User login
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER
Vitamin B6 (50–100 mg/d) and elemental calcium (1200 mg/d) are safe, inexpensive, and moderately effective (Table) (grade of recommendation: B). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and some other antidepressants are more effective, but are also more costly and more likely to cause side effects or treatment dropout (grade of recommendation: A). Antidepressant dosing only during the luteal phase may be effective and more tolerable (grade of recommendation: B). Alprazolam (generally 0.25–0.5 mg 3 times a day during luteal phase) may be effective for treating mood or anxiety symptoms (grade of recommendation: B). Hormonal therapies (oral contraceptives, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, danazol, estrogen) lack convincing evidence of efficacy and cause many side effects; progesterone is no more beneficial than placebo (grade of recommendation: B). There is no convincing evidence of benefit from diuretics, magnesium, beta-blockers, or lithium (grade of recommendation: C).
TABLE
Agents for treating symptoms of premenstrual syndrome
Medication | Sample drug and dose | Adverse effects | Benefit |
---|---|---|---|
Vitamin B61 | 50–100 mg/d | Peripheral neuropathy | OR = 2.32 (95% CI 1.95–2.54) |
Elemental | 1200 mg/d calcium2 | Same as placebo | NNT = 6 for 50% symptom reduction |
SSRIs3 | Fluoxetine 20 mg/d | Insomnia, headache, nausea, dizziness | NNT = 4–11 |
Benzodiazepines4 | Alprazolam 0.25–0.5 mg tid/qid in luteal phase | Habituation | NNT = 3 for 50% symptom reduction |
GnRH agonists5 | Danazol 200–400 mg/d | Hypoestrogenic Androgenic | Benefit unclear Benefit unclear |
GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; NNT, number needed to treat; SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. |
Evidence summary
Pooled results of 9, generally poor-quality studies of Vitamin B6 show some benefit.1 Doses higher than 100 mg/d may cause peripheral neuropathy. Three small studies in the 1980s suggested possible benefit of Vitamin E; however, these studies have not been further replicated. One well-designed, randomized controlled trial of calcium therapy showed > 50% decrease in symptom complex scores after 3 months in more than half of subjects taking 1200 mg/d supplemental elemental calcium (NNT=6).2
Among SSRIs, fluoxetine (20 mg/d) is well-studied and effective.3 Other SSRIs, including sertraline, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, and venlafaxine, and clomipramine (a tricyclic with serotonin reuptake inhibitor activity), also show benefit but are less well studied. Luteal phase-only dosing may be equally or more effective than continuous dosing for some SSRIs. Benzodiazepines have shown mixed results in treating PMS, and overall their benefit appears smaller than that of SSRIs.4 Luteal phase-only dosing theoretically reduces the risk of benzodiazepine withdrawal or dependence, but published data are rare.
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists may be effective, but troublesome anti-estrogenic side effects limit their utility. Estrogen and progesterone “add-back” therapy to counter side effects further complicates this approach. The gonadotropin inhibitor danazol has a high treatment dropout rate at higher doses (200–400 mg/d continuously), but can be effective in individuals who are able to tolerate it3,5 ; however, danazol is expensive and causes significant androgenic side effects. Lower-dose danazol (200 mg/d luteal phase only) is better tolerated but ineffective.6 A meta-analysis of progesterone found no evidence to support its efficacy.7 Oral contraceptives are ineffective for global symptoms, and may actually cause PMS symptoms in some women.
Recommendations from others
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend that patients with mild to moderate PMS should receive supportive, lifestyle, and dietary interventions. For severe PMS, SSRIs are the initial drug of choice. Alprazolam may be useful when these interventions are ineffective. Consider oral contraceptives for primarily physical symptoms and reserve gonadotropin-releasing hormone for severe cases unresponsive to other treatments.8
Clinical Commentary by Peter Danis, MD, at http://www.fpin.org.
1. Wyatt KM, Dimmock PW, Jones PW, Shaughn O’Brien PM. BMJ 1999;318:1375-81.
2. Thys-Jacobs S, Starkey P, Bernstein D, Tian J. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:444-52.
3. Wyatt K. Clinical Evidence 2002;7:1739-57.
4. Freeman EW, Rickels K, Sondheimer SJ, Polansky M. JAMA 1995;274:51-7.
5. Watts JF, Butt WR, Logan Edwards R. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987;94:30-4.
6. O’Brien PM, Abukhalil IE. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:18-23.
7. Wyatt K, Dimmock P, Jones P, Obhrai M, O’Brien S. BMJ 2001;323:776-80.
8. ACOG. Premenstrual Syndrome. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 15. Washington, DC: ACOG; April 2000.
