User login
Don’t overlook all options for ocular rosacea
Managing ocular rosacea often includes a combination of oral and topical treatments, and some patients find relief with natural strategies such as warm compresses and eyelid massage, Julie C. Harper, MD, said at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.
Ocular rosacea can present in several forms, including sties on the eyelids, blepharitis with chalazia and telangiectasia, and “meibomian inspissation visible as pale streaks perpendicular to the lid margin,” according to a 2016 review article she cited (Clin Dermatol. 2016 Mar-Apr;34[2]:146-50).
The most common symptoms at baseline were burning, stinging, and light sensitivity. At baseline, all the cyclosporine-treated patients had burning, stinging, and light sensitivity, which dropped to 21%, 47%, and 10.5% of the patients, respectively, after 3 months of twice-daily topical treatment. In the study, all patients also were administering artificial eye drops daily.
The patients treated with doxycycline also showed improvement in these three symptoms after 3 months of treatment, but not to the same degree: At 3 months, 74% still had burning and stinging, from 100% at baseline. Almost 95% had light sensitivity at baseline, dropping to 21% after 3 months of treatment.
When treating patients with ocular rosacea, “the greatest challenge is that we don’t have any medications that are Food and Drug Administration–approved for this indication,” Dr. Harper said in an interview.
In the interview, she provided the following pearl: “Always ask about eye involvement in rosacea patients; they won’t volunteer information because they think it is unrelated. Teach patients about lid care (lid massage and artificial tears). This is analogous to good skin care in cutaneous rosacea.”
Dr. Harper disclosed serving as a speaker/adviser for Allergan, Bayer, and Galderma, and receiving research support from Bayer. SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
Managing ocular rosacea often includes a combination of oral and topical treatments, and some patients find relief with natural strategies such as warm compresses and eyelid massage, Julie C. Harper, MD, said at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.
Ocular rosacea can present in several forms, including sties on the eyelids, blepharitis with chalazia and telangiectasia, and “meibomian inspissation visible as pale streaks perpendicular to the lid margin,” according to a 2016 review article she cited (Clin Dermatol. 2016 Mar-Apr;34[2]:146-50).
The most common symptoms at baseline were burning, stinging, and light sensitivity. At baseline, all the cyclosporine-treated patients had burning, stinging, and light sensitivity, which dropped to 21%, 47%, and 10.5% of the patients, respectively, after 3 months of twice-daily topical treatment. In the study, all patients also were administering artificial eye drops daily.
The patients treated with doxycycline also showed improvement in these three symptoms after 3 months of treatment, but not to the same degree: At 3 months, 74% still had burning and stinging, from 100% at baseline. Almost 95% had light sensitivity at baseline, dropping to 21% after 3 months of treatment.
When treating patients with ocular rosacea, “the greatest challenge is that we don’t have any medications that are Food and Drug Administration–approved for this indication,” Dr. Harper said in an interview.
In the interview, she provided the following pearl: “Always ask about eye involvement in rosacea patients; they won’t volunteer information because they think it is unrelated. Teach patients about lid care (lid massage and artificial tears). This is analogous to good skin care in cutaneous rosacea.”
Dr. Harper disclosed serving as a speaker/adviser for Allergan, Bayer, and Galderma, and receiving research support from Bayer. SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
Managing ocular rosacea often includes a combination of oral and topical treatments, and some patients find relief with natural strategies such as warm compresses and eyelid massage, Julie C. Harper, MD, said at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.
Ocular rosacea can present in several forms, including sties on the eyelids, blepharitis with chalazia and telangiectasia, and “meibomian inspissation visible as pale streaks perpendicular to the lid margin,” according to a 2016 review article she cited (Clin Dermatol. 2016 Mar-Apr;34[2]:146-50).
The most common symptoms at baseline were burning, stinging, and light sensitivity. At baseline, all the cyclosporine-treated patients had burning, stinging, and light sensitivity, which dropped to 21%, 47%, and 10.5% of the patients, respectively, after 3 months of twice-daily topical treatment. In the study, all patients also were administering artificial eye drops daily.
The patients treated with doxycycline also showed improvement in these three symptoms after 3 months of treatment, but not to the same degree: At 3 months, 74% still had burning and stinging, from 100% at baseline. Almost 95% had light sensitivity at baseline, dropping to 21% after 3 months of treatment.
When treating patients with ocular rosacea, “the greatest challenge is that we don’t have any medications that are Food and Drug Administration–approved for this indication,” Dr. Harper said in an interview.
In the interview, she provided the following pearl: “Always ask about eye involvement in rosacea patients; they won’t volunteer information because they think it is unrelated. Teach patients about lid care (lid massage and artificial tears). This is analogous to good skin care in cutaneous rosacea.”
Dr. Harper disclosed serving as a speaker/adviser for Allergan, Bayer, and Galderma, and receiving research support from Bayer. SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
AT SDEF LAS VEGAS DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR
Analysis indicates coprescribing of tetracyclines, isotretinoin is low
LAS VEGAS – Coprescribing isotretinoin and tetracycline antibiotics among dermatologists and nondermatologists was low, according to a study that analyzed 11 years of ambulatory medical data.
The findings were presented in a poster at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.
“Patients with an inadequate response to tetracyclines or severe cases of acne may require isotretinoin,” wrote Brooke Vasicek, MD, of Loyola University Chicago in Maywood, Ill., and colleagues. However, since the combined use of tetracyclines and isotretinoin puts patients at risk of pseudotumor cerebri, which may lead to blindness, “concurrent use of these medications must be avoided,” they explained.
To assess the frequency of isotretinoin/tetracycline coprescribing, they reviewed data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey collected during 2003-2013 and estimated the number of prescriptions for isotretinoin and/or tetracycline. The dataset included 51,980,042 visits to dermatologists for acne and 29,063,717 visits to nondermatologists.
