Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/04/2018 - 11:13
Display Headline
VIDEO: Two good options for mitral valve repair

BALTIMORE – Degenerative mitral regurgitation due to anterior or bileaflet prolapse can be treated with excellent results by both the traditional double orifice edge-to-edge repair or the implantation of artificial chordae, combined with ring annuloplasty, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery.

Researchers at San Raffaele University Hospital in Milan undertook a long-term comparison between the two methods of degenerative MR repair and found no differences in outcomes in cases of bileaflet prolapse, whereas in isolated anterior leaflet prolapse, the double orifice repair actually appeared to be more effective.

Mitral valve repair is a very well-accepted modality to fix posterior leaflet prolapse, according to Dr. Marc Ruel, chief of cardiac surgery at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute and a discussant on the paper at the meeting. But anterior mitral leaflet prolapse is a much more challenging operation, he said, and surgeons are looking for a “foolproof” way to address it.

“The double orifice repair, for most surgeons, is a much simpler procedure than doing artificial chordae, so this is good news,” Dr. Ruel said. “It shows that a fairly reproducible way of repairing the mitral valve seems to work as well, and likely better in some lesions, than the more complex way of addressing it.”

Dr. Ruel, who discusses the study in this video interview, reported no relevant financial disclosures.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

rpizzi@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @richpizzi

References

Meeting/Event
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
cardiac surgery
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

BALTIMORE – Degenerative mitral regurgitation due to anterior or bileaflet prolapse can be treated with excellent results by both the traditional double orifice edge-to-edge repair or the implantation of artificial chordae, combined with ring annuloplasty, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery.

Researchers at San Raffaele University Hospital in Milan undertook a long-term comparison between the two methods of degenerative MR repair and found no differences in outcomes in cases of bileaflet prolapse, whereas in isolated anterior leaflet prolapse, the double orifice repair actually appeared to be more effective.

Mitral valve repair is a very well-accepted modality to fix posterior leaflet prolapse, according to Dr. Marc Ruel, chief of cardiac surgery at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute and a discussant on the paper at the meeting. But anterior mitral leaflet prolapse is a much more challenging operation, he said, and surgeons are looking for a “foolproof” way to address it.

“The double orifice repair, for most surgeons, is a much simpler procedure than doing artificial chordae, so this is good news,” Dr. Ruel said. “It shows that a fairly reproducible way of repairing the mitral valve seems to work as well, and likely better in some lesions, than the more complex way of addressing it.”

Dr. Ruel, who discusses the study in this video interview, reported no relevant financial disclosures.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

rpizzi@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @richpizzi

BALTIMORE – Degenerative mitral regurgitation due to anterior or bileaflet prolapse can be treated with excellent results by both the traditional double orifice edge-to-edge repair or the implantation of artificial chordae, combined with ring annuloplasty, according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery.

Researchers at San Raffaele University Hospital in Milan undertook a long-term comparison between the two methods of degenerative MR repair and found no differences in outcomes in cases of bileaflet prolapse, whereas in isolated anterior leaflet prolapse, the double orifice repair actually appeared to be more effective.

Mitral valve repair is a very well-accepted modality to fix posterior leaflet prolapse, according to Dr. Marc Ruel, chief of cardiac surgery at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute and a discussant on the paper at the meeting. But anterior mitral leaflet prolapse is a much more challenging operation, he said, and surgeons are looking for a “foolproof” way to address it.

“The double orifice repair, for most surgeons, is a much simpler procedure than doing artificial chordae, so this is good news,” Dr. Ruel said. “It shows that a fairly reproducible way of repairing the mitral valve seems to work as well, and likely better in some lesions, than the more complex way of addressing it.”

Dr. Ruel, who discusses the study in this video interview, reported no relevant financial disclosures.

The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel

rpizzi@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @richpizzi

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
VIDEO: Two good options for mitral valve repair
Display Headline
VIDEO: Two good options for mitral valve repair
Legacy Keywords
cardiac surgery
Legacy Keywords
cardiac surgery
Sections
Article Source

AT THE AATS ANNUAL MEETING

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article