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER
Vitamin B6 (50–100 mg/d) and elemental calcium (1200 mg/d) are safe, inexpensive, and moderately effective (Table) (grade of recommendation: B). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and some other antidepressants are more effective, but are also more costly and more likely to cause side effects or treatment dropout (grade of recommendation: A). Antidepressant dosing only during the luteal phase may be effective and more tolerable (grade of recommendation: B). Alprazolam (generally 0.25–0.5 mg 3 times a day during luteal phase) may be effective for treating mood or anxiety symptoms (grade of recommendation: B). Hormonal therapies (oral contraceptives, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, danazol, estrogen) lack convincing evidence of efficacy and cause many side effects; progesterone is no more beneficial than placebo (grade of recommendation: B). There is no convincing evidence of benefit from diuretics, magnesium, beta-blockers, or lithium (grade of recommendation: C).
TABLE
Agents for treating symptoms of premenstrual syndrome
Medication | Sample drug and dose | Adverse effects | Benefit |
---|---|---|---|
Vitamin B61 | 50–100 mg/d | Peripheral neuropathy | OR = 2.32 (95% CI 1.95–2.54) |
Elemental | 1200 mg/d calcium2 | Same as placebo | NNT = 6 for 50% symptom reduction |
SSRIs3 | Fluoxetine 20 mg/d | Insomnia, headache, nausea, dizziness | NNT = 4–11 |
Benzodiazepines4 | Alprazolam 0.25–0.5 mg tid/qid in luteal phase | Habituation | NNT = 3 for 50% symptom reduction |
GnRH agonists5 | Danazol 200–400 mg/d | Hypoestrogenic Androgenic | Benefit unclear Benefit unclear |
GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; NNT, number needed to treat; SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. |
Evidence summary
Pooled results of 9, generally poor-quality studies of Vitamin B6 show some benefit.1 Doses higher than 100 mg/d may cause peripheral neuropathy. Three small studies in the 1980s suggested possible benefit of Vitamin E; however, these studies have not been further replicated. One well-designed, randomized controlled trial of calcium therapy showed > 50% decrease in symptom complex scores after 3 months in more than half of subjects taking 1200 mg/d supplemental elemental calcium (NNT=6).2
Among SSRIs, fluoxetine (20 mg/d) is well-studied and effective.3 Other SSRIs, including sertraline, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, and venlafaxine, and clomipramine (a tricyclic with serotonin reuptake inhibitor activity), also show benefit but are less well studied. Luteal phase-only dosing may be equally or more effective than continuous dosing for some SSRIs. Benzodiazepines have shown mixed results in treating PMS, and overall their benefit appears smaller than that of SSRIs.4 Luteal phase-only dosing theoretically reduces the risk of benzodiazepine withdrawal or dependence, but published data are rare.
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists may be effective, but troublesome anti-estrogenic side effects limit their utility. Estrogen and progesterone “add-back” therapy to counter side effects further complicates this approach. The gonadotropin inhibitor danazol has a high treatment dropout rate at higher doses (200–400 mg/d continuously), but can be effective in individuals who are able to tolerate it3,5 ; however, danazol is expensive and causes significant androgenic side effects. Lower-dose danazol (200 mg/d luteal phase only) is better tolerated but ineffective.6 A meta-analysis of progesterone found no evidence to support its efficacy.7 Oral contraceptives are ineffective for global symptoms, and may actually cause PMS symptoms in some women.
Recommendations from others
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend that patients with mild to moderate PMS should receive supportive, lifestyle, and dietary interventions. For severe PMS, SSRIs are the initial drug of choice. Alprazolam may be useful when these interventions are ineffective. Consider oral contraceptives for primarily physical symptoms and reserve gonadotropin-releasing hormone for severe cases unresponsive to other treatments.8
Clinical Commentary by Peter Danis, MD, at http://www.fpin.org.
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER
Vitamin B6 (50–100 mg/d) and elemental calcium (1200 mg/d) are safe, inexpensive, and moderately effective (Table) (grade of recommendation: B). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and some other antidepressants are more effective, but are also more costly and more likely to cause side effects or treatment dropout (grade of recommendation: A). Antidepressant dosing only during the luteal phase may be effective and more tolerable (grade of recommendation: B). Alprazolam (generally 0.25–0.5 mg 3 times a day during luteal phase) may be effective for treating mood or anxiety symptoms (grade of recommendation: B). Hormonal therapies (oral contraceptives, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, danazol, estrogen) lack convincing evidence of efficacy and cause many side effects; progesterone is no more beneficial than placebo (grade of recommendation: B). There is no convincing evidence of benefit from diuretics, magnesium, beta-blockers, or lithium (grade of recommendation: C).
TABLE
Agents for treating symptoms of premenstrual syndrome
Medication | Sample drug and dose | Adverse effects | Benefit |
---|---|---|---|
Vitamin B61 | 50–100 mg/d | Peripheral neuropathy | OR = 2.32 (95% CI 1.95–2.54) |
Elemental | 1200 mg/d calcium2 | Same as placebo | NNT = 6 for 50% symptom reduction |
SSRIs3 | Fluoxetine 20 mg/d | Insomnia, headache, nausea, dizziness | NNT = 4–11 |
Benzodiazepines4 | Alprazolam 0.25–0.5 mg tid/qid in luteal phase | Habituation | NNT = 3 for 50% symptom reduction |
GnRH agonists5 | Danazol 200–400 mg/d | Hypoestrogenic Androgenic | Benefit unclear Benefit unclear |
GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; NNT, number needed to treat; SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. |
Evidence summary
Pooled results of 9, generally poor-quality studies of Vitamin B6 show some benefit.1 Doses higher than 100 mg/d may cause peripheral neuropathy. Three small studies in the 1980s suggested possible benefit of Vitamin E; however, these studies have not been further replicated. One well-designed, randomized controlled trial of calcium therapy showed > 50% decrease in symptom complex scores after 3 months in more than half of subjects taking 1200 mg/d supplemental elemental calcium (NNT=6).2
Among SSRIs, fluoxetine (20 mg/d) is well-studied and effective.3 Other SSRIs, including sertraline, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, and venlafaxine, and clomipramine (a tricyclic with serotonin reuptake inhibitor activity), also show benefit but are less well studied. Luteal phase-only dosing may be equally or more effective than continuous dosing for some SSRIs. Benzodiazepines have shown mixed results in treating PMS, and overall their benefit appears smaller than that of SSRIs.4 Luteal phase-only dosing theoretically reduces the risk of benzodiazepine withdrawal or dependence, but published data are rare.
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists may be effective, but troublesome anti-estrogenic side effects limit their utility. Estrogen and progesterone “add-back” therapy to counter side effects further complicates this approach. The gonadotropin inhibitor danazol has a high treatment dropout rate at higher doses (200–400 mg/d continuously), but can be effective in individuals who are able to tolerate it3,5 ; however, danazol is expensive and causes significant androgenic side effects. Lower-dose danazol (200 mg/d luteal phase only) is better tolerated but ineffective.6 A meta-analysis of progesterone found no evidence to support its efficacy.7 Oral contraceptives are ineffective for global symptoms, and may actually cause PMS symptoms in some women.
Recommendations from others
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend that patients with mild to moderate PMS should receive supportive, lifestyle, and dietary interventions. For severe PMS, SSRIs are the initial drug of choice. Alprazolam may be useful when these interventions are ineffective. Consider oral contraceptives for primarily physical symptoms and reserve gonadotropin-releasing hormone for severe cases unresponsive to other treatments.8
Clinical Commentary by Peter Danis, MD, at http://www.fpin.org.
1. Wyatt KM, Dimmock PW, Jones PW, Shaughn O’Brien PM. BMJ 1999;318:1375-81.
2. Thys-Jacobs S, Starkey P, Bernstein D, Tian J. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:444-52.
3. Wyatt K. Clinical Evidence 2002;7:1739-57.
4. Freeman EW, Rickels K, Sondheimer SJ, Polansky M. JAMA 1995;274:51-7.
5. Watts JF, Butt WR, Logan Edwards R. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987;94:30-4.
6. O’Brien PM, Abukhalil IE. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:18-23.
7. Wyatt K, Dimmock P, Jones P, Obhrai M, O’Brien S. BMJ 2001;323:776-80.
8. ACOG. Premenstrual Syndrome. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 15. Washington, DC: ACOG; April 2000.
1. Wyatt KM, Dimmock PW, Jones PW, Shaughn O’Brien PM. BMJ 1999;318:1375-81.
2. Thys-Jacobs S, Starkey P, Bernstein D, Tian J. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:444-52.
3. Wyatt K. Clinical Evidence 2002;7:1739-57.
4. Freeman EW, Rickels K, Sondheimer SJ, Polansky M. JAMA 1995;274:51-7.
5. Watts JF, Butt WR, Logan Edwards R. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987;94:30-4.
6. O’Brien PM, Abukhalil IE. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:18-23.
7. Wyatt K, Dimmock P, Jones P, Obhrai M, O’Brien S. BMJ 2001;323:776-80.
8. ACOG. Premenstrual Syndrome. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 15. Washington, DC: ACOG; April 2000.
Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network