Clinical Edge Journal Scan

Key clinical point: Discontinuing adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) was associated with a higher likelihood of discontinuing cardiovascular therapy and an increased risk for mortality due to cardiovascular diseases in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (ER+ BC).

Major finding: Compared with patients who continued adjuvant HT, the rate of discontinuing cardiovascular therapy was higher among patients who discontinued HT within a period of 3 months before (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.83; 95% CI 1.41-2.37) and after (IRR 2.31; 95% CI 1.74-3.05) adjuvant HT discontinuation. Discontinuation of adjuvant HT was also associated with a higher risk for death due to cardiovascular diseases (hazard ratio 1.79; 95% CI 1.15-2.81).

Study details: Findings are from a population-based cohort study including 5493 patients with nonmetastatic ER+ BC who initiated adjuvant HT and concomitantly used cardiovascular therapy.

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council and other sources. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: He W et al. Concomitant discontinuation of cardiovascular therapy and adjuvant hormone therapy among patients with breast cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(7):e2323752 (Jul 17). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23752

Key clinical point: Discontinuing adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) was associated with a higher likelihood of discontinuing cardiovascular therapy and an increased risk for mortality due to cardiovascular diseases in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (ER+ BC).

Major finding: Compared with patients who continued adjuvant HT, the rate of discontinuing cardiovascular therapy was higher among patients who discontinued HT within a period of 3 months before (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.83; 95% CI 1.41-2.37) and after (IRR 2.31; 95% CI 1.74-3.05) adjuvant HT discontinuation. Discontinuation of adjuvant HT was also associated with a higher risk for death due to cardiovascular diseases (hazard ratio 1.79; 95% CI 1.15-2.81).

Study details: Findings are from a population-based cohort study including 5493 patients with nonmetastatic ER+ BC who initiated adjuvant HT and concomitantly used cardiovascular therapy.

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council and other sources. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: He W et al. Concomitant discontinuation of cardiovascular therapy and adjuvant hormone therapy among patients with breast cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(7):e2323752 (Jul 17). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23752

Key clinical point: Discontinuing adjuvant hormone therapy (HT) was associated with a higher likelihood of discontinuing cardiovascular therapy and an increased risk for mortality due to cardiovascular diseases in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (ER+ BC).

Major finding: Compared with patients who continued adjuvant HT, the rate of discontinuing cardiovascular therapy was higher among patients who discontinued HT within a period of 3 months before (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.83; 95% CI 1.41-2.37) and after (IRR 2.31; 95% CI 1.74-3.05) adjuvant HT discontinuation. Discontinuation of adjuvant HT was also associated with a higher risk for death due to cardiovascular diseases (hazard ratio 1.79; 95% CI 1.15-2.81).

Study details: Findings are from a population-based cohort study including 5493 patients with nonmetastatic ER+ BC who initiated adjuvant HT and concomitantly used cardiovascular therapy.

Disclosures: This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council and other sources. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: He W et al. Concomitant discontinuation of cardiovascular therapy and adjuvant hormone therapy among patients with breast cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(7):e2323752 (Jul 17). doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23752

Key clinical point: A diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) within the first 5 years of childbirth was associated with aggressive clinicopathological characteristics and unfavorable survival outcomes.

Major finding: Women diagnosed with post-partum BC (PPBC) within 5 years of childbirth showed more aggressive disease characteristics than nulliparous women with BC and women diagnosed with PPBC ≥ 5 years after childbirth (clinical stage T3: 5.9% vs 3.3% and 3.9%, respectively, or higher lymph node metastases: 40.6% vs 27.8% and 34.7%, respectively) and had the worst survival rates (hazard ratio 1.55; P = .004).

Study details: This study retrospectively reviewed 32,628 premenopausal women aged 20-50 years who underwent BC surgery, of which 508 women were nulliparous and 2406 women were diagnosed with BC within 5 years of childbirth.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Korean Breast Cancer Society. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Paik PS et al for the Korean Breast Cancer Society. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of postpartum breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 (Aug 5). doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07069-w

Key clinical point: A diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) within the first 5 years of childbirth was associated with aggressive clinicopathological characteristics and unfavorable survival outcomes.

Major finding: Women diagnosed with post-partum BC (PPBC) within 5 years of childbirth showed more aggressive disease characteristics than nulliparous women with BC and women diagnosed with PPBC ≥ 5 years after childbirth (clinical stage T3: 5.9% vs 3.3% and 3.9%, respectively, or higher lymph node metastases: 40.6% vs 27.8% and 34.7%, respectively) and had the worst survival rates (hazard ratio 1.55; P = .004).

Study details: This study retrospectively reviewed 32,628 premenopausal women aged 20-50 years who underwent BC surgery, of which 508 women were nulliparous and 2406 women were diagnosed with BC within 5 years of childbirth.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Korean Breast Cancer Society. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Paik PS et al for the Korean Breast Cancer Society. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of postpartum breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 (Aug 5). doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07069-w

Key clinical point: A diagnosis of breast cancer (BC) within the first 5 years of childbirth was associated with aggressive clinicopathological characteristics and unfavorable survival outcomes.

Major finding: Women diagnosed with post-partum BC (PPBC) within 5 years of childbirth showed more aggressive disease characteristics than nulliparous women with BC and women diagnosed with PPBC ≥ 5 years after childbirth (clinical stage T3: 5.9% vs 3.3% and 3.9%, respectively, or higher lymph node metastases: 40.6% vs 27.8% and 34.7%, respectively) and had the worst survival rates (hazard ratio 1.55; P = .004).

Study details: This study retrospectively reviewed 32,628 premenopausal women aged 20-50 years who underwent BC surgery, of which 508 women were nulliparous and 2406 women were diagnosed with BC within 5 years of childbirth.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Korean Breast Cancer Society. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Paik PS et al for the Korean Breast Cancer Society. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of postpartum breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 (Aug 5). doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07069-w

Key clinical point: Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast showed worse prognostic outcomes than patients with ILC who also had lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS).

Major finding: Patients with ILC + LCIS vs ILC only had better median distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS; 16.8 vs 10.1 years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.55; P < .0001) and overall survival (OS; 18.9 vs 13.7 years; HR 0.62; P < .0001) rates, with the absence of LCIS being associated with poor prognosis in terms of both DRFS (adjusted HR 1.78; P < .0001) and OS (adjusted HR 1.60; P < .0001) outcomes.

Study details: This observational, population-based investigation included the data of 4217 patients with stages I-III ILC (of whom 45% had co-existing LCIS) from the MD Anderson breast cancer prospectively collected electronic database.

Disclosures: This study was partly supported by the US National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant. Five authors declared receiving consulting fees or research support from various sources. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Mouabbi JA et al. Absence of lobular carcinoma in situ is a poor prognostic marker in invasive lobular carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2023;191:113250 (Jul 21). doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113250

Key clinical point: Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast showed worse prognostic outcomes than patients with ILC who also had lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS).

Major finding: Patients with ILC + LCIS vs ILC only had better median distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS; 16.8 vs 10.1 years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.55; P < .0001) and overall survival (OS; 18.9 vs 13.7 years; HR 0.62; P < .0001) rates, with the absence of LCIS being associated with poor prognosis in terms of both DRFS (adjusted HR 1.78; P < .0001) and OS (adjusted HR 1.60; P < .0001) outcomes.

Study details: This observational, population-based investigation included the data of 4217 patients with stages I-III ILC (of whom 45% had co-existing LCIS) from the MD Anderson breast cancer prospectively collected electronic database.

Disclosures: This study was partly supported by the US National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant. Five authors declared receiving consulting fees or research support from various sources. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Mouabbi JA et al. Absence of lobular carcinoma in situ is a poor prognostic marker in invasive lobular carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2023;191:113250 (Jul 21). doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113250

Key clinical point: Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast showed worse prognostic outcomes than patients with ILC who also had lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS).

Major finding: Patients with ILC + LCIS vs ILC only had better median distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS; 16.8 vs 10.1 years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.55; P < .0001) and overall survival (OS; 18.9 vs 13.7 years; HR 0.62; P < .0001) rates, with the absence of LCIS being associated with poor prognosis in terms of both DRFS (adjusted HR 1.78; P < .0001) and OS (adjusted HR 1.60; P < .0001) outcomes.

Study details: This observational, population-based investigation included the data of 4217 patients with stages I-III ILC (of whom 45% had co-existing LCIS) from the MD Anderson breast cancer prospectively collected electronic database.

Disclosures: This study was partly supported by the US National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant. Five authors declared receiving consulting fees or research support from various sources. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Mouabbi JA et al. Absence of lobular carcinoma in situ is a poor prognostic marker in invasive lobular carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2023;191:113250 (Jul 21). doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113250

Key clinical point: Consumption of alcohol during and 6 months after breast cancer (BC) diagnosis did not negatively impact mortality rates in women who survived BC.

Major finding: The occasional consumption of alcohol (0.36 to < 0.6 g/day) during BC diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71; 95% CI 0.54-0.94) and 6 months after BC diagnosis (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.94) was associated with a lower risk for all-cause mortality in women with body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m².

Study details: This study analyzed 3659 BC survivors from The Pathways Study (a prospective cohort study) who were diagnosed with stages I-IV invasive BC.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the US National Cancer Institute. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kwan ML et al. Alcohol consumption and prognosis and survival in breast cancer survivors: The Pathways Study. Cancer. 2023 (Aug 9). doi: 10.1002/cncr.34972

Key clinical point: Consumption of alcohol during and 6 months after breast cancer (BC) diagnosis did not negatively impact mortality rates in women who survived BC.

Major finding: The occasional consumption of alcohol (0.36 to < 0.6 g/day) during BC diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71; 95% CI 0.54-0.94) and 6 months after BC diagnosis (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.94) was associated with a lower risk for all-cause mortality in women with body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m².

Study details: This study analyzed 3659 BC survivors from The Pathways Study (a prospective cohort study) who were diagnosed with stages I-IV invasive BC.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the US National Cancer Institute. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kwan ML et al. Alcohol consumption and prognosis and survival in breast cancer survivors: The Pathways Study. Cancer. 2023 (Aug 9). doi: 10.1002/cncr.34972

Key clinical point: Consumption of alcohol during and 6 months after breast cancer (BC) diagnosis did not negatively impact mortality rates in women who survived BC.

Major finding: The occasional consumption of alcohol (0.36 to < 0.6 g/day) during BC diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71; 95% CI 0.54-0.94) and 6 months after BC diagnosis (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.94) was associated with a lower risk for all-cause mortality in women with body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m².

Study details: This study analyzed 3659 BC survivors from The Pathways Study (a prospective cohort study) who were diagnosed with stages I-IV invasive BC.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the US National Cancer Institute. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kwan ML et al. Alcohol consumption and prognosis and survival in breast cancer survivors: The Pathways Study. Cancer. 2023 (Aug 9). doi: 10.1002/cncr.34972

Migraine is well known as a vascular phenomenon, but research over time has shown that vasodilation is a secondary feature of headache rather than the cause of headache pain. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and other vasoactive inflammatory proteins transmit nociceptive signals through the trigeminal system, and although vasodilation occurs, it is not essential for migraine attacks to occur. White matter changes on MRI are a common finding in people with migraine, and the burden of migraine often correlates with the amount of white matter changes seen. This connection highlights the indirect connection between migraine and vascular risks factors, and this study attempts to better quantify this, specifically with respect to stroke and myocardial infarction (MI).

The study by Fuglsang and colleagues was a registry-based nationwide population-based cohort study that included over 200,000 individuals with migraine, using data collected from 1996 to 2018. Participants were differentiated as having or not having migraine on the basis of prescriptions of preventive or acute migraine medications. Male and female participants were further subdivided, and these groups were compared to healthy controls. The primary endpoints were hazard ratio and absolute risk differences for developing hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke or MI among all groups.

The researchers found an increased risk for ischemic stroke that was equal among male and female participants. Hemorrhagic stroke and MI were seen to be increased in migraine, but primarily among women with migraine. This study specifically investigated what the researchers termed "premature" stroke and MI, and there remains a likelihood that estrogen could be the differentiating factor between the difference in risk between male and female participants with migraine. I have recently highlighted a number of studies investigating vascular risk factors associated with migraine; this study will help clinicians appropriately educate their patients with migraine regarding vascular risk.

The first medications reported as helpful preventively for migraine were antihypertensives, specifically beta-blockers (BB). A number of other medications in other antihypertensive subclasses have also subsequently been shown to be helpful for migraine prevention. These include angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), and alpha-blockers (AB). Carcel and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis that investigated a wide variety of antihypertensive medications in multiple classes and compared the reduction in headache frequency as defined as headache days per month.

This analysis reviewed 50 studies involving over 4000 participants. The majority of the studies (35 out 50 [70%]) had a cross-over design. The medications evaluated included clonidine (an alpha agonist), candesartan (an ARB), telmisartan (an ARB), propranolol (a BB), timolol (a BB), pindolol (a BB), metoprolol (a BB), bisoprolol (a BB), atenolol (a BB), alprenolol (a BB), nimodipine (a CCB), nifedipine (a CCB), verapamil (a CCB), nicardipine (a CCB), enalapril (an ACE inhibitor), and lisinopril (an ACE inhibitor). For each class of antihypertensive, there was a lower number of monthly headache days with treatment compared with placebo; the greatest reduction was for the CCB with a mean difference of about 2 days per month. BB on average decreased headache days per month by 0.7 days. For BB, there was no clear trend to increased efficacy with increased dose. Only six trials reported the difference in blood pressure: On average, there was a 9.3 mm Hg drop in systolic and 3.0 mm Hg drop in diastolic pressure.

The authors showed that there is statistical significance for the use of antihypertensive medications for decreasing migraine days per month, and this was statistically significant separately for numerous specific drugs within the classes: clonidine, candesartan, atenolol, bisoprolol, propranolol, timolol, nicardipine, and verapamil. Antihypertensive medications remain some of the most popular first-line preventive options for migraine, and although the benefit of this class as a whole is mild (slightly more than 1 day per month), it can be an excellent option for many patients

The relationship between migraine and caffeine is necessarily controversial. Caffeine is included as a component of many over-the-counter migraine treatments, and the beneficial effect of caffeine as an acute treatment for migraine has been documented for decades. Reduction in caffeine, however, has also been established as a helpful lifestyle modification for prevention of migraine attacks. Zhang and colleagues used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database, a program conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States.

This study sought to quantify the relationship between dietary caffeine and "severe headache." For this study, "severe headache" was defined as answering yes to the question: During the past 3 months, did you have severe headaches or migraines? Dietary caffeine intake was collected through two 24-hour dietary recall interviews, one in person and one 3-10 days later via telephone. The amount of caffeine consumed was estimated in mg/day from all caffeine-containing foods and beverages, including coffee, tea, soda, and chocolate, using the US Department of Agriculture's Food and Nutrient Database. Each participant's mean caffeine intake was defined as the difference between the first and second dietary recalls.

A large number of covariates were assessed as well, including age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, poverty-income ratio, educational level, marital status, hypertension, cancer, energy intake, protein intake, calcium intake, magnesium intake, iron intake, sodium intake, alcohol status, smoking status, and triglyceride level. A total of 8993 participants were included. Caffeine intake was divided into four groups: ≥ 0 to < 40 mg/day, ≥ 40 to < 200 mg/day, ≥ 200 to < 400 mg/day, and ≥ 400 mg/day. After adjusting for confounders, a significant association between dietary caffeine intake and severe headaches or migraines was detected.

Curiously, in this study, only male participants were included. The authors found a clear correlation between the amount of caffeine consumed over a 24-hour period and severe migraine attacks. Further evaluation should investigate the frequency of attacks rather than just individual experience over a 3-month period. Although caffeine is helpful acutely, higher dose consumption is a risk factor for worsening migraine.

Migraine is well known as a vascular phenomenon, but research over time has shown that vasodilation is a secondary feature of headache rather than the cause of headache pain. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and other vasoactive inflammatory proteins transmit nociceptive signals through the trigeminal system, and although vasodilation occurs, it is not essential for migraine attacks to occur. White matter changes on MRI are a common finding in people with migraine, and the burden of migraine often correlates with the amount of white matter changes seen. This connection highlights the indirect connection between migraine and vascular risks factors, and this study attempts to better quantify this, specifically with respect to stroke and myocardial infarction (MI).

The study by Fuglsang and colleagues was a registry-based nationwide population-based cohort study that included over 200,000 individuals with migraine, using data collected from 1996 to 2018. Participants were differentiated as having or not having migraine on the basis of prescriptions of preventive or acute migraine medications. Male and female participants were further subdivided, and these groups were compared to healthy controls. The primary endpoints were hazard ratio and absolute risk differences for developing hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke or MI among all groups.

The researchers found an increased risk for ischemic stroke that was equal among male and female participants. Hemorrhagic stroke and MI were seen to be increased in migraine, but primarily among women with migraine. This study specifically investigated what the researchers termed "premature" stroke and MI, and there remains a likelihood that estrogen could be the differentiating factor between the difference in risk between male and female participants with migraine. I have recently highlighted a number of studies investigating vascular risk factors associated with migraine; this study will help clinicians appropriately educate their patients with migraine regarding vascular risk.

The first medications reported as helpful preventively for migraine were antihypertensives, specifically beta-blockers (BB). A number of other medications in other antihypertensive subclasses have also subsequently been shown to be helpful for migraine prevention. These include angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), and alpha-blockers (AB). Carcel and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis that investigated a wide variety of antihypertensive medications in multiple classes and compared the reduction in headache frequency as defined as headache days per month.

