User login
Article Type
Changed
Tue, 11/14/2023 - 15:24
TOPLINE:
.
METHODOLOGY:
- Data on the incidence of sharps injuries among dermatologic surgeons is limited.
- In a cross-sectional analysis of anonymous survey responses from members of the American College of , researchers aimed to determine the incidence and types of sharps injuries among Mohs surgeons.
- The researchers used descriptive statistics for continuous and nominal variables (percentage and frequencies) to report survey data and Fisher exact or chi-square analysis of categorical variables to obtain P values.
TAKEAWAY:
- Of the 60 survey respondents, more than half (56.7%) were from single-specialty group practices, 26.6% were from academic practices, and fewer than half (43.3%) had been in practice for 15 or more years.
- In the past year, 56.7% of respondents experienced at least one sharps injury. Of these, 14.7% involved exposure to a blood-borne pathogen, which translated into an annual exposure risk of 7.6% for any given Mohs surgeon.
- The top two types of sharps injuries were self-inflicted suture needlestick (76.5%) and other types of self-inflicted needlestick injuries (26.5%).
- Of respondents who sustained a sharps injury, 44.1% did not report them, while 95% of all survey respondents said they had access to postexposure prophylaxis/protocols at their workplace.
- The researchers determined that the average annual rate of sharps injury was 0.87.
IN PRACTICE:
- “In best practices to prevent sharps injuries, the authors recommend that a standardized sharps handling protocol be developed and disseminated for dermatologic surgeons and their staff,” the researchers wrote.
STUDY DETAILS:
- Faezeh Talebi-Liasi, MD, and Jesse M. Lewin, MD, department of dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, conducted the research. The study was published in Dermatologic Surgery.
LIMITATIONS:
- The study’s cross-sectional observational design and small sample size was skewed toward single-specialty and academic practices.
DISCLOSURES:
- The authors reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
Publications
Sections
TOPLINE:
.
METHODOLOGY:
- Data on the incidence of sharps injuries among dermatologic surgeons is limited.
- In a cross-sectional analysis of anonymous survey responses from members of the American College of , researchers aimed to determine the incidence and types of sharps injuries among Mohs surgeons.
- The researchers used descriptive statistics for continuous and nominal variables (percentage and frequencies) to report survey data and Fisher exact or chi-square analysis of categorical variables to obtain P values.
TAKEAWAY:
- Of the 60 survey respondents, more than half (56.7%) were from single-specialty group practices, 26.6% were from academic practices, and fewer than half (43.3%) had been in practice for 15 or more years.
- In the past year, 56.7% of respondents experienced at least one sharps injury. Of these, 14.7% involved exposure to a blood-borne pathogen, which translated into an annual exposure risk of 7.6% for any given Mohs surgeon.
- The top two types of sharps injuries were self-inflicted suture needlestick (76.5%) and other types of self-inflicted needlestick injuries (26.5%).
- Of respondents who sustained a sharps injury, 44.1% did not report them, while 95% of all survey respondents said they had access to postexposure prophylaxis/protocols at their workplace.
- The researchers determined that the average annual rate of sharps injury was 0.87.
IN PRACTICE:
- “In best practices to prevent sharps injuries, the authors recommend that a standardized sharps handling protocol be developed and disseminated for dermatologic surgeons and their staff,” the researchers wrote.
STUDY DETAILS:
- Faezeh Talebi-Liasi, MD, and Jesse M. Lewin, MD, department of dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, conducted the research. The study was published in Dermatologic Surgery.
LIMITATIONS:
- The study’s cross-sectional observational design and small sample size was skewed toward single-specialty and academic practices.
DISCLOSURES:
- The authors reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
TOPLINE:
.
METHODOLOGY:
- Data on the incidence of sharps injuries among dermatologic surgeons is limited.
- In a cross-sectional analysis of anonymous survey responses from members of the American College of , researchers aimed to determine the incidence and types of sharps injuries among Mohs surgeons.
- The researchers used descriptive statistics for continuous and nominal variables (percentage and frequencies) to report survey data and Fisher exact or chi-square analysis of categorical variables to obtain P values.
TAKEAWAY:
- Of the 60 survey respondents, more than half (56.7%) were from single-specialty group practices, 26.6% were from academic practices, and fewer than half (43.3%) had been in practice for 15 or more years.
- In the past year, 56.7% of respondents experienced at least one sharps injury. Of these, 14.7% involved exposure to a blood-borne pathogen, which translated into an annual exposure risk of 7.6% for any given Mohs surgeon.
- The top two types of sharps injuries were self-inflicted suture needlestick (76.5%) and other types of self-inflicted needlestick injuries (26.5%).
- Of respondents who sustained a sharps injury, 44.1% did not report them, while 95% of all survey respondents said they had access to postexposure prophylaxis/protocols at their workplace.
- The researchers determined that the average annual rate of sharps injury was 0.87.
IN PRACTICE:
- “In best practices to prevent sharps injuries, the authors recommend that a standardized sharps handling protocol be developed and disseminated for dermatologic surgeons and their staff,” the researchers wrote.
STUDY DETAILS:
- Faezeh Talebi-Liasi, MD, and Jesse M. Lewin, MD, department of dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, conducted the research. The study was published in Dermatologic Surgery.
LIMITATIONS:
- The study’s cross-sectional observational design and small sample size was skewed toward single-specialty and academic practices.
DISCLOSURES:
- The authors reported having no relevant financial disclosures.
A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.
Publications
Publications
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Consolidated Pubs: Do Not Show Source Publication Logo
Use ProPublica
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article