Of the dermatologists in the survey data, 13.6% reported prescribing isotretinoin (compared with 1.6% of nondermatologists), 29.2% reported prescribing tetracycline (compared with 22.9% of nondermatologists), and 0.40% reported concurrently prescribing both medications (compared with .025% of nondermatologists).
Dermatologists were significantly more likely to mention isotretinoin than nondermatologists, but mention of tetracycline was not significantly different among specialties. “Acne severity and level of comfort because of specialty-based training may be at play in the isotretinoin prescribing pattern differences between dermatologists and nondermatologists,” the researchers noted. The increased pseudotumor cerebri risk associated with combining the medications “is well known among dermatologists, hence, patient exposure is likely very uncommon,” they added.
The results were limited by the cross-sectional nature of the study and possible sampling bias associated with the data collection source, they said.
The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
LAS VEGAS – Coprescribing isotretinoin and tetracycline antibiotics among dermatologists and nondermatologists was low, according to a study that analyzed 11 years of ambulatory medical data.
The findings were presented in a poster at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.
“Patients with an inadequate response to tetracyclines or severe cases of acne may require isotretinoin,” wrote Brooke Vasicek, MD, of Loyola University Chicago in Maywood, Ill., and colleagues. However, since the combined use of tetracyclines and isotretinoin puts patients at risk of pseudotumor cerebri, which may lead to blindness, “concurrent use of these medications must be avoided,” they explained.
To assess the frequency of isotretinoin/tetracycline coprescribing, they reviewed data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey collected during 2003-2013 and estimated the number of prescriptions for isotretinoin and/or tetracycline. The dataset included 51,980,042 visits to dermatologists for acne and 29,063,717 visits to nondermatologists.
Of the dermatologists in the survey data, 13.6% reported prescribing isotretinoin (compared with 1.6% of nondermatologists), 29.2% reported prescribing tetracycline (compared with 22.9% of nondermatologists), and 0.40% reported concurrently prescribing both medications (compared with .025% of nondermatologists).
Dermatologists were significantly more likely to mention isotretinoin than nondermatologists, but mention of tetracycline was not significantly different among specialties. “Acne severity and level of comfort because of specialty-based training may be at play in the isotretinoin prescribing pattern differences between dermatologists and nondermatologists,” the researchers noted. The increased pseudotumor cerebri risk associated with combining the medications “is well known among dermatologists, hence, patient exposure is likely very uncommon,” they added.
The results were limited by the cross-sectional nature of the study and possible sampling bias associated with the data collection source, they said.
The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
LAS VEGAS – Coprescribing isotretinoin and tetracycline antibiotics among dermatologists and nondermatologists was low, according to a study that analyzed 11 years of ambulatory medical data.
The findings were presented in a poster at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.
“Patients with an inadequate response to tetracyclines or severe cases of acne may require isotretinoin,” wrote Brooke Vasicek, MD, of Loyola University Chicago in Maywood, Ill., and colleagues. However, since the combined use of tetracyclines and isotretinoin puts patients at risk of pseudotumor cerebri, which may lead to blindness, “concurrent use of these medications must be avoided,” they explained.
To assess the frequency of isotretinoin/tetracycline coprescribing, they reviewed data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey collected during 2003-2013 and estimated the number of prescriptions for isotretinoin and/or tetracycline. The dataset included 51,980,042 visits to dermatologists for acne and 29,063,717 visits to nondermatologists.
Of the dermatologists in the survey data, 13.6% reported prescribing isotretinoin (compared with 1.6% of nondermatologists), 29.2% reported prescribing tetracycline (compared with 22.9% of nondermatologists), and 0.40% reported concurrently prescribing both medications (compared with .025% of nondermatologists).
Dermatologists were significantly more likely to mention isotretinoin than nondermatologists, but mention of tetracycline was not significantly different among specialties. “Acne severity and level of comfort because of specialty-based training may be at play in the isotretinoin prescribing pattern differences between dermatologists and nondermatologists,” the researchers noted. The increased pseudotumor cerebri risk associated with combining the medications “is well known among dermatologists, hence, patient exposure is likely very uncommon,” they added.
The results were limited by the cross-sectional nature of the study and possible sampling bias associated with the data collection source, they said.
The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
AT SDEF LAS VEGAS DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR
Key clinical point: Most clinicians understand the risk of pseudotumor cerebri associated with concurrent use of tetracyclines and isotretinoin.
Major finding: Very few dermatologists (0.40%) and nondermatologists (0.025%) mentioned both tetracycline and isotretinoin at a clinical visit for acne.
Data source: The data for this cross-sectional study came from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2003 to 2013 and included 51,980,042 acne visits to dermatologists and 29,063,717 acne visits to nondermatologists.
Disclosures: The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
Nondermatologists more likely to prescribe nystatin for dermatophyte infections, survey finds
LAS VEGAS – Nondermatologists were 11 times more likely than dermatologists to prescribe nystatin for dermatophyte infections, according to a study that analyzed 12 years of ambulatory-care data in the United States.
The findings were presented in a poster at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.
“Although it is effective for the treatment of cutaneous or mucocutaneous candidiasis, the topical polyene nystatin, however, is clinically ineffective in the treatment of dermatophyte infection,” wrote Jeave Reserva, MD, of the division of dermatology at Loyola University Health System in Illinois, and colleagues.
In their analysis, the researchers used 12 years of data from two separate surveys – the National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey–Emergency Department – collected between 2003 and 2014, as well as 9 years of data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey–Outpatient Department collected between 2003 and 2011. They reviewed data from 48.4 million ambulatory-care visits for dermatophyte infections, including 1,459,184 visits in which nystatin was prescribed. Overall, nondermatologists were significantly more likely than dermatologists to prescribe nystatin. The researchers also found that, after controlling for race, gender, and insurance status, male or black patients were significantly more likely to have positive tinea infections.