This analysis reviewed 50 studies involving over 4000 participants. The majority of the studies (35 out 50 [70%]) had a cross-over design. The medications evaluated included clonidine (an alpha agonist), candesartan (an ARB), telmisartan (an ARB), propranolol (a BB), timolol (a BB), pindolol (a BB), metoprolol (a BB), bisoprolol (a BB), atenolol (a BB), alprenolol (a BB), nimodipine (a CCB), nifedipine (a CCB), verapamil (a CCB), nicardipine (a CCB), enalapril (an ACE inhibitor), and lisinopril (an ACE inhibitor). For each class of antihypertensive, there was a lower number of monthly headache days with treatment compared with placebo; the greatest reduction was for the CCB with a mean difference of about 2 days per month. BB on average decreased headache days per month by 0.7 days. For BB, there was no clear trend to increased efficacy with increased dose. Only six trials reported the difference in blood pressure: On average, there was a 9.3 mm Hg drop in systolic and 3.0 mm Hg drop in diastolic pressure.

The authors showed that there is statistical significance for the use of antihypertensive medications for decreasing migraine days per month, and this was statistically significant separately for numerous specific drugs within the classes: clonidine, candesartan, atenolol, bisoprolol, propranolol, timolol, nicardipine, and verapamil. Antihypertensive medications remain some of the most popular first-line preventive options for migraine, and although the benefit of this class as a whole is mild (slightly more than 1 day per month), it can be an excellent option for many patients

The relationship between migraine and caffeine is necessarily controversial. Caffeine is included as a component of many over-the-counter migraine treatments, and the beneficial effect of caffeine as an acute treatment for migraine has been documented for decades. Reduction in caffeine, however, has also been established as a helpful lifestyle modification for prevention of migraine attacks. Zhang and colleagues used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database, a program conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States.

This study sought to quantify the relationship between dietary caffeine and "severe headache." For this study, "severe headache" was defined as answering yes to the question: During the past 3 months, did you have severe headaches or migraines? Dietary caffeine intake was collected through two 24-hour dietary recall interviews, one in person and one 3-10 days later via telephone. The amount of caffeine consumed was estimated in mg/day from all caffeine-containing foods and beverages, including coffee, tea, soda, and chocolate, using the US Department of Agriculture's Food and Nutrient Database. Each participant's mean caffeine intake was defined as the difference between the first and second dietary recalls.

A large number of covariates were assessed as well, including age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, poverty-income ratio, educational level, marital status, hypertension, cancer, energy intake, protein intake, calcium intake, magnesium intake, iron intake, sodium intake, alcohol status, smoking status, and triglyceride level. A total of 8993 participants were included. Caffeine intake was divided into four groups: ≥ 0 to < 40 mg/day, ≥ 40 to < 200 mg/day, ≥ 200 to < 400 mg/day, and ≥ 400 mg/day. After adjusting for confounders, a significant association between dietary caffeine intake and severe headaches or migraines was detected.

Curiously, in this study, only male participants were included. The authors found a clear correlation between the amount of caffeine consumed over a 24-hour period and severe migraine attacks. Further evaluation should investigate the frequency of attacks rather than just individual experience over a 3-month period. Although caffeine is helpful acutely, higher dose consumption is a risk factor for worsening migraine.

Migraine is well known as a vascular phenomenon, but research over time has shown that vasodilation is a secondary feature of headache rather than the cause of headache pain. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and other vasoactive inflammatory proteins transmit nociceptive signals through the trigeminal system, and although vasodilation occurs, it is not essential for migraine attacks to occur. White matter changes on MRI are a common finding in people with migraine, and the burden of migraine often correlates with the amount of white matter changes seen. This connection highlights the indirect connection between migraine and vascular risks factors, and this study attempts to better quantify this, specifically with respect to stroke and myocardial infarction (MI).

The study by Fuglsang and colleagues was a registry-based nationwide population-based cohort study that included over 200,000 individuals with migraine, using data collected from 1996 to 2018. Participants were differentiated as having or not having migraine on the basis of prescriptions of preventive or acute migraine medications. Male and female participants were further subdivided, and these groups were compared to healthy controls. The primary endpoints were hazard ratio and absolute risk differences for developing hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke or MI among all groups.

The researchers found an increased risk for ischemic stroke that was equal among male and female participants. Hemorrhagic stroke and MI were seen to be increased in migraine, but primarily among women with migraine. This study specifically investigated what the researchers termed "premature" stroke and MI, and there remains a likelihood that estrogen could be the differentiating factor between the difference in risk between male and female participants with migraine. I have recently highlighted a number of studies investigating vascular risk factors associated with migraine; this study will help clinicians appropriately educate their patients with migraine regarding vascular risk.

The first medications reported as helpful preventively for migraine were antihypertensives, specifically beta-blockers (BB). A number of other medications in other antihypertensive subclasses have also subsequently been shown to be helpful for migraine prevention. These include angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), and alpha-blockers (AB). Carcel and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis that investigated a wide variety of antihypertensive medications in multiple classes and compared the reduction in headache frequency as defined as headache days per month.

This analysis reviewed 50 studies involving over 4000 participants. The majority of the studies (35 out 50 [70%]) had a cross-over design. The medications evaluated included clonidine (an alpha agonist), candesartan (an ARB), telmisartan (an ARB), propranolol (a BB), timolol (a BB), pindolol (a BB), metoprolol (a BB), bisoprolol (a BB), atenolol (a BB), alprenolol (a BB), nimodipine (a CCB), nifedipine (a CCB), verapamil (a CCB), nicardipine (a CCB), enalapril (an ACE inhibitor), and lisinopril (an ACE inhibitor). For each class of antihypertensive, there was a lower number of monthly headache days with treatment compared with placebo; the greatest reduction was for the CCB with a mean difference of about 2 days per month. BB on average decreased headache days per month by 0.7 days. For BB, there was no clear trend to increased efficacy with increased dose. Only six trials reported the difference in blood pressure: On average, there was a 9.3 mm Hg drop in systolic and 3.0 mm Hg drop in diastolic pressure.

The authors showed that there is statistical significance for the use of antihypertensive medications for decreasing migraine days per month, and this was statistically significant separately for numerous specific drugs within the classes: clonidine, candesartan, atenolol, bisoprolol, propranolol, timolol, nicardipine, and verapamil. Antihypertensive medications remain some of the most popular first-line preventive options for migraine, and although the benefit of this class as a whole is mild (slightly more than 1 day per month), it can be an excellent option for many patients

The relationship between migraine and caffeine is necessarily controversial. Caffeine is included as a component of many over-the-counter migraine treatments, and the beneficial effect of caffeine as an acute treatment for migraine has been documented for decades. Reduction in caffeine, however, has also been established as a helpful lifestyle modification for prevention of migraine attacks. Zhang and colleagues used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database, a program conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States.

This study sought to quantify the relationship between dietary caffeine and "severe headache." For this study, "severe headache" was defined as answering yes to the question: During the past 3 months, did you have severe headaches or migraines? Dietary caffeine intake was collected through two 24-hour dietary recall interviews, one in person and one 3-10 days later via telephone. The amount of caffeine consumed was estimated in mg/day from all caffeine-containing foods and beverages, including coffee, tea, soda, and chocolate, using the US Department of Agriculture's Food and Nutrient Database. Each participant's mean caffeine intake was defined as the difference between the first and second dietary recalls.

A large number of covariates were assessed as well, including age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, poverty-income ratio, educational level, marital status, hypertension, cancer, energy intake, protein intake, calcium intake, magnesium intake, iron intake, sodium intake, alcohol status, smoking status, and triglyceride level. A total of 8993 participants were included. Caffeine intake was divided into four groups: ≥ 0 to < 40 mg/day, ≥ 40 to < 200 mg/day, ≥ 200 to < 400 mg/day, and ≥ 400 mg/day. After adjusting for confounders, a significant association between dietary caffeine intake and severe headaches or migraines was detected.

Curiously, in this study, only male participants were included. The authors found a clear correlation between the amount of caffeine consumed over a 24-hour period and severe migraine attacks. Further evaluation should investigate the frequency of attacks rather than just individual experience over a 3-month period. Although caffeine is helpful acutely, higher dose consumption is a risk factor for worsening migraine.

The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) has been transformed over the past decade with the advent of targeted therapies, including Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. Covalent BTK inhibitors, which are available in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings, include ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib.^1-3

BTK inhibitors have also demonstrated activity in higher-risk subgroups, including patients harboring TP53 aberrations. Clinical trials have shown encouraging outcomes of BTK inhibitors in these patients, and real-world studies have demonstrated similar findings.^4-6 Recently, a real-world Italian registry study similarly showed favorable outcomes in 747 patients with CLL carrying 17p- or TP53 or both mutations treated with first-line ibrutinib. in what appears to be the largest real-world analysis of this patient population (Rigolin et al). At 24 months, the median overall survival was not reached; the estimated treatment persistence and survival rates were 63.4% (95% CI 60.0%-67.0%) and 82.6% (95% CI 79.9%-85.4%), respectively. The median time to treatment discontinuation was 37.4 months (95% CI 34.8-42.2 months). Disease progression or death was the reason for discontinuation in 45.8% of patients. Although ibrutinib is not generally the favored BTK inhibitor given an improved safety profile with next-generation options, these data provide real-world estimates for outcomes with BTK inhibitors in this large dataset of high-risk patients.

