Article Type
Changed
Fri, 06/11/2021 - 10:19

 

LAS VEGAS – Combining the right products and anatomical knowledge translates patient concerns into better outcomes when using fillers, according to Burt Steffes, MD, a dermatologist in Fond du Lac, Wisc.

“If you understand differences in products, you’ll get better results and minimize complications” for different areas, Dr. Steffes said in a presentation at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas dermatology seminar.

The physical properties of different fillers impact the results, he pointed out. For example, G prime, a measure of elasticity, varies among fillers; a filler with a higher G prime is more contour stable and is designed to lift tissue, while a product with a lower G prime is designed to spread through tissues and move more naturally with the face.

However, “lift capacity using G prime is only useful across products in the entire family and make up,” Dr. Steffes noted. A recent Allergan-sponsored study emphasized that “product performance is a complex interaction of various properties and tissue interactions not just G prime,” he said (Dermatol Surg, 2015;41:S373-81).

Determining the most effective filler to use depends on the location and area to be corrected.

• Tear troughs: Dr. Steffes recommends avoiding hydrophilic products; he prefers Belotero, Restylane, or Restylane Silk.

• Lips: More flexible products such as Juvederm, Restylane, or Belotero can provide patients with the desired result, he noted.

• Nasolabial fold: Juvederm, Restylane, or Radiesse are appropriate choices likely to produce favorable outcomes, Dr. Steffes said.

• Lateral and midface atrophy: For greater lift and cohesivity in these patients, Dr. Steffes considers Perlane, Voluma, Radiesse, or Sculptra as options.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

LAS VEGAS – Combining the right products and anatomical knowledge translates patient concerns into better outcomes when using fillers, according to Burt Steffes, MD, a dermatologist in Fond du Lac, Wisc.

“If you understand differences in products, you’ll get better results and minimize complications” for different areas, Dr. Steffes said in a presentation at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas dermatology seminar.

The physical properties of different fillers impact the results, he pointed out. For example, G prime, a measure of elasticity, varies among fillers; a filler with a higher G prime is more contour stable and is designed to lift tissue, while a product with a lower G prime is designed to spread through tissues and move more naturally with the face.

However, “lift capacity using G prime is only useful across products in the entire family and make up,” Dr. Steffes noted. A recent Allergan-sponsored study emphasized that “product performance is a complex interaction of various properties and tissue interactions not just G prime,” he said (Dermatol Surg, 2015;41:S373-81).

Determining the most effective filler to use depends on the location and area to be corrected.

• Tear troughs: Dr. Steffes recommends avoiding hydrophilic products; he prefers Belotero, Restylane, or Restylane Silk.

• Lips: More flexible products such as Juvederm, Restylane, or Belotero can provide patients with the desired result, he noted.

• Nasolabial fold: Juvederm, Restylane, or Radiesse are appropriate choices likely to produce favorable outcomes, Dr. Steffes said.

• Lateral and midface atrophy: For greater lift and cohesivity in these patients, Dr. Steffes considers Perlane, Voluma, Radiesse, or Sculptra as options.

 

LAS VEGAS – Combining the right products and anatomical knowledge translates patient concerns into better outcomes when using fillers, according to Burt Steffes, MD, a dermatologist in Fond du Lac, Wisc.

“If you understand differences in products, you’ll get better results and minimize complications” for different areas, Dr. Steffes said in a presentation at Skin Disease Education Foundation’s annual Las Vegas dermatology seminar.

The physical properties of different fillers impact the results, he pointed out. For example, G prime, a measure of elasticity, varies among fillers; a filler with a higher G prime is more contour stable and is designed to lift tissue, while a product with a lower G prime is designed to spread through tissues and move more naturally with the face.

However, “lift capacity using G prime is only useful across products in the entire family and make up,” Dr. Steffes noted. A recent Allergan-sponsored study emphasized that “product performance is a complex interaction of various properties and tissue interactions not just G prime,” he said (Dermatol Surg, 2015;41:S373-81).

Determining the most effective filler to use depends on the location and area to be corrected.

• Tear troughs: Dr. Steffes recommends avoiding hydrophilic products; he prefers Belotero, Restylane, or Restylane Silk.

• Lips: More flexible products such as Juvederm, Restylane, or Belotero can provide patients with the desired result, he noted.

• Nasolabial fold: Juvederm, Restylane, or Radiesse are appropriate choices likely to produce favorable outcomes, Dr. Steffes said.

• Lateral and midface atrophy: For greater lift and cohesivity in these patients, Dr. Steffes considers Perlane, Voluma, Radiesse, or Sculptra as options.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM SDEF LAS VEGAS DERMATOLOGY SEMINAR

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME