User login
SEATTLE –
A decrease in neutrophils over 6 months in a cohort of fingolimod treatment–experienced patients “was a surprise, at least to me,” said study investigator Bruce Cree, MD, PhD, professor of neurology at UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco. Why levels of these innate immune cells decreased in patients who had been on the drug for years “remains to be understood,” Dr. Cree said at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. “This is something that deserves further investigation ... to understand if that neutrophil count will continue to drop down over time or whether it ultimately plateaus.”
The decline in neutrophils in this cohort of patients continuously treated for at least 2 years was “only about 9%,” from an average of 3,698.56 cells per microliter at study baseline to 3,336.13 cells per microliter at 6 months.
Among fingolimod-naive patients who initiated treatment during the study, neutrophils decreased from 4,058.48 cells per microliter at baseline to 3,475.09 cells per microliter at 6 months, about 14%.
In the treatment-experienced patients, other immune cell subsets remained relatively stable over the 6-month period.
“If we are trying to understand the impact of fingolimod ultimately on propensity for development of opportunistic infection, of course we are focused almost exclusively on adaptive immunity,” Dr. Cree said. “But perhaps we are forgetting that innate immunity might be also extremely important for protecting ourselves against infection.”
The FLUENT study
Dr. Cree presented interim, 6-month data from the ongoing, open-label FLUENT study, which is a 12-month, prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study to assess changes in the immune cell profiles of patients with relapsing MS who receive fingolimod. The study includes a cohort of treatment-experienced patients and a cohort of treatment-naive patients.
Fingolimod is a once-daily oral sphingosine 1–phosphate receptor modulator that prevents egress of lymphocytes from lymph nodes. Since its FDA approval in 2010, rare opportunistic infections, including progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), have been reported in patients taking fingolimod.
Investigators did not assess changes in innate and adaptive components of the immune system during fingolimod treatment in the pivotal clinical trials, and the relationship between anti-JCV antibody index and immune cell subsets during fingolimod treatment is not known. Immunologic profiling may help gauge patients’ treatment response and risk of infection.
The FLUENT study’s primary outcome is change from baseline to month 6 in peripheral blood cellular components of the innate and adaptive immune system. Secondary endpoints include change in the immune cell subtype profile at months 3 and 12; anti-JCV antibody status at months 3, 6, and 12; change in anti-JCV antibody index at months 3, 6, and 12; and clinical variables. In addition, the investigators plan to examine changes in serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels at months 3, 6, and 12.
FLUENT includes a cohort of fingolimod-naive patients and a cohort of patients who have received continuous, commercially available fingolimod 0.5 mg/day for at least 2 years and plan to continue the drug during the 1-year study. The interim analysis included data from 166 fingolimod-naive patients (median age, 41 years; 77.7% female) and 216 fingolimod-experienced patients (median age, 50 years; 73.1% female). About 70% of patients in the fingolimod-naive cohort had had a relapse in the past 2 years, compared with about 22% of patients in the treatment-experienced cohort. Investigators began enrolling patients in September 2017.
Immune cell subsets
In the fingolimod-naive cohort, changes in immune cell subsets were expected and characteristic. Overall CD4+ count declined from baseline to month 6, and the decrease was “driven primarily by a decline in CD4+ naive T cells and CD4+ central memory T cells.” CD4+ effector memory cells, CD4+ Th1 cells, CD4+ Th2 cells, and CD4+ Th17 cells were less affected. “The effector cells do not have an expression of CCR7 [C-C chemokine receptor type 7] so they tend not to hone to the lymph nodes anyway,” Dr. Cree said.
CD8+ cells followed a similar pattern. “The overall count goes down, but perhaps not as much as with the CD4+ cells. The central memory and naive cells are affected a little bit more than the effector memory cells,” Dr. Cree said. “Then we see a comparable pattern with B cells. The absolute CD19+ counts go down. They’re driven by a decline in the naive cells. ... with less of a decline in memory cells and almost no decline in regulatory cells.”
Among innate immune cells, monocytes increased slightly, neutrophils declined, as expected, and natural killer cells declined slightly.
“When you turn your attention to ... those patients who have been on fingolimod, you do not see these changes for the lymphocytes,” Dr. Cree said. “Those lymphocytes are already sequestered, and we are really not seeing much of a change over time at all.”
A measure of CNS injury
In the treatment-naive cohort, serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) declined, but this measure did not change by much in the treatment-experienced cohort.
Among patients already on fingolimod, the serum NfL reduction “that would be anticipated as a therapeutic benefit from fingolimod is already being realized,” he said.
The serum NfL levels in the treatment-naive cohort at 6 months were similar to those of the treatment-experienced cohort at baseline, which indicates that “the impact of fingolimod in reducing circulating neurofilament – a marker of central nervous system injury – is seen within 6 months of treatment and likely persists as patients continue on fingolimod therapy,” Dr. Cree said.
Baseline anti-JCV antibody index was about the same for the treatment-naive and treatment-experienced cohorts (1.28 vs. 1.39, respectively), and this measure did not meaningfully change over 6 months in either cohort.
Adverse events
No new adverse events were identified in this interim analysis. Most common adverse events occurred more frequently in the treatment-naive cohort than in the treatment-experienced cohort, including headache (7.2% vs. 1.9%), upper respiratory tract infection (4.2% vs. 1.9%), pain in extremity (4.2% vs. 1.4%), lymphopenia (4.8% vs. 0.5%), anxiety (3.6% vs. 1.4%), fatigue (3.6% vs. 1.4%), nausea (3.0% vs. 0.9%), dizziness (3.0% vs. 0.5%), hypoesthesia (3.0% vs. 0.5%), and tremor (3.0% vs. 0%). An exception was falls, which occurred in 3.0% of the treatment-naive cohort and 4.6% of the treatment-experienced cohort.
Serious adverse events were about equal between the two groups (4.2% of the treatment-naive group and 5.1% of the treatment-experienced group), and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were more common in the fingolimod-naive cohort (10.2% vs. 5.6%).
Novartis funded the study, and four of the authors are Novartis employees. Dr. Cree disclosed consulting fees from Novartis and other pharmaceutical companies. His coauthors disclosed consulting fees, speaking fees, research support, and serving on advisory boards for pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis.
SOURCE: Mao-Draayer Y et al. CMSC 2019. Abstract DXM03.
SEATTLE –
A decrease in neutrophils over 6 months in a cohort of fingolimod treatment–experienced patients “was a surprise, at least to me,” said study investigator Bruce Cree, MD, PhD, professor of neurology at UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco. Why levels of these innate immune cells decreased in patients who had been on the drug for years “remains to be understood,” Dr. Cree said at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. “This is something that deserves further investigation ... to understand if that neutrophil count will continue to drop down over time or whether it ultimately plateaus.”
The decline in neutrophils in this cohort of patients continuously treated for at least 2 years was “only about 9%,” from an average of 3,698.56 cells per microliter at study baseline to 3,336.13 cells per microliter at 6 months.
Among fingolimod-naive patients who initiated treatment during the study, neutrophils decreased from 4,058.48 cells per microliter at baseline to 3,475.09 cells per microliter at 6 months, about 14%.
In the treatment-experienced patients, other immune cell subsets remained relatively stable over the 6-month period.
“If we are trying to understand the impact of fingolimod ultimately on propensity for development of opportunistic infection, of course we are focused almost exclusively on adaptive immunity,” Dr. Cree said. “But perhaps we are forgetting that innate immunity might be also extremely important for protecting ourselves against infection.”
The FLUENT study
Dr. Cree presented interim, 6-month data from the ongoing, open-label FLUENT study, which is a 12-month, prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study to assess changes in the immune cell profiles of patients with relapsing MS who receive fingolimod. The study includes a cohort of treatment-experienced patients and a cohort of treatment-naive patients.
Fingolimod is a once-daily oral sphingosine 1–phosphate receptor modulator that prevents egress of lymphocytes from lymph nodes. Since its FDA approval in 2010, rare opportunistic infections, including progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), have been reported in patients taking fingolimod.
Investigators did not assess changes in innate and adaptive components of the immune system during fingolimod treatment in the pivotal clinical trials, and the relationship between anti-JCV antibody index and immune cell subsets during fingolimod treatment is not known. Immunologic profiling may help gauge patients’ treatment response and risk of infection.
The FLUENT study’s primary outcome is change from baseline to month 6 in peripheral blood cellular components of the innate and adaptive immune system. Secondary endpoints include change in the immune cell subtype profile at months 3 and 12; anti-JCV antibody status at months 3, 6, and 12; change in anti-JCV antibody index at months 3, 6, and 12; and clinical variables. In addition, the investigators plan to examine changes in serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels at months 3, 6, and 12.
FLUENT includes a cohort of fingolimod-naive patients and a cohort of patients who have received continuous, commercially available fingolimod 0.5 mg/day for at least 2 years and plan to continue the drug during the 1-year study. The interim analysis included data from 166 fingolimod-naive patients (median age, 41 years; 77.7% female) and 216 fingolimod-experienced patients (median age, 50 years; 73.1% female). About 70% of patients in the fingolimod-naive cohort had had a relapse in the past 2 years, compared with about 22% of patients in the treatment-experienced cohort. Investigators began enrolling patients in September 2017.
Immune cell subsets
In the fingolimod-naive cohort, changes in immune cell subsets were expected and characteristic. Overall CD4+ count declined from baseline to month 6, and the decrease was “driven primarily by a decline in CD4+ naive T cells and CD4+ central memory T cells.” CD4+ effector memory cells, CD4+ Th1 cells, CD4+ Th2 cells, and CD4+ Th17 cells were less affected. “The effector cells do not have an expression of CCR7 [C-C chemokine receptor type 7] so they tend not to hone to the lymph nodes anyway,” Dr. Cree said.
CD8+ cells followed a similar pattern. “The overall count goes down, but perhaps not as much as with the CD4+ cells. The central memory and naive cells are affected a little bit more than the effector memory cells,” Dr. Cree said. “Then we see a comparable pattern with B cells. The absolute CD19+ counts go down. They’re driven by a decline in the naive cells. ... with less of a decline in memory cells and almost no decline in regulatory cells.”
Among innate immune cells, monocytes increased slightly, neutrophils declined, as expected, and natural killer cells declined slightly.
“When you turn your attention to ... those patients who have been on fingolimod, you do not see these changes for the lymphocytes,” Dr. Cree said. “Those lymphocytes are already sequestered, and we are really not seeing much of a change over time at all.”
A measure of CNS injury
In the treatment-naive cohort, serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) declined, but this measure did not change by much in the treatment-experienced cohort.
Among patients already on fingolimod, the serum NfL reduction “that would be anticipated as a therapeutic benefit from fingolimod is already being realized,” he said.
The serum NfL levels in the treatment-naive cohort at 6 months were similar to those of the treatment-experienced cohort at baseline, which indicates that “the impact of fingolimod in reducing circulating neurofilament – a marker of central nervous system injury – is seen within 6 months of treatment and likely persists as patients continue on fingolimod therapy,” Dr. Cree said.
Baseline anti-JCV antibody index was about the same for the treatment-naive and treatment-experienced cohorts (1.28 vs. 1.39, respectively), and this measure did not meaningfully change over 6 months in either cohort.
Adverse events
No new adverse events were identified in this interim analysis. Most common adverse events occurred more frequently in the treatment-naive cohort than in the treatment-experienced cohort, including headache (7.2% vs. 1.9%), upper respiratory tract infection (4.2% vs. 1.9%), pain in extremity (4.2% vs. 1.4%), lymphopenia (4.8% vs. 0.5%), anxiety (3.6% vs. 1.4%), fatigue (3.6% vs. 1.4%), nausea (3.0% vs. 0.9%), dizziness (3.0% vs. 0.5%), hypoesthesia (3.0% vs. 0.5%), and tremor (3.0% vs. 0%). An exception was falls, which occurred in 3.0% of the treatment-naive cohort and 4.6% of the treatment-experienced cohort.
Serious adverse events were about equal between the two groups (4.2% of the treatment-naive group and 5.1% of the treatment-experienced group), and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were more common in the fingolimod-naive cohort (10.2% vs. 5.6%).
Novartis funded the study, and four of the authors are Novartis employees. Dr. Cree disclosed consulting fees from Novartis and other pharmaceutical companies. His coauthors disclosed consulting fees, speaking fees, research support, and serving on advisory boards for pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis.
SOURCE: Mao-Draayer Y et al. CMSC 2019. Abstract DXM03.
SEATTLE –
A decrease in neutrophils over 6 months in a cohort of fingolimod treatment–experienced patients “was a surprise, at least to me,” said study investigator Bruce Cree, MD, PhD, professor of neurology at UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco. Why levels of these innate immune cells decreased in patients who had been on the drug for years “remains to be understood,” Dr. Cree said at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers. “This is something that deserves further investigation ... to understand if that neutrophil count will continue to drop down over time or whether it ultimately plateaus.”
The decline in neutrophils in this cohort of patients continuously treated for at least 2 years was “only about 9%,” from an average of 3,698.56 cells per microliter at study baseline to 3,336.13 cells per microliter at 6 months.
Among fingolimod-naive patients who initiated treatment during the study, neutrophils decreased from 4,058.48 cells per microliter at baseline to 3,475.09 cells per microliter at 6 months, about 14%.
In the treatment-experienced patients, other immune cell subsets remained relatively stable over the 6-month period.
“If we are trying to understand the impact of fingolimod ultimately on propensity for development of opportunistic infection, of course we are focused almost exclusively on adaptive immunity,” Dr. Cree said. “But perhaps we are forgetting that innate immunity might be also extremely important for protecting ourselves against infection.”
The FLUENT study
Dr. Cree presented interim, 6-month data from the ongoing, open-label FLUENT study, which is a 12-month, prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study to assess changes in the immune cell profiles of patients with relapsing MS who receive fingolimod. The study includes a cohort of treatment-experienced patients and a cohort of treatment-naive patients.
Fingolimod is a once-daily oral sphingosine 1–phosphate receptor modulator that prevents egress of lymphocytes from lymph nodes. Since its FDA approval in 2010, rare opportunistic infections, including progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), have been reported in patients taking fingolimod.
Investigators did not assess changes in innate and adaptive components of the immune system during fingolimod treatment in the pivotal clinical trials, and the relationship between anti-JCV antibody index and immune cell subsets during fingolimod treatment is not known. Immunologic profiling may help gauge patients’ treatment response and risk of infection.
The FLUENT study’s primary outcome is change from baseline to month 6 in peripheral blood cellular components of the innate and adaptive immune system. Secondary endpoints include change in the immune cell subtype profile at months 3 and 12; anti-JCV antibody status at months 3, 6, and 12; change in anti-JCV antibody index at months 3, 6, and 12; and clinical variables. In addition, the investigators plan to examine changes in serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels at months 3, 6, and 12.
FLUENT includes a cohort of fingolimod-naive patients and a cohort of patients who have received continuous, commercially available fingolimod 0.5 mg/day for at least 2 years and plan to continue the drug during the 1-year study. The interim analysis included data from 166 fingolimod-naive patients (median age, 41 years; 77.7% female) and 216 fingolimod-experienced patients (median age, 50 years; 73.1% female). About 70% of patients in the fingolimod-naive cohort had had a relapse in the past 2 years, compared with about 22% of patients in the treatment-experienced cohort. Investigators began enrolling patients in September 2017.
Immune cell subsets
In the fingolimod-naive cohort, changes in immune cell subsets were expected and characteristic. Overall CD4+ count declined from baseline to month 6, and the decrease was “driven primarily by a decline in CD4+ naive T cells and CD4+ central memory T cells.” CD4+ effector memory cells, CD4+ Th1 cells, CD4+ Th2 cells, and CD4+ Th17 cells were less affected. “The effector cells do not have an expression of CCR7 [C-C chemokine receptor type 7] so they tend not to hone to the lymph nodes anyway,” Dr. Cree said.
CD8+ cells followed a similar pattern. “The overall count goes down, but perhaps not as much as with the CD4+ cells. The central memory and naive cells are affected a little bit more than the effector memory cells,” Dr. Cree said. “Then we see a comparable pattern with B cells. The absolute CD19+ counts go down. They’re driven by a decline in the naive cells. ... with less of a decline in memory cells and almost no decline in regulatory cells.”
Among innate immune cells, monocytes increased slightly, neutrophils declined, as expected, and natural killer cells declined slightly.
“When you turn your attention to ... those patients who have been on fingolimod, you do not see these changes for the lymphocytes,” Dr. Cree said. “Those lymphocytes are already sequestered, and we are really not seeing much of a change over time at all.”
A measure of CNS injury
In the treatment-naive cohort, serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) declined, but this measure did not change by much in the treatment-experienced cohort.
Among patients already on fingolimod, the serum NfL reduction “that would be anticipated as a therapeutic benefit from fingolimod is already being realized,” he said.
The serum NfL levels in the treatment-naive cohort at 6 months were similar to those of the treatment-experienced cohort at baseline, which indicates that “the impact of fingolimod in reducing circulating neurofilament – a marker of central nervous system injury – is seen within 6 months of treatment and likely persists as patients continue on fingolimod therapy,” Dr. Cree said.
Baseline anti-JCV antibody index was about the same for the treatment-naive and treatment-experienced cohorts (1.28 vs. 1.39, respectively), and this measure did not meaningfully change over 6 months in either cohort.
Adverse events
No new adverse events were identified in this interim analysis. Most common adverse events occurred more frequently in the treatment-naive cohort than in the treatment-experienced cohort, including headache (7.2% vs. 1.9%), upper respiratory tract infection (4.2% vs. 1.9%), pain in extremity (4.2% vs. 1.4%), lymphopenia (4.8% vs. 0.5%), anxiety (3.6% vs. 1.4%), fatigue (3.6% vs. 1.4%), nausea (3.0% vs. 0.9%), dizziness (3.0% vs. 0.5%), hypoesthesia (3.0% vs. 0.5%), and tremor (3.0% vs. 0%). An exception was falls, which occurred in 3.0% of the treatment-naive cohort and 4.6% of the treatment-experienced cohort.
Serious adverse events were about equal between the two groups (4.2% of the treatment-naive group and 5.1% of the treatment-experienced group), and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were more common in the fingolimod-naive cohort (10.2% vs. 5.6%).
Novartis funded the study, and four of the authors are Novartis employees. Dr. Cree disclosed consulting fees from Novartis and other pharmaceutical companies. His coauthors disclosed consulting fees, speaking fees, research support, and serving on advisory boards for pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis.
SOURCE: Mao-Draayer Y et al. CMSC 2019. Abstract DXM03.
REPORTING FROM CMSC 2019