Although outcomes have improved for patients with CLL or SLL, it is common for resistance to targeted therapy to eventually occur. Noncovalent BTK inhibitors, such as pirtobrutinib, offer a promising approach for this population. The BRUIN trial was a phase 1/2 trial of pirtobrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL or SLL (Mato et al). A total of 317 patients were treated, including 247 who had previously received a BTK inhibitor. Patients had been treated with a median of three prior lines of therapy and over 40% had been treated with a BCL-2 inhibitor. The overall response rate was 73.3% (95% CI 67.3%-78.7%) and increased to 82.2% (95% CI 76.8%-86.7%) when partial response with lymphocytosis was included. At a 19.4-month median follow-up, the median progression-free survival was 19.6 (95% CI 16.9-22.1) months. The drug was also well-tolerated, with 2.8% of patients discontinuing therapy owing to treatment-related adverse events. Adverse events that can be seen with BTK inhibition, including hypertension, atrial fibrillation or flutter, and bleeding, were rare. This trial demonstrates that CLL/SLL cells can maintain dependency on the B-cell receptor pathway following treatment with a covalent inhibitor and that ongoing BTK inhibition using a novel mechanism is a feasible strategy. The optimal sequencing of pirtobrutinib with other available therapies, including BCL-2 inhibitors, remains unknown.

BTK inhibitors are also active in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). They are approved for relapsed/refractory disease and are being studied in earlier lines of therapy. Whereas early progression of disease (POD) has been shown to be an important prognostic marker in MCL, the impact of early relapse on outcome specifically after BTK inhibitor initiation is less clear.⁷ A recent multicente retrospective observational study aimed to determine the impact on time-to-POD between rituximab-containing front-line therapy and second-line BTK inhibitor and overall outcomes (Villa et al). This study included 360 adult patients with relapsed or refractory MCL treated with second-line BTK inhibitor. Not surprisingly, the authors found that patients with POD within 24 months of first-line therapy had significantly shorter median progression-free survival (0.45 year vs 2.3 years; P < .001) and overall survival (0.9 year vs 5.5 years P < .001) compared with patients with relapse beyond 24 months. Furthermore, they found that Ki-67 ≥ 30% and Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) were also associated with progression‐free survival and overall survival from the start of a second-line BTK inhibitor, though to a lesser extent than time-to-POD. These variables were subsequently used to determine a second-line BTK MIPI, which can help inform which patients are most likely to benefit from a BTK inhibitor compared with other available options, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy or a clinical trial strategy.

BTK inhibitors are an important drug class for the treatment of lymphoid cancers and have changed the treatment paradigms in CLL/SLL and MCL. Additional studies evaluating combination strategies, sequencing approaches, time-limited options, and predictors of response are likely to further refine optimization of use in these diseases.

Additional References

1.         Barr PM, Owen C, Robak T, et al. Up to 8-year follow-up from RESONATE-2: first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood Adv. 2022;6:3440-3450. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006434

2.         Sharman JP, Egyed M, Jurczak W, et al. Efficacy and safety in a 4-year follow-up of the ELEVATE-TN study comparing acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2022;36:1171-1175. doi:10.1038/s41375-021-01485-x

3.         Tam CS, Brown JR, Kahl BS, et al. Zanubrutinib versus bendamustine and rituximab in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SEQUOIA): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23:1031-1043. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00293-5

4.         Ahn IE, Tian X, Wiestner A. Ibrutinib for chronic lymphocytic leukemia with TP53 alterations. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:498-500. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2005943

5.         Allan JN, Shanafelt T, Wiestner A, et al. Long-term efficacy of first-line ibrutinib treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in patients with TP53 aberrations: a pooled analysis from four clinical trials. Br J Haematol. 2022;196:947-953. doi:10.1111/bjh.17984

6.         Mato AR, Tang B, Azmi S, et al. A clinical practice comparison of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with and without deletion 17p receiving first-line treatment with ibrutinib. Haematologica. 2022;107:2630-2640. doi:10.3324/haematol.2021.280376

7.         Bond DA, Switchenko JM, Villa D, et al. Early relapse identifies MCL patients with inferior survival after intensive or less intensive frontline therapy. Blood Adv. 2021;5:5179-5189. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004765

The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) has been transformed over the past decade with the advent of targeted therapies, including Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. Covalent BTK inhibitors, which are available in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings, include ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib.^1-3

BTK inhibitors have also demonstrated activity in higher-risk subgroups, including patients harboring TP53 aberrations. Clinical trials have shown encouraging outcomes of BTK inhibitors in these patients, and real-world studies have demonstrated similar findings.^4-6 Recently, a real-world Italian registry study similarly showed favorable outcomes in 747 patients with CLL carrying 17p- or TP53 or both mutations treated with first-line ibrutinib. in what appears to be the largest real-world analysis of this patient population (Rigolin et al). At 24 months, the median overall survival was not reached; the estimated treatment persistence and survival rates were 63.4% (95% CI 60.0%-67.0%) and 82.6% (95% CI 79.9%-85.4%), respectively. The median time to treatment discontinuation was 37.4 months (95% CI 34.8-42.2 months). Disease progression or death was the reason for discontinuation in 45.8% of patients. Although ibrutinib is not generally the favored BTK inhibitor given an improved safety profile with next-generation options, these data provide real-world estimates for outcomes with BTK inhibitors in this large dataset of high-risk patients.

Although outcomes have improved for patients with CLL or SLL, it is common for resistance to targeted therapy to eventually occur. Noncovalent BTK inhibitors, such as pirtobrutinib, offer a promising approach for this population. The BRUIN trial was a phase 1/2 trial of pirtobrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL or SLL (Mato et al). A total of 317 patients were treated, including 247 who had previously received a BTK inhibitor. Patients had been treated with a median of three prior lines of therapy and over 40% had been treated with a BCL-2 inhibitor. The overall response rate was 73.3% (95% CI 67.3%-78.7%) and increased to 82.2% (95% CI 76.8%-86.7%) when partial response with lymphocytosis was included. At a 19.4-month median follow-up, the median progression-free survival was 19.6 (95% CI 16.9-22.1) months. The drug was also well-tolerated, with 2.8% of patients discontinuing therapy owing to treatment-related adverse events. Adverse events that can be seen with BTK inhibition, including hypertension, atrial fibrillation or flutter, and bleeding, were rare. This trial demonstrates that CLL/SLL cells can maintain dependency on the B-cell receptor pathway following treatment with a covalent inhibitor and that ongoing BTK inhibition using a novel mechanism is a feasible strategy. The optimal sequencing of pirtobrutinib with other available therapies, including BCL-2 inhibitors, remains unknown.

BTK inhibitors are also active in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). They are approved for relapsed/refractory disease and are being studied in earlier lines of therapy. Whereas early progression of disease (POD) has been shown to be an important prognostic marker in MCL, the impact of early relapse on outcome specifically after BTK inhibitor initiation is less clear.⁷ A recent multicente retrospective observational study aimed to determine the impact on time-to-POD between rituximab-containing front-line therapy and second-line BTK inhibitor and overall outcomes (Villa et al). This study included 360 adult patients with relapsed or refractory MCL treated with second-line BTK inhibitor. Not surprisingly, the authors found that patients with POD within 24 months of first-line therapy had significantly shorter median progression-free survival (0.45 year vs 2.3 years; P < .001) and overall survival (0.9 year vs 5.5 years P < .001) compared with patients with relapse beyond 24 months. Furthermore, they found that Ki-67 ≥ 30% and Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) were also associated with progression‐free survival and overall survival from the start of a second-line BTK inhibitor, though to a lesser extent than time-to-POD. These variables were subsequently used to determine a second-line BTK MIPI, which can help inform which patients are most likely to benefit from a BTK inhibitor compared with other available options, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy or a clinical trial strategy.

BTK inhibitors are an important drug class for the treatment of lymphoid cancers and have changed the treatment paradigms in CLL/SLL and MCL. Additional studies evaluating combination strategies, sequencing approaches, time-limited options, and predictors of response are likely to further refine optimization of use in these diseases.

Additional References

1.         Barr PM, Owen C, Robak T, et al. Up to 8-year follow-up from RESONATE-2: first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood Adv. 2022;6:3440-3450. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006434

2.         Sharman JP, Egyed M, Jurczak W, et al. Efficacy and safety in a 4-year follow-up of the ELEVATE-TN study comparing acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2022;36:1171-1175. doi:10.1038/s41375-021-01485-x

3.         Tam CS, Brown JR, Kahl BS, et al. Zanubrutinib versus bendamustine and rituximab in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SEQUOIA): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23:1031-1043. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00293-5

4.         Ahn IE, Tian X, Wiestner A. Ibrutinib for chronic lymphocytic leukemia with TP53 alterations. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:498-500. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2005943

5.         Allan JN, Shanafelt T, Wiestner A, et al. Long-term efficacy of first-line ibrutinib treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in patients with TP53 aberrations: a pooled analysis from four clinical trials. Br J Haematol. 2022;196:947-953. doi:10.1111/bjh.17984

6.         Mato AR, Tang B, Azmi S, et al. A clinical practice comparison of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with and without deletion 17p receiving first-line treatment with ibrutinib. Haematologica. 2022;107:2630-2640. doi:10.3324/haematol.2021.280376

7.         Bond DA, Switchenko JM, Villa D, et al. Early relapse identifies MCL patients with inferior survival after intensive or less intensive frontline therapy. Blood Adv. 2021;5:5179-5189. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004765

The treatment landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) has been transformed over the past decade with the advent of targeted therapies, including Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. Covalent BTK inhibitors, which are available in both the frontline and relapsed/refractory settings, include ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib.^1-3

BTK inhibitors have also demonstrated activity in higher-risk subgroups, including patients harboring TP53 aberrations. Clinical trials have shown encouraging outcomes of BTK inhibitors in these patients, and real-world studies have demonstrated similar findings.^4-6 Recently, a real-world Italian registry study similarly showed favorable outcomes in 747 patients with CLL carrying 17p- or TP53 or both mutations treated with first-line ibrutinib. in what appears to be the largest real-world analysis of this patient population (Rigolin et al). At 24 months, the median overall survival was not reached; the estimated treatment persistence and survival rates were 63.4% (95% CI 60.0%-67.0%) and 82.6% (95% CI 79.9%-85.4%), respectively. The median time to treatment discontinuation was 37.4 months (95% CI 34.8-42.2 months). Disease progression or death was the reason for discontinuation in 45.8% of patients. Although ibrutinib is not generally the favored BTK inhibitor given an improved safety profile with next-generation options, these data provide real-world estimates for outcomes with BTK inhibitors in this large dataset of high-risk patients.

Although outcomes have improved for patients with CLL or SLL, it is common for resistance to targeted therapy to eventually occur. Noncovalent BTK inhibitors, such as pirtobrutinib, offer a promising approach for this population. The BRUIN trial was a phase 1/2 trial of pirtobrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL or SLL (Mato et al). A total of 317 patients were treated, including 247 who had previously received a BTK inhibitor. Patients had been treated with a median of three prior lines of therapy and over 40% had been treated with a BCL-2 inhibitor. The overall response rate was 73.3% (95% CI 67.3%-78.7%) and increased to 82.2% (95% CI 76.8%-86.7%) when partial response with lymphocytosis was included. At a 19.4-month median follow-up, the median progression-free survival was 19.6 (95% CI 16.9-22.1) months. The drug was also well-tolerated, with 2.8% of patients discontinuing therapy owing to treatment-related adverse events. Adverse events that can be seen with BTK inhibition, including hypertension, atrial fibrillation or flutter, and bleeding, were rare. This trial demonstrates that CLL/SLL cells can maintain dependency on the B-cell receptor pathway following treatment with a covalent inhibitor and that ongoing BTK inhibition using a novel mechanism is a feasible strategy. The optimal sequencing of pirtobrutinib with other available therapies, including BCL-2 inhibitors, remains unknown.

BTK inhibitors are also active in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). They are approved for relapsed/refractory disease and are being studied in earlier lines of therapy. Whereas early progression of disease (POD) has been shown to be an important prognostic marker in MCL, the impact of early relapse on outcome specifically after BTK inhibitor initiation is less clear.⁷ A recent multicente retrospective observational study aimed to determine the impact on time-to-POD between rituximab-containing front-line therapy and second-line BTK inhibitor and overall outcomes (Villa et al). This study included 360 adult patients with relapsed or refractory MCL treated with second-line BTK inhibitor. Not surprisingly, the authors found that patients with POD within 24 months of first-line therapy had significantly shorter median progression-free survival (0.45 year vs 2.3 years; P < .001) and overall survival (0.9 year vs 5.5 years P < .001) compared with patients with relapse beyond 24 months. Furthermore, they found that Ki-67 ≥ 30% and Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) were also associated with progression‐free survival and overall survival from the start of a second-line BTK inhibitor, though to a lesser extent than time-to-POD. These variables were subsequently used to determine a second-line BTK MIPI, which can help inform which patients are most likely to benefit from a BTK inhibitor compared with other available options, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy or a clinical trial strategy.

BTK inhibitors are an important drug class for the treatment of lymphoid cancers and have changed the treatment paradigms in CLL/SLL and MCL. Additional studies evaluating combination strategies, sequencing approaches, time-limited options, and predictors of response are likely to further refine optimization of use in these diseases.

Additional References

1.         Barr PM, Owen C, Robak T, et al. Up to 8-year follow-up from RESONATE-2: first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood Adv. 2022;6:3440-3450. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006434

2.         Sharman JP, Egyed M, Jurczak W, et al. Efficacy and safety in a 4-year follow-up of the ELEVATE-TN study comparing acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2022;36:1171-1175. doi:10.1038/s41375-021-01485-x

3.         Tam CS, Brown JR, Kahl BS, et al. Zanubrutinib versus bendamustine and rituximab in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SEQUOIA): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23:1031-1043. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00293-5

4.         Ahn IE, Tian X, Wiestner A. Ibrutinib for chronic lymphocytic leukemia with TP53 alterations. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:498-500. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2005943

5.         Allan JN, Shanafelt T, Wiestner A, et al. Long-term efficacy of first-line ibrutinib treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in patients with TP53 aberrations: a pooled analysis from four clinical trials. Br J Haematol. 2022;196:947-953. doi:10.1111/bjh.17984

6.         Mato AR, Tang B, Azmi S, et al. A clinical practice comparison of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with and without deletion 17p receiving first-line treatment with ibrutinib. Haematologica. 2022;107:2630-2640. doi:10.3324/haematol.2021.280376

7.         Bond DA, Switchenko JM, Villa D, et al. Early relapse identifies MCL patients with inferior survival after intensive or less intensive frontline therapy. Blood Adv. 2021;5:5179-5189. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004765

Although there are several treatment options for PsA, there have been few head-to-head studies conducted to determine comparative efficacy. Ustekinumab, a biologic agent targeting IL-p40, and therefore both IL-12 and IL-23, has proven efficacy in PsA, but the impression is that this drug is less effective than are TNF inhibitors for the treatment of the peripheral arthritis domain. However, in a prospective, observational study, Gossec and colleagues report that the improvements in patient-reported outcomes were generally comparable between ustekinumab and TNF inhibitor treatments. This study evaluated 437 patients with PsA from the PsABio study who initiated first- to third-line ustekinumab (n = 219) or TNF inhibitors (n = 218) and continued the initial treatment for 3 years. At 3 years, ustekinumab and TNF inhibitors were associated with comparable improvements in the EuroQol-5 dimensions health state visual analog scale scores, Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease 12-item scores, and work productivity, although the improvements were generally greater in the TNF inhibitor–treated group. A randomized trial comparing ustekinumab to TNF inhibitors in PsA is warranted to confirm these findings and inform treatment decisions.

Targeted therapies, such as biologics, are proven to be more efficacious than are conventional therapies; however, only about 60% of patients initiating targeted therapies demonstrate treatment response. Identifying the predictors of treatment response is an active area of research. Linde and colleagues looked at data from 13,369 biologic-naive patients registered with a PsA diagnosis from 13 European registries who initiated a first TNF inhibitor treatment. The study demonstrated that sex, disease duration, C-reactive protein level, age at treatment initiation, and fatigue predicted the achievement of the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis in 28 joints remission at 6 months.

Could biomarkers help predict response beyond clinical predictors? An interesting study indicates that beta–defensin 2 (BD-2) may serve as a predictive biomarker for clinical response to secukinumab in PsA. BD-2 is an antimicrobial peptide and an important protein in innate immune response. Cardner and colleagues analyzed protein expression data in serum samples from the phase 3 FUTURE 1-5 trials that included 1989 patients with PsA who received secukinumab or placebo. Baseline BD-2 levels were associated with early as well as sustained PsA treatment response to secukinumab, independent of psoriasis severity. BD-2 levels did not predict response to adalimumab in PsA nor was it associated with treatment response to secukinumab in RA. The addition of BD-2 to the clinical prediction model significantly improved the prediction of the 16-week American College of Rheumatology 20 response. Thus, BD-2 seems to be a secukinumab treatment response biomarker and requires further evaluation.

Although there are several treatment options for PsA, there have been few head-to-head studies conducted to determine comparative efficacy. Ustekinumab, a biologic agent targeting IL-p40, and therefore both IL-12 and IL-23, has proven efficacy in PsA, but the impression is that this drug is less effective than are TNF inhibitors for the treatment of the peripheral arthritis domain. However, in a prospective, observational study, Gossec and colleagues report that the improvements in patient-reported outcomes were generally comparable between ustekinumab and TNF inhibitor treatments. This study evaluated 437 patients with PsA from the PsABio study who initiated first- to third-line ustekinumab (n = 219) or TNF inhibitors (n = 218) and continued the initial treatment for 3 years. At 3 years, ustekinumab and TNF inhibitors were associated with comparable improvements in the EuroQol-5 dimensions health state visual analog scale scores, Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease 12-item scores, and work productivity, although the improvements were generally greater in the TNF inhibitor–treated group. A randomized trial comparing ustekinumab to TNF inhibitors in PsA is warranted to confirm these findings and inform treatment decisions.