Nondermatologists were 11.08 times more likely to prescribe nystatin for dermatophytosis, compared with dermatologists (P = .02), the researchers found.
Although the number of visits does not reflect disease prevalence, the results suggest that health care disparities affect patients presenting with dermatophytosis, the researchers said. “Nondermatologists may benefit from additional provider education on the diagnosis and appropriate treatment of dermatophyte infections,” they concluded.
The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose; no funding source was listed.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
LAS VEGAS – Nondermatologists were 11 times more likely than dermatologists to prescribe nystatin for dermatophyte infections, according to a study that analyzed 12 years of ambulatory-care data in the United States.
The findings were presented in a poster at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.
“Although it is effective for the treatment of cutaneous or mucocutaneous candidiasis, the topical polyene nystatin, however, is clinically ineffective in the treatment of dermatophyte infection,” wrote Jeave Reserva, MD, of the division of dermatology at Loyola University Health System in Illinois, and colleagues.
In their analysis, the researchers used 12 years of data from two separate surveys – the National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey–Emergency Department – collected between 2003 and 2014, as well as 9 years of data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey–Outpatient Department collected between 2003 and 2011. They reviewed data from 48.4 million ambulatory-care visits for dermatophyte infections, including 1,459,184 visits in which nystatin was prescribed. Overall, nondermatologists were significantly more likely than dermatologists to prescribe nystatin. The researchers also found that, after controlling for race, gender, and insurance status, male or black patients were significantly more likely to have positive tinea infections.
Nondermatologists were 11.08 times more likely to prescribe nystatin for dermatophytosis, compared with dermatologists (P = .02), the researchers found.
Although the number of visits does not reflect disease prevalence, the results suggest that health care disparities affect patients presenting with dermatophytosis, the researchers said. “Nondermatologists may benefit from additional provider education on the diagnosis and appropriate treatment of dermatophyte infections,” they concluded.
The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose; no funding source was listed.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
LAS VEGAS – Nondermatologists were 11 times more likely than dermatologists to prescribe nystatin for dermatophyte infections, according to a study that analyzed 12 years of ambulatory-care data in the United States.
The findings were presented in a poster at the Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.
“Although it is effective for the treatment of cutaneous or mucocutaneous candidiasis, the topical polyene nystatin, however, is clinically ineffective in the treatment of dermatophyte infection,” wrote Jeave Reserva, MD, of the division of dermatology at Loyola University Health System in Illinois, and colleagues.
In their analysis, the researchers used 12 years of data from two separate surveys – the National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey–Emergency Department – collected between 2003 and 2014, as well as 9 years of data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey–Outpatient Department collected between 2003 and 2011. They reviewed data from 48.4 million ambulatory-care visits for dermatophyte infections, including 1,459,184 visits in which nystatin was prescribed. Overall, nondermatologists were significantly more likely than dermatologists to prescribe nystatin. The researchers also found that, after controlling for race, gender, and insurance status, male or black patients were significantly more likely to have positive tinea infections.
Nondermatologists were 11.08 times more likely to prescribe nystatin for dermatophytosis, compared with dermatologists (P = .02), the researchers found.
Although the number of visits does not reflect disease prevalence, the results suggest that health care disparities affect patients presenting with dermatophytosis, the researchers said. “Nondermatologists may benefit from additional provider education on the diagnosis and appropriate treatment of dermatophyte infections,” they concluded.
The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose; no funding source was listed.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
AT SDEF LAS VEGAS DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR
Key clinical point: Nondermatologists may not be aware that nystatin is not effective for treating dermatophyte infections.
Major finding: Nondermatologists were 11.08 times more likely than dermatologists to prescribe nystatin for dermatophyte infections.
Data source: The data came from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey–Emergency Department, and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey–Outpatient Department and included 1,459,184 visits between 2003 and 2014 in which nystatin was prescribed.
Disclosures: The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
Infections, psoriasis, facial fillers heat up Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar
Updates on vaccines and infections, as well as the latest acne treatments and the Psoriasis Forum are among the hot topics at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.
The meeting is cochaired by Linda F. Stein Gold, MD, of Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, Mich., Christopher B. Zachary, MD, of the University of California, Irvine, and Joseph F. Fowler Jr., MD, of the University of Louisville (Ky).
Dr. Stein Gold, along with Julie Harper, MD, will direct a rosacea forum on Thursday to review the latest information on pathology and treatment. The day’s acne forum will include details on sebum-reduction products in the pipeline, as well as data on benzoyl peroxide.
The psoriasis forum on Friday will feature “long-term information on the safety of current drugs,” and also look ahead to more data on IL-23 inhibitors, Dr. Fowler said in an interview.
Aesthetic dermatology highlights from Saturday’s scheduled presentations include Dr. Zachary’s review of options for facial rejuvenation and what clinicians need to know about body contouring. Kristin M. Kelly, MD, of the University of California, Irvine, will discuss devices and how they can be best used to modulate scarring, and Howard Steinman, MD, who is in private practice in Irving, Tex., will share tips on “avoiding the danger zones” when using toxins and fillers.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
Updates on vaccines and infections, as well as the latest acne treatments and the Psoriasis Forum are among the hot topics at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.
The meeting is cochaired by Linda F. Stein Gold, MD, of Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, Mich., Christopher B. Zachary, MD, of the University of California, Irvine, and Joseph F. Fowler Jr., MD, of the University of Louisville (Ky).
Dr. Stein Gold, along with Julie Harper, MD, will direct a rosacea forum on Thursday to review the latest information on pathology and treatment. The day’s acne forum will include details on sebum-reduction products in the pipeline, as well as data on benzoyl peroxide.
The psoriasis forum on Friday will feature “long-term information on the safety of current drugs,” and also look ahead to more data on IL-23 inhibitors, Dr. Fowler said in an interview.
Aesthetic dermatology highlights from Saturday’s scheduled presentations include Dr. Zachary’s review of options for facial rejuvenation and what clinicians need to know about body contouring. Kristin M. Kelly, MD, of the University of California, Irvine, will discuss devices and how they can be best used to modulate scarring, and Howard Steinman, MD, who is in private practice in Irving, Tex., will share tips on “avoiding the danger zones” when using toxins and fillers.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
Updates on vaccines and infections, as well as the latest acne treatments and the Psoriasis Forum are among the hot topics at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar.
The meeting is cochaired by Linda F. Stein Gold, MD, of Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, Mich., Christopher B. Zachary, MD, of the University of California, Irvine, and Joseph F. Fowler Jr., MD, of the University of Louisville (Ky).
Dr. Stein Gold, along with Julie Harper, MD, will direct a rosacea forum on Thursday to review the latest information on pathology and treatment. The day’s acne forum will include details on sebum-reduction products in the pipeline, as well as data on benzoyl peroxide.
The psoriasis forum on Friday will feature “long-term information on the safety of current drugs,” and also look ahead to more data on IL-23 inhibitors, Dr. Fowler said in an interview.
Aesthetic dermatology highlights from Saturday’s scheduled presentations include Dr. Zachary’s review of options for facial rejuvenation and what clinicians need to know about body contouring. Kristin M. Kelly, MD, of the University of California, Irvine, will discuss devices and how they can be best used to modulate scarring, and Howard Steinman, MD, who is in private practice in Irving, Tex., will share tips on “avoiding the danger zones” when using toxins and fillers.
SDEF and this news organization are owned by the same parent company.
ACOG advises against vaginal seeding
The practice of vaginal seeding should not be performed outside of an approved research protocol until adequate data on safety and potential benefits are available, according to a new policy statement from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Vaginal seeding is “the practice of inoculating a cotton gauze or a cotton swab with vaginal fluids to transfer the vaginal flora to the mouth, nose, or skin of a newborn infant,” according to ACOG.
Data from several studies have suggested babies delivered by cesarean may lack the immunologic and metabolic benefits of vaginally delivered babies because of the unique properties of vaginal fluid, and a proof-of-concept study showed changes in newborns’ microbiome profiles when they received transfers of vaginal fluid soon after a cesarean delivery. However, the impact of the fluid transfer (vaginal seeding) remains unknown, according to the ACOG committee opinion (Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e274-8).
Additional safety concerns include the potential transfer of pathogens from mother to neonate from undiagnosed maternal conditions such as gonorrhea, human papillomavirus, group A streptococci, and others, the committee noted.
Women who wish to perform neonatal seeding themselves should be educated about the risks and tested for infectious diseases and pathogenic bacteria, the committee emphasized. Additionally, ACOG urged ob.gyns. to document the discussion in the medical record. The infant’s physician should also be made aware of the procedure because of the potential for neonatal infection.
The research on vaginal seeding currently consists of one pilot study, with an outcome measure of neonatal microbiota. No studies of other clinical outcomes have been completed.
“The paucity of data on this subject supports the need for additional research on the safety and benefit of vaginal seeding,” the ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice wrote.
In the meantime, ACOG recommends exclusive breastfeeding in the first 6 months, noting that there are mixed data on associations between breastfeeding and the development of asthma and atopic disease in childhood.
The practice of vaginal seeding should not be performed outside of an approved research protocol until adequate data on safety and potential benefits are available, according to a new policy statement from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Vaginal seeding is “the practice of inoculating a cotton gauze or a cotton swab with vaginal fluids to transfer the vaginal flora to the mouth, nose, or skin of a newborn infant,” according to ACOG.
Data from several studies have suggested babies delivered by cesarean may lack the immunologic and metabolic benefits of vaginally delivered babies because of the unique properties of vaginal fluid, and a proof-of-concept study showed changes in newborns’ microbiome profiles when they received transfers of vaginal fluid soon after a cesarean delivery. However, the impact of the fluid transfer (vaginal seeding) remains unknown, according to the ACOG committee opinion (Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e274-8).
Additional safety concerns include the potential transfer of pathogens from mother to neonate from undiagnosed maternal conditions such as gonorrhea, human papillomavirus, group A streptococci, and others, the committee noted.
Women who wish to perform neonatal seeding themselves should be educated about the risks and tested for infectious diseases and pathogenic bacteria, the committee emphasized. Additionally, ACOG urged ob.gyns. to document the discussion in the medical record. The infant’s physician should also be made aware of the procedure because of the potential for neonatal infection.
The research on vaginal seeding currently consists of one pilot study, with an outcome measure of neonatal microbiota. No studies of other clinical outcomes have been completed.
“The paucity of data on this subject supports the need for additional research on the safety and benefit of vaginal seeding,” the ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice wrote.
In the meantime, ACOG recommends exclusive breastfeeding in the first 6 months, noting that there are mixed data on associations between breastfeeding and the development of asthma and atopic disease in childhood.
The practice of vaginal seeding should not be performed outside of an approved research protocol until adequate data on safety and potential benefits are available, according to a new policy statement from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Vaginal seeding is “the practice of inoculating a cotton gauze or a cotton swab with vaginal fluids to transfer the vaginal flora to the mouth, nose, or skin of a newborn infant,” according to ACOG.
Data from several studies have suggested babies delivered by cesarean may lack the immunologic and metabolic benefits of vaginally delivered babies because of the unique properties of vaginal fluid, and a proof-of-concept study showed changes in newborns’ microbiome profiles when they received transfers of vaginal fluid soon after a cesarean delivery. However, the impact of the fluid transfer (vaginal seeding) remains unknown, according to the ACOG committee opinion (Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e274-8).
Additional safety concerns include the potential transfer of pathogens from mother to neonate from undiagnosed maternal conditions such as gonorrhea, human papillomavirus, group A streptococci, and others, the committee noted.
Women who wish to perform neonatal seeding themselves should be educated about the risks and tested for infectious diseases and pathogenic bacteria, the committee emphasized. Additionally, ACOG urged ob.gyns. to document the discussion in the medical record. The infant’s physician should also be made aware of the procedure because of the potential for neonatal infection.
The research on vaginal seeding currently consists of one pilot study, with an outcome measure of neonatal microbiota. No studies of other clinical outcomes have been completed.
“The paucity of data on this subject supports the need for additional research on the safety and benefit of vaginal seeding,” the ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice wrote.
In the meantime, ACOG recommends exclusive breastfeeding in the first 6 months, noting that there are mixed data on associations between breastfeeding and the development of asthma and atopic disease in childhood.
FROM OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Golimumab earns new FDA approvals
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved golimumab (Simponi Aria) for use in adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
Simponi Aria is an intravenous formulation of golimumab that is already approved for moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. The subcutaneous injection formulation of golimumab, Simponi, is already approved for RA, PsA, AS, and ulcerative colitis. Golimumab is a fully human anti–tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy, and the intravenous formulation is designed for use as a 30-minute infusion.
“In the study for the treatment of active PsA, patients experienced improvement in joint symptoms and inhibition of structural damage. In the study for treatment of active AS, results showed improvement in measures of disease activity,” according to an Oct. 20 announcement from the manufacturer of golimumab, Janssen Biotech.
Read the revised prescribing information for Simponi Aria here.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved golimumab (Simponi Aria) for use in adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
Simponi Aria is an intravenous formulation of golimumab that is already approved for moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. The subcutaneous injection formulation of golimumab, Simponi, is already approved for RA, PsA, AS, and ulcerative colitis. Golimumab is a fully human anti–tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy, and the intravenous formulation is designed for use as a 30-minute infusion.
“In the study for the treatment of active PsA, patients experienced improvement in joint symptoms and inhibition of structural damage. In the study for treatment of active AS, results showed improvement in measures of disease activity,” according to an Oct. 20 announcement from the manufacturer of golimumab, Janssen Biotech.
Read the revised prescribing information for Simponi Aria here.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved golimumab (Simponi Aria) for use in adults with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
Simponi Aria is an intravenous formulation of golimumab that is already approved for moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. The subcutaneous injection formulation of golimumab, Simponi, is already approved for RA, PsA, AS, and ulcerative colitis. Golimumab is a fully human anti–tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy, and the intravenous formulation is designed for use as a 30-minute infusion.
“In the study for the treatment of active PsA, patients experienced improvement in joint symptoms and inhibition of structural damage. In the study for treatment of active AS, results showed improvement in measures of disease activity,” according to an Oct. 20 announcement from the manufacturer of golimumab, Janssen Biotech.
Read the revised prescribing information for Simponi Aria here.
Genetic analysis indicates ovarian cancer may originate in fallopian tubes
Many of the most severe ovarian cancer cases may originate in the fallopian tube (FT), based on data from an analysis of nine patients published online in Nature Communications.
“Our data suggest that FT neoplasia is the origin of ovarian serous carcinogenesis, and can directly lead to cancer of the ovaries and of other sites,” wrote Sana Intidhar Labidi-Galy, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, and her colleagues (Nature Commun. 2017 Oct 23. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00962-1).
Preliminary evidence suggests that fallopian tube cancers may develop into high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), but evolutionary evidence is limited, the researchers said.
They conducted genetic sequencing on 37 tumor samples from five adult patients with HGSOC. They identified changes in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene in all cases of HGSOC. They also studied serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas from four patients.
“As expected, we identified sequence changes in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene, a well-known driver gene in HGSOC, in all cases,” the researchers wrote.
“The TP53 alterations were identical in all samples analyzed for each patient including in the p53 signatures, the [serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma] lesions, and other carcinomas,” Dr. Labidi-Galy and her associates said. Although TP53 was the only gene analyzed in this study, the researchers also noted changes in areas of several known ovarian cancer genes, including BRCA1 and BRCA2.
The study findings were limited by the small size of the tumor samples and small number of cells, the researchers noted.
The results, however, suggest an avenue for further research to help guide early detection and treatment of ovarian cancer, such as the potential removal of fallopian tubes rather than the ovaries in some cases, they concluded.
The research was supported by multiple foundations and organizations, including the National Institutes of Health. One of the investigators is a founder of Personal Genome Diagnostics and a member of its scientific advisory board and board of directors. The other researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
Many of the most severe ovarian cancer cases may originate in the fallopian tube (FT), based on data from an analysis of nine patients published online in Nature Communications.
“Our data suggest that FT neoplasia is the origin of ovarian serous carcinogenesis, and can directly lead to cancer of the ovaries and of other sites,” wrote Sana Intidhar Labidi-Galy, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, and her colleagues (Nature Commun. 2017 Oct 23. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00962-1).
Preliminary evidence suggests that fallopian tube cancers may develop into high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), but evolutionary evidence is limited, the researchers said.
They conducted genetic sequencing on 37 tumor samples from five adult patients with HGSOC. They identified changes in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene in all cases of HGSOC. They also studied serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas from four patients.
“As expected, we identified sequence changes in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene, a well-known driver gene in HGSOC, in all cases,” the researchers wrote.
