User login
TOPLINE:
A cohort study of primary care patients with obesity found significant associations between weight management treatments (WMTs) and ≥ 5% weight loss for individuals.
Yet, low WMT utilization hindered population-level benefit.
METHODOLOGY:
This retrospective, population-based cross-sectional cohort study included 149,959 primary care patients from a Michigan academic health system between October 2015 and March 2020.
TAKEAWAY:
- From 2017 to 2019, the average unadjusted body mass index (BMI) increased from 29.34 kg/m2 to 29.61 kg/m2 and the prevalence of obesity from 39.2% to 40.7%.
- Among 31,284 patients with obesity in 2017, 25.9% (6665) achieved ≥ 5% weight loss at 2 years.
- Among 37,245 with obesity in either 2017 or 2019 and sufficient follow-up, 1-year WMT utilization increased from 5.3% in 2017 to 7.1% in 2019 (difference, 1.7%; 95% CI, 1.3%-2.2%), including nutritional counseling (6.3%), weight loss medication prescriptions (2.6%), and bariatric surgery (1.0%).
- In two groups of n = 5090 with and without WMT exposure who were propensity score–matched on covariates including BMI, sex, and age, the probabilities of ≥ 5% weight loss at 1 year were 15.6% without WMTs, 23.1% for nutrition counseling, 54.6% for meal replacement, 27.8% for weight loss medication, and 93% for bariatric surgery, with all approaches significant compared to no WMTs.
IN PRACTICE:
“Health systems and insurers should consider novel strategies to enhance preference-sensitive use of WMT to optimize achievement of 5% or greater weight loss among individuals and populations with obesity.”
“While we included glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes, including semaglutide 1.0 mg, in our analyses, the study period predated the [US Food and Drug Administration]-approval of semaglutide 2.4 mg for weight management. Future work should explore the potential for semaglutide 2.4 mg and other medications with substantial weight loss effectiveness to reduce weight at the population level.”
SOURCE:
This study was conducted by James Henderson, PhD, of the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and colleagues and was published online in JAMA Network Open .
LIMITATIONS:
Single health system. Electronic health record data may be subject to weight and WMT measurement error, lack of adherence data, and any information about outside WMT access. Retrospective, observational study, subject to bias. Study period occurred before FDA approval of semaglutide for weight management, and thus, the findings may understate current use and effectiveness of weight loss medications.
DISCLOSURES:
The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Michigan Center for Diabetes Translational Research, Michigan Nutrition Obesity Research Center, and the Elizabeth Weiser Caswell Diabetes Institute at the University of Michigan. Dr. Henderson had no further disclosures, but some of the coauthors had industry ties.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
A cohort study of primary care patients with obesity found significant associations between weight management treatments (WMTs) and ≥ 5% weight loss for individuals.
Yet, low WMT utilization hindered population-level benefit.
METHODOLOGY:
This retrospective, population-based cross-sectional cohort study included 149,959 primary care patients from a Michigan academic health system between October 2015 and March 2020.
TAKEAWAY:
- From 2017 to 2019, the average unadjusted body mass index (BMI) increased from 29.34 kg/m2 to 29.61 kg/m2 and the prevalence of obesity from 39.2% to 40.7%.
- Among 31,284 patients with obesity in 2017, 25.9% (6665) achieved ≥ 5% weight loss at 2 years.
- Among 37,245 with obesity in either 2017 or 2019 and sufficient follow-up, 1-year WMT utilization increased from 5.3% in 2017 to 7.1% in 2019 (difference, 1.7%; 95% CI, 1.3%-2.2%), including nutritional counseling (6.3%), weight loss medication prescriptions (2.6%), and bariatric surgery (1.0%).
- In two groups of n = 5090 with and without WMT exposure who were propensity score–matched on covariates including BMI, sex, and age, the probabilities of ≥ 5% weight loss at 1 year were 15.6% without WMTs, 23.1% for nutrition counseling, 54.6% for meal replacement, 27.8% for weight loss medication, and 93% for bariatric surgery, with all approaches significant compared to no WMTs.
IN PRACTICE:
“Health systems and insurers should consider novel strategies to enhance preference-sensitive use of WMT to optimize achievement of 5% or greater weight loss among individuals and populations with obesity.”
“While we included glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes, including semaglutide 1.0 mg, in our analyses, the study period predated the [US Food and Drug Administration]-approval of semaglutide 2.4 mg for weight management. Future work should explore the potential for semaglutide 2.4 mg and other medications with substantial weight loss effectiveness to reduce weight at the population level.”
SOURCE:
This study was conducted by James Henderson, PhD, of the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and colleagues and was published online in JAMA Network Open .
LIMITATIONS:
Single health system. Electronic health record data may be subject to weight and WMT measurement error, lack of adherence data, and any information about outside WMT access. Retrospective, observational study, subject to bias. Study period occurred before FDA approval of semaglutide for weight management, and thus, the findings may understate current use and effectiveness of weight loss medications.
DISCLOSURES:
The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Michigan Center for Diabetes Translational Research, Michigan Nutrition Obesity Research Center, and the Elizabeth Weiser Caswell Diabetes Institute at the University of Michigan. Dr. Henderson had no further disclosures, but some of the coauthors had industry ties.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
A cohort study of primary care patients with obesity found significant associations between weight management treatments (WMTs) and ≥ 5% weight loss for individuals.
Yet, low WMT utilization hindered population-level benefit.
METHODOLOGY:
This retrospective, population-based cross-sectional cohort study included 149,959 primary care patients from a Michigan academic health system between October 2015 and March 2020.
TAKEAWAY:
- From 2017 to 2019, the average unadjusted body mass index (BMI) increased from 29.34 kg/m2 to 29.61 kg/m2 and the prevalence of obesity from 39.2% to 40.7%.
- Among 31,284 patients with obesity in 2017, 25.9% (6665) achieved ≥ 5% weight loss at 2 years.
- Among 37,245 with obesity in either 2017 or 2019 and sufficient follow-up, 1-year WMT utilization increased from 5.3% in 2017 to 7.1% in 2019 (difference, 1.7%; 95% CI, 1.3%-2.2%), including nutritional counseling (6.3%), weight loss medication prescriptions (2.6%), and bariatric surgery (1.0%).
- In two groups of n = 5090 with and without WMT exposure who were propensity score–matched on covariates including BMI, sex, and age, the probabilities of ≥ 5% weight loss at 1 year were 15.6% without WMTs, 23.1% for nutrition counseling, 54.6% for meal replacement, 27.8% for weight loss medication, and 93% for bariatric surgery, with all approaches significant compared to no WMTs.
IN PRACTICE:
“Health systems and insurers should consider novel strategies to enhance preference-sensitive use of WMT to optimize achievement of 5% or greater weight loss among individuals and populations with obesity.”
“While we included glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes, including semaglutide 1.0 mg, in our analyses, the study period predated the [US Food and Drug Administration]-approval of semaglutide 2.4 mg for weight management. Future work should explore the potential for semaglutide 2.4 mg and other medications with substantial weight loss effectiveness to reduce weight at the population level.”
SOURCE:
This study was conducted by James Henderson, PhD, of the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and colleagues and was published online in JAMA Network Open .
LIMITATIONS:
Single health system. Electronic health record data may be subject to weight and WMT measurement error, lack of adherence data, and any information about outside WMT access. Retrospective, observational study, subject to bias. Study period occurred before FDA approval of semaglutide for weight management, and thus, the findings may understate current use and effectiveness of weight loss medications.
DISCLOSURES:
The study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Michigan Center for Diabetes Translational Research, Michigan Nutrition Obesity Research Center, and the Elizabeth Weiser Caswell Diabetes Institute at the University of Michigan. Dr. Henderson had no further disclosures, but some of the coauthors had industry ties.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.