Targeted therapies, such as biologics, are proven to be more efficacious than are conventional therapies; however, only about 60% of patients initiating targeted therapies demonstrate treatment response. Identifying the predictors of treatment response is an active area of research. Linde and colleagues looked at data from 13,369 biologic-naive patients registered with a PsA diagnosis from 13 European registries who initiated a first TNF inhibitor treatment. The study demonstrated that sex, disease duration, C-reactive protein level, age at treatment initiation, and fatigue predicted the achievement of the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis in 28 joints remission at 6 months.

Could biomarkers help predict response beyond clinical predictors? An interesting study indicates that beta–defensin 2 (BD-2) may serve as a predictive biomarker for clinical response to secukinumab in PsA. BD-2 is an antimicrobial peptide and an important protein in innate immune response. Cardner and colleagues analyzed protein expression data in serum samples from the phase 3 FUTURE 1-5 trials that included 1989 patients with PsA who received secukinumab or placebo. Baseline BD-2 levels were associated with early as well as sustained PsA treatment response to secukinumab, independent of psoriasis severity. BD-2 levels did not predict response to adalimumab in PsA nor was it associated with treatment response to secukinumab in RA. The addition of BD-2 to the clinical prediction model significantly improved the prediction of the 16-week American College of Rheumatology 20 response. Thus, BD-2 seems to be a secukinumab treatment response biomarker and requires further evaluation.

Although there are several treatment options for PsA, there have been few head-to-head studies conducted to determine comparative efficacy. Ustekinumab, a biologic agent targeting IL-p40, and therefore both IL-12 and IL-23, has proven efficacy in PsA, but the impression is that this drug is less effective than are TNF inhibitors for the treatment of the peripheral arthritis domain. However, in a prospective, observational study, Gossec and colleagues report that the improvements in patient-reported outcomes were generally comparable between ustekinumab and TNF inhibitor treatments. This study evaluated 437 patients with PsA from the PsABio study who initiated first- to third-line ustekinumab (n = 219) or TNF inhibitors (n = 218) and continued the initial treatment for 3 years. At 3 years, ustekinumab and TNF inhibitors were associated with comparable improvements in the EuroQol-5 dimensions health state visual analog scale scores, Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease 12-item scores, and work productivity, although the improvements were generally greater in the TNF inhibitor–treated group. A randomized trial comparing ustekinumab to TNF inhibitors in PsA is warranted to confirm these findings and inform treatment decisions.

Targeted therapies, such as biologics, are proven to be more efficacious than are conventional therapies; however, only about 60% of patients initiating targeted therapies demonstrate treatment response. Identifying the predictors of treatment response is an active area of research. Linde and colleagues looked at data from 13,369 biologic-naive patients registered with a PsA diagnosis from 13 European registries who initiated a first TNF inhibitor treatment. The study demonstrated that sex, disease duration, C-reactive protein level, age at treatment initiation, and fatigue predicted the achievement of the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis in 28 joints remission at 6 months.

Could biomarkers help predict response beyond clinical predictors? An interesting study indicates that beta–defensin 2 (BD-2) may serve as a predictive biomarker for clinical response to secukinumab in PsA. BD-2 is an antimicrobial peptide and an important protein in innate immune response. Cardner and colleagues analyzed protein expression data in serum samples from the phase 3 FUTURE 1-5 trials that included 1989 patients with PsA who received secukinumab or placebo. Baseline BD-2 levels were associated with early as well as sustained PsA treatment response to secukinumab, independent of psoriasis severity. BD-2 levels did not predict response to adalimumab in PsA nor was it associated with treatment response to secukinumab in RA. The addition of BD-2 to the clinical prediction model significantly improved the prediction of the 16-week American College of Rheumatology 20 response. Thus, BD-2 seems to be a secukinumab treatment response biomarker and requires further evaluation.

The excellent short-term efficacy of the drug was well maintained up to 48 weeks, with only a slight loss of efficacy over time. Abrocitinib is a small molecule. We wouldn't expect a loss of efficacy due to the anti-drug antibodies that we see for large-molecule biologic drugs. I suspect that the slight loss of efficacy over time is a form of tachyphylaxis that is, to my thinking, probably due to poor adherence. Shocking, I know! Patients may not be fully adherent to treatment, even in a clinical trial. I think we should encourage patients to use 7-day pill boxes to aid better long-term adherence and outcomes.

Long-term safety is a critical issue with any new drug, certainly with a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor. Reich and colleagues concluded, "The long-term safety profile was manageable and consistent with previous reports." That conclusion seems reasonable to me. The most common side effects were upper respiratory tract infections. There may be a slight signal for increased risk for oral herpes infection, particularly at the higher dose. If this safety profile endures with longer-term data in larger numbers of people, it will be very reassuring.

The study by Wan and colleagues is another extremely well-done, important study by the premier dermatoepidemiology research team at the University of Pennsylvania. The study used an outstanding database from the United Kingdom that encompassed the clinical care experience of hundreds of thousands of children and adults with atopic dermatitis and millions of control patients without atopic dermatitis. With this many patients, the study has tremendous power to detect risk differences between groups.

With all that power, this study’s findings are very reassuring that there is no meaningful overall increased risk for malignancy in children or adults with atopic dermatitis. And while there was a statistically significant increased risk for lymphoma in children with severe atopic dermatitis, that risk is small … very small. Similarly, adults with severe AD had a twofold higher risk for noncutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), but since non-CTCL is rare, patients with severe AD shouldn't lose any sleep over it..

Simpson and colleagues' study of the effect of dupilumab on Staphylococcus aureus surprised me. Of course, we could expect that S aureus counts would be reduced with dupilumab; as barrier function is restored, surely S aureus counts would go down too. But, fascinatingly, with dupilumab treatment, S aureus counts decreased almost immediately, at both 3 and 7 days, before there was apparent clinical improvement in the skin rash. Simpson and colleagues suggest that the drop in S aureus counts could be due to improvement in immune function when interleukins 4 and 13 are blocked. Whether or not that is true, it is striking how fast S aureus counts improved, long before normal skin barrier function is restored.

Here's a fun fact: Atopic dermatitis is a little less common, about 10% less common, in people born second or later in the birth order. Lisik and colleagues did a meta-analysis of 114 studies and found this marginally lower rate in those born second or later compared with those born first. I'm not sure that there is any clinically meaningful significance to this, but I found it interesting (even though I was born first, and my younger brother had atopic dermatitis).

The excellent short-term efficacy of the drug was well maintained up to 48 weeks, with only a slight loss of efficacy over time. Abrocitinib is a small molecule. We wouldn't expect a loss of efficacy due to the anti-drug antibodies that we see for large-molecule biologic drugs. I suspect that the slight loss of efficacy over time is a form of tachyphylaxis that is, to my thinking, probably due to poor adherence. Shocking, I know! Patients may not be fully adherent to treatment, even in a clinical trial. I think we should encourage patients to use 7-day pill boxes to aid better long-term adherence and outcomes.

Long-term safety is a critical issue with any new drug, certainly with a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor. Reich and colleagues concluded, "The long-term safety profile was manageable and consistent with previous reports." That conclusion seems reasonable to me. The most common side effects were upper respiratory tract infections. There may be a slight signal for increased risk for oral herpes infection, particularly at the higher dose. If this safety profile endures with longer-term data in larger numbers of people, it will be very reassuring.

The study by Wan and colleagues is another extremely well-done, important study by the premier dermatoepidemiology research team at the University of Pennsylvania. The study used an outstanding database from the United Kingdom that encompassed the clinical care experience of hundreds of thousands of children and adults with atopic dermatitis and millions of control patients without atopic dermatitis. With this many patients, the study has tremendous power to detect risk differences between groups.

With all that power, this study’s findings are very reassuring that there is no meaningful overall increased risk for malignancy in children or adults with atopic dermatitis. And while there was a statistically significant increased risk for lymphoma in children with severe atopic dermatitis, that risk is small … very small. Similarly, adults with severe AD had a twofold higher risk for noncutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), but since non-CTCL is rare, patients with severe AD shouldn't lose any sleep over it..

Simpson and colleagues' study of the effect of dupilumab on Staphylococcus aureus surprised me. Of course, we could expect that S aureus counts would be reduced with dupilumab; as barrier function is restored, surely S aureus counts would go down too. But, fascinatingly, with dupilumab treatment, S aureus counts decreased almost immediately, at both 3 and 7 days, before there was apparent clinical improvement in the skin rash. Simpson and colleagues suggest that the drop in S aureus counts could be due to improvement in immune function when interleukins 4 and 13 are blocked. Whether or not that is true, it is striking how fast S aureus counts improved, long before normal skin barrier function is restored.

Here's a fun fact: Atopic dermatitis is a little less common, about 10% less common, in people born second or later in the birth order. Lisik and colleagues did a meta-analysis of 114 studies and found this marginally lower rate in those born second or later compared with those born first. I'm not sure that there is any clinically meaningful significance to this, but I found it interesting (even though I was born first, and my younger brother had atopic dermatitis).

The excellent short-term efficacy of the drug was well maintained up to 48 weeks, with only a slight loss of efficacy over time. Abrocitinib is a small molecule. We wouldn't expect a loss of efficacy due to the anti-drug antibodies that we see for large-molecule biologic drugs. I suspect that the slight loss of efficacy over time is a form of tachyphylaxis that is, to my thinking, probably due to poor adherence. Shocking, I know! Patients may not be fully adherent to treatment, even in a clinical trial. I think we should encourage patients to use 7-day pill boxes to aid better long-term adherence and outcomes.

Long-term safety is a critical issue with any new drug, certainly with a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor. Reich and colleagues concluded, "The long-term safety profile was manageable and consistent with previous reports." That conclusion seems reasonable to me. The most common side effects were upper respiratory tract infections. There may be a slight signal for increased risk for oral herpes infection, particularly at the higher dose. If this safety profile endures with longer-term data in larger numbers of people, it will be very reassuring.

The study by Wan and colleagues is another extremely well-done, important study by the premier dermatoepidemiology research team at the University of Pennsylvania. The study used an outstanding database from the United Kingdom that encompassed the clinical care experience of hundreds of thousands of children and adults with atopic dermatitis and millions of control patients without atopic dermatitis. With this many patients, the study has tremendous power to detect risk differences between groups.

With all that power, this study’s findings are very reassuring that there is no meaningful overall increased risk for malignancy in children or adults with atopic dermatitis. And while there was a statistically significant increased risk for lymphoma in children with severe atopic dermatitis, that risk is small … very small. Similarly, adults with severe AD had a twofold higher risk for noncutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), but since non-CTCL is rare, patients with severe AD shouldn't lose any sleep over it..

Simpson and colleagues' study of the effect of dupilumab on Staphylococcus aureus surprised me. Of course, we could expect that S aureus counts would be reduced with dupilumab; as barrier function is restored, surely S aureus counts would go down too. But, fascinatingly, with dupilumab treatment, S aureus counts decreased almost immediately, at both 3 and 7 days, before there was apparent clinical improvement in the skin rash. Simpson and colleagues suggest that the drop in S aureus counts could be due to improvement in immune function when interleukins 4 and 13 are blocked. Whether or not that is true, it is striking how fast S aureus counts improved, long before normal skin barrier function is restored.

Here's a fun fact: Atopic dermatitis is a little less common, about 10% less common, in people born second or later in the birth order. Lisik and colleagues did a meta-analysis of 114 studies and found this marginally lower rate in those born second or later compared with those born first. I'm not sure that there is any clinically meaningful significance to this, but I found it interesting (even though I was born first, and my younger brother had atopic dermatitis).

Although there are several treatment options for PsA, there have been few head-to-head studies conducted to determine comparative efficacy. Ustekinumab, a biologic agent targeting IL-p40, and therefore both IL-12 and IL-23, has proven efficacy in PsA, but the impression is that this drug is less effective than are TNF inhibitors for the treatment of the peripheral arthritis domain. However, in a prospective, observational study, Gossec and colleagues report that the improvements in patient-reported outcomes were generally comparable between ustekinumab and TNF inhibitor treatments. This study evaluated 437 patients with PsA from the PsABio study who initiated first- to third-line ustekinumab (n = 219) or TNF inhibitors (n = 218) and continued the initial treatment for 3 years. At 3 years, ustekinumab and TNF inhibitors were associated with comparable improvements in the EuroQol-5 dimensions health state visual analog scale scores, Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease 12-item scores, and work productivity, although the improvements were generally greater in the TNF inhibitor–treated group. A randomized trial comparing ustekinumab to TNF inhibitors in PsA is warranted to confirm these findings and inform treatment decisions.

Targeted therapies, such as biologics, are proven to be more efficacious than are conventional therapies; however, only about 60% of patients initiating targeted therapies demonstrate treatment response. Identifying the predictors of treatment response is an active area of research. Linde and colleagues looked at data from 13,369 biologic-naive patients registered with a PsA diagnosis from 13 European registries who initiated a first TNF inhibitor treatment. The study demonstrated that sex, disease duration, C-reactive protein level, age at treatment initiation, and fatigue predicted the achievement of the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis in 28 joints remission at 6 months.

Could biomarkers help predict response beyond clinical predictors? An interesting study indicates that beta–defensin 2 (BD-2) may serve as a predictive biomarker for clinical response to secukinumab in PsA. BD-2 is an antimicrobial peptide and an important protein in innate immune response. Cardner and colleagues analyzed protein expression data in serum samples from the phase 3 FUTURE 1-5 trials that included 1989 patients with PsA who received secukinumab or placebo. Baseline BD-2 levels were associated with early as well as sustained PsA treatment response to secukinumab, independent of psoriasis severity. BD-2 levels did not predict response to adalimumab in PsA nor was it associated with treatment response to secukinumab in RA. The addition of BD-2 to the clinical prediction model significantly improved the prediction of the 16-week American College of Rheumatology 20 response. Thus, BD-2 seems to be a secukinumab treatment response biomarker and requires further evaluation.

Although there are several treatment options for PsA, there have been few head-to-head studies conducted to determine comparative efficacy. Ustekinumab, a biologic agent targeting IL-p40, and therefore both IL-12 and IL-23, has proven efficacy in PsA, but the impression is that this drug is less effective than are TNF inhibitors for the treatment of the peripheral arthritis domain. However, in a prospective, observational study, Gossec and colleagues report that the improvements in patient-reported outcomes were generally comparable between ustekinumab and TNF inhibitor treatments. This study evaluated 437 patients with PsA from the PsABio study who initiated first- to third-line ustekinumab (n = 219) or TNF inhibitors (n = 218) and continued the initial treatment for 3 years. At 3 years, ustekinumab and TNF inhibitors were associated with comparable improvements in the EuroQol-5 dimensions health state visual analog scale scores, Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease 12-item scores, and work productivity, although the improvements were generally greater in the TNF inhibitor–treated group. A randomized trial comparing ustekinumab to TNF inhibitors in PsA is warranted to confirm these findings and inform treatment decisions.

Targeted therapies, such as biologics, are proven to be more efficacious than are conventional therapies; however, only about 60% of patients initiating targeted therapies demonstrate treatment response. Identifying the predictors of treatment response is an active area of research. Linde and colleagues looked at data from 13,369 biologic-naive patients registered with a PsA diagnosis from 13 European registries who initiated a first TNF inhibitor treatment. The study demonstrated that sex, disease duration, C-reactive protein level, age at treatment initiation, and fatigue predicted the achievement of the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis in 28 joints remission at 6 months.

Could biomarkers help predict response beyond clinical predictors? An interesting study indicates that beta–defensin 2 (BD-2) may serve as a predictive biomarker for clinical response to secukinumab in PsA. BD-2 is an antimicrobial peptide and an important protein in innate immune response. Cardner and colleagues analyzed protein expression data in serum samples from the phase 3 FUTURE 1-5 trials that included 1989 patients with PsA who received secukinumab or placebo. Baseline BD-2 levels were associated with early as well as sustained PsA treatment response to secukinumab, independent of psoriasis severity. BD-2 levels did not predict response to adalimumab in PsA nor was it associated with treatment response to secukinumab in RA. The addition of BD-2 to the clinical prediction model significantly improved the prediction of the 16-week American College of Rheumatology 20 response. Thus, BD-2 seems to be a secukinumab treatment response biomarker and requires further evaluation.

Although there are several treatment options for PsA, there have been few head-to-head studies conducted to determine comparative efficacy. Ustekinumab, a biologic agent targeting IL-p40, and therefore both IL-12 and IL-23, has proven efficacy in PsA, but the impression is that this drug is less effective than are TNF inhibitors for the treatment of the peripheral arthritis domain. However, in a prospective, observational study, Gossec and colleagues report that the improvements in patient-reported outcomes were generally comparable between ustekinumab and TNF inhibitor treatments. This study evaluated 437 patients with PsA from the PsABio study who initiated first- to third-line ustekinumab (n = 219) or TNF inhibitors (n = 218) and continued the initial treatment for 3 years. At 3 years, ustekinumab and TNF inhibitors were associated with comparable improvements in the EuroQol-5 dimensions health state visual analog scale scores, Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease 12-item scores, and work productivity, although the improvements were generally greater in the TNF inhibitor–treated group. A randomized trial comparing ustekinumab to TNF inhibitors in PsA is warranted to confirm these findings and inform treatment decisions.

Targeted therapies, such as biologics, are proven to be more efficacious than are conventional therapies; however, only about 60% of patients initiating targeted therapies demonstrate treatment response. Identifying the predictors of treatment response is an active area of research. Linde and colleagues looked at data from 13,369 biologic-naive patients registered with a PsA diagnosis from 13 European registries who initiated a first TNF inhibitor treatment. The study demonstrated that sex, disease duration, C-reactive protein level, age at treatment initiation, and fatigue predicted the achievement of the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis in 28 joints remission at 6 months.

Could biomarkers help predict response beyond clinical predictors? An interesting study indicates that beta–defensin 2 (BD-2) may serve as a predictive biomarker for clinical response to secukinumab in PsA. BD-2 is an antimicrobial peptide and an important protein in innate immune response. Cardner and colleagues analyzed protein expression data in serum samples from the phase 3 FUTURE 1-5 trials that included 1989 patients with PsA who received secukinumab or placebo. Baseline BD-2 levels were associated with early as well as sustained PsA treatment response to secukinumab, independent of psoriasis severity. BD-2 levels did not predict response to adalimumab in PsA nor was it associated with treatment response to secukinumab in RA. The addition of BD-2 to the clinical prediction model significantly improved the prediction of the 16-week American College of Rheumatology 20 response. Thus, BD-2 seems to be a secukinumab treatment response biomarker and requires further evaluation.

With several new biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARD now available for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), information regarding their comparative effectiveness would be of interest. Relatively few head-to-head trials have been published, however. Though "real-world" studies have been published to provide some information about comparative effectiveness, Deakin and colleagues used a target trial emulation framework to apply clinical trial methods to real-world data. Using the Australian OPAL registry of bDMARD/tsDMARD-naive patients, they developed a randomized controlled trial protocol of tofacitinib vs adalimumab using an intention-to-treat analysis. Under this framework, there was small reduction of disease activity with tofacitinib vs adalimumab at 3 months and no difference at 9 months. While this framework is conceptually interesting, it may be more meaningful used in side-by-side comparison to a real-world analysis of the same data to evaluate pitfalls and biases in both; otherwise, its utility as a stand-alone analysis of observational data is not fully clear.

Østergaard and colleagues also performed a head-to-head study of several different therapies to address the question of optimal treatment strategies for patients with early RA. Patients with moderate to severe disease activity were randomly assigned to treatment with methotrexate combined with (1) oral glucocorticoid or sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and intra-articular steroid injections, (2) certolizumab, (3) abatacept, or (4) tocilizumab. Disease activity and radiographic changes were evaluated at 48 weeks. In this study of over 800 patients, treatment with abatacept or certolizumab was associated with improved Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission rates compared with the active conventional therapy (group 1), but tocilizumab was not. The overall differences between bDMARD treatment groups were small and thus may not reflect significant differences in effectiveness. Instead, this study challenges the notion of initiating conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) therapy in patients with early RA and stepping up to bDMARD, as initial bDMARD therapy may be of benefit in patients with more active early RA.

Alongside the question of the effectiveness of bMARD and tsDMARD in real-world settings, the appropriate role for long-term low-dose prednisone in the treatment of RA remains unknown. A recent study by Güler-Yüksel and colleagues examined the effects of 5 mg prednisolone daily in addition to standard therapy in patients over 65 years of age with active RA. Due to the potential complications of weight gain and glucose intolerance with long-term glucocorticoids, in addition to low-bone-density issues, their use has generally not been viewed favorably. In this multicenter trial, 449 patients were randomly assigned to receive prednisolone vs placebo in addition to their usual medications over 2 years. Notably, patients in the prednisolone group had an average of 0.9 kg weight gain compared with placebo with 0.4 kg weight loss over 2 years. By the end of 2 years, 29% of patients in the prednisolone group had a weight gain of > 2 kg compared with 18% of patients in the placebo group. Only 57 patients in all underwent body composition analysis, and, interestingly, those in the prednisolone group had small increases in lean body mass compared with fat mass, though these patients were not necessarily representative. The authors suggest, though the study does not prove, that low-dose prednisolone can be protective against sarcopenia, which is associated with older age and "rheumatoid cachexia." The study also did not examine the interaction of glucocorticoid use with diet and exercise. While it is reassuring that patients in this study did not experience major weight gain, it does not appear to be a generalizable finding at this point.

With several new biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARD now available for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), information regarding their comparative effectiveness would be of interest. Relatively few head-to-head trials have been published, however. Though "real-world" studies have been published to provide some information about comparative effectiveness, Deakin and colleagues used a target trial emulation framework to apply clinical trial methods to real-world data. Using the Australian OPAL registry of bDMARD/tsDMARD-naive patients, they developed a randomized controlled trial protocol of tofacitinib vs adalimumab using an intention-to-treat analysis. Under this framework, there was small reduction of disease activity with tofacitinib vs adalimumab at 3 months and no difference at 9 months. While this framework is conceptually interesting, it may be more meaningful used in side-by-side comparison to a real-world analysis of the same data to evaluate pitfalls and biases in both; otherwise, its utility as a stand-alone analysis of observational data is not fully clear.

Østergaard and colleagues also performed a head-to-head study of several different therapies to address the question of optimal treatment strategies for patients with early RA. Patients with moderate to severe disease activity were randomly assigned to treatment with methotrexate combined with (1) oral glucocorticoid or sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and intra-articular steroid injections, (2) certolizumab, (3) abatacept, or (4) tocilizumab. Disease activity and radiographic changes were evaluated at 48 weeks. In this study of over 800 patients, treatment with abatacept or certolizumab was associated with improved Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission rates compared with the active conventional therapy (group 1), but tocilizumab was not. The overall differences between bDMARD treatment groups were small and thus may not reflect significant differences in effectiveness. Instead, this study challenges the notion of initiating conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) therapy in patients with early RA and stepping up to bDMARD, as initial bDMARD therapy may be of benefit in patients with more active early RA.

Alongside the question of the effectiveness of bMARD and tsDMARD in real-world settings, the appropriate role for long-term low-dose prednisone in the treatment of RA remains unknown. A recent study by Güler-Yüksel and colleagues examined the effects of 5 mg prednisolone daily in addition to standard therapy in patients over 65 years of age with active RA. Due to the potential complications of weight gain and glucose intolerance with long-term glucocorticoids, in addition to low-bone-density issues, their use has generally not been viewed favorably. In this multicenter trial, 449 patients were randomly assigned to receive prednisolone vs placebo in addition to their usual medications over 2 years. Notably, patients in the prednisolone group had an average of 0.9 kg weight gain compared with placebo with 0.4 kg weight loss over 2 years. By the end of 2 years, 29% of patients in the prednisolone group had a weight gain of > 2 kg compared with 18% of patients in the placebo group. Only 57 patients in all underwent body composition analysis, and, interestingly, those in the prednisolone group had small increases in lean body mass compared with fat mass, though these patients were not necessarily representative. The authors suggest, though the study does not prove, that low-dose prednisolone can be protective against sarcopenia, which is associated with older age and "rheumatoid cachexia." The study also did not examine the interaction of glucocorticoid use with diet and exercise. While it is reassuring that patients in this study did not experience major weight gain, it does not appear to be a generalizable finding at this point.

With several new biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARD now available for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), information regarding their comparative effectiveness would be of interest. Relatively few head-to-head trials have been published, however. Though "real-world" studies have been published to provide some information about comparative effectiveness, Deakin and colleagues used a target trial emulation framework to apply clinical trial methods to real-world data. Using the Australian OPAL registry of bDMARD/tsDMARD-naive patients, they developed a randomized controlled trial protocol of tofacitinib vs adalimumab using an intention-to-treat analysis. Under this framework, there was small reduction of disease activity with tofacitinib vs adalimumab at 3 months and no difference at 9 months. While this framework is conceptually interesting, it may be more meaningful used in side-by-side comparison to a real-world analysis of the same data to evaluate pitfalls and biases in both; otherwise, its utility as a stand-alone analysis of observational data is not fully clear.

Østergaard and colleagues also performed a head-to-head study of several different therapies to address the question of optimal treatment strategies for patients with early RA. Patients with moderate to severe disease activity were randomly assigned to treatment with methotrexate combined with (1) oral glucocorticoid or sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and intra-articular steroid injections, (2) certolizumab, (3) abatacept, or (4) tocilizumab. Disease activity and radiographic changes were evaluated at 48 weeks. In this study of over 800 patients, treatment with abatacept or certolizumab was associated with improved Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission rates compared with the active conventional therapy (group 1), but tocilizumab was not. The overall differences between bDMARD treatment groups were small and thus may not reflect significant differences in effectiveness. Instead, this study challenges the notion of initiating conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) therapy in patients with early RA and stepping up to bDMARD, as initial bDMARD therapy may be of benefit in patients with more active early RA.

Alongside the question of the effectiveness of bMARD and tsDMARD in real-world settings, the appropriate role for long-term low-dose prednisone in the treatment of RA remains unknown. A recent study by Güler-Yüksel and colleagues examined the effects of 5 mg prednisolone daily in addition to standard therapy in patients over 65 years of age with active RA. Due to the potential complications of weight gain and glucose intolerance with long-term glucocorticoids, in addition to low-bone-density issues, their use has generally not been viewed favorably. In this multicenter trial, 449 patients were randomly assigned to receive prednisolone vs placebo in addition to their usual medications over 2 years. Notably, patients in the prednisolone group had an average of 0.9 kg weight gain compared with placebo with 0.4 kg weight loss over 2 years. By the end of 2 years, 29% of patients in the prednisolone group had a weight gain of > 2 kg compared with 18% of patients in the placebo group. Only 57 patients in all underwent body composition analysis, and, interestingly, those in the prednisolone group had small increases in lean body mass compared with fat mass, though these patients were not necessarily representative. The authors suggest, though the study does not prove, that low-dose prednisolone can be protective against sarcopenia, which is associated with older age and "rheumatoid cachexia." The study also did not examine the interaction of glucocorticoid use with diet and exercise. While it is reassuring that patients in this study did not experience major weight gain, it does not appear to be a generalizable finding at this point.