“The TP53 alterations were identical in all samples analyzed for each patient including in the p53 signatures, the [serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma] lesions, and other carcinomas,” Dr. Labidi-Galy and her associates said. Although TP53 was the only gene analyzed in this study, the researchers also noted changes in areas of several known ovarian cancer genes, including BRCA1 and BRCA2.
The study findings were limited by the small size of the tumor samples and small number of cells, the researchers noted.
The results, however, suggest an avenue for further research to help guide early detection and treatment of ovarian cancer, such as the potential removal of fallopian tubes rather than the ovaries in some cases, they concluded.
The research was supported by multiple foundations and organizations, including the National Institutes of Health. One of the investigators is a founder of Personal Genome Diagnostics and a member of its scientific advisory board and board of directors. The other researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
Many of the most severe ovarian cancer cases may originate in the fallopian tube (FT), based on data from an analysis of nine patients published online in Nature Communications.
“Our data suggest that FT neoplasia is the origin of ovarian serous carcinogenesis, and can directly lead to cancer of the ovaries and of other sites,” wrote Sana Intidhar Labidi-Galy, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, and her colleagues (Nature Commun. 2017 Oct 23. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00962-1).
Preliminary evidence suggests that fallopian tube cancers may develop into high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), but evolutionary evidence is limited, the researchers said.
They conducted genetic sequencing on 37 tumor samples from five adult patients with HGSOC. They identified changes in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene in all cases of HGSOC. They also studied serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas from four patients.
“As expected, we identified sequence changes in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene, a well-known driver gene in HGSOC, in all cases,” the researchers wrote.
“The TP53 alterations were identical in all samples analyzed for each patient including in the p53 signatures, the [serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma] lesions, and other carcinomas,” Dr. Labidi-Galy and her associates said. Although TP53 was the only gene analyzed in this study, the researchers also noted changes in areas of several known ovarian cancer genes, including BRCA1 and BRCA2.
The study findings were limited by the small size of the tumor samples and small number of cells, the researchers noted.
The results, however, suggest an avenue for further research to help guide early detection and treatment of ovarian cancer, such as the potential removal of fallopian tubes rather than the ovaries in some cases, they concluded.
The research was supported by multiple foundations and organizations, including the National Institutes of Health. One of the investigators is a founder of Personal Genome Diagnostics and a member of its scientific advisory board and board of directors. The other researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.
FROM NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
FDA panel advises approval of semaglutide to lower HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes
The Food and drug Administration’s Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee (EMDAC) recommended the approval of a once-weekly semaglutide injection for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The vote was 16-0 in favor of approval, with one committee member abstaining.
The committee met on Oct. 18 and discussed the safety and efficacy of new drug application (NDA) 209637 for semaglutide injection when used to help glycemic control in addition to diet and exercise. Semaglutide, manufactured and submitted for approval by Novo Nordisk, is described by the company as “an investigational analog of native human glucagonlike peptide–1,” with a half-life of approximately 1 week, making the agent appropriate for weekly dosing.
The researchers found some increase in diabetic retinopathy in the SUSTAIN trials, but a post-hoc analysis found that “To the extent that the data suggest a signal that there was progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with significant decreases in HbA1c, these events should be expected because they are consistent with treatments that decrease HbA1c. While this decrease may result in an initial increase in retinopathy, ocular health is ultimately benefited by decreasing HbA1c.”
Novo Nordisk submitted the application for semaglutide in December 2016; the drug also is being reviewed in Europe and Japan.
The FDA is not obligated to follow the committee’s recommendation but considers it as part of the review process of new drug applications.
The Food and drug Administration’s Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee (EMDAC) recommended the approval of a once-weekly semaglutide injection for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The vote was 16-0 in favor of approval, with one committee member abstaining.
The committee met on Oct. 18 and discussed the safety and efficacy of new drug application (NDA) 209637 for semaglutide injection when used to help glycemic control in addition to diet and exercise. Semaglutide, manufactured and submitted for approval by Novo Nordisk, is described by the company as “an investigational analog of native human glucagonlike peptide–1,” with a half-life of approximately 1 week, making the agent appropriate for weekly dosing.
The researchers found some increase in diabetic retinopathy in the SUSTAIN trials, but a post-hoc analysis found that “To the extent that the data suggest a signal that there was progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with significant decreases in HbA1c, these events should be expected because they are consistent with treatments that decrease HbA1c. While this decrease may result in an initial increase in retinopathy, ocular health is ultimately benefited by decreasing HbA1c.”
Novo Nordisk submitted the application for semaglutide in December 2016; the drug also is being reviewed in Europe and Japan.
The FDA is not obligated to follow the committee’s recommendation but considers it as part of the review process of new drug applications.
The Food and drug Administration’s Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee (EMDAC) recommended the approval of a once-weekly semaglutide injection for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The vote was 16-0 in favor of approval, with one committee member abstaining.
The committee met on Oct. 18 and discussed the safety and efficacy of new drug application (NDA) 209637 for semaglutide injection when used to help glycemic control in addition to diet and exercise. Semaglutide, manufactured and submitted for approval by Novo Nordisk, is described by the company as “an investigational analog of native human glucagonlike peptide–1,” with a half-life of approximately 1 week, making the agent appropriate for weekly dosing.
The researchers found some increase in diabetic retinopathy in the SUSTAIN trials, but a post-hoc analysis found that “To the extent that the data suggest a signal that there was progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with significant decreases in HbA1c, these events should be expected because they are consistent with treatments that decrease HbA1c. While this decrease may result in an initial increase in retinopathy, ocular health is ultimately benefited by decreasing HbA1c.”
Novo Nordisk submitted the application for semaglutide in December 2016; the drug also is being reviewed in Europe and Japan.
The FDA is not obligated to follow the committee’s recommendation but considers it as part of the review process of new drug applications.
AT AN FDA ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
Guidelines cut acute chest syndrome hospital returns in pediatric sickle cell
Children with sickle cell disease who experience acute chest syndrome benefit from the current guideline-recommended antibiotic regimen, based on data from more than 7,000 patients.
Although acute chest syndrome (ACS) is among the most common complications of sickle cell disease (SCD), data on the effectiveness of the recommended antibiotic therapies (macrolides and cephalosporins) are lacking, wrote David G. Bundy, MD, of the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, and colleagues. ACS often leads to intensive hospital care and 1%-2% morbidity, they noted.
The most recent guidelines from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute call for “an intravenous cephalosporin and an oral macrolide antibiotic,” the researchers said.
To determine the impact of antibiotic use as directed on reducing hospital readmissions in young SCD patients, the researchers reviewed data from 14,480 hospitalizations for ACS involving 7,178 children and young adults aged 0-22 years seen at 41 hospitals in the United States (JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Sep 11. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2526).
“This high level of interhospital variation also suggests possible clinician disagreement regarding the ideal antibiotic treatment for children with ACS,” the researchers wrote.
Rates of all-cause readmission and 30-day ACS-related readmission were significantly lower among patients who received the recommended antibiotics (odds ratio, 0.50 and 0.71, respectively). Children aged 5-9 years were most likely to receive the recommended antibiotics (80%), while young adults aged 19-22 years were the least likely (64%).
The findings were limited by several factors, including coding errors and incomplete clinical information, the researchers noted. But the results suggest that the guideline-recommended antibiotics are effective, “so more robust dissemination and implementation of existing treatment guidelines may reduce readmissions in this high-risk population,” they said.
The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. Study coauthor Staci Arnold, MD, was supported in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program.
Children with sickle cell disease who experience acute chest syndrome benefit from the current guideline-recommended antibiotic regimen, based on data from more than 7,000 patients.
Although acute chest syndrome (ACS) is among the most common complications of sickle cell disease (SCD), data on the effectiveness of the recommended antibiotic therapies (macrolides and cephalosporins) are lacking, wrote David G. Bundy, MD, of the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, and colleagues. ACS often leads to intensive hospital care and 1%-2% morbidity, they noted.
The most recent guidelines from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute call for “an intravenous cephalosporin and an oral macrolide antibiotic,” the researchers said.
To determine the impact of antibiotic use as directed on reducing hospital readmissions in young SCD patients, the researchers reviewed data from 14,480 hospitalizations for ACS involving 7,178 children and young adults aged 0-22 years seen at 41 hospitals in the United States (JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Sep 11. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2526).
“This high level of interhospital variation also suggests possible clinician disagreement regarding the ideal antibiotic treatment for children with ACS,” the researchers wrote.
Rates of all-cause readmission and 30-day ACS-related readmission were significantly lower among patients who received the recommended antibiotics (odds ratio, 0.50 and 0.71, respectively). Children aged 5-9 years were most likely to receive the recommended antibiotics (80%), while young adults aged 19-22 years were the least likely (64%).
The findings were limited by several factors, including coding errors and incomplete clinical information, the researchers noted. But the results suggest that the guideline-recommended antibiotics are effective, “so more robust dissemination and implementation of existing treatment guidelines may reduce readmissions in this high-risk population,” they said.
The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. Study coauthor Staci Arnold, MD, was supported in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program.
Children with sickle cell disease who experience acute chest syndrome benefit from the current guideline-recommended antibiotic regimen, based on data from more than 7,000 patients.
Although acute chest syndrome (ACS) is among the most common complications of sickle cell disease (SCD), data on the effectiveness of the recommended antibiotic therapies (macrolides and cephalosporins) are lacking, wrote David G. Bundy, MD, of the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, and colleagues. ACS often leads to intensive hospital care and 1%-2% morbidity, they noted.
The most recent guidelines from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute call for “an intravenous cephalosporin and an oral macrolide antibiotic,” the researchers said.
To determine the impact of antibiotic use as directed on reducing hospital readmissions in young SCD patients, the researchers reviewed data from 14,480 hospitalizations for ACS involving 7,178 children and young adults aged 0-22 years seen at 41 hospitals in the United States (JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Sep 11. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2526).
“This high level of interhospital variation also suggests possible clinician disagreement regarding the ideal antibiotic treatment for children with ACS,” the researchers wrote.
Rates of all-cause readmission and 30-day ACS-related readmission were significantly lower among patients who received the recommended antibiotics (odds ratio, 0.50 and 0.71, respectively). Children aged 5-9 years were most likely to receive the recommended antibiotics (80%), while young adults aged 19-22 years were the least likely (64%).
The findings were limited by several factors, including coding errors and incomplete clinical information, the researchers noted. But the results suggest that the guideline-recommended antibiotics are effective, “so more robust dissemination and implementation of existing treatment guidelines may reduce readmissions in this high-risk population,” they said.
The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. Study coauthor Staci Arnold, MD, was supported in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program.
FROM JAMA PEDIATRICS
Key clinical point: Treatment with the recommended antibiotics was effective in reducing hospital readmissions for acute chest syndrome in children and young adults up to age 22 years with sickle cell disease.
Major finding: Hospital readmission for 30-day acute chest syndrome and all-cause readmission were significantly lower (odds ratio, 0.71 and 0.50, respectively) among children with sickle cell disease who received antibiotics (macrolides and cephalosporins) according to current guidelines, compared with those who did not.
Data source: A retrospective, multicenter study of 14,480 hospitalizations at 41 locations involving 7,178 children and young adults aged 0-22 years.
Disclosures: The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose. Study coauthor Staci Arnold, MD, was supported in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program.
Metals may surprise as sources of contact dermatitis
, according to Jennifer H. Perryman, MD, of the Greeley Skin Clinic in Fort Collins, Colo.
For example, metal from orthopedic implants can cause contact dermatitis, Dr. Perryman said at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s Women’s & Pediatric Dermatology Seminar.
The cutaneous complications of metal implants generally are eczematous, but they can be urticarial and vasculitic as well, with symptoms either generalized or localized. Dr. Perryman explained. Noncutaneous complications from contact dermatitis associated with the metal include chronic joint pain, and a loosening and dysfunction of the device.
It is a case of “chicken or the egg: Metal allergy causes device failure, or device failure causes metal allergy,” Dr. Perryman said.
Dental implants also can be unforeseen causes of contact dermatitis, she noted. The bone cement used in some implants may contain a variety of potential irritants such as methyl methacrylate, N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine (DPT), benzoyl peroxide, gentamicin, and hydroquinone.
Metal allergy in the mouth most often presents as a reaction resembling oral lichen planus, with lesions that are reticular, atrophic, erosive, or plaque-like. These lesions usually erupt next to the implant, she said. Some patients also experience burning mouth syndrome from amalgam tattoos. However, some patients who test positive for metal allergies in general have developed a tolerance for dental implants as a result of having worn braces in the past.
Metal eyelid weights implanted to treat lagophthalmos are another rare, but potential allergen to consider, said Dr. Perryman. These weights often are made of gold, and Dr. Perryman cited a study in which four patients with gold eyelid weights experienced inflammatory reactions. Patch testing revealed gold sodium thiosulfate as the cause of their allergic contact dermatitis (Dermatitis. 2008 May-Jun;19[3]:148-53). Other options for these patients include platinum weights, hyaluronic acid, ointment, and taping, she said.
Dr. Perryman had no financial conflicts to disclose. SDEF and this news organization are owned by Frontline Medical Communications.
, according to Jennifer H. Perryman, MD, of the Greeley Skin Clinic in Fort Collins, Colo.
For example, metal from orthopedic implants can cause contact dermatitis, Dr. Perryman said at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s Women’s & Pediatric Dermatology Seminar.
The cutaneous complications of metal implants generally are eczematous, but they can be urticarial and vasculitic as well, with symptoms either generalized or localized. Dr. Perryman explained. Noncutaneous complications from contact dermatitis associated with the metal include chronic joint pain, and a loosening and dysfunction of the device.
It is a case of “chicken or the egg: Metal allergy causes device failure, or device failure causes metal allergy,” Dr. Perryman said.
Dental implants also can be unforeseen causes of contact dermatitis, she noted. The bone cement used in some implants may contain a variety of potential irritants such as methyl methacrylate, N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine (DPT), benzoyl peroxide, gentamicin, and hydroquinone.
Metal allergy in the mouth most often presents as a reaction resembling oral lichen planus, with lesions that are reticular, atrophic, erosive, or plaque-like. These lesions usually erupt next to the implant, she said. Some patients also experience burning mouth syndrome from amalgam tattoos. However, some patients who test positive for metal allergies in general have developed a tolerance for dental implants as a result of having worn braces in the past.
Metal eyelid weights implanted to treat lagophthalmos are another rare, but potential allergen to consider, said Dr. Perryman. These weights often are made of gold, and Dr. Perryman cited a study in which four patients with gold eyelid weights experienced inflammatory reactions. Patch testing revealed gold sodium thiosulfate as the cause of their allergic contact dermatitis (Dermatitis. 2008 May-Jun;19[3]:148-53). Other options for these patients include platinum weights, hyaluronic acid, ointment, and taping, she said.
Dr. Perryman had no financial conflicts to disclose. SDEF and this news organization are owned by Frontline Medical Communications.
, according to Jennifer H. Perryman, MD, of the Greeley Skin Clinic in Fort Collins, Colo.
For example, metal from orthopedic implants can cause contact dermatitis, Dr. Perryman said at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s Women’s & Pediatric Dermatology Seminar.
The cutaneous complications of metal implants generally are eczematous, but they can be urticarial and vasculitic as well, with symptoms either generalized or localized. Dr. Perryman explained. Noncutaneous complications from contact dermatitis associated with the metal include chronic joint pain, and a loosening and dysfunction of the device.
It is a case of “chicken or the egg: Metal allergy causes device failure, or device failure causes metal allergy,” Dr. Perryman said.
Dental implants also can be unforeseen causes of contact dermatitis, she noted. The bone cement used in some implants may contain a variety of potential irritants such as methyl methacrylate, N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine (DPT), benzoyl peroxide, gentamicin, and hydroquinone.
Metal allergy in the mouth most often presents as a reaction resembling oral lichen planus, with lesions that are reticular, atrophic, erosive, or plaque-like. These lesions usually erupt next to the implant, she said. Some patients also experience burning mouth syndrome from amalgam tattoos. However, some patients who test positive for metal allergies in general have developed a tolerance for dental implants as a result of having worn braces in the past.
Metal eyelid weights implanted to treat lagophthalmos are another rare, but potential allergen to consider, said Dr. Perryman. These weights often are made of gold, and Dr. Perryman cited a study in which four patients with gold eyelid weights experienced inflammatory reactions. Patch testing revealed gold sodium thiosulfate as the cause of their allergic contact dermatitis (Dermatitis. 2008 May-Jun;19[3]:148-53). Other options for these patients include platinum weights, hyaluronic acid, ointment, and taping, she said.
Dr. Perryman had no financial conflicts to disclose. SDEF and this news organization are owned by Frontline Medical Communications.
FROM SDEF WOMEN’S & PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR