacitinib in refractory dermatomyositis was limited to anecdotal case reports.

Dr. Paik reported having no financial conflicts.

bjancin@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Paik JJ et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract L02.

CHICAGO – Oral tofacitinib demonstrated strong clinical efficacy and good safety in the first-ever formal study of a Janus kinase inhibitor in patients with active, treatment-resistant dermatomyositis, Julie J. Paik, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

Based upon the encouraging results of this small, open-label, proof-of-concept study, a larger randomized controlled trial is being planned, according to Dr. Paik, a rheumatologist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

The study included 10 dermatomyositis patients enrolled at the Johns Hopkins Myositis Clinic. All had previously failed at least two steroid-sparing drugs and/or high-dose steroids. After first going off all steroid-sparing agents and being limited to a maximum of 20 mg/day of prednisone, the participants were placed on 11 mg of open-label, extended-release tofacitinib (Xeljanz XR) once daily. Dr. Paik only reported results in 9 patients because the 10th hadn’t yet reached the 12-week mark.

The primary outcome was the rate of achievement of significant improvement at week 12 as defined using the validated International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) criteria, which require at least a 20% improvement in three of six core set measures coupled with no more than two measures worsening by 25% or more. By this standard, all nine patients met the primary endpoint. Five were rated as showing moderate improvement, and the other four demonstrated minimal improvement, based on the Total Improvement Score of the Myositis Response criteria. The median Total Improvement Score was 40, indicative of at least moderate improvement.

The mean CDASI (Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index) activity score – a key secondary endpoint – improved from 28 at baseline to 9.5 at week 12, which translates to a shift from moderate or severe disease to mild disease.

Levels of the alpha-chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10, which are expressed in muscle affected by idiopathic inflammatory myopathies such as dermatomyositis, declined strongly over the course of 12 weeks of treatment to an extent that was just shy of statistical significance.

Myositis antibody titers didn’t change in response to tofacitinib therapy. Of note, six patients were positive for antitranscriptional intermediary factor 1-gamma, and five of the six were moderate responders to JAK inhibitor therapy.

Four patients were on 20 mg/day of prednisone at baseline; three of the four were able to go off steroids altogether over the course of 12 weeks.

The treatment was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events.

Asked if she thought 11 mg/day of tofacitinib was the right dose for this population of refractory dermatomyositis patients, Dr. Paik replied, “We’re not sure we have the right dose. We had one patient who didn’t have as robust a response, and I really wonder, if we gave her a higher dose, it would have made a difference.”

Extended-release tofacitinib at 11 mg/day is the approved dose for rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. However, 20 mg/day is approved for patients with ulcerative colitis, and Dr. Paik is lobbying for inclusion of a higher-dose arm in the randomized, controlled trial.

Prior to this formal proof-of-concept study, which was funded by Pfizer, the experience with tofacitinib in refractory dermatomyositis was limited to anecdotal case reports.

Dr. Paik reported having no financial conflicts.

bjancin@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Paik JJ et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract L02.

CHICAGO – Oral tofacitinib demonstrated strong clinical efficacy and good safety in the first-ever formal study of a Janus kinase inhibitor in patients with active, treatment-resistant dermatomyositis, Julie J. Paik, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

Based upon the encouraging results of this small, open-label, proof-of-concept study, a larger randomized controlled trial is being planned, according to Dr. Paik, a rheumatologist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

The study included 10 dermatomyositis patients enrolled at the Johns Hopkins Myositis Clinic. All had previously failed at least two steroid-sparing drugs and/or high-dose steroids. After first going off all steroid-sparing agents and being limited to a maximum of 20 mg/day of prednisone, the participants were placed on 11 mg of open-label, extended-release tofacitinib (Xeljanz XR) once daily. Dr. Paik only reported results in 9 patients because the 10th hadn’t yet reached the 12-week mark.

The primary outcome was the rate of achievement of significant improvement at week 12 as defined using the validated International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) criteria, which require at least a 20% improvement in three of six core set measures coupled with no more than two measures worsening by 25% or more. By this standard, all nine patients met the primary endpoint. Five were rated as showing moderate improvement, and the other four demonstrated minimal improvement, based on the Total Improvement Score of the Myositis Response criteria. The median Total Improvement Score was 40, indicative of at least moderate improvement.

The mean CDASI (Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index) activity score – a key secondary endpoint – improved from 28 at baseline to 9.5 at week 12, which translates to a shift from moderate or severe disease to mild disease.

Levels of the alpha-chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10, which are expressed in muscle affected by idiopathic inflammatory myopathies such as dermatomyositis, declined strongly over the course of 12 weeks of treatment to an extent that was just shy of statistical significance.

Myositis antibody titers didn’t change in response to tofacitinib therapy. Of note, six patients were positive for antitranscriptional intermediary factor 1-gamma, and five of the six were moderate responders to JAK inhibitor therapy.

Four patients were on 20 mg/day of prednisone at baseline; three of the four were able to go off steroids altogether over the course of 12 weeks.

The treatment was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events.

Asked if she thought 11 mg/day of tofacitinib was the right dose for this population of refractory dermatomyositis patients, Dr. Paik replied, “We’re not sure we have the right dose. We had one patient who didn’t have as robust a response, and I really wonder, if we gave her a higher dose, it would have made a difference.”

Extended-release tofacitinib at 11 mg/day is the approved dose for rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. However, 20 mg/day is approved for patients with ulcerative colitis, and Dr. Paik is lobbying for inclusion of a higher-dose arm in the randomized, controlled trial.

Prior to this formal proof-of-concept study, which was funded by Pfizer, the experience with tofacitinib in refractory dermatomyositis was limited to anecdotal case reports.

Dr. Paik reported having no financial conflicts.

bjancin@mdedge.com

SOURCE: Paik JJ et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract L02.

ORLANDO – More therapies are becoming available for children for the treatment of influenza and multidrug-resistant infections such as Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter, John S. Bradley, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Dr. Bradley, director of the division of infectious diseases at Rady Children’s Hospital–San Diego, discussed a therapy for influenza, baloxavir, which was recently approved as a fast-acting single-dose medication and currently is under study in children. Also, a recent double-blind, phase 3 trial in the New England Journal of Medicine recruited patients as young as 12 years old. In the study, patients in the intervention group resolved their fever in median 25 hours, compared with 42 hours in the placebo group. Baloxavir better reduced viral load at day 2, compared with oseltamivir and placebo, but there was a similar alleviation of symptoms between both groups. There was a greater incidence of nausea and vomiting among the oseltamivir group, while the baloxavir group had a higher rate of diarrhea (N Engl J Med 2018;379:913-23).

However, Dr. Bradley noted baloxavir is much more expensive than oseltamivir, which may not justify the better tolerance of the drug for influenza treatment.

You don’t get better with it faster, so I’m not going to be recommending you all run to baloxavir this flu season for kids 12 years of age and older,” Dr. Bradley said. “I think oseltamivir is still fine, unless we end up with oseltamivir resistance.”

Solithromycin, an intravenous and oral fluoroketolide, has shown promising results against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens for community-acquired pneumonia and other infections. During the drug’s study period, Cempra sold solithromycin to Melinta. However, one trial showed elevated liver functions in a higher number of patients than expected, and the Food and Drug Administration asked Melinta to conduct additional studies. Investigations on solithromycin have currently stopped until Melinta secures funding. “Until they get better resources, this particular drug is on hold, but you’ll see it again, I’m sure,” said Dr. Bradley, who also is professor and chief of the division of infectious diseases at the University of California, San Diego.

Dr. Bradley also discussed the efficacy of tedizolid, a protein synthesis inhibitor similar to linezolid approved in adults for the treatment of skin infections. He noted tedizolid is more active than linezolid, but the treatment course is a shorter dose for a shorter amount of time. Compared with linezolid, which can cause thrombocytopenia or neutropenia if taken for more than 10 days to 14 days, there also are fewer side effects.

“The tedizolid is much, much safer,” Dr. Bradley said, who added that trials for efficacy of tedizolid are currently underway in pediatric patients. “We’re hoping that will end up being the pediatric oxazolidinone.”

Other investigative therapies approved for adults and under study for use in children include ceftazidime/avibactam for treatment of urinary tract and complicated intra-abdominal infections, which is effective against meropenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and resistant Escherichia coli with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL); ceftolozane/tazobactam has also been approved for adults, is pending approval in pediatric patients, and is active against ESBLs such as Pseudomonas; and meropenem/vaborbactam, which is active against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)–producing isolates. Plazomicin, an aminoglycoside similar to gentamicin used to treat KPC-producing isolates, is stable against enzymes that degrade gentamicin and tobramycin.

CDC/ Matthew J. Arduino

Therapies currently under study for adults and being considered for children include imipenem/relebactam for treatment against E. coli, Enterobacter species, and KPC-producing isolates, and cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin antibiotic – commonly described as a “Trojan horse” antibiotic because it binds to iron and is actively transported into the organism – is effective against Pseudomonas and has finished phase 2 trials in adults, with researchers looking to do single-dose trials in children, Dr. Bradley noted.

More experimentally, phage therapy for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii proved effective in a 68-year-old patient with necrotizing pancreatitis who continued to deteriorate over a 4-month period despite multiple courses of antibiotics and attempted drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst. Researchers selected a phage-specific bacterium with specificity for A. baumannii and cured him. “This is like science fiction,” Dr. Bradley said.

Dr. Bradley reported no relevant conflicts of interest.

ORLANDO – More therapies are becoming available for children for the treatment of influenza and multidrug-resistant infections such as Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter, John S. Bradley, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Dr. Bradley, director of the division of infectious diseases at Rady Children’s Hospital–San Diego, discussed a therapy for influenza, baloxavir, which was recently approved as a fast-acting single-dose medication and currently is under study in children. Also, a recent double-blind, phase 3 trial in the New England Journal of Medicine recruited patients as young as 12 years old. In the study, patients in the intervention group resolved their fever in median 25 hours, compared with 42 hours in the placebo group. Baloxavir better reduced viral load at day 2, compared with oseltamivir and placebo, but there was a similar alleviation of symptoms between both groups. There was a greater incidence of nausea and vomiting among the oseltamivir group, while the baloxavir group had a higher rate of diarrhea (N Engl J Med 2018;379:913-23).

However, Dr. Bradley noted baloxavir is much more expensive than oseltamivir, which may not justify the better tolerance of the drug for influenza treatment.

You don’t get better with it faster, so I’m not going to be recommending you all run to baloxavir this flu season for kids 12 years of age and older,” Dr. Bradley said. “I think oseltamivir is still fine, unless we end up with oseltamivir resistance.”

Solithromycin, an intravenous and oral fluoroketolide, has shown promising results against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens for community-acquired pneumonia and other infections. During the drug’s study period, Cempra sold solithromycin to Melinta. However, one trial showed elevated liver functions in a higher number of patients than expected, and the Food and Drug Administration asked Melinta to conduct additional studies. Investigations on solithromycin have currently stopped until Melinta secures funding. “Until they get better resources, this particular drug is on hold, but you’ll see it again, I’m sure,” said Dr. Bradley, who also is professor and chief of the division of infectious diseases at the University of California, San Diego.

Dr. Bradley also discussed the efficacy of tedizolid, a protein synthesis inhibitor similar to linezolid approved in adults for the treatment of skin infections. He noted tedizolid is more active than linezolid, but the treatment course is a shorter dose for a shorter amount of time. Compared with linezolid, which can cause thrombocytopenia or neutropenia if taken for more than 10 days to 14 days, there also are fewer side effects.

“The tedizolid is much, much safer,” Dr. Bradley said, who added that trials for efficacy of tedizolid are currently underway in pediatric patients. “We’re hoping that will end up being the pediatric oxazolidinone.”

Other investigative therapies approved for adults and under study for use in children include ceftazidime/avibactam for treatment of urinary tract and complicated intra-abdominal infections, which is effective against meropenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and resistant Escherichia coli with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL); ceftolozane/tazobactam has also been approved for adults, is pending approval in pediatric patients, and is active against ESBLs such as Pseudomonas; and meropenem/vaborbactam, which is active against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)–producing isolates. Plazomicin, an aminoglycoside similar to gentamicin used to treat KPC-producing isolates, is stable against enzymes that degrade gentamicin and tobramycin.

CDC/ Matthew J. Arduino

Therapies currently under study for adults and being considered for children include imipenem/relebactam for treatment against E. coli, Enterobacter species, and KPC-producing isolates, and cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin antibiotic – commonly described as a “Trojan horse” antibiotic because it binds to iron and is actively transported into the organism – is effective against Pseudomonas and has finished phase 2 trials in adults, with researchers looking to do single-dose trials in children, Dr. Bradley noted.

More experimentally, phage therapy for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii proved effective in a 68-year-old patient with necrotizing pancreatitis who continued to deteriorate over a 4-month period despite multiple courses of antibiotics and attempted drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst. Researchers selected a phage-specific bacterium with specificity for A. baumannii and cured him. “This is like science fiction,” Dr. Bradley said.

Dr. Bradley reported no relevant conflicts of interest.

ORLANDO – More therapies are becoming available for children for the treatment of influenza and multidrug-resistant infections such as Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter, John S. Bradley, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Dr. Bradley, director of the division of infectious diseases at Rady Children’s Hospital–San Diego, discussed a therapy for influenza, baloxavir, which was recently approved as a fast-acting single-dose medication and currently is under study in children. Also, a recent double-blind, phase 3 trial in the New England Journal of Medicine recruited patients as young as 12 years old. In the study, patients in the intervention group resolved their fever in median 25 hours, compared with 42 hours in the placebo group. Baloxavir better reduced viral load at day 2, compared with oseltamivir and placebo, but there was a similar alleviation of symptoms between both groups. There was a greater incidence of nausea and vomiting among the oseltamivir group, while the baloxavir group had a higher rate of diarrhea (N Engl J Med 2018;379:913-23).

However, Dr. Bradley noted baloxavir is much more expensive than oseltamivir, which may not justify the better tolerance of the drug for influenza treatment.

You don’t get better with it faster, so I’m not going to be recommending you all run to baloxavir this flu season for kids 12 years of age and older,” Dr. Bradley said. “I think oseltamivir is still fine, unless we end up with oseltamivir resistance.”

Solithromycin, an intravenous and oral fluoroketolide, has shown promising results against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens for community-acquired pneumonia and other infections. During the drug’s study period, Cempra sold solithromycin to Melinta. However, one trial showed elevated liver functions in a higher number of patients than expected, and the Food and Drug Administration asked Melinta to conduct additional studies. Investigations on solithromycin have currently stopped until Melinta secures funding. “Until they get better resources, this particular drug is on hold, but you’ll see it again, I’m sure,” said Dr. Bradley, who also is professor and chief of the division of infectious diseases at the University of California, San Diego.

Dr. Bradley also discussed the efficacy of tedizolid, a protein synthesis inhibitor similar to linezolid approved in adults for the treatment of skin infections. He noted tedizolid is more active than linezolid, but the treatment course is a shorter dose for a shorter amount of time. Compared with linezolid, which can cause thrombocytopenia or neutropenia if taken for more than 10 days to 14 days, there also are fewer side effects.

“The tedizolid is much, much safer,” Dr. Bradley said, who added that trials for efficacy of tedizolid are currently underway in pediatric patients. “We’re hoping that will end up being the pediatric oxazolidinone.”

Other investigative therapies approved for adults and under study for use in children include ceftazidime/avibactam for treatment of urinary tract and complicated intra-abdominal infections, which is effective against meropenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and resistant Escherichia coli with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL); ceftolozane/tazobactam has also been approved for adults, is pending approval in pediatric patients, and is active against ESBLs such as Pseudomonas; and meropenem/vaborbactam, which is active against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)–producing isolates. Plazomicin, an aminoglycoside similar to gentamicin used to treat KPC-producing isolates, is stable against enzymes that degrade gentamicin and tobramycin.

CDC/ Matthew J. Arduino

Therapies currently under study for adults and being considered for children include imipenem/relebactam for treatment against E. coli, Enterobacter species, and KPC-producing isolates, and cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin antibiotic – commonly described as a “Trojan horse” antibiotic because it binds to iron and is actively transported into the organism – is effective against Pseudomonas and has finished phase 2 trials in adults, with researchers looking to do single-dose trials in children, Dr. Bradley noted.

More experimentally, phage therapy for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii proved effective in a 68-year-old patient with necrotizing pancreatitis who continued to deteriorate over a 4-month period despite multiple courses of antibiotics and attempted drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst. Researchers selected a phage-specific bacterium with specificity for A. baumannii and cured him. “This is like science fiction,” Dr. Bradley said.

Dr. Bradley reported no relevant conflicts of interest.

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) is a low grade, indolent sarcoma that tends to occur on sun-exposed areas, such as the head and neck. White individuals over aged 50 years are more frequently affected. Both genders are equally affected, and 25% of cases occur on the covered areas (trunk or extremities) of younger patients. Clinically, lesions present as pink to red plaques or nodules that exhibit rapid growth. Ulceration or crusting may be present. Causes of AFX include ultraviolet radiation and ionizing radiation. AFX is considered a superficial variant of malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH), the most common soft tissue sarcoma of adults. Clinically, MFH involves deeper tissues than does AFX, often on the thighs or buttocks. MFH is a more aggressive malignancy that regularly metastasizes.

Dr. Donna Bilu Martin

Histologically, the tumor occurs as a dermal proliferation of “bizarre” spindle cells, epithelioid cells, and atypical histiocytes. Vesicular changes may be present in the nucleus or cytoplasm of the spindle cells. Mitotic figures are present. Multinucleated giant cells may be present. Solar elastosis is often seen, as well. Vimentin and histiocyte stains are positive. Unlike melanoma, S-100 staining is minimal. Unlike squamous cell carcinoma, prekeratin staining is negative. CD34 is negative. AFX resembles MFH histologically.

Surgical excision by the Mohs procedure is preferred over wide excision as there is a risk of recurrence. AFX rarely metastasizes. This is more likely if inadequately excised or the patient is immunosuppressed. Sun protective practices, such as applying and reapplying sunscreen regularly, wearing sun protective clothing, and avoiding excessive UV exposure during peak hours is recommended.

Dr. Bilu Martin is a board-certified dermatologist in private practice at Premier Dermatology, MD, in Aventura, Fla. More diagnostic cases are available at edermatologynews.com. To submit a case for possible publication, send an email to dermnews@mdedge.com.

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) is a low grade, indolent sarcoma that tends to occur on sun-exposed areas, such as the head and neck. White individuals over aged 50 years are more frequently affected. Both genders are equally affected, and 25% of cases occur on the covered areas (trunk or extremities) of younger patients. Clinically, lesions present as pink to red plaques or nodules that exhibit rapid growth. Ulceration or crusting may be present. Causes of AFX include ultraviolet radiation and ionizing radiation. AFX is considered a superficial variant of malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH), the most common soft tissue sarcoma of adults. Clinically, MFH involves deeper tissues than does AFX, often on the thighs or buttocks. MFH is a more aggressive malignancy that regularly metastasizes.

Dr. Donna Bilu Martin

Histologically, the tumor occurs as a dermal proliferation of “bizarre” spindle cells, epithelioid cells, and atypical histiocytes. Vesicular changes may be present in the nucleus or cytoplasm of the spindle cells. Mitotic figures are present. Multinucleated giant cells may be present. Solar elastosis is often seen, as well. Vimentin and histiocyte stains are positive. Unlike melanoma, S-100 staining is minimal. Unlike squamous cell carcinoma, prekeratin staining is negative. CD34 is negative. AFX resembles MFH histologically.

Surgical excision by the Mohs procedure is preferred over wide excision as there is a risk of recurrence. AFX rarely metastasizes. This is more likely if inadequately excised or the patient is immunosuppressed. Sun protective practices, such as applying and reapplying sunscreen regularly, wearing sun protective clothing, and avoiding excessive UV exposure during peak hours is recommended.

Dr. Bilu Martin is a board-certified dermatologist in private practice at Premier Dermatology, MD, in Aventura, Fla. More diagnostic cases are available at edermatologynews.com. To submit a case for possible publication, send an email to dermnews@mdedge.com.

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) is a low grade, indolent sarcoma that tends to occur on sun-exposed areas, such as the head and neck. White individuals over aged 50 years are more frequently affected. Both genders are equally affected, and 25% of cases occur on the covered areas (trunk or extremities) of younger patients. Clinically, lesions present as pink to red plaques or nodules that exhibit rapid growth. Ulceration or crusting may be present. Causes of AFX include ultraviolet radiation and ionizing radiation. AFX is considered a superficial variant of malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH), the most common soft tissue sarcoma of adults. Clinically, MFH involves deeper tissues than does AFX, often on the thighs or buttocks. MFH is a more aggressive malignancy that regularly metastasizes.

Dr. Donna Bilu Martin

Histologically, the tumor occurs as a dermal proliferation of “bizarre” spindle cells, epithelioid cells, and atypical histiocytes. Vesicular changes may be present in the nucleus or cytoplasm of the spindle cells. Mitotic figures are present. Multinucleated giant cells may be present. Solar elastosis is often seen, as well. Vimentin and histiocyte stains are positive. Unlike melanoma, S-100 staining is minimal. Unlike squamous cell carcinoma, prekeratin staining is negative. CD34 is negative. AFX resembles MFH histologically.

Surgical excision by the Mohs procedure is preferred over wide excision as there is a risk of recurrence. AFX rarely metastasizes. This is more likely if inadequately excised or the patient is immunosuppressed. Sun protective practices, such as applying and reapplying sunscreen regularly, wearing sun protective clothing, and avoiding excessive UV exposure during peak hours is recommended.

Dr. Bilu Martin is a board-certified dermatologist in private practice at Premier Dermatology, MD, in Aventura, Fla. More diagnostic cases are available at edermatologynews.com. To submit a case for possible publication, send an email to dermnews@mdedge.com.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) places a considerable burden on mental health and quality of life for patients with disease of even moderate severity, according to a cross-sectional study of data from the Atopic Dermatitis in America survey.

Among adults with severe AD, the mean score on the Dermatology Life Quality Index was 11.4, with a score of 6-30 representing a moderate to large effect on quality of life. The mean for those with moderate disease, 5.9, was just below that range, but 37% of that group did have scores between 6 and 30, Zelma C. Chiesa Fuxench, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and her associates said in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

The mean on the Dermatology Life Quality Index for all AD patients was 4.1, with 24% falling into the moderate to large effect range, compared with 1% and 5% for controls. Results were similar on the mental health measure used, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Mean HADS-anxiety scores were 7.0 for all AD patients and 4.7 for controls, and HADS-depression means were 5.8 for AD patients and 3.6 for controls, the investigators reported.

Analysis by disease severity found that 32% of those with moderate AD and almost 56% with severe AD had clinical anxiety (HADS-A score of 11-21), while somewhat lower prevalences were seen for clinical depression (HADS-D score of 11-21): 19.5% for those with moderate AD and 19.7% for patients with severe AD, Dr. Chiesa Fuxench and her associates said.

“An increasing number of studies provide evidence that AD is associated with marked [quality of life] impairment and increased health care costs with higher burden and costs in those with more severe disease. Additional studies should center on exploring those factors associated with AD, and AD disease severity, which lead to increased disease burden in this population,” they wrote.

Respondents to the Atopic Dermatitis in America survey were part of the GfK Knowledge Panel. The study involved a two-stage sampling process: one group of 1,278 adults determined prevalence ,and an oversample of 602 AD patients assessed severity differences.

Dr. Chiesa Fuxench has received research grants from Regeneron, Sanofi, Tioga, and Vanda for work related to atopic dermatitis and has received honoraria for CME work in atopic dermatitis sponsored by educational grants from Regeneron and Sanofi.

rfranki@mdedge.com

SOURCE: J Invest Dermatol. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.08.028.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) places a considerable burden on mental health and quality of life for patients with disease of even moderate severity, according to a cross-sectional study of data from the Atopic Dermatitis in America survey.

Among adults with severe AD, the mean score on the Dermatology Life Quality Index was 11.4, with a score of 6-30 representing a moderate to large effect on quality of life. The mean for those with moderate disease, 5.9, was just below that range, but 37% of that group did have scores between 6 and 30, Zelma C. Chiesa Fuxench, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and her associates said in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

The mean on the Dermatology Life Quality Index for all AD patients was 4.1, with 24% falling into the moderate to large effect range, compared with 1% and 5% for controls. Results were similar on the mental health measure used, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Mean HADS-anxiety scores were 7.0 for all AD patients and 4.7 for controls, and HADS-depression means were 5.8 for AD patients and 3.6 for controls, the investigators reported.

Analysis by disease severity found that 32% of those with moderate AD and almost 56% with severe AD had clinical anxiety (HADS-A score of 11-21), while somewhat lower prevalences were seen for clinical depression (HADS-D score of 11-21): 19.5% for those with moderate AD and 19.7% for patients with severe AD, Dr. Chiesa Fuxench and her associates said.

“An increasing number of studies provide evidence that AD is associated with marked [quality of life] impairment and increased health care costs with higher burden and costs in those with more severe disease. Additional studies should center on exploring those factors associated with AD, and AD disease severity, which lead to increased disease burden in this population,” they wrote.

Respondents to the Atopic Dermatitis in America survey were part of the GfK Knowledge Panel. The study involved a two-stage sampling process: one group of 1,278 adults determined prevalence ,and an oversample of 602 AD patients assessed severity differences.

Dr. Chiesa Fuxench has received research grants from Regeneron, Sanofi, Tioga, and Vanda for work related to atopic dermatitis and has received honoraria for CME work in atopic dermatitis sponsored by educational grants from Regeneron and Sanofi.

rfranki@mdedge.com

SOURCE: J Invest Dermatol. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.08.028.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) places a considerable burden on mental health and quality of life for patients with disease of even moderate severity, according to a cross-sectional study of data from the Atopic Dermatitis in America survey.

Among adults with severe AD, the mean score on the Dermatology Life Quality Index was 11.4, with a score of 6-30 representing a moderate to large effect on quality of life. The mean for those with moderate disease, 5.9, was just below that range, but 37% of that group did have scores between 6 and 30, Zelma C. Chiesa Fuxench, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and her associates said in the Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

The mean on the Dermatology Life Quality Index for all AD patients was 4.1, with 24% falling into the moderate to large effect range, compared with 1% and 5% for controls. Results were similar on the mental health measure used, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Mean HADS-anxiety scores were 7.0 for all AD patients and 4.7 for controls, and HADS-depression means were 5.8 for AD patients and 3.6 for controls, the investigators reported.

Analysis by disease severity found that 32% of those with moderate AD and almost 56% with severe AD had clinical anxiety (HADS-A score of 11-21), while somewhat lower prevalences were seen for clinical depression (HADS-D score of 11-21): 19.5% for those with moderate AD and 19.7% for patients with severe AD, Dr. Chiesa Fuxench and her associates said.

“An increasing number of studies provide evidence that AD is associated with marked [quality of life] impairment and increased health care costs with higher burden and costs in those with more severe disease. Additional studies should center on exploring those factors associated with AD, and AD disease severity, which lead to increased disease burden in this population,” they wrote.

Respondents to the Atopic Dermatitis in America survey were part of the GfK Knowledge Panel. The study involved a two-stage sampling process: one group of 1,278 adults determined prevalence ,and an oversample of 602 AD patients assessed severity differences.

Dr. Chiesa Fuxench has received research grants from Regeneron, Sanofi, Tioga, and Vanda for work related to atopic dermatitis and has received honoraria for CME work in atopic dermatitis sponsored by educational grants from Regeneron and Sanofi.

rfranki@mdedge.com

SOURCE: J Invest Dermatol. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.08.028.

Figure 1

The FP suspected that this was a basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or squamous cell carcinoma. He leaned toward a BCC because of the pearly border on the edge, but knew that a biopsy diagnosis was needed before planning definitive treatment.

The FP recommended performing a shave biopsy that day. (See the Watch & Learn video on “Shave biopsy.”) After obtaining patient consent, he injected 1% lidocaine with epinephrine and waited for the epinephrine to work. He performed the shave biopsy with a Dermablade, and used a cotton-tipped applicator to vigorously apply aluminum chloride to the site. He used a twisting motion and pressure to achieve hemostasis. The bleeding stopped, and the FP dressed the lesion with petrolatum and some gauze. Dermatopathology revealed a sclerosing BCC.

The FP realized this was an aggressive tumor and referred the patient for Mohs surgery. The surgery required 4 excisions to get clean margins (FIGURE 1B). The usual 4- to 5-mm margins with an elliptical excision would not have removed the full tumor.

‌

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Karnes J, Usatine R. Basal cell carcinoma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:989-998.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.

Figure 1

The FP suspected that this was a basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or squamous cell carcinoma. He leaned toward a BCC because of the pearly border on the edge, but knew that a biopsy diagnosis was needed before planning definitive treatment.

The FP recommended performing a shave biopsy that day. (See the Watch & Learn video on “Shave biopsy.”) After obtaining patient consent, he injected 1% lidocaine with epinephrine and waited for the epinephrine to work. He performed the shave biopsy with a Dermablade, and used a cotton-tipped applicator to vigorously apply aluminum chloride to the site. He used a twisting motion and pressure to achieve hemostasis. The bleeding stopped, and the FP dressed the lesion with petrolatum and some gauze. Dermatopathology revealed a sclerosing BCC.

The FP realized this was an aggressive tumor and referred the patient for Mohs surgery. The surgery required 4 excisions to get clean margins (FIGURE 1B). The usual 4- to 5-mm margins with an elliptical excision would not have removed the full tumor.

‌

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Karnes J, Usatine R. Basal cell carcinoma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:989-998.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.

Figure 1

The FP suspected that this was a basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or squamous cell carcinoma. He leaned toward a BCC because of the pearly border on the edge, but knew that a biopsy diagnosis was needed before planning definitive treatment.

The FP recommended performing a shave biopsy that day. (See the Watch & Learn video on “Shave biopsy.”) After obtaining patient consent, he injected 1% lidocaine with epinephrine and waited for the epinephrine to work. He performed the shave biopsy with a Dermablade, and used a cotton-tipped applicator to vigorously apply aluminum chloride to the site. He used a twisting motion and pressure to achieve hemostasis. The bleeding stopped, and the FP dressed the lesion with petrolatum and some gauze. Dermatopathology revealed a sclerosing BCC.

The FP realized this was an aggressive tumor and referred the patient for Mohs surgery. The surgery required 4 excisions to get clean margins (FIGURE 1B). The usual 4- to 5-mm margins with an elliptical excision would not have removed the full tumor.

‌

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Karnes J, Usatine R. Basal cell carcinoma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:989-998.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.

Prompted by his new bride, who is concerned she might “catch something” from him, a 53-year-old man self-refers for evaluation of a slightly itchy intergluteal rash. He’s had it for years; it waxes and wanes but never fully resolves.

It has been previously diagnosed as a yeast infection, fungal infection, and even herpes. But none of the respective treatments have helped.

More history-taking reveals a family history of psoriasis (maternal grandmother), but the patient denies other areas of involvement or other skin changes. He also denies having arthritis.

EXAMINATION
A salmon-pink, 7-cm, roughly round dry patch covered by white tenacious scale is located in the upper intergluteal/sacral interface. There is no increased warmth or tenderness on palpation.

A similar process is noted in the periumbilical area (a difficult area for this patient to see, due to his weight). Inspection of his fingernails reveals 3/10 with definite tiny pits.

What is the diagnosis?

DISCUSSION
The urge to call any and every rash occurring near the genitals a yeast infection is universally compelling among primary care providers. It is often so reflexive that even when anti-yeast medications fail, the provider hangs onto the diagnosis. This happens for one simple reason: Their differential is lacking.

This patient has psoriasis, albeit a somewhat unusual form, which demonstrates an important learning point: Psoriasis can present in any number of ways, not just in the standard “extensor surfaces of elbows and knees” distribution. It’s not unusual for psoriasis to zero in on one or two areas. I’ve seen it confined to the groin, the genitals, and the scalp. It can even involve the oral mucosa.

In these somewhat obscure cases, additional findings can be helpful to establish the diagnosis. The two areas of involvement in this case—the upper intergluteal area and the periumbilical region—may not fit the classic “knees and elbows” picture of psoriasis, but they are not atypical for the disease. Add the nail pits, the fixed nature of the problem, and the family history, and you’ve nailed the diagnosis.

Don’t forget that, occasionally, psoriatic arthropathy can precede the appearance of psoriasis, and that the severity of one does not predict the severity of the other.

Finally, in a fair number of cases, the diagnosis of psoriasis must be made by biopsy, which shows characteristic changes such as parakeratosis, epidermal thickening, and fusing of rete ridges. These “psoriasiform” changes seen microscopically must be corroborated by clinical findings, though, since many other papulosquamous diseases can exhibit similar changes.

TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS

• Psoriasis is one of the more common dermatoses in this country, which means you will see it with some frequency.
• Psoriasis can affect limited or atypical areas, but corroboration of the diagnosis can be sought in classic areas (nails, scalp, upper intergluteal and periumbilical areas).
• Strive to develop alternative diagnoses for similar rashes—in other words, build your differential for “yeast infection.”

Prompted by his new bride, who is concerned she might “catch something” from him, a 53-year-old man self-refers for evaluation of a slightly itchy intergluteal rash. He’s had it for years; it waxes and wanes but never fully resolves.

It has been previously diagnosed as a yeast infection, fungal infection, and even herpes. But none of the respective treatments have helped.

More history-taking reveals a family history of psoriasis (maternal grandmother), but the patient denies other areas of involvement or other skin changes. He also denies having arthritis.

EXAMINATION
A salmon-pink, 7-cm, roughly round dry patch covered by white tenacious scale is located in the upper intergluteal/sacral interface. There is no increased warmth or tenderness on palpation.

A similar process is noted in the periumbilical area (a difficult area for this patient to see, due to his weight). Inspection of his fingernails reveals 3/10 with definite tiny pits.

What is the diagnosis?

DISCUSSION
The urge to call any and every rash occurring near the genitals a yeast infection is universally compelling among primary care providers. It is often so reflexive that even when anti-yeast medications fail, the provider hangs onto the diagnosis. This happens for one simple reason: Their differential is lacking.

This patient has psoriasis, albeit a somewhat unusual form, which demonstrates an important learning point: Psoriasis can present in any number of ways, not just in the standard “extensor surfaces of elbows and knees” distribution. It’s not unusual for psoriasis to zero in on one or two areas. I’ve seen it confined to the groin, the genitals, and the scalp. It can even involve the oral mucosa.

In these somewhat obscure cases, additional findings can be helpful to establish the diagnosis. The two areas of involvement in this case—the upper intergluteal area and the periumbilical region—may not fit the classic “knees and elbows” picture of psoriasis, but they are not atypical for the disease. Add the nail pits, the fixed nature of the problem, and the family history, and you’ve nailed the diagnosis.

Don’t forget that, occasionally, psoriatic arthropathy can precede the appearance of psoriasis, and that the severity of one does not predict the severity of the other.

Finally, in a fair number of cases, the diagnosis of psoriasis must be made by biopsy, which shows characteristic changes such as parakeratosis, epidermal thickening, and fusing of rete ridges. These “psoriasiform” changes seen microscopically must be corroborated by clinical findings, though, since many other papulosquamous diseases can exhibit similar changes.

TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS

• Psoriasis is one of the more common dermatoses in this country, which means you will see it with some frequency.
• Psoriasis can affect limited or atypical areas, but corroboration of the diagnosis can be sought in classic areas (nails, scalp, upper intergluteal and periumbilical areas).
• Strive to develop alternative diagnoses for similar rashes—in other words, build your differential for “yeast infection.”

Prompted by his new bride, who is concerned she might “catch something” from him, a 53-year-old man self-refers for evaluation of a slightly itchy intergluteal rash. He’s had it for years; it waxes and wanes but never fully resolves.

It has been previously diagnosed as a yeast infection, fungal infection, and even herpes. But none of the respective treatments have helped.

More history-taking reveals a family history of psoriasis (maternal grandmother), but the patient denies other areas of involvement or other skin changes. He also denies having arthritis.

EXAMINATION
A salmon-pink, 7-cm, roughly round dry patch covered by white tenacious scale is located in the upper intergluteal/sacral interface. There is no increased warmth or tenderness on palpation.

A similar process is noted in the periumbilical area (a difficult area for this patient to see, due to his weight). Inspection of his fingernails reveals 3/10 with definite tiny pits.

What is the diagnosis?

DISCUSSION
The urge to call any and every rash occurring near the genitals a yeast infection is universally compelling among primary care providers. It is often so reflexive that even when anti-yeast medications fail, the provider hangs onto the diagnosis. This happens for one simple reason: Their differential is lacking.

This patient has psoriasis, albeit a somewhat unusual form, which demonstrates an important learning point: Psoriasis can present in any number of ways, not just in the standard “extensor surfaces of elbows and knees” distribution. It’s not unusual for psoriasis to zero in on one or two areas. I’ve seen it confined to the groin, the genitals, and the scalp. It can even involve the oral mucosa.

In these somewhat obscure cases, additional findings can be helpful to establish the diagnosis. The two areas of involvement in this case—the upper intergluteal area and the periumbilical region—may not fit the classic “knees and elbows” picture of psoriasis, but they are not atypical for the disease. Add the nail pits, the fixed nature of the problem, and the family history, and you’ve nailed the diagnosis.

Don’t forget that, occasionally, psoriatic arthropathy can precede the appearance of psoriasis, and that the severity of one does not predict the severity of the other.

Finally, in a fair number of cases, the diagnosis of psoriasis must be made by biopsy, which shows characteristic changes such as parakeratosis, epidermal thickening, and fusing of rete ridges. These “psoriasiform” changes seen microscopically must be corroborated by clinical findings, though, since many other papulosquamous diseases can exhibit similar changes.

TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS

• Psoriasis is one of the more common dermatoses in this country, which means you will see it with some frequency.
• Psoriasis can affect limited or atypical areas, but corroboration of the diagnosis can be sought in classic areas (nails, scalp, upper intergluteal and periumbilical areas).
• Strive to develop alternative diagnoses for similar rashes—in other words, build your differential for “yeast infection.”

The Food and Drug Administration has accepted the supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) for dupilumab in patients aged 12-17 years with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who have not been well controlled with topical therapies or who are unable to use topical therapies.

In a statement, dupilumab manufacturers Regeneron and Sanofi announced that the target action data for an FDA decision on dupilumab for adolescents is March 11, 2019. “Currently, there are no FDA-approved systemic biologic medicines to treat adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis,” the companies said in the statement.

The sBLA for dupilumab use in teens is based on data from a phase 3 study presented at the annual congress of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology in September 2018. In that study, the proportion of patients who achieved a 75% or greater improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index at 16 weeks was 38.1% with monthly dupilumab, 41.5% with dupilumab every 2 weeks, and 8.2% with placebo.

According to the companies, the most common adverse events included injection site reactions, oropharyngeal pain, and cold sores. Conjunctivitis has also been reported in some patients.

Dupilumab (Dupixent), which inhibits interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signaling, is currently approved for treating uncontrolled moderate to severe AD in adults and, more recently, as an add-on maintenance treatment in patients with moderate to severe asthma aged 12 years and older with an eosinophilic phenotype or with oral corticosteroid–dependent asthma.

The FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy designation for dupilumab in 2016 for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in adolescents and severe AD in children aged 6 months to 11 years who are insufficiently controlled with topical medications.

The Food and Drug Administration has accepted the supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) for dupilumab in patients aged 12-17 years with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who have not been well controlled with topical therapies or who are unable to use topical therapies.

In a statement, dupilumab manufacturers Regeneron and Sanofi announced that the target action data for an FDA decision on dupilumab for adolescents is March 11, 2019. “Currently, there are no FDA-approved systemic biologic medicines to treat adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis,” the companies said in the statement.

The sBLA for dupilumab use in teens is based on data from a phase 3 study presented at the annual congress of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology in September 2018. In that study, the proportion of patients who achieved a 75% or greater improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index at 16 weeks was 38.1% with monthly dupilumab, 41.5% with dupilumab every 2 weeks, and 8.2% with placebo.

According to the companies, the most common adverse events included injection site reactions, oropharyngeal pain, and cold sores. Conjunctivitis has also been reported in some patients.

Dupilumab (Dupixent), which inhibits interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signaling, is currently approved for treating uncontrolled moderate to severe AD in adults and, more recently, as an add-on maintenance treatment in patients with moderate to severe asthma aged 12 years and older with an eosinophilic phenotype or with oral corticosteroid–dependent asthma.

The FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy designation for dupilumab in 2016 for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in adolescents and severe AD in children aged 6 months to 11 years who are insufficiently controlled with topical medications.

The Food and Drug Administration has accepted the supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) for dupilumab in patients aged 12-17 years with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who have not been well controlled with topical therapies or who are unable to use topical therapies.

In a statement, dupilumab manufacturers Regeneron and Sanofi announced that the target action data for an FDA decision on dupilumab for adolescents is March 11, 2019. “Currently, there are no FDA-approved systemic biologic medicines to treat adolescents with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis,” the companies said in the statement.

The sBLA for dupilumab use in teens is based on data from a phase 3 study presented at the annual congress of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology in September 2018. In that study, the proportion of patients who achieved a 75% or greater improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index at 16 weeks was 38.1% with monthly dupilumab, 41.5% with dupilumab every 2 weeks, and 8.2% with placebo.

According to the companies, the most common adverse events included injection site reactions, oropharyngeal pain, and cold sores. Conjunctivitis has also been reported in some patients.

Dupilumab (Dupixent), which inhibits interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signaling, is currently approved for treating uncontrolled moderate to severe AD in adults and, more recently, as an add-on maintenance treatment in patients with moderate to severe asthma aged 12 years and older with an eosinophilic phenotype or with oral corticosteroid–dependent asthma.

The FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy designation for dupilumab in 2016 for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in adolescents and severe AD in children aged 6 months to 11 years who are insufficiently controlled with